so by him then were all men saved from the imputative damnation of Adams transgression wherefore in this respect all mankinde is the heele of Christ in this relation But from this relation Satan drawes us in our remissenesse by lying vanities to forsake our own mercies and so to perish not for Adams transgression but for our owne against this grace in Christ and so are bruised by Satan for thou shall bruise his heele Secondly as God is the Saviour of all men from Adams imputative damnation so more especially hee is the Saviour of them that beleeve and that in two respects First by pardoning their owne personall transgressions against this universall mercy Secondly by estating them in that eternall life by Faith in Christ which they lost by their owne sinne and in Adams for saith Christ he that beleeveth in me hath eternall life and is past from death unto life And because these men by beliefe of truth set to their Seales that God is true in his guift of Christ and his righteousnesse imputed and in the perfection of parts in some degree of inherent righteousnesse witnesse Gods truth against Satans lies or lying vanities Therefore Satan by tentations and other envyous operations as by Cain to Abell doth bruise this heele of Christ or but his heele for this company of the Faithfull here Militant in comparison of that with Christ triumphing in heavenly glory is but the heele of Christ and thou shalt bruise his heele Thirdly because the second Adam did apply all the power of his pure Naturalls of holinesse and righteousnesse a meanes witnessing Gods word of truth for good and evill opposing Satans lyes therefore Satan by himselfe or men adhering to him did by envious operations as he did by Cain to Abel crush Christ himselfe yet it did not extinguish his Faith and love to God and his Neighbour in the least degree but drew it out the more as in due place it will appeare Yet all these envious operations being but extended to the affliction of his body and soule being his nature humane the lowest nature in his Sacred Person therefore it was but his heele as it was foretold thou shalt bruise his heele Fourthly againe as if God should say to Satan true it is that in the first Adams faithlesse fall from me thou didst devour all both heele body and head but against this the second Adam whom I wil raise up in the nature of all men of the seed of the woman to him doe thy worst yet thou shalt but bruise his heele at the most and thou shalt bruise his heele So much for opening of this first out-breake of the object of Faith once given to the Saints in this fourth estate of man Gen. 3.15 As Adams traÌ„sgression and the guilt and punishment was from the justice of the Covenant reckoned or imputed to al mankind in the fall even so by Gods mercy in the free guift of Christs righteousnesse reckoned or imputed to all was that sinne guilt and punishment removed from all and therefore noÌ„e ever perished for that transgression for although Adams eat ng the forbidden fruit and the demerit of it was not any mans indâ—vidually but Adams yet God in the justice of the Covenant did reckon or impute it to all and every individuall of mankinde as if it had bin their own act and demerit even so although Christs righteousnesse and merit of it was his own onely and alone individually considered yet that righteousnesse and merit being to satisfy Gods justice in behalfe of the world it was therefore by Gods free guift in mercy reckoned or imputed to all and every individuall of man generally and to man beleeving more specially as is declared but what this righteousnesse is which was so imputed see the end of the 8. Chap. Againe Rom. 5.18 the Apostle saith for as by the offence of one judgement came upon â—ll men to condemnation even so by the righteousnesse of one the free guift came upon all men to the jâ—stification of life from these words I will make these briefe observations following First that in the next verse before this Christs righteousnesse is called the guift of righteousnesse but in this Text it is spoken as if Christs righteousnesse were the procuring cause of the guift of it selfe as imputed to come upon all men and the truth is so it was for had not Christs righteousnesse in the figurative lamb to the justice of the Covenant in every respect answered the imputative unrighteousnesse of Adam the righteousnesse of Christ could not imputatively by free guift have come as it did upon all men to the justification of life for till the justice of the Covenant was so satisfied although God was willing to impute it to life yet he could not for as God cannot lye so he cannot deny his truth but all mankinde must certainly have dyed according to Gods-word that death in the day that Adam did sinne Secondly here note that this free guift of Christs imputative righteousnesse came at this time on all men unfought for or unthought on by them for when God brought this guift to them Adam runne away from him therefore here God waâ— found of them which sought him not Thirdly here observe that this free guift of righteousnesse came upon al men when there was not any d) See this justification before mans faith and without faith cleared in the answer to the 10 Objection in Chap. 4. Faith in man for we by Adam faithlessely betray'd Gods truth and at this time as in our naturall roote in his loynes runne from the God of truth Therefore Faith foreseene was now no cause or instrumentall meanes of all mens salvation or election from Divells in Adams imputative damnation 4. Againe observe that this guift of imputative righteousnesse conferred upon all men viz justification for saith the Text It came upon all men to justification Therefore mans Faith can be but the receptive instrument of this justification and justification with Faith or justification without Faith is all one except that in the last mans receptive instrument is of use and this presents unto us two things first a definition of Iustification what justification then was men having not as yet the guift of Faith Secondly what it was not And first in a word this justification by Chriâ—ts impâ—tative righteousnesse was this the pardon and the removall of the imputative sinne guilt and punishment due for Adams transgression as farre as the East is from the West and so gave man a gracious acceptance and at this time this was the justification of all men Secondly mans owne works of righteousnesse was not his justification nor no good works foreseene for as now man by the fall his works were onely so euill as the Divells so all mens works but Christs works in this fourth estate of Restauration at best are but in the perfection of parts by reason of the Serpentine seed which hereditarily runnes down in the
an oath that by two immutable things in which it was impossible for God to lie that wee might have strong consolation who fled for refuge to lay hold on the hope set before us in the object of justification c. Heb. 6 17. Wherefore saith the Apostle the rather brethren give diligence to make your calling and election sure for if you do these things you shall never fall that is not totally nor finally from the object of justification and that is only implied in this Text for he that saith he hath no swarving from this sacred object by sinne is a lyar for as he that saith he knoweth God and keepeth not his Commandements is a lyar and the truth is not in him so on the contrary If we say we have not sinned wee make him a lyar and the truth is not in us 1 Joh. 2.4.2 chap. Joh. 1.10 and the reasons why God not onely thus makes perfect justifying beliefe by operation but also gives to the Saints an undissolved relation to him in the object of justification to be as mount Sion which shall never be moved are these The first is drawne from the nature of the exercising any ability which the more 't is exercised the more 't is perfected for as use makes perfectnesse so custome breeds another nature Hence saith the Psalmist I have remembred thy name O Lord in the night and have kept thy Law this I had because I kept thy statutes Likewise hee saith I have more understanding then the antient because I have kept thy Statutes and he saith Blessed is the man that delighteth in the Law of the Lord and in his Law doth meditate day and night he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water that bringeth forth his fruit in due season Psal 1.2.3 Psal 119.55.100 A second reason is because the most perfect operations of justifying faith brings man most passively subjective to God to receive in his gift of Christs righteousnesse imputed the fulnesse of all that leads or ends in blessednesse therfore as every effect the more it doth subject it selfe to it's cause the more influence for it's perfection it doth receive from that cause so also in this Hence saith God to his redeemed Spouse I am IEHOVAH thy GOD which brought thee out of the Land of Egypt open thy mouth wide and I will fill it Psal 81.10 but by the way for further incouragement to men of an honest and good heart to presse forward to faiths perfection I will here explicate the different operations betweene the perfection of faith in the one and the imperfections of the other as first betweene righteous Lot weake in saith and Abraham perfect therein for Lot being more weake in the spirit of faith was therefore more strong in the spirit of this world as once were the Apostles desiring to be chiefe in sensuall felicities but Abrahams mind was farre more free from these intanglements for he preferred his communion with Saints in the bond of peace and love in relation to Christ before the fertile pleasures of the plains of Sodome for to enjoy this he leaves Lot to choose that and takes for his aboad what Lot refused Gen. 13.8 9.10.11 So Moses perfect in faith esteemed Christ in the object of Faith with reproach greater riches then the pleasures of Egypt for he had respect to the recompence of reward implying hee esteemed Gods gift of Christs righteousnesse imputed to be mans exceeding great reward consequently his owne wherefore in Idolatrous Egypt hee refused his relation to the crowne of Egypt in that hee refused to be called the sonne of Pharaohs daughter Gen. 15.1 Heb. 11.24.25.26 Again men of an honest and good heart yet weake in the object of life They then are in zeale against sinners preposterously pitilesse as was Iames and Iohn who for Christs sake would have them consumed with fire from Heaven but take man more perfect in beliefe of this sacred object then hee knowing the terror of the Lord doth perswade men for saith the Apostle the love of Christ constraineth us because wee thus judge if one died for all then were all dead implying because in love Christ died for all men then dead in sinnes and trespasses that this love of him constrained them to perswade sinners to life and salvation in him 2 Cor. 11 14 Againe being but weake in this sacred object they therefore savour the things of men and not the things of God as did Peters counsell to Christ so hee stooped to please men but not as man perfect in faith becomming all things to all men to save some as did Saint Paul but basely dissembling perverting his trust which Christ put in him so hazarding the salvation of men as he did at Antioch but Paul more perfect in beliefe of this sacred object openly reproved him to his face not caring what hee or they thought of him in the right discharge of his ambassage to them Marke 8.33 1 Cor. 9.22 Gal. 3.11.12 13 14. Againe men of an honest and good heart yet weake in faith to this sacred object the crosse of Christ will bring them to doubt as did the men going to Emaus for they said wee trusted it had beene he which should have redeemed Israel Luke 24.21.25 but on the contrary man perfect in faith under the crosse saith We know that the Sonne of God is come and hath given us an understanding that wee may know him that is true even his Sonne Iesus Christ this is the true God and eternall life 1 John 5.20 Againe man weake in this sacred object of justification doth over value his inherent righteousnesse telling Christ What great things hee will doe for him more then others as did Peter but man more perfect in beliefe of this sacred object is of another minde saith Saint Paul who is fit for these things meaning to doe great things for Christ according to their ambassage and saith he wee know but in part darkely through a glasse 2 Cor. 2.16 1 Cor. 13.8 and saith the Prophet Esay Woe is mee because I am a man uncleane because I am a man of uncircumcised lips Esay 6. And the ground of the point is this man perfect in beliefe of Gods gift of Christ his righteousnesse imputed firmely believes according to truth that the seed of the Serpent intermingling his inherent righteousnesse therefore makes it internally as a menstruous cloth and externally at the best but unprofitable wherefore as hee desires to be found in Christ his righteousnesse in point of imitation to sanctification so also to be found in it as imputed for a continuall acceptation for remission of sinnes and salvation still referring all his great workes for Christ to Christ his owne efficiency in him as Saint Paul not I but Christ in mee Phil. 3.9.10 Againe a third reason why God gives this perfection of faith to men of an honest heart which thus exercise to him more then to them which to this object of life
whom I will have compassion as if hee should say I respect none of them but with respect to my imputed gift of the Lambs righteousnesse which they reject and apply not themselves to me in it Therefore all those which had seene Gods great workes in the wildernesse and were remisse not answerable by beliefe of truth to this mercy God cut them off from the figure of eternall felicity and caused their carkasses to fall in the wildernesse yea hee spared not Mirriam Aaron nor Moses nor any save Caleb the Sonne of Iephuneh the Kenite and Iâ—shua the Sonne of Nun for they wholly followed IEHOVAH saith the Text clearely proving that God is no respecter of persons but to all and alike Deut. 9.14 Exod. 33.19 Rom. 9.15 Numb 32.10.14.28 and Deut. 32.28 Againe about 407. yeeres after the Law was added to the promise then God gave them a two-fold figure more to lead them to Christ the onely ground of all their good As first that the â—romised seed should come of the seventh sonne of Ishâ—i and the sonne of David King on Sion hill to sit on his Throne figuratively shadowing out in Salomons thronized glory So leading this nationall Spouse by right beliefe of truth to piâ—ch her ultimate felicity in the eternall Throne of the promised seed God-man blessed for evermore 2 Sam. 7.12 13 14. Psal 45 6. Luke 1.32 and 33. Heb. 1.8 The second figure was the glory of the Temple standing in the midst of the Land which also was a figure of the promised seed as to it was related the worship and the most especiall presence of God for to it must the sacrifices be brought and to it did this elect Spouse bring all her divine worship and adoration yea although remote from thence yet towards it must they worship figuratively leading this Spouse in the promised Land to feed on the promised seed as on a tree of life by right beliefe of truth as in the Paradise of God Psal 122.4 2 Chron. 7.12 1 King 8.44.45 Rev. 3.7 Prov. 11.30 Yet although God gave all these severall lines of truth leading by beliefe thereof to the imputed righteousnesse of the seed as it in which hee onely (b) This is the true ground of Election elected them to enjoy this Land to be their day of grace and there to receive his gift of eternall glory Notwithstanding they in the spirit of concision referred their election not to the object of faith but (c) These are false and erroneous grounds of Election to Abrahams flesh whence they were descended and to a worth in their owne workes to the Law as but conversant about the object of Faith and for that cause resisted the doctrine of Christ Esai 8.25 Heb. 10.21 Rom. 10.3 as leading them to submit to that righteousnesse of God imputatively given in him the ground of all their good And therefore Saint Paul Rom. 9. punctually encounters both these errors from the light of Divine truth for having in the 8. Chapter beheld the stable felicity of some Gentiles by belâ—fe of this truth he therefore in this ninth Chapter reflects upon this elect Spouse as neere to the rejection for this resisting of Christ and therefore his griefe for them was beyond measure because they were Israel to whom appertaine the adoption and the glory and the Covenants and the giving of the Law and the service of God and the promises of whom are the Fathers and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for evermore Amen Vers 1.2 3 4 and 5. Yet hee implies that these glorious priviledges did not make him so conceive of them as if Gods Word of curse according to his Covenant with Abraham had taken none effect upon them to their rejection for saith hee all are not Israel that are of Israel implying all are not of Israels faith that are of Israels flesh consequently Gods Word of curse might be of force to them which refuse Christ as the object of Faith notwithstanding their precedent election Wherefore he further saith neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children but in Isaack shall thy seed be called that is saith hee they which are the children of the flesh these are not the children of God but the children of the promise are counted for the seed for saith hee this is a word of promise c. Verse 6.7 8 9. implying this figure of Isaack as the promised childe was intended to lead them to Christ the promised seed as precedently is declared And so he goes on to the next figure namely the manner of Esau and Iacobs conception and birth for saith he not onely this but when Rebeka had also conceived by one even by our father Jacob for the children being not yet borne neither having done any good or evill that the purpose of God according to * By election in this text is meant onely of the Iewes to be Christs elect Spouse Nationally and not of any of the Gentiles election might stand not of workes but of him that calleth it was said unto her the elder shall serve the younger as it is written Iacob have I loved but Esau have I hated that is God to manifest his mind rightly in this mysterie loved to preferre the younger in the fleshly line and hated to preferre the first borne to the greatest honour namely to the Nationall election as the first borne after the flesh wherefore God not onely exprest this betweene Ishmael and Isaac and primarily betweene Esau and Iacob as before but also in Iosephs seed God preferred the younger to the greatest honour and the eldest to be inferiour in honour purposely Gen. 49. So likewise in his choyce amongst the sonnes of Ishai he passed by all the eldest to the lowest in the naturall line even the seventh to David and preferred him to the throne therefore it is evident by the testimony of God this love and hatred to those two babes was but to delare his purpose * So that God hated not Esaus person nor hated he him in respect of the foresight of his sinne nor did he love Iacobs Person more then Esaus nor loved he him for the foresight of his Faith and righteousnesse but the truth is God then looked upon them both alike with love to his present and future purpose that is by those Babes to declare that not from any respect of foresight of faith or righteousnesse nor to Abraham or Israels person as they were the naturall root of the Iewes which moved him to extend his mercy to them and to declare on the contrary that the evill of their father Terahs Idolatrous Apostacy hindeâ—ed him not from predestinating them then untorne and to call them in Isack to espouse them nationally to Christ from that Idolatrous den but that the only moving causes was for the glory of his grace by the promised seed as precedently is clearely explained namely to leade this elect
at God as the eye doth follow the light So that if Adam was created in knowledge after the Image of him that created him as certainly hee was then mans originall righteousnesse in his pure naturals was this namely Col. 3.10 Eph. 4.24 man * Mans original righteousnesse operating understandingly from the effect to the cause from the whole creation to the Creator according to the rules of the perfections of the creation as to him in whom he and they did live move and had their being The reason why thus to operate was his naturall righteousnesse is because it was right according to the perfection of that truth which shined in the perfections of the creatures to him Againe his holinesse in his pure naturalls was this his operating according to the perfections of the creatures in the Mans originall holinesse purity of his perfect love to God in all through all and above all living not so much amongst the perfection of the creatures where he was as in God whom he so loved and the reason why in these perfections of love was conteined his naturall holinesse was this Because by it hee did not onely set God above all creatures but also by it hee did rightly dedicate himselfe to Gods use onely and alone with al his soule with al his heart and with all his strength for it is the property of love to adde to the perfection of the thing loved more then to it selfe as wee see in Ionathan and Moses c. That Adam had this in the perfection of it is proved thus if all love in men generally doth arise from that agreeablenesse which is betweene the subject and the object as certainly it doth then in Adam most of all because to him the Subject God the Object did shine in all the perfection of the creation in a sutable agreeablenesse in all things in all respects as before is proved Therefore in Adam there was the truth of that perfect love to God againe and not onely the truth but the uttermost extent of love in the strength thereof for if the beauty of the Object being transparant to the Subject will draw forth all the strength which is in the Subject to it selfe as in Iâ—nathan to David 2 Sam. 1.26 Exod. 32.32 and Moses to God then much more did it draw forth Adams love to God as the most transparent object of beauty being an object of infinite goodnesse excitively drawing out his soule in all his strength in a liking and uniting affections in all through all and above all And from this Principle in his minde did naturally * The first originall of the first Table of the moâ—all law spring the first Table of the morall Law namely to love God with all the soule and with all the strength and here I will note these five observations for conclusion of this Chapter First that man in his innocency in the perfections of his righteousnesse and holinesse was but the receiver of all his good as his being passively by creation and his blessednesse actively by reception as by his sense his reason will and affections he enjoyed God And what had hee that hee had not received for it is proper to God alone to be being and blessednesse in himselfe and of himselfe Therefore both men and Angels are but receivers of all their good from God Secondly here observe that the perfection of the creation in the estate of pure naturalls had no dependancie upon Adams Personall perfections or his perfect operations whereby they could keepe or lose their created perfections by him therefore it was from some other cause whereby they became subject to fall into vanity for in this estate Adam depended upon them for the support of his Personall perfections and operations but not they upon him for they were created in their flourishing perfections before Adam was All being made first in their immediate dependancie upon God but hee last therefore in this estate they had no such dependancie upon him Thirdly here observe that man perfect in holinesse and righteousnesse did not by false apprehensions interpose the good in the Creatures betwixt God and him to cut off his blessed union of love to God nor God from him for hee by that perfect love loded himselfe and all that created good in Goâ— from whom it came and so returning to God the glorâ— of all his workes which hee had created and made and so gave God full content Fourthly observe that in the estate of perfect Creation of the world God establish'd his Glory to returne to him in a mutuall concordancie of mans good and no otherwise and therefore the state of Creation produced man good and no evill for God looked upon all and saw it was all good as liking it well Fiftly observe that although Adam did beleeve God to be being and blessednesse in himself and of himselfe and communicating all blessednesse to him yet this estate to Adam was not an estate of Faith for Adams beliefe of all this did arise to him by naturall demonstration from the perfections of the Creation according with the perfection of his Senses and Reason and so to his will Therefore all to him was but Naturall but in an estate of Faith to live by Faith in God First for the thing beleeved it must be Supernaturall Secondly man his minde must depend for the attayning of it upon the credit he gives to the word of God which only declares the thing to him but so was not this Estate and therefore this was not an Estate of Faith to Adam But his next estate to this was an Estate of Faith namely the worke of the Covenant which is the next ground to be treated of And so much for Adams first Estate being naturally perfect in all CHAP. II. Opening the Covenant betweene God and man GOD having revealed to Moses the Creation of the World hee in the next place makes knowne to him a Garden that was Planted by God himselfe without the helpe of man in which place comes in the second Estate of Adam before his fall and his entrance into this Garden was to enter into Covenant with God and God with him for good and evill for this Estate did not propose good only to Adam as did the Estate of Creation * Adam was by God fitly enabled to perform the Covenant in the behalfe of God and the world before God called him to so weighty a bâ—sinesse and the reasons why God led Adam from one perfect State to a higher aâ—e primarily two first because the created perfections of this world could not direct or admit him to enjoy God answerable to his vast comprehension being a Spirit so neare the Angelicall nature secondly because God was delighted to receive his glory at as high a pitch as his reasonable creature could apprehend or comprehend its felicity to all eternity but good and evill was in the Covenant propounded unto him I call it a Covenant
destruction of the world and to state it thus to travell together with man-believing truth to it 's desired felicity was onely this namely Gods love to the world for God so loved the world that hee gave his onely begotten Sonne c. Therefore the world must be onely considered as an object agreeable to Gods will because it was to him an object of love for the truth is God did so consider it and that in a two-fold respect First in all that good which God communicated to the world by creation as involved in the Covenant to it 's ultimate perfection and all this as issuing from himselfe was his owne effect as the off-spring of God and therefore a good every way agreeable to Gods will and an object of love to him But if the justice of the Covenant had passed to execution then God had proceeded to annihilate all this good not onely in part but totally and eternally but this went against his mind therefore hee so loved the world that hee gave his onely begotten Sonne c. That glory which was to result to God out of all the good of the creatures according to the spire of perfection of the Covenant by Adams supernaturall operation was Gods finall end for which he made all namely his glory and this was to God the object of good in the highest respect But if God had in the justice of the Covenant proceeded to execution then this his finall end had beene separated from him and he might in the ruine and destruction of the creatures to all eternitie have glorified himselfe But from the creatures good his glory could never have returned to him in any degree much lesse from the highest spire of perfection intended in the Covenant as was Gods desire but this was contrary to his mind therefore God so loved the world that he gave his onely begotten Sonne as his Lambe to take away the sinnes of the world by regaining his glory in the redundancie thereof to the eternall praise of his mercy Is it so that by this second Adam Observation his satisfaction of Divine justice God in mercy gave to all mankinde alike the meanes and end namely Eternall life and that the good of this world is a remote meanes to the same end as here wee see Then hence observe that all men either poore or rich which desire or indeavour to attaine the good of this world for them and theirs and not as a means to this end they then in their imaginations and all their labours are but a mere lye and vanity whence rightly saith the Psalmist Surely men of low degree are vanity and men of high degree are a lye Psal 62.9 Againe is the good of this world Gods gift in Christ Observation a comfortable and remote meanes amongst many to leade man to Christ to receive in him eternall life then take this rule for a direction not to be dismaid to see some in want for their chastisement and some for triall and some to abound for those men which terminate their rests in wealth and in the pleasures and delights of this world shall attaine but a brutish rest here and never receive eternall rest in Angells glory hereafter for this is but a meanes and a remote one too therefore hee that sits downe in this meanes must needs lose the end and so perish eternally Here follow some Objections made by a Reverend Divine which are accordingly answered and the Objections made by others are answered in the twelfth Chapter Object 1. If Adams omitting to eate of the tree of Life were a Sinne and that Sinne of omission brought on her Sinne of commission shee was not the first occasion of his Sinne but first Sinne a rose intrinsecus Answ Neither in this page nor in any other is it said his omitting to eate of the tree of Life was a sinne nor is it said he did omit to eate the fruit of this Garden or of the tree of Life but it is said hee was remisse of the different end from his former Estate why he was to eate of these fruits as a meanes thereunto and his remisnesse to eate these fruits as such a meanes brought his sinne of omission and that brought on his sinne of commission Because of the naturall liberties of their wills therefore sin might arise from within Also because their righteousnesse and holinesse did spring from naturall causes internally and externally as Chap. 1. therefore righteousnesse and holinesse being not their nature they might mutually turne to good or evill Againe why might not sinne in both of them arise from within this second Estate being so farre different from the former Estate of creation if their understandings were not carefully applyed to Gods rules in the Covenant to keepe them from evill and their wills to God as a good more fully to be communicated to them then by the perfections of the creation and the truth is from the remissenesse of them both it was that shee was the first in the transgression with Satan by the Serpent and he the second in the same by her Object 2. * Pag. 21. Where you say all mankinde were in reprobation if you meane the case of reprobates or guilt of damnation it is true but if you meane of Gods decree it crosseth the doctrine of Election Answ I meane as it is explained in the page namely that in the fall of Adam all mankinde alike were reprobated under the guilt due punishment of eternall condemnation joyned together with reprobate divells as opposed to our conjunction with elect Angels in eternall glory by vertue of the intended end of Gods Covenant with Adam Againe I deny any such decree and in the prosecution of the sixth point I have as I believe explained those Scriptures which reverend Calvin and you I suppose doe thinke doe prove that decree and case of Reprobates and as for that doctrine of Reprobation the Scripture proves it no more then it doth that word Decree which neither in the old Testament or the new is so much as mentioned with reference to the point of Election and Reprobation as I suppose you meane Object 3. Pag. 22. The judgement was executed that very moment that Adam eat of the forbidden fruit in that instant he was dead in sinne and mortality seized upon his body and hee stood guilty of eternall damnation Answ True it is judgement was executed the very moment that Adam eat the forbidden fruit yet not upon the first Adam but onely upon the second Adam as his Saviour and ours as pag. 24. and 25. figuratively in the blood of the Lambe or if not how or why was he as Saint Iohn affirmes the Lambe slaine from the worlds foundation Rev. 13.8 Or how was it that as by one offence judgement passed upon all men to condemnation even so by one righteousnesse the free guift came on all men to justification of life as Saint Paul affirmes Rom. 5.18 and as