worketh also in them to be warie and to take heed thereof Rom. 8.3 Whom hee predestinate them hee iustified They therfore doe amisse who thinke to receiue comfort without any desire of a good conscience Replie But if they must take heed and beware they are vncertaine Aunswere No because they haue this as a spur to goe forwarde and perseuere But To bee certaine and not to haue a desire of repentance amendment of life implieth a contradiction as if thou shouldest say I am certaine of my reward therefore I will not runne for a rewarde is not giuen but to him that runneth These propositions doe mutuallie one follow another To bee certaine of saluation and to haue a desire of conuersion and amendement of life 2 What Predestination is PRedestination differeth from prouidence The difference bâ—tweene predestination and prouidence as a speciall from the generall For prouidence is the eternall counsell of God concerning al creatures but Predestination is the eternall counsel of GOD concerning the sauing of men and Angels Wherefore Predestination is the eternal most iust and vnchangeable counsel of God of creating men of permitting their fal into sinne and eternal death of sending his Sonne into flesh that hee might bee a sacrifice and of conuerting some by the woorde and the holie ghost for the Mediatours sake and sauing them in true faith and conuersion and of leauing the rest in sinne and eternall death raising them vp to iudgement casting them into eternal paines Here is spoken of men which shall bee saued and not saued therefore to them onely and not to Angels doth this definition of Predestination agree Election The partes of Predestination are Election and Reprobation Election is the eternal vnchaungeable free and most iust decree of god whereby hee hath decreed to conuert some to Christ to preserue and keepe them in faith and repentaunce and by him to giue them eternall life Reprobation Reprobation is such a decree of god as whereby hee hath decreed to leaue some according to his most iust iudgement in their sinnes to punish them with blindnesse and damnation and to condemne them beeing not made partakers of Christ euerlastingly That Election likewise as also Reprobation are both the decree of god these and the like sayinges doe prooue John 13.18 I know whom I haue chosen 2. Tim. 1.9 His grace was giuen to vs before the worlde was Rom. 9.18 He hath mercy on whom he wil. Both therefore election and reprobation were made by counsell and therefore both are a decree and that eternal because there is no new thing in God but all from euerlasting and the Scripture doth manifestlie saie Ephes 1.4 That God hath chosen vs before the foundation of the worlde Seeing then hee hath chosen vs hee hath therefore reiected the rest That which the verie word of choosing doth shew For whatsoeuer is chosen the same is chosen other thinges beeing reiected This Election is of grace and free that is not in respect of anie good foreseene in vs. He hath mercie on whom he will that is He giueth freely what he giueth Joh. 15.16 You haue not chosen me 3 What the causes of Predestination or Election and Reprobation The efficient cause of our election Gods good pleasure not any thing in vs. THE efficient and motiue cause is the good pleasure of God Matth. 11.26 Jt is so O Father because thy good pleasure was such God hath not foreseene any thing in vs for which he should choose vs for there can be no good in vs as of our selues For if anie good bee found in vs that hee dooth worke wholy in vs and hee woorketh nothing in vs which hee hath not decreed to woorke from euerlasting Wherefore the alone gracious and most free good pleasure of God or the alone free mercy of God is the efficient and motiue cause of our Election Ephes â— 5. God hath predestinate vs to be adopted through Jesus Christ vnto himselfe according to the good pleasure of his wil. See further Roman 9.11 Coloss 1.12 2. Timot. 1.9.10 The cause of reprobatioÌ„ in God In like manner also the efficient cause of Reprobation is the most free good pleasure of God For wee beeing all by nature the children of wrath had al perished if sin were the cause of reprobation Wherefore the cause of reprobation is not in men themselues but that is in God his will of shewing foorth his iustice Therefore of particular men why this man is elected and he reprobated there can bee no other reason giuen but the good pleasure of God onely But the cause of damnation is altogether in men The cause of Damnation in men which is sinne The supreme final cause of Predestination is gods glorie and the last and proper final cause of Election is the manifestation of Gods goodnesse and mercie in freelie sauing the Elect. The next neerest finall cause of our Election is our Iustification when God dooth in his Sonne freely account vs for righteous Both which finall causes the Apostle compriseth in these wordes Ephes 1 6. He hath predestinate vs to the praise of the glorie of his grace wherewith he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloued Likewise of the contrarie The first final cause of Reprobation is the declaration of gods iustice seueritie and hatred against sinne in the reprobate 1 Obiection God did foreknowe our workes Therefore he choose vs for our woorks Aunswere He did foreknowe those good thinges which he purposed to woorke in vs as also he foreknewe the persons otherwise he could not haue foreknowen any good workes So could he not haue foreseene any euill except he had purposed to permit the same 2 Obiection Christs merite applied vnto vs by faith is the cause of our Election Therefore not the good pleasure of God Answere Christes merit is not the cause of election but is reckoned among the effects thereof 3 Obiection Euil workes are the cause of reprobation therefore good workes are the cause of election Aunswere Euil workes are not the cause of reprobation but of that which followeth reprobation that is of damnation Good workes go not before in him that is to be iustified muchlesse are they the cause of election but they followe in a man beeing iustified and draw their original and their perpetual efficacy and vertue from gods meâ—e grace 4 Whaâ— are the effects of Predestination THE effect of election is the whole woork of our saluation and al the degrees of our redemption 1. The creation and gathering of the church 2 The sending and giuing of Christ the Mediatour and his Sacrifice 3. Effectuall calling of men to his knowledge which is the conuersion of the Elect by the holie Ghost and the woorde 4. Faith iustifâ—cation regeneration 5. Good woorkes 6. Finall perseueraunce 7 Raising vnto glorie 8. The effects of Reprobation Glorification and eternal life The effects of Reprobation are the creation of the reprobate priuation
of gods grace blinding hardening perseueraunce in sinne raising to iudgement and casting into eternal torments Obiection Diuers or contrarie causes haue contrarie effectes The effectes of election are good woorkes Therefore euil works are the effectes of reprobation Aunswere The Maior is not alwaies true in voluntarie causes For there is a dissimilitude Because God purposed onely to permit euil woorks but to worke good in vs. But the proper cause of euill works is the Diuel and euil men Replie But god hardeneth and blindeth men Blindnes is an effect of reprobation and a sinne Therefore sinne is an effect of reprobation Aunswere Blindnesse is a sinne in respect of men who admit it and as it is receiued of them and purchased by their owne demerite but as it is inflicted of God it is a iust punishment And that God doth deliuer some from that blindnesse is of his mercie Obiection Hardenesse or induration is an effect of reprobation and is a sinne God is autor of reprobation therefore of hardnes also and so of sinne Aunswere Hardnesse is an effect of reprobation but so that it is done according to reprobation but commeth not from it Hardnesse and blindnesse or exâ—ecation are according to reprobation or according to predestination as they are sins But they are effects of reprobation or predestination as they are most iust punishmentes 5 Whether Predestinatiâ—n â—e vnchaungeable PRedestination is firme sure and vnchaungeable which maie appeare euen by thâ— generall reason Predestination vnchangeable Because God is vnchaungeable and doth not depend on the interchangeable course of thinges but the same rather dependeth on his decree What therefore hee hath from euerlasting decreed of sauing the elect and condemning the reprobate that hath he vnchaungeablie decreed And therefore both election and reprobation is firme and vnchaungeable For whom he woâ—ld and hath decreed from euerlasting should be sauâ—d them also hee now will and so hereafter perpetually The same alâ—o wee are to think concerning reprobation Neither are there wanting testimonies of Scripture whereby the same is confirmed Iohn 6.39 This is the Fathers wil that of al which hee hath giuen mee I shoulde loose nothing Isai 46.10 My councel shal stand and J wil doe whatsoeuer I wil. Mal 3 6. I am the Lord I chaunge not Ioh. 10.28 None shal pluck my sheepe 〈◊〉 of my hand Ioh. 1. â—6 Yee beleeue not for yee are not of my shâ—epe â— Tim. 2.19 The foundation of god remaineth sure and hath this seale the Lord knoweth who are his The foundation which Paul so calleth is the decree of sauing the Elâ—ct 1. Because it is the beginning and welspring of our saluation and the end thereof and of al the meanes tending to saluation 2. It is called the foundation for the surenesse and firmenesse thereof because the same is neuer shaken These things are needefull for vs to knowe that wee maie haue firme comfort and consolation that wee may beleeue eternall life and so al other Articles of christian faith The reason is often repeated and therefore often to bee meditated of because he that denieth himself to be certain of the gracâ— to come is vncertaine also of the present grace of God For God is vnchangeable 6 How far forth Predestination or Election and Reprobation is knowen vnto vs. IT is knowen vnto vs in general as That some are Elect and some Reprobate but not in speciall whether this or that man be But of our own Election euery of vs not only may but also ought to bee in speciall certaine and assured And verily thereof we shall be certaine by the effectes Euerie man ought to bee assured of his owne Election in speciall namelie by conuersion that is by true faith repentance For that we may beleeue and know that we are certainly chosen to eternal life wee are bound to beleeue in Christ and to beleeue also eternal life But this wee cannot beleeue except wee haue true faith and repentaunce And as euerie one ought to haue both these So also euery one ought certainly to hold that he is of the number of the Elect. Otherwise they shal accuse God of lying Rom. 5.2 Wee reioice vnder the hope of the glory of God Christ is our intercessour woorking our euerlasting saluation I beleeue euerlasting life that is not spiritual life onely but euerlasting also which being heere begunne I carrie hence with mee out of this life Neither onely in speciall dooth euerie one know his owne Election by faith and conuersion but it is in generall also knowen that some are Elect. The Election of others is to bee beleued in generall And in general thou oughtst not only to hope but also certainely to beleeue that there are other besides thee elected For thou art bound to beleeue the Article of the Church because that hath bin at al times nowe is But thou alone by thy selfe art not the Church and therefore thou must not saie with Elias I am left alone But to discerne of particulars and of euerie single man is not thine to do Thou art notwithstanding wel to hope of the Election of others eueÌ„ as concerning euery particular man In generall is the whole Election of all in speciall there is a diuerse consideration of himselfe and of others No certainetie of reprobation eitheâ— concerniâ—g our selues or others Of Reprobation no man ought to iudge or determine any thing certainely either as touching his owne or as touching an â—thers reprobation before the end of his life For he that is â—or yet conuerted may be here after conuerted before he dâ—â— No maÌ„ therefore ought to iudge of others that they are reprobates but to hope wel of them of himselfe euerie man ought certainely to beleeue that he is an elect For wee haue a generall commandement 7 Whether the Elect be alwaies members of the Church and the Reprobate neuer The elect are then first member of the Church when they are regenerated THE Elect are not alwaies members of the church but then first when they are conuerted and regenerated by the holy Ghost For it is said Rom. 8.9 Jf any man hath not the spirite of Christ the same is not his Likewise the church is called holy But then first are the Elect holy when they are conuerted For Saint Paul expressely saith 1. Corint 6.11 And such were some of you but yee are washed Againe Coloss 1.13 He hath translated vs into the kingdome of his deare Sonne Now some are borne liue and die in the church others are not born in it but are called either soone or late vnto the visible church some both to the visible inuisible church as the theefe on the crosse As also those of the Gentiles of whome Christ spâ—ke Joh. 10.16 J haue other Sheepe Some either are borne in the visible church or come vnto it who neuerthelesse are not members of the inuisible and who sometimes depart from the visible Such are the reprobate who
reuerence him and declare our loue and thankefulnes towardes him by our good workes and obedience Rom. 12.1 J beseech you brethren by the mercies of God that ye giue vp your bodies a liuing sacrifice holy acceptable vnto God which is your reasonable seruing of God 1. Pet. 2.5 Yee are made an holie Priesthoode to offer vp spiritual sacrifices acceptable to god by Jesus Christ We are to doe good workes also in respect of our selues 1. That by our good workes we maie be assured of our faith Mat. 7.17 Euerie good tree bringeth forth good fruite Iames 2.20 That faith which is without workes is dead Phil. 1.11 Filled with the fruites of righteousnesse which are by Iesus Christ vnto the glorie and praise of god Now by our workes we must needes know that wee haue faith because the effect is not without his cause and wee must knowe the cause by his proper effect when as therefore we find not in our selues good works or newe obedience we are hypocrites neither haue we faith but an euil conscieÌ„ce For true faith only which neuer waÌ„teth al her fruites bringeth foorth as a fruitful tree good woorkes obedience amendment of life and these fruites likewise discerne and distinguish true faith from historical and temporary faith and so also from hypocrisie 2. That we maie be assured that we haue obtained remission of sinnes through Christ and are for Christes sake iustified before God for iustification and sanctification are benefites linked together which so cleaue together and that necessarily as they neuer can be seuered or pulled asunder For Christ obtained both for vs at once namely both remission of sinnes and the holy Ghost who stirreth vp in vs by faith the study and desire of good works and new obedience 3. That we maie be assured of our election and saluation 2. Pet. 1.10 Giue diligence to make your calling and election sure These proceede from the cause next going before For god hath chosen from euerlasting of his free mercy those onely which are iustified for the merit of his sonne Roman 8.30 Whom he predestinat them also hee called and them also he iustified Nowe that wee haue receiued from Christ iustification which is neuer giuen vnto the Elect without sanctification we knowe by faith And that we haue faith wee perceiue by the woorkes of faith true obedience and true conuersion 4. That by good woorkes our faith maie bee exercised cherished strengthned and aduaunced For they who giue themselues ouer to corrupt lusts against their conscience in them faith cannot be and therefore neither a good conscience neither a confidence and trust in god as beeing appeased and fauourable vnto them For wee haue through faith onelie a feeling of gods fauor towards vs a good conscience Rom. 8.13 Jf yee liue after the flesh yee shal die 2. Tim. 1.6 J put thee in remembrance that thou stirre vp the gift of god which is in thee by the putting on of my hands 5. That by good works we may shew forth and honest our life and calling Ephes 4.1 I praie you that yee walke worthie of the vocation whereunto yee are called 6. That wee maie escape temporal and eternal punishmentes Matth. 7.19 Euerie tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is cut off and cast into the fire Rom. 8.3 If ye liue according to the flesh ye shal die 7. That we maie obtaine corporall and spirituall rewardes which according vnto the promise accompanie good workes 1. Timot. 4.8 Godlines is profitable vnto al things which hath the promise of the life present and of that that is to come Except God woulde haue the hope of rewards and the feare of punishments to be motiue causes vnto good works he would not vse them in admonitions We must doe good woorkes also in respect of our neighbour 1. That wee maie bee profitable vnto our neighbours by our good example and so edifie them 1. Cor 15. All things are for your sakes that most plenteous grace by the thankes-giuing of manie maie redound to the praise of god Phil. 1.24 That I abide in the flesh is more needefull for you 2. That offences maie bee auoided Matth. 18.7 Woe bee to that man by whome offences come Rom. 2.24 The name of god is blasphemed among the Gentiles through you 3. That wee maie winne vnbeleeuers and by our woordes and deedes and example conuert them vnto Christ Luk. 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethren We see now then what are the causes for which we must necessariely doe good workes as also how or in what sense our workes are said to be necessarie for vs vnto saluation to wit not as a cause of our saluation but as mean or way without which wee come not vnto it And after the same sort also it maie be said That good woorkes are necessarie vnto iustice and righteousnes or vnto iustification or in them that are to be iustified namely as a consequent following iustification wherewith regeneration is vnseparably ioined But yet I would not vse these kindes of speaking 1. Because they are ambiguous doubtful 2. Because they breed contentioÌ„s minister occasioÌ„ of cauilling vnto the aduersaries 3. Because the Scripture doth not vse them which must be followed of vs in speaking 6 Whether good woorkes merit any thing before God THIS sixt question ariseth out of the fift as the fourth did out of the thirde For when men heare that wee receiue rewardes by our woorkes they presently conclude that we merit somewhat by them Wherefore wee are to know that good workes indeede are necessarie and therefore are to bee doone also for the rewardes ensuing them but yet that they merit nothing no not the least of gods giftes either corporall or spirituall The reasons hereof are most true and most euident 1 Our woorkes are vnperfect wherefore we can merit nothing by them Gal. 5.17 The flesh lusteth against the spirit and the spirit against the flesh and these are contrarie one to the other so that yee do not the same thinges that yee would 2 The good workes what euer we are able to doe are all due Luk. 17.10 When ye haue doone all those thinges which are commanded you say we are vnprofitâ—ble seruants 3 Our woorkes are impure and vitious how-euer they seeme most good Isay 64.6 Wee haue all beene as an vncleane thing and all our righteousnesse is as filthy cloutes Phil 3.8 J thinke all things but losse for the excellent knowledge sake of Christ Jesus my Lord for whome I haue counted all thinges losse and doe iudge them to be dongue that J might winne Christ 4 If we doe any good woorkes they are not ours but are belonging to god onely Phil. 2.13 Jt is god which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure 1. Corinth 4.7 What hast thou which thou hast not receiued We are euill trees if then we doe any good that must needes come from God onely Mat 20.15 Is it
the consequents of sinnes that is punishment and execution of his iustice therefore he will also the antecedent that is sinne it selfe without which these should not follow or be consequēts we deny the whole consequence of this reason For nothing foloweth or can bee concluded in reason when both the former propositions are mere particular For the Maior of this reason is not vniuersally true but onely then holdeth it when as the antecedent together with the consequent agreeth with the nature of him which will the consequent and not when onely the consequent agreeth and not the antecedent For when it falleth thus out then is the consequent by his wil but the antecedent is not by his will but onely by permission For God is saide to will those thinges which he liketh as agreeing with his nature and rightnes but to permit those thinges which yet he disliketh abhorreth condemneth but neuertheles for iust causes hindereth them not from being done And therefore it is said in the scripture that he will causeth life euerlasting which is the consequent and the conuersion of men which is the antecedent and goeth before and that he will not but only permitteth punishment as it is sin which foloweth and is the consequent of sinnes as is deliuered in holy Scripture Rom. 9. and Ephes 1. If again they vrge He that forbiddeth not sin The reasons why God not forbidding sinne is yet no cause of sin when he may forbid it to be committed in him is some cause fault of the sin but God permitteth it when he might forbid it therefore there is some cause fault of sin in him we deny the consequence because the Maior is not vniuersally true For it is onely true of him who doth not perfectly hate sin and therefore forbiddeth it not when he may who is bound to hinder sin that it be not committed But it is not true of God who with vnspeakable anger accurseth condemneth sin neither yet hindereth it from being committed because he is neither bound to doe so neither doth he permit it without most good iust causes Farther God might by his absolute power hinder euil but he wil not corrupt his creature man being iust righteous Wherefore he dealeth with mā after the order of mā He proposeth lawes vnto him he proposeth rewardes punishments he willeth him to embrace good and flie euill To the doing of which thing neither denieth he his grace without which wee can doe nothing neither refuseth he our diligence and labour Hereif man cease giue ouer the sin negligence is ascribed to man not to God though he could haue hindered it did not because he ought not to hinder it least he should trouble his appointed and setled order and destroy his owne worke Wherefore God is not author of euill or sin If they obiect farther God doth not euil when he permitteth euil He that doth euill that good may come of it doth not well Rom. 3. God when he permitteth euill for good ends doth euill that good may come of it Wherefore he doth against his iustice and law and by a consequent is bound to hinder euill we deny the Minor For God when he permitteth euill doth not euill but good For the permission of sinne is one thing which is the good and iust worke of God and sinne is an other thing which is the euill and vniust worke of the Deuil or man sinning and transgressing the lawe Lastly they say what God permitteth willingly that he will to be done God permitting sin doth not will sin to be done but he willingly permitteth sinne wherefore he will sinne to be committed and by a consequent is the cause of sinne But the Maior is to be denied God will the permission that is the priuation of his spirite and grace but the sinne of his creature which concurreth with it he will not because he neither mindeth it nor approueth it They confirme their Maior by this Argument To permit is neither to will or not to will But it is not not to will for then either that shoulde not be done which God is saide to permit or something shoulde bee done that God woulde not both of which are absurd Wherefore to permit is the same that to will and by a consequent God when he permitteth sinne doth will sinne We denie the consequence because there is not a sufficient enumeratiō of the diuersities of will in the Minor for God is said to will not to will a thing after two waies Either to will as when together he both liketh worketh a thing or as he liketh a thing onely vnder which also is comprehended his cōmanding but doth not worke it And he is said not to will any thing either as he both disliketh hindereth a thing either as he onely disliketh it but doth not forbid or hinder it Both which kindes of will are contained in the Maior but onely one of them in the Minor which is both to dislike hinder a thing from being done For if God in that sense woulde not sinne to bee committed then those absurdities shoulde follow which they speake of But when we say that God will not sinne we vnderstand that they doe greatly displease him and yet that god hindereth them not from being committed which also is not to will but to not will sinne For god can will nothing but that which is agreeable to his owne nature and goodnes neither doth the holy Scripture shewe any where that god will those thinges which are contrarie to his nature in such sort as they are contrarie This is also obiected God the cause of mans will but not of the corruption of his will is not a cause of sinne whereof mans will corrupted is a cause Hee that is the cause or the efficient of a cause is also the author of the effectes of that cause if not the next yet a farre off But god is the cause of that will which is the cause of sinne therefore is he the cause of the effect of the will that is of sinne Wee aunswere to the Maior by distinguishing of the cause For a cause which is a farre off a cause is sometimes by it selfe and sometimes onelie by an accident a cause That is a cause by it selfe of an effect which doth not onely bring forth the next cause of the effect but also doth moue and gouerne it in bringing forth the effect which it selfe intended or vnto the which it was appointed as when god frameth and bendeth the will of men which himselfe made to good workes or to such actions as himselfe will haue done when the Father or Master bringeth vp his Sonne or his Scholer to good thinges and the learning which hee instilleth into his minde mooueth him to doe well when the Sunne and raine make the earth fertill and the earth bringeth forth Corn. But when the cause which is a far off a cause
Li. 3. de libero arbitrio cap 4. And Augustine God is a iust reuenger of those thinges of which yet he is not an euill autor Wherefore those sinnes which ensue and followe are in respect of god considered as most iust punishments which as they are punishments haue their beeing from him as their author and causer but as they are sinnes in respect of men they come God neither willing nor causing them but permitting onely seeing he doth not cause men to do that which he would haue done for a punishment to this end as for to obay therein his will For one and the same work is good and holy in respect of God and sin in respect of men by reason of the diuersitie both of the efficiences of the ends For first man by reason of his great both ignorance and corruption will and worketh euill only But God because hee is exceeding good and the verie rule of goodnesse and righteousnesse doing in all things what he wil will and worketh alwaies only that which is good Secondly men haue such an end of their actions as is disagreeing frō the Law of God that is what they doe they do not to that end to obay God but to fulfill their bad and corrupt desires But God hath the end of all his woorkes agreeing with his nature and Law euen that he may declare and execute his iustice goodnesse and mercie By these two thinges it commeth to passe that the reasonable creature woorking together with God God woorking vprightly and holily doth neuerthelesse it selfe woorke vnholylie and corruptly 5 What are the effects of sinne NOw that it is defined what sinne is and from whence it came we are to consider also what be the euils which follow sinne For except this also be knowen we know not yet how great euil there is in sinne and with how great hatred God pursueth it It hath been said before that euil was of two sorts one of crime or offence which is sinne the other of paine or punishment The euil of punishment is the effect of the euil of offence That this maie be the better vnderstoode we must here againe remember that of punishments Some are onlie punishments as are the destruction of nature or tormentes others both punishments and sins as al sins which haue followed since the first fal 1 The sinnes which follow are effects of those which go before Sinnes ensuing effects of sinnes which go before So original sinne is the effect of the sinne or fal of our first parents By one mans disobedience manie were made sinners And secondly All actual sinnes are effects of original sinne Sinne took occasion by the commandement and deceiued me And thirdlie The effect of actual sins is the increase of them that is greater guiltines by reason of the most iust iudgement of God because God punisheth sins with sins Wherefore God also gaue them vp to their hearts lustes Rom. 1.24 2 Thes 2.11 Mat. 25.29 Other mens sins oftentimes effectes of actual sinne And therefore God shal send them strong delusiō that they should beleeue lies Frō him that hath not shal be takē away also that which he hath And fourthly The effects of actual sins are also oftentimes other mens sins by reason of scandale or example wherby some are made worse of others are entised or moued to sin So the persuasion of the diuel caused man to decline from God and now it worketh in stubburn-minded men The diuel put it into the heart of Iudas to betraie Christ Ioh. 13. Euil speeches corrupt good maners So euill teachers doe withdrawe men from god to errours idolatry and other sins So a vse of liberty out of season offendeth and draweth men to sinne An euil conscience an effect of sinne 2 There followeth sin in the immoueable and perpetual order of Gods iudgement an euil conscience which is the knowledge and dislike which we haue in our mind of our own sinne and the knowledge of the iudgement of God against sin and that proceeding out of the knowledge of Gods Law vpon which ensueth the fear of the wrath of God and punishment according to the order of gods iustice and a flieng and hatred of God who destroieth sinne which is the beginning of desperation and eternall torments except it bee cured by the comfort of the gospel Rom. 2. The gentiles shewe the effect of the Law written in their harts their conscience also bearing witnes and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing And Isaiah There is no peace to the wicked Temporall and spiritual euils effects of sin 3 Temporall and spirituall euils as temporall death and in a worde all the calamities of this life These euils are onely punishments that is torments and dissolution of nature If any man obiect that they also are subiect to temporall death and other calamities who haue all their sinnes remitted them and therefore al temporall euils are not the punishmentes or effects of sinne Temporal euils in the regenerate are effectes of sinne not as punishmentes but as chastisements but some haue other causes we answere that the consequence holdeth not from the denial of one particular to the denial of the general For albeit the calamities of the regenerate are not effectes of sin as a punishment which is inflicted on men sinning that so the iustice of God might be satisfied yet are they effects of sinne as chastisementes and exercises whereby sinne is repressed and more and more purged out vntill at length by corporall death the whole be abolished Now that of the blind man Ioh. 9. Neither this man hath sinned nor his parents Christ meaneth not simply that they had not sinned or that their sins were not a cause of this calamity but that their sinnes were not the principal cause why he was borne blind but that the woorkes of God should be shewed on him Christ by a miracle opening his eies 4 Eternall death which is the effect of al sinnes Eternall death the effect of sin as they are sinnes For al of what quality soeuer they bee are punished either with eternal paine as in the reprobate or with equiualent paine to eternal as in the sonne This death doth begin in the reprobate euen in this world that is anxiety and torment of conscience which we also should feele except we were deliuered by the grace of God Now by the name of eternal death is not vnderstoode the destruction of the soule or body or the separation of them but the abandoning and banishing of the soule and bodie liuing from the face of God a continuall horror and torment and a feeling and flying of Gods wrath and iudgement and a horrible murmuring against God taking vengeance of their sinnes If they obiect that the sinnes of those who beleeue in Christ The regenerate though they sin are not punished with this death because Christ hath suffered an equiualent punishment for them are not punished with eternall
are not perfect and sufficient And therefore God cannot bee rightly worshipped according to these remaines or reliques of spirituall light except there come thereunto the knowledge of God and his diuine will out of the word of God which is deliuered vnto the Church Further Men not brought vp in the Church doe patch manie false thinges with these true imprinted notions of nature and doe heape sinnes vpon errors Thirdly Such is the frovvardnes of the vvill and affections euen against the iudgement of rightlie informed and ruled reason that they obeie not so much as those naturall notions much lesse those vvhich are to be adioined out of the vvoord of god Whence also are those complaints euen of the heathen I see the better and I like them but I follow the worse that accusation of the Apostle Rom. 1.18 The wrath of god is reueiled from heauen against all vngodlines and vnrighteousnes of men which withhold the truth in vnrighteousnes wherefore those notions without the grace of the holy ghost doe not ingender true godlines in them 2 Obiection God commendeth vs for good vvorkes The praise and commendation which is giuen of God to our good workes doth not proue that they proceed from our selues but rather are his giftes Therefore good vvorkes are in our povver and vvill Answere This is a fallacie concluding of that which is no cause as if it were a cause God commendeth our good workes not because they are or can bee performed of vs without our renewing by the holy ghost but because they are agreeable vnto his lawe and good and pleasing vnto him yea because they are his owne giftes and effectes in vs and wee his instrumentes vnto whom hee communicateth himselfe and his blessinges according as it is saide Romans 8. Whom he predestinate them also he called Replie Who doth not in such sort vvorke vvell as that it is in his ovvne povver to doe either vvell or ill hee deserueth neither commendation nor revvard but those good things vvhich men doe are not in their povver and arbiterment therefore they deserue not either commendation or revvardes for their vertues Aunswere If the question bee of desert wee graunt the whole Argument For it is true that no creature can deserue or merite ought at gods hand neither ought the praise or commendation or glorie bee giuen to vs as if the good which wee doe were of our selues it beeing god who worketh whatsoeuer is good in all But if they saie that neither rewarde nor commendation is iustly giuen more is in the conclusion than was in the premisses For God to testifie that righteousnesse pleaseth him and to shewe forth more and more his bountie and goodnesse doth adorne it with free rewardes How God is said to wish our conuersion and good workes and yet they not thereby proued to be in our power 3 Obiection What God doth wishe and will to bee done of vs that wee are able to performe by our selues but God doth wishe and will our conuersion and our good workes Deutronom 32.29 Luke 19.42 Therefore wee are able to performe them by our selues And so consequently wee neede not the operation and working of the holy Ghost Answere This reason is a fallacie deceiuing by the ambiguitie of the word Wish For in the Maior proposition it is taken as it vseth properly to signifie in the Minor not so God is saide to wish by a figure of speache called Anthropopathie making God to be affected after the order of men and therefore the kinde of affirmation is diuers in the Maior and in the Minor But God is said to wish in two respectes First In respect of his commaunding and inuiting Secondly In respect of his loue towardes his creatures and in respect of the torment of them that perish but not in respect of the execution of his iustice Replie 1. He that inuiteth others is delighted with their wel doing it foloweth thereof that their wel dooing is in their owne power not in his who inuiteth them But God inuiteth vs and is delighted with our well dooing Therefore it is in our selues to doe vvell Aunswere Wee denie the Minor because it is not inough that God inuiteth vs but our will also to doe well must bee adioyned which wee cannot haue but from god onely God therefore doth wish our conuersion and doth inuite all vnto it that is hee requireth obedience towardes his lawe of all hee liketh it in all and for the loue which hee beareth vnto his creature hee wisheth nothing more than that all performe it and all bee saued but yet a will to performe it they onely haue whom god doth regenerate by his spirite Deutronom 29.2 Yee haue seene all that the Lord did before your eies yet the Lorde hath not giuen you an heart to perceiue and eies to see and eares to heare vnto this daie Reply 2. Hee that commandeth thinges vnpossible to bee done is vniust GOD commaundeth such obedience as is vnpossible to be doone Therefore hee is vniust Aunswere The Maior is to be distinguished He is vniust that commaundeth thinges vnpossible except himselfe first gaue an abilitie to perfourme those thinges which hee commaunded and Secondly except hee vvho is commaunded to perfourme them hath lost that ability through his ovvne fault Lastly except there bee some other endes and vses of the commaundementes besides his obedience vvho is commaunded But God had made man such a one as was able to perfourme that obedience which hee requireth of him Wherefore man by his owne fault and folly leesing and of his owne accord casting away this ability God neuertheles hath not therefore lost his right to require obedience of him beeing dewe and by him owed vnto GOD his creator But rather hee doth in right require it of all First in respect of his glorie because hee is iust and therefore doth of right require no lesse nowe than before Adams fall our conformity and correspondence with the whole Lawe Secondly that wee may subiect and submit our selues vnto God and implore and craue his grace when wee see him of right to require that of vs which thorough our owne fault we are not able to perfourme Reply 3. But not vve but Adam receiued and lost this abilitie of perfourming obedience vnto GOD. Therefore the Lavv is not vnpossible vnto vs thorough our ovvne fault Aunswere Adam as hee receiued this ability for himselfe and his posterity so he lost it from both Wherefore God doth in right depriue both Adam and his posterity of his giftes and gtaces Euen as a noble man by his disobedience leeseth a Lorde-shippe in fee graunted him of the Prince not onelie from himselfe God commaunding thinges vnpossible doth yet commaund them for good causes and to good ends but also from his posterity neither doeth the Prince any iniurie to his Children if hee restore not vnto them the Lorde-shippe lost by their Fathers fault and disobedience And if hee doe restore it hee doeth it
purposed from euerlasting And seeing god both foreseeth all things vnchangeable and his counsailes concerning the euent and end of thinges are certaine and vnchangeable it must needes be also that the second causes and meanes or Antecedents without which those euents were not to followe must bee certaine and vnchangeable And because in things created especially in humane affaires there is great vncertaintie and mutabilitie neither is there any cause of vnchangeablenesse but the will of god God could not haue appointed any thing certaine or vnchangeable concerning the euent and end except hee had also made all the meanes by which the end is attained vnto and which as concerning their owne nature are most vncertaine and chaungeable by his euerlasting counsaile and decree certaine and vnchangeable Wherefore it is saide Isay 14.27 The Lord of hostes hath determined it and who shall disanull it Thirdly the whole vse and force and declaration of the promises threatnings and examples of Gods goodnesse power iustice mercie and wrath both olde and newe to teach vs and to erect vs with comfort or by feare to holde and keepe vs in our duetie and the feare of God dependeth of Gods vnchaungeable nature For all those do then affect vs when wee thinke that the same nature and will of God which was in times past is nowe also and is and will bee such to vs repenting or persisting in our sinnes as wee see it was in times past and nowe is towardes others And then doe wee truelie relie vpon the promises of God when wee knowe that his counsell shall neuer bee chaunged Fourthlie This doctrine inclineth mens mindes to obedience and subiection which is necessarie in asking thinges at Gods handes that wee desire not GOD to doe those thinges for vs or others which hee hath before time assuredlie toulde vs that hee will not doe and further that wee submit and leaue with reuerence those thinges to his pleasure whereof hee would not as yet haue knowen vnto vs what hee hath decreede Fiftlie The vnchaungeablenesse of Gods will is the grounde and foundation of the hope and comfort of the godlie in this life For it is most absurd to conceiue of GOD that nowe hee loueth and nowe hee hateth vs nowe hee will assuredlie giue vnto vs euerlasting life and a little after againe hee will not And therefore when once true faith and conuersion vnto GOD is begunne in our heartes and the spirite of God hath begunne to witnesse to our spirite that wee are the sonnes of GOD and heires of euerlasting life God will haue vs certainlie to resolue that as hee had this his will towardes vs from euerlasting so to euerlasting hee will not change it but will assuredlie bring vs at his pleasure out of this wicked and miserable life through al tentations and daungers what-soeuer to eternall and euerlasting life according to that article of our Faith I beleeue life euerlasting When as Omnipotencie is attributed to GOD What is signified by gods omnipotencie thereby is first vnderstoode That whatsoeuer hee will or whatsoeuer not impairing his nature and maiestie hee is able to will he is also able to perfourme Secondie That he is able to performe all those thinges without anie difficulty labour euen with his only beck will Thirdly That all the force power of working and effecting anie thing is so in god only that there is not the least abilitie or efficacie of anie creature but what he continuallie imparteth preserueth at his pleasure And therefore the power of God is to bee considered of vs not as beeing idle but as creating sustaining mouing and ruling al thinges The reasons are 1 God is the first cause of all thinges Therefore he hath all thinges in his power and their abilitie is so much as he giueth vnto them 2 Hee dooth such thinges as can bee done by no created finit power as are the creation gouerning of all thinges the preseruation of common weales the deluge the deliuerie out of Aegypt all his miracles 3 He is vnchangeable Therefore in him to be able to do and to doe is the same which to will and so of the contrary But although al men affirme God to be omnipotent yet there is a double difference betweene the sacred Doctrine of the Church How the doctrin of the church and philosophie differ in conceiuing of Gods omnipotencie and Philosophie concerning gods omnipotency For first without the doctrine of the Church men only know the vniuersall and generall power of god whereby hee createth preserueth and gouerneth the whole world but they know not that power whereby he saueth men and restoreth the world by his sonne gathering and preseruing an euerlasting Church and deliuering it from sin and death and endowing it with life and glory euerlasting by which works God especially sheweth forth his power as it is said Hag. 2.7 Yet a litle while I wil shake the heauens the earth and the sea and the drie land Secondly neither doe they professe of the generall power of god so much as is sufficient For albeit they are enforced to confesse that God is the author and preseruer of the woorld yet are they not able to saie that al things were created of nothing by the woorde of God alone for as much as they are ignorant fo the cause of sin confusion they cannot affirme al things so to be administred and gouerned by gods omnipotency as that al which is good is done by the powerful working of Gods will but they attribute many things to chance fortune humane wisdome or vertue and so imagine the power of god to be idle in these and doing nothing Furthermore that god cannot either sinne or wil and allowe of sinne or be changed or diminished or suffer any thing or make things doone vndoone or wil thinges flat repugnant and contradictorie or create another god or some nature equal to himselfe or bee perceiued by bodilie senses or doe other thinges proper to a create or finite nature or admit the same into himselfe this doth not diminish or weaken but rather augment strengthen his power For that is the greatest and most perfect power which can neither be destroied nor weakned nor diminished and that none susteining it but only by it selfe But contrariwise to be able to be corrupted impaired is a token of imbecillity and imperfection of exceeding immense wisedome Gods exceeding wisedome whereby both hee knoweth all thinges perfectly and is the fountaine of all knoweledge and vnderstanding That we may rightly and with profit and commoditie know the power of God it is necessarie not to consider it but as it is ioyned with his immense wisedome and goodnesse which moderateth it Further of his diuine wisedome first we learne That God doth of himselfe in one act or view vnderstand and behold perpetually and most perfectlie in maruellous manner and that vnknowen to vs himselfe and the whole
him but of the creatures which once beganne to be from him when they were not at all before Wherefore these respectes creation dominion and the rest are in the creatures reall relations but in GOD respectes onelie of our consideration And therefore the creatour and the creature are relatiues not mutuall as the Schoolemen wel speake and iudge because not both of them but one onelie dependeth of the other and is referred thereto reallie and formallie that is the creature For in the creatour is nothing at all depending of the creature For if the creatour and the creature were relatiues mutuall then these absurdities necessarily follow 1. That god is not most perfect in himself 2. That frō euerlasting both the creator was as he is creator and the creature 3. Or some reall thing to haue come in time to the diuine essence 4. and therefore the diuine essence to be mutable and compound Wherefore relations in god do not make mutation but are attributed to god in respect of the creatures 2 How God made the world The world created 1 By the Sonne and the holie Ghost 1 THe woorlde was created of God the father by the sonne and the holie ghost Of the sonne it is saide Ioh. 1.3 All thinges were made by this woorde of the holy Ghost Gen. 1.2 And the spirite of GOD mooued vpon the waters And Iob. 33.4 The spirite of GOD hath made mee 2. God created the world most freely without anie constraint not by anie absolute necessitie but by necessitie of consequence 2 It was created most freelie without constraint that is by the decree of his wil which decree though it were eternall and vnchangeable yet was it most free For neither was God tied to the creating and susteining of things neither if hee had not at all created the world or did annihilate it being created bring it to nothing were hee therefore lesse good or lesse happie 3. God made the world with his beck onelie or wil without labor wearisomnes 3 Without motion motiō or any change of himselfe that is not by any new action of his but by his forcible will onely which from euerlasting woulde that things shoulde on a sodaine exist and be at such a time as hee had freely appointed and decreed Isai 40.28 The Lord hath created the ends of the earth he neither fainteth nor is wearie Now to worke any thing with his becke and word onely is the highest and chiefest manner of working Fiue sorts of Agents For there are fiue kindes of operations and agents 1. A naturall agent 2. That which woorketh with an appetite 3. Men and Diuels 4. Angels 5. God which three latter sortes are voluntarie agents 1 Naturall The first therefore is of those things which worke according to the qualitie and force of their owne nature not beeing guided by anie proper vnderstanding or will of their owne Such is the operation of fier water medicinable hearbs precious stones The actions and operations of these are subiect to the rule of those which are voluntary agents and are by them moued and directed to certain vses 2 Agents with an appetite as are brute beasts and to the performing of certain works The second is of those which folow also the lore of nature in woorking but not without some proper appetite or desire of their own though the rule of reason be wanting But neuerthelesse their action and working is so ordered that sometimes it is forced from them against their will Of this sort are the operatiōs actions of brute beasts But these also are subiect to the rule direction of god Angels men yet so that no violence is offered vnto them but what they doe moued by these superiour agents that they do of their own accord according to their owne nature force giuen thē of god The third is of men Diuels 3 Men and Diuels working with reason but corruptly who also work according to the qualitie of their nature namely by reason by deliberatiō freely but corruptlie The fourth is of good spirits which we cal Angels who likewise as mē work by reasō wil but not corruptly yet notwithstāding both of thē both men Angels though they woorke according to their nature freely 4 The blessed Angels working with reason also but not corruptly yet directed by a higher power 5 God working most perfectly and directed by none but by himselfe are not exempted from the decree and direction of God The fifth is the highest and supreme kinde of working which according to the nature of the first agent floweth from an vnderstanding and will and that most pure most perfect and most right neither is it subiect to the pleasure and disposition of anie higher cause Therefore this agent which is God himselfe is most wise most good most free and immense which hath no neede of any deliberation to goe before and doth without motion at his becke and commaundement onely woorke and guide al things which he will and as he will Wherefore all thinges depend of his will but he of none Psal 33.6.9 He spake and it was done he commaunded and it was created Rom. 4.17 Who quickeneth the dead and calleth those thinges which be not as though they were 4 God created all thinges of nothing not of a preexistent or forebeing matter 4 The world was created of nothing not of the Essence of god nor of anie matter coeternall with god For if God created all things nothing then is excepted besides the creator himselfe no not the matter whereof all the rest were framed 1 Obiection That which is produced with some preexistent thing is not created All things created of nothing either immediately or mediatly Man was produced out of a preexistent thing the earth and the rib Therefore hee was not created But this is false for the scripture saith that god created man Therefore creation is not a production of a thing out of nothing Aunswere The Maior is not simplie true Because those thinges also are said to be created whose matter whereof they came is of nothing Man therefore was made of nothing not immediately but mediately by reason of his matter not the last but the first matter for this at the beginning had a beginning from nothing out of it afterward diuers kinds of things were formed To this reason also that may bee added namely that that production also is called creation whereby a thing which was not before is made sodainly without any motion by the commaundement of God onely out of a matter indeede but yet such as hath no definite power in it selfe of producing any thing Such a production being no naturall generation and being after a sort not out of any matter is rightly called in the scripture creation Wherefore it followeth not Some creation is not of nothing immediately neither of that which is simply no matter therefore no creation is of
actions of all creatures The reason is for that God alone by his own nature can will appoint or doe nothing that is vniust whether he worke by the good or by the wicked Because seeing he is most good his will onely is the rule of iustice and seeing be oweth nothing to any man he cannot to any man bee iniurious Wherefore to spoile another against the law commandement of God is sinne in it selfe and theft But god commanding Exo. 11.2 by an especial commandement the Israelits to spoile the Aegyptians it was not theft but a worke good in it selfe both in respect of God by this meanes punishing the iniustice of the Aegyptians as also of the Israelits doing to this end that they might obay therin the special wil commandement of god which if they had done without this commandement they had committed thâ—ir 2 Reply He that will and woorketh an action which is in it selfe sinne will and woorketh sinnes God will those actions God will those thinge which are sinnes in themselues in respect of mans will but not in respect of his wil which in themselues are horrible sins as are the hainous offences of Absalon 2. Sam. 12. The lying of the Prophets 1. Kings 22.23 The crueltie of the Assyrians making waste of Iurie Isay 10. Therefore God will worketh sinne Aunswere The Maior is true of one who worketh an action which is sinne disagreeth from the law of God in respect of his will who worketh it and not of others But the actions of the Assyrians and of others sinning which God effectually would were sins not in respect of the wil of god but of the will of the men themselues sinning For though god would the same thing yet would hee it not in the same sort that they A rule to be obserued of good and euil causes of one and the same effect But that this answer as also the former may be the better vnderstood may bee with greater certainty opposed against the like sophismes which humane reason in great number frowardly wresteth against gods prouidence this generall rule is to be obserued the truth whereof is manifest and the vse great in Philosophie both Naturall and Morall as also in Diuinitie One the same woorke or action or effect in subiect or matter is in consideration manner forme made most diuerse good and bad according to the diuersitie of the causes both efficient and finall For in consideration and respect of a good cause it is good in respect of a bad cause bad a good cause is in it selfe a cause of good by an accident a cause of an euill bad effect or of vice which is inherent and remaining in the effect by reason of a bad vitious cause concurring in the producing of that effect contrary a bad euil cause is in it selfe a cause of euill but by an accident of good which good is in the effect by reason of a good cause concurring therewith to the producing of that effect Now then whatsoeuer God doth cannot be but most good most iust seeing both himselfe is most good hath no scope or ends of his counsels works but such as are most good alwaies agreeing with his nature law namely his glory the safety and saluation of his chosen But the creatures action is then good when both themselues are good haue a good end proposed vnto them of their action which end they haue when as they execute the commandement of God either generall or speciall being moued by the cogitation of this commandement whether they haue or haue not any knowledge of the counsell and purpose of God why hee commaundeth this or that thing to be done And the action of creatures is euil when both theÌ„selues are euil as also when being forsaken and not corrected by God they do a thing without his coÌ„mandement or not to that end as thereby to obay him Wherfore that worke the working and dooing whereof is ascribed by the Scripture both to God and to a corrupt euill creature must needs be good in respect of God euill in respect of the creature neither what is euill in that woorke may bee attributed to God neither what is good vnto the corrupt creature but by an accident So the afflicting or wasting of the Iewes was in subiect and matter one and the same worke which both God would ordeined and wrought the Assyrians yet in consideration and respect it was not the same but most diuerse For in respect of God purposing by this meanes to punish the sins of the Iewes it was the proper and most holy woorke of God in respect of the Assyrians who were both wicked cruell rauenous and bent not vpon the will of God which they were ignorant of but on the fulfilling of their owne rapacity hatred against the Law of God it was wicked robberie the proper woorke of the Assyrians as it is expressely shewed Jsay 10.7 c. which God neither would nor intended nor wrought in the Assyrians Wherefore neither the proper woorke of the Assyrians can be attributed to God nor the proper woorke of God vnto the Assyrians but by an accident because namely in one and the same losse and waste which God brought vpon the Iewes by the Assyrians the vniust woorke of the Assyrians did by an accident concur with the most iust worke of God Euen as a iudge is not therefore made a theefe nor a theefe made a iudge because a iust iudge putteth to death a robber by an euill executioner a theefe but one and the same slaughter is a iust punishment in respect of the iudge and murther in respect of the executioner beeing a theefe So a Captaine lawfully waging warre and laying waste the country of his enimies doth well but the wicked souldiers who fulfill therein and follow their owne lusts sinne So God afflicting Iob thereby to trie him doth iustly Satan and the Chaldeans spoiling vexing him for to fulfill their own lusts to destroy him do wickedly Wherefore it is a most true rule The end maketh the kinde of action either the same or diuerse 3 Reply That which is doone God simply not willing it God doth not will or worke sinne it selfe but only permitteth it is doone God willing it But sinne is it is sinne can not be doone god simplie not willing it Because God is omnipotent Therefore sinne must needes be doone God willing it And so it followeth that not only euils of paine and punishment but euils of crime and offence also are doone by the prouidence of God Answere The consequence of this argument is to be denied because the Maior hath not a sufficient enumeration for this member is wanting namely God permitting it For that which is not doone God not willing it may be done God either willing it or permitting it Or wee may aunswere that the Maior hath an ambiguity and doubtfull meaning
of Christ imputed vnto vs. Christ is in respect of our iustification 1. As the subiect matter wherein our iustice is 2. As the impellent cause because he obtaineth it 3. As the chief efficient because he together with his Father dooth iustifie vs and 4. Because he giueth vs faith whereby we beleeue and apprehend it The mercy of god is as the impellent cause thereof in GOD. Christes satisfaction is the formal cause of our iustification giuing the very life and being vnto it 7 Why Christes satisfaction is made ours by faith onelie Faith the apprehensiue instrument of Christs satisfaction CHRISTES satisfaction is made ours by faith alone 1. Because faith is the onely instrument which apprehendeth Christs satisfaction 2. Because the proper act operation of faith and not any other act of vertue is the application or apprehension of Christes merite yea faith is nothing else than the acceptation it selfe or apprehension of anothers iustice and of the merit of Christ 3. It is done by faith onely because we are iustified by the obiect of faith onely to wit by the merite of Christ alone besides which there is no iustice of ours nor any part thereof For wee are iustified freely for Christes sake without woorkes There is nothing which is our iustice and righteousnes before God neither in whole nor in part besides Christes merite onely by receiuing and beleeuing anothers iustice and not by working wee are iustified Not by working nor by meriting but by apprehension and acceptation only we are iust and righteous Wherefore we are iustified by faith onely by faith as Saint Paul speaketh as by a mean and instrument but not for faith as the Papistes say who wil admit both these maners of speaking as if faith were indeede the application whereby we apply vnto our selues Christes iustice but were also besides a certaine work or merite whereby we merite to bee iust Nowe the exclusiue particle onely is added that whatsoeuer merit of ours may bee excluded and faith vnderstoode with relation and respect to Christes merit which is our iustice That so the sense may be Christes merite iustifieth vs and not faith it selfe that which is apprehended dooth iustifie vs and not the instrument which doth apprehend Neuerthelesse this proposition Wee are iustified by faith may bee vnderstoode also without relation to wit wee are iustified by faith as by a meane But this proposition of the Apostle Faith was imputed to him for righteousnesse and other the like are necessarilie to bee vnderstoode with a relation vnto Christes merite and iustice Faith was imputed vnto him for righteousnes as faith is the apprehending instrument of righteousnes apprehended faith beeing as it were the hande wherewith the Iustice of Christ is receiued and by this means faith is wholy excluded frō that which is receiued by faith vnto which nature notwithstanding of faith it were repugnaunt That For faith we should be iust and righteous For if for faith then faith were nowe no longer an acceptation of anothers righteousnesse but were a merit and cause of our owne iustice neither should receiue anothers satisfaction which now it should haue no neede of Obiections against this Doctrine of Iustification 1 OBiection Wee are iustified by faith Faith is a woorke Therefore we are iustified by the woorkes thereof that is by the merite of faith Aunswere First the consequence of this reason is denied because more is in the conclusion than in the premisses of which premisses this onely followeth That by that worke wee are iustified as by an instrument or meane not as an impellent cause Nowe it is one thing to be iustified by faith that is to be iustified faith only being the meane to receiue it by the bloode of Christ and it is another thing to be iustified for faith that is for the merite of faith 2. The kinde of affirmation is diuerse for in the Maior faith is vnderstoode with relation to Christes merite in the Minor it is taken absolutelie and properlie 2 Obiection Justice is that whereby wee are formallie or essentiallie iust Faith is iustice Therefore we are by faith formallie and essentiallie iust Aunswere The consequence of this reason is to bee denied because the kinde of affirmation is diuers For the Maior is meant properly but the Minor * Per Metalepsin figuratiuely one thing being taken for another faith for the obiect of faith which is Christs merite and iustice 3 Obiection Faith is imputed for righteousnes as Paul saith Therefore for faith we are righteous Aunswere This is also figuratiuely vnderstood because by faith which is imputed for righteousnes is correlatiuely vnderstood the obiect of faith vnto which faith hath relation For Christs merite which is apprehended by faith is properly our iustice and this merite of Christ is the formall cause of our iustice The efficient of our iustice is God applying that merite of Christ vnto vs. The instrumental cause of our iustice is faith And therefore this proposition We are iustified by faith being legallie vnderstoode with the Papists is not true but blasphemous but being taken correlatiuely that is Euangelically with relation to Christs merit it is true For the correlatiue of faith is the merit of Christ which faith also as a ioint-relatiue or correlatiue respecteth and as an instrument apprehendeth 4 Obiection That which is not alone dooth not iustifie alone Faith is not alone Therefore faith dooth not iustifie alone Aunswere Here is a fallacie of composition the reason beeing deceitfully composed For the woorde alone is composed and ioined in the conclusion with the predicate which is the woorde iustifie but in the premisses or antecedent it is ioined with the verbe is The Argument is true if in the conclusion alone bee not sundred from the verbe is or from being which is the participle of is but bee ioined with it on this wise Faith therefore doth not iustifie alone that is being alone For if it be so vnderstood the argument is of force for faith is neuer without workes as her effects Faith iustifieth alone but is not alone when it iustifieth hauing workes accompanying it as effects of it but not as joint-ioint-causes with it of iustification 5 Obiect That which is required in those who are to be iustified without the same faith doth not iustifie Good works are required in those who are to be iustified Therefore without good workes faith doth not iustifie Auns The particle without is ambiguously doubtfully taken for in the Maior it is taken thus Faith without it that is being without it doth not iustifie So that the same fallacie is in this obiection which was in the former The Minor also of this obiection is more at large to be explaned In them who are to be iustified moe things are required but not after the same maner Faith is required in them who are to be iustified as an instrumēt apprehending anothers iustice Good works are required in them not as a cause of
iustification but as effectes of faith and as it were a testimony of their faith and thankefulnes For faith is not without her fruit Now to applie the merit of Christ is the proper act of faith but other good workes are not so though they also proceede from faith Wherefore also the apprehension of Christs merite is after another manner required in them that are to bee iustified than are other good woorkes For faith with this her proper act without which faith cannot bee considered is required as a necessarie instrument whereby we applie Christs merite vnto vs. But good woorkes are not required that by them we may apprehend Christs merite and much lesse that for them wee should be iustified but that by them we may shew our faith which without good woorkes is dead and is not knowen but by them Whatsoeuer is necessarily coherent with the cause that is not therefore necessarily required to the proper effect of that cause but good workes although they are necessarily coherent and ioined with faith yet are they not necessarie for the apprehension of Christs merit that we should ouer and besides faith by them also apply the same vnto vs. 6 Obiection The Messias bringeth euerlasting iustice and righteousnes Jmputed righteousnes is not eternall Therefore wee are not thereby iustified Aunswere It is said that Christes righteousnesse shall bee an euerlasting righteousnesse but after a diuerse manner For in the life to come wee shal bee iust after another manner than in this life For although we shall then be iust by the same righteousnes euen by the righteousnes of Christ imputed vnto vs yet with this shall also the legal iustice and righteousnesse be continued so that then also by the legall righteousnesse we shall be perfectly iust because now onely we are as concerning that but in part and beginning iust Each iustice both the iustice of the Law and the iustice of the Gospel is eternall by continuation And the iustice and righteousnesse of the Gospell that is the iustice of Christ imputed vnto vs is eternal by continuation of the imputation The iustice of the Law is eternal by continuation of good woorkes euen as it is continued by good woorkes first and beginning in this life vntill at length after this life it bee perfected and become perfect and so continue to al eternity 7 Obiection Knowledge dooth not iustifie Faith is a knowledge Therefore faith doth not iustifie Aunswere Knowledge alone dooth not iustifie But iustifieng faith is not a knoweledge onely but also a confidence and sure persuasion whereby as a meane we apply Christes merit vnto vs. And furthermore Knowledge and this sure persuasion are much different Knowledge is in the vnderstanding but this is in the will Therefore a sure persuasion or confidence is not only a knoweledge of a thing but also a will and purpose of doing or applieng that which wee knowe or of resting in it so that wee are thereby secure and take ioie of heart therein 8 Obiection Saint Iames saith cap. 2.24 Yee see then how that of workes a man is iustified and not of faith onelie Answere 1. Hee speaketh of that iustice whereby wee are iustified through our workes before men that is are approued iust or are found to be iustified but he speaketh not of that iustice whereby we are iustified before God that is whereby wee are reputed of God iust for vniust For hee saith in the same chapter Shew me thy faith by thy works and J will shewe thee my faith by my woorkes 2. He speaketh not of a true or liuely faith but of a dead faith which is without works 9 Obiection Euil workes condemne Therefore good workes iustifie Ans 1. These contraries are not matches for our euil works are perfectly euil our good workes are imperfectly good 2. Although our good woorkes were perfectly good yet should they not deserue eternal life because they are debts Vnto euil workes a reward is giuen by order of iustice vnto good works not so because we are obliged and bound to doe them For the creature is obliged vnto his creator neither may he of the contrary bind god vnto him by any works or means to benefit him 10 Obiect Saint Iohn saith 1. Ioh. 3.7 He that doth righteousnes is righteous Therefore not he that beleeueth Ans 1. He is righteous before mē that is by doing righteousnes he declareth himself righteous to others but before god we are righteous not by dooing righteousnes but by beleeuing 2. He sheweth there not how we are righteous but what the righteous are when he saith that hee that is regenerated is also iustified 11 Obiection Christ saith Luk. 7.47 Many sinnes are forgiuen her because she loued much Therfore good works are the cause of iustification Ans 1. Christ here reasoneth from the latter to the former from the effect which commeth after to the cause which goeth before Manie sins are forgiuen her Therefore shee loued much and because there is a great feeling in that woman of the benefite it must needes therefore bee that the benefite is great and many sins are forgiuen her That this is the meaning of Christes woordes appeareth by the parable which hee there vseth 2. Not euerie thing that is the cause of consequence in reason is also the cause of the thing it selfe which followeth in that consequence of reason Wherefore it is a fallacie of the consequent if it bee concluded Therefore for her loue manie sins are forgiuen her For the particle because which Christ vseth doth not alwaies signifie the cause of the thing folowing It foloweth not The Sunne is risen because it is day Therefore the day is cause of the rising of the Sun the contrarie rather is true 12 Obiection That which is not in the Scripture is not to be taught or reteined That wee are iustified by faith onelie is not in the Scripture neither the wordes themselues nor the sense of the woords Therefore it is not to be reteined Aunswere To the Maior we say That which is not in Scripture neither in words nor in sense is not to be reteined But that we are iustified by faith onely is conteined in Scripture as touching the sense thereof For we are said to be iustified freely Rom. 3.27 Gal. 2.16 Eph. 2.8 9. Tit. 3.5 1. Iohn 1.7 without the workes of the Law by faith without merite Not of anie righteousnesse which we haue doone The blood of Jesus Christ cleanseth vs from al sinne Therefore no woork shall be meritorious If no worke Therefore are we iustified by faith onely apprehending Christes merit Wherefore wee are necessarily to retaine the particle onelie 1. That all merite either of faith or our workes maie be remooued from this woork of our iustification 2. That it maie be shewed that faith not the merite of faith is necessarily required to iustice because the iustice or merite of Christ is giuen by faith onely and by this meane alone we receiue that iustice and
righteousnesse 13 Obiection Jf Christ hath satisfied for vs we shall not be iustified freelie but for merite and desert Aunswere Wee are iustified freely in respect of vs not freely in respect of Christ whom the sauing of vs cost full dearely 14 Obiection Reward presupposeth merite So that where reward is there is also merite For reward and merite are correlatiues whereof if one bee put the other is put also But euerlasting life is proposed as a reward for good workes therefore also the merite of good workes is euerlasting life Aunswere The Maior is sometimes true as concerning creatures as when men may merite or deserue of men But neither alwaies among men doth it folowe that there is merite where there is reward For men also oftentimes giue rewards not of merit or desert Now it is vnproperly saide of God that he proposeth eternal life vnto our workes as a reward for we can merite nothing at Gods hands by our workes But for this cause especially doth God say that he wil giue a reward to our workes thereby to shew that good workes are grateful and pleasing vnto him 15 Obiection That which is not required vnto iustification is not necessarie to be done Good woorkes are not required vnto iustification Therefore it is not necessarie to doe them Answere The Maior is false if it bee meant generallie because wee ought to doe good woorkes in token of thankefulnes But if the Maior be meant particularly then nothing can bee concluded the premisses beeing meere particular nowe good woorkes are as an effect without which the cause to wit faith cannot be Therefore good workes verily are necessarie but not as any cause or merite of iustice 16 Obiection He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one only But we besides that we are iustified by faith are iustified also by the merite and obedience of Christ therefore not by faith onely Answere He that is iustified by two things is not iustified by one onely that is after one and the same manner But we are iustified by two thinges after a diuerse manner For we are iustified by faith as by an instrument apprehending iustice but by the merit of Christ as by the formal cause of our iustice 17 Obiect Doctrine which maketh men profane is not to be deliuered But this doctrine that we are iustified by works maketh men profane Therefore it is not to be deliuered Ans If it should so fal out with any man it were but an accident Reply Euen those thinges which fall out to bee euils by an accident are to be eschued But this doctrine maketh men by an accident euil Therefore it is to be eschued Aunswere Those thinges which fal out to be euils by an accident are to be eschued if ther remain no greater cause for which they are not to bee omitted which by an accident make men euil But we haue greater causes why this doctrine ought to be deliuered 1. The commaundement of God 2. Our owne saluation 18 Obiection Christ hath brought vs eternall iustice This applied iustice is not eternal Therefore this is not our iustice but God himselfe is our iustice Aunswere The Lorde is our iustice that is our iustifier But that our applied iustice is eternal hath been shewed before because the imputation thereof is continued to all eternity That iustice also of the Lawe which is begunne in vs in this life shall bee continued and perfected in the life to come But that iustice which is God himselfe is not in vs because so God should be an accident to his creature and become iustice in man For iustice and vertue are thinges created in vs not the essence of God Moreouer Osiander who obiecteth this doth not discerne the cause from the effect As we liue not or are wise by the essence of God for this is all one as to say that wee are as wise as God so also we are not iust by the essence of God Wherefore nothing is more impious than to say That the essentiall iustice of the creatour is the iustice of the creatures for thereof it would follow that wee haue the iustice of God yea the verie essence of God The cause must be discerned from the effect increate iustice from created iustice 19 Obiection Where sinne is not there is no place for remission or imputation Jn the life to come sinne shall not be Therefore no place there for remission or imputation Aunswere In the life to come shall not bee remission of any sin then present but the remission which was graunted in this life shall continue and endure for euer And that conformity also which we shal haue with God in the life to come shal be an effect of this imputation 20 Obiection Ten Crownes are part of a hundred Crownes in paiment of a debt Therefore good workes also may be some part of our iustice Aunswere There is a dissimilitude because ten Crownes are a whole part of an hundred Crownes But our workes are not a whole and perfect part 21 Obiection It is said that Phinees worke and deede was imputed vnto him for righteousnes Answere The meaning of the place is That God did approue his worke but not that he was iustified by that worke Why we are iustified by christs merit onely We are iustified by the merite of Christ onely 1. For his glorie that his sacrifice might not bee extenuated and made of lesse value 2. For our owne comfort that we may be assured that our iustice doth not depend vpon our owne woorkes but vpon the sacrifice of Christ onely otherwise we should leese it a thousand times Why we are not Iustified partly by faith and partly by works Gal. 3.10 We are iustified not partly by faith partly by works 1. Because works are vnperfect and therefore our iustice also should be then vnperfect Cursed is euerie man that continueth not in all thinges which are written in the booke of the lawe to doe them 2. Although they were perfect yet are they due and debt So that wee cannot satisfie for an offence past by them When ye haue done all that yee are commaunded say wee are vnprofitable seruants 3. They are Gods works who worketh them in vs. 4. They are temporarie neither haue anie proportion with eternall blessinges 5. They are effectes of iustification therefore no cause 6. They are excluded that wee might not haue whereof to glorie 7. If they were part of our iustification our conscience should be destitute of stable and certaine comfort 8. Christ should haue died in vain 9. We should not haue the same way to saluation 10. Christ should not be a perfect Sauiour Why our works are vnperfect therefore cannot merit Now our workes are vnperfect 1. Because we omit manie things which we should doe and doe manie things which we should not doe 2. Because we blend and mingle euil with that good which wee doe that is wee doe good but wee doe it ill The thinges
excluded that coined deuise of good intentions when as namely men doe euill things that good things may come thereof likewise when they deuise and imagine woorkes which they thrust vpon God insteed of worship Neither doth it suffice if a woorke be not forbidden but it must also be commaunded if it shall serue for Gods worship 2 That the worke haue his original from a true faith which faith must be grounded and depending on the merite and intercession of the Mediatour and by which he may know both the person and the worke to be accepted of god for the mediatours sake For without faith it is vnpossible for anie man to please God Neither is such a faith â—â—ere sufficient which assureth thee that God will this â—r that this worke is commaunded of God For then the wicked also should doe that which God will but not with a true faith A true or iustifieng faith therefore stretcheth surder as both coÌ„prehending historicall faith and also which is the chiefest thing applieng the promise of the gospell vnto vs. Of this true faith are these things spoken Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Without faith it is vnpossible to please God And the reasons of both these sayings are not obscure because without faith there is no loue of God and so consequently no loue of our neighbour And whatsoeuer woorke ariseth not from the loue of God is hypocrisie 3 It is required that this woorke be referred principally iâ— the glorie of God onely Otherwise it shal proceed froÌ„ the loue of thy selfe not from the loue of God Whenas thou doest any thing thou must not heede or care what men speake whether they praise thee or no so that thou knowe that it pleaseth God But yet true glorie we may lawfully desire seeke for according to that Mat. 5.16 Let your light so shine before men that they may see your good woorkes By these former conditions all these woorkes are excluded 1 Which are sins in themselues and repugnant vnto Gods Lawe and his will reuelled in the word 2 Which are not repugnant vnto the Law neither in themselues good or euill but which may yet by an accident be made good or euil Workes not repugnant vnto the Lawe are made euill or sinnes by an accident when as they beeing not commaunded of God but imposed by men are done with an opinion of worshipping God therein 3 Which are good in themselues and commanded by God but yet are made sinnes by an accident in that they are vnlawfully doone as not arising from those lawfull causes by which the doers of them should be moued to do them and which in doing them they should respect that is they are not done by faith neither to this end chiefly that God might therein be honored 2 The woorkes of the regenerate and vnregenerate differ because the workes of the vnregenerate First Proceed not of faith Secondly Are not ioined with an inward obedience and therefore are doone dissemblingly and are meere hypocrisie Thirdly As they proceed not of the right cause so are they not referred to the chiefe end which is Gods glory 3 This difference which appeareth in the workes of the godly the wicked coÌ„firmeth also that the very morall works of the wicked are sins though yet not such sins as those are which in their owne nature are repugnant vnto Gods Lawe For these are sinnes by themselues and in their own kind but those either are sins onely by an accident namely by reason of defect because neither they come of faith neither are doone for Gods glorie Wherefore this consequence is not of force Al the workes of the wicked and of Paynims are sins Therefore they are al to be eschued For the defects only are to be eschued not the worke 2 How good workes may bee doone GOod workes may be done through the grace or assistance of the Holy Ghost onely and that by the regenerate onely whose heart is regenerated of the holy ghost by the gospel and that not onely in their first conuersion and regeneration but also by the perpetual and continual gouernment of the holy ghost who both worketh in them an acknoweledgement of sinne faith new obedience and also doth daily more and more encrease and confirme the same gifts in them Vnto this doctrine Saint Ierome also consenteth Let him be accursed saith hee who affirmeth the Lawe to be possible without the grace of the holy Ghost Wherefore out of this doctrine wee learne that men not as yet regenerated are able to doe no good and that euen the holiâ—st men sinne also except the benefite and blessing of regeneration bee continued This wee maie see in Peter and Dauid Without regeneration no one part of a good work can bee so much as begunne because All our righteousnesse is as the cloth of a menstruous womaÌ„ In which saying also the Prophet comprehendeth himselfe and euen the holiest among men If in the Saintes themselues nought else is found before God what then in the vnregenerate What these are able to perfourme wee see in the Epistle to the Romanes in the two first Chapters Now as by our selues we are not able to beginne good workes So neither are we our selues able to accomplish anie good worke For it is God which worketh in you both the will and the deede euen of his good pleasure Without imputed righteousnes we are all in the sight God abomination filth and dung But the righteousnes of christ is not imputed vnto vs before our conuersion Therefore it is vnpossible before our conuersion that either our selues or our worke should please God Faith is the cause of good woorkes Faith commeth from God Therefore the effect also shall come from God neither shall it goe before the cause therfore good works caÌ„not be before conuersion 3 Whether the workes of the Saintes be perfectly good THE woorks of the Saintes are not perfectly good or pure 1. Because the Saints which doe good workes doe many things which are sinnes in themselues for which they deserue to be cast out into euerlasting paines Cursed be he that abideth not in al. Deut. 27.26 Yea the holiest men doe many euil works commit many sins and acts which are euill in themselues Such was the sinne of Peter thrise denying Christ and of Dauid murthering Vrias committing adulterie willing to couer it and numbering the people 2. Because there is not that degree of goodnesse in those good woorkes that proceede from the Saintes which ought to be For their good workes are not so pure and good as God requireth Yea when the Saintes perfourme most holy workes yet are they not perfect but haue alwaies in this life defectes and are stained with sins For faith and the loue of God and our neighbour whence good workes flow are imperfect in vs in this life The effect then shall not bee perfect because the cause is not perfect For we do not perfectly know and loue God and our neighbour and
therefore neither doe we so cheerfullie and perfectlie as we ought perfourme these workes vnto God and our neighbour J see another Law in my members rebelling against the Lawe of my minde And this is the cause why the works of the godly cannot stand in iudgement 4 How our workes though not perfectlie good please God ALbeit our works be not done according vnto the Law but are contrariwise manie waies defiled they please God notwithstanding through faith and for the merit and intercession of Christ our Mediatour remaining now also intercessour for vs with his Father Whence Christ is called our High-Priest by whom our woorks are offered hee is called also the Altar wheron our works being put are pleasing to God whereas otherwise they would stincke in the sight of God The works of the person which pleaseth god so please God as the person himselfe doth Nowe the person pleaseth God by the imputation of the righteousnesse and sanctification or satisfaction of Christ beeing clad namelie with the righteousnes puritie and sanctification of Christ that is the person pleaseth God for the Mediatours sake and therefore the woorks also of the person are for the Mediatours sake pleasing and acceptable vnto god God doth not examine our vnperfect iustice our works as they are in themselues according to the rigour of the Law according to which he should rather condemn them but he regardeth and considereth them in his son Whereof it foloweth that we do as it were supplie and repaire our want defect with the perfection of Christs satisfaction 5 Why we are to doe good works OVT of the doctrine of free satisfaction humane reason reasoneth on this wise He is not bound himselfe to satisfie for whom another hath alreadie satisfied Christ hath satisfied for vs. Therefore there is no neede for vs to doe good woorks Aunswere There is more in the conclusion of this reason than in the premisses For this onely should follow be concluded Therefore we our selues are not bound to satisfie and this wee grant 1 In respect of Gods iustice which doth not exact a double paiment 2 In respect of our own saluation which otherwise should be none at all Reply Satisfaction is perfect obedience we are not bound to satisfaction Therefore neither are we bound to perfect obedience no not in the life to come For whō another hath satisfied for he himselfe is not enforced to satisfie But the obedience of Christ is not a ful satisfaction for our sinnes Therefore the fomer consequence is true Aunswere There is yet more concluded than the premisses would afford For this should followe that obedience is neuer at any time to bee performed of vs as thereby to satisfie for our sins already cōmitted or which shall be committed vntill the end of our life But it followeth not hereof that wee must not bee perfect in the life to come For then also wee shall bee bound to perfect obedience we shall be like vnto the Angels and our worke shall be perfectly good although that perfect obedience then due neither shall nor can be a satisfaction or ransome for our sinnes to wit for that obedience which we omitted in this life and yet was due to be performed of vs. For he that oweth twenty florens doth not pay his debt if he repay ten florens Wherefore the Maior proposition hath a double meaning and is true if it be taken in this sense whom an other hath satisfied for hee himselfe is not bound to satisfie to wit for those thinges for which satisfaction was made before So we are not bound to satisfie for our sinnes which we now commit For Christ hath fully perfectly satisfied his Father for all our sinnes and hath performed perfect obedience vnto the Lawe in our behalfe which otherwise wee shoulde haue performed in this life vnto the lawe and which we in this life omit and are no way able to perfourme Now for this end hath Christ satisfied for vs and redeemed vs by his bloud that at length we might in the life to come cease from sinne and performe that obedience vnto him which then we are to performe Neither dooth it for all this hereof followe that God requireth a double obedience or satisfaction of vs. For God excteth obedience hence-forward of vs as thereby to shewe our thankefulnesse and not to satisfie for those sins which we commit in this life For wee are neuer able to satisfie by that obedience which we owe for that obedience which we doe not performe neither is there any other besides Christs satisfaction required for that obedience which is not performed by vs in this life this satisfaction of christ is sufficient to expiate and doe away all our sinnes God notwithstanding doth in this life also require of vs this our obedience though yet it be but begun and vnperfect For seeing God so greatly hated sinne that satisfaction could not be made vnto him for sinne but by the death of his only begotten Sonne wee verily must also hate it euen as himselfe also cōmandeth vs to fly abhor it from our hart and soule And Christ hath not therefore freely redeemed vs that it might hence forwarde be lawful for vs to giue our selues ouer vnto sinne but that being freed from sinne wee should hereafter begin to liue to him onely This end of our redemption which Christ himselfe respected is cause sufficient for which al of vs should necessarily doe good workes because namelie they are testimonies and effectes of that new life which is at length after this life to be accōplished Besides this cause there are manie others also in like sort most weightie which we wil in few words declare We are to doe good woorkes in respect of God our selues and our neighbour In respect of God 1. Because of the commandement of God Let your light so shine before men that they maie see your good workes and glorifie your Father which is in heauen God requireth the beginning of obedience in this life and the perfection thereof in the life to come Wherefore we are necessarilie to giue our selues to good workes that wee maie perfourme due obedience vnto God who requireth it of vs. Joh. 15·12 This is my commaundement that yee loue one another Rom. 6.18 Beeing made free from sinne yee are made the seruantes of righteousnes 1. Thess 4.3 This is the wil of God euen your sanctification 2. For the glorie of God The setting foorth of Gods glorie is the chiefe end why God commaundeth and wil haue good works to be don of vs that both by them we maie worship and magnifie god and others seeing the same maie glorifie our heauenly father like as that saying of christ before alleadged out of S. Matthew doth teach vs. 3 Because of that thankefulnes which the regenerat ow. It is right and iust that by whom we are redeemed and from whom we receiue exceeding great benefites and those of al sorts we should also loue magnifie worship
not lawfull for me to doe as I wil with mine own He must needs be very impudent who hauing receiued of gift an hundred florens of a rich mā thinketh that he deserueth a thousand mo by receiuing those hundred whereas rather he is by this gift receiued bound to the rich man not the rich mā to him 5 No creature which doth euen the most perfect woorkes can thereby merit ought at Gods handes or bind God vnto him to giue him any thing according to order of iustice The reason hereof doth the Apostle yeeld Who hath giuen him first We deserue no more our preseruation than we deserued our creation He did owe nothing vnto vs when hee created vs so neither now doth he owe vs our preseruation neither is he bound to giue vs any thing We can bestow no benefit vpon our Creatour nay although we should neuer sinne yet can we not sufficiently declare and shew forth our thankefulnesse 6 There is no proportion betweene our woorkes which are vtterly vnperfect and the excellency of those great blessings and benefites which the Father giueth vs freelie in his Son 7 1. Cor. 1.31 He that reioiceth let him reioice in the Lorde But if we merit by our work remission of our sins man should haue in himselfe whereof to reioice neither should the glorie be giuen to God Rom. 4.2 If Abraham were iustified by his woorkes hee hath wherein to reioice but not with God 8 Wee are iust before we doe good woorkes Rom. 9.11.12.13 For yer Esau and Iacob were borne when they had neither done good nor euil that the purpose of God might remain according to election not by works but by him that calleth it was said vnto her The elder shall serue the yonger As it is written I haue loued Jacob and haue hated Esau 9 They who will be iustified by woorkes haue no sure and steadefast conscience Rom. 4.16 The inheritance is by faith that it might come by grace and the promise might be sure to all the seede 10 If wee should obtain righteousnesse by our own worke the promises should be made voide For in Abraham shall all the nations bee blessed And Christ also should haue died in vaine 11 There should not be one and the same reason and cause of our saluation if this Doctrine of the merit of woorkes should be admitted Abraham and the Theefe on the Crosse should haue bin otherwise iustified than we are iustified But there is but one way leading vs to saluation I am the way the truth and the life 1. Tim. 2.5 There is one Medatour betweene God and Men. Eph. 4 5. There is one Lorde one Faith one Baptisme Heb. 13.8 Jesus Christ yesterday and to day the same is also for euer Acts. 4.12 There is giuen no other name vnder Heauen whereby wee must bee saued Therefore we shall not be saued by good workes or for our good woorkes 12 Christ shoulde not giue vs full and perfect saluation and so neither should hee bee a perfect Sauiour if some thing were as yet required of vs whereby we should bee made iust But Christ is our perfect Sauiour For as Paul witnesseth God with his glorious grace hath made vs accepted in his beloued By whom we haue redemption through his bloud euen the forgiuenes of sinnes according to his rich grace And Ephes 2.8 By grace are yee saued through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God 1 Obiection They which haue not good woorkes cannot be saued Therefore good woorkes are necessarie vnto saluation Ans That without which we cannot be saued is necessary vnto saluation that is as a part of saluation or as an accident of saluation not as a cause of saluation 2 Obiection God calleth those blessings which hee promiseth to them that doe good workes rewardes and meed Now meede presupposeth merit Therefore good workes doe merit Aunswere Amongest creatures sometimes it doth but neuer with god But they are called the rewardes or meede of our woorkes in respect of God forasmuch as hee recompenseth most fully those thinges which wee doe neither yet is that recompence due For there can come no commoditie vnto God by vs therefore God is not bound no not to make the least recompence For he that stādeth no waies in need of our works and vnto whom they can ad or bring nothing at al of him doubtles wee are not able to merite or deserue any thing But there commeth good rather vnto our selues by good workes For the good works which we doe are a conformity with God therefore are Gods gift by which gift and benefit we are bound vnto god but not god vnto vs. Wherfore it is no lesse absurde to say that we merite saluation at gods hāds by good works than if one should say Thou hast giuen me an hundred florns Therefore thou oughtest also to giue me a thousand florens Obiection 3. But whereby may we be assured that we haue good works Aunswere 1. By the peace of conscience 2. By our conuersion 3. By the fruites of conuersion OF THE LAW OF GOD OR OF THE DECALOG AND TEN COMMANDEMENTES THE chiefe Questions 1 What the Law is in general 2 What are the parts of the Law 3 What is the vse of the Law 4 Jn what the Lawe differeth from the gospell 5 How far the Law is abrogated 6 How the Decalog is diuided 7 What is the meaning of the Decalog and of euerie commandement thereof 1 What the Law is in general THE Lawe in generall is a sentence or decree commaunding things that are honest binding creatures endued with reason vnto obedience with a promise of rewarde and a commination or threatning of punishment It is a sentence commaunding thinges that are honest otherwise it is no Law It bindeth creatures endued with reason for the Lawe was not made for them who are not bound to obedience With a promise of reward The Law freely promiseth blessings vnto those who perfourme obedience because no obedience can be meritorious before God Obiection But the gospell also promiseth freelie good things blessings Therefore the Law differeth not from the gospell Answ The Law promiseth freely after one maner and the Gospel after another The law promiseth freely with a condition of our obedience But the gospel promiseth freely without the works of the Law with a condition of faith not with a condition of our obedience Wherefore the gospell dooth not promise blessings freely without al condition but without such a condition as wherewith the Lawe promiseth blessinges vnto vs. And with a commination or threatning of punishment Otherwise the Lawe were a vaine and empty sound and shoulde effect nothing Moreouer the Latine woorde Lex which signifieth the Law is deriued from Lego which signifieth to reade and publish or from Lego which signifieth to choose With the former deriuation agreeth the Hebrue woorde with the latter the greeke woord For in Greeke the Lawe is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
repentance Obiection 4. Paul obtained remission neither yet did he forgiue al of them their trespasser because he saith 2. Tim. 4.14 Alexander the Copper-smith hath done me much euil the Lord rewarde him according to his woorkes Therefore it is not necessarie that we shoulde forgiue Answere There is a threefold remission or forgiuing 1. Of reuenge This belongeth to all men because all men ought to remit and forgiue reuenge Hereof speaketh this petition and this Paul did forgiue Alexander 2. Of punishment This as all can not inflict so neither can all remit but neither they also vnto whom yet the same otherwise is committed ought alwaies to remit this but onely for certaine causes For God will haue the execution of his iustice and Lawe But Paul forgaue Alexander the punishment also as much as concerned himselfe yet hee will notwithstanding haue him punished of God but with a condition that is if hee persist in sinne 3. Of iudgement This is not alwaies remitted because it is written Mat. 10.16 Bee yee simple as Doues and wise as Serpents that is let vs not call him good who is euil or contrarily Wherefore we are also to reteine a true iudgement concerning others For God who forbiddeth lying will not haue vs to iudge of knaues that they are honest men but hee will haue vs to discerne the good from the bad THE SIXT PETITION AND leade vs not into temptation But deliuer vs from euill Here some make one some two petitions but we are not to striue so that nothing of the doctrine be taken away but that this be made plaine Now they are rather two partes of one petition Leade vs not into temptation is a petition of deliuerie from future euil Deliuer vs from euil is a petition of deliuerie froÌ„ present euil The special questions 1 What temptation is THERE are two causes of temptations The one is from God the other from the Diuel and the flesh The temptation wherby God tempteth vs is a tryal of our faith godlines and obedience by the Crosse and other encumbrances which are opposed to euery one that our faith patience and constancie may be manifested and made knowen both to our selues and others So God is said to haue tempted Abraham Ioseph Job Dauid The temptation whereby the Diuel and our flesh and the wicked also tempt vs is euerie soliciting to sinne which soliciting it selfe also is sinne So the Diuel tempted Iob that hee might seduce and withdrawe him from God whom hee had before loued and serued albeit the matter fell out otherwise than the Diuel would haue it Here is vnderstood by the name of temptation that temptation of God that is the trial of our faith godlines and patience which God worketh by whatsoeuer lets or hinderances of our saluation as by all euils by the Diuel the flesh our lusts the world afflictions calamities the crosse that our faith constancie and hope may bee made knowen vnto our selues others Obiection But God tempteth no man Aunswere God tempteth no man that is by soliciting him to sinne or euil but hee tempteth by proouing and trying vs. The Diuels the woorld our flesh tempt vs that is solicite vs to euils and withdrawe vs from God But God as he tempteth no man and yet is said to haue tempted Abraham Iob Dauid that is to haue tried their faith and constaâ—â—ie by afflictions the crosse so by the same he trieth our faith hope patience loue inuocation constancy whether we wil or no worship serue him also in afflictions Hereby we easily vnderstand seeing temptation is attributed vnto the Diuel to the corrupt lusts and inclinations of men in what sense God maie bee saide to tempt or not to tempt men For Satan tempteth both offering occasions of sinning without and instigating within to sinne thereby to drawe men headlong into destruction and to reproch God Corrupt inclinations tempt because they bend and are prone to actions by god forbidden But god tempteth not to destroy vs nor to cause vs to sin but to trie exercise vs when either hee sendeth calamity vpon vs or permitteth the Diuel or men or our flesh to prouoke inuite vs to sin hiding for a while his grace efficacy in preseruing ruling vs that our faith constaÌ„cy may be made more known apparant not verily vnto god himself as who froÌ„ euerlasting knoweth what how much it is and how much also hereafter it shall bee by his fauour and blessing but vnto our selues and others that so also a trust full persuasion of gods presence protection may be confirmed in vs by the examples of our deliueraunce and in others a desire of folowing our example may be kindled through the beholding of our perseuerance and that in al of vs maie be raised and stirred vp true gratitude and thankefulnes towards god who deliuereth his out of temptations So Gen. 22. God tempteth Abraham commaunding him to sacrifice his sonne Jsaack Exod. 15. He is said to haue tempted the people with want of water Exod. 16. Hee commandeth Manna to be gathered as much as was sufficient for euery daie that hee might tempt or prooue the people whether they woulde walk according to his Lawe or no. Deutr. 13. Hee is said to tempt the people by false Prophetes that he might know whether they loued him with al their heart and with al their soule 2. Chron. 32. Jn the embassage of the Princes of Babel god left Hezechia to tempt or try him and to know al that was in his heart Wherefore this praier which christ taught vs Lead vs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euil speaketh not simply of al trial manifestation of our faith and godlinesse vnto which also Dauid offereth himselfe of his owne accord Psal 26. saying Proue me O Lord and trie me examine my reines and mine heart And Saint Iames speaketh not of our triall but of our incitement to sinne cap. 1.13 Let no man saie when hee is tempted J am tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with euil neither tempteth he anie man But euery man is tempted when he is drawn awaie by his owne concupiscense and is entised Then when lust hath conceiued it bringeth foorth sinne and sinne when it is finished bringeth forth death It is also hereby manifest how god punisheth the wicked or chastiseth or tempteth the godlie by euil spirites neither yet is hee the cause or partaker of those sinnes which the diuels commit For that by the wicked the wicked are punished or the good chastised or exercised it is the righteous and holy work of Gods diuine will but that the wicked execute the iudgement of God by sinning that commeth not so to passe by any fault of god himself but through the proper corruptioÌ„ of the wicked and such as themselues haue purchased god neither willing nor allowing nor working nor furthering their sinne but in his most iust iudgement only permitting it when exequuting
manie Sacramentes there are of the new Testament 707 Certain conclusions of the sacraments in generall 708 The confirmation of such of the former conclusions as most require it 711 Of Baptisme VVhat Baptisme is 717 VVhat are the ends of Baptisme 719 VVhat is the sense meaning of the wordes of the institution of Baptisme 722 vvhat are the formes and manners of speaking of Baptisme 724 VVho are to bee baptized 725 Certaine obiections against the Baptisme of Infants refuted 727 VVhat is the right and lawfull vse of Baptisme 730 In place whereof Baptisme succeeded 730 How Baptisme agreeth with circumcision wherein it differeth from it 731 Certaine conclusions of Baptisme 732 Of Circumcision VVhat circumcision is 735 vvhat are the ends of circumcisioÌ„ 736 vvhy circumcision is abolished 736 vvhy Christ was circumcised 737 Of the Lords Supper vvhat the supper of the Lord is 737 vvhat are the endes of the Lords supper 739 vvhat the supper differeth from Baptisme 741 vvhat is the sense or meaning of the institution of the Lordes supper 743 Against the Transubstantiation of the Papists 755 A refutation of obiections framed to confirme consubstantiation 757 vvhat is the difference betweene the Lords Supper and the Popish Masse 761 vvhat is the right and lawfull vse of the supper 766 vvhat the wicked receiue in the Lords supper 767 Who ought to approch to the Lordes Supper 768 Who ought to be admitted to the lords Supper 769 Certain conclusions of the Supper 771 The first appendix or addition vnto the former treatise of the Supper containing certaine principal arguments of the Consubstantiaries against the sincere doctrine of the Lords Supper the Sacramentaries as they call them together with a refutation of them 777 Certain arguments of the Consubstantiaries whereby they goe about to ouerthrowe the doctrine of the Lords Supper together with the refutation of them 777 The shiftes of the Consubstantiaries whereby they go about to elude and shift off certain of our obiections not al for mo are obiected against them 783 Certaine reasons whereby it is proued that the bodie of Christ is not present either In or Vnder or At the bread of the Lords Supper neither is corporallie eaten Vnder With In or At the Bread 786 The second appendix or addition containing arguments whereby the opinion of the Vbiquitaries is refelled the truth of sounde doctrine confirmed 786 The generall points wherein the Churches which professe the gospel agree or disagree in the controuersie concerning the Lordes Supper 790. 791 Of the power of the keies of the kingdome of Heauen and of Excommunication What the power is of the keies giuen vnto the Church 792 Vnto whom the power of the keies is committed 793 Why the power of the keies is necessarie 794 How the power of the keies differeth from ciuil power 797 What order ought to bee obserued in exercising the power of the keies 798 Certaine arguments assoiled whereby some haue endeuored to abolish excommunication 804 THE THIRD PART OF MANS THANKFVLNES Of Conuersion VVHAT conuersion is 825 In what the conuersion of the godly differeth from the repentaunce of the wicked 826 What are the parts of conuersion 827 What are the causes of conuersion 829 What are the effects of conuersion 830 Of good-workes What good workes are 831 How good workes may bee done 833 vvhether the workes of the Saints bee perfectly good 834 How our workes though not perfectly good please God 834 vvhy we are to doe good works vvhether good woorkes merite anie thing before God 839 Of the Lawe of God or Of the Decalog vvhat the Law is in generall 852 vvhat the vse of the lawe is 849 In what the lawe differeth from the Gospell 859 How farre the law is abrogated 859 How the Decalogue is diuided 867 vvhat is the substance and meaning of the Decalogue and of euerie commandement thereof 870 Certain conclusions of the Decalogue 873 The first commaundement 876 The second commandement 886 Of Jmages How farre Images may be allowed to be made 894 vvhy Images are to bee abolished in the churches of christians 894 How they are to be abolished 896 Certaine obiections of the Papistes in defence of Images 896 Of Superstiton 900. 901. 902 Of Traditions 902 903 c. The third commaundement 910 Of an oath or swearing vvhat an oath is 914 By whom we must sweare 915 Of what thinges we are to sweare 916 vvhether all oathes are to be kept 917 vvhether a christian may take a right and lawful oath 920 The obiections of the Papistes praying vnto Saints departed 930 The fourth commaundement 941 Of the Sabboth How manifold the Sabboth is 945 The causes for which the Sabboth day was instituted 947 How the Sabboth is sanctified or kept holy how broken or profaned 948. 953 How the Sabboth belongeth vnto vs. 954 Obiections against the abrogating of the ceremonial Sabboth 955 Of Ceremonies vvhat ceremonies are 958 How the ceremonial lawes differ from the Morall 958 How many sortes of ceremonies there are 958 vvhether the church may ordaine ceremonies 959 Of the Ministerie vvhat the ministerie is 959 vvhat are the degrees of Ministers 959 For what end and purpose the ministerie was instituted 960 Vnto whome the ministery is to bee committed 961 vvhat are the duties and functions of ministers 961 The fift commaundement 962 The sixt commaundement 973 The seuenth commandement 981 Of Marriage vvhat mariage is 984 vvhat are the cause of mariage 985 vvhether mariage bee a thing indifferent 986 vvhat are the 〈◊〉 of married persons 986 The Eight commandement 987 The Ninth commaundement 993 The Tenth commaundement 998 How the Law is possible 100â— what is the vse of the lawe 1002 Of Praier vvhat praier is and howe many sortes of praier there are 1003 vvhy praier is necessarie 1004 vvhat is required to true praier 1005 vvhat is the forme of praier by Christ prescribed 1009 The proeme of the Lords praier 1010 The first petition 1014 The second petition 1017 vvhat how manifold the kingdome of God is 1017. 1019 vvho is King and who subiects in Gods kingdome 102â— The Lawes benefites and blessings 〈◊〉 this kingdome 1021 In what place it to administred 1022 The time of durauâ—ce of this kingdom 10â—â— How this kingdome coÌ„meth why 〈◊〉 are to desire the comming thereof 10â—â— The third petition 〈◊〉 vvhat we â—eâ—â—e 〈◊〉 vvherefore we desire that God 〈◊〉 done and of whom it is done in 〈◊〉 The fourth petition 1027 why we are 〈…〉 corporal blessings 1028 How they are to be desired 1029 vvhy Christ comprised them vnder the name of Bread 1030 vvherefore christ calleth it Our Bread also Daily Bread and addeth This Daie 1031 vvhether it bee lawful to desire riches 10â—2 vvhether it bee lawefull to put vp anie thing for hereafter 1033 The fift petition 1034 vvhat christ calleth Debtes and what Remission of sinnes 1035 vvhy we are to desire remission of sins and how they are remitted vnto vs 1036 The sixt petition what Temptation is 〈◊〉 1039 â—hat is To lead into Temptation 1041 vvhat is To deliuer vs from euil 1042 â—hy thy this petition is necessary 1042 The conclusion of the Lordes praier 1046 Amen 1047 FINIS
were very good Psal 5. Because thou art not a God that loueth wickednes Iames. 1. Let no man say when he is tempted I am tempted of God Eccle. 15. Saie not thou it is through the Lord that I turne backe for thou oughtest not to doe the thinges that he hateth To these and verie manie the like speaches maie be added the great and most perfect goodnes of God so that no effect of his is euill And because God is true and far from all dissembling and guile neither can destroie or denie himselfe 2. Tim. 2. it is certain that plaine contradictorie willes cannot be in him But he testifieth in his law which is as it were a glas of that puritie which is in God that hee hath a horrible hatred of sinne Wherefore he doth not will anie and much lesse causeth or furdereth it Moreouer that which one himselfe worketh in an other hee cannot of right punish But God doth most iustlie punish al sinnes Wherefore he neither will nor causeth anie sin Rom. 3. Is God vnrighteous which punisheth God forbid else how shall God iudge the world Lastlie God doth neither wil nor cause that which destroieth his image sin is the destruction of the image of God Wherefore God doth neither will nor cause it Of this wee conclude that God is not the author of sinne but that the originall of euill springeth from man himselfe by the instigation of the Deuill yet so neuerthelesse that we say that the Deuill being at the first corrupted did corrupt man The cause of sin is to be sought in our first father through the Deuils instigation and so by discent to be found in vs. but coulde haue done nothing except man of his owne accord had consented to euill Here are we to remember againe the fall of our father Adam God made Adam to his owne image and similitude that is he made him most good vncorrupt holy righteous and immortall hee furnished him with most excellent giftes that nothing might be wanting vnto him to all blessednes in God Wherefore his vnderstanding was wholy diuine his will most free and most holy hee had power of dooing good and euill a law was giuen him of God which shewed him what he should doe or what he should not doe For the Lord said Thou shalt not eate of the fruite of the tree of knowledge both of good and euill God simply required of him obedience and faith and that whole Adam should depende of him and that not constrained by necessitie but shoulde doe it freely God made man from the beginning and left him in the hand of his counsel saying If thou wilt thou shalt obserue the commandements and testifie thy good will Therefore when the Serpent tempted man and counsailed him to tast of the forbidden tree man was not ignoraunt that the counsaile of the Serpent did not agree with the commaundement of God The Lorde compelled him not neither did Satan compell him in the Serpent For God had said Ye shall not eate of that tree neither shall ye touch it least ye die Wherefore it was in the hand of his counsaile to eat or not to eate God declared vnto him his will plainely charging him that he should not eate and adding the perill he did withdraw him from eating least perhaps thou die Satan also as neither coulde hee did not vse any force but did probably moue him vnto it at length did ouercome him For when the will of the woman declined to the word of the Deuill her minde departed from the worde of God and reiecting a good lawe she committeth an euill worke afterwardes she drewe on her husband willingly following her to bee partaker of her sinne That doth the Scripture inculcate in these wordes So the woman seeing that the tree was good for meate Gen. 3.6 and that it was pleasant to the eies and a tree to be desired to get knowledge tooke of the fruit thereof and did eate and gaue also to her husband with her and hee did eate Here haue you the beginning of the euill the Deuill and that which moued the will of man that is the false commendation of the Deuill and euen a mere lie and the delectable shewe and sightlines of the tree Wherefore Adam and Eue doe of their owne accord that which they doe being lead with a hope of more excellent wisedome which the Seducer had lyingly promised them The beginning of sinne from the Deuil and the free election of man corrupted by his seducement Wee conclude therefore that sinne hath his beginning not from God who forbiddeth euill but from the Deuill the free election of man which was corrupted by the Deuils falshood And therefore the Deuill and mans corrupted will obeying him are the most true cause of sinne This euill flowed from our first Parents vnto all their posteritie so that sinne hath not else whence his beginning than from our selues and our corrupt iudgement and wicked will and the suggestion of Saran For an euill roote and that first corruption bringeth forth of it a rotten braunch agreeable to the nature thereof which Satan now also setteth forwarde and laboreth it as it were plantes by his guiles and lies but in vaine doth he labour except we yeeld our selues to bee fashioned and dressed by him That is called originall sinne which proceedeth from the first originall that is What is originall sinne was deriued from the first parent into all by propagation or generation For this sinne wee bring with vs in our nature out of our mothers wombe into this life I was borne in iniquitie and in sinne hath my mother conceiued me And of the Deuill Christ speaketh thus Hee hath beene a murtherer from the beginning and abode not in the truth because there is no truth in him When he speaketh a lie then speaketh he of his owne for he is a lier and the father thereof To this may be added this reason that sinne cannot be a proper natural effect of any cause but of that which hath power to doe against the law But this no nature hath power to doe Sinne the proper effect of a reasonable nature transgressing the law besides the nature of Angels and of men For God is a law vnto himselfe and can not doe or intend any thing against his lawe And other creatures whereas they are not indued with reason and therefore the law not made for them they cannot commit sinne because take away the law and there is no place left for sinne Wherefore it necessarily foloweth that sinne is such an effect as agreeth to those Angels alone who fell and to men The first cause of the first sinne the Deuil The second mans will The first sinne cause of all sins thence folowing But there is an order to bee obserued in these causes For the cause of the first sinne in Paradise is the Deuil instigating the will of man assenting or obaying these former
It is the propertie of him that is merciful to exercise mercie tru on beleeuers and such as are penitent 1 Reply It is the propertie of him that is mercifull to pardon men whether they be penitent or not penitent Answere This is a false definition of mercy 2 Reply Faith and repentance are not the cause of mercie Therefore by this aunswere neither should the penitent obtaine mercy that is deliuerance from death Aunswere I graunt that faith and repentance are not the cause of mercie and that it is not done for their repentance but for the satisfaction and punishment of Christ only yet with this condition that we apply this by a true faith vnto our selues and repent Reply Naie neither on the penitent doth God exercise mercie For if god punish all sinnes with sufficient punishment in Christ he is not mercifull Aunswere I deny the consequence of this proposition because he gaue vs his Sonne freelie who should satisfie for vs. This satisfaction did the Gospel adde God remitteth freelie our sins in that he giueth vs freely that recompence which he taketh for them 4 Obiection Hee that remitteth not without all recompence doth not remitte freely and so not of free mercy God remitteth not without all recompence Therefore hee remitteth not freely Answer God remitteth not vnto vs our sinnes freely in respect of christ but freelie in respect of vs because hee exacteth nothing of vs and freely giueth vnto vs Christes satisfaction Although then he wil haue satisfaction to be made by another euen by Christ yet doth he remit vnto vs our sins freely because he as it hath been said giueth vs Christ of his free mercy who might satisfie for vs and from him proceedeth this satisfaction and application of it vnto vs. For he causeth vs both by his election the satisfaction of Christ freely giuen of him vnto vs by the giuing of his holy spirit to receiue Christ by faith and this he doth for no other cause but only of his free mercy Yee are saued by grace First because satisfaction is not made by vs. Secondly because the price for sinnes is imputed vnto vs. Reply What mercy god extendeth to the wicked against that which was aunswered to the second Obiection that is that the mercy of God is extended also to the wicked The Prophet Ieremy saith Forgiue not their iniquity neither put out their sinne from thy sight The mercy therefore of God is not extended to the reprobate Aunswere 1. It is true when God denieth his mercy vnto them repenting and except he haue iust cause why hee doth not saue all But God hath most iust cause why he suffereth some to perish euen the manifestation of his iustice and power in punishing the wicked 2. It is to bee vnderstoode of that degree of his mercie which he sheweth towardes his chosen euen of this mercy whereby he giueth them remission of sinnes his holy spirit and life euerlasting But it is not to be graunted concerning that generall mercie whereby hee guideth and gouerneth all creatures Replie against that which is saide in the same Aunswere to the Second Obiection That God is not delighted with the destruction of the wicked The Lorde saith in Isaiah Ah I will ease me of mine aduersaries Therefore God is delighted with the destruction of his enemies Aunswere These and the like speeches are spoken after the order of men by an anthropopathie or humane affection and by them is signified That God will the execution of his iustice but is not delighted with the death or destruction of men as beeing his creatures It is requisite that this doctrine bee knowen in the Church That knowing howe great an euil sinne is The vse of this doctrine of sinne in the church wee maie yeelde the praise of iustice vnto God who doth most seuerelie punish it and that we maie abhor al sinnes with our whole heart and desire the more earnestlie to bee fensed and defended of God against all sinne and that not extenuating or lessening anie wee flatter our selues in a conceit of our owne righteousnesse or in hope of escaping that measuring our sinne by the Law of God neither esteeming euill good or good euill wee loose our consciences when God bindeth them or binde them when God looseth them and acknowledging the remnant of sinne in vs and our manifolde fallings we should not despaire of pardon flieng to God the mediatour with bouldnesse that also we maie be able to discerne our selues from the wicked and prophane men in whom sinne raigneth and from all those that sinne against the holie ghost and that wee maie conceiue in our minde hope and confidence of Gods mercie that we laie not the cause and fault of our sinnes destruction on God but remēber that it is to be sought in our selues that knowing there are degrees of punishments sinnes we ad not sinnes to sinnes but consider that lesser sinnes shal be punished with lesser punishments and greater with greater that remembring the sins of the parents are punished also in their posteritie wee spare not onelie our selues but our posteritie also in auoiding sinne that wee maie giue and render thankes vnto God for this benefit that hee for his own glorie and the gathering and saluation of his Church doth maintaine and continue also amongst the wicked some order of vertue and discipline And last of all that true and perpetuall thankefulnesse maie be kindled in vs towardes God and his Sonne our Lord Iesus Christ in that he hath deliuered vs frō these great euils sinne and the paines and punishment of sinne OF THE CREATION OF MAN The necessity of this Doctrine SEEING that God would especially open manifest himselfe in the creatiō of angels men necessary for man is the knowledge of himselfe both for that God wil be knowen by his own image which he engraued in mans nature also because without it we neither aspire nor attaine to that end to the which we were created Now the knowlege of our selfe is two-fold That is of man vncorrupted such as hee was made of God shal be after his restoring accōplished of man fallē into sin corrupted such as he now is The first is of the excellency and happines the other of the misery of mankind Now this common place is annexed vnto the former of sinne 1. Because when it is proued that there is sinne Why it is placed next the discourse of sinne and that the nature of man is sinfull the question straight ariseth whether God created man subiect to sinne And if not so how then For out of the doctrine concerning Original sinne this obiection seemeth to follow Man is a sinner Man was created of God Therefore God created man a sinner Whereunto our answere is that it is a fallacie of the Accident or that more is brought in the Conclusion than was in the Antecedent Secondly This place is annexed that it may be vnderstood
a voluntary assent folowing chooseth that which God wil sheweth to be chosen 3 It appertaineth as well to the vnderstanding as vnto the will that God as he vnchangeably knoweth all things 3 God determined all things which he will from euerlasting and wil them vnchangeablie we determine what we wiâ—l in time many times change from that which we fiâ—st determine so also hath determined from euerlasting and will vnchangeablie al thinges which are done as they are good permitteth them as they are sins Now as the creatures notions and iudgements of thinges so also their willes are chaungeable so that they will that which before they would not and will not that which before they woulde For seeing that al the counsels of God are most good most iust and most wise he neuer disliketh correcteth or changeth them as often-times men doe when as they doe perceiue themselues to haue determined anie thing vnaduisedly before Neither doth God depend on their second causes either motions actions or mutations or doth aduise according to them as doth the creature but himselfe beeing the first cause al the actions of al creatures depend on him For he doth not as men take aduise concerning the end by viewe of meanes or things antecedent leading thereunto but according vnto his decree concerning the end consequent he doth decree ordaine the means antecedents that is God woorketh not thereafter as hee seeth the second causes to woorke but he causeth or permitteth the second causes so to worke as he himselfe hath decreed and purposed to woorke Hither appertaine those sayings Num. 23. God is not as man that he shoulde lie Mal. 3. I am the Lord and change not The vnchangeablenes of Gods purpose taketh not away the libertie of his will Obiection Hee that can not change his counsaile and purpose hath not free-will But God cannot change his counsail and purpose which he hath once appointed Therefore his will is not free First we deny the Maior For not he which doth not change his purpose which hee hath once appointed hath not liberty of wil but he which could not purpose any other thing beeing let by some external cause But the liberty of god consisteth not in the change of his wil or purpose but in this that God will all thinges whatsoeuer hee will altogether with his will and of himselfe and could haue hadde otherwise decreed or not decreed all thinges which hee decreed from euerlasting of the creation preseruation and gouernment of things according to these sayings Matthew 19. Luk. 18. With men this is impossible but with God al thinges are possible These and the like sayings shew that God hath so appointed from euerlasting with himselfe the creation of things and the gathering sauing of his church not as if he could not haue not don this or not haue appointed it otherwise but because so it seemed good to him neither must men seeke anie superior cause thaÌ„ his wil of al his diuine works which he exerciseth in his creatures neither is there any other necessitie to be found in them than which dependeth of the most free appointment of god himselfe For as to resolue of such a purpose as is to be changed so also to change it either to better or to worse is rather seruitude or bondage than freedoome and libertie For it proceedeth of ignorance or impotencie For they change their counsels and purposes who either or in taking them or are not able to perfourme the counsaile which they haue taken But to resolue of such a purpose as might alike either haue beene decreed or not decreed and which after it is decreed is neither changed nor to be changed at any time this is perfect and diuine libertie Nowe God whatsoeuer he hath decreed could either not haue decreed it at al or haue decreed it otherwise And that he changeth not that which he hath once decreed the perfectnes of his nature euen his infinit wisedome and goodnesse is cause thereof For most wisely and rightlie doth he decree all thinges constantlie persisteth in that which is good right Wherfore the immutability in god doth aswell not diminish his libertie as his immortalitie other things which are proper vnto his diuinitie Secondly if any man vrge that it is a point of liberty not onlie to resolue of anie aduise what he will but after he hath resolued to bee able either to followe it or to change it we vnderstand by those things which haue beene alreadie spoken that this doth agree to the creatures which may or in their purposes and therefore stand in need of changes alterations but not to god who can neuer er and therefore requireth no change of his purpose Lastly if they reply That not to be able to alter a purpose once vndertaken is a defect of abilitie or power therefore against the libertie of God we answere that the antecedent of this reply is true if the change of it be impossible by reason of some impediment comming from some external cause or by reason of defect of nature or ability but the antecedent is most false if the impossibilitie of change proceed from a perfection of that nature which is not changed from a wisedome and rightnesse of that purpose which is vnchangeable and from a perseuerance and constancy of the will in that which is good and right after which sort it is apparant to be in God Gods directing of out wil taketh not away the lâ—bertie thereof But against that where it was said that the wils of all creatures are so guided by God that neither they are able to will what hee from euerlasting hath not decreed neither not to will what hee hath decreed for them to will more question is vsed to bee made 1 That which is ruled by the vnchangeable will of God doth not woorcke freelie The will of Angels and men is ruled by the vnchangeable will of God Therefore either it hath no libertie or the choise which it maketh is not tied to the will of God Answere wee make to the maior by a distinction It is not a free agent which is so ruled by God as it hath no deliberation and election of his owne But that which GOD so ruleth as hee sheweth the obiect vnto the vnderstanding and by it effectuallie mooueth and affecteth the will to choose it that dooth notwithstanding freelie woorke albeit it bee inclined at the becke and will of GOD whither hee will haue it For to woorcke freely in the creatures is not to woorcke without anie ones gouernment but with deliberation and with a proper and selfe-motion of the will although this motion be elsewhence raised ruled Wherefore it is not the immutabilitie and operation of the diuine will and prouidence which is against this libertie but a priuation and constrainte of iudgement which is an impulsion or a motion proceeding not from an inwarde cause or facultie but
at the creation by his perpetuall efficacy and operation and doth inspire into all by his vertue true notions and right election But if they challenge a libertie vnto the creatures depending of no other cause whereby it is guided wee denie their whole argument as knowing such a liberty of creatures to stand against the whole Scripture and that it only agreeth vnto God For him alone doe al things serue In him we liue and moue and haue our being he giueth vnto al not only life or power of mouing themselues but euen breathing too that is very mouing it selfe To the same tendeth this Obiection also If the will The will worketh togither with God is not mere passiue when it is conuerted of GOD or turned and inclined to other Obiectes cannot with-stand it is euen meere passiue and so woorcketh not at all But this consequence deceiueth them because there is not a sufficient enumeration in the Antecedent of those actions which the will may haue when it is mooued of GOD. For it is able not only to withstand God mouing it but also of it owne proper motion to assent and obey him And when it doth this it is not idle neither doth it onely suffer or is mooued but it selfe exerciseth and mooueth her owne actions And yet this is to bee vnderstoode of the actions of the wil not of the new qualities or inclinations which it hath to obey God For these the wil receiueth not by her owne operation but by the working of the holy Ghost The will of man withstanding the reueiled will of God is yet guided by his secret wil therefore resisting doth not resist Thirdly they say That which withstandeth the will of God is not guided by it But the will of men in manie actions withstandeth the will of God It is not therefore alwaies guided by the will of God But the consequence heere faileth because there are foure termes For the Maior is true if both the reuealed and the secret will of God bee vnderstood so that simplie and in all respects it bee withstood and that bee doone which simply and by no meanes it would haue done that which is impossible to come to passe because of the omnipotency and liberty of God But in the Minor the will of God must bee vnderstoode as it is reuealed For the secret decrees of Gods will and prouidence are euer ratified and are perfourmed in all euen in those who most of all withstand Gods commandements Neither yet are there contrarie wils in god For nothing is found in his secret purposes which disagreeth with his nature reuealed in his woord And God openeth vnto vs in his Law what he approueth and liketh and what agreeth with his nature and the order of his mind but he doth not promise or reueal how much grace he wil or purposeth to giue to euery one to obey his commandements God though the mouer of wicked wils yet not the mouer of the wickednes of the wil◠Fourthly as touching this Obiection If all motions euen of wicked willes are raised and ruled by the will of God and manie of these disagree from the Lawe of God and are sinnes god seemeth to be made the causer of sinnes The aunswere is that it is a paralogisme of the accident For they disagree from the law not as they are ordained by or proceed from the wil of god for thus far they agree very wel with the iustice and Law of God but as they are done by men or Diuels and that by reason of this defect because either they doe not know the will of god when they doe it or are not moued by the sight knowledge therof to do it that is they doe it not to that end that they maie obey God who will so haue it For whatsoeuer is doone to this ende it disagreeth not from the Lawe seeing the Law doth not but with this condition either commaund or forbid any thing if God hath not commanded a man to doe otherwise So doth the Lawe of God forbidde to kill anie man except whome God hath commaunded anie to kil Who then killeth a man God not commaunding it hee out of doubt doth and offendeth against the Lawe Neither doth God dissent from himselfe or his law when he wil haue some thing done either by his reueiled or secret will otherwise than according to the generall rule prescribed by himselfe in his Law For hee hath such endes and causes of all his purposes as that they cannot but most exactlie agree with his nature and iustice Fifthly they obiect Libertie which is guided of another can not be an image of that liberty which dependeth of no other which is in god But the liberty of mans will is the image of the liberty which is in god Therefore the liberty of mans will dependeth not or is not guided by the will of god We denie the Maior For seeing that euerie thing which is like is not the same with that vnto which it is like to conceiue in some sort the libertie of God it is enough that reasonable creatures doe woorke vpon deliberation and free election of will albeit this election in the creatures is both guided by themselues and another in God by no other than by his owne diuine wisedome The image of a thing is not the thing it selfe and the inequality of degrees taketh not awaie the image as neither the likenesse and similitude of some partes taketh awaie the dissimilitude of others Wherefore the libertie of reasonable creatures both is gouerned of God and is notwithstanding a certaine image of the libertie which is in God because it chooseth thinges once knowen vnto it by her own and free or voluntary motion For as of other faculties or properties so also of libertie it is impossible that the degrees should bee equall in God and his creatures whereas all thinges are infinite in God and finite in his creatures Seeing therefore wisedome righteousnesse strēgth in the creatures is the image of the vnmeasurable wisedom righteousnes power which is in god a portion also of liberty agreeable and competent for the creatures may be the image of the liberty which is in God The will is not idle or mere passiue when God worketh by it no more than the sun raine and such like instrumentes of Gods operation Sixtly they say If the creature cannot but doe that which God wil haue done and cannot do what god will not haue done the wil hath no actiue force but is wholy passiue especially in our conuersion which is the work of god Likewise there is no vse of laws doctrine discipline exhortation threatnings punishments examples promises and lastly of our study and endeuour Wee denie the consequence Because the first or principal cause beeing put the second or instrumentall cause is not thereby taken away For as god lightneth the world doth quicken the earth bringeth foorth corne nourisheth liuing creatures yet are not the
GOD doth not inflict punishment but on those who sinne but to bee forsaken of the holie Ghost is a punishment of sinne and vnthankefulnesse Therefore no man is forsaken of the holie Ghost but who hath first deserued that forsaking through his owne stubbornes The aunswere hereto is double Fisst the Argument may be graunted as concerning the regenerate For in them as long as they are in this life there is alwaies so much remaining of sinne as they deserue not onely temporall but eternall desertion and forsaking and although because the sinne which remaineth in them is forgiuen them for Christ therefore they are freed from euerlasting punishment yet are they not free from chastisementes so long as the remnaunts of sinne abide in them There is therefore in respect of their sinnes also alwaies most iust cause why sometimes for a season God woulde bereaue them of the grace and guiding of his spirite As it is in the second of Samuel the twentie and fourth Chapter And the wrath of the Lord was again kindled against Israell and hee mooued Dauid against them in that hee saide Goe and number Israell and Iuda Euery forsaking or rather sleeping as it were of the holy ghost in the regenerat is not a punishment neither done to that end Secondly we answere to the Minor that euery forsaking is not a punishment or done to that end as to punish but sometimes also for tryall that is for to make knowen and open the weakenes euen of the best and holiest both to themselues and others that they may learne that they cannot for one instant or moment stand against the tentations assaults of Satan if they be not presently sustained and ruled by the conduct of the holy spirite and that so they may be made more watchful and more earnest to cal hereafter for the assistance of the holy spirite to beware of relapses fallinges Lastly that both in this life in the world to come they may the better know and set forth their own vnworthines and the mercie of God towardes them who hath reclaimed and recalled them out of so many grieuous sinnes vnto himselfe and hauing deserued a thousand times death and destruction hath not yet suffered them to perish For these causes it is saide 2. Cor. 12. Least I shoulde bee exalted out of measure through the abundance of reuelations there was giuen vnto me a pricke in the flesh And Rom. 11. God hath shut vp all in vnbeliefe that he might haue mercie of all Against this they say That God doth promise the assistance of his holy spirite to all that aske it But this is generall onely concerning finall perseueraunce but not so as touching continual perseuerance For God promiseth no where that he will so guide his saints by his spirite in this life that they shall neuer fall By this which hath beene said that obiection also vanisheth to nothing when they say That the conuerted seeing they haue in their owne power to depart from that which is right and to resist haue also perseueraunce in their owne power For although hee constraineth not or violently draweth their wils but maketh them of rebels and enimies willingly of their owne accorde to become the sonnes of God and as concerning mens wils in this life there is nothing more prone than they to euill yet as touching the counsel purpose and working of God euidence of truth constraineth euen the aduersaries themselues to confesse that it cannot be but that the wil of man must then obey when God according to his euerlasting counsels hath decreed forcibly to moue incline it either to conuersion or to perseuerance Neither doth this immutabilitie and efficacie of Gods purpose take away the libertie of will in the conuerted but rather increaseth preserueth it and how much the more effectually God moueth it with so much the greater propension and readines it both will and doth good which the example of the blessed Angels cōfirmeth This is also more friuolous that they say That the godly are made careles and slouthfull and the desire to perseuere is diminished in them if they heare that their perseueraunce dependeth of the grace of the holy spirite alone For we may very well inuert this and returne it vpon our aduersaries seeing nothing doth more giue an edge vnto the saints and those who are indeed godly to a desire and indeuour to beware of falling and to a daily and earnest calling vpon God than if they knowe that they cannot so much as one moment stand against the tentations of the Diuel and their fleshe except by the vertue and instinct of the holy spirite they bee withdrawen from euill and bee forceably moued to good but contrariwise that opinion as experience teacheth maketh men careles and lesse minding to beware of sin by which men imagine that it is in their owne power to depart from god listening a while and yeelding to their owne lusts and to returne againe to God as oft as themselues thinke good so to doe Now if so bee this sentence concerning true perseuerance depending of the grace of the holy spirite breed in the reprobate and prophane men a carelesnesse and contempt of God it is both foolish and iniurious to iudge of the elect and godly by their humour or for their frowardnes to hide and smoother the truth Lastly against the defectes of libertie in the second and third state or degree of man they obiect after this sort If whole conuersion and perseuerance doe so depend of Gods will and doe the worke of God in men that neither they can haue it in whom hee doth not worke it neither they cannot but haue it in whom he will worke it that then not onely the libertie but all the action and operation of the will is taken away and there remaineth onely that it bee constrained and suffer which is against the scripture experience the inward strife and combate of the godlie and our owne confession But we answere that the will is not therefore idle when as it doth not resist the spirit forciblie mouing it For to assent also obey is an actiō of the wil. The working of the instrumentall cause which is our will is not taken away when we put the working of the principal cause which is God But when they reply That we make that obediēce of the wil in conuersiō perseuerāce wholy the worke of god so leaue nothing to the wil what to doe they run into an other paralogism of consequēt wheras they remoue the working of the second or instrumental cause for that the first cause or principal agēt is put For that which is so wholy the work of god in mā that man is only as the subiect in which god worketh in that we grant that the wil is only passiue suffreth doth work nothing as in imprinting or working or maintaining in the will heart newe qualities or inclinations But that which is
all euill For these are the effectes to come of that present and perpetuall wil of God towards vs which wee apprehend by faith Rom. 8.24 Wee are saued by hope but hope that is seen is not hope But if we hope for that we see not we doo with patience abide for it 1 Obiection Life euerlasting is a thing to come We beleeue life euerlasting Wee beleeue therefore that which is to come that is faith is also of things to come and so faith is hope it selfe Ans The Maior must bee distinguished Life euerlasting is to come tru as concerning the consummation or accomplishment therof But it is present vnto vs as cōcerning the wil and vnchaungeable purpose of God who hath decreed from euerlasting that which he hath begun in vs and will also in due time accomplish it Againe it is present vnto vs as concerning the beginning therof For euerlasting life is begun here in the elect by the holy ghost Wherefore faith apprehendeth it as it is present both in respect of the purpose of God in respect of the beginning thereof in vs. For he that beleeueth feeleth and knoweth that he is quickened and resolueth this to bee the will of God that that quickening and reuiuing which is here begunne shall bee absolued in another life Iohn 5.24 He that beleeueth in the sonne hath passed from death to life Iohn 17.3 This is life eternall that they know thee to be the only verie God and whome thou hast sent Iesus Christ Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts which crieth Abba father Rom. 8.24 We are saued by hope 1. Ioh. 3.2 Now are we the sonnes of God but it doth not yet appear what we shal be By faith thē we are certein that those blessings also which as yet we haue not are notwithstanding ours for Gods promise for the vnchangeable will in God to giue them vs but in certain hope wee looke for them as concerning their accomplishment Faith apprehendeth the promises of thinges to come hope relieth on the thinges promised The summe is There is one and the same act and operation of faith and of hope but they differ in consideration It is called faith as it doth apprehend things to come as if they were present in regard of the vnchangeablenes of Gods will It is called hope as it doth certainlie look for the bestowing of those things Therfore Heb. 11 1. it is shewed that faith is the ground substance of things which are hoped for that is it is that which maketh things which are hoped for to be extant and present in that manner as hath bin shewed Shorter thus Faith apprehendeth the promises concerning things to come as they are to come Hope the things themselues which are promised 2 Obiection Faith is the euidence of thinges which are not seene therefore not of thinges present Aunswere It is the euidence of thinges which are not seene to wit by the outward senses but they are seene by the eies of the mind euen as if they did lie open to the eies of the bodie Againe they are not seene in respect of their accomplishment or consummation 5 What are the causes of Faith THE first and principall efficient cause of faith is the holie ghost illightening the minde that it may vnderstand the word and moouing the will that it may assent vnto the woord once vnderstoode Yee are freelie saued by faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of God Ephes 2.8 Obiection The Diuel hath faith It is wrought therefore in him by the holie ghost Aunswere What faith is in the Diuel is wrought by the spirit of God but that by a generall woorking onely whereby hee worketh in all euen in Diuels and hypocrites what-soeuer knowledge or vnderstanding is in them 1. Cor. 12. c. not by a speciall and proper action or working wherby to regenerat or sanctifie them that they might truely acknowledge him to bee the author of this gift and magnifie him therefore after which maner hee woorketh faith in the elect alone The Diuels therefore and hypocrits haue faith from the spirit of God but the elect from the spirit of God sanctifieng them The instrumentall cause of faith in generall is the whole worde of God the Lawe and the Gospell written spoken readde heard The chiefe instrumental causes of ingendering iustifieng faith are the preaching of the word and the vse of the sacramentes meditated likewise many works miracles of God in the world But the chiefe and proper instrument of iustifieng faith is the preaching of the Gospell the vse of the sacraments For these doth the holy ghost vse as instruments yet not necessarie but arbitrarie at his own good pleasure both to stir vp faith in vs and to nourish strengthen increase the same Rom. 10.17 Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 1.16 The gospell is the power of God vnto saluation to euerie one that beleeueth 1. Cor. 4.15 I haue begottē you through the gospel Mar. 16.16 He that shall beleeue and be Baptized shall be saued Act. 22.16 Wash away thy sins 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is the communion of the bodie of Christ Wherefore ordinarilie iustifieng faith is neuer engendred in those who are of yeares to receiue it without the preaching of the gospell The cause of that faith which worketh miracles is not simply the woorde of God but there must necessarily come thereto an especiall and immediate reuelation from God The formal causes of faith a sure and ful confidence in Christ The obiect of faith Christ and his benefites promised The final causes of faith Gods glorie our saluation The formall cause of iustifieng faith is a certaine knowledge confidence in Christ The obiect of it is Whole Christ and his benefits promised in the word Likewise God fauorable to vs through Christ The subiect wherein it remaineth is the vnderstanding will of man The end or finall cause 1 The glorie of God to wit the celebration of his trueth iustice bountie mercie which hee hath shewed in the sending of his Sonne and in the giuing of faith in him 2 Our Saluation that we may receiue the blessings which are promised in the worde 6 What are the effects of faith The effectes of faith iustification and regeneration THe effects of iustifieng faith are 1 The iustifieng of vs before God 2 Peace of conscience or ioy resting on God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith we haue peace with god 3 Our whole conuersion which followeth faith and beginneth at the same time with faith For by faith are our hats purified 4 The fruits of conuersion repentance euen good woorkes For whatsouer is not of faith is sinne Hither may be referred also the consequences of faith that is encrease of spirituall corporal giftes The first then and immediate effect of iustifieng-faith is Iustification from this afterwardes flow al other benefites
fall Therefore perseuerance dependeth not of God promising but of our selues and therefore is doubtful standing vpon a doubtfull ground Aunswere This is a fallacy reasoning from that which is no cause as if it were a cause For by this verie exhortation hee goeth about to nourish make perfect and preserue the safetie of the faithfull For God vseth such threatninges thereby to retaine the godly in their dutie that they may not waxe proude and please themselues But hereof it doth not followe that hee permitteth the perseuerance of the godly in faith grace to their owne strength and arbiterment Moreouer Paul in that place speaketh not to particular men but to the bodie of the Church of Corinth in which many were hypocrites Wherefore they who truely bâ—leeue must certainly resolue that God wil saue them For if he will haue vs assured of his present fauour gâ—ace towards vs he will also haue vs assured of that which is to come because God is vnchangeable Reply 4. Salomon saith Man knoweth not whether he be worthy of loue or hatred Therefore we cannot be assured of the election of God neither resolue any thing of Gods present fauor s by consequent neither of that which is to come Answere To the Antecedent 1. Man knoweth not true as concerning second causes or by euents of thinges bee they good or euill For external and outward fortune is no certaine token whereby to iudge of Gods fauour 2. Againe man knoweth it not of himselfe but he knoweth it God reuealing it and certifiyng vs aboundantly of his loue towards vs by his word and spirite Replie 5. But no man hath knowen the mind of the Lord. Rom. 11.34 Aunswere No man hath knowen it that is before Gâ—d hath reuealed it neither after hee hath reueiled it doth any man perfectly know it for so much know we of god as himselfe hath reuealed vnto vs It is the spirit which reuealeth and witnesseth vnto vs that we are the sonnes of God 2. Cor. 1.22 Rom. 8.16 2 Obiection Ezech. 18.24 The iust man is said to perish if he turne himselfe out of the right way I herefore beleeuers also may defect from godlines and fall from euerlasting saluation Answere He in that place is called iust not who is truely iust but who seemeth vnto men iust For the sonnes and heires only are indewed with true conuersion and godlines Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the spirite of God they are the sonnes of God And if sonnes then also heires 1. Cor. 2.12 We haue receiued the spirite which is of God that we might know the things which are giuen vnto vs of God vers 16. Wee haue the minde of Christ Eph. 1.13 2. Cor. 1.22 and 5.5 The spirite is called the earnest of our deliuerie which is to come 3 Obiection Paul 2. Cor 6.1 exhorteth the Corinthians that they receiue not the grace of God in vaine so Christ likewise biddeth vs watch and pray Aunswere Thereby carnal securitie is forbidden and certainety of saluation as also faith tranquillity watchfulnes and praier is commaunded For these are the necessary and proper effects of our election an infallible Argument of saluation For al beleeuers are elected and Eph. 1. Paul teacheth that by faith wee are made partakers of Gods adoption 4 Obiection Saul failed and fell away finally Saull was one of the godlie Therefore the godly also fall away Aunswere We denie the Minor that Saul was one of the godly Replie But he had the giftes of the holie ghost Aunswere Hee had such giftes of the holie Ghost as are common to the godly with the reprobate he had not the gifts of regeneration and therefore neither shall hee the holy Ghost sanctifiyng him which is proper to the elect 5 Obiection The doctrine of the certaintie of our saluation breedeth securitie Aunswere It breedeth indeede a spiritual securitie by it selfe in the elect alone and a carnal by an accident and that onely in the wicked and reprobate but not at all in the godly Conclusions comprising the summe of the doctrine of Faith 1 FAith if wee take the word amply and largelie signifieth a certaine knowledge rising from the asseueration of witnesses who are thought not to deceiue 2 In the doctrine of the Church mention is made of fower sortâ— of faith Historicall Temporarie working miracles and Iustifieng 3 Historicall faith is a knowledge resoluing those thinges to be true which are deliuered in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles 4 TeÌ„porary faith is the knowlege of the doctrin of the church ioined with a ioy for the knowledge of the truth or for other either true or apparent good thinges without any applying of the promise of grace to the beleeuer and therefore without either true conuersion or finall perseuerance 5 Faith which worketh miracles is a certaine knowledge by especiall reuelation of the will of God of working some certain miracle according to the petition or foretelling of him by whom it is to be wrought 6 Iustifieng faith is a knowledge whereby a man doth firmly assent to euery word of God reuealed vnto him and resolueth that the promise of gods grace through christ belongeth to him further it is a ful persuasion and coÌ„fidence in this fauor of god towards him ouercomming al fear and pensiuenes 7 For the confidence of iustifieng faith is a motion of the will heart consisting of a ioy conceiued for the certainty of the present grace of God towardes vs and of a hope of our future deliuery from al euils 8 There is no faith therefore but which resteth on the wil of God reuealed in his word 9 All faith is wrought in men by the holie Ghost either by the voice of Gods heauenly doctrine or by immediat reuelation 10 Seeing God wil kindle frame and confirme ordinary faith in vs by the doctrine of the Church al are bound to hear it and meditate thereon 11 Temporarie faith befalleth to manie hypocrites which are in the Church Historical and the faith of miracles is common to the godly and vngodly Iustifieng faith is giuen in this life to all those only who are chosen vnto euerlasting life 12 Iustifieng faith doth not alwaies comprise Historicall neither is alwaies ioined with the faith of miracles As also the faith of miracles hath alwaies either historicall or temporarie faith ioyned therewith but Iustifieng it hath not alwaies 13 Faith also in the Saintes is imperfect in this life and languishing but yet whosoeuer feeleth in his hart an earnest desire of beleeuing and a strife against doubts arising in his mind he maie and ought certainely to resolue that hee is endewed with true faith 14 True faith being once kindled in our hearts albeit often it languisheth and is darkned for a time yet is it neuer wholy extinguished 15 But after this life it shall attaine vnto a more certaine and ful knowledge of God diuine matters euen to a feeling and experience with all the blessed
shall say Verily there is a reward for the righteous doubtles there is a god that iudgeth the earth And Psa 9.16 The Lord is knowen to execute iudgemēt now albeit the wicked florish often for a while the godly are oppressed yet neuertheles exāples which are fewer in nūber do not weaken the general rule vnto which most euēts agree But if it were so that fewer of the wicked did suffer punishment yet those selfsame examples though but a fewe would testify that god is that he is displeased with the offences of others also who seem to be lesse punished But this is not true no not of any of them that they are not punished in this life For al those who are not before the end of this life conuerted to god if punishment do not sooner ouertake them yet at length they die in dispaire which punishment is more grieuous than all the euils eyther corporall or externall and is the beginning testimonie of euerlasting punishment Now in that this punishment is not sufficient it doth therein agree with all euen the most tragicall cases of the wicked and therefore wee are taught by the doctrine of the Church that Gods lenitie which he doth not seldome vse in this life towards the wicked and his seueritie which hee seemeth to shew towardes the godly doth not at all weaken his diuine prouidence and iustice but rather declareth his goodnes whiles by differring of punishment he inuiteth the wicked to repentaunce and by exercising the godly with chastisementes and crosses hee perfecteth their saluation and also it confirmeth the certaintie of iudgement after this life wherein perfect satisfaction shall be made by the wicked to Gods iustice 7 From a bodie politique which is wiselie ordered by lawes 7 Common weales wisely ordered This coulde not haue beene shewed vnto men but from a minde vnderstanding and approouing this order which minde is God himselfe Moreouer that which is not preserued by humane wisedome or by force or naturall causes neither yet can be ouerthrown by Diuels the multitude of wickedmen hath a defender more potent mightie than these Common-weales are not preserued by humane strength or wisedome are oppugned by the wicked and Diuels Therefore they haue a superior and mightier defender than all these And this defender is God alone 8 From the order and nature of efficient causes 8. The order and nature of efficient causes For it can not bee that the processe and race of efficient causes shoulde bee of an endlesse and infinite extent wherefore there must bee some first and principall cause which may either mediately or immediately produce and mooue the rest on which also all other causes may depende Nowe that the progresse of causes which haue their moouing and beeing eache of other is not infinite they shewe by this reason If the causes of anie effect were infinite whereof some should mooue or produce other some one of these absurdities should follow that either within the compasse of a finite time should bee effected infinite motions and mutations or else at no time those infinite causes euer to attaine vnto their end that is vnto their purposed effect Both which beeing manifestly false and impossible it must needes be that the original of mutations dependeth of some cause immutable eternal and omnipotent 9. The endes of all thinges 9 From the final causes of al things To appoint the endes of all thinges belongeth to a nature which is wise and administreth al things Now al thinges are ordeined to their ends and those also certaine But these endes and vses of thinges haue not their beeing by chaunce or from a nature onely endewed with sense Therefore from some nature which is wise and omnipotent which is God alone For that nature worketh for some end this is so farre from remoouing the framer and artificer from it as rather it most of all confirmeth that there is a minde maker and framer of the woorlde which appointed the actions of nature to these ends and nature deede intendeth to an end thtough the ordination and appointment of another but neither vnderstandeth it nor is moued thereby to work And further that there are manie things in the world which not onlie seeme vnprofitable to all but are also troublesome and pernicious this also doth not infringe the generall rule That all thinges were made to a good vse For by reason of sinne those things nowe hurt which would haue profited men if they had not sinned And therefore to the godly al thinges turne to their safetie yea that punishment it selfe which God inflicteth by other creatures vpon mē serueth for an vse agreeable to the wisedome and iustice of God Many thinges also whereby men feele discommodities haue withal some vses acceptable preseruatiue to mans life And farther there is no one thing among all things which yeeldeth not matter of agnizing and celebrating the wisedome bounty power and iustice of the author 10. Certaine euident foretellings of euents 10 From certaine and cleare significations of future euentes which neither by humane sight or perceiueablenes neither by naturall causes or signes coulde haue beene foreknowen but only beeing reuealed by him who hath both mankinde and the nature of all thinges so in his owne power that nothing can bee doone but through his motion Such are the prophecies of the deluge of the posterity of Abraham of the comming of the Messias Which first is thereby manifest for that the decrees and counsailes of that minde which is the first cause of his owne workes no man can knowe before himselfe and therefore they cannot bee foreknowen of others but beeing disclosed by him Furthermore many Prophecies haue beene vttered in such sort that God hath not onely foretolde things should so come to passe but also that those thinges shoulde bee doone and brought so to passe by him Ezech. 12. Of all thinges foretolde by him hee saith I will speake the woorde and I will doe it Lasty it must needes bee that he knoweth all things who promiseth that hee will giue aunswere concerning all purposes and euentes necessary to bee knowen which shall bee demaunded of him and dooth indeede perfourme this euen as God did among the people of Israel And therefore God himselfe alleageth this as his worke alone for proofe of his diuinity against all forged fained Gods Isa 41.23 Shew the things that are to come heereafter that wee may knowe that you are Gods 11 From heroicall instinctes that is wisedome 11. Heroical and noble instincts of minde and excellent vertue in vndertaking and atchiuing those woorkes which surpasse the common capacity of mans nature Such is the felicity and happinesse of noble artificers or gouernours in searching or polishing artes and in finding out deuises and counsailes Likewise the couragiousnesse of mind in performing the actions of vertue and in menaging matters such as was in Achilles Alexander Archimedes Plato and others 2 Who and what
easily imagine in him the gouernment of al things in the woorlde as being partly hard or impossible and partly as vnwoorthie of God and lastly by reason of confusions sins al which euils would seeme to haue God their author if it should be granted that God gouerned all thinges we find experience euerie one both in our selues and others how hardly the true Doctrine concerning Gods prouidence getteth place in the minde and that naturall light sufficeth not to the right vnderstanding thereof so great varietie of opinions and errors concerning this point of doctrine dooth sufficiently declare Now there are of these three sorts especially 1 The Epicures will haue either no prouidence at all Errors concerning Gods prouidence or onely of those thinges which are and are doone in the lower partes of the world 2 The Stoickes haue deuised in steede of prouidence an absolute necessitie and order of all thinges being in the verie nature of things whereunto not onlie al other things but god himselfe also is subiect 3 The Peripatetiques did imagine that God indeede dooth beholde and vnderstand all thinges but yet dooth not order and rule all thinges but mooueth the celestiall motions and dooth by them send downe by waie of influence some power and vertue vnto the lower partes of nature but the operations themselues or motions depend of the matter and of the wils of men that is they will haue the prouidence of GOD to bee a prescience or foreknowlege in god of al things but not a will decreeing causing and ruling al things Contrarily The Church teacheth out of the worde of God that nothing is extant and commeth to passe in the whole world but by the certaine and definite though yet most free and most good counsail and purpose of God Which that it may the better bee vnderstoode these three questions are to bee considered 1 Whether there be any prouidence of God 2 What the prouidence of God is 3 Why the knowledge thereof is necessarie 1 WHETHER THERE BE ANY PROVIDENCE OF GOD. The prouidence of God certaine and not to bee doubted of It is manifest that they who deny Prouidence take away religion and the whole woorshippe of God For if God dooth not respect and rule humane affaires then neither were good things to be desired of him neither were hee to be praised for them receiued who doth not giue them neither his anger to be feared who doth not punish neither were we to liue according to his will who requireth not obedience nor maketh or keepeth anie difference betweene the good and bad These therefore are the first and most knowen and most certaine grounds and principles of al religion That there is a God and that there is prouidence that is that God knoweth and ruleth those thinges which are and are done in the world and especially mankinde as beeing the chiefe and principall part of the world Neither yet doth the whole Scripture therefore so many waies inculcate Gods gouernment of all thinges as if their own conscience did not conuince euerie man of it but that it might the more confirme in vs the beleefe perswasion of a thing most certaine and most necessary to be knowen teach vs that which men know not of it and correct that which they vnderstand amisse Testimonies of scripture for Gods prouidence There are two sorts of arguments proofs whereby is confirmed that there is a prouidence of God First it is proued by testimonies of Scripture Act. 17.21 He giueth to al life breath and all thinges and a little after In him wee liue and mooue and haue our being Matth. 10.29 Are not two Sparrowes sold for a farthing and one of them shal not fall on the ground without your father Yea and all the haires of your head are numbered Like to these are found infinite testimonies in the Scripture not onely as concerning the generall rule but also as concerning particular examples For there is almost no point of heauenly Doctrine which is more diligently inculcated vrged in the old Testament than the Doctrine of Gods prouidence So in Ier. 27. God reasoneth from the generall to the particular that is from the rule it selfe to the exāple The general is I haue made the earth the man and the beast that are vpon the ground and haue giuen it vnto whom it pleased me And presently he adioyneth the particular Now haue I giuen all these landes into the handes of Nabuchadnezzar the king of Babel my seruant Moreouer the prouidence is confirmed by reasons Reasons of philosophie for proofe of the same which are in such sort Philosophicall as that also the Scripture often vseth the same Of these there are two sorts whereof one demonstrateth the thing that is in question from the woorkes or effectes of GOD the other from the attributes or properties or nature of God whereon as their proper cause those effects depend Yet more knowen proofes and more common and obiect are those which are drawen from the woorkes or effectes of god For by these as being more knowen vnto vs we learne and knowe the cause it selfe euen the nature and properties of God then after wee knowe the cause we returne backe againe from it to the effectes and demonstrate them by this and haue distinct and perfect knowledge thereof And both these proofes and reasons are demonstratiue necessarily and irrefragably proouing that which is in question and common to Philosophy with Diuinity But the properties and workes of God are better knowen of them which are in the Church than of them which are without And furder the prouidence of God is proued almost by the same arguments whereby it is shewed that there is a God The reasons drawen from the workes or effects of God for proofe of his prouidence 1 THE order which is in the nature of things that is 1 Order the most apt disposing of all the parts the succession of motions and actions continuing by certaine and perpetual Laws and courses and seruing for the preseruation of the whole and for those ends whereunto thinges were ordained This order proceedeth not from a mere sensible nature neither commeth it by chance or fortune but contrarie hee must needes be most wise who appointed and setled this order in the nature of things and so he also who by his prouidence gouerneth and ruleth nature Psal 8 19.135.147.148 2 Th◠minde 2 The minde and vnderstanding which is in Angels and men Man which is as it were a litle worlde is ruled by a minde and vnderstanding much more then is the great woorlde gouerned by diuine prouidence as in the administring whereof more wisedome is required Whence it is saide Psalm 94.9 Hee that planted the eare shall hee not heare Or hee that formed the eie shall he not see 3 The natural knowledge of the law 3 The naturall notions of principles engraffed in our minds o the Lawe of nature or the difference betweene
The wicked are not ruled of God so manifestly as the godly and they withstand gods reâ—eâ—â— wil but not his secret will 2 Obiection They who are against God are not ruled and guided by GOD. Diuels and wicked men are against GOD. Therefore they are not ruled and guided by his diuine prouidence Aunswere Wee graunt the whole reason in some respect namely that Diuels and wicked men are not ruled of God by his speciall prouidence that is by his holy spiritual lightning their minds with the knowledge of Gods wil and inclining their harts not to respect and execute in their actions their owne lustes but the knowen will of God and so themselues to woork well together with God who by them woorketh well But they are ruled and gouerned of GOD by his generall and secret prouidence or gouernement so that they cannot doe any thing but what GOD hath decreed to doe by them and are the instrumentes of his punishmentes and benefites though themselues think and respect some other thing Dan. 4.32 According to his will hee woorketh in the armie of heauen and in the inhabitantes of the earth and none can staie his hard nor say vnto him what dost thou Prouer. 21.1 The Kings heart is in the hande of the Lorde vs the riuers of waters hee turneth it whithersoeuer it pleaseth him Gen. 45. God moueth enclineth and ruleth the wicked wil of Iosephs brethren in such wise as not to kill Ioseph but freely to sell him to the Ismalites that by this meanes he might transport the family of Iacob into Aegypt nourish and multiply them and beeing oppressed by long seruitude and boundage gloriously deliuer them Isai 10. Assur though a wicked and proud King yet is called the rod of the Lords wrath Likewise the Assyrians are called the sanctified of GOD his hired souldiours dooing seruice to God whom yet their own ambition cruelty and couetousnesse carried to take weapons against the Iewes Likewise euery where in Scripture God is said to infatuate besot the wicked to strike them with a giddines to mad and amase them to effeminate them to fil them ful of fear so that their spirits faile them at the â—oice of the falling of a leafe to rule the swords of the wicked with his hand to obdurate and harden their hearts By those and the like it is manifest that euen the deliberations counsels actions of the wicked are subiect to his diuine prouidence and gouernement and that it is not an idle permission in them but an effectuall woorking of God inclining their wils and guiding their actions at his good pleasure The second sophisme of the cause of sinne 1 OBiection All the actions and motions of all creatures are done by the wil and working of God Manie actions as the selling of Ioseph the Assyrians warring against the Iewes are sinnes Therefore sinnes are done by the wil and working of god Actions are not sinnes in them selues but by an accident Aunswere There is a fallacy of the accident in the Minor proposition Actions are sins not in themselues and as they are actions but by an accident by reason of the corruption of the instrument in those actions which God woorketh most iustly by him he not respecting this as to obey therin the knowen wil of God This corruption or defect of the creature the action which god worketh by the creature concur together by an accident For neither is essentiall to other neither the cause of other but each is to other accidentary For both god could haue wrought that selfesame punishment which hee inflicted iustly on the Iewes by the Assyrian sinning by an instrument not sinning and the Assyrian if it had pleased god to correct his wil might haue been notwithstanding the instrument of gods wrath and yet good how great soeuer seueritie hee had exercised towarde the Iewes As when GOD by his good Angell slaieth the wicked host of the Assyrians Sinne therefore which is in the actions of the creature is not doone by the will and woorking of GOD but by an accident to witte as God will and woorketh those actions which are sinnes by the fault of the creature The summe of all commeth to this The most good action of GOD exercised by an euill and corrupt instrument is no otherwise the sinne of the bad instrument than water which commeth pure out of the fountaine is made impure running thorough vncleane places or the best wine comming out of a good vessell waxeth sowre and eger being put in a corrupt vessell according to that of Horace Lib. 1 Epist. 2. Vnlesse the vessell bee pure whatsoeuer thou powrest in sowreth or further than the good woorke of a good iudge is the euill woorke of an euill seruant or minister or the riding of a good horse man is the haulting of a lame horse In al these is a Paralogisme or fallacy of the accident that is there is a proceeding from the essence or thing it selfe to that which is but an accident to the thing and dooth but by an accident concurre with it after this manner The going of a lame horse is a plain haulting The horse-man will and woorketh the going of the lame horse Therefore hee will and woorketh the haulting In like sort the Diuell is created and susteined by God The Diuell is wicked Therefore the wickednesse of the Diuel is from God as the author and effector thereof Both which reasons are a like sophisticall false Many thinges in respect of the creatures are sinnes in them selues 1 Reply Those thinges which are in their own kind sinnes or vnto which the definition of sin agreeth they are in themselues sinnes Many actions are in their own kind sinnes as theft lying adulterie murder Therefore they are sinnes in themselues Answer It is a fallacie reasoning from that which is in some respect so to that which is simply so For the whole argument is graunted concerning actions prohibited by God in respect of the creature as they are committed by them against the will of God knowen vnto them either by generall or speciall commaundement or as they are not doone to that end principally as thereby to doe and execute the knowen will of God The reason thereof is certaine and expresse in the Scriptures because the wil of God reueiled in his word is the only and surest rule of goodnesse rightnesse in the creatures Wherefore whose motions and actions accord with the wil of god they are in themselues good pleasing to God but those actions which disagree from his will are in themselues sinnes which God abhorreth and punisheth Rom. 14.23 Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne that is whatsoeuer resteth not vpon the certaine commaundement of God neither is doone to that end as thereby to obey the knowen will of God No action euil in it selfe in respect of God But the argumeÌ„t on the other side is false if we respect the wil of god moouing and woorking all the motions and
work so cannot withall not worke or work otherwise because two contradictories cannot bee both at one time true FORTVNE and CHANCE are sometimes taken for the euents themselues or effects which follow causes that are causes but by an accident by reason of such causes Fortune and chaunce as are causes by and in themselues but not knowen to vs as when wee say good or euil fortune happy or vnhappy chance sometimes they signify the causes of such euents either the manifest causes which are causes but by an accident as when any thing is said to be don by fortune or by chance or the hidden and vnknowen causes which are causes by and in themselues As it is said in the Poet Omnipotent fortune and fate ineuitable And they are wont to cal that fortune which is a cause by an accident in voluntary agents whose actions haue some euent that seldom happeneth besides their appointment As he that digging with purpose to builde findeth treasure Chaunce they call an accidentall cause in naturall agentes whose motions haue effects neither proper to them neither alwaies hapning that without any manifest cause directing it as if a tile falling from a house kill one that passeth by By the name of FATE or destiny Fate or destinie The difference between the stoickes and th◠churches doctrine concerning Gods prouidence somtimes is vnderstoode the decree prouidence of God As that of the Poet Leaue off to hope that the fates of the gods are moued with entreaty But the Stoickes by this woorde vnderstoode the immutable connexion and knitting of all causes effectes depending of the nature of the causes themselues so that neither the second causes are able to woorke otherwise than they woorke neither the first cause can woorke otherwise than doe the second and therefore all effectes of all causes are absolutelie necessarie This opinion of the Stoickes because it spoileth God of his libertie and omnipotency and abolisheth the order and manner of woorking in second causes disposed by Gods diuine wisedome not onely founder Philosophy but the Church also reiecteth and contemneth and doth openly professe her dissenting from the Stoickes First because the Stoicks tie god to second causes as if it should be necessary for him so to woorke by them as their nature dooth beare and suffer But the Church teacheth that God worketh not according to the rule or lore of second causes but second causes according to the prescript of GOD as beeing the chiefe and most free gouerner and lord and therefore are subiect and tied to his wil pleasure Secondly the Stoikes were of opinion that neither God nor second causes can doe any thing of their owne nature otherwise than they do The church affirmeth that not only second causes are made ordained by god some to bring forth certaine definit effects some variable and contrary but God himselfe also coulde from euerlasting either not haue decreed or haue decreed wrought otherwise either by second causes or without them and by them either changeable in their own nature or vnchangeable al things whose contrary are not repugnant to his nature that hee hath so decreed them and doth so work them not bicause he could not otherwise but because it so pleased him as it is said Ps 115.3 Our god is in heauen he doth whatsoeuer he wil. And Luk. 1.37 With god shal nothing be impossible that is which is not against his nature or whereby his nature is not ouerthrowen as it is saide 2. Tim. 2. Out of this then which hath beene spoken we answere vnto the argument which was That which is done by the vnchaungeable decree of God is not done contingently but necessarily All thinges are doone by the vnchangeable decree of God nothing therefore is doone contingently neither by fortune or chaunce but all necessarily First wee say there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses when the opinion of the Stoicks is obiected to the Church For albeit the church confesseth al euents in respect of gods prouidence to be necessary yet this necessity is not a Stoical fate destiny because the church defendeth against the Stoikes both liberty in god gouerning things at his pleasure a chāgeablenes in second causes sheweth out of gods word that god could both nowe doe and from euerlasting haue decreed many things which neither hee doth nor hath decreed And therefore the church also hath absteined from the name of fate Necessitie of consequence or supposition doth not take away contingency least any should suspect her to maintaine with the Stoicks an absolute necessity of al things Secōdly if remouing stoicisme yet notwithstāding the necessity of al things the abolishing of cōtingency fortune chance be obiected we make aunswere to the Maior by distinguishing the words For those things that are done by the prouidence decree of god are done indeed necessarily but by that necessity which is by supposition or of consequence not by simple necessity or absolute Wherefore it followeth that all things come to passe not by simple absolute necessity but by that of supposition or consequence And necessitie of consequence doth not at al take away contingency The reason hereof is this Because the same effect may haue causes whereof some may produce it by an order changeable some by vnchangeable order therefore in respect of some it is contingent in respect of some necessary For as the originals or causes of contingency in things are that liberty which is in the will of god and Angels and men and the mutable nature of the matter of the elementes together with the readinesse or inclination thereof to diuers motions and formes so the cause of absolute necessitie in God is the very vnchangeable nature of god but the cause of that necessitie which is onely by consequent is the diuine prouidence or decree comming between those things which are in their own nature mutable also the nature of things created which is framed and ordained of god to certaine effects and yet subiect to the most free wil gouernment of god either according or besides or contrary to this order which himselfe hath made In respect therefore of second causes some things are necessary which are done by causes woorking alwaies after one sort as the motion of the son the burning of any matter put vnto the fier if it be capeable of burning some thinges are contingent which haue causes working contingently that is apt and fit to produce or to forbeare producing diuerse contrary effects as the blasts of windes the locall motions of liuing creatures the actions of mens wils But in respect of the first cause that is of the wil of god all thinges which are or are doone in Gods externall and outward woorks are partly necessary partly cōtingent necessary as euē those things which haue second causes most chaungeable as that the bones of Christ on the crosse were not broken
19. By the obedience of one manie shall bee made righteous Isay 53.5 Hee was wounded for our transgressions hee was broken for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was vpon him and with his stripes wee are healed All wee like sheepe haue gone astraie we haue turned euerie one to his owne waie and The Lord hath laide vpon him the iniquitie of vs all 2. Cor. 5.21 Hee hath made him to be sinne for vs which knewe no sinne that we should be made the righteousnesse of God in him Gal. 3.13 Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the lawe when he was made a curse for vs that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles through Christ Iesus that wee might receiue the promise of the spirite through faith Gal. 4 4. God sent forth his sonne made of a woman and made vnder the lawe that is made an execration or curse Gal. 3.13 For we are deliuered not from the obedience but from the curse of the lawe that hee might redeeme them which were vnder the lawe that we might receiue the adoption of the sonnes Heb. 9.14 How much more shall the bloud of christ which through the eternall spirite offered himselfe without spot to god purge your conscience from dead woorkes to serue the liuing god Heb. 10.10 By the which will we are sanctified euen by the offering of the bodie of Iesus christ once offered By these and verie many the like places of Scripture it is manifest that for Christes merite wee are not onely freed from punishment the remission of our sinnes being obtained but are also reputed righteous before GOD adopted of him to bee his sonnes blessed endewed with the holy GHOST sanctified and made heires of euerlasting life Nowe this so great force and power fully and perfectly to deliuer vs Why Christs death was of such force as fully and perfectly to saue vs. and further to bestowe most perfectly saluation on vs the death and punishment of Christ which is a most perfect merite hath first by the worthinesse of the person because hee that suffered it is God Acts. 20.28 God hath purchased the church with his owne bloud Hebrewes 9.14 which through the eternall spirite offered himselfe Hereof therefore is it that the obedience of the Sonne in punishment or satisfaction surpasseth the righteousnes and punishment or satisfaction of all the Angels and is a sufficient price and merite for so many and so great blessinges Againe it hath this force by the greetiousnesse of the punishment because hee susteined the torments and feeling of GODS wrath for all the sinnes of the whole woorlde Hee descended into hell For hee suffered so great torments thâ—t euen those who are euerlastingly damned cannot sustaine so great and so sufficient afflictions and tormentes and therefore cannot satisfie the wrath and iustice of God Obiection The sufficient punishment for sinne must needes bee eternall But the punishment of CHRIST for our sinnes was not eternall Therefore was it not sufficient neither dooth it merite Aunswere The Maior hath not a sufficient enumeration either it must bee eternall as the reprobates punishment or equiualent to eternall as was the punishment of Christ for the causes euen now specified Secondly Christ saueth vs by his efficacie power 2 Christ saueth vs by his efficacie and powerful working operation whereby hee effectually applieth vnto vs his merited deserued benefits that is 1. He iustifieth vs by imputing vnto vs that satisfaction which he performed vnto the law for our sins 2. He giueth vs by the ministerie of his word the holy ghost by whom he worketh in vs both faith whereby we appling Christs merite vnto our selues maie be assured of our iustification in the sight of god through the force thereof also conuersion or the desire loue of new obedieÌ„ce and so by his word spirit he gathereth his Church 3. He confirmeth this his collected gathered Church defendeth and preserueth it in this life against the force of Diuels and the world and against all the corporal and spiritual assaultes of all enimies euen to the end so that not one of those which are conuerted perisheth 4. And at length their bodies being raised from the dead he fullie deliuereth his church aduanced vnto euerlasting life and glorie from all sinne and euill The efficacie therefore whereby the sonne saueth vs compriseth the whole benefit of our redemption which hee bestowed on vs by faith through the vertue and woorking of his spirite For what benefites he merited by his death hee dooth not retaine them vnto him-selfe but beestoweth them on vs. For saluation and life euerlasting which him selfe had before hee purchased not for him-selfe but for vs as beeing our Mediatour The gift of the holy Ghost is part of our saluation Hereby wee may vnderstand that the giuing of the holie Ghost is a part of our saluation or deliuerie by Christ Iesus our Mediatour For the holy Ghost is hee by whom Christ effectually performeth this which hee beeing our intercessour with his Father hath promised his Father in our behalfe that is hee teacheth vs by illuminating our mindes with the knowledge of GOD and his diuine will and regenerateth or sanctifieth and guideth and establisheth vs that we may begin the studie of holines persist and profit therein vntil sinne be fully abolished in vs and sinne being abolished death must also needs be abolished which that hee might together with death destroy Christ was sent of his Father into the woorlde Of this efficacie or effectuall operation speake these places Colos 1.14 In the Sonne wee haue redemption through his bloud the forgiuenesse of sinnes Isai 53.11 By his knowledge shall my righteous seruaunt iustifie manie Iohn 1.9 That was the true light which lighteth euerie man that commeth into the world that is hee is the author and fountaine of all light both naturall in all Angels and men and spirituall in his elect and chosen Iohn 5.21 As the Father raiseth vp the dead and quickeneth them so the Sonne quickeneth whom hee will Iohn 15.26 I will send vnto you from the Father the spirite of truth Matthew 3.11 Hee that commeth after me will baptize you with the holie Ghost and with fire Ephes 4.8 When hee ascended vp on high hee gaue giftes vnto men Hee ascended that hee might fill all thinges Luc. 10.22 No man knoweth who the Father is saue the Sonne and hee to whom the Sonne will reueile him Iohn 1.18 No man hath seene GOD at anie time the onelie begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father hee hath declared him Matthew 28 2. I am with you alway vntill the ende of the woorld Iohn 14.18 I will not leaue you comfortles Iohn 10.28 My sheepe shall neuer perish neither shall anie plucke them out of mine hand 1. Iohn 3.8 For this purpose appâ—â—â—ed the Sonne of God that hee might loose the woorkes of the Diuel Iohn 16.54 I will raise him vp at the last
is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the worlde Heb. 3. Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Hebr. 13. Iesus Christ yesterdaie and to daie and the same for euer Our Second aunswere is by denying their interpretation For Saint Iohn there speaketh of the first creation Which we shewe First Because he speaketh of the second afterwardes As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to be the Sennes of God Likewise Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued and againe Grace and trueth came by Iesus Christ Now he therefore setteth down the first creation before because both creations are the worke of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the woorde it was necessarie for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and repairer of the worlde Secondly Because he saith the world was made by him Reply The woorlde heere is taken for the Church Aunswere No for hee addeth And the woorlde knewe him not The same woorlde which was made by him knewe him not Therefore hee meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate Thirdly other places demonstrate the same Iohn 5.17 My Father woorketh hitherto and I woorke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the woorlde woorke the workes of both creations In the same place verse 19. Whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same thinges dooth the Sonne also And vers 20. The Father sheweth him all thinges whatsoeuer hee himselfe dooth Therefore not onlie the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preseruation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickeneth so the Sonne quickeneth whom he wil. But the Father was from the very beginning the giuer of corporal spirituall life Col. 1.16.17 By him were all things created which are in heauen and which are on earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all thinges were created by him and for him And hee is before al thinges and in him al things consist Thus farre of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Reply 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Answer No. Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Reply 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and ioined to their head Auns But the new creation is called a restoring from sinne death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Reply Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worldes The worlds that is the new Church Aunswere 1 God made the old also by him because it is one Church hauing one head and foundation 2 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is vsed in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And faâ—der when it is there added Bearing vp al thinges by his mighty worde those words speak of the preseruation not only of the Church but of al things And moreouer he rendereth a cause why he is the heire not only of the Church but of all Creatures namely because he is the creatour preseruer of all thinges Heb. 1.10 Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth the heauens are the works of thine hands Reply In these wordes he conuerteth his speach to the Father to prooue that he was able by his power to lift vp the Sonne to diuine maiestie Aunswere This is â—â—â—mpudent shift and elusion 1 Because it is saide before But vnto the Sonne which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2 Because the Psalme dooth entreat of Christes kingdome and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be vnderstood next immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the father Reply 1. If he made all thinges then then father made them not by him Aunswere Both he made them and they were made by him Ioh. 5. Whatsoeuer things the Father dooth the same dooth the Sonne also And yet the father dooth them by him Reply 2. The creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of thingeâ—â—s not attributed vnto Christ Aunswere He is not comparâ—d with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme prooueth â—he heauens shall perish but thou doost remaine Reply 3 Iâ— hee were creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sittâ— at his right hand Aunswere Wee may inuert this and saâ— of the contrarie rather if he were not equal he could not sitte at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heauen earth Phil. 2.6 who beeing in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equal with God Isay 45.23 Thus saith the Lorde that created heauen Euerie knee shall bowe vnto me This is saide of Christ Rom. 14.11 Phil. 2 10. Againe Isay 48.12 I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laide the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heauens when I call them they stand vppe together These wordes Christ applieth vnto himselfe Reuelat. 1.18 and 22.23 In it was life In the word was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret That the sonne of God is by himselfe the life as is the Father and the fountaine giuer and maintainer of al life as wel corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the verie beginning of the world Iohn 5. He hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe as the father hath life in himselfe They conster it That the man Iesus is the quickener or giuer of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saued These are their words Vnto which we reply If hee giue eternall life to all so that no man hath is without him Therefore either no man was quickened before hee was borne of Mary which were absurd or hee was the quickner giuer of life from the beginning Euen as Ioh. affirmeth this of him as beeing verified in him also before hee was made fleshe Neither can this be vnderstood onely of his merit whereby hee deserued this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that hee is by his efficacie and effectuall woorking the quickner and reuiuer as himselfe expoundeth it Iohn 5. and 10. and the aduersaries themselues confesse So are wee also to vnderstand his illightening of men that is the knowledge of God the author whereof hee was in all euen from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne will reueile him And Iohn Baptist saith No man hath seene God at ANY TIME the Sonne hath declared him And the light shineth in the darckenes
proper to flesh created finit but to a nature infinit omnipoteÌ„t existing froÌ„ euerlasting Therfore christ promiseth the holy ghost to his disciples which is the spirite of trueth wisdome feare praier grace c. But although after that maner which hath bin spoken of the god-head only christ by reason of his god-head doth behold do al things is adored of vs yet his humanity also doth behold vnderstand hear our necessities desires coÌ„plaints praiers yet after another sort that is not of it selfe but by the godhead reueiling shewing our desires to the humane vnderstanding which is vnited to it And fuâ—der it performeth those things which we craue both by the efficacy of his merit by intercession made incessaÌ„tly to the father for vs whereby he wil obteineth of his father all blessings for vs by the force and omnipotency not of his flesh but of his godhead vnited thereunto by which christ man doth effectually apply to vs those benefits which he hath obtained for vs of his father Now to acknowledge when we worship Christ the Mediatour these things in him to profes the same both in words gestures actioÌ„s is the honor which is du is exhibited by vs to his humanity by reason of the god-head vnited thereto yet so that this veneratioÌ„ of the humanity is not separated froÌ„ the honor which agreeth to Christ according to his Godhead For with one the same particular indiuiduall inuocation worship we speak to honor whole christ god man according to the properties of both natures which he reteineth will haue also now in his glory for euer to be attributed to him vnitely but yet distinctly that is As the persoÌ„ office of the mediator so the adoratioÌ„ or worship is coÌ„pound hauing parts whereof some agree to the godhead some to the flesh as in the office so also in the honor of the person the properties operations of the natures are not separated nether yet confounded but being vnited are distinguished Wherefore as it doth not folow The godhead in Christ is redeÌ„ptres by reason of the flesh assuÌ„pted Therefore it is also subiect to sufferings mortal did suffer was dead So is there no necessity in this Vbiquitary argumeÌ„t Christs humanity is adored by reason of his god-head Therefore the same is also really omniscieÌ„t omnipoteÌ„t after the same maner to be adored as is the godhead The reason is because of the fellowship or coniunction of office honor in the person the same properties operations in natures are wrongly heretically inferred The sum of al is That christs humanity is adored by reason of his godhead coÌ„meth not thereof as if his humanity also were really omniscient and omnipotent as is the God-head For by reason of these other like properties is the godhead only inuocated but because it doth truely know vnderstaÌ„d hear our necessities cogitations desires praiers the diuine intelligence vnderstanding which is vnited to it reâ—â—iling and opening them vnto it And also because what we craue aâ— christs hands the same it effectually performeth not by the bones sinowes hands fingers feete but by the force and power of the same God-head Furdermore that maner form of speaking whereby the properties of one nature are really attributed to the person denominated of the other nature or of both natures is vsuallie called the communicating of the properties Likewise the communicating of names because the names and attributes of both natures are affirmed of the same person and of themselues enterchaungeably by reason of the vnitie of person consisting of both natures The communicating of properties hath some resemblance of the figure in speech called Synecdoche and is termed by manie Synecdoche because that is affirmed of the whole person which agreeth vnto it onelie in respect of one of the natures as a part It is also called a mutuall and enterchaungeable attribution because as humane properties are attributed vnto god in respect of the humanitie so diuine are attributed vnto man in respect of the Diuinitie As God suffered man is omnipotent So likewise the communicating of names For Man is God and God is Man by reason of the personall vnion of both natures A rule to be obserued concerning the attributes or properties of the office of Christ Mediatour THE names of office and honour agree vnto the whole person in respect of both natures keeping still the differences in natures of properties and operations These attributes are rightlie affirmed of subiectes both concrete and abstract that is both of the person and of the natures For it is well said The God-head quickeneth the Man-hood quickeneth And God or man quickneth The attributes of office are to be Mediatour to make intercession to redeeme to saue to iustifie sanctifie purge from sinnes to be Lord and Head of the Church to be woorshipped to heare and such like These offices require the properties and operations of both natures not separated neither yet confounded but conioined and distinct For euen for this verie cause was it necessarie that the two natures should be vnited in Christ Mediatour that what neither nature could doe being set a part in the work of our redemption that Christ subsisting in both ioined together might doe and accomplish by both As therefore the natures themselues so their properties also or faculties of woorking and operations are proper and remaine diuerse and distinct yet so that they concurre to the effectuating and working of one effect or work and benefit as parts and communicated labours For albeit the natures doe alwaies labor work together in the office and benefits of the Mediator nether without other yet doth not therefore one worke the same which the other doth But each woorketh according to his property force of woorking onely that which is proper to each nature not that also which belongeth vnto the other As neither the soule doth that which is proper vnto the body neither the body that which is proper vnto the soule but the same man doth woorke some one worke by his body and soul each dooing their proper function So likewise the humanity doth neuer accomplish that which is proper vnto the God-head nor the Godhead that which is proper vnto the manhood but the same Christ executeth and perfourmeth one and the same office benefit by both natures which he hath in him as parts of his person the Worde woorking according to the propertie thereof what belongeth to the Worde and the fleshe in like manner executing according to the peculiar and proper faculties thereof not according to others that which belongeth to the flesh For the properties operations proper to each nature are not common to both natures but to the same person consisting of both natures Wherefore in such like phrases of speech concerning Christes office which are called of the auncient 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that
is communicatings or such as make thinges common the properties and operations of natures are to be distinguished from the office of the person froÌ„ the honor which in respect of the office is due vnto the person Likewise one effect or act theandricall that is both of god and man or woorke or benefite from one operation or action as the whole from a part The office is common to both natures but the natures proper faculties of woorking and actions in exequuting that office are not common to both natures For that the same shoulde bee both proper and common doth implie a manifest contradiction So the worke and benefite of whole Christ is a certaine whole thing and is as it were compound and common to both natures but there are two partes heereof and diuerse operations proper to each nature which are wrought yet iointlie and belong to the same person which is Christ God and man that is both are wrought of one person according to diuerse causes and originals of woorking or according to diuerse natures but not by one and the same nature By these groundes it is easie to dissolue assoile most of the Sophismes and cauils with which at this time both the Schwenkefildians and Vbiquetaries are woont to glose and blanch that their real communicating of essential properties in natures and their Eutychian deifieng of Christs flesh to thrust the same vpon the simple for the true glory maiestie of Christ himselfe For thus they reason The offices benefits of the Mediatour his redemption intercession purging froÌ„ sins quickning sitting at the right hand of the Father his dominion and Lordlie power ouer al creatures his presence with the church beholding ruling al things raising the dead iudging both quicke and dead al these agree to Christ according to both natures Therefore the humanitie as wel as the diuinitie is also it selfe reallie omniscient searcher of harts omnipotent present in the substance of his bodie at the same moment in al places doth of it selfe know al things hear our coÌ„plaintes praiers giue the holie ghost work by him in the hearts of the chosen faith and conuersion to conclude in respect of these things the humanitie it selfe also is for it selfe adorable to be adored as wel as the godhead To these and the like there is one and a readie aunswere namelie That it is ill going from the person and from the office honor of the person to the properties operations of the natures Or The societie and coniunction of the office and honor dooth not cause or inferre the same properties or operations of both natures Or In the affirmation of the office honor are not signified the same properties of both natures nor the working of the same operations but the coniunction or concurrence of distinct operatioÌ„s proceeding froÌ„ distinct properties to the same effect or action theandrical that is of god and man The reason is because of redemption quickning adoration the like which are the functions benefits worship of the whole person there are moe and diuerse manners and parts which all agree reallie to one the same person but not to one the same nature but some to the god-head onlie some onlie to the manhood Wherefore this Maior of the reason is false Whatsoeuer thinges agree vnto Christ god and man according to both natures the same also doe agree after the same manner and as touching all parts to both natures For it doth not followe because the godhead is redemptresse therefore also it suffered and was dead Now that those things which in the person office of the Mediatour are and abide proper vnto one nature neither are made nor are by reason of the vnion common to both natures maâ—â— be shewed at large but now let these few suffice First Such as is the vnion of the natures such is the communicating of the properties But the vnion of the natures was not made in the natures or into one nature but in the person or vnto one person Therefore the communicating of the properties was made in the person not in the natures that is the vnion maketh the properties of both natures common not to one nature but to one person For not one nature but one person hath truly as two natures so also double properties and operations and those infinitely differing created and increate finite and infinite Wherefore as by vnion the man-hoode was not made the God-head or God so neither is it immense infinit and omnipotent But contrariwise man neuerthelesse is trulie and reallie as God eternal so omnipotent also and eueriewhere and giuer of the Holy Ghost The reason is Because not the manhood but the Man Christ hath indeed in his substance the eternall and immense God-head Secondly That which is proper to one can not bee common to moe that is can not exist or be found together in other subiects also of diuers nature For to be proper and to be common are contradictory therfore in fardest repugnancie Thirdlie There can not be made one omnipotencie and one omnipotent operation to be of both natures whereby as well the manhood as the Godhead should be reallie omnipotent and worke diuine thinges but there must needes be also one essence of both whereby the manhood also must bee reallie God For the omnipotency which they wil haue one and the same to be communicated vnto the flesh is the Godhead it selfe Fourthly If Christs humanitie in the office of the Mediator doth it selfe reallie effectuallie perfourme not onely that which belongeth vnto the flesh but also those thinges which are proper vnto the Godhead then either his Godhead shall bee idle and doe nothing in the woorke of our redemption or surelie the fleshe assumpted shall doe more and more shall be due and yeelded vnto it than to the Word which assumed and tooke it Fiftly Jf the flesh because it is saide to bee quickning is also omnipotent and doth by proper vertue regenerate mens hartes after the same sort also may it bee saide that the God-head also because it is redemptresse is subiect to suffering and did suffer For both quickning and redeeming are properties of the office common to both natures but not after one and the same manner Sixtly The whole maiesty of the God-head is that it is an essence existing not of another but of it selfe and subsisting by it selfe spirituall or incorporeal eternall immense vnchaungeable of infinite power wisedom goodnes c. That is the whole Maiesty compriseth all the perfections and operations proper vnto the Godhead But omnipotencie is the whole maiestie of the God-head according to the supposition of the Vbiquetaries For so Schmideline writeth in the 142. conclusion of his disputation of the Lords Supper of the communicating of the properties had at Tubinge in the yeare M.D.LXXXII In the word omnipotencie I comprise the whole maiestie of the godhead And in his 143. conclusion Omnipotencie is
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
presently For so had hee perished for euer Wherefore the Sonne offered a mitigation and lenifieng raised him vp to a new life that stil notwithstanding he should remaine subiect to the corporal death which yet should not be deadlie and pernicious vnto him 3 In respect of the promise made to the fathers both by words as in Isa 53.7 He is brought as a sheepe to the slaughter and as a sheepe before the shearer is dum so openeth he not his mouth by sacrifices wherby god promised that christ should dy dy such a death as should be an equiualēt price for the sins of the whole world This could not be the work of any meere creature but of the son of god only and therefore it was requisite necessarie that the Sonne of God should suffer so grieuous a death for vs. Obiection Then they doe not satisfie gods iustice who are punished because their punishment is endlesse and eternall Answere They satisfie by eternal punishment Replie So then might we also be deliuered from the curse by our selues Aunswere So then shall wee neuer bee deliuered but shall susteine punishment eternall which is without ende Out of this which hath beene saide we may draw this doctrine 1 That sinne is most of all to bee eschued of vs which could not bee expiated but by the death of the sonne of god 2. That wee ought to bee thankefull to the sonne of god for this his so great a benefit of vnspeakable grace fauour bestowed vpon vs. 3. That all our sinnes how many how great and how-greeuous soeuer they be are expiated and done awaie by the death alone of Christ 3 The fruit of Christs death THE fruite cōmoditie of Christs death is the whole work of our redemption 1. Iustification or remission of sinnes because the iustice of God requireth that God should not punish a sinner twise but hee hath punished our sinnes in Christ Therefore hee will not punish againe the same in vs. 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ purgeth vs from all sin as well originall as actuall as well of fact or doing what we should not as of omission or not dooing what we should The cause of this effect is the death of Christ 2. The gift of the Holy ghost through his working regeneration a new life because Christ by his death hath not onely obtained for vs pardon for our sinne and reconciliation with god but also the gift of the holy Ghost that by his working and vertue the old man might bee crucified with Christ that is that by the Holy Ghost through the efficacie of Christs merite our engraffing into him our corrupt and as yet not regenerated nature might bee abolished in vs and that of the contrarie righteousnesse might be begunne in vs the image of God destroied by the Diuel in vs might bee restored and wee by the same spirit moued to shew yeelde all thankefulnes for so great a benefite 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made vnto vs righteousnesse wisedom sanctification and redemption Col. 2.10 Ye are compleat in him The death of christ is the impellēt or motiue cause in effectuating our regeneration in two respectes 1. In respect of god because for the death of christ god pardoneth vs our sinne and giueth vs the holie ghost Galat 4.6 Because yee are Sonnes god hath sent forth the spirite of his Son into your harts which crieth Abba Father 2. In respect of vs also it is an impellent cause because they who apprehend Christs merit by a true faith and apply his death vnto themselues for them it is vnpossible to be vnthankfull For all after they are once iustified prepare and addresse themselues to do those things which are grateful vnto God for regeneration or the desire and endeuour of obeying God cannot bee separated from the applying of his death vnto vs nor the benefite of regeneration from the benefite of iustification All who are iustified are also regenerated and sanctified And all who are regenerated are also iustified Obiection 1. Pet. 1.3 The Apostle attributeth our regeneration to Christes resurrection why then is regeneration here attributed to his death Aunswere It is attributed vnto Christes death as touching his merite for hee merited regeneration for vs by dieng And it is attributed to Christes resurrection in respect of the applieng of it for by rising from the dead he applieth vnto vs regeneration and giueth vs the Holie Ghost 3. Eternal life is also the fruit of Christs death Ioh. 3.16 God so loued the woorld that he gaue his onely begotten Sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life 1. Iohn 5.11 GOD hath giuen vnto vs eternall life and this life is in his Sonne Obiection Jf Christ died for vs why then die we too For hee should not die for whom another hath alreadie died otherwise the satisfaction would seeme double Aunswere He for whom another hath died should not dy as thereby to satisfie that is so that his death should be any merite or satisfaction but there are other causes why we must die For wee die not to satisfie the iustice of God but by death as a meane to receiue those giftes which Christ by his death hath merited for vs. For this our temporal death is 1. An admonition of the greatnesse of sinne 2. A purging and cleansing of vs. For by death are purged out the reliques and remaines of sinnes in vs. 3. A translating into eternal life For by corporal death is the passage of the faithfull made into eternall life Reply If the cause be taken away the effect is takē away but the cause of death in vs which is sin is taken awaie by Christ therefore the effect also which is death it selfe ought to be taken awaie Ans Where al cause is taken awaie the effect also is taken awaie but in vs all cause of death is not taken awaie as concerning the purging out of sinne albeit it bee taken awaie as touching the remission of sinne Or we maie aunswere vnto the Minor proposition That sinne is indeede taken awaie as touching the guilt but it is not taken away as touching the matter of sinne which as yet remaineth AND BVRIED THE causes of Christes buriall are 1 That we might knowe that hee was dead indeed For the liuing are not buried but the dead only And hither belong some parts of the storie penned by the Euangelists as that christ was pearced with a launce that he was taken downe from the Crosse that he was annointed wrapt in linnen clothes For as by the touching feeling of him by his eating appearing after his resurrection we gather that he did indeed rise again so of the other we collect that he was indeede dead 2 That the last part of his humiliation whereby hee did debase himselfe for our sakes might bee accomplished That was his burial in which his body was as well cast into the earth as any other
woord of God is the instrumental cause Now the cause of the difference beeing known let vs in a woorde see what that difference is Three sorts of men Wee are to obserue therefore that there are three sortes of men verie much different one from another For some men are euen in profession estraunged and aliants from the church as who deny faith or repentance and therefore are openly enemies of the Church others are called but not effectuallie which are al hypocrits Others lastly are called effectually which are the Elect who are but a little portion according to that of Christ Matt. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen 7 Whether anie one maie bee saued out of the Church None saued out of the church NO man can bee saued out of the Church For whomsoeuer God hath chosen and elected to the ende which is eternal life them he hath chosen to the means which is the inward and outwarde calling Obiection Therefore Election is not free Aunswere It is free because God chose freely both to the end and to the meanes But after he hath once destined and ordeined men to meanes hee neuer changeth Wee are here also to holde against the Anabaptistes That infantes which are borne in the church are also of the church OF PREDESTINATION THIS common place of Predestination or election and reprobation ariseth out of the former place Of the Church is ioyned with it The special questions are 1 Whether there be Predestination 2 What it is 3 What is the cause thereof 4 What are the effectes thereof 5 Whether it be vnchangeable 6 How far it is knowen vnto vs. 7 Whether the Elect bee alwaies members of the church and the reprobate neuer 8 Whether the Elect fal from the church and the reprobate remaine euer in the church 9 What vse there is of this Doctrine 1 WHETHER THERE BE PREDESTINATION Predestination proued by Testimony of scripture THAT there is predestination testimonies of scripture do confirme Mat. 20.16 Many are called but few are chosen Ioh. 15.16 Yee haue not chosen mee but I haue chosen you Iohn 10.16 Other sheep haue I also which are not of this foulde Eph. 1.5 Predestinate according to the good pleasure of his will Acts. 18.10 J haue much people in this citie Eph. 1.4 Hee hath chosen vs in him Rom. 8.30 Whom he predestinate them also hee called By these and the like places wee learne that some are elected some not and therefore there is predestination When the Question is whether there be predestination theÌ„ this is in Question Whether there bee any such counsell of God which hath seuered some to bee saued and others to bee reprobate Some say that Election when mention is made thereof in scripture is taken for some excellencie for which a man is worthy to bee elected or chosen as wee may say a Choise and gallant horse So also they interpret reprobation but falsely for it is the eternall counsell and purpose of God That there is Reporbation is apparent by diuerse places Reprobation proued by scripture S. Paul saieth Rom. 9.22 That god doth shew his iustice on the vessels of wrath Mat. 13.11 It is giueÌ„ vnto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of heauen but to them it is not giuen Iud. vers 4. who were before of old ordeyned to this condemnation Mat. 14.25 â—hou hast had these thinges from the wise Iohn 10.26 Ye are not of my sheepe Pro. 16.4 He hath made al things for his own sake euen the wicked for the day of euill 1 Obiection But the promise of grace is vniuersall Aunswere It is vniuersall in respect of the faithfull that is it belongeth to all those who beleeue But it is particular in respect of al men Our aduersaries say that those which are conuerted maie fal awaie Which is to weaken and diminish the general promise Reply But it is said 1. Tim. 2.4 That God will that al men be saued But contrarie Matth. 20.16 Places of scripture reconciled concerning gods wil to saue and not to saue men Manie are called but fewe chosen Matth. 13.15 This peoples heart is waxed fat saith the Lorde least they shoulde returne that J might heale them And heere it is saide that God will that some bee not saued Therefore these testimonies are contrarie one to another Aunswere 1. God wil that al be saued as he is delited with the saluation of all Albeit elsewhere it is saide That hee reioiceth at the destruction of the wicked Prou. 1.26 yet hee reioiceth not thereat as it is a vexation or destruction of his creature but as it is an execution of his iustice 2. Hee wil that all bee saued in as much as he inuiteth al to repentance But he wil not haue all saued in respect of the force and efficacie of calling Actes 17.27 He dooth good vnto al if so be they might haue groped after him and found him Rom. 11.7 The Elect obtaine it the rest are hardened He saith verily vnto all Honesty of life pleaseth me yee owe it vnto me But he saith not to al I wil worke it in you but to the elect onely because from euerlasting it hath so pleased him 2 Obiection He that giueth vnequallie to those that are equal is an accepter of persons Aunswere It is true First if hee giueth to those which are equall vnequallie for anie outward causes or respectes that is for such causes as are not that condition in respect of which equall rewardes or punishmentes were to be giuen or not to be giuen that is when the cause which is common to both is neglected and other thinges regarded which are not the cause as riches honours and the like But here God respecteth the receiuing of this benefite and conuersion and giueth eternall life to them which haue these Secondly he that giueth vnto those which are equall vnequallie beeing bound to anie were an acceptour of persons But God giueth most freely of his meere mercy and grace Hee is bound to no man because we were his enemies therefore he might most iustly haue excluded all And if vniustice shoulde any waie fal into God which God forbid that we should think he should be vniust an acceptour of persons in that he giueth any thing at all But if thou beeing moued with pittie and compassion shouldst giue a farthing to one begger and a pennie to another thou art not therefore an acceptour of persons Matth. 20.15 Js it not lawfull for mee saith Christ to doe as I will with mine own Js thine eie euil because J am good Rom. 11.35 Who hath giuen first vnto the Lord To knowe this is behoouefull for the glory of God 3 Obiection Jt is meete and iust that he who hath taken a sufficient ransome for all sins should receiue al men into fauor God hath receiued a sufficient ransome for the sins of the whole worlde Therefore he should receiue al into fauor Christs ransome though
1. A griefe both for sin past and present which is called Sorrowe and also for sinne to come which is called Feare 2. An hatred of sinne committed both of present sinne and of sinne to come 3. An auerting from sinne committed both present and future sinne 4. A flying of sinne to come The griefe is in the heart The flieng is in the will in that we wil not here after commit sinne The auerting is in the hart and wil and it is an auerting vnto somewhat to wit an auerting from euil vnto good This former part of conuersion is called mortification 1. Because as dead men can not shew foorth the actions of one that is liuing so our nature the corruption thereof beeing abolished doth no more shew forth or exercise her actions that is doth no longer bring forth actuall sinne originall sinne beeing repressed For the dead bite not 2. Because mortification is not wrought without griefe and lamenting The flesh rebelleth against the spirite and for this cause mortification is also called a crucifieng Quiâ—â—ening Quickâ—â—â—â—g comprehendeth those thinges which are contrarie vnto mortification 1. The knowledge of Gods mercie and the applieng thereof in christ 2. A ioifulnesse thence arising which is for that God is pleased and for that newe obedience is begun and shal bee perfected 3. An ardent or earnest endeâ—â—ur and purpoâ—â— to sinne no more arising from thankefulnes and because we reioâ—â—e that we haue God appeased and pacified towardes vs a desire also of righteousnesse and of reteining gods loue and fauour That ardent desire both of not sinning and also of righteousnesse and of reteining Gods loue and fauour is newe obediencâ— it selfe This latter part of conuersion is called quickening for a cleane contrarie respect vnto that for which the former part was called mortification 1. Because as a liuing man doth the actions of one that liueth so quickening is a kindling of newâ— faculties and qualities of working in vs. For the loue of God is kindled in vs and the holy Ghost is giuen vs by whom we doe good woorkes By nature the vnregenerate are dead astouching good works The regenerate begin to doe good woorkes 2. In respect of that ioie which the conuerted haue in God which is a most pleasaunt thing This ioie in God which is the other part of quickening ariseth from hence to wit in that we know God now to be pacified towardes vs and that we are able to performe the Law and bee conformed and correspondent vnto the Law and God 4 What are the causes of conuersion THE principal efficient cause of conuersion is the holie Ghost Conuert vs and we shal be conuerted The instrumentall causes or meanes are first the Lawe then the Gospell and after the doctrine of the Gospel hath beene preached Lamen 5 2â— againe the doctrine of the Law For the preaching of the Law goeth before preparing vs to the preaching of the Gospel because without the Lawe there is no knowledge of sinne and therefore no griefe or sorrowe for sinne Afterwardes followeth the preaching of the Gospell because without the Gospel there is no faith after the preaching of the Gospel againe followeth in the church the preaching of the Law that it maie be the squire of our actions So doe the Prophets first accuse threaten and exhort and then promise and lastlie exhort againe Such was also Iohn Baptistes preaching And such is the preaching doctrine of repentance which comprehendeth the Law the gospel The next instrumentall cause is faith because without faith there is no loue of God and except wee knowe what the wil of God is as namely that hee wil remit vnto vs our sinnes by and for Christ conuersion will neuer be begunne in vs neither in respect of the first part thereof which is Mortification neither in respect of the second part which is Quickening For by faith are the harts of men purified without faith there is no true ioying iâ— God neither can wee without faith loue god And whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne All good works flow from faith as from their fountain We being iustified by faith haue peace with god The furthering causes of conuersion are The crosse chastisementes as also punishmentes benefites and examples of others The subiect or matter of conuersion which belongeth to the mind will and hart is 1. Jn the minde and vnderstanding a right iudgement concerning god his wil and workes 2. In the wil an earnest and ready desire and purpose to obey god according to al his commaundementes 3. In the hart a good reformed affection The obiect of conuersion is 1. Sin or disobedieÌ„ce which is the thing from which we are conuerted 2. Righteousnes or new obedience which is the thing whereunto we are conuerted The formal cause of conuersion is the conuersion it selfe and the properties thereof The chiefe finall cause of conuersion is gods glorie The next and subordinate ende is our good euen our blessednes and fruition of euerlasting life There is another end also of conuersion which is lesse principall to wit the conuersion of others When thou art conuerted confirme thy brethren Let your light so shine before men that they may glorifie your heauenly father which is in heauen 5 What are the effectes of conuersion THE effectes of conuersion are all good woorkes and an earnest desire both to obey God according to all his commandements without exception also to conuert and recall others into the way The conuerted or beleeuers sinne indeede oftentimes but they defend not their sinnes but endeuour more and more to shun and auoide them OF GOOD-WORKES THE chiefe Questions 1 What good-workes are 2 How they may be doone 3 Whether the works of Saints be perfectly good 4 How our woorkes though not perfectlie good please God 5 Why we are to doe good-workes 6 Whether good-woorkes merit any thing in the sight of God 1 WHAT GOOD-WORKES ARE. GOOD workes are such as are done according to the prescript rule of Gods Lawe with a true faith to the glorie of God onlie Three things are heere to be considered 1 The conditions cirumstances required for the making a woorke good 2 The difference betweene the woorkes of the regenerate and the vnregenerate 3 Jn what sort the morall woorkes of the wicked are sinnes 1 That a work which we do may be good these conditions are required necessarily vnto it 1 That it be commaÌ„ded of God Matt. 15 9. Jn vaine they woorshippe mee teaching for doctrines mens precepts No creature hath the right or wisedome and vnderstanding to institute and ordaine the worship of God But good woorkes wee speake of morall good and the worship of God are all one Nowe Morall good is farre differing from naturall good in as much as al actions as they are actions euen those of the wicked are good that is naturallie but all actions are not good morally that is agreeing with the iustice of God And thus is
of sanctifieng of the sabboth We wil shortly propound them on this wise 1 Vnto the deliuering and teaching of the doctrine is opposed the omitting or neglect of teaching As also a corrupting or maiâ—ing of the doctrine or a fitting of it vnto the opinions affections lusts or commodities of the Magistrates or others 2. Corint 2.17 For we are not as manie which make merchaundize of the word of God but as of sincerity but as of God in the sight of God speak we of Christ 2 Vnto the right due administration of the Sacraments is opposed an omitting or neglect in the Church of exhortation to the receiuing of the sacraments as also a corrupt and vnlawful administration of the sacramentes when somewhat is either taken from or added to the ceremonies instituted of God or is altered chaunged in them or when some are excluded from the Sacramentes which should be admitted or are admitted which should by Gods ordinance be driuen from them or when the people is not instructed concerning the right and lawfull vse of them 3 Vnto the studie of learning the doctrine is repugnaunt 1. A contempt and neglect of the doctrine that is either not to afford our presence in sacred assemblies when there is no iust cause to hinder vs and to busie our selues in such works on the sabboth day as might haue been differred or not to giue eare and attendaunce to Sermons and the preaching of Gods woorde or not to meditate consider and examine the doctrine of the Church 2. Curiositie which is a desire study of knowing those things which God hath not reueiled vnnecessary strange and vaine 4 Vnto the right vse of the sacramentes is contrarie the omitting and contempt thereof as also a profaning of them when they are not receiued as God hath commaunded neither by them for whom they were ordained Likewise also contrary thereto is all superstitious vsing of them when as saluation and the grace of God is tied to the obseruation of the rites and ceremonies or when they are vsed to such ends as God hath not appointed 5 Vnto publike praiers is opposed the neglect of them an hypocritical presence at them without anie attention and inward deuotion Likewise such reading or praieng as serueth not for any edifieng of the Church 1. Cor. 14.16 When thou blessest with the spirit how shal he that occupieth the roome of the vnlearned saie Amen at thy giuing of thankes For he knoweth not what thou saiest For thou verily giuest thanks wel but the other is not edified 6 To the bestowing of Almes is repugnant a neglect of the works of charitie as when wee doe not according to our power succour the poore that stand in need of our help 7 To the honour of the ministerie of the church is opposed the contempt of the ministerie as when either the ministerie of the Church is abolished or committed to men vnworthy and vnable or is denied to be the means instrument which God will vse for the gathering of his Church likewise when the ministers are reproched when their doctrin is heard and not obeyed in the ordering of our life when the works of charity are neglected when necessary mainteinaunce is not allowed the Ministers when the defence and protection of them and other duties of thankefulnesse are not perfourmed towardes them when the mainteinance of Schooles and studies and learning is neglected when the tolerable defectes of the Ministers are not borne with and when for such the ministery suffereth reproch and contumely In like maner also is it against the vse of the whole ministerie not onely when some one priuately neglecteth or omitteth the vse of the ministerie but also when one by his commandement and persuasion or example or by some other hinderance calleth away his children family or any other from the vse of the ministery 5 How the sabboth belongeth vnto vs. THE seuenth day was euen from the beginning of the world designed by God to signifie that men should after the example of God himselfe rest from their labours 〈…〉 from sinnes And afterwards in Moses Lawe this commandement was againe repeated and then withal was the ceremony of ceasing from labour on the seuenth day ordayned to be a sacrament that is a signe and token of that signifieng whereby god signified himselfe to bee the sanctifier of his church that is to pardon her al her sins offences â—o receiue her into fauour to endue rule her with his holy spirite for the beginning of newe and euerlasting life in her in this life which afterwardes should be accomplished perfected for by the Messias promised to the fathers And this is the reason why the ceremonial sabboth of the seuenth day is now to be abolished namely because it was typical admonishing the people of their own duty towards god of gods benefits towards them which was to be performed by christ for which selfesame cause also al the other sacramentes sacrifices ceremonies made before after the Lawe were abolished by the comming of Christ by whom that was fulfilled which they signified But although the ceremonial sabboth is abrogated and disanulled in the new testament yet the moral sabboth continueth stil and belongeth vnto vs and euen the verie generall of the ceremoniall sabboth belongeth vnto vs and dooth still remaine which is that some time is to be alotted for the ministerie of the Church For we must euer haue some day wherein the word of god may be taught in the Church and the Sacramentes administred But neuerthelesse we are not restrained or tied to haue either saturday or wednesday or any other certaine day therefore the sabboth doth not belong vnto vs ceremonially in special and particular albeit it dooth belong vn vs so to al men euer continueth both morallie ceremonially in general Obiections against the abrogating of the ceremonial sabboth THE Decalogue is a perpetual Law The commaundement of the sabboth is a part of the Decalogue therefore it is a perpetuall Law and not to be abolished Aunswere The Decalogue is a perpetual Law as it is a Moral Law But the additions or circumstances and limitations of the Morall preceptes annexed by way of signification were to be kept vntil the comming of the Messias 2. The commaundments of the Dacalogue belong vnto vs. This is a commaundement of the Decalogue Therefore it belongeth vnto vs. Aunswere The commandements of the Decalogue which are Morall belong vnto vs. But this commandement is in part ceremonial so as it is ceremonial it belongeth not vnto vs albeit the general belong vnto vs. The reasons why the ceremoniall Lawe belongeth not vnto vs are especially these 1. One part of this Law of sanctifieng the sabboth is ceremonial 2. Paul saith Coloss 2.16 Let no man condemne you in respect of an holie daie 3. The Apostles themselues did change the sabboth 4. From the end or purpose of the Law It was a type
of thinges that were to bee fulfilled by Christ namely of sanctification and euery type must giue place to the thing thereby signified Likewise it was a seuering or distinguishing of the Iewes from other nations but this seuering and distinction was taken away by christ 3 The Lord saith of the sabboth daie Jt is a signe betweene mee and the children of Jsrael for euer and an euerlasting couenaunt Aunswere 1. The ceremonial sabboth was perpetuall vntil Christes comming who is the end of ceremonies 2. The sabboth is eternal as concerning the thing signified which is a ceasing from sins and a rest in God for in this sense are all the types of the old testament eternal euen the kingdome of Dauid also which yet was to be ouerthrown before the comming of the Messias 4 We grant the Mosaicall ceremonies to be changeable yet it followeth not thereof that the Lawes which were made before Moses time are changeable in the number whereof also is the keeping of the Sabboth daie Aunswere The ceremonies which were ordained by God before Moses are also changeable because they were types of the benefites of the Messias to come and therefore are by his comming abolished as circumcision which was giuen vnto Abraham as also the sacrifices which were prescribed vnto our first Parents 5 The lawes which were giuen of God before the fall are not types of the benefites of the Messias and binde all mankind for euer for then was not giuen as yet the promise of the Messias and there was one and the same condition of all mankind But the Sabboth of the seuenth daie was ordained by God assoone as the creation of the world was finished before the fall of mankinde Therefore it is vniuersal and perpetual Aunswere The Maior proposition is true concerning the morall lawe the notions whereof were imprinted in mans minde at the first creation but it is not true as touching the ceremonie or obseruing of the seuenth day as which after the fall was made a type of the benefites of the Messias in the Mosaicall lawe therfore in like maner as other ceremonies which were either then or before instituted it became subiect to mutation change by the comming of the Messias For god would not haue the shadowes of thinges to continue or remaine the thinges themselues being once come and exhibited Wherefore albeit we graunt that the exercises of diuine woorship were to haue beene kept on the seuenth day according to the commaundement prescript of the Decalogue as well if men had neuer sinned as nowe after they sinned yet notwithstanding seeing god hath enrolled this ceremonie amongest the shadowes of the Messias to come he hath by this new law enacted by Moses made it changeable together with other ceremonies 6 The cause of a law beeing perpetual doth make the lawe it selfe also perpetual The memorie and celebration of the creation and the meditation on the works of God is a perpetual cause of the Sabboth Therefore the Sabboth is perpetual Aunswere A law is made perpetuall or vnchaungeable by reason of an vnchangeable cause that is if that cause it doe necessarily or perpetually require this lawe as an effect or meane but not if at other times that ende may bee there come vnto by other meanes or if the Law-giuer may as wel obtaine the same ende by another Law In like maner seeing also this Lawe of sanctifieng the Sabboth of the seuenth day being repealed abolished we may neuertheles godlily holily by other means meditate on gods works it foloweth not that this law of the ceremonial Sabboth is perpetual although the memorie celebration of Gods creation workes ought to be perpetual and therefore hath the Church by common consent according to Christian libertie well chaunged this ceremonie of obseruing the seuenth day being taken away by Christ hath substituted in the place of the seuenth day the first day of the weeke yet so that there is obserued no difference of daies which is vtterly forbid in the Church seeing one day is not holier than another Wherefore also great difference is there betweene the Christian obseruing of the Lords day and the Iewish obseruing of the seuenth daie For 1 It was not lawfull for the Iewes to change the saboth or to omit it as being a part of ceremoniall woorship The christian church retaining still her libertie alotteth the first day vnto the Ministerie without adioyning any opinion of necessitie or woorship 2 The olde ceremoniall Sabboth was a type of things to be fulfilled in the new Testament by christs but in the new Testament that signification ceaseth and there is had regard onlie of order and comelinesse without which there could be either no ministerie or at at least-wise no well ordered ministerie in the church OF CEREMONIES The speciall Questions 1 What Ceremonies are 2 Howe the Ceremoniall Lawes differ from the Morall Lawes 3 How manie sortes of Ceremonies there are 4 Whether the Church maie ordaine Ceremonies 1 WHAT CEREMONIES ARE. CEremonies are external solemne actions ordained in the Ministerie of the Church either for order sake or for signification 2 How the ceremoniall Lawes differ from the Morall 1 CEremonies are temporarie the Morall are perpetuall 2 The Ceremonies are done all alike The Morall are not doone alwaies alike 3 The Ceremonies signifie The Morall are signified 4 The Morall are as the generall The Ceremoniall are restrained in speciall 5 The Ceremoniall serue for the Morall The Morall are the end or scope of the Ceremoniall 3 How manie sorts of Ceremonies there are CEremonies are of two sorts some commaunded by God some ordained by men Those that are commanded by god cannot be changed but by God only and those are either sacrifices or Sacraments A sacrifice is an obedience which wee performe to God A Sacrament is a token whereby God testifieth somewhat to vs. Those ceremonies which are ordained by mē may be changed by the aduise of the church if there bee good causes for the changing and alteration of them 4 Whether the church may ordaine ceremonies THE church maie and ought to ordaine ceremonies because without defining and determining of circumstaunces the Moral cannot be kept There are notwithstanding certaine conditions to bee obserued by the Church in ordaining ceremonies namely They must bee such ceremonies as are not impious but agreeable to the word of the Lord. Secondly they must not be superstitious so that wee must not thinke them necessarie to be done nether must they be done with offence Thirdly they must not be too many 4. They must not be idle and vnprofitable but must al tend to edifieng OF THE MINISTERIE The chiefe Questions 1 What the Ministerie is 2 What are the degrees of Ministers 3 For what end and purpose the Ministerie was instituted 4 Vnto whom the Ministerie is committed 5 What are the duties and functions of Ministers 1 WHAT THE MINISTERY IS THE Ministerie is a function by God ordained of teaching
Samaritan was moued rather by humane theÌ„ diuine Testimonies to imbrace it it caÌ„not therof be gathered that the certainty of the holy scripture depeÌ„deth on no other Testimonies or that by no other wee are assured of it because that that some are moued especially by humane voices to reuereÌ„ce it commeth not therof to passe for that the Scripture is not maintained by any other authority but it chaunceth through the fault and weaknes of them who sticking vpon humane records do not feel as yet or vnderstaÌ„d diuine An image and example of these degrees of faith is in the storie of the Samaritan woman Iohn 4. For many of the Samaritans are said to haue beleeued in Christ because of the speech of the woman who testified that he had told her whatsoeuer shee had done But after that they had had Christ with theÌ„ for two daies many more beleeued because of his owne speech and they said vnto the woman Now we beleeue not because of thy saying for we haue heard him our selues 2 The Emulation of the Iewes and know that this is indeed the Christ the Sauiour of the world Al men come not by the same occasions nor haue not the same beginninges vnto faith Rom. 11. Paul saith that saluation was come vnto the Gentiles and that he did magnifie his ministerie that the Iewes might bee prouoked to follow the Gentiles In the first of Peter cap. 3. 3 The honestie of wiues wiues are willed to be subiect vnto their husbandes that eueÌ„ they which obey not the woord may without the woord be wonne by the conuersation of the wiues while they behold their pure coÌ„uersation which is with feare Euen then as the Samaritans were moued first by the speech of the woman to beleeue in Christ but after they had seen Christ and heard him they were so confirmed that they said they would now beleeue though the woman hold her peace so also may it bee that they which are not as yet conuerted or are but weaklings may be moued especiallie by the Churches testimonie as which runneth more into their eies to giue credence vnto the Scripture who yet neuerthelesse after they are once illuminated with a more plentifull light of faith do find by experience that they are confirmed by a far superior and more certain testimonie that the Scripture is the woord of God and do know by the force and euidence of it that they must keepe their faith were all the Angels and men perswaders to the contrary as it is said by the Apostle Though we or an Angel from heauen preach vnto you otherwise theÌ„ that which we haue preached vnto you Gal. 1. The conclusion of the first part let him bee accursed By these thinges therefore it may bee vnderstood that the voice and consent of the catholicke Church may and ought amongest other testimonies to serue for our confirmation and yet the autoritie of the holy Scripture not to hang vpon it but that out of the Scripture it selfe rather wee must learn by what argumentes wee may bee brought to know that it was deliuered from God Because that God himselfe doth witnes it and also such is the force and quality of that heauenly doctrine that although all men should gainsay it yet it would not be any otherwise more manifestly certainly knowen to bee the voice of God then by it selfe The 2. part Arguments shewing the certaâ—ntie of the scripture But least any man may thinke that by any argumentes which eueÌ„ reason by a naturall light iudgeth to bee sound without the singular grace of the spirite this may bee wrought in the mindes of the wicked as either to obey the truth or to leaue off to reproch it first hee must remember that the arguments or testimonies are of two sortes which shew the certainty of Christian religion and maintaine the autority of the Scripture For there is but one onely testimonie which is appropriated vnto them alone who are regenerated by the Spirit of Christ and vnto them alone is it knowen the force of which testimonie is so great that it doth not onely abundantlie testify and seale in our mindes the truth of the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles but it also forcibly inclineth and moueth our hartes to the embracing and following of it Other testimonies whatsoeuer may bee brought they are vnderstood indeed both of the godly and the wicked and do compell their consciences to confes that this religion rather than others is pleasing vnto God that it came from him but vnlesse that one other come also which is knoweÌ„ of the godly alone these testimonies wil neuer bring to pas that meÌ„ shal embrace the truth although it be knowen vnto them The arguments therfore which shew the truth certainty of the scripture are these 1 The puritie of doctrine 1 Puritie and perfectnes of doctrine For wee haue the pure perfect doctrine as of the Gospel so also of the Law Now other sectes haue not both the tables of the Law perfect the first many haue in part the second but in some part also and that stained with many lies 2 The Gospel it self 2 The Gospel shewing our deliuerance Because it yeeldeth sure consolatioÌ„ to mens consciences shewing the onely way of escaping sin death The nature of man was not created to destruction Wherfore that doctrine which sheweth deliuerie without violating the iustice of God is vndoubtedly true certain 3 The antiquity of this doctrine 3 Antiquity because it is found to be most auncient partly by conference For if wee confer this with other doctrines wee shall find it to be pure and most true as deliuered from God from which men afterwardes fell away Other sectes haue sprung vp at other times and again haue perished this hath continued though it hath bin mightily oppugned by her enimies 4 Miracles proper vnto the Church 4 Miracles which tend to the same end that they may declare confirme this doctrine 1 Obiection Others also haue miracles Aunswere It is not true For albeit mention is made also of some miracles of the heathen it is said of Antichrist and false prophets that they shall woorke signes and great woonders so that the verie elect themselues if it were possible should be seduced yet these neither in number nor in greatnes are equall vnto the miracles of the Church and by the ende for which they are done it may easily be discerned that they are not wrought by any diuine power Wherefore there is a double difference especially by which true miracles are seuered from false For first those miracles which are vaunted of by the enemies of the church are such They differ 1 In the substance as without changing the course and order of nature may bee done by the sleightes iuglings of men or diuels seeme therefore to others to be miracles because they perceiue not the causes of them 2
In the end and the meanes whereby they are wrought Furthermore they haue this as their chiefe end that they may confirme idols superstitions manifest errors mischiefs But the miracles with which god hath set foorth his church are works either besides or contrarie vnto the course of nature and second causes and therefore not wrought but by the power of God The which that it might be the more manifest god hath wrought many miracles for the confirming of his truth whose verie shew the diuel is neuer able to imitate or resemble as are the raising of the dead to stay or call backe the course of the Sunne to make fruitles and barrain women fruitful But especially the miracles of God are distinguished by their endes from the diuelish and fained For they confirme nothing but which is agreeing with those thinges which afore time were reuealed by God and that in respect of the glorie of the true God of godlines and holines and the saluation of men And therefore is it said of the miracles of Antichrist 2. Thessal 2. That his comming shal bee by the working of Sathan with al power and signes and lying wonders and in al deceiueablenes of vnrighteousnes among them that perish c. Now if any be so bold as to cal in question 2 Obiection They are doubtful Answere The Antecedent is false whether or no the miracles which are reported in the Scriptures were done so indeed he is out of al question of ouer great impudency For he may after the same maner giue the lie to al both sacred and profane histories But let vs first vnderstand that as other parts of the holy story so especially the miracles are recited as things not wrought in a corner but done in the publik face of the Church and mankind In vaine should the Prophets and Apostles haue had endeuored to get credit vnto their doctrine by miracles which men had neuer seen Furthermore the doctrine which they brought was strange vnto the iudegement of reason and contrarie to the affections of men and therefore their miracles except they had bin most manifest woulde neuer haue found credite Also it clearly appeareth both in the miracles themselues and in the doctrine which is confirmed by them that they who writte them sought not their owne glory or other commodities of this life but only the glory of God mens saluation To these arguments agreeth not only the Testimonie of the Church but the confession also of the verie enemies of Christ who surely if by any meanes they could woulde haue denied and suppressed euen those thinges that were true and knowen much lesse would they haue confirmed by their Testimony ought that had beene forged or obscure 5 Oracles Obiection The Heathens also haue Prophecies Answere 5 The prophecies which were fulfilled in their due time doe yeelde their testimony vnto this doctrine in like manner the foretellings of thinges to come and the correspondence of euentes which could not bee foretold but by God reuealing them And albeit the heathens also and others boast of their prophecies and oracles yet great and manifold is the difference betweene them the sacred Prophecies which sheweth euidentlie enough that these were vttered by diuine instinct but those to haue beene Leigerdemains of the Diuell going about by a fained imitation to darcken the trueth and glorie of God For they squared from the truth and iustice of God before time reuealed they countenanced wickednesse and idolatry they were poured out by Prophets who were stirred with a furious and diuelish pang they were darke or doubtful and wheras they were vncertaine oftentimes by a false hope they allured those who listened vnto them into hurt and destruction at leastwise they were vttered of such things whose euents the Diuel through his subtiltie maie after a sort coniecture by tokens going before or else because he did know that by the permission and commaundement of God hee should bring them to passe Wherefore neither do they confirme and make good the Religions of those men amongst whom they florished neither doe they diminish the authoritie of the holy Scripture in whose oracles we maie see al things contrary vnto that which hath bin now spoken of these 6 The confession of the enemies them-selues 6 The confession of the enemies because whatsoeuer is true good in other Sects that also Christian Religion hath and that more clearly and better neither can those natural principles be refelled And if other sectes haue anie thing which agreeth not with our doctrine that may easily be refuted but if they haue any thing which cannot be refuted they haue stollen that from vs which is the Diuels woont Yea our verie enemies themselues are constrained to confesse that our doctrine is true yea the Diuel himselfe too Thou art the Sonne of God Luke 4.41 For of that force and nature is the woord of God that it doth so much the more grieuously strike and wound the consciences euen of those who are not conuerted how much the more stubburnelie they kicke against the pricke Euen as it is said Heb. 4. The word of God is liuely and mightie in operation and sharper then any two edged sword and entereth through euen vnto the diuiding asunder of the soule and the spirit and of the iointes and the marrow and is a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the hart And Luke 21. I wil giue you a mouth and wisedom wher-against al your aduersaries shal not be able to speak or resist 7 The hatred and oppugning of the diuel the wicked Iohn 8.44 7 The hatred and oppugning of this doctrine by the diuel and the wicked which is a testimonie that it is true For the truth breedeth hatred The diuel was a lier from the beginning He endeuoureth therefore to oppresse the Law and the Gospell that faith and honestie may bee destroied He doth therefore together with his complices persecute the truth because it doth more sharply accuse him than other sectes Iohn 7.7 The world hateth me saith Christ because I testify of it that the woorkes thereof are ill 8 The marueilous preseruation 8 The maruailous preseruation of this doctrine against the furies of Satan and enemies of the Church None is so much assailed none also continueth so sure Others are not assailed and yet they perish most speedily 9 The punishments of the enemies 9 The punishmentes of the enemies as of Arius Iulian and others Albeit in the world for the most part the wicked florish and the Church is oppressed yet that it falleth not Objection 1 so out by chaunce The enemies of the church doe florish Aunswere For a short time neither because God is pleased with them the euents witnes and the Scripture very often doth iterate it For the Church is alwaies preserued euen amidst her persecutions when as the short felicity of Tyrants wicked imps hath a most dolefull and aeternall destruction
writing by S. Paul himselfe So Paul saith of the Lordes supper 1. Cor. 11.23 I haue receiued of the Lord that which also J haue deliuered vnto you But this tradition after the Euangelistes himselfe also hath set downe in writing The Iesuites cite the saying of Paul 2. Thes 3.6 Withdraw your selues frō euery brother that walketh inordinately and not after the tradition which hee receiued of vs. But a little after in the same chapter hee describeth what tradition he meaneth as it is manifest to him that looketh on the place And yet will they thence prooue that many thinges are to bee beleeued which can not bee proued by anie testimonie of Scripture The like impudencies they shewe in another testimony taken out of Luke Act. 16.14 They deliuered them the decrees to keep ordained of the Apostles Elders which were at Jerusalem When a little before Cap. 15.23 he witnesseth that those decrees were set downe in letters written by the Apostles But wee are to keepe and hold the notes and marcks before set downe First in respect of Gods glorie that enimies may be discerned from Sonnes Secondly In respect of our own saluation that we may ioine our selues to the true Church For there are three sorts of men 1 They who openly professe and declare themselues to be enimies 2 Hypocrits 3 The company of the Elect chosen 4 Why the Church is called holy and Catholicke THE Church is called Holy The church holy in respect of Christs holinesse imputed and their own begun Catholique in respect of place and time 1 Because Christes sanctification is imputed vnto it 2 Because al his members haue begunne al the parts of obedience It is called Catholicke 1 In respect of places because it is spread through the whole world For there is one Vniuersall Church of all places degrees of life neither is it tied to a certaine place kingdome or to certain succession 2 In respect of times Because there is but one true Church of all times which also is at all times so Catholicke as that it is dispersed through the whol world nether is at any time tied to any certain place Jt is not called Catholicke because it possesseth many kingdomes For Catholicke is a title giuen vnto the Church in the Apostles time for before time the Church was limited within narrowe bondes Nowe that there is but one Church of al times and ages from the beginning of the world vnto the end it is out of doubt For 1 It is manifested that the Church hath euer been Neither can Abrahams daies be obiected as if before he was called there had beene no worship of the true God in his familie and himselfe had beene after his calling alone without anie others For before his calling he held the foundations and grounds of Doctrine of the true God though it were darkned with superstitions mingled therewith Againe Melchisedec liued at the same time who was the Priest of the most high God and therefore neither was Abraham after his calling alone but there were others besides him worshippers of the true God whose priest was Melchisedec 2 That the Church as it hath beene euer so shall also continue euer appeareth by these testimonies Isay 59.21 My woordes shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out of the mouth of thy seed Ier. 33.20 If the night and day may bee chaunged then shall my couenant also be changed Mat. 28.20 I am with you alway vntill the end of the world Moreouer Christ was euer and euer shal be King Head and Priest of the Church Wherefore the Church was euer and euer shall be And hence also it is manifest That the Church of both testaments is one and the same that which is confirmed also by the article folowing For Christ is the sanctifier of his Church who is common to men of both testaments Hither appertaineth the Question of the authoritie of the Church Which I omit In this we wil consider here onely that opinion or saying The church doth not erre How the church may bee saide not to erre Which is true after this sort First the whole doth not erre though some members thereof doe er Secondly it doth not erre Vniuersally although in some pointes of Doctrine it may Thirdly It erreth not in the foundation 5 In what the Church differeth from the common-weal 7 Differences betweene the Church and common-weale THE Church differeth from the common-weal 1. Because common-weales are distinct and kingdomes of the world in diuerse places and times The Church is alwaies one and the same at all times and with all men 2. The kingdomes and states of the world haue many Heads or one chiefe Heade and many other inferiour Heades besides and that on earth The Church hath but one and that in heauen 3. The common-wealth is gouerned by certaine lawes made for the maintenance of outwarde peace and tranquillity The Church is ruled by the Holy Ghost the worde of God 4. The common-wealth or ciuill state requireth outward obedience onely The Church requireth both as well inwarde obedience as outwarde 5. In ciuill states and common-weales there is power and libertie to make new lawes positiue by the authoritie of the magistrate the violating of which lawes bindeth mens consciences and deserueth corporal punishmentes The Church is tied to the woorde of God vnto which it is not lawfull to adde ought or to detract ought from it 6. The ciuill state hath corporall power where-with it is armed against the obstinate disobedient For he may and ought by force to curb these and to punish them by the sword The Church punisheth by denouncing of Gods wrath out of the worde of God 7. Jn the Church are alwaies some Elect Holie but not alwaies in the common-wealth 6 Whence ariseth the difference of the Church from the rest of mankinde THE cause of the difference is the Election of God Election putteth the difference betweene the Church and others Act. 14.16 Jn times past god suffered all the Gentiles to walke in their owne waies Rom. 9.18 God hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Ioh. 6.37 Al that the Father giueth me shal come to me Rom. 8.29.30 Those which hee knew before he also predestinate to be made like to the Image of his Sonne and whom he predestinate them also he called By these wordes we are also taught that the promise of grace is generall in respect of the Elect or beleeuers God verilie would haue all to be saued and that Rom. 11.7 1 Jn respect that he loueth the saluation of all But the Elect only haue attained to that saluation 2 In respect that he inuiteth al to saluation But the rest haue beene hardened The Efficient cause then of this difference is the Election of God willing to gather vnto himselfe a Church in earth Secondly the Sonne is a mediate executour of this will and purpose The holy ghost immediate Thirdly The