Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	death_n	sin_n	suffer_v	2,561	5	6.6311	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A53583	Man wholly mortal, or, A treatise wherein 'tis proved, both theologically and philosophically, that as whole man sinned, so whole man died ... with doubts and objections answered and resolved, both by Scripture and reason ... : also, divers other mysteries, as of heaven, hell, the extent of the resurrection, the new-creation, &c. opened, and presented to the trial of better judgment. / by R.O.; Mans mortallitie	Overton, Richard, fl. 1646.; Overton, Robert, ca. 1609-ca. 1668.	1675 (1675)	Wing O629C; Wing O640_CANCELLED; ESTC R11918	46,615	138

shall be burnt up with fire 2 Pet. 3.10 Therefore whole Man is corruptable for as in Adam all dye 1 Cor. 15.22 even so in Christ shall all be made alive what fell in Adam shall be raised by Christ what was mortalized by the earthly Man shall be immortalized by the Heavenly man wherefore All not a part of Man was mortalized by Adam or else onely the fallen part must be redeemed and not the whole man for no more of man then fell was redeemed and if the body onely fell and his formal part his soul continued immortal then that part of man his body onely was purchased not his constitutive or better part his Soul So that the bodies onely of the Reprobate according to this fancy shall be damned for nothing of Adam but what fell of Adam can be made lyable to condemnation and what of him stood shall stand as well as the Angels that never fell But in Christ we are compleat Col. 2.10 Therefore in Adam totally fallen Further If Adams fall was not a compleat change of his whole manhood from immortality to absolute mortality of the whole then in the day that he did eate the forbidden Fruit he did not surely die for He implyes his Man-hood and my very Opposites confess the Soul the very Essence and Being of Man-hood and in the day and surely dye imply Execution as well as Transgression to be then for both have equally relation to the Day In the Day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely dye so as well may we say he did not eate as did not die That Day And if nothing dyed that is became mortal but his Body then that dyed his Soul lived that is must be as it was at first before God breathed life into it that is a dead corps and indeed was never other if the Soul were a distinct Being of self and all life in it self and the Body but an Instrument to it whereby it performeth all motion and action as Nemesius on Mans Nature p. 266. with others maintain And thus it must needs follow that this death threatned was a meer Scar-crow even nothing at all for He that is his constitutive part his Soul continued immortal and unchanged and used his body instrumentally as it did before the Transgression And if it be answered It became sinful and subject to sin and so of final Condemnation in Hell at the length I Reply That before he sinned he was subject to sin or else he could not have sinned for quicquid est in actu prius fuit in potentia and if the wages of sin be death then he must be of necessity subject to death the effect as well as sin the cause at the same time And so consequently the Souls possibilty of sinning being producted into Actual sin the Soul must have its wages Actual mortality Further if the Souls Death be onely that of Hell so then principal or efficient cause deepest in the Transgression was less punished then the instrument the Body being but the Souls instrument whereby it acts and moves as if a Magistrate should hang the Hatchet and spare the Man that beat a mans brains out with it and so the Soul suffer the last death and scape the first which is as preposterous as if this Death should be received before this Life Moreover Condemnation in Hell is not properly but remotely the reward of Adams Fall For properly Condemnation is the wages of Infidelity or unbeliefe in Christ as Salvation is of Beliefe So that none can be condemned into Hell but such as are actually guilty of refusing Christ because immortality or the Resurrection cannot be by Propagation or Succession as mortality from Adam to his Issue and so the Child though temporally yet shall it not eternally be punished for his Fathers sin but his Condemnation shall be of himself If the Soul as they say be the very life or have all life in it self and the body but its instrument then the body now hath no more life in it then when it is reduced to the earth but is as dead as a dore-naile And so at the Resurrection cannot be raised from death for that which never had life cannot be raised from death and the union of it to the Soul at the Resurrection they Fabulate on is but an addition of corpulency or gross matter to the Soul which in truth is no Resurrection at all from the dead no more then the restoration of flesh lost by Famine sickness c. For Resurrection from the death is not the addition of gross matter to life but the Restoration of life from death So that the restitution of lost flesh now to the soul is in quality as much a Resurrection from the dead as the addition of the whole body to the soul at the Last day which is to say with the Sadduces there is no Resurrection from the dead But the Soularies I know are loth to be branded for Sadduces which how they will avoid I cannot see for if the soul live separated from the body the body cannot be raised from the dead except the body had a life of its own differing from that of the soul and so a man must have two lives as they say a Cat hath nine the one mortal the other immortal and at the Resurrection have two immortalities If the soul be of a distinct being from the body and sinned as the body and thereby incurred the condemnation of Hell then must the soul have a particular redemption from thence as the body from the grave or else it must perish there for ever And if Christ redeemed us from thence then he must suffer the same eternal Torments that is the worme of conscience despaire everlasting chains of darkness c. But those he never suffered as witnesseth Doctor Ames to Bellarmine Ergo. If you urge that in his agony and sweating of blood he suffered equally with the Torments and therefore might be said to suffer eternal toments though he was never personally in hell then may we as well say that by his agony c. he suffered paine equivalent to death and therefore might be said to have suffered the death of the grave though personally he had never been in the grave for there is a greater equivalency betwixt those sufferings and the grave then betwixt his sweating of blood and the torments of the damned Spirits in hell CHAP. III. Scriptures to prove this Mortality JOb 3.12 13 16. Why did the knees prevent me or why the breasts that I should sucke for now I should have lien still and been quiet I should have s●ept then had I been at rest Or as a hidden untimely birth marke I had not been as an Infant that never saw light Job 4.19 21. How much less on them that dwell in Houses of clay whose Foundation is in the Dust which are crushed before the moth Doth not their excellency which is in them goe away they die even without Wisedome