Sincere and Upright accompanied with an earnest reaching after Perfection as Paul did p. 51. Answ. What ever Perfection with respect to a full Apprehension or Knowledge was prest after by Paul as Phil. 3. 12 13. yet this his Perfection granted of Sincerity and Uprightness was sinless it was pure in Nature wherein he was capable of attaining a perfect Growth in spiritual Understanding And this is implyed in his pressing after Perfection while he was perfect as appears in his own Words But if in this Sence sincere and upright Men do earnestly reach after a sinless Perfection and that Paul did so then it is attainable otherwise both Paul and the rest did â—…rnestly strive after an Impossibility and this renders both their Praying Striving and Preaching in valid as yours is who put on People earnestly to reach after Perâ—…ction and yet tell them it is not attainable Upon Mat. 5. 〈◊〉 Be ye perfect as your Heavenly Father is perfect thou presumest We intend not that we should be perfectly powerful wise and good as God is Answ. 1st We do not intend that we should be God but holy just and good men renewed after his own Image which is perfect 2ly Though not so perfectly powerful and wise as God is yet while thou withal excludes being good as God is thou art contradictory in saying the meaning of the Text is Be Merciful as your Heavenly Father is Merciful that is Love your Enemies do good to them that hate you p. 51. these are not intelligibly consistent That we must not be good as God is and yet Merciful as he is that is love our Enemies c. I would know if that Soul is not endued with the Goodness of God that is endued with his Mercy and Love so as to do good to enemies Was it not a plain Caracter of being his Children when they did so love their Enemies and do good to them that did hate them See Math. 5. 44 45. But this perfect Resemblance of the Heavenly Father such Sin-pleasers and pleaders as T. H. will not admit of in this Life who is so far from this Love and Goodness towards Enemies that his Enmity leads him to abuse bespaâ—…ter and defame such of us who never owed him or his Friends ever any ill-will in the World But when doth he expect this divine Resemblance of God or sinless Perfection to be brought forth It doth appear in Answer to the Question stated by him thus viz. Where wouldst thou be perfectly free from Sin if not in this Life His Answer is in Heaven p. 50. Reply He would be perfectly free from Sin in Heaven as he pretends but opposeth Perfection being attainable in this Life accounting that it causeth much Pride Presumption hinders all holy Fear Humility Watchfulness and industrious Endeavours to Persons in a holy Course whereas this all tends to a perfect Life But sufficiently hath he contradicted this his sinful Doctrine against a perfect Freedom where he confesses p. 24 That Christ came to carry on in the World the Design of insinite Grace and Love in being a Saviour of Sâ—…ers from Sin Death and Hell Note here he hath given a deadly Blow to his own Imperfect lame and Sinfull Cause for if Christ came into the World to save Sinners from Sin and to redeem us from all Iniquity then to be so saved is attainable in this Life for Christ is able perfectly to do the Work which he came for that is to save from Sin and to redeem from all Iniquity Again T. H. in his Forgery deals very corruptly according to his â—…onted manner in stating the Christian and the Quaker thus speaking viz. Chr. If thou canst prove a perfect Freedom from Sin 's Inherency c. remember thou must prove it by Scriptures or Instances Qua. I will prove it by both First By Scriptures Phil. 3. 15. Math. 5. 48. Secondly By Instances Many of our Friends do witness it p. 50 51. Reply Herein most falsly and abusively he hath acted the Quakers speaking his own Notorious Forgery as Prooâ—… They have no Reason to chuse him for their mouth for what needed they bring any Instances of themselves for any Proof when they are left to prove Perfection by Scriptures or Instances while the Scriptures plainly prove it And let me tell him it is not our manner of arguing with our Opposers to tell them that many of our Friends do witness Perfection knowing not only that to be the thing which they seek to reproach us by but also that to plead the Verity of Principles from the meer Credit of Persons asserting them to be no prevalent Proof nor Effect any Conviction while the Persons themselves are slited and abused But our Adversary having thus falsly acted the Quaker as before as saying many of our Friends witness Perfection he declines the Scriptures for it and falls upon personal reviling and to express to the World some wrong Expressions and Mistakes of Persons If he rightly state them which I much question because his many notorious Abuses Sect. XXII Tho. Hicks his groundless Calumny and malitious Railing against G. Whitehead NOw we come to his Railing and Slaâ—…der against G. Whitehead viz. That he is guilty of Deceit and Falshood in matter of Fact and that he told him he was a Knave that is he was a false deceitful man p. 53. Answ. Here I shall take leave to answer for my self therefore understand Reader what he pretends as his Reason for this abusive Language to me I find two things he pretends for it First He accuseth me with denying mine Opinions when charged with them 2ly He that shall give a false Relation of what another man asserts and does it wifully is false and Deceitful But thâ—…s he accuseth me and why so But because I acknowledged Explicatioâ—…s to be given to his Propositions yet gives not the least him what tâ—…ose Explications were p. 53. Reply To the first what I did deny I still do deny as none of my Opinions as stated by T. H. in his accusing the Quakers That they deny the Person of Christ his Offices Satiâ—…action and the Râ—…surrection of the Body I do recharge these upon him as his Lyes and Slanders forged and brought forth in Envy and Darkness as I did in the Paper and publick Debate between us and in so doing I do not deny any Opinion or Tenent of mine or my Friends And he dealt most dis-ingenuously in not laying down my own Words to prove that I denyed the Person of Christ or his Offices Satisfaction and the Resurrection But instead thereof was it either ingenuous or honest to bring my â—…dversary T. D. his Pamphlet stiled a Sinopsis which falsly accuseth me with saying there is no Resurrection from the Dead for Proof Most falsly instancing my Answer to W. Burnet in which Answer quite contrary to what I am accused oâ—… I have given a plain Confession to the man Christ his Offices Satisfaction and the Resurrection
proved of no Force The Type and Anti-type in some respect may be at one and the same Time This is proved by plenty of Scripture Our Adversaries Opposition and Cavil weak and insuccessful pag. 94. CHAP. XX. The fourth Part of the Objection stated and considered Christ ' s Death and Sufferings confossed to and respected They were Beneficial The Light of Christ within is the efficient Cause to Salvation pag. 99. CHAP. XXI A Confession in particular to Christ ' s Redemption Remission Justification and Salvation pag. 104. CHAP. XXII That Christ is the Light or the Light is Christ proved from Scripture and so concluded notwitstanding two Objections which are fully answer'd pag. 114. CHAP. XXIII The Universality of the Light proved by Reason pag. 120. CHAP. XXIV The Sufficiency of the Light proved by Reason pag. 122. CHAP. XXV The Question Who He or They are that obey the Light c consider'd and answered being a Character of 〈◊〉 true Quaker pag. 124. CHAP. XXVI The Discourse hithero summed up and concluded with an Exhortation to all Professors of Religion especially our Oppâ—…sers pag. 128. APPENDIX Of the Rule of Faith and Life pag. 135. Of the Judge of Controversie pag. 155. Thâ—… Conclusion pag. 160. THE CONTENTS OF THE Second Part Entituled The CHRISTIAN-QUAKER and his Divine Testimony Vindicated Which consists of several Treatises The Contents of the First Treatise To the Unprejudieâ—…d Reader an Epistle from pag. 3. to pag. 9. Some of the Doctrines and Contradictions of T. Hicks declared at a Discourse between him and some of the Quakers so 〈◊〉 in Aldermanbury London the 20th of the 3d Moneth 1672. p. 10 11. Christ's Light Within asserted as it is Divine and therefore a sufficient Rule of Life unto Salvation to all that truly obey it and vindicated from Tho. Hicks ' s dark Exceptions fallacious and Impious Arguments consisting of manifest Ignorance Confusion and Ranterism which are here inserted as they were exhibited in a Paper afterwards owned and signed by him from p. 13. to p. 23. Section 1. In Answer to his Dialogue The Light within proved Divine and Saving c. p. 24. § 2. The Life which is the Light of Men not a Creature or meer Effect c. p. 27. § 3. The Baptist ' s Quarrel grounded on his Mistakes about the Light and our Testimony of it p. 29. § 4. Christ guideth to Salvation by his Inward Light and the Baptist Confounded in his Opposing it p. 31. § 5. The Dipper proved a Blind Guidâ—… and in gross Confusion in undervaluing the Light Within p. 32. § 6. His Ignorance of the Divine Principle p. 34. § 7. His Madness and Self-Contradiction about the Light p. 35. § 8. Christ as the Rock of Ages and the Intent of his Coming in the Flesh not known to the Baptists while they Oppose his Light Within p. 37. § 9. The Dipper plunged in a Labyriâ—…th of Self-Contradictions and the Light within proved a Rule above the Scriptures p. 39. Sect. 10. The Subject Understanding and Obeying the Light Within unknown to the Cavilling Baptist pag. 41. § 11. Concerning the Soul of Man as under divers Considerations and States and G. Fox ' s words so considered with Eight Queries added from pag. 43. to pag. 47. § 12. The Neck of the Baptist ' s Cause broken by his own Concession to the Light Within in which Christ and his Testimonies are effectually received p. 47. § 13. The Baptist's impious Forgery upon the Quakers about the Scriptures which are in reallity owned and used by them p. 49. § 14. His impious Abuse about Revelation Light Within Scriptures c. from p. 50. to p. 56. § 15. His partial Relation against John Story p. 59. § 16. The Baptist ' s Dispargement of the Light within contrary to his own Pretence p. 61 62 63 64. § 17. His Slander about the Person Offices Sufferings and Blood of Christ and continued Abuse of the Light Within p. 65 66 67 68. § 18. The Baptist ' s Quarrel against S. Crisp removed p. 69 70 71 72. § 19. The End of Christ's Coming Example and Suffering more truly owned by the Quaker then the Dipper p. 73. § 20. The Baptist ' s Ignorance and Cavil about Redemption and the spiritual Discoveries of Christ and his Seed p. 74 75 76. § 21. The Baptist ' s imperfect Work against Perfection p. 77 78 79 80. § 22. Thomas Hicks ' s groundless Calumny and malicious Railing against George Whitehead p. 81 82 83 84. § 23. The Baptist ' s Abuse against G. W. about a Meeting with them at Devonshire-House London p. 85 86. The Contents of the Second Treatise entituled LIGHT SPRUNG UP in the Despised Quaker c. are inserted next after the Title before page 87. The Contents of the Third Treatise entituled THE ANGRY ANABAPTIST proved Babylonish follow after the Title before pag. 121. The Contents of a Bill of Excommunication exhibited by the Baptists at Chichester together with a brief Answer thereunto from pag. 159. to pag. 166. Some Confessions concerning the Baptized Churches made by their own Messengers in their Bewailing Epistle from Tiverton from p. 167. to p. 170. The Fourth Treatise THE PRESBYTER's ANTIDOTE TRYED in Answer to Stephen Scandret The Contents Chap. I. A comprehensive Account concerning the Rule the Light and Scripture explaining both Our Sense of the Terms and Stephen Scandrets Together with the Assembly ' s Confession about the Scriptures from p. 173 to p. 180. Stephen Scandret ' s Sense about the Points in Controversie examined p. 181 182 183 184 185. Chap. II. About JUSTIFICATION and IMPUTATION from p. 185. to p. 209. Chap. III. About Christ's Justifying Righteousness the best Robe the Necessity of its Inherence or being inwardly enjoyed not to invalidate but to fulfil the blessed Intents and Ends of his Suffering in Reply to S. S. from p. 210. to p. 224. Chap. IV. Of SATISFACTION some serious Considerations farther opening the Doctrine and Sense of our Opposers from p. 225. to p. 238. An Appendix wherein the Controversie is summ'd up and resolv'd partly by way of Question and Answer with a plain Intimation of my Sense thereof as relating to the second third and fourth Chapters before fromp 239 to p. 249. The Difference between our Opposer's Gospel and OUR's briefly stated p. 250 251. Chap. V. Concerning ELECTION and REPROBATION from p. 252. to p. 290. The Contents thereof follow A brief Introduction with the Assembly ' s Opinion and Stephen Scandret ' s uncertain Proposition for it p. 253. Section 1. His Abuse of divers Scriptures in his State of the Case sor a Personal Election answer'd the Way of Goa's Choosiag resolv'd p. 255. § 2. The Weakness of his two first Arguments touching Gods Decree and Promises p. 257. § 3. His gross Ignorance of those Names written in the Lamb's Book Arg. 3. His Impertinency and ignorant Allegation and Misunderstanding of divers Scriptures concerning God's Choice and Ordination
and the Cause of men's Destruction opened against Arg. 4. Persons being chosen proves not their Eternal Election as Persons p. 260. § 4. Concerning Jacob and Esau Christ's Sheep those that come â—…ome drawn and given unto him of the Father Arg. 5 6. p. 262. § 5. Election explained God's Loving Jacob and hating Esau their Posterities concerned therein and how far the two Births were figured in Jacob and Esau p. 265. § 6. Our Opposer's blasphemously placing a partial Resolution upon God as creating Persons with Intention to leave them to Destruction contrary to his universal Call and Tend rs of Salvation p. 268. § 7. The Unchangeableness of God's Election in what State and our Opposer's Ignorance and Error concerning God's Purpose p. 269. § 8. My Unanswered Objection of setting Life and Death before men and Warning them of Destruction p. 271. § 9. The Cause of God's Hardening Pharaoh Judas and others not grounded upon meer Will and Pleasure but for their Rebellion p. 272. § 10. Touching the Fall of particular Angels and Men the Tendence of God's Long-suffering towards the Wicked and my Opposer's Confession to Truth to the utter Overthrow of his Opinion p. 273. § 11. Presbyters Mockery in their Warnings and setting Life and Death Conditional Promises and Threats before People contrary to their Partial Opinion of an Eternal Personal Election and Reprobation png. 275. Sect. 12. The sad Consequence of their Accusing God with decreeing to deny Saving Grace to particular Persons yea to the greater part of Mankind shewing that Divine Justice it self hath not so decreed pag. 277. § 13. Grace differing from Debt The Reason why God finds Fault with Men The Question Who hath resisted his Will resolved p. 278. § 14. Their urging all to forsake Sin contradictory to their Opinion and not in true Faith Their flattering many with fair Pretences contrary to their own Intentions The poor Encouragement and cold Comfort that their Doctrine of a Personal Reprobation yields to the greatest part of Mankind p. 279. § 15. The Wise God the Just Judge is the Ordainer of the Punishment not of the Fact nor the Author of Sin or their Wickedness who persecuted Christ p. 281. § 16. Hypocritical Priests making and strengthening Hypocrites by deceitfully daubing them up in their Sins and flattering them with a YOU ARE NOT FALLEN FROM GRACE while they are guilty of gross VVickedness p. 283. § 17. Concerning God's Covenant with David and his Seed and the Mystery typified in him p. 284. To all which is added a Short Postscript concerning the WILL of God in its Manifestation 1st as Unresistible 2dly as Resistible p. 286 287 288 289. Chap. VI. VVhether PERFECTION that is a State freed from all Sin be attainable in this Life from p. 290. to p. 312. The Fifth Treatise about the RESURRECTION beginning at pag. 315. to the end of the Book The RESURRECTION owned by us and Scripturally asserted with the Future and distinct Beings of Men Angels and the Eternal Advantage Glory Felicity of the Righteous or Saints after Dissolution The Scriptures spiritual Teftimony thereof being owned and vindicated by us in Opposition to our OPPOSER ' s CARNAL THOUGHTS about the Resurrection and future State particularly in Answer to Tho. Hicks W. Burnet and Thomas Danson Unto which is annexed Thomas Vincent ' s Illustrations about the Resurrection as partly an Explication of the Sense of the rest of our Opposers therein Finally Some Passages of Hen. Moor ' s for the SPIRITUALITY of the Resurrection-Bodies viz. the Body of Christ and the Bodies of Saints The Intent of all this Fifth Treatise being both to remove Groundless Objections Unnecessary Questions and Fruitless Disputes about this Weighty and Mysterious Point of the Resurrection THE CHRISTIAN-QUAKER And his DIVINE TESTIMONY VINDICATED c. Viz. The Universality Sufficiency of Christ's LIGHT WITHIN through all Ages to Eternal SALVATION fully Stated and Defended CHAP. I. The Occasion of the Discourse The Unhandsome Dealing of our Adversary with Respect to the Invented Weakness he chargeth upon the Quakers as the Strength of their Cause THere is a Book lately come to my Hands intituled A Dialogue between a Christian and a Quaker which with several others lately publisht against us hath given Occasion for this general Undertaking I was very curious to peruse that Discourse which should make a Difference between them having in my diligent Search after Religion ever desired to understand and profess That which upon true Convictions I had Reason to believe was the most Christian But as upon Impartial View I found the Weakness of that Book more favourable to us then the Uncharitableness of the Title-Page which seem'd to dis interest a Quaker in Christianity so most unexpectedly I found my Name among others often us'd and as often undeservedly abus'd by the Author I was not willing that any else should answer for my Faults if any there were and if Innocent I esteem'd my self both sufficient and oblig'd to my own Relief which will not be hard to do and the Reason is because so little Reason and so much Railing have been by him imploy'd against me as if he intended to scold rather then confute me and to let the World know how much better skill'd He is in Scurrility then Argument This I confess drew me first into any Willingness of considering his Discourse at large Not that the Truth was not first in mine Eye but because I know the Person most concern'd with him to be both able and resolv'd to reply I thought my Endeavors at least for this time might have been very well excused But so many Out-cries coming upon the Neck of another if possible to expel us the World I found my self press'd in Spirit to buckle my Mind to this Enterprise notwithstanding that my late Concernment with some other Adversaries had left the Wearisomness of a Combat upon my Spirit and the Hopes I had of being spared by the ingenuous Acknowledgment of our Enemies from the like Necessity of further Controversie But as it fell out with the People of Syracuse that several very Bad Tyrants were succeded by Worse so truly it hath done with us The Confutation of one Adversary redoubling Envy Prejudice and almost every evil Quality in the next as if to be overcome were more intollerable to them then to find the TRUTH by it would be Acceptable Oh Lamentable Use that these Men make of our Love and Pains But we have some Cause to think that failing of that Reason which is necessary to prop so infirm a Cause they would if possible supply the Want of it with the LAST WORD which at Billings Gate I hear goeth a Great Way to Advantage and turn the Scale in all Disputes And truly if the Temper of this Adversary be but consider'd with what Help he himself has given us to do it For my part I should stand amaz'd that any Sober Civil or Christian Man could refrain passing
their Weakness that he might both keep them from gadding after the Pompous Invention and Idolatrous Worship of other Nations and point out unto them under their great Carnality that more Hidden Glory and Spiritual Dispensation which should-afterwards be revealed to wit The Compleat Redemption of the Soul and Raign of the Holy Seed from the Child born and the Son given to the Wonderful Counsellor the Mighty God the Everlasting Father and Prince of Peace of the Increase of whose Government there shall be no End So that then we ought and we do by absolute Force of Truth conclude 1. That the Seed which Seed is Christ was in all Ages with Abraham with the Israelites with the Prophets Therefore he was as well before he came in that prepared Body as then and since 2. Yet it is confest That He was not so clearly revealed perfectly brought forth and generally known before his so Coming as then and since but more darkly figured out by Types and Shaddowy Services which though they Cleans'd not Sav'd not Redeem'd not yet did show forth a more Hidden and Spiritual Substance that was able to Cleanse Save and Redeem and did all that received it and were truly subject to it 3. That it therefore is not at all Absurd that the more Excellent Manifestation of Truth should he Typified and Prophesied of under the Enjoyment of the Lesser since the Reason of the Thing and the Testimonies of the Scripture are so express for it which ends our Answer to this Particular CHAP. XX. The Fourth Part of the Objection stated and considered Christ's Death and Sufferings confessed to and respected they were beneficial The Light of Christ within is the Efficient Cause to Salvation HAving thus considered the Third Part of this great Objection I am now come to what chiefly stumbles People with respect to the Light within at least as I apprehend and that is this Fourth and Last Particular viz. But if the Light in every Man be Christ how doth it bear our Sins and are our Iniquities laid upon it and how can we be said to be Justified Redeemed or Saved by its Blood since all these things are spoken by the Holy Pen-men of the Man Christ or Jesus born at Nazareth Surely you wholy invalidate his Life Death Resurrection Ascension and Mediation by this Belief in the Light This I take to be the very Stress of the Matter collected out of the most Forceable Writings of our Adversaries To which I Answer and let him that reads understand It must be considered in this Last Part of the Objection how those Questions can be applicable to the Light and yet be reconciliable with those Scriptures that seem to attribute all to his Bodily Sufferings I hope to make appear that as we exalt the First so we dare not by any means to slight the Last The Light or rather He that is Light in Man for I have alwayes desired so to be understood Light being a Metaphor or word taken from the outward Day and chiefly so term'd because of Man's Darkness which is thereby discovered hath been as a Lamb slain since the Foundation of the World that is the World had not been long created before the good Order of it and every thing therein being envied by the Fallen Angels that Spirit of Iniquity betrayed Man of his Innocency and Sin by Disobedience prevailing the Light or Principle of Life under whose Holy Leadings Man was placed became Resisted Grieved and as it were Slain which word Slain is also Metaphorical that is to say the Innocent Pure Life was as Wounded unto Death through Man's Disobedience and Lamb-like Image in which Adam was created by him through Rebellion lost Thus that Holy Principle which God placed in the Heart of Adam in which was true Light Life and Power bore the Sin was prest under it as a Cart under Sheaves grieved exceedingly and as it were quencht with Iniquity This hath been the Condition of that Precious and Elect Seed Spirit Light Life Truth or whatever Name equivalent any may please to give it ever since that first Rebellion to this very Day And as in Wicked Men God's Holy Light and Spirit or that Principle which is so called hath been deeply Wounded yea as one Slain so in Good Men that have had a Sence of the World's Abomination hath it also born many Burdens and Weights for the Light and Life is One in All. And those who have been reformed by it and joyned to it have been as One Spirit and have not been without their Share of their Lord 's heavy Sufferings from the Ungodly World which was as well a filling up of Christ's Sufferings that were before his Outward Coming as what to this Generation are behind And as at any time Disobedient Men have harkened to the still Voice of the WORD that Messenger of God in their Hearts to be affected and convinced by it as it brings Reproof for Sin which is but a Fatherly Chastizement â—…o upon true Brokenness of Soul and Contrition of Spirit that very same Principle and Word of Life in Man has mediated and attoned and God has been propitious lifting up the Light of his Countenance and replenishing such humble 〈◊〉 with Divine Consolations So that still the same Christ Word-God who has enlightned all Men by Sin is grieved bearing the Iniquities of such as so sin and reject his Benefits but as any hear his Knocks and let him in he first Wounds and then Heals afterwards he attones mediates and re-instates in the holy Image Behold this is the State of Restitution And this in some Measure was witnessed by the Holy Patriarchs Prophets and Servants of God in old time to whom Christ was substantially the same Saviour and Seed bruising the Serpent's Head that he is now to us what Difference sâ—…ever there may be in Point oâ—… Manifestation But notwithstanding the same Light and Life with that which afterwards clothed it it self with that outward Body did in measure inwardly appear for the Salvation of the Souls of Men yet as have often said never did that Liâ—…â—…eminently put â—…orth it self for that End as in that 〈◊〉 and prepared Body so that what he then suffered and did in that transcendent Manisestation may by way of Eminency assume the whole Work unto it self that he ever did before or might do afterwards For doubtless that very Light Life and Power which dwelt in that Fleshâ—…y Tabernacle eminently was the Convincer Condemner Saviour and Redeemer yet not only as confined to that Body but as revealed in the Hearts of Men as he was in Paul who not consulting with Flesh and Blood against the Lord of Glory willingly receive him in to bind the strong Man spoil his Goods and cast him out that He might Reign And that the Divine Life Light Spirit Nature of Principle which resided in that Body was the efficient Cause of Salvation observe the Title that is given from the great Work he was to
not that a little degree of the Light Vertue and Knowledge thereof is not saving or sanctifying A small Stream can wash and a little Fire kindle and increase to more and a little convenient Food nourish and satisfie and a little Water quench one's Thirst or a small Seed grow and bring forth great Increase and so a little Light from Christ can increase and shine more and more till it discover the Glory of God in the Face of Jesus Christ the anointed these things are truely known in the Mystery through true Obedience to so much Light or Illumination as God hath given man for he the Glorious Creator hath given a Light to all men sufficient to save or else they could not be left without Excuse but it would reflect upon him for condemning them for Sin if he did not afford them a Light sufficient to guide out of Sin unto Salvation But for our asserting the Light of Christ that is in every Man to be convincing sanctifying and saving H. G. concludes as followeth p. 5. III. The Effect of Christ's Sufferings only known in his Light within H. G. IN this appears your great Darkness and herein you are beguiled and cheated by the Devil to the invalidating of the Meritorious Death and Sufferings of our Lord as if there were no need of his Blood to be poured forth nor of his Intercession p. 5. Answ. Can either Christ's Light within or our following of it invalidate or make void his Sufferings without Or deprive us of the End thereof or of the Vertue of his Blood When they that crucified murthered Christ were turned from his Light within Or can any receive the Benefit of Christ's Sufferings and Blood without or out of his Light within Or are the Sufferings and Death of Christ absolutely meritorious for Man's Justification without any Dependance upon his Light within If so how can any be deprived of Justification for whom Christ dyed Which was for all Men but what Proof hath he from Scripture That the shedding Christ's Blood was the Meritorious Cause of Justification Seeing it was shed by wicked Hands and surely had the Jews and Gentiles obeyed and walked in that holy and just Light that was in them they had not crucified nor murthered the just One the Son of God whose giving up to the Death of the Cross though of Necessity yet it was occasioned because of Sin and Death that was come over all which man must only be convinced and truely sensible of by the Light of Christ within and it s such only as walk in his Light who come to know the Blood of Christ to cleanse them from all Sin And there is a certain Congruity and Oneness in being sanctified redeemed and saved by his Life Light Blood Power Arm Ingrafted Word Spirit Fire Water or by Grace these do not oppose Christ as Saviour he being in all the great Workman of God through whom God hath saved us by the washing of Regeneration and renewing of the holy Ghost Titus 3. 4 5. These being one in Substance with him and of himself as the Spirit the Water and the Blood agree in one And as his offering up himself being a Propitiation for the Sins of the whole World pouring out his Soul to Death and making Intercession for the Transgressors was by the Eternal Spirit so the blessed Effects thereof are spiritually and inwardly received by them that obey and walk in the Light of his Spirit wherein his Life and Vertue of the Blood of the Covenant is received unto Cleansing Sanctification and Reconciliation with God The great Sufferings Burthens and Afflictions of Christ were occasioned by man's Sin Disobedience and turning from his Life and Light within and this brought Darkness and Death over Man-kind and therefore Christ deeply travelled in the Spirit of Prayer and Intercession through all his Sufferings to bring forth his own Life and Light for man's Deliverance out of Death and Darkness that he might see his Seed and the Travel of his Soul and be satisfied And this is the Seed that shall serve him throughout all Ages which shall be counted unto the Lord for a Generation and this serves him in his Light and worships him in Spirit therefore they that oppose this Light of Christ to the End of Christ's Coming Death Sufferings Blood or Intercession as if his Light in Man did invalidate these they are darkned and cheated by the Devil and not these who obey Christ's Light within for Life and Savation in him IV. The saving Work of the Spirit HEnry Grigg observes from John 16. 7. That the Spirit or blessed Comforter cannot be the Saviour pag. 46. H. G. Contradiction Till the Coming of his Spirit and Grace with Power in my Heart for the binding of the strong man Satan and killing my Corruptions my Soul was not brought out of the horrible Pit p. 16. having wrought this glorious Work of Regeneration p. 17. G. W. his Animadversion Then it s the Spirit and Power of Christ that effects Salvation through the Work of Regeneration Tit. 3. 5. which is not meerly by Christ's outward Sufferings though we cannot believe that Satan is bound in this Man while he is in Satan's Work blaspheming Christ's Light within and belying us H. G. replyes What sober Christian Man can find any Contradiction here against H. G Is not G. W. the Lyar and false Accuser I say the Spirit or blessed Comforter cannot be the Saviour or Mediator p. 6. G. W. Answer The Contradiction is very obvious to say the Spirit cannot be the Saviour when it can save the Soul out of the horrible Pit can it save and not be a Saviour Or can it bind the strong Man or kill man's Corruptions and yet not save him And if the Father the Word and the holy Spirit be God cannot God be the Saviour When as Christ's being the Author of Faith giving Power to others to become the Sons of God is a Proof of his being God Light from the Sun p. 91. And Christ said The Son can do nothing of himself c. The Father that dwelleth in me he doth the Works Joh. 5. 19. 30. and 8. 28. and 14. 10. And the holy Spirit where received also maketh Intercession according to the Will of God and by this Spirit Christ prayed unto the Father but to say the Spirit or blessed Comforter cannot be the Saviour is also to deny Christ in his spiritual Appearance to be a Saviour and so to confine the saving Work to him only as man or in the Flesh without or separate from us whereas he said I will not leave you comfortless I will come to you John 14. 18. which plainly denotes him to be the Comforter in that Spiritual Appearance wherein he that was with them promised to be in them and as revealed in them his Appearance was another or diverse to his outward Appearance in the Flesh whereas H. G. saith Are there not three that bear Record in
with the Assemblies Opinion and Stephen Scandret's uncertain Proposition for it His Abuse of divers Scriptures in his State of the Case for a personal Election answered and the Way of God's â—…hoosing resolved The Weakness of his two first Arguments touching God's Decree and Promises His gross Ignorance of those Names written in the Lamb's Book Arg. 3. His Impertinency and ignorant Allegation and mis-understanding of divers Scriptures concerning God's Choice and Ordination and the Cause of Mens Destruction opened against Argum. 4. Persons being chosen proves not their Eternal Election as Persons Concerning Jacob and Esau Christ's Sheep those that come are drawn and given unto him of the Father Arg. 5 6. Election explained God's loving Jacob and hating Esau their Posterities concerned therein And how far the two Births were figured in Jacob and Esau. Our Opposers blasphemously placing a partial Resolution upon God as creating Persons with Intention to leave them to Destruction contrary to his universal Call and Tenders of Salvation The Unchangeableness of God's Election in what State and our Opposers Ignorance and Error concerning God's Purpose My unanswered Objection of setting Life and Death before Men and warning them of Destruction The Cause of God's hardning Pharoah Judas and others not grounded upon meer Will and Pleasure but for their Rebellion Touching the Fall of particular Angels and Men the Tendence of God's long-Suffering towards the Wickeâ—… and my Opposer's Confession to Truth to the â—…tter Overthrow of his Opinion Presbyterians Mâ—…ckery in their Warnings setting Life Death conditional Promises and Threats before People contrary to their partial Opinion of an eternal personal Election and Reprobation The sad Consequence of their accusing God with decreeing to deny saving Grace to particular Persons yea to the greater Part of Mankind shewing that divine Justice it self hath not so decreed Grace differing from Debt The Reason why God finds Fault with Men. The Question Who hath resisted his Will resolved Their urging all to for sake Sin contradictory to their Opinion and not in true Eaith Their Flattering many with fair Pretences contrary to their own Intentions the poor Encouragement and cold Comfort that their Doctrine of a personal Reprobation yields to the greatest Part of Mankind The wise God the just Judge is the Ordeiner of the Punishment not of the Fact nor the Author of Sin or their Wickedness who persecuted Christ. Hypocritical Priests making and strengthning Hypocrites by deceitfully daubing them up in their Sins and flattering them with a You are not fallen from Grace while they are guilty of gross Wickedness Concerning God's Convenant with David and his Seed and the Mystery typified in him To all which is added a short Postscript A Brief Introduction TO The following Discourse concerning Election and Reprobation STephen Scandret begins with an absolute false Charge against me as Depraving God's Truth whenas according to plain Scripture without any Depravation thereof I examined their partial and graceless Opinion as their making God the Ordeiner of whatsoever comes to pass both as to the States and Ends of Men and their placing his Decree thereof from all Eternity upon particular Persons and noâ—… upon the two Seeds and Conditions wherein Election and Reprobation do originally consist which in time extends to Persons only as related to the good or evil Seed and not from a partial absolute and meer voluntary Decree and Design to particular Persons as their narrow and silly Opinion imports which I opposed and that from the Scriptures of Truth testifying 1. God's Good-Will and Grace to Mankind in general 2. The real Causes on their Parts of his Severity towards them and their Reprobation I â—…aid down the Presbyterian Principle and Opinion as it may be seen in their Confession and Catechism agreed upon by their Assembly of Divines so called at Westminster and approved by the general Assembly of the Kirk of Scotland as where they say in their 3d Chapter That God from all Eternity did by the most wise and holy Counsel of his own Will freely and unchangeably ordain whatsoever comes to pass And that by the Decree of God for the Manifestation of his Glory some Men and Angels are predestinated unto everlasting Life and others fore-ordained unto everlasting Death and that these Angels and Men thus predestinated and fore-ordeined are particularly and unchangeably designed their Number so certain and definite that it cannot be either encreased or diminished c. And also upon the same Principle they add in their tenth Chapter That all those whom God hath predestinated unto Life and those only he is pleased effectually to call by his Word and Spirit out of the State of Sin and Death in which they are by Nature to Grace and Salvation by Jesus Christ enlightning their Minds spiritually and savingly to understand the things of God c. And in their eleaventh Chapter God did from all Eternity decree to justifie all the Elected and Christ did in the Fulness of time dye for their Sins and rise again for their Justification The Consequence of this Doctrine with a plain and scriptural Answer and Confutation are laid down in the latter End of our Book entituled The Glory of Christ's Light within expelling Darkness which Book yet remains unanswered by S. S. both as to this and other Heads wherein he and his Brethren are concerned though now in order to vindicate this Doctrine he layes down the Proposition thus S. Scandret That God did most freely and unchangeably and from all Eternity choose some particular Persons to partake of saving Grace c. from whence it will necessarily follow That he hath reprobated or passed by others I must manifest this by Parts Answ. In Opposition to this Partiality unjustly charged upon God I must assert this Proposition That God's eternal Election stands originally in his own Seed of Promise and free Grace thereby freely tendered to all Mankind both Jews and Gentiles and all Men in the first place left free for a Share therein and none are reprobated but who first reject this Grace and like not to retain God in their Knowledge his words that he hath reprobated or passed by others are very doubtful being as much as to say that either God hath from all Eternity reprobated particular Persons or left them to Reprobate themselves It is then either God's Act or the Creatures which as appears this Man's Masters the pretended Divines could not resolve and we do not expect him to be a more proâ—…ound Divine then his Tutors However their Opinion at least reflects upon God as passiâ—…g by the greater part of Mankind without aâ—…ording them any Saving Grace or the least Spiritual Assistance of Divine Light or Life so as if he thus takes no notice of them at all but passeth by them they must inevitably be left to Destruction and eternal Misery by this Graceless and Uncharitable Opinion which tends greatly to â—…cclipse the Glory of