Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	efficient_a	faith_n	instrumental_a	2,644	5	11.5403	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A63017	The re-assertion of grace, or, Vindiciæ evangelii a vindication of the Gospell-truths, from the unjust censure and undue aspersions of Antinomians : in a modest reply to Mr. Anth. Burgesses Vindiciæ legis, Mr. Rutherfords Triall and tryumph of faith, from which also Mr. Geerie and M. Bedford may receive a satisfactory answer / by Robert Towne.	Towne, Robert, 1592 or 3-1663.; Bushell, Seth, 1621-1684.; Towne, Robert, 1592 or 3-1663. Monomachia, or, A single reply to Mr. Rutherford's book ...	1654 (1654)	Wing T1980; ESTC R23436	205,592	262

Christ a distressed and pursued soul may be safe and in peace but nowhere else M. B. Now these speak of Christs death as an universal meritorious cause without any application of Christs death unto this or that soul Therefore you must still carry this along with you that to that grand mercy of justification somthing is requisite as the efficient viz. the grace of God something meritorious viz. Christs sufferings something instrumental viz. faith and one is as necessary as the other Answ The full bent and chief drift of the Doctors ministery is the application of Christ and the benefits of his death unto the soul who so see any thing cannot but so judge I marvel then at this your so palpable accusation 2. Dr. Crisp speaketh of justification as it is Gods alone gracious act in Christ discharging and acquitting all the Elect in him at the time of his passion and resurrection fully and for ever This was done in fore caeli or as others coram judicio Dei As for the instrumentals whether the word to reveal and publish it or faith to apprehend and rest on it they were neither necessary to that Act of God but onely afterward to give evidence and assurance to the several consciences of all those Elect of what was done for them freely by God in Christ upon the cross For there God was in Christ reconciling them to himself 2 Cor. 5.18 M. B. I will but mention one place more Psal 68.18 Thou hast received gifts even for the rebellious also c. adding Is not all this strange Though the Author press sanctification never much in other places yet certainly such principles as these over grow it Answ 1. Why is it that you think this strange viz. That the loathsomness and hatefulness of this rebellion is transacted from the person upon the back of Christ he beareth the sin as well as the shame c. So that God acquitted his Elect and satiffied his justice in Christ their Sure y and by this means it cometh to pass that God can dwell withthose persons Is this any more then what Paul saith in short and plain words viz. Christ was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 and Ephes 2.14 Christ by his Crosse hath slain enmity and made peace Is not Christ the Communis terminus the bond and mean of union and atonement with God by his only sacrifice while we were sinners enemies in our selves we were reconciled in Christ Rom. 5.10 The ground and reason of your opposing is in that you are of opinion that God commeth unto us by or with or because of some inherent graces or qualifications in us which be as a Load-stone to draw and unite his affection and that Christ is but the meritorious cause of this a Papistical conceit God is in Christ and where Christ is there is God present I am in the Father and the Father in me Ioh. 14.10 he that hath the Son hath the Father also and he that hath not the Son hath not the Father He that receiveth me receiveth him that sent me Ioh. 13.20 God then loveth uniteth himself and cometh to the soule only in and through Christ In whom he makes us accepted Eph. 1.6 and that only of his grace If the presence of good works you so contend for in justification were granted you yet God hath no respect to them but beholdeth us as sinful wretches plunged into all confusion and being moved to pity us he considereth our persons and receiveth us alone in our Lord Jesus Christ yea he only beholdeth as our selves so all our good works in that perfection of his Son else they could not be accepted nor liked saith Mr. Calvin And these are the only true and most powerful and operative principles of all right sanctification though your legally-forced sanctity or reformation may grow and arise out of another natural principle and dead root Lastly as for that conversion and change of the most rebellious by the Ministery it is the product or effect of this doctrine I muse that a man of your parts and Religion should so stumble in so clear a light LECTURE IIII. 1 Tim. 1.8 9. Knowing the Law is good if a man use it lawfully M. B. Having confuted some dangerous inferences that the Antinomian makes from that precious Doctrine of justification Answ Egregiam vero laudem spolia ampla refers tu Review now your elaborate work and you will not finde one syllable of real confutation you may learn palmodiam canere I only intend to defend and vindicate the assertions and cause of your later Antinomians as you are pleased to call them as for Islebius Agricola he is none of my acquaintance I never read him If you wrong him God is his Judg and avenger yea and this also I would have the Reader know thāt I am minded to pass by whatever I shall henceforth meet withall whether positive or controversal if it do not directly touch or reflect upon his three named Antinomians lest all the rest in this book be taken for orthodox or I be accounted an approver of it for many things in it besides are to me unsavoury and unsound M. B. sect 2. They tell us not only of a righteousness or justification by imputation but also Saintship and holiness by this obedience of Christ And hence it is that God seeth no sin in believers Answ If they tell you of such perfection that God seeth no sin they withal in the same place tell you if you had the same ears to hear it that this justification or Saintship is by imputation and not by inherent sanctification If Christ be held forth unto you by God himself as one that hath washed you and cleansed you from all sin and withal it be given you so to apprehend and receive it what think you now of your self and condition while you abide in this light In the Creed you say I believe a holy Church yet the Church it self is no exterior or visible thing that the world can discern though the persons be visible and her holiness is invisible onely faith which is of things not seen Heb. 11.11 can behold this purity of the Church not in the Law nor any work or inherent thing but as she is washed and made clean in the blood and righteousness of her Redeemer The Church is all fair saith August for her filthiness is taken away by Christ and he hath made her fair Look upon the Christians life and there thou maist finde many things that thou blamest If he look within himself the work of renovation there wrought it is also imperfect and not pure but as he is beheld in Christ who hath sanctified him he is altogether pure and holy but faith only seeth this Mark but this one saying of Calvin To the intent that God may no more be an enemy and take part against us who are

law wherefore I am not the first deviser or broacher thereof nor alone in this opinion as walking in an unbeaten path But unto me it is most strange that M. B. should be so self-confident and bold of spirit as to presume to carry it with violence against all others Let me commend unto thee the words of Perkins because he is worthily approved of and best known unto the simple sort upon Gal. 3.2 Here saith he we see the difference between the Law and the Gospel the law doth not minister the Spirit unto us for it onely sheweth our disease and giveth us no remedy the Gospel ministereth the Spirit And upon Gal. 2.19 Evangelical sorrow is sorrow for sin because it is sin this indeed is the grace of God but it is not wrought by the law but by the preaching of mercy and reconciliation c. the Law then being the cause of no good thing in us And Cudworth on Gal. 6.2 in the last difference between Law and Gospel hath these words The law is no instrumental cause of faith repentance or any saving grace Is this now but seemingly to comply with our opinion when they say the law is no instrumental cause of faith repentance nor of any saving grace nor yet of any good thing in us and still these Authors were no Antinomians but we must be so because our Adversaries like those of Stephen Act. 7. do rule and will have it so I tremble to consider the woful consequences if the Ecclesiastical power should be once in their hands but I trust God will not suffer the wise and honourable Parliament so to intrust them But let us listen what his conceit is M. B. I shall now labour to maintain the positive part that the law preached may be blessed by God instrumentally to work the conversion of men An. The question is not of Gods power whether he may or can do it but whether he hath done it let it appear in all the New Testament that any one was converted but by the Gospel Nay Paul and Priests with others who had been zealous in the way of the law were then onely converted when they received the Gospel and become obedient to the faith Act. 6.7 or did God ever reveal it that his will is to convert by the law God can or may make heavy mountains to ascend as high as the Sun and there abide and the waters in the Sea to burn like straw or other combustible matter but he never did so as yet If you shew it to be his will we shall question it no further M. B. And it is necessary to make this good Answ Because you have undertaken it and are resolved to oppose the apparent and generally received truth to be contrary to all the Orthodox to gratifie Sion Colledge to get a name to your self of being a knowing man seeing more then all other learned Divines or at least to maintain your owne credit now it is necessary for you M. B. For were the contrary true it would be a Ministers duty in great part to lay aside the preaching of the Moral Law as not instrumental and subservient to that maine end of the ministry which is the conversion of souls Answ If I take your words in their true sense they argue 1. I am sorry to speak it that M. B. knoweth not what conversion of the soul is but this may be tryed by and by 2. That he intendeth when he preacheth to convert people by the Law and looketh that the Spirit should make it effectual for that purpose and however he putteth in or subservient to that main end yet he meaneth not onely preparatorily for that he saith he cannot yeeld unto which yet is the clear judgement and constant and sound doctrine of all true Divines but he will be singular But see his ground and how sandie uncertain and weak it is to lay and erect an edifice of so great consequence upon it M. B. I suppose that Jesus Christ hath obtained of God by his death that such efficacy and vertue should go forth in the Ministery that whether it be by Law or Gospel he preacheth the souls of men may be healed and converted thereupon Answ And must your meer supposition satisfie us in a controversie so newly needlesly and yet dangerously started up to the great offence and disturbance of the Church of this nature and high concernment you may suppose Christ hath redeemed all men and Devils A Papist supposeth that Christ by his death hath obtained that his Alms-deeds Penance and good works should have a meritorious vertue and efficacy in them for pardon and salvation and upon that deceitful foundation or supposition the silly deluded wretch buildeth and hazardeth his everlasting salvation Oh that any should be so simple and unwise to content himself with an I supposed it is so 2. You say whether it be by law or Gospel so as if God and Christ are indifferent and it is left to mans choice to use either as he liketh for conversion that is more liberty then is allowed you 3. That the souls may be healed and converted The right order is first to be converted then healed Mat. 13.15 But let this pass yet it is requisite that we agree about the terms for some doubts or differences may arise from the ambiguity of the words yet not as if I would yeeld that regeneration conversion or healing of which I see you make no difference in whatever Scripture-acceptation are wrought instrumentally by the law but to help the weak reader and to clear the truth every way And first Regeneration is the begetting again of the soul to God which God doth freely of his owne accord by the word of truth Jam. 1.18 but because this will not be current that this is meant of the Gospel onely as is objected and as is to be discussed more fully in the next Lecture in that the law is also called the word of truth Let me therefore add two pregnant Texts to put this out of all doubt that it is to be understood of the Gospel exclusively The first is Eph. 1.13 In whom you also after you heard the word of truth the Gospel of your salvation by which Paul telleth how the Ephesians came to their faith and hope in Christ namely by the preaching of the Gospel So saith Calvin He adorneth the Gospel with two Epithets in that he calls it the word of truth and in that it is the instrument of salvation which two adjuncts saith he are diligently to be observed And the Gospel is not onely a certain truth which cannot deceive for so is the Law but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he calls the word of truth as if properly no truth were without it and the vertue and efficacy of it is such that it bringeth salvation unto us as it is also Rom. 1.16 The Gospel is the power of God to salvation c. and therefore Paul was not ashamed nor afraid to

condition the free gift of God is eternal life Rom. 6.23 All the Orthodox deny the promise of the Gospel to be conditional for if good works be conditions of life in the Covenant of Grace what then are the conditions of the Covenant of works Or wherein do they differ As this is to confound Law and Gospel Nata est in scholis Pseudo Apostolorum thus to distinguish between justification and salvation so it is remarkable that this distinction and question did first come out of the school of the false Prophets who thereby occasioned great disturbance in the Church as Act. 15.1 5. So Gerard c. M. B. Now by the Antinomian Argument as a man may be justified while he is wicked and doth abide so so also he may be glorified and saved for this is their principle that Christ hath purchased justification glory and salvation for us even though sinners and enemies Answ Methinks your face should blush for shame at the framing of this so appareatly unjust charge and accusation doth any say that Justification leaveth a man wicked Nay do not all and every write otherwise let others judge I say no more But that their principle is undenyably true yet your Logick can finde no ground in it for this corrupt and absurd inference If Christ ever purchased glory justification and salvation for us it was when and while we were sinners and enemies or not at all for he purchased nothing since ye became holy and a friend to God or him neither needed to purchase righteousness and life for any but sinners How are you permitted to err and mislead M. B. 6. They are in their own nature a defence against sin and corruption if we consider the nature of these graces Eph. 6.14 16. there you have some graces a shield some a breast-plate c. Answ 1. Graces as you call them or gifts of Grace are improperly put in and reckoned among good works 2. The defence and power they have against sin is especially in regard of their object Christ his righteousness and promises For thence it is that all they are so good and useful armour If you have Faith and hope and ever was in any great conflict you have found that all your defence help stay and victory was onely from and by Christ the object he is the onely refuge plea and sure Rock when all works will fail M. B. 8. They are necessary by debt and obligation Answ The works of the Law are debts required to be payed first that we may have life and favour but the love and works of the Gospel are for life peace and favour first had and obtained M. B. 9. And the Law of God still remaineth as a rule and directory Answ As it ruleth so it reigneth reproveth and condemneth and when you have walked most precisely according to it it will subdue you and your obedience under the Curse Gal. 3.10 for all you can do is too light when it is put into this balance You say The Antinomian teacheth the abolition of all the Commandments He is an Antinomian indeed that doth so but I must you still thus wrong and slander us M.B. 10. They are necessary by way of comfort to our selves And this opposeth many Antinomian passages who forbid us to take any peace by our holiness Answ There be divers kindes of comfort arising from different grounds and considerations The Doctor speaks of that peace and comfort which ariseth from the true and certain knowledge of remission of sins and reconciliation with God the true proper and pure fountain whereof is Christ crucified as for your works they are like puddle-water a blundered and polluted stream or a deceitful brook yea as a broken Cistern that holdeth little or none You say in temptation they fail and are not to be regarded or looked at See this answered also in the third prejudicial inference Lect. 3. M. B. These good works though imperfect may be a great comfort to us as the testimony of Gods eternal love towards us Thus did Hezekiah 2 King 20.3 he is there a thankful acknowledger of what was in him c. Answ The best and most satisfactory testimony and assurance of Gods love is his giving of that dear Son of his love to die that we might live through him Joh. 3.16 1 Joh. 4.9 10. In this he commends sets forth and confirms his love Rom. 5.8 to put it out of all doubt 2 The next testimony is the giving of his Spirit for to reveal the things of Christ the unsearchable riches in him Joh. 16.14 Eph. 3.8 To shed abroad that love in our hearts that so the soul may know it feel the consolation of it c. 3 A third is the delivering and freeing of our hearts and natures from that bondage and pollution of sin by sanctifying us in body soul and spirit yet these are no causes but effects and expressions of his free and eternal love because he loved his own he doth all for them Our works are no causes or motives to him nor yet sure testimonies of Gods eternal love for many a Papist heathen and reprobate for the matter and shew of works exceed divers of them who believe Therefore if you will have them such testimonies and so have comfort from them you must look on them in all their causes especially in 1 The Efficient and the impulsive and moving cause which be neither the light judgement or dictamen of reason and natures principles nor the command coaction and commination of the Law by its rule and authority extorting them from us as being unwilling but they come from a free and voluntary spirit so made by the spirit of regeneration and Adoption moving to do good in love and delight Rom. 8.14 therefore be they called the fruits of the Spirit Gal. 5.22 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naz. Secondly in the subject that the person be reconciled accepted and in favour through Faith in Christ Jesus Heb. 11.6 Lastly to say nothing of the form or object the end they are to be referred unto is not self-praise or profit to procure nor preserve by them our own peace favour or salvation with God which be the effects of Faith in Christ but simply Gods honour his Churches and our neighbours good even as our love is due also Mat. 22.37.39 And if these circumstances required necessarily to every good work Displicet deo dubitatio quare neque cols neque invocari cum dubitatione ●otest Melanct. be considered the soul will finde little need of works as testimonies and arguments of Gods love For that must be out of doubt first for a doubtful Conscience cannot please God by any work or obedience And your example of Hezekiah cometh nothing neer to make good your Assertion For as Gods works for us are testimonies of his love so our works at the most are but witnesses of our love unto him and therefore cannot be testimonies as you affirm of Gods

it M. B. A third and last instance out of Scripture in answering of which all is answered from Gal. 3.2 Received ye the Spirit by the works of the Law or by the hearing of Faith that of the Gospel or doctrine of Faith In the opening of this Text we must take heed of three errors Answ A Caveat against all error is necessary but it is well that you accuse your Antinomian of none of those three And it had been wisdom in you to have taken heed of affectation of singularity for in rejecting all other of the Orthodox you substitute a most doubtful opinion of your owne as may appear by and by M. B. First I may demand whether any under the old Testament were made partakers of Gods Spirit or no. If they were how came they by it there can be no other way found but that God did give his Spirit in all those publick Ordinances unto the believing Israelites so that although they did in some measure obey the Law yet they did it not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace Answ You might beware of co-incidency with the first error you named of having Faith before the Spirit for ever we come not to Faith by our reason and will yet you grant a giving of the Spirit to believers as if they first believed then received the Spirit but the gifts and operations of the Spirit are divers It s by the Spirit that the soul cometh to union with Christ and after the woman touched the hem of his garment she received a healing vertue but let this pass 2. By your next expression you might seem to be an Antinomian for They obeyed the Law say you but not by the power of the Law but by the power of Grace what difference now but I like not to force the joyning of hands where the parties hearts be not first linked yet the Reader may take it as if you contradicted your self for why are your words so exclusive but if it be not by the power of the Law originally as by the first and principal efficient yet you mean still it is a subordinate and secondary cause or mean of conveyance Egregie sane M.B. Again in the next place which hath alwayes much prevailed with me did not the people of God receive the grace offered in the Sacraments in the Circumcision Paschal Lamb They were partakers of Christ as well as we and yet the Apostle doth as much exclude Circumcision and these Jewish Ordinances from grace as any thing else wherefore that there may be no contradiction in Scripture some other way is to be thought upon about the exposition of these words Answ When a man willingly of himself is going down a steep place every thing will further him If you had not first conceived this silly and weak opinion of your self out of a humour of contradiction and desire to be accounted the vindicator of the Law you needed not to be so puzled and put to such shifts nor to seek out such sandy grounds and tottering Pillars to support what you see cannot be upholden I may so far credit you that this hath prevailed with you as you tell us but I cannot think it alway did so for you have not alway thought of this nor alway been of this private opinion that the Law is the doctrine of regeneration 2. Grant that this prevailed to keep and continue you in that minde yet would I learn if I might be so bold what brought you into it at first sure it came by some immediate inspiration for I see neither clear Scripture nor Author for it 3. As it hath so prevailed with you so I am sensible of no force at all in it whether to incline or carry the judgement unto it at first or to keep the minde the same still Consider better of it It is granted the people of God did receive the grace offered in their Sacraments c. and were partakers of Christ as well that is as truly and as really as we now what is this to your purpose I ingenuously profess I see not wherein it maketh one jot for you or to confirm your tenet what would you infer hence you say the Apostle did as much exclude these ordinances from grace as any things else and as well as much as the Law that must be your meaning Answ Your self have seemed still to exclude the Law from Grace and to make a direct opposition between them 2. As for Circumcision and these Ordinances being in their prime institution types yea signes exhibitive of Christ and if not essential parts yet appendances of their Covenant of Grace which cannot be said of the Law it being a doctrine of another nature and use therefore neither the Apostles nor Prophets in that case and sense did exclude them from Grace but onely as the hypocrites Ceremonia Legis in sua natura consideralae non autem quatenus suo tempore Sacramenta erant gratiae Pisc Gal. 3. and unbelievers did use them as resting in the things done or using them being antiquated and our of date or joyning them with Christ and Faith as necessary observances to salvation c. Now as this assertion will be too bold as unjustifiable That the Apostle doth as much exclude the Jewish Sacraments in their prime pure and right use from Grace as he doth the Law so that Argument is too childish viz. If the believing Jewes were partakers of Christ and did receive grace by these Ordinances so did they receive grace by the Moral Law also If you look again there is neither contradiction in Scripture nor occasion given to seek out such an uncouth and unwarrantable exposition of the words M. B. Some there are that understand by the Spirit c. Answ Here you first present your Reader with Beza's interpretation but that is misliked as not to your purpose Again say you thus it may be explained As by faith is meant the doctrine of faith so by the works of the Law is to be understood the doctrine of the works of the law thus far I approve which the false Apostles taught viz. That Chrict was not enough to justification unless the works of the law were put in as a cause also Answ If you look into Act. 15. and compare vers 1. and 5. it seemeth that they taught Christ for justification for it is said vers 5. they believed and what should they believe in Christ for but for righteousness and yet they required Circumcision and the keeping of the Law of Moses as necessary to salvation vers 1 5. when we are justified we must work to get heaven So many now hold and teach that good works and observing of the Law are not needfull to justification but they are to salvation of which sort you will prove one if I mistake not Contrary to Act. 15.10.11 Now why tempt ye God to lay a yoak on the Disciples necks c. that is as though he

their actions else perfection should be in us and no need of justification if we sin not What gaine you by this you say by justification there is no removal of sin but of the guilt or obligation to eternal wrath c. But the Scripture speaketh not of guilt nor obligation to punishment but of sin and the debt it self whereof we being discharged the obligation to the curse ceaseth upon that yet we may be discharged in our accounts with God of sin and it be still dwelling in us and we confess it too Now what flashly divinity is this nay is not your doctrine truely fleshly for it is self-liking and from a carnal principle That our good works are conditions of life and salvation And that Christ saveth from eternal wrath but we must suffer temporary punishment here we may sin and the law not curse us c. hence is your doctrine so currant and acceptable to all carnal mindes M. Rutherf pag. 572. Towne by the word Law Rom. 6. I understand saith he Moral law with all its Authority Answ If we be freed from all authority of the law then hath the sixth command no authority from God to teach that murder is a sin that Idolatry is agaainst the second commandment Reply By like consequence it may be said If there be no curse nor condemnation in the law we live under as you teach us then the sixth Commandment cannot curse or condemn for murder c. Your Argument holdeth not what the law saith it is to them that are under it The law may have power though you in a true sense be not under it So the Law teacheth what sin is and what curse is annext to sin though you agree with the prophane and secure in heart who in their imaginations deceitfully separate sin and the curse as they would sin without peril M. Rutherf Then the Believer when he lyes whores c. is not obliged to know and see from the light of the law that these be sins Reply In like manner by your doctrine he is to see no condemnation nor danger by the Law for these sins but may live and continue secretly in sinning for the Law to him hath no condemning power deliver your self and acquit me M. Rutherf Mark saith T. Three grounds of mistake 1. That justification and sanctification are separable 2. To ease men by faith of the yoke of the law is to suffer them to run after the course of the world 3. That all strict conformity to the law is right sanctification Answ 1. Not any of these is owned by Protestant Divines they are all in Mr. T. forged calumnies Reply I hate forging and wish you used it no more then I you finde not me charging Protestant Divines with these but whether Mr. Burgess with the President and fellows of Sion Colledge who unanimously justifie and commend to the whole Kingdome his Sermons and Doctrine and Dr. Taylor whom your self so much defend be Protestant Divines I leave that to your thoughts For 1. Mr. Burgess saith expresly That the Law is used as an effectual instrument of Sanctification Regeneration and Conversion And D. Taylor saith If a man be freed from the Law he may whore steal c. as if there were no power in the word of Grace and spirit to renew guide and keep us in the good wayes of God And to the third I say If hundreds teach not so then I am mistaken Who is now the forger of Calumnies whether they owne them or no. I avow them as I say Yet you say we never make the Law the efficient instrument of sanctification and you know it is otherwise They for whom you so plead and against whom for that cause we except have taught and published as I say Mr. Rutherf I cannot see that sanctification is any thing by Antinomian Doctrine but meer justification Reply You want eye-salve or will not see how often may you read them distinguished in the Assertion Mr. Rutherf Mr. T. passes by all guidance of the Saints by Commandment of Law or Gospel and tells us of a leading by a free Spirit onely So that by the Antinomian doctrine we are no more under the Gospel as a directing and Commanding rule then under law What hindereth then but Antinomian justification bids live as we list 2. A dead letter forbids no sin commands no duty but the Gospel without the Spirit is a dead letter as well as Law Reply 1. Is Mr. Rutherf guilty of denying all truths he never mentioneth but 2. The Assertion telleth you of a sanctifying vertue and power of the Spirit by the Gospel to subdue sin change the heart and freely dispose it to walk according to the rule of the Law this you read And under this dominion and guidance of this Evangelical spirit of Christ are all the Sons of God Rom. 8.18 What an indirect and undue inference then do you make saying We teach men to live as they lift First there is a change in their list and will from what they were The Spirit lusteth against the flesh Gal. 5. And 2. I tell you If this Spirit have not soveraignty over you and power to renew and guide you you will neither follow the rule of Law nor Gospel The unction leadeth into all truth You call the Gospel a dead Letter It s no Scripture-phrase which saith it s the ministration of the spirit 2 Cor. 3.8 yet it makes not against me at all Mr. Rutherf If by conformity to the law in the letter Mr. T. means external obedience without faith in Christ He knows Protestant Divines acknowledge no sound sanctification but that which is the natural issue and fruit of justification and flows from faith And such strict conformity to the law we hold to be true sanctification though all enemies to holy walking cry out against it such as are all mockers of all religion the Prelatical and Antinomian party who mock strait walking Reply Bona verba quaeso But 1. I know Protestant Divines hold sanctification to issue out of justifying faith and you cannot but know many who deny it and that some will have sanctification to be coetaneous unto yea to precede justification 2. If it be the issue and fruit of faith by which the heart believeth first to justification and salvation how is it that you teach strict conformity to be a necessary condition mean or way of salvation which by faith is attained in order before holy walking He that believeth is saved Abraham did believe and work both but he did onely by faith come to blessedness and so all his children Gal. 3.9 2. You are ill-transported when in your distemper you conjoyn us with the Prelatical party though I doubt not but amongst them were divers as sound for doctrine and life as in your party and make us both mockers and enemies to holy walking Sir doth the Law now regulate you when you are so far from charity and truth The Lord forgive and