the light of Gods marvellous mercy toward sinners of Christs infinit lov in dying for them the inestimable merits of his death the powerful Gifts Graces and aids of the holy Ghost To pour into sinners hearts hope which shal stay them from desperat sinning To inspire the Grace of praier that they may escape the wrath to com and receiv Gods favor to beget repentance and work Faith that they rely wholy on him and cast themselfs into the arms of his goodnes to be saved by him Thes Graces the holy Ghost is stil ready to work by the Gospel in a repentant sinner humbled and prepared by the Law for what proportion of power the Spirit had in the Law on Unregenerats to humble them the same it hath in the Gospel on the humbled to work hope and infer the other Graces of Praier Repentance Faith Justification Mortification Vivification and new Obedience Howbeit if the Spirit is not present in preaching the Law to giv Unregenerats strength of new obedience becaus 't is present to convince and condemn their wickednes Nor is it present in preaching the Gospel to one not yet penitent or beleeving to giv new obedience or work Peace Joy and Lov as it doth in Beleevers for such degrees com not per saltum The sum is Gods Spirit is annexed to his Word for such Gifts and operations as the hearer is a fit disposed subject to receiv for God works by order of things antecedent or preparativ which if they find no admission the subsequent are suspended Hence coms the frequent just separation of the Spirit by the word by the great Pastor of Souls who sercheth the heart and renes To prov this point that Gods Word in the Law and Gospel is perfect and powerful to convert Souls read Psal 9. 7. Joh. 17. 17. Joh. 20. 21. 2 Cor. 3. 8. Heb. 4 12. wher the Gospel is caled the ministration of the Spirit not of the Letter becaus it givs what it commands but the Law commands and givs no help for the Law was given by Moses not hearts to receiv it Joh. 1. 17. but Grace and Truth cam by Jesus Christ saith S. John To prov that Caling is al one to them that obey not and obey Christs words are cleer Many are caled but few chosen Here Mat. 22. 14. two sorts are specified som caled but not chosen and som caled and chosen of thos many yet the Caling one of both which is not by the outward Word alone for by it none are chosen but by the Word and Spirit in common So the few chosen excelled not in number or Caling but in obeying when the rest refused as the Sun hardens clay and melts wax Christ saith The Ninivets shal rise in judgment with this generation Mat. 12. 41. and condemn it If Jonas preached without the Spirit how did they repent If Jesus preached without it how is he greater then Jonas If refusers be not al equaly caled how can Ninivets rise in Judgment they can answer we were not caled like you by Gods voice speaking to the heart but by Mans barely to the ear If God had excited us as he did you we would repent as you did The Jews exemple confirms the same being yet uncaled not becaus they liv without the Gospels sound sith they convers scatterdly with Christians and may hear Sermons or read Scriptures but becaus they persist obdurat and reject the illumining softning Spirit often offered therfore the distinction of Caling into outward ineffectual and inward effectual is fals or frivolous Bare preaching may be a commanding like the Law not a Caling as the Gospel for God may stil require obedience as a natural duty sith he created Man able but becaus the new Covenant cals Men to Faith and Repentance being unable to rise or recover of themselfs it were a mock and no cal to say turn repent beleev and liv unles som Grace be prepared to doo it The effect of this Caling is ascribed to one caus chefly the Spirits operation yet ther be mo and if any fails the effect fals for obedience to Gods Caling is an act of Mans wil under aid of the Spirit which is oft refused or resisted and Grace offered in vain sith God doth not cross the cours of the secund Causes established at first It also makes Gods Covenant differ from al other in which no party performs al but ech a part for himself wheras here God is made to perform al pacts and promises for both who only undertakes to make his conditions feasible and afford his help so far as is needful as Isaiah intimats For 't is not safe to rely soly on Isai 59. 21. Gods absolut Wil as if we were tied to nothing or to gul our selfs as if God required nothing of us For this Covenant of Grace hath som conditions for Man to fulfil which by Gods universal Grace he is able to doo as shal be shewed 11. Conversion of a Sinner which is the end of Gods Caling 11 Conversion Men by the Word is the obedience of him that is Caled for he must hear and obey els no conversion The terms a Quo ad Quem are from Satans power to God viz. in his mind from darknes to light in wil from Idols to serv the living God Acts 26. 18. and in his whol life from unrighteousnes to holines This conversion is duple 1. When a natural Man is regenerat and made a Member of Gods Church as the Gentils being Aliens were converted 2. When a Regenerat faling into sin returns 1 Thes 1. 9 Acts 1â— 3. by repentance as Peter being converted after his Apâ—stasy was bid strengthen his Brethren The prime principal Caus of Luke 22. 32. Lam. 5. 21. conversion is Gods holy Spirit working on a sinners heart both at beginning middle and end The ordinary instrumental is the word preached the adjuvant means are the cross that chastens Jer. 31. 18. blessings which draw or allure others praiers and exemples of Men already converted The main scruple is what part a sinner to be converted bears in it being a living rational subject whether he be Activ or meerly Passiv whether he can further or hinder it whether supposing two equaly Caled one may be converted and not the other if so whether it riseth from God or Man 12. Gods Grace is al that proceds from him of free favour 12 Free Grace universal tending to a sinners salvation wherby is not meant the remains of Nature as som light of Reason sens of Conscience though thes by Grace were left after the Fal nor the Law describing the righteousnes of Works though the Preacher of Grace useth it to prepare a sinner for Christ nor the bare outward Word of the Gospel though cal'd the Word of Grace becaus internal Grace goes with it but only the inward illuminations teachings tractions motions operations inspirations and gifts of the holy Ghost merited by Christ for
the flesh and make God to decree sin efficatiously with an energetical working wil blaming thos that refer ought to Gods prescience only Permission properly is an act of Gods consequent judiciary Wil by which he punisheth Men for abusing their freedom in committing sins day by day which they might hav declined and 't is caled his long-suffering proceding to punish with a slow unwilling pace See Ps 81. 11 12. Ezek. 18 39. Rom. 1. 21 24. Rev. 22. 11. but Permission by them intended is an act of Gods antecedent Wil exercised on innocent men lying under no guilt whom he eternaly preordains to sin and punishment So tru Permission about whomever exercised is only not to hinder them from faling which are able to stand and supposeth a possibility in the party permitted to sin or not but in their sens 't is a withdrawing or with-holding of Grace needful to shun sin and so infolds an absolut necessity of sinning as the fal of Dagons hous folowed Sampsons plucking down the Pillars which supported it So Maccovius saith Permission is a subtraction of divine assistance necessary to prevent sin so Dr. Whitaker Permission is a privation of that aid which bâ—ing present would hav prevented sin So Pareus That help which God witheld from Adam made that he could not so use his indowments as to persever which he saith is the doctrin generaly defended by their side So their Permission of sin being a subtraction of necessary Grace is equivalent to an actual effectual procuring and woking of it for a deficient caus in things necessary is truly efficient so this devise is a very figleaf to cover the ugly nakednes of their Opinion Others consider two things in every evil act 1. The matter 2 Devise or Entity wherof God is Author 2. The form or Obliquity which proceds from Satan as in a lame Hors This distinction halts wors then the Hors nor holds in al Answer sins sith in many the very acts are sinful as Adams eating the forbidden fruit and Sauls sparing Agag which in others had not bin sin NOE wil it serv their turn for they make Gods Decree caus of al thos means which lead to damnation therfore of sinful actions as sinful and not as bare Entities sith they deserv death not as simple actions but as transgressions of the Law As to their sly Simile that Master or Owner who shal first resolv to kil his Hors and after lames him that he may hav color to doo it is cruel to his Beast and Author both of his halting and death so if God first decree to cast Men into Hel and then bring them into a state of sin that he may effect his purpose justly he must needs be Author of sin so wel as the actions to which it cleavs sith he intends destruction Thes are horrid aspersions Som coin a third evasion that the Wil is determined to an 3 Devise object two wais 1. By compulsion against its inclination so God forceth no Man 2. By complying with its natural appetit or liking So God may lead a Man to what he would yet not be Author of sin but only necessitats it When Men sin 't is tru they cannot chuse and as tru they wil not but sin so 't is not Gods Decree but their own wicked Wil which is caus of their sin and death The Fathers and School-men make Compulsion and Necessity Answer al one denying that God necessitats any to sin for then he is Author of it so wel as if he compeld Men sith therby it must inevitably be committed which els might be declined Nay what necessitats the Wil to sin is more the caus then the Wil it self becaus it overruleth and bears most sway bereaving al tâ—â— liberty to dispos it s own acts which should be free Lord of it self For the Necessitater is Commander Comptroler and Compeller but the Wil a servil instrument determined by divine Decree from which al such acts rather proced then from Mens wicked Wils When two Causes concur to produce an Effect one principal overruling the other instrumental at the principals devotion the Effect is ascribed to the influx or impression of the former and not to the later which is only a subservient Servant See Mat. 10. 20. 1 Cor. 15. 10. Gal. 2. 20. wher the work is wholy imputed to the principal Agent Adams Wil in innocence was whit paper or a clean-Table equaly inclined to good or evil So if God decreed his Fal as Supralapsarians say that necessity was a coaction but al others by depraved Nature are disposed to evil yet determined by divine decree both Elect and Reprobats Wils Though then Mans Wil works with Gods Decree in sinning yet siâ—h it doth it by the commanding power of his irresistible Decree the sin cannot so rightly be attributed to Mans Wil the inferior as to Gods Decree the superior Caus Yea that which makes a Man sin by necessity with and not against his Wil is caus of his sin in worâ— sort then he which constrains him against his wil as he that by powerful perswasion draws one to kâ—l himself is more gâ—osly the caus of his self-homiciâ— then he who inforceth him to it becaus it makes him consent to his own death So if Gods Decree makes Men sin and willingly too which is both to act and wil evil he hath a deeper stroke in the sin Another shift is suggested that sin is considered as sin and 4 Devise so God doth not destinat Men to it Or as a means to manifest his Justice and so he doth decree to punish it yet is not the Author of sin This is a silly slide for a good end cannot justify an il actions Answer Both end matter and maner too must be good els the act is evil If a Man shal steal to giv Alms as Robin Hooa did or commit whordom to beget Children for the Church as the Harlot did which was mother to three famous School-Doctors or the like be his end never so good he sinneth hainously sith 't is a violation of Gods Majesty and directly opposit to divine Good as S. Paul saith We must not doo evil that good may insu If then God willeth evil for ends never so Rom. 3. 8. good yet sith he decrees it with a powerful necessitating Wil he is Author of it For sin simply is a means of punishment If then he wils it as a means of punishment he wils it as simply sin by an absolut Decree Absit omen This Position loads him with three indignities 1. Want of Wisdom which must needs be weak if he can find no way to glorify his Justice but by bringing in sin which his Soul hates that he may manifest it in punishing 2. Want of sincerity or plain dealing as Tiberius purposing to destroy Drusus and Nero sons to Germanicus provoked them to revile him that so he might justly put them to death So if God appointing Men to eternal
not most part lying in laps predecreed to Reprobation Som slily expound the word World for a World of Elect or Beleevers only which is no wher so taken but either for al Men or al living in som certain place or at som certain time sans distinction of good or bad Or if it be any wher restrained 't is applied to wicked Men wedded to this World Yet if it be somwher limited to the Elect 't is not so here for then the words would bear a sensless sens God so loved the Elect that whoever beleevs in his Son should not perish which imports two sorts of Elect som that beleev and shal be saved others which beleev not and shal perish but Beleevers and Uunbeleevers saved and damned includ al Mankind which S. John cals elswher the whol World as an exposition of the former S. Paul 1 John 2. 2. 1 Tim. 2. â— saith God wil hav al Men to be saved and com to the knowledg of the truth Ergo his wil is that al shal hav the means of knowledg and be saved but none shut up under unbeleef Som by Al understand al sorts of Men but not al particulars in ech sort which is a silly shift Indeed 't is somtimes so taken but not here as the context shews for in the first vers a duty is injoined to make praiers and supplications for al Men and then a motiv annexed God wil hav al to be saved The duty extends to every particular we must in charity pray for al even Tyrans Persecutors prophane Persons Ergo the motiv intends al individuals or els reacheth not home to inforce the duty Others answer That God intends al to be saved by his reveled Wil but millions damned by his secret O beware of ascribing two several Wils to God who is no dissembler sith one must needs be good the other bad For if his Word be his reveled Wil and repugnant to his secret Mind or meaning it must be untru or simulatory and consequently a ly S. Peter saith The 2 Pet. 3. 9. Lord would hav none perish but al com to repentance Som fully it That he means only the Elect or Beleevers but the context flatly contradicts it For the next preceding words speak of patience or long-sufferance toward Men which must be Reprobats rather who dy in their sins as the same Apostle tels That Christ in spirit preached to the spirits which in Noahs dais 1 Pet 3. 19 20 were disobediens and now in prison or Hel for it Yea Reprobats are the most proper objects of his patience as S. Paul saith He useth much patience and long-suffering to them that Rom. 2 4. go on in sin that he might lead them to repentance Again he suffers Rom 9 22. with long patience Vessels of wrath prepared not decreed to destruction See Isai 5. 2. Isai 65. 2. So S. Peters words intend Reprobats so wel as others or rather them then others that God wil hav none to perish by his power or pleasure except by their own fault or folly This is confirmed by som conditional passages If thou seek him he wil be found but if then forsake him he wil cast thee off So God said to Cain If thou doâ— wel shalt thou not be accepted but if thou doo il sin lies at dore S. Paul saith The just shal liv by faith but if any draw back Hebâ— 1â— 38. my soul shal 〈◊〉 no pleasure in him By which conditions 't is clear that God forsakes no Man simply considered in the fal til he first forsakes him The result is That he rejects none by previous Decree sav such as he foresaw would cast him off by continuance in sin and contempt of Grace For Gods acts in time are regulated by his Decrees before time as 't is said He works al according to Eph. â— â—â— the Counsil of his Wil. For ther is an exact conformity betwen the Rule and thing squared by it therfore whatever God doth in the World he purposed before the World and by actual casting Men off when they grow rebellious or impenitent we may be sure he decreed to doo it for foreseen rebellion and impenitence Som obscure Texts may seem to favour the Opinion of free pleasure as Men mis-interpret them which by presupposing prevision are rightly reconciled But S. Austins rule is we must not contradict plain places becaus we cannot comprehend obscure And Tertullian teacheth that a few places are to be understood after the current sens of most part and not contrary to it as in this case for the most part it seems to be 2. It crosseth som chief Attributs of God Mercy Justice 2 Reason Truth Holines which are his perfections wherby he exerciseth his acts among Men conform to them For they are the same in God with thos virtues in Men but infinitly differing in degree sith what is just tru holy or merciful in Men is superlativly so in God Els cannot Man be properly made after his Image nor renewed in Regeneration after the same or made Col. 3. 10. partaker of divine Nature but 't is commanded Be ye perfect Mat. 5. 48. as your havenly Father is perfect and holy as I am holy Nor is soveraign power or dominion an Attribut moraly good in it self sith it may be shewed in cruel unjust acts so wel as contrary But our good God is Justice in the Abstract and wil not exercise it tyrannously contrary to his other Attributs 1. Now absolut Reprobation repugns his Holines making him the chief caus of sin in most Men sith he brings them into a state of sin which they cannot decline For al are guilty of Adams transgression and Natures corruption yet not by natural generation so much as by divine Ordination as Calvin â— 3. Inst â— 23. â— 7â— faith Al Men are held under guilt of eternal death in the person of one Man which cannot be ascribed to any natural caus but must com from Gods wonderful Counsil who would hav it so Doctor Twiss saith the same The guilt of Original sin is derived only by imputation the stain only by propagation and both meerly by Gods free constitution So saith S. Bernard Adams sin is anothers becaus we knew not Serm. 1 Dom. â— past 8. Epiâ—â— of it yet ours too becaus by Gods just though secret Judgment reputed ours This agrees with reason for if we incur guilt of the first sin and Natures corruption only as being in Adams loins when he sinned then are we guilty of al his other sins being virtualy or potentialy in his loins after the fal so wel as before But Scripture intitles only the first sin which entred the World and invaded al Mankind Yea Children should be guilty of al their Progenitors specialy the next Parents sins as being in their loins when they sinned more immediatly then in Adams yet Children partake not their Parents guilt nor punishments unles they hate