manifestly intendeth the grave and its forerunner death the last but not the least nay the greatest of all temporal evils When the prophet Isaiah mentioneth One that feareth the Lord and obeyeth his voyce walking in darknesse and seeing no light no doubt he is principally to be understood of the darkness of spiritual desertion when God withholdeth the light of his countenance from the soul. Finally when we frequently read in the New Testament of utter darkness the mist of darkness blackness of darkness what else do those phrases mean but the damneds everlasting misery in being wholly deprived of the beatifical vision 3. Of iniquity in this respect it is that the power of sin ruling in mens hearts is called the power of darkness and the works of sin which they act in their lives are called the works of darkness especially flagitious enormities such as rioting and drunkenness chambring and wantonness strife and envying which are enumerated by the Apostle as the works of darkness If you ask in which of these acceptions it is here to be construed some Interpreters answer in two of them namely for ignorance and iniquity but doubtless more sutably the latter is to be understood namely sin and wickedness and chiefly gross notorious sins because the Apostle speaketh of the conversation the darkness of ignorance is that in which men are said to sit but that in which they walk is most congruously construed to be the darkness of sin And indeed so truly nay fully doth this term of darkness agree to sin that it taketh in all the other acceptions under some notion or other each of which may serve as a several reason why this appellation of darkness is given to it 1. Sin hath relation to the darkness of nature as a concomitant which it most delights in most sins are such as flie the light and love to be covered over with nights canopy St. Paul saith of drunkards that they are drunk in the night and Solomon of the young man that he goeth to the harlots house in the evening in the black and dark night and Iob of the adulterer the thief the murderer that they rebell against the light and the morning is to them even as the shadow of death To this purpose it is that Clemens Alexandrinus observeth of the Carpocratians that they appointed their meetings in the night Indeed the night being a cover to wickedness maketh men secure and shameless in committing it no marvell if they make choice of that time and there works are therefore deservedly called the works of darkness because acted in the night 2. Sin hath relation to the darkness of ignorance both as an effect and as a cause in which respect it is called by wickedness 1. No sin is committed but the Iudgement is first infatuated and therefore it is the wisemans question Do not they erre that devise mischief and the Phylosophers assertion every offender erreth there is upon the heart of every sinner atra nubes caeca nox to use the Poets expression a black cloud a dark night which causeth him to wander and the blindness of our mind is that which misguideth our feet in which respect sin is an effect 2. The commission of sin as it hardneth the heart so it blindeth the minde what mists and fogs and clouds are to the aire that are corrupt affections and flagitious actions to the soul darkning and obscuring whatever light of knowledg shineth in it in this notion we may very well understand that of the wise man when he saith the way of the wicked is as darkness the darkness of ignorance increasing upon men as they go on in sinfull wayes and in this respect sin is as a cause and because sins are caused by and withall are the causes of darkness and ignorance in the mind very fitly is this brand of darkness set upon it 3. Sin hath reference to the darkness of misery as a cause and that in its full latitude Wherefore doth the lâ—ving man complain saith the Church in respect of temporal afflictions man suffereth for the punishment of his sin all the miseries of life yea death it self being the bitter fruits of sin for so the Apostle saith expressely death entred into the world by sin It is the interposition of sin between God and us that eclipseth his loving kindness towards us so saith the Prophet Isay Your iniquities have separated between you and your God and your sins have hid his face from you finally it is wickednâ—ss that brings eternall wrâ—tchedness that being the doom denounced by our blessed Saviour against the wicked servant Cast him into utter darkness there shall be weeping and gnashâ—ng of teeth so that in this respect is sin most justly called darkness because it brings so great a darkness of sorrow and calamity upon the sinner And thus I have given a dispatch to the first of these metaphors 2. The other of walking is no less considerable a word that is very frequently used in Scripture and that to signifie in generall a course of life Indeed what is our life but a walk and all the actions of our life as so many steps and as walking in a way leadeth to some place or other so doth the course of every mans life tend to some end either of felicity or misery To this purpose is that metaphor of sowing which we so often meet with in holy writ because sowing bringeth forth some harvest or other according to the seed that is sown And I would to God that all men might hence learn so to look upon themselves as sowers as travellers therefore to make choice of their seed and take heed to their wayes more particularly this word is used both in respect of a good and an evill course of life and an instance of both we have in this and the next verse there it is applyed to a godly and here to a wâ—cked conversation That then which we are now to inquire into is what this phrase of walking imports concerning a state of sinfull living the answer to which will appear by taking notice of three properties in the motion of walking as being motus voluntarius continuus progressivus a voluntary constant and a progressive motion 1. Walking is a voluntary motion it is one thing to be drawn and another thing to goe the one is an act of violence the other of voluntariness walking is a free willing act so willing that it is an act of choice and is never done but upon a preceding delâ—berate resolution nor is it onely voluntary but delightful running is painful but walking a pleasant motion and it is a great deal of content and pleasure men take in walking All this representeth the temper of wicked men who not onely act sin but affect it a good man may be sometimes drawn into sin but bad men walk in it yea as Solomons expression is They leave the
a legall word and in both it represents this blood of Christ. 1. As it is a metaphoricall word What water is in the corporal that is this blood of Christ in the spiritual cleansing blood in a natural way is not cleansing but defilâ—ng and besmearing and yet what water doth to material that this blood doth to the immaterial cleansing in this respect it is that as men use to wash themselves in water so Christ is said to wash us in his blood to this the promise in Ezechiel properly alludeth where God saith I will sprinkle clean water upon you and for this end certainly Christ instituted water as the element in the holy Sacrament of Baptism that he might thereby signifie the cleansing efficacy of his blood 2. As it is a legall word What the blood of beasts in the law did tipically that the blood of Christ doth really to wit cleanse from sin The Authour to the Hebrews observeth that almost all things in the law were purified with blood and without shedding of blood there was no remâ—ssion thus in the ceremonies for legal uncleanness there was for the most part blood used and in their sacrifices for expiation of moral uncleaness there was shedding of blood to both which the Apostle alludeth when he speaketh of the blood of Bulls and Goats and the ashes of an heyfer the blood of Bulls and Goats being shed in their sin-offerings and the ashes of a slain heyfer used in cleansing those that touched a dead body And surely what were all these cleansings by blood but types and figures of the cleansing by Christs blood for which cause the Apostle manifestly calls these purifyings patterns of the heavenly things indeed as the same holy writer saith it is not possible that the blood of Bulls and Goats should take away sin so that when expiation of sin is attributed to them it is only to be understood in a tipical and sacramental sense as they were shadows figures representations of this blood whereof my Text speaketh and therefore it is they all vanished and were abrogated from the time of the shedding of this blood in which they had their accomplâ—shment and by which this admirable effect was really and fully performed the cleansing from all sin For the better understanding of this precious truth give me leave briefly to resolve these three Queries What we are here to understand by the blood of Christ. What kind of causality this blood hath to the cleansing from sin Whence it is that this blood hath this causalâ—ty and when I have thus opened the vein of this clause I shall the better let out the blood contained it for your spiritual refreshment 1. In answer to the first of these you must know that this blood of Christ is here to be taken both metonymically and synechdochically 1. Metonymically Socinus making use of this trope understandeth by Christs blood Gods new Covenant in which this benefit is promised a sence which if admitted yet according to a right construction will nothing advance his design It is true he maketh it a metonymy of the adjunct as if the covenant were called Christs blood onely because it is confirmed by it but when St. Paul telleth us in general that all the promises are in him yea is well as Amen made as made good yea when our blessed Saviour in particular calleth it the blood of the new Testament or Covenant because it was shed not so much for confirming the covenant wherein remâ—ssion of sins is promised us for the remission that is obtaining the remission of sins which is promised in that covenant it plainly appeareth that if by blood we will understand the covenant it must be a metonymy not so much of the adjunct as of the cause so it amounts to thus much that the remission of sin which is promised in the new covenant is procured by the blood of Christ which is as much as the orthodox doctrin asserts But the right metonymy here necessarily to be taken notice of is by the blood to understand the death of Christ and this of the cause for the effect because by the violent effusion of his blood his death was effected The better to clear this take notice that the blood of Christ was shed according to St. Bernard who supposeth they drew blood from his cheeks when they smote him seven but rather six several times Soon after his birth when at his câ—rcumcâ—sion they took away the foreskâ—n of his flesh a little before his death in the garden when he was cast into that bloody sweat in his scourging when they plowed his back with whips and made long furrows on his shoulders upon his coronation when they platted his head with a crown of thorns at his death on the Cross in the piercing of his feet and hands with nayls after his death when his side was opened with a spear blood and water gushing forth and truly though none of these times his blood was shed in vain yet it is the blood of the Cross when together with his blood he powred out his life that was the offering for sin in which respect it is expressely so called by St. Paul It is indeed by some asserted that one drop of his blood by reason of the hypostatical union might have sufficed for the redemption of the world but that must be taken cum grano salis since supposing at least Gods decree it was no less blood then his life-blood that could avail to the accomplishing this expiation 2. Synecdochically Socinâ—anizing Vorstius making use of this trope extends the synecdoche to that which he cals the whole oblation of Christ and so comprehendeth not only his antecedent obedience but his subsequent glory to wit of his resurrection ascension session and intercession But inasmuch as the authour to the Hebrews expressely saith that when he had purged our sins he sate down at the right hand of God and again he entred into the holy place having obtained eternal redemption for us yea our blessed Saviour himself being ready to up the Ghost cried it is finished I shall not noubt to assert but that what concerned the acquisition of this great benefit was then fully performed though the resurrection with the consequents of it were needful for the effectual application of it to us This Synecdoche therefore is to be extended onely to his passion one part put for the whole of his sufferings and so we are to construe it not onely of his blood but his body since as the one was shed the other was crucified and as here his bloud cleanseth from sin so in St. Peter he is said to beare our sins on his body yea St. Paul ascribeth our reconciliation both to his bloud and to his body nor yet onely of his body and bloud but his soule also in which suffering a subtraction of the Divine vision he cryed out upon the Crosse My God my God
why hast thou forsaken me and therefore the Prophet Isay foretelling his passion mentioneth his soule which was made an offering for sin in a word not onely his bloud and body and soule but his whole person is to be included the passion being expiatory as you shall hear more fully anon in that it was the passion of such a person and therefore it is often said he gave up himselfe and more appositely to our present purpose is that of the Auther to the Hebrews by himselfe he purged our sins 2. For the Resolution of the 2. question be pleased to take notice 1. That the cleansing of our sins is attributed in scripture to God to Christ to faith and all of them have a reall and severall influence upon this benefit the principall efficient of this cleansing is God to whom therefore it is attributed in the 9 verse the instrument receiving the benefit is faith and therefore it is said to be through faith the meritorious cause deserving this benefit at the hands of God for us is Christs bloud indeed Socinus asserts with a nihil verius that God and Christ act in the same way of efficiency onely with this difference God is the principall and Christ the organicall cause and so God forgiveth by Christ but whilst he onely asserts but doth not prove it we may as confidently deny as he affirmeth especially when the scriptures expresse that not per but propter Christum by but for Christ we are forgiven so our translators render the sence of St Paules 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for Christ sake and our Apostle in the twelfth verse of the next chapter saith our sins are forgiven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for his name sake 2. More particularly Christs bloud is the meritorious cause of cleansing us from sin inasmuch as he thereby took our sins upon himselfe This is the truth which the Apostle Peter manifestly asserts where he saith he bore our sins on his own body on the tree and presently addeth by whose stripes we are healed Healing cleansing are paralel phrases our sins being the diseases of our souls of these sicknesses we are healed of these sins we are cleansed by Christs bearâ—ng them on his body which because it was done on high upon the tree the Apostle useth not barely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifyeth sursum tulit not onely he bore but he carryed up whereby the sence is not diminished but augmented as having in it a fit allusion to the sacrifices which were lift up upon the Altar It is very considerable in this respect that the hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the greeke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like the latine tollo signifie both ferre and auferre to bear and to take away and both these are used concerning Christ in this particular the one by the prophet Isay where he saith he bore our griefes the other by Iohn Baptist when he saith he taketh away the sins of the world and most aptly because he taketh away the sinne from us by taking it upon himselfe To unbowel this precious truth know 1. That Christ bleeding and dying on the Crosse stood in our stead and suffered in our room to this purpose are those expressions where Christ is said to suffer for us to die for the people for so much the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sometimes signifieth as when St. Paul wisheth to be an anathema 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for or instead of his brethren and when the Apostles are said to be Ambassadors 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in Christs stead more clearly to this intent is that phrase of the Evangelist where Christ is said to give his life a ransom for many the preposition being not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which alwayes implyeth a commutation and when it is applyed to persons signifieth the comming of one into the room of another so Archelaus is said to raign in Judea 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the rooom of his father Herod Yea that this sence is intended where spoken of Christs sufferings appeares by St. Pauls question is Paul crucified for you for if it were onely meant for your good Paul might have been crucified for them as he tells the Colossians I rejoyce in my sufferings for you and therefore crucified for you must be as much as in your stead which neither Paul nor any other could be 2. That Christ standing in our stead death was inflicted on him by God for our sins this no doubt is the genuine meaning of those Scriptures where he is said to be wounded for our transgressions and bruised for our iniquities and again he was delivered for our offences he died for our sins That these phrases cannot properly note the final cause appeareth in that the end of his death is not our sins but what is directly contrary to our sins the destruction of them who ever said that Physick was taken for death that is the avoyding death but for the disease the disease being that which necessitateth to Physick besides to instance yet nearer when we say a man died for theft for murder or treason what else do we mean but that those crimes were the deserving cause which brought him to his end Thus Christ died for our sins our sins bringing him to his Cross to his grave in this sense no doubt it is that the Apostle saith he that is God made him to be sin for us to wit at least so farre as to be made a sacrifice for our sins when yet he sin-namely in himself and look as the beast in the law was slain and sacrificed in the room and for the sin of the person that brought it so was Christ crucified in our stead because of our sin 3. That Christ bleeding and dying for our sins suffered that punishment which was due to us It was the commination of God to Adam Thou shalt dye the death Death then was the punishment due to him and all his posterity for sin and this death which we must have undergone in our own persons is inflicted upon Christ. To this purpose it is that Christ is said by the Apostle to be made a curse when this but when he hung upon the tree for cursed is every one that hangeth upon the tree so that the curse which the law pronounceth against uâ— was laid on him if it be said that the curse and death which was due to us was eternal whereas Christs was temporary I answer that duration is but a circumstance to the thing and the reason why on us it must have been eternal is because our punishment could no other way be infinite which yet is required for the satisfaction of an infinite offended justice whereas the case is farre different in respect of Christ as will appear presently 4. That Christ having suffered
loving to us he had been little other then cruâ—l to Christ There wanâ—ed not other wayes to declare his tender affection to mankind but there was no other way to declare his impartial justice against sin so that since the inflicting of death on Christ as a punishment carrieth with it a more urging inducement then any other cause assigned and since the lesse cause there is of inflicting death upon any the greater must needs be the injustice in the inflicter it evidently followeth that there is nothing can so much clear the justice of God in this act as that which the Orthodox asserts to be the cause of it his undergoing the penalty due to our sins 3. But further Christ becoming man is joyned to us in nature and undertaking in our behalf is conjoyned to us by suretiship and in sensu forensi a judicial construction one with us We see in humane Courts the Law taketh as much hold of the surety as of the debtor and why then should it be unjust for God to punish Christ engaging for our debt indeed upon this account the Messiah though innocent became after a sort guilty not as guilt noteth a due deserving of punishment in respect of sin either personally inherent or at least naturally imputed but onely so farre as it noteth an obligation to the punishment in a judicial way as being our surety in which respect that phrase of St. Paul is very apposite he was made sin for us 4. Lastly to put all out of doubt The undergoing this punishment was Christs voluntary Act who as he had power so he wanted not will to lay down his life He was not sent for this end without his own consent as God layed so he took our iniquities upon him the curse to which we were subject saith Theodorus he assumed upon himself of his own accord the death that was not due to him he underwent that we might not undergo that death which was due to us saith S. Gregory he made himself a debtor for us who were debtors and therefore the creditor exacts it from him saith Arnoldus now Volenti non â—it injuria so the moralist most truly if another will voluntarily substitute himself in the room of a malefactor though the inferiour Judge who is bound by the law cannot yet the superiour Governour may without injustice accept of it When therefore God saith the soul that sinneth shall dye he only sets forth the ordinary course of his providence which impedeth not but that Christ being ready to dye in our stead who had sinned God being the supream Ruler and Judge might most justly inflict it on him 2. This punishment thus inflicted on Christ is a plenary satisfaction to Gods justice It is true this word satisfaction is not formally expressed in Scripture yet there are aequivalent phrases such among others is that phrase so often used of redeeming and as if the Holy Ghost would prevent that Socinian Exposition of redimere pro aliquâ— modo liberare redeeming as if it were onely in a large sence no more then delivering it is St. Pauls expresse phrase ye are bought with a price and that this price may appear to be of full value it is opposed to and advanced above corrupt gold and silver by the Apostle Peter nor is it any infringement to the merit of this price and worth of this satisfaction that the suffering of Christ was not every way the same that we should have undergone since it is all one whether the debt be payed in the same coyne or no so it be to the full value Christ suffered the punishment of our sins as Calovius well observeth though not Seâ—undum identitatem omnimodam yet per aequivalentiam the same in every respect yet aequivalent to it Indeed what satisfaction could justice demand more then infinite and the suffering of an infinite person could not be lesse whence followeth 3. In the last place that Gods justice being satisfied for our offences it cannot but remit those offences to us As the creditor cannot demand that of the debtor which the surety hath already payed so neiâ—her can God exact the punishment of us which Christ hath suffered and therefore it is just with him to forgive and cleanse us The case being thus cleared it will be altogether needless to enquire whether it had been injustice in God to forgive without satisfaction St. Austins determination is very solid there wanted not to God another possible way and if it were unjust it were impossible but this of satisfaction was most agreeable to divine wisdom before God did decree this way it might be free to have used it or not but in decreeing this seemed most convenient and after it became necessary so that there can be no remission without it and however it might not have been unjust with God to have forgiven without yet we are sure it is most just with him to forgive upon satisfaction There is onely one objection which remaineth to be answered and it is that which seemeth to carry a great deal of strength in it namely that forgiveness is a free act in God springing from grace and mercy and if it be of grace how can it be of justice that which is of grace is freely done and might justly have been otherwise that which is of justice there is a necessary obligation to the performance of it and what more opposite besides that which addeth the greater force to this argument is that remission and satisfaction are altogether inconsistent A man cannot be said to forgive that debt which he is fully payed so that plenary satisfaction leaveth no place for remission To remove this doubt you must know that things in their own nature opposite may according to different respects concur to the same work and therefore forgivenesse of sin may be an act both of mercy and justice in a several reference In respect of us it is an act of mercy meer mercy and therefore we are said by St. Paul to be justified freely in respect of Christ it is an act of justice and therefore he is said by the same Apostle in the same place to set forth Christ a propitiation to declare his righteousnesse In these different considerations it is that remission and satisfaction are consistent inasmuch as the satisfaction was by Christ not us and the remission is to us not Christ. For the further clearing of this answer be pleased to observe that 1. This satisfaction was neither performed nor procured by us we did not could not do it our selves we did not desire could not obtain it at the hands of Christ it was no other then God himself the injured person who provided and that no other then his own Son to perform this work if a creditor should of his own good will appoint his Son to pay the debt might he not be said to forgive the debtor and would it not be interpreted an act of benignity though
reference of this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 these things to the things which precede in the end of the former and immediately follow in this Chapter For whereas he had in the foregoing verses delivered the doctrines of an impossibility of being without sin of a possibility of pardon of sin that upon confession besides he was presently to mention the comfortable doctrines of Christs interceding to God for us and reonciling us to Gâ—d well knowing how apt men are and how ready they would be to make these doctrines encouragements to sin he thought it necessary that this caveat should be put after the one and set before the other whereby the misconstruction and misapplication of these precious truths might be prevented and according to this reference here is something implyed something expressed That these things which were written would be perverted by some for the encouragement of themselves and others in sin That these very things which would be so perverted were written by him that they should not sin 1. Our Apostle no doubt foresaw how these things which he wrote would be abused and therefore thought this caveat very needful for how apt are men to reason in this or the like manner If we can never come to say we have no sin what need we care though we have sin that which no man can avoid why should we go about to withstand and thus from a necessity take to themselves a liberty of sinning again Again If God will forgive sin upon confession what need we fear the commission if he is ready to forgive all sin what need we care how many and great sins we run into we can confesse as oft as we offend and God will forgive as oft as we confâ—sse Once more If Christ will be an Advocate and propitiation when we have sinned why should our sins trouble us There is a plaister provided for our wounds what need we fear to wound our selves and since Christ will free us from sin let us sin freely Thus as the best of actions so of expressions are subject to misconstructions nothing can be done so exactly nor written so exquisitely but a wicked eye will pry and censure and slander a vitiated stomach turneth all its meat into choller a venemous spider sucketh poyson out of the sweetest flower and men of corrupt minds will strengthen themselves in sin from pure and heavenly truth as they make the good gifts of God conferred on them so the good word of God published to them fuel for their lust St. Peter saith of many unlearned and unstable soules that they wrest the Scriptures to their own perdition to wit by making them patrons of errour no lesse do prophane men by making them fautors of sin and the metaphor there used is very emphatical borrowed from the stretching of men upon the rack and as those who are racked are ofttimes made to confesse what they never did so these cause the Scriptures as it were to speak what they never meant Oh let us take heed of learning this hellish sophistry beware we of putting foule glosses upon the fair Text It is very ill to make a sinister construction of our neighbours words but farre worse to misinterpret Gods sayings and we cannot more abuse these writings then to make them speak any thing which is either untrue or impure And because it is that to which men are so prone oh let Gods Ministers take heed how they deliver these things too largely and loosely without their due caution it is Ferus his note how wary S. John is in delivering the sweetest doctrine of remission and reconciliation by Christ no lesse is S. Paul when he handleth the doctrine of justification and so ought we in delivering those sweet Gospel verities so to propose them as that wicked men may not hereby take occasion to let loose the reines to all licentiousnesse 2. But further to prevent this mâ—stake he plainly asserts that these very things were written by him that men might not sin Those very doctrines which wicked men abuse to countenance loosenesse directly tend to perswade strictnesse When the Apostle saith we cannot be altogether without sin what should that teach us but to be so much the more careful and watchful since we daily gather filth we had need to take the more pains in cleansing our selves If I cannot shoot fully home when I have done my best I had need draw the arrow as far as I can that I may come the nearer to the mark Because my best knowledge is mixed with some ignorance have I not reason to study hard that I may attain the more knowledge seeing do what we can we shall slip is there not cause of the more warinesse that we may not fall or at least not often these things if we say we have no sinne if we say we have not sinned are written that we sinne not Again when the Apostle saith if we confesse our sins God is faithful and just to forgive for what is this confession required but that we might not sin the truth is confession is required not so much in reference to sin past either to inform God of or make him amends for it but chiefly in reference to sinne for time to come that hereby being the more sensible of the offence guilt shame and griefe attending we may be both inraged and engaged against it he that by confession condemneth himselfe for his sinne is thereby obliged to condemn sinne in himself and the end of acknowledging our sins is as that the sinner may be absolved so that the sinne may be executed Once more when the Apostle saith God forgiveth and cleanseth from all unrighteousnesse and Christ is our Advocate and propitiation for our sinnes these are sweet yet strong arguments to disswade from sinne Gospel-truths favour the sinner but not the sin they reach forth an hand of succour to us but it is to pluck us out of the mire they are a playster not to skinne but to heale the sores Very apposite to this purpose is that of S. Paul The grace of God which bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men teaching us that denying ungodlinesse and worldly lusts we should live soberly righteously and godly in this present world pardoning and reconciling love cannot but 1. oblige to thankefulnesse and it were a very iâ—l requitall for pardoning an old to offer a new injury 2. Excite love and love must needs make us careful not againe to displease no wonder if Arnobius saith We who beleeve that our sinnes are expiated by Christs blood cannot but be caâ—telous how we plunge our selves into the guilt of sinne again Oh let us study the purity of Evangelical doctrines let us get spiritual enlightened understandings that we may judge aright of these truths Having these promises saith Saint Paul let us not defile but cleanse our selves from all filthinesse of flesh and spirit perfecting holinesse in the feare of God then
that there be in some things a similitude though not in all things an aequality nor is it any wonder if there be more energy in the body then in the shadow since the shadow is but a resemblance of the body 2 Besides this allusion which no doubt is most congruous to S. Pauls phrase there is another more suitable to this of S. John and that is in reference to the Sacrifices of expiation attonement Almighty God in the Law appointed both the burnt-offering for sin in generall and trespasse-offerings for particular sins by which being offered up he became appeased towards the sinner Now all those Sacrifices did look at Christ and the attonement which was made by them was not as considered in themselves but as they did typify Christs death and the propitiation to be wrought by it That those sacrifices did all of them typify Christ seemeth to me an undoubted truth and that among others for this reason because by Christs death they were abolished and became mortua dead yea soon after mortifera not onely dead but deadly upon this account that to continue those Sacrifices was to deny Christ. That whatsoever efficacy those Sacrifices had towards attonement was onely in reference to Christ must needs follow upon the former since as when the antitype is accomplished the type ceaseth so the vigour of the type whilest inbeing is from its relation to the antitype in this respect it is that under the legall administrations the people offering Sacrifices were minded of Christ and beleeving in him and God was propitiated by those Sacrifices as they did prefigure and so as it were mind him of Christ to be offerred up a reall and effectuall propitiation To close up this it would not be passed by how emphaticall our Apostles expression is in that he doth not onely say of Christ he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a propitiatour but the propitiation it selfe that is victima 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the propitiatory Sacrifice Indeed he is both the Priest and the Sacrifice rhe propitiator and the propitiation according to which is that of Origen God hath set him forth a propitiation through faith in his blood that by the Sacrifice of his body he might render God propitious to men In one word to speak after the Schooles inasmuch as Christ by his death did removere peccatum take away the guilt of sin which causeth the enmity and offerre sacrificium Deo acceptissimum offer up a sacrifice most grateful to God he might be truly said to be the propitiation There is only one objection which carrieth in it a shew of reason and therefore calls for a solution It is drawn from those Scriptures in which Gods love to mankind is set down as the cause of sending Christ into the world whereas if Christs coming into the world to dye did propitiate God for our sins this love of his towards man should be the effect not the cause and those Scriptures should have run thus not God so loved the world that he sent but God sent his Son into the world that he might love it and not in this was the love of God manifested but by this was the love of God procured to wit the sending his only begotten Son To untye this knot you may please to know that these two assertions are not irreconcileable Gods love to us moved him to send Christ to dye Christs dying moveth him to love us Indeed the love of God to man is in one respect the cause and in another the effect of Christs death and that thus it appeared to St. John is plain in that he puts these two together in one verse he loved us and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins To clear the truth hereof briefly observe these distinctions 1. Man fallen is to be considered say the Schooles two wayes either quantum ad naturam or quantum ad culpam as made by God or marr'd by sin he loved us as the work of his hands and that love was the cause of sending Christ he hated us as transgressours of his Law and Christ by making satisfaction removeth that hatred and obtaineth his favour 2. There is a twofold love of God towards man The one of commiseration and benevolence whereby he was reconcileable yea himself appointed the way of reconciliation and this love was the cause of Christs death The other of friendship or complacency whereby he becomes actually reconciled and so conferreth all good upon us and this love is the effect of Christs death It is observable concerning the friends of Job that God said to them My wrath is kindled against you therefore take seven bullocks and seven rams and go to my servant Job and offer up for your selves a burnt-offering and my servant Job shall pray for you for him will I accept wherein it appeareth God so far tendred them as to acquaint them with his wrath and the meanes of pacifying it but his wrath was not removed till those meanes were used An enemy may so far love as to propose and offer conditions of peace to his adversary but till those conditions be accomplished and performed there is no amity between them so is it in this case though God loved us so as to propose nay indeed to perfect the meanes of reconciliation yet still he is not actually reconciled to us but only in and by those means the chief whereof is Christs passion The summe of all then amounts to this God considered without respect to Christ was though iratus yet placabilis actually angry yet so as that there was a possibility of appeasing it he was not so far provoked with men as with the Angels for whom he would not appoint nor accept a ransom but still it is only in and through Christ that he becometh placatus actually appeased toward sinners 2. He only is the propitiation for our sins only Moses must go up to God in the mount none but the High Priest must enter with the blood into the holy of holies Christ alone must mediate with God for man Indeed there was not could not be found in heaven or earth any one fit or able to undertake this work This will the better appear if we consider that whosoever would become a propitiation for our sins must both be free himself from all sin and be both capable and able to undergoe the punishment of our sins 1. He must be free from sin and therefore we could not propitiate God for our selves can it be imagined a Rebâ—ll should pacify the King towards himself or fellow-rebels whatever we could do whilest in our sins were but evaginato gladio pacem peterâ— seeking for peace with a drawne sword in our hand against our Soveraign indeed the good works of them that are in Christ do placere but not pacare please not appease and that only as dyed in Christs blood but as we are in a
Who art thou then that sayest Christ dyed not for thee and will not be a propitiation for thy sins when the doore is open by God why should it be shut by thee when God is ready to receive thee why shouldest thou reject Christ and cast away thy self view the Text well and tell me if the whole world do not include thee surely omne totum continet suas partes omnis species sua individua every species includeth its individuals every whole its parts it is both Calvins and Gualters note upon the word world that it is so often repeated ne aliquem à Christi merito exclusum puâ—aremus so Gualter that we should not think any one excepted ne quis omnino arceri se putet modo â—idei viam teneat so Calvin lest any one should think himself excluded if he walk in the path of beleeving Beleeve it never any missed of propitiation for want of merit in Christ but of faith in themselves why should I give my self over when my Physician doth not so long as I am one of the whole world and my particular sins are not so great as the sins of the whole world I will not cast away all hopes of propitiation 3. Caution that we do not hence presume of a propitiation without application St. John saith he is the propitiation for our sins and for the sins of the whole world but we cannot inferre he is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world therefore he will be for ours though we live as we list Alas brethren you have already heard this propitiation as it is universal so it is conditional habet quidâ—m in se ut omnibus pro sit sed si non bibitur non medetur this cup of salvation hath that in it which can benefit all but if no drinking of it no healing by it If thou dost not beleeve saith St. Ambrose Christ did not descend for thee nor dye for thee to wit so as effectually to save thee and in another place more aptly to our present purpose if any one doth not beleeve he defraudeth himself of that benefit which is so generall indeed by reason of this condition it falls out that though Christ be a propitiation for the sins of the whole world yet it is not the whole world no nor the greater no nor an equall part of the world but a third a fourth part a remnant a little flock partake of this propitiation and therefore we have a great deal of reason to fear and tremble lest we miscarry and have no share in this propitiation which is so universal 4. Exhortation that since Christ is a propitiation for the whole world we labour to make sure our own share in this universal good it had been little comfort to St. Iohn that he could say Christ is the propitiation for the sins of the whole world if he could not have said he is the propitiation for our sins that known saying is in this case too often verified later dolus in universalibus men deceive themselves whilest they rest in generalities content not thy self to know that Christ hath dyed for the world but strive to be assured that thou shalt be saved by his death it will be a sad trouble at that day for thee to think I had a price in my hand but I made no use of it I might have obtained propitiation by Christ but I neglected it there was a remedy prepared but I contemned it And therefore let our great care be to gain an interest in assurance of this propâ—tiation to our own soules that what it is in it self it may be to us and it may be for our sins efficiently what it is sufficiently not for ours onely but for the sinnes of the whole world FINIS A TABLE of the materiall Truths in this Treatise A. ADvocate How affirmed of Christ how of the Holy Ghost 351. how Christs Advocateship differs from his Mediatorship 352. He the onely Advocate 363. wherein it consists 354. with whom he is an Advocate 356. what giveth efficacy to it 357 369. he is no Patron of sin though advocate for sinners 353. he is no Advocate for them that continue in sin 346.347 we must be advocates for Christ. 365 Afflictions compared to darknesse 151 152. Christians rejoyce in them 110. the Word of God comforts in them 118 for sin inflicted even on forgiven persons 294. Ambition spiritual commendable 192. Angels Christs death in some sense suffiâ—ient to redeem the fallen Angels 397. yet not applicable to them 400. Anger Gods how terrible 371. sin the cause of it 369 370. Antiquity a note of verity 80. what kind of Antiquity is so 81 82. Apostles the meannesse of their outward condition 133. their integrity and unblameableness 71. Christs witnesses 21. their continual converse with him 64 65 66. why needfull 67 68. B. BLood of Christ how taken in Scripture 205. how often shed 206. how it cleanseth from sin 207 208. C. CHildren Regenerate persons must be as such 327. they must reverence their parents 330. Christ. Why called the Word 37 38 39 40. The subject of the whole Scripture 42. how the life the eternal life 44 45 46 His eternal subsistence from the beginning 53 76. Truly man 68. God and man in one person 69 212. How he was visible 67. His excellent preaching 64. His unspeakable dignity 6â— His fitnesse for the work of our Redemption 54. promised before sent 43. our miserable condition without him 46 391. In what respects said to be righteoue 395. The onely Refuge of a wounded conscience 350. The Parable between him and the Mercy-Seat 375. His great love to sinners 215. No fellowshâ—p with God but through him 98. no salvation but through him 388. Christians their dignity 102. their charity in desiring others may partake with them 86 87.385 what is done to them reflects on Christ. 101. Christ to be manifested in their lives 60. Church the Christian in it self a great multitude 393.395 Civility how differenced from sanctity 182 183. Cleansing from sin twofold 27 28. the causes of it 208. Commandments of God joyned with promises 131. how conversant about things impossible 228. many think they keep them all 252. Communion with God and Christ and the Saints see fellowshâ—p Confession threefold 264. of sin necessary to remission and how 280 281 282. it brings glory to God 285. benefit to us 283. The devil an enemy to it 285. it must be particular 266 267 chiefly of our ouwn sins 269. to whom to be made 271 272. its antecedent ingredients consequent 273 274 275. to be performed by the Holiest 227. Conversion maketh an alteration 192 192. others must be desired by us 87. Conversation of Christians ought to be exemplary 179. Covenant of Grace double one general the other special 399. D. DArkness fourfold 150. Death of Christ in our stead for our sins our dischrge 209 210. what gave the merit to iâ— 213 214. no benefit by
this respect what Christ said concerning those words he uttered at the raising of Lazarus because of the people that stand by I said it and concerning that voyce from heaven it came not for me but for your sakes the same may be asserted concerning the Apostolical Testimony it was not as if Christ needed it but because we need it for our confirmation and consolation I end this with a double Item To the Ministers of the Gospel that we remember this is our duty as well as it was the Apostles to bear witness to Christ to be an eye witness of Christ risen was indeed peculiar to the Apostles and therefore that St. Paul might be an Apostle Christ was pleased to manifest himself visibly to him but to bear witness to Christ is that which all Ministers are obliged to and therefore to labour that we approve our selves true and faithful witnesses asserting only and wholly the truth of the Gospel It is required in a steward saith the Apostle that he be found faithful no less in a witness Ministers are both Gods stewards and Christs witnesses oh let them discharge their duty with fidelity To the people that they receive with faith what the Apostles and Ministers of Christ attest with truth that as there is fidelitas in teste so there may be fides in auditore these faithfull witnesses may finde believing cares What great reason there is of believing these witnesses wil afterwards appear let it suffice us to know for the present that he who hath appointed them to bear witness expecteth we should embrace it And so much the rather ought this duty to be performed by the people because as we do testari so likewise obtestari protestari for that sometimes is the notion of this word and is so construed here by Cassian we so bear witness to the truth as that we protest against all those who receive not our Testimony we testifie not only for the strengthning of faith in the weak but for the affrighting of them who are obstinate in their infidelity since as we now bear witnesse to you so we shall one day bear witnesse against such and that Testimony which cannot now prevaile for your conversion shall at last come in as an evidence to your condemnation and so much for the first terme 2. The next expression 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is twice repeated but Englished by two several words we shew and we declare it is that which intimateth what kind of bearing witness the Apostle here intended There are indeed several ways of bearing witnesse to Christ to wit by suffering especialâ—y death it self for to such the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 applied for Christs cause and the Gospels by leading lives answerable to the Christian profession by openly publishing the truth of Christ all of these waies the Apostles did bear witness to Christ the most of them suffering death actually except this Apostle who yet was banished no doubt was ready to have dyed had he been called to it for the name of Iesus nor were any of them wanting by the Holiness and uprightness of their conversations to attest and credi their doctrins but that way of bearing witnes which here is meant appeareth by the subjoyning of this phrase to be the promulging of the Evangelicall truths concerning the Messiah to which those other wayes are necessary appendixes that as we preach we should live and be ready to justifie the truth of what we preach with the losse even of our lives if the providence of God and malice of men put us upon it That then which we have here to take notice of is the readiness of these Apostles to shew and declare the misteries of salvation to the people indeed this was the chief part of their work being therefore compared to lights and Embassadours the nature of light is to discover the business of an Ambassadour is to impart his message and accordingly the work of an Apostle is to reveale the Gospel Indeed for this very end the life was manifested to them that they might manifest it to others Christ made knowne himselfe to them that they might make him knowne to others and it is that which is Gods ayme in what soever knowledge he bestoweth upon any of us He hath given light to the Sun that it should be communicated to the World water to the ocean that it should feed the rivers and talents to Ministers Christians not that they should hide them in a napkin but imploy them for the enriching of their brethâ—en and therefore if we heare a veni et vide come and see we must expect to heare another voyce abi et narra go and tell and declare it The truth is this is the temper of a religious heart Jeremy saith of himselfe I was weary with forbearing and David I have not hid thy righteousnesse nor concealed thy truth from the great congregation and the Apostles we cannot but speake Spirituall knowledge in the Christian soul is like new wine in the vessel which must have a vent or the oyntment in the right hand which cannot but bewray it self The zeale that is in a faithfull ministers nay in every godly man for the advancing of Gods glory edifying others propagating religion burneth so strongly that it cannot but flame forth in shewing what he knoweth to others oh let every one of us to whom any divine illumination is imparted fulfill Gods designe testify the truth of grace in our hearts by endeavouring to teach and instruct our brethren But this is not all we are to consider in this expression the Greeke word is a compound of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to bring a message 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is as much as from another so Beza glosseth upon the word here we declare as being sent by God to publish this erran and that which hereby is intimated to us is that these holy Apostles did not run before they were sent but had a mission and commission to show and declare the things of the Gospel Indeed St. Paul puts the question and by it no doubt intendeth a negation how shall they preach except they be sent and the Author to the Hebrews is express no man taketh this honour upon him except he be called of God as was Aaron These Apostles were in an immediate and extraordinary way sent by Christ himself the successors of the Apostles were separated and sent by them and all the true Ministers of Christ have been are and shall be sent by their successors until the end of the world to declare this message I would to God this were more seriously pondered on in this licentious age wherein so many presumptuously undertake to preach the Gospel without a call Gregory Nazianzen speaking in his own defence saith he came to this work 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not of himself but being called
assertion the blood of Jesus Christ his sonne cleanseth from all sin In its connexion with the preceding parte of the verse intimated in that coniunctive particle and. 1. The plaine position of this clause is the bloud of Iesus Christ cleanseth from all sin insignis hic locus to use Calvins expression an elegant and excellent sentence wherein every word hath its weight so that we might finde in it as many parts as words If you please to allude to a known and apt metaphor here is observable the Phisitian the patients of that Physitian the disease of those patients the physicke for that disease the operation of that physick and the efficacy of that operation 1. The Physitian is Iesus Christ the son of God one who being the son of God must needs be able and skilfull since he is the Christ he wants not a call to the office as he is Iesus he cannot but be ready willing to the worke who can desire a better who would seeke after another Physitian then him in whom skill and will ability and authority do meete 2. The patients of this Physitian are expressed in the pronoune us conceive it by way of exclusion us not the Angells he is pleased to have no pitty on their misery nor to vouchsafe them any remedy by way of inclusion us Apostles as well as others none but stand in need of this Physitian and they most need him who thinke they have least 3. The disease of these patients is sin a disease both hereditary as to the root of it which together with our nature we receave from our parents and likewise contracted by our selves upon our selves in the dayly eruption of this corruption by thoughts words and workes A disease that maketh the patient sick dangerously desperatly sicke even to the death yea such as must inevitably have brought upon us not only the first but the second death had not this Physitian interposed and undertaken the cure 4. The physick which this Physitian administreth to the patient for the cure of his disease is blood and which is the wonder his owne blood Indeed the cause so stood that as none but this Physitian so nor he but by his blood could effect this cure and behold he is content to part with his owne blood for our sakes 5. The operation of this physick is by cleansing indeed such is the excellency of Christs blood that it is both a purge and a cordiall strengthening and cleansing none like this to comfort our hearts none like this to purge out the ill humors of our sins whereby our spirituall health is restored 6. Lastly the efficacy of its operation which appeareth by a double extent 1. The one in regard of the disease it cleanseth from all sin that is whatsoever can be called sin of what kâ—nd nature degree soever it be since the cure of no dâ—sease can be impossible to him that can do all things 2. The other in respect of the permanency of this physicks vertue implyed in the present tence of the verbe this blood never loosing its efficacy cleansing not onely when shed but indeed both before and after so that the patriarchs and Prophets before Christ the Apostles who were contemporary with Christ nay all Christians after him to the end of the world may truly take up this saying the blood of Christ cleanseth us from all sin But that I may rather breake then crumble this bread of life be pleased only to take notice of two generall parts in this clause namely The effect or benefit it selfe in those words cleanseth from all sin The cause and spring of this benefit in those words the blood of Jesus Christ his son of the first breifly of the latter more largely 1. The benefit it selfe is cleansing from all sin for the undeâ—standing of which we must know that in sin there are two things considerable to wit macula and reatus the staine whereby it defileth our natures and the guilt by which it defileth our persons according to these two there is a double cleansing the one of sanctification the other of justâ—fication nor is it my distinction but St. Pauls where having mentioned walking as the genus he presently distinguisheth it into its species sanctifying and justifying The one by subduing the dominion of sin gradually abateth and in due time shall by an expulsion of the being wholly take away the staine of sin upon our natures the other so taketh away the guilt of sin that the person is not in Gods Sight and account oblâ—ged to suffer the punâ—shment due to it If you aske which of these is here understood I answer in a large sence we may comprehend both it being true that the blood of Christ hath in it self a moral efficacy to perswade and withall hath purchased the spirit of Christ to be annexed to it which is the efficient cause of the cleansing of sanctification in which respects our dying to sin and redeeming us from all iniquity are set down as ends yea effects of Christs death but withall in a proper sense we are here to understand the cleansing of justification partly because the walking in the light before mentioned includeth in it the purity of sanctification and partly because this cleansing is here promâ—sed as a priviledge to be conferred upon them that walk in the lâ—ght To this purpose it is rationally observed that 1. Where cleansing from sin is required as a duty to be done by us it is to be understood necessarily of cleansing by sanctification so in that of the Prophet wash you make you clean of the Apostle S. Paul let us cleanse our selves S. James cleanse your hands and the like 2. Where cleansing from sin is prayed for as a mercy of which we stand in need it extends to both as appears in Davids penitential Psalm where he beggeth of God washing cleansing purging and creating in him a clean heart since though the former principally refer to the cleansing of justification yet the latter manifestly relateth to that of Sanctification 3. Where cleansing is promised as a benefit to be bestowed upon us if it is not only yet primarily to be interpreted of cleansing by justification of this nature are those Evangelical promises we read of in the Prophesyes of Jeremy and Ezechiel and thus I conceive we are to interpret both the ninth and this present verse According to this construction the blessing here assured is that which is elsewhere called remâ—ssion and forgiveness of sins why it is expressed by this metaphor of cleansing shall be God willing more fully illustrated in the handling of the ninth verse Let it suffice for the present that we have found out the genuine meaning of it and so pass we on to 2. That which is the chief intendment of this clause the cause and spring of this benefit the blood of Jesus Christ his Son This phrase of cleansing is both a metaphorical and
let us look upon our black feet and as with one eye we behold the good that is done by us so with the other the evill that remaineth in us 2. Charitable towards their brethren If thy brother be overtaken in a fault restore him with a spirit of meeknesse give to thy neighbours actions the allowance of humane frailty and be not too rigid in censuring other mens faults If they offend in one thing perhaps thou art more guilty in another if they fall to day thou mayst tomorrow the same corruption that hath led another aside is still in thee and if grace withdraw will soon prevail over thee indeed if you practise the former duty you will soon learn this pride and censoriousnesse are ever companions and he that is lowly in his own esteem will be charitable towards others 3. Watchful over their own hearts indeed he that carrieth gun-powder about him had need beware the least sparks of fire what cause have we to take heed of every temptation who are at best so prone to be led into it Happy is the man saith SolomoÌ„ that feareth always no doubt he sinneth least that most feareth lest he should sin it is Jobs saying of himself according to the vulgar Latine verebar omnia opera mea I did fear all my works let the best do so fear themselves in all their actions lest they should fall into sin 4. Frequent in prayer to God for this shall every one that is godly pray to thee saith David for this what because of his sins and who not the wickedest but the godly in this respect have cause to pray and for what should he pray surely for renewed pardon for increase of grace and for the perfection of glory We cannot say we have no sin Oh then let us pray with David Enter not into judgement with thy servant oh Lord where there is a double emphasis observable it is not ab hoste but à servo though Gods servant yet he would not have God to enter into judgement with him and again ne intres it is the very entrance into judgment that he dreads and prayeth against not only do not proceed but do not so much as enter when we have done our best we have need to crave for mercy Again we cannot say we have no sin let us pray for more grace that we may every day have lesse sin so doth Paul in effect when he confesseth himself not to have already attained but resolveth to reach forward we must never cease to hunger and thirst after greater measures of righteousness till we are wholly and perfectly without any stain of sin and therefore we must continually say with the Apostles Lord increase our faith and all other graces of thy spirit in us Finally since we cannot now in this life say we have no sin how should we pray and sigh and long to be possessed of that future felicity indeed in this respect only it is lawful and commendable to desire death that we may be free not from pain or misery but from sin and iniquity upon this ground we may we ought and the stronger we are in grace the more earnestly we should groan for the day of our perfect redemption when we shall be cloathed with unspotted purity perfect felicity and that to all eternity AMEN THE FIRST EPISTLE OF St. IOHN CHAP. I. Ver. 8.10 If we say we have no sin we deceive our selves and there is no truth in us If we say we have not sinned we make him a lyar and his word is not in us IT is one of the sage counsels which the wise man giveth Turn not to the right hand nor to the left remove thy foot from evill the genuine and literal sense whereof no doubt is that we must keep the straight way which God hath chalked before us in his word not in the least declining on either hand but withall there are severall allusions and profitable applications made of these words by the Ancients Hugo taketh the right hand as an embleme of prosperity to which we must not turn by being too much lâ—fâ—ed up and the left hand of adversity which we must not turn to by being too much cast down veneâ—oble â—edâ— resembleth by the right hand 〈◊〉 to which we must not turn by being wise above what is written and by the left hand folly to which we must not turn by giving our selves up to its dictates once more to our present purpose according to St. Austin To turn to the right hand is by saying we have no sin to deceive our selves to turn to the left hand is to go on in sin and yet think our selves safe and our condâ—tion happy Both these our Apostle warneth us of in this Chapter and it is not mine but Aretius his observation where he saith the Kings high way lyeth betwixt two extremes the one whereof is to will a continuance in our sins the other to acquit our selves from having any sin the former of these which is secura delectatio peccati a secure delight in sin is that which is sharply reproved at the sixth verse which calleth those lyars who walk in darknesse live in wickedness and yet boast of communion with God the latter of these which is superba justitiae presumptio proud presumption of our own righteousness is no less severely condemned in these verses letting such know how vainly they cozen themselves and highly they injure God If we say we have c. Having already dispatched the first branch of the confutation which is the truth implicitely asserted proceed we now to the second which is the errour expresly refuted for the handling whereof be pleased to observe these two things The opinion wherein the errour consists and that is set down in the beginning of the eighth and the tenth verses If we say we have no sin if we say we have not sinned The arguments by which it is refuted and disswaded drawn from The folly of it in that we deceive our selves and the truth is not in us verse eighth The impiety of it in that we make God a lyar and his word is not in us verse tenth Begin we with the opinion it self which we see is not singly mentioned but ingeminated as if our Apostle would hereby insinuate that it is at once both a very common and very dangerous disease no lesse spreading then deadly infecting in some degree or other the greatest part of men of Christians The manner of committing this moral errour is saying which refers both to the tongue and the mind saying is not only peculiar to the lips every thought is interpreted by God a saying the heart may cry when the tongue is silent and we may say when we do not speak Hence it is that though this be not our open assertion or outward protestation yet if it be our inward thought our secret imagination we shall be found guilty before God The
1. Some interpreters make faithful and just to be synonima's therefore he is faithful and just because it is just he should be faithful in this respect the Hebrew word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth truth is by the Septuagint translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that signifieth righteousnesse nor is it without reason because it is a righteous thing to be true before a man maketh a promise he is free to make it or not but when he hath made it he is not free to keep it or not by promise a man becometh a debtor and for one to pay his debt is no more then just Indeed this is not exactly true in regard of God because we never so fully perform the condition but it is justly lyable to exception yet after a sort it is that which he accounts himself engaged to in point of justice to perform all his promises and therefore though it is meer mercy which maketh it is justice which fulfilleth the promise This interpretation Socinus layeth hold on hereby to evade the doctrine of satisfaction which this word according to its proper sense doth clearly â—avour But the designe of the Holy Ghost being in these words to strengthen our weak faith in beleeving the pardon of sin I conceive we shall do best to expound the words in that way which may most â—onduce to this end and that is as affording not only a single but a double prop to our faith from a double attribute in God and therefore I waâ—e this interpretation 2. Others there are who distinguishing these two understand by justice mercy so Grotius here saith I interpret just to be good gentle and Illyricus observeth that righteousnesse is sometimes taken for benignity and clemency in this respect iâ— is that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth mercy is sometimes by the Sepâ—uagint rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that signifieth righteousnes agreeable hereunto the Greâ—k word for almes is by the Syriach rendred righteousness the merciful mans bounty is by the Psalmist and St. Paul called righteousnesse yea upon this account mercy and righteousnesse gracious and righteous are joyned together and David promiseth if God would deliver him from blood guiltinesse he would sing aloud of his righteousnesse And now according to this interpretation we see another impulsive cause of forgivenesse namely the grace mercy clemency of God Among others there are two Greek words by which pardon is set forth that excellently confirm this truth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the former by St. Paul which comming from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to forgive freely and intimateth free grace to be the spring of pardon the latter by the Authour to the Hebrews in that quotation of the Prophet I will be merciful to their sins and their transgressions which is by shewing mercy to the sinner in the forgivenesse of his sins so that we may hence learn to what we are to ascribe the pardon of our sins meerly the good will and grace and mercy of God Indeed we shall still find all those benefits especially spiritual which we receive attributed to mercy the regeneration of our nature according to his mercy he hath begottâ—n us the salvation of our soules according to his mercy he saved us and the remission of our sins through the tender mercy of our God oh let us admire the bowels of love the riches of grace the treasures of mercy which are manifested in pardoning and cleansing our sins 3. But though this interpretation may be received yet since it is a good rule in expounding Scripture to keep to the proper meaning of the words if there be not very good reason to the contrary and there being no reason why we should here recede from I have chosen rather to adhere to the litterall sence of the word Iust. For though it be true that 1. The commission of sin deserveth punishment and therefore justice which giveth every one their due calls for the punishing not the remitting of sin and 2. The confession of sin cannot as hath been before asserted deserve pardon because it is no proportionable compensation of the offence Upon which grounds it appeareth that this justice which forgiveth cannot be in respect of us yet it still is a truth in regard of Christ God is just to forgive so that a Gualtâ—r well he cannot but forgive unlesse he will be unjust to his own Son and inasmuch as our Apostle in the foregoing verse save one expressely attributes this cleansing to Christs blood this interpretation of justice is doubtlesse most genuine and congruous To clear briefly and perspicuously this sweet truth of pardoning justice be pleased to know that 1. The mâ—ledictory sentence of death denounced by the law against sinners was inflicted by God upon Christ this is that which the Prophet Esay positively asserts where he saith the chastisement that is the punishment called a chastisement because inflicted by a father and onely for a time of our peace was upon him and again he was oppressed and he was afflicted which according to the genuine sence of the original is better rendred it was exacted to wit the punishment of our sin and he was afflicted or he answered to wit to the demand of the penalty It may be here enquired how it can stand with Godâ— justice â—o inflâ—ct punishment upon the guiltles and if this doubt be not cleared we shall stumble at the threshold and the foundation of this pardoning justice will be layed in injustice and truly when we find God saying the soul which sinneth shall die and asserting those who condemne the righteous as an abomination to him it is hard to imagin how he can himself justly punish the innocent for the nocent To remove this scruple consider 1. That God did inflict death on Christ is undeniable and who may question the justice of his actions when as things are therefore just because he wills them to be done whose will is the supream rule of justice 2. There cannot be a more necessitating reason of Gods afflâ—cting Christ by death then this so that if it be not just for God to inflict it upon him on this ground it is much lesse upon any other That Christ should die for the confirmation of his doctrine was needless it was done sufficiently by miracles To make way by death to his glory was not necessary he might have been translated as were Enoch and Eliah To dye only as an example of patience and fortitude to his followers is a far less cogent cause then to dye as an example of Gods justice and severity against sin nor need he have died for that end since the death of any of his Apostles might have been exemplary in that kind Finally had he died only for the declaration of Gods immense love to us and not for the demonstration of his severe justice against sin whilest he had been so
signifieth a Saviour and he that vouchsafeth to be our Saviour will not stick to be our advocate yea that he may save as the Apostles phrase is to the utmost he will leave no way unatempted as by his passion so by his intercession by the one purchasing salvation for by the other applying it to us nor need we doubt that he will be thus every way a Iesus to us when we observe that he is the Christ a word that signifieth anointed and indeed so he was to all his offices among the rest to that of his priesthood and so this part of it which consists in intercession Anointing carryeth in it both designation to and preparation for an office all that were anointed being thereby called to and furnished with abilities for the office to which they were anointed our advocate therefore being Christ is both a legal and skilful advocate called to the barre invested with gifts and therefore knoweth how to plead and that our joy may be full take in the last words Righteous and therefore he will not deceive us in our trust or faile our expectation though an advocate be able knowing yet if he be not just our cause may miscarry but this advocate is so righteous that he cannot be perverted nay he is righteous and therefore can stand in Gods sight to plead for us whereas were he himselfe nocent he must flee from the face of the Iudge and being unable to answer for himselfe could not undertake our cause Once more this advocate is Iesus Christ The righteous because so exactly perfectly without the least spot we know how far the intercession of Abraham Moses and other righteous men have prevayled yea St. Iames saith The effectuall fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much and that not onely for himselfe but others surely then much more must the intercession of him who is the righteous one be effectual Yea perhaps as Origen observes Therefore Moses obtained so much of God in Israels behalfe that we might not be faithlesse but confident in our advocate Iesus Christ the righteous And now oh thou drooping sinner let me bespeak thee in S. Austins language Thou committest thy cause to an eloquent Lawyer and art safe how canst thou miscarry when thou hast the Word to be thy Advocate Let me put this question to thee if when thou sinnest thou hadst all the Angels Saints Confessors Martyrs in those celestial mansions to beg thy pardon dost thou think they would not speed I tell thee One word out of Christs mouth is more worth then all their conjoyned intreaties When therefore thy daily infirmities discourage thee or particular falls affright thee imagine with thy self that thou heardest thy Advocate pleading for thee in these or the like expressions Oh my loving and affectionate Father look upon the face of thine anointed behold the hands and feet and side of thy crucified Christ I had no sins of my own for which I thus suffered no it was for the sins of this penitent wretch who in my name sueth for pardon Father I am thy Son the Son of thy love thy bosome who pleads with thee it is for thy child thy returning penitent child I plead that for which I pray is no more then what I payed for I have merited pardon for all that come to me Oh let those merits be imputed and that pardon granted to this poor sinner Chear up then thou disconsolate soul Christ is an Advocate for thee and therefore do not despaire but beleeve and beleeving rejoyce and rejoycing triumph and triumphing take up that bold challenge of St. Paul Who shall lay any thing to the charge of Gods elect it is God that justifieth who is he that condemneth it is Christ that died yea rather that is risen again who is even at the right hand of God who also maketh intercession for us 2. Councell and that in several particulars 1. Since we are so well provided seek we not elsewhere it is not unfitly observed to this purpose that St. Iohn saith not we have advocates in the plural number but an advocate in the singular this being Christs peculiar prerogative Indeed the Papists have coyned a distinction between Mediator redemptionis and intercessionis a Mediator of redemption and intercession appropriating the former to Christ attributing the latter to the Virgin Mary and the rest of the glorified Saints but the advocateship and the propitiation are here by our Apostle joyned together and accordingly our Church in the close of one of the Collects putting mediatour and advocate together prefixeth an exclusive particle to both through our onely mediator and advocate Iesus Christ our Lord. I deny not but that the Saints in heaven pâ—ay for the Church on earth but though they pray for her in general yet not for her paeticular members whose sins and wants they are strangers to and therefore cannot pray for and that they pray for the Church it is ex charitate ut fratres non ex officâ—o ut mediatores by way of charity not authority as friends not as advocates And whereas it is another subterfuge of the Romanists that though Christ be our onely mediator with the Father yet we may make use of the Mother and the rest to be our advocates to Christ besides that in their prayers they expressely desire the Saints to pray to God for them even in respect of Christ it is both vain and impious Vain because it being his work to reconcile us to God there is no need of any to reconcile us to him and though an advocate be needful to the Iudge yet what need of an advocate to the advocate nay indeed when Christ bids us come to him to wit our selves what an impious contempt were it of his command to go to him by a proxie It may perhaps be here objected if we may not desire the prayers of the Saints in heaven why do we of those on earth how is iâ— that St. Paul calleth upon the Thessalonians to pray for him and St. Cyprian in an Epistle to the Romane Confessors craveth their remembrance of him in their prayers and nothing more usual with christians then thus both by word and writing to beg one anothers prayers but beloved this we desire of one another not as advocates but only as fellow-helpers and hence it is that whilest as members we pray each for other we all in our prayers acknowledge Christ to be him who doth and must intreat for us all In summe there is a great deal of difference between a christian-desiring of their prayers who know our persons to whom we may signifie our wants and a religious invocation upon them for their prayers who are both ignorant of us and our necessities Let then the Apostatized Rome seek to Angels and Saints we will only make mention in our prayers of the name of Iesus Christ as him on whose intercession we depend and rest 2. Since