Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	evil_a	good_a	reason_n	2,746	5	5.3703	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93441	The antiquity & original of the Court of Chancery and authority of the lord chancellor of England being a branch of Serjeant Snagg's reading, upon the 28 chapter of Magna Charta, at the Middle Temple, in Lent, 13 Eliz. : with his congratulatory epistle, (by way of preface) to the Lord Chancellor Hatton, in 29 Eliz.	Snagg, Robert.	1654 (1654)	Wing S4381A; ESTC R42651	18,654	95

to the Law or that great Office for some have grown by Grant by reasō of the Kings Prerogative which both the Law and the Chancery alloweth and are to allow of right so it be not in derogation of their Authorities and may stand with the Law of the Land For the Kings Bench proceedeth by Bill without Original against such as be Prisoners to the Mareschal thereof and that justly for that no Law can prescribe the King a form to proceed in Iustice for those Causes that be before himself but he may receive any complaint without Writ and proceed as it please him so he observe the Law for Iustice Iudgement which is done there as well as in the Common Pleas where all come in by Original Writ For though it be not by like form for process yet it is by the same form of pleading and judgement in matter substance of Law all one And in this part it is manifest that this Authority also in the Lord Chancellor to direct out Original Writs is by the Law of the Land given unto him and his form prescribed to him by the Law how he should make them And to that purpose there is a Book of Law left in the Chancery that the Chancery men are bound to follow which is called The Register And if the Writs be not made according to the form of Law thereby prescribed the Judges will reject them and judge thē void which is called in Law abating of the Writ So as it is apparent that in this also his Lordship and his Office is by the Common Law and are members of the Commō Law and that he doth it not by any other Authority above Law or besides it 5. Then was considered of his Lordships authority to judge which appeareth in 9 E. 4. fol. 14. in a Book-case to be of two sorts or by two powers viz. One according to the course of the Common Law or Positive Law which is there said to be Potentia ordinata which is in process in pleading and in judgement according to the course of the Common Law of the Land The other is said Absoluta potentia which is in process according to the Law of Nature to send for the party to Answer and receive his Answer if he will make it then proceed to examine the truth of the matter and if he will not answer but be Contumax yet his Honour is to proceed to the examination of the truth and not to condemn him in the cause for his obstinacy if it may appear that the matter be not good against him And there is noted this difference which is apparent and common in practice That where the proceeding is according to Ordinary power mispleading on either part may marr his Matter and the judgement must be according to the Law howsoever the equity of the Case shall fall out But if the proceeding be according to Absolute power though the party mis-plead if the Lord Chancellor shall perceive the matter to be good on his side his Lordship is to judge for him for whom Equity serveth be it the Plaintiff or Defendant for that he is to judge as he shall find the matter to be in Conscience good or bad and not as he shall find the pleading to be formal and good or vicious and evil or as the Law will in the Case As for example in such actions as be brought in the Chancery before the L. Chancellor as an Audita querela to avoid a Recognisance for Nonage or other good Cause in Law And in actions brought according to the course of the Law either by any of the Court or against any of them by reason of their Privilege and in Vouchers upon Aid-prayer of the King and such other whatsoever actions are pursued there according to the course of the Law his Lordship is not to regard what Conscience would in the Case but is tyed to the strict course of Law so as if the matter be against Conscience in his Lordships opinion yet he is to adjudge with him that the Law serveth for yea if his matter appear to be good and his Counsel have lost it by pleading his Lordship can not help it in judgement nor if the Law be against him though Equity Conscience would seem for him But on the other side if the proceeding be by the Absolute power howsoever the party or his Counsel oversee or set forth their matter whatsoever the precise Rule of Law requireth if his Lordship perceive by his Wisdom that the cause in Conscience is good on his side his Lordship is to adjudge with him for that then judgement is to proceed secundum Conscientiam Veritatem and not in Forma Juris But in any Case that is there in form of Law if it fall out that in Conscience it ought to be relieved the party may put in a Bill follow it in that course and then his Lordship may stay the course of Law 6. Then was it enquired Whether his Lordship may take order in all causes which are against Conscience or that the Law hath limited them also and allowed of some to hold in that course and some not And it seemed that Conscience whereby his Lordship is to judge is not to be understood simpliciter and to be Simplex Conscientia but Regulata Conscientia and therein to follow Order and Course accustomed viz. to take order in such Cases as by the Course of the Court hath been ordered before-time and in Causes of like Equity or greater wherfore oftentimes Presidents are sought for and required and for lack of Presidents it hath been sought how cases in the like reason or in eodem respectu with that that is then in question have been used to prove that that Court may take cognizance of the Cause As for example it is against Conscience that a rich Father should suffer an honest Son to begg that a rich Son should suffer a good Father to want yet his Lordship in those cases cannot make the one to give away his goods to relieve the other according to Conscience But that which that Regulata Conscientia relieveth is not when one keepeth his own unconscionably but when one seeketh an other mans Goods or Lands or to trouble his person unconscionably either by colour of Law or extorted power further or otherwise than in good Conscience it ought to be then his Lordship proceeding according to the course of that Court is in Conscience to relieve the party that is so dealt with or his Lands or Goods so taken or sought contrary to Conscience 7. And it was thought that if it be unconscionable that is done if the Law in ordinary course may give a competent remedy and the party sufficiently able to follow it and that there be no defect in any circumstance but that by the Law the party wronged may be relieved that his Lordship ought not to deal in it but referr it to the Law to be judged