Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	ecclesiastical_a	king_n	law_n	5,150	5	5.4995	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A62025	Reasons of the present judgement of the Vniversity of Oxford concerning The Solemne League and Covenant, The Negative Oath, The Ordinances concerning discipline and vvorship : approved by generall consent in a full convocation, 1, Jun. 1647, and presented to consideration.; Judicium Universitatis Oxoniensis. English	Sanderson, Robert, 1587-1663.; Zouch, Richard, 1590-1661.; Langbaine, Gerard, 1609-1658.; University of Oxford.	1647 (1647)	Wing S624; ESTC R183228	29,783	44

to endeavour the extirpation of the Church-Government by Law established without forfeiture of those Obligations 1. Having in the Oath of Supremacie acknowledged the King to be the onely Supreme Governour in all Ecclesiasticall Causes and over all Ecclesiasticall Persons and having bound our selves both in that Oath and by our Protestation To maintain the Kings Honour Estate Iurisdictions and all manner of Rights it is cleare to our understandings that we cannot without disloyalty and injury to Him and double Perjury to our selves take upon us without his consent to make any alteration in the Ecclesiasticall Lawes or Government much lesse to endeavour the extirpation thereof Unlesse the imposers of this Covenant had a power and meaning which they have openly d disclaimed to absolve us of that Obedience which under God we owe unto His Majesty whom they know to be intrusted with the Ecclesiasticall Law 2. We cannot sincerely and really endeavour the extirpation of this Government without a sincere desire and reall endeavour that His Majesty would grant His Royall Assent to such extirpation Which we are so far from desiring and endeavouring that we hold it our bounden duty by our daily prayers to beg at the hands of Almighty God that he would not for our sins suffer the King to doe an act so prejudiciall to his honour and conscience as to consent to the rooting out of that estate which by so many branches of his e Coronation Oath he hath in such a solemne manner sworn by the assistance of God to his power to maintain and preserve 3. By the Lawes of this Land f the Collation of Bishopricks and g Deanries the h fruits and profits of their Lands and Revenues during their vacancies the i first fruits and yearly tenths out of all Ecclesiasticall Promotions and sundry other Privileges Profits and Emoluments arising out of the State Ecclesiasticall are established in the Crown and are a considerable part of the Revenues thereof which by the extirpation of Prelacy as it is in the Article expounded or by subsequent practice evidenced will be severed and cut off from the Crown to the great prejudice and damage thereof Whereunto as we ought not in common reason and in order to our Allegiance as Subjects yeeld our consent so having sworn expresly to maintain the Kings honour and estate and to our power to assist and defend all Jurisdictions c. belonging to His Highnesse or united and annexed to the Imperiall Crown of the Realm we cannot without manifest Perjury as we conceive consent thereunto 4. The Government of this Realm being confessedly an Empire or k Monarchy and that of a most excellent temper and constitution we understand not how it can become us to desire or endeavour the extirpation of that Government in the Church which we conceive to be incomparably of all other the most agreeable and no way prejudiciall to the state of so well a constituted Monarchy In so much as King JAMES would often say what his long experience had taught him No Bishop no King Which Aphorisme though we find in sundry Pamphlets of late yeares to have been exploded with much confidence and scorn yet we must professe to have met with very little in the proceedings of the late times to weaken our belief of it And we hope we shall be the lesse blamed for our unwillingnesse to have any actuall concurrence in the extirpating of Episcopall Government seeing of such extirpation there is no other use imaginable but either the alienation of their Revenues and Inheritances which how it can be severed from Sacrilege and Injustice we leave others to find out or to make way for the introducing of some other form of Church-Government which whatsoever it shall be will as we think prove either destructive of and inconsistent with Monarchicall Government or at least-wise more prejudiciall to the peaceable orderly and effectuall exercise thereof then a well-regulated Episcopacy can possibly be §. V. Of the other parts of the Covenant HAving insisted the more upon the two first Articles that concern Religion and the Church and wherein our selves have a more proper concernment We shall need to insist the lesse upon those that follow contenting our selves with a few the most obvious of those many great and as we conceive just exceptions that lye there against In the third Article we are not satisfied that our endeavour to preserve and defend the Kings Majesties Person and Authority is so limited as there it is by that addition In the Preservation and defence of the true Religion and Libertyes of the Kingdome Forasmuch as 1. No such limitation of our duty in that behalf is to be found either in the Oathes of Supremacy and Alleagiance which no Papist would refuse to take with such a limitation nor in the Protestation nor in the Word of God 2. Our endeavour to preserve the Rights and Privileges of Parliaments and the Libertyes of the Kingdome is required to be sworn of us in the same Article without the like or any other limitation added thereunto 3. Such limitation leaveth the duty of the Subject at so much loosenesse and the safety of the King at so great uncertainty that whensoever the People shall have a mind to withdraw their obedience they cannot want a pretence from the same for so doing 4. After we should by the very last thing we did viz. swearing with such a limitation have made our selves guilty of an actuall and reall diminution as we conceive of His Majesties just power and greatnesse the obtestation would seem very unseasonable at the least with the same breath to call the world to bear witnesse with our Consciences that we had no thoughts or intentions to diminish the same 5. The swearing with such a limitation is a Testimony of the Subjects Loyaltie to our seeming of a very strange nature which the Principles of their severall Religions salved the Conscience of a most resolure Papist or Sectary may securely swallow and the Conscience of a good Protestant cannot but strein at In the fourth Article 1. We desire it may be considered whether the imposing of the Covenant in this Article do not lay a necessity upon the Son of accusing his own Father and pursuing him to destruction in case he should be an Incendiary Malignant or other evill Instrument such as in the Article is described A course which we conceive to be contrary to Religion Nature and Humanity 2. Whether the swearing according to this Article doth not rather open a ready way to Children that are sick of the Father Husbands that are weary of their Wives c. by appealing such as stand between them and their desires of Malignancy the better to effectuate their unlawfull intentions and designes 3. Our selves having solemnly protested to maintain the Liberty of the Subject and the House of Commons having publiquely declared against the exercise of an Arbitrary Power with Order that their said Declaration

should be printed and published in all the Parish-Churches and Chappells of the Kindome there to stand and remaine as a testimony of the clearnesse of their intentions whether the subjecting of our selves and brethren by Oath unto such punishments as shall be inflicted upon us without Law or Merit at the sole pleasure of such uncertaine Judges as shall be upon any particular occasion deputed for that effect of what mean quality or abilities soever they be even to the taking away of our lives if they shall think it convenient so to doe though the degree of our offences shall not require or deserve the same be not the betraying of our Liberty in the lowest and the setting up of an Arbitrary Power in the highest degree that can be imagined The substance of the fift Article being the settling and continuance of a firm peace and union between the three Kingdomes since it is our bounden duty to desire and according to our severall places and interests by all lawfull meanes to endeavour the same we should make no scruple at all to enter into a Covenant to that purpose were it not 1. That we doe not see nor therefore can acknowledge the happinesse of such a blessed Peace between the three Kingdomes for we hope Ireland is not forgotten as in the Article is mentioned So long as Ireland is at War within it self and both the other Kingdomes engaged in that War 2. That since no peace can be firme and well-grounded that is not bottom'd upon Justice the most proper and adequate act whereof is Ius suum cuique to let every one have that which of right belongeth unto him we cannot conceive how a firm and lasting Peace can be established in these Kingdomes unlesse the respective Authority Power and Liberty of King Parliament and Subject as well every one as other be preserved full and entire according to the known Lawes and continued unquestioned customes of the severall Kingdomes in former times and before the beginning of these sad distractions In the sixth Article we are altogether unsatisfied 1. The whole Article being grounded upon a supposition which hath not yet been evidenced to us viz. that this Cause meaning thereby or else we understand it not the joyning in this Covenant of mutuall defence for the prosecuon of the late War was the cause of Religion Liberty and Peace of the Kingdomes and that it so much concerned the Glory of God and the good of the Kingdomes and the Honour of the King 2. If all the Premisses were so cleare that we durst yeeld our free assent thereunto yet were they not sufficient to warrant to our consciences what in this Article is required to be sworn of us unlesse we were as clearly satisfied concerning the lawfulnesse of the means to be used for the supporting of such a Cause For since evill may not be done that good may come thereof we cannot yet be perswaded that the Cause of Religion Liberty and Peace may be supported or the Glory of God the Good of the Kingdomes and the Honour of the King sought to be advanced by such means as to our best understandings are both improper for those Ends and destitute of all warrant from the Lawes either of God or of this Realm Lastly in the conclusion our hearts tremble to think that we should be required to pray that other Christian Churches might be encouraged by our example to joyn in the like Association and Covenant to free themselves from the Antichristian yoke c. Wherein 1. To omit that we doe not know any Antichristian yoke under which we were held in these Kingdomes and from which we owe to this either War or Covenant our freedome unlesse by the Antichristian yoke be meant Episcopall Government which we hope no man that pretendeth to Truth and Charity will affirm 2. We doe not yet see in the fruits of this Association or Covenant among our selves any thing so lovely as to invite us to desire much lesse to pray that other Christian Churches should follow our example herein 3. To pray to the purpose in the conclusion of the Covenant expressed seemeth to us all one in effect as to beseech Almighty God the God of Love and Peace 1. To take all Love and Peace out of the hearts of Christians and to set the whole Christian world in a combustion 2. To render the Reformed Religion and all Protestants odious to all the world 3. To provoke the Princes of Europe to use more severity towards those of the Reformed Religion if not for their own security to root them quite out of their severall Dominions 4. The tyrannie and yoke of Antichrist if laid upon the necks of Subjects by their lawfull Soveraigns is to be thrown off by Christian boldnes in confessing the Truth and Patient suffering for it not by taking up Arms or violent resistance of the Higher Powers §. VI Some Considerations concerning the meaning of the Covenant OUr aforesaid scruples are much strengthned by these ensuing Considerations First that whereas no Oath which is contradictory to it selfe can be taken without Perjury because the one part of every contradiction must needs be false this Covenant either indeed containeth or at leastwise which to the point of conscience is not much lesse effectuall seemeth to us to contain sundry Contradictions as namely amongst others these 1. To preserve as it is without change and yet to reforme and alter and not to preserve one and the same Reformed Religion 2. Absolutely and without exception to preserve and yet upon supposition to extirpate the self-same thing viz. the present Religion of the Church of Scotland 3. To reform Church-Government established in England and Ireland according to the Word of God and yet to extirpate that Government which we are perswaded to be according thereunto for the introducing of another whereof we are not so perswaded 4. To endeavour really the extirpation of Heresies Schismes and Profanenesse and yet withall to extirpate that Government in the Church the want of the due exercise whereof we conceive to have been one chief cause of the growth of the said evils and doe beleeve the restoring and continuance thereof would be the most proper and effectuall remedy 5. To preserve with our estates and lives the liberties of the Kingdome that is as in the Protestation is explained of the Subject and yet contrary to these liberties to submit to the imposition of this Covenant and of the Negative Oath not yet established by Law and to put our lives and estates under the arbitrary power of such as may take away both from us when they please not onely without but even against Law if they shall judge it convenient so to doe Secondly we find in the Covenant sundry expressions of dark or doubtfull construction Whereunto we cannot sweare in judgement till their sense be cleared and agreed upon As Who are the Common Enemies and which be the best Reformed Churches mentioned in the first

drawn from the Analogie of other Courts wherein the Kings Power is alwayes supposed to be virtually present under submission we conceive it is of no consequence 1. The Arguments à minore and à majore are subject to many fallacies and unlesse there be a parity of reason in every requisite respect between the things compared will not hold good A Pety Constable they say may doe something which a Justice of Peace cannot doe And the Steward of a pety Mannour hath power to adminster an Oath which as we are told the House of Commons it self hath no power to doe 2. That the high Court of Parliament is the supream Judicatory we have been told it is by vertue of the Kings right of presiding there he being g the Supream Iudge and the Members of both House his Councell Which being so the reason of difference is plaine between that and other Judicatories in sundry respects 1. The Judges in other Courts are deputed by him and doe all in his name and by his authority and therefore the presence of his power in those Courts of ministeriall Jurisdiction is sufficient his personall presence not necessary neither hath he any personall vote therein at all But in the high Court of Parliament where the King himself is the Supreme Judge judging in his own name and by his own authority his Power cannot be presumed to be really present without either the actuall presence of his person or some virtuall representation thereof signified under his great Seal 2. The Judges in inferiour Courts because they are to act all in his name and by his Authority doe therefore take Oathes of fidelity for the right exercising of Judicature in their severall places sitting there not by any proper interest of their owne but only in right of the King whose Judges they are and therefore they are called the Kings Judges and his Ministers But in the high Court of Parliament the Lords and Commons sit there in Councell with the King as Supreme Judge for the good of the whole Realm and therefore they are not called the Kings Judges but the Kings Councell and they have their severall proper rights and interests peculiar and distinct both between themselves from that of the Kings by reason whereof they become distinct h Orders or as of late times they have been stiled in this sense as we conceive i three distinct Estates Each of which being supposed to be the best Conservators of their own proper interest if the power of any one Estate should be presumed to be virtually present in the other two that Estate must needs be in inevitably liable to suffer in the proper Interests thereof Which might quickly prove destructive to the whole Kingdome The safety and prosperity of the whole consisting in the conservation of the just rights and proper interests of the maine parts viz. The King Lords and Commons inviolate and entire 3. The Judges of other Courts for as much as their power is but ministeriall and meerly Judiciall are bounded by the present Lawes and limited also by their owne Acts so as they may neither swerve from the Laws in giving Judgement nor reverse their owne Judgements after they are given But the High Court of Parliament having by reason of the Kings Supreme Power presiding therein a Power Legislative as well as Judiciall are not so limited by any earthly Power but that they may change and over-rule the Lawes and their own Acts at their pleasure The Kings Personall assent therefore is not needfull in those other Courts which are bounded by those Lawes whereunto the King hath already given his personall assent but unto any Act of Power beside beyond above or against the Lawes already established we have been informed and it seems to us very agreeable to reason that the Kings Personall Assent should be absolutely necessary Forasmuch as every such Act is the exercise of a Legislative rather then of a Judiciall power and no Act of Legislative power in any Community by consent of all Nations can be valid unlesse it be confirmed by such person or persons as the Soveraignty of that Community resideth in Which Soveraignty with us so undoubtedly resideth in the person of the King that his ordinary style runneth Our k Soveraign Lord the King And he is in the Oath of Supremacie expresly acknowledged to be the onely Supreme Governour within his Realmes And we leave it to the wisdome of others to consider what misery and mischief might come to the Kingdome if the power of any of these three Estates should be swallowed up by any one or both the other and if then under the name of a Judiciall there should be yet really exercised a Legislative power 4. Since all Judiciall Power is radically and originally in the King who is for that cause styled by the Lawes l The Fountaine of Iustice and not in any other Person or Persons but by derivation from him it seemeth to us evident that neither the Judges of inferiour Courts of ministeriall Justice nor the Lords and Commons assembled in the High Court of Parliament may of right exercise any other power over the Subjects of this Realm then such as by their respective Patents and Writs issued from the King or by the known established Laws of the Land formerly assented unto by the Kings of this Realm doth appear to have been from him derived unto them Which Lawes Patents and Writs being the exact boundary of their severall Powers it hath not yet been made appeare to our understandings either from the Lawes of the Realme or from the tenour of those Writs by which the Parliament is called that the two Houses of Parliament have any power without the King to order command or transact but with him m to treat consult and advise concerning the great affairs of the Kingdome In which respect they have sundry times in their Declarations to His Majesty called themselves by the name of His great Councell And those Lawes and Writs are as we conceive the proper Topick from which the just power of the Honourable Houses can be convincingly deduced and not such fraile Colletions as the wits of men may raise from seeming Analogies and Proportions VIII Of the Negative Oath WE are not satisfied how we can submit to the taking of the Negative Oath 1. Without forfeiture of that liberty which we have sworne and are bound to preserve With which liberty we conceive it to be inconsistent that any obligation should be laid upon the Subject by an oath not established by Act of Parliament 2 Without abjuring our a naturall Allegiance and violating the Oathes of Supremacy and Allegiance by us formerly taken By all which being bound to our power to assit the King we are by this Negative Oath required to swear from our heart not to assist him 3. Without diminution of His Majesties just Power and greatnesse contrary to the third Article of the Covenant by