Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	effect_n	faith_n	justification_n	4,667	5	9.6727	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A93702	Rome ruin'd by VVhite Hall, or, The papall crown demolisht: containing a confutation of the three degrees of popery, viz. papacy, prelacy, and presbitery; answerable to the triple crowne of the three-headed Cerberus the Pope, with his three fold hierarchies aforesaid. With a dispelling of all other dispersed clouds of errour, which doth interpose the clear sun-shine of the Gospel in our horrizon. Wherein the chiefe arguments each of them have, for the vindication of their erronious tenents are incerted, and refuted; with a description of such whem [sic] the true Church of Christ doth consist of: as also how, and by whom, they may be gathered, and governed, according to the will, and appointment of Jesus Christ, and his apostles, in the primative purity thereof. / By Iohn Spittlehouse, assistant to the Marshall Generall of the Army, under the command of his Excellency, the Lord Generall Fairfax. Imprimated by Theod. Jennings, and entred in the Stationers Hall.	Spittlehouse, John.	1649 (1649)	Wing S5013; Thomason E586_2; ESTC R203633	304,213	396

worthinesse in them but for his owne mercies sake And Moses telleth the Israelites that God did not set his love upon them because they were more holy then other Nations for saith he you are a rebellious people but because the Lord loved you therefore he hath done this unto you Deut. 7. 8. 2. Inst Neither did Joseph obtaine that great favour with God to have the preheminence over his Brethren by any merit or worthinesse in himself but of Gods meere mercy grace and favour towards him for as yet Joseph had not shewed his faithfulnesse and chastity in Potiphers house the purpose of God then to exalt Joseph revealed to him in his dreame Gen. 37. 6. went before any merit on Josephs part so also Gods free and gracious election in setting us apart to everlasting salvation is without all respect or workes in us as the Apostle toucheth Rom. 9. 15. 3. Inst Yea the Book of Exodus sheweth us on the one side the ingratitude and disobedience of the people of Israel and on the other side the stedfast love of God towards them which offereth unto us an evident argument of Gods free election without any respect to workes the Apostle likewise to the same purpose alleadgeth that notable Text I will have mercy on whom I will have mercy Rom. 9. 15. 4. Inst Neither did the Lord look upon us Gentiles in makeing of us his people for any worthinesse in us but for his owne mercies sake he hath called us to the knowledge of his truth for otherwise what we are in our selves the Apostle sheweth out of the fourteenth Psalm where it is said that they are all gone astray c. there is none that doth good no not one So then it is most evident that Gods election changeth not but Good workes is no precedent cause but a consequent effect of election whatsoever he hath decreed concerning any mans Salvation shall stand for the gift and calling of God are without repentance Rom. 11. 29. And the Apostle sheweth us that the Lord hath chosen us that we should be holy not that because we were holy so that good works is no precedent cause of our election but a consequent effect thereof CHAP. X. Treateth of their tenent of justification by faith and workes SECT 1. THe Popish tenent concerning faith is that it justifieth A Popish assertion not as it apprehendeth and applyeth the righteousnesse of Christ but as it is a meritorious work by the worthinesse and dignity thereof and that it is a presumption for any man to be assured of his salvation Ans Now that this their assertion is contrary to Scripture will thus appeare as Gen. 15. 6. where it is said that Abraham beleeved in God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse the Apostle also concludeth the contrary where he saith That to Faith justifieth not as a work but as it apprehendeth the righteousnesse of Christ him that worketh not but beleeveth c. his faith is counted for righteousnesse Rom. 4. 5. where righteousnesse then is imputed and accounted there it is not obtained by workes faith then justifieth not as it is a work or meritorious but as an instrument it apprehendeth the justice of Christ which is imputed by faith SECT 2. Faith a speciall application of the promises of God Object A Justifying faith is not a speciall application of the promises of God in Christ but a generall beliefe only that whatsoever God saith is true as Abrahams giving of credit to Gods speeches that he should be the father of many nations Ans It is otherwaies evident for Abraham did not only beleeve Gods promises concerning his carnall seed but his faith reached also to the spirituall seed which was Christ as the Apostle applyeth it Gal. 3. 16. yea Abraham rejoyced to see Christs day Joh. 8. 16. as having a particular interest in him as his Saviour the fore-named place doth therefore strongly prove against that their assertion for whereas Abraham had formerly shewed many excellent workes as of Piety in building Altars in many places and calling upon the name of the Lord in charity in seeking reconciliation betwixt L●t and him Chap. 13. of mercy in redeeming of Lot being taken prisoner Chap. 14. contempt of riches in refusing to take the King of Sodoms goods yet none of all these workes are reckoned or imputed to him for righteousnesse but only his faith SECT 3. How Phineas zealous act was imputed to him for righteousnesse Obj. PHineas work in executing judgement upon the Adulterer and Adulteresse was imputed to him for righteousnesse faith then is not only imputed for righteousnes but works also Ans The Prophet in that Psalme speaketh not of that righteousnesse whereby Phinias was originally counted righteous or just before God for that was by faīth because without faith it is unpossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. but of that righteousnesse whereby Phinias faith was declared and testified and thereby his zealous act because of his faith was counted a righteous work The like is also where the Apostle Paul denyeth that Abraham Paul James reconciled was justified by workes Rom. 4. 2. and the Apostle James affirmeth that he was justified through workes Jam. 2. 21. The first speaking of justification properly before God the other of the same testified and declared by workes unto men and therefore Phinias fact is said to be imputed to him for righteousnesse from Generation to Generation that is in all ages he was known and reputed just before God and men And therefore the Apostle James saith Shew me thy faith by thy workes Jam. 2. 18. as if he should have said 'T is true before God it is thy faith only that justifieth thee in regard that he only knoweth thy heart but in that I cannot judge of thy inward affections it is requisite that I should discerne some actions from thee which may testifie to me that thou art godly and therefore our Saviour saith ye may know them by their fruits c. Albeit therefore the Apostle urgeth the shewing and approving of faith that Abraham was justified through faith in the offering up of his Son Isaac yet before God he was formerly justified by faith but by this his obedience his faith was both approved to God and made manifest unto men SECT 4. Foure sorts of faith Object WHat manner of faith is that which you terme justifying faith Ans For the better discerning hereof it is requisite to know the divers kindes of faith which are of foure sorts viz. 1. There is fides inissialis vel fundamentalis the faith of beginning The faith of beginning or fundamentall faith whereof the Apostle speaketh Heb. 11. 6. He that commeth to God must first know that God is c. and this kinde of faith towards God the Apostle referreth to the doctrine of beginning and essence of God in knowing him to be the only God 2. There is another faith called fides miraculorum the

so that it maketh directly against the Pelagians who deny sinne to be a deprivation of nature but say it is a corrupt imitation whereas it appeareth by the Text that even in the very youth and first age when we are not so apt to imitate there is evill and corruption in the heart Again sinne is the cause of death for if Adam had not sinned he had not dyed but it is most evident that Infants dye which if sinne were not the cause then were the Scriptures false which The death of Infants an evident demonstration of originall sinne saith the wages of sinne is death Now what other sinne can procure an infants death which hath not sinned according to the similitude of Adams transgression viz. actually unlesse it be originall sinne which certainly is a most infallible demonstration that children are borne in originall sinne In the next place I will shew you what it is SECT 3. Originall sinne described ORiginall sinne is an inherent corruption of our nature powred out into all the parts of the minde by the guilt of Adam who was not only the Progenitor but also as it were the root of mans nature for the Lord committed those gifts to Adam which he intended to bestow upon mans nature which when he had lost he lost them not only for himself but also for his while posterity by meanes of which we bring forth the workes which are called the workes of the flesh Gal. 5. 19. Now to the further description of originall sinne we finde in Scripture the cause the subject and the effect of it 1. The cause as I said before was Adams fall as we may see The cause of originall sin Rom. 5. 15. 1 Cor. 15. 21. as also by the suggestions of the Devell Gen. 3. 4. as also through Adams Free-will whereas he might have refused 2. The subject of it we take to be the old man with all his The subject of originall sin power minde will and heart for in the minde there is darknesse and ignorance of God and his Will as appeareth by the words of our Saviour Mat. 12. 34. O generation of vipers how can ye being evill speake good things The Apostle also saith that the carnall minde is at emnity with God for it is not subject to the Law of God neither can be Rom. 8. 7. The Apostle James also testifieth the same in these words Let no man say when he is tempted that he is tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with evill neither tempteth he any man but every man is tempted when he is drawne away of his owne lusts and inticements then when lust hath conceived it bringeth forth sinne c. Jam. 1. 13 14 15. 3. The fruits of originall sinne are either internall or externall The fruits of originall sin internall as ungodly affections or evill concupisence which the Apostle termeth Idolatry 2. Externall as wanton lookes prophaine speeches and devillish actions as in Mat. 15. 19. Out of the heart proceedeth evill thoughts c. which procureth a cauterised conscience the which procureth the wrath of God and eternall damnation as the Apostle testifieth where he saith that the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse and unrighteousnesse of men that holdeth the truth in unrighteousnesse for which thing sake the wrath of God is come upon the Children of disobedience Col. 3. 16. Joh. 8. 24. Rom. 5. 12. 18. Jam. 1. 15. SECT 4. Of Concupisence THe Pelacians doe hold this tenent in the generall that Concupisence was not sinne in any man and so doe the Papists generally in particulars viz. that concupisence after Baptisme is not properly sinne nor forbidden by Commandement and that it is not verily and properly a sinne in the regenerate but that it is only so called because it comes of sinne and inclineth to sinne each of their Objections shall be propounded and answered Questions propounded and answered touching Concupisence And first in answer to the Pelagians objection that hold it in the generall that concupisence which is the first fruit of originall sinne being to will or to desire without the externall action is no sinne to which purpose they argue thus viz. Obj. Such things as are naturall are not evill but concupisence or to will is naturall therefore it is not evill nor consequently sin Ans The Apostle saith that we are all by nature the children of wrath therefore because we are so by nature by the same reason it should be no discommodity unto us to be the children of wrath which would be a meere madnesse to conceive Obj. Even in our nature as it now standeth corrupt the appetite or desire of such things as tend to the conservation of nature and to decline and shun the contrary are not evill but such is the concupisence to meat and drink and the like ergo Ans Such motions and appetites of themselves are not evill Concupisence how evill and how not evill as they are naturall motions but if they be inordinate motions and exceed a just measure they are evill as to have an immoderate desire to meat and drink for as it was naturall for Eve to desire to eate of the fruit of the tree yet to desire it against the Commandement of God was evill so it is likewise with these naturall motions if they be immoderate and inordinate they are evill SECT 5. How Sinne is to be measured Obj. THat which is not in mans power to avoyd is no sinne but not to covit is not in mans power ergo it is no sin Ans Sin is not measured by the necessity and liberty of Nature How sin is to be measured but by the disagreement which it hath with the Will of God 2. When God first printed the Law in mans nature before his fall then were the precepts of God given unto him in his power to keepe 3. Though man by his voluntary corruption hath lost his power and liberty yet God fore-goeth not his power and right in commanding but that Concupisence is sinne Concupisence is sinne it is most evident by the Morall Law that would not forbid it unlesse it were sinne As also the Apostle who urgeth the same argument saying I had not known sin but by the Law for I had not known lust except the Law had said thou shalt not covit Rom. 7. 7. Thus much touching the objections of the Pelagians next in answer to the Popish objections Obj. The objection which the Papists make touching concupisence is viz. That it is taken away by Baptisme to whom I returne this answer viz. Ans The subjects which they and many other Societies admit Popish objections touching concupisence answered to Baptisme are not at that time of their admittance fit members or subjects to receive that Sacrament of initiation into the Church of Christ which in its due place I shall fully prove But as to such persons as are meete Members

in robbing of the Aegyptians the fornication of Hosea the Prophet Hosea 1. 2. For the Will of God which is most just and the right which he hath in the lives bodies and goods of men maketh these things lawfull being done by the Commandement of God which otherwise would be unlawfull for a man may use his Oxe or his Asse at his pleasure because they are ordained for his use so likewise may the Lord doe with men take away their lives at his pleasure and that by a double right both because man by his sin hath deserved to dye 2. As he is his Creator and may use the creature at his pleasure or as may best serve to his glory And as man may use his owne goods and that which is lent unto him precario freely and frankly during the pleasure of the lender which when he will he may require againe so the earth being the Lords and the fulnesse thereof which he as it were lend●th to man so long as it pleaseth him He may justly at his pleasure transfer things from one to another and like as Matrimony maketh carnall copulation lawfull so the Lord may by his Commandement bring and supply the like bond as Matrimony is as in the instance of the Prophet afore mentioned when the Lord bid him take unto him a Wife of fornication the Commandement of God made that lawfull which otherwise was unlawfull and so in the other examples But albeit God can make that which seemes unjust to be lawfull and just yet can he not make a just and a good act to be evill and wicked as that he which worshippeth God aright doth evill or such like and the reason is because God by this meanes should be contrary to himself in commanding one so to worship him and yet counting him for so worshipping him to doe evill Again it is impossible for God to doe that which he cannot will now the Lord willeth no evill to be done therefore he cannot make that which is good to be evill because he cannot deny himself who is only good SECT 3. A difference betwixt the precepts of the first and second Table THere is also a difference to be made betwixt the precepts of the first and second Table God doth dispence with the second which he referred to the good of our neighbour when he seeth it more to make for his owne glory which is the true end and scope of the first and second Table as when God commandeth to dishonour Parents rather then to dishonour him and biddeth them kill and so in the rest But with the precepts of the first Table he dispenceth not because they are immediatly referred to his owne glory for otherwise it were to consent to dishonour himself and thus much for the answer of the first part of the Argument 2. It followeth not if God can dispence that therefore the Though God can dispence the Prelates cann●● Prelates and the Church may 1. Because the dispensation against a Law must be by as great authority as the Law was first made by But the Moral Law grounded upon the Law of Nature was founded by the Author and Creator of Nature and therefore by him only and not by any else may it be dispenced with 2. As in naturall effect● ordinarily there must goe before an extraordinary cause a naturall cause as a thing cannot be made hot unlesse fire or some other efficient cause of heat be put unto it so that the Pope himself cannot command a thing to be ho● but by such efficient cause of heat Yet the Lord without such ●ediate and ●rdinary mean●s can make a thing hot by his infinite power supplying that cause himself So likewise in Spirituall actions the Lord may supply that which maketh the thing lawfull which man cannot doe without some externall cause or circumstance doe concurre in making the act lawfull As to kill is an unlawfull act in it self neither can the Pope or any other man make it lawfull to kill unlesse there be some cause that maketh it lawfull to kill as when the party commanded to be slaine deserveth to dye But God to whom all men are debtors and who is the Lord of every mans life may command to kill without any injustice although there be no such apparant cause or circumstance which should make that act lawfull SECT 4. Obj. BVt they further object thus To restore that which is committed to a mans trust is a naturall duty yet this is dispensed with when as a man refuseth to restore to a Mad-man his sword or weapon which he gave one to keep so the Magistrat● ordinarily dispenceth with that precept Thou shalt not kill when he commandeth Malefactors to be slaine So also the Maccabees dispenced with the Sabbath when they resolved to fight with their enemies on the Sabbath day 1 Mac. ● Chap. As these precepts then were dispenced withall by men so may the rest Ans For the first instance there is in that particular case no dispensation against the Law of Nature for then by such dispensations it would be made lawfull not to restore that which is committed to trust which cannot be made lawfull by any dispensation for this were to crosse and over-throw the Law of Nature but not to restore a sword to a furious man is but a particular interpretation of that generall Law of Nature wherein the in●ent of that Law is kept for it is agreeable to the Law of Nature to render whatsoever belongeth unto another and the reason thereof is because it is just So it is lawfull by the same Law notwithstanding not to give unto a Mad-man his owne sword because it is just Also the meaning and reason of the Law is kept because the furious man would doe some hurt with his weapon and therefore to administer occasion and instrument unto his rage were unjust In the other two particulars there is no dispensation but an interpretation rather or declaration of the Law as that it is no Murther when one is justly slaine And in the other that it is no breach of the Sabbath when necessity compelleth to breake the rest thereof but thus to dispence were a dispensation to make it lawfull to kill where one cannot justly be put to death and to worke upon the Sabbath where there is no necessity 2. Thus to dispence were to make it lawfull afterward which was not before such a dispensation but it was alwayes lawfull for the Magistrate to put to death and upon like necessity to intermit and suspend the rest of the Sabbath 3. Besides these interpretations and declarations of these Lawes they are not devised by man but warranted in Scripture by the Lord himself the Maker and Author of the Law and therefore they are not to be interposed by any humane authority CHAP. XVI Tr●ateth of their opinions touching ●he Sabbath day c. SECT 1. Objection TO this particular they say That the keeping of the Lords day or the first

then make better tryall of mans obedience then in forbidding that which is good But to the point in question if all were alike saved by the death of Christ why then are the termes of election and Predestination used so frequently in Scripture SECT 5. Object VVHat is meant by the word Election and Predestination Answ Predestination is the eternall decree of God whereby he determined with himself what he would have become of every What election is in the generall man for men are not since the fall of Adam created to the like estate and condition but for some eternall life and for others eternall death is appointed whereby Gods free election is made manifest seeing it lyeth in his will what shall be the estate and condition of every Nation whereof the Lord sheweth a token in the whole issue of Abraham as we may read Gen. 24. 37. Deut 32. 8. Psal 147. 20. There is also a certain speciall election wherein appeareth Of particular election more plainly the grace of God seeing that of the same Stock of Abraham God rejected some as Ishmael and Esau and at length most of the Tribes of Israel unto whom the entery of life were shut before them by his just yet by his incomprehensible judgement In the next place it is requisite to shew the effect that Gods The effects of election and repto●ation election and reprobation worketh and 1. Touching the elect whom God in his mercy hath appointed to salvation for his own righteousnesse sake and not for their desert Those he guideth by the grace of his holy Spirit Rom. 8. 14. c. 9. c. As many as are led by the Spirit of God are the Sons of God as also the Prophet Isai All those that I have called by my name I have created fashioned and made for my honour Isa 43. SECT 6. NOw as the elect are led guided and directed by the Spirit of God so on the contrary are the reprobate by the spirit of Sathan who is the God of the world or worldly-minded men and hence it is that Christ telleth the wicked Jewes That they were of their father the Devill Joh. 8. 44. whose workes they did so that as on the one side the elect indeavoured to doe the will of God their Father so the other the will of their father the Devill And those sort of people are compared by the Prophet Isaiah S●mpromes of the sonnes of Sathan to a raging Sea that cannoe rest whose waters foameth with myre and gravell for they have no peace with God Isa 57. 20. The Prophet David also considering of their estate and condition Psa 73. 4 5 6. giveth this reason for it viz. The Lord suffereth them to come to no perill of death but they are lusty and strong they come in no danger like other folke neither are they plagued like other men Their eyes swell with fatnesse and they doe even what they lust they have riches in possession and they call their Lands by their owne names And this is the cause saith he that they be so holden with pride and overwhelmed with cruelty these are they that talke against the most highest which say Tush how shall God perceive it is there knowledge in the most high Can he heare our Swearings see our secret Wheredomes and Adulteries Doth he take notice of our prophaning the Sabbaths or of our quaffing and drinking of healths of villifying Professors with reproachfull tearmes of Schismaticks and Hereticks and the like surely no. Such as these were Cain Cham Ishmael Pharaoh Ammon Their predecessor Saul Absolom Antiochus Herod Pilate Judas the traitor and many others who brought upon themselves eternall condemnation The same Prophet David also describeth the end of such men with another reason of it in these words namely That the Their end Lord hath set them in slippery places and cast them downe and destroyed them by which meanes how suddenly doe they consume and perish and come to a fearefull end yea even as a dreame so doth he make their image to vanish SECT 7. Object IF God have reprobated and cast them off how can they doe any other the cause of sinning therefore is not in them but in God who leaveth them to themselves how doe those Scriptures agree then where the Lord saith that he delighteth not in the death of a sinner Ezek. 33. 6. And O that Israel would obey me c. with O Jerusalem Jerusalem how often would I have gathered thee together and ye would not Mat. 23. 37. As also that he willeth not the death of a sinner and other while that some are ordained of old to condemnation as in Jude vers 6. Judas also is called the sonne of perdition Joh. 17. 12. Ans To the Answer which hath formerly been made to such Sundry arguments answered touching rejection a question as this may be added this answer of the Prophet Jeremy The Lord is more righteous then to be disputed with Jerem. 28. 6. And the Prophet Isaiah saith We are in the hands of the Lord as the Clay in the hands of the Potter Isa 47. 9. And the Apostle saith Hath not the Potter power over the Clay and of the same lump to make one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Rom. 9. 21. Again Who art thou that replyest against God ver 20. Was there unrighteousnesse in God in loving Jacob and hating Esau God forbid ver 14. For he will have mercy on whom he will have mercy and compassion on whom he will have compassi●n ver 15. and whom he will he hardneth so that there is vessels of wrath and vessels of mercy as in ver 22. 23. for otherwise why should these phrases be used in Scripture CHAP. III. Treateth of hardning the heart SECT 1. Objection IF God harden the heart of a sinner how can he chuse but sinne seeing that by nature we are all the children of wrath Ans In every action the ●nd and meanes must goe together the cause doth never follow the effect but the effect the cause and in one and same action there is a double cause as 1. The instrumentall cause moving 2. God separating from the instrument yet giving power of motion to the same and so the wicked may be said to be the instruments of God yet not God the cause of their wickednesse and therefore one saith Deus agit per malos non in malis God worketh by evill men not in evill men God therefore may be said to be the cause of the action but God is no way the author of sinne not of the quality of the action Gods decree is no cause of their sinning but the voluntary inclination of the will unto evill being neither forced nor by any violence compelled and therefore no evill is either to be attributed to God or his decre● 2. Again God is no way the author of sinne seeing he neither tempteth nor perswadeth unto it Jer. 1.