make coÌ„parison between a vaine and true faith and desire to haue the true faith to bee shewed or proved to bee such by workes 3. That which hee doth derogate from a dead faith is wrongfully wrested to a iustifying faith 2 Yet the Protestants cannot endure this proposition Good workes are necessarie to Saluation therefore they beleeue that iustifying faith is without good workes Ans That which we deny in some respect and consideration only that our Aduersaries take as simplie and absolutely spoken in all respects We distinguish between faith works as betweene the cause and effects of iustification we denie good workes to be necessarie as causes of iustification or saluation but wee require them as necessarie conditions of them which are iustified and shall be saued Our Aduersaries maintaine that faith is informed Condition 5 by charitie but we say that charitie is rather informed by faith Because faith doth not please God in iâ— selfe but for and because of Christ whome it layeth hold on In euerie Relation two things doe concurre nowe faith in that respect in which it iustifieth is in the predicament of Relation first the foundation which is the matter or materiall parte and secondly the forme or formall part which is the destinating or referring of it to an other thing which it respecteth So faith as it is taken in a generall acception is the foundation or materiall part or the thing in which this Relation is the formall part is the ordaining or referring of it to an other thing to wit vnto Christ Because the efficient cause doth informe the effect and not contrariwise therefore because charitie is the effect of faith and faith the efficient cause of charity faith cannot bee informed by charity Contrariwise our Aduersaries doe reason 1 Paul makes faith to be of no reckoning without charitie 1. Corinth 13 therfore charitie doth â—nforme faith Ans 1. Paul speakes there of the saith of miracles not of iustifying faith 2. He doth not say that faith is informed by charitie but commendeth the necessitie oâ— charitie in some respect because that the faith that hath not charitie following it is not the true and sauing faith 2 Faith worketh by charitie Galat. 5. 6 therefore charitie doth informe faith Ans 1 Charitie is heere placed for the meanes and instrument by which saith worketh Now meanes and instruments are not the forme of that thing by which they are moved but are said rather to bee informed by that which moueth or worketh by them 2. Paul heere describes a true and iustifying faith by the effects thereof Therefore our Aduersaries vnderstand not what faith is Question 2. Of the certainetie of saluation Because in the handling of this question the Author hath many thinges throughout which might â—rooue offâ—nsiue I thought it better to referre the reader to the writings of our Countrey-men then to leaue â—â— things scandalous or to make it vp with many patches which the reader may haue exactly done otherwhere if he please to reade Maister Perkins in his Reformed Catholicke and in his treatise of Conscience and Maister Downham Christian warfare booke 2 Chap 6 7 8 c. CHAP. 12. Of good Workes VVHat we are to thinke of iustification by workes hath beene declared in the former chapter there remaine yet two principall errors of our Aduersaries one of the worke wrought an other of good workes themselues to the doing whereof Christians are bounde Now let vs treate of them in generall and in particular Question 1. Whether a good worke doe please GOD by vertue of the worke wrought though it be done without a good and sanctified minde as for example while they vse the Sacraments heare Masse singe Canonicall houres c. without deâ—â—tion Our Aduersaries affirme it but wee denâ—â— it and teach that the worke doth not please goâ— vnles it bee done by a man that is iustified and when that the person is in sauour with God then that the worke is accepted also And this is proved by this reasons following Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Rom 14 23 But that which is by the work wrought onely is not of faith therefore c. Woe bee to you Scribes and Pharises hypocrites for ye tithe mint and anise cummin and leaue the waightier matters of See a work otherwise commanded tithing with out mercy and faithfulnesse the lawe as iudgement and mercie and fidelitie Matt 23 23 This people draweth neere vnto me with their mouth and honoureth mee with their lipps but there hart is farre of from me Matt 15 8 Isai 29 13. The same thing is proued by the example of the Israelites and others whereas their works no not those which were commanâ—â—d theÌ„ did please God any longer because of want of faith in the persons that did â—hem 1. Sacrifice was a worke acceptable to God Abel sacrificed and Cain sacrificed but his worke was not accepted the reason whereof is given in the Epistle to the Hebrewes cap. 11. ver 4. By faith Abel offered vnto God a greater sacrifice than Cain by the which faith he obtained witnesse that he was righteous c. 2. To him will I looke even to him that is poore and of a contrite spirit and trembleth at my words Hee that killeth a bullock See works what they are by the worke wrought is as if he flew a man hee that sacrificeth a sheep as if he cut off a dogs neck he that offereth an Oblation as if he offered Swines bloud hee that remembreth Incense as if hee blessed an Idoll Isa 66 2. 3 4. 3. VVhat haue I to doe with the multitude of your sacrifices saith the Lord I am full of the burnt offerings of Ramms and of the fatte of the fed beastes and I desire not the bloud of bullocks nor Heere is a large Catalogue of works done without faith and an honest hart of Lambes nor of Goates When yeâ— come to appeare before mee who required this at your handes to tread in my Courts Bring no moe oblations in vaine Incense is an abhomination vnto mee I cannot suffer your new moones nor Sabbaths nor solemne daies it is iniquitie nor solemne assemblies My soule hateth your new Moones and your appointed feasts they are a burden vnto mee I am wearie to beare them And when yee shall stretch out your handes I will hide mine eyes from you and though yee make many praiers I will not heare for your The cause why they displeased God hands are full of bloud Wash you make you cleane take away the euill of your workes from before mine eyes cease to doe euill learne to doe well seeke iudgment relieue the oppressed iudge the fatherlesse and defend the widowe And come now let vs reason together faith the Lord though your sinnes were as crimsin they shal be made white as snow though they were red like scarlet they shall be as wooll Isa 1 11 12 c. 4. The same is witnessed Psalm 50.
sufficient to Iustification that wee might know that we are truly and sufficiently iustified 2 Euill doers which are drawne to death and haue done none or without doubt very few good workes such as the thiefe was Luke 22 should by this meanes despaire whereas notwithstanding God desireth not the death of him that dieth Ezech 18 32. The holy Scripture doth take away the power of iustifying from workes as well by sayings of Scripture as by examples 1 In his sayings it takes away iustification from works 1 To him that worketh not but believeth in him that iustifieth the vngodly his faith is counted for righteousnes Rom. 4 5. 2 By the works of the law no flesh shall bee iustified in his sight Rom. 3 20. 3. We conclude that a man is iustified by faith without the works of the Law Rom. 3 28. 4 If it be of grace it is no more of works or else grace were no more grace Rom. 11 6. 5 We know that a man is not iustified by the works of the law Gal. 2 16. 6. As many as are of the works of the law are vnder the curse Gal 3 10. 7 Not of workes least any man should boast himselfe Ephes 2 9. 8. According to the power of God who hath saued vs and called vs with an holy calling not according to our workes 2 Tim. 1 9 9. Not by the workes of righteousnesse which we had done but according to his mercy he saued vs Tit. 3 5. 2 The same is declared vnto vs by the examples of others such as is 1 The example of Abraham who was not iustified by works 1 If Abraham were iustified by works he hath whereof to reioice but not with God Rom 4 2 2 Abraham beleeued God and it was imputed to him for righteousnes Nowe to him that worketh the wages is not counted by favour but by debt Rom 4 3 4 Gal 3 6 Now it is not written for him onely but for vs c. Rom 4. 23 2 The example of Dauid 1. As Dauid declareth the blessednes of the man vnto whom God imputeth righteousnes without works Psa 32 1 Rom 4 6. 2 Enter not into iudgement with thy servant Psal 143. 2. Now he is the servant of God that doth the will of the Lord and walketh in his waies Psal 119. 3 The example of the Patriarck Iacob Not by workes but by him that calleth Rom. 9 11. 4 The example of Paul 1 I knowe nothing by my selfe yet am I not thereby iustified 1 Cor 4 4. 2 If any other man thinketh that he hath whereof hee might trust in the flesh c. touching the righteousnes which is in the law I was vnrebukeable but the things which were vantage vnto mee the same I counted losse for Christs sake c. for whoÌ„ I haue counted all thinges losse and doe iudge them doung that I might winne Christ and might be found in him not having mine owne righteousnes which is of the lawe but that which is through the faith of Christ Philip 3 4. 6 c. 3 Wee to wit Peter and Paul which are Iewes by nature knowe that a man is not iustified by the works of the Law c. and we haue believed in Iesus Christ that we might bee iustified by the faith of Christ and not by the works of the law Galat. 2 15 16. 5 The example of the man sicke of the palsie to whom without any his good works before done Christ saith Thy sinnes are forgiven thee Math 9 2. 6 The example of the Thiefe vpon the Crosse Luk 23. 43. 7 The example of the Publican Luke 18. 8 The example of the sinnefull woman Luke 7. 9 The example of the Iewes converted by the Sermon of Peter Acts 2 37 41 c. Moreover works doe therefore not iustifie because they are vnperfect in the regenerate also Contrariwise our Aduersaries do argue thus 1 Euill works doe condemne therefore good works doe iustifie Answere The opposition is vnperfect therefore no good consequence can bee grounded thereon for euill workes are perfectly euill but good workes are not perfectly good therefore they cannot iustifie for wee doe not the good thing that we would but the euill which wee would not that doe wee Rom 7 19. 2 Eternall life which abideth in them that be iustified is called a reward Matth. 5. 12. and 20. 1. 2. c. Luk 6 35 therefore by good works we deserue eternall life Answere i. The worde Reward is taken two manner of waies 1 In the Antecedent The word Reward is diuerse in the Law in Divinitiâ—â— of this argument for a reward that is due and answereth in a iust and exact proportion to the worke wrought Secondly it is taken otherwise in the Scripture namely for a free It is as if a father shold promise a reward to his son for his paines where as notwithstaÌ„ding all the fathers goods do bv right of inheritance come to the son and the son doth owe obedience to his father although his father promise him no reward gift and heereof it is that euerlasting life is called a gift Ephes 2 8 an inheritance Gal. 4 7 and that whereunto no proportion of desert doth answere but the elect themselues doe esteeme the reward greater than their labour or deseruing Matth. 25 37 there are therefore in this Syllogisme foure termes 2 The word reward is vnderstood many times not of life eternall it selfe but of the increase of glory in life eternall as Math 5 and Luke 6 for the glory of the blessed Saints in the life to come shall be different Once againe therefore heere be foure termes for the middle terme Medius terminus is one while taken for life euerlasting it selfe and an other while for a special and singular recompence in life eternall 3. Christ shall frame the judiciall sentence at the last judgement from their good works Mat. 25 34. 35 c. He will reward every man according to his works Rom 2. 6. Ans 1. Christ dooth reason from sanctification to iustification going before as from that which is better knowen vnto vs for in that last iudgment he will make manifest the faith of his Electe even before men also he concludes as it were froÌ„ the effect to his cause froÌ„ the fruit to the tree froÌ„ the later to the former In this argumeÌ„t therfore they turne the later into the former the effect into the cause 2 These verie same workes if Faith bee not there before are of none account neither doe they deserue any spirituall blessings as was before sayde when we treated of the workes of infidells 4 If thou wilt enter into life keep the Commandements Mat 19 17. Ans 1 It is a fallacie from that which is spoken but in some respect onely to the same taken absolutely and in all respects for that which Christ spoke in a particular respect that is to beate backe the perswasion of perfection in the young man that our Aduersaries take as
simply absolutely spoken 2 And Christ would that the young man should have tryall of the weakenesse of his strength in fulfilling the law 5 Not everie one that saith vnto me Lord Lord shall enter into the kingdome of Heauen but hee that dooth my fathers will which is in Heaven Matthew 7. 21. Therefore wee are justified by workes which we are to doo Answ 1 This is my Fathers will that every one that seeth the Son and belieueth in him should haue eternall life sayth Christ The Heavenly Father therefore willeth that we believe in his Sonne and by faith obtaine eternall life For this is the worke of GOD which is required at our hands that wee believe in him whom the Father hath sent Ioh 6 29 2. Wee denie that those which bragg of their faith in Christ and yet doo no good workes are the heires of eternall life because they haue not true faith which worketh by love Galat 5 6. But it dooth not hereof follow that we deserue eternall life by our good workes For we are saved by grace not of workes least anie man should boast Eph 2 8. 9. And good works are not pleasant to God but onely in them which bee iustified 6 VVorke out your saluation with feare trembling Philip. 2 12. Ans Hee speakes of sanctification or renovation in men alreadie regenerate And warneth them that they doo not through securitie let goe the meanes of their saluation but inure themselues dayly to the exercise of piety and the works of sanctification Now to apply this to iustification is to confound iustification with sanctification The argument therefore hangeth not together 7 With such sacrifices God Promeretur is promerited Heb 13 16. Ans 1 The Author of that Epistle speaketh of men which are iustified they doe then wrongfully wrest it to men which are to be iustified 2 That translation is corrupt For the text according to the Greeke is with such sacrifices God is well pleased which is not all one as to be iustified For good works doo please God as beeing a begunne and vnperfect obedience in them which are iustified although those workes doo not iustifie 8 God is not vnrighteous that hee should forget your worke and labour of loue c Heb 6. 10. An 1 There is more in the consequent than in the Antecedent for it followeth not God will recompense the good workes of them which are justified in the life to come Therefore those good workes deserue iustification 2 It is a fallacie making many questions where there is but one For it is one question whether good workes doe iustifie and an other whether God will reward the good workes of the iustified 9. Redeeme thy sinnes by almsdeedes and thine iniquities by mercy to ward the poore Dan 4. 24. Ans 1 Hee speaketh of the escaping of temporall punishments and not of the manner of iustification His words haue this sense Repent and bee mercifull to the poore that God may turne from thee the temporall punishments of thy sinnes which now hang over thy head 2 His speech is a Sermon of Repentance which doth include faith in it by the figure Synechdoche 3 The place is corruptly translated The proper signification of the word true meaning of the place is rightly rendred thus Breake of thy sinnes by righteousnesse c. that is cease thy woonted sinnes and begin a new life c. 10 Almes do deliuer from all sinne and from death and will not suffer the soule to come into darknesse Tobit 4 11. Answ 1 The booke of Tobit is Apocriphall and therefore can prooue no point in controversie 2 He speaketh not of iustification but of temporall death and of the temporall punishments of sinne which are meant in this place by the word Sinne after the phrase of the Hebrues And he teacheth here the same that is in Psal 41 1. Blessed is hee that iudgeth wâ—â—ely of the poore the Lord c. 3. By a Synechdoche faith is included also in the wordes going before set the Lord God alwaies before thine eyes c. Verse 6 4. The worke cannot please God vnlesse it bee done of one that is iustified 11 The hearers of the Lawe are not righteous before God but the doers of the Lawe shall be iustified Rom 2 13. An It is a fallacie from that which is spoken but in some respect only to the same taken absolutely and in all respects For Paul speakes vpon supposition If iustification be by the law then not the hearers but the doâ—ers of the Lawe shall be iustified and so hee expresseth represseth the insolencie of the Iewes who would be iustified whereas notwithstanding they kept not the law as if he should say If iustificatioÌ„ be by the law then not the hearers but the dooers of the lawe shall bee iustified But there can no man bee found either amongst the Iewes or the heathen which is a perfect doer or keeper of the lawe as Paul prooves it in the first second third Chapters to the Romans therefore if iustification be by the lawe no man liuing shall be iustified looke the placeâ— Euen as Paul also doth ouerturne this supposition Gala 3. Therefore this sophisme of our Aduersaries falleth to the ground 12 VV as not Abraham our Father iustified through workes Iames 2 21. Ans If the words bee vnderstoode as they sound according to the letter they are repugnant to other Scriptures 1. in the meaning because they speake cleane contrarie concerning the iustification of Abraham Romans 4 3. Genesis 15. 6. Secondly in the historie Because Iames saith thaâ— Abraham was iustified after the offering vp of his sonne whereas it appeareth by the former places that hee was iustified about some twentie fiue yeares before The meaning then of Saint Iames is that they which are iustified are not without good workes but that they doo so manifest their faith by their workes that by the effects they may bee knowne of others to be iustified which is nothing els but to bee declared iust or righteous 13 Loue couereth the multitude of sinnes 1. Peter 4 8. Answ In the proper place whence this sentence is cited Prou 10 12. it appeares that it is meant of that hiding of sinns which is before men not before God Therefore it is impertinently alleadged for iustificatioÌ„ 14 Many sinnes are forgiuen her for shee loved much Luke 7. 47. Therefore loue meriteth forgiuenesse of sinns Answ 1. In the Parable going before Christ sheweth that wee may gather by the love that followeth in the partie who hath had manie sinnes forgiuen and who fewe in their iustification going before seeing hee will loue more for the time to come to whom manie than he to whom few sinnes have beene forgiven This is therefore a changing of the consequent into the Antecedent and of the effect and that which followes after into the cause and that which goes before 15 The chiefest vertue dooth chiefely iustifie But Charitie is preferred before faith 1 Cor
Note Paul calleth concupiscence sin Rom. 6 fiue times Rom 7. six times Rom 8 thrise Rom 6 12. 3 I knew not sinne but by the lawe for I had not knowen lust or concupiscence except the lawe had said thou shalt not lust Rom 7. 7. 4 Sinne tooke occasion by the commaundedement and deceiued me Rom 7 8 11. Because termes aequiualent to sinne are attributed to Concupiscence 1. An euill present with vs Rom 7 8 21. 2 A thing not good Rom 7 18. 3. The flesh lusteth against the spirit Galat 5. 17. which is enimitie against God Rom 8 7. 4 Therefore Paul teacheth vs to crucifie Concupiscence or the luste of the flesh Galathians 5 25. The first motions of luste or concupiscence and other bad affections are condemned as sinnes 1 Of anger Christ saith whosoeuer is angrie with his brother vnaduisedly shall bee culpable of iudgment Matthew 5 22. 2. Of hatred whosoeuer hateth his brother is a Man-slayer 1 Ioh. 3 15 3 Of the first motion of Concupiscence vnto wantonnesse Christ sayth whosoeuer looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committted adulterie with her alreadie in his heart Mat. 5 18. Contrariwise our aduersaries doe reason thus 1. There is nothing that bringeth damnation in them which are in Christ Iesus Rom. 8. 1. But sinne is a thing that causeth damnation Therefore sinne is not in the regenerate and consequently Concupiscence seeing it is in the regenerate is no sinne Ans All sinne deserueth damnation but it bringeth not damnatioÌ„ to any in whom it is pardoned as it is in all the children of God that is Paules meaning that there is nothing that shall cause damnation in them which are in Christ Iesus because that which is damnable in them of it selfe is made veniall for Christs sake 2 Christ hath purged all our sinnes Heb. 1. 3. Therefore concupiscence in the regenerate is not sinne Ans This is a monstrous and misshapen reason for by the like argumeÌ„t because Christ hath purged all sinnes therefore neither adulterie nor manslaughter should bee sinnes any more 3 Christians regenerate are sanctified and washed from their sinnes and offences 1 Cor 6 11. therefore they haue no sinne and consequently Concupiscence in them is no sinne Ans 1. There is more in the Conclusion than in the premisses for this only doth follow they are washed and sanctified therefore their sins are not imputed to them For if they were not sinnes they had no neede to bee washed from them 2. Washing from sinnes doth not cause tâ—at they should not be but it respecteth the guilt of sin which is taken away otherwise the regenerate should not sin any more which sauoureth of the error of the Anabaptists And maruaile it is that our Aduersaries daâ—e come into the light with such toyish fooleries The Anabaptisme of the Papists 4 Concupiscence if it be ouercome as it is in the regenerate giueth but matter of victorie and glorie vnto them therefore it is not sinnne Ans 1 It were a shamefull argument for by the like reason Satan should not sinne because if hee be ouercome hee doth but yeeld vs matter of reward 2. It is a fallacie from that which is a cause by accident not of it selfe for we may not say that Concupiscence is not sinne by his owne nature because the conquest of it yeeldeth vs matter of glorie 5 If concupiscence be sinne then all sinnes bee equall and be a like sinnefull Answere 1. Though we keepe the iust degrees of sinnes yet sinnes of the lowest degree cease not to be sinnes and qualities in the smallest degrees doe not because of their smallnesse cease to be such qualities as they by nature are 2 The consequence of the argument should bee this If concupiscence be a sinne then all men are sinners before God but this conclusion liketh not our Aduersaries 6 Sinnes are not sins vnlesse they bee voluntarie but Concupiscence is not voluntarie therefore c. Ans 1 The theologicall knowledge of By this reason originall sinne should be no sinne sinne is not to be learned out of Aristotle or Baldus but out of the holy Scripture which reckoneth Concupiscence and inuoluntary sins amongst sinnes 2 And according to this definition of the Papists Concupiscence is a sinne for though it be not done by the consent and will of the spirit yet it is voluntarie in respect of the flesh Rom 7 25 3 It is a proposition Ethic. Nâ— com lib. â— c. 5. deliuered by Aristotle himselfe that those things be done of vs willingly the beginning cause whereof was in our selues as if a drunken man coÌ„mit any fault in his drunkenes when he knoweth not what hee doth and cannot auoid it yet he is to be accounted to doe it willingly because himselfe was the cause of his ignorance disabilitie so by nature God made vs able to keepe his lawe wee through our fault haue lost this abilitie haue brought vpon our selues a necessitie of sinning which is therefore voluntarie in vs because our selues were the cause thereof 7 Concupiscence when it hath conceiued bringeth forth sinne Iames 1. 15. therefore Concupiscence it selfe is not sinne but the cause thereof Ans 1 Iames speaketh of actuall sinne and in the meane while he doth not acquitte concupiscence of the name of sinne for if therefore concupiscence be not sinne because that which springeth from it is by Saint Iames called sinne then neither can concupiscence bee a sinne in the vnregenerate which is absurde 2 Seeing euery thing doth beget and bring forth his like to insist in the metaphore of S. Iames certainely concupiscence which bringeth forth sinne is it selfe sinne also And that which maketh another to be so is it selfe much more so but concupiscence doth tempt and entise vs to sinne as saint Iames saith in the same place therefore c 8 Concupiscence is in the Scripture called sinne improperly as Christ also is called sinne 2. Cor. 5. 21. Ans 1. Why wee should not take the worde sinne in his proper signification in the place alledged 2 Cor 5. 21 the text giueth vs reason when it saith That God made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne but there bee noe reasons why when wee speake of concupiscence wee should change the proper signification of the word into an improper 2. Neither is it in the place of Paul an improper speech but a manner of phrase borowed from the Hebrewes wherein the worde sinne is taken for a sacrifice for sinne therefore our Aduersaries doe bewraie their great ignorance 9 Blessed is hee in whose spirit there is no guile Psal 32 â— therefore Concupiscence is not a sinne in the righteous Ans 1. To be without guile is opposed vnto hypocrisie and nothing els is meant but that the righteous are of a single vpright heart 2. It is a fallacie of diuision whiles the thinges that goe before are seuered from those that follow after for the whole verse is