Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n death_n sin_n suffer_v 2,561 5 6.6311 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A16898 A letter apologeticall of George Brisse Lord of Desgrutieres wherein are set downe the reasons that moued him to turne to the reformed. / Written to Monsieur Touraine, Aduocate in the Court of Parliament of Bretany. A worke very profitable for those to reade that desire to know the grounds of their religion. Translated out of French.; Lettre apologétique de George Brisset, Sr Desgrustières. English. Brisset, Georges.; Tauraine, Monsieur. 1616 (1616) STC 3792; ESTC S119305 8,697 22

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

with our Priests making GOD and that they sold GOD for a little mony in priuat Masses and that if IESVS CHRIST be in the Hoast he which steales away the Hoast must necessarily steale away IESVS CHRIST They also in way of mockage told vs that our greatest Doctours held that the body of CHRIST might be carried away by Mice which would make any mans haire to stand an end that hath in a deare esteeme the honour of IESVS CHRIST our blessed Sauiour the eternall Sonne of GOD. Moreouer to affirme that CHRISTS body is in so many places and that it is in euery crum of the bread is not agreeable to the Ghospell which giues him a body like to ours that he might be our brother They who alledge that his body is now glorified doe not consider that when hee made this Sacrament his body was yet infirme and not glorified Further his glorification hath not changed his humane nature but hath onely taken away the infirmities of it There is also another inconuenience in the Roman Church which draue mee from it which is that whereas Saint Paul in the 10. Chap. to the Hebrewes saith that wee are sanctified onely by the death of IESVS CHRIST the Romish Priests say that the Masse is the same sacrifice with that of the Crosse and that they sacrifice IESVS CHRIST really and truely for our redemption Which I vtterly dislike for whereas at first the Romish Priests taught me that the death of IESVS CHRIST was the onely price of our redemption now they giue me for the price of my redemption the sacrifice of the Masse which notwithstanding is not the death of Iesus Christ It cannot be said that the Masse is the continuation of the sacrifice of the Crosse for then it should be the continuation of the death of Christ and so CHRIST should die continually To conclude they which affirme that the Masse is the sacrifice of IESVS CHRIST say withall that it is the application and commemoration of the sacrifice of CHRIST on the crosse from whence this consequence may be deriued that it is not the sacrifice of IESVS CHRIST for as the application of a plaister is not a plaister or as the application of a medicine or a rule is neither a medicine nor a rule so the application of the sacrifice of IESVS CHIST is not the sacrifice of IESVS CHRIST The same may also be said of commemoration Purgatory is another cause of my separation from the Romish Church I learned at last that the Popish Purgatory was built vpon this tenent to wit that IESVS CHRIST by his death and suffering hath satisfied for the punishment of sinnes before Baptisme but that he hath not satisfied for the punishment of sinnes committed after Baptisme I was very inquisitiue after this doctrine as iudging it to be a point most behoofull of all for a Christian to vnderstand since that it explaines vnto vs what CHRIST hath done for vs. But though with all diligence I read the Scriptures yet could I not finde there any mention at all made of Purgatory I then grew bolder and thus questioned some of the Romish religion Hath not IESVS CHRIST payed inough to deliuer vs from Purgatory And if hee haue payed inough why does not GOD accept and take this payment for as much as it is worth 2 And since that Christ makes intercession for vs in heauen why should not the soules be rather quit of Purgatory by his intercession then by the indulgences of the Pope 3 And if as the Papists hold none of the faithfull which shall liue at the day of Iudgement shall goe to Purgatory why cannot GOD as well exempt vs without violating his iustice 4 It is true that nothing defiled shall enter into Paradis but Saint Iohn in his 1 Epist chap. 1. saith that the bluod of Iesus Christ doth cleanse vs from all sinne 5 The Roman Church also holds that in Purgatory sinnes are not purged away but punished it may therefore more fitly be stiled a Tormentary then a Purgatory The ordrus and blots of our soules are not punishments or paines but sinnes of which Iesus Christ doth cleanse vs. 6 It is necessary that the satisfaction of our Sauiour be applied to vs but it is GOD that must prescribe the meanes how to apply it for to vs it is not permitted to inuent them Moreouer the ineanes applied to a thing ought to be contrary to the thing there being no medicine which is applied with poyson In like maner the way to apply vnto our selues the remission of our debts by Iesus Christ is not to make vs pay them The meanes to apply to out selues his grace and mercy is not in tormenting vs in a fire Truely the holy Scripture produceth vs examples of persons receiued into Paradise and entred into peace and glory incontinently after their death as the thiefe Luke 2.29 Saint Paul 2 Timo. 4.8 and Esay 57. vers 1. and 2 Apocal. 14. vers 13. But wee finde no example of any man sent to Purgatory 8 The onely light which hath directed vs to finde out the errour of this Purgatory is experience which shewes vs that it is a thing meerely inuented for gaine for no man sees particular Masses but for those that giue money poore men must content themselues with generall prayers in which the rich haue also a part The Mendicant Friers neuer goe to the funerall of a poore man and yet his soule hath cost as much and is no lesse precious in the eye of GOD then an Emperours The letters of Indulgence and personall dispensation which the Pope grants is not but for persons of quality Another thing also much moued mee to wit that a man cannot be assured of his saluation which made mee thus to reason with my selfe Shall I any longer remaine in a religion which after I haue made a hurde of merits and satisfactions nay haue bought the satisfactions of others cannot assure mee after all this whether I be the childe of GOD or of the Diuell what religion can this be which teacheth such distrust On the contrary through the whole Scripture GOD exhorts vs to trust in him and to come to him with a full certainty of Faith Heb. 10.22 and bids vs with boldnesse to trust in him with a liuely faith in Iesus Christ Ephe. 3.12 Consider also Sir with mee that the commandements of the Roman Church are much more honoured obserued then the commandements of GOD. 1. Because it is there taught that the Roman Church authoriseth the holy Scriptures that is to say that the ordinances of men authorise the commandements of GOD. 2 To cate flesh vpon a good Friday is a greater sinne then to commit murther or adultery yet is this the Friday on which ordinarily Christ did eate the Paschall Lambe 3 To blaspheme the name of GOD in this world is a small offence but to speake ill of the Pope especially in Italy and Spaine is an vnpardonable and a burnable