therefore doeth the Apostle say Rom. chap. 11. ver 7. that the Election hath obtayned it to shew vs that the cause of obtayning the promise all blessings therein contayned dependeth neither vpon Christ as Mediator nor vpon Man but vpon the Lords free choice who giveth Christ for whō and to whom he will and therefore is Christ him self called the gift of God Iohn chap. 4. ver 10. and Iohn chap. 3. ver 16. because even he is given vnto vs of grace according as the words of Iohn declare manifestly saying God so loved the world that hee gave his onely begotten Sonne And although all power bee given vnto Christ both in heaven and earth yet in dispensing of life he is limited by the Fathers will and therefore saith him selfe that al power is given him to this end that he may give eternal life not to all simply and indifferently but to all that the Father hath given him Iohn chap. 17. vers 2. And that because such is the Fathers will as Christ him self witnesseth Ioh. cha 6. ver 39. This is the will of my Father that sent me that of all which hee hath given me I should loose none and the reason why hee restrayneth his dispensation of life vnto the Fathers will whose will and pleasure is that he should save only those whom he had given vnto him is declared by Christ him self in the verse immediately preceeding saying I am come downe from heaven not that I should doe myne owne will but the will of him that sent me which wordes plainly teach vs that the dispensation of life dependeth not vpon the will of Christ as he is Mediator much lesse vpon the will of Man but only vpon the good wil pleasure of God And this is cleere in all the blessings bestowed vpon vs in Christ of al the meanes which God grants vs to bring vs to the communion of the blessings which all are said in scripture to be according to the will of God and to be given vs freely by grace as namely the revelation of the mysterie of godlines Eph. chap. 1. ver 9. preachers to reveale it Eph. cha 3. ver 7. c. and Gala. chap. 1. ver 15. 16. also the benefit of our calling 2. to Timot. chap. 1. vers 9. also our beleeving and by faith assenting to the calling of God 1. to the Corint cha 12. ver 9. 11. and Ephe. chap. 2. ver 8. Phil. chap. 7. ver 29. and 2. chap. ver 13. Rom. chap. 11. ver 7. Ioh. chap. 6. ver 36. 37. and 44. 45. and Math. chap. 11. vers 25. 26. and Mat. chapt chap. 13. ver 11. Also the gift of perseverance 1. to the Corinthi chapt 1. vers 8. 9. and Iohn chap. 10. verses 28. 29. and 1. Epist of Iohn chapter 2. vers 27. and chapter 3. vers 9. 1. to the Corinthians chapter 15. vers 57. and 58. 1. epist to the Thess chap. 5. ver 23. 24. and 2. epist to the Thessal chapter 16. verse 17. and I eremy chap. 31. vers 32. 33. and chap. 32. ver 40. so forth of all the remanent benefites of God and namely of our Iustification for we are iustified freely by grace And therefore even the righteousnes of Christ whereby we are iustified is said to be the gift of God that of free grace Rom. chap. 5. vers 15. 16. 17. For of whatsoever worth vertue value the satisfaction made by Christ be of in Gods sight far exceeding al vnworthines and weaknes of all mankinde yet it is no farther extended nor given to any moe but such as is the good will pleasure of God Neither is it contrarie vnto this that all the blessings of God are said to be in Christ and we said to be blessed with all spirituall blessings in him For neither he nor they in him are made ours for any cause either in him or vs but onely by the will good pleasure of God which is manifest by the saying of the Apostle Ephe. chap. 1. ver 6. which is That God by his grace hath freely made vs acceptable to him selfe in his beloved Sonne Which wordes doe evidently witnes that although GOD give vs no blessing but in Christ yet the cause moving God is only his owne grace and good pleasure which excludes all other cause whatsoever either in Christ or in vs. Neither is this to be vnderstood of the benefites themselves onely but also of their measure which also dependeth wholy vpon the purpose and good pleasure of Gods will Which is cleare by the speech of Christ in the 20. chapt of Math. ver 23. And Marke chap. 10. ver 40. where he sayeth To sit at my right hande and at my left hande is not myne to give but to whom it is prepared of my Father Moreover this is not onely to be vnderstood of the blessinges them selves and of their measure but also of all the circumstances concerning their dispensation Which wholy depend vpon the will of God who hath assigned the seasons which were ordeyned before and the bounds of mens habitatiō Act. chap. 17. vers 26. And who hath put the times and seasons in his owne power Actes chap. 1. vers 7. and hath appointed a day of grace to every one that shal be called Hebr. chap. 3. ver 13. and 15. and Hebr. chap. 4 vers 7. 8. and 9. so that the reason that one is called from the wombe another in his mid-age another in the houre of his death why the Gospell is salvation first vnto the Iewes and next vnto the Gentiles why Christ did come at such a time died at such a time and the Gentiles not called till such a time is the onlie appointmēt of Gods will who as saith the Apostle Ephe. chap. 1. vers 11. Doth all things according to the counsell of his owne will Thus it is manifest that not onely the blessings in Christ the measure of them but all circumstances of these blessings either in respect of persons place time or maner doe depend wholie vpon the counsell of Gods will CHAPTER VII IT resteth now thirdly that we trye the truth of this same ground in the third point of the substance of Gods Decree that is in the Meane whereby we are predstinate vnto adoption which is Iesus Christ of whom it is manifest in the Scriptures that he is the Meane of our happines by the same will of God as is evident by the Apostle Coloss chap. 1. vers 19. 20. For it pleased the Father that in him should all fulnes dwell and by him to reconcile all things to him selfe making peace by the blood of his crosse For first there was no cause in Christ why hee should haue beene made Man and sinne for Man Secondly there was no cause nor reason in vs which could move the Father to give him to the death for vs or which could move him to become our brother and to lay down his life
evidently what is the matter and substance of our righteousnes before God Now in them nothing but water and the washing thereby and bread broken and wine poured out with eating drinking thereof is set before vs as either the signes or seales of our righteousnes To teach vs that our righteousnes consists in nothing but in Christs bloud shed and sprinkled vpon vs and in his body broken vpon the Crosse and his bloud communicated vnto vs. But it is most certayne that if there had bene any other thing in his obedience in which had consisted any part or portion of our righteousnes he would likewise have left it in the seales of the covenant to bee remembred of vs and vsed by vs for our instruction and comfort For nothing is to be esteemed to bee any part or portion of our righteousnes in Christ wherof Christ himselfe hath institute neither signe nor seale This ground is confirmed further vnto vs by divers sentences of the holy Ghost touching Baptisme which beeing answerable vnto circumcision is most properly both the signe and seale of the righteousnes which is by faith In which sentences Baptisme is made to have referēce to no part of Christs obediēce except vnto his death only as is manifest Rom. chap. 6. vers 3. Where it is said knowe yee not that all wee which have bene baptised into Iesus Christ have bene Baptised into his death Therefore also this same Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 1. vers 13. taketh his argument from no parte of Christs obedience but his death only and from Baptisme in the name of Christ as the signe and seale of our righteousnes in his death and suffering to remove the schismes and divisions that were amongst the Corinthians saying Was Paul crncified for you or were ye Baptised in the name of Paul For which cause also the Apostle to the Eph. chap. 5. vers 25. 26. 27. doth wholly attribute the worke of our iustification purgation from sinne vnto Christs giving himselfe vnto the death for vs the vertue whereof hee makes to bee applied vnto vs by the washing of water through the word And this point is most cleere by the words of the Apostle Peter who sheweth the veritie hereof in the practise of God towards his saints both before the comming of Christ and now after For hee affirmeth that Noach and these that were with him in the Arck were saved by water and that now we are saved by Baptisme as answering in analogie to the waters of the floud Thereby expresly teaching vs that from the beginning Christ was crucified and set forth in nothing but in his death and bloud to be the matter our righteousnes as by the Apostle Peter in the same place interpreting the benefite that redounds vnto vs by Baptisme or rather defining what Baptisme it self is whereby we are saved may easily be gathered when he saith that this Baptisme is uot a putting away of their filth of the flesh but a confident demanding which a good conscience maketh vnto God 1 Epi. chap. 3. vers 20. and 21. Which discription is nothing els in effect but iustification Which the Apostle in another place calleth the purging of our consciences from dead workes Heb. chap. 9. vers 14. and the sprinkling of our harts from an evill conscience Heb. chap. 10. vers 22. which by the Apostle Peter is discribed from the effect which is our accesse with confidence vnto God in calling vpon him as our Father vpon the sense and frelling of the remission of all our sinnes in the bloud of Christ This same also is manifest touchinn the other seale of the covenant which is the Supper of the Lord by the wordes of Christ himselfe Luke chap. 22. vers 19. 20. and of the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 11. vers 24. 25. where expounding his owne minde touching the bread and wine he sayeth that the bread was his body which was given and as the Apostle sayeth which was broken for them and that the cup was the new Testament in his bloud which was shed for them For Iesus Christ flesh and his bloud are vnto vs no righteousnes vntill his body be broken and his bloud shed vpon the crosse for vs. For neither did hee destroy the Devill but by his death nor set vs at libertie from our bondage but by his death Heb. chap. 2. vers 14. 15. Neither did he put away our sinnes but by the offering of himselfe Heb. chap. 9. vers 26. 28. And therefore sayeth Christ himselfe Ioh. chap. 12. vers 24. except the wheat corne fall into the ground and die it abydeth alone but if it die it bringeth forth many fruite Thus by the seales of the righteousnes of faith and by the phrase of the spirit concerning them and by the testimonie of Christ himselfe touching his owne death it would evidently appeare that the matter of our righteousnes consisteth in no parte of his obedience proceeding his death but consisteth wholly in the onely one oblation of him selfe vppon the crosse The third grounde in holy Scripture confirminge this pointe is builded vpon the testimonie of Christ him selfe and the Apostles interpretation of his minde sett downe Hebr. chapt 10. where first out of the 40. Psalme the speech of Christ is cited wherein hee declareth what is the will of the Father touching the expiation of our sinnes in him Which is by his obedience vnto the Father in doeing his will Which will of the Father is expounded by the Apostle in the 10 verse in these wordes By the which will we are sanctified even by the offering of the body of Iesus Christ once Now the obedience of Christ in the matter of our righteousnes is not to bee esteemed of any larger extent then is the will of GOD which hee did obey and by which wee are sanctified Therefore seeing the will of GOD in the matter of our righteousnes is restrayned onely to the offeringe of Christ Surely his obedience as it is saide to make vs righteous must bee of no larger sense except we will be wise above that which is written If the Lordes owne interpretation of his owne minde touchinge his owne will and obedience of his Sonne therevnto whereby wee are iustified will not serve to satisfie mens mindes it is in vaine to labour by any other meanes to give contentement to those who cannot be content with that which God him selfe hath revealed touching this point Whose minde must needes be best knowne to him selfe and in the which we are to rest according as it is revealed And that this interpretation set downe in this same place is the vndoubted mynde of God him selfe it may evidentlie appeare by the cōstant course of his speech set down thronghout all the New Testament In the which still all the partes of our Redemption touching Iustification Reconciliation and Sanctification are ever attributed vnto the bloud of Christ◠vnto his death and vnto his crosse and sacrifice of him selfe And the killinge of
Christ onely being the immediate and absolute necessarie Meane appointed of God for the enioying of these blessings as being the onely matter substance of them in him selfe The word Sacraments and Faith being in them selves neither part nor portion of the Matter and substance of these benefites but onely the signes or seales or instrumentes of enioying him who alone is the substance And that onely vnto such as are partakers of the outward dispensation of the covenant others who die before they either heare faith preached or are made partakers of the Sacraments such as are many children of the faithfull such also as are called like vnto the thiefe in the last houre being adopted of God and iustified through Christ without them and therefore when in the Scriptures the spirit of God doth indifferently attribute our adoption iustification salvation c. vnto Christ and vnto â—aith yet they are not of a like large extent nor alike relatiue in all persons adopted iustified and saved c. For albeit actuall beleeving doth necessarily imply Christ yet to be adopted and iustified through Christ doth not alwayes in all persons necessarily imply actuall beleeving seeing that faith commeth of hearing the word preached and therfore is to be restrayned to such as are by outward dispensation called which all that are adopted and iustified are not for we are to distinguish betwixt these two things that is to be partakers of the covenant and to bee partakers of the outward dispensatioÌ„ of the couenant and therefore when it pleaseth God by outward dispeÌ„sation to call those who are within the covenant these meanes are then necessarily required vnto salvation For we are bound to these outward Meanes when it pleaseth God to vse them towards vs for our calling but God is no wayes bound to them nor his grace in Christ but that he may freely by his grace without them performe his Decree through Iesus Christ in vs after the manner knowne to him selfe whose wayes are past finding out els if those meanes were absolutely necessarie in all who are within the covenant then certainly the children of the faithfull who according to the Scriptures are within the covenant dying without externall dispensatioÌ„ of the covenant should contrarie to the scriptures not be accounted holy Of this it followeth that wheÌ„ it is said in scripture that without faith it is vnpossible to please God that wee are to vnderstand that saying prudently least we fall in a dangerous error so as to esteeme the children of whom coÌ„sisteth the kingdome not to be acceptable to God who notwithstanding are baptised as belonging to God in Christ and heyres of that righteousnes which is by faith although they haue never heard saith preached Of all these things we may easily perceive that seeing Christ who is the matter of our righteousnes life is not the cause why but the Meane whereby God doth decree to adopt vs iustifie vs c. that faith which is no material but instrumental Meane can much lesse be the cause why but a meane wherby God doth predestinate vs to be adopted iustified and glorified otherwise faith which is powerfull onely in respect of Christ should be of greater respect with God then Christ himself which were abominable to thinke In danger of which sinne many notwithstaÌ„ding do fall in defining both Gods decree and our iustification When as they distinguish not first betweene the thing which is decreed and the cause moving God to decree that which he decreed Secondly wheÌ„ they distinguish not in the thing which is decreed that whervnto we are ordeyned from the Meane wherby God doth ordayne to adopt vs. thirdly wheÌ„ in the meane they distinguish not betwixt that which is absolutly necessarie in all within the covenant froÌ„ those things which only are necessarie in such as not only are within the covenant but also are called by outward dispensation thereof and which are not substantial partes of our righteousnes but accidentall meanes therof except we will say that to be iustified by Christ and by faith is one and the same thing in proper and not borrowed speach which is impossible except we hold that faith in proper and not figurative speach doth signifie Christ These oversights cause some to make faith the cause moving God to predestinate vs to adoption c. and others to esteeme faith not to be the Meane and that instrumentall that in some case only but the very matter of our righteousnes and that not in borrowed or figurative but in simple and proper speach of which matter we shall have occasion to speak heereafter CHAPTER V. THis much being spoken of the substance of the Decree we are next to consider what is the cause that moved God to make this Decree Where we are to observe that we doe not speak of the final cause which is the prayse of the glorie of Gods grace neither yet of the Materiall cause and that which in the schooles is called causa procataretica that is the formost after the first or after the beginning which in the substance of Gods Decree we haue already declared to be Christ but the cause we inquire of is that which in the schooles is called proegumena that is to say which goeth before all causes and doth leade order guide al the rest Which the Apost setteth down in these words according to the good pleasure of his will by which words it is evident that nothing either in Christ as Mediator or in Man himself or any thing els without God but only Gods owne will in him selfe was the cause that did move God to predestinate such as are predestinate and to predestinate them vnto that wherevnto they are predestinate that is adoption and to predestinate them to be adopted by no other Meane except through Iesus Christ alone so that both Gods action of decreeing the persons who are predestinate and the thing wherevnto they are predestinate the Meanes whereby they are predestinate doth depend vpoÌ„ no cause without God but vpon the cause that is in God him self and vpon no cause in God him selfe except only his will Which sometimes is called in the scriptures his Mercie his love his grace his purpose his gift his good pleasure and counsell of his will And for the clearer vnderstanding of this point we are carefully to marke these two phrases conteyned in the description of predestination The first is that God is said to have predestinate vs in him selfe The seconde is that he is said to haue predestinate vs according to the good pleasure of his owne wil. By the first of these sayings the spirit of God would teach vs that God went not without him selfe neither consulted with anie thing but him self neither looked to any thing that was not in him self when he did predestinate vs. and so coÌ„sequently that the Decree of God or predestination is an action of God not in Christ the Mediator nor in vs that are
his members but in God him self For the benefites of God towards Mankinde and the fruites of his love to the vessels of honour are clearely distinguished in scripture in three degrees The first is of those things which God doth in him selfe of which kinde are his purpose foreknowledge predestination The second is of those things which he doth in Christ the Mediator of which kinde are our election redemption and blessing of vs with all spirituall blessings c. The third is of those thinges which he doeth in vs through Christ of which kinde are our adoption or calling our iustification and sanctification and glorification c. By the second pharse the spirit of God would teach vs that albeit in God there be many things set downe in scripture to be considered as the fountaynes of Gods working as namely his infinite wisedome his omnipotent power his infinite goodnes c. yet this action of predestinating vs to adoption is only attributed to the will of God which limiteth the infinitenes both of his wisedome power goodnes in all his actions outward toward the creatures both in their creation and government dispensation of all blessings towards vs both bodily spirituall Heereby we may learne that our blessednes if wee shall examine it in the cause doth surmount all reason and all the capacitie of the reason of man and Angell seeing it is builded vpon no reason of any creature or ground of reason in any creature but vpon the will of the Creator which is not mooved directed or ruled by any thing that is in the creature but by it selfe alone and is the rule of all reason in the creature and of things done by the Creator vnto the creature This shall yet be more easily perceyved if we shall severally consider it in those three pointes of the substance of Gods Decree before mentioned that is in the persons predestinate in the thing whereto they are predestinate and the Meane whereby Concerning the persons who can give a reason why Iacob should be beloved and Esau hated before any of them had done either good or evill except onely the Will of God as it is written I will shew mercie to whom I will shew mercie and will haue compassion vpon whom I will haue compassiō Exod. chap. 33. ver 19. Rom. chap. 9. ver 15. And the spirit of the Lord giving the reason why the Lord did set his loue vpon Israell and did choose them doth remove all respectes which can bee considered in them First their number Deut chap. 7. saying The Lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a precious people vnto him selfe above all people that are vpon the earth the Lord did not set his loue vpon you nor choose you because you were more in number then any people for you were the fewest of all people Secondly he removeth their power and strength Deutero chap. 8. saying Beware least thou say in thy heart My power and the strength of myne owne hande hath prepared me this aboundance And thirdly he remoueth their righteousnes Deut. chapt 9. saying Speake not thou in thine heart saying For my righteousnes the Lord hath brought me in to possesse this Land And shortly after in the same chap. Vnderstand therefore that the Lord thy God giveth thee not this good Lande to possesse it for thy righteousnes for thou art a stiffnecked people Fourthlie he cleareth this ground most evidently in the 10. chapter of Deutero by removing all praerogative and respect of right or reason in respect of right why the Lord should haue chosen thē aboue any other people all people being alike belonging to the Lord saying Behold heaven and the heaven of heavens is the Lord thy Gods and the earth and all that therein is notwithstanding the Lord set his delight in thy Fathers to loue them and did choose their seed after them even you above all people as appeareth this day Moreover the same point is yet further cleared by the Lord him selfe in the Prophesie of Ezechiel chap. 16. by removing all respect of their worthines or perfection declaring their wretched estate in them selues in filthines and naturall corruption in the very tyme when the Lord did choose them saying In thy nativitie when thou wast borue thy navell was not cut c. And when I passed by thee I saw thee polluted in thy owne blood and saide vnto thee When thou wast in thy blood thou shalt live c. And this ground is made cleare by Christ him selfe Math. chap. 11. vers 25. 26. when he speaketh of the persons vpon whō the Lord bestoweth his grace and of the reason moving him thereto saying I thanke thee O Father Lord of heaven and earth because thou hast hid these things from the wise and men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes It is so Father because thy good pleasure was such These wordes doe plainely teach vs that the will of God onely without any reason in the creature yea which is more contrarie to all reason that may seeme to bee in the creature is the cause of Gods mercy towards man When the simple are preferred to the wyse the weake to the strong the poore to the rich the vyle to the honorable and which is yet more strange the sicke to the whole and sinners to the righteous Therefore to conclude this point we shall see sufficiently the evidēce of it by comparing the first of Iohn vers 13. with the first of Iames vers 18. in the 1. of Iohn it is said That the prerogative to bee the fonnes of God is given to those who are borne not of bloods nor of the will of flesh nor of the will of man but of God And in Iames it is said That of his owne will God begate vs. Of which it appeareth evidently that the persons who are ordayned vnto adoption are pre destinate chosen and called for no cause without God either in Christ as Mediator or in them selves but only of Gods free will good pleasure For it is not in him that willeth nor in him that runneth but in God that sheweth mercy Rom. chap. 9. ver 16. CHAPTER VI. WE are next to consider the same ground in that wherevnto we are ordayned which is adoption including in it our conformitie with Christ in righteousnes holines life and glory c. of all which benefites there is not one which is not the gift of God and that of meere grace according to his wil good pleasure For albeit al blessings be in Christ yet neither he nor any of thē in him are given to vs but according to the wil of God so that he is a Saviour Redeemer of none but of such as pleaseth God of his good will so that his death satisfaction for sinne is not for any nor imputed as righteousnes vnto any for any cause either in Christ or Man but only to such as it is the wil of God to give it
Christ onely who being ordeyned of God the Meane of al his mercie to Mākinde he commeth in as Mediatour betweene God vs in all things decreed of God for vs so as we are to expect nothing of all that is decreed concerning the vessels of honour whether it bee in making of vs sonnes or making vs cōforme to the Image of his Sonne in righteousnes and glorie but only in and through Iesus Christ our Lord in whom alone all the promises of God are yea and amen For he is the first borne among all the sonnes of God and the beginning and first begotten of the dead for it is the Fathers will that in all things hee have the praeeminence Rom. chap. 8. ver 29. Col. chap. 1. ver 18. Thus albeit God in him selfe and of him selfe ordayne vs to great dignitie and manifold vnspeakeable blessings yet this honour doeth he reserve vnto his only begotten sonne that of all these blessings we shall enioye none except in through him onely so that it is true that we are ordayned to nothing without Christ but not in that deceitfull sense whereby the mindes of many are deluded as though he were the cause why GOD doth ordeyne vs to adoption The Scripture teacheth vs farre otherwise distinguishing betwixt the cause why God decreeth vs to adoption and the cause why he ordeyneth vs to this adoption through Christ onely Setting downe the cause of the Decree to be his owne will good pleasure in him selfe And declaring the cause why he ordeyneth vs to be adopted through Christ to be this that Christ might be the first borne among manie brethren and that he might have the praeeminence in all things wherevpon it followeth that albeit he be not the cause why we are ordeyned to adoption yet notwithstanding seeing it is Gods will to performe towards vs his gracious purpose and good pleasure of his wil only in and through Christ that of necessitie we must first enioy him before we can enioy any thing of that that is decreed And therefore it was the Fathers will that in him should all fulnes dwell Coloss chap. 1. vers 19. That out of his fulnes we all should receyve Iohn chapt 1. vers 16. And for this same cause is it said That God hath made him wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption and that vnto vs 1. Corinth chapt 1. verse 13. For whatsoever God hath made Iesus Christ the Mediatour he hath made him that for our cause so that the love of God to vs and the good pleasure of his wil towards vs is the cause why Christ is made of God the meane of our salvation And therefore in the consideration of Gods Decree Christ as Mediatour commeth in order after the consideration of that wherevnto we are ordayned although in the executiō and performāce of Gods Decree Christ in vs must goe before all other things ordayned for vs for that is the nature of all Meanes which are subordinate to that whereof they are appointed to be Meanes Thus God first in order purposeth and decreeth what to doe to vs and secondly by what Meanes but when hee performeth his Decree he first prepareth the Meanes and then accomplisheth thereby his purpose and decree towardes vs. For if the Lord had never ordayned vs that are men to bee made his sonnes he had never ordayned his sonne to bee made a Man this is cleere by the Apostles speech wherein he declareth the cause why the sonne of God did take mans nature vpon him Hebr. chap. 2. ver 14. saying For asmuch therefore as the children were partakers of flesh and blood even he likewise tooke part with them And thereafter shewing the cause why not only he tooke our nature◠but also did take it with the same infirmities sinne only except wherewith our nature is indued he vseth these speeches For it became him in all thinges to be made like to his brethren Hebrewes chap. 2. vers 17. according to which grounde it is saide in another place That God sent his Sonne in the flesh in the similitude of sinnefull flesh Roman chap. 8. vers 3. This point is evidently cleare by the same Apostles speech Galath chap. 4. verses 4. and 5. when hee sheweth the ende wherefore God sent his sonne in the flesh saying VVhen the fulnes of tyme was come God sent foorth his owne Sonne made of a woman c. that we might receyve the adoption Letting vs see that in Gods execution hee giveth vs the adoption to the which he ordayned vs by the same Meane thorough the which he ordayned to give it vs. Thus we may see evidently that that parte of Gods Decree touching the Meane of our adoption doeth in order of Decreeing depende vpon the former parte touching the adopting of vs but in order of performing the sending of Christ made of a woman and made vnder the Law and made righteousnes sanctification and redemption c. doth goe before our adoptiō For he was not made the cause of eternall salvation to his owne till he was perfited Hebr. chap. 5. vers 9. For which cause the Apostle sayeth Hebr. chap. 2. vers 10. when hee gives the reason why he was made to taste of death That Christ being to bring many children to glorie it became him for whom are all these things and by whom are all these thinges to perfite or to consecrate the Prince of their salvation through afflictions This shall be yet more cleare if wee consider who it is that is appointed the Meane of our adoption that is not the Father nor yet the holy Ghost but the Sonne only and that because hee onely is that vnto the which wee are ordayned For this grounde we must holde that what so ever wee are made by grace it must firste bee in GOD him selfe and then made ours by our communion and fellowship with GOD. Now this blessing of sonne-shippe which is ordeyned vnto vs is no propertie of the Father nor yet of the Holy Ghost but of the seconde person onely who by that propertie is distinguished both from the Father and from the Holy Ghost and therefore although the Father and the Holy Ghost doe with the Sonne not onely ordeyne vs to adoption but also adopt vs yet they neither ordeyne vs to adoption neyther doe adopt vs through any but the Sonne alone for the Father and the Holy Ghost are not the Sonne neither can be because their personall properties are incommunicable howsoever their naturall properties bee common yea one and the same in all three because the nature of all three is most simply one and the same Of which it commeth to passe that we being adopted thorough Christ and so consequently called to the communion of Christ in that which he is by subsisting that is sonnes wee are also made partakers of the Divine nature as sayeth the Apostle Peter that is we are made like to all three in that which they are by nature for all three have but
efficient cause which is God alone for he is the Father of lights from whom commeth down all good gifts and every perfect donation Iam. chap. 1. vers 17. This may be confirmed by particular testimonies of Scripture touching every particular benefite as of Faith Adoption Iustification Peace or Reconciliation Sanctification Glorification and our whole Redemption For they are neither bred in vs by nature nor acquired by our industrie nor ministred by humane education but are all the gifts of God The second thing wherein they all agree is the cause which moueth God to give them which is nothing but his grace and good pleasure For none of them is obtayned by our desert or meritt For as sayeth the Apostle 2 Tim. chap. 1. vers 9. God hath saved vs and called vs with an holy calling not according to our workes but according to his owne purpose and grace and this likewise is cleere by particular testimonies of the Scriptures touching every one of these benefites The third thing wherin they all agree is the meanes through which God of his grace doth give them which is Iesus Christ the Sonne who is made of God vnto vs all these blessings For in him all fulnes dwelleth and out of his fulnes we all receive grace Which point also is most evident throughout all the Scriptures in everie particular benefite The fourth thing wherein they all agree is the instrument by the which God maketh vs to apprehend them all in Christ which is Faith only The fift thing wherein they all agree is that they are inseparable one from another so that none can have one of them but he must needs have all for whom he calleth them he Iustifieth and whom he Iustifieth them he glorifieth Rom. chap. 8. vers 30 And as sayeth the Apostle by the grace of God which is given vs in Christ Iesus we are made riche in him in all gifts 1 Cor. cha 1. ver 4. 5. And the same Apostle gives thankes to God because he hath blessed vs with all blessings in Christ Eph. ch 1. ver 3. The last thing wherein they all agree is that they are never taken away againe from those that receive them For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance Rom. ch 11. ver 29. And whom Christ loved hee loveth to the end Iohn chap. 13. vers 1. Now followeth the third thing to be considered of vs which is touching the vse arising vpon those former 6. points which wee are to marke for our right vnderstanding of the nature of Gods saving benefites and this vse is sixe fould The first is that none of these blessings is in vs by nature nor from nature nor any power or facultie in nature but are all the supernaturall gifts of God The second vse is that we are to acknowledge the good will of God and his free grace to bee the only cause moving God to give these benefites For by his grace he hath made vs freely accepted in his beloved so that even what in Christ hee gives vs he gives it freely of grace so that all respects is removed why God should bestowe his blessings in Christ except his owne grace in himselfe Which we are carefully to marke that we may keepe our selves from the error of these who confound either the subordinate meane through which or the subordinate Instrument by which God bestowes his blessings with the cause moving God to bestow them For although Christ be the meane through which faith be the instrument by which God gives all spirituall blessings yet the cause moving him to give all is his grace For hee gives Christ and the righteousnes that is in him and faith freely to whom he will and withouldes them from whom he will Thus although the subordinate meanes in and by which God dispenseth his blessings are not to be separate from his grace yet they are never to bee confounded with it but even Christ himselfe and all blessings in him and the merit of his sufferings and faith by the which wee apprehend all are still to bee distinguished from the grace of God which is the only cause why eyther Christ himselfe or the meritt of his suffrings or faith to apprehend it is given vs of God Therefore in Gods working the Scriptures still ioyne these three together to wit grace Christ and faith Faith as the instrument whereby we apprehend and Christ as the subiect in which wee apprehend the blessings of God and the grace of God as the only cause moving God both to giue faith and Christ by faith and in Christ al these blessings So that it is a greevous sinne against the grace of God for the prayse of the glory whereof the Lord doth bestowe vpon vs all spirituall blessings when we spoyle it of this prayse due to it alone by making any other thing to bee the moving cause why God doth blesse vs. As likewise it is a great sinne when separating this grace from the subordinate meanes wee doe despise the meanes and turne the grace into wantonnes The third vse is that no where except in Christ alone is any of the saving blessings of God to bee found And therefore it never can be accompted to be Gods Adoption Gods Righteousnes Sanctificatian Reconciliation or Redemption which is placed in any thing without Christ Wherevpon it must follow that they erre farre from the trueth who place their righteousnes either in their faith or workes or who place reconciliation in their owne satisfaction For though Christ be the obiect of faith yet it hath the being of it in mans hart concerning works and our own satisfactions It is cleere that they are not in Christ who notwithstanding is all in all things and filleth all in all things The fourth vse is that without faith God by his grace communicates noe blessing in Christ in ordinarie dispensation Therefore they must erre who thinke that Christ and the blessings of God in him may be apprehended by the externall bodily action of man in receyving the Sacraments that is as they call it by the very externall worke wrought This likewise teacheth vs to perceive their error who doe make Faith which is but the apprehending instrument to bee the blessing it selfe thereby apprehended in Christ Of which sort they all are who place the matter of our righteousnes in the act of our beleeving The fift vse is to teach vs to be wise in iudging of our selves whether we be truly in the state of grace or no for he that is destitute of any one of these saving blessings he is destitute of them all whatsoever foolish confidence he have to the contrarie For as sayeth the Apostle Peter 2. Epi. chap. 1. vers 3. God through the knowledge of him that hath called vs hath given vnto vs al things that appertayne to life and Godlines And therfore Iames sheweth that it profits nothing that a man say he hath faith if he have no workes And Iohn 1. Ep.
as is cleere Rom. chap. 5. 1. In which we have to observe that as the Father by Adoption maketh vs one with the sonne so by Iustification hee maketh vs one with him selfe Conforme to the saying of the Apostle 2. Corinth chapt 5. vers 19. For God was in Christ reconciling the worlde vnto him selfe by not imputing to them their sinnes therefore is our peace and reconciliation with GOD attributed vnto the Crosse of Christ by the which sayeth the Apostle hee killeth hatred Ephe. 2. 16. and also our libertie and boldnes to enter into the most holy place is attributed vnto the bloud of IESVS Heb. 10. 19. Secondly by sanctification the Lord makes vs like to his Son by puritie and holines of nature Thirdly by redemption as it is particularly taken for glorification the Lord makes vs like vnto his Sonne in immortalitie glory and power This order and difference of these benifites is cleere 1 Cor. chap. 1. vers 30. where wisdome is put in the first place which specially answeres to our calling wherein consisteth our Adoption In the second place righteousnes In the third sanctification and in the fourth place redemption Which place is specially to be marked for the right knowledge both of the order and difference that is amongst is benefites of God For in other places of Scripture Redemption as likewise Iustification and Reconciliation are taken in a larger sense to signifie the whole freedome of the sonnes of God and every parte thereof in particular And that because all libertie peace and reconciliation whatsoever is given vs of God floweth from the death of Christ in the which standeth our righteousnes peace redemption For which cause it is that in the Scriptures sometymes our Iustification is ascribed to the death of Christ sometymes our Sanctification sometymes our Reconciliation and sometimes our Redemption Because howsoever these blessings as they are imparted vnto vs differ both in order and nature yet they proceed all from one fountayne and are all comprehended only in that one oblation of Iesus Christ vpon the Crosse For cleering our iudgements therefore in this point we are carefully to marke these two senses in the which in the Scriptures Redemption Iustification and Reconciliation and Sanctification are taken Sometymes they are taken for the action of God in Christ for his saints when as God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe according to that which hee had purposed in Christ which was as sayeth the Apostle Eph. chap. 1. vers 10. That in the fulnes of tyme he would gather together all things in Christ Iesus as sayth the same Apostle Coll. chap. 1. ver 20. It pleased the Father to reconcile all things to himselfe by him making peace by the blood of his crosse In this sense God at one tyme by the only one oblation of Iesus Christ in one worke once performed did eternally redeeme Iustifie Sanctifie and Reconcill to himselfe all his ellect that ever were is or shall bee vntill the end of the world For Christ bare all their persons vpon the Crosse and God did lay vpon him the iniquitie of them all and did wound him for their transgressions and breake him for their iniquities and did lay vpon him the chastisment of their peace Esa 53. Therefore sayeth the Apostle Heb. 10. that by that will of God we are sanctified even by the offringe of the body of Iesus Christ once And in the 9. chap. 12. verse hee sayeth that Christ by his owne bloud entered once in the most holy place and abtayned eternall redemption and in that same Chapter ver 28. it is sayd that Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of many Now in this sense there is neither difference of tyme nor order nor distinction to be made all beeing accomplished together and at once by one worke of one man Iesus Christ the Lord. Sometymes againe they are taken for the worke of God in vs and toward vs in his owne tyme applying that which hee wrough in Christ for vs to every one of vs in particular bringing vs by effectual calling to the knowledge apprehension by faith of our Redemption Iustification and Reconciliation which God accomplished onely in that day of Christ which all the Fathers desired to see howsoever in divers ages and divers tymes they bee applyed by God to these whō then and in that day by the death of his Sonne he did Redeeme Iustifie and Reconcile vnto him selfe And in this sense we speake of these benefites in this treatise not as they were wrought by God in Christ for vs but as in the dispensation of God they are applied vnto vs for whom Christ dyed In which sense the Apostle speakes of them 1. Coll. 1. 21. 22. saying And you also which were in tyme past straungers and enemies having your mindes exercised in evill workes hath he now reconciled in that body of his flesh by death And in this sense it is that both order and difference is to be marked amongst these benefites In consideration whereof how so ever Adoption and Iustification agree in this that they both are benefites bestowed by imputation without inhesion in vs yet as they differ in nature so doe they in order in respect of the grounds wherevpon they are builded whence they flow For Adoption neither dependeth vpon nor floweth from the death of Christ But from his personall propertie of beeing the sonne of God whereas Iustification dependeth vpon floweth from his suffering and therefore as our cōmunion with him in person goeth before our cōmunion with him in his suffrings so doth our Adoption in order goe before our Iustification CHAPTER XX. HITHERTO have we spoken of those groundes whereby both the nature and order of Gods saving benefites are most cleerly knowen So that by these things which are alreadie set downe a modest minde onely searching truth and abhorring contention may sufficiently knowe what Iustification before God is yet notwithstanding for the further contentement of those of weaker iudgement we will speake something more particularly of the benefite is selfe For the clearer vnderstanding whereof and discovering of the trueth which now almost lyeth hid by the manifold opinions of men it were needfull that we should speake of divers things as namely of God him selfe what place he hath in that worke 2. of his grace 3. of Christ and his obedience 4. of faith 5. of man him selfe and of his workes and lastly of the Lawe and of the Gospell For all these points are called in cōtroversie and mens iudgements is divers concerning every one of them in the worke of Iustification but to eschew longsomnes wee will reduce all that we are to speake into these few grounds The first shal be touching the special divers and severall iudgements of men concerning Iustification The second shal be touching the discussing of these pointes controverted which are of greatest moment The third shal be concerning the worke it selfe of Iustification
partly faith and partly Christes obedience is the matter of our righteousnes The fourth and last is that onely Christ in his obedience is the whole matter of our righteousnes The vanitie of the first 3. opinions will more fully appeare when we speake of the formal cause of iustification when we shall treat of Iustificatiō it selfe as likewise when we shall cleere the truth of the fourth opinion therefore we wil speak the more shortlie of them now Against all three this ground generally serveth to witt that no man is iustified before God by any worke inherent in himselfe or done by him selfe whether it be of nature or of grace or whether it be a worke of the Lawe or of the Gospell The reason is If man be iustified in any sorte by workes Iustification can not be by grace according as sayeth the Apostle Rom. 11. 6. If it be of grace it is no more of workes els were grace no more grace and if it be of workes it is no more grace els were worke no more worke Thus none of these three formost opinions can stande excepte we will destroy the grace of God and abolish it altogether frō the worke of Iustification for grace and workes even though they bee of grace can never stande together in the worke of our Iustification Which also manifesteth the grosse impietie of all these three opinions in placing faith either in whole or in parte in our righteousnes as it is our owne worke seeing by no worke of his owne can man possibly be iustified For otherwise it cannot be but Christ must have died in vaine Secondly our righteousnes consisteth not in Gods acceptation of any thing that proceeds from vs to Godward but in Gods imputation of that that comes from him to vsward by his gift as is cleere Rom. 5. 15. 16. 17. where our righteousnes is still called the gift of God we are saide to receyve righteousnes as a gift Whereby it is most evident that no worke of the Law nor faith as it is the worke of our heart can possibly be our righteousnes For our act of beleeving is an action passing from vs to God-ward and being attributed as it is by them to mans free will is no lesse the worke of man then any other worke of the Law what soever But our righteousnes is called in the Scriptures the righteousnes of GOD and not of man because it goeth not from vs towardes him but it commeth from him to vs. Thirdly it is manifest by the Scriptures that no man is iust in him selfe but in another For among men there is none righteous no not one Psal 14. But if that whereby hee is iustified which is the matter of his righteousnes bee in him selfe he must not onely bee iust but iust in him selfe which both doe playnely contradict the trueth of God which plainlie denies that there is any man righteous and that any man is made righteous in him selfe but whom soever God iustifieth he iustifieth them in Christ and maketh them the righteousnes of God in him 2. Corinth 5. 21. Fourthly the nature of Iustification consisting in the remission of sinne it can not possibly stande in that that is the direct contrarie But all these three opinions maketh it stande in the contrarie that is in Gods acceptation of obedience For whether the Lorde iustifie vs for doeing the workes of the Lawe or for fulfilling the condition of the Gospell required by God of vs vnto Iustification it is alwayes for and by our obedience that he iustifieth vs. so that Iustification shall never consist in pardoning of sinne and covering of iniquitie but by the contrarie in the acceptation of obedience Which saying is so impious that nothing can be devised more contrarie to the grace of God and mans salvation These groundes serve generally to shewe the wickednes of all these three opinions Nowe we come to speake somwhat concerning the first alone against which these groundes conteyned in scripture shall sufficiētly serve of which divers make against the rest also First that which excludes not mans gloriation can not have place in his righteousnes for God will have no flesh to glory in his sight in any thing except in him alone wherevppon it followeth that no man can bee iustified by the workes of the Law For as sayeth the Apostle Rom. chap. 3. vers 27. gloriation is not excluded by the lawe of workes For if Abraham was iustified by workes hee hath wherein to glory Rom. chap. 4. vers 2. and the reason heere of is declared in the fourth verse saying That to him that worketh the wages is not compted by favour but by debt Wherevpon it followeth that if man bee iustified by workes he hath wherein to glorie because he is not iustified by grace but by deservinge and Gods iustifying of him is not a worke of his favour but a worke which hee is indebted to doe And this is the same very thing which the Romish Church doeth meane by their merit ex condigno whereby Gods free grace iniustification is quite overthrowen Secondly man can not be iustified by that which makes the death of Christ of none effect but as sayeth the Apostle Gallat chapter 2. verse 21. If righteousnes bee by the Lawe then Christ hath died without a cause Which place doeth evidently convince them all of errour and proove them all to bee enimies to the crosse of Christ and to his death that make righteousnes to bee by any other thinge then by his death for if Christ died without a cause if righteousnes bee by the Lawe he must have much more died in vaine if it bee by any other thing For righteousnes is not to be found in any other thing but either in the Law of God or Christ By this we may perceyve that the opinion of those men who place our righteousnes in faith properly taken as it is the acte of our heart without relation of it as an apprehending instrument vnto Christ is much more pernitious then the opinion of the Papistes and that by cleere evidence of both their doctrines cōpared together For the Papist placeth his righteousnes in that which conteynes in it selfe perfect righteousnes in deed so that if their other ground could holde wherein also the other sorte doeth agree with them that is that it were in mans power to fulfill the Lawe certaynlie they should be iustified by the works of the Law For the doers of the Lawe shal be iustified Rom. 2. 13. And if there had bene a lawe given which could have given life surely righteousnes should haue bene by the Lawe sayeth the same Apostle Gal. 3. 21. But these other men doe place their righteousnes in that which they them selves confesse to be imperfect and not to contayne in it selfe perfect righteousnes For when faith is not relatively or instrumentally taken in respect of Christ apprehended by it it can never contayne perfect righteousnes and so the Lord can never
of the Testament which God hath appointed vnto you Exo. 24. 8. Heb. 9. 20. Nowe it is playne that Iesus Christ in his bloud is our peace and reconciliation with God For no bloud save his bloud alone can purge vs from our iniquities and iustifie vs. And there is no Mediator betwixt God and vs save hee alone For as sayeth the Apostle 1 Timoth. chap. 1. vers 5. There is but one Mediator betwixt God and Man even Iesus Christ the Man Whereby it is playne that none can make a firme and stable covenant of peace betwixt God and vs but hee alone neither can he make this covenant sure by any other meane except his death and blood shedd because no other thing in heaven or earth can purge vs and obtaine remission of sinnes and iustifie vs. Therefore is it said 1 Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. That Christ once suffered for sinnes the iust for the vniust that he might bring vs to God Vpon which respect it is that by him we are said to have accesse to the Father Ephes 2. 18. and 3. 12. Now vpon all these grounds we have to gather of what covenant Christ is Mediator that is whether of the covenant of workes or of the covenant of grace or which is all one thing whether of the covenant of the Law or of the Gospell For God hath never made any other covenant of Peace with man then these two So that in one of these two must consist both our Iustification and Peace with God and of which soever of these covenants hee is Mediator and which of them soever hee hath confirmed by his death in that only must consist our righteousnes and peace But it is manifest by the Scriptures that he is not Mediator of the old but of the new Testam as is cleere by the Apostle Heb. 9. 15. where he sayeth For this cause is hee also the Mediator of the newe Testament And againe Heb. 12. 24. and vnto Iesus the Mediator of the new Testament And this is confirmed by the same Apostle Heb. 7. from the nature of his Priest-hood For as the Apostle there witnesseth in the 12. verse where the Priest-hood is changed of necessitie the Law also must be changed Therefore it must follow that Christ beeing a Priest not after the order of Aaron vnder the which the Law was given but after the order of Melchisedech that he cannot possiblie bee the Mediator of the old Testament that is of the covenant of the Law and therefore in that same chap. ver 22. it is said that Iesus is the Mediator of a better Testament then the Law Herevpon followeth this conclusion that it is not only a vaine opinion but also an impossible that any flesh can ever be iustified by the workes of the Lawe For no covenant whereof Christ is not the Mediator and which hee hath never confirmed by his death can ever possibly serve to our Iustification but of the covenant of workes or of the law Iesus is no wise Mediator neither hath hee died and shed his bloud to confirme it Therefore by the covenant of workes no flesh shall ever bee iustified and have accesse vnto God CHAPTER XXIII NOW for the second and third opinion the discussing of them is coincident with the points following and especially in the next point which concerneth the 4. opinion that is that only Christ is the matter of our righteousnes Whereof now we are to speake which beeing sufficiently cleered is enough to overthrow all other opinions whatsoever Now to make it manifest that in Christ alone is the matter of our righteousnes wee are first to divide this point in two and secondly to set downe the confirmations of both The two partes wherein this point is to be divided be these First that nothing in heaven or in earth in man or without man is the matter of mans righteousnes before God except only Christ The second is touching that wherein in particular Christ is our righteousnes Now for the confirmation of the first point we have these six grounds shortly to be considered First nothing can be our righteousnes but that only which is made by God righteousnes vnto vs. For he is only righteous and the only Author of all righteousnes For as there is no man righteous so there is no man that can make any thing to be righteousnes either to himselfe or to others And therefore wee are to consider what it is that God the Creator and ordayner of all the righteousnes of men hath ordayned and made righteousnes to vs. Nowe in all the trueth of God nothing is ever said to bee made of God vnto vs righteousnes except Iesus Christ alone Neither is there any thing whatsoever that is called our righteousnes whereby wee are iustified by God except Christ alone and his obedience Wherevpon it must follow that he only must be the matter of our righteousnes Therefore is it said by the Apostle 1 Cor. 1. 30. that hee is made of God vnto vs Wisdome Righteousnes Sanctification and Redemption And in the Prophete Ierem. 23 6. This name is given him of God as the name by the which the children of God shall call him while it is said And this is the name whereby they shall call him The Lord our righteousnes And againe chapter 33. vers 16. And hee that shall call her is the Lord ouâ— righteousnes Secondly that only must be our righteousnes which only is all in all things and only filleth all in all things For he that is vnto vs all in all things must needes be our only righteousnes and hee that filleth vs all in all things must needes fill vs likewise in righteousnes Now Christ only in the Scriptures of God hath both these attributed vnto him The first is shewen cleerly Collos 3. 11. And the second is cleerly shewen Eph. 1. 23. Therefore is it that the Apostle Peter Act. chap. 4. vers 12. sayeth That there is not salvation in any other For among men there is given none other name vnder heaven whereby we must be saved And for this same cause doth the Apostle say That we are made the righteousnes of God in him 2 Corinth chap. 5. vers 21. As likewise that in him wee are made perfect or complete Col. chap. 2. vers 10. Therefore also doeth the Apostle blesse God the Father for blessing vs with all spirituall blessinges in Christ Ephes chap. 1. vers 3. And if with all blessinges then also vndoubtedly with righteous in him except wee will denie righteousnes to bee one of the spirituall blessinges of God Therefore the Scripture admitteth nothing to bee ioyned with him neyther hath the Father ordayned any thing to have parte or place with him in the matter of our righteousnes For it hath pleased the Father that in him all fulnes should dwell and that out of his fulnes wee should receyve what soever grace wee receyve from God And this is a parte of that preheminence which Christ
hatred the blotting out of the hand-writinge which was against vs the removinge of the partition wall and abolishinge of all Principalities and Powers and all our spirituall enimies is still attributed vnto his crosse And therefore the whole worde of the Gospell is called the worde or preachinge of the Crosse first Corinth chapt 1. vers 18. And the speciall thinge which the Apostle respected in preaching nothinge but Christ and him crucified and why Christ will not have the Gospell preached in wisedome of wordes is that the Crosse of Christ may not bee made of none effect 1. Corinth chap. 1. vers 17. Which should make vs all to take heed vnto our selves in layinge downe any other grounde except the death of Christ or ioyning any other thing vnto the death of Christ in the matter of our righteousnes least wee make his death and crosse of none effect The fourth grounde which seemeth cleerlie to confirme this pointe is the argument which the Apostle vseth Hebr. chapter 10. ver 18. conteyned in these wordes VVhere there is remission of sinnes there is no more oblation for sinne By which argument hee both proveth the ineffectuallnes of all the sacrifices of the Law and the eternall vertue of the death of Christ vnto the remission of sinnes By which argument of the Apostle it seemeth necessarilie to followe that in nothing which is in Christ himselfe before his death consisteth the remission of our sinnes and so consequentlie our righteousnes For where remission of sinnes is there is no more offeringe for sinne Therefore if in Christes actuall obedience or in his habituall righteousnes there had beene remission of sinnes originall and actuall as it behoved to bee if they bee imputed to vs for righteousnes surely the death of Christ is needlesse For to what ende should Christ have bene delivered to death for our sinnes as sayeth the Apostle Rom. chapt 4. vers 25 or to what ende should hee haue beene offered for the takinge away of sinne as hee is saide to bee Hebr. chap. 9. vers 26. 28. if so be that all our iniquities both originall and actuall be pardoned in his preceeding actuall obediende Surely it seemeth that this opinion would have made Christ to die without a cause For where it is aledged that he was offred to remove the punishment of our sinne it seemeth to conteyne a double contradiction to Gods truth For first it is manifest by the Scriptures that he was offred not only to deliver vs from the curse and punishment but also from sinne it selfe Secondly it seemeth to impugne the iustice and righteousnes of God who never punisheth where guiltines is taken away For death is the reward of sinne Therefore where sinnes are removed death can not bee inflicted For where there is no sinne there is no death And therefore sayeth the spirit of God that where remission of sinnes is there is no more sacrifice for sinne According to which saying either Christs death and suffring vpon the crosse is no sacrifice for sinne or then there was no remission of sinne before either in his habituall righteousnes or actuall obedience or any other thing whatsoever Thus the very offring of Christ for sinne secludes all things preceeding whatsoever from all vertue or efficacie of purging sinne and removing of iniquitie For as witnesseth the same Apostle Heb. chap. 10. vers 2. 3. Where there is a new remembrance againe of sinnes they have never bene formerly taken away An therefore seeing in Christs death there is a new remembrance of sinnes againe it cannot bee that they were ever taken away by any thing preceeding his death For otherwise Christ should not have bene offred Because that the offerers beeing once purged have from that tyme forth no more conscience of sinnes Heb. chap. 10. vers 2. The first ground which serveth to cleere this point is set downe by 1. Ep. Ioh. chap. 1. vers 7. where he sayth that the bloud of Iesus Christ purgeth vs from all sinne which wordes importe playnlie that it is a needles and vnnesseccary thing to adde any thing to the death of Christ in the matter of our righteousnes For if it alone performe the whol worke of our iustification it is an idle curiositie and a fruitles contention when men contend for any other thing to bee ioyned in this worke with it But these wordes of the Apostle doe plainly manifest that the bloud of Christ alone accomplisheth our iustification For whatsoever purgeth vs from all sinne must needes accomplish our righteousnes and fully iustifie vs both from originall and actuall sinne therefore it must needes holde that in his bloud consisteth the full matter of our righteousnes For nothing that contayneth not full and perfect righteousnes can possibly cleanse vs from all sinne Moreover by this sentence of Iohn it would appeare that the opinion of those men who put a difference betwixt an innocent man and a iust man hath no soliditie at all nor any warrant in Gods trueth if we compare the saide sentence with the wordes of David Psalm 32. repeated by the Apostle Rom. 4. in the which The man whose sinnes are pardoned is pronounced to be blessed By which wordes it is manifest that vnto eternall blessednes it is sufficient to have remission of sinnes which could not be true if after remission of sinnes which is alleadged to be by imputatiō of Christes actuall obediēce and fulfilling of the Lawe men should yet be in dāger of punishment vntill Christ did die for thē For hovv can he be blessed that still is liable to punishment vnder the sentence of death Therefore either remission of sinnes maketh not a man blessed or then remission of sinnes must onely cōsist in the bloud of Christ seeing as saith the Apost Heb. ch 2. ver 15. we are not delivered from the feare of death but by the death of Christ only by whose stripes onely wee are healed By the same reason it is evident that by Christs actual obedience there can be no remission of sinnes seeing in the cōfession of those that are of that opinion by that obedience men are not exempt from punishment and so cannot be said to be blessed Besides this opinion doth flatly contradict the trueth For the Scriptures placeth righteousnes in the remission of sinnes and vnto life it requireth no more but righteousnes For the iust by faith shall live Moreeover innocencie before God cannot preceede righteousnes For as the Lord holdeth not the wicked innocent so by the contrarie he holdeth him that is righteous to be innocent therefore betwixt a sinner and a iust man there can be no mid dell estate and condition of a man before God Except we will place a middest betwixt righteousnes sinne and a middell condition betwixt heaven and hell in the world to come For as heaven is for iust men and hell for wicked men the same iustice of God requireth that there bee a middell condition for such as are betwixt both
seeing they are neither in the state of the iust nor of the wicked Men doe not see what a foundation this opinion layeth for establishinge the Papistes Limbus Patrum and vainely invented Purgatorie Furthermore this opinion seemeth to imply a contradiction in it selfe For first it affirmeth that the actuall obedience of Christ is imputed vnto vs as righteousnes and yet they holde that it doth not iustifie vs from punishment Secondly they confesse that it maketh vs innocent and yet denie that it maketh vs iust Which are thinges impossible For whatsoever is imputed as righteousnes must iustifie vs and whatsoever maketh vs innocent must necessarily make vs iust For nothing but righteousnes can make a man innocent before God Therefore seeing that sentence of Iohn asscribeth the purging of all sinne to the bloud of Christ be it originall or arctuall it is the safest way for vs being warranted by the H. Ghost to accompt it onely the matter of our righteousnes and to beware of adding any thing too it Whereof we have not the like expresse warrant And to make this ground yet more sure we are to coÌ„sider the nature of the death and suffering of Christ Which is manifest by the wordes of Christ him selfe Math. cha 20. ver 28. Marke cha 10. ver 45. where he sayeth The sonne of man is not come to bee served but to serve and to give his live a ransome for many therefore was he called Iesus because he saved vs from our sinnes And for the same cause we are saide in his bloud to have redemption and by the bloud of his crosse to be reconciled vnto God And for this same cause the Lord is said to have set him foorth a propitiation for sinne in his bloud and to have wounded him for our transgressions to have broken him for our iniquities and to have made him sinne and a curse for vs. All which phrases import three thinges The I. is that Christ did pay by his death a price for vs to set vs at libertie from sinne The II. is that by his death he reconciled vs vnto God removing his wrath froÌ„ vs. The III. is that God did execute vpon him in his death the iudgement due to vs for our iniquities therefore is hee saide not to have spared his owne sonne Vpon the which it followeth that both the whole price of our Redemption the whole matter of our peace and the whoie satisfaction for our sinnes consisteth in the death of Christ and so consequently of our full righteousnes Now as we have said before the iudgemeÌ„t of God is alwayes according to truth so that in wounding his sonne for our transgressions he behoved to have chastised him in proportion and measure answerable to all our iniquities So that this satisfaction by his death being layde in ballance with the perfect obedience of the Law required of vs it behoved in the iustice of God to be of equal waight with it and no lesse able fully to answere the iustice of God then the full obedience of the Lawe For the onely iust GOD and Iudge of all the worlde can not ordayne a punishment and satisfaction to his iustice for sinne neither execute it in greater or lesser measure or proportion of iustice then the fault required Hereof it must follow seeing Christes death bloud is the chastisement of our peace punishmeÌ„t inflicted of God for the sinnes of his elect it must contayne in it as full iustice righteousnes as the full accomplishment of the Lawe by vs should have done therefore saith Ioh. That the bloud of Iesus purgeth vs from all iniquities to teach vs that his bloud being imputed vnto vs as our righteousnes by God doth put vs in the same estate case touching righteousnes vnto life before God wherin we should have bene if we had performed the condition of the law which is do this thou shalt live and therfore it being equivalent in the iustice of God to that which was required of vs vnto life it is in vaine to adde anything vnto it vnto perfect righteousnes This same is also cleere by the Apostles speech Rom. cha 3. ver 25. when he sheweth that God did set foorth Christ a propitiation in his bloud to shew his righteousnes to this end that he might be iust For heere two thinges are to be observed serving to this purpose The first is that only in the bloud of Iesus the righteousnes of God whereby we are iustified is to be seene The second is that by the sight thereof God is knowne to bee iust in sparing his elect and iustifying them freely by the redemptioÌ„ that is in Christ Wherevpon it must follow that Christ in his death must have in most full and perfect manner answered the iustice of God no lesse then our full and perfect obedience should have done otherwise it could never have shewen the righteousnes of God neither could he have bene manifested iust in iustifying vs thereby For the Law of God is fulfilled and the righteousnes or iustice of God therein required is accomplished two manner of wayes that is eyther by doeing all thinges commanded therein or els by suffering such punishment as in the iustice of God for the transgression thereof is in iust proportion answerable therevnto so that in eyther of these fully finished the iustice of God vnto eternall life is answered The sixt ground is builded vpon the lawe of the Priesthood which was ordayned particularly of God for this end to make expiation of our sinnes and bring vs vnto God Which two benefites were shadowed in two actions of the Levâ—ticall high Priest in the day of expiation The first was in offering sacrifice for the peoples sinnes and sprinkeling the bloud thereof before the Lord. The second was the carying of the names of the Tribes of the Lord into the Sanctuarie ingraven in the two stones vpon his shoulders and twelve vpon his brest for a remembrance continually before the Lord Exod. 28. Now the Law of this Priesthood is that none performe this office before the 30. yere of his age as is manifest Nomb 4. where all that enter in the assemble to doe the worke in the tabernacle of the congregation are commanded to bee nombred from 30. yeare olde and above vntill 50. according to which lawe Christ him seife who was the substance of all those shadowes did not enter in that office vntill hee began the thirtie yeare of his age as is cleere Luke chap. 3. vers 21. Heereof it must followe that no action performed by Christ before that time can be accompted the action of expiation of sinne or reconciliation of vs vnto God therefore the Scripture attributeth our redemption and reconciliation and particularlie our iustification to no action preceeding but to his death thereafter following and the action of bringing vs vnto God is particularie asscribed by the Apostle Peter vnto the death of Christ 1. Epi. chap. 3. vers 18. And the Apostle declareth that
to serve vnto our iustification by that wherein he is made our righteousnes And secondly if we shal distinguish the matter of our righteousnes it selfe in Christ from the action of God in iustifying by it wee shall perceyve evidently that the matter of our righteousnes consisteth only in the death and bloud of Christ and that all the rest of Christes obedience doeth serve not as the materiall but rather as the subordinate efficient causes of our iustification And so all the three former opinions touching the obedience of Christ may well agree in one when the question is concerning the action of God in iustifying and not concerning the particular matter of the righteousnes which God imputes vnto vs vnto iustification For there is no parte of Christes obedience which is not as it is said in the schooles causa sine qua non that is a cause without the which wee cannot be iustified For if he had not bene a man and a iust man and a Priest and such a Priest as we have said yea if hee had not risen from the dead and ascended vnto heaven and made intercession for vs his death and bloud could never have iustified vs. And yet still his death and bloud is the only matter of our righteousnes but so as it is the bloud of such a sacrifice offred by such a Priest vpon such an Altar in such a Tabernacle carried in by the same Priest after resurrection from the dead into the heavens And as by vertue of the same bloud the same Priest sittinge at the right hande of God maketh intercession for vs. Thus the matter is not of such moment being rightly waighed and charitablie considered that it needed ever to have bred such bitter contention amongst brethren in the Church of God CHAPTER XXVI HAving thus spoken of the materiall cause of our righteousnes it followeth now that we speake of the formall cause In the which three thinges are specially to be marked for clearing vnto vs how and in what manner wee are made the righteousnes of God by the death and bloud of Iesus Christ our Lord. The first is Gods giving vnto vs. The second is Gods imputation of that which is given vs. The third is the cause moving him both to give and impute For God iustifieth vs by gift by imputation and by grace Neither can the true forme of our iustification bee knowne of vs a right except we acknowledge all these three in it For mā hath no saving grace which he hath not receyved of God according to the saying of the Apostle 1. Cor. chap. 4. ver 7. For who hath seperate thee or what hast thou that thou hast not receyved and if thou hast receyved it why gloriest thou as if thou hadst not receyved it And to the same purpose saith I am 1. chap. 17. All good giving and every perfect gifte is from above Therefore also our righteousnes speciallie is called a gift and a gift by grace Rom. chapt 5. ver 15. 16. 17. as also Rom. chap. 6. vers 23. but the gift of God is eternall life Where the word gift if that place be rightly vnderstood doth signifie righteousnes given vs of God Secondly howsoever many confounde imputation and giving as one thinge as in some sense they may both bee taken for one yet it is expedient for our sounder knowledge that wee distinguish them For howsoever nothing is imputed which is not given yet many things are given which are never saide to be imputed Yea moreover in which imputation hath no place Beside the imputation of a thing if we shall rightly consider it doth alwayes presuppone the thing imputed to be in our possession either by nature working or gift as by Gods grace wee shall heare hereafter And therefore in the forme of our iustification Gods giving of a thing vnto vs is to be distinguished from his imputing of it Specially if we marke one thing which is flat contrarie sayings and yet of equall force vsed by the spirit of God in the description of iustification For sometimes it is defined by imputation of righteousnes and sometimes by not imputation of sinne Thirdly in the manner and forme of our iustification grace is specially to be considered because both the givinge and imputation of the thing given is of meere grace Therefore are wee saide to bee iustified freely by grace so that the perfect forme of our iustification consisteth in this that is in Gods gracious givinge and gracious imputinge of thinge given vnto vs to bee our righteousnes So that whosoever make our iustification to consist without giving of righteousnes or without imputing the thinge given or esteeme eyther the matter of our righteousnes which is given vs to be given otherwise then by grace or to be imputed as righteousnes vnto vs otherwise then by grace doe destroy the true forme of the iustification of a sinner before God And because this is a pointe of speciall moment and bringeth great light in the matter of iustification wee will speake severally of these three pointes And first touching the action of Gods giving Secondly of the action of Gods imputation Thirdly of his grace as the only cause of both Touching the first there be two thinges which are given vs of God vnto iustification The I. is faith The II. is Christ both these giftes of God are necessarie vnto iustification as we shall see by Gods grace hereafter when we speake of iustificatiō it self Therfore in this place wee will onely speake of faith as it is the gift of God in which we have these pointes to be marked First what kinde of gift it is Secondly to whom it is given Thirdly what faith it selfe is And fourthly to what ende and vse it is given First then that it is a gift and the gift of God it is cleere in the Scriptures according as wee have showen before of all the saving graces of God and therefore it is called by the Apostle Heb. chap. 7. vers 4. a heavenly gift and in Ephe. chap. 2. ver 8. it is expresly called the gifte of God And the same Apostle Phil. chap. 1. ver 29. teacheth vs that to beleeve in Christ is a gift given vs. Therefore 1. Cor. chap. 12. It is uombred amongst the giftes of God by his spirit So that in this there is no great contradiction but the speciall question is what kinde of gift it is that is whether it bee a naturall or a supernaturall gift Depending either vpon the naturall power which God hath created in man or vpon the supernaturall power of God For clearing hereof We are to consider that which in the scriptures is spoken concerning faith First touthing the ground and cause of our beleeving Secondly touching the propertie that is attributed vnto faith and which still is in him that beleeveth And thirdly touching certaine effectes attributed vnto faith Besides these things which heereafter will shewe them selves when we treate both to whom faith is given and
can Christ live in any more of our soule then that wich liveth by the faith of CHRIST By this it may appeare how vngraciouslie they speake of Gods grace in the worke of faith who make him effectually to renewe no more of man but his vnderstanding leavinge the action of consenting and embracing by faith the things reveiled to the will of man as also how slenderly they speake of faith who place it in nothing but in the willes assentinge to the trueth of God CHAPTER XXVIII NOw it followeth that we speake of faith it selfe what it is In which point wee will first intreate of the divers significations of Faith in the word of God And secondly of the true signification and nature of it in the wroke of iustification Touching the first Faith is taken in foure divers significations in the scriptures of God besides that signification which it hath in the worke of iustification The first signification is when faith is taken for fidelitie and trueth as Math. chap. 23. 32. Yee leave the waightier matter of the Law as iudgement mercie and fidelitie Likewise Rom. chap. 3. ver 3. Shall their vnbeliefe make the faith of God of none effect and 1. Timoth. cha 5. ver 12. having damnation because they have broken their first faith Secondly faith doeth signifie the doctrine of the Gospell because it is begotten in vs by the Gospell for faith commeth by hearing therefore faith is called the faith of the Gospell as also because the Gospell preacheth salvatiō to be no otherwise but by faith and therefore the Gospell is called the worde of faith Rom. chap. 10. ver 8. In this signification it is taken Gall. chap. 3. Receyved ye the spirit by the workes of the Lawe or by the hearing of saith And againe Galla chap. 1. ver 23. He which in time past persecuted vs. nowe preacheth the faith that he before destroyed And Acts chap. 6. ver 7. And a great companie of the Priests were obedient to the faith Thirdly faith is taken for particular knowledge Rom. 14. 22. Hast thou faith have it with thy self c. That which in this place the Apostle calleth faith in the same question matter and purpose he calleth knowledge 1. Cor. chap. 8. Fourthly faith is somtimes put for Christ himself in the gospel because al that ever faith in the gospell apprehendeth is Christ who is the only true obiect of faith vnto salvation In this sense it is takē Gal. 3. 23. before faith came we were kept vnder the law as vnder a garrison shut vp vnto that faith which afterward should be reveiled which words being cōpared with the 24. 25. verses folowing with the 19. verse preceeding it shal be manifest that by the name of faith in that place Christ the obiect of faith is vnderstood Thus much for these foure divers significations wherein faith is taken in the word of God Now we come to the special significatiō and nature of it as we are said thereby to be iustified And when it is said to be imputed vnto righteousnes In which point there is greatest need of carefull attention because vpon the mistaking hereof ariseth principally the mistaking of iustification it selfe Specially in that sentence where it is saide that Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Concerning which there is a two-folde controversie The first is whether faith in this place be taken in the owne proper signification or in a borrowed sense The seconde controversie is touching the proper signification of faith what it is In the first controversie these who take faith in a borrowed speech doe expound that sentence Metonymically by faith vnderstanding Christ crucified apprehended by faith and so doe esteeme that faith relatively or instrumentally taken and not properly is imputed vnto vs for righteousnes And this opinion agreeth with the trueth of the matter it selfe But there is no necessitie why faith in that place should bee taken in a borrowed sense if the right minde and meaning of the holy Ghost in this phrase be gravely and maturely considered so that if they who take it properly did not erre eyther in the signification of it or in the true sense of the imputation of it their opinion might wel be allowed For faith in this sentence is in my opinion to be taken properly in that sense whereby in it selfe it is distinguished both from the worde whereby it is begotten and from the obiect of it in the worde which is Christ As also from the naked knowledge of the worde and Christ therein reveyled how soever it doeth comprehend knowledge For searching out therefore the true significatiō of the word Faith in this sentence we will first set downe the divers significations wherein it is taken Secondly wee will speake of the true nature and signification of it in this place where it is saide to be imputed vnto righteousnes Cōcerning the first we are not to speak of that differēce which in the scriptures is warranted of historicall faith miraculous faith and iustifying faith but onely of the different opinions of men touching iustifying faith In one thing all men doe consent and agree that faith is an action of the heart consisting in iudgement but they differ in three sortes The first sorte make this iudgment of the harte in beleeving to be nothing but a naked opinion which is a doubtfull inclination of an vncertayne minde to the best part of the contradiction with feare of the contrarie parte beeing destitute of the knowledge of the true cause As for example in this contradiction Christes death shall save vs. and Christes death shall not save vs they have an opinion of the best that is that Christes death shall save them but no certaine knowledge because they are ignorant of the cause of that effect and therfore feare that they shall not bee saved and in this opinion they place faith The seconde sorte which are the wiser amongst the Papistes doe make faith to be an action of the heart in iudging neyther by way of opinion nor yet by way of certayne knowledge but by a middle way of iudgement betwixt opinion and knowledge Which participates of both and yet is neyther of them For they will not have it a doubtfull inclination of the minde vnto the best parte with feare of the worst vpon ignorance of the cause Neither will they have it a certayne inclination of the minde to the best without all feare of the worst vpō certayne knowledge of the cause and necessarie meanes But will have it middle conceyte of the minde neither altogither contingent neither altogither necessarie And now in these dayes there is a sorte of men which agree with this second sorte in substance whatsoever deceitfull shew their wordes doe make to the contrarie Therefore as touching this point wee make no severall order of them For albeit in word they seeme to admit in beleeving knowledge of the thing beleeved yea which is more albeit they graunt application yet seeing they
cause our righteousnes is saide to bee the righteousnes of God which is by faith and the righteousnes which is through the faith of Christ Phil. chap. 3. ver 9. And Christ is saide to bee a reconciliation through faith in his bloud Rom. chap. 3. ver 25. All serving to teach vs that faith is not our righteousnes it selfe but only the meane by the which we attayne to that which is our righteousnes that is Christ in his bloud for in that sense is righteousnes faid to be through faith and by faith Moreover it is for this same cause that faith is called in the Scriptures the faith of Christ Rom. chap. 3. where righteousnes is saide to be the righteousnes of God by the faith of Iesus and that because the whole matter and substance which by faith wee eyther knowe or apprehende vnto righteousnes is onely Christ Sometimes it is called the faith of his name Acts cha 3. ver 16. as also the faith in his name as Ioh. chap. 1. ver 12. because all the vertue strength and power whereby we beleeve to bee iustisied is in Christ alone and in the vertue of his death and resurrection so that the vertue is not in faith it selfe but in Iesus apprehended by faith Sometimes againe it is called the faith towardes Christ Act. chap. 20. ver 21. because faith setteth nothing before it as the obiect but Christ alone for the Gospell which is the worde of faith propoundeth not any thing vnto vs but onely Christ as eyther promised or given vnto vs of God to bee the matter eyther of our righteousnes sanctification or redemption Sometimes againe it is called the faith in Christ Gal. chap. 3. ver 26. and that for two causes First because that wherein by faith our heartes are fastened and in the which our heartes only setleth their full confidence of righteousnes and remission of sinnes is onely Christ in whom onely our faith is and we also by faith for thereby we are made to be in him and hee in vs and therfore in the scripturs to be in Christ to be in the faith are put indifferently Rom. cha 8. vers 10. compared with 2. Cor. cha 13. ver 3. 5. And for this same respect the proper effectes of Christ him selfe are attributed vnto faith The second Reason is because faith neither suffereth vs to rest vpon it nor on our selues nor on anie other thing nor yet in any thing that is in faith or in our selves or in any thing except Christ onely and that which is in him as the ground of our confidence or as the matter of our righteousnes or blessednes therefore are we saide in him to have redemption in him to be made righteousnes and in him to be circumcised For whatsoever we are made by Faith we are made it in Christ and what soever faith maketh to be ours it is also in Christ therefore faith maketh not God our God but in Christ nor vs the children of God but in Christ nor righteous but in Christ c. For whatsoever faith layeth holde on it findeth it in Christ so that the hart of man when it beleeveth vnto righteousnes sendeth out faith fixeth it in Christ thereby laying holde vpon him and his obedience vnto righteousnes bringing him and his obedience with all the vertue both of his death and life into our heartes to dwell in them Sometimes also it is called the faith by Christ because hee is the Author Fountayne and occasion of it not so much because he with the Father and holy Ghost doeth worke it as because hee alone is the meane and occasion of it For as the Father redeemeth vs by Christ and by him maketh vs his sons and righteousnes c. so also he maketh vs to beleeue by Christ so that take mee away Christ all ground and foundation of saving faith in God is taken away for God hath layde the whole foundation of our beleefe in him alone For which cause Pet. 1. Epist chap. 1 ver 21. sayeth That by his meanes wee beleeve in Gâ—d and in that same place it is saide That God hath raysed him from the dead and given him glorie that our faith and hope might bee in God And to this same effect the same Apostle sayeth in the same chapter ver 3. That God hath begotten vs againe to a lively hope by the resurrection of Iesus Christ from the dead Vpon which respect it is that the Apostle Paul 1. Cor. chap. 15. ver 17. sayeth expresly If Christ bee not raysed your faith is vayne Vpon which we may easilie gather that faith is a vaine fooilsh faith whereby a man is made to beleeve or hope for any blessing from God which maketh it not first to bee performed by God in Christ For our faith of our vnioÌ„ with God ariseth vpon the knowledge of Christ his assuming in vnitie of person our nature vnto his the faith of our being the sonnes of God ariseth vpon Christ the man our brother being the very sonne of GOD our faith that God will make vs righteousnes ariseth vpoÌ„ this that God hath made Christ sinne for vs and so foorth of the rest the hope of our resurrection is builded vpon his resurrection the hope of our assention vpon his assention the hope of our glorification vpon his glorification so that the Lord worketh in our heartes neither faith nor hope in him of any blessing whatsoever whereof hee doeth not first reveyle vnto vs a cleere ground and evident fouÌ„dation in Iesus Christ the sonne And therefore it may appeare how detestable a doctrine that is and execrable be the teachers of it that affirmeth that a man may be saved without the knowledge of Iesus Christ our Lord. Thus by all these phrases concerning faith the Lord would teach vs that Christ is the matter and hee is the ground of all whatsoever wee beleeve and that there is nothinge in Christ which is not made ours by faith And for this same purpose in Scriptures it is sometimes called the faith in the bloud of Christ Rom. chap. 3. ver 25. and that to teach vs what is the particular thing in Christ wherein God hath made him our righteousnes and whereby the Lord would haue vs to beleeve remission of sinnes in him for albeit Christ be vno vs all and that in all thinges and doeth fill vs all in all thinges yet as wee haue marked before there is no benefite which wee apprehende by faith in Christ but it hath the owne particular ground and foundation wherevpon it is builded and therefore as his faith is but vaine who expects his resurrection in Christ if he doe not know Christ to bee risen againe so his faith must be vaine who beleeveth the remission of sinnes in Christ and yet knoweth not that Christ did shed his bloud expressely for his iniquities For as God begettes vs to the hope of life by the resurrection of Ieses from the dead so he begetteth vs
to the faith and assurance of the remission of our sinnes by making him sinne for vs and woundinge him for our transgressions So to conclude this point albeit all blessing bee in Christ and he be made of God wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemptioÌ„ yet all this shal be in vaine to vs except we beleeve because there is no meanes in the world whereby to obtaine possesse Christ or any blessing in him except faith only For as concerning the Word and Sacraments they are not so much the meanes of our possessing Christ as the meanes of our faith whereby we possesse Christ The third vse and end wherefore faith is given is keeping preserving vs in the possession which it hath brought vnto vs and that both because through faith wee are kept vnto salvation as saieth Pet. 1. Epi. 1. 5. and also because by it wee keepe Christ and all his blessings in our heart For which cause the scriptures place our victorie over Satan sinne and the world in our faith Ioh. 1. Epi. ca. 5. ver 4. 5. and the Apost Paul placeth the chief strength of a Christlan in his faith as that whereby we are made able to quench all the fierie dartes of the Divell Eph. 6. 16. so that there is no enemie of our salvation so great neither any temptation so vehement and fierie which by faith wee are not made able to overcome Thus faith wrought in our heartes by God is of a stronger might and power then the Divel himselfe and all the powers and principalities of darknes therfore Pet. 1. Ep. 5. willeth vs to resist the divel by being stedfast in the faith thereby to teach vs that in a stedfast faith there is streÌ„gth to overcome him The examples of the great power of God which is â—n them that beleeve set downe in Heb 11. doth suâ—â—icieÌ„tly cleer the truth hereof who only by faith are said to have performed suffered so strange wonderful things as no power that ever nature hath given vnto man was able either to performe or suffer This also is manifest if we marke another pointe which is the Saintes recouering of them selves when they have appeared to have bene overthrowen by Sathan in sinne who notwithstanding have by the strength of faith onely recovered victorie over Sathan and sinne So when as in our practise and obedience to God we fall most fearfully yet by faith we not onely overcome our owne guilthines but also all the feare of Gods iust deserved wrath for our guilthines so that our verie sinnes cannot seperate our heartes that beleeve from Christ nor remove the favour of God from vs. For whatsoever blessing wee have once obtayned by faith by that same saith wee are made able to holde it fast to the ende and the faithfull heart sayeth as Iob chap 27. ver 6. I will keepe my righteousnes and will not forsake it and my heart shall never cast it away all my dayes Vpon this ground it is that the Apostle willeth Timothie to fight the good fight of faith 1. Tim. chap. 6. vers 12. because indeed our faith hath the greatest labour in our spiriruall bataile For when all other grace faileth vs yet faith must vpholde vs otherwise we could not possibly but perish For what should have become of Pieter after his fearefull fall if faith had not sustained him This point is yet more cleere if we marke the strength of faith in other two thinges The first is if we shall consider the examples of the children of God who have drawn from God manifold great blessinges by faith as their vncurable diseases to bee cured their dead to be raysed c. Of which a lively example wee have in Math. chap. 9. and Luke chap. 8. in the Woman that had an ishewe of bloud 12. yeares longe and in the wordes of Christ vnto Iairus Luke chap. 8. ver 50. where he saith Feare not beleeve onely and shee shal be saved The other thing to be considered of vs is when God himself seemeth to set him selfe against his children and they are compelled to wrestle with God as with their owne enimie yet by faith they overcome say with Iob 13. 15. Though hee slay me yet will I trust in him And this was liuely shadowed in the Lord his wrestling with Iacob Gen. chap. 32. where it is saide of the Lord that when he sawe that he could not prevaile against Iacob he touched the hollowe of his thigh c. therefore saieth the Prophet Hose cap. 12. ver 3. 4. By his strength hee had power with God and had power over the Angell and prevayled And this the Lord setteth downe expresly to shew vs that the power of God in him that beleeveth is able so to strengthen him that nothing is able to overthrow him To conclude this point that which Angells by nature could not doe in heaven and that which Adam could not doe in Paradise a poore fraile wretch beleeving in the Lorde Iesus is made able to doe by the power of God which dwelleth in his heart by faith for the verie weaknes of God is stronger then Men and Angells and it pleaseth the Lorde to magnifie his strength in our weaknes that the excellencie of this worke may be knowen to be of him and not of vs. For this cause as the Scripture calleth faith our victorie and our shield so the Fathers likewise cal it and moreover the key whereby the treasures that are in Christ are opened vnto vs the ladder by the which we climbe vp from earth to heauen Now the last vse and end wherefore Faith is given is practise that is to make vs able to doe the will of the Lord and obey his commandements for man whose imaginations are nothing but vanitie and that continually and is of no strength of him selfe to performe any good worke neyther is nor can be subiect to the lawe of God having his minde continually sett on evill workes having no goodnes at all dwelling in him is by this supernaturall gift of faith made able to doe the will of the Lord from the hearte for thereby not onely is his darkened vnderstanding illuminate that he may know what is that good acceptable and perfect will of God but also his rebellious will subdued to will and to doe the will of the Lord and his whole affections sanctified to love the lawe of God and to delight in it more then in all treasures and to esteeme it more precious then gold For by faith he is buried with Christ and also hee is raysed vp with Christ by the faith of the effectuall working of God who raysed Christ from the dead Colos chap. 2. ver 13. For which cause also the Apostle Paul to the Ephe. ca. 2. shewing what is the exceeding power of God in theÌ„ that beleeve saieth That we that were dead in sinnes are through the grace of God by faith quickened raysed and made to sit together in heaven in Christ
this gift it is that in this place we speake for howsoever by the Fathers givinge Christ vnto the death the full redemption of all Gods elect was wrought Yet in our particular persons we enioye it not vntill wee bee called of God therefore IustificatioÌ„ is placed after our calling Rom. chap. 8. and this giving of Christ is the cause why God firste giveth vs faith because before we receyve faith it is impossible to vs to enioye Christ because we have neyther hande heart nor will to receyve him and in this gift as wee have showen before standeth the matter of our righteousnes and the forme of our iustification consisteth in parte in the giving of it and this is needfull to be marked of vs for their cause that make our iustification to consist in Gods gracious acceptation of our faith and not in his gracious giving of faith vnto vs and Christ by faith Touching this second gift which is Christ in his death and bloud I will speake no more the things preceeding serving sufficientlie to cleare it and therefore we come to the next pointe wherein we have said consisteth the forme of our iustification CHAPTER XXXI THE second thinge wherein consisteth the forme of our iustification is the Lords imputing of the thinges given vnto vs that is both of faith and Christes obedience and for the observation of the imputation of both wee are to marke these two phrases First where it is saide that faith is imputed vnto righteousnes Rom. cha 4. ver 5. 9. Secondly where it is saide that righteovsnes is imputed Rom. chapt 4. ver 11. For the one importes plainely the imputation of faith the oher importes the imputation of righteousnes it selfe which is by faith For we have alreadie shewen that our faith is neither our righteousnes nor called in the Scriptures our righteousnes howsoever our righteousnes be called the righteousnes of the faith of Iesus or by the faith of Iesus and it may be that the not observing hereof hath made some worthie and learned Divines to denie al imputation of Christes obedience to maintaine nothing to be imputed vnto vs but faith only that not vnto righteousnes but as they interprete the worde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for that is in the place of righteousnes For cleering of this point of Imputation we will first speake of the word imputation what it signifieth Secondly what sorte of things are saide to be imputed in the Scriptures whether thinges that are inherent in vs or thinges not inherent or both Thirdly we will speake of these things which are saide in scripture to be imputed to vs for our iustification Concerning the first the word it selfe signifieth the sentence of our iudgement or resolut opinion of his minde and in this sense it is taken Rom. chap. 3. 28. as also Rom. 6. 11. Secondly it is referred to the reasoning of the minde and the disputing of the vnderstanding as Marke chap. 11. ver 31. Thirdly it is referred to a mans purposing or imagining or plotting any thing as 1. Corint chap. 13. ver 5. Fourthly it is referred to the estimation or accompt of the minde touching any thing as Acts chap. 19. ver 27. in which sense also it may be taken Mark 15. 28. Luke chap. 22. ver 37. Fiftly it is reâ—erred to the laying to a mans charge of any debt or guiltines as 2. Timoth. chap. 4. ver 16. Lastly it is taken in a borrowed sense froÌ„ accompts and reckonings for accompting vnto a man or reputing vnto a man and reckoning to a man any thing to bee his or to be good payement and satisfaction from him in his accompts and in this sense is it taken in the matter of our iustification when as God eyther reckoneth that to be ours which is not ours or when hee esteemeth and accompteth that sufficient which hee giveth vs freely for our iustification before him But in this sense it appeareth that there is a three folde difference in mens taking of the meaninge of the worde imputation The first is when imputation is taken for naked acceptation of a thing although in it selfe insufficient as sufficient by God and this maketh some men to define our iustification to be nothing els but a gracious acceptation of our imperfect faith by God in place of perfect righteousnes but to this wee have answered before and certaine and sure it is that God receyves no righteousnes from vs but gives righteousnes vnto vs. The second meaning is when imputation is takeÌ„ not simply for a naked acceptation of a thing whether in it selfe perfect or imperfect but for accompting that which is perfect righteousnes in it selfe and yet is not ours to be ours The third sense is when imputation is so taken that it signifieth not only the accompting or reckoning to vs as ours the righteousnes which is imputed but so reckoneth and reputeth it to vs as done by our selves The first importeth no more but the Lordes accompting and holding of a thing sufficient which notwithstanding of it selfe is not sufficient nor perfect righteousnes which opinion can never be maintayned with Gods honour The seconde importeth not onely an accompting and holding of a thing which in it selfe is sufficient righteousnes to bee full and perfect but also an accomptinge of that perfect righteousnes vnto vs as ours howsoever it bee onely Christes so that this opinion taketh the word imputatioÌ„ so as when God reckoneth to vs that to be our righteousnes which in effect is not our righteousnes but onely by his accompt and imputation The third importeth that same that the second doeth but in a more strict sense to wit that God by imputing of Christs obedience vnto vs doeth not onely accompt it to be our righteousnes but also doth accompt it as performed and done by vs and this sentence though it seeme hard and to derogate something to the honour of God and praise of his grace yet one word being taken in a charitable which also is a true sense there shal be no fault fouÌ„d in the speech The word is as when it is saide that the Lord imputeth Christes obedience to vs as if we had done it our selves which word is not to be taken as though it imported that God did impute vnto vs. that wee had done this but oely is set downe by similitude to shewe the faithfulnes and trueth of Gods imputation to wit that GOD imputeth Christes righteousnes as truely to be ours and as effectually to iustifie vs as it should have done if wee had in our owne persons actually performed it and in that sense this speech may well be approoved Moreover it may be taken in good parte even although we take it in the strictest sense spoken before if wee consider that Iesus Christ did beare all our persons in his death and therefore he is saide in scriptures to have died for vs so that what he did bearing our persons even in the sight of God and dying for
vs even by the very appointement of God that which hee did for vs and in our name may not impertinentlie be saide to bee imputed by God vnto vs as done by vs But for myne owne iudgement I esteeme the first interpretation of the word as to bee most sounde and agreeable to the trueth and beeing so taken there shal be no difference in substance betwixt the second and third opinion onely that which is not expressed in the second but vnderstood in the word imputation touching the trueth and effectualnes of it is by similitude expressed in the third and in this sense it is to bee taken in the matter of our iustification and it declareth the forme of our iustification importing this much that God iustifieth vs by accompting vnto vs Christes obedience which is in it selfe perfect righteousnes in such sorte as by this his imputation it is ours as truely and doeth as truely cleere vs before God as if it were our owne in deede and we our selves in deed had performed it Thus we have need to take heed of two extremities whereinto it is evident that many men doe fall in this point some taking imputation too slenderly and others taking it too strictlie each being to other the cause of others stumbling Furthermore wee shall vnderstande the more cleerlie the right meaning of the word imputation if wee doe consider it in the two coÌ„trarie phrases wherein it is vsed al to one sense in the Scriptures For sometimes our iustification is described negatively by not imputing of sinne sometimes affirmatively by imputing of righteousnes For as the word imputation is taken in the negative phrase it must also be taken in the affirmative now in the negative we may know how it is taken by the Apostle 2. Cor. chap. 5. ver 19. where it is saide God was in Christ reconciling the world to him selfe not imputing to them their sinnes As likewise Psal 32. and Rom. chap. 4. where it is saide Blesied is the man to whom the Lord imputeth not sinne In which places not imputing of sinne signifieth the not reckoning vnto vs sinne nor iniquitie and the not accompting of vs to be vnrighteous and so the not laying guiltines to our charge nor exacting punishment of vs for it wherevpon it followeth that imputation of righteousnes must signifie the reckoning of righteousnes vnto vs and accompting of vs to be righteous pronouncing of vs guiltlesse and decerning life vnto vs. For clearer vnderstanding whereof we are to knowe that the word of imputation hath alwayes reference to some other thing fo that it commonly cometh in betwixt two things the one the thing which is imputed the other that wherevnto it is imputed so that imputation hath relation vnto both and to make this manifest we shall consider these 3. phrases The obedience of Christ is imputed vnto iustification conforme to the saying of the Apostle Rom. chap. 5. ver 19. By the obedience of one man many shal be made righteous The second phrase is Faith is imputed vnto righteousnes And the third is Righteousnes is imputed vnto life The equivalent whereof we have Rom. chap. 4. ver 11. and 5. 17. 18. In the first phrase imputation commeth in betwixt Christes obedience as the thing which is imputed iustification as the end wherevnto it is imputed and it hath reference to both In the second phrase imputation coÌ„meth in betwixt faith as the thing which is imputed and righteousnes as the end wherevnto it is imputed In the last phrase imputation commeth in betwixt righteousnes it selfe as the thing imputed and life as the end wherevnto it is imputed Thus we see that imputation in the matter of iustification hath alwayes reference to two things and thus much concerning the meaning of the word Now we are to consider what thinges they are which are said to be imputed coÌ„cerning which there are two extremities wherein men do commonly fall the one holding that nothing inherent in vs can possibly be imputed to vs the other hold the contrarie that nothing is imputed to vs but that which is inherent in vs. That opinion which is betwixt both seemeth to agree most with Gods truth that is that not only things inherent in vs but things that are not inherent in vs are imputed to vs therefore imputation is vsed by the holy ghost when hee speaketh of iustification by grace and of iustification by works as Rom. cha 4. likewise when he speaketh of the accompting of vs sinners because of our workes and corruption inherent And when he speaketh of the accompting of vs righteous by grace through the obedience of Christ Rom. chap. 4. this same is cleare by other examples of Scripture as 2. Sam. chapt 19. vers 19. where Sheâ—ei sayeth to David Let not my Lord impute wickednes vnto me and Rom. chap. 2. ver 26. where it is saide His vncircumcision shal be imputed vnto circumcision This same may bee confirmed vnto vs Psalm 32. and 2. Cor. chap. 5. and Rom. chapt 9 ver 8. and 2. Cor. chap. 12. ver 6. Gal. chap. 3. ver 6. and 2. Tim. chap. 4. 16. And therfeore somtimes righteousnes is said to be imputed by debt and sometimes by grace Rom. cha 4. 4. For vnderstanding whereof we are not only to distinguish betwixt thinges as they are inherent or not inherent in vs but also as they are our owne or not our owne For somethings inherent are so in vs that they are our owne because they consist in these thinges which are in our nature and are the effectes and fruites of our naturall powers somethings againe are so in vs as they are no wayes our owne being no parte nor portion of any naturall power or qualitie nor flowing from any power or facultie in nature but beside and above nature coÌ„ming to vs from God and wrought in vs by the power of his spirit and therefore though they be in vs cannot be said to be our owne because they are no parte nor propertie of our nature nor effectes produced by nature such as is faith for although we be saide to beleeve with the hearte yet neither is faith it selfe any naturall power or facultie in the hearte nor produced by any naturall power or facultie of the hearte neither doe wee beleeve with the heart naturally and by our owne strength as though wee might make our heartes to beleeve or that faith or beleevinge were our owne worke but faith as wee have showen before is an instrument supernaturall and wrought not by our heartes but in our heartes by the supernaturail power of God by the which as by a supernaturall meane given vs of God we beleeve with our harts and so lay hold vpon supernatural things and performe supernaturall workes According to this diverse consideration of thinges in vs or proceeding from any power that is in vs so is there a distinction of imputation in the scriptures One is said to be by debt another is saide to be by