not it should bee sayd that faith is formed with charity because that kind of speach is not vsed by Saint Paul but onely that faith worketh by charity Others vnderstood that iustifying faith was faith in generall not saying it was either liuely or dead because they doe both iustifie after diuers manners either compleatly as the liuely or as a beginning or foundation as the historicall faith and of this Saint Paul speaketh when he attributeth iustice vnto it no otherwise then as Philosophie is contained in the alphabet that is as in a basis which is as it were nothing the principall remaining that is to set the statue vpon it This second opinion was iointly maintained by the Dominicans and Franciscans the other by Marinarus and his adherents But the principall point of the difficulty was not touched that is whether a man is iust and then doth iustly or by doing iustly becommeth iust They all agreed in one opinion that to say onely faith doeth iustifie was a proposition of many fenses and all absurd For God and the Sacraments doe iustifie as causes in their seuerall kindes so that the proposition hath that and many other exceptions The preparation also of the soule to receiue grace is a cause in its kinde so that faith cannot exclude that sort of workes But the Articles concerning workes that goe before grace all which Luther condemneth for sinne the Diuines censured for hereticall rather by way of inuectiue then otherwise condemning likewise of heresie the opinion taken in generall that humane workes without faith are sinne thinking it a cleare case that many actions of men are indifferent neither good nor euill and that others there are which though they bee not acceptable to God yet are morally good as the honest actions of Infidels and Christians which are sinners which to call honest and sinnes implieth a contradiction and the rather because in this ranke are included the heroicall actions so much commended by antiquity But Catarinus maintained that man without the speciall helpe of God can doe no worke which may truely bee good though morally but sinneth Catarinus his opinion concerning the value of workes still Therefore the workes of the Infidels who are not excited by God to beleeue and of the faithfull who are sinners before God stirreth them vp to conuersion though they seeme honest to men euen heroicall yet are truely sinnes and hee that commendeth them doth consider them in generall and according to externall appearance but hee that shall examine the circumstances of euery one shall finde they are peruerse and that for this Luther was not to bee condemned notwithstanding hee sayd that the Articles ought to bee censured as they speake of workes that follow preuenting grace which are a preparation to iustification as an abomination of sinne feare of hell and other terrours of conscience For confirmation of his opinion hee brought the doctrine of Saint Thomas that to doe a good worke the concurrence of all circumstances is necessary but the want of one onely is sufficient for an ill So that howsoeuer among the workes considered in generall some are indifferent yet in the singular there is no medium betweene hauing all the circumstances and wanting some Therefore euery particular action is good or euill neither is there to bee found any one indifferent And because amongst the circumstances the end is one all workes referred to a bad end are infected so that the Infidels referring all to a bad end their actions are sins though they seeme heroicall to him that knoweth not their intention Neither doth it make any difference whether the relation to a bad end be actuall or habituall because the iust doth merit though hee referreth not the worke actually to God but habitually onely He said further alleaging Saint Austine that it is sinne not onely to refer the action to a bad end but also not to referre it to a good and because hee defended that without the speciall preuenting assistance of God a man cannot referre any thing to God he concluded that no good morall worke can bee before For this he alleadged many places of Saint Austine to shew that hee was of this opinion He alleadged also places of Saint Ambrose Saint Prosper S. Anselmus and of other Fathers He produced Gregory of Arimini the Cardinall of Rochester who in his booke against Luther was cleerely of the same opinion saying it was better to follow the Fathers then the Schoole-men who are diuided and rather to take the Scriptures for a ground from whence true Theologie is taken then the subtilties of Philosophy which the Schooles haue vsed that himselfe also was of that opinion but hauing studied the Scriptures and Fathers had found the trueth Hee alleadged the passage of the Gospel A bad tree cannot beare good fruit with the amplification which our Sauiour added saying Either make the tree good and the fruit good or the tree euill and the fruit euill He vsed also other arguments and especially the place of Saint Paul that nothing can be cleane to Infidels because their minde and conscience is spotted This opinion was very sharpely impugned by Soto proclaiming it hereticall Soto proclaymeth the opinion of Catarinus to bee hereticall for inferring that man had not libertie to doe well nor could obtaine his naturall end which was to denie Free-will with the Lutheranes Hee maintained a man might by that strength of nature obserue euery precept of the Law in regard of the substance of the worke though not in regard of the end which was enough to auoid sinne Hee said there were three sorts of humane actions one the transgression of the Law which is sinne another the obseruation thereof hauing charity for the end which is meritorious and acceptable to God the third mixt when the Law is obeyed for the substance of the precept which worke is morally good and perfect in its kinde because it accomplisheth the Law making euery worke good according to morality auoiding by that meanes all sin But he moderated this great perfection of our nature by adding that it was one thing to take heede of any one particular sinne and another to beware of all together and sayd that a man might auoid any one but not all by the example of him that had a vessell with three holes who could not stoppe them with two hands but could stop which two of them he would one remaining open of necessity This doctrine did not satisfie some of the Fathers For though it clearly shewed that all workes are not sinnes yet it did not wholly salue Free-will because it will necessarily follow that it is not free in auoiding all sinne But Soto giuing the title of good workes vnto these knew not how to determine whether they were preparatory to iustification It seemed to him they were in regard of the goodnesse of them and it seemed they were not considering the doctrine of Saint Austine approoued by Saint Thomas and other good Diuines
not absolutely necessarie There was another opinion also to be condemned which said That the Sacraments were not necessarie in the Church because it is certaine they are not necessary to euery one yea that some are incompatible as Order and Matrimonie Yet the more common opinion was that the Article should bee condemned absolutely for two reasons one because the necessitie of one is sufficient to make the Article false as it lieth the other because they are all necessary in some sort some absolutely some by supposition some by conueniencie and some for greater vtilitie But many maruailed that Articles of Faith should bee established in such multiplicity of equiuocation For whose satisfaction when the Canons were composed there was added condemning him that held the Sacraments not to be necessarie but superfluous inlarging by this last terme the signification of the first Many were of opinion that the other part of the Article ought to bee omitted because it was defined in the last Session that faith onely was not sufficient and Marinarus sayd that the distinction of the Sacrament in vow was vsed by the Schoolemen but was vnknowen to antiquitie and full of difficulties For in the Acts of the Apostles when Cornelius the Centurion was instructed the Angel sayd his prayers were acceptable to God before hee knew the Sacrament of Baptisme and other particulars of Faith and all his familie hearing the Sermon of Saint Peter receiued the holy Ghost before they had been instructed in the Doctrine of the Sacraments and after the holy Ghost receiued they were instructed concerning Baptisme by Saint Peter so that hauing no knowledge of it they could not receiue it in vow and the Thiefe vpon the Crosse then onely illuminated by the vertue of CHRIST knew not the Sacraments nor could make any vow of them And many holy Martyrs conuerted in the heate of persecution by seeing the constancie of others and presently taken and put to death one cannot say but by diuination that they knew the Sacraments and could make a vow Therefore it was better to leaue that distinction to the Schooles and to put it in the Articles of faith The common opinion was to the contrarie saying that although the words of the distinction were new and scholasticall yet one must beleeue that the thing signified was taught by CHRIST and is an Apostolicall tradition and for the examples of Cornelius the Thiefe and Martyrs it is to bee vnderstood that there are two sorts of vowes of the Sacrament the one explicite the other implicite and at the least this second is necessarie that is that they had not the vow actually but would haue had it if they had been informed These things the others granted to be true but not obligatorie as Articles of faith The difficulties in which they could not agree where referred to the Synod that is to the generall Congregation As it hapned also in the third Article which though euery one thought to be false yet all did agree that in regard of the necessitie and vtilitie Baptisme Concerning the dignity of the Sacraments doth proceede in regard of the signification Matrimony in regard of the dignitie of the Minister Confirmation in regrad of diuine worship the Eucharist but because one cannot say without a distinction which is more worthy it is better to omit the Article which cannot bee vnderstood without subtiltie Another opinion was that all the respects of dignitie ought to bee expressed And another that the clause should bee added to the Article that is according to the diuers respects This opinion was most followed but did much displease those who could not endure that the Synode should abase it selfe to these scholasticall fooleries for so they called them and beleeue that CHRIST would haue these weake opinions brought into his faith Although that the fourth Article ought to bee condemned yea that it was necessary to amplifie it condemning the doctrine of Zuinglius in particular The fourth Article is generally condemned who will haue the Sacraments to bee but signes by which the faithfull are discerned from infidels or Actes and exercises of the profession of Christian faith hauing no other relation to grace but as signes that one hath receiued it After they treated of condemning those who denye that Sacraments doe conferre grace to him that putteth not a barre or doe not confesse that grace is contained in the Sacraments and conferred not by vertue of faith but Ex opere operato But comming to expound how they are contained and their causalitie euery one did agree that grace is gained by all Whether the Sacramēts do confer grace Ex opere operato those actions that excite deuotion which proceedeth not from the force of the worke it selfe but from the vertue of deuotion which is in the worker and these are said in the Schooles to cause grace Ex opere operantis There are other actions which cause grace not by the deuotion of him that worketh or of him that receiueth the worke but by vertue of the worke it selfe Such are the Christian Sacraments by which grace is receiued so that there be no barre of mortall sinne to exclude it though there bee not any deuotion So by the worke of Baptisme grace is giuen to the infant whose minde is not mooued toward it and to one borne a foole because there is no impediment of sinne The Sacrament of Chrisme doeth the like and that of extreame vnction though the sicke man hath lost his memorie But hee that hath mortall sinne and doth perseuere actually or habitually cannot receiue grace by reason of the contrarietie not because the Sacrament hath not vertue to produce it Ex opere operato but because the receiuer is not capeable being possessed with a contrarie qualitie Though they all agreed in this yet they differed because the Dominicans did affirme that how be it grace is a spirituall qualitie created immediately by GOD yet it is an instrumentall and effectiue vertue in the Sacraments which causeth a disposition in the soule to receiue it And therefore it is said that they containe grace not that it is in them as in a vessell but as the effect in the cause alleadging a subtill example as the chezill is actiue not onely in scabling the stone but in giuing forme to the Statue The Franciscans The Franciscans and Dominicans cannot agree about the manner ho 〈…〉 the Sacraments doe containe grace said that it could not be conceiued how God being a spirituall cause can vse a corporall instrument for a spirituall effect as is grace they did absolutely deny all effectiue or dispositiue vertue in the Sacraments saying they haue no vertue but by the promise of God that so often as they shal be administred he will giue his grace to them Therefore it is sayd they doe containe it as in an effectuall signe not by any vertue of their owne but by a Diuine promise of infallible assistance to the ministerie Therefore
it is a cause for that the effect doeth follow not by any vertue of its owne but by the promise of God to giue grace at that time as the merite is cause of the reward without any actiuitie This they prooued not onely by the authoritie of Scotus and Saint Bonauenture their Diuines but by Saint Bernard also who saith that grace is receiued by the Sacraments as a Canon is inuested by the booke and a bishop by the ring The reasons were expounded on both sides with great prolixitie and sharpenesse And they censured one another The Dominicans said that the other opinion was neere to Lutheranisme and the others that theirs being impossible gaue occasion to the heretikes to calumniate the Church Some good Prelates desired though without effect to make peace saying that in regard they agreed in the conclusion that the Sacraments conteine and are cause of grace it did little import in what manner and that it was better not descending to particulars to stand in the generall But the Fryars replied that they spake not of words but of establishing or annihilating the Sacraments There would neuer haue been an end if the Legate Sancta Croce had not giuen order that they should passe to that which remained and that afterwards they should returne to examine whether it were necessary to decide the point or to leaue it The Legates called vnto them the generals of the orders and prayed The Legates vse meanes to represse the dangerous libertie of the Fryars them to cause the Fryars to treat with modestie and charitie without partialitie to their owne sect shewing they were called to speake against heresies and not to make new arise by disputes And they wrote thereof to Rome shewing how dangerous the libertie was which the Friars did assume and to what it might come And they told the Pope that a moderation was necessary For there being a fame spred of those dissensions and censures which one partie pronounced against the other it must needs raise scandall and small reputation of the Councell It was thought fit to omit the fifth Article as decided in the former Session But Friar Bartholmew Miranda called to minde that Luther by that paradox of his that the Sacraments doe not conferre grace but by exciting faith drew also a conclusion that those of the old and of the Euangelicall law are of equall vertue which opinion was to bee condemned as contrary to the doctrine of the Fathers and the Church all hauing said that the olde Sacraments were onely signes of grace but the new conteine it and cause it No man did contradict the conclusion but the Franciscans proposed that it should not bee sayd of the old Law but of Moses Law in regard that Circumcision it selfe did cause grace but it was not a Mosaicall Sacrament for CHRIST also said it was not of Moses but of the Fathers and also because other sacrifices before Abraham did conferre and cause grace The Dominicans replyed that Saint Paul sayd plainely that Abraham had receiued the Circumcision onely for a signe that hee being the first vnto whom it was giuen it is as much as to say it was instituted onely for a signe And the questions of the manner of conteining and causing grace returned into the field Friar Gregorie of Padua said hereupon that it was a cleere case in Logique that things in the same kinde haue identitie and difference among themselues If the old Sacraments and ours had onely difference they would not all bee Sacraments but equiuocally if onely identitie they would bee absolutely the same thing Therefore they must beware to put difficultie in plaine matters for some diuersitie of wordes and that Saint Augustine had sayd that these and those are diuers in the signe but equall in the thing signified And in another place that they were diuers in the visible species but the same in the intelligible signification and that else where he puts a difference that those were promissiue and these demonstratiue which another doth expresse in another terme that those were prenunciatiue and these contestatiue Whence it plainely appeareth that they agree and differ in many things which no sensible man can deny and therefore it was wisedome not to put that Article in the beginning neither was it to any purpose to touch it in the present Decree Another opinion came forth that the opinion of the Lutherans and Zuinglians was to bee condemned without descending to the particulars For they say there is no difference betweene the old and new Sacraments but in the Rites But it hath beene shewed that there are other differences and therefore they are to be condemned for this onely without descending to shew what those differences are But the sixt was censured by the Dominicans who said it was proper to the Euangelicall Sacraments to giue grace and that the old did not giue it but onely by the vertue of deuotion and that this was the opinion of Saint Thomas They alleadged for a principall ground the determination of the Florentine Councell that the Sacraments of the old Law did not cause grace but did figure that it must bee giuen by the passion of CHRIST But Because S. Bondaenture and Sootus did maintaine that the Circumcision did conferre grace Ex opere operato Scotus adding that immediatly after the sinne of Adam a Sacrament was instituted in which a grace was giuen to babes by vertue of it that is Ex opere operato the Franciscans said the Article was true and could not be censured and that if as Saint Thomas said children before CHRIST were saued by the fathers faith the state of Christians was worse For now the fathers faith doth not helpe the children without Baptisme and Saint Austine saith that the childe that is caried by the father to be baptized if hee die in the way is damned So that if faith onely did then suffice the condition of the sonnes of Christians is now worse In these difficulties many did propose that the Article as probable should bee omitted To leaue out the seuenth and eighth there was a great agreement But in Concerning the Character imprinted by the Sacrament the ninth of the Chalacter Friar Dominicus Soto endeauoured to declare that it hath foundation in the holy Scripture and hath euer bin held in the Church for an Apostolicull Tradition and though the name hath not been vsed by the Fathers yet the thing signified is most ancient Others did not grant him so great a scope because it did not appeare that Gratian or the Master of the Sentences had made any mention thereof Yea Iohn Scotius said that it was not necessary by the words of the Scripture or of the Fathers to affirme it but onely by the authority of the Church a thing vsuall with that Doctor to denie things with a kinde of courtesie It was worth the knowing what thing they meant it should be and where situated in such multiplicity of Schoole-opinions some
patience because another was in fault and not himselfe and because hee could not resolue so suddenly vpon a conuenient Citie hee deserred the celebration thereof vntill the first of Nouember the same yeere At that time the King of England published a manifest in his owne name and of his nobilitie against the Popes Conuocation as by a person that had no power in a time when Italie was set a fire with warre and in a place not secure adding that hee much desired a Christian Councell but that to The King of England opposeth the Councel by a publique manifest the Popes he would neither goe nor send Ambassadours hauing nothing to doe with the Bishop of Rome or his Edicts more then with the edicts of any other Bishop That the auncient Councels were called by the authoritie of Kings which custome ought now the rather to be renewed because the defect of the Court of Rome are called into question That it was not vsuall with Popes to breake their faith which himselfe had more cause to consider then others beeing most bitterly hated by him for hauing denyed him authoritie in his Kingdome and the reuenew which was payd him That to blame the Prince of Mantua because hee will not receiue so many people into his Citie without a garrison is to mocke the world as also to prorogue the Councel vnto Nouember not saying in what place it shall be celebrated And if the Pope choose the place without doubt it will be in his owne State or of some Prince that is obliged to him Therefore it being impossible that any man of iudgement should hope for a true Councel the best way was for euery Prince to reforme Religion at home concluding in the end that if any man could giue him better directions hee would not refuse to follow them The care of reforming the Court was committed to 4. Cardinals but nothing was done which made the Italians suspect the Popes actions In Italy also there was a generall disposition to interpret the Popes actions in the worser sense and it was spoken freely that though the Duke of Mantua were blamed yet he was not the cause why the Councell was not called whereof there was a manifest argument because the Pope had published a Bull for reformation of the Court and committed the care thereof to foure Cardinals at the same time which notwithstanding was buried in silence though neither the Duke nor any bodie else hindered it from beeing in his power and hauing proposed it immediately after it was assumed to the Papacie it was not so much as spoken of for three yeeres after The The reformation is set on foot againe Pope to withstand these defamations resolued to set the businesse on foote againe first reforming himselfe the Cardinals and the Court that none might obiect against him nor make bad construction of his actions and he elected foure Cardinals and fiue other Prelates whom he so much esteemed that the yeere following hee made foure of them Cardinals giuing charge to those nine to collect the abuses which deserued amendment and withall to adde the remedies by which they might quickly and easily be remooued and to reduce all to a good reformation The Prelates made the collection as the Pope commanded and committed it to writing The fountainâ— of the abuses of the Court. In the beginning they proposed for the fountaine and source of all the abuses the Popes readinesse in giuing eare to flatterers and his facility in dispensing with Lawes with neglect of the Commandement of Christ not to receiue gaine for spirituall things And descending to particulars they noted twenty foure abuses in the administration of Ecclesiasticall matters and foure in the speciall gouernment of Rome they touched the ordination of The particular abuses Cleargie men Collation of Benefices Pensions Permutations Regresses 1538 PAVL 3. CHARLES 5. HENRY 8. FRANCIS 1. Reseruations Pluralitie of Benefices Commendoes Exemptions deformation of the regular order ignorance of Preachers and Confessors libertie of printing pernicious Bookes the reading of them toleration of Apostates Pardoners And Passing to dispensations first they touched that for mariage of those that are in orders for marriages in degrees forbidden dispensations granted to Symoniacall persons facilitie of graunting Confessionals and Indulgences dispensation of vowes licence to bequeath by will the Church-goods commutation of wils and testaments toleration of harlots negligence of the gouernement of hospitals and such other things which they exactly handled expounding the nature of the abuses the causes and originall of them the consequences of the euils which they carry with them the meanes to redresse them and to keepe hence forward the body of These things are set downe at large in the 12. Booke of Sleidan the Court in Christian life a worke worthy to be read and which deserued to be set downe word by word if it had not beene too long The Pope hauing receiued the relation of these Prelats caused many Cardinals to consider of it and after that he might resolue what to doe proposed it in the Consistory Fryar Nicholas Scomberg a Dominican Cardinall of S. Sistus alias of Capua shewed in a long discourse that that time comported The Cudinall of S. Sistus would haue no reformaton at al made not any reformation at all First hee put them in mind of the malice of man which being stopped in one course findeth a worse and that it is better to tolerate a knowen euill which because it is in vse is not so much marueyled at then by redressing that to fall into another which being new will appeare greater and be more reprehended Hee added that it would giue occasion to the Lutherans to bragge that they had inforced the Pope to make that reformation and aboue all he considered that it would bee a beginning to take away not onely the abuses but the good vses also and to endanger the whole state of religion For by the reformation it would be confessed that the things prouided against were deseruedly reprehended by the Lutherans which would be a great abetting to their whole Cardinall Caraffa desireth the reformation doctrine On the other side Iohn Peter Caraffa Cardinal Theatino shewed that the reformation was necessarie and that it was a great offence to God to leaue it and answered that it was a rule in Christian actions that as euill is not to be done that good may follow so no good of obligation is to be omitted for feare that euill may ensue The opinions deliuered were diuers The Pope comandeth the remonstrance of the Prelats to be concealed but a copie of it is sent into Germany by Cardinall Scomberg The King of Denmarke becommeth a Protestant and the finall conclusion was not to speake any more of it vntill another time and the Pope commanded that the remonstrance of the Prelats should be concealed But Cardinall Scomberg sent a copie thereof into Germanie which some thought was done
created Emperour and they made protestation of the iniurie But many of the Protestants kept themselues on his side because they could not beleeue that hee had any other respects then of State And the Arch-bishop of Collen of whom wee haue spoken The Arch-b 〈…〉 of Collen sentenced by the Pope is obeyed by his people and followeth the Emperour before who though hee were sentenced and depriued by the Pope continued in gouerment and was obeyed by his people followed the Emperour who also acknowledged him for Election and Arch-bishop and wrote vnto him that none of his subiects might beare armes against him wherein the Arch-bishop imployed his endeuours sincerely The Elector of Saxonie and the Landgraue seeing this they published a Manifest the eleuenth of Iuly declaring that the warre was vndertaken for Religion and that the Emperour couered his meaning with a cloake of taking reuenge against some few for rebellion to disioyne the confederates and oppresse them by degrees They alleadged that Ferdinand and Granuell and other ministers of his Maiestie had said that the cause of this warre was the The Elector of Saxonie and the Landgraue of Has 〈…〉 a publish a Manifest against the Emperour contempt of the Councell they called to minde the Popes sentence against the Elector of Collen they added that the Spanish Prelates would not haue contributed so much of their proper reuenewes for any other cause they shewed that in other things the Emperour could pretend nothing against them But while the Pope and Emperour prepared against the Lutherans some thing beside Anathematismes the day after the Session the eighteenth of Iune a Congregation was made where after the accustomed prayers and inuocation Iustification is to be handled in the next place of the holy Ghost the Secretary read in the Legates name a writing framed by the principal Theologues in which it was proposed that hauing by diuine inspiration condemned the heresies concerning originall sinne the order of the things to bee handled did require that the doctrine of the modernes in the point of diuinegrace which is the medicine of sinne should be examined and that the rather it was fit to follow the order because it was obserued by the Augustane Confession all which the Councell meaneth to condemne And the Fathers and Diuines were intreated to haue recourse by prayer vnto the diuine assistance and to be assiduous and exact in their studies because all the errours of Martin were resolued into that point For hauing vndertaken from the beginning to oppugne the Indulgences he saw hee could not obtaine his purpose except hee destroyed the workes of repentance in defect whereof Indulgences doe succeede And iustification by faith onely a thing neuer heard of before seemed to him a good meanes to effect this from whence he hath collected not onely that good workes are not necessary but also that a dissolute liberty in obseruing the Law of GOD and of the Church will serue the turne hath denyed efficiencie in the Sacraments authority of Priests Purgatorie sacrifice of the Masse and all other remedies for remission of sinnes Therefore by a contrary way he that will establish the body of the Catholike doctrine must ouerthrow this heresie of iustice by faith onely and condemne the blasphemies of that enemie of good workes When the writing was read the Emperours Prelates said that the more principall and important the point proposed was it should bee the more maturely and opportunely handled that the sending of the Cardinall Madruccio to the Pope shewed that some businesse was on foote the which it was not fit to disturbe but in the meane space to handle some thing of the reformation The Papalins did on the other side inculcate that it was no honour to interrupt the order begun to handle together in euery Session doctrine and reformation and that after originall sinne no other matter could be handled The Legates hauing heard all their opinions concluded that to discusse the points and prepare them was not to define them but that they could not bee determined without preparation before Which they said onely to gaine time and after to put themselues in order to execute what should bee resolued at Rome betweene the Pope and the Cardinall in the Emperours name That to digest that matter was not to hinder the reformation because in that the Diuines would bee imployed and in this the Fathers and Canonists With this resolution it was concluded that the Articles to bee discussed and censured should bee collected out of the bookes of Luther out of the Colloquies Apologies and out of the writings of the Lutherans and Fathers And three Fathers and as many Diuines were deputed to set downe what should bee discussed and to frame the Articles The next Congregation was held to order the matter of Reformation The discourse of the Card. Monte concerning residencie where the Cardinal of Monte sayd that the world hath complayned long since of the absence of Prelats and Pastoures dayly demanding residence that the absence of the Prelats and other Curats from their Churches is the cause of all the mischiefes of the Church For the Church may bee compared to a ship the sinking whereof is ascribed to the absent Pilot that should gouerne it if he were present He shewed to them that heresies ignorance and dissolution doe reigne in the people and bad manners and vices in the Clergie because the Pastours being absent from the flocke no man hath care to instruct those or correct these By the Prelates absence it is come to passe that ignorant and vnlearned Ministers haue beene promoted and persons assumed to bishoprickes that were more fit for any other charge for in regard they neede not execute their duety in person no fitnesse is necessary So he concluded that to establish the point of residencie was a generall remedy for all the maladies of the Church which also hath sometimes beene vsed by Councels and Popes but either for that the transgressions were then but few or for some other cause it was not applyed with such strong and strait bonds as is necessarie now that the disease is come to the height that is with a more seuere commandement with more greiuous and fearefull punishments and by meanes more easie to be executed This was approued by the first voyces of the Prelates But when Iacomo The Bishop of Vesone speaketh in fauour of nonresidency Cortesi a Florentin Bishop of Vesone was to speake commending what had beene sayd by others he added that as hee beleeued that the presence of the Prelats and Curats in times past was the cause of maintayning purity of faith in the people and discipline in the Clergie so hee could cleerely shew that their absence in these latter times hath not beene the cause of the contrary subuersion and that the custome of not residing hath beene brought in because residence hath beene wholy vnprofitable For the Bishops could not then preserue sound doctrine amongst
first pleased them all The Legates accompanied with the Prelates went to the Church with the vsuall ceremonies on Thursday the thirteenth of Ianuary and held the Session where Andreas Cornarus Archbishop of Spalato sang Masse Thomas Stella Bishop of Salpi did preach and the Decrees of faith and reformation were read The first conteined sixteene heads with their prohemes and thirty three anathematismes After it had forbid to beleeue preach or teach otherwise then was constituted and expressed in that Decree it declared in substance 1. That neither Gentiles by naturall meanes nor Iewes by the letter of Moyses hath been able to free themselues from sinne 2. Whereupon GOD sent his Sonne to redeeme the one and the other 3. Who though he died for all yet those onely enioy the benefit vnto whom his merit is communicated 4. That the iustification of the wicked is nothing but a translation from the state of the sonne of Adam into the state of the adopted sonne of God by IESV CHRIST which after the publication of the Gospel is not done without Baptisme or the vow thereof 5. That the beginning of iustification in men of age proceedeth from preuenting grace which inuiteth to dispose themselues consenting and cooperating with it freely which they doe willingly and might refuse 6. The manner of the preparation is first to beleeue willingly the diuine reuelations and promises and knowing ones selfe to bee a sinner to turne from the feare of Gods Iustice to his mercie to hope for pardon from him and therefore to begin to loue him and hate sinne and finally purposing to bee baptized to begin a new life and keepe the commandements of God 7. That iustification followeth this preparation which is not onely a remission of sinnes but sanctification also and hath 5. causes the finall the glory of God and eternall life the efficient God the meritory CHRIST the instrumentall the Sacraments and the formall iustice giuen by God receiued according to the good pleasure of the holy Ghost and according to the disposition of the receiuer receiuing together with remission of sinnes faith hope and charitie 8. That when Saint Paul saith that man is iustified by faith and gratis it ought to be vnderstood because faith is the beginning and the things that precede iustification are not meritorious of grace 9. That sinnes are not pardoned to him that vaunteth and reposeth himselfe onely in the confidence and certainty of the remission Neither ought it to be said that onely faith doth iustifie but euery one as hee should not doubt of the mercie of God the merits of CHRIST and efficacie of the Sacraments so in regard of his owne indisposition he may doubt because he cannot know by certainty of infallible faith that he hath obtained grace 10. That the iust are more iustified by obseruing the Commandements of God and the Church 11. That it cannot be said that the Commandements of God are impossible to the iust who though he fall into veniall sinnes yet ceaseth not to be so that no man ought to relie on faith onely nor say that the iust sinneth in euery good action or committeth sinne if he do any thing for reward 12. That no man should presume hee is predestinated beleeuing that the iustified can sinne no more or sinning can promise himselfe repentance 13. That no man can promise to himselfe absolute certaintie to perseuere vntill the end but should put his hope in the assistance of God who will continue if man faile not 14. That those that are fallen into sinne may againe receiue grace beeing stirred vp from aboue to recouer it by repentance which differeth from baptisme because it containeth not only contrition but sacramental confession Priestly absolution at the least in vow and satisfaction besides for the temporall punishment which is not alwayes remitted altogether as in baptisme 15. That the grace of God is lost not onely by infidelity but by any mortall sinne though faith bee not lost by it 16. It proposeth to the iust the exercise of good workes by which eternall life is gained as grace promised by the mercie of God and a reward due to good workes by the diuine promise And it concludeth that this doctrine doth not establish any iustice of our owne refusing the iustice of God but the same is said to bee ours because it is in vs and of GOD being infused by him for the merit of CHRIST In fine to make euery one vnderstand not only the doctrine to be followed but that also which is to be auoided it addeth Canons against him that saith 1. That a man may bee iustified without grace by the strength of humane nature and doctrine of the Law 2. That grace is giuen to liue well with greater facilitie and to merit eternall life as if free The Canons will can doe it but with difficultie 3. That a man may beleeue loue hope or repent as he ought without the preuention or assistance of the holy Spirit 4. That free will excited by GOD doeth not cooperate to dispose vs to grace nor can dissent though it would 5. That after the sinne of Adam free will is lost 6. That it is not in the power of man to doe ill but as well bad as good workes are done not onely by Gods permission but by his owne proper working 7 That all workes done before iustification are sinnes and that a man sinneth the more by how much the more hee laboureth to dispose himselfe vnto grace 8. That the feare of hell which maketh vs abstaine from sin and to flie to the mercy of GOD is sin 9. That the wicked is iustified by faith onely without preparation proceeding from the motion of his will 10. That man is iustified without the iustice by which CHRIST did merit for vs or is formally iust by that 11. That he is iustified onely by the imputation of the iustice of CHRIST or onely by remission of sinnes without inherent grace and charitie or that the grace of iustification is onely the fauour of GOD. 12. That iustifying faith is nothing but confidence in the mercy of GOD who remitteth sinnes for CHRIST 13. That for remission of sinnes it is necessary to beleeue they are remitted not doubting of ones own indisposition 14. That man is absolued and iustified because he doeth firmely beleeue it 15. That he is bound by faith to beleeue that hee is in the number of the predestinated 16. That one may be certaine he hath the gift of perseuerance without speciall reuelation 17. That onely that the predestinated obtaine grace 18. That the Commandements of God are impossible to the iust 19. That there is no other Euangelicall precept but of faith 20. That the iust and perfect man is not bound to obserue the Commandements of God and the Church or that the Gospel is a promise without condition of obseruing the Commandements 21. That CHRIST is giuen for a redeemer not for a law-maker 22. That the iustified may
Cardinall Theatinus Arch-bishop of that Citie promising them the adherence of all his kinred who were many and potent and his owne paines also who to that purpose would goe in person did effectually exhort them not to let slip an occasion so profitable for the seruice of the Church gaining vnto it so great a kingdome The Spaniards calling succours from diuers parts became more potent and letters came from the Emperour that he was content there should be no Inquisition and pardoned the Citie except nineteene all which he named but one whom he would discouer when time serued yet the City paid for a fine an hundred thousand crownes These conditions were of necessity receiued and those few of the nineteene who could be found were put But appeased by the Emperour to death and so the tumult was appeased In Bolonia the Legats did not well know as yet what to doe and the Pope The Councel in Bolonia proceedeth slowly had commanded them not to proceed to any action which might be opposed or make a diuision but to goe on slowly deferring the Sessions and making some Congregations to shew they were not idle But it was not easie to make them in a good forme to discusse the point of the Eucharist in regard the principall Diuines accustomed to handle matters of faith in The reformation is wholly forgotten Trent were wanting Yet some Congregations were held and diuers Diuines did speake but no Decree was framed There is no cause to speake any more of the Reformation because it was then buried in deepe silence The second of Iuly being come the Session was celebrated with the same The second Session is held and nothing done ceremonies where they did nothing but prorogue it with a decree like to that of the forme shewing that the Synode had deferred it vntill that day because the Fathers were absent and expected whereupon beeing desirous to deale louingly with them they added another Prorogation vntill the fifteenth of September not ceasing in the meane space to examine the points of doctrine and Reformation reseruing to themselues power to abbreuiate or prolong that terme though in a priuate Congregation In France it was not hard for the Legate to obtaine of the King whatsoeuer A strong alliance is made betweene the Pope and the French King the Pope desired For hee also was no lesse iealous of the Emperours fortune and there was good intelligence betweene them and very secret propositions did passe Amongst the publique one was that the King should send to the Councell of Bolonia as soone as might be as many Prelats as was possible Marriage was contracted betweene Horatius Farnese the Popes Nephew and Diana the Kings bastard daughter of the age of nine yeeres The King sent nine French Cardinals to remaine in the Court to giue the Pope reputation and to nourish friendship betweene them The Pope created Two Cardinals are created at the Kings instance Cardinals the sixe and twentieth of Iuly at the Kings instance Charles di Guisa Archbishop of Reins and Charles of Vandosme of the blood royall In the end of August Caesar went to Ausburg to celebrate the Diet there The Emperor holdeth a Diet in Austburg hauing about the Citie the whole Armie of Spaniards and Italians and some companies of foote within the Citie It began the first of September where the Emperor desiring principally to pacific Germany did impart what he had formerly done in diuers Diets to reconcile it and how for this end he had caused the Counsell to bee called and to begin in Trent but that his paines auailing nothing hee was constrained to passe to another remedie And because it pleased God to giue a happy issue to his resolution reducing Germany to those termes that he was assured to reforme it hee had assembled the Princes for that end But for that the difference of religion was cause of all those troubles it was necessary to begin there The opinions of the Princes in that Diet were diuers for amongst the Electors the Ecclesiastiques desired and vrged that the Councell of Trent should be held and demanded no condition The Seculars adhering to the Lutherans were content with these conditions that it should be free pious that the Pope should not preside neither in person nor by his Ministers should release the oath by which the Bishops In which the Princes differ in opinion are bound vnto him that the Protestant diuines should haue a deciding voice and that the Decrees already made should be reexamined The other Catholikes demanded that the Councell should be continued and the Protestants haue safe conduct to go thither and speake freely and be inforced to obey the Decrees While the Pope was in expectation of the successe of the Diet in Germanie The Popes sonne is murdered in his owne palace and his citie Piacenza possessed by the gouernour of Milan the 10. of September his sonne Petras Aloisius Duke of Piacenza was slaine in his owne palace by conspiracie and his body ignominiously exposed and some few houres after souldiers came from Milan sent by the Vice-Duke Fernandus Gonzaga who made themselues Lords of the Citie This afflicted the Pope aboue measure not so much for the death of his sonne and the ignominie as for the losse of the Citie and because hee saw plainely that all was done with the Emperours knowledge But the Legats in Bolonia thought that in this affliction and businesse of the Pope it was not fit to write two letters euery weeke of what did passe in the Councell as they were wont and therefore that it was conuenient to prorogue the Session for a long time and to intermit all Actes of the Councell which would bee done with honour enough if the Session intimated for the fifteenth were celebrated and the next deferred Yet the publique griefe for the Dukes death requiring that no solemnity should bee made they deemed it was better to anticipate and deferre it in a Congregation Therefore the fourteenth the Prelates being all called into the house where the Cardinall of Monte was lodged hee spake vnto them thus in substance C. Monte maketh a speech to the Fathers in his owne lodging for prorogation of the Session That the morrow was appointed for the Session but euery one saw in what staits the Synode was that not many Prelates are arriued who are in their iourney especially the French-men and those who are lately come are not well informed yea euen those who haue been present the whole Summer at the disputation of the lesser Diuines are not well in order whereunto was to bee added the cruell murder of the Duke which held euery one in suspence and themselues busied in prouiding for the security of the Cities belonging to the Church that hee was glad hee had reserued power to prorogue the Session that they may be freed from the paines of going to the Church to celebrate it that his aduice was yea that
and vnder their iudgement and hee wrote to those Priests who of their owne braine had reconciled some that they should giue an account to the people The goodnesse and charitie of the Bishops made their opinion for the most part to be followed and by little and little was cause that the Church charitie waxing colde not regarding the charge layd vpon them by CHRIST did leaue the care to the Bishop and ambition a witty passion which doth insinuate it selfe in the shew of vertue did cause it to be readily embraced But the principall cause of the change was the ceasing of persecutions For then the Bishops did eâ—ect as it were a tribunall which was much frequented because as temporall commodities so suites did encrease The iudgement though it were not as the former in regard of the forme to determine all by the opinion of the Church yet it was of the same sincerity Whereupon Constantine seeing how profitable it was to determine causes and that by the authoritie of Religion captious actions were discouered which the Iudges could not penetrate made a Law that there should lye no appeale from the sentences of Bishops which should bee executed by the secular Iudges and if in a cause depending before a secular tribunall in any state thereof either of the parties though the other contradict shall demand the Episcopall iudgement the cause shall be immediately remitted vnto him Here the tribunall of the Bishop began to be a common pleading place hauing execution by the Ministerie of the Magistrate and to gaine the name of Episcopall iurisdiction Episcopall audience and such like The Emperor Valence did enlarge it who in the yeere 365. gaue the Bishops the care ouer all the prizes of vendible things This iudiciall negotiation pleased not the good Bishops Possidonius doth recount that Austin being imployed herein sometimes vntill dinner time sometimes longer was wont to say that it was a trouble did diuert him from the things proper vnto him and himselfe writeth that it was to leaue things profitable and to attend things tumultuous and perplexed And Saint Paul did not take it to himselfe as being not fit for a Preacher but would haue it giuen to others Afterwards some Bishops beginning to abuse the authoritie giuen them by the law of Constantine that law was seuentie yeeres after reuoked by Arcadius and Honorius and an ordination made that they should iudge causes of religion and not ciuill except both parties did consent and declared that they should not be thought to haue a Court. Which law being not much obserued in Rome in regard of the great power of the Bishop Valentinian being in the Citie in that yeare 452. did renew it and made it to be put in execution But a little after some part of the power taken away was restored by the Princes that followed so that Iustinian did establish vnto them a Court and audience and assigned to them the causes of Religion the Ecclesiasticall faults of the Clergie diuers voluntary iurisdictions also ouer the Laitie By these degrees the charitable correction instituted by CHRIST did degenerate into domination and made Christians loose their ancient reuerence and obedience It is denyed in words that Ecclesiasticall iurisdiction is dominion as is the secular yet one knoweth not how to put a difference betweene them But S. Paul did put it when he wrote to Timothie and repeated it to Titus that a Bishop should not be greedy of gaine nor a striker Now on the contrary they make men pay for processes and imprison the parties as is done in the secular Court But the Westerne Countries being separated and an Empire made of Italy France and Germany and a kingdom of Spaine in these foure Prouinces the Bishops for the most part were made Counsellors of the Prince which by the mixture of spirituall and temporall charges caused their iurisdiction to encrease exceedingly Before 200. yeeres were past they pretended absolutely all iudicature criminall and ciuill ouer the Cleargie and in some things ouer the Laitie also pretending that the cause was Ecclesiasticall Besides this kinde of Iudicature they inuented another which they called mixt in which the Magistrate or the Bishop might proceed against the secular which of them tooke the cause in hand first whereby in regard of their exquisite diligence neuer leauing place to the secular they appropriated all vnto themselues and those which remained out of so great a number were comprehended in the end by a generall rule established by them as a ground of faith that euery cause is deuolued to the Ecclesiasticall Court if the Magistrate will not or neglect to doe iustice But if the pretensions of the Cleargie were contained within these bounds the state of Christian Common wealthes were tolerable The people and Princes when they saw it mount to these vnsupportable termes might with Lawes and statutes haue brought the iudgements to a sufferable forme as formerly vpon occasion hath beene done But that which put Christendome vnder the yoke tooke from it in the end all meanes to shake it from the necke For after the yeere 1050. all the causes of the Cleargy being appropriated to the Bishops and very many of the Laitie vnder title of spiritualitie and almost all the rest vnder the name of a mixt iudicature and placing themselues aboue secular Magistrates vpon pretence of iustice denied they came to say that the Bishop had that power to iudge not by the grant or conniuency of Princes or by the will of the People or by custome but that it was essentiall to the Episcopall dignitie and giuen to it by CHRIST And though the Lawes of the Emperours remaine in the Codes of Theodosius and Iustinian in the Capitulars of Charles the great and Lewis the Deboneere and others of later Princes of the East and West which doe all shew plainely how when and by whom this power hath beene graunted and all Stories as well Ecclesiasticall as prophane doe agree in declaring the same grants and customes adding the reasons and causes yet so notorious a trueth hath not had such power but that a contrary affirmation onely without any proofe hath been able to ouercome it which the Canonists haue so farre maintained as to publish those for heretikes who doe not suffer themselues to bee hoodwinckt And not staying heere they adde that neither the Magistrate nor the Prince himself can meddle in any of those causes which the Clergie hath appropriated because they are spirituall and of spirituall things the Laiques are vncapeable Yet the light of trueth was not so put out but that learned and godly men in those first times did oppose that doctrin shewing that both the Premisses of that discourse were false that the Maior that is that the Laiques are vncapeable of spiritual things was absurd and impious For they are adopted by the heauenly Father called the sonnes of God brothers of CHRIST partakers of the Kingdome of heauen made worthy of Diuine grace Of
iudge desiring therefore that what was done in the Councel the yeeres past might not haue the strength of a law but that the discussion of euery thing already handled should begin again it being not iust that when two contend in law what is done by one the other beeing lawfully absent should bee of forces and the rather because it may be cleerely demonstrated that aswell in the last actions as in those of the yeeres before Decrees haue been published contrary to the word of GOD. And they presented their doctrine and discourse in writing all which was receiued by the Secretary but the doctrine was not read The Speaker answered in the name of the Fathers that answere should be giuen in time conuenient When this was done the Electours and Ambassadours departed the The Fathers resolue not to alter the Safe Conduct Prelates remaining with the Presidents to giue order for the Session First the Decree was established and then the Safe Conduct proposed adding the causes why the Protestants were not content And consulting whether that which they desired should bee added to the forme they did easily agree all in one opinion that nothing should be added to auoide inextricable disputes and ineuitable preiudices The next day the 25. of Ianuary deputed for the Session they went to the The Session Church with the vsuall Ceremonies but with more Souldiers called by the Presidents to make ostentation of the greatnes of the Councel and with many strangers who came thither thinking the Protestants should be receiued publikely and with singular ceremonies The B. of Catanea sang Masse and Iohn Baptista Campeggio B. of Maiorica preached and the vsuall Riâ—es being obserued the Decree was read by the Masse Bishop the substance whereof was That the Synod to performe the things already decreed hauing exactly handled The Decree whatsoeuer belongeth to the Sacrifice of the Masse Sacrament of Order to publish in the Session the Decrees concerning them and the 4. Articles of the Sacrament of the Eucharist deferred thinking that the Protestants vnto whom they had giuen safe Conduct would haue been arriued by this time in regard they are not come but haue made supplication that all should be deferred vntil another Session giuing hope that they wil come long before the celebration thereof hauing receiued a safe Conduct in a more ample forme the Synod desirous of quiet peace beleeuing that they will come not to contradict the Catholike faith but to vnderstaÌ„d the truth that they wil be satisfied with the Decrees of the holy mother the Church hath put off the next Session vntill the nineteenth of March to giue light to and publish the things aforesaid granting them to remoue all cause of greater delay a safe Conduct of the tenour as shall be recited determining to handle in the meane while the Sacrament of Matrimony and to prosecute the reformation that they may publish the definitions of this together with the definitions of the things aforesayd The substance of the safe Conduct was That the Synod adhering The Safe Conduct to the safe Conduct already giuen and amplifying it doeth make faith to all Priests Princes Nobles and persons of what condition soeuer of the German nation which shall or are already come to the Councell Safe Conduct to come remaine propose and speake in the Synode to handle and examine what they thinke fit giue articles and confirme them answere the obiections of the Councell and dispute with those whom it doth elect declaring that the controuersies in this Councell shall bee handled according to the holy Scripture Traditions of the Apostles approoued Councels consent of the Catholike Church and authoritie of the holy Fathers adding that they shall not be punished vpon pretence of Religion or offences committed or which will bee committed so that there neede not bee any cessation from Diuine Seruice by reason of their presence either in the iourney or in the Citie of Trent or in any place else and shall returne when it shall seeme good vnto them without let with safety of their robe honour and persons but with the knowledge of the deputies of the Synode that prouision may bee made for their security granting that in this safe Conduct all those clauses bee held to bee included which are necessary for reall and full assurance adding that if any of them either in comming or in Trent or in returning shall commit any enormity which shall nullifie the benefit of this publike faith hee shall be punished by their own Iudges so that the Synod may be satisfied and on the other side if any other in comming hither remaining here or returning shall commit any thing which may violate this Safe Conduct hee shall bee punished by the Synode with the approbation of the Germans themselues who shall be present in Trent the forme of the assicuration remaining still in force giuing leaue to their Ambassadours to goe out of Trent to take the ayre and returne to send and receiue aduises and messengers as often as they shall thinke fit yet accompanied with the Deputies for their scecurity which Safe Conduct shall remaine in force so long as they be vnder the care of the Synode in comming to Trent in their abiding there and twenty dayes after they shall aske leaue to depart or after it shall bee granted to them that they may bee rendred in a secure place at their election which things it promiseth faithfully in the name of all faithfull Christians of all the Princes Ecclesiasticall and Secular and likewise of all other persons Ecclesiasticall and Secular of all conditions faithfully promising withall that the Synod shall not seeke occasion publikely or secretly that any thing bee attempted in preiudice of this Safe Conduct nor to violate the same will vse or suffer any to vse any authority power right statute or priuiledge of Lawes Canons or Councels especially that of Constance and of Siena which things in this behalfe and for this time it doth disallow And if the Synod or any person in it or any that belong to them shall violate the forme of this Safe Conduct in any point or clause whatsoeuer and punishment bee not inflicted to their approbation let them thinke that the Synode hath incurred all the punishments which the violaters of such Safe Conducts may incurre by the law of GOD or man or custome without admitting excuse or contradiction These things being read the Session was ended It is certaine that the Presidents doubtfull what might ensue were willing to bee prepared if the winde were prosperous to decide the matter of the Sacraments all in one Session and therefore hauing in a readinesse all that belonged to the Communion the Masse and Sacrament of Order they were desirous to digest also and put in order all that concerned Matrimonie that they might put all into one bundle and to handle succinctly in another Session Purgatorie Indulgences Images Reliques and such small matters for so they
Many are burned in England for Religion they had beene liuing and their bodies digged vp and burned an action commended by some as a reuenge of what Henrie the eight had done against S. Thomas by others compared to that which the Popes Stephanus the sixth and Sergius the third did against the Corps of Pope Formosus Many also were at the same time burned in France for Religion not And in France also without the indignation of honest men who knew that the diligence vsed against those poore people was not for pietie or Religion but to satiate Which was done to satiate the couetousnesse of Diana Valentina the couetousnesse of Diana Valentina the Kings Mistris to whom he had giuen all the confiscations of goods made in the Kingdome for cause of Heresie It was wondred also that those of the new reformation should meddle with blood for cause of Religion For Michael Seruetus of Tarragona made a Diuine of a Physician renewing the old opinion of Paulus Samosatenus and Marcellus Anciranus that the word of God was not a thing subsisting and therefore that Christ was a pure man was put to death for Michael Seruetus is burned in Geneua it in Geneua by Counsell of the Ministers of Zuric Berne and Schiaffusa and Iohn Caluin who was blamed for it by many wrote a Booke defending that the Magistrate may punish Heretickes with losse of life which Doctrine being drawen to diuers sences as it is vnderstood more strictly or more largely or as the name of Hereticke is taken diuersly may sometime doe hurt to him whom another time it hath helped At that time Ferdinand King of the Romanes published an Edict to all The King of the Romanes publisheth an Edict against all innouation in Religion the people subiect vnto him that in points of Religion and Rites they should not innouate but follow the ancient customes and particularly that in the holy Communion they should bee content to receiue the Sacrament of bread onely Wherein though many persons of note the Nobilitie and many of the Cities made Supplication vnto him that at the least the Cup might bee granted them saying that the institution was of Christ which might not bee altered by men and that it was the vse of the old Church as was confessed by the Councell of Constance promising all submission and obedience in all other things praying him not to burthen their consciences but to accommodate his commandement to the orders set downe by the Apostles and of the Primitiue Church yet Ferdinand perseuered in his resolution and answered them that his commandement was not new but an ancient institution vsed by his Ancestors Emperours Kings and Dukes of Austria and that the vse of the Cup was a nouitie brought in by curiositie or pride against the Law of the Church and consent of the Prince Yet hee moderated the rigour of the answere saying that the question being of a point that concerneth saluation hee would thinke of it more diligently and answere them in fit time but that in the meane while hee expected from them obedience and obseruation of the Edict Hee published also a Catechisme the fourteenth of And a Catechisme August made by his authoritie by some learned and pious Diuines 1555 PAVL 4. CHARLES 5. MARY 〈◊〉 HENRY 2. Which gaue distaste to the Court of Rome commaunding all the Magistrates of those Countries not to suffer any Schoolemasters to reade any but that either in publique or in priuate because by diuers Pamphlets which went about Religion was much corrupted in those Countryes This constitution distasted the Court of Rome because it was not sent to the Pope to bee approoued by his authoritie nor came foorth in the name of the Bishop of the Countrey the secular Prince assuming the office to cause to bee composed and to Authorize Bookes in matter of Religion especially by name of Catechisme to shew that it belonged to the secular power to determine what Religion the people should follow and what refuse The two yeeres of the suspension of the Councell being expired they treated in the Consistorie what was fit to bee done For although the condition in the Decree was that the Councell should be of force againe when the impediments were remooued which did still continue by reason of the warres of Siena Piemont and others betweene the Emperour and the French King yet it seemed that any man of an vnquiet Spirit might say that those impediments were not sufficient and that it was vnderstood that the Councell was on foote againe so that to free themselues from those dangers it might be good to make a new declaration But wiser men It is resolued in Rome not to speak of the Councell though the two yeeres of suspension were ended gaue counsell not to mooue the euill while it was quiet while the world was silent while neither Prince nor People demaunded the Councell lest by shewing they were afraid they might excite others to require it This aduice preuayled and made the Pope resolue neuer to speake more of it In the yeere 1555. there was a Diet in Ausburg which the Emperour 1555. A Diet. 〈◊〉 had in Ausburg to compose the differences in Religion had intimated principally to compose the controuersies of religion in regard this was the fountaine of all the troubles and calamities of Germanie with the losse not onely of the liues of many thousands of men but of their soules also Ferdinand began the Diet in the Emperours name the fifth of Februarie where hee shewed at large the lamentable spectacle of Germanie in which men of the same Baptisme Language In which Ferdinand maketh an Oration and Empire were distracted by so various a profession of Faith there arising new Sects euery day which did shew not onely small reuerence towards God and great perturbations of mens mindes but was cause also that the multitude knew not what to beleeue and that many of the principall Nobilitie and others were without all faith and honestie making no conscience of their actions which tooke away all commerce so that now it could not bee sayd that the Germanes were better then the Turkes and other barbarous people for which causes God hath afflicted it with so great calamities Therefore it was necessarie to take in hand the businesse of religion Hee sayd a generall free and pious Councell was formerly thought the onely remedie For the cause of Faith beeing common to all Christians it ought to bee handled by all and the Emperour imploying all his forces heerein did cause it to bee assembled more then once But there was no neede to say why no fruit came by it it beeing well knowen to all that were present Now if they desired to prooue the same remedie againe it was necessary to remooue the impediments which did 1555 MARCDILVS 〈◊〉 CHARLES 5. MARY HENRY 2. hinder them from attaining the wished end But if by reason of the accidents
those that say Masse onely and not for all the faithfull that it was necessary to insert this clause to remooue all doubt from the Catholiques and all occasion of opposing and calumniating from the heretikes that they as Diuines sent from the Pope could not forbeare to giue their aduice in a matter of so great importance and were both so earnest especially Salmeron who talked with Varmiense that the reading of the Decree being ended Varmiense first and then Madruccio made the proposition which pleased many but was reiected by the greater part not for its owne sake but for the manner of proposing it on the sudden without allowing time to consider on it It did not please the other Legats for the same cause also yet in regard of the honour of the place they said without any adoe that it should be reserued to the next Session in the handling of the two next Articles Afterwards the nine points of reformation were read That for collation of Orders Dimisories Testimonials Seale or any thing else neither the Bishop Nine points of Reformation are read nor any of his Ministers shall receiue any thing though voluntarily offered That the Notaries where there is custome not to receiue and where they haue no salarie may receiue the tenth part of a crowne That no secular Clerke though sufficient may be promoted to holy Orders if hee haue not a Benefice patrimony or pension able to maintaine him and that the Benefice may not be renounced nor the pension extinct nor the patrimony aliened without licence of the Bishop That in the Cathedrall or collegiate Churches in which there are no distributions or very small the Bishop may conuert to that vse the third part of the profits of the Prebends That in Parish Churches where much people is the Bishops may compell the Rectors to take the assistance of other Priests and those that are large in compasse may bee diuided and furnished with new Rectors if there shall be neede and the people may be compelled to contribute That the Bishops may make a perpetuall Vnion of Benefices with cure or without because of pouertie or other iuridical causes That the Bishops may giue Coadiutors to Parish Priests that are vnlearned and punish those that are scandalous That the Bishops may ioyne the Benefices of old ruinous Churches to others and cause the Churches to bee built compelling the people to contribute to the fabrique That they may visite all Benefices held in Commenda That the name office and vse of Receiuer be taken away in all places In the end the Session was ordained for the seuenteenth of September and a declaration made that the Synod might abbreuiate or prorogue at pleasure as well that Terme as any other which shall be limited for the future Sessions The actions of this Councell were not in so great expectation in former times as at this present in regard all Princes had agreed in demanding it and sent Ambassadors and that a great number of Prelats were assembled foure times so many as before and had beene begunne now sixe moneths and The actions of the Councell are censured those spent in daily and continuall treaties and discussions with dispatches of many Curriers and Prelats from Rome to Trent and from Trent to Rome But when the Session came out in print the vsuall Latine prouerbe of The birth of the Mountaines was generally vsed by all And particularly the delaying of two Articles was noted it seeming strange that hauing made foure Articles of faith with foure Anathematismes they were not able to declare that of granting the Cup which is de iure Ecclesiastico Some were of opinion that it ought to haue beene handled first because if it had beene granted all the disputations had ceased The third point of doctrine was much considered on in the conclusion For it being said that the faithfull who receiueth the body of CHRIST onely is not defrauded of any necessary Grace it First in matter of doctrine seemed a confession that some grace not necessarie is lost And here a doubt was made whether there bee any authoritie of man which can hinder the superabundant and not necessarie grace of God and if it can whether these impediments bee charitably vsed Two things were much spoken of amongst the rest one the obligation imposed to beleeue that antiquitie did not hold the Communion of children to bee necessarie because where the trueth of a story is in question it is a matter of fact and past in which there is no authoritie that can alter the things done Yet hee that readeth Austin will know that in nine places not in a word but with a discourse hee doeth affirme the necessitie of the Eucharist for children and two of them doe make it equall to the necessitie of Baptisme yea hee saith more then once that the Church of Rome hath held and defined it to bee necessarie for the saluation of children and doeth alleadge for it Pope Innocentius whose Epistle doeth yet remaine in which hee saith it plainely And they marueiled why the Councell would without necessitie trouble it selfe here in to no end when it might bee said that either it or Innocention had erred The other was the second Anathematisme with the declaration that he is an heretike who saith the Church was not induced vpon iust causes to communicate without the Cup which was to ground an Article of faith vpon a fact of man And they held it a miraculous thing that they would say that one is bound to obserue the Decree onely iure humano but is bound iure Diuino to beleeue it is iust and to make Articles of faith in things which may bee changed daily Others added also that if the causes were so iust they should say what they were and not force men to beleeue by terrour but induce them by perswasion because that was to domineere ouer the faith which Saint Paul doth so much detest Concerning the points of reformation Secondly in point of Reformation it was generally said that more light points could not be handled nor more lightly and that they did imitate the Physician who in an Hecticall bodie laboured to kill the itch And to put their hands into mens purses to maintaine Curats or repaire Churches seemed a strange thing both for the matter and for the manner For the matter because the Cleargie was luperfluously rich and rather indebted to the Layne for diuers euident respects for the manner because neither CHRIST nor his Apostles did euer compell men to make contributions but onely gaue power to receiue those that were voluntarie And he that readeth Saint Paul to the Corinthians and to the Galathians shall see the masters treatment of the Oxe that treadeth the Corne and the dutie of the catechised towards him that doth teach yet so as that those labourers haue no action or right by rigour of Law nor any Chancerie to relieue them The Session being ended the Legats began
who required that the matter should be deferred and examined againe To whom the Speaker answered in the name of the Legats that consideration should be had of it And finally the next Session was intimated for the twelfth of Nouember to determine concerning the Sacraments of Order and Matrimony The matter of the next Session And the Synod was dismissed after the vsuall manner great discourses betweene the Fathers about the Communion of the Cup continuing still Concerning which some perhaps will be curious to know for what cause the Decree last recited was not put after that of the Masse as the matter seemeth to require but in a place where it hath no connexion or likenesse with the Articles preceding He may know that there was a generall maxime in A Maxime in the Councell about the Maior part that Councell that to establish a decree of reformation a maior part of voyces was sufficient but that a Decree of faith could not be made if a considerable part did contradict Therefore the Legats knowing that hardly more then halfe would consent to this of the Chalice did resolue to make it an Article of reformation and to place it the last amongst those to shew plainely that they held it to be of that ranke There were also many discourses at that time and some dayes after about the point decided that CHRIST offered himselfe in the Supper some saying that in regard of the three and twenty contradictors it was not lawfully decided and others answering that an eight part could not bee called a considerable or notable part There were some also who maintained that the maxime had place onely in the Anathematismes and in the substance of the doctrine and not in euery clause which is put in for better expression as this which is not mentioned in the Canons The Emperours Ambassadours were very glad for the Decree of the Cup beeing assured that his Maiestie would more easily obtaine it of the Pope and vpon more fauourable conditions then it could haue beene obtained in the Councell where for the variety of opinions and interests it is hard to make many to bee of one minde though in a good and necessary matter The greater part ouercommeth the better and he that opposeth hath alwayes the aduantage of him that promoteth And their hope was the greater because the Pope seemed before to haue fauoured their Petition But the Emperour had not the same opinion aiming not to obtaine the communion of the Cup absolutely but to pacifie the people of his owne States and of Germanie who beeing distasted with the Popes authoritie for the things past could not relish any thing well that proceeded from him whereas if they had obtained this grant immediatly from the Councell it would haue giuen them good satisfaction and bred an opinion in them that they might haue obtained other requests which they esteemed so that this motion beeing stopped and the infected Ministers casseered he did hope he might haue held them in the Catholique Communion Hee saw by former experience that the grant of Paul was not well receiued and did more hurt then good and for this cause hee did prosecute the instance no further with the Pope and declared the cause of it Therefore when hee receiued newes of the Decree of the Councell turning to some Prelates who were with him hee said I haue done all I can to saue my people now looke you vnto it whom it doeth more concerne But those people which desired and expected the fauour or as they sayd The censure of the decrees the restitution of that which was due vnto them were all distasted that their iust request hauing been treated on sixe moneths presented by the intercessions of so many and so great Princes and after for better examination deferred and disputed and discussed againe with such contention should in the end be referred to the Pope which might haue been as well done at the very first without loosing so much time so many perswasions and so great paines They sayd the condition of Christians was according to the Prophecie of Isayas Hee sendeth and countermandeth expecteth and reexpecteth For the Pope who was moued first referred that to the Councel which now the Councell remitteth to him and both of them doe mocke both Prince and people Some discoursed more substantially that the Synod had reserued the definition of two Articles Whether the causes which did formerly moue to take away the Cup are such as that they ought to make them perseuere in the same prohibition and if not with what conditions it ought to be granted The former being vndoubtedly a matter not of fact but of faith the Councell did confesse by a necessary consequence that it knew the causes to bee vnsufficient and would not for worldly respects make the declaration For if they had thought them sufficient they must needes perseuere in the prohibition if any doubt had remained they should haue proceeded in the examination and ought not to remit it but for the insufficiencie of the causes But if they had made the declaration negatiue that is that the causes were not such as that they ought to perseuere and referred to the Pope to doe vpon information what remained to be done defacto they might haue beene excused Neither can it bee sayd that this is presupposed by the reference For in the Decree of this Session hauing repeated the two Articles they resolued to referre the whole businesse to the Pope and therefore not presupposing any thing I doe not finde in the memorials which I haue seene that the Decree of the sacrifice did rayse any matter of discourse And the cause perhaps was for that the words doe not so easily declare the sense as contayning many strained Metaphors which draw the mindes of the Readers vnto diuers considerations who when they are come to the end know not what they haue read Onely concerning the prohibition of the vulgar tongue in the Masse the Protestants sayd something For it seemed a contradiction to say that the Masse doeth containe much instruction for the faithfull people and to approoue that part should be vttered with a lowe voice and wholly to forbid the vulgar tongue onely commanding the Pastors to declare something to the people Whereunto some answered well that in the Masse were some secrets which ought to be concealed from the people which are vncapable for which cause they are spoken softly and in the Latine tongue but other things which be of good edification are commanded to be taught But this was opposed two wayes one that therefore this second sort ought to bee in the vulgar the other because they did not distinguish the two sorts For the Pastors being commanded to declare often something of that which is read and conceale the rest these two kindes being not distinguished some of them may mistake for want of knowledge and so abuse the people The Antiquaries did laugh at these discourses because it is
was granted in those times because the common people and Grandies also were deuout and did by this meanes entertaine themselues in spiritual things and shewed more obedience and reuerence to the Clergie beeing more ready to inrich it with oblations and donations which hath made the holy Church to be in that state in which it now is But since deuotion did cease the seculars haue armed only at the vsurpation of the Church goods to place their adherents in the Clergie And now the new Heretikes haue made a deuilish inuentiō saying that was due to the people which was granted by fauor which is one of the most pestiferous heresies which hath euer bin set on foot because it doth destroy the Church without which faith cannot stand He alleadged many reasons and congruities to shew that the ordination ought to be in the power only of the Ordainer which he confirmed by the Popes Decretals and concluded in the end that not only the Article was to be condemned as hereticall but that the voice and consent of the people in ordinations being taken away for iust and necessary reasons the Pontifical also ought to be corrected and those places remoued which make mention thereof because so long as they continue there the heretikes wil make vse of them to proue that the assistance of the people is necessary He said the places were many but to recite one in the ordination of Priests the Bishop ordaining saith that it hath been constituted by the Fathers not without cause that the people should haue voice in the ordination of the Rectors of the altar that they may be obedient to him whom they haue ordained in regard of their consenting to his ordination If this and other Rites shall remaine the heretikes will alwayes detract from the Catholike Church saying the ordinations now are but shadowes and shewes as Luther did wickedly say Francis Forrier a Dominican of Portugal said the Hierarchie of the Catholike Church could not be doubted of it being proued by the Apostolicall tradition by testimony of all antiquity and by the continuall vse of the Church And howsoeuer the word bee not vsed by all yet the thing signified hath euer been in practise Dionysius Areopagita hath made a proper treatise of it and the Nicen Councell hath approoued it and called it an ancient custome and that which hath been called ancient in the beginning of the fourth age must needes haue its originall from the time of the Apostles Onely he thought it not fit to handle this poynt ioyntly with the Sacrament of Order howsoeuer many of the Schoole-men doe handle it in that place putting the Hierarchie in the superiour and inferiour Orders a thing which cannot subsist it being certaine that the Pope is the highest Hierarch and that the Cardinals do follow then the Patriarchs Primats Arch-Bishops Bishops Arch-Priests Arch-Deacons and other inferiour degrees vnder the Pope as Head And to omit the disputation whether the Bishopricke be an Order it is certaine that the Arch-bishoprike Patriarkship and Papacie are not Orders and doe signifie only superiority and iurisdiction ouer Bishops Therefore the Hierarchie consisteth in iurisdiction and the Councel of Nice placeth it in that when it speaketh of the Bishop of Rome Alexandria and Antioch Therefore the handling of Hierarchie must not be ioyned with that of Order for feare of giuing way to calumnie There was much varietie in the discussion of these Articles those of the second ranke returning to the former and some disputing that the degree of a Bishop was an Order and others that aboue Priesthood there was nothing but Iurisdiction some alleadging Saint Thomas and some Saint Bonauenture and some beeing of a middle opinion that is that it is an eminent dignitie or office in the Order The famous saying of Saint Hierom and the authority of Saint Austin were alleadged who say that the degree of a Bishop hath beene most ancient but yet an Ecclesiasticall Constitution Michael of Medina did oppose and say that the Catholique Church as Saint Epiphanius saith did condemne Aerius of heresie for saying that the Degree of a Bishop is no greater then that of a Priest into which heresie it is no wonder if Hierom Austin and some other of the Fathers did fall because the matter was not cleere in all poynts This boldnesse to say that Hierom and Austin did sauour of heresie gaue great scandall but hee insisted the more vpon it and maintained his position And the Doctors were equally diuided into two opinions in this poynt Others placed this Hierarchie in Orders onely alleadging Dyonisius who in naming the Hierarchs maketh mention of none but of Deacons Priests and Bishops Some followed Forrier that it did consist in Iurisdiction At the last a third opinion came foorth that it was a mixture of both which afterwards was more generally approoued For placing it in Order it did not appeare how Arch-bishops Patriarches and which is of more importance the Pope himselfe could enter all beeing of accord that these Degrees are not Orders aboue the Degree of a Bishop Yet some did alleadge the common saying to the contrary that the Episcopall Order is diuided into foure parts Bishops Archbishops Patriarches and the Pope and placing it in Iurisdiction none of the holy Orders did enter There was a great disputation amongst them about the forme of the The forme of the Hierarchy Hierarchie some saying it was Charitie some Faith informed and others according to Cardinall Turrecremata Vnitie To this last was opposed that vnitie is a genericall qualitie in all that is one and is an effect of the forme which doth produce it Those who were for charitie brought very many places of the Fathers which doe attribute the vnitie of the Church vnto it But others said that it was the heresie of Wigles For if it were so a Prelate loosing charity would bee out of the Hierarchie and lose authoritie Notwithstanding they did not auoyd the difficultie by making faith informed to bee the forme because a Prelate might externally counterfeit and bee secretly vnfaithfull who not being of the Hierarchie the Christian people could not know whom to obey because they might doubt of all and sometimes had cause to doe it And as the Diuines especially the Friars are free in exemplifications they alleadged the Pope saying that in case he should bee incredulous the whole Hierarchie would perish by his default whether one did make faith or charitie to bee the forme And therefore they sayd Baptisme was But the same difficulties did arise in regard of the vncertaintie thereof because the intention of the Minister according to the determination of the Councell is essentially required which is more secret then the other two for which cause it cannot bee certainly affirmed of any that hee is baptized The Articles whether there bee a visible Priesthood or whether all Christians bee Priests or whether a Priest may become a Layman or whether his office bee preaching were
Fathers were admonished to put vp in writing to the deputies the abuses obserued by them in the matter of Matrimonie The voyces beeing all giuen concerning the Anathematismes two Articles were proposed the promotion of married persons to holy Orders and the making voyde of clandestine marriages For the former the Fathers Two new Articles concerning married Priests and secret mariages did vniformely and without difficultie agree on the negatiue and the Arch-bishop of Prague and the Bishop of Fiue Churches who perswaded them to thinke better on it were scarcely heard But the other of clandestine marriage did not passe so For one hundred thirty and sixe did approue the making it voyd fiftie seuen did contradict and ten would not declare themselues The Decree was composed according to the opinion of the Maior part that howsoeuer clandestine mariages were good so long as the Church did not make them voyde and therefore the Synod doth anathematise him that thinketh the contrarie yet the Church hath alwayes detested them And now seeing the inconueniences the Synod doth determine that all persons which hereafter shall either marrie or betroth themselues without the presence of three witnesses at the least shall bee vnable to contract and whatsoeuer they doe therein shall be voide And another Decree followed commanding the Banes but concluding that if there were a necessitie to omit them the mariage might be made so that it were in presence of the Parish Priest and of fiue witnesses at the least publishing the Banes afterwards vpon paine of excommunication to him that should contract otherwise But that great number which would make void the secret mariages was diuided into two parts some following the opinion of those Diuines who grant power to the Church to make the persons vncapable and some those who say it may make the contract voide And the Legates themselues did differ Morone was content with any resolution so that they might dispatch Varmiense thought that the Church had no power herein and that all mariages celebrated in what manner soeuer with consent of the persons contracting are good Simoneta said that the distinction of the contract of Matrimonie from matrimonie it selfe and the giuing of power to the Church ouer the one and not ouer the other seemed to him sophisticall and chimericall and was much inclined not to make any innouation Concerning the abuses of Matrimonie many Prelates considered that the causes to hinder mariages and to make them voyde though they were contracted were so many and happened so often that there were but few not subiect to some of those defects and which was more persons did contract ignorantly either not knowing the prohibition or the fact or by forgetfulnesse in whom after they knew the trueth many perturbations and scruples did arise as also suits and contentions about the legitimation of the issue and the dowries The impediment of kinred contracted in baptisme was particularly alleadged for a very great abuse because in some places twenty or thirty men were inuited for God-fathers and as many women for God-mothers betweene all which by Ecclesiasticall constitution a spirituall kinred doth arise who oftentimes not knowing one another do ioyne in marriage Many thought fit to take away this impediment not because it was not well instituted at the first but for that the cause of the institution beeing ceased the effect ought to cease also They considered that the gossips were then sureties to the Church for the faith of the children baptized and therefore were bound to instruct and chatechize them according to their capacitie by which meanes they conuersed often and familiarly with them and their parents as also the gossips amongst themselues by which meanes a certaine relation did arise betweene them which was a cause to be reuerenced and sufficient to prohibite marriage as all other causes to which reuerence ought to bee borne But afterwards when vse bad abolished whatsoeuer was reall herein and the God-father did seldome see his God-childe and had no care at all of his education the cause of reuerence ceasing the relation ought not to haue place Likewise the impediment of Affinitie by fornication nullifying marriages vntill the fourth degree it beeing a matter of secrecie did ensnare many who vnderstanding the trueth after the mariage were filled with perturbations For kinred of Consanguinity and Affinity it was said that the same account beeing now not made of it as formerly was and amongst great personages scarce memorie kept of the fourth degree that might bee omitted also Wherein there was much disputation Some thought that as seuen degrees of kinred did hinder marriage for many hundred yeeres and Innocentius the third tooke away three of them at once restrayning the impediment vnto the fourth alleadging very common reasons that there are foure Elements foure humours of mans body so it appearing now that foure cannot bee obserued without many inconueniences the impediments may bee more iustly restrayned to the third Others contradicted and sayd that so they might hereafter proceede further and at the last come to that of Leuiticus which would cherish the opinion of the Lutherans and therefore did conclude that it was dangerous to innonate Which opinion after much examination did preuaile Some thought that the impediment of fornication beeing secret ought wholly to beetaken away But they preuailed not because there appeared an inconuenience in regard that many things which first are secret are published afterwards Many were of opinion that no nouitie should bee made in these prohibitions but power granted to Bishops to dispence and maintained that it was better to giue it to them then to the court because they knowing better the merits of the fact and the causes may exercise distributiue iustice more exactly herein They sayd the court of Rome doth often giue dispensations to persons not knowen who obtaine them by deceipt and that diligence cannot be vsed in regard of the distance of the Countreys besides the world beeing scandalized thinking they are not giuen but for money that imfamie ought to be taken away The Spaniards and French-men laboured effectually herein but the Italians said they did it to make themselues all Popes and not to acknowledge the Apostolique Sea and that the difficultie of sending to Rome and negotiating the expedition with paines and cost was profitable because by that meanes few marriages were contracted in degrees prohibited whereas if by granting power to Bishops there were aâ—facility herein the prohibitions would in a short time come to nothing and so the Lutheranes would gaine their opinion Here upon a common inclâ—natioâ— grew that none should bee dispensed with in these prohibitions but for a very vrgent cause into which opinion those who could not preuaile for the Bishops did enter also thinking it was more for their credit if that which was forbid to them were not granted to others After many discourses in the Congregations it was resolued to restraine spirituall kinred and affinity by mariage and
of heresie and others said it was much to bee suspected at the least and others that it was offensiue to godly eares They said hee had taken occasion to doe it in absence of the Cardinall of Loraine who would neuer haue endured those termes and that his end was to dissolue the Councell that hee did attribute to Kings more then belongeth to them that hee inferred that the Popes authority is not necessary for the vsing of Church goods that hee made the French King like to the Queene of England But nothing did so much offend as that hee said that the authority of the French Kings ouer persons and goods Ecclesiasticall was not founded vpon the Pragmatique Concordates and priuiledges giuen by Popes but vpon the law of Nature holy Scripture ancient Councels and lawes of the Christian Emperours The French Ambassadours were reprehended also because they did not follow the steps of the Emperours and Spanish Ambassadors who though they had the same interests made not such a commotion because they knew there was no reason for it De Ferrieres defended himselfe said that the Legates had promised the Cardinall of Loraine that this matter should not bee spoken of but with such moderation as that it should not touch the affaires of France which was not performed that the Kings instruction had beene imparted to the Cardinall who if he had beene present would not onely haue consented to but counselled Protestation that those were great Ignorantes who hauing seene nothing but the Decretals Lawes of foure hundred yeeres did thinke that there were 〈◊〉 Ecclesiasticall lawes before them that if any would reforme the King by the Decretals he would reforme them by the Decrees and lead them also to more ancient times not onely of Saint Austine but of the Apostles also that he did not make the French King as the Queene of England but did oppose them who haue begunne long since to enlarge their owne authority by di 〈…〉 ing the Kings that if those Articles did so much damnifie the Emperour and Catholique King as they doe France they would neuer haue beene proposed and therefore he was not to take example by those who haue not equall interests The Arch-bishop of Sant and the Abbat of Claraual were distasted most of all who went vp and downe saying that the Ambassadours had done ill to protest and that their end was to make a confusion and giue occasion for a Nationall Councel in France that they were men not well affected creatures of the King of Nauarre sent by him to the Councel for his owne deseignes had protested without the Kings commission that it was fit to make them shew their instructions to frame an Inquisition against them as not hauing a good opinion in matter of faith Where in great differences did arise between the Ambassadours and them The next day the Ambassadors gaue the King an account of the causes why they had deferred the protestation vntill then and how they were forced at that time to come vnto it adding that they would deferre the registring of it in the acts of the Councell vntill his Maiesty had seene it and commanded them what they should doe The Legats not hauing a copie of the Oration made a collection of it by the memory of those who had beeene most attentiue to send it to the Pope of which de Ferrieres hauing gotten a copie complained that many things were expressed against his intention and in particular where hee named Ecclesiasticall lawes it was repeated spirituall lawes and that Kings might take Church goods at their pleasure whereas hee had sayd onely for necessary cause By this he was forced to giue foorth his Oration and sent a copie of it to Rome to the Cardinall of Loraine excusing himselfe for not hauing vsed words of such acrimony as he was commanded in the last instructions and in the first which are reconfirmed in those adding also that he thought it necessary to obey the King and was not willing to vndergoe the reprehensions of the Counsellors of Parliament who would haue taxed him if in a Generall Councell matters of so great importance had beene determined against that which hath beene by them so exactly maintained besides the Kings authority which hee defended hauing beene vpheld foure hundred yeeres by the Kingdome of France against the war in opposition of it made by the Court of Rome it was not iust that the Fathers of the Councell the greater part of whom are Courtiers should be Iudges of the ancient differences which the kingdome hath with that Court He gaue a copie of the oration to the Ambassadors also and to as many as did desire it and some saide that he had pronounced it otherwise then it was written Whereunto hee replyed that that could not bee said by any that had any meane vnderstanding of the Latine and that howsoeuer it was the same pronounced and written yet if they thought otherwise they must remember that the stile of the Synod was neuer to iudge of things as they were deliuered in voyce but as they were exhibited in writing and therefore they should moue no controuersie herein or if they would himselfe was to bee beleeued before any other The oration being published it was answered in the name of the Synod And answered by a namelesse man Hee said that the French Ambassadours had reason to compare themselues to the Ambassadours of the Iewes because they had both made an vniust complaint against GOD and that the same answere might be giuen them which the Prophet gaue to that people in the name of GOD that if they had fasted and lamented so many yeeres or ate and drunke all was for their owne interests that the Kings of France were cause of all the abuses of that Kingdome by naming to Bishoprickes vnlearned persons ignorant in Ecclesiasticall discipline and more inclined to a lasciuious then to a religious life that the French-men would not haue a resolution in the controuersies of faith that Christian doctrine might allwayes be vncertaine and place might be giuen to new masters who might rub the itching eares of that vnquiet Nation that they spared not to say in those turbulent times that it belonged to the King though very yong as yet to dispose of all the gouerment of the Church that they had sayd with asseueration that beneficed men had onely the vse of the reuenues whereas in France time out of mind they haue carried themselues for Vsufructuaries making Testaments and receiuing inheritances from their kinsfolke who die intestate that to say the poore are owners of the reuenues was much contrary to another saying in the same oration that the King is Patron of all Ecclesiastical goods and might dispose of them at his pleasure that it was a great absurdity to say that the King might not bee reprehended by a generall Councell seeing that Dauid was reprehended by the Prophet Nathan and tooke it in good part that it did
protestation made by the French Ambassadours would haue which was read with varietie of affections Those who were ill affected to the Court of Rome did commend it as true and necessarie But the Popes adherents thought it as abominable as the Protestations formerly made by Luther In the sixt Anathematisme of Matrimonie many did wonder that the dissolution The censure of the Decrees of mariage not consummated for a solemne vow should bee made an Article of faith because the matrimoniall coniunction though not consummated by carnall copulation is a bond instituted by the Law of GOD. For the Scripture doeth affirme that there was a true mariage 〈…〉 Mary and Ioseph and the solemnitie of the profession being or 〈…〉 reâ— po 〈…〉 as Boniface the eighth hath decreed it seemed strange not so 〈…〉 humane bond should dissolue a diuine as that he should bee condemned for an hereticke who will not beleeue that an inuention of man borneth any hundred yeeres since the Apostles should preuaile against a diuine instituted on made at the first creation of the world In the seuenth it was thought to bee a captious speech to condemne for an hereticke him that shall say that the Church hath erred in reaching that Matrimonie is not dissolued by adulterie For if one should say absolutely that Matrimony ought to be dissolued for that cause without saying or thinking that one hath erred or not erred in teaching the contrary it seemeth that this man should not bee comprehended and yet it doeth not appeare how one can thinke so except the hold the contrary to bee an errour It was iudged that they should haue spoken plainely and said absolutely that 〈…〉 noâ— dissolued by adulterie or that both opinions are probable and not to make an Article of faith concerning a word onely But these men would not haue made the difficultie if they had knowen the causes before mentioned why they did speake in that maner The ninth Canon did affoord matter of speech also by that affirmatiue that God doth not deny the gift of chastitie to him that doth demaund it a right because it did seeme to be contrary to the Gospel which affirmeth that it is not giuen to all and to Saint Paul who doth not exhort to demaund it which was more easie then to marry The Polititians knew not what to thinke of the twelfth Anathematismem that it should bee heresie to hold that matrimoniall causes doe not belong to Ecclesiasticall Iudges it being certaine that the Lawes of mariage were all made by the Emperours and the iudicature of them administred by the secular Magistrates so long as the Roman Lawes were in force which the reading onely of the Theodosian and Iustinian Codes and of the Nouels doth euidently demonstrate And in the formes of Cassiodore there is mention of termes vsed by the Gothish Kings in the dispensations of degrees prohibited which then were thought to belong to ciuill gouernment and not to bee matters of religion and to him that hath any skill in story it is most knowen that the Ecclesiastiques began to iudge causes of this nature partly by commission and partly by negligence of Princes and Magistrates But in the beginning of the Decree of reformation of Matrimony many wondred how it could bee defined as an Article of faith that clandestine mariages are true Sacraments and that the Church hath alwayes detested them because it doeth implie a contradiction to detest Sacraments And to command that the Parish Priest should 〈…〉 gate those that are ioyned and vnderstanding their consent should say I ioyne you in Matrimony in the Name of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost was derided by the criticks saying that either they are ioyned by those words or not if not then that is not true which the Councell of Florence hath determined that matrimony receiueth perfection from consent if so what coniunction is that which the Priest maketh of persons ioyned before And if the word I ioyne should be expounded I declare them ioyned a way would be layd open to conclude that the words of the absolution are declaratory also But howsoeuer it was they said the decree was made to no other end but that within a short time it might bee made an Article of faith that those words pronounced by the Parish Priest were the forme of the Sacrament For making void clandestine mariages they spake as much as was spoken of it in the Councell it selfe For some did extoll the decree to the heauens and others said that if those matrimonies were Sacraments and consequently instituted by CHRIST and the Church hath alwayes detested them and finally made them voyd it did not appeare how those who had not made prouision for it in the beginning could be excused from the blame of ignorance or negligence And when the distinction on which they founded the decree was published that the contract was nullified which is the matter of the Sacrament it was hard to vnderstand a long time because the matrimoniall contract hath no distinction from the matrimony nor the matrimony from the Sacrament and the rather because the matrimony was indissoluble before it was a Sacrament in regard CHRIST doeth not pronounce it insoluble as instituted by him but as by GOD in the earthly Paradise But it being admitted that the Matrimoniall contract is an humane and ciuill thing separate from the Sacrament which is nullified some said this annullation would not belong to the Ecclesiasticall Iudge but to the Secular to whom the discussion and cognition of all ciuill contracts doeth appertaine The cause alleadged to moderate the impediments of mariage was much commended as reasonable but it was obserued withall that it did necessarily conclude many more restrictions then those that were decreed in regard there are no lesse inconueniences by the impediments confirmed then by those that were abolished The end of the Article of matrimoniall dispensations mooued a vaine question in the curious whether the Pope by reseruing them to himselfe alone did more good or hurt to his authoritie For the good was alleadged the great quantitie of gold which did flow into the Court through this chanell and the obligations of so many Princes gained by this meanes as to be satisfied in their appetites or interests so to defend the Papall authoritie on which onely the legitimation of their children was grounded For the hurt the losse of the reuenues of England and of the obedience of that crowne was produced which did weigh downe all gaine or friendship which the dipensations might procure The Frenchmen did not like the decree that hee that stealeth a woman shall bee bound to endow her at the pleasure of the Iudge saying that the Law concerning dowries cannot be made by Ecclestiâ—all authoritie and that it was an artifice to take the iudicature of that delict from the secular Magistrate For if the Ecclesiastique may make the Law hee may iudge the cause And howsoeuer they said absolutely at the pleasure of the
Some defended the words of the Decree that they were dispencers alleadging the place in the Gospell of the faithfull seruant and the Doctrine of all the holy Fathers But the precipitation to finish the Councell caused those words that is of which they are appointed faithfull dispencers for the poore to be omitted as also other difficulties to be passed ouer in silence In the Article of Patronages the Ambassadours of Sauoy and Florence made request that those of the Princes might bee accepted also or that all might be comprehended but those of the Emperour and Kings Satisfaction was giuen them by accepting besides the Emperour Kings or Possessors of Kingdomes other great and supreame Princes who haue soueraignety in A dispute whether the Decrees made vnder Paul Iulius should be read their dominions Afterwards a proposition was made for the reading in Session of all the Decrees made vnder Paul and Iulius to bee approoued which Modena opposed saying that it would bee a derogation to the authoritie of the Councell of those times if it should seeme that the things then done had need of a new confirmation of the Fathers and would shew that this and that was not all one because none can confirme his owne things Others sayd it was necessarie to doe it for that cause that authoritie might not bee taken from them saying that they were not of the same Councell And the same French-men who before did so earnestly desire that it might be declared that the Councell was new and not continuated with that vnder Paul and Iulius did now labour more then others that all cause of doubting might be taken away that all the acts from the yere 1545. vntill the ende were not of the same Synode Thus it happeneth as in humane affaires so in religion also that one credulity is changed with his interests Therefore now all aiming at one marke it was determined simply to read them and say no more For so the vnitie of the Councell was most plainely declared and all difficulty remooued which the word confirmation might bring leauing euery one to thinke what he listed whether the reading of them did cousequently import a confirmation or a declaration of their validity or an inference that it was one Synode which made them with that which read them Finally a proposition was made to anticipate the Session and to celebrate The Session is anticipated it the next day and if all the actions could not then be dispatched to continue it the day following and to dismisse the Fathers and subscribe all the acts of the Councell on Sunday The Spanish Bishops opposed this saying that there was no necessity to abbreuiate the time Notwithstanding Card. Morone sayd that the Session should bee held And Loraine and the Emperors Ambassadors renewed their perswasions to the Count of Luna that he would yeeld to that which is so vniformely resolued Who in the end after many things spoken and replyed was content vpon two conditions one that a decree might be made that the Pope should make prouision for all things that remaine another that in the handling of Indulgences it should not bee said that they ought to bee giuen graâ—ts nor any other thing that might preiudice the Crusadoes of paine That day therefore being come which was Friday the third of December they wentto the Church with the vsuall Ceremonies and the Masse was said in which Ierolamus Ragazzone Bishop of Nazianzo made the Sermon And held the 3. December Hee summoned all the world to admire that most happie day in which the The Sermon temple of God was restored and the ship brought into the hauen after so many tempests and stormes and that the ioy had beene greater if the Protestants would haue had their part in it which was not the Fathers fault He said they had chosen that citie for the councell scituated in the mouth of Germanie euen at the threshold of their houses without any gard not to giue suspition of want of libertie that the Protestants had beene inuited by a Safe-conduct expected and prayed that for the safetie of their soules the Catholike faith was expounded and the Ecclesiasticall discipline restored He shewed the abuses taken away in holy Rites He said that if there had beene no other cause to call a Councell it had beene necessary to doe it for the prohibition of Clandestine mariages And passing to the things constituted for reformation he shewed from step to step the publike seruice the Church would receiue by those decrees Hee added that the explication of faith with the reformation of manners had beene handled in former Councels but not more diligently in any that the arguments and reasons of the heretikes had been often handled and discussed and many times with great contention not because there was any discord amongst the Fathers which cannot bee amongst those who are of the same opinion but to proceed with sinceritie and so to cleere the trueth as that more could not haue beene done if the heretikes had beene present He exhorted all that being returned to their Diocesses they would put the Decrees in execution as also to thanke God first and then the Pope shewing what hee hath done to fauour the Councell sending Nuncij into the Protestant Countries Legates to Trent exciting Princes to send Ambassadours sparing no cost to maintaine the Councell in libertie He commended the Legates as being good guides and moderators and in particular Cardinall Morone and concluded with the commendation of the Fathers After the ceremonies were ended the Decrees were read In the doctrine The Decrees of Purgatorie it was said that the Catholike Church hath taught out Of Purgatory of the Scripture traditions and in this same Synode that there is Purgatorie and that the soules detained in it are assisted by the suffrages of the faithfull and the sacrifice of the Masse Therefore it doth command Bishops to teach sound doctrine in this matter and cause it to bee preached without handling subtile questions before the ignorant people not suffering vncertaine and vnlikely things to be published prohibiting curiosities superstition and vnhonest gaine procuring that those suffrages bee fully executed which are vsually made for the dead by the liuing as also that the things ordained in last wils or in any other manner be fully performed In matter of the Saints it doth command Bishops and all others who haue Of Saints the charge of teaching that they instruct the people concerning the intercession and inuocation of them honour of relikes lawfull vse of Images according to the ancient doctrine of the Church consent of Fathers and Decrees of Councels teaching that the Saints doe pray for men that it is profitable to inuocate them and to haue recourse to their prayers and assistance Afterwards all in one periode it doeth condemne seuen asseâ—tions in this matter That the Saints of Heauen ought not to bee inuocated That they doe not pray for men That it