reprobate are condemned because of their sinnes Sinnes foresene are noâ— the cause why a man is reprobate And yet we ought not hereby to inferre that sinnes foreséene are the cause why any man is reprobate For they cause not that GOD purposeth that he will not haue mercye Howbeit they are the cause of damnation whiche followeth in the last time but not of reprobation which was from eternally The laste ende of reprobation is the declaration of the mightye iustice of God as Paul hath taughte namely that these vessels are prepared vnto wrath because God woulde shew in them his power And God aunswereth of Pharao Euen vnto this end haue I raysed thee vp that I might shew in thee my power The farthest ende is damnation whiche as it is iust so also is it allowed of God But the niest ende are sinnes For God coÌ„maunded that the people should be made blinde that they should not vnderstand that they should not heare Lest peraduenture saith he they should be conuerted and I should heale them For sins although as they are sins they are by God in his lawes condemned yet as they are iuste punishmentes they are by him imposed for the wicked desertes of the vngodly But we muste not stay in these néerer endes We must go farther that we may at the length come to that ende which Paul hath set foorth namely that the iustice of God should be declared And thus muche hitherto as touching the first article Now let vs come to the second wherein is to be sought the cause of predestination Of the cause of predestination Forasmuch as predestination is the purpose or will of God and the same wil is the first cause of all thinges which is one and the selfe same with the substance of God it is not possible that there should be any cause thereof Howbeit we do not Of the will of God may sometimes be geuen a reason but neuer any cause especially an efficient cause We cannot geue any reasonâ— of the 〈◊〉 of God â–ª but those which the holâ— scriptures haue set forth vnto vs. Predestination may haue a final cause The material cause is after a sorte found in predestination The â—nd is considered two maner of wayes therfore deny but that sometimes may be shewed some reasons of the wil of God which although they may be called reasons yet ought they not to be called causes especially efficient causes But that in the scriptures are sometimes assigned reasons of the will of God may by many places be gathered The Lord sayth that he therefore did leade aboute the children of Israell throughe the deserte rather then through shorter passages through which he could haue lead them that they should not sodenlye méete with theyr enemies Adam also was placed in Paradise to husband it and to kéepe it And God testifieth that he woulde not as yet expell the Cananites out of the land of Chanaan because they had not yet as filled yâ— measure of their sinnes Howbeit althoughe as we haue sayde the scripture vse sometimes to bring reasons of the wil of God yet no maÌ„ ought to take vpon him to râ—der a certain reason of it but that which he hath gathered out of the scriptures For so as we are dull of vnderstanding we should easely vsurpe our owne dreames in stede of true reasons But that there are finall causes of the predestination of God we deny not For they are expressedly put of Paul and especially when he citeth yâ— of Pharaoâ—euen o this end haue I stirred thee vp that I mighte shewe in thee my power and of the elect he sayth that God would in them shew forth hys glorye The materiall cause also may after a sorte be assigned For men which are predestinate and those thinges which God hath decreed by predestination to geue vnto the elect as are these vocation iustification and glorification may be called the matter about which predestination is occupied This moreouer is to be noted that the end may sometimes be taken as it is of vs in minde and desire conceaued and then it hath the consideration of an efficient cause for being so conceaued in the minde it forceth men to worke Sometimes also it is taken as it is in the thinges and as we attayne vnto it after our laboures And then properly it is called the end bycause the worke is then finished and we are at quiet as now hauing obteyned the end of our purpose But we therefore put this distinction It may be both true false that we are predestinate by workes that if at any time we should be asked whether God do predestinate men for workes or no we should not rashly eyther by affirming or by beniinge geue hasty sentence For the ambiguity is in this word for how it is to be vnderstand For if good workes be taken as they are in very dede are wrought bycause God predestinateth vs to this end that we should liue vprightly as we rede in the Epistle vnto the Ephesians namely that we are elected to be holye and immaculate and that God hath prepared good workes that we shoulde walke in them as touching this sentence or meaning the proposition is to be affirmed But if that worde for he referred vnto the efficient cause as thoughe the good workes which God foresaw we should do are as certayne merites and causes which should moue God to predestinate vs this sence is by no meanes to One effect of predestination may be the cause of an other effect but they cannot be causes of the purpose of God be admitted It is possible indede that the effectes of predestination may so be compared together that one may be the cause of the other But they can not be causes of the purpose of God For vocation which is the effect of predestination is the cause that we are iustified Iustification also is the cause of good works and good workes although they be not causes yet are they meanes by which God â–ª 〈…〉 ngeth vs vnto eternall life Howbeit none of all these is the cause or the meane why we are choseÌ„ of God as contrariwise sins indede are yâ— causes why we are damned but yet not why we are reprobate of God For if they should Iâ— sinnes were the causes of reprobation no man should be elected The purpose of God not to haue mercy is as free as the purpose to haue mercy Why good workes foresene are not the causes of predestination A place out of the first epistle to Timothie be the cause of reprobation no man could be elected For the condition estate of all men is a like For we are all borne in sinne And when at any time Augustine sayth that men are iustly reprobate for theyr sins he vnderstandeth together with reprobation the last effect thereof namely damnation But we may not so speake if by reprobation we vnderstand the purpose of God not to haue mercy For that purpose is no lesse
obiecte vnto vs the Gospell younge menne whyche are studious of the Gospel yea euen theyr own senses and humane reason cryeth agaynst them saying are ye not ashamed of thys new doctrine Are ye so blynde that ye see not that by thys meanes good workes are condemned the worshipping of God perisheth the minstery of the church is troden vnder foote the dignity of priesthode is abiected ecclesiasticall riches are vtterly spoyled what patrones or supporters of learned men shall ye haue hereafter Did your elders which went before you both in thys Mecoenate◠vniuersity and in others being both doctors notable men follow these steps Vnto these men also ought we to aunswere we are not ashamed of the Gospell howsoeuer you speake ill of it If so be they wil say we haue the Gospell yours A collatio◠of the doctrine of the Papistes of the Gospell is a new doctrine Let vs answere them agayne In such sort is that the Gospel which ye haue as that is the Gospell to set forth fayned worshippinges of god casting away and dispising the sincere worshipping described vnto vs of God as it is to worshippe stockes and images as is to obtrude vowes whereby such men are drawen away from matrimony which aboue others haue most neede therof as is to go on pilgrimages vnto Images to worshippe the bones of Saynctes to inuocate the dead and an infinite number of such other like Wherefore ye ought to be ashamed of your doctrine and not we of the Gospell of Christ Let it be diligētly examined what we by the same gospel iudge of the What maner of doctrine ours is honour of god We attribute all thinges vnto hym only we wil in all thinges depend of hym only Farther see what our iudgement is concerning the worshippyng of hym We desire to retayne the same pure and holy as it is delyuered vs in the holy scriptures What do we thinke of good works we vrge them continually and requyre to haue them done of vs so perfectly that we thinke alwayes that something remayneth not perfectly done of vs vnto whiche we should leuel and whereunto we ought to direct all our endeuors What iudge we as concerning the holy ministery we trauayle to haue it to be in great estimation as by which God worketh our saluacion What of Sacraments That they should be kept pure and vndefyled and be reduced vnto that vse whereunto Christ instituted them What iudge we of magistrates that they should be obeyed and that we should be subiecte vnto them in all thinges so that they commaund nothing agaynst the word of God What of poore and miserable men that we should helpe and relieue them What of publike peace and tranquillity That it be kept yea euen with the los of our goods What of sciences and good learning That they should be mayntained and aduaunced Why do ye obiect auncientnes vnto vs There is nothing that we more desire then to haue thynges brought to their olde estate Ye haue brought in new thinges we require againe the estate of the primitiue Church and desire to haue againe the institucions of the Apostles Wherefore there is no cause why we should be ashamed of the gospel of which such as complain do rather lament the losse of theyr commodities then that they can accuse our doctrine And if anye Troubles and discommodities are not to be ascribe◠vnto the Gospel troubles or discommodities happen they are not to be ascribed vnto the doctrine but vnto those which vnder the pretence of Christ and of the gospell doo seeke those thinges which are their owne and not the thinges which are Iesus Christes But now let vs see Paules reason why he is not ashamed of the gospell of Christ Because it is the power of God to saluacion to euery on that beleueth It is the power that is the organe and instrument wherby God sheweth forth hys power to saluation For together with the woord of God and the gospell are instilled grace and the holy ghost and especially remission of sinnes by whiche we are renewed and made safe And yet this knittinge together of mans saluation wyth the gospell is not naturall that is of necessitye so that the gospell The Gospell is not a naturall instrument but at the pleasure of God This diffinicion hath the cause efficient end and instrument of receauinge the Gospel A similitube of the Sacraments The sum of the whol controuersy concerning iustificatiō Why in iustification mencion is made chiefly of the power of god The difference betwene the righteousnes of the law and of the Gospel This phrase of speach to take holde by fayth is not strange nor rare in in the holye scriptures beyng geuen and set forth saluation should streight way follow of necessitye For it is needefull that God doo also inwardly moue the harts of the hearers as in the Actes of the Apostles we reade it was doone vnto the woman that sold silke Wherfore the gospel is to be counted an instrument arbitrary which God vseth according to hys will Many thynke that thys definition is taken of the cause efficient For in it is expressed the power of God whiche maketh vs safe Then is added the fynall cause namely that thys power of God is to saluation neyther is that lest vnspoken of whereby we are made able to take hold of so greate a benefyte and the same is fayth For it is added to euery beleuer For they which come to heare the Gospell and wante fayth receaue nothyng but wordes and the Gospell to them is no Gospell Euen as in the Sacraments they which are without fayth do in deede receaue the simboles or signes but they haue not the fruyte and thing of the sacraments Here is now touched the chief poynt of all the controuersy For in that it is sayd that saluacion cometh of the Gospell vnto euery one that beleueth is sufficientlye declared that we are iustifyed by fayth and not by works nor by our owne strength nor by philosophy nor by ceremonies of the law Neither did he without cause make mencion of the power of God For that before we can be saued our enemyes ought to be vanquished that is the deuill death hell and in especiall sinne Hereby playnly appeareth also the difference betweene the righteousnes of the lawe and the righteousnes of the gospell The righteousnes of the lawe is to do and to worke He that shall do these thinges shall liue in them sayd Moyses as it is alleaged to the Galathyans and shall in this Epistle be afterward intreated of in hys place But contrarywyse the ryghteousnes and saluation of the Gospell is by fayth vnto all thē that beleue For it is fayth which taketh hold of the mercye and promes of God although there haue bene some which durst affirme that this kind of speach to take hold by fayth is straung that is not vsed in the holy scriptures But they are excedingly deceaued It is
Christ which thing Paul also teacheth saying The end of the law is Christ to saluation The law doth not by it selfe bring men to Christe and to saluatiō The Ethnikes opinion concerning the end of the law What is the law which yet he speaketh not vniuersally But to euery one that beleueth For the law doth not of it selfe bring a man to thys end The Ethnikes sayd that the end of the law is knowledge which it engēdreth of thinges that are to be done Wherfore Christippus as he is cyted in the digestes fayth that the law is the knowledg of thinges diuine and humane But thys end and thys definition extend to largelye For all wisdome and all good artes doo geue some knowledg of diuine and humane thinges Now resteth diligently to se what is the matter and efficient cause of the law And briefely to speake of these thinges I say that the Law is a commaundement of God wherein both hys will and also disposition or nature is expressed When I say a commaundement I note the generall woorde For there are commaūdemēts of people Senators kings of Emperors But whē I say of God I adde the difference which noteth the efficient cause But in that I The law expresseth vnto vs the disposition nature of God say that in the law is expressed the will of God that is so manifest that it nedeth not to be expounded But this may peraduēture seme more obscure in that I said that in the law the disposition of God is taught vs and we are stirred vp to the knowledge of his nature we wil therfore by examples make it more playn Whē God commaundeth vs to loue him he therebye teacheth that he is of nature amiable For those things cannot iustly be beloued which are not worthy to be beloued And vnles he bare great good will toward vs he would not set forth vnto vs the chiefe good which we should loue Wherfore he for this cause exhorteth vs therunto bicause he desireth to haue vs pertakers of himselfe We sée therfore that he is such towardes vs as he desireth vs to be also And when he prohibiteth vs to kill First therin he declareth his will farther he sheweth himselfe to be such a God which abhorreth from violence and from iniuries had rather do good vnto men then hurt them After the same maner these two thinges may also be declared in the other preceptes and out of this definition may those thinges also be gathered which we haue before spoken concerning the forme and ende of the law bicause of necessity such doctrine ought to be both spirituall and also to engender a wonderfull excellent knowledge and we are taught that God by it hath geuen no small Benefites of the lawe benefite vnto men for it causeth vs both to know our selues and also to vnderstand the proprieties of God Plato in his bookes of lawes of a publike wealth and Platoes definition in Minoe seemeth thus to define the lawe namely that it is an vprighte manner of gouerning which by conuenient meanes directeth vnto the best ende in setting forth paynes vnto the transgressors and rewardes vnto the obedient This definition may be most aptly applied vnto the law of God yea there can be no such law Lawgeuers made God the author of theyr lawes vnles it be of God It is no meruaile therefore if the olde lawgeuers when they would haue their lawes commended fayned some God to be the author of them For Minos ascribed his lawes to Iupiter Licurgus his to Apollo Solon and Draco theirs to Minerua and Numa Pompilius referred his vnto Aegiria But we are assured and that by the holy scriptures that our law was geuen of God by Moses The Manichies do wickedly condemne the law There is no good or euill whych is not by the law of God either commaunded or forbiddē The law requireth not onely deades but also the wil The law bringeth vs to the knowledge of God and of our selues in mount Syna And these thinges beyng thus sene concerning the nature and definition of y◠law we mayeasly vnderstand how fowly the Manichies erred which blasphemed it and cursed it as euil For seyng that the law commaundeth nothing but things worthy to be commaunded and prohibiteth nothing but thinges mete to be prohibited how can it iustly be accused For there can be no iust or honest duety found which is not commended in the law of God nor nothyng filthy or vnhonest which in it is not forbidden neither are wicked actes onely prohibited in y◠law but also wicked lustes are there condemned Wherfore it sheweth that not onely outward workes are to be corrected but also the mynd and will And forasmuch as a great part of felicitie consisteth in the knowledge of God and Philosophers do so much extoll the knowledge of our selues and the law of GOD as we haue taught performeth either it can not but with great wickednes be reproued as euill and hurtful Howbeit this place wherein it is sayd That the law entred in that sinne should abound may seme to make somwhat with the Manichies as doth that also vnto the Galathians That the law was put for transgressions and that also in the 7. chap. of this epistle That sinne through the commaundement killeth and that likewise which is sayd in the second epist ▪ to the Corint That the law is the ministery of death All these thinges may seme to confirme the error of the Manichies But The things which are ioyned vnto the law of themselues and the thinges that come by chaunce must be seperated A similitude we must diligently put a differēce betwene those things which of themselues pertaine vnto the law and those things which follow it by reason of an other thing per accidens that is by chaunce For as we haue before taught sinne death damnation and other such like do spring of the law by reason of the corruption of our nature But if a man compare not the law with our nature but consider it by it selfe or if he referre it to a sound vncorrupt nature then can he affirme nothing els of it then that which Paul sayth Namelye that it is spirituall holye good and instituted vnto lyfe and it is said rather to shewe synne then to worke synne Wherefore if men deformed lying hidde in the darke shoulde saye vnto a man whiche by chaunce bryngeth a lyghte vnto them gette the hence least by this thy light thou make vs deformed vndoubtedly we could not gather by their wordes that the power and nature of light is such that it doth make men deformed but this we might rather gather that those things which of themselues are deformed are by the light vttered and shewed what they be And so is it of the lawe for it after a maner bringeth light and openeth to our knowledge the sinnes which before lay hidden But a man will say if the law be good and holy why
glorye If God willing to shewe his wrath and to make hys power knowen suffreth with long patience of minde the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction that he might declare the riches of hys glory vpon the vessels of mercy which he hath prepared to glory If God vvilling to shevv his vvrath â–ª When the Apostle had before declared After the reason takeÌ„ of the efficient cause followeth that reason which is taken of the ende Of endes some are me some farre of Here is entreated of the extreme and vttermost ende by the efficieÌ„t cause that is lawful for God being as it were a potter to electe some meÌ„ and to reiecte other some and that vtterly in such sort at his pleasure that no cause can bee geuen why this man is elected and that man reiected now in this place he thought to proue the same by the end And that end is that the goodnes and power of god might be declared howbeit his iustice remaining in the meane time sound But there is no man I suppose which is ignoraunt that there are some endes which are farther of and more distaÌ„t and other some more nere Heare is touched the vtter most end which is the declaration of the proprieties of God Vnto the Ephesians is touched an end more nigh for there we are sayd to be to this end elected to be holy and blameles which selfe thing is signified in the epistle to Timothe For thus Paul writeth of himselfe I haue obtayned mercy that I might be saythfull And beyond these nigh endes there is an other extreeme ende namely that the glory or power of God might be declared And this reason is not taken out of the secrecy of the counsell of God or out of the deepe pit of the wisedome of God but out of those thinges which easely offre them selues vnto the mindes of the godly But this reading is somwhat obscure which thing also Origen hath noted and after him Erasmus Origen saw that there was nothing which answered vnto this coniuÌ„ction 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is If and that here is vsed the figure AnantopadotoÌ„ therfore he thought yâ— yâ— seÌ„ce mought be plaine and redy inough wtout that coÌ„iuÌ„ctioÌ„ but so durst not I do For I iudge it a thing wicked to alter one iot or title in the holy scriptures Erasmus thinketh yâ— We must not alter one ioâ—e or title in the scriptures that which is waÌ„ting may be had of those things which were a litle before spoken so that this should be the sence If God willing to shewe his power suffreth the vessels of wrath to make knowen theriches of his glory c And againe O man what arte thou which makest aunswere vnto God Again Hath not the potter power ouer the clay Or that which wanteth may thus be supplied Men haue not whereof to accuse God Caluine to make the sense more plaine readeth these wordes by way of interrogation What if God would shew forth c. As thoughe it were a kinde of figure called Reticentia He sayth that God would shew forth his wrath and make known his power and that by the vessels of wrath which he suffreth with much lenity The wicked are called vessels of wrath because they are prepared appointed and destinied to ven geaunce Which God suffreth This place may be two manner of wayes interpretated of which the first is that God brought forth and created those vessels and in that sense Augustine many times citeth this place The seconde is that God doth not straight way ouerthrow or destroy the wicked being now produced and created as they deserue but a long time suffreth and tollerateth theÌ„ This latter sense I iudge better then the first not indéede by reason of the signification of the worde for in very déede this woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hath either of both these significations but because Paul addeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is with much patience Vnles peradueÌ„ture Why God so long suffreth vessels of perditioÌ„ some will say that God sheweth great lenitie when he bringeth forth those whome he knoweth shal be enemies and rebels vnto him which yet cannot so properly be sayd if the naturall signification of that word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 be well considered Wherefore God tellerateth such vessels a long time for that by that meanes they are made more manifest For if he should straight waye breake them the power of God could not so easely be considered nor shine forth neither could men so â—asely take example by them But when God long time tollerateth the wicked at the length by his most mighty power punisheth and destroyeth them he therby not onely declareth his power but also by one and the selfe same worke declareth how plentifull his mercy is towardes the elect For those elect when they compare themselues with them so forsaken deiected and broken thereby vnderstande how greate a benefite and how great mercy is bestowed vpon them And here haue we the end But the cause why some are appoynted to wrath and other some to mercy ought to be sought for of those thinges which haue bene already spoken namely of Vessels signifie instruments the will and power of God By vessels Paul in this place meaneth instrumentes Wherefore Augustine very well noteth that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is not with the GreciaÌ„s that which containeth licour for that sayth he is called by an other name 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he thinketh signifieth impediments or instrumentes the like woorde also do the Hebrues vse For Iacob called Simeon and Leui Cele hammas that is vessels of deceate or guile for that they were instrumentes of these vices After the manner of which hebrue phrase Paul was called a vessell of election that is an organe A vessell of election and instrument elected of God And Paul in the second to Timothe He sayth he which shall purge himselfe from those things shall be a vessell sanctified to honor and prepared to euery good worke Such kindes of speach declare that men of themselues caÌ„ do nothing For God is sayd to vse them not onely because hemoueth them but also because he directeth and applieth them to whatsoeuer thinges he will which is In what sort God vseth men God vseth alsâ— wicked men to be vnderstanded not onely of the godly but also of the vngodly For although of themselues they haue praâ—ity and corruption yet God vseth them as an instrument of his counsell Therefore the scriptures vse to call wicked men and cruell tyrans the rodde of the Lord his axe his sword his hammer for that they are moued by his prouidence and gouernement For although they perpetually sinne and worke wickedly yet can they not deceaue nor frustrate the counsell of God For so Iudas being so sore infected with couetousnes that he woulde do any thing for An example of Iudas gain sake by the preparacion of God
thinges worke to good as though foreknowledge and predestination whereof he afterwarde maketh mencion should depende of that sentence And to this purpose A place of Salomon they cite this sentence out of the Prouerbes of Salomon Those that loue me I loue Neither cōsider they as we haue said y◠Paul in this place entēdeth to declare who they are vnto whō it is geuen to loue God and to haue all thinges to worke vnto them to good And those he saith are they which are by the predestination of God elected And as touching Salomon we also confesse that those whiche loue God are againe loued of him But this is now in question whether the loue of God whereby he embraceth vs do spring of our loue or no. This thinge doth Iohn by expresse wordes decalre in his Epistle Not saith he for that we haue loued him He hath The loue of God springeth not of our loue but contrariwise first loued vs. The second thing that we gather of these wordes of Paul is that the predestinatiō of God if it be of this force to confirme vs touching the good wil and loue of God towardes vs can not depende of our woorkes For our woorkes are both weake and of moste sclender righteousnes Farther this is to be considered that Paul kept not in silence those causes which might be geuen for he expressedly putteth the ende namely that the mercy and iustice of God might be made manifest But when he commeth to the efficient cause he will haue vs so fully to stay our selues on the will of God that he compareth God to a potter and vs to clay In which comparison he declareth that there is nothing whiche oughte farther to be enquired of I know that the aduersaries say that that comparison is brought onely Of the comparison of God to the potter to suppresse the malepertnes of the demaunder not that the matter is on either behalfe in very déede so For God electeth men by workes foreséene But if it so be how then by this similitude shall the mouth of the murmurers be stopped For they will saye if the iustice of God requyre thys that election be of woorkes soreséene what needed Paul to saye Before they had done eyther good or euill it was sayde The elder shall serue the younger Iacob haue I loued and Esau haue I hated Agayne Not of woorkes but of hym that calleth that election mighte abide firme accordinge to purpose And why is this similitude of the potter brought when as the thinge it selfe is farre otherwyse and neyther doth God as a potter do all thynges as pleaseth hym neyther are we as clay vtterly without difference doubtles by this reason of these men the malepert demaunder is not repressed yea rather there is offred an occasion of caueling for that the similitude which is brought serueth not to the purpose There is also an other sentence of Paul vnto the Ephesians wherby is strongly confirmed this our sentence For whē he had said that we are predestinated according to the purpose of God he added God worketh according to his will not accordyng to oures By the power whereof he worketh all thinges according to the counsell of hys wyll But if it were so as these men imagine God should not worke all things according to his will but according to the will of an other For as we should order our works so should he moderate his election and that is to be led by an other mans wil and not by his own This self thing testifieth Paul to the Corrinthians saying God hath chosen the foolishe weake and vile thinges of thys world to confound the wise mighty and noble men Looke brethren saith he vpon your vocation not many wyse men not many mighty men not many noble men are called And in the selfe same epistle when he had described the former estate of the elect had reckoned vp a great many greuous sinnes at the length he added And these thinges were ye but ye are washed but ye are sanctified And vnto the Ephesians Ye were saith he once with out God without hope in the world These things proue that the vocation and predestination of God depend not of our merites But as Augustine writeth vnto Simplicianus God ouerhippeth many philosophers men of sharpewit of notable learning he hath also ouerhipped many which if a man haue a respect vnto ciuill maners were innocentes and of a good vertuous life Neither doubtles is this to be meruailed at For if God to this ende predestinateth to make manifest the riches of his mercy that is sooner accomplished if he bring to saluation The mercy of God is more declared if we be predestinated frely then if of workes those which both more resist and by reason of their desertes of life are more stranger from it then if he should elect those whom humane reason may iudge to be more mete Hereof it came that Christ gathered the flocke of his disciples out of sinners publicanes and vile men neither disdained he to call vnto hym thieues and harlots In all which men what consideration I besech you was there to be had vnto merites Paul also writeth vnto the Corrinthyans We preach Christ crucified vnto the Iewes in dede an offence and vnto the Grekes foolishenes but to them that are called both Iewes and Gentiles Christ the power of God and wisdome of God We see also in this place wherehence the Apostle seeketh the difference when he affirmeth that some thinke well of Christ preached and some ill For The difference of the beleuers of the vnbeleuers ▪ dependeth of vocation God said that he would deliuer his people not for their works but for his name sake The Iews were not of God preferred before the Gentles for their workes all this he saith commeth wholy of vocation For he sayth But vnto the called as if he should haue said They which are not called haue Christ for an offence and for foolishenes But they which are called do both follow him and also embrace him for the power and wisdome of God In the prophets also when God promiseth that he will deliuer his people he sayth not that he will do it for their workes or merites sake but I wil do it saith he for my names sake From this reason Paul departeth not For he sheweth that God by predestinatiō will make open the riches of his glory that all men might know how litle the Iewes had deserued this election of God that other nations being ouerhipped they alone should be counted for the people of God Which thing Steuen expresseth in the Actes of the Apostles when he saith That they had euer resisted God and had bene alwayes stiffe necked What good workes then did God see in them to preferre that nation aboue all other nations Ezechiell notably describeth howe GOD looked vpon the people of the Iewes at the beginning namely as vpon a maiden naked and on
cause for that then Christe ought rather to haue holpen them by speaking plainly and not darkely vnto them But whereas the thing is spoken in the future tempse of the indicatiue mode that nothing helpeth their case for we also affirme that that then was to come which nowe we know to be done but we say that it was done by the commaundement of the Lord as Esay expresseth as Paul also declareth Moreouer sayth Pigghius it is a foretelling and therfore it is not a cause This is a weake profe for that which Esay foretold his words I say and preaching irritated the Iewes and stirred vp in them the affect of incredulity Is not the doctrine of the law sayd to encrease sinne for that by it are stirred vp lustes But this sayth he commeth not thorough the default of the law we graunt that neyther also say we that this commeth to passe thorough the default or sinne of God or of the prophets preachers when yet notwithstanding they are after a sort causes Men are not made blind thorough the default of the doctrine or preaching of the Gospell therof but let vs looke vpon originall sinne which is the foundacion of all the euils that come vnto mankind There doubtles after the first fall Adam with all his posterity was spoiled of grace and the spirite from the mind was taken away light that it should not vnderstand the things that pertayne to God from reason was taken away the power to kéepe vnder wicked appetites and on the other syde the affects were corrupted to rebell with greate violence agaynst reason and honesty These thinges thou wilt say are punishements yea they are also sinnes And who inflected them God inflicted them which thing no man can deny For it is his ordinaunce that iust that he which departeth from him should incurre suffer these thinges But of this matter I will cesse now to speake any more for that I haue before at large fully discoursed it But sayth he men are not compelled to sinne Is this most sharpe sighted Sophister yet so dull that he knoweth not how to distinguishe necessity from violence This particle vt that is that The word of God and preaching are instruments whereby they which shal be made blind are irritated sayth he in Marke signifieth a consequence and not a cause yea it also signifieth a cause for the words of God spoken and preached by Esay by Christ and by the Apostles were instruments wherby they were irritated This may be perceaued by a similitude very manifest and playne Suppose that there were a body full of choler which choler notwithstanding as yet bursteth not forth when sommer is com then by reason of heate if vnto him be geuen cold fruites and also cold drinke whereof he excessiuely taketh these things are corrupted in his stomack the choler is encreased and is poured abrode thoroughout the bodye whereof springe perillous flixes and gripinges in the inward partes Who can deny but that the heate of the sommer the fruites and drinke were the cause of this dissease at the least the cause called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 although it were not the principall cause or as they call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He supposeth that this particle That in Marke signifieth a cause efficient and not finall So that the sense is Therfore I speake in parables for that seing they sée not He chaungeth the coniunctine mode into the indicatiue mode and transformeth the whole in suche sort that he turneth the words of Marke into the words of Mathew when yet the holy ghost of purpose caused this diuersity of words to be And Pigghius séemeth to obtrude these things as though we should deny Mathew which thing is not true Onely we are displeased with Pigghius exposition but the Gospell of Mathew we both receaue and reuerence Moreouer he declareth himself not to haue bene very dâ—igent in the Popes decrées although he bable of them continually In them is coÌ„maunded that if any controuersy arise about any part of the scripture of the old Testament we should goo vnto the Hebrue verity And it is Augustines rule in his booke De doctrina Christiana Seing therfore that the Euangelists expresse In controuersies perâ—ayning to the old testament we must go to the Hebrue verity not this place of Esay with one and the self same words why goeth he not to the fountayne of the Hebrue verity Neyther is there any reason why he should be offended if this particle That do signify a finall cause as though Christ to this end spake in parables that they shoulde be made blind Doth not the Lorde say of Pharao to this end haue I raysed the vp that I might in the shew forth my power And is not the potter sayd to make some vessells to honor and some to contumely After whose maner God is sayd to haue ordeyned vessels of mercy and vessels of wrath to declare both the riches of his glory and the seuerity of his iustice When the scripture plainly setteth forth vnto vs such ends of the workes of God they ought neyther to be obscured nor to be denied Mathew turneth this place of Esay by the indicatiue mode and by the future tempse followinge the edition of the Seuenty which thing he mought lawfully do when as these interpreters disagréed not from the Hebrue verity as touching the sense but onely as touching â—oords And that this might lawfully be done Rabbi Dauid Kimhi one of the Hebrues vnderstoode only in that edition wanteth the efficient cause of their blindnes which cause both Paul and Iohn haue expressed And in the Hebrue it is plainly declared by the imperatiue mode which is in that place not in vayne put But it shal be good to heare what Ierome sayth touching this matter who in his Commentary vpon the sixt chapiter of Esay at the first doubteth why Luke as it is read in the Actes of the Apostles in the 28. chapiter citing this place followeth the 70. and not the Hebrue verity And he answereth yâ— the Ecclesiastical writers write yâ— Luke was expert in the arte of Phisike was more skilfull in the Greke â—oung then in the Hebrue therfore it is no meruaile if in citing testimonies of yâ— Luke had more skil in the Greke tonge then in the Hebrue old testameÌ„t he followed the texte which he was best acquainted with But in stead of this answere I would rather thus make answere That the holy ghost had so instructed Luke and the rest of the Euangelists that they mought redily haue cited testimonies out of the Hebrew verity if they had would but of purpose when they might conueniently they followed the 70. that the Gentiles vnto whose vses theyr writinges should chiefely serue might by that edition of the 70. which only they had vnderstand the thinges which were by them cited Ierome moreouer reproueth those which in his time sayd that we ought not to looke vpon
one and the selfe same will of godly men are contrary motions Contrary motions may be in the will of men when as they happen not in respect of one and the selfe same thing but in respect of diuers For in that they looke vpon the will and decrée of God and the destruction of sinne and such like they can not but reioyce in the punishments of the wicked But in that they looke vpon them as men being ioyned vnto them by nature of one and the same flesh and lompe they are excedingly sory for their destruction as Samuell mourned for Saul for that he was reiected of God as it is An example of Samuel written in the 15. chapiter of the first booke of kings And this shall suffice touching this matter Wherefore I will now returne vnto the words of Paul For that it was to be feared least the Gentiles hearing these so horrible things of the reiection and blindnes of the Iewes should be puffed vp with arrogancy and contemne the Iewes as people vtterly reiected of God and also it was to be feared least the nation of the Iewes should vtterly be in dispaire of their saluatioÌ„ and should thinke that a way vnto Christ is vtterly cut of from them when as the Gentiles were now called to supply their roome It is not so saith Paul And he bringeth an argument An argument taken of the finall cause taken of the finall cause Therefore are the Gentiles called that the Iewes should be prouoked to emulation Wherefore their saluation is not past all hope And we must cal to memory that which was said at the beginning of this chapiter namely the Paul here enteÌ„ded to proue two things First yâ— the fall of yâ— Iewes was not vniuersal which he hereby proueth for the electioÌ„ obtaineth saluatioÌ„ in many of the nation of the Iewes as Paul before plainly declared in himself although others are left in their blindnes The secoÌ„d thing which is to be proued is now set forth namely that the fall of the Iewes is not vnprofitable when as of it followed the saluation of the Gentles This is it which he at this present saith I say then Haue they therefore stombled that they should fall God forbide But thorough theyr fall saluation hath come vnto the Gentiles to this end to prouoke them to emulation Wherefore if the fal of them be the riches of the world the diminishing of them the riches of the Gentiles howe muche more shal theyr fullnes be I say then haue they therefore stombled that they should fall God forbid But thorough theyr fall saluation hath come vnto the Gentiles The meaning is God hath not therefore made blind and forsaken the Iewes that they should fall as though the purpose of God should stay there nor seke any farther commodity it sought doubtles farther commodity and that was the conuersion of Many ends appointed one vnder an other the Gentiles whose end also is the saluation of the Iewes wherefore that nation ought not vtterly to despayre or repentaunce neither shall theyr fall be perpetuall Augustine in his Enchiridion sayth that God is so good that he suffreth nothing that is euill to happeÌ„ but that thereof come some good things And the same Augustine interpreting this place sayth that the Apostle denieth not but that the lewes fell but he sayth that theyr fall was not in vayne nor vtterly without fruite But this is not to be passed ouer with silence that the thinges which the Apostle speaketh are not to be vnderstanded of all the Hebrewes perticularly for some of them The thinges which are here spokeÌ„ are not to be vnderstanded of all men perticularly were in state to be holpen and were coÌ„uerted vnto Christ but others thorough theyr incurable obstinacy and blindnes perished Wherefore these thinges are to be referred vnto the nation of the Iewes generally which so fell away from the grace fauor and giftes of God that yet notwithstanding there still remayneth in it precious sede yâ— still hath remnantes which shal be saued and the roote is not vtterly so dead but that God in due time commeth and when it shal seme vnto him good can make it to spring forth agayne For the promises of God although they are not bound vnto the stocke of the Iewes yet are they alwayes fullfilled in them as touching the elect Neither is it of necessity that wheÌ„ a Iew As touching saluation it is no hindraunce to a Iewe that he is borne a Iewe. is borne his plague should therefore for that he is a Iew be incurable or vtterly past all hope And as touching the wordes Paul sayth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth nothing els but to stomble and to fall The Lattine interpreter hath added this word So But in the Greke is not red that particle And it skarsely fitteth well when as Paul entreateth not here of the greauousnes of the fall of the Iewes but rather leâ—ifieth it by the end namely for that it was not vnprofitable For of it followed the saluation of the Gentiles and therefore it is to be The Iewes by their fall made roume for the Gentiles to enter in thought that it shall dure but for a time For the Iewes gaue place for a time to make roume for the Gentiles to enter in And this is referred vnto God who suffred the Iewes therefore to be reiected that the Gentiles which were vnbeleuers might be called But this is to be knowen that the fall of the Iewes if we will speake properly was not the cause of the saluation of the Gentiles but rather an occasion For this is a constant and most firme rule that the effect can The fall of the Iewes was an occasion and not a cause that the Gentiles were called not in dignity excel the cause if we coÌ„sider it as the ful and true cause Wherfore it is of necessity that good thinges in as much as they are good doo spring from ells where then of the euill thinges And if after sinnes follow some spirituall commodities that is in no wise to be ascribed vnto them but vnto the goodnes and prouidence of God which hath a perpetuall care for the gouernment of the world and rule of the Church And euen as of false propositions sometimes followeth a true proposition by the force and order of the sillogisme but yet not by A similitude the efficacy of the false and lieng proposition so by â–ª this order which God vseth in the administration of thinges out of euill thinges commeth some good And as in naturall transmutacions we perpetually se that the generation of one thing is the corruption of an other for this commeth not for that corruption An other similitude of his owne nature helpeth forward generation but bycause that efficieÌ„t cause which expelleth out of the subiect the first forme bringeth in a new And that the elect succede those which haue
but was not altogether reiected And that this benefite was bestowed vpon the fathers the Scripture in many places mencioneth There were other nations which in déede receaued the Gospel but yet kéept it but for a while skarce aboue one age or two It is true that we haue succeded in the place of the Iewes and are made pertakers of the selfesame priuiledges with them yet notwithstanding the Iewes were before vs abode the long tyme before in possession Wherefore if they be nowe broken of we ought more to bee afeard if they for their pride were smitten with blindnes were for their incredulity cut of what is to be thought of vs wild oliue trées and barren vnfruitfull branches Thorough incredulity were they broken of sayth Ambrose not for thy sake but by reason of their owne defaulte whiche thing I meruayle he should write If this Preposition propter that is For do signifie the cause efficient I graunt that our saluation was not the cause of their cutting of They had Our saluatiō was the small cause of the reiection of the Iewes in themselues the sinne of incredulity which GOD minding to punishe in this sort by his iustice reiected them But that our calling was not the finall cause which God in their reiection had a regard vnto I can in no wise deny seing that Paul affirmeth it wherefore I thinke rather we may say that they were broken of from their fruitefull trée both for theyr owne default and for our sakes Be not high minded 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This is which is otherwise sayd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which vice is opposite vnto the pouerty of the spirite which Christ so commended that he called them which were endewed with it blessed But they are to be laughed at which by this saying of the Apostle labour to defend ignoraunce to feare away men from knowledge Noli altum sapere say they that is Be not ouer wise Whiche exposition how strang it is from the skope of the Apostle I suppose now euery man plainly séeth But to close vp the exposition of this place I thinke that betwéene the degrées whereby we come to saluation the meanes which bring vs hedlong to destruction this order is to bee put As touching them The degrees to saluation and the degrees to destruction which shal be saued first is election or predestination Thereout burst forth grace the spirite and fayth strayght way follow good workes then haue they geuen vnto them perseueraunce and at the last is rendred the crowne of felicitie But vnto destruction the first degrée is the corruption of the lompe of mākind thorough originall sinne that God would not haue mercy thereof followe many sinnes which we by liuing wickedly afterward adde after them followeth blindnes they are infected with incredulity moreouer the harte is hardened and at the last followeth eternall damnation See therfore the bountefulnes seuerity of God Towards thē whiche haue fallen into seuerity but towards thee bountefulnes if thou continue in his bountefulnes or els thou also shalt be cut of And they also if they abide not still in vnbeliefe shal be grafted in For God is able to graft them in agayne For if thou wast cut out of the oliue tree which wast wild by nature and wast grafted contrary to nature into a right oliue tree how much more shall they that are by nature be grafted into their owne oliue tree Se therfore the goodnes and seuerity of God c. This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greke the is See some turne Ecce y◠is Behold for in signification it is somtimes all one with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Apostle cōtinueth stil in one the self same matter For this treatise was very necessary to put away the discord which in the primitiue sprang betwene the Gentiles the Iewes He exhorteth thē to set two things before their eyes the goodnes of God his seuerity Goodnes he calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word signifieth clemency a redines of mind to do a man good to do him pleasure Seueritye he calleth in the Gréeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whiche is then when thinges are done with extremitie and that men are delt with euen according to the rigor of iustice The singuler bountefulnes of God towardes the Gētiles Against the Maniches and Marcionites The scripture euery where inuiteth vs to consider the seuerity an◠goodnes of God Towardes thee saith he goodnes For that was a singuler bountifulnes that when as the Gentils were contaminated with idolatry and mought iustly worthely haue bene left in their infidelity they were yet notwithstanding called adopted and adorned with so many ornamentes and giftes By these woordes are confuted the Manichies Marcionites which affirmed that there are two Gods one good gentle and mercifull the other seuere yea and cruell when yet the Apostle in this place attributeth the selfe same proprieties vnto one and the self same true God It is manifest also that they which are cut of are by the iust seuerity of God broken of and fall away so that they are without excuse Moreouer not onely Paul in this place but also the whole scripture in infinite places in a maner prouoke vs to the consideration of those two thinges And that not without iust cause for in the consideratiō of the goodnes of God we are prouoked vnto faith and vnto loue towards him also to geue him thanks for y◠benefits receiued at his hands But when we consider y◠seueritie iudgements of God it maketh vs to pity those which fall and to be fearefull of our owne estate Chrisostome expounding this sentence See the goodnes It is not saide saith he See thy merites and thy laboures for it commeth all whole of grace from aboue I woulde to GOD he had alwayes spoken after this manner and that he had abode still in that whiche he here teacheth The entent of the Apostle in the consideratiō of the seuerity of God is that we beholding other mens dangers and falles should be made more ware Which selfe thing he in an other place meaneth when he sayth in the first to the Corrinth He which standeth let him take heede that he fall not and vnto the Galathians Considering Two kinds of feare thy self least thou also be tempted Wherfore this is to be known that feare is of two sortes the one is which abateth nothinge of confidence but onely engendreth a greater diligence and bringeth more effectuall endeuors The other is which excéedingly diminisheth yea rather taketh away confidence pulleth away endeuor and bringeth sluggishnes The latter commeth of infidelity the other cōmeth of diligence and of fayth By this kind of feare are the churches moued more and more to apply themselues vnto God and to praye instantlye for their preseruation What prayer is vaine namely that the kingdome of God shoulde not be transferred from them
this place of Zachary it may be expounded two manner of wayes First that those are the wordes of the law commaunding yet by theÌ„ cannot be proued yâ— a man can be conuerted vnles God conuert him For What are the inward motions in iustification of it Augustine thus writeth Lord geue that which thou coÌ„maundest and commaund what thou wilt An other exposition is this in iustification are two inward motions of which the one pertayneth vnto reason which as we haue said hath nede not onely to be taught but also to be persuaded and to be drawen into the sentence of the holy ghost the other motion pertaineth vnto the wil that it may be bowed to receiue al those things which the holy ghost promiseth and offreth And this is the faith by which we are iustified and wherby our sinnes are forgeueÌ„ vs. But forasmuch as these things are done secretly in the inward partes of the mind the Prophet speaketh not of them but rather spake of those things which follow For man after he is once iustified beginneth to be conuerted vnto good works Wherfore he which before liued dissolutely and wickedly now behaueth himselfe wel and orderly and being renewed with grace and the spirite worketh together with the power of God Of this conuersion the Prophet speaketh when he sayth Be ye conuerted vnto me And God promiseth to heape them vp with great benefites which is signified by this And I will be conuerted vnto you For before when he withdrew from them his benefites and afflicted them with captiuities and other miseries he seemed to be turned away from them Wherfore the Prophet spake not of the inwarde iustification but of the outward conuersion vnto good workes But Ieremy when he said Conuert vs Lord and we shall be conuerted had a respect vnto those inward motioÌ„s of the mind which we haue now described But our men of Trent when they thus say although they faine that they differ from the Pelagians yet in very deede they can neuer proue it They say that they deny not grace but in very deede they put that grace which the Pelagians would neuer haue denied But let vs see what degrees and what preparations these men appoynt â—o iustification First say they a man which is to be iustified being called stirred vp by the grace Degrees of iustification appointed by the Synode of Trent of God beginneth to beleue those things which are written in the holy scriptures then is he smitten with the feare of the sinnes which he hath committed afterwarde loking vnto the mercy of God he beginneth to haue a good hope this hope being conceiued he loueth God out of which loue springeth in him a certaine detestation of sinnes and a purpose to liue wel lastly he receiueth baptisme or the sacrament of repentaunce and herein say they consisteth iustification For all other things which went before were only preparations But these men see not that we ought farre otherwise to iudge of baptisme For the holy scriptures teache that Abraham was first iustified by faith in vncircumcision and then he receiued circumcision as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a seale of righteousnesse already receiued This selfe same consideration according to the Analogy is to be kept in baptisme For our baptisme answereth vnto the circumcision of the elders When these men put that fayth the feare of God hope charitie The degrees of Trent before brought are coÌ„futed What causes of iustication they of Trent assigne detestation of sinne and a new purpose of liuing vprightly are only certaine preparations vnto iustification they decree that a man may be perfecte before he be iustified Then they adde the causes of our iustification and beginne at the finall cause and that say they is the glory of God and our saluation The efficient cause they say is GOD himselfe of his mercye The meritorious cause as they call it they put to be Christ Iesus by his death on the crosse and the sheading of his bloud â–ª And hitherto in dede all is wel The formall cause they say is the iustice of God not that iustice whereby he himself is iust but that which he communicateth vnto vs wherby we truely bothe are counted iust and also are so in deede By which wordes they vnderstand the renewing of a man now regenerate and his new forming by grace and the holy ghost And that these things are done in a man already iustified we deny not but that iustification consisteth therein we can not graunt For Paule affirmeth Wherin iustification properly consisteth â–ª it to consist herein that our sinnes are forgiuen vs and that they are no more imputed vnto vs. And to confirme this he citeth a testimony out of Dauid Blessed are they vvhose iniquities are forgiuen and that testimony also out of Genesis Abraham beleued God and it vvas counted vnto him for righteousnesse And to the end he would expresse the thing more plainly he oftentimes in that selfe same place vseth this word Imputacion And therefore say we that in Iustificatâ—oÌ„ cannot consist in that righteousnes which cleaueth in â—â— vs. that righteousnesse and instauration wherby we are reformed of God can not consist iustification for that it through our corruption is imperfect neither can we with it staÌ„d before the iudgement seat of Christ Farther they say that this righteousnesse wherby they will haue vs to be iustified is distributed vnto euery man by the holy ghost as it pleaseth him which saying in deede may be suffred For the holy ghost is the disposer in the distribution of the giftes of God But they goe on farther and say According to the measure of the preparation but this can by no meanes be borne with all For we haue before shewed out of the fathers and chiefly out of the holy scriptures that all those things which are done before iustification are sinnes so farre is it of that they can merite and prepare vnto iustification Farther these men teache that iustification being once had men ought neuer to be thereof assured and certaine but ought to be doubtfull and carefull And when we obiect that this is to derogate yâ— truth of the promises of God and the dignitie of grace they deny that to be true For they say that they doubt not of the promises of God but when they looke vpon their owne indispositions as they call it then at the length they begin of necessitie to doubt Vndoubtedly this is not to be meruailed at for if a man haue a regarde to his owne vnworthinesse he shall not only doubt of the promises of God but also shall be most assured that he can not be iustified But the holy scriptures teache farre otherwise For they set forthe vnto vs the example of Abraham how that he contrary to hope beleued in hope and that he when now A man being iustified doubteth not of his iustification he was in a maner a hundreth yeares of age had no
acte of Brutus and Cassius which destroyed the tyran Cesar and yet that their doings were not alowed of God the ende declared Wherefore we ought not to resist Princes though they be wicked as Peter admonisheth He which obeyeth the powers iobeyeth god We reuerence God in the earthly powers In earthly iudgements we contemplate the iudgement of Christ to come vs. Of these wordes we may thus gather he which resisteth the powers resisteth God therfore they which obey the powers as it is méete obey God This argumeÌ„t taken of contraryes is very manifest and true And this sentence not a little comforteth the children of God For they sée that when they obey Princes they obey God and reuerence him in the powers Moreouer also by the forme of the iudgements of the earthly magestrate they set before theyr eyes a certayne similitude of the iudgement of God which at the ende of the world we doubt not but Christ shall put in execution For princes are not to be feared for good workes but for euill Now Paul when he had aboundantly spoken of the efficient cause of humane powers whereby he taught that we ought to obey them tendeth to proue the same by the end that we might with the attentiue mynde harken to those precepts If magistrates be appointed to take away wicked workes and haynous factes then it semeth that there should be no place left for them if men would of their owne accord endeuor themselues to piety and to iustice and would not offend against the lawe Yea but euen then also their function is some way necessary For oftentimes we sée that good and innocent men although their mynd and will be good and albeit they desire Not onely the euâ—◠〈◊〉 also â— good and godly are hospen by magistrates to leade an vpright life yet of themselues they can not kéepe any order as touching ciuill discipline Therefore they haue nede of good and godly lawes to direct them to that which they desire Wherfore the ciuil power may be vnto them as a scholemaister But amitte that amongst men were no ignoraunce of the oâ—â—ices of life and of ciuill duties yet must we neds confesse that they shall euen then also be had in honor and admiration which are more aboundauntly endewed of God with most excellent giftes vnto whome yet should remaine no part of principality to be exercised ouer others And forasmuch as this shall happen vnto vs after that blessed resurrection therefore Paul to the Corinthians very well writeth For what causes some resist the magistrates that Christ at the end shall deliuer the kingdome to God and vnto the father and all principality and power shal be abolished But whilest we liue here still in the world and haue our conuersation here amongst euil men both the magistrate is necessary and we ought vtterly to obey him in those thinges which are not repugnaunt vnto piety And forasmuch as the magistrate is to this end appoynted to punish wicked workes and to aduaunce good thereby we may vnderstand that they which resist him may two maner of wayes be accused either for that their owne conscience accuseth them of euill actes by them committed which they would not haue punished or for that they are negligent followers of iustice whereunto they can not abide to be pricked forward But they complaine that they which are magestrates are men corrupt cruell and violent and that theyr whole trauaile is that euery man should haue either nothing at all or else very little But these meÌ„ ought to coÌ„sider that Paul here entreateth of the thing it self and not of the abuse and speaketh of that which happeneth for the most part not of that which happeneth seldome As touching the first that may not to be imputed as a fault to the thing which commeth of the abuse thereof As if a wicked man should peruersly abuse either the minde or the eyes or the eares or the rest of the powers of the soule yet should it not therof follow that the ends of all these things are not most excellent Both the subiects and the princes sometymes abuse the power Tyrannes also want not many good thinges Examples of the gouernment of Nero. vnles peraduenture we will say that God is the author of euill things And as touching power it may be abused as well by them which exercise it as by them which ought to obey it We ought also to remember that euen tyrannes also all be it they be greuous and irksome doe notwithstanding retaine still many offices of iustice and of equity and therfore they haue much more vtility and commodity then Anarchia hath wherin euery man may at his pleasure without any consideration doe what he will For vnles tyrans though they be neuer so cruel had some regard to right and equitie they could not kepe stil that theyr power When Nero in his gouernement oppressed the whole world yet were matters in controuersie decided nether was the strength of lawes vtterly taken away from men For vnder him Paul was by the Centurion deliuered from the danger to be torne in sonder of the common people and of the multitude of the Iewes And wheÌ„ he had cried that he was a citezen of Rome he was losed from his bandes eskaped stripes And the same Paul to the ende he should not be oppressed of the embushmentes of the Iewes was by night led away of the souldiours to Antioche and there oftentimes had libertie to defend himselfe And to be short he pleaded his cause and at the last appealed vnto Nero. Wherefore séeing that euen in wicked Princes shineth It is not lawfull for priuate men to kill a tyranne Examples of Dauid forth much good it is very manifest yâ— theyr power also is of God neither is it lawfull for any priuate man to kill a tiranne Dauid when he mought yet notwithstanding would not kil Saule although he vsed himself like a tyranne yea rather he commaunded that Amalechite to be slaine which bosted that he had killed Saule and he put them to death also which had slaine Jsboseth Saules sonne And doubtles if it should be lawful for euery man at his pleasure to destrâ—y a tyranne there would not want wicked men which vnder the pretence of the condemning of tyranny would doe violence vnto godly Princes and so should nothing be left holy and vnuiolated Howbeit I speake not this that I thinke that superior powers What inferiour powers may do to wardes supeâ—â—our powers There are two principall offices of power The coÌ„mon wealth is contained in two things can not be put downe by inferior magestrates or that they can not be coÌ„strained to doe theyr duety of those which are appoynted either kepers or authors or electors of Princes if they transgresse the endes and limites of the power which they haue receiued As in times past at Rome the Senate people of Rome were wont to do at this day in
though they coulde finde no remedye wherby to auoyde reprobation or ells doe put so much confidence therin to liue losely and at pleasure saying that it maketh no matter for that seing they are predestinate they can not be condemned what doe they els but most wickedly abuse a good thing Euery thing ought to be taken by that part wherby it may be holden For a sworde is not drawē by the edge or by the blade but by the Euery thing must be taken by that part wherby it may be holden hafte neyther is a vessell taken by the middest of the bellye but by the handle or eare So predestination ought to be referred to the commodities now declared and not to those thinges which may engender destruction These notes and these titles hath Paule affixed vnto hys name that we shoulde not thinke hym to be a wandryng man which rashlye sowed contentions concernyng religion and that we shoulde vnderstand that there is a great difference betwene Apostles and other common ministers although there be some which dare teach that we must no lesse beleue the Byshop of Rome then Paule the Apostle I graūt in deede that eyther of them do both thunder and lighten but yet after a farre diuers and sundrye manner The Pope thundreth and lightneth with bulles belles gunnes and weapons of warre but Paule hath by the worde of God The Pope and Paule do diuersly thunder and lightē by admonitions rebukinges wholesome doctrine by miracles thundred and lightned in the Church But let vs see by what reason these men defend theyr opinion They say the byshops succeded the Apostles wherefore both haue one and the selfe same authoritie and to both ought we to obey a lyke But we aunswere them thus It is true that the Apostles departyng out of thys world left Byshops to be gouernours ouer Churches but we vtterly deny that Apostles Byshops are not of lyke authoritie Byshops succeding the Apostles are endued with the selfe same or lyke authoritie and that thyng we proue after thys sorte Fyrst because we see that the Apostles were to thys end chosen to constitute the religion and dignitie of the Gospell and to publishe vnto the beleuers the thynges which they had heard of The difference betwene the Apostles Byshops Christ But byshops are to this ende instituted to defend those thynges which are conteyned in the Gospell and in the holy Scriptures which they must so take in hand to defend that they adde no newe thynges vnto them nor fayne any new traditions at theyr owne will and pleasure Farther the holy fathers which were Byshops when they gaue them selues to wryting do confesse that they are onely intreaters or interpreters of the holy Scriptures and will not that those thinges which they write should be had in so great authoritie as we attribute vnto the Canonicall Scriptures yea rather they forbidde that any credite should be geuen vnto them if they speake any thyng agaynst the holy Scriptures Thyrdly to the Apostolicall doctrine were adioyned many miracles wherby theyr authoritie is confyrmed which thyng we see is not done in these traditions of the elders Farther we are sure that the Apostles wrote by the inspiration of the holy ghost which thing vndoubtedly we dare not affirme of our Byshops Wherefore we conclude that the Apostles could not erre in those thynges which they wrote But we see that the Byshoppes very often tymes made vngodly decrees as touchyng rules of religiō as it appeareth in the Counsell of Ariminum and also in the seconde Synode of Ephesus and also in many other yea and they also erred very much in their actes At Chalcedon and Chrysostome deposed Constantinople were Synodes gathered together in which Chrysostome was condempned and deposed which thyng also was done in the name of those Byshoppes which were of a ryght and perfect fayth And there myght be alleaged many examples of the lyke sorte Paule also writing vnto Timothe prayeth hym to saue that which is geuen hym to keepe declaryng that he ought neither to adde nor to diminishe any thyng of the doctrine of the Gospell receaued that is to keepe iustly the thyng committed vnto hym Let thys also be added that the Apostles be so vnto the Bishops and Ordinarye pastours as in the olde time were the Prophetes vnto the high priestes and priestes For they myght write bookes and adioyne them vnto the Canonicall Scripture For Samuell added hys bookes vnto the Scripture Esaie Ieremie and the other Prophets added theyr Monuments vnto the Scripture which thyng the Scribes Priestes and high Priestes could not doe The Apostles called the Gentiles and abrogated the ceremonies of the lawe which thing was aboue the power of the high priestes and priestes The Apostle doth therefore set forth hym selfe by these titles that Why Paul ascribed vnto hym selfe these titles when we read hym or heare hym we should thinke that we heare not the wordes of a man but oracles from heauen Here is also put in the prayse of the Gospell which must bee read by a parenthesis and the same extendeth euen vnto thys place where he sayth To all which are at Rome c. The Gospell to speake brieflye is the preachyng The grosse definitiō of the Gospell takē of the matter of Christ offred vnto vs to saluation accordyng to the promises made in the olde tyme. Thys commendation is taken of the matter which is entreated of in the Gospell because euery science and facultie hath hys dignitie of the thyng that it intreateth of Afterward is geuen an other definition and that is An other definitiō of the Gospell takē of the efficient cause taken of the strength of working namely that the Gospell is the power of God vnto saluation that is the instrument wherby Christ would haue vs saued Definitions takē of these causes ought to be ioyned together to the end to haue the more full knowledge of the Gospell In that it is sayd VVhich he had before promysed c. It is a preuenting whereby hee declineth the enuious name of newnes For the Gospell was counted a new doctrine For they which heard Paule thus reasoned with them selues The olde Patriarches and the Prophets had saluation and a Church and yet they wanted your Gospell therefore thys doctrine is not necessary yea rather more then needeth Here Paule confesseth that the elders were saued but The doctrine of the Gospell is not newe not without the Gospell For in as much as God had before promised it by the fayth of thys promise they were all made safe But now it appeareth new doctrine vnto you because ye haue ouerwhelmed thys promise with humane traditions and haue made it obscure with your owne inuentions Thys selfe same argumēt may we at this day make against our aduersaries which cry out that we bryng in new doctrine Vndoubtedly we go about no new thyng but they haue vtterly brought in straunge and new
worthy because God by them doth sometimes punishe vs. Otherwyse we should commend the deuill also whose bondslaues we are made through sinne and of hym are greuouslye afflicted For he is the tormentour of God and the executour of the deuine vengeaunce Moreouer we read that Saule was geuen of God to be kyng in Gods furye and wrath to auenge the wantonnes and rebellion of the people by the tyrannie of a wicked kyng And yet is not an vngodly kyng therefore to be commended or praysed These thynges and such lyke do plainly declare the weakenes of that argument And as touching that which was sayd in the second place that the wordes of the Apostle which we are here in hand with carye with them theyr exposition for they are sayd to be deliuered vp vnto the lustes of theyr owne hart Wherfore they had them within them before and God wrought them not within them but for that they were before extant he deliuered them vp vnto them to be set a fire of them we graunt in déede that the powers and faculties of lusting are naturally grafted in man And God was the author of them when he created man But God made them moderate and such which should be subiecte vnto reason and obedient vnto the worde of God and not be rebellious eyther agaynst hym or agaynst reason But after sinne they became stubborne violent and rebellious Wherefore it is plaine that that is false which thys man sayth that suche lustes as we are now deliuered vp vnto for to be punished withall were extant in vs before sinne They are vndoubtedlye Iatsar harang that is an euill workmanship or imagination wherwith our hart is perpetually enfected But this euil imagination was not geuen of God in the creation but followed after sinne And agaynst that whiche was lastly alleaged namely that these things are done rather by the patience or suffrance of God then by his power Augustine declareth by the words of Paul that either of them is true for to the Romanes it is written Euen so God willing to shew his wrath and to make his power knowen suffred with long patience the vessels of wrath Rom. 9. ordeyned to damnation In these wordes is expresse mencion as well of power as of pacience And although in that 3. chapter of the 5. booke agaynst Iulianus Augustine sayth that he greatly passeth not whether of these wayes these kinde of speaches be expounded yet enclineth he more to my sentence to thinke that God worketh something els when he delyuereth hardeneth or blyndeth then that he suffreth permiteth or forsaketh Yea he manifestly writeth that it is not likely but that euē as God whē he punisheth worketh something in our bodies so also should we thinke that he worketh something in the mindes although after a secrete maner And thus much hitherto of the Fathers If my iudgement therein should be demaunded I would say that these kyndes of speache To deliuer vp to blinden to harden and to seduce do signify somethyng more then to be forsakē of God or withdrawing of grace which hapneth through sin and which all men confesse For we can not deny but that of God are offred many occasions which in men that are destitute of grace and of the holy ghost séeme to stirre vp euill lusts to be vnto thē occasion of fallyng as it is manifest of the vngodly king Achab vnto whō the words of the false prophetes wer as a snare And the words of God pronounced vnto Pharao by Moses wer instrumēts of his greater hardening And the aduersities whiche happened vnto the Israelites in the desert were occasions both of blasphemye and also of infidelity And that God ministred such occasions it is out of controuersye Whiche occasions when they light vpon a godly mynd and one that is adorned with the grace of God they turne vnto good and are profitable for theyr saluation But when Occasions inward and outward they happen vpon those which are forsaken of God they cause a greater fall and a greater turning away from God And such occasions happen both outwardly and also inwardly For not only persecutions aduersities pleasures and entismentes do outwardly offer themselues vnto vs but also cogitacions and inward motions are suggested vnto the mynde which to the godly are profytable to saluation but the wicked they do more and more confyrme in impiety Besides these occasions such as are alredy alienated from God seme not to nede any other preparation to sinne For by reason of our corrupt nature we are prone inough vnto it of our selues Wherefore Paule in this Epistle to the Romanes sayth that these vessels of wrath are prepared and apt to destruction And in the booke of Genesis Our cogitations and counsels are prone vnto euill euen from Sinne comprehendeth two things our childehode But to make the thing more playne being otherwise somewhat darke it shal be good to marke that sinne comprehendeth two thinges Action and a defect or want For that action is called sinne which wanteth of the law and of such conditions and circumstances which should make it vpright and commendable If we speake of the action in that it is extant and is counted among naturall creatures it is not to be doubted but that it is done of God But the defect or want forasmuch as it pertayneth to priuation neyther is in very deede extant hath no neede of any efficient cause but it sufficeth that the grace It is God which with draweth his grace from sinners of the holy ghost be remoued and our strengthes taken away by whiche that action myght haue bene brought to a iust perfection And who can deny but that this withdrawing of strengthes and grace is done of God For he is the moderator of hys owne giftes But we must alwayes adde this that God doth iustly and for our euill desertes withdraw hys ayde And as Anselmus writeth in his booke of the fall of the deuill Euen as we are not afrayd to confesse that that creature is made of God which yet is brought forth through the wicked will of man for we say that God is the Creator of an infant borne of adultery why also shall we deny but that he is the author of that action whiche is brought forth through an euill will And this must we without all controuersy graunt that whatsoeuer is extant in the nature of thinges the same must of necessitie haue God for hys author Wherefore it followeth that these thinges are done of God not only by permission but also his might and power thereunto helpeth and as they say worketh God permitteth not against his will but willingly with all Otherwise that thing should be nothing For whereas they talke of permission I would fayne know of them whether God permitteth willingly or not willingly If thou say not willingly then shall it followe that God permitteth it agaynst hys will and by compulsion But if thou say that he doth it willingly because
forasmuch as so great a price is payd for our saluation we By the vse of the sacramēts we are put in minde of the benefit receaued The wayght of sinne is to be waighed by the price of our redemption ought not to suffer so great a benefite lightly to slippe out of our memory For the auoyding whereof we are holpen not only by doctrine and the scriptures but also by sacramentes For euen as among the elders the often sacrifices shadowed Christ to come so now the often vse of the misteries bringeth to memory his death and bloud shed for vs. And by this price of redemption may we perceaue the greeuousnes of sinne forasmuch as the waight thereof was so great that it kindled agaynst vs the iust wrath of God and such a wrath as was not rashely conceaued which wrath being an appetite or desire of vengeance by a most iust consideration required a most excellent sacrifice vpon which might be transferred all our sinnes And forasmuch as the same wrath is by no other thing asswaged but by the bloud and death of Christ they are to be coūted most greeuous blasphemers which dare attribute the same either to our workes or to outward rites VVhome God hath set forth a propitiator In that Christ is sayd to be set forth vnto vs by God thereby is shewed that the doctrine of the Gospell is God two maner of wayes setteth forth Christ vnto vs to be beleued The merite of the death of Christ dependeth of the predestination of God no new thing nor inuented by men But in what sort Christ is set forth vnto vs is declared by two principall pointes First because God by reuelation setteth forth vnto vs thinges to be beleued vnto the knowledge whereof by the light of nature we could neuer attayne Secondly in that he causeth vs to haue a pleasure in thinges shewed vnto vs and to geue our assent vnto them and moueth and stirreth vp our mynd inspiring vs with fayth This may also be referred vnto the good pleasure and blessed predestination of God wherehence dependeth the merite of the death of Christ Otherwise God mought by any other thing haue redemed vs and deliuered vs from sinnes Wherefore we must count that by his determination and purpose only haue we receaued that he would vouchsafe to accept the death of Iesus Christ his sonne and by it reconcile vnto him the sayntes Of this purpose and good pleasure is mencion made vnto the Ephes in the first chapiter Where it is thus writtē According to his good pleasure which he had purposed in himselfe euen vnto the dispensation of the fulnes of tymes that he might set vp all thinges perfectly by Christ both the thinges which are in heauen and the thinges which are in earth in whome euen we also are by lot called being predestinate according to his purpose which worketh al things according to the counsell of his wil that we which before hoped in Christ should be to the prayse of his glory in whom also we hope forasmuch as we haue hard the word of truth euē the Gospell of your saluation c. And in an other place oftentymes and in this selfe same epistle is mencion made of the purpose of God Although this reason of the will and A probable reason of the counsel of God counsell of God is not to be contēned yet as I thinke this reason may be assigned that by him it was mete the world should be restored to his olde estate by whome all thinges were created This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is here put may signifye these three thinges a propitiator propitiation and propitiatory I rather allow the latter signification because Paule semeth to allude vnto the How Christ is our propitiatory oracle of the olde Testament and couering of the arke which is there called the propitiatory or mercy seate For vpon the arke of the couenaunt there was layd a board or table for the oracle of the arke at whose endes stoode two Cherubins but the midle place was empty out of which were answeres geuen vnto them that asked and God was made fauorable vnto the people and was sayd to dwel there It is playne and manifest and not to be doubted but that all these things may aptly be referred vnto Christ as in whom dwelleth the whole fulnes of the godhed corporally as Paule sayth vnto the Collossians and therehence are most certayne oracles geuen of the will of God as touching our saluation And that by hym God is pacefied and reconciled vnto vs there is no doubt we may also interprete it a propiciator as though that word were put in the maskuline gender that euen as we call Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a sauior so we may call him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a pacefier Neyther paraduenture is this farre from the true and proper sence if we vnderstand Christ to be our pacification For Iohn in his epistle the 2. chapiter calleth Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is our pacification where he thus writeth My little children these thynges I write vnto you that ye sinne not But and if any man sinne we haue an aduocate with the father Iesus Christ the iust and he is the propitiatiō for our sinnes and not for our sinnes only but also for the sinnes of the whole world But as I haue sayd the first exposition pleaseth me best and that for this cause chiefely because a little afterward is sayd By his bloud For the maner of the high priest of the Hebrues was once euery yeare to sprinkle the propitiatory or mercy seat with bloud when he entred into the place which was called Sancta sanctorū that is the holy of holyes Nether is it without a cause that the Apostle here straightway addeth By faith forasmuch as our aduersaries also do graunt y◠by Christ commeth rightousnes vnto vs but they will not once declare by what meanes we apply the same vnto vs How Christ is sayd of the Papistes to be our redemer and make it ours which thing Paule now plainly expresseth They seme alwaies to tende this way that Christ therfore hath redemed vs because he is to be counted the chiefe and hed of our merites as though as their common phrase of speache is Christ deserued for vs onely the first grace and afterward leaueth vs wholye to our selues But this is to muche niggardly and maliciously to vse the benefite of God Wherefore seing now we vnderstand hym we wil continually oppose vnto the iustice of God the death of Christ as a full satisfaction of our sinnes To declare his righteousnes Hitherto we haue spoken of the efficient cause of iustification which is God and his mercy But those whiche are iustified pertaine to the materiall cause are men of all sortes being guilty of sinnes and destitute The order of iustification of the grace of God The instrumentes also haue bene declared The one
things But we speake so of sacramentes as Paule now speaketh of circumcision Now because we haue sufficiently spokē of the word we will adde the definition of a sacrament Definition of a sacrament What a signe is and this definition is most receaued A sacrament is a visible forme or a visible signe of an inuisible grace And that is called a signe which besides the forme which it offreth vnto the senses bringeth some other thing into our knowledge And a signe as Augustine writeth and the master of the sentences affirmeth is deuided into a naturall signe and a signe geuen Smoke is a naturall signe of fyre and cloudes a naturall signe Distinction of a signe Thinges signified haue theyr distinction by diuersities of times of fyre and cloudes a naturall signe of rayne But a signe geuen and appoynted of the will is diuers as letters wordes gestures beckes and many such like And these signes may pertayne to diuers and sondry senses But the things that are signified are eyther thinges past thinges present or thinges to come The tables of the lawe the Manna the rodde of Aaron which were kept signified thinges past For God would haue these thinges to remayne as certayne monumentes of thinges past Other signes betoke thinges to come as the raynebow in the cloudes which was geuen in the tyme of Nohe the flese of Gedeon and the shadow of the Sunne which in the tyme of Ezechias the king went backward Sometimes are signified thinges present as in the garments of the priestes in the apparell of the Leuites in the ornamētes of magistrates and in the miracles of Christ For all these signified the present power of God Our sacramentes are visible signes not indede of theyr owne nature but geuen vnto vs by the will of God and they pertayne to many senses For the wordes which are set forth in the sacramentes are receaued with the eares but the notes and outward simboles are perceaued eyther by sight or féeling or smelling or tasting and they demonstrate both thinges present thinges past and thynges to come for the death of Christ is represented in them which is now past and the promise and gift of God which in the mynde and by fayth is presently embraced and the purenes of lyfe and mortification and duties of charity which are afterward to be performed of vs. By those thinges it is manifest what maner of signes we put to be sacramentes But it may séeme to be sufficiēt to take that definition which Paule here vseth namely to say that Definition of a Sacramentout of this place of Poule What is the chiefest◠promise which is sealed in a sacrament sacramentes are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is sealinges of the righteousnes of fayth For they seale the promises by which so that fayth be adioyned vnto them we are iustifyed If a man demaund what it is that God promiseth vnto vs to aunswere briefely it is that he will be our God which thing where it taketh place saueth vs maketh vs blessed happy This is the promise which is by diuers outward simbols sealed in the sacramentes Which thing we haue in the boke of Genesis the 17. chapter where circumcision is geuen whereby was confirmed the couenant made betwene God and Abraham The summe of that promise was as we haue sayd that God would be his God and the God of hys séede Which selfe same thing Ieremy also testefieth of the new couenant of the Gospell where he sayth that the lawes shoulde not only be written in the bowelles and hartes of the beleuers but also that God would be vnto them theyr God and they agayne on the other side shoulde be vnto hym his people That also we well allowe Sacramentes consist of two thinges We must haue a consideration vnto the analogy of the signe vnto the thing signified We must also kepe a diuersity betwene the signe and the thinge signified which is commonly sayd that the sacramentes consist of two thinges namely of outward signes which the scholemen count for the matter and of the thing signified Which is chiefely expressed by the words adioyned vnto the simbols out of which we may gather the forme Which is not so to be vnderstand as though those thinges which are signified are bound to the outward signes or lye hidden vnder them otherwise as many as should receaue the outward clementes should together therewithall receaue the thinges signified And it is necessary that betwene the signe and the thing signified there be kept some analogy that is proportion and conueniency For if signes had no similitude with those thinges that are signified then shoulde they not be signes of them And yet notwythstandyng wyth thys conformity is styll to be kept a diuersity betweene that which is signified and those thinges whiche signifye Whiche thinge Augustine moste manifestly teacheth agaynste Maximinus the Arrian in hys 3 boke where he sayth that Sacramēts are one thing signify an other thing Wherby oftentymes it commeth to passe that these things which are attributed vnto the Oftētimes are thinges spoken of signes which are not agreable with theyr nature A place out of the epistle of Iohn signes agree in no case with the nature of them but onelye are to bee referred vnto the thinges by them signified And he citeth a place out of the epistle of Iohn where thys thing is manifestly shewed For he saith y◠there are thrée things which bear witnes bloud water and the spirite and these thrée saith he are one This can by no meanes be true if we haue a consideration to the nature of bloud water and the spirite For these things are not one as they vse to speake in essence or in kinde But this verily agréeth with the father the sonne and the holy ghost which are the thing signified And that thing which Augustine here writeth may we easely perceaue in the sacramēts which we now entreate of in which the properties of the signes and of the thing of the sacrament are put one for an other Now that I haue sufficiently spoken of the name and definition and also of the matter and forme of the sacraments there resteth to speake of the finall and efficient cause of them The end of the sacramentes The ende for which the sacraments were instituted is that our mynde being admonished by the senses might be stirred vp and by faith take holde of the promises of God and so be inflamed with a desire to attaine vnto them For we sée y◠signes tend to no other ende but to transferre and to imprint those things which we our selues haue in our mindes into the minde of an other man that therby he may be made the more certaine of our meaning and will And this is not cōmonly done but in matters of great weight For if they be but light matters we are not accustomed to confirme them with signes But in things of great importance they are To
things of greate wayght are added signes commonly vsed As when princes are consecrated whē matrimonies are contracted when bargainings gifts or other such like couenaunts of great waight are made For we desire to haue them to the vttermost witnessed and to be knowne not only by reason but also by the sences But there can be no other efficient cause of the sacramentes geuen but either God or our Lord Iesus Christ who also is verily God and of them ought we to haue an euident testimony out of the holy scriptures Which thing is most plainly declared by the definition which we haue now set forth For thus we defined them namelye that sacramentes are signes not indede naturall but appointed that by the will of God And this his will can not be made known vnto vs but onely out of the holy scriptures And therfore it is no hard matter to know how many they are in number in the new Testament We sée y◠How many the sacramentes of the new testament are New found out sacramentes excluded Christ instituted Baptisme and the Eucharist but the other sacramentes which the schole deuines set forth can not by the worde of GOD be proued to be sacraments We speake not this as though we deny that matrimony is to be had in reuerence or that the ordinations of ministers is to be retained still or that penance is to be doue although we reiect auriculer confession and other the abuses thereof deny it to be a sacrament otherwise euen we also do highly esteme these things but not as sacraments Neither dislike we with that confirmation whereby children when they come to age should be compelled to confesse their faith in y◠church and by outwarde profession to approue that whiche was done in Baptisme when they vnderstoode nothing but yet in such sort that of such an action we frame not a sacramēt But as touching extreme vnctiō it is manifest y◠it nothing pertayneth vnto vs especially seing it had no lōger any force then whilest the gifts of healings were extant in the Church And forasmuch as those giftes are now long since taken away it were absurde to kepe still the vayne signe thereof Neither also dyd Why besides baptisme and the Eucharist the rest are not properly sacramentes Basilius putteth vnction amongst traditions neither saith he that it is had out of the scriptures Christ commaund that this vnction should perpetually be vsed in the church But those other things which we before spake of although they may still be wyth profite retained yet are they not properly sacramentes eyther bicause they haue not outward signes or els bicause they wantmanifest words of promises which should by a visible signe be sealed or els bicause there is no commaundemēt of God extant wherby we are bound to obserue these thinges Basilius in his booke de spiritu sancto where he reckneth vp the traditions of the church maketh mencion of the signe of the crosse wherwith we ought to defend our selues and that adorations vppon the Sonday and from the resurrection vnto the feast of Penticost ought to be done standing vpright Amongst others also he reckeneth holy vnction Hereby we sée y◠this father held not that this vnction is had out of the holy scriptures which thyng our aduersaries rashly do Farther by his wordes we gather of how great waighte it is when as it is put amongst the number of those thinges which haue now long since growen out of vre Now let vs sée what be the effectes of the sacraments The Effectes of the sacramentes maister of the sentences in the 4. booke in the first dist putteth thre effectes of the sacramentes For he would that as men for pleasure sake haue made themselues subiect vnto thinges sensible and inferiour vnto themselues so now they should for piety sake do the same that of a certaine modesty or as they speake humilitie they should suffer themselues to be made subiect vnto these visible signes of the sacraments By the sacraments we are not made subiect vnto creatures In the sacramentes we are instructed touching thinges diuine But herein he far erreth For by the sacraments we are not made subiect vnto creatures neither ought we to worship them Onely the mind is there erected vnto God that man may be restored vnto his olde dignitie For he is set to be aboue all things which are sene and not to be subiect vnto them The second effect he putteth to be erudition that by the outwarde signes we should be instructed of things heauenly Which thing we also vndoubtedly affirme Lastly he sayth that therfore thei were iustituted that we should not be idle but be profitably exercised in true ceremonies rasting away supersticions But this vnles it be declared is not very plaine For we are sufficiently occupied in beleuing praying readyng of the word of God and doing good to our neighbours But outward ceremonies although they be instituted of God yet without faith they nothing profit Wherfore the exercising of them doth not of it selfe please God Howbeit if faith be presēt supersticions can take no place for that it hath alwayes a regard vnto the worde of God Wherfore after this maner they may be called exercises of faith and of pietie and be counted acceptable vnto GOD. But we will after a better sorte set forth these effectes of the sacraments First we say that they instruct vs which thing is alredye said Secondly that they kindle in vs fayth a desire of the promises of God Thirdly that they knit vs together in a streighter bond of charity for that we are By the sacramentes the holy ghost kindleth in vs fayth Other effectes What thinges are repugnante vnto the sacramentes Vnto the sacraments are sometimes attributed those thinges which long vnto the thinge signified Who be sacramentaries They are not bare signes A sacramēt is not of his owne nature a sacrifice all initiated with one and the selfe same mysteries And to these may two other effects also be added For by the sacraments we are both seperated from other sects also are admonished to lead an holy life But touching grace whither it be conferred by the sacraments or no we shall afterward sée These things being thus ordered there are two thinges which are contrary and repugnaunt vnto the nature of the sacraments The first is if we attribute to much vnto them For by y◠meanes is easely brought in idolatry when as that which belongeth vnto God onely is ascribed vnto a creature And if at any time the sacraments are sayd either to saue or to remit sinnes or any such like thing the same ought to be vnderstand of the thing signified and not of the signes For these thinges onely procéede of the promise and liberality of God whiche is sealed vnto vs by visible signes And oftentimes it happeneth that both the scriptures and the fathers seme to attribute vnto the signes those things which only belong
lyeth a sléepe in them as Augustine sayth in his 2. booke of the merites and remission of sinnes following yâ— which is spoken of Paul sayth I liued sometimes without a law not yâ— there was at any time no law prescribed vnto Paul but bycause in his childhode by reasoÌ„ of age he felt it not Wherefore sinne sayth Paul was dead which Augustine interpreteth was on slepe But when the commaundement came yâ— is when I began to know yâ— law sinne reuiued He had sin in him before but forasmuch as it was not felt it semed dead Now appeareth how those thinges which we haue spoken agree with the holye scriptures Yet still Pigghius vrgeth that these thinges nothing An obiection of Pigghius pertaine vnto infantes for they oughte not to haue a law prescribed vnto them which can not be auoyded But in so saying he vnderstandeth not the meaning of the holy scriptures for they sufficiently declare that those things which A law may be geuen eueÌ„â—or those thinges which can not be performed are commaunded in the law can not perfectly be performed of vs when as yet they are most seuerely commauÌ„ded Paul saith in this epistle That which was imposible vnto the law forasmuch as it was weakened through the flesh God sending his sonne c. By these words it most manifestly appeareth that we caÌ„not performe the law â—s it is commaunded For if we could we should be iustified by works nether had Christ neded to haue suffred death for vs. There ar also other offices Vtilities of the law of the Law for which it is written For it is profitable to direct the actions of the godly but it is most profitable to declare sin For by the law sayth Paul coÌ„eth the knowledg of sin Again I was ignoraÌ„t of lust vnles the law had sayd Thou shalt not lust Farther by the law sinne is also increased doth more lead vs greuouslier oppresse vs. For the law 〈…〉 ed in that sin should abound to the Corrint The power of sin is the law And al these things teÌ„d to this end yâ— maÌ„ should as it were by a Scholmaster be brought vnto Christ and implore his ayd and desire to haue streÌ„gth geuen him whereby at the least in some part and with an obedience now begon to performe those thinges which are commaunded and that those things wherin he fayleth might not be imputed vnto him but might be made whole by the righteousnes of Christ Augustine in his first boke against Iulianus reproueth the The pelagians boasted that God commaundeth not those things which can not be done Augustine reherseth the sinnes of infantes Pelagians for that they thoughte that they had taught some great point of doctrine when they taughte that God commaundeth not those thinges whiche can not be doone and he declareth those to be the endes of the lawe whiche we haue now expressed Yea and Augustine also in his bookes of confessions maketh mencion of those sinnes which euen suckinge infantes doo committe Agaynst which no maÌ„ caÌ„ say they could resist And they should not be sins vnles they wer referred to some law which is by them violated Nether doth yâ— any thing helpe Pigghius or put away their sinnes for that they vnderstand them not For that which is filthy although it seme not so to vs yet of his owne nature is it filthy Thinges filthy although they seme not filthy yet ar they neuerthelesse of their owne nature fylthy The opinioÌ„ of Augustine and Anselmus differ not in very deede The definition of Original sinne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as he saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 yâ— is That which is filthy is filthy whither it seme so or no. This opinion of Anselmus concerning the lacke and want of originall iustice doth in very dede nothing differre from the sentence of Augustine wherein he calleth originall sinne luste but that whiche in Anselmus is spoken somewhat more expressedlye is more obscurely wrapped in the word concupiscence But bycause this want of originall iustice may so be taken as though we vnderstoode onely the priuation of the giftes of God with out any vice of nature therefore it shall be good to set forth a more full definition of originall sinne Originall sinne therefore is the corruption of the whole nature of man traduced by generation from the fall of our first parent into his posterity which corruption were it not for the benefite of Christ adiudgeth al men borne therin in a maner to infinite euills and to eternall damnation In this definition are contained al kinds of causes We haue for the matter or subiect all the partes strengthes of man The forme is the deprauation of them al The efficieÌ„t cause is the will of Adam which sinned The instrument is the propagation of traduction which is done thorough the flesh The end and effect is eternall damnation together with all the discomoditis of thys life And hereof sprange sondrye Sondry names of this sinne names of this sinne so that sometimes it is called a defect or want sometimes peruersenes sometimes vice sometymes a disease sometymes contagiousnes sometymes malice and Augustine calleth it an affected quality and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a disorder And that the whole maÌ„ is corrupt hereby appeareth because he was to this ende created to cleaue vnto God as to the chiefe good But now he vnderstandeth The corruption of the partes of man is declared not things pertayning vnto God nor with patience waiteth for the promises which are set forth in yâ— sciptures but with grief he harkeneth vnto yâ— preceptes of God and the paynes rewardes he vtterly coÌ„temneth The affections rebelling agaynst sound reason do wantonly deride the word of God The body neglecteth to obey the soule All these thinges although they be experimeÌ„ts of naturall corruption yet are they also confirmed by testimonies of the holy scriptures Of the corruption of vnderstanding Paul sayth The carnall man vnderstandeth not those thinges which are of the spirite of God yea he can not because they are foolishenes vnto him In which wordes let vs marke by the way agaynst A proofe of the impossibility of the law Pigghius that the lawe was geuen of such thinges which of vs can not be performed For the lawe doth chiefely commaund vs to haue knowledge in things pertayning to God which thinges yet Paul apertly affirmeth that the carnall man can not vnderstand And to our purpose we sée that Paul affirmeth that this blindnes or ignorance is grafted in man and that of nature for we can not imagine that it commeth by reason of tyme or age For the elder in yeares a man is so much the more and more is he instructed concerning God Wherefore in that he is carnall and vnapt to vnderstand thinges pertayning to God it commeth of his corrupt nature And this corruption is of so great waight that Augustine in his 3. booke agaynst Iulianus the 12.
of creation that it should be called a filthines therfore that opinion is also What is the subiecte of Original sinne reiected The last opinion is of most men receiued and it is that the soule contracteth originall sinne by his coniunction with the body which is alredy infected and corrupted of our parentes so that if we be demaunded what is the place thereof or as they commonly speake what is his subiect we answer that the place therof is in the fleshe as in the roote and beginning then out of that fountayne it also Seede is the instrument wherby this sin is traduced possesseth the soule and so it is extended thoroughout the whole man Wherfore séede is the instrument wherby this sinne is traduced from the parentes into the children Pigghius obiecteth that vices can not be deriued by sede into the posterity vnles peraduenture it be those vices which cleaue and sticke in the body of the parent as we sée happeneth in the leprosie in the falling sickenes and other diseases of the body Neither doth nature suffer that in the very substance of séede sinne should haue place that by it it should be traduced into the children Here we aunswer Not onely the affections of the body are deriued from the parents into the children but also the affections of the minde first that it is not true that onely the diseases of the body of the parentes are deriued into the children For we sée many conditions of the minde deriued from the parentes into the children As wit fury ambition gentlenes hautines such other To the other we graunt in déede that the euill qualitie or corruption which is brought by the séede as it is in the sede is not sinne But yet that letteth not but that the corruption brought into the children by seede as by an instrument may haue in it the nature of sinne As the qualities which we haue now rehersed do not make the séede it selfe wittie docible or couetous but yet those qualities brought vnto the child conceiued do make him such a one But whether God may be put Whether God be the author of this traduction of originall sinne the author thereof they commonly say that the deformitye and vnrighteousnes which is in this sinne is drawn out of nature already corrupted which as it was created of God was not so vitiated and so they graunte that whatsoeuer is good in nature the same to be of God And whatsoeuer is therein euill for as much as it is nothing ells but a defect or want of it it is not or necessity to put an efficient cause For that which is but a want it is not of necessity that it should be made for if it should be made it should also remayne in it But this is not enoughe We agree indede with them that God is the author of the subiect or of the thing layd vnder the defect or want But in that they say that this defect it selfe hath not an efficieÌ„t cause therein we agree not with them For there ought to be something to remoue or prohibite that perfectioÌ„ which is wanting and to with hold the grace and giftes wherewith our nature was endewed at the beginning Wherefore we must needes referre this priuation or defecte vnto God which geueth not perfection vtterly without want which thing he euermore doth by his iust iudgement although it be not alwayes manifest vnto vs. And it is most certayne by the scriptures nether can it be denied but that God punisheth sinnes by sins But yet they are not so laid on vs of god yâ— they should be sinnes as they depende of him for whatsoeuer God doth the same without all controuersy is both righte and luste And euen punishementes so farre forth as they are punishementes pertaine to the nature of goodnes Howbeit as they procede from vs they are sinnes For we doo not affirme that God by himselfe God when he createth the soule corrupteth it not when he createth the soule corrupteth it For it contracteth the filthines of sin from a corrupt body where vnto it is adioyned But in this thing humane wisedome is muche offended For it thinketh that by no meanes there ought to be made any suche coniunction For it semeth to be like as if a man should cast a Wherein humane wisedome is here offended precious thinge into an vncleane vessell It semeth also vniust that the soule which hath done nether good nor euil should be ioyned with abody from which it should contract originall sinne Yea rather if it should be so men ought to absteyne from procreation As they that are leprous are also exhorted to absteyne if it be possible from procreatioÌ„ lest by it they should coÌ„tinew to infect humane nature And bycause the end whereunto man is instituted is eternall felicity it semeth not agreable that the soule should be placed in that body whereby it should be called backe from the end prescribed And as it is vniust that the soule which hath not offended should be punished in hell fire so also semeth it vniust yâ— it should be cast into that body wherein it incurreth not payne as in hell but sinne and hatred of God which are thinges more grenous and doth so incurre them that it can by no meanes auoyde them These thinges are so hard and obscure that they can not fully be satisfied by mans reason There are indede certayne These obiections may be lâ—nified but not so dissolued that they can satisfy mans reasoÌ„ consolations gathered out of Ecclesiasticall writers which doo only mitigate and lenefie these obiections so much as is sufficient for godly myndes but not so much as mans reason requireth For the soule is ioyned with an vncleane and infected body in consideration of the whole world that the kinde of man which is the chiefest should not be wanting in it God cesseth not of from his office He letteth not the course of nature but the body being now made according to his prefixed order he treateth the soule and will rather a man to be God will rather haue a man to be although he be corrupt then that he should be nothing Of those thinges which he gaue at the beginning he geueth certaine He hath put forth the remedy of Christ God myght otherwise haue helped if he had would God sheweth a form of his goodnes in renuing of this our kinde A sentence of Gregorius although he be not borne without sinne then to be nothing And though he geue not al those thinges which he gaue at the beginning yet of his mercy he geueth many of them Farther he hath set forth the remedye of Christ our mediator by whome the sinne which we haue contracted should be purged Which corruption driueth the Elect before their conuersion vnto Christ that feling the streÌ„gth of their disease they may receaue medicine of him And then after they are once grafted into Christ they haue this sinne lefte to
I knew not sinne but by the law for I had not knowen lust except the law had saide Thou shalt not lust But sin toke an occasion by the commaundement and wrought in me all manner of lust For without the law sinne was dead For I once was aliue wythout the law but when the commaundement came sinne reuiued but I was dead and the same commaundement which was ordeyned vnto lyfe was found to be vnto me vnto death For sinne tooke an occasion by the commaundement and deceaued me and thereby slew me Wherefore the lawe is holy and the commaundement is holy and iust and good What shall we then say Is the law sinne God forbid Here Paul beginneth after a sort to defend the law For before he sayd that we are deliuered from it And he mought haue semed not very godly to haue estemed of the law especially when he sayd That the affectes of sinnes which are by the law were of efficacy in our members that we should bryng forth fruite vnto death For these and such other lyke things which semed to be contumeliously spoken agaynst the law he was cōmonly ill thought of of the apostles Wherfore by preuention he obiecteth vnto himself that which he knew was by them layd to his charge Is the law sayth he sinne By the figure Metonymia he putteth sinne for the cause of sinne or for that doctrine whiche persuadeth to sinne He speaketh it by way of interrogation as though he would put forth a question to be debated And to cleare himselfe of all manner of suspicion and to declare how farre he was from this impietie straight way without The law is not properly the efficient cause of sinne In our selues is the true cause of sinne any taryeng he aunswereth God forbid But to make that which followeth y◠eastlier and plainlier to be vnderstand this is to be noted that Paul attributeth not vnto the law the workyng of sinne For sinne commeth of it only per accidēs that is by chaunce For the true and proper cause of sinne is in our selues For y◠lust which is grafted infixed in vs when the law of God setteth it self against it waxeth more 〈…〉 ce and is more vehemently kindled not that the law bringeth occasions to this infection For it only sheweth things which are euill setting forth what things are to be done what to be eschued But when the corruption of nature perceyueth that those thyngs which are set forth of the law are agaynst it it gathereth together his strengths and strengthneth it selfe to resist as much as lyeth in it and therfore it poureth out greater forces As we sée in the sommer whē A similitude cold cloudes hange ouer vs then in these lower regions are much greater heates And when as of the sonne al things are inflamed and made whote yet by Antiperistasin welles and places vnder the earth are more cold For such is the nature of The nature of thinges contrary things contrary that to repell the presence of their contrary they more vehemētly bend themselues and gather greater strengthes But I knevv not sinne but by the Lavv For I had not knovven lust except the Lavv had sayd Thou shalt not lust By these wordes the Apostle teacheth that How the law encreaseth sinne the Law encreaseth not sinne but so farre forth as it setteth before our eyes the knowledge thereof And he speaketh of himselfe to geue vs to vnderstand that he speaketh or declareth nothing but that which he had learned by feling and experience And by y◠same example he secretly exhorteth vs wholy to discēd down into our selues if we will together with him know the groūde of our saluation If thou demaund it what time Paul sayth that he knew not sinne and was ignorant At what time Paul◠knew not sinne of lust many thinke y◠he meaneth this of his childhode in which time by reason of age he could not vnderstand the commaundementes of the law This answere although I meane not to disproue yet do I not thinke it to be sufficiēt For after that we are come to discretion nether age nor naturall knowledge can of themselues shew sinne vnles we most attentiuely consider the Law of God For if it be but lightly and sclonderly looked vpon it engēdreth not a true knowledge of sinnes Wherefore we may say that sinne is not knowen of men both when they are letted by age and when being come to age they neglect the Law of God and also when they doo not attētiuely enough ether heare or rede it This place manifestly teacheth that Paul entreateth not only of ceremonies Both age and sinne let vs from the knowledge of the law Here is proued that Paul entreateth also of morall preceptes The law of nature also shewed sin The law of nature was in a manner cleane blotted out The presumption of hipocrites went about to depraue many thinges in the law of God An euident difference betwene the letter the spirite but also comprehendeth the ten commaundementes For out of thē he bringeth a confirmatiō of his sentence when he citeth this precept Thou shalt not lust And euen this Law whereof he speaketh is it from which he pronounceth that we are deliuered Which thing were not possible if as our aduersaries affirm we should be iustified by the workes thereof But thou wilt say did not the Law of nature shew sinne why then doth Paul say that he knew not sinne but by the law geuen of God by Moses Indede the law of nature shewed sinne but yet so long as it was soūd and whole But it being in a maner clene blotted out partly by the fall of the first parentes and partly by many other corruptions which it had now by long vse and continuance contracted could not performe his office so much as should be sufficient vnto the saluation of men Wherfore God gaue a law which should restore all thinges which our prauity had corrupted in the Law of nature And yet could not the presumption of men be so repressed but it went aboute in the Law also geuen of God to depraue many things For the Scribes and Pharisies with theyr interpretaciōs had corrupted the natiue and proper sence of the Law Wherefore Christ was compelled to bring it to perfection from theyr deprauation and to shew that it is farre otherwise to be vnderstand then they in the olde time had interpretated it And hereby we vnderstand that there is no small difference betwene the Law and the Spirite The Law may be blotted and corrupted by euill interpretations Farther also although it be perfect yet hath it not suche strengths that it can ether extinguishe sinne or alienate the minde from sinne But the spirite can not be vitiated nor corrupted and it breaketh sinne and chāgeth the minde But we ought to know that the Law geuen by Moses could not so much be corrupted as the Law of nature For although it were by interpretations
kingdome of heauen he streight way declareth that thing by the effectes I was hungry sayth he and ye fed me I was thursty and ye gaue me drinke I was in prison and ye visited me c So Paul in this place expresseth the true cause of our deliuery namely the spirite of Christ Now to know who they are that be partakers therof he setteth forth yâ— effectes of this deliuery sayingâ— Vnto those vvhich are in Christ Iesus vvhich walke not according to the flesh but according to the spirite That which is added namely to walke according to the spirite and not according to the fleshe bycause it is afterward repeated shall in that place be expounded Let vs se therefore what it is to be in Christe First commeth that which is common vnto all men For the sonne of God bycause What is the coniunction which we haue with Christ he tooke vpon him the nature of man is ioyned and made one with al meÌ„ For sithen they haue fellowship with flesh and bloud as witnesseth the epistle vnto the Hebrues he also was made pertaker of flesh and bloud But this coniunction is generall and weake and onely if I may so call it according to the matter For the nature of men is farre diuers from that nature which Christe tooke vpon him For the nature of man in Christ is both immortall and also exempted from sinne and adorned with all purenes but our nature is vnpure corruptible and miserablye contaminated with sinne But if it be endewed with the spirite of Christ it is so repayred that it differeth not much from the nature of Christ Yea so greate is that affinity that Paul in his epistle to the EphesiaÌ„s sayth That we are flesh of his flesh and bones of his bones Which forme of speaking An Ebrue phrase our bone and our flesh semeth to be taken out of the writinges of yâ— old TestameÌ„t For there bretherne and kinsefolkes doo thus speake of themselues one to an other He is my bone and my flesh For they seme to acknowledge vnto them one common matter by reason of one and the selfe same séede of the father and one the selfe same wombe of the mother Whereunto this also is a helpe for that children doo draw of theyr parentes not only a carnall and corpulent substance but also witte affections and disposition This selfe same thing commeth to passe in vs when we are endewed with the spirite of Christ For besides our nature which we haue commoÌ„ with him we haue also his mind as Paul admonisheth in the first to the Cor. and the selfe same sence as he requireth vnto the Phillippians saying Let the selfe same sence be in you which was also in Christ Iesus Thys our coniunction with Christ Paul expressed in this selfe same epistle by graftinge wherein are verye well perceaued or sene those two things which we haue now made mencion of For the grafte whiche is grafted and the stocke whereinto it is grafted are A similitude made one thing nether only are yâ— matters which were diuerse ioyned together but also they are nourished together with one and the selfe same iuyce spirite and life This selfe same thing the Apostle testefieth is done in vs when he sayth that we are grafted into Christ The same thing also Christ teacheth in the Gospel of Iohn wheÌ„ he calleth himself yâ— vine vs yâ— braunches for yâ— braunches haue yâ— selfe same life common with the vine trée they burgen forth by yâ— same spirite and bring forth one and the selfe same fruite Paul also in his epistle to the Ephesians Our coniunction with Christ is compared with matrimony â–ª compareth our coniunction with Christ with matrimony For he saith that it is a greate sacrament betwene Christ and the Churche For euen as in matrimony not only bodyes are made common but also affections and wills are ioyned together so commeth it to passe by a sure and firme grouÌ„d betwene Christe and the Churche Wherefore the Apostle pronounceth them frée from sinne which abyde in Christe and be in hym after that maner which we haue now expressed to the end they should liue his life and haue one and the self same sence with him and bring forth fruites of workes not disagreing froÌ„ his frutes and they whiche are suche can not feare condemnation or iudgement For the Lorde Iesus is saluation it selfe as hys name suffycyentlye declareth Wherfore they which are in him are in no daunger to be condemned Hereunto Who are in Christ we adde that they also are in Christ which in all their things depend of hym and which whatsoeuer they take in hand or do are moued by his spirite For to depeÌ„d of him is nothing els then in all thinges that we go about to haue a regard vnto him and to séeke onely his glory but they which are moued by his spirit â–ª do not follow the affections and instigations of lustes Hereby it is manifest how faithfull and godly men are in Christ and that by all kindes of causes â—â—or we haue one the selfe same matter also the selfe same first groundes of forme for we are endued with the self same notes proprieties and conditions which he had The efficient It is proued that we are in Christ by all kindes of causes cause wherby we are moued to worke is the same spirit wherwith he was moued Lastly the ende is all one namely the the glory of God should be aduanced But that which was vnpossible vnto the law in as much as it was weake because of the flesh God sendyng his own sonne in the similitude of the flesh of sinne and by sinne condemned sinne in the flesh That the righteousnes of the Lawe might be fulfilled in vs which walke not after the flesh but after the spirit For they which are accordyng to the fleshe sauour the thinges that are of the flesh but they that are accordyng to the spirite sauour the thinges that are of the spirite For the wisedome of the fleshe is death but the wisedome of the spirite is lyfe and peace Because the wisedome of the flesh is enmity against God for it is not subiect vnto the lawe of God neyther in deede can be So then they that are in the fleshe cannot please God But that which was impossible vnto the law in as much as it was weakened by the flesh God sending his sonne Here is brought a reason wherby is shewed that this spirite of God is geuen vnto vs for a deliuerer to the ende we might be made the more certaine therof For when we heare that of necessity we must haue the spirite of Christ streight way we thinke with our selues that by reason of our vncleane affections and corrupt maners we are vnworthy of the receauing of it This doubt Paul taketh away saith that yâ— benefite commeth vnto vs by the death of Christ For this was the ende for which Christ would dye namely
These things we now hold by hope â—nto which hope are not repugnaunt gronings and sighinges yea rather they very Two thinges included in hope much agrée with it For hope includeth two thinges namely the absence of the thing which is desired and the assured wayting for the same Wherfore for that the good thing which we desire is differred is not present we are vexed in mind Sorrow ioy follow hope neither can we be but greued But forasmuch as this waityng for that God will performe his promises is sure and certaine we reioyce and are glad And therfore the scriptures euery where set forth the reioycinges and ioyes of the saintes The absence of the thing waited for Paul declareth by the nature of hope For he saith that the hope which is sene is not hope Which words are to be expounded by the figure Metonymia For hope is put for the thing hoped for And Pauls meaning is Hope is put for the thinge hoped for nothing els but yâ— hope is not touching those things which are sene Those thinges he saith are sene which are present which we may both haue fruicion of and also delight our selues in That which is sene saith he is not hope For that hope is of that thing which is not sene Neither bringeth he any other reason then the coÌ„mon sence of all men For how can a man saith he hope for that which he hath Afterward he declareth the waiting for which we said is contained in hope But if we hope for that we see not we do with patience waite for it By these wordes Paul declareth yâ— vnto hope pertaineth that we with a valiaunt and quiet minde waite for the promises of God although they be absent and long differred And therfore is required hope lest we should fal into dispayre by reason the The good thing which we hope for is hard and difficult Hope is not touching that thinge which is vnpossible good thing which we hope for is difficult and hard Hope erecteth the minde that it should not geue place either to aduersities or to differring of the thing hoped for It behoueth also that yâ— thing which we hope for be not so hard or difficill to thinke that we can by no meanes obteyne it otherwise we should cease from hoping For there is no wise man will labour for things impossible Wherfore when we behold that eternall felicitie is promised vnto vs these two thinges straight way come in to our minde that it is a thing infinitely distant from our strengths and yet may be obteined of such as beleue But the power of attaining vnto it dependeth neyther of our merites nor of our workes but only of the mercy of God and merite of Christ Here heÌ„ce is the certainty of our hope to be sought for which could be none The certainty of hope should be nothing at all iâ— felicitie should depend of merites at all if eternall felicity should be attained vnto by our merites or workes By this certaine and assured expectation our mindes are in aduersities and temptations confirmed For vnto souldiours is set forth the victory which being a goodly thinge and very muche delightinge their mindes causeth them to haue a regard vnto two thinges First that it is a thing hard and to be attayned vnto by great labours and daungers Secondly that it is not only possible for them to attaine vnto it but also that they are certaine therof and so being full of good hope they couragiously fight and obtayne yâ— victory Out of these proprieties which Paul in this place attributeth vnto hope we may gather the definitioÌ„ therof Hope therfore Definition of hope is a faculty or power breathed into vs by the holy ghost wherby we with a valiant and patient minde wayte for that the saluation which is now begun in vs and is receiued by faith may one day be made perfect in vs. And that hope is geuen by the holy ghost hereby it plainly appeareth for that it can not be gotten by any humane reason For we wayt for those good things which farre passe our nature That it engendreth in vs a patient waiting for Paul declareth in these words But if we hope for that we see not we do with patience waite for it That we haue eueÌ„ now receiued some part of yâ— saluation which we hope for hath bene before declared For Paul saith that we ar now adopted to be the sonnes of God are made his heires and the fellow heires of Christ And the epistle vnto the Hebrues teacheth that now are begonne in vs those good thinges which by faith we waite for for theyr faith is described to be the substaunce of thynges that are hoped Hope and charity follow faith for For hope hath no other foundacion to leane vnto but faith wherof it springeth For such is the nature of these thrée principall vertues faith hope and charity that the one euer followeth the other For first by faith we know the eternall good thing which is promised of God Vnto this promise faith geueth a firme assent and therof in our mindes springeth hope For for that we beleue that God is true and will performe that which he hath promised we patiently waite vntil the promise be rendred although we know that in the meane tyme we must suffer The order of the production of the three vertues These vertues haue theyr being togâ—ther at one and the selfe same time One of these vertues produceth not an other as the cause but the holy ghost is the author of them things most hard long enduring But for that we sée yâ— at the length shall be rendred vnto vs so great good things we are kindled with a great desire of them which thing pertaineth vnto charity this is the order of the production of these vertues in this sort the one goeth before the other although in very dede they haue their being all at one time and together But we ought not to thinke that fayth is the efficient cause of hope or that of those two springeth charity For the spirit of Christ is the only author of all these vertues he stirreth them vp in our mindes in such sort as we haue now declared But how the propriety of hope is not to make ashamed and how it hath certaintye inseperably ioyned with it we haue before taught in the 5. chapiter when we expounded this place Hope maketh not ashamed because the loue of God is powred abroade into our hartes Now let vs sée why Paul vnto hope addeth the helpe of the holy ghost In my iudgement he doth it therefore for that faith and hope embrace that good thing which is as yet farre absent neither can be attayned by the senses nor comprehended by reason But euils and calamities and corrupt affectes wherewith we are vexed are alwayes present and light vnder some one sence Wherefore that their rage should not ouerwhelme the power of
inculcate then shoulde not boastinge be excluded for euery righteous man mought say of himselfe I haue obtained grace because wheÌ„ it was offred I receiued it I haue beleued God making promise vnto me for that I gaue mine assent I haue obteined Christ because wheÌ„ he came I receaued him But Paul crieth out that our boasting is excluded not in déede by the law of workes but by the lawe of fayth and of grace Neither can the aduersaries That modicum is some kinde of of worke Workes at vniuersally excluded froÌ„ the cause of iustificatioÌ„ The sentence of Paul is to be takeÌ„ simply and not by way of comparison deny but that that modicum which they labour so ernestly to establish is some kinde of worke But Paul so excluded not woorkes from iustification that he lefte vnto them the second place vnto faith but he vtterly and vniuersally excluded theÌ„ as touchyng the power to iustifie For he sayd not onely that we are iustified frely but added without workes Wherefore whereas they say that the senteÌ„ce of Paul is not to be vnderstanded simply but by way of comparison it is vntrue and vain But the scriptures saye they in other places speake so For it is written in the Psalm Vnles the Lord buyld the house they labour in vayne which buyld it And Paul to the Corrinthians sayth Neither he which plaÌ„teth is any thing nor he which watreth but God which geueth the encrease It is certaine say they that these thinges are to be expounded by way of comparison For in very déede both he which buildeth and which planteth and whiche watreth doth somewhat But that whatsoeuer it be forasmuch as it is but little if it be compared vnto the worke of God therefore it is sayd to be nothing and they are sayd to labour in vaine As touching the firste place we say that Dauid speaketh of ciuill works touching which we graunt that men in them take greate paynes and woorke somewhat Howbeit they labour in What is to be thought of ciuill enterprises vaine vnles God vouchsafe to fauor theyr enterprises Let Cesar AlexaÌ„der or Cato take what paynes they will either in the kingdome or in the Publike wealth and yet shall all thinges come to no purpose vnles God geue the successe In the other place Paul entreateth of the holye ministerye of the churche Neyther will I graunte this vnto the aduersaries that the Ecclesiasticall ministerye is eyther a thing small or suche as maye be called nothing For it is a thinge honorable and The holy ministery is both a thing great also nothing with most weighty wordes commended of the holy scriptures Wherefore as touching the office it is not nothing but touchinge the geuinge of spirituall life it is as Paul sayth vtterlye nothing For of it selfe it can not geue that spirituall life neyther perfect nor vnperfect The minister of the church in déede setteth forth the worde of God and the sacramentes but cannot reach to the coÌ„municating of that heauenly life Wherefore Paul spake truly and properly neither néeded he that figure A figure vsed in one place is not alwayes vsed in an other place of comparison whiche these men imagine Moreouer graunte that the scripture in other places vseth these kindes of speaches shoulde it straight way follow that therefore this sentence is so to be taken especially séeing it hath bene by most firme argumentes proued that it is in verye déede neither of him that willeth nor of hym that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy And therefore our election or predestination consisteth not of our works but fréely and of the mercy of God But still notwithstanding they are ouercome by reasons they cauill and say that they deny not but that we are elected of God fréelye but yet that causeth not but that some respecte may be had to woorkes foreséene For so they saye that we say with Paul That eternall life is grace when yet notwithstandyng we confesse that God rendreth vnto euery man accordyng to hys woorkes And if God can haue a respecte vnto woorkes when yet he geueth eternall lyfe fréely what shoulde let hym that he can not fréelye predestinate a man although he haue a respect also vnto workes foresene Hereunto we answer that eternall life is indede geuen Good workes oftentimes go before eternal life but can not preuent predestination Predestination is the efficient cause of good works and not eternall lyfe Predestination and reprobation are oftentimes with ouâ— works freely which yet followeth good workes not as merites but as necessary degrees by which they which are of full age come vnto it And this order the scripture it selfe putteth But that any our workes go before predestination the scriptures in no place haue tought vs yea rather contrariwyse Paul sayth to yâ— Ephesians Hereunto are we predestinated that we shoulde be holye and immaculate And vnto Timothe he sayth that he had obteyned mercy that he moughte be faithfull Why then seke these men to preuent order and especially seyng that theyr own similytude serueth not For eternall life followeth good workes and is not the efficient cause of them but predestination is the cause of good works Farther thys respect to good workes in predestination can not as we haue sayde take place in all men For many are predestinated vnto eternall lyfe and many are appoynted to eternall destruction which neuer should haue any workes at all as it is manifest in infantes Wherfore this is firme and vnmoueable that as touching election and infusion of the spirite there is nothing at all in vs whereby God shoulde be moued to bestowe these thinges vpon vs. For in predestination vocation and iustification there goeth before in vs nothing that is good but good works go before glorificatioÌ„ The reasoÌ„ therof is for that we straight way dye not so sone as we are iustified wherefore it behoueth that that space Why good workes in them that are of age â—o before eternall life of tyme which is betwene haue workes whereby may be declared our fayth and righteousnes which we haue by yâ— electioÌ„ of God obtayned By will Paul vnderstandeth the endeuor of the mynde and by course or running all holy workes vniuersally which metaphore is much vsed in the holy scriptures For Paul in an other place writeth of himselfe I haue fought a good fight I haue finished my course And vnto the Corrinthyans So ranne ye that ye maye winne the price And vnto the Galathyans Ye runne well who letted you Out of thys sentence two thynges we ought to gather first that our saluation or election is not of hym that wylleth nor of hym that runneth that is not of our merites but of the mercy of God onely as God sayth in the 9 chapter of Deutronomy Say not for my righteousnes hath the Lorde brought me into thys lande Secondly that it is not of the willer to will nor of the runner to runne but these
difference is only in the men and not in God The goodnes of God is equally geuen vnto all men In the nature of men is equality All men are not by one â–ª and the selfe same force drawen Against the similitude of the clay and of the wâ—xe A place to the Hebrues declared For some embrace his goodnes when it is offred but others reiecte it and are hardned For rather contrariwise in men we must put equality and likenes as which comming of one and the selfe same masse haue like condition of free wil and they by themselues can do nothing that is vpright Wherefore seing that this infirmity or rather vnablenes is a like in all men the differeÌ„ce must nedes be put in grace as in the mouing and efficient cause for that all men are not after one the selfe same maner drawen For vocation is of two sortes the one is of â—fficacy the other common And that similitude of the clay and of the waxe is vayne and trifling For after the fall of Adam this distinction hath no place in frée will For in maÌ„kinde now are not some like waxe and other some like clay For god as Paul saith maketh his vessels of one yâ— selfe same clay according to his conning geueth to one the self same clay sondry formes Neither doth yâ— place to the Hebreues make any thing to this purpose For there the scripture exhorteth men which ofteÌ„times heare the word of God to endeuour themselues by holy life to be fruitful which if they do they shall obtain the blessing of God but if they liue wickedly and suffer the sede of God to be corrupted and made vnprofitable in them they shal be obnoxious vnto the curse For the declaration whereof he vsed an excellent similitude taken of the earth Wherefore in that place is nothing spoken of fre wil and grace but of the word of God of men which professe Christ in the church whome God exhorteth yâ— they should not be such as dure but for a time and are only in name Christians Whereunto also The parable of Christ of the seede Christ had a respect in the parable of the sede cast partly vpon good earth and partly vpon stony ground and partly amongest thornes and partly in the high way Wherfore the condition of the shoure of the word of God is described yâ— it always lâ—ghteth not vpon good men and vpon such as are reformed by the grace The good earth are those which are elected spirit of God Wherfore we may say yâ— yâ— good earth are those which are elected and yâ— barren earth are yâ— reprobate And the earth as it hath showers froÌ„ heaueÌ„ so therehence also hath it fertility bareÌ„nes So it is god which ministreth vnto vs both his word also yâ— grace of faith wherby we with profit receiue yâ— same word But whereas Pigghius saith that it is a phrase of speach much vsed that a good and gentle master will say vnto his seruauntes abusing his lenity I my selfe haue marred you I my selfe haue spilt you that doubtles I deny not But he should haue proued that Paul in this place spake in this sort For seing that God is otherwise This figure of Pighius agreeth not with the wordes of Paul vnderstanded to harden the harts of men this figure will not agrée with the words of Paul For first it is an hard inuersion of speach if whereas Paul saith God hardeneth the hart of Pharao we should say vtterly excluding God Pharao hardeneth his hart for that he abuseth the goodnes of God Moreouer if as Pigghius thinketh to harden should be all one with to do good to haue mercy to shew clemency it should not then be the part of a father which gouerneth well and with clemency to forgeue sinnes to adopt into children and to geue sondry giftes but to chasten and to punishe And by that meanes shall follow many absurdities For when God deliuered the children of Israell into captiuity we must say that he had mercy on them because he punished them And when he brought them home againe from captiuity for that he did good vnto them we must say that he hardened them By this meanes to send his sonne into the worlde which was a token of incredible clemency was to harden the worlde and by Titus and Vespasian to destroy and ouerthrow Ierusalem was to haue mercy on the Iâ—wes So shall the glorification of the saintes pertaine to hardening and the punishemente of hell fyre to mercye And forasmuch as God doth good vnto all men rayneth vpon the iust and vpon the vniust and maketh his Sunne to arise vpon the good and vpon the euil if we follow Pigghius opinion we must say that God hardeneth them all Further who can deny but that Pharao was smitten of the Lord and chastised especially when as there are reckoned vp so many plagues wherewith God smote him But euen then most of all as Pigghius dreameth God should haue mercy vpon him not haue â—ad hardened hym yea rather although God be sayde sometymes to haue hardened the hart of Pharao when he tooke away those plagues yet if a man diligently reade of the history of Exodus he shall fynde that the selfe same was spoken when Pharao was smitten and when the plagues were layde vpon hym For when the lice were sent and the sorcerers coulde not do the like when the cattayle were slayne with the pestilence and when euery where men were so troubled with botches that neither the sorcerers themselues coulde escape them it is by expresse wordes written that the hart of Pharao was hardened Lastly Paul sayth that vnto them that loue God all thinges turne to good Wherefore whether he send vpon them prosperity or aduersity he alwayes hath mercy vpon Pighius in vaine excuseth God them neither can he by any maner of meanes be sayd to harden them Neither doth it any thing profite Pigghius when as though he would excuse God he sayth that he hardeneth when he will not punishe those which deserue punishmentâ—s For neither by this meanes doubtles if a man loke vpon humane reason can God eschew the suspicion of cruelty and of iniustice For if that He may be callâ—d an vniust father which punisheth not his children in tyme. â—enity be hurtfull and God is not ignorant thereof why then vseth he it Should not he be counted an vniust father which chastiseth not his children in tyme God indede tollerateth many things and that not agaynst his wyll but with hys wyl And if he tolerateth and willeth that which is agaynst our saluation how shall he not seme to be against our saluation But he hath geuen vs thâ—u wilt say free will But reason will say O God whatsoeuer thou dost either A false imagination of Pighius of certayne others in chastising or in fauoring me it is nothing vnles thou shalt first change me and in stede of
is reduced all those things which follow in this chap. he shall sée that the Apostle draweth those thinges which he teacheth of predestination to these principall pointes namely vnto power For he saith Hath not the potter power Vnto purpose or good pleasure for vnto the Ephesians he vseth both words Vnto will for he saith He hath mercy on whome he will and whome he will he hardeneth Vnto mercy or loue for he saith It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that hath mercy Also Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hated Seing Paul what cause soeuer he eyther here or in any other place geueth of predestination reduceth them to these fower principall pointes can we doubt of his meaning or shall we take vpon vs to geue sentence otherwise But as touching works he speaketh not so much as one worde wheresoeuer he entreateth of this matter but onely to exclude them Farther consider this that there is nothing more against the scope and meaning of Paul then to put workes foreséene to be the causes of predestination IustificatioÌ„ should come by workes if election should depende of workes forsene For by that meanes woorkes shoulde be the causes of iustification But that doctrine the Apostle hath in this Epistle by all manner of meanes oppugned And I hereby proue this reason to be firme because the Apostle maketh predestination to be the cause of vocation and vocation the cause of iustification Wherefore if workes be causes of predestination they shall also be causes of iustification For this is a firme rule among the Logicians whatsoeuer is the cause of any cause is also the cause of the effect Farther no man can deny but that good workes procéede of predestination For we are sayd to be predestinate that we shoulde be holye and blameles And God by predestination hath prepared good woorkes in whiche we should walke And Paul himselfe confesseth that he obteined mercy to be faithful Good workes are the effectes of predestination Against the good vse of of free wil. Wherfore if workes be the effectes of predestination howe can we then say that they are the causes thereof and chiefly those kinde of causes which are called efficient causes For that vse of frée will is nothing worth which they so often boast of as though we haue it of our selues and not of the mercye of God For Paul sayth that it is God which worketh in vs both to will and to performe And God in Ezechiell sayth I will take away from them theyr stony hart and wil geue vnto them a fleshy hart We can not saith Paul thinke any thing of our selues as of our selues And if we had in our selues that good vse which they speake of what shoulde let but that we mighte glory thereof Vndoubtedly the Lord sayth No man commeth vnto me vnles my father draw him And Ierome against the Pelagians excelleÌ„tly wel writeth that those which are sayd to be drawen are by that woord signified to haue bene before withstanding He which is drawen was before vnwillyng resisting and vnwilling but afterward God so worketh that he chaungeth them This selfe same thing also doth the nature of grace proue For Paul sayth That the remnantes might be saued according to the election of grace yâ— is according to gracious or frée electioÌ„ For so is the genetiue case after yâ— Hebrue phrase to be resolued Farther in the definition of predestinatioÌ„ in yâ— first place we haue put this word purpose which seing it signifieth nothing els as we haue declared out of the Epistle vnto the Ephe. but the good pleasure of God thereby it euidentlye appeareth that from no other where must we séeke the cause of predestinatioÌ„ More Workes caÌ„not be the causes of our calling ouer workes can not be the causes of our vocation and much les of our predestination for predestination goeth before vocation And that woorkes are not the causes of vocation is declared by the Epistle vnto Timothy God hath called vs sayth Paul with his holy calling not by our works but according to his purpose and the grace which we haue in Christ before the times of the world Hereby it most manifestly appeareth that works are not the causes of our calling Yea neither also are works the causes of our saluation whiche yet were farre more likely for by good woorkes If we should be predestinate by workes thâ— exclamatioÌ„ of Paul were to no purpose God bringeth vs to felicity But Paul to Titus sayth that God hath saued vs not by the workes of righteousnes but according to his mercy Farther what néeded Paul after this disputation to cry out O the depth of the riches of the wisedom knowledge of God how vnsearcheable are his iudgementes and how vnaccessable are his waies For if he would haue followed these mens opinion he might with one poore word haue dispatched the whole matter and haue sayd that some are predestinate and other some reiected because of the works which God foresaw should be in both of them Those men Augustine in mockage called sharpe witted men which so trimly and so easly saw those things which Paul could not sée But say they the Apostle in thys place assoileth not the questioÌ„ But it is absurd so to say especially seing yâ— he broght it in of purpose the solucioÌ„ therof serued very much vnto yâ— which he had in hand And how in Gods name can he seme not to haue assoyled the question when he The question is assoyled when it is reduced to the highest cause reduced that euen vnto the highest cause namely vnto the will of God And therewithall sheweth that we ought not to go any farther when God had appointed limities at the fote of the mounte Sina if any man had gone beyond those limites he was by the law punished Wherefore let these men beware with what boldnes they presume to go further then Paul would they should But they say that the Apostle here rebuketh the impudent Be it so But yet is this rebuking a most true solution of the question For Paul by this reprehension prohibiteth vs not to enquire any thing beyond the mercy and will of God If these men meane such a solution which may satisfye humane reason I will How the questioÌ„ may be said to be assâ—yled not to be assoyled easely graunt that the question is not in such sorte assoyled But if they seke yâ— solution which fayth ought to embrace and to reste therein they are blind if they se not the solution But let vs se what moued these men to say that workes foresene are the causes of predestination Vndoubtedly that was nothing ells but to satisfy humane iudgement which thing yet they haue not attayned vnto For they haue The aduersaries satisfie not humane reason nothing to answere touching an infante which being grafted into Christ dieth in his infancy For if they will haue him to
be saued they must nedes confesse that he was predestinated But forasmuch as in him followed no good workes God doubtles could not foresee them Yea rather this he forsaw that he should by his free will doo nothing But y◠is more absurd which they obiect that God foresaw what he would haue done if he had happened to liue longer For humane reason will not so be satisfied For reason will complayne for some that are ouerhipped and reiected for those sinnes which they haue not done and especially therefore for that they should haue committed those sinnes if they had liued For ciuill iudges punishe not any man for those sinnes which they would haue committed if they had not bene letted And that God is nothing moued with those workes which men would haue done Christ playnly declareth whē he entreateth of Corosaim and Bethsayda and Capernaum If sayth he the thinges which haue benedone in thee had bene done in Tire and in Sydon they had doubtles repēted and those cities had bene at this day remayning Behold God foresaw that these nations would haue repented if they had sene and heard those things which were graunted and preached vnto these cities Seing therefore that they perished it is manifest that God in predestinating followeth not those workes which men would haue done if they had liued Neyther yet ought any man to gather out of this sentēce of Christ that they by themselues euen by the strēgth of free will could haue repented For as we haue in other places taught repentaunce God vnto some addeth not such means whiche mought moue thē to saluation As touching nature there is no difference minē is the gifte of God But the meaning of that place is that God added not those means to conuert these men wherby they mought haue bene moued These men suppose y◠euen by nature is a distinction in men which the election of God foloweth Neither consider they y◠all men are borne the sonnes of wrath so that as touching the masse or lompe wherout they are takē there can not be put in thē any difference at all for whatsoeuer good cōmeth vnto vs y◠same with out al doubt cōmeth frō God from grace And the in the nature of mē is not to be put any difference the Apostle declareth euē in this selfe same chap. For when he would declare that the one of the two brethern was taken and the other reiected only by the frée will of God First he vsed an example of Isaac and Ismael But when in these two it mought be obiected that there was some difference for that the one was borne of a free woman and the other of a handmaydē afterward he brought two brethren that were twines Iacob and Esau which had not onely one and the selfe same parentes but also were brought for the both at one and the selfe same tyme and in one and the selfe same trauaile And as touching workes there was no difference at all betwene them For as the Apostle sayth Before they had done eyther good or euill it was sayd The elder should serue the younger Agayne Iacob haue I loued but Esau haue I hated What nede was there that Paul should so diligently alledge these thinges but to make those two brethern equall in all poyntes as touching nature Which doubtles had bene to no purpose if still there had remained so much difference in works foresene Wherfore it foloweth that whatsoeuer difference is in men the same dependeth only of the will of God For we all otherwise are borne obnoxius vnto sin Further if there should be any thing of our selues which mought moue God to predestinate vs that should chiefely be fayth For Augustine also when he was yet young neither so greatly nor thorowly acquainted with this question thought that God in predestination and reprobation hath a respect vnto faith and vnto infidelitye whiche sentence Ambrose before him and Chrisostome had embraced But in very deede neither also can it be attibuted vnto faith For faith also cōmeth of predestination For it is not of our selues but is geuen of God and that Faith foresene can not moue God to predestinate vs. not rashly but by his appoynted counsel which may easely be proued by many places of the scriptures For Paul vnto the Ephesians writeth By grace ye are saued through fayth and that not of your selues for it i◠the gifte of God leaste anye man should boast And againe in the selfe same Epistle Charity and fayth from God the father through Iesus Christ. And in this Epistle vnto the Romanes As God hath deuided By the scriptures it is proued that faith is of God vnto euery man the measure of fayth And vnto Timothy I haue obteyned mercy that I might be faythfull Vnto the Phillppians Vnto you it is geuen not only to beleue in Christ but also to suffer for his sake In the Actes God opened the hart of the woman that sold silkes that she mought geue hede to those things which wer spoken of Paul And in the 13. chapiter They beleued as manye as were ordeyned vnto eternall lyfe Christ also sayth in the Gospel I confesse vnto thee O father of heauen and earth that thou hast hidden these thinges from the wise and prudent and hast reueled them vnto infantes Euen so father bycause it hath so pleased thee And in an other place Vnto them sayth he I speak in parables that when they feare they should not heare and when they se they should not se But vnto you it is geuen to vnderstand And vnto Peter he sayd Blessed art thou Simon Bariona for fleshe and bloud hath not reueled thys vnto thee And there are many other testimonies in the holy scriptures wherby is proued that fayth is geuen and destributed of God only Wherefore it can not be the cause of predestination And if fayth can not thē doubtles much les can works Moreouer no man can deny but that the predestination of God is eternal For If faith be not the cause of predestination much les other works Paul to Timothe sayth That God hath elected vs before the times of the world And vnto the Ephesians Before the foundacions of the world were layd But our works are temporall wherefore that which is eternall can not come of them But they vse to cauell that those workes in whose respect we are predestinated are so to be takē as they are foresene of God and by this meanes they can not seme to be temporall Graunt that it were so let them be taken after that maner Yet can it not be denied but that they are after predestination for they depend of it and are the effectes thereof as we haue before taught Wherefore after these mens doctrine that which commeth after should be the efficiente cause of that which went before Which thing how absurd it is euery man may easely vnderstand Further the efficient cause is of his owne nature more worthy and of
is due throughe the worthines of the good worke but because it followeth good workes by a disposition and order instituted of God And after good workes followeth the reward of felicity and after euill the rewarde of eternall death althoughe hell fire be in verye déede due to the desertes of sinnes Grace saith he is not grace For that it is turned into a recompense due to workes And worke should not be worke if that which is geuen and rendred vnto works should be counted to be geuen by grace for it is the nature of worke to claime the ende of duetye and not fréelye Some cauell that we are not saued and iustified by the workes which we our selues haue done but if they be the workes of God which are done in vs by them we are iustified herebye entendinge that by the receiuing of the sacramentes is conferred grace as the terme it but they are farre deceaued For no man in receiuinge the sacramentes receaueth any grace but that which he receiued by faith When as we receaue the sacramentes as sealinges The sacramentes do not thorow the worke wrought coÌ„ferre grace Wherunto the receauing of the sacraments â—s an helpe of grace and of the giftes already obteyned neither is any thing gotten by them by vertue and strength of the worke wrought as they vse to speake For he which receaueth the sacramentes commeth either worthely or vnworthely if vnworthely he thereby getteth nothing but hurt and losse if worthely then bringeth he a liuely faith wherby he receaueth grace represented by the wordes of God and the sacramentes The woorke it selfe is an helpe whereby faith being somewhat weake is thorough the holy ghost stirred vp and forasmuch as there is celebrated the memory of the Lord and his name is called vpon therfore many good things are obtained and by those obsignations and seales the mindes of the beleuers are confirmed but that the worke it selfe conferreth grace we can in no wise graunt They say also that workes which follow iustification forasmuche as they are not An other â—â—â—llatioâ— ours but come of grace do merite many thinges But althoughe that the grace of God do helpe vs in doing good workes and the thinges which we do are therefore acceptable vnto God and that he will reward those workes yet notwithstanding therein is neither duety nor merite as we haue tought but onely an order and a certaine consequence by the institution and goodnes of God And in summe according to Pauls doctrine where mencion is of grace there muste woorkes néedes be banished as touching that they should be causes eyther of saluation or of iustification And although the proposition which is now proued do pertaine as well vnto the Gentils as vnto the Iewes yet notwithstanding therein are chiefly reproued the Iewes who peraduenture would easely haue graunted that the Gentils grafted into Christ were saued by grace when as before they had liued wickedly and in ydolatry But they which were Israelites and were as they boasted obseruers of the lawe craked that saluation came vnto them throughe the merite of workes Which opinion as it was erronious and iniurious vnto Christ so is it euery where confuted by the Apostle What then Israell hath not obtained that he sought but election hath obteined it and the rest haue bene made blinde According as it is written God hath geuen vnto them the spirite of pricking that when they see they shoulde not see and when they heare they should not heare vnto this day And Dauid saith let theyr table be made a snare and a net and a stomblinge blocke euen for a recompense vnto them Let theyr eyes be darkened that they see not and bow downe theyr backe alwayes What then Israel hath not obteyned that he sought but the election hath obteyned it He concludeth his argument thus that not all the Iewes are The Iues sought not rightly saued but those onely whome God foreknew the elect I meane If they sought how found they not because they sought not rightely They sought a Messias which in glory and pompe should raigne ouer the whole world which should enriche them and subdue all nations vnto their Empire They sought their owne aduauntages namely to be féede with bread at Christs hand They sought to worshippe Messias and God otherwise then was prescribed in the holy scriptures They sought Christ to kill him as it is written in Iohn the 7. chapiter Yet a litle while I am with you and I go vnto my Father ye shall seeke me and shall not finde me Wherfore seing that they sought not rightly it is no meruaile if they found not Wherfore Christ also when he sayth Seke ye shall finde aske and ye shal receaue knocke and it shal be opened vnto you we must adde thereunto this aduerbe rightly namely that we aske rightly that we seke rightly that we knock rightly otherwise we shall do all in vayne The Iewes sought saluation preposterously when as they sought to get it by workes That they sought saluatioÌ„ it is not to be doubted when as Paul attributeth vnto them zele although he take away from them vpright iudgement and true knowledge They applied them selues to sacrifices and ceremonies for no other cause but by them to be saued But forasmuch as that was not to seke a right they attayned not to their purpose Chrisostome truly saith that they therfore were frustrated for that they stroue agaynst them selues For in seeking of saluation they repelled it being offred vnto them frealy by Christ but to seke a thing â–ª and to reiect it when it is offred is manifestly for a maÌ„ to resist that which he purposeth Election sayth he hath obteined it Here he toucheth the true cause yea The chiefest cause of saluation and the chiefest and the assured cause of saluation otherwise they which are saued had by nature nothing of more excellency or woorthines then those which perish Election according to the Hebrue phrase signifieth the elect as circumcision doth What election is after the Hebrew phrase the circumcised And Israel is called the sanctification of God for that it was sanctified by him They are also called Gods possession for that he possesseth them And this kind of speache not a litle furthereth the purpose of Paul for he ment to drawe vs agayne to the consideration of the very cause that we might with the more attentiuenes consider of it But the rest are made blind Here he deuideth Israell into two partes into â—srael is deuided into two partes the elect I say and into the reprobate And affirmeth that the promises are accomplished in the elect which were indefinitly set forth vnto all men Wherefore this proposition is to be proued that the rest which are not comprehended vnder election are by God made blind the cause of which blinding if a man enquire some aunsweres wickednes or sinne But thereby is not the question dissolued What is the efficient cause of excecation
for sinne or wickednesse are eyther ignoraunce blindnes or els they bring with them and comprehend ignoraunce blindnes Wherfore as touching the efficâ—ent cause some saye that it is the deuill which sentence is true and is written of Paul in the 4. chapiter of the second to the Corrinthians The God of this worlde hath made blind the mindes of the vnbeleuers Neither let vs regard that the Fathers A place in the â— to the CorinthiaÌ„s as Hilary Chrisostome Augustine and Ambrose haue interpreted that place not of the deuill but of the true God as though this were the sense God hath made blinde the minds of the vnbeleuers of this world But this transposing of woords the order of the Greke tonge will not suffer Neyther is it an hard matter to sée wherunto they had a respect in that their violent interpretacion They had to doo agaynst the Arrians and agaynst the Maniches bothe which vsurped the The Manichies made two beginninges words of the Apostle as though they made on their syde The Arrians went about to proue that the name of God mought be attributed vnto Christe although he were a creature when as the deuil is here called God And the Maniches taught yâ— there are two beginnings of things a good and an euil God the maker of yâ— world We must not for heretikes decline from the true seÌ„ce of the scriptures and God the father of our Lord Iesus Christe aboue the worlde and they sayd that the Apostle in this place calleth the euil beginning the God of this world as though he ought to be called the author of the world But we must not because of heretikes decline from the true sense of the scriptures Neither is it to be denyed vnto the Arrians that the deuill is called God when thereunto is added this particle of this worlde For this particle declareth that he is not the true God but is of the worldlings and men of this worlde both counted and worshipped for God As Dauid also sayd the Gods of the nations but straight way as it were by way of correction he addeth Deuils And vnto the Corrinthians in the first epistle There are many Gods and many Lords namely according to the iudgement of men corrupted And of some he sayth whose God is the bealy And Helias sayd vnto the false prophetes touching Baal Crye yet louder for your God is paraduenture in his caue or he is busy talking so that he can not heare And so he calleth Baal God because he was so comted of men But when Christ is called God he is sayd to be blessed ouer Christ is not called with any terme dâ—ninâ—â—iâ—e for he is in very dede god al and world without end Which coÌ„ditions added plainly declare the nature of the true God Moreouer we are admonished to put our confidence in him to call vpon him to worship him which things without al doubt are to be attributed vnto the true God onely and to none other Neither will we so be agaynst the Maniches to deny but that the deuill hath geuen him of God a certayne dominioÌ„ or preheminence in the world when as in the Gospell he is called the Prince of this world and Paul calleth him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the gouernour of the world How the deuil is called yâ— prince of thys world and called him also principality and power But these things he to this end hath to do seruice vnto God and therfore he can do nothing more or les then is permitted him of God He in déede exerciseth power but yet that power which he receaueth of God and therefore he is sometymes called the spirite of the Lord but yet the euill spirite for so is he described in the booke of Samuell to haue inuaded Saul Wherfore excecation or making blind is a work common both to God and Excecation coÌ„meth both from God and froÌ„ thâ— Deuill Sinne is the in â—ard cause of excecatioâ— â–ª Excecation commeth of want of graâ—â— to the deuill God maketh blind as commaunding as a iudge as the chief and principall author but the deuill as the minister and hangman of God in which worke doubtles he is redy at hand and willingly offreth himself and yet can he do nothing vnles God commaunded him Hereby now is declared that sinne is the inward cause of excecatioÌ„ yea that it hath alwayes ioyned with it ignorance and that the deuill is the instrument thereof and the true God as a iudge is the cause efficient But how excecation coÌ„meth may thus be shewed Men by reason of sinnes are thorough Gods hidden iudgement whiche is yet notwithstanding euer iust left destitute of his grace spirite fauour and light and being thus miserably destitute they must néedes still more and more stomble and more greauously fall especially then when they be deliuered vp vnto sathan to be deceaued and to be throwne downe hedlonge That which the Apostle before sayd of Ismael and Esau and Pharao he now most manifestly affirmeth of the Iewes and that as it is most likely not without their great hatred and griefe Chrisostome sayth that they were made blind thorough their euill and contentions mynd But the commentaries ascribed vnto Ierome adde thereto God whereof Chrisostome speaketh not And doubtles we can not deny but that God doth with euery one of vs what soeuer séemeth good vnto him but yet so iustly that no man can excuse his sinnes or wreast the fault vpon him It is méete without doubt that we thinke the best of God and that we speake most reuerently of him but yet not in such sort that we be against the scriptures or plucke away any thing from his mighty power Paul had absolutely pronounced that the rest of the Iewes are made blind but he left vnmencioned the efficient cause thereof but now in the oracles whiche he citeth he expresseth it saying As it is vvritten God hath geuen vnto them the spirite of pricking that when they se they should not se and wheÌ„ they heare they should not heare Here now we ought not to doubt but that also the excecation of the wicked commeth froÌ„ God and that by his iust iudgement Origen sayth that he had in no part of the scriptures red that God gaue yâ— spirite of pricking and he thinketh that it may be that Paul added that of his owne for explication sake as also at the end he of him selfe addeth euen to this day Which thing he also before did for when he had sayd Who shall ascend vp into heauen he added to fetche downe Christ And after that he had sayd â–ª Who shall go downe into hell he added that is to fetch agayne Christ from the dead But although Origenes surmise be not vnlikely to be true yet in the 51. chapiter of Esay we rede that the Israelites had geuen them of God to drinke the cuppe of fury and Hithraalah that is of madnes or of poyson And
to fall into pouerty or into the death of the body â—uen the Ethnike vnderstoode the truth of this matter Pallas in Sophocles shew 〈…〉 h how that Aliax being in a greate rage agaynst Vlisses was so farre besides him selfe that he slew oxen shepe and such like cattayle in stede of the â—recians and also in stede of AgameÌ„non Menelaus and of Vlisses and in this sorte sayth he 〈…〉 s he smitten of God bycause of his blasphemy But the holy scripture where 〈…〉 e cleaue teach this thing also in other places most manifestly He deliuered them vp sayth Paul into a reprobate sence he hath mercy on whome he wil and whome â—e will he hardneth It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that 〈…〉 h mercy Esau was bated Ismaell was not counted for the sede Pharao was hardned The â—â—tter maketh vessels some to honor and some to contumely Yea Rabby Kimby saw this and sayth that of the sonnes of Hely the priesâ— it is sayd that they harkned noâ— vnto theyr father for that God would slay theÌ„ And king Roboam harkned not vnto yâ— people for that God was agaynst him as he had foretold by Ahiam the Silomite Moreouer although these thinges should be spoken by the future tempse of the indicatiue mode yet for all that is not the minde quieted for if in seing they shal â—e and shall not vnderstand and if in hearing they shall heare and not know it may be enquired what is the efficient cause of this excecation Men eschew to â—ay that God is the cause for that they haue theyr eyes drowned in the fleshe and are aferd leste they shoulde make God a sinner For they can not seduce make blind or impell others vnto sinne vnles they themselues should sin they thinke yâ— we should so imagine of god if we should so make answer But an argument taken a simili the is of the like in these matters is daÌ„gerous wheÌ„ we traÌ„sferre vnto God things pertaining vnto vs. The deuil which is the father of Sophisters after that sort reasoneth a simili wheÌ„ he transformeth himselfe into an Angell of light and a simili seketh to deceaue vs to the end we should worship him Aben Esra affirmeth that the Prophet had not the power to make blinde The Prophet could not make blinde but the word of God the burning cole that was taken out of the alter had this power and doubtles that this should come to passe by the power of the word the Prophet before saw For when the Seraphines cried the thresholdes and poffes of the temple were moued to declare that the wordes of God pronounced by his Angels by the Prophetes I say and the Apostles should so irritate and moue the Iewes vnto impiety and hatred of God that at the last by his iust iudgement they should be caried away out of their owne land into captiuity and be despersed abroade Moreouer yâ— house was filled with smoke wherewith God punisheth vs not by sins vâ—les sinne haue bene before committed the Iewes were made blind Wherefore let this be a sure and a constant doctrine that God punisheth not men by sinne vnles before by them hath bene committed some sinne deseruing the same and contrariwise that no man is saued but through his rich and plentifull mercy which also shineth forth euen when men are in such sort iustly punished For when it is sayd that hearing they heare not thereby is declared that the power of hearing is not taken away from them but rather that the word of GOD is aboundantly offred vnto them There were also miracles shewed vnto theÌ„ which they mought haue sene and in their hart was grafted some light and iudgement of conscience which thinges who will euer deny but that they are singular giftes of God But thou wilt say they profited them not I graunt that also but yet are not these things therefore to be depriued of their dignity and of their dew prayse If a wound were to the death and yet notwithstanding vnto it be laid good playsters and oyntmeÌ„ts which nothing preuaile should therefore those playsters and oyntments be depriued of their valew and strength Who euer doubted but that the gracious gifts which serued to worke miracles are the giftes of God and those most excellent although sometimes they nothing profited them that had them And we may yet more plainly in them sée the plentifulnes of the goodnes of God if we consider wel the Hebrew phrase For as often as a verbe is put before and thereunto is added A certayne Hebrue phrase declared an infinitiue moode the same verbe which we turne by yâ— Gerunde thereby is signified an often and vehement action Wherefore in hearing to heare is oftentimes to heare and that not after a common sort In séeing to sée is both oftentimes to sée and also to behold excellent and wonderfull thinges What other thing els was this then as it is sayd of Tantalus to dye for thirst being vp to the chine in water â–ª and to starue for hunger hauing all kinds of delicate meates before him So did God punish the Iewes that in so great an aboundance of spirituall giftes they are smitten with an extreme blindnes and madnes They werâ— â–ª wicked and therefore they were iustly smitten of God with these plages when as dayly they were made an earth more ful of stones ouergrowen with thornes a way ouertroden to much worne so yâ— the séede of God fell amongst theÌ„ without fruit They which sinne against yâ— holy ghost are punished with his horrible blindnes Neither is this sentence now alleadged any thing hindred by that which was obiected that some will say let vs commit sinnes seing that God semeth to commaund them for whosoeuer pretendeth this let him looke vpon the lawe of God set forth vnto all men and there let him diligently serch whether that he can find that God hath commaunded any thing that is sinne Wherefore our part is to obey the law of God and not to haue a regard vnto his hidden will God say they would haue all men to be saued I deny not this For in the promises I heare of none that are by name excluded they are generally both set forth and preached God in his lawe commaundeth not sinnes vnto all men Wherefore as farre as appeareth by them he would haue all men to be saued Which sentence may also be expounded as we haue before many times interpreted it And that which is written in Ezechiell I will not the death of a sinner is both true and maketh nothing against vs. For if thou speake of a sinner that abideth in his sinne and alloweth his wickednes his death he willeth for by his lawes he commaundeth him to be punished and he condemneth him to hell fire and vtter destruction But if thou speake of a sinner which is sory for his sinnes which repenteth and which detesteth his sinnes his death
he willeth not And without doubt God is most gentle and most plentifull of mercy but he is also most iust and therfore it is not to be meruayled at if somtimes he punish with this kind of punishment Pigghius that most trifling Sophister laboureth to inuert this place cited of all the Euangelistes to the end to proue that God is by no maner of meanes the cause of sinne But how farre wide he is from the doctrine of Paul hereby it may plainly be proued in that he maketh election common vnto all men and affirmeth that God hath a like appointed all men vnto eternall life when as Paul not only in very many other places but also here chiefly deuideth the Israelites into chosen and into not chosen and saith that others were made blind and that only election obtained saluation The first place he bringeth out of the 4. chapiter of Marke when Christ was asked why he spake in parables he answered Vnto you it is geuen to know the mistery of the kingdome of God but vnto them which are without all thinges are shewed by parables Here by an vntimely allegory he reproueth vs as though we are without and the flocke of the Papists are within And therefore he saith that we vnderstand not the scriptures But I would gladly know of this man whether they are to be counted out of the church which embrace the holy scriptures which obserue the sacraments and rightly Who are to be counted to be in the Church administer them which deny not the holy ghost wherby the life of the body of the Church is nourished and which confesse the selfe same articles of faith which all Christians confesse What I pray you claymeth he vnto himselfe that we haue not but only mere supersticions and bondage wherin he flattereth the Antechrist of Rome Verely that we are without these things and haue escaped them we are exceding ioyfull and he if he had any witte would much lament that he is within and abiding in them Marke sayth That seing they should see and not perceaue These words are most playne and vnles he had thornes in his eyes without any doubt God because of the wicked deserts of the Iewes would make them By what meanes Christ 〈…〉 seth to make blind blind thereto he vsed these meanes namely the foretellinges of the Prophetes the preachinges of Christ and of the Apostles which when they heard they were more irritated and skipt backe from the truth And therfore Christ sayth Vnto theÌ„ I speake in parables that thereby they may receaue for their sinnes the iust reward of obstinacy and pricking But saith he the obscurenes which is in the words of Mark touching this may be explaned by the brightnes and light which shineth in the words of Mathew For he in the 13. chapiter saith Therefore do I speake vnto them in parables for that seing they see not and hearing they heare not But he willingly ouerhippeth that which was before said Vnto you it is geuen to knowe the mistery of the kingdome of heauen but vnto them it is not geuen for in these words is manifest yâ— inequality of the grace gifts of God Vnto him that hath saith he it shal be geueÌ„ but he which hath not euen that which he hath shal be taken away froÌ„ him They are Hou 〈…〉 them that haue â—â— geuen and froÌ„ them that haue not is takeÌ„ away sayd to haue vnto whom is graunted election vnto saluation and of election commeth faith vnto those I say are continually many heauenly giftes aboundauntly geuen They are sayd not to haue which are reprobate and which are destitute of faith and lose also euen yâ— which they haue for the natural gifts wherwith they were sometimes excellently adorned are made vnto them vnprofitable and the wordes of God and miracles which are offred vnto them bring forth no fruite in their minds Therefore vnto them I speake by parables for yâ— seing they sée not Now sayth Pigghius thou séest the cause why Christe spake in parables for that they were blinde and obstinate not that they were such because that Christe so spake but for that they were such therfore Christe spake vnto them in parables and so neyther in Christ nor in God is there any cause of excecation But this man is farre deceaued for that word quia that is for that or because alwayes signifieth not the cause of a thing to make it to be but rendreth a cause of the knowledge that it may be and that by the effect As in Luke it is written of the sinfull woman Many sinnes are forgeuen her because she hath loued much This vehement aboundaunt loue was the effect and did set open the remission of sinnes which lay before hidden So also is it in the parable of the debters He loueth more vnto whom more is forgeueÌ„ So here also when the Apostles demaund Why speakest thou in parables The reason is geuen by the effect because that they seing see not Hereof commeth the excecation of these men Do ye not sée what here followeth I shewe the effect I declare the euent which is that these men in seing sée not in hearing heare not and are made blind And that Pigghius expositioÌ„ aptly agréeth not I will proue by two reasons First for that this sentence of Esay where as in the Hebrue is written God coÌ„maunding In Paul is not expressed the name God as the efficieÌ„t cause of this madnes and obstinacy but in other places of the scripture it is put and especially as we shall sée it is most plainly set forth in Iohn Secondly for that it agréeth not with the question of the Disciples They asked Why speakest thou in parables If Christ had aunswered that their blindnes was the cause therof it mought be thought that therfore he ought not to haue spoken vnto them in parables but ought rather to haue spoken vnto them more manifestly and more plainly to ouercome their blindnes with the brightnes of his doctrine But for that he would punishe them for their rebellion against God to the ende they should be made blind such a doctrine was sette forth vnto them whiche for that they vnderstood not they hated and fled away from it If one man to an other would speake obscurely that they which stand by should not vnderstand hym should afterward be asked why speakest thou so obscurely would he say thinke you for yâ— they which stand by are blockes vnderstaÌ„d not Doubtles this should be a ridiculous aunswere But he would aunswere if he would aunswere with reason Therfore spake I obscurely that they which stoode by should not vnderstand The Apostles asked not why those men beleued not whiche if they had then mought this cause haue bene geuen because that they are blind and heare not the thinges which are spoken But they asked why dost thou speake vnto them in parables and then caÌ„ not their blockishnes and blindnes be rendred as a
oftener expressed hope confidence but in the new testameÌ„t fayth both to fayth and to trust For euen as it is sayd The iust man liueth by fayth Also He which beleueth in him shall not be confounded And in the new Testament He which beleueth in the sonne hath eternall lyfe Agayne We thinke that a man is iustified by fayth So also is it written in the Psalme Blessed are all they which put their trust in him And in Esay the 26. chapiter He shall keepe peace because they hoped in him And in the new Testament Hope confoundeth not To Titus also the 3. chap. That we may be heyres according to the hope of eternall lyfe Althoughe in the old Testament we finde the promises are oftener made vnto hope then to fayth yet in the new Testament it is contrariwyse whereof this may be the reason because in the old tyme the Hebrues erred not in the beliefe that there was but one God yea they professed the worshippinge of hym onely but this was not well amongst them that they had not a liuely fayth which draweth with it a trust but onely by education had conceaued eyther a certayne opinion or els a certayne knowledge and therfore vnto this the Scripture exhorteth them to beleue truly and with efficacy which is expressed by the affecte vnder the name of trust But in the new Testament they erred in the meaning both the GeÌ„tiles which were worshippers of Idoles and of many goddes and also the Iewes as touching the conditions of Messias for they looked that he should come in glorious pompe like a kinge and magnifical in worldly gouernement wherfore faith was oftentymes beaten into them whereby they myght obteyne the promises of God For it was very necessary that they should rightly be instructed of the chief point of the thing that they should beleue And of this Hebrue verbe A man is deriued this nowne Emunah Faith signâ—fieth firmenes which signifieth fayth And it sometymes signifieth certaynty and constauncy of wordes and promises Wherfore God is in the holy scriptures oftentymes called faythfull and his workes are called faythful because they are firme and constantly coÌ„tinue And we read before in this Epistle What if some of them haue not beleued hath their incredulity made vayne the fayth of God Yea and this latten word Fides that is fayth if we may beleue Cicero is deriued of Fio because that thing is done in dede which was spoken And sometymes it signifieth the assent of our mynd whereby we receaue words which are set forth vnto vs as it is sayd of Abraham How fayth is taken in this disputation He beleued God and it was imputed vnto him for righteousnes And forasmuch as is this disputation nowe we take fayth after this maner it shall not be from the purpose to define what fayth is wherefore fayth is a firme and an assured assent of the mynd vnto the words of God which assent is inspired by the holy ghost The definitioÌ„ of fayth vnto the saluation of the beleuers And therfore it consisteth in the mynd and is occupied about the words of God from whence we haue the matter thereof Of the forme also we neede not to doubt because it is defined to be an assent The efficient cause is here to be the inspiration of the holy ghost And the ende is declared in the last place when as we say that this assent is inspired of the holy ghost The definition of faith which is written in the 11. to the Hebrues is declared What hypostasis signifieth to the saluation of the beleuers Not much vnlike vnto this definition are those thinges which are written concerning fayth vnto the Hebrues the 11 chapiter namely that fayth is a substance of thinges to be hoped for and an argument of thinges that appeare not Where that which the Latine interpretor hath turned substantia â–ª that is substance in Greke is written 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which word Budeus most lernedly turneth in his commentaries boldnes strength or valiantnes of mynd And it is deriued of this verbe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to susteyne to receaue not to geue place to one that rusheth vpon a man Hereof a souldier is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is trusty and turneth not his backe vnto his enemies but goeth agaynst them and resisteth them And vndoubtedly in beleuing we haue neede of this strength and patience by reason of the greate fyght of which there we haue In beleuyng we haue nede of strength experience For we must resist the fleshe reason must be ouercome whiche very much striueth agaynst fayth we must also resist the condemnation of our owne conscience synne and the anger of God and there are many thinges besydes by which a faythfull assent is both letted and resisted Very well are compared together betweene them selues these two 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a substance and those thinges that are hoped for For God promiseth resurrection but yet vnto the dead he promiseth eternal lyfe but yet to them that are rotten He calleth men blessed but yet those which aboundantly thyrst and hunger and are on euery side oppressed He pronounceth men to be iustified but yet such as ar couered with sinnes and filthines Wherefore seing these thinges seeme to be so farre of from vs it is needfull that we haue boldenes strength and the assuraunce of a most firme assent which may make these thinges to abide and to consiste vnto vs as thinges most assured With such a shield of defence ought we to be armed whereby we may quenche all the fyrie dartes of the deuill when they are cast agaynst vs that we may also ouercome euen the world For as Iohn testifieth This is the victorye which ouercommeth the world euen our fayth Further we must note that this word Argumentum that is argument which in Greke is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is turned of some demonstratio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a declaration because by fayth are shewed and declared those thinges which appeare not but me thinketh Augustine althoughe peraduenture not so Latine like yet very faithfully turned it conuictio that is an ouercoming For by fayth our mynd is ouercome to graunt that those thinges are true whiche God eyther speaketh or promiseth But Hostiensis in his booke De summa Trinitate fide Catholica laboureth by two reasons to shewe that fayth is not by these wordes of the apostle defined because that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or substance agreeth also with hope Wherfore forasmuch as it is not proper to fayth it can not be applied to the definition therof Further because fayth hath not a regard onely to thinges to come and those thinges which are hoped for but also is referred vnto things past For we beleue that GOD created heauen and earth that Christ was borne of a Virgin that he suffred for vs and was raysed from the dead but all these
regarde to his body being past getting of children nor to the wombe of Sara being past childbearing and that he staggered not by reason of distrust but was by faith confirmed most certainely persuaded that God was able to performe what so euer he had promised This example teacheth vs that we ought not to haue a regarde vnto those things which either may or seeme to hinder our iustification but our faith ought vtterly to be fixed in the words and promises of God but contrariwise these men will call vs backe to our owne indispositions as they cal them and will haue vs therefore alwayes to be in doubt of our iustification In dede we ought not to dissemble whatsoeuer imperfection or fault is in vs and that for this cause that it may be daily amended and corrected Yet ought we not therefore to be in doubt and wauering touching our iustification and the grace of God Now haue we to proue the second proposition namely that a man is iustified by faith Which thing we entend first to proue by testimonies of the holy A confirmation that we are iustified by faith scriptures Paule in the first chapter of this Epistle thus defineth the Gosple that it is the power of God to saluation to euery one that beleueth In these wordes is touched the efficient cause of our iustification namely the power of God and the ende which is our saluation and also the instrument wherby it is receiued namely faith for he addeth vnto euery one that beleueth And this he confirmeth by a testimony of Abacucke the Prophet In which sentence he so much delighted that he vsed it both to the Galathians and also to the Hebrues in the self same sense He addeth moreouer that the wrathe of God was reueled from heauen by reason of the knowledge of the Philosophers which withheld the truthe of God in vnrighteousnesse and which when they knew God glorified him not as God but fell to the worshipping of Idols But contrariwise in the gospell is reuealed the righteousnesse of God namely that righteousnesse whereby men are iustified from faith to faith which phrase of speache we haue in his due place sufficiently expounded in the third chapter Now is the righteousnesse of God saith he made manifest without the law the righteousnesse I say of God by the faith of Iesus Christ in all and vpon all them which beleue in him And a little afterward wherefore being iustified frely by his grace by the redemption which is in Christ Iesus whome God hath set forth a propitiator by faith in his bloud Here also is not onlye shewed the grace by which God fréely iustifieth vs but also Christ his deathe is set forthe that it may manifestly appeare that he is the reconciliator and the mediator Wherunto also is added faith wherby we receiue the fruit of his redemption to the shewing forth also of his righteousnesse in this time that he might be iust and iustifying him which is of the faith of Iesus Christ. If men coulde by theyr workes get vnto themselues righteousnesse the righteousnesse of God shoulde not then be so declared But seeing we sée that it is communicated vnto vs by faith without any preparation of workes it must needes seeme vnto vs very great And amongst other things which God requireth of men this is the chiefest that they should not any thing glory of themselues But if iustification should consist of workes men might boast of their owne endeuor and industry But seeing we are freely iustified by faith there is no place left for boasting Wherfore Paule saith Thy boasting is excluded by what law by the law of works No but by the law of faith Wherfore he concludeth after this manner We iudge that man is iustified by faith without works And that we should not think that that proposition is particular he declareth that it is vniuersall â–ª God saith he is he the God of the Iewes only is he not the God of the gentiles also Yea of the Gentiles also For it is one God which iustifieth vncircumcision through faith and circumcision by faith Wherefore euen as there is but one God ouer all men so iustifieth he all men by one and the selfe same way And in the fourth chapter he saith but vnto him which worketh not but beleueth in him which iustifieth the wicked faith is imputed vnto him vnto righteousnesse By this sentence are bothe workes excluded and also faith is set forth by which is imputed righteousnesse vnto men And straight way he addeth of Abraham that he is the father of all them that beleue by vncircumcision that it might also be imputed vnto them and that he is the father of circumcision not only vnto them which are of circumcision but also vnto them which walke in the steps of faith which was in the vncircumcision of Abraham our father Afterward by the nature of the promesse he sheweth that iustification is by faith For he saith by the lawe was not the promesse made vnto Abraham and vnto his seede to be the heire of the worlde but by the righteousnesse of faith for if those which are of the law should be heires then shold faith be abolished and the promesse made voide In these words are two excellent things to be noted The first is that the promesse is free â–ª neither is it ioyned with the condition of workes and therfore seing faith is as a correlatiue referred vnto the promesse it must needes follow that it is such as the promesse is and therefore it hath a respecte vnto the promesse by it selfe and not to the conditions of our vntowardnesse or indisposition as the good holy Fathers of Trent â—eache The second is that if the inheritance and righteousnesse should depend of that condition of works then had there bene no néede of the promesie For meÌ„ might haue sayd why is that fréely promised vnto vs which we can claime vnto our selues by our owne endeuor and labor Or why is it so necessary that we shold beleue when as by our owne workes we can attaine vnto righteousnesse Afterward Paule addeth the finall cause why iustification commeth by fayth By grace sayth he that the promesse might be firme for if by our owne works and preparations we should be iustified the promesse should alwayes be vnstedfast neither could we appoint any certaintie of it Afterwarde he putteth the example of Abraham who as it is before said contrary to hope beleued in hope neither had he a regarde vnto those things which as touching his owne part mought haue bene a let vnto the promesse of God namely his own body being nâ—w as it were dead and an hundreth yeare olde and the age of Sara his wife These things sufficiently declare what maner of faith that was by which vnto Abraham was imputed righteousnesse so that thereby we also may vnderstande the power and nature of faithe which iustifieth Paule also addeth that by suche a faith is muche aduaunced the
what his scope is we will first define what a magestrate is A magestrate is Definition of a magistrate aperson elected and that of God to defend the lawes and peace and with punishments and the sword to represse vices and euils and by all manner of meanes to aduaunce vertues The efficient cause is God the ende is the preseruation of the lawes and of peace the banishing away of vices and discommodities and the encrease of vertues The forme is the order which the prouidence of God hath appoynted in things humane The matter is the man or person For who so euer is appoynted to be a magestrate is taken of men The methâ—de which is here kept is in a maner generall First he sayth that all men ought to bâ— subiect vnto magestrates which thing is first proued by the efficient cause for that â—â— suche powers are of God then is it proued by the coÌ„trary for that they which conteâ—â—ne the magestrate are against God and that to theyr owne great hurt Finally i◠〈…〉 proued Why so often in the new testament is in 〈…〉 ted thaâ— ough 〈…〉 geue ho 〈…〉 to the magistrate â— he Pope heâ—e proued guilty and condemned by the ende for that the magestrates bring vnto vs great profit This is bo 〈…〉 〈…〉 ery often and also very exactly entreated of in the new Testament and that for 〈…〉 cause chiefly for that the children of God sometimes thinke that it is a thing in a maner vayne that they being gouerned by the spirit and word of God should be subiect vnto outward powers Neither can it be expressed in how ill part yâ— Iewes toke it when they were as captiues oppressed of the Babilonians Assirians Medes and Persians and when at home in theyr Countrey they were greuously afflicted first of the Macedontans and afterwarde of the Romaines They would gladly haue shaken of that yoke which the Anabaptistes Libertines at this day with great fury go about to shake of and which the Pope and his dearlings hath now long time shaken of For he hath so exempted bothe himselfe and his cleargy from all publique power that now Princes are subiect vnto him and he suffereth the great monarchies of Christendome to kisse his féete and most filthily to worship him He createth Emperors and putteth them downe as it pleaseth him He taketh away kingdomes and pylleth and polleth them as he lust But Christ behaued himself farre otherwise for he payed tribute and taught that vnto Cesar Christ was subiect to the powers of the world ought to be rendred that which is Cesars With these wordes of Paul agréeth that which Peter wryteth in the second chapiter of his first Epistle saying Be ye subiect to euery humane creature that is vnto the ordinaunce which God would shoulde be amongst men Be subiect sayth he for the Lords sake whether it be vnto the king as vnto the superior or vnto gouerners as vnto them that are sent of him namely either of the king or of God for the punishment of euill doers and for the praise of them that do wel If we examine all the partes of this commaundement we shall in a manner finde in it all those thynges whiche are here taught of Paule The selfe same thyng Paul wrote to Titus in the third Chapiter Admonishe them sayth he that they be subiect vnto Princes and powers and that they be obedient to the magestrates And in his Epistle to the Ephesians to Timothe and to Titus he diligently commauÌ„deth seruaunts to be obedient to theyr masters And vnto Timothe he commaundeth Christians to make prayers for theyr magestrates Whereby that is most manifest which we haue ofteÌ„times sayd and which Chrysostome in this place wryteth that the doctrine of the Gospel was not geuen to ouerthrow the politique gouernments The Gospel ouerthroweth not the gouernments of the world A magistrate called by the name of a father of the world but rather to confirme them and to make them better This place of the Apostle partaineth to that commaundement of the law Honoure thy father and thy mother For in the olde time as Aristotle also wryteth in his Politiques fathers gaue lawes to theyr famely and to them were as kings And amongst the Romanes the Senators were called Patres conscripti that is appoynted Fathers For a magestrate is nothing els but the father of the countrey Here we nede not curiously to entreat by what right or by what wrong Princes haue obtained theyr power This thing only is to be séene vnto that we reuerence magestrates when they are in that roome For this Epistle was written when the Romaines had now obtained the Empire of the whole world which Empire we know they possessed by violence and afterward the Emperors by as wicked practises drew vnto them the whole dominion ouer al yet Paul without al exception commaundeth vs to be obedient vnto the powers And so generall is this proposition In this prâ—cept are contayned all degrees of men of Paul that Chrysostome testifieth that vnder this commaundement are contained Priests Monks Prophets Apostles and Euangelistes But I thinke that Origen is not here to be allowed For he wryteth that Paul sayth let euery soule and not euery spirite for they which are vtterly spiritual do not by any meanes follow the affectes of the fleâ—â—e neither possesse things humane doe not liue vnder Princes and powers Bâ—t who euer had more aboundance of the spirite then our Lord and sauior C 〈…〉 t had Who at any time was more holy then his Apostles were and yet thâ—â— submitted themselues to the higher power euen to the death 〈…〉 to 〈…〉 to popes bishops Wherefore 〈…〉 s muche better to say with Chrysostome that none is to be excepted from this â—niuersall sentence But those ecclesiasticall Papists will say that the kings â—hemselues and publique powers haue geuen vnto them theyr right and ha 〈…〉 appoynted that the clergye should be exempted But we ought not to regard â—hat Princes haue done herein but what they ought to haue done For it lyeth not in theyr hands to disanull the lawes of God Wherefore if this diuine commaundement of Paul willeth that euen euery soule be subiect vnto the publique power then doubtles ought we to obey it For the decrées of God ought not to be reuoked by any authority of man Although these wordes are so to be contracted that we vnderstande that we are not subiecte to the magestrate but only as touching his function and office Which if he at any time goe beyond and commaund any thing that is repugnaÌ„t vnto piety and vnto the law of God we ought to obey God rather then men For there is no power but of God He proueth his purpose by the efficient cause For that no humane strength or force but God himselfe is the author of all powers And it is to be noted that there are sondry kindes of powers For there is Sondry kindes of
himselfe amongste those which receiue profite out of the holy scriptures For he saythe not they are written for your learning but for our learning Neither is there any cause why the Anabaptists together with the Maniches and Marcionites should bark against The thinges which are in the olde Testament pertain to vs. the olde Testament For here Paul bringeth a testimony out of the Psalmes in the olde Testament Origen by a certaine learned induction proueth that those things which are written in the olde Testament pertainâ— also to vs. Paul in the first Corin. sayth that those things happened to them in a figure and were sealed in wrytings for our sakes vpon whome the ends of the world haue come And in the same Epistle he citeth this sentence Thou shalt not binde the mouth of the Oxe that treadeth out the corne and this he declareth was not so spoken as though God hadde a care ouer Oxen but for that they rather serue for vs. And to the Galathians he sayth that Abraham had two sonnes which in very dede shadowed vnto vs two Testaments And to the Corinthians he saythe that the Israelites did eate Manna in the wildernes and dranke of the rocke that we might knowe that they did eat the spirituall meat and drink of the spirituall drinke namely of the rocke that folowed them and that rocke was Christ Thus much Origen And doubtles it would be tedious if a man The common people ought not to be prohibited from the reading of the holy scriptures The vtilitie of the holy scriptures should recken vp all such kind of testemonies By these thinges also let those men consider which seke to prohibite Christian men from the reading of the holy scriptures how ill they prouide for theyr commodity whilest the labour to defeÌ„d theyr owne obstinacy inueterate abuses and supersticions That we thorough patience consolation of the scriptures might haue hope This thing Paul attributeth to the doctrine of the scriptures that it easely bringeth men to patience and maketh them willing wholy to committe all that they haue to the gouernaunce of God And thereout he declareth are taken most swete consolations and most feruent exhortacions wherby the minds may be thoroughly stirred vp to execute the dewties of piety and of loue And by that meanes being fensed with a strong and sound hope we shal neuer afterward wauer in nor out as children and reedes doo These notable and excellent giftes sayth Origen he attayneth not vnto out of the scriptures which only redeth them when yet in the meane time he beleueth them not neither vnderstandeth them but he which both vnderstandeth them and beleueth them Although I thinke that vnto these woordes is to be added that God of his goodnes geueth at the length vnto men that dayly rede the holy scriptures grace both to vnderstand and to beleue and chiefely seing that fayth The reading of the holy scriptures is profitable both to the beleuees to the vnleuers Patience and consolation commeth of the scriptures commeth of hearing the light of fayth shaketh away the darkenes of ignorance Wherefore the reading of the holy scriptures is most profitable both to them that that beleue and to them that doo not beleue And patience and consolation is sayd to procede of the scriptures both for that God geueth these thinges vnto them which pereseuer in reding of the holy scriptures and whith beleue them and also for that in them we rede that Christ and his members haue for the truth and for innocency and piety sake suffered many greauous and sharpe things and by such examples we are mooued moreouer also for that by them we vnderstand that God hath alwayes bene present with his so that he hath eyther vtterly deliuered them or ells he hath made them constant and valiant to suffer all thinges And thereof we conceaue a good hope that God wil also be the same God towardes vs and that he will haue vs in the same place and nomber that in times past he had them which are commended vnto vs in the holye Scriptures Neyther are we mooued by such examples only but also we heare God himself exhorting vs to patience and to valiantnes and also promising vnto vs his helpe And therby we are made couragious and doo fele sondry and manifold consolations and also we are stirred to a good hope of the chiefe felicitie Novv the God of patieÌ„ce and consolation geue you that ye may be like minded one towards an other according to Christ Iesus That we should not thinke that the very scriptures can of themselues engender in vs patience and hope and consolation â–ª Paul pronounceth God to be the true author of these giftes He vseth indede The scriptures are not of them selues the efficieÌ„t cause of these giftes the holy scriptures as lawfull instruments by which he engendreth these things in our hartes Neyther doth Paul in vayne adde this kind of prayer For thereby we vnderstand that it is not inough that we teach vprightlie and faythfully vnles God geue strength and efficacy to our doctrine Wherefore they which preach and teach the people ought also with dayly and feruent prayers to helpe them whome they instruct that they being by God made good ground may receaue sede with fruite He calleth God the God of patience and of consolation for that he can God is named by his effâ—ctâ—s not be named otherwise of vs but of his effectes And amongst other effects which are attributed vnto God Paul in this place mencioneth those chiefely which serued most to his purpose and which a litle before he had attributed to the holy scripture He wisheth vnto the Romaines mutuall agréement for that at that time they somewhat disagréed amongest themselues as it is manifest by those thinges What agrement is wished which we haue before red Howbeit he wisheth not vnto them euery kind of agrement but yâ— which is according to Christ For many conspire together and well inough consent in committing of wicked actes and that very oftentimes agaynst Christ But we must not pray vnto God for such an agreement but rather must pray against it Or els by According to Iesus Christ he vnderstandeth that they should be instructed according to his example That ye with one minde â—nd with one mouth may glorify God and the father of our Lord Iesus Christ It is not inough with one mouth with one the selfe same words to glorifie God Christ vnles also be added one the self same mind which is to be vnderstanded by the coniuÌ„ction of charitie namely that all discords be vtterly banished away There is also required an agréement in the principall Touchyng what thinges an agrement is necessary in the church poyntes of doctrine and in the articles that are necessary to saluation As touching thinges probable it is not of necessity that all men be of one the same mind concerning them so that charity be