Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n death_n great_a king_n 2,913 5 3.6168 3 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A97180 The devilish conspiracy, hellish treason, heathenish condemnation, and damnable murder committed and executed by the Iewes against ... Christ their king ... As it was delivered in a sermon on the 4 Feb. 1648 ... out of some part of the gospel appointed by the Church of England to be read on that day. Warner, John, 1581-1666. 1648 (1648) Wing W902; Thomason E550_16 37,074 47

There are 8 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

wherein he shewes that they were Innovators for saith he Mat. 19.8 What ye now teach and professe was not from the beginning but ye by forsaking the old good way prescribed and by following the traditions and expositions taken up from your latter Rabbins you Mat. 15.3 6. have made the commandement of God of none effect and thereby v. 9. you teach for doctrines the commandements of men John 7.19 Moses did give you the auncient good Law which you would wrest and force against me yet none of you keepeth the Law A second generall pretended charge upon which they proceed to his condemnation is exprest John 11.48 If we let him alone all men will believe on him and adhere to him against us and so we may lose our place and Nation where we see plainly that salus Populi the safety and liberty of the People is their maine pretended cause which cause hath no other ground or bottome but that which themselves created for their owne wicked ends to wit some feares and jealousies that if we let Him alone the Nation will be destroyed and hereupon from this charge grounded upon their own disguised and counterfeit fears the whole Councell gives sentence it is expedient that he the one Man die for the People v. 50. To which I may reply as M. W. Sedgwicke one of the Armies Prophets in his Justice upon the Army p. 5. O ye Jewes ye miserably abuse this Maxime and the People too like a company of Deceivers and Mountebanks who talke of curing saving delivering while that they doe but waste spoyle and destroy the People and therefore all your swelling words are but as the attire of an Harlot whereby as you make your selves more vendible so you make your selves more abominable A third generall pretended charge against him we find Mark 15.2 He calls himselfe King and he that is so can be no friend to Caesar that is to the Conquerour and we John 19. are resolved and professe that we will have no other King hereafter but the Conquerour Caesar Will you now that I summe up the whole charge of these Jews against Ch the King Why the first part is That he is a Tyrant in that he hath endeavoured to change and destroy our Lawes thereby robbing us of our liberty which he traversed and denied Mat. 5.19 The second charge is He is a Traytour and an Enemy to the State for Luke the 23.2 he perverteth the Nation and that two waies 1. By forbidding tribute and power of Governing to the Conquerour 2. By calling himselfe their King The third charge is that his course tends to the destruction murder of the People which is implied in those words Joh. 11. We must not let him live but kill him lest the Nation perish Pardon I pray this one short digression while I become a Rehearser of what the Armies Remembrancer hath borrowed from Master Sedgwicke whom he calls the Armies justice These men are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Devils exquisite Accusers and such wicked Spirits are now abroad like those Ezek. 21.32 brutish men skilfull to destroy Brutish not sparing the holiest nor honourablest things Kings Lords Ministers Scripture Ordinances Oathes they lay all wast and yet in the greatest bruitishnesse And yet though there be the most sensuall and beastly confusion yet they will doe it artificially skilfully saying all is for God justice Religion and that they doe it by the power of Christ and the power of God in Religion And see saith he how old studied Professours of Religion when once their consciences are defiled and they begin to trade in the world with a pretence that it is for God they are so cunning that no bonds of honesty or faith can hold them and there can be no such compleat and very Knaves as a Jesuite and a Pharisee and how close these words come home to these Layers of this charge judge ye for they who are the onely Breakers of the Law accuse Him for destroying the Law and thereupon his charge is to be a Tyrant they have perverted the Nation and slaughtered the People whereby they incurre the name and guilt of Traytours and Murderers Matth. 22. Luke 7.52 and yet they charge him to be the Traytour Enemy to the State and Murderer but let this be remembred what there falls from them John 11.50 He must die for the People that is for our Laws and Liberties and so is become by his death your Martyr your Sacrifice and your Saviour Hitherto you have heard the Jewes feigned false unjust charge against Ch the King with a short vindication of him and a recrimination to them which that it may more plainly appeare be content I pray with a little more pleasing patience to be rightly informed what the reall true causes were which moved these accursed Jewes to so horrid an act as to kill Ch the King And the generall leading cause is in one word that they are Hypocrites a Generation of Vipers Sonnes of Belial Children indeed of the Devil for so Ch told them John 8.44 Ye are of your Father the Devill he was a Murderer from the beginning and the lusts and the works of your Father ye will doe and therefore from such a viperous generation and Devilish brood what can be expected lesse then murder And from this source see another cause bubling as it were for when they perceived and found that he spake as never man did John 7.46 2ly That he did all things well Marke 7.37 yea wonderfully well John 11.45 and that by these meanes the People loved believed and adhered to him John 11.48 which they by no means would have had the People perceived or done these rare endowments and virtues like the glorious rayes of the Sunne upon putrified matter worke and beget the poysonous Brats of envie hatred and malice and thereupon and therefore as it is Mat. 27.18 Marke 15.10 for envie they delivered or betrayed him to death A third reall cause that although they knew by experience that Ch the King in his life was so tender and meek that he studied the saving of all that would not wilfully perish and so patient and mercifull at his death that he forgave and prayed even for his Murderers yet the guilt of their hate malice and murder against him was of so deep a staine that they could not that they would not believe either and therefore as their elder Brother Cain they crying out Our sins are greater than he can forgive us can find no other way to save or secure themselves but by his death and this is a reall maine cause why these bloudy Jewes did kill Ch the King A fourth reall cause may be conceived that he was their King not by their election and free will but by the Title of an Heire for so Mat. 21. before they resolved to kill him they premised this is the Heire so that though his other graces and virtues might have preserved him as a Man yet
understand that in this Treason those Priests were like our Romish Jesuits yet you may well understand and believe them to be Mars his Priests called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who in their Temples and Sacrifices scattered the fire of sedition and rebellion and being appointed in the Church as Trumpets yet upon the least grievance or discontent of the People they used their Trumpets as Sheba did 2 Sam. 20.1 to stirre up the People to their Tents and to take up Armes though it be against Ch their King and indeed without these or the like never did Commotion or Rebellion take life or live long so that to choake or strangle these is the way to cut the throat of all Rebellion I cannot omit in a word to put you in mind that the Gospels have minded us of some who though comprised under those before mentioned yet notified by an especiall title as called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or as in our English Bible Luke 7.30 Lawyers and these as chiefe peeces culled out of the rest were as I may call them Chaire-men for so Christ spake of them they sit in Moses Chaire and what they say saith Christ that is when they speake and say the Law doe as they say and teach but doe not follow or imitate them in their waies and practises for as Christ there said of them they have rejected or frustrated the counsels of God written in the Law against themselves and therefore Luke 11.52 Woe unto you Lawyers for ye have taken away the key of knowledge the Law and instead thereof you teach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the traditions of men Mat. 15.3 6. which traditions Saint Paul Ephes 2.15 calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and in our English not Laws or Canons but Ordinances In the 15. of Marke 1. we read of their Councel in which or to which most of the fore-specified Parties were assembled and gathered together I cannot I thinke no good Christian can call it as some of our Councels have termed Benedictum but either Indoctum Insanum Sacrilegum or as indeed this was and so to be stiled of all others from the beginning of the world to this day Diaholicum The Councell of Trent in comparison of this was Divinum and of it we may truly and properly apply that Psal 1.1 it is the Councell of the Vngodly the way of Sinners and the seat of the Scornfull and therefore all good men may say as Jacob Gen. 49.5 Instruments of cruelty are in their hands or their Swords are Weapons of violence and may pray as he did v. 6. O my soule come not thou into their secret unto their assembly be not thou united for in their anger they slew a Man v. 7. Cursed be their anger for it was fierce and their wrath for it was cruell I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel and why may not all the People say Amen for though in this Councell and Treason there were of severall Sects and Factions as Pharisees and Sadduces who were as opposite as Lutheran and Calvinist and Scribes and Herodians who differed in many things and hated each other yet they all in this conspire and thence it is called in the worst sense a Conspiracy or as here a Councell to betray to death Ch their King And yet that all may not appeare alike guilty let me adde that though there be no Accessaries in Treason or none more Traytours than others in respect of its ordinary punishments yet some are and may justly be said to be greater and more guilty in the Treason than others And to this I desire it may be noted that there being at this time but three apparent profest Sects among the Jewes into which or some of which all Jewes of what Authority Place or Office soever had cut and divided themselves viz. Pharisees Sadduces and Essenes of which latter sort happily Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea might be Now as these I find not mentioned in the New Testament so nor to be Actors in this grand Rebellion or Treason for they were peaceable men but as the Pharisees of the two ruling Sects were the most numerous and potent so were they the most forward and active in the leading part to tempt and betray Christ yet the Sadduces who denyed all Scripture that made against them 2. The immortality of the Soule 3. All punishment for evill after death these and upon these grounds and causes I may suppose were the most active and cruell in hurrying the Lord of life to death and killing Ch their King Besides Officers and Sects there is a Faction mentioned in this Treason as distinct from all the former and they are in the Gospel called Herodians and these were flattering Courtiers who varied and changed their Opinions with the over-ruling and swaying part and concerning these and such like Christ gave that saving cautionary counsel Marke 8.15 Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Herodians that is of the contagious doctrines of the former and the Fox-like subtilties of the latter 2. Of their leaven of doctrine for it is 1. sower 2. spreading 3. tainting and from their persons Matth. 23. a Generation of Vipers 1. multiplying 2. infectious 3. killing There is further mention of Samaritans who were to the Jews as Papists to Protestants and branded by the Jewes as inhumane and bloudy men and though Ch the King did all he possible could for the Jewes and nothing at all for the Samaritans more than to pity them and not fuffer them to be destroyed when some of his Disciples like fiery Zealots desired it yet these would not joyne in the bloudy act with the more seeming-holy Professors but shall at last rise up and condemne them But in stead of those you shall find Luke 22.66 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 word for word the Presbytery for they led the way and Marke 15.1 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the whole Councell of the professing Jewes they first or last have their hands in it But I heare these Jewes John 8.3 boasting themselves to be Abrahams seed the Faithfull vers 41. the Children of God but here truth it selfe tells them what indeed they are notwithstanding their vaine hypocrisie and he saith v. 44. ye are of your Father the Devill and the lusts of your Father ye doe who was a Murderer from the beginning As the persons of the Traytours are not in this or any other Text laid together so nor in this or any other is the manner exprest how they enterprized plotted or proceeded in this devilish Tragedy of any one that Text which Christ parabolically uttered Mat. 21. comes the nearest to the point where Christ saith they seeing him there called the Heire but now their King upon sight of such a sacred Majesty which would have begot an awfull reverence in all but such as they were upon this sight their eyes became bloud-shot and therefore forth with from seeing they proceed to saying saying 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
this alone shall destroy him for being their naturall rightfull born King for such Jewes will never serve and obey any but either a Conquerour who holds them to it by dint of Sword or some tame Creature who will serve their turnes and obey their wills But the fifth cause comes nearer home to the root of all and that is exprest John 11.48 If we let him alone suffer him to live and not kill him some Forreigners Romans will come and take away our place we have now a toleration for our Religion any Sect is free in Gods service and worship to chuse and professe what he will be he Pharisee Sadducee or other and we have yet an Anarchy no Government but that of the Conquerour who so long as we honour humour and feed him and his leaves us to wallow in all sinnes as we lust whereas if this Ch the Anointed live and get the power be we Scribe Pharisee Presbyter yea the whole Councell he will not suffer or endure this but will take away our places our usurpt power and authorities and therefore in the next vers 49. Ye know nothing at all and ver 50. nor doe ye consider that it is expedient he the one man idie their feare of losse is the first immediate reall cause of their killing Ch the King The second last immediate fundamental cause of his death is their desire and hope to get and hold all the Power Authority which is the Kings and so we find it Mat. 21.8 This is the Heire let us kill him and let us seize on his inheritance Saint Luke hath it that the inheritance fiat may become ours which S. Marke expresseth by erit and then certainly it shall and will be ours none when he is dead can keep us from it so long as we hold in which we will alwaies doe with Caesar the Conquerour and now believe this to be as true as Gospel it selfe is that pretend the Jewes change of Religion destruction of Lawes losse of Liberty or what else to be the cause of killing the King all are but forged feigned and held out to deceive the people and blind the world for this habebimus is the cause when all is done We will kill Ch the King and so seize on his inheritance For this habebimus we will have is the largest Commander and the greatest Sinner in the world the intention plot and action of every mans ends in having his pleasure his profit and his will is the Devils first seed-plot and is the commotion or confusion of all for what is the Rulers study but to have his power enlarged what the Inferiours plea but to hold or encrease his liberty whereas could any Generall Councell determine and make it durable what every man should have all would soone be at peace whereas so long as this one Verbe we will have raignes in the Superiour and rageth in the Inferiour say what we will we can expect no better then Kill kill that we may have And as by inheritance in this Gospel Mat. 21. was primarily and principally meant the inheritance of the Vineyard which Vineyard Isa 5. Cant. 2. is expounded to be the Church so having the Church inheritance first brought the doctrine of killing into the Church quid vultis dare is the Jewes question in this case omnia haec is the Devils answer and such a dialogue betwixt the Devil and a Jew for the Church inheritance is enough to bring Ch the King to his death that the Jew by the Devils help may have the inheritance of the Church which rather then Ch the King would surrender up unto them it being his rightfull inheritance and committed to his trust by God himself he would rather suffer this ignominious death and for this he deserves to be everlastingly Chronicled as the Churches nursing Father Patron Protector and Martyr in that he was killed in defence of the Church But these Jewes and Conquerours betwixt them even while they speake this let us kill that we may have have that inheritance in their power and possession already what need they then kill the King that they may have what they have but having oftentimes as here now begets more then a bare having and therefore the Greek word in S. Matth. c. 21. is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is that we may hold it as we have got it by force the Sword and bloud for sinne and this sinne especially of forcible entrance will not easily be led out of its old track the Whore in the Apoc. c. 17. having tasted and delighted her self with bloud will not cease from swilling more till she be drunke with the bloud and that bloud not of the coursest or most common but the purest the holiest the bloud the Saints in the Church unjust Purchasers be it of Christs inheritance never think of restitution but retention how to hold it as they got it by the sword by bloud yea by the bloud of the rightfull Heire Ch the King So much the word in the originall will easily beare without much force and I conceiue somewhat more that is Let us kill him that we may have and hold more then what we yet have or more then ever he had let us never leave killing till we have all as much as our eyes can see or our hearts desire for ambition and usurpation are violent and greedy which like the Daughters of the Horse-leech are still gaping and crying Give give and more more yea of bloud and never think themselves full till they breake with fulnesse of bloud I shall end this point with this one short observation Ch the King like a Monarch whose institution was from Heaven heavenly held his inheritance Church and all in one single Person but these Husbandmen the Jewes liked not this though they thrived best under it but they will have it among themselves no more Monarchy by a King and Princes of the People but a pure Democracy though that the worst and the basest of all Governments it is like the Acephali which have faces of men in their brests but without an head such a Monster it is and yet this for the present pleaseth us and therefore we wil kill him the onely true Heire and rightfull King that we the people may have the inheritance but I must and cannot but tell these men that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is more antient then these Jewes and the Scepter in the hand of one is more steady and upright then in the hands of many and as we find one soule to governe one body and when it leaves to be one the body is dissolved so we may observe that the greatest Empires that ever were grew great by Monarchy which soone crumbled away when shared among the many in Gods name let all that love peace and unity crie 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 let us have one King and away with habebimus we the many will have the inheritance and governe for
ejected and cast him forth by their Law their sin had been the lesse but first to kill him and that upon his owne ground his own Vineyard and then after that to cast him out and declare against him and his title for ever thereby to take and hold the inheritance to themselves is but to lay the foundation of their Babel in the bloud of Gods Anointed their lawfull rightfull King and so to strengthen one sin by another worse which Gods justice will not suffer long to prosper lest the wicked should thinke God altogether such an one as themselves Psal 50.21 and therefore the Prophet in the same Psalme subjoynes but I will reprove thee and in the forementioned Gospel after that they had killed and cast him forth it presently followes in the next words v. 9. God the Lord of the Vineyard will come and destroy the unjust bloudy Actors and will give the Vineyard to others And should not this move a Iew to tremble and repent it had this operation by the mercy of God on many of them as it appeares Acts 2.37 for they hearing Saint Peter to open their sin they were pricked in their hearts and said what shall we doe that is to be saved to which the Apostle applies a double counsell the first v. 38. repent and the second v. 40. save your selves from and no longer be seduced and deluded by this untoward Generation which Christ Mat. 23.33 calls a Generation of Vipers which will eat out the bowels of those who give them their life And the execution ended let me put you in mind how the people were affected therwith which is exprest Luk. 23.48 where it is said and all the people beholding the things that were done smote their breasts and now oh ye people having in this sad discourse or short history beheld what hath been done to the Anointed of the Lord Ch the King the least that ye can doe and to this I must exhort you is to smite your brests and yet as Ch himselfe taught Luke 23.28 Weep not for me but weep for your selves so beat not your brests for me but beat them and repent you of your sinnes committed against Heaven and me which were the cause of my death and will be your destruction if in time you repent not And weep not beat not your brests for me for it is come to passe as in the words following the Text it was prophesied He shall rise againe 2. He shall ascend and for an earthly ignominious Crowne he shall receive an Heavenly glorions one 3. And throughout the world where the Gospel is preached and further this shall be spread which hath been done by the Jewes to Ch the King And thus the Tragicall Acts being ended on the Sufferers side the Actors there are now to be made Sufferers in another Tragedy for the Tragedy ends not in the bloud of Him in the Text Ch the King but calls for bloud more bloud the bloud of these Jews for if the bloud of Abel which living and animated could not speake yet being wickedly shed receives a voice to be heard as high as Heaven then much more this bloud of Ch the King the Text speaks it Mat. 21.41 God will miserably destroy them and will let out his Vineyard to others In this Tragedy there are but two Acts 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is set down Mat. 21.40 but in them a destruction threatned he will destroy 1. Personally them 2. Nationally their Vineyard or Church 3. Both totally not by letting the Vineyard or People out for a time but by alienating or giving utterly away them and it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to others that is Aliens or Strangers Neither was this long in acting for Judas the Arch-Traytor either before or soone after the death of his Master whom he had betrayed hanged himself and so payed himselfe his owne wages and that without all pity or regard of those Jewes for whose sake he betrayed his Lord for they said what is that to us Mat. 7.4 or what care we Go and be hang'd 2. Pilat the Judge not long after the execution of Christ whom he sentenced was put out of his place was exiled his Country and killed himselfe 3. Caiphas and Herod died through misery or violence 4. Many of the Jewes who were alive at that time of Christs suffering lived to see the great City Jerusalem destroyed 1100000. at least of their Country men slaughtered and all the rest of them either to be captivated by their Enemies or to be scattered over the face of the earth and to this day to live as Vagabonds odious to all and pitied of none And lastly so it came to passe that as severall Factions conspired together to kill Ch the King so it pleased God to blind these Jewes at the time of the Roman Siege that the one part of them were zealous for the Temple the Church another part who cared not much for the Church yet were willing to have a good peace on reasonable termes but the third part who were all for robbing spoiling killing and therefore regarding neither Church nor State put all in such a confusion and combustion that the Romans became Conquerours more by the Jewes divisions than by their owne Armes And lastly whereas these Jewes pretended three speciall causes why they would put Ch the King to death 1. Lest by his life the Romans should invade and change their Lawes 2. Lest their Nation should perish 3. Lest the People should believe and follow him All these pretended feares as leading causes to his death are by Gods righteous judgment soone after brought upon them for the conquering Romans did invade and change their Lawes 2. Did destroy City and Country 3. And the People farre and neare both of Jewes and Gentils have believed on and followed this Christ the crucified King And thus oft-times God crosseth mans policy turning the edge and point of his owne weapons upon himselfe we have found it so done to the Brethren of Joseph to Pharoh to Achitophel to Jeroboam and thousands more and here saith the Jew It is expedient that our King die lest the Nation perish and God saith the Nation shall perish because ye have wickedly murdered your King And thus we see God to be an upright Judge in the execution of his owne antient Law-given Gen. 9.6 Who so sheddeth mans bloud by man shall his bloud be shed 2. A strict Defender of his inherent prerogative as it is written vengeance is mine 3. A faithfull Performer of his covenanted promise I will revenge saith the Lord Rom. 12.19 we read Acts 5.11 that upon the judgement executed on Ananias and Saphira the Text saith and great feare came upon all the Church and upon as many as heard these things and I pray God the like feare may touch our hearts and worke in them a timely and hearty repentance that God in his mercy may avert all judgments which deservedly are threatned to fall upon us and this Land and this let us humbly beseech God to grant for the passion and mediation of his onely Son and our alone Lord and Saviour Christ Jesus FINIS
THE DEVILISH CONSPIRACY HELLISH TREASON HEATHENISH CONDEMNATION AND DAMNABLE MURDER Committed and Executed by the IEWES against the Anointed of the LORD CHRIST their KING And the just Judgment of God severely executed upon those TTAYTORS and MURDERERS As it was delivered in a SERMON on the 4 Feb. 1648. being the Quinquages Sunday Out of some part of the Gospel appointed by the Church of England to be read on that Day LAM 1.12 Is it nothing to you all ye that passe by behold and see if there be any sorrow like unto my sorrow which is done unto me wherewith the Lord hath afflicted me in the day of his fierce anger LAM 5.16 The Crown is fallen from our head woe unto us that we have sinned LAM 3.64 Render unto them a recompence O Lord according to the worke of their hands Vers 65. Give them sorrow of heart thy curse unto them HORAT virtutem Sublatam ex oculis quaerimus invidi London Printed in the Yeare M. DC.XL.VIII LUKE 18. v. 31 The Son of man v. 32. shall be delivered unto the Gentiles and shall be mocked and spitefully entreated and spit on v. 33. And they shall put him to death THe Words contain a Propheticall History of that most lawlesse cruell and hellish murder of Gods Anointed Christ the King of the Jewes and are as Prophetically appointed by our Church to be read on the Quinquagesima Sunday which in this year 1648. fell out to be the 4 of February Now although in these words there are but 3 tragicall Acts 1. Traditio the Treason or Conspiracy 2. Illusio the mocking or spitefull using 3. Occisio the execution or murder of their King Yet to make it a compleat Tragedy two other Acts may be justly added out of other Gospels viz First a precedent Act expressing the double cause of this execrable fact which was partly pretended partly reall And the last subsequent Act as the fruit and effect of all the foregoing treason conspiracy triall condemnation and murder The Sonne of man c. To execute so much vilany and outrage as this and other Texts speake of had it been onely against the bare Sonne of man had been an act to be detested and abominated by all the Sonnes of Men even Heathens to whom he was betrayed but this Sonne of Man is more to these Jewes then the bare Sonne of Man for he was their King not onely prophesied so to be Isa 62.11 Zach. 9.9 but the Wisemen Matth. 2. comming to worship him they enquire after him by this Title Where is he that is King of the Jewes yea and he is so proclaimed Luke 19.38 Blessed be the King that commeth and Pilat not onely knew and confest him so to be by his question Iohn 19.15 Shall I crucifie your King but confirmed and wrote it to be commended to all posterity by that superscription on the Crosse in three Languages JESUS OF NAZARETH KING OF THE JEWES adding What I have written I have written and therefore not to be repealed Yea heare truth it selfe speake though of himselfe Iohn 18.37 when Pilat asked him Art thou a King he plainly and affirmatively answers To this end was I born and for this cause came I into this world to be a King and though not de hinc not from hence as Saint August on the words yet hîc here on earth to be a King And this Sonne of Man the King their King is the man whom ye shall find so betrayed despitefully used and murdered by his owne Subjects the bloudy barbarous and inhumane Jewes The originall in the Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is generally rendred in Latine tradetur and Traditor both in Ecclesiasticall and Civil acts and writings signifies in our English a Traytour and this word here used by the Evangelist and Penman of the holy Ghost none except ignorant or Jewes will deny to be the most proper significant word to express the illegal demeanour of Subjects against their King And so onely proper to them that I appeale to all the learned or to the Searchers of the Scriptures whether this or any other the like word was ever affixed or applied to any King for any act whatever of his against his Subjects This Text besides that Luke 6.16 Acts 7.52 proves the Actors against their King to be Traytours wherein Iudas the other Conspirators and the whole People of the Jewes are expresly so called Traytours but not one Text in all the Holy Bible ever called the Prince or King a Traytour for any act were it never so false so foule so bloudy that was committed by the Prince against his Subjects and in this the Laws of our Land follow and accord with that of Gods and for that they may be justly called as they are holy Lawes Now although this Text barely saith He shall be betrayed but saith not by whom and although the Traytours would not willingly be discovered and made knowne to the world for feare of an after-reckoning they knowing that the People loved him yet because other Gospels have both pointed them out and named them by their severall qualifications offices and sects I shall therefore here range and set them downe in some order beginning with the Arch-traytour who by the Psal 41.9 prophetically is thus deciphered Mine owne familiar friend in whom I trusted which did eate of my bread and Psalm 55.12 it was not a professed Enemy then I could have borne it neither he that hated me then I would have hid my selfe and not have imparted my secrets unto him but v. 13. it was thou my guide and mine acquaintance yea more v. 14. thou wert of my secret counsels we tooke counsell together it were lost labour to tell you whom the Prophet means in all this since in one Chap. Mat. 26. Judas is no lesse then twelve times proclaimed to everlasting memory and infamy the Traytour Yet though he were the Ring-leader and the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Traytour for that he being a Servant a meniall Servant a Counsellour of the secret Counsell under colour of friendship betrayed him yet because in Scripture sense not onely they are accounted Traytours who are primarily immediate Actors in the condemnation or the execution such as were this ever to be branded Judas nor they who Soldier-like went out with Swords to take hold of and lay him fast nor the Court of Justice or Councell as it is called but who ever joyned in the first second or any other conspiracy plotting counselling assisting consenting against this King were no lesse then Traytours for so Marke 15.1 The Elders Priests Scribes and the whole Councell are involved and named to have delivered him up therefore I shall take the leave and liberty to discover some of these close Traytours who having washed their hands as they thinke from the last execution would therefore perswade the world that they are innocent and free from this loud-crying Treason And of these we shal find in the Gospels specified
to dale not suffering him to rest and not leaving him a safe hold wherein to lay his head for so Ch the King complaines that they had cast him into a condition worse then that of Birds or four footed Beasts when he saith Matth. 8.20 The Foxes have holes and the Birds of the aire have nests but the Sonne of man hath not where to lay his head 3. And was it not a spightfull usage of a King to be led into the common judgment Hall by a Band of rude Soldiers who not long before had been attended by the Best crying as he went Hosanna blessed be or God save the King 4. And was it not a spightfull usage of a King when he was in this common Hall to countenance set on and to hire the scumme of the People or rascallity of the Soldiers to call out for Justice and Execution when they cried Crucifie crucifie him Luke 23.31 5. Was it not a spightfull usage of a King when as he the King speaks to them in mild and civill language as to Judas Mat. 26.50 Friend or Sir but they to him as Mat. 26.61 this Fellow the Prisoner 6. Was it not a spightfull usage of a King to carry him out to Golgotha there to suffer in an open place which was more fit for the baiting of Beasts than the decolling of a King 7. Lastly was it not a spightfull usage of a King not to afford him a Sepulcher or place of Buriall but he must be beholding even for this to another man and yet thus spightfully was Ch the King used My heart bleeds to thinke of their mockings and spightfull usage of their most blessed King and will leave them to be inlarged by our owne Meditations and for a brief close of this scene shall onely say that as a King may so this King was killed by these Jewes before he was slain or put to death and K. David shewes how when be saith Psal 55.21 Psal 59.7 their tongues are swords Psal 140.3 they are poyson of Serpents Killers all these so that calumny slander if it be not the first degree it is a step I am sure to kill a King and here with these weapons they first set upon Ch the King calling him Samaritan John 4. Perverter of the Lawes Deceiver c. And spit on A man may be said figuratively to be spit on when by Declarations Remonstrances Pamphlets or scurrilous terms he is reproachfully and uncivilly entertained and so Ch the King was shamefully most unjustly spit upon when they proclaimed him a Deceiver of a trust John 19.29 a Traytour by perverting the People and drawing them to destruction and in this sense they might truly be said to spit upon Ch the King But not onely this they did which was too much and more dangerous then what was after done by the Soldiers who did vomit out their excrementitious froth upon him of whom I may repeat a passionate expostulation or holy indignation once used by a Preacher on this occasion What rheumatick Raskals said he were these Soldiers for had they or could they find no place to disgorge the scumme of their ulcerous lungs but on the Anointed of the Lord All that I can say for these is they were not onely Soldiers but barbarous Heathens that did this and yet if report be true there hath not wanted even among such as professe themselves Christians such a Soldier who hath done the like to his King and if any such were let him repent in time lest God in justice spew him out of his mouth as it is said Apoc. 3.16 or that he spit not poure out to the dregs the full vialls of his wrath and indignation upon him and all such as have mocked spightfully entreated and spit on Ch the King In the 20 of S. John v. 5. we read that when Pilat a Stranger an Heathen and an Idolater had seen and presented the King thus spightfully entreated he said to the bloud-thirsty-miscreant Jewes Behold the Man as if he had said See how disgracefully and wickedly you have used him already and therefore if you have any sparke of manhood left in you for humanity sake proceed no further but behold him as an object of all pity a deserted afflicted scorned spitefully-used man but the sight of this man which would have melted the eyes of a savage Tiger into water hardens them as rocks and prompts them on to the increase of his misery and their owne vilany for seeing him even then and so miserable then they say as Mat. 21. Come let us without delay not granting time or reprieve let us kill him for so it followes in the story in the Text for they shall kill him But before we enter upon this bloudy act it will be proper and pertinent to the whole to set downe the severall grounds and causes moving these Traytours thereunto which we shall clearly collect and expresse as we find them storied in the Gospels And these were either pretended such as themselves fained and held forth as causes or such as were really and truly the motives and causes of this their killing Ch the King Now the causes pretended we find to be First that which is generally used in raising the People into a Rebellion the Innovation Alteration or Destruction of Religion and with this the Jewes closely charged him Mat. 5.17 where Christ himself by way of Answer saith Thinke or say not that I am come to destroy the Law or the Prophets I am not come to destroy but to fulfill and in that Chap. he instanceth and proves that they by their owne Expositions and Traditions were the Innovators and himself the keeper of the Law of Moses and of the Prophets And after this when they thought him too strict in the point of reverence in the Temple in that he drove out the Prophaners thereof Mat. 21.12 which they conceived was lawfull for them to doe No saith he for God himselfe saith of this materiall Temple or Church My house shall be called an house of prayer but You you have made it a den of Thieves or a Stable and place for theft and prophanation 2. They charge him often and with loud out-cries that in the matter of Sabbath-keeping he is too loose and a Prophaner thereof to which he Answers that themselves are in this Jewishly superititious and not he the Prophaner for saith he Marke 2.27 The Sabbath is made for man that is for the preservation of man by necessary actions and recreations conducing to his life and health on that day 3. They closely charge him with abridging them the liberty of Divorces upon any cause which they said was granted them by Moses Mat. 5. Mat. 19. No saith he it is not I but you that alter the Law in this for Mat. 5.32 Whosoever shall put away his Wife saving for the cause of Fornication causeth her to cōmit Adultery but to this whole charge he gives one general answer
people the creator and maker of the King as it appears he is by the Text hath power to destroy his owne creature if he faile in the end of his creation Answ Saint Peter writing here to the Jewes who held their Royall Government 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be divine and immediate from God and to stand in force without the election or ordination of man might call the Heathen dominion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 an humane ordinance or creature for so creature sometimes notes what is heathenish or not heavenly and if so then the Argument of the Apostle holds the more strong for Ch and all Christian Kings being the Apostle commands the subjection not resistance the obedience not murdering of such humane creatures as Heathenish Kings 2. In some part and in some degrees the jurisdiction of the best Kings for extent may be humane of man but that concludes not that the power of managing the Sword is simply humane and not divine for as Saint Paul and Saint Peter spake by and from the Spirit infallible truth so Saint Paul expresly professeth Rom. 13. that this power of the Sword is in the King the Supreme as Saint Peter here stiles him and that to be not from man humane but from God divine 3. Were the Kingly Office an humane creature yet the person or manhood of the King is not such his person or manhood is Gods creature so that from this Text taken in their owne sense the most that can be inforced were that they might in some cases dethrone whom they had exalted but kill him the person the man they cannot they may not for this God made and not they Object But nature and reason teach us to defend our selves and to kill what would destroy us rather then to be killed Resp 2 Cor. 20. the wisdome and reason of worldly men is foolishnesse with God and the naturall man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God for they are foolishnesse unto him 1 Cor. 2.14 Secondly although nature and reason in the generall dictates so much unto us yet nature and reason have laid some restraints upon this Maxime in respect of Persons for suppose the head of a man intoxicated or distracted should endeavour the hanging or drowning the body might the body to preserve it selfe destroy this head and the King in respect of his Subjects hath the like relation and therefore is so called both in Gods and our Lawes the Head of the People Thirdly but can there be a better Expounder of the Law of nature or reason then God himselfe in this case which if you grant then I pray go through the whole Booke of God both in the Old and New Testament and tell me if God hath not every where injoyned subjection and forbad even resistance against the worst Kings 2. Whether throughout the Bible those that were led by Gods Spirit did not follow this rule strictly as David to Saul c 3. Tell me whether you find the least print of any precept or counsell given to any Subject to put their King to death 4. Whether ever any Subjects mentioned in all Gods Book ever pleaded any Text or good example in warranty or excuse of such an act 5. Whether for the most part all Offenders in this kind have not throughout Gods Booke and Law received condigne punishment from heaven or earth or both and if all this holds true and good I cannot but wonder that men that Scriptures should forsake Scriptures and betake themselves to reason and nature when as still it cannot be denied that the Scripture of God is the best Expositor of nature and reason Object But vox Populi vox Dei what all the People say may be interpreted to be as the voice of God 2. Heare Pilat as well as divers Texts in the Gospels thy Nation John 18.35 which may be expounded the people of the Jewes in generall they have delivered thee unto me Resp Had this been really and absolutely true that all the Jewes had delivered Christ to death yet it could not have justified the act any more then the number of Sinners can make a sin just and lawfull 2. Though in this case of Ch it be said the People or Nation yet no more could rightly strictly be thereby understood than that those who were then present or who conspired delivered him to be slaine and this was not all the people of the Jewes it is therfore too unjustly too figuratively charged upon all when it is done but by a few of them all Object But you 'l say it was done by the Councell the Representative of all Resp This Councell by money corruption and usurpation had a great deale inlarged their power 2. But had their power or priviledge been greater it could neither make good evill nor evill good 3. But to the point if you consider what Ch the King had done for the people and how the people loved him you will easily collect from severall passages in the Gospels that the voice of the people was not for killing him And if you will yet presse that the voice of the People of God was for it and that is as the voice of God I must answer that if all be such as call themselves so then the Conspirators Numb 16. and then these Jewes that acted against the Lords Anointed were the people of God for these so stiled themselves the holy yea Numb 16.3 the word Holy may be rendered Saints And these are they who shall put him to death They shall put him to death which Translation by the leave of the learned and judicious I would gladly change and for this they shall I would read they will in stead of put to death I would render it they will kill and murder him for although for the most part future tenses are rendred indifferently by shall or will yet here to take away all shadow or plea from the malice of the act by laying it on the determinate counsell of God as Acts 4.28 I would read not they shall but they will 2. Not put to death but kill or slay for a lawfull Judge may put to death a Malefactor without staine or guilt of sinne but if the Party executed were innocent and the Judge not vested with just authority the man is truly and rightly said to be murdered And indeed I know not upon what cause or slip the same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here is Englished by put to death and in other Texts as Mat. 21.39 by slay John 5.16 John 8.44 by Murder And all other Scriptures that speake of Christs death in relation to the Actors render it by kill slay or murder But if any aske the Question why not imprison or secure his Person as to Jo Baptist or banish him as to John the Apostle I must answer 1. that generally when Tyrants Usurpers of rule begin they scarce ever end but as here in killing for usurpation and unjust possession
King the Ancestors of these Jewes said to their King 2 Sam. 5.1 we are caro tua thy owne flesh and no man faith Saint Paul Ephes 5.30 I say none but a mad man or a Jew hath this hated his owne flesh But when this King perceived and saw that all their drift was to get his inhoritance 3. had it not been better for him and his people to have parted with that than thus to lose his life no this King inspered from above knew well what he did when he thus suffered for in it he hath proved and declared him selfe to be a King a just King a magnanithous King a religious King and a right good Shepherd who layeth downe his life for his Flocke and will not destroy them by saving his owne life and therefore he resolves rather then I will betray the rights of the Crowne the Lawes and Liberties of the People let them kill me And so being cometo this a cannot but remember a sweet meditation that Saint Bernard used upon the words of Saint Peter when Chr would wash his feet the Apostle in an awfull reverence breaks out O Master Tu mihi pedes thou to wash my feet on which the Father descants thus Quid est Tu quid est mihi quid est pedes and concludes cogitanda sunt non dicenda give me leave in imitation to aske quid est illi quid est occident quid est Illum they the worst to kill him the best of men they the feet to murder him the head they the scumme of the People to slaughter him the Anointed of the Lord they the lowest of Subjects to butcher him their King ô infandum scelus cogitanda non dicenda we cannot expresse the heinousnesse of the fact but they are to be laid up in the closets of our brests and we are to remember and in after better times to thinke on all that hath been done in order to this killing him the King An * Speed English Chronicler in the Life of Henry the 3. saith They that kill a Christian King commit a four-fold murder 1. Homicide killing a man 2. Parricide killing their publich civill Father 3. Christicide killing the Anointed of the Lo Ch 4. Deicide killing as much as in them is God himselfe being the King is Gods Vicegerent and of Kings God himself saith you are Gods livor post fata quiescit was antiently true that men let dead men rest in peace but Devils Beasts and such Iews as these degenerate in this from all mankind and therefore are not alone content to murder Ch their King but that they will crucifie him againe when he is dead and that not onely in his Disciples and Servants but in his never-dying name which like Flies they endeavour to corrupt and to blast suppresse or destroy all the heavenly fruits of his divine soule witnesse Saint Luke throughout the Acts of the Apostles where we find that these miscreant Iewes forbade all to preach or speake and punished all who durst be so justly holy as to publish any thing which might redound to his glory or the good of any who loved or adhered unto him yea if Nicodemus dare but say as he did Iohn 8.51 that by their Law none should be judged before he be heard which was Ch the Kings very case even for this Nicodemus is checked as a Malignant and neer to be made a Delinquent for ver 52. curstly the Iewes reply unto Nicodemus art thou of Galile art thou one of the pack if we find it so look to your selfe for all that adhere to him the King or to the Gospel of peace first or last shal suffer for or with him Oh more then devilish Iews Ye see and observe the wonderfull wisdome and justice of God who in this as in other wicked plots turnes the point upon the Sinners and wounds them with their owne weapons for nothing did or could advantage the propagation and growth of Ch the Kings most glorious name more then their forcible suppression of it S. Luke having finished the Gospel or Chronicle of Ch the King saith c. 24. 46. so it behoved Christ to suffer and if you aske why so 1. Because it was foretold Mat. 21. 2. As S. Paul speaks 1 Cor. 11.19 it behoved that the heresies rebellions wickednesses might be made manifest 3. That for this wicked act God may let the Iewes as the whole world see that he had just cause to destroy them as it is threatned Mat. 21.39 And 4. that Ch the King may rise againe and reigne in everlasting glory with his Father in Heaven as it followes in the words after my Text. And now they have made an end of him I would gladly end here but these Iewes not ending all in killing him they make me to follow them and to observe that in killing him their purpose is to kill more then him and herein to imitate the savage Tartars who when their great Cham dies they cast many of his nearest friends into the grave after him and so this issue here of his the Kings bloud is not stinched in the bloud of him alone I pray remember his words though in a parable Mat. 21. when he speaking of this act of the Iewes he saith these Iewes will have the inheritance and their meanes to have and hold it is by killing the Heire so that as long as there is an Heire the Iews voice is as there Hic Heres est This is the Heire Come let us him that the inheritance may be ours And this very thing Ch the King foresaw and foretold not long before his death when he said Mat. 23.34 Behold I send unto you Prophets and Wise-men and some of them you shall kill and some ye shall persecute from City to City and this Ch the King spake not onely by a prophetick Spirit but out of the consideration of their former actions for Lazarus the Noble-man Iohn 12. who adhered to Ch him they sought to put to death even even in Christs life time and therefore now let all his Friends and Followers look to themselves for when they have digged up the root they will not leave a branch nor a bough not any prop that supported either Peter being but suspected by a Wench to have been a Follower of Ch nay but to have been in his company had he not denied it he had paid dearly for it had he escaped his life and none can expect better now they have killed him Ch the King S. Basil said of Herod 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 His meat was the flesh and his drinke was the bloud of men and as it is said of the Whore Rev. 17.6 so of such they are 1. Unsatiable therefore drunke 2. Unmercifull for drunk with bloud 3. Unjust for with the bloud of Saints men holy in life and Martyrs Witnesses of Gods truth It is recorded Mark 12.8 that these Traytours killed him and cast him forth of the Vineyard whereas had they first