Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it BY the late Act before mentioned where the Doubt so it is called there about the Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts is clear'd and taken away One Proviso is That that Act nor any thing therein conteined shall extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop or Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge c. any power or authority to exercise c. If any be peccant that way it ought to be amended Another Proviso forbids any Archbishop Bishop c. to tender or administer unto any person the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tendred or administred may be charged or compelled to confess or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment This being now forbidden by Act of Parliament every Subject ought to give obedience therein But some now insulting and upbraiding the Ecclesiastical Courts that all this while they have oppressed the Subject with that proceeding which the Parliament hath taken away renewing the old cry in Queen Elizabeths time and ever since against such proceedings which never till now I alwayes except what was done in the late times of usurped government were legally prohibited Though I am far from questioning the reasons whereupon that Act passed but do humbly submit to it both in word and practice yet I hope it will be allowed to make some defence against such persons as so tax such proceedings before the passing of this Act. And herein I shall follow that most able Civilian Richard Cosin Doctor of the Laws and Dean of the Arches in that his Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. Mr. Cambden as before mentions him with honour as surely he well deserv'd and that work of his if nothing else evinces it Mr. Swinburn in that Work of his of Last Wills and Testaments printed at London for the Company of Stationers 1611. in the first part sect 6. numb 8. fol. 17. writes thus of him and of that Work of his that Apology I find saith he written by that learned and no less religious man Doctor Cosins at I take it in that worthy Work entituled An Apology for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical c. and so he goes on Upon this subject he hath written so fully that I believe little can be added to it and if any should go about it excepting such additions as well may be added by reason of some emergencies since the time he wrote and some other additions and explications not derogatory from him they would be forced very much to plough with his Heyfer which would but look too much like a Plagiary I could wish the book were reprinted and haply it will be so which may serve for Topicks to this subject For as all the Poets after Homer are said to drink of his Fountain according to that picture or statue of his that denotes as much with that Inscription Ridet anhelantem post se vestigia turbam Even so must I conceive all do from Doctor Cosin that shall write upon this subject I was upon Epitomizing that Apology of his and had made some progress therein but upon second thoughts desisted thinking it better to refer the Reader to him rather then to adventure to abbreviate him and thereby perhaps wrong him an offence that too many Epitomizers are guilty of therefore I say I shall onely make use of some Notes as confessed arrows out of his quiver and sippe of some others elsewhere and point the Reader to his full stream where any that list may drink their fill Upon these words in the late Act Provided that this Act. nor anything therein contained shall extend or be construed to extend or give unto any Archbishop Bishop c. any power or authority to exercise or execute c. any jurisdiction which they might not have done before the year of our Lord 1639. or to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters or affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year 1640. I say upon these words some are ready mistaking questionless the words and meaning of that Act to renew that old exploded Opinion or rather groundless Fancy That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon is required Hereto Doctor Cosin answers That admitting This were true then all the other opinions of those that oppugn the ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical stand in no stead and might be spared because this would cut off all at once For none that exercise ordinary Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical have it in particularity which by the oppugners seems to be meant otherwise then by permission of Law to every of their proceedings and impossible were it by reason of the infinity of it and troublesomness to procure such particular assent to the execution of every Canon His Majesties Delegates when Appeals are made to His Majesty in Chancery would signifie nothing could not exercise the power to them delegated by reason of the want of such particular assent and it is a gross absurdity to grant as even the Oppugners and Innovators do That Testamentary and Matrimonial causes are of Ecclesiastical cognizance to say nothing of the rest of Ecclesiastical causes and yet cannot by reason of this want be dispatched nor can be dealt in by any other authority according to any Law in force This would speak a defect in the publick Government that the Subject should have a right but no likely or ready mean to come by it and great offences by Law punishable and yet no man sufficiently authorized to execute these Laws Since the abrogation of Papal pretended Supremacy when the ancient rights of the Kings of England of being Supreme Governors over all persons within their Dominions as well in all spiritual or Ecclesiastical things or causes as Temporal and that no forreign Prince Person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to have any jurisdiction power superiority preeminence or authority Ecclesiastical or Spiritual within this Realm and so forth as in the Act and the Oath Since these rights were as it were ex postliminio restored and declared to have been as they ever ought to have been in the Kings of England many Laws have been made in several Parliaments for the strengthning of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and the more effectual execution thereof and some of the Ecclesiastical Laws were enlarged altered and explained * 25 H. 8.19 The Statutes for Delegates upon Appeals †27 H 8 130. 32 H 8.7 Not long after two Statues for assistance of ordinary Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and for the speedier recovery of Tithes in Courts Ecclesiastical * 34 35 H. 8 19. The like for the recovery of Pensions Procurations c. †1 Ed. 6. c. 2. In the time of Edw. 6.
His Majesties Prerogative or the known Laws of the Land Ecclesiastical or Temporal or the politick Government either in Church or State or which may give just offence I do hereby absolutely retract it as no wayes by me intended or thought of wishing this small taste may stir up others more able to make a further and better progress in this kind Anno 13. CAROLI II. Regis An Act for explanation of a Clause contained in an Act of Parliament made in the seventeenth year of the late King Charles entituled An Act for repeal of a branch of a Statute primo Elizabethae concerning Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical WHereas in an Act of Parliantent made in the seventeenth year of the late King Charles entituled An Act for repeal of a branch of a Statute primo Elizabethae concerning Commissioners for Causes Ecclesiastical it is amongst other things enacted That no Archbishop Bishop nor Micar General nor any Chancellor nor Commissary of any Archbishop Bishop or Micar General nor any Droinary whatsoever nor any other Spiritual or Ecclessastical Judge Dificer or Minister of Justice nor any other person or persons whatsoever exercising Spiritual or Ecclessastical Power Authority or Jurisdiction by any Grant License or Commission of the Kings Majesty his Meirs or Successors or by any Power or Authority derived from the King his Deirs or Successors or otherwise shall from and after the first day of August which then shall be in the year of our Lord Bod One thousand six hundred forty one award impose or inflict any Pain Penalty Fine Amercement Imprisonment or other corporal punishment upon any of the Kings Subjects for any Contempt Misdemeanour Crime Offence matter or thing whatsoever belonging to Spiritual or Ecclestastical Cognilance or Jucisdiction whereupon some doubt hath been made that all ordinary Power of Coertion and Proceedings in Causes Ecclessastical were taken away whereby the ordinary course of Justice in Causes Ecclessastical hath been obstructed Be it therefore declared and Enacted by the King most excellent Majesty by and with the advice and consent of the Lords and Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the Authority thereof That neither the said Act nor any thing therein contained both or shall take away and ordinary Power or Authority from any of the said Archbishops Bishops of any other person of persons named as aforesaid but that they and every of them evercisting Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction may proceed determine sentence erecute and erecise all manner of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and all Censures and Coertions appertaining and belonging to the same before the making of the Act before recited in all causes and matters belonging to Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction according to the Kings Magesties Ecclesiastical Laws used and practised in this Realm in as ample manner and form as they did and might lawfully have none before the making of the said Act. And be it further enacted by the Authority aforesaid that the afore recited Act of decimo septimo Caroli and all the matters and clauses therein contained ercepting what concerns the High Commission Court or the new erection of some such like Court by Commission shall be and is hereby repealed to all intents and parposes whatsoever Any thing clause or sentence in the said Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding Provided alwayes and it is hereby enacted That neither this Act not any thing herein contained shall ertend or he construed to revive or give force to the said branch of the said Statute mave in the said first year of the Reign of the said late Queen Elizabeth mentioned in the said Act of Parliament made in the said seventeenth year of the Reign of the said King Charles but that the said branch of the said Statute made in the said first year of the Reign of the said Queen Elizabeth shall stand and be repealed in such sort as if this Act had never been made Provided also and it is hereby further enacted that it shall not be lawful for any Archbishop Bishop Hicar General Chancellor Commissary or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge Officer or Minister or any other person having or erercising Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction to tenver or administer anto any person whatsoever the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tenvered or administred may be charged or compelled to confesse or accuse or to purge him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment any thing in this Statute or any other Law Custom or Mage heretofore to the contrary hereof in any wise not withstanding Provided alwayes that this Act or any thing therein contained shall not extend or be construed to extend to give unto any Archbishop Bishop or any other Spiritual or Ecclesiastical Judge Officer or other person or persons aforesaid any power or authority to exercise execute inflict or determine any Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Censure or Coertion which they might not by Law have done before the year of our Lord One thousand six hundred thirty and nine nor to abridge or diminish the Kings Majesties Supremacy in Ecclesiastical matters and affairs nor to confirm the Canons made in the year One thousand six hundred and forty nor any of them nor any other Ecclesiastical Laws or Canons not formerly confirmed allowed or enarted by Parliament or by the established Laws of the Land as they stood in the year of the Lord One thousand six hundred thirty and nine The Contents of the Chapters Chap. I. THe endeavours of the Innovators to change the course of Ecclesiastical proceedings That stupendious Fanatick Hackett his fearful end Mr. Cambdens judgment touching the Innovators Their perseverance in their design of Innovation in King James his time and afterwards The pretended taking away the Coercive power from the Ecclesiastical Courts how gained what use was made of it by the Innovators and how they boasted of their benefit by it Two passages in the Long Parliament touching two Inconformists Page 1. Chap. II. The two Proviso's in the late Act that takes away the doubt touching Coercive power in Ecclesiastical Courts Dr. Cosens Apologie for sundry proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical That groundless Opinion That a several Royal assent to the executing of every particular Canon in required is confuted The validity of the Ecclesiastical Laws The clamours of Inconformists Innovators and Fanaticks against the putting of Ecclesiastical Laws in execution though the Ecclesiastical Officers and Ministers are by Act of Parliament severely commanded to do it p. 10. Chap. III. The Heads of the several Chapters in that Apologie of Doctor Cosens Part 1. p. 27. Chap. IV. By the late Act the manner of proceeding in Ecclesiastical Courts is not altered but left as it was A summary relation of what Dr. Cosens in his Apologie hath asserted and made good by Gods Word the practice of the Primitive Christians the opinion of the Father the
not be good just and lawful and after the same Matrimony solemnized and consummate by carnal knowledge and also sometime fruit of children ensued of the same Marriage upon pretence of a former contract made and not consummate by carnal copulation for proof whereof two witnesses by that Law were onely required been divorced and separate contrary to Gods Law and so the true Matrimony both solemnized â—n the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge and confirmed also with the fruit of children had between them clearly frustrate and dissolved Farther also by reason of other prohibitions then Gods Law admitteth for their lucre by that Court invented the dispensations whereof they alwayes reserved to themselves as in kindred or affinity between Cousin-germans and so to the fourth and fourth degree carnal knowledge of any of the same kin or affinity before in such outward degrées which else were lawful and be not prohibited by Gods Law and all because they would get money by it and kéep a reputation of their usurped jurisdiction whereby not onely much discord betwéen lawful married persons hath contrary to Gods Ordinance arisen much debate and suit at the Law with wrongful veration and great damage of the innocent party hath béen procured and many just marriages brought in doubt and danger of undoing and also many times undone and lawful heirs disherited whereof there had never else but for his vain-glorious usurpation béen moved any such question since fréedom in them was given by Gods Law which ought to be most sure and certain But that notwithstanding Marriages have been brought into such an uncertainty thereby that no Marriage could be surely knit and bounden but it should lye in either of the parties power and arbiter casting away the fear of God by means and compasses to prove a precontract a kindred and aliance or a carnal knowledge to defeat the same and so under the pretence of these allegations afore rehearsed to live all the dayes of their life in detestable Adultery to the utter destruction of their own souls and the provocation of the terrible wrath of God upon the places where such abominations were used and suffered Be it therefore enacted by the King our Soveraign Lord the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled and by the authority of the same That from the first day of the Moneth of July next coming in the year of our Lord God 1540. all and every such Marriages as within this Church of England shall be contracted betwéen lawful persons as by this Act we declare all persons to be lawful that be not prohibited by Gods Law to marry such being Marriages contracted and solemnized in the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge or fruit of children or child being had therein betwéen the parties so married shall be by authority of this present Parliament aforesaid déemed judged and taken to be lawful good just and indissoluble notwithstanding any Precontract or Precontracts or Matrimony not consummate with bodily knowledge which either of the parties so married or both shall have made with any other person or persons before the time of contracting that marriage which is solemnized and consummate or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as afore and notwithstanding any Dispensation Prescription Law or other thing granted or confirmed by Act or otherwise And that no reservation or prohibition Gods Law except shall trouble or impeach any marriage without the Levitical degrées And that no person of which estate degrée or condition he or she be shall after the said first day of the Moneth of July aforesaid be admitted to any of the Spiritual Courts within this the Kings Realm or any his Graces other Lands and Dominions to any processe plea or allegation contrary to this foresaid Act. Rep. 1 2 P. M. 8. Rep. 1. El. 1. This Act was not many years after repealed as followeth 2 3 Ed. 6. cap. 23. Part of the Statute of Precontracts repealed WHereas in the two and thirtieth year of the reign of the late King of famous memory King Henry the eighth because that many inconveniences had chanced in this Realm by breaking and dissolving good and lawful marriages yea whereupon also sometime issue and children had followed under the colour and pretence of a former contract made with another the which contract divers times was but very slenderly proved and often but surmised by the malice of the party who desired to be dissolved from the marriage which they liked not and to be coupled with another there was an Act made that all and every such marriages as within the Church of England should be contracted and solemnized in the face of the Church and consummate with bodily knowledge or fruit of children or child being had between the parties so married should be by authority of the said Parliament deemed judged and taken to be lawful good just and indissoluble notwithstanding any precontract or precontracts of Matrimony not consummate with bodily knowledge which either of the persons so married or both had made with any other person or persons before the time of contracting that marriage which is solemnized or consummated or whereof such fruit is ensued or may ensue as by the same Act more plainly appear Sithence the time of the which Act although the same was godly meant the unrulinesse of men hath ungodly abused the same and divers inconveniences intolerable in manner to Christian ears and eyes followed thereupon women and men breaking their own promises and faiths made by the one unto the other so set upon sensuality and pleasure that if after the contract of Matrimony they might have whom they more favoured and desired they could be contented by lightnesse of their nature to overturn all that they had done afore and not afraid in manner even from the very Church door and Marriage feast the man to take another spouse and the espouse to take another husband more for bodily lust and carnal knowledge then for surety of faith and truth or having God in their good remembrance contemning many times also the commandment of the Ecclesiastical Iudge forbidding the parties having made the contract to attempt or do any thing in prejudice of the same Be it therefore enacted by the Kings Highnesse the Lords Spiritual and Temporal and the Commons in this present Parliament assembled that as concerning Precontracts the said former Statute shall from the first day of Day next comming cease be repealed and of no force or effect and be reduced to the estate and order of the Kings Ecclesiastical Laws of this Realm which immediately before the making of the said Estatute in this case were used in this Realm so that from the said first day of Day when any cause or contract of marriage is pretended to have been made it shall be lawful to the Kings Ecclesiastical Iudge of that place to hear and examine the said cause and
on that subject entituled Tenenda non tollenda or the necessity of preserving Tenures in capite c. and if it should be thought fit still to continue the abolition of Wardships c. whether the Tenures notwithstanding should be continued and whether a fitter retribution to His Majesty should be made then by Excise of Ale c. I need say no more of this but let Mr. Philipps book plead for it And also if it shall be thought fitting Rates to be set upon some Commodities for the sale of them that upon many more commodities then are yet the known rate and value of what they should be sold for should by indifferent and knowing men be set down considering the great hurt done by selling many commodities at unreasonable rates upon some accidental straits in regard of some accidents of time place or persons and many imposing upon the unskilful and unwary buyer very often as is notorious demanding more the double the price they will take In forreign parts both upon books and other commodities fitting rates are by Authority set down whereby the seller may have a just gain and the buyer not be over-reached Certum quid is the great satisfaction to the Subjects as in Fees certain in all Courts so at least in many commodities Also if it be thought fit that in point of dignity and precedency About dignity and precedency a fixt certain plain rule might be set down which probably would take away much emulation and grudging and quarrels oftentimes amongst many if it were clearly once determined And amongst others if it were so determined who should have precedency the eldest son of him whose father was a Knight and the first Knight of the Family or the eldest son of him whose father was but an Esquire but the eldest son of a Knight Senior to the Knight father of the former or whose Grandfather or direct Ancestor from whom he is lineally descended and is eldest son and heir was a Knight the second conceiving it is his right in regard he is the direct descendant and heir to the Senior Knight And that if it shall be thought fitting no person that bore Arms against the late King or His Majesty that now is or had any pretended Commission or authority so to do shall own the Title of General Lieutenant General Major General Commissary General Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Major Captain Lieutenant Cornet Ensign or any other Title by reason of any such pretended Commission or Authority nor any person shall so call them by any such Title under pain of a great Mulct toties quoties to be inflicted both upon the person that owns such Title and on the person that gives it or so calls them Nemo ex delicto consequitur beneficium and so bad a cause ought not in any implicite manner to be approved and rightly considered 't is an infamy to the parties to be called so And also Against the Act of limitation of actions in some cases if it be thought fitting that in regard that many who took the Kings part in the late wars could not have their right of suing for their own just due debts owing them and contracted either before the wars or in the time of the wars in the Courts of Justice then in being so that six years were elapsed according to that Act of 21 Jacobi 16. touching limitation of Actions and so they are thereby excluded to their great impoverishment There should be an abrogation or suspension of that Act so as to give remedy in this case that the spoiled may have reparation or retribution of justice if not reward for his Loyalty And also Against multiplicity of Statutes upon one and the same subject if it be thought fit that where Laws are doubtfully penned they may be explained and where there are multiplicity of several Statutes touching the same subject some repealing part of a statute some enlarging and altering so that the true meaning of the Statute becomes difficult and perplexed that in such cases all the said Statutes several so concerning the same subject may be repealed and one plain and clear Statute thereof to be made as namely these several Statutes in the Reigns of King Edward 6. Queen Mary Queen Elizabeth King James and King Charles 1. touching the prohibition of eating Flesh in Lent and other Fish-dayes and concerning Fasting-dayes may be so repealed and made void and one Statute made clearly and plainly to comprehend all that is necessary upon that subject Touching Ecclesiastical Persons Courts and Causes SOme have wished if it were thought fit The Clergies Proctors in the House of Commons that now the Lords Spiritual the Bishops being restored to their right in the Lords House that the Clergy should have their Proctors to sit in the House of Commons if they desired it representing the body of the Clergy as they used to do till about Henry the sixths time or not long before as it was then used since which time it hath been disused Some have affirmed that a Clergy-man of competent temporal estate having in King James's time been chosen Burgesse for a Corporation was not suffered to sit there nor a Clergy-man to say Prayers there Nor will some yield they can vote to chuse a Parliament-man either in County or borough so little of representation have they and yet when in Convocation they give the King Subsidies their grant must be confirmed by Act of Parliament Anciently such care was taken that Bishops should be present in Parliament that in their absence their Chancellors were summoned to sit there Also if it be thought fit About augmentation of Vicaridges that whereas before the dissolution of Monasteries the Bishops had power to augment poor Vicaridges out of the Tithes of Impropriations so they are now commonly called though the true name is Appropriations the Tithes having been appropriated to some Monastery or Religious house or other before the dissolution and after that falling into Lay-mens hands who held them improperly living by the Altar and doing nothing there got the Nick-name of Impropriators and Impropriations which now holds good such is the tyranny of Custom in this and many other cases Or if there were no Vicaridge endowed the Bishops might endow one nay and go so far as to leave to the Appropriator which then was that Religious house to which it was appropriated who then thought themselves as worthy to be kindly used as a man would think our Lay-Impropriators can do now not much more then a 50. part of the Tithes or thereabout It seems hard that the Lay-Impropriator should have a matter of 200. or 300 l. per annum Against Mensals or more and the poor Vicar a matter of 20. marks or 20. Pounds or thereabout and hardest in Mensals that is as it was usual when a Religious house could procure from the Patron the right of Presentation to some Living near their Monastery whither one of their
THE Law of Laws OR THE EXCELLENCY OF THE CIVIL LAW Above all Humane Laws whatsoever By Sir ROBERT WISEMAN Knight Doctor of the Civil Laws Together with a Discourse concerning the Oath Ex Officio and Canonical Purgation LONDON Printed for R. Royston Bookseller to the King 's most Excellent Majesty 1664. The Epistle to the Reader Reader IF this Book were set forth in any other Language for Forreigners to read I were unavoidably driven to give them an account why I had put my self upon so superfluous and so unnecessary an undertaking as to extoll and commend that whose worth and merit is owned by all the World and which every where shines so brightly that it cannot be obscured by any either Tongue or Pen. For it is very well known to them that the Civil Law is the issue and product of that great and mighty State the Roman Empire that led so many Nations and people captive by their Wisdome as much as by their Valour that was once the School of all Moral Honesty and goodness and the stage whereon the whole variety of humane affairs was represented Neither need I tell them that what through the prosperous success of that State for which it was ordained and what through the natural Equity that is to be read all along in it and its being fitted for the general affairs of Europe the Laws of most of the Europaean Nations who indeed all of them anciently were subject to the Roman Government are but as copies drawn from that original borrowing that lustre of goodness they have from it and where their particular Laws faile thither their Judicatories resort to be supplied They cannot be ignorant That though every particular Nation has some few Laws of their own proper for their occasions government and people yet no where beyond the Seas is there any profession or science of Law but this nor any Law accounted the Law of Nations but the Civil Law onely That time practise argument and applying it to the several affairs of so many Nations where it has been used has made it so perfect and so sufficient a body to decide all cases by that are between party and party and do not concern the publick government that they stand in need of very few Laws of their own making and without it no Laws they can make would ever be able to serve their turn To those therefore that make such continual use of this Law in their Courts and who suffer none to sit as Judges nor plead at their Bars but such as have been brought up in that faculty and who strive to imploy those onely in all transactions between themselves and other Nations to them I say to praise and applaud this Law that is dignified by them so many several wayes is so little needful that it were almost impertinent But to make known to the people of this Nation to whom it is rendred now so contemptible how excellent it is in it self how rational what a general approbation it has had with other Nations and how very useful it may be to the publick welfare of this Nation divers wayes it is a work so seasonable and necessary that it may be done without either Apology Preface or reason premised and is no more then the present state of things calls for For when it is considered what an account it has been in amongst us for many hundred years together how many causes Civil Ecclesiastical Maritime and Military it dealt in how the jurisdiction thereof ran through the whole Nation how very little it was beneath the profession of the Common-Law it self how many professours and practisers it maintained and how much it did enrich them what a number of students it encouraged what coercive power it was intrusted withall and the many Courts the employment thereof lay in And when we see that now the causes thereof are cantonized and like a spoyl divided some carried to the Courts of Common-Law some to the Court of Equity others sent into the Countrey some left without any rule or regulation at all and nothing left entire to the Civil Law and when the solid reason of that Law is crowded out by vulgar reason the professours thereof scattered the study thereof discontinued the very Law-books for want of use here all transported beyond sea to other Nations and all coercion taken away It is so much worth the enquiring what the ground of this great change should be that to be silent thereat were great stupidity That the fall of the Ecclesiastical jurisdiction might be a reason to suspend the exercise of that profession in some causes for a time till it were again setled I admit But why it should not under this present form of Government if authority think fit be restored againâ— as to a civil regulation of those very matters under the Civil Magistrate no satisfactory reason can be rendred I am sure it can neither be rational nor convenient that they should be carried from the Civil Law which was the known established and practised Law in those matters unto the conizance of those that have neither Law nor rule nor skill to try them especially when the so doing does inevitably draw after it the certain ruine of that whole profession It is therefore very well worthy the most serious consideration of those that sit at the Helme That since there must be a triall of those matters still and again attending thereupon to one or other which is the Game every body hunts after Whether the Publick is more concerned that the profit of such conisances should flow into the purses of others no way apt or skilful then go to the maintaining and keeping up of such a learned profession which this Nation cannot be without And certainly whensoever we see that profession laid aside which for the publick good I trust I never shall we shall find this Common-wealth of ours made very much inferiour and unequal to other Nations with whom as it is an Island and now become an active one it has and must have many wayes to do In other things as in strength riches and alliances we contend for advantage and superiority with them why should we then suffer them to over-match us in wit dexterity skill knowledge wisdome policy reason or judgment which that learning above all other and experience together gives them The dealings that we may have with them as they are not a few but innumerable even as many as there are things in the World to deal in So some of them are of highest moment and consequence also As Right to Kingdomes or Provinces by Donation last Will Succession or by Marriage community or property of the Sea and the rights of Fishing and trading there freedome from Customes and other immunities granted to forreign Merchants Precedency amongst the Embassadours of Princes and Republicks Promises of protection and aide against enemies Entertainment and harbouring of Traytors or Rebels Interpretation of publick Leagues or
which all men are to submit 126. 138. 157 Cases that do happen are to be all setled by some rule or other 145 Civil Law perfected as it is at this day very sufficient to resolve all cases that can happen 15. 53. 147. 155 171. and is the true Art and Science of Law 166 Canon Law and Civil Law have been at variance which should spread most 163. 185. yet both of them have been admitted by Princes for several uses 125. 185. that they are not inseparable as some do imagine 184. Canon Law is but the Civil Law applied to the use of the Church and church matters and is in most things the same with the Civil 163. 186 orders divers things meerly temporal under pretence of being spiritual 186 Causes that were tried by the Civil Law before the government changed why they should be tried by the same Law still 178. and in the Epistle D Defence legal ought not even in capital matters be denied a subject against his King 7 Dead bodies not to be arrested nor touch'd in their graves 80 E Exarchate of Ravenna after Constantinople was the seat of the Empire was still governed by the Civil Law 118 England had the Civil Law read publickly in it as soon as it was restored in Italy by Lotharius 125 Ecclesiastical men and Ecclesiastical matters have been and may be regulated by temporal Princes 186. 162 Ecclesiastical men have through favour of Princes rather then of right been suffered to order some causes which are meerly temporal 186 F Fraud so detested by the Civil Law that sometimes it did dissolve the whole bargain sometimes it did enjoyn the whole true value to be paid where one was deceived in more then half the worth 12. never suffered to bring any advantage to the deceiver or to any one else 13. most detestable in those that the Law does most priviledge when deceived 13 Forreign States not to be judg'd by Municipal Laws 146 Forreign States why they do judge so much by the rules of the Civil Law 153 G Great men are not suffered to assume or protect the controversies or litigious suits of others 62 Guardians may husband but not sell the estates of their pupils 106 Government was at first without any Law at all 110 Government being changed the Laws seldome remain the same 116 Government howsoever changed yet the Civil Law is of use 157. 176 I Ingratitude does make a free gift revocable from him that is ungrateful 84 Italy was seven times brought almost to utter desolation in less then eighty years 114 Justinians body of the Law was compiled at Constantinople and kept out of Italy 500 years together 118. but prevailed altogether in the East ibid. Italy when it was possessed by the Gothes and Lombards some parts of the Civil Law were in use there still 119 Justinian is by some made instrumental in suppressing the old books of the Roman Laws after his collection was finished but without just ground 121 K Killing in ones own defence ought to receive no punishment 6. nor killing by chance ibid. A King by the Civil Law is no more absolved from the observation of the Law nor has any looser power over the lives liberties or goods of his subjects then by other Laws 19 Kings being driven out of Rome their Laws were never in use more 103 L Law what properties it ought to have and that chiefly it ought to agree with reason 1. 2. seq 46. it is but a determination of the Law of Nature 4. it must not onely not cross the first and chief principles of nature but not such neither as are any way though remotely depending on them 8. to be fairly and candidly interpreted and without any fraud 13. may profitably containe the very maximes of Reason 21. common capacities no good judges of Laws 25. and who are and what must be considered to judge rightly of them ibid. the severity of them to be imputed to the demerits of men 26. though not so rational as others subjects must acquiess in them till they be altered 31 Law of Nations is that which orders all affairs between Nation and Nation 59. to be known out of the Civil Law 61 Laws of the twelve Tables the ground-work and foundation of the Civil Law 104 Laws of all other Nations are gone and extinct with the States themselves excepting the Roman 110 Laws of some people more famous then others 111 Lotharius the Emperour was the restorer of the Civil Law when it was as it were extinct in Europe 122 Law forreign not to be preferred before the proper Law of the Countrey 125. 140. 144 Law of no Nation so sufficient but that another Law is needful 128. 144. 154 Law of government proper for the state it self is necessary in every Nation 129. 140 Laws of all Nations too imperfect for the multitude of cases that do happen 52. 144. 145 Laws not to be measured by their abuse or execution 28 Legal matters are to be judg'd by Lawyers onely 25. 151 Lawyers none in forreign parts but Civilians 152 Lawyers of the latter age more learned then those before them 160 Two Laws in one state not inconvenient 120. 154. 182 M Municipal Laws must be in every Nation 129. 140. and they to be preferred before any other Law or reason 103. 125. 140. 143. 144 Municipal Laws are too short and scanty to take in all cases that do arise 144 Merchants no fitting judges to trie and decide Sea causes 148 Men how much they differ in their tempers and so in their actions 25. 41. 53. 145 Monarchy is no looser government then any other 19 Military questions to be regulated by the Civil Law In the Epistle Municipal Laws have no degrees taken nor Lectures read in them any where but in England 152. 153. all that is good in them is taken out of the Civil Law 98. 164. N Nations not so abounding in all things but that they do or may stand in need one of another 155 Nations abroad do mainly practise the Civil Law in matters between man and man 128. 133. 159 Nations abroad are best satisfied by justice done according to the rules of the Civil Law 134 Nations in their dealing with one another must have some common Law to guide them 59. 146. 155 National differences not to be debated but by the Law of Nations and the reason of the Civil Law In the Epist and fol. 65. Natural Laws cannot be repealed 49. 174 O Offences though the same may be punished with more severity in one State then in another 26 P Parents could not give away nor forfeit their whole estate from their children by the Civil Law except in case of Treason 9 Proceedings legal how rationally ordered by the Civil Law 15 President or example no rule to judge by 38. 65 Promises if serious though without consideration are to be performed by Civil Law 87 Pope of Rome did make edicts against the Civil Law thereby to advance
he was that emboldens me to desire your Lordships leave to prefix your Name that this may be as an Accessory to follow its desired Principal And knowing you to be such I cannot but as all that know you as well as I I am confident do wish for the common good that your Lordship were put in statum merendi into the sphere of your proper Activity that the Publick might reap the benefit thereof of and that your Talent might be no longer as it was whilest Rebellious Usurpation caused it and did obicem ponere now removed wrapt up in a Napkin nor your Candle hid under a Bushel So wishes so prayes MY LORD Your Lordships much bounden and most humble Servant EDWARD LAKE Westminster 11. Novemb. 1661. To the READER SOme account may perhaps be expected to be given of this small endeavour touching the passing that Act of clearing the doubt touching Coercive Power in Causes Ecclesiastical wherein is that Proviso that forbids all Ecclesiasticall Judges to tender or administer an Oath to any person Ex Officio or otherwise or Purgation whereby any person may confesse or accuse himself so as to make him or her liable to censure or punishment There were not a few persons unfriends at least to the Discipline of the Church of England that insulted much as is touched hereafter and clamoured of the oppression of the Ecclesiastical Courts that hath been say they all the time before the passing of that Act that took away that Oath It was suitable to their interest to call that oppression When Brutus had murdered Caesar he called him Tyrant Ita enim appellari Caesarem facto ejus expediebat saith Velleius Paterculus Histor lib. 2. From the time of passing that Act till within these few dayes I expected from abler pens some Vindication of the proceedings of Ecclesiasticall Courts as touching such Oath and Canonical Purgation and the lawful andexpedient use thereof before that Act but none that I hear of attempting it I looked upon the cause as a Derelict took it up and though by the late iniquity of the times I being too much severall wayes unfurnished for such a Work yet if but to give some satisfaction to indifferent men and to wipe away at least in part causeless calumny and to stir up others to a further prosecution hereof I conceived I might adventure upon this little Modell or Plat-form and perhaps more fitly at this time then another till a more complete Structure may be raised upon this subject if more be needful being so learnedly and fully handled especially by Doctor Consens sometimes Dean of the Arches and that late glory of our Church Doctor Andrewes lat Lord Bishop of Winchester That I should escape from objections and censures too I can scarce suppose upon such a Subject as this is ingrateful to such men as are haeredes ex asse to the ancient opposers of it and are inveighers against it and those that executed it quos laeserint oderint alwayes excepting the Members of both Houses of Parliament out of that number Some too perhaps may dislike my Dedication of it though no Act more free then that as not to some of my own profession or rather to my own most Learned and Pious Diocesan the Reverend Father in God Doctor Robert Sanderson Lord Bishop of Lincoln having relation to him by Office of Trust To him and then I should rather have made my addresse then Dedication and have herein consulted with them had time and convenience served before I had attempted this and not carry Owles to Athens go about to give instruction to them from whom I should rather have received it But as to that most Noble Person to whom this is inscribed though according to his Birth and Education his motion hath alwayes been in an higher Orbe and Contemplation of affaires of greater moment more immediately enabling him to serve his King and Country But they by being somewhat more particularly concerned in a great part of the subject matter hereof therefore by some may be supposed partiall and interessed Yet even in the subject matter of these Memoranda he is not unversed if not more particularly yet as comprehended in that generality of Learning and Knowledge whereto he hath from his younger yeares been habituated to at the feet of such a States-man as was his most accomplished Father and such Instructors as he by his especial and most discerning choice appointed him and all this perfected up by most advantagious acquisition by travel and residence in forraign parts amongst those who are justly ranked in the number of the most Civil Learned and Wise in Europe and so consequently in the Universe and so need not mine or others instruction herein more then others not professed Lawyers But all that is comprised in this Model both in the Memoranda's and the Notes somewhat grounded upon some yeares experience I have had and tending as before at least in my well-meaning opinion to the publick good solely is so most humbly offered to consideration if by those in Authority it be thought fit He is I conceive very fit to further and advance this both in consideration of his abilities and his being impowred as others of his noble rank and quality in the Supreme Judicatory of this Kingdom and by his own Genius and propensity willing and desirous to effect any thing ayming that way as less cannot be expected from the Son of such a Father and Husband of such a wife his most noble and most vertuous Lady a pair in respect of the mutual parity of their most intense conjugal affection and parentizing love to Loyalty Justice and Honour hereditary vertues flowing in their veines from their most Noble Loyally Gloriously Acting and Suffering Parents not easily parallel'd and therefore I have not so much Dedicated this to him as supplicated his effectual adminicular hand hereto Upon the whole matter as touching my self this Modell as also if not more especially the Notes subjoyn'd I having had no small share of Sufferings in the time of exilement of Monarch and Monarchy and so consequently of joy and gladness in the happy Restauration of both in my due gratitude and obligation both by tie of natural duty and of God and Mans Laws have made it part of my study to endeavour to contribute my well-meaning mite to the publick good and the prevention such miseries for the future as too lately we have had too sad experience of Instances might be given of many that have published their endeavours heretofore to such publick ends which have not proved ineffectual and more especially Mr. Spencer touching the State of Ireland in queen Elizabeths time If in any measure never so remote they may any whit help to attain to that end they aime at I shall be glad of it and with that true candour submissively offering them alwayes protesting as I now do that if there be any thing herein contrary to Gods word Directly or indirectly or to
legi Ad recognitiones vel sacramenta praestanda Recognitionem item facere non significare testimonium perhibere vel respondere in jure sed debitum agnoscere fateri vel placita de Catalogis vel debitis tenere Juramentum ex officio in foris illis ut in aliis ex omni memoria fuisse exactum ad simoniam adulterium alia tenebrarum opera rimanda praesertim cum Insinuatio ut loquuntur fuerit clamosa Et quamvis nemo teneatur seipsum prodere tamen per famam proditum teneri oftendere utrum possit suam innocentiam defendere seipsum purgare quandoquidem poenitentia imposita non sit poena sed medicina ad peccatores curandos alios à peccato deterrendos scandalum tollendum juxta illud in Sacris Literis Pro anima tua ne confundaris dicere verum Est enim confusio adducens peccatum confusio adducens gloriam gratiam Sed qui de hiis immoror quum dissertationes Richardi Cosini Legum Doctoris Johannis Morrisii Lanceloti Andrewes eruditae hac de re utrinque praestent Regina haud ignara suam authoritatem per Episcoporum latera in hoc negotio peti adversantium impetus tacite infregit Ecclesiasticam Jurisdictionem illaesam conservavit That is Not onely these speaking of Hackett and his Complices but others also who had hitherto though in vain impugned the received Discipline of the Church of England by condemning the calling of Bishops and contumeliously slandering the Praelates having now drawn into their party some Common-Lawyers sharpned both their Tongues and Pens against their Jurisdiction and the Authority which the Queen delegated in Ecclesiasticall Causes as altogether unjust declaiming every where even in Books published that men were unworthily oppressed in the Ecclesiasticall Courts contrary to the Lawes of the Kingdom That the Queen could not by Law delegate such kinde of Authority nor others to whom it was delegated could exercise it That these Courts could not require the Oath ex officio from the defendent party when as no man is bound to accuse himself That Oath precipitates men to condemn themselves with ignominious confusion or into wilful perjury to the destruction of their Souls Besides they ought not to hold cognizance of any other causes then Matrimoniall and Testamentary according to that old Mandate of Rescript We command our Sheriff of our Counties of S. N. c. that they suffer not any in their Balive to come together in any places to make any Recognizances upon their Oaths but in Matrimoniall and Testamentary causes On the other side the Professors of the Ecclesiasticall Lawes maintain'd the Royall Authority in Causes Ecclesiasticall as vested in the Queen by Authority of Parliament To oppose this was nothing else then to offer violence to Royall Majesty and violating the Oath of obedience to insult over the Sacred Prerogative Royall The Ecclesiasticall Courts may hold cognizance of other Causes then Matrimoniall and Testamentary by the Statute of Circumspecte agatis and Artiouli Cleri in the time of Edward the first as they made it appeare That Rescript or Law which they produc'd was suspected because it was incertain for the time and is variously read Elsewhere I have read it To perform Recognisances and Oaths and to make recognition or recognizance doth not signifie to give testimony or to answer in Law but to acknowledge and confesse a debt or to hold plea of Inventaries or Debts That the Oath ex officio hath time out of mind been given in these Courts as in others to sift out Simonie Adultery and other works of darkness especially when the Insinuation as they call it becomes loud And though no man is bound to betray himself yet being betrayed by fame he is bound to shew himself whether he can defend his innocence and purge himself seeing the penance enjoyned is not a punishment but a medicine to cure sinners and to deter others from sinning and to take away scandall according to that in Scripture Be not confounded in speaking truth for thy souls sake for there is a confusion that brings sin and there is a confusion that brings glory and grace But what do I dwelling upon these things when the Learned discourses hereupon on both sides are extant of Richard Cosin Doctor of the Lawes and John Morris and Lancelot Andrewes The Queen not ignorant that Her Authority was in this business struck at through the sides of the Bishops tacitely crusn'd the violence of the Adversaries and conserv'd the Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction inviolate Thus in a few words he summes up part of them marrow of these Learned dissertations and gives his sound judgement thereupon But still they went on in their design in which I believe they will ever be found immoveable We have had sufficient experience that way at what they aime and that there is no hope of bending without breaking too In their admonition to the Parliament in that Queens Reign they tell us to this effect at least that if they cannot have what they desire by fair meanes they will have it by a way shall make our hearts ake and I think they have indifferently well made their words good Yet blessed be God we are delivered again from them god give us care to beware of them and not to fall again into their snares by those blessed Titles of Mercy and Moderation heavenly good surely if rightly applied Let us but contemplate our fresh miseries and the murther of our blessed King and Martyr King Charles the First and his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 't is well to be hoped 't will prove as much or more effectual then the Pages Memento to Philip of Macedon in another case These men for they were all of the same Leaven still persisted in their design all along the Reign of Queen Elizabeth and upon King James his coming in thinking upon that change to have wrought something extraordinary upon a Prince that had a great access of Dominion and probably at his entrance would endeavour to satisfie all or most so far as with reason it could be expected and to ingratiate himself as far as fitting with his new Subjects But it was our happiness though his trouble and vexation that he was well acquainted with the factious and seditious humours of that gang in Scotland with whom and ours here of the same mould I believe ever was and will be a correspondence and co-operation Ex virids observantia this is too demonstrable They then set upon King Iames with their most humble Petition called The Lincoln-shire Ministers Petition perhaps denominatio à majori it was a complication of many parts there they desire favour for tender Consciences and thereupon was the Conference at Hampton-Court granted where their Reasons were as it were brayed in a Mortar and they or most of them seem'd satisfied but many of them at least soon returned to their vomit In that Petition they promise all obedience
plagues wherewith Almighty God may justly punish his people for neglecting this good and wholsome Law Who would think had we not sadly felt their designs that the great Magnifiers of Parliaments for which I discommend them not so they keep within due compass would have been so bitter against those that acted but according to these strict Parliamentary charges CHAP. III. The Heads of the several Chapters in that Apologie of Doctor Cosens Part 1. C. 1. THE particular distribution of causes proved to be of Ecclesiastical cognizance besides Testamentary and Matrimonial With a discourse of C. 2. Bishops Certificates against persons excommunicated being a special point of their voluntary Jurisdiction where there is no party that prosecuteth C. 3. That matters in the former Chapter adjoyned to Testamentary and Matrimonial causes though properly they be not of Testament or Matrimony are of Ecclesiastical cognizance and how far C. 4. General proofs out of Statutes that sundry other causes besides Testamentary and Matrimonial are of Ecclesiastical cognizance C. 5. That Suits for Tithes of Benefices upon voidance or spoliation likewise that Suits for Tithes Oblations Mortuaries and Pensions Procurations c. are of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction is proved by Statutes especially C. 6. That Suits for right of Tithes belong to the Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and how far is shewed out of the books and Reports of the Common Law so of places of Burial and Church-yards and of Pensions Mortuaries Oblations c. C. 7. Of right to have a Curate and of Contributions to Reparations and to other things required in Churches C. 8. Proofs in general that sundry crimes and offences are punishable by Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and namely Idolatry Heresie Perjury or Laesio fidei and how far the last of these is there to be corrected also of disturbance of Divine Service or not frequenting of it and neglect of the Sacraments C. 9. That Simony Usury Defamation or Slander beating of a Clerk Sacrilege Brawling or Fighting in Church or Church-yard Dilapidations or waste of an Ecclesiastical Living and all Incontinency are punishable by Ecclesiastical authority and how far C. 10. Several other matters reckoned in this tenth Chapter as ordeining of real Compositions and disannulling of them suspension ab ingressu Ecclesiae c. Interdiction of a Church Sequestration Excommunication Parish-Clerks fees Goods due to a Church deteined Blasphemy Idolatry Apostasie from Christianity violation and prophanation of the Sabbath Subornation of Perjury Attestation of a womans chastity Drunkenness filthy speech violation of a Sequestration or Induction hindering and disturbance to carry away Tithes enjoyning of Penance corporal contempt of obeying the Decrees of the Ecclesiastical Judge Fees due in Ecclesiastical Courts Curates and Clerks wages Forgery in an Ecclesiastical matter as of Letters Testimonial of Orders of Institution burying of excommunicate persons communicating with excommunicate persons frequenters of Conventicles digging up of Corps buried and generally for any matter Ecclesiastical indefinitely by the Articuli cleri may be cited All these are of Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction and proofs that any Subjeet Lay or other may be cited in any cause Ecclesiastical C. 11. That Lay-men may be cited and urged to take Oaths in other causes then Testamentary and Matrimonial C. 12. The grounds of the opinions to the contrary examined and confuted C. 13. That judgment of Heresie still remaineth at the Common Law in Judges Ecclesiastical and that the Proviso touching Heresie in the Statute 1 Eliz. 1. is onely spoken of Ecclesiastical Commissioners thereby authorized C. 14. That by the Statute Her Majesty may commit authority and they may take and use for Ecclesiastical causes Attachments Imprisonments and Fines Herein he writes also how the Law was at that time C. 15. That an Ecclesiastical person may be deprived of his Benefice without indictment or prosecution of party C. 16. That after forty dayes an excommunicate person may be otherwise punished then upon the Writ De Excommunicato capiendo and that the said Writ may and ought to be awarded upon contempts arising on other causes Ecclesiastical then any of those ten crimes mentioned in the Statute 5 Eliz. 23. C. 17. Of a Prohibition what it is where it lyeth not and where it doth and how it ceaseth by a Consultation and of the Writ of Indicavit C. 18. An Analysis or unfolding of the two special Statutes touching Praemunire with sundry questions and doubts about that matter requiring more grave resolution Then in the second part of his Apology the Doctor sets forth his Proofs together with his Answers to the objections made against the manner of practice of Jurisdiction Ecclesiastical by those that oppugn it C. 1. Of the distinction of Offences and several kinds and ends in punishing them with the necessity of punishments C. 2. Of two sorts of prosecution of crimes and offences viz. by a party and of office the practice of them in Scripture and in the several Courts of this Realm C. 3. Of the sundry kinds of objecting crimes by a party mentioned in the Civil Law as by reason of a mans publick charge and function also by way of Exception Supplication Complaint Delation and Accusation The true signification of the word Accusatio its divers acceptions definition and exposition thereof with some reason of the frequency of Accusation in Courts of the Civil Laws in former times is also declared C. 4. That the prosecution of crimes by way of Accusation is in most places forbidden or grown into disuse The reasons hereof be partly the danger to the Accusers and partly the hatefulness of that course Therein also is disputed whether all Accusation be unlawful and certain points delivered to be observed by all them that will accuse others C. 5. Of the several acceptions of the word Officium the signification of the words Inquisitio Questio crimina ordinaria extraordinaria the reason why enquiry by office came in place of Accusation Of Enquiry in general and special of Enquiry special Ex officio nobili sive mero mixto promoto and of the privileges of proceeding ex mero officio above the other C. 6. Of Denunciation a special means of stirring up the office of the manifold use thereof on the other side the Sea The general acception of that word and of four kinds of Denunciation how they differ one from another what is required in them and when a Denouncer is to be condemned or excused of expences and what course of dealing against crimes and offences is holden both in Courts of the Ecclesiastical Commission and in ordinary Courts Ecclesiastical of this Realm C. 7. That the Civil and Canon Laws allow sundry means to ground a special Enquiry of office against a crime besides Accusation and Presentment therein is also conteined an Answer to a supposed Rule and declared how from general they descend to special Enquiry And that besides those two either a fame or clamosa insinuatio or private judicial Denunciation or Canonical Denunciation
or Indicia or taking with the manner or other notoriety of the fact or impeachment by some of the Complices or collusion of the accuser or the not objecting in due time or when the Enquiry tendeth but to a spiritual punishment may severally any of them serve to warrant such enquiry with some observations touching the nature of most of these C. 8. That to proceed sometimes against an offence otherwise then upon Accusation or Presentment or then upon an Appeal or Indictment which two at the Common Law have respective correspondence unto the two former is no diverse much less any contrary or repugnant course to the Laws Statutes and Customs of this Realm This is proved by Common Law Statutes and practice in proceedings informative and punitive with answer to certain objections made to the contrary C. 9. How the second opinion here to be treated of is that no Lay-person may be cited of office in any cause but Testamentary or Matrimonial and that the drift of that opinlon is against proceeding of office in matters criminal The necessary use and equity of proceeding somtimes criminally by the Judges office in Courts both Temporal and Ecclesiastical C. 10. Conteineth an Answer to some further objections made against the conveniency and reasonableness of proceeding against crimes of office C. 11. That the Laws of the Realm do use Enquiries and Proceedings ex officio that they allow it in Courts Ecclesiastical with answer to some objections that are made to the contrary C. 12. Is set down a Reply to the Note-gatherers answers given to certain reasons that have been made long ago for to shew the like course to be also practised in Temporal Courts and an answer to his reasons brought to prove that in proceeding of office there is some contrariety unto the Laws of England C. 13. That the Enquiry ex officio against crimes is allowed both in Civil and Temporal Courts and in Ecclesiastical also by the two Laws Canon and Civil C. 14 Conteineth an answer to such objections as upon the Civil or Canon Laws are brought against all proceedings of office in causes criminal by the Treatisor and the Note-gatherer C. 15. Enquiry and proceeding of office without an accuser and grounded upon some other of the means afore proved sufficient to enter into such enquiry is approved by sundry examples of Scripture C. 16. An Answer is made to such objections as out of Scripture or Ecclesiastical Writers be made against criminal proceeding of office by the Note-gather and others In the third part he concludes upon the whole matter for which his Apology was made C. 1. Of the lawfulness of Oaths What an Oath is and the reason or original formal cause of the use of Oaths C. 2. An Answer to certain doubts made concerning oaths as namely why in Scripture God is said to have sworn how by Oath he is said to be called to Witness An Oath no tempting of God but a part of his Worship Why nevertheless some are repelled from taking Oaths Whether Adjuration be lawful After whose meaning an Oath is to be understood Whether every promissory Oath be simply to be kept Whether an Oath may be dispensed with and how far and whether a Christian may by mutual Oaths contract with him that sweareth by false gods C. 3. Division of Oaths according to the outward form of taking them according to the matter and inward form of them with plain description of every kind of Oath C. 4. That the Ceremonies used in taking and giving of corporal oaths with laying hands upon the Bible or Testament and swearing by the Contents of it are not unlawful C. 5. The true issue of the next Opinion in question Two sorts of crimes and offences prohibited In what causes an Oath here spoken of may not be ministred and the manifold convenience and necessity of an Oath sometimes to be ministred in a cause criminal and penal unto the party with some few objections touching inconveniences thereof answeted C. 6. That Oaths of men touching matters damageable criminal and penal to themselves are urged and acted by Temporal Courts and by the Laws of this Realm C. 7. Wherein are contained Answers to such Objections and Reasons as be made for proof of a contrariety or repugnancy in these Oaths unto the Statutes Laws or Customs of this Realm and a Reply to the Treatisours Answers made unto certain Objections supposed likely to be made in justification of this kind of Oath by the Temporal Laws C. 8. That ministring of such Oaths is by the Law of the Realm allowed unto Judges of Ecclesiastical Courts and some few Objections made to the contrary answered C. 9. That such Oath touching a mans own crime is allowed both by the Canon and Civil Laws how far and in what sort and that the like is establish'd and thought equal by the Laws and Customs of sundry other Nations as well ancient as modern C. 10. An Answer to some Objections pretended to be made against this kind of Oath from the Laws Civil and Canon C. 11. That not only such an Oath may be taken but also being by Magistrates duly commanded ought not to be refused is approved by Scriptures by practice of the Primitive Church and of late times together with a Reply unto certain Answers made unto some proofs here used C. 12. An answer unto such Objections as be pretended to be gathered from Divinity Divines and from the examples of godly men against ministring Oaths unto parties in matters of their own crimes C. 13. Four several opinions of the Innovators against the parties taking of an Oath in criminal causes with Answers also unto their Reasons and Objections C. 14. That a man being charged by authority to discover his knowledge touching some offence which his Christian brother is supposed to have done is bound to reveal it though it may breed trouble and punishment to his broaher and the Reasons to the contrary are answered and refuted C. 15. their Arguments are answered that condemn the ministring and taking of an Oath as unlawfull because they have not distinct knowledge given unto them of every particular before the taking of it and the like course by Examples is upproved lawful and godly C. 16. That after the party hath answered upon his Oath it is neither unusual unlawful or ungodly to seek to convince him by Witness or other trial if he be suspected not to have delivered a plain and full truth and somewhat also in approbation of Canonical Purgation with answers to the Treatisors Objections against them CHAP. IV. By the late Act the manner of proceeding in Ecclesiastical Courts is not altered but left as it was A Summary relation of what Doctor Cosens in his Apology hath asserted and made good by Gods word the practice of the Primitive Christians the opinion of the Fathers the Laws Canon and Civil and the Laws of the Land allowing and warranting them The like practice at Common Law and
at Geneva and other places pretending strict Reformation AS to the proceeding Ex officio or otherwise in the Ecclesiastical Courts according to Law and the due former practise nothing in that late Act is said against it and therefore implicitly at least it is allowed and approved Rati habitio mandato aequiparatur 't is a Rule of Law The Law in that case remains at it was before nothing need be said in justification thereof but only as touching the Oath Ex officio or other Oath not to be administred as there and touching Purgation Touching the Proviso's in that late Act that which forbids Ecclesiastical Judges to exercise any power c. as there and that other Proviso that forbids them to tender or administer unto any person whatsoever the Oath usually called the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath whereby such person to whom the same is tendred or administred may be charged or compelled to confess or accuse him or her self of any criminal matter or thing whereby he or she may be lyable to any censure or punishment I say touching the former Proviso he hath I conceive given full satisfaction in that his Apology in answering to the objeetions made in his time thereabout Therein also he clearly and fully justifies the proceedings of Ecclesiastical Courts in general and particular cases And to that other Proviso touching the Oath Ex officio or any other Oath and touching Purgation as in that Act I humbly conceive salvo meliore judicio he fully and clearly evinces it that the law and practice thereof was just to tender and administer the Oat◠ex officio or at the instance of a party for the finding ou◠or Simony Adultery and other crimes and deeds of darkness difficidimae probationis so that evil may be removed from the Land Alwayes provided that there was just cause for the Ecclesiastical Judge so to tender and administer that Oath that is that there was before such oath was so administred or tendered to any party due proof made of a common fame that the party was guilty of such crime touching which such oath was to be ministred or at least there was as in some cases denunciatio Evangelica or canonica or insinuatio clamosa or other sufficient indicia praesumptionis or suspicionis to induce the Judge to tender that oath and so the practice alwayes was and if it ever was otherwise as I believe that will scarcely be proved it ought not to have been He sets down the due cautions that ought to be had when it is very probable that the person to whom that oath is tendered will forswear himself then to forbear it and that in capital crimes to the danger of loss of life or limb it is not the practice in any Courts to administer such oath for that very fear of Perjury it being too much to be feared that too too many would rather forswear themselves then endanger either life or limb though in some places of Scripture it appears that even in such cases such oaths have been administred The Father of lies could speak truth in such a case Job 2.4 Skin for skin or rather as some learned in the Hebrew would have it Skin after skin and all that a man hath will he give for his life There also he shews the weakness and inconcludency of that vulgar Saying Nemo tenetur seipsum prodere or accusare being indeed the trite and general objection That a man is not properly said to betray or accuse himself when as publick fame or other sufficient indicia presumptions or suspicions have accused him these are instead of the accusers and it seems dis-ingenuous at least in those especially that pretend to Learning and have or might have examined the Canons and Ecclesiastical Laws in that point to urge one piece of a sentence and leave out the rest where they found or might have found that sentence Nemo tenetur seipsum prodere or accusare they did also or might have found that which follows in that sentence viz. Sed proditus per famam tenetur seipsum ostendere innocentiam suam purgare Mat. 4 6. The accuser of his brethren cited Scripture to our Saviour sayes he He shall give his Angels charge concerning thee and in their hands they shall bear thee up c. leaving out that in the Text that follows after these words Psal 91.11 He shall give his Angels charge concerning thee that is to keep thee in all thy wayes which alters the case That note or comment upon the Law or if they will needs call it a Rule or Maxime it matters not Nemo tenetur seipsum prodere vel accusare sive propriam turpitudinem revelare is to be understood in crimes simply secret and which are no wayes disclosed or come to light But when such secret sins are by some of those wayes that open a way to enquiry of a person supposed criminous come abroad and so in some sort are manifested then those former rules cease and that of St. Chrysostom comes in Homil. 31. ad Hebraeos Non tibi dico ut te prodas in publicum neque apud alium accuses but upon such disclosing then Proditus tenetur seipsum ostendere innocentiam suam purgare This is for the avoiding of scandal and that the party may be reformed Therefore doth Aquinas himself reason thus Thom. 2.2 Cum quis saith he secundum ordinem juris à judice interrogatur non ipse se prodit sed ab alio proditur dum ei necessitas respondendi imponitur per cum cui obedire tenetur As for tendering the Oath to the party where there is an accuser that is not done upon the crime till the fame be proved or sufficient presumptions circumstances indicia or suspitions or semiplena probatio the oath of one sufficient witness at least to induce the judge to give that oath though penal in some sort to the party This practice he proves consonant to Gods Word to the practice of the primitive Christian and the opinion of the holy Doctors and Fathers of the Church as also consonant to the practice of Geneva and other at least seemingly strictly reformed Churches and to the practice of all Christian Nations and other Nations not Christian guided onely by right reason and the Law of Nature as also that by the known Laws of this Land the Ecclesiastical Judges were so warranted and commanded to give that oath the Ecclesiastical Laws and Canons being full and clear in that point Then he shews how the proceeding at Common Law in this Land is the same not onely in some criminal but civil causes also For private debts 'twixt private persons penal to them as in Wagers of Law sometimes for a greater sometimes a lesser debt 'twixt two private parties with the parties oath that is accused and his Compurgators too even as in Purgation Canonical in the Ecclesiastical Courts together with other Purgation or Decisory Oaths
examineth Gehazi his servant (c) Gen 43.3 Joseph in AEgypt gave an oath to his brethren (d) Ezek. 7.13 Zedekiah took an oath of Subjection and is blamed and punished for breaking of it (e) 1 Sam. 21.2 The oath given to the Gibeonites was to be kept and the violation of it punished For the manner of proceeding or the cause of questioning we see many instances First in flagranti crimine * John 8.4 if a party be taken in the manner as we say or the fact is manifest as (f) Num. 25 8 Zimri's was (g) Deut. 21.3 Or though the fact be manifest the person committing it is unknown or the question is of the person the fact being unknown as in (b) John 7.18 Achans case Or by indicia suspected signs so (i) Gen. 3.8 Adam hiding himself So against (k) Gen 4.6 Cam Abel not appearing Adam impeacht Eve and Eve the Serpent and both were punished upon it Or upon infamy and cry (l) Gen. 18.10 The cry of the Sodomites being great I will descend saith the Lord. And such kind of Enquiries are made both in the Law (m) Deut. 17.4 If a report shall come to thee or thou shalt hear as also in the Gospel as against the incestuous person (n) 1 Cor. 5.1 It is reported Or by suggestion or complaint as in (o) Job 1.11 Jobs cause where the Devil was Accuser Joseph onely upon suspicion gave his brothers the oath Evangelical denunciation as Mat. 18.7 when Church or state are in danger as in the Valley of Achor that is against the troublers of Israel so signifies the word Achor When Peter and John were examined in the great Council By what power Acts 4.7 or in what name they had done that miracle Peter full of the Holy Ghost answered plainly and truly though it might have been capital to him What spirit are they of who being required by lawful Authority to answer in matters not capital yet will not answer at all for upon a mans own confession judicial though not upon oath he may be equally convicted In the proceedings against St. Acts 6. Stephen there were no Accusers in truth but those who by Subornation denounced him to the Priests and who are twice-called witnesses because they deposed against him yet he refused not to make answer though capital to him When the Captain asked St. Paul Acts 22. whether he were not that AEgyptian that made a Sedition c. he answered directly and denied it Likewise the same Saint Paul in all other his conventings before Authority mentioned in the Acts even at the suit and accusation of a p arty refused not particularly and truly to answer to all that was objected Acts 4.25 c. And all this is done to the sifting out truth and punishing crimes either truly so or at least thought to be so and criminous persons are questioned as well of the fact as circumstances or fame (a) Gen 3.9 Hast thou eaten of the fruit of the ferbidden tree So the Princes questioned Baruch about Jeremiahs book (b) Jer. 36.17 Tell us how didst thou write these words So (c) Ezra 10.11 Esras examined the questioned persons concerning their own fact So the (d) Acts 23.20 High-Priest having committed Saint Paul examined him further for oftentimes Accusers as the Heathen could observe fall off all cannot some will not accuse what then many crimes being the deeds of darknesse cannot be (e) Eph. 5.11 revealed (f) Prov. 16.5 Because hand is in hand and they will not bewray themselves Because the name of Doeg founds harsh and to come forth to accuse a man is accounted poor and odious a matter of cost danger and (g) Prov. 25.8 Infamy must Villany therefore be hid and scattered abroad and get strength till they break out to the destruction of the Commonwealth Or because none can or will for 't is all one whether one will not accuse or cannot accuse therefore it is not lawful to question and without an Oath 't is to little purpose therefore God commands that way of Adjuration or giving an oath * 2 Kings 22. So the King adjured Micheas †Mat. 26.93 so the High-Priest our Saviour and both of them answered But should any question Adjuration even a clear oath was lawfully given even to the actor as Exod. 22.8 1 Kings 8.3 and therefore more then permitted to the Magistrate For surely it were hard if every private man might require an oath of the questioned and not the Magistrate should it be lawful in the cafe of a Pawn and not of a Kingdom An oath is an end of controversie Heb. 6.16 saith St. Paul then an oath to be taken for that end In a case Matrimonial which is meerly ecclesiastical Interrogatories were administred with oath as in a cause of Incontinency Num. 5. and the proceedings being by Enquiry without any accuser at all And this which is to be noted in the case in Esdras Esdras 1.8 9. they are no wayes forced to it but desire to take their oath first and to be examined after then which there is no cause more suitable then to the proceedings in Ecclesiastical Courts before the Passing of the late Act and against which the Innovators heretofore used to take exceptions In some of these above-mentioned instances we see how oaths were administred even in capital causes much more may they be where there is not that danger nay no danger of losse of Goods Liberty or any other losse but onely for a medicine to the soul for reformation of manners and taking away scandal and offence given They were questioned too we set upon small su7spicions signs presumptions or any other causes of question nay nothing at all as to the person questioned upon whom no true colour of suspicion lay something like our Coroners proceedings in some cases but onely a fact was committed that was apparent whereof it was possible that he was not guilty as in the case of a person found slain then much more ought it to be upon great suspicions presumptions or publick fame thereof proved This being thus by Gods Word in the next place we may look into the practice and opinion of the primitive Christians hereupon CHAP. VI. That the Opinion and Practice of the Primitive Christians and the Fathers of the Church was to administer such Oath Ex officio and upon Accusation and for Purgation Canonical with the practice at Geneva IT is well said by an ancient and learned * Cromatius in 5 Mat. Facit canon 36. concil Tolet. quart Writer Dominus inter juramentum loquelam nostram nullam vult esse differentiam And Aquinas saith †Thom. 2.2 qu. 69. art 3. If he which is brought into question and interrogated by the Judge without his oath shall answer untruly that therein he sinneth deadly The old Christians in the primitive Church were far
from such shifts of answering dangerous questions propounded to them by Heathen Magistrates or from answering untruths to them Tertullian is herein very plentiful especially in his book called Apologeticon A Christian saith he if he be indicted or denounced to the Magistrate be rejoyceth in it if he be accused he propoundeth no defence when he is interrogated he mostwillingly confesseth and when he is condemned he giveth them or God thanks Tertul. in Apol. c. 1. And much more hath Tertullian to this purpose St. Aug. serm 28. de verbo Apost cap. 6. Augustine doth plainly establish and allow of Oaths taken concerning a mans open offences being indeed such also in their own nature If perhaps saith he thine Oath he urged meaning a Decisory oath be exacted of thee by a private person say not I will not swear for it cometh of evil which though doest but yet of his evil that exacteth it of thee insomuch as though hast no other means but thine oath to purge and clear thy self of the matter in handling Aug. bid c. 10. In another place he speaks and allows of oaths taken in way of purgation of one suspected for theft and in another place he sayes and approves of the same practice at Millain Aug. ep 137. this was in a civil cause criminally moved and for theft a crime though not simply capital by the Civil Laws In another place In denouncing others saith he Aug. in qu. Lev. speaking of Denunciation of faults to the Magistrate this moderation is alwayes to be used by us that we relate it unto such which may rather help than hurt him in case the party shall swear falsly either by correcting him or by deprecation to God for him so that he will by confessing his fault apply this remedy unto himself Chrys hom 16. ad pop Antioc St. Chrysostom alloweth of Decisory Oaths or Wagers of Law and testifieth that such necessary oaths were in those times imposed to exact mens confessions and whether they had stollen some certain thing or not This he allowes touching meer crimes in their own nature and that upon the instance of a Plaintiff particularly interested but in his goods and chattels This kind of oath was not onely allowed in the old Church but commanded to be put in use as lawful and consonant unto Gods Word against persons convented and had in suspicion even in one Church which the most and hottest oppugners of this oath do reckon to be best yea and almost the onely Reformation that may rightly be so called For in the Discipline of France concluded of in the national Synod there 1559 1561 1563 1565. it was thus declared The faithful may be constrained by the Consistory to tell the truth so far forth as it derogateth nothing from the authority of the Magistrate They may be constreined The Ecclesiastical Senate or Consistory act 12. say they but there is no compulsion but either Civil which they will not arrogate to themselves as torture or racking imprisoning or fining c. or else by the parties oath which upon pain of Perjury if he once swear or of conviction if he will not doth as it were constrein a man to say truth And that an Oath is meant by the Canon of the French Church we are taught both by the History of Camperell a French Minister at Geneva as also by that of those who danced in Widow Balthazar 's house there Camperell was appointed by the Consistory of Elders there Inter epist Calvin in folio pag. 421 422. to be examined upon his Oath upon certain Interrogatories whereof also two concerned what he had in his very purpose and intention of mind Calvin Farello pag. 64. epist in folio The Dancers because at first they denyed it were put to their corporal oaths to declare the whole truth of that merriment And all dancing there is held as an offence and grievous crime as appears by the Ordinances of Geneva and by the very last frame of Discipline concluded 1571. by the French Churches For Purgation Canonical as it was used in the Ecclesiastical Courts of this Kingdom in a word 't is the same in these Courts in a criminal cause as at Common Law a Wager of Law is in a civil cause differs no more then thus this is touching our Lands or goods that touching our Good name and Credit It is so far from being condemned by good and godly Bishops in ancient times that by whole Councils it hath been prescribed Let a Lay-man saith one Council Concil Tribur canon 21. if need be purge himself by his Oath and let a Priest by the consecration of the holy Sacrament be interrogated And another Council thus Let a Priest if he can purge himself of the crime with seven of his Order and a Deacon with three Ivo lib. 5. ex concil Agath So was it decreed by a third Council If a Priest or Minister be infamed amongst his charge and it cannot be proved before the Bishop by witness let him be suspended untill be perform due satisfaction lest the faithful people be scandalized But as our Elders have taught then is the satisfaction due and orderly when according to the Canons or as the Bishops shall judge fit be joyneth unto him seven Compurgators and swears by the holy Gospel laid afore him that he hath not committed the crime laid unto him When he is thus purged then let him again freely execute his office Ivo ibid. ex concil Herden And in another Council we find Purgation prescribed for theft and also for Adultery Concil Worm and according to the prescriptions of these Canons and many others that might be alledged examples of sundry ancient Bishops in the Church that have themselves made their own Purgation for avoiding and removing scandal and offence Sixtus the third and ancient Bishop of Rome 12 qu. 4. c. Mandastis but upon the accusation of one Bassus did willingly make his Purgation upon his oath in a Council And so did Leo Ivo Carn l. 5. another ancient Bishop of the same See purge himself with twelve Bishops Gregory the Great enjoyned unto * Greg. ep 23. ad Iustin Presb. Leo †Id. ep 8. l. 2. Memius and * Id. ep 8. l. 7. ep 79. Maximus three Bishops to clear and purge themselves of several crimes by their oaths whereof the last was for Simony Innocentius also caused the Bishop of Trent to purge himself likewise of the like crime of Simony And what be the Oaths touching Goods stollen or imbezelled which were left with a man upon trust appointed in Exodus Exod. 22.7 8. and those in Salomons Prayer at the Dedication of the Temple other than oaths of Purgation of a crime 2 Kings 8.31 imposed by the party having an interest Lev. 6.2 Likewise the oaths mentioned in Leviticus concerning goods denyed that are pretended to have been left in deposito
is the most frequent and onely mention almost of such a thing This very term to Swear you will scarce any where find it in the Old Testament but either under the word Hiphil that is the Imperative commanding conjugation in respect of him that gives the oath or under the word Niphal that is the passive suffering conjugation in respect of him that takes the oath And under the same rule are the Greeks amongst whom Orcos is the name of the oath which almost solely the holy Ghost acknowledges in the New Testament In that word is a kind of straitning necessity and as they say an exigengy no less then there is in the word Orcos for from the same word comes both that is of straitning Thereupon comes that common Proverb War and Oaths are voluntary evils and that they may be good they ought to be pressed and expressed as St. Augustine of Oaths sayes wittily either by the Authority of him that gives the oath or at leastwise by the hardness of his heart that believes not So that it is a sin either to swear or to make war except it be at least in some manner exacted and upon some and no light cause Therefore that it may be required or rather that it ought to be the very force of Nature the very force of the term it self evinceth it But whether from the Magistrate this is the second branch Yes surely from the Magistrate So the Divines of old Not onely every body but every soul is to be subject to the Powers Rom. 13.1 Therefore the Powers have power to commit the body to custody by imprisoning it lest it escape And so likewise the soul to commit that to custody by laying an oath upon it lest it should have any subterfuge by which name God himself hath most fitly called an Oath the Bond or prison of the soul Num. 30.13 by which the soul may as it were be tyed up and being so tyed up may be bound to answer appositely and readily But yet it comes nearer If it be lawful for the Master to force his servant to take an oath as Gen. 24.3 Abraham did if a father to his son as Jacob to Joseph Gen. 47.29 if a brother to a brother as the same Jacob to Esau Gen. 25.33 By how much better right is it lawful for the Magistrate to do it to his Subject whose command is more excellent then any other command I adde also about the right settling in marriage of a son if that be lawful as Abraham to his servant of chusing a fitting place of burial as to Joseph of passing away the right of Birth-right as Esau and in private causes I adde also of the least concernment if compared with the publick Then surely by better righr may the Magistrate do it in the common cause of the Commonwealth whose Interest is greater then any other Interest And that is provided for by Gods Law Exod. 12.8 in express terms in the case of a Pawn saith God let them come before the Magistrate In which place the Magistrates are named by the name of God himself and not by any name but by that very name which is taken from the force of an oath as though he should say Let them come before the Oath-givers or those who when they give the Law in Gods stead in his Judgment and in his Name may require his Oath to be taken That is Gods Deputies Psal 82.6 in Gods judgment 2 Chro. 19.8 the Oath of God Eccles. 8.2 therefore to the Magistrate It is lawful to the Magistrate I say as well Ecclesiastical as Civil Before him that is the Ecclesiastical Judge by Law the Woman is commanded to purge her self in a case of suspicion of breach of Wedlock bond Num. 5.19 Before him that is the Temporal Judge by law the man is commanded to purge himself in a cause of suspicion of breach of Social promise or Contract Exod. 22.8 The practice whereof we see and the practice of the Saints is the Interpreter of the Commandments of the Ecclesiastical Judge in Ezra who required an oath in a Matrimonial cause Ezra 10.5 Of the Temporal Judge in Nehemiah who forced an Oath in a cause of Usury Neh. 5.12 Neither hath the pious and religious Magistrate onely right to do this but the Heathen Magistrate too and that to Gods people Zedekiah gave his Oath of Allegeance to Nebuchadnezzar 2 Chron. 36.9 though forced he gave it and rightly too if we believe Ezekiel and afterwards by a sacrilegious boldness he attempted to break it he scaped not unpunished for it Ezek. 17.13 Lastly I adde that this was not lawful to do to their own people onely but also to guests and strangers living within their Territories either for trafficking or any other cause In which regard Joseph now become Vice-Roy of Aegypt imposes an Oath upon his Brethren in a case of Treason suspected though both by Law and by Nature they were Canaanites Gen. 43.3 therefore hence it now appears that it is lawful to impose an Oath and that it is lawful also to the Magistrate But whether is it lawful to do it to the party that is the party guilty or defendant the third thing I propounded Nor can that be called into question Exod. 22.8 He to whom the Pawn was concredited is the party guilty or defendant Num. 5.19 The woman suspected by the jealous husband to have wronged his bed is also the party guilty or defendant but to each of them is this oath to be given nor is it lawful for them to decline it In a few words I will summe it up Whether one deceitfully keeps his neighbours goods or perfidiously deteins his friends goods or restores not to the owner his found goods when he requires them Levit. 6.3 or as it seems to me in any other crime for it is mentioned indefinitely 1 Kings 8.31 in whatsoever he shall sin it is lawful for the Plaintiff or Agent to impose an oath upon the party that is the guilty or defendant or to lay an oath upon him as it is in the Hebrew phrase nor is it lawful for the guilty or defendant party to refuse it whether it be imposed by the Agent or Plaintiff or by the Magistrate Indeed I cannot deny but we are fallen into such times that it may be expedient to impose the oath upon the party Agent or Plaintiff and not onely upon the Defendant for it may happen that they may both prevaricate that is the party Agent or Plaintiff by calumniating and the party guilty or defendant by Tergiversation But if we would take the Law from Heaven from the holy Writ to the party guilty or defendant 't is more necessary to be given Examples are thereof Scarce will you find in the Law an oath laid upon the Agent or Plaintiff but very often may you find it upon the party guilty or defendant Moses renders the reason of it The actor who for the most part is the party