power which is not restrained The Father hath power of life and death over his children by the Law of Nature the power is absolute But it is evident that the Law of Nature gives Fathers a power over their Children without restriction Therefore the Fathers power is absolute and by consequence he hath power of life and death over his Children See Bodin cap. 4. pag. 21. de rep where he says That the Persians the people of Higher Asia the Hebrews Romans Celtae Gaules the West Indians before the Spaniard subdued them did use this absolute power And see pag. 23 24. how he makes all the strife disorders and contentions among Brethren their Father living the wantonness luxury and riot of youth without fear of punishment the contempt and scorn of the Fathers person and power and the decay of the glory and ennobled virtue of the Romans to proceed from the taking away of the Fathers power Examples of the Fathers power of life and death are hard to find because it cannot easily be imagined a Father should give judgment upon himself his son being part of himself to cut off any part of himself which he hopes might by any means be cured Yet Quintus Fulvius did adjudge his son to death for being of Catelines Conspracie Salust de conj Cat. And see Deut. 21. 18 19 20 21. where it is most evident that the Father hath power of life and death for the People do but execute the judgment of the Father and Mother That such a son is stubborn and rebellious c. The exercise of this power is restrained generally among Christians by positive humane Laws but from what ground I cannot tell 6. The Fathers power arising from generation and the person of the The Son hath propriety against his Father Son being only generated the Fathers power can extend no further and therefore whatsoever the Son does acquire it is his own excluding his Father 7. Though the Son out of wedlock is alike subject to both parents Why out of wedlock the Fathers commands are to be preferred before the Mothers because he is alike part of both yet if the Father and Mother command contrary things whereby it becomes impossible for the Son to obey both there the command of the Father is to be preferred because of the excellencie of his sex CHAP. VII The Husbands Power 1. THe Husbands power doth not arise ex concubitu for then a man hath power over all the women which he hath or shall have known which is absurd besides one woman known by several men should be alike subject to them all which is impossible 2. The Husbands power does not arise from his Wifes being a part of his family for any part of the family may become no part of the family but the Wife can never be out of the power of her Husband therefore the Husbands power does not arise from the Wifes being a part of his family 3. The Husbands power does not arise from the Wifes submission or subjecting herself to her Husband for that is but an act of her will unumquodque dissolvi potest eo ligamine quo ligatum est and therefore by an act of her will she may when she list set herself free 4. It does not arise from the Husbands accepting of the Wifes will for that makes the Husband obedient to his Wife obedience being no other thing but the accepting the will of another which is unnatural 5. The Husbands power does arise from the law of God or Nature by From whence the Husbands power doth arise the conjunction of Man and Wife in wedlock For these two individual persons by the law of God are made one mystical person of which the Husband is head and the head is the directive and ruling part of the body therefore the Husband is the director and ruler of his Wife Object But if the Law of Nature by Marriage gives the Husband a power or right of command over the Wife why may it not be that God by the Civil pact might give a Prince or Court a right of command over those Men who made it Answ I answer That first a Similitude proves nothing Secondly The cases are nothing alike For Marriage was an institution of God in Paradise and the power of the Husband over the Wife being due by the Law of Nature hath been ever since attributed by Mankind to the Husband yet so that after the death of the Husband the Wife becomes free from such subjection until by Marriage she again subjects herself In none of these respects does this hold in the Civil pact for no such thing was ever instituted by God nor any such thing ever constituted or done by Man but only a Chimera invented by capricious men to palliate sedition Nor did ever any man become free from subjection to Supreme powers by the death of him or them to whom they made their subjection by virtue of the Civil pact Nor was it ever known in the world that Men were free before they made their Civil pact as Women are before they marry 6. God gives a power to the Husband without restriction viz. Thy The Husband hath jus vitae necis over his Wife desire shall be to thy husband and he shall rule over thee Gen. 3. 16. And therefore the Husbands power over the wife is without restriction and by consequence the Husband hath power over the life of his Wife Antiently among the Gaules this power was not restrained The Romilian Law restrained the Husbands Caesar lib. 3. de bel Gal. power to put his Wife to death for four causes only This power was used by the West-Indians before they were subdued by the Spaniard and is generally among the Idolaters and Mahumetans But the exercise of the Fathers and Husbands power of life and death over their Children and Wives is restrained not by any law of God that I know of but by the Temporal laws and yet no wrong done to the Fathers or Husbands neither For though their Children and Wives be in their power by the law of Nature yet by the law of Nature are they in the power of their Soveraign and subject unto him And though the Fathers and Husbands power be from the law of Nature yet the exercise of it is humane politick and voluntary and the exercise of all Subjects voluntary actions may be restrained and determined by him who hath the supreme power therefore the Fathers and Husbands exercising their power over their Children and Wives may be restrained by him who commands by the highest right which is the King But supposing the Husbands and Fathers power to be from the law of Nature and Regal power but a politick and invented thing and made only by the will of Man it were then a violence upon the law of Nature that any thing which hath no origination but from the inventions and wills of Men should restrain the exercise of that
subjection to them which are created by Gods will so revealed are not created by the Law of nature 11. All offices which are created by Divine Law whether by the Law All offices of commanding and obeying are not Gods ordinance immediately of Nature or by divine positive institution being from higher then humane causes are indelible and cannot be aliened transferred or communicated by any humane act for ejus est nolle cujus est velle and therefore cannot the power and obedience of Parents and Children of Husband and Wife of King and Subjects be aliened dissolved communicated or transferred but the offices of Masters and Servants of Magistrates and those subject to them are alienable communicable and transferrable and sometime are and sometime are not they are not therefore from any immediate ordinance of God either positive or natural But the offices of commanding and obeying as Masters and Servants and Magistrates and those subject to them are but temporary and determinable by the laws of him that made them therefore not Gods ordinance 12. Humane laws create Magistrates power two ways Immediately How many ways power and subjection happens by humane laws to Magistrates and those subject to them as when Supreme powers which are the fountain from whence all Temporal laws are derived constitute any Magistrate giving him jurisdiction over the inhabitants of any place or when the Laws or Higher powers enable such men to nominate their Magistrate there the Nominators are the instruments by which the Law does transfer this Magisterial power 13. The mutual offices of power and subjection between Masters and How many ways humane laws create the power and subjection of Masters and Servants Servants happen two ways either created by the contract or pact of the Master and Servant and we have before shewed that all pacts and contracts receive their obligation from Humane laws as the means by which Humane laws do create these offices or else without any pact or contract of the parties commanding and obeying as in the cases of Slavery where prisoners are taken in war or men condemned thereunto for some offence or of Apprentiship where children are bound for such a term by the Laws of their Country or Parents And I do grant Mr. Hobbs Grotius and White that this power and subjection Humana voluntas introduxit but not the parties obeying as they most senslesly feign but the Supreme powers or the parties commanding And where they are not so created all men are originally free I do much wonder at those men who make all Supreme or Regal power to have Annot. its origination from the consent and aggregation of many families For they not only confound the Masters power with the Fathers which in the nature and cause we have already shewed and shall more fully hereafter in their proper Chapters shew but also make the Masters power to be from the Law of God and Regal power to be a Humane institution whereas the contrary is true in both And what it is should move men to imagine that after Adam's and Noah's posterity dilated themselves into many families that they should give Adam and Noah more power then God gave them I am sure no such thing or the least probability thereof appears in Scripture or that after Adam's and Noah's deaths their Posterities became free and independent from all Government which was no body can tell when brought in by the Pacts of Men or by consent and submission of Families to it 14. That power or right of command which God jure divino hath as All power and subjection from what causes solely and absolutely over all his creatures as the Creator first and efficient Cause of them and therefore by highest right all obedience is chiefly due to them before any creature in all things Or else power and subjection are caused from the Laws of Nature or from the Law of God revealed in the Scriptures or from Humane positive Laws All Society which is not contained in these causes is Tyranny in the party commanding nor is any obligation in Conscience to such Commands from the party commanded Having thus far treated of the Causes of Power and Subjection conjunctly we shall hereafter in their several Chapters treat of them severally and more at large And we insist more largely hereon in regard these Powers and Subjections are either so confounded in their Causes by other men or such wild things begged for Principles that so far as I understand no ingenuous man should grant CHAP. II. Of Regal and Magistrates power 1. THere is no question but one of Mans chiefest happinesses in this Introduction life consists in the contemplation of God in his works to contemplate the Heavens and the Earth the workmanship of his hands and the admirable order and motion of them all being by him so made and created Nor is God less seen in the generation and birth of Man and other creatures then in the creation of the Universe And as admirable is the preservation of every Man as his generation For abstracting from the internal cause Spiritus intus alit totamque infusa per artus Virg. Aen. 6. prop. fin Mens agitat molem How God does renew and preserve every Man and every part of Man by a perpetual motion viz. the Systole and Diastole of the Blood If a Man considers his outward preservation not only from the violence of other creatures who are of much more force then himself but also from the force and violence of his own kind for were he not restrained Homo homini lupus And what are the People in general but a sudden rash and furious Beast carried hither and thither upon every wild fancy raging to have this thing done and presently lamenting because it is done He must needs As the Athenians did in their sentence on Socrates and the Captains at the Fight at Arginusae confess there is no power under heaven which can restrain the raging of the sea and the madness of the people The Psalmist therefore Psal 77. when he calls to mind the works of God and his wonders of old Thou thundrest from heaven thou shakest the earth thou dividest the sea and at last as the greatest wonder of all he says Thou leadest thy people like sheep by the hands of Moses and Aaron It is not therefore from any pacts and inventions of Man that he may hope for any security but by submitting himself to what God hath ordained for his preservation 2. Upon a survey taken in Scripture how often Christi Domini are Regal power cannot be created by the People used they are found to be thirty three two of which are spoken of the Patriarchs one of our Saviour and all the rest of Kings only Once of our Saviour Luk. 2. 26. twice of the Patriarchs Psal 105. 15. and 1 Chro. 16. 22. all the rest to Kings only and expresly And though others were anointed yet none
but our Saviour Patriarchs and Kings were the Lords anointed Nor is Gods anointed peculiar to them not the material anointing and the receiving and believing Gods revelation of him-self in the Scriptures is essential to the making of Gods anointed here but all rightful Kings are so whether they be materially anointed or believe Gods revelation of himself in the Scriptures or not For not only Cyrus was not Isa 45. 1. materially anointed and an unbeliever yet Gods anointed but Nabuchadnezzar also a cruel persecutor and destroyer of Gods people But Lam. 4. 20. God calls them Mortal Gods too Psal 82. 6. And is it not strange that our Saviour should say No power can be but from above data desuper and that Joh. 19. 11. Men should be so impudent as to affirm that there is no power unless data de subter and that against all sense and reason as well as faith For it is impossible that any Power should be superior to the cause of its being or that any thing should give that to another which it self hath not How then can an imaginary rout of Men give a power of life and death and of creating property which not any of them nor all of them together have to another 3. Humane Laws being the accidents or effects of Regal Power they Regal power not made by Humane laws cannot be superior to give or create a being to the cause Regal Power therefore cannot be made or created by Humane Laws 4. That in Regality as well as in Subjects estates jus proprietatis The possession or exercise of Regality does not create Regal power possessionis have been divided and Regal power usurped and exercised by them who had no right thereunto is not only testified by infinite Authorities out of prophane History but also many times in Sacred Writ as in the cases of Absolom Adonijah Athaliah c. It is true indeed that there is no visible power under Heaven but only Mens Consciences that can judge between an Usurper and a rightful Prince Yet ought men principally to have a care how they offend herein for God no where denounces a more dreadful sentence nor shewed a more terrible judgement then upon such Rom. 13. Men Num. 16. And if in Regality possession alone did create a just title then were summa injuria summa justitia it being no question the highest injury to invade the highest authority or dominion of another 5. If possession conjoyned with the submission and acknowledgement Possession with the Subjects acknowledgment and submission does not create Regal power of the Subjects did create regal power or right of command which Kings have over their Subjects then were the dominion of Theeves and Pirates where others submit to them just and Jeroboams title good to the kingdom of the Ten Tribes nor the Children of Israel Rebels but true Subjects after they had quietly submitted themselves to Jeroboam But this is false for God does denounce them Rebels to the house of David unto this day 1 Kings 12. 19. And Jeroboam himself a Rebel after he was quietly 1 King 12. 19. possessed and acknowledged by the Ten Tribes 2 Chron. 13. 6. It is a very remarkable thing that the Subjects of this Nation although Annot. pretending to be Christians have against all rules of Christian Faith placed all power in Government to be from the people and their obligation to it to be from their own submission to it and have by their often forswearing themselves to this and that Government not only habituated themselves into a belief that there is no such thing as right or power in Government but only possession but also taken away all Religion and Obligation of an Oath in things lawful and indifferent God no doubt permitting it that they who would not stand and be protected by his ordinance and institution should fall into all infidelity and perjury and never be true to any thing they sweare to and set up instead of it 6. If the Law of God or Nature did create Regal Power by the acknowledgement The Law of God or Nature does not create Regal power by the submission or any act of the Subject or submission of Men thereunto or that Subjects were the essential instruments by which Regal Power was originally created and yet is continued in the world then were not Men only free from Regal or Higher Powers before they did submit thereunto but also free to make whom they would their Prince and so by consequence there can be no such thing as Hereditary Monarchy in the world which for many Hundred nay Thousand years where God was not pleased to reign himself immediately over his peculiar people was in the old time the only Government in the world For above 3000 years after the Creation was neither Aristocracy Democracy or Elective Monarchy ever heard of in the world and yet Hereditary Monarchy is in above 19 of 20 parts in the world the only Government Nor would any Government that ever was or is in the world grant this liberty to any one born in their dominion but upon resisting it or renouncing it whether he ever submitted to it or not proceed against him not as an Enemy but as a Rebel and Traitor To suppose therefore that Subjects acknowledgment and submission is previous the essential means by which God does create Regal or Higher Powers is upon the matter to give the Lye to all the Powers and Governments that are or ever were in the world 7. None of these things therefore but some higher cause must create Regal power and that Regal Power is the Ordinance of God the Apostle Regal Power is the Ordinance of God and created by the Law of Nature saies expresly where he saies Rom. 13 that he which resisteth the Higher or Regal power resisteth the Ordinance of God And that this is not Gods Ordinance only to them who receive and believe his revelation of himself in the Scriptures is evident by his ordaining of Hazael Cyrus Nabuchadnezer c. and to put all out of question the Apostle here calls Higher or Regal Power Gods Ordinance and at that time whenas there was no King in the world which did receive the Scriptures for the revealed word of God Besides Kings reign by God c. Pro. 8. 5. and that Kings reign by God not only where he is believed as having extraordinarily revealed himself in the Scriptures Job in the state of nature long before the Job 3. 6 7. Moral Law was given by Moses saies Reges in solio collocat in aeternum Regal power therefore is Gods Ordinance and from the Law of Nature 8. Regal power being Gods Ordinance and created by the Law of Adam had Dominion over all Creatures and not as Father Husband or Master of a Family Nature there was never any time wherein Men were borne out of subjection to it not but that the Laws of Nature
seen that the Turkish Muscovitical and other whatsoever Governments setled upon this principle That the goods and lives of the Subjects are the Princes not to defend as our Laws go but to dispose at will c. neither do nor can breed any obligation of Obedience in the Subject more then of Fear and present Utility Observ It seems then neither Fear nor Utility may be expected from our Authors Laws with which his absolute Trustee is impowered And what other means besides the law of God which commands us to be subject to the higher Powers Rom. 13. and S. Peter 1 Ep. cap. 2. 13. To submit our selves to every ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether to the King as supreme c. can any Governor propound to his Subjects for their conformity to his Laws but utility and reward for their obedience and fear of punishment for their disobedience And here our Author calls them Tyrannical c. What 's the matter Have they too much power They have no more then God hath given them and in having less they should soon actually have none at all and Aristocraties and Democraties assume as much Do they eat too good meat or wear too good clothes Why sure Nature intended that the best things should be used and who better use them then the King What are many of their Subjects poor and miserable 'T is not their fault 't is the curse of God upon the ground for Adams sin in not giving up his will to Gods command that in sorrow man should eat of it all the days of his life Gen. 3. 17. And if any of these Tyrannical Governors as our Author calls them should divest themselves of all their power and greatness yet there would not be fewer poor laboring men And let our Author shew me in any of these Goverments half so many Slaves and miserable men as I will shew him have been under the Romans and other popular States Nor need any man in any of these be a Slave if he will become Renegado to his Faith and Religion whereas under the Romans c. they were necessitated to it at the will of their Lords Will they if they fear the power of any man to grow too great use means not fully warrantable in the known Laws either to make it less or none at all why the Portian Law prescribed only banishment to the Citizens of Rome in any offence yet Cethegus Lentulus Longinus c. were put to death for being agents in Catilines Conspiracie The Athenians would by their Ostracism banish any man that they but suspected would grow too great Will they make unjust war without any cause given why the Romans undertook the protection of the Mamertines Livy lib. 16. a company of * Sir Walter Raleigh book 5. ch 3. Hellhounds who had murdered their Hosts the Messanians and took possession of Messana against the Carthaginians which was the ground of the first Punick war And when Greece was divided amongst Athenians Lacedemonians Arcadians Corinthians Achaeans c. when was there any faith or troth among them but the weaker still bandying against the stronger till they were all brought in subjection to Philip the father of Alexander Will they put men to death upon no sufficient proof of crime against them why what proof of suspicion of crime was there against the most excellent and divine Philosopher Socrates or against the victorious Athenian Captains at the battel of Arginusae Will they not reward their good Servants and Captains what reward had Camillus Coriolanus both the Scipio's African and Asiatick See Dio Siculus Bib lib 13. Where the Syracusans before Dionysius his time made it their pastime to reward the vertue of their worthiest Commanders with death or banishment And Nicias lost the whole Athenian Army in Sicily consisting of above forty thousand men for fear if he had preserved them he should have been proscribed or put to death by the Athenians Thucid. lib. 7. Themistocles Alcibiades Hermocrates the noble Syracusan Dion c. Will they take severe revenge upon their enemies although it may be they had no just occasion given The poor Melaeans who were content not to have medled in the wars between the Athenians and Lacedemonians and no occasion of war against them but the will of the Athenians after they were forced to yield up their City at discretion were all of military age slain the women and children made slaves and Melos made a Colony to Five hundred of these cursed Demagogues as you may see at the end of the 5. book of Thucidides And see Plutarch in the Life of Sylla what came upon the Athenians who first called the Romans into Greece when Sylla took Athens Will they take severe revenge where as our Authors calls it the obeyer does not understand that it is his own profit which the action aims at that is to say when the Subject will not obey Let him see the fate of the Capuans in Livy lib. 26. and of the Mytileneans and Scionians in the 3. and 5. book of Thucidides What do they not govern their Subjects in peace Where was there ever any such dissention and confusion as in Democratical and Aristocratical States And the Grecians have seen less war and disquiet two hundred years together under the Turk then ever they saw in three years when it was divided into so many Aristocraties and Democraties But our Author will not endure that the Subject should be protected in his life and estate by the Law of these Tyrannical Governors Why what greater obligation of obedience can there be to Government on the Subjects part then that he is thence protected in his life and from thence holds whatsoever may be called his And since there never was nor can be a fourth species of Government how much better is it for a Subject to obey one Individual Prince then by an imaginary liberty to make his obedience to many for Quantae molis erit dominis servire duobus Author Well but let us compare one of these Tyrannical Governors with our Authors Absolute Governor For though our Authors Absolute Governor be a Mungrel extracted from equivocal generation and such a Beast as Nature never intended and Ground 8. tied up to certain Laws and Limits of the People yet for all that our Author can have a course too with his Lycisce though tied up in a line But then it must be agreed between our Author and his Lycisce that they say it be for the good of the People and then Ground 11. they are his Laws alack the while what is become of the Peoples Laws c. And Gr. 13. p. 101. The lawfulness of a Soveraign Commander is no other then that he truly thinketh to be for the good of the Commonwealth Observ So now Casting of Dollars and Coining of Dollars is all the difference between our Authors Trustee and one of these Tyrannical Governors the same thing differently called by the Author
to the wills of men whereas Natural causes do immediately proceed from God and are above the will of man Society therefore being natural the actions of the wills of the most perverse and wicked men in the world could never make them out of society but where they would not be commanded by their rightful Superiors fell a commanding and obeying among themselves 4. They all not only invert Nature and make Wills and Pacts superior to it in the cause of Society but all of them make the natural relations of rightful Princes and Subjects to be dissolvible by the wills of men yet after a different manner Grotius when there is a necessity makes them dissolvible by the Subjects Our Author when the Subjects judge it reasonable And Mr. Hobbs when the King or Civitas will give or sell the relations Whereas Regal power being Gods ordinance is therefore superior to mens wills and cannot be aliened or dissolved by the will of man 5. They all not only invert Nature and make it alterable by the will of man but make the Law of Nature or God to take its origination from the civil pact or will of man whereas the Law of Nature is eternal and immutable by the will of man and connatural with every man and always had and ever shall have a like obligation upon all men in all ages and places 6. I say They not only blasphemously make Nature and the Law of God alienable and depending upon the will of man but also most illogically confound the relations of agencie and patiencie in the same subject and make the Cives to constitute the civil pact and to be subject to it whereas Omnis potentia activa est principium transmutandi aliud 7. They invert Grammatical construction in making the Cives who constitute the Civitas the patient or governed and the Civitas who accepts the wills of the Cives to be the agent or governor Whereas the contrary is true in both for Obligans is the governor who does will and obligatus the governed who accepts the will of the governor 8. They all most ridiculously make the Creature the Civitas superior to and the Governor of the Creator viz. the Cives whereas it is impossible any Being should be prime or superior to the cause of its being 9. They all of them make the Cives to endue the Civitas with that which none of them have either separately or conjunctly viz. a power of life and death and creating property whereas Nil dat quod non habet nemo potest transferre id in alium quod ipse non habet If all these things be true and that I have not unjustly charged them in my Observations how contrary they are not only to one another but to themselves in their superstructure then let the world judge especially you my dear and native Countrymen whether grounds so unnatural so blasphemous so illogical so contrary to common sense and grammatical construction so ridiculous and impossible should be worthy to be accounted the Principles of Humane society Or whether they ought not to be exploded by mankind as fit for nothing but to abuse ignorant men and to open a gap for Sedition and Atheism If I have here or heretofore unjustly charged them two of my Adversaries are alive and of age and may answer for themselves and no question but Grotius hath followers enough who may vindicate him if he hath wrong done him Or if I have committed any of these things in these Elements let them make it appear I will thank them for it A Premonition to the Reader BEside that part of this Treatise which shews the causes and means by which men attain Arts and Sciences in this Preface Observations and Elelements I have designed three things First in the Preface I designe to demonstrate That it is impossible that the Cause of Humane Society should be originally created by the pacts and wills of men and the occasion of writing these Observations Secondly in the Observations I designe to shew That the Causes of Humane Society do not appear from these mens Grounds and Principles Thirdly in the Elements I endevour to demonstrate the Causes of all Humane Christian and Legal Society And if any of my Adversaries or any man else shall shew me any errors in any of them I profess I will ascribe it as an act of Friendship to him I have one request more to the Reader That he would look upon all these Elements and Observations except one half-sheet added to the Observations to be passed the Press before His MAJESTIES Acknowledgment or Restitution until the last Book or one sheet or two of the Fourth Book of Justice c. And to insert in pag. 9. of this Preface line 22. after For which no reason can be given what is contained in the Margin from These things thus premised c. ELEMENTS OF Power Subjection Or the Causes of all Humane Christian Legal SOCIETY Vir bonus est quis Qui consulta Patrum qui Leges juraque servat By ROGER COKE LONDON Printed by T. N. for G. Bedel and T. Collins at the Middle-Temple Gate 1660. TO THE READER MAns thoughts of Life and Living are odd things pritty Antitheses he thinks his whole Life though he should live a Thousand years too short and yet every day nay hour of his living too long Vicious Men therefore misplace their happiness in entertaining worldly pleasures thereby to delude and spend their time which they desire so much to continue in their Life that in their living it might not seem to be Virtuous Men have the same thoughts of Life and living with vicious Men but their actions discern them For those hours which in their Life would otherwise seem tedious to them they entertain either in the Contemplations of God or his Works or by doing virtuously sweeten those sowre effects which idleness causes So that the old Philosophers would affirm That not Years but Virtue should be the measure of Mans life And this reward hath God the Author of Virtue in Men as Plato divinely affirms given Meno prope finem to virtuous Men that they not onely take pleasure in remembring time past but also hope well in time to come notwithstanding all the frowns of perverse and wrinckled Fortune whereas vicious Men are onely pleased with deceiving the present time ashamed to look back upon their actions past and affrighted upon the apprehensions of death and worldly calamities which notwithstanding all their Proteus shapes and Janus faces happens to them as well as virtuous Men in time to come There is no time wherein virtuous Men may not contemplate God either as God or in his Works or do well whereas many times vicious Men though never so rich and able to maintain their Vices are either wearied with them or have not means to attain to what they call the fruition of them and then they may be truly accounted miserable because they know not what to
although no man can hope to preserve any thing which he hath but as he and what he hath is secured by that Power which gives him property which Power must be preserved by every mans life and fortune or else no man can hope to enjoy any thing he holds by that Power and the paying of Taxes is to maintain others who are to expose themselves and their lives in defence of what he and his fellow-subjects enjoy Yet are none of these things considered by the greatest part of men but as Mr. Hobbs observes The raising of Taxes makes men fire as those who are in Cap. 12. art 9. the disease called Incubus or as we say ridden with the Night-mare which rising from the stomach makes men think they are invaded oppressed and suffocated with great weight Which thing they who seem to themselves to be oppressed with all the weight of the City are prone to sedition and men declining in their fortunes will not spare though the fault be in themselves to impute their declining condition to the payment of the publick Taxes nor will avaritious rich men fail to pretend poverty and seek by innovation and sedition to prevent them 23. Honos est in honorante Honor is nothing else but the opinion of Passionate desire to punish Subjects especially where many are peccant moves to sedition anothers power joined with goodness Majesty does never appear so amiable as when arrayed in Clemencie whereas he who rigorously executes his power will be hated and servilely feared by them who otherwise would honor and willingly obey him It were the most easie and natural thing in the world to govern well if the violent and rigid execution of Laws against all offenders would cure the maladies of State nay Subjects ought to be preserved though peccant where the pardoning may appear an act of grace not remisness and the example not encourage others to the like offence Punishment ought always to look forward never backward that is Princes in punishing ought by the example to deter others from the like offence not to take pleasure in punishing any who hath offended him I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu and will cause to cease the house of Israel saith the Lord Hos 1. 4. How should God avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu whenas Jehu did nothing but what the Lord commanded him The reason is given that Jehu took pleasure in executing so dreadful a judgment upon his Masters house Weak and indisposed bodies are killed never cured by violent physick nor will Patients ever seek to Physitians who they fear will rather kill than cure them Princes who by violent and cruel ways do govern suppress yet nourish a fire which breaking out will hardly be quenched Yet it is sometime the fate I dare not think through the fault of most serene and clement Princes to suffer death and martyrdom from the sensless rage and fury of their seditious Subjects If then the insite piety of the most devout religious and best of Princes adorned with all the excelling virtues of Patience Temperance Chastity Justice Mercy love and tender care of his Subjects Magnanimity in Adversity Moderation in Prosperity could not secure Innocent Majesty from the violence of unnatural Subjects sure Peace and happiness may by other men be endeavored and prayed for in the next World but it can scarcely be hoped for in this If there were neither Heaven nor Hell no hope of bliss or fear of Annot. punishment hereafter yet sure so much Morality should be harbored in humane breasts as not causelesly to offer violence or injury to them of their own kind How much more unnatural ingrateful and inhumane then is it for Subjects against all Oaths of faith and allegiance not only not to make any restitution of those things which they hold of their Prince before they attempt any thing against him but also to imploy them all to the destruction of that Person and Power by whose grace and favor they enjoyed them And if that Monarchy be Tyranny as Libertines affirm and that all power is from the People then ought they not in reason to condemn it in the cause and allow it in the effect and rob the People of so great a part of their original right by retaining their Estates which were all mediately or immediately holden of the Crown If Regal power be unjust and usurped in the cause then cannot any act of it be just or legal and so by consequence all these famous Assertors of Liberty do unjustly and illegally hold their Estates which are nothing but Concessions originally from the Crown and do unjustly usurp them from the People from whom originally all power is derived And where these men complain so much of unjust illegal and arbitrary power of a Prince let any man shew where ever after they had usurped Regal power they made Justice Law Equity or Reason but only their Rage and Will the rule of their Actions and Laws 24. It is a vain thing to expect that Subjects will long be governed in By what degreâ—s and from what causes thâ—â— Nation became miserable peace where either they are not governed by force of Arms as the Turks English Scots Irish and Low-Dutch are or where the Subjects have not that estimation of their Prince that by his power they are protected in their lives and estates and from him do claim whatsoever may be called theirs and do not unite themselves in a Religious Unity which is the chiefest bond of Peace or Publique Form and Communion of serving God For both in Church and State there must be some one thing to which all Subjects must indifferently submit themselves or it is impossible there should be any decision of their differences in either Where men therefore will not indifferently submit themselves to the just and legal established Government in Church and State there necessarily must men whatever they pretend or hope for be forcibly governed by Arms or they will infinitely destroy one another It is true indeed that Henry the Eighth who being of all mortal men the most unfit for a Churchman ascribed to himself the Headship of the Church and having converted to his own use so great a part of the Church-lands the veneration which men retained of the Church became vile and contemptible and the Crown lost the chief support thereby The Crown thus left almost without support it descended to a Child in whose Aristocratical reign not only the Chantries and divers other Religious Houses were given by the Parliament and Bishops to the King but almost all things Sacred became a prey to the ravenous Courtiers Queen Mary endeavored to have had restored all to the Church again but the lands being incorporated into particular mens estates it was not in her power After her Queen Elizabeth by Act of Parliament so stopt the precipice of things that what was left in the Church
Yet this can be no objection by those men who ascribe all infallibility to the Pope and that all his Acts and Decrees are to be received and obeyed by an implicite faith as Divine oracles Well but suppose these determinations of the Pope were not concerning matters of Faith as no doubt they were not then how comes the Pope because he is infallible in the Faith that he takes upon him to be Judge and Determiner of those things which no ways appertain to it but are as much where Christianity is not planted as where it is Object Yet it will be objected That if the Church be not Judge of what conduceth to the peace and safety of the Kingdom and Church then who shall and so farewell to all Government and peace in Church or State But before I answer this Quaere I would be resolved one Question or two Who shall be Judge whether the Pope or a General Council be superior Who shall judge whether in any Determination of the Popes it be concerning matter of Faith or not or whether it be determined in Gathedra or not In the many Schismes of the Papacy who should judg who was the true Pope or who shall judg whether Alexander the tenth be now the true Pope or who ever gave the Cardinals who were an humane institution many hundred years after our Saviour this power of Election of the Pope that whosoever they should so elect should be universal Bishop and St. Peters successor Although I might justly insist hereupon nor can these things upon these mens principles who maintain the Popes infallibility at least in my understanding be solved and so are they for all their boast of unity among themselves in as much confusion and dissention even in their very principles as other men yet am not I ashamed to give an account of my obedience both to my Church and King Answer I say that God hath made man a sociable intellectual and reasonable creature and endewed him with an immortal soule potentially capable of eternal happiness Nor will God be served by man having so made him only by a base servile feare and without the intellectual and rational faculties of the soule and therefore has engraven by nature in the heart of every man certain rules by which he is to direct his actions which are the first principles and foundations upon which I honor my Parents King and them who are set over me for my direction in order to my eternal good And although that out of the Church and not being preserved by humane Laws I can neither hope for safety in this world nor salvation in the world to come yet who he is from whom all humane Laws are derived or what is the Church in which I must hope for salvation there is no visible Judge under Heaven but only mens consciences to direct them viz. those directions which God either by nature has given to men or revealed supernaturally in the Scriptures Nor does a mans conscience thus informed leave him after it be informed who it is from whom he ought to expect protection and to whom he owes his obedience as well spirituall as temporal for though there be no visible means for men to hope for peace in Church or State yet does it not follow that by all men all things which may be commanded for the Laws of the Church and State are to be observed as the Laws of Church and State as if the Church command men to worship Images or any creature for the Creator which under the old Law it many times did nor do I understand how it can be excused in the Church of Rome or if men be commanded by higher powers immoral things as to dishonor them or their Parents or whenas temporal powers command things plainly derogatory to the ghostly power of the Church or the Church commands things contrary to the duty men owe to their King and Country which we daily see both the one and the other do which makes some men in their passion ultimately resolve their Temporal and Ecclesiastical obedience into the Church others into the secular power and many deny all obedience to either and set up themselves or something else in stead of either But though mens affections carrie them several waies yet ought not all reason therefore and conscience to forsake all men for although I ought not to judge either King or Church if they command any thing they ought not yet have I and every man else a conscience to direct them whether I ought to do all things whatsoever commanded by King or Church Nor ought men to be frighted out of their consciences viz. the Law of God by nature informing them or his Law supernaturally revealed by his grace directing them because a perverse company of Schismatical and seditious men have abused all Temporal and Ecclesiastical Laws and Powers by pretending conscience Nor will a blind obedience in all things to the Church of Rome cause unity and peace among Christians although it be so much magnified by them for let any man read the lives of H. 4. 5. 6. and 7. and Frederick 1. and 2. Emperors whenas the whole Empire was of the Roman Catholick Religion and see if ever greater broyles were in the Christian World and let them judge whether Obedience to the Popes by so great a part of the Empire were not the cause of them or whether all the Wars in Christendom caused by Boniface the eight and Julius the second were not against Christians in the communion and form of the Church of Rome But where secular or ecclesiastical Laws do plainly command things not plainly derogatory to Gods Law for where they do God is in all things to be obeyed before man so as it is doubtful whether they do repugne Gods Law or not then certainly the best way is to submit to them for a mans conscience wrong informed does not excuse him from any Article of his duty and if it may be the Laws do repugne Gods Law it may be they do not and in controverted and doubtful cases the Law is alwaies presumed to be on the Governors part Nor shall any mans conscience ever excuse him if the Laws either of Church or Country do command things repugnant to Gods word from the duty and obedience he owes to them in all things where they do not repugne it Nor does it free any man from his subjection to higher power but where he cannot submit he ought to suffer And no question that where two evils unavoidable happen the least is to be taken as if a man in the communion of the Church of Rome be reduced to that necessity of simply conforming himself to all things used in the Church of Rome although his conscience cannot digest many things or be excluded out of the visible Church of Christ he had better be of such a Church then of none at all Sure God never affixt such infallibility to men how great or good soever
Tribute or of St. Peter Cap. 20. Who shall deny the peny of St. Peter the peny let him pay by the Justice of the Church and thirty pence forfeiture and if he will be impleaded concerning it by the Justice of the King let him forfeit to the Bishop thirty pence and forty shillings to the King Of Religion and the publick Peace 51. First of all we Ordain above all things That one God be worshipped all over our Kingdom and the one Faith of Christ be always kept inviolate c. The Laws are Translated out of the Original set forth by Mr. Abraham Whelock in his Appendix to the History of Bede from page 150. to 107. Sir Ed. Coke in Caudrys Case cites a quare Impedit 7 Ed. 3. tit 19. where it is agreed that no man can make an appropriation of any Church having cure of souls being a thing Ecclesiastical and to be made by some person Ecclesiastical but he that hath Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction but William the first of himself without any other as King of England made appropriation of Churches with cure to Ecclesiastical persons wherefore it does follow he had Ecclesiastical Jurisdiction Here is nothing but argumentum à facto ad jus and a man may as well infer that Saul Jeroboam and Azariah did offer sacrifice and burn incense and therefore they had Sacerdotal power in them or that King John did give the Crown and received it again from him and therefore the Crown of England is holden of the Pope Ecclesiastical Laws made by Henry the first Who began to Reign in the year of Christ 1100. THese at last are the happy joys of the long wished for peace and liberty Proem by which the glorious Cesar Henry doth shine forth to his whole kingdom in Divine and Secular Laws written Institutes and Exhibitions of good Works Moderate Just Valiant Prudent whom God may make to command with happy auspices and healthful prosperity of body and minde with his famous wife Maud the second and their children for ever and the everlasting peace of this Nation His Epistle to all his Leigmen 1. Henry by the Grace of God King of Englishmen to all Barons and his Leigmen French English health Know that I by Gods mercy and the Common Counsel and consent of the Barons of the Kingdom of England am Crowned King of the Kingdom aforesaid and because the Kingdom was oppressed by unjust exactions I in respect of God and the love which I have towards you all first of all make the Church of God free so that I will neither sell nor let to farm nor after the death of an Archbishop or Bishop or Abbot will take any thing of the Demesns of the Church or her men until the successor be come in c. Of the propriety of Causes Cap. 5. In all Causes Ecclesiastical and Secular legally and in order to be handled some are Accusers some Defenders some are Witnesses some are Judges In every discussion of honesty fitting men are to be joyned together and that without any exaction until the quality of the Causes and the intention of the Accused the manner of Witnesses and election of Judges be weighed with upright scrutiny Let there be no foreign Judgements nor celebrated by their improper Judge in place or time nor in a doubtful case or the party accused being absent the sentence being pronounced notandum that for all if the accused had competent warning and lawful leave of answering and defending he be not denied or impleaded or outlawed or circumvented by some stealth or judged by deceit If he be satisfied in the Witnesses Judges and Persons If he consent to the Judges or hurt or contradict It is not altogether so in Ecclesiastical business as Secular in Secular business after that any is called shall come and begin to plead in the Court it is not lawful to go back before the Cause be determined although they shall agree but in Ecclesiastical business it is lawful to go back in the Cause aforesaid If a man suspect a Judge or think himself oppressed surely Judges ought not to be so nisi quos impetitus Elegerit Neither may any one be heard or give judgement before that they be chosen and he who refuses to consent to the elected let no man communicate with him until he obey but if in judgement there arises dissention among the parties of which a strife comes forth let the sentence of the more prevail It is Enacted in the Cause of Faith or of any Ecclestastical Order he ought to judge who neither takes reward nor is of another Law and will do nothing without an accuser For God and our Lord Jesus Christ did know Judas to be a Thief but because he was not accused therefore he was not rejected and whatsoever he acted among the Apostles for the dignity of his Office remained firm As also Clerks ought not to receive Laiks Accusers so ought not Laicks to receive Clerks to be Accusers of Clerks in their Accusations and Informations and Witnesses ought to be legitimate and present without any infamy or suspition or manifest spot because they cannot rightly accuse Priests who cannot be Priests nor of their Order nor is it needful to Judge a man before he hath had lawful Accusers present and accepts a place of defence to wash out his crimes And it is our pleasure as often as many crimes are objected to Clerks by Accusers and they cannot make good one of the first of which they are accused they shall not be admitted to the rest And a Bishop shall not be condemned unless by seventy two Witnesses nor the Archbishop be judged of any A Presbyter-Cardinal Note the preheminence of a Bishop in England at this time above a Cardinal shall not be condemned unless by forty four Witnesses a Deacon-Cardinal shall not be condemned unless by twenty six Witnesses nor a Sub-Deacon under seven nor let the greater despair for the force of the lesser men and there always the Cause may be Pleaded where the Crime is admitted If a man stricken will he may plead his cause before his Judge and if he will not before his Judge he may hold his peace and as for men stricken as often as they desire respit let it be granted And every man which objects a crime let him write that he will prove it and if before he be changed he will not follow he is convinced no crime is to be accounted But if he will prosecute if he shall not prove what he objects let him undergo the penalty which he brought the Apostle says Against a Presbyter a writing is not to be received without two or three approved witnesses how much more against Bishops if these things be observed of Presbyters and other faithful men If any one will accuse any of the Clerks in an accusation of Fornication according to the precept of St. Paul two or three testimonies are required from him but if he