things very considerable in Sin the transient act and the remaining habit of which the later is far the worse and of which it is necessary that the one be deleted as well as the other pardoned for any one to be accounted positively just or not impious this later the habit is not removed or abolished but by Grace first infused and also whether before or rather after the same Grace infused our former actual Sins are pardoned is thought by Protestants a thing doubtful and not necessary to be decided δ δ. See the words of Calvin in Antidoto Conc. Trident. Of Beza contra Illyricum and others in Forbes de Justific 2. l. 4. c. p. 70 71. Simul nos justificari renovari saith Calvin dico in Christo per fidem nobis unito applicato neque haec an illa ordine antegrediatur tantillum laborandum censeo cum unam sine altera nunquam recipiamus This infusion of Grace therefore by several titles claims the chief place in our Justification and is that thing only in us that justifieth or maketh us to be really just and so is usually stiled the formal cause of our Justification 3. Meanwhile both the one and the other being the effects only of God's mercy Catholicks affirm That since God justifieth us not for those but for the righteousness and sufferings of Christ as the sole meritorious cause thereof it is not necessary as to our Justification in respect of inherent righteousness that this be every way consummate and perfect 4. Nay further they freely concede that it is such as that it doth produce some particular acts perfect and without contagion of Sin learned Protestants assenting ε. ε. Forbes Ibid. c. 5. Ecquid magis injuriose contumeliose dici potest in Christi Gratiam quam asserere nos nihilominus nihil prorsus vel cogitare vel dicere vel agere posse quod purum sit a peccati Sorde And § 13. Sententia haec rigida multis etiam doctissimis Protestantibus aliisque viris moderatissimis semper unprobata fuit quoting them at large Ibid. Yet ordinarily it doth many or the most mixt with several imperfections and that Venial Sins do both adhere to and intervene between many of the good actions of the justified ζ. ζ. Estius 2. Sent. 41. d. 4. § Et justi in iis operibus quae indubitate bona sunt saepe-numero peccant dum its se aliquonsque vel concupiscentiae vel negligentiae vel alicujus levioris circumstantiae ad integritatem boni operis requisitae defectus admiscent Forbes de Justificatione 4. l. 3. c. 8. § Communiter sentiunt Romani nullum Sanctorum vitare posse omnia venialia peccata per longum vitae tempus Conc. Trid. Sess 6. Can. 23. Which Sins after are remitted only by God's Mercy through Christ's Merits as those are before Justification γ. γ. Bellarm. de Justificat 4. l. 14. c. In Answer to the Objection Post primam reconciliationem Christus ociosus esset saith no Quoniam peccata nostra quamvis levia quotidiana ipse purgat sanguis ejus emundat nos ab omni peccato Estius 2. Sent. 42. d. 6. § Nemo quantumcunque justus nisi sanguine Christi Redemptoris etiam a Veniali peccato emundatus fuit in regnum Dei admitti potest See the same in Bellarm. de Justificat 4. l. 21. c. § Resp non dicit 5. Lastly Several learned Catholicks do not hold this inherent righteousness or internal renovation so absolutely necessary to mans Justification i. e. to remission of Sin or capacity of future Glory as that none possibly could had it so pleased God received from him pardon of his offences or also through virtue of Christ's merits an eternal glory without having such inherent righteousness and whilst he only reduced to his pure Naturals or that none could possibly or justly be deprived of Glory that hath such inherent righteousness Vid. Bellarmin de Justificat 2. l. 16. c. Reatus paenae quartus effectus Scotus 1. Sent. 17. d. F. a Sanct. Clara Deus Natura Prob. 23. But only maintaining that it is God's Pact or Covenant and declared Will that Christ's Merits should this and no other way merit for us freedome from Hell and life eternal Namely First by satisfying for our former Sins and procuring for us this donation of the sanctifying Spirit within us 2ly What Catholicks do include in and understand by Justification being thus explained Next they affirm that there is nothing in man that can antecedently merit this our Justification but that the sole meritorious cause of it both in respect of remission of Sin or any punishment due unto it and of the donation of Grace destroying in us the habits and pollutions of Sin and producing good works is the obedience active and passive the works labours sufferings and satisfactions of Jesus Christ only exclusive to the works sufferings or satisfactions of any other Where also they maintain that neither any works of our's done by the meer strength of nature have the least worth in them to procure God's assistant Grace for the producing of any previous disposition to this Justification as of Faith Repentance a love of God c. Nor again these dispositions tho wrought by assistant Grace and having some supernatural dignity in them have any such worth as by it to procure from God setting aside his meer bounty and free promise the Justification it self ζ. ζ. Conc. Trid. Sess 6.8 c. Nihil eorum quae justificationem praecedunt sive fides sive opera ipsam justificationis gratiam promeretur 'T is true that these dispositions to or conditions of man's Justification as effected by Grace having some true worth in them tho this no way comparable to the Acts produced by Grace inherent after Justification and besides having a gracious promise made to or acceptance of them which two things none can deny some Catholick Authors think that this word Meritum qualifying it with the addition de congruo may be justly applyed to them especially since St. Austine and other Fathers have so applyed it formerly St. Austine and other Fathers have so applyed it formerly St. Aust Ep. 105 106. others think not the matter agreed on the difference is about words and the Church's Subjects left to their liberty See Bellarm. de Justific 1. l. 21. c. And see Head XVI Merits 3. Yet they next affirm That there are some conditions or dispositions required of us and also by God's free first exciting and then assisting Grace man's Will assenting and co-operating wrought in us Which tho by any worth of theirs they cannot merit yet by vertue of God's free Promise and the new Covenant do certainly impetrate the applying or if Protestants Will imputing to us both the active and passive Obedience of Christ viz. all his Merits which are accepted by God instead of and as if they had been our own but this not as to our being esteemed by God our selves
them For if some more imperfect acts of Faith of Repentance Hope Love c. done only by God's assistant Grace did thro God's promise and Christ's merits procure our first Justification and the consequents thereof much more the same acts and others the like now more perfect and proceeding from Grace inhabitant do thro the same promise and merits confer on or procure for us a greater or as some stile it a second Justification viz. An improvement of our former justice the remission of such Venial Sins as are still committed by the justified and a richer eternal reward 9. They affirm That a man may fall away again from this state of Justification by incurring those greater Sins either of Omission or Commission which are for this cause called commonly Mortal from which fall he is capable of restorement to a second Justification or justified condition by the same means as he attained the first only if instead of Baptisme not iterable he make use of the Sacrament of Penance for his entrance into it where-in concerning the just value and vertue of Penal Works see below Head XIX 10. These are the Catholicks Positions concerning Justification much tending to the promotion of pious endeavours and an holy life with whom also the more moderate Protestants do in most if not all the former Points concur But meanwhile there are other Tenents of the more rigid Protestants on this subject and several also of them broached by the first Author of the Reformation which brings a very great prejudice to it that tend much to the relaxation of good manners the breeding of false securities and weakning mens endeavours in the prosecution of a good life such as these ζ. ζ. See the most rigid Protestants maintaining the most of these Opinions cited and censured by Bishop Forbes in his Considerationes aequae placidae de Justificatione And by Dr. Hammond in his Treatise of Fundamentals from the 11th to the 19th Chapter And by Mr. Thorndike Epilog 2. l. from the 4th to the 10th Chapter 1st Their placing Justification only in the remission of Sin and imputation to us of the righteousness of Christ not in infusion of Grace or renovation of life making men fancy here that all their work is done for and without them none to be done in or by them 2ly In such remission of Sin their making Justification as it were one momentaneous act and God at one and the same time remitting to us all our Sins past present and to come which must needs produce afterward a very careless behaviour both to committing and repenting of Sin 3ly In such imputation of Christ's Righteousness their maintaining it in such a manner not as if we were meritoriously justified by the application of the effects of it to us as if it had been our own but formally justified by a translation of it and investiture with it in such a manner as if it were inherent in us and esteemed to be done by our selves 4ly From whence ariseth also a conceit that all men by this righteousness apprehended by their Faith are equally justified or all esteemed equally righteous in their Justification 5ly And so also that all become equal in the future celestial reward whether working much or working little 6ly Their making the only instrument or necessary condition required in us for Justification or remission of Sin Faith alone an easy act of the brain as Dr. Hammond Of Fundamentals p. 116. observes having nothing in it repugnant to our passions and not any other good disposition wrought in us by God's especial Grace Repentance purpose of a better Life and this Faith too required of us for this purpose not as any work or duty but only as an instrument or hand to apprehend and apply Christ's merits to us and to make his righteousness ours c. 7ly Their making this Faith that justifies us a strong fiducia or full assurance that we are justified or if you will that we shall be justified only on those terms if we firmly believe we shall be so Which obliging men of what life soever to believe they are or shall be justified without looking after any requisite thereto save only this full belief renders those who continue still unreformed in their Manners yet by such strong fancy secure of their Salvation whilst none more than they extol the all-sufficiency of Christ's Righteousness nor none so much as they do or have reason to diffide in and dis-esteem their own From which Tenent also it follows that all those that are truly justified are assured or certainly know that they are justified The ordinary effect of which Doctrine is despair in some who find in themselves no such assurance certain presumption in others who are fully assured without just cause 8ly Their holding that a justifying is only a true Faith which breeds a great presumption in those for their being also justified persons who do and have no reason but to take themselves for true believers and who would even give their bodies to be burnt for any Article of the Christian Faith 1. Cor. 13.3 and yet do or may want Charity and so Justification 9ly Their holding good works and the other dispositions that always accompany a justified Faith to be necessary to our Justification or Salvation only as effects and fruits or also signs and assurances to our selves or others of this Faith necessary for their presence indeed but not for their efficiency as causa sine qua non ad salutem non impediendum but not as instruments or conditions required thereto as our Faith is thus destroying obedience it self by taking away the chief motives that men have to it and making them neglect any further pains-taking for the production of those things which they are taught do necessarily grow from Faith or which serve only to justify them not before God but Men. 10ly Their expounding St. Paul not only to exclude Works performed by strength of Nature but done by Grace from any way disposing us or concurring thereto And St. James only to speak of good Works as declaring our Justification before men not obtaining it with God 11ly Their affirming the Promises of the Gospel to be meerly gratuital excepting for Faith and not conditional upon Obedience as those of the Law were denying our Lord to be any Legislator or denying Christian liberty to be so far obliged to the Obedience of the Law as that any account is had of our observing of it in any degree as to obtaining or improving our Justification And that Christians ought now not as tied to it by God's Law but spontaneously and freely to do that Will of his which was formerly made known to them by the Law Which Obedience of our's how little soever and upon such terms we may guess it will not be much yet is accepted by God through the more perfect Obedience of his Son made ours by Faith See Calvin Institutiones 3. l. 19. c. 2.4 § And then we may
guess what a poor harvest there will be of good Works where they are thus only Free-will-offerings 12ly Their depressing the righteousness and true worth of good Works flowing from Grace infused and by this undervaluing the true Power of God's Grace given unto us and so by this again inconsiderately lessening the effects of Christ's merits also as purchasing this infusion of Grace whereby to forbear sinning as much as they seem to extol them in the pardoning of us whilst doing nothing but sinning lessening also the same merits in the removing of Sin whilst they make it in their Justification rather covered than the strength and habit deleted and eradicated misapplying Rom. ch 7. 13ly Their affirming that the pretended restoring of the once justified and afterwards faln from Grace to the State of Grace again taught and used in the Church is a thing meerly imaginary See Dr. Field Append. 3. l. p. 312. for that he who is once justified can never be unjustified and who are once assured of their Justification are also assured of perseverance in it happen afterwards what sin will happen Which sins also consequently tho of the same kind must not be in these persons of the same guilt as in others i. e. losing the Kingdome of Heaven 1. Cor. 6. and so these persons being indeed though they perswade themselves otherwise by such sins faln from Grace Now are the Keys of the Church and those Sacraments and such a measure of repentance neglected whereby they might have been restored and so the last state of these men worse than the first that before their justification and their end miserable because too much conceited and secure These are the Tenents of some more rigid Protestants in the Point of Justification in opposition to the Roman Doctrines In some of which if perhaps their meaning may by a charitable construction be reconciled to truth yet do their expressions seem very pernicious to a good life and easily misunderstood by the vulgar or those who take them in the most obvious sense HEAD XVI Of Merit Of Merit COncerning the Merits of Grace inhabitant or of the good Works that proceed from it 1. Catholicks do generally disclaim any merit of them in such a sense as the word Merit is explained by Protestants See Field Append. 3. l. p. 324. Forbes de Justifica 5. l. 3. c. p. 197. viz. First Ut opus sit nostrum non ejus a quo mercedem expectamus 2ly Ut sit indebitum 3ly Ut nihil unquam faciendum omittatur nec omittendum committatur sive quoad partes sive gradus 4ly Ut sit aequalitas inter opus mercedem Or yet as Merit is taken in the former Covenant of Works involving the first and third of these Conditions They willingly granting That as there are no works of our's done by Grace assistant tho having some worth in them that can merit our Justification so neither any Works of the already justified proceeding from Grace infused and inhabitant tho having yet a greater worth in them that can merit the future divine reward promised to them as condigne i. e. as any way in strict justice equalling it α. α. Bellarm. de Justific 5. l. 14. c. Opera bona si considerentur ex natura sua remota promissione dignitate principii operantis nullam habent proportionem ad beatitudinem illam supernaturalem proinde non eis debetur ex justitia merces aeternae vitae quoting Rom. 8.18 Luk. 19.17 Matt. 19.29 centuplum 2. Cor. 4.17 and in his using the Phrase ex condigno for this reason because their Works have not only a promise made to them of a reward but also a dignity by reason of the divine principle of them God's Grace in us that hath some correspondency or similitude to the reward as the Seed to the fruit a lesser degree of Grace here to a higher measure there-of here and hereafter in the next world yet he disclaims any equality in a sense strictly taken as most clearly appears in his answer to the Objection made against condignity viz. the great inequality of our present Works tho proceeding from Grace and life eternal especially taken for the Object thereof Deus merces nostra magna nimis as also the inequality of the imperfect knowledge and charity we have here to that perfect we shall receive for it hereafter To which he answers Ibid. c. 18. Negari non potest quin beatitudo longe excellat actioni meritoriae cum in illa sit coguitio charitas perfecta in ista vero sit cognitio charitas imperfecta And That Non requiritur absoluta aequalitas inter meritum praemium secundum justitiam distributivam ut dici possit praemium ex condigno etiam ex parte operis sed sufficit ut sit proportio quaedam secundum quam is qui meretur dici possit dignus eo praemio And That Ideo dicimus ex condigno deberi fidei formatae per charitatem visionem cum ardentissima charitate quia dignum est ut res a Deo inchoata disposita tandem aliquando perficiatur absolvatur Granting also there that God doth always remunerare justorum opera supra condignum This account gives this Cardinal of the Word Condignum See the like in Scotus 1. l. 17. d. 1. q. Praemium speaking of aeterna beatitudo est majus bonum merito justitia stricta non reddit melius pro minus bono ideo bene dicitur quod Deus semper praemiat ultra meritum condignum See more Testimonies tending to this purpose below ε. and Head _____ Letters χ. Ï. Ï„. Ï…. φ. Or Secondly As nostra or ex nobis or 3ly As indebita γ. 1. or 4ly All of them quoad partes gradus perfect and free from faults See Head XV. of Justification Further also conceding that these good Works in order to that meriting which is by Catholicks ascribed to them do stand in need of the supply or support of the Merits of our Lord and that in many several respects 1st Both for procuring the gift of that Grace to us which in us procures or produceth these good Works β. 2ly And for procuring the Pact and Promise which God hath made to them without which whatsoever their worth had been they could have claimed from God no such reward 3ly And for the remission of the imperfections and Venial Sins accompanying many of them pardoned to us for Christ's not their Merit see Head XV. 4ly And lastly For the exhibiting to God an Obedience which in its true worth equalizeth or if you will exceeds the reward for Catholicks affirm a meritorious cause as of our Justification so of our Glorification perfectly equalling life eternal and the highest degrees thereof which any one receiveth but this not in us or our Works α but in Christ the effect of whose merits is dispenced to us for this end according to the measure of these our Works which as the
There is in all good Works a dignity of Grace Divine similitude goodness and honour Phil. 4.8 4ly Affirm also this worth of the actions of the Regenerate after Justification much different from and transcendent to that worth which is in the former dispositions precedent to Justification done indeed by the external help of God's Grace but before the transfusion into us of his Spirit But this always to be remembred that no worth of the one or the other is from our selves as of our selves but the worth of them is from God They affirm accordingly that there is in these Works of the justified proceeding in us from this Divine Principle a worth and similitude some way proportionable and corresponding to the reward promised to them in respect of which worth Life eternal and the beatifical Vision of God and all the consequences thereof are called the Wages and Stipend Reward Prize and Crown of these Works Matt. 5.12 Apoc. 22.12 Matt. 20.8 2. Tim. 4.8 Apoc. 2.10 1. Cor. 9.24 25. And they said truly to merit such reward according to the sense of the word Merit used by the Fathers and the word Dignity used in the Scriptures a chief portion of which reward as a greater measure of God's Spirit and Charity and Sanctification in the most intense degree received in the next world and the augmentations of Grace daily received in this are only higher degrees of the same kind and nature with that of which they are the reward And God also is said to give such rewards to these ex justitia quia digni sunt Apoc. 3 4. 2. Thess 1.5 Heb. 6.10 2. Tim. 4.8 not only in this respect that God is just and faithful in keeping his promise once made tho to a Service of little or no worth at all but in respect of some valuable goodness and worth tho this from God also in the condition it self to which he makes the promise of such reward They rationally affirm also that whatever benefit any ones Sanctity or good Works may be said by way of impetration to procure from God for others they may be said also to have the same power with God for themselves when by relapse into sin or falling into any necessity or misery themselves are in the same condition as such others and when their ingratitude and affront and contempt of former Grace c. doth not aggravate their offence and fall beyond that of others See 2. Chron. 9.3 Nehem. 13 14.22.31 5ly Yet this worth of the Righteousness or works of the justified whatever it it be as it hath its original not from us but from God and is also without any purchase thereof wholly due to him from us his Creatures and Vassals so is it not affirmed to ascend so high as any way to equal those rewards promised to it but to be far inferior and God ever to reward beyond any such Merit Matt. 25.22 2. Cor. 4.17 For whereas our good Works momentary are not only said to merit Life eternal but also to merit those higher measures of the Holy Spirit and degrees of Sanctification that shall be conferred on us there as also the the increase of Grace in this life here it is manifest that the lesser degree the Merit and the greater the reward cannot be equalled in their worth Some proportion some similitude there is between this Seed the justified sow here and the Fruits thereof they reap hereafter sufficient to support the Phrase especially after the intervening of a Pact of the one meriting or being worthy of the other but not to maintain in commutative justice one of equal value or worth to the other α. This we have title to by Christ's Merits only not our Works to the which Merits also we owe that we have these Works therefore the Council of Trent that admits meritum bonorum operum ex pacto and so ex justitia c yet waves the expression ex condigno as liable to Mistakes ε. ε. Bellarm. de Justificat 5. l. 16. c. Catholici omnes agnoscunt opera bona justorum esse meritoria vitae aeternae sed tamen aliqui censent non esse utendum his vocibus de condigno de congruo sed absolute dicendum opera bona justorum esse meritoria vitae aeternae ex gratia Dei Bishop White Answer to Fisher p. 172. and the same p. 512. The Opinion of Modern Papists saith he concerning the Merit of Condignity was always opposed by Pontificians themselves Scotus Durand Marsilius Dionysius Cisterciensis Gregory Ariminen Thomas Walden Paulus Burgensis Joh. Ferus Eckius Pighius c. and see many more later added by Bishop Forbes de Justificat 5. l. 4. c. which I mention here to shew a liberty of Opinion herein left to her Subjects by the Roman Church and many who propugne ' the Doctrine of Merit of Condignity speak improperly Thus Bishop White Mr. Thorndike Epilog 2. l. 33. c. p. 308. As it cannot be denied that the Church of Rome allows this Doctrine of Merit he means of Condignity to be taught yet can it not be said to enjoyn it Because there have not wanted to this day Doctors of esteem that have always held otherwise Again They who only acknowledge Meritum congrui in Works done in the state of Grace i. e. that it is fit for God to reward them with his Kingdome say no more than that it was fit for God to promise such a reward which who so denieth must say that God hath promised that which was unfit for him to promise And if the Dignity of our Works in respect of the reward may have this tolerable sense because God daigns and vouchsafes it such reward the Council of Trent which hath enacted no reason why they are to be counted Merits can neither bear out these high Opinions he means maintained by some of the Roman Authors nor be said to prejudice the Faith in this point Again That which necessarily comes in consideration with God in the bestowing the reward which the condition he contracted for must necessarily do tho it cannot have the nature of Merit i. e. taken in a Protestant sense because the Covenant it self is granted meerly of Grace in consideration of Christ's death yet it is of necessity to be reduced to the nature and kind of the Meritorious Cause Nor can the Glory of God or the Merit of Christ be obscured by any consideration of our Works that is grounded upon the Merit of our Lord Christ and expresseth the tincture of his Blood as all the Roman Merit professedly doth And so do many Roman Authors both before and since the Council And also most of those other that use this Phrase to signify some true worth in these Works as before explained Thes 3 4. yet so qualify it as that it can offend no rational Protestant 6ly That therefore first he who conceits any good works of the justified are or may be such as may challenge from God's justice life
quicquam non tuum HEAD XIX Of Penances and Satisfactions Of Penances and Satissactions THE Catholick Assertions concerning Penances and Satisfactions may be easily collected out of these Theses concerning Justification and Merit 1. By Penances Catholicks understand any Acts either produced by adjuvant Grace before Justification or by inhabitant Grace after it that are some way painful laborious or afflictive to us by depriving us of some Good either utile or jucundum Whereby all sorts of good Works may be reckoned Penal and Satisfactory as they do cross and mortify our contrary carnal secular and terrene appetites and inclinations α. α. Estius 4. sent 15. d. 24. § Paena non aliud est quam privatio boni vel utilis vel delectabilis Nam privatio boni honesti ad culpam pertinet igitur satisfactionem quae cum tali quadam privatione seu substractione fieri debet paenalem esse oportet Lugo de Paenitent Disp 24. § 3. De facto omnis nostra operatio meritoria est simul satisfactoria quia omnis de facto paenalis est sicut omnis satisfactio est simul meritoria quia debet procedere ex actione laudabili honesta ut diximus sic etiam e contra omnis actio meritoria est Satisfactoria quia affert secum aliquam paenalitatem Ratio autem a priori est quia nullum est opus honestum quod non adversetur alicui bono vel delectabili vel utili c. See δ. Or would have crossed them if these had not been by Grace formerly mortified for in such a case a less pain in doing it when it ariseth only from such a cause diminisheth not but increaseth the satisfactoriness and merit of the Work as proceeding from a person more eminently sanctified and one who hath formerly suffered the pains he hath now conquered Such then are both these acts of Christian Virtues which are sub Praecepto and cannot be omitted in due time and place without sinning and breach of God's commands which in what sense they are said to merit and obtain life eternal See before Head XVI may be much more in the same sense to merit and obtain the remission of some temporal punishment the divine acceptation being always supposed As likewise the same acts done more imperfectly before our Justification are conditions or dispositions instrumental for obtaining remission of our Sins as well as of the infusion of Grace in our Justification β. β. Lugo de Paenit 24. § 3. Art 1. Per opera praecepta posse hominem satisfacere communis sententia verissima affirmat Et quidem stante doctrina Concilii Tridentini contraria sententia non videtur posse ulla ratione sustineri Num Concil Tridentinum Sess 6. cap. 10. 16. definit iis operibus quibus divina lex observatur mereri hominem justum augmentum gratiae Unde non apparet cur non habeant ea opera vim purgandi debitum paenae sicut habent vim novum jus comparandi ad novum praemium And see Bellarm. de Paenit 4. l. 13. c. § Adde quod And Ibid. c. 8. He argues thus Si opera justorum i. e. praecepta eam vim habeant ut vitam aeternam vere proprie mereantur nullo modo negari potest quin etiam efficacia esse possunt ad satisfaciendum pro reatu paenae temporalis siquidem longe majus est gloria aeterna quam paenae temporalis remissio In the same manner Lugo Ibid. § 1. Quia opera hominis justi habent aequalitatem condignitatem in what sense this see Head XVI in ratione meriti in ordine ad beatitudinem aeternam ergo possunt habere condignitatem ad redimendum paulatim debitum paenae temporalis quod est multo minus But such are more principally those higher acts of Christian Virtues that are in Consilio See Head XVIII which as they are still in a higher degree painful and opposite to our secular contents than the other and as in some sense in debita See Numb freely undertaken so are they more acceptable to God and satisfactory in the manner which shall be explained hereafter for any debt of punishment and suffering that we still owe unto him and that his vindicative justice for our sins is ready to inflict upon us Thus the acts of any Christian Virtues may be reckoned amongst Works Satisfactory in respect of cancelling punishment as also satisfactions as they also are good works cannot be denied to be meritorious in respect of acquiring Glory but more especially δ. δ. See life eternal the promised reward of our temporal sufferings 2. Cor. 7.14 and 2. Tim. 1.12 Rom. 8.17.13 and particularly of those Works wherein a satisfactory Virtue is said principally to consist I mean Alms-deeds Fasting and Prayer Matt. 25.34 35. 6.6.16.18 Where the open reward is the kingdome of heaven Bellarm. de Indulgent 1. l. 2. c. In bonis actionibus hominum justorum duplex valor sive praemium assignari potest meriti videlicet Satisfactionis Again Ibid. In uno atque eodem opere bono eleemosyna vel jejunio meritum Satisfactio reperitur Nam eleemosyna delet peccatum quod est Satisfactorium esse tamen eadem eleemosyna quia est opus bonum Deo gratum meritoria est vitae aeternae Esse Satisfactoriam convenit eleemosynae quia opus est laboriosum paenale esse meritoriam convenit eidem quia est opus bonum ex charitate factum Eadem oratio simul est impetratoria meritoria meritoria quia orans orando bene operatur Deo placet quid impedit quo minus possit esse simul Satisfactoria Meritoria those of Prayer Fasting and Alms-deeds The first respecting the Soul and involving all the mental Exercises and spiritual Mortifications thereof in the acts of Contrition For Contrition is not denied as it is penal so also to be satisfactory Confession Deprecation examinations of Conscience intensive recollections of Spirit to celestial matters c. acceptable to God The second respecting the Body and including the several macerations and subduings thereof by suffering cold thirst hunger hard fare clothing lodging disciplines watchings solitude silence c. The third respecting the goods of fortune but also those of the Soul and Body in order to the shewing all manner of Works of mercy to or any way benefiting our Neighbour Always provided that our penal Works in any of these three kinds be such first as are for the matter of them lawful which all those are Learned Protestants consenting γ. 1. γ. 1. See Dr. Hammond in his Answer maintaining good Free-will or spontaneous Worships against Cawdry much in this matter p. 154. The Law and Will of God being the Rule in agreement with or opposition to which lawful and unlawful consists it is as impossible that any thing should be unlawful in respect of God's Law which is not forbidden by it as that any should be lawful that is
forementioned is not allowed nor other explicite Faith than the forementioned required Therefore that Proposition Haec est vera Catholica fides extra quam nemo Salvus esse potest as applied to the larger Creeds that of Athanasius or yet further to all the Decrees of all lawful Oecumenical Councils as in the Bull of Pius the Fourth ought either to be understood not distributively as if any Decree of any such Council unknown and so not believed or assented to excludeth from Salvation For how few among Christians do know or yield actual assent to all the Decrees of some one Council And how can the Doctors of that Church require such Belief to all the Decrees suppose of the Council of Trent a many of whom require it not to all the Articles of the Apostles Creed But collectively thus That all that Fides extra quam nemo Salvus is contained therein and that extra eam totaliter sumptam or si tota desit nemo Salvus esse potest As elsewhere in the same Council of Trent the Nicene Creed is called Fundamentum firmum unicum contra quod portae inferi nunquam praevalebunt Conc. Trid. Sess 3. or to be understood distributively but hypothetically thus That when any one knows any such Article to have been defined by the Church wherein a non-culpable ignorance of the Church's Definitions always excuseth he after this in non-believing or in dissenting from such Article doth by this his Pertinacy and Disobedience to the Church as by other greater sins persisted in and unrepented of incur the loss of Salvation HEAD XIV Concerning Obedience to Humane Laws made by the Ecclesiastical or Civil Magistrate Concerning Obedience required to Humane Laws 1. CAtholicks do not affirm from God's commanding Obedience to the Ecclesiastical and Civil Magistrate and to their Laws That therefore all Dis-obedience to them or their Laws is a mortal Sin For so all Dis-obedience to any of their Laws whatever tho never so light for their matter would be mortal Sin 2. It is manifest that many times the matter which these Magistrates command is antecedently our duty in obedience to some Divine Law under Penalty of Mortal Sin tho they had not commanded it As in matters of much consequence to the publick or our private good the Charity to our Neighbour or also to our selves that is commanded by God's Law requires that which the Magistrate also exacts of us In such cases therefore there may be a great and mortal Sin committed in dis-obeying the Ecclesiastical or Civil Laws but this by vertue of the Divine concurring with and corroborating them in these particular Injunctions 3. Catholicks affirm That the Breach of a humane Law made in a thing that is left indifferent by the Divine out of contempt may be a greater Sin than breaking one of the Divine Precepts out of Infirmity but this is also by vertue of our offending against another particular Divine Law prohibiting such contempt of the Magistrate But such contempt neglect c. set aside that a much greater guilt is ordinarily contracted from the breach of a Divine than only an humane command both from the greater necessity and benefit in general of the matter of the Laws Divine and from the supreme Dignity and Majesty of the immediate Legislator 4. Catholicks affirm That no humane Laws made in matters of what consequence soever do bind beyond the Law-Giver's intention so that such Laws tho given in matters of greatest moment bind not under pain of mortal Sin I mean as they are his Laws if he doth not intend them to do so In whose Power since it is to lay no obligation so not to lay the greatest 5. That whatever obligation to Sin such Laws may have from the Law-givers intention yet that in some Circumstances they may not bind at all as the Divine do as in Periculo mortis cum pergravi damno aut infamia for quod valde difficile moraliter impossibile and to Impossibles Laws bind not I say if the thing commanded appear not of a greater consequence than such private damage nor hath been expressed by the Magistrate to be esteemed so Otherwise it is presumed that the Law-Giver in that Charity which he oweth to his Subjects doth or ought to pass his Laws without any intention that they should bind under Sin in such cases 6. Most of the Church's Laws are passed without any express Declaration of her Subjects incurring mortal Sin in the Breach of them yet this rationally collected by her Doctors from the great consequence of the matter commanded the heavy punishment annexed c. And sometimes her Laws are so indulgent as to oblige to a Penalty only without any Guilt laid upon the Transgressor of them HEAD XV. Of Justification Of Justification COncerning Justification whereby man hath Right by vertue of the Evangelical Covenant to freedome from eternal Death and possession of eternal Life 1. Catholicks declare That by Justification they mean both God's pronouncing or reputing Man just or not unjust i. e. freed from his wrath and from punishment due to the unjust by God's free remission of all his former Sins And 2ly God's making and so reputing him just or holy by habitual Grace infused or by inherent righteousness Thus making God's Remission of the former Acts of Sin and our Sanctification and so by it the removal of former habits of Sin the two parts of our Justification or the two effects of God's mercy in justifying us α. α Conc. Trid. Sess 6.7 c. Hanc dispositionem Justificatio ipsa consequitur quae non est Sola peccatorum remissio sed Sanctificatio Renovatio interioris hominis c. Again In ipsa Justificatione cum Remissione peccatorum haec omnia simul infusa accipit homo per Jesum Christum cui inseritur fidem Spem Charitatem 6. Sess 11. Can. Si quis dixerit homines justificari Sola peccatorum remissione exclusa gratia charitate quae in cordibus eorum per Spiritum Sanctum infunditur Anathema sit Bellarm. de Justificationes l. 2. 6. c. Cum tam mors Christi quam resurrectio ad justificationem necessaria esset potuisset Beatus Paulus utramque partem justificationis i. e. Remissionem peccati donum renovationis tribuere morti Christi sed maluit resurrectioni tribuere renovationem Rom. 4.15 And § Deinde Justificatio non ideo Solum nobis confertur a Deo ut Gehennae paenas evadamus i. e per remissionem peccatorum sed etiam ut praemia vitae caelestis acquiramus i. e. per gratiae infusionem bona opera And see Ibid. c. 2. § Quod si Where he makes remissionem peccatorum infusionem gratiae duos effectus Dei hominem justificantis Where therefore renovatio interioris hominis per susceptionem gratiae is affirmed to be the formal cause of Justification and deletion of Sin to be the effect of it It is spoken of the only formal
cause of Justification that is within us and from which we are denominated really just whereas the remission of Sin is an act of God without us and of the deletion of the habit of Sin inherent not of the pardon of the acts of Sin formerly committed After that this is agreed on also by Protestants that these two go always together and that none is reconciled or received into God's favour by remission of Sin who is not also at the same time renewed in his mind and made righteous by infusion of the Holy Spirit β. β. Calvin Institut Lib. 3. ch 14. § 9. Fatemur dum nos intercedente Christi justitia sibi reconciliat Deus ac gratuita peccatorum remissione donatos pro justis habet cum ejusmodi misericordia conjunctum hoc esse beneficium quod per Spiritum suum in nobis habitat Lib. 3. cap. 16. § 1. Jam utrumque nobis confert Christus utrumque fide consequimur vitae scilicet novitatem gratuitam reconciliationem De vera Christianae pacificationis ratione 2. Cap. Si quis ex adverso objiciat non aliter nos fieri participes Christi justitiae quia dum ejus Spiritu in obedientiam legis renovamur hoc quidem fatendum est c. Again Neque vero cum homines dicimus gratis justificari Christi beneficio tacenda est regeneationis gratia Quin potias cavendum ne a nobis separentur quae perpetuo Dominus conjungit Quid ergo Doceantur homines fieri non posse ut justi censeantur Christi Merito quin renoventur ejus Spiritu in sanctissimam vitam frustraque gratuita Dei adoptione gloriari omnes in quibus Spiritus regenerationis non habitat denique nullos a Deo recipi in gratiam qui non justi quoque vere fiant Mountague Appeal p. 170. Whom Christ doth not quicken he doth not justify This is directly the Doctrine of the Scripture Gal. 3.22 1. Cor. 6.11 Heb. 9.14 Rev. 1.5 6. 1. Pet. 2.9 Fathers also are cited c. Bishop Forbes de Justific Lib. 2. c. 4. Protestantes unanimi consensu fatentur inhaerentis justitiae seu sanctitatis infusionem cum gratuita nostri justificatione necessario ac perpetuo conjunctam esse Now first that our Justification consists not only in the former but also in the later Catholicks evidently collect from many Texts of Scripture which do apply our freedome from God's wrath and punishment and inheriting eternal life to this later as other Texts do to the former Such are these Rom. 3.24 Where we are said to be justified freely i. e. without any thing in us deserving it by his Grace i. e. infused as all grant it is at that time when God justifies us Titus 3.5 ver Where speaking of Baptisme the Apostle saith That according to his mercy he saved us by the laver of regeneration and renovation i. e. internal of the Holy Ghost that being justified by his Grace i. e. in this internal renovation c. we should be made Heirs of eternal life 1. Cor. 6.11 compared with the former where speaking of the same Baptisme he saith But ye are washed but ye are sanctified but ye are justified in the name of the Lord Jesus into which they are baptized and by the Spirit of God i. e. infused in our Baptisme by which infused we are said here expresly as to be sanctified so justified and this put the last as also Rom. 8.30 it is put alone but there necessarily including also our Sanctification Rom. 4.25 Where Christ is said to be delivered for our offences i. e. the remission of them and to be raised again for our justification i. e. for our regeneration or renovation by the Spirit given unto us upon his Resurrection comp Rom. 8.10 Eph. 4.23 24. where the new man is said to be created in justice Gal. 5 6. comp 6.15 Rom. 6.7 He that is dead i. e. to Sin by a new life given by Grace is justified from Sin comp Gal. 3.21 Rom. 5.17.21 Where 't is said That those who receive abundance of Grace and donation of Justice shall reign in life c. And that Grace reigneth i. e. in us by or thr Justice to life eternal It were needless to add more To the same matter belong all those Texts wherein we are said By being born again and by inherent righteousness to be made Friends Domesticks Children Heirs of God All those Texts which atribute Salvation or also remission of Sin or punishment either to the several particular habits and branches of this inherent Righteousness as to that of Faith of Hope or Charity of the Love or Fear or Service of God or Love Mercy and Alms to our Neighbour or to the several Act of these Habits and Graces i. e. to our good works following Regeneration Lastly All those Texts wherein God is said To accept persons for their inherent holiness or righteousness And as this is evident in Scripture so it is concluded by many Protestants that the Term Justification both sometimes in Scripture and most frequently by the Fathers is used to signify not only remission of Sin but internal Sanctification and in this Latitude have several Protestants themselves explained it γ. γ. Bishop Forbes de Justificatione Lib. 2. Cap. 4. cioncerning the Scriptures Verbum justificari quandoque etiam in Scriptura significare justitia imbui vel donari non diffitentur permulti docti Protestantes contra aliorum rigidorum id pertinaciter negantium sententiam quoting there the words of Beza Zanchy Peter Martyr Chamier and others Again concerning the Fathers Ibid. c. 5. Hanc fuisse communem Patrum omnium tum Graecorum tum Latinorum Sententiam ex quamplurimis illorum dictis Augustini imprimis acerimi gratiae Christi propugnatoris nemini in veterum lectione versato obscurum esse potest Res adeo certa manifesta est ut dissentientes ipsimet Protestantes id ultro concedunt quoting the Confessions of Calvin Chemnitius Beza Bucer Chamier c. to this purpose Imo saith the same Forbes multi etiam doctissimi Protestantes hanc ipsam sententiam secuti sunt aut saltem eam non omnino improbarunt quoting after many others Spalatensis Bishop Mountague and Dr. Feild Whose words are Append. 3. l. 11. c. The first Justification implyeth in it three things remission of Sins past acceptation and receiving into that favour that righteous men are wont to find with God and the grant of the gift of the Holy Spirit and of that sanctifying and renewing Grace whereby we may be framed to the declining of Sin and doing of the works of righteousness 2. Again Catholicks contend that in comparing these two concurrents to our Justification the later i. e. to be made internally and habitually just ut peccatis mortui justitiae vivamus 1. Pet. 2.24 is the chiefer and more principal then the first i. e. to be reputed only not unjust or not a Sinner To which may be added that there being two