Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	ecclesiastical_a	king_n	supremacy_n	2,485	5	10.5338	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A08890	Eclogarius, or briefe summe of the truth of that title of Supreame Governour given to his Maiestie in causes spirituall, and ecclesiasticall, from the Kings of Israel, in the old Testament; the Christian emperours in the Primitive Church; confirmed by 40. epistles of Leo the Bishop of Rome, vnto the Emperours, Theodosius, Martianus, and Leo. Not published before. By Iohn Panke.	Panke, John.	1612 (1612)	STC 19170; ESTC S106400	39,387	80

as we striue for or his Maiestie taketh to himselfe in this businesse whereof we entreat If he doe I craue but their assent to that oath if he do not their iust exceptions against the evidence which is drawne from him A shew of an answere to the most pressing arguments brought by vs I knowe hath beene ever ready from them but such that comming from none of them Read D. Mort. 1. 2. part of his Apologie his Catholik appeal for the Protestants and M. White of the way of the true Church an other hath evermore bin readie to oppugne it a manifest evidence of a false ground Those evasions and trickes on their parts I wish in this excellent temper of the world light of knowledge in the guids of this Church whose eies they cannot blinde with any craft were wholy laid aside and that the direct voice of Scripture first ancient Ecclesiasticall histories for the practise of the christian Emperors and testimonies of fathers confirming their practise might bee called in For in these cases to answere of our selues is to answer nothing not to answer to the allegation is silently to graunt our adversarie what he would To bee so conceited to our cause that whatsoever is tendered not to see it is willingly to cast our selues headlong into the gulfe of endlesse woe and miserie To come therefore to the first thing required which is the oath it selfe that al men may see what they sweare vnto that sweare vnto it The tenor where of is this I.A.B. doe vtterly testifie and declare in my conscience The oath of Supremacie in his Maiesties Apol. pag 48. that the kings highnesse is the only supreame governour of this Realme all other his Highnes dominions and countries aswell in spirituall or Ecclesiasticall things or causes as temporall And that no forraine Prince person Prelate State or Potentate hath or ought to haue any iurisdiction power superioritie preheminence or authoritie Ecclesiasticall or spirituall within this Realme And therefore I doe vtterly renounce forsake all forrain iurisdictions powers superiorities and authorities and doe promise that from henceforth I will beare faith and true allegiance to the Kings highnes his heires and lawful successors and to my power shall defend all iurisdictions priviledges preheminences and authorities granted or belonging to the Kings highnesse his heires and successors or vnited or annexed to the imperiall crowne of this Realme So God me helpe and by the contents of this booke Besides the setting downe of this oath thus in these tearmes of which the Papists are afraid as of some monster I must expresse the meaning and intendment thereof what is challenged thereby and what is vnsought for by his Maiestie and from whom more sooner and trulier may wee learne the scope and drift thereof thē from him to whom we owe it and to whome of right it belongeth to be sworne His Maiestie therefore having proved from many and sundry sentences titles and prerogatiues both in the old Testament and in the new that Christian Princes within their dominions haue warrant to governe the Church as well as the rest of their people in being Custodes vtriusque tabulae persons to whom God hath commended and commaunded the keeping of both tables doth there disclaime and denie that hee hath any power to make new articles of faith What the king doth either take or refuse by the oath of supremacy His Maiesties Apol pag. 108. that office he leaveth to the Pope or to set vp anie points of religion not warranted by the word of God but by commanding obedience to bee given to the word of God by reforming the religion according to his prescribed will by assisting the spirituall power with the temporall sword by reforming of corruptions by procuring due obedience to the Church by iudging and cutting of all frivolous questions and schismes as Constantine did And finally by making decorum to bee observed in every thing and establishing orders to bee observed in all indifferent things for that purpose And this is the only intent of this oath of Supremacy This is inlarged with more words Rain conf with Hart. c. 10. div 1. but to the same effect by D. Rainolds in his cōference with M. Hart. For the king saith he to be supreame governour of all his dominions in things spirituall and temporall is to haue the preheminence over all rulers in government of matters touching God and man within his dominions and this by the Scripture is Cesars right 1. Pet. 2.13 The high Priest is ordained for mē in those things that appertaine to God to do them The Priest duty Heb. 5.1 that is to offer gifts and sacrifices for sin this is the peculiar duty of the priest which if the Prince meddle with as Ozias did 2. Chro. 26. v. 16 18.19 who would haue burnt incense vpon the Altar of incense a thing inioined to Priests only then hee transgresseth the bounds of his office and provoketh vengeance of the Lord vpon him The Princes du tie But to provide by Civill punishments and orders that Priestes doe their dutie in things concerning God not only Priests but people too it is the Princes charge and so hee is ordained to deale in things of God Iudges 27 5 6 For when Michah had an Idols chappell in his house with a vestment and Images in those daies saith the text there was no king in Israell but every man did that which was good in his own eies Iudges 18.1.2 And againe there was no king in Israell when the men of Dan got that Idolatrous stuffe with an Idololatrous Priest 17. went a whoring after it which being said in like sort when adultery was committed 19. and with adultery murther doth shew that as the subiect should haue beene restrained from murther and adulterie Iudg. 19.1.2 25.26 so from Idolatry too by the Princes sword sith all these sinnes raigned Iud. 20.28 Deut. 17.19 not for want of a Priest but of a king in Israell And where the king is willed by Moses to keepe all the words of the law to doe them the Lord meant therby that he ought to keepe them not only as a private man but as a king by seeking and providing that all his subiects did their duties both to God and man Wherefore since the supremacie we giue to our Prince in things Ecclesiasticall 2. Chr. 29. v. 5. 21 27.30 2. Chr. 30.1.6.12 to deale therein as Ezechias did first to command that the Priests and Levites doe doe their duties afterward the people to come and serue the Lord and finally both Priest and people to reforme themselues for maintenance of religion not as Ozias who as is said before would burne incense nor ours to preach the word minister the sacraments celebrate the prayers or practise discipline of the Church but to provide that those things bee done as they ought by them whom God hath called

therevnto And this is to Giue Caesar no more then is Caesars for every lawful Prince is the supream governour of his owne subiects in things spirituall and temporall And the Parlamēt may take an oath of English men for Iames our King against the Pope A president for the lawfulnesse of the oath of supremacie 2 Kings 11.4.17 against Athalia that vsurped his state Now in this maner as hath been expressed and no otherwise doth his Maiestie take or we giue him the title of Supreame governour in matters spirituall and Ecclesiasticall which so vnderstood would cut of a great number of addle idle talk which at this day passeth amongst them touching it who know not what they say To governe and rule the Church of God is of two sorts The kings duty consisteth in this 1. For to distinguish the offices which are by God at this day set to rule and govern his Church must we not needs say they are of 2 kindes and sorts The one being by the supreame authority and power of the sword to guid care for provide direct and aide Gods Church to further maintaine and set forth the true religion vnitie and quietnesse of Gods Church and to oversee visit reform restraine amend and correct all manner of persons with al maner errors superstitions heresies schismes abuses offences contempts and enormities in or about Gods Church which government and rule belongeth to kings queenes and princes and not to Apostles Bishops and Priests The other is to governe rule by feeding the flocke of Christ with the spiritual food of Gods word The Priests duty consisteth in this preaching it in season and out of season 2. administration of the sacraments and power of the keyes which is the onely rule and government belonging to the Apostles Bishops and Ministers of Christs Church Examples of the god●y kings of Israell their practise Shall we see then by the practise of the Godly kings in the time of the old Testament this supreame government I meane in spirituall and Ecclesiasticall matters and over the persons exercising the same confirmed Tortura Torti pag. 363. From thence we must begin from the common wealth of Israell all this question hath its strength and force Ecclesia est in republica sed respublica non est in Ecclesia For in Israell the people of God did God ordaine the kingdome and the Church in the kingdome according to his owne mind since we haue no example in the new Testament we must take it from the old The Empire and the Church in that time were never united in one the Empire was then enimie to the Church therefore what charge the kings had of religion must be fetched from thence where the civill policie and the Church are as it were twins and friendly imbrace together not where they are separated From that fountaine therefore of Israell doe we deriue our cause and from that example where both are together where the Church is in the kingdome doe we informe our selues of the Government both of our Church and Kingdome Touching their practise therefore I doubt not but to make our question cleere insomuch that I hope I shall finde none so shamelesse as to deny the principall care in the matter of religion belonged to the king which is seene by this one argument drawne from the whole course of the holy historie Note this especially That looke how the king was changed 1. so was the forme of religion 2. and that change was alwaies ascribed to the king as his deed neither could the Priests at any time so order the matter that any change was made 3. from the worse to the better or from the better to the worse But if the chieftie had beene theires 4. some one Priest or other would haue beene found at one time or other or at the least some part of the people though the king had beene otherwise affected that would haue kept the worship of God sound I will now beginne with the example of Iehoshaphat mentioned in the text of the Apology Tortura Torti pag 364. Iehoshaphat the king whose doings in the matter of religion is notably set downe in the chapter quoted 2 Chron. c. 19 v. 4. The king went through the people from Bersheba to mount Ephraim brought them againe vnto the Lord God of their fathers He brought them again to the Lord that is he caused that they were a Church and hee did it by his kingly authoritie whereby also afterward in the 8. verse V. 8. hee appointed Iudges in Israell of the Levites Priests and chiefe of the families of Israel to iudge the cause of the Lord which is said in the 10. v. to be of the law and of ceremonies And what greater supremacie can there be then of setting and appointing Iudges in matters of religion And where the text saith V. 11. Amariah the Priest shall be the chiefe over you in all matters of the Lord and Zebadiah the son of Ishmaell a ruler of the house of Iuda shall be for all the kings affaires and the Levites shall be officers before you it appeareth plainely that the king Iehoshaphat commandeth the Priest to be chiefe in those things which belongeth to the Lord and gaue the captaine or Lieutenāt charge of those things which appertaineth to the Common weale Iehoshaphat appointed both The ground of the high commission in England taken from Ezra cap. 7. v. 25 26. c. 10. By which deed of his he teacheth vs that no lesse the one then the other doth principally belong vnto the kings charge since first he could reduce the people to the worship of God and when they were reduced to appoint Iudges and by his kingly power to divide the causes amongst the Iudges who should be chiefe in what things Thus hath the civill policie and the church distinct causes and distinct courts but vnder the king no lesse the church then the common wealth hath them by whose authority and command Iudges do sit Amariah over the one and Zabadias over the other Both of them handle matters belonging to their courts but both of them vnder the king What Iosias did in the affaires of religiō appeareth by that which is written of him Tortura torti pag. 367. Iosias 2. Chron 22.11 He made the booke of the law which was new lie found to be read vnto the people The text saith further the king called the assembly togither commanded the book to be read vnto them being read entered into a newe covenant with the Lord An 〈…〉 of th● 〈…〉 tooke an oath of the people for the performance thereof There the king commanded the high priest himselfe the rest of the priests of the second order that they should cast out of the temple of the Lord burne all the vesse is that belonged to Baall and throw downe their high