Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	ecclesiastical_a	king_n	temporal_a	3,017	5	8.3913	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A33636	An exact abridgement in English of the eleven books of reports of the learned Sir Edward Coke, knight, late lord chief justice of England and of the councel of estate to His Majestie King James wherein is briefly contained the very substance and marrow of all those reports together with the resolutions on every case : also a perfect table for the finding of the names of all those cases and the principall matters therein contained / composed by Sir Thomas Ireland.	Coke, Edward, Sir, 1552-1634.; Ireland, Thomas, Sir.	1650 (1650)	Wing C4919; ESTC R26030	276,990	515

or Ignominious Signes as Gallowes c. The Punishment is by Indictment as in the Starre-Chamber Palmers Case 8. Jac. fo 126. banco regis THe Gardian in Chivalry shall have the single value of the Marriage of the Heire without tender otherwise the Heire may defeate the Lord by Marriage or goe beyond the Sea and so prevent the Lord of any tender if it were requisite Caudreyes Case 33. Eliz. in Trespasse THe Jury found the Statute of 1. Eliz. cap. 1. and cap 2. and that the Plaintiffe was deprived for Preaching against the Booke of Common Prayer by the Bishop of London una cum assensu c. Resolv 1 The deprivation was good for the first offence because the Act of 1. Eliz. for uniformity of Common Prayer doth not abrogate 1. Eliz. for Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction without negative words and by an expresse proviso the Jurisdiction of the Bishop is saved Resolv 2. That sentence given by the Bishop by assent of his Collegues ought to be allowed by our Law Resolv 3. The Commissioners shall be intended Subjects borne c. Stabitur praesumptionj c. Also it is found that the King authorized them Secundum formam Statuti Resolv 4. The Act of 1. Eliz. for Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction was onely declaratory for the King being an absolute Monarch and head of the body politick had plenary power to minister justice to his Subjects in Causes Ecclesiasticall and temporall See Circumspecte agatis 13. E. 1. and Articulj Clerj 9. E. 2. Reges sacro oleo uncti sunt spiritualis jurisdictionis capaces See there diverse judgements Lawes and Acts of Parliament cited to prove the Kings supremacy in Causes Ecclesiasticall The End of the Fifth Booke THE SIXTH BOOK Where Services intire shall be Apportioned Bruertons Case 36. Eliz. In the Court of Wards Fol. 1. LORD and Tenant of three Acres by Homage Fealty a hawke and Suite of Court the Tenant makes a Feoffement of one Acre the Feoffee by the common Law shall hold by all intire services annuall and casuall and the Statute of Quia emptores Terrarum doth not extend to intire services but by the Statute of Marlebr c. 9. the Feoffees shall make but one Suite and he who doth it shall have Contribution against the others if they are severally infeoffed otherwise if jointly 2. Intire services shall be multiplied by the Act of the Tenant and extinct by the Act of the Lord as if he purchase part 3. By Act of the Lord intire service for his private benefite is extinct otherwise if it be for the publick good for works of Charity Devotion or administration of Justice 4. If part comes to the Lord by act in Law yet the intire service remaines except in Case where Contribution is to be made for the Lord shall not contribute 5. If part comes to the Lord by Act in Law and of himselfe as by recovery in a Cessavit all the intire services are gone Where the Paroll shall demurre for the nonage of the Demandant and where the Tenant shall have his Age. Markals case 35. Eliz. com banco fo 3. IN a Formedon in the remainder by an Infant of a remainder limitted to his Father and his heirs the tenant cannot pray that the parol may demur but in a Formedon in the reverter he may In actions auncestrell the Tenant may pray that the parol may demurre because a right onely discends to the Infant and the Law will not suffer him to sue for feare that he may loose for want of understanding but in possessory Actions he cannot because then every one will put Infants out of possession and it would be mischevious if they should not regaine their possession untill full age So it is in all Writs where the cause of action happens in the time of the Infant And as to Actions auncestrell they are of two sorts Droiturell and possessory the first is where a right onely discends from the Auncestor and the Infant ought to lay the explees in the Auncestor and there the Tenant without plea pleaded may pray that the paroll may demurre but if the Auncestor were never in possession as in this case he was not and the Infant himselfe is the first in whom it vests there without plea pleaded hee shall not pray that the Parol may demurre but if a right discend from an auncester who was in possession although the Action doth not discend the Tenant may pray that the parol may demurre as if Non compos mentis alien and dye In actions auncestrell possessory the parol shall not demurre without plea but if at the common Law the Tenant had pleaded a feoffement of the auncestor then he may pray c. but the Statute of Gloucester cap. 2. aideth that in writs of Cosinage Besaiell and aiell but this extends not to other actions in a Formedon in the discender where an Infant recovers but a limitted estate the Parol shall not demurre without plea in an Assize or assize of Mortdauncester the Parol shall not demurr because the Jury is to appeare the first day and try all things The Statute of Westm 1. cap. 46. Age is taken away in entry upon disseisin where fresh suite is made but an Infant shall have his age in all reall Actions where he is in by discent and the Action is not founded upon his owne wrong except in Nuper obijt and Partitione facienda where both are in possession or attaint for the mischiefe of the death of the Petty Jury The Statute of West 2. cap. 40. Ousteth the age of the Vouchee in cuj in vita and Sur cuj in vita although that the Tenant will answer if the parol ought to demurre yet the Court ought to award that the parol shall demurre Sir John Molyns Case 40. Eliz. in Scaccar fo 5. KIng Edward the third Lord Abbot of Westminster Mesne and C. Tenant C is attainted of Treason the King grants to Sir Jo. Mo. Tenendum de nobis álijs capitalibus dominis feodi illius per servitia c. the Mesnalty is revived Obj. 1. That the tenure shall be Per servitia inde debita at which time no service was due to the Mesne 2. An expresse tenure of the King is limitted and it cannot be immediatly holden but of one To the first it was answered that there are sufficient words to renew the Mesnalty because the intention of the King appeares to be so and it is reasonable that the Mesne who offended not should not suffer losse 2. It shall be holden imediatly of the Abbot and mediatly of the King Wheelers Case 43. Eliz. in Scaccario fo 6. THe King grants Land Tenendum by a Rose Pro omnibus servitijs this is Socage in chiefe and the tenure shall be by fealty and a Rose and Pro omnibus is to be intended of other services which the Law doth not implie Resolutions and Diversities when a barre in one action shall be a barre in another Ferrers Case 41. Eliz. Com.

prescribe In modo decimandi but not In non decimando And the reason is because he is not except in speciall Cases capable of Tythes at the common Law before the Statute of 32. H. 8. Cap. 7. And therefore without speciall matter shewing it shall not be intended that he hath any Lawfull discharge and in favour of the Holy Church although it may have a lawfull comencement the Law will not suffer this prescription In non decimando to put it to the Tryall of lay men which sooner will straine their conscience for their private benefit then render to the Church the duty which belongeth to it A spirituall person that was capable of Tythes at the common Law in pernancy may prescribe to be discharged of Tythes generally or to have a portion of Tythes in the Land of another Before the Counsell of Lateran every man might give his tythes to any spirituall person that he would and if the Lands of the Bishop were discharged in his hands absolutely by prescription the demising it to a lay man cannot make it chargeable and the Bishop might reserve the greater Rent And in discharge of Tythes the Judges of our Law doe know that the Ecclesiasticall Judges will not allow any such allegation and therefore a Traverse Absque hoc quod judices placitum c. recusarunt is insufficient for the refusall is not materiall for the party might have a prohibition before any plea pleaded by him but in some Cases the refusall is traversable as t was adjudgd in Morris and Eatons Case where t was pleaded that the plaintiffe did not read the Articles c. and that the Ecclesiasticall Judge refused this Plea But the truth is a man may prescribe that hee and all others whose estate he hath in the mannor of D. time out of remembrance have paid to the parson of C. for the time being one certaine pension yearly for the maintenance of Divine service there in contentation of all Tythes renewing or happening within the same Mannor and prescribe in respect of the pension payd c. to have all the Tythes within c. and this was adjudgd good in Banco Regis Mich. 39. Et. 40. El. Rotulo 199. And that a lay-person may sue for the Tythes c. For at the beginning it shall be intended that the Lord was seised of the whole Mannor before any tenancy was derived out of the same and then by composition or other lawfull meanes the Lord had all the Tythes within the Mannor for the said Pension paying to the parson and the Law intends it was for Divine service Et pro bono Ecclesiae the reason of whch intendment is the continuall usage time out of remembrance And upon such speciall matter a man might have Tythes as appurtenant to a Mannor for he prescribes in a Que estate in the Mannor and therefore cannot have them in grosse but t was adjudged Winscombs Case in a prohibition that a man cannot prescribe generally in him and all those c. to have Tythes appurtenant to a Mannor without speciall matter shewne because Tythes are due Jure divino The Arch-Bishop of Canterburies Case 38. Of the Queene fo 46. A Religious house in M. was given to E. 6. by the Statute of 1. E. 6. a Rectory which was impropriated to it was granted to the Arch-Bishop of Canturbury who leased to the Defendant and Land within M. parcell of the said Colledge came to the Lord Cobham and from him to the Plaintiffe who shewes that the Master of the Colledge was seised of the said Land and Rectorie Simul semel as well at the making of 31. H 8. as of 1. E. 6. Resolved that this Colledge came to the King by 1. E. 6. onely for when 31. H. 8. speakes of dissolution renouncing relinquishing forfeiture giving up which are inferior meanes by which c. or by any other meanes cannot be intended of an act of Parliament which is the highest manner of conveyance that can be and the makers would have placed this in the beginning if they had intended it Bishops are not included within 13 of the Queene which begins with Colledges Deanes and Chapters c. Also 1. E. 6. Enacts that all Colledges by this Parliament shall be in actuall possession of the King which last act being of as high nature as the first it cannot come to the King by 31. H. 8. and it was never pleaded that of Colledges which came by 1. E. 6. the King was seised Vigore of the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that neither the Act nor the meaning of 31. H. 8. extends to other Colledges then to those which came to the King by 31. H. 8. for it should be absurd that a Branch of the act of 31. H. 8. should extend to a future Act of which the makers of 31. without a spirit of prophecy could not have foreknowledge and the Act of 31. concludes in as large manner as the late Abbots c. which late as it hath been agreed extends onely to those to be dissolved by 31. Resolved admitting that the Colledge had come to the King by 31. H. 8. that such a generall allegation of unity of possession of the Rectory and the Land with it was not sufficient for no unity shall be sufficient but lawfull and perpetuall unity of possession time out of minde as 't was adjudged in Knightly and Spencers case and that the generall allegation of the plaintiffe that the Master of the Colledge at the making of 1. E. 6. held the Land discharged is not good without shewing how either by prescription composition or other lawfull meanes as 't is adjudged in the Bishop of Winchesters case otherwise if the Land had come by 31. then by force of the said branch of discharge such generall allegation had been good Resolved that no Ecclesiasticall house except religious was within the Statute of 31. H. 8. Resolved that though 1. E. 6. saith that the King shall have the lands of Colledges in as ample and large manner as the said Priests c. enjoyed the same yet these generall words doe not discharge the land of any tythes for they doe not issue out of the land for a Prior had tythes against his own Feoffment of the Mannor and 't is no good cause of prohibition to alledge unity of possession in a Colledge which came to the King by 1. E. 6. as 't is upon 31. H. 8. in Abbyes c. For the Statute of 1. E. 6. hath no such clause of discharge of payment of tythes as 31. hath and therefore such perpetuall unity will not serve upon 1. E. 6. So 't was likewise resolved betwixt Greene and Buffkin Sir Hugh Cholmleys case 39. of the Queene fo 50. TEnant in Taile the remainder in taile the remainder bargaines and sells the Land and all his estate to J. S. to have for the life of Tenant in taile the remainder to the Queene c. upon condition that the