to permit that they being tempted by Sathan should of their owne free-will fall into sinne and should fall into the pit of eternall death as the most iust stipend of their sinne Secondly of his grace by Christ to free some of them out of the pit of sinne and death by certaine meanes and to accompany them with his spirit whom he freed and at length to giue them eternall life and to others he decreed not to vouchsafe this grace but rather to blinde them and harden them with Sathan and to destroy them with eternall destruction c. The same man in the same place The speciall predestination of the elect is the eternall most wise and immutable decree of God whereby he determined with himselfe from eternity according to the good pleasure of his will freely to deliuer by Christ some certaine and set men fallen with all the rest into the deepe pit of sinne and death The same man lib. 5. de Natura Dei cap. 2. quest 4. By ascending after this order from the effects to the causes and by descending from the causes to the effects Election and Reprobation may and ought to be considered by vs to wit that God from eternity determined by a firme decree first to create all men then to suffer them to fall into sinne and for sinne to be obnoxious to eternall death Lastly to free by that meanes which he hath freed some men by Christ and to giue them eternall life but to reiect the rest from this grace and being left in their sinnes at length to punish them eternally for their sinnes Bucer vpon the ninth Chapter to the Romanes They that will plainly and simply follow Gods word may easily free themselues from these things for they stick fast to this that God doth witnesse of himselfe viz. that he out of mankinde destroyed by their first father chose some men to be framed by him to a new and blessed life and he accounted the rest the vessels of his wrath Philip Melanchton in his Theologicall Common places loco de Praedestin doth repeate these words more then once It is certaine that this is the cause of Reprobation to wit sinne in man Vuolfangus Musculus loco de Elect. Chap. 5. It is manifest that our election is not made for any respect of our quality It must needes be therefore that we seeke the respect of our election in God electing For the sence of our owne basenesse and deprauation doth driue vs thither Dauid said What is man that thou art mindfull of him and the son of man that thou didst predestinate him when thou didst fore-know that he would be euill and depraued Dauid Paraeus in his commentary on the ninth chapter to the Romanes Page eight hundred and sixeteene will haue Iacob and Esau to be considered as sinners by God electing The cause saith he was the eternall purpose of God whereby he determined to make such difference of them Esau was wicked and Iacob was no lesse wicked for they were both conceiued in sinne and yet God loued the one and hated the other not for any inherent or fore-seene difference but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to election whereby he elected one but not the other The same man page 819. The pleasure or will of God calling is his purpose according to election in Christ that is the purpose of God whereby out of the perished masse he seperated some from others by choosing these and leauing the rest which purpose is called Predestination containing vnder it Election and Abiection The Pastors of the Walachrian Churches in their Epistle doe with one consent thus define Predestination This is the opinion of them who cleaue to the old and receiued confession of our Churches That God from eternity according to the immutable good pleasure of his will decreed to saue some men whom by his meere bounty in Christ Iesus he seuered out of corrupted mankinde c. Iohn Piscator a most rigorous maintainer of Predestination out of the entire and vncorrupted Masse and of reprobation without the beholding of sinne hath very lately set forth a treatise digested into ten Aphorismes the second whereof is conceiued in these words This Predestination hath two species or kindes the one whereof is called Election the other Reprobation by a Metonimy of the effect For election and reprobation are properly referred to mankinde already made and fallen but Metonimically the decree it selfe of Electing or Reprobating is so named The learned man doth at length see that it must needes be that in election and reprobation man be considered as already fallen and in the corrupted Masse But he hath deuised another higher decree whereby God doth neither elect nor reprobate but doth only decree to elect and reprobate Of which decree there is no mention made in the Scripture Finally the Synode of Dordt in the seuenth Canon doth thus define election Election is the vnchangeable purpose of God by which before the foundation of the world according to the free good pleasure of his will of his meere grace he hath chosen out of all mankinde to saluation in Christ a certaine and set number of men neither better nor more worthy then others but lying in the common misery with others and fallen from originall righteousnesse into sinne and destruction by their owne fault c. The same Fathers in the 15. Canon of Reprobation doe thus speake The holy Scripture doth manifest and commend vnto vs this eternall and free grace especially when it doth further witnesse that not all men are elected but that some are not elected or are passed by in the eternall election of God To wit those whom God according to his free iust vnreprouable and immutable good pleasure decreed to leaue in the common misery into which they had cast themselues by their owne fault and not to giue to them sauing faith and the grace of conuersion c. FINIS
obserued that the Apostle speaking of reprobates doth say that they are vessels 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fitted or prepared to destruction He doth not say that God prepared or sitted them least he should seeme to say that God put sinne in them by which they might be prepared to destruction but when he speaketh of the elect hauing turned his speech saith that God prepared them for glory which God doth by giuing them the spirit and faith It is not without consideration that the Apostle would not after the same manner speake in both places viz. because God found some vessels fitted to destruction but made others vessels appointed to glory and that by hauing mercy on them X. Saint Austen is expresse to this purpose For in sixe hundred places either explaning or touching this place of Saint Paul hee doth vnderstand by the name Masse the Masse corrupted and polluted with sinne So Epist 105. Because that whole Masse is iustly condemned iustice hath giuen that contumely and disgrace that is due and grace doth giue that honour which is not due and in the same Epistle The vniuersall Masse is iustly condemned of sinne and a little after If they are the vessels of wrath which are made for that destruction which is duâ—ly giuen to them let them impute this to themselues because they are made of that Masse which for the sinne of one man is iustly and deseruedly condemned of God He doth repeate the same thing Epist 106. and Encherid cap. 98 99. and 107. where he calleth it the Masse of destruction See also the 2. lib. against the two Epistles of the Pelagians cap. 7. and lib. 5. against Iulian cap. 3. Neither did euer any among the ancient thinke that Paul speakes of the sound and not corrupted Masse CHAP. XV. That Arminius doth willingly darken the words of the Apostle which are cleare and expresse ARminius with a carefull subtilty but with an vnhappy successe hath written a Treatise vpon the ninth Chapter to the Romanes for hee doth torment the Apostle and doth as it were with wracks draw from him against his will what things he thinks may make for the patronage of his errour of Election for faith fore-seene I. He faines that the Apostles minde is to teach that they onely of the Iewes were to be reckoned the sonnes of Abraham who letting passe iustification by the law doe follow after righteousnesse and faith and the purpose according to Election hee denyeth to be the decree of the election of seuerall men but the generall and condition all decree of sauing all who were to beleeue By which decree Arminius will haue all men to be elected conditionally which surely is no election seeing election is not but of seueral men who are chosen out of the multitude others being reiected II. I confesse indeede that the doctrine of election by free grace doth make the way to the doctrine of righteousnesse by faith yet all this dispute of Saint Paul concerning election which reacheth from the sixt verse to the thirteenth doth not deale of iustification by faith neither would the Apostle proue in this place that man is iustified by faith or that God doth elect those which apprehend Christ by faith But by the doctrine of election doth frame to himself an entrance to the treatise of iustification by faith which afterwards he addes Hee would here proue this one thing that man is not truely the sonne of the promise by the workes of the law but by the election of free grace and by the mercy of God for it is manifest that here workes are not opposed to faith but to election and to God calling So Verse the 11. he doth not say not by workes but by faith but he saith not by workes but by him that calleth So Verse 16. when he had said It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth hee doth not adde but of him that beleeueth What then but of God that sheweth mercy III. For when it is spoken of the cause why of two that are equally conceiued in sinne such as were Esau and Iacob God should preferre the one afore the other the onely mercy of God and the election by grace is to be considered and not faith which is not the cause but the effect of our election neither doth it goe before election but followeth it So Saint Paul 1 Cor. 7.25 saith that he obtained mercy from God to be faithfull and not because he was after to be so Wherefore Saint Paul in all this speech wherein hee speaks of the cause of the difference which God makes betweene two that were by nature alike makes no mention of faith But this Treatise being finished he doth descend verse 30. to the righteousnesse of faith as to the fruit which doth follow election IV. But Arminius for the safegard of his cause doth change the words of Saint Paul and doth thrust in something of his owne Pag. 27. For in the place of that which Saint Paul saith not of workes but of him that calleth he doth substitute these his words feigned by himselfe not of worke but of faith whereby God calling should be obeyed when notwithstanding in all that disputation which dealeth concerning election there is no mention made of faith neither doth the least steppe thereof appeare V. It is meruailous how much Arminius doth abuse the examples of Isaac and Ishmael and also of Iacob and Esau He doth contend that they are here propounded not as examples but as types of them who followed after righteousnesse by workes not by faith Certainely there must be some agreement betweene the type and the thing signified by the type But who euer heard it said that Ishmael would haue beene iustified by the workes of the Law and not by faith seeing at that time the law was not giuen neither were these differences of iustification by the law and by faith knowne neither is it credible that Ishmael euer thought of or regarded these things Therefore Arminius doth as much as if Nimrod should be made a type of the Pharisaicall righteousnesse Can the night be a type of the light or can Esau whom the Apostle Heb. 12.16 calleth prophane and therefore also a despiser of the Law be a type of them who being set on fire with the zeale of the Law would be iustified by their workes But it is worth the labour to here why he would haue Esau be a type of the sonnes of the flesh and of them which affâ—ct rightâ—ousnesse by workes Because saith he he was first borne O acutely spoken He should haue said because he was red or because he was a hunter I am ashamed to refute these things and yet in these figments and forgeries the good man doth place the chiefe safegard of his doctrine of election for faith fore-seene VI. Then also see how licentiously he mookes the Apostle For when he layeth downe Ishmael and Esau not as examples of reâ—ection by the secret counseâ—l of God
the decree of Reprobation and a 〈◊〉 after God by the certaine accree of Reprobation determinea not to giue faith anâ— repentance to some to wit by yeelding them his effectuall grace by which they would certainely belecue and be conuâ—rted There is no cause therefore that we should be traduced by the Arminians in this respect seeing that the principall of their sect doth say the same thing And it is easie to tell the cause why God should not be bound to giue to all men faith and repentance For God who hath not wrought the disease is not bound to giue to all men the remedies of the disease nor to giue the ability of performing those things which are due from man to God For this impotency disability in performing proceeded from man himselfe not from God And the fulfilling of the law is a naturall debt Which law seeing it is violated by the retection of the Gospell it is plaine that it is also a naturall debt to beleeue the Gospell not before it is preached Arnold Page 3.6 Dicat Arminius gratâ—am quaâ—aâ—u tas creâ—eâ—didaâ—â— quaÌ„plurimis dâ—â—at emmbus câ—mmunâ—m esse ac proinde nâ—gat graâ—iam esse Et P 262. Respondeo Dâ—um cum nâ—uum loe lus gratia pro enit cultae admistae remissi nem proâ—itâ—â— sub noua obedientiae conditione teneri maxiâ—â— vires 〈◊〉 quibus â—â—mo condi tonâ—m stuÌ„ possit implere alioqui non pâ—ssit â—udicars â—st im gratiâ—msincere offerre but then when it is preached XIII The Arminians are of opinion that no man is reprobated but hee that hath contemned that grace which doth leade to Christ and they make incredulity the speciall cause of reprobation not onely in them to whom the Gospell is preached but a so in them who haue not heard the name of Christ spoken off Arminius maketh these guilty of the contempt of grace For he saith that there is giuen to all men vnresistabâ—y the faculty of beleeuing and the power of obtaâ—ning faith if they will Yea they say that sufficient meanes to be eeue were administred to the heathen who before the comming of Christ liued in the inmost part of Spaine or Scythia And they lay downe a certaine vniuersall sufficient grace common to all men but when they come to explaine that grace sometimes they place it in the common notions and naturall light sometimes in the contemplation of the creatures sometimes in any generall knowledge of the law Of which cursed doctrine and how by these things they doe not obscurely passe into the campe of Pelagius shall be spoken in their due places XIV But here we are euery where set vpon by their darts and the Arminians doe abundantly cast reproaches vpon vs and doe faigne to themselues monsters which they may kill The conferrers at the Hage Page 122. after they haue belched out some calumnies doe thus conclude their speech These things are briefely spoken Collat. Hag Non potuit se conuertere impeditus sciticet a dinina voluntate against that absurd detestable and abhominable opinion Good words I pray you These terrible vizards doe not fright vs. They imagine that we teach that in fidelity doth flow from reprobation as if reprobation were the cause of infidelity The good men sing this Cuckowes song to vs sixe hundred times attributing to vs the doctrine which we neither beleeue nor teach For if one hath not decreed to giue to him that is blinde the remedies by which he might recouer his sight hee is not therefore the cause of his blindnesse nor hath hee appointed him to blindnesse XV. They ground on a false foundation on which they build those things which are worse For they thus beginne their speech of Reprobation Page 118. It is knowne to the Contraremonstrant brethren that such as Election is on the one part such Reprobation ought to be on the other part This is the fountaine of their error this false beginning hath led aside those acute men into by waies The respect of Election is one the respect of Reprobation is farre other For sinne and in fidelity is not a condition required after the same manner in the reprobates as faith is a condition required in the elect For sinne is a condition fore-required in reprobates but faith is a condition following election Reprobation is made for sinne but election is made to faith Sinne is the cause of the appointing to punishment faith is the effect of election God findeth sinne but worketh faith Sinne followeth reprobation onely in the necessity of consequence but not in the necessity of the consequent But faith doth follow election both waies By these things that calumny is abundantly washed off which Arnoldus Page 228. and in many other places doth sprinkle vpon vs that we deny that the reprobates are reprobated for sinne XVI It yeeldeth an occasion to the Arminians of falsely accusing vs because we say that the decree of reprobation is precise and absolute nor doe we agree to Arminius who teacheth that the reprobates indeede are not saued but yet they might be saued and who denieth that the number of the reprobates is determined by the decree of God But here is nothing from whence it can be drawne that reprobation is the cause of sinne or that any one is reprobated without the beholding of sinne XVII Arnoldus doth carpe at our opinion with certaine little obiections Page 219. Ye say that the reprobates haue beene excluded of God from saluation in his decree for one sinne but that they shall be excluded in time for another diuerse sinne It is a calumny wee neither thinke nor say it He doth heape vp the same false accusation Page 229. and 238. where hee saith that men are reprobated as onely considered in the sinne of Adam XVIII In the same page he doth thus vainely argue It is not the part of wisedome to be willing that they should hope for good who are excluded from it by the absolute decree of God But I deny that vnbeleeuers and prophane men are excluded from God by the absolute decree of God after that manner as you take the word absolute that is without respect to their sinnes Neither doth it fauor of folly to command that they who are excluded from eternall life by the absolute that is by the certaine and ineuitable decree should contend and aspire to eternall life seeing that they are therefore excluded from life because they haue not aspired to it XIX The same man Page 226. Ye determine saith he that God hath precâ—sely reprobated from saluation some sinners lying in the fall of Adam without the consideration of impenitency Is is a slander Our Churches doe not beâ—eeue it The confession of the Churches of France of England of the Low-Countries doth not say it Indeede in the decree of reprobation is included the will of not giuing faith and finall repentance to reprobates but it doth not follow thence that reprobation is without the consideration of impenitency
decree of God to be precise yet doth confesse that God doth certainely fore-know who are to be damned And to confesse this what is it else then to teach that God is willing that wee should pray for them whom he certainely knoweth our prayers will not profit But that which he casteth vpon vs that we make the decree of reprobation to goe before all things and causes and therefore also before sinne it selfe is plainely contrary to our opinion And if such words haue fallen from any vnawares it is not therfore the opinion of our Churches we defend those things that are ours but we doe not warrant other mens XXVI Concerning the place of the Apostle where hee saith that God would haue all men be saued it shall be spoken in his order and place To will here is no other thing then to inuite and to call Also by all men he vnderstandeth men of euery condition and sort After the same manner that Titus 2.11 The grace of Christ is said to bring saluation to all men when notwithstanding so many perish This is a token here of that in the former place it is spoken of kings in this place of seruants Their domination was at that time contrary to Christ and the lot and state of these men was abiect and base the Apostle would not hinder that they should not be prayed for and these are thought such as may be partakers of sauing grace XXVII The Arminians seeme to themselues to deale very acutely when they dispute thus If there be any one say they whose eyes haue beene pulled out for not keeping his watch well is it a iust thing to command him that hereafter he should watch and ward And then if he hath not done it to lay great punishments vpon him because he hath not watched I answere that this is an example nothing to the purpose For they vse the example of one that is blinde who is not bound to see But man though he be corrupted and wicked yet he is bound to obey God which if hee hath not done he is iustly punished Then also they bring an example of one whose eyes were pulled out hee striuing against it and being vnwilling But man brought this deprauation on himselfe of his owne accord and was voluntarily euill and therefore he is iustly punished CHAP. XXVII How farre and in what sence Christ died for all The opinions of the parties I. THE Arminians are of opinion that Christ by his death obtained got remission of sins Coll. Page 130. Christut omnibus per mortem impetrauit recenciliationem remissionem peccatorum Collat. Hag. P. 183. Non omnibus merito suo partam salutem consert etiamsi omnthussit acquisita reconciliation saluation for all particular men Nor doe they doubt to say that by the death of Christ reconciliation was obtained for Pharaoh Saul Iudas and Pilate not as they were reprobates but as they were sinners For God doth equally intend and desire the saluation of all men and that the incredulity of man is the cause that remission and reconciliation is not applied to all Yet Vorstius alone the champion of the Arminians doth stagger in this question and doth seeme to be more prone to the contrary opinion In the 56. Page Collat. cum Piscat He saith that Christ was deliuered by God to death not for the elect alone but for all men whatsoeuer at least for them that are called III. They thinke that the end which God propounded to himselfe in deliuering his Sonne to death was not to apply this benefit to some certaine men nor doe they thinke that Christ was appointed to death by the precise will of God to saue man for Christ was appointed to death by his father before God thought of sauing of men and therefore that he was appointed to death without that respect that they which beleeue in him should be saued Greuinchouius Page 21. doth say expressely that reconciliation being obtained there was yet no necessity of application that is after saluation and reconciliation for all men was obtained there was no necessity that any one should be saued and it was possible that no man in act should be reconciled Because he will haue the decree of sending Christ in order to goe before the decree of sauing those which beleeue and therefore that God determined to send his Sonne when he had not yet determined to saue those which beleeue But the Arminians would haue this to be the end which God propounded to himselfe in sending his Sonne to wit to make the saluation of men possible and to lay open a way for himselfe whereby hee might saue finners without any hurt to his iustice By this meanes they say God hath gotten power of sauing man because without the death of Christ Greuinch Pag. 15.16.17 by which the iustice of God was satisfied God could not be willing to saue men IV. And if no man had beleeued in Christ yet Christ if these men be beleeued had obtained that end which he propounded to himselfe in dying For they denie that he died to saue any man precifely but that the saluation of man might be made possible and a gate might be opened vnto him to saluation which is left free for man by the helpe of grace to enter or not to enter V. Vide Collat. Hag. p. 172. Greum p. 8.9 Deus applicationem reconnliationes amnibus nec voluit nec noluit c. They distinguish therefore betweene the obtaining of reconciliation and the application of it They contend that reconciliation and remission of sinnes is obtained for all which yet is applied onely to them that beleeue That all men are giuen to Christ in the right of saluation but not in the communication of saluation That God hath neither willed nor nilled the application of reconciliation that is faith and saluation to all men but he hath thus willed it if they beleeue if they will receiue grace VI. Armin in Perkins Page 77. 78. The same men also doe deny that Christ on the crosse sustained the person of the elect or that he died for the elect Because election had not then place for election is something that is after the death of Christ VII They say indeede that Christ offered himselfe for a sacrifice for all men but as concerning his intercession they are not constant to themselues in that * Greuinch P. 46. Christus quoad actum oblationis omnium â—m nino hominam sacerdâ—s suit etiam Pharaonis c Ibâ— per oblationeÌ„ vult fiâ—ri impetration 〈◊〉 per intercessionem â—ere applicationem sometimes they will haue him to make intercession onely for the saithfull as if something might be obtained without intercession Sometimes they make two kindes of intercession * Coll Ha. p. 187. Respondemus dupâ—â—ceÌ„ esse intercessâ—onem vnam generalem quae â—otum mundum spectat alteram particulareÌ„ quae ad solâ—s credemtes pâ—rtiâ—es one generall
faith chap. 19. Election for faith fore-seene is confuted by places taken out of the Gospell of Saint Iohn chap. 20. The same is proued out of the eight ninth and the eleauenth Chapter to the Romanes chap. 21. The same Election in respect of faith fore-seene is confuted by reason chap. 22. The opinion of Saint Austin concerning Election for faith fore-seene chap. 23. The arguments of the Arminians by which they endeauour to stablish Election for faith fore-seene are examined chap. 24. whether Christ be the cause and foundation of Election chap. 25. Of Reprobation chap. 26. How farre and in what sence Christ died for all chap. 27. That reconciliation remission of sinnes and saluation is not obtained nor purchased for all and particular men by the death of Christ chap. 28. The obiections of the Arminians are answered by which they endeauour to maintaine and confirme the obtaining of saluation for all men chap. 29. That it was long agoe desputed whether Christ died for al but in a farre other sence chap. 30. Whether God loue all men equally and doth alike desire the saluation of all chap 31. Of free-will the opinions of the parties chap. 32. It is proued out of the holy Scripture that an vnregenerate man is altogether destitute of the power and liberty of free-will in those things which belong to saluation c. 33. The reasons of the Arminians are examined by which they maintaine free-will in an vnregenerate man concerning things that are spirituall and belonging to saluation chap. 34. The obiections of the Arminians borrowed from the Pelagians and Papists are answered Whether an vnregenerate man doth necessarily sinne and whether necessity excuseth the sinner Also whether God commandeth those things which cannot be performed by man chap. 35. Of the outward and inward calling and whether the one may be without the other chap. 36. Of the distinction of Grace into sufficient and effectuall Grace chap. 37. The opinion of the Arminians concerning vniuersal grace which is also called sufficient grace chap. 38. Vniuersall sufficient grace is confuted by places of Scripture chap. 39. The same sufficient grace is impugned by reasons ch 40. The arguments by which the Arminians maintaine vniuersall sufficient grace are confuted chap. 41. The consent of the Arminians with the Semipelagians is declared chap. 42. The opinion of the Arminians concerning the manner of the operation of grace and of that power which they call Irresistible Of morall perswasion And of the power and act of beleeuing chap. 43. The opinion of the Orthodoxe Church concerning the conuersion of man and of the manner and certainty of conuersion chap. 44. The question of morall perswasion is sifted and whether euery perswasion may be resisted chap. 45. The certainty of the conuersion of the elect and the finall vnconquerablenesse of grace is proued chap. 46. The iudgement of Saint Austin concerning this controuersie chap. 47. That the Arminians doe openly stablish that vnresistiblenesse which they impugne chap. 48. The weake obiections of the Arminians against Irresistibility that is infallible certainty of conuersion are answered chap 49. An addition to the thirteenth Chapter containing some places taken out of the confession of the Church of France and out of the speciall doctors of this age concerning the obiect of Predestination and the iudgement of the Synode of Dordt FINIS THE ANATOMIE of Arminianisme CHAP. I. How soberly we are to deale in this Argument IF in any other Argument especially in this which we are to treate of that rule of Saint Paul is to be kept Rom. 12.3 that no man be wise aboue that he ought but that he be wise vnto sobriety For God hath put a great mist ouer the secrets of his wisedome into which it is a sinne to rush lest while wee search into his Maiesty we be ouerpressed by his glory Prou 25.27 It is better to vnderstand things that are safe then things that are high and to keepe Gods commandements then to pry into his counsels This curiosity hath vndone mankinde Adam whilest he would be like God in the knowledge of good and euill lost his good and learned euill to his losse being punished Hence Heresies haue beene bred whilest men violently carried with the itching of their owne wit runne out beyond the bounds of Gods word Hence haue proceeded those troubles which Sathan hath stirred vp in this age which is as fertill of disputes as it is barren of piety hauing vsed therto men who by their lewd wit and rash presumption daring to call God to account and to prescribe lawes to him haue greatly afflicted the most flourishing Churches of the low-Countries Most safe therefore it is to follow God as our guide to vnderstand so much as hee hath made manifest to vs in his word to command silence to our selues where God himselfe speaketh not But we must haue a very great care least we patronize and maintaine the wisdome and prouidence of God with the damage of his iustice and againe lest while we defend his iustice wee put out the eyes of his prouidence God is not to be thought vniust if hee doe any thing that doth not euery way answere to the rules we haue conceiued in our owne mindes These two things are seriously to be auoided as two fatall and dangerous rockes and yet it is farre worse to set on God the marke of iniustice then to place limits to his prouidence For with lesse perill is God made a carelesse spectator and beholder of sinne then if he be beleeued to be the author and incitor to sinne Neither is there any more capitall mischiefe then to transferre on God the cause of mans wickednesse For thus it comes to pass that men hauing broken their bars doe scot free commit all riot as hauing God the patron and author of their wickednesse And yet to restraine curiositie and to strike our mindes with a religious feare the consideration of our owne meanenesse being compared to the diuine maiestie is much profitable For if any of vs should crush to death an Ant with his foot no man would lay to his charge an action of iniustice for it although the Ant hath not offended him although he hath not giuen life to the Ant although he hath destroyed anothers worke which cannot be restored by man and although betweene man and it there is no infinite inequality but a kinde of certaine and finite proportion But man hath grieuously offended God and yet God hath giuen life to man and there is no proportion betweene God and man but as infinite a distance as betweene a finite and infinite thing If therefore God shall crush those sinfull men which he is able to saue if patiently tolerating the vessels of anger he shall make them the matter of his glory shall any man expostulate with God or thinke goodnesse wanting in him or accuse his iustice CHAP. 2. That we are not therefore altogether to abstaine from the doctrine of Prouidence and
defile that act it must not be said to be from God Man is the effector of sinne God the permitter That act in which there is deformity is naturally good in as much as it is from God but morally euill in as much as it is from man The action in which the sinne is is one thing the deformity of the action in which formally the sinne is is another thing To the action it selfe God doth concurre with man but not to the sinne XVI Neither is God to be blamed that he doth concurre with the creature which hee knoweth will abuse his concurrence and assistance to sinning For mans vice cannot straighten the limits of Gods power nor dissolue that eternall law by which the whole frame of nature doth stand nor pull away that naturall necessity whereby the creature cannot moue it selfeâ— without the assistance of God So the Soule although it knowes that the body will abuse her mouing power to halting doth not keep back her mouing force or abstaine from the motion of the body Neither will therefore the power of God be diminished in naturall things or his influence cease because in morall things the will of man is disobedient to the law of God Yea God cannot require obedience from the creature vnlesse he should sustaine it and giue to it power of mouing it selfe XVII As the Sunne is not the cause of darkenesse although darkenesse doth necessarily follow the absence of it So God seeing he is the most exact iustice is not the cause of sinne although inordinate affections blindenesse of minde the prauity of the will doe necessarily follow the deniall of the grace of God This is their meaning which say that God is not the efficient but the deficient cause of sin Yet I could wish men would abstaine from this kinde of speaking XVIII Although wicked men doe worke freely and of their owne motion are carried to sinne God not alluring nor forcing them yet it is certaine that the euents which doe follow thence are directed and gouerned by Gods prouidence For as the downefall of the running water inclining to the lower parts may be turned the channell being guided by the diligence of the conueyor so although wicked men of their owne disposition are prone to sinne yet by the prouidence of God and his secret counsell they are inclined to commit this sinne rather then that that they may serue the execution of the iudgements of God when he will vse them either to punish any ones wickednesse or to try the faith of the godly or to stirre vp their sloathfulnesse This similitude Salomon doth vse Prou. 21. The heart of the King is in the hand of the Lord as the riuers of waters and hee turnes it whether he will By this meanes as Saint Peter saith Act. 4. The wicked doe whatsoeuer things the hand of God and his purpose had determined to be done Hence it is that God saith Esay 5. that hee will whistle for the remote nations to say waste Iudea And Chap. 10. hee cals Ashur the rod of his wrath Ieroboam seekes after nouelties and doth practise a reuolting from Salomon Ahias the Prophet sent from God doth declare to him the euent of this attempt God did not instill this rebellion into his heart which was before conceiued but hardned his minde which was already euill to the daring this wicked attempt that he might vse the wicked man to punish the sinnes of Salomon and Rehoboam As therefore Horse-leaches applyed to the parts of a sicke man while they satisfie their owne gorge doe performe the intent of the Physitian so wicked men whilest they rage against good men besides their owne intention they further the purpose of God as Esay teacheth in his tenth Chapter where God saith that hee had decreed to vse the King of Assiria to punish the hypocrisie of Israel but that this minde was not in the King being led onely by ambition and desire of prey Thus God vsed the wickednesse of the brethren of Ioseph to keepe famine from his people and the treason of Iudas for the death of Christ and by it for our redemption and the ambition of Augustus Caesar taxing the whole Empire for the bringing of Mary out of Galile to Bethlehem that there shee might be deliuered and so the prophesie of Michai be fulfilled Euen they which resist the commandement of God helpe forward his prouidence and like Rowers which set their backes that way which they goe God by the folly of men doth worke the purposes of his wisedome he doth vse vniust men to the exercising of his iustice as if one with a crooked staffe should strike a straight blow XIX Whensoeuer God letting loose the reines to Sathan doth permit him to tempt any man Sathan truely may allure the appetite by propounding Obiects or trouble the phantasie by the alteration of the humours of the body but he cannot compell the will otherwise the man should not sinne but Sathan Neither could God iustly punish a man for sinne to which hee had beene compelled by an outward cause without his owne inclination XX. But because God when hee would auenge the contumacy of his enemies or punish the sinnes of his owne doth sometimes vse Sathan as his minister the holy Scripture doth attribute one and the same euent both to God and to Sathan So 1 Sam. 16. the euill spirit troubling Saul is said to be from God and 1 Chro. 21. Sathan is said to haue rose vp against Israel and to haue stirred vp Dauid to number the people and 2 Sam. 24. it is attributed to God There God is to be considered as a iust iudge and Sathan as an incitour of the wickednesse By these instructions well conceiued the way of exâ—using Saint Austen will easily be found from whom sometimes there fall some speeches which trouble tender eares if they be not moderated with a fit interpretation such is that which he saith of Shemei cursing Dauid in his Booke de Gratia libero arbitrio Cap. 20. What wise man doth vnderstand how the Lord said to this man Curse Dauid For he did not bid him by commanding him that his obedience should be praised bu because God inclined his will which by his owne proper vice was euill to this sinne by his iust and secret iudgement and therefore is it said the Lord bid him And Cap. 22. God worketh in the hearts of men to incline their wils whithersoeuer he will either to good things of his own mercy or to euill things according to their deserts And against Iulian the Pelagian lib. 5. cap. 3. Many other things we might rehearse in which it would plainely appeare that the heart is made peruerse by the secret iudgement of God that the truth which is said might not be heard and so man might sinne that sinne might be the punishment of a former sinne Yea in the same place he doth contend against Iulian that those which are deliuered vp to their owne desires are
They therefore doe inuert the nature of things who say that God decreed that Adam should sinne because hee had determined to send Christ who should cure Adams sinne when rather God decreed to send Christ because Adam was to sinne Man did not sinne that Christ should abolish sinne but Christ came that he might abolish sinne Here is nothing said that ought to trouble tender eares or which should make God partaker of sinne which yet if any one doth either not conceiue or not digest it is better to accuse his owne dulnesse then accuse the iustice of God and to abstaine from lawfull things then attempt vnlawfull things CHAP. VII That all mankinde is infected with Originall sinne I. SInne is either Originall or Actuall I vse the accustomed words for clearenesse of speech for if one would deale strictly he shou d abstaine from these tearmes seeing it is certaine that Originall sin is in act and therefore is actuall But vse hath obtained that that sinne should be called actuall which is committed in action or in deede and that originall which we haue from the birth that hereditary blot which is sent into vs from our Parents II. Of Originall sinne Saint Paul doth treat in the fifth and seauenth Chapter to the Romanes In the fifth Chapter how it hath passage into all mankinde in the seauenth Chapter how it doth remaine in him in whose minde the law of God is perfectly written III. That no man is free from this blot the Scripture doth cry and experience doth witnesse Whatsoeuer is borne of the flesh is flesh saith Christ Iohn 3. And there he doth plainely teach that all men are defiled with Originall sinne when he saith that it is necessary to be borne againe and to be formed anew We are by nature the children of wrath Eph. 2.3 Who can bring forth a cleane thing out of an vncleaâ—e there is not one Iob 14. Dauid acknowledgeth himselfe infected with this contagion Psal 51. Behold saith he I was formed in iniquity and in sinne my mother conceiued me He doth not acâ—use his father nor expostulate with his mother but although hee was adorned with fingular prerogatiue and replenished with benefits yet hee doth confesse himselfe to be defi ed with that vniuersall contagion he fetcheth the cause of his sinne from that originall and in this common lot he doth lament his owne Circumcision signiâ—ied this for by that externall symbole â—e Church was warned that there was something â—n man 〈◊〉 soone as he was borne that ought to be cut off and â—â—â—râ— ted The end of Baptisme is the same watch 〈◊〉 the Sacrament of our cleansing in the bloud of Christ by which our naturall filthinesse is washed away IV. Not onely the progenie of Ethnicks and Infidels or euill Christians is borne in this Originall sinne but also the off-spring of the godly and faithfull No otherwise then he that was Circumcised begat one that was vncircumcised and as a graine of Wheate well cleansed and receiued in the lap of the earth afterward growing doth bring forth Wheate with chaffe Then was Adam iustified then did hee by his faith cleaue to the promise of his seede that should bruise the serpents head when he begot Cain the heire of his naturall wickednesse and not of his faith or repentance Piety is not hereditary to be deriued to ones heires neither doth holinâ—sse come into vs by nature but by grace not generation but regeneration doth make men holy and good After the same manner that Aristotle lib 2. Phisic doth teach That artificiall formes as the forme of a statue or image are not begotten but onely naturall formes Therefore in the children of the best man as soone as they beginne to speake you may see a crafty and lying disposition and prone to reuenge stubbornenesse against those that admonish them prickes of glory and sporting vanity also that great honour wherewith they prosecute their puppets and babyes are no obscure seedes of their inclinablenesse to Idolatry For as puppets are the Idols of infants so Idols are the puppets of those that are growne in age And therefore when any man hath children of euill manners he ought to acknowledge his image in them when he hath good children he ought to admire the worke of God in them For these are they of whom Saint Iohn saith Chap. 1. who are not borne of bloud nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God V. The second Canon of the Mileuitan counsell is expresly to this thing It pleaseth vs that whosoeuer doth deny little ones that are new borne to be Baptised or doth say that indeede they are Baptised for the remission of their sinnes but yet they drew no originall sinne from Adam which is to be taken away by the lauar of regeneration whence it followeth that the forme of Baptisme in them is to be vnderstood not to be true but false be an Anathema VI. Christ alone was free from this blot he deriued not Originall sinne from his Mother Saint Paul indeede Rom. 5.10 saith that all men sinned in Adam neither is it any doubt but that Christ was in Adam as being one of his posterity but that sentence of the Apostle doth not concerne Christ because the person of Christ was not in Adam but onely his humaine nature neither is he from Adam as from the agent principle and from the seminating power but thence he tooke that matter which by the ouer-shadowing of the holy Ghost was freed from the common contagion VII Now if you should aske me whether Originall sinne is done away by Baptisme or whether that blot doth yet remaine in those that are regenerated by the holy Ghost it is readily answered out of the Scripture and experience which is so certaine here that there is no place left for doubting Dauid was circumcised and plentifully instructed with the gifts of the holy Ghost and yet he doth confesse that he was not free from this staine but was polluted in an equall contagion with others And Saint Paul Rom. 7. speaking vnder his owne person of euery man in whose minde the law of God is faithfully imprinted doth acknowledge that sinne doth dwell in him which he â—aileth the law of sinne because it doth stirre him vp to sinne We see infants dye as soone as they are baptised and death the Apostle being witnesse Rom. 6. is the wages of sinne I demand for what sinne doe those Baptised infants dye is it for actuall sinne but they haue committed none therefore it is for Originall sinne Whence it appeareth that Originall sinne doth remaine after Baptisme wherein sinne is remitted as touching the guilt although it remaine in the act as Saint Austen teacheth at large in his first Booke against Iulian concerning Marriage and concupiscence Cap. 25. and 26. The concupiscence of the flesh saith he is forgiuen in Baptisme not that it should not be at all but that it should not be imputed for sinne VIII
But seeing the regenerate doe afterward sinne whence are these sinnes but from their inward corruption For that being taken away the effects also which doe flow onely from this cause would be taken away IX And what shall we say to this that the best men beget their children tainted with this blot and therefore standing in neede of Baptisme Now if the parents begetting children were without originall sinne how could they send this blemish to their issue and giue that to their children which themselues haue not X. Therefore say you marriage is euill seeing by it children of wrath are begotten and sinne is propagated which ought rather to be pulled vp by the roote and to be choaked in the very seede I answere that marriage is more ancient then sinne and instituted by God himselfe the sinne that came vpon it doth not hinder but that marriage is naturally a good thing No otherwise then meate and drinke are things that are good and to be desired although thereby the life of wicked men is sustained Besides marriage doth bring forth sonnes to God and doth serue to fill vp the number of the Elect. I let passe that the faithfull couple doe ioyne their prayers doe stirre vp one another to good workes doe cure one anothers incontinency and in slippery places doe stretch forth the hand one to another Neither are there wanting examples of wicked men to whom by Gods benefit there haue happened good and godly children euen as God doth send seasonable raine on those seeds which were stollen and sowed by a theefe CHAP. VIII What Originall sinne is and whether it be truely and properly sinne I. ORiginall sinne is the deprauation of mans nature contracted and drawne from the very generation it selfe and deriued from Adam into all mankinde consisting of the priuation or want of originall righteousnesse and the pronenesse to euill II. These two things to wit the priuation or want of originall righteousnesse and the inclinablenesse to euill are in originall sinne For as sicknesse is not onely a priuation of health but also an euill affection of the body from the distemper of the humours so this hereditary blot is not onely the want of righteousnesse but also the inclinablenesse to vnrighteousnesse III. The last of these proceedes from the former For the soule which by originall sinne hath ceased to be good is necessarily euill and the soule being instructed by the will which cannot be idle holines and righteousnesse being lost must needes turne to the contrary part IV. This corruption brings blindnesse to the minde peruersenesse to the will perturbation to the appetites the losse of supernaturall gifts and the corruption of those that are naturall V. And although in Adam the minde was first stained with errour before the will was infected with peruersenesse yet is the corruption of the will farre worse and that blot more foule because wee are not made good or euill by the vnderstanding but by the wiâ—l for whatsoeuer euill is committed it is the sinne of the will the committing of wickednesse is a greater sinne then the ignorance of the truth VI. The guilt or obliging to punishment cannot be any part of the definition of Originall sinne Lombard lib. 2. dist 30. Thâ—mas t. 2 Quest â—2 art 3. seeing it is the effect of it VII Lombard and Thomas and the other schoolemen who say that originall sinne is concupiscence doe not attaine sufficiently to the nature of concupiscence For Originall sinne doth infect all the faculties of the reasonable soule and concupiscence is the disease of the will and appetite also concupiscence is contrary to one commandement of the Law and Originall sinne is contrary to the whole Law Neither by it doe men sinne more against the second table of the law then against the first What that concupiscence is forbidden by a proper law But I know not whether Originall sin may be said to be forbidden by the law for God doth not command that wee should be generated or begotten pure without sin for so God should speak to man before he were born Surely man is not bound to obey the law before he be man and seeing the law doth not speak but to them that heare are partakers of reason to think that the law commands a man that is growne to age to be born without sin is a ridiculous thing well nigh a dreame For so the law should command him to be born that is already born him to be begotten that is already grown a man The law doth not command but presuppose Originall righteousnes doth speake to man being considered in the state wherein he was before the fall requiring that old debt and naturall obedience Whence it is manifest that Originall sin is condemned by the law but not forbidden VIII Of this sinne although the Scripture speaketh so expressely and sense it selfe and experience doth abundantly testifie it yet there haue not beene wanting some who did deny this sinne and would not acknowledge mankinde from his first stock and originall to be infected with sinne Cyrillus Ierosolomytanus or whosoeuer else is the author of those Catechismes which goe vnder his name in his fourth part of his Catechisme hath these words Thou dost not sinne by generation thou dost play the adulterer by fortune And a little after Wee come without sinne but now we sinne by our owne election IX In Saint Austins age Pelagius Celestius did deny Originall sinne and did contend that sinne did passe from fathers to their issue onely by example and imitation They did deny that sinne was remitted to infants by Baptisme because they had none and did affirme that by it onely the kingdome of heauen was opened to them whose heresie is long agoe hissed out and strongly confuted by Saint Austin X. Saint Hierome or whosoeuer else is the author of those briefe comentaries vpon the Epistle of Saint Paule which are put in among Saint Hieromes works doth fauour Pelagius For those words of the Apostle Rom. 5. in whom all haue sinned he restraines to example and doth take them as spoken of the imitation of the sinne of Adam XI Saint Chrisostome in many places doth seeme to creepe into this error In his Homily vpon new Conuerts he denyeth Baptisme to be profitable only to the remission of sinnes For saith he wee Baptise infants although they are not polluted with sinne that holinesse and righteousnesse adoption and the inheritance c may be added to them And in his tenth Homisie vpon the Epistle to the Romanes expounding that of Saint Paule Rom. 5. By the disobedience of one many were made sinners by sinners hee would haue vs vnderstand those that are guilty of punishment and mortall and not those that are defiled by the blot of sinne XII Lombard lib 2. distinct 30. litera E. saith there were some that said Originall sinne was no vice in vs but onely the guilt of punishment euen of that eternall punishment which is
soule that sinneth shall die The sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father Whereunto the law of God Deut. 24. is consonant and agreeable which law doth forbid children to be punished for the sinnes of their parents Why then doe we die for anothers sinne Why is the sinne of Adam imputed to vs Or is it credible that he that forgiues vs our sinnes will impute to any one anothers sins What that the punishment is greater then the sinne For when we sinned in Adam onely in potentia in power and possibility yet we are punished in actu in act And that seemeth most cruell that Adam which sinned in act is saued and for the same sinne many are damned who sinned in Adam onely in power and possibility I answere the place in Ezechiel must be taken thus the innocent sonne shall not beare the punishment of his fathers sinne So when God saith in the law that he will visit the iniquity of fathers vpon the children he speaketh of children which walke in their fathers steps and are partakers of the same fault But the sonnes of Adam cannot be said to be innocent as they which not onely sinned in Adam as in the stocke and roote of mankinde but also themselues are borne stained with the same deprauation and prone to the same sinne Secondly I say that that place in Ezechiel makes nothing to the present matter for hee speaketh of the sinnes of the fathers whose sinnes are personall and who in sinning doe not sustaine the persons of their children For Arminius is deceiued in setting downe the cause why those Infidels are reprobated who haue not refused the Gospell viz. Because saith he they refused the grace of the Gospell in their parents In Perkins p. 92. grandfathers great-grandfathers and their fathers by which act they deserued that they should be forsaken by God For I would haue them shew me a solid and sound reason why Infants haue not sinned against the grace of the Gospell in their Parents to whom the grace of the Gospell was offred and by whom it was refused seeing in Adam all his posterity sinned against the Law and by it deserued punishment and forsaking For the reason of the couenant of God is perpetuall that children are comprehended in their Parents VI. Let therefore the Schoole and followers of Arminius learne the cause of this difference and why the sinne of Adam should be imputed to his posteritie but the sinnes of other fathers should not be imputed to their children These therefore I say to be the causes of this difference 1. Because by the sinne of Adam we lost originall purity but wee haue not lost it by the sinnes of our Grand-fathers or great-Grandfathers 2. Because Adam receiued gifts which as he had for himselfe so hee should haue conueyed them to his posterity which seeing hee lost it iustly comes to passe that his posterity should be depriued of those gifts But my Grand-father or great-Grandfather receiued no supernatural gifts from God which by an hereditary right they should deriue to their posterity 3. Then also the sinnes of my Grand-father and great-Grandfather were personall sinnes neither did they in their sinning sustaine the persons of their posterity which cannot be said of Adam Vide Tho. 1.2 quest 81. Art 2. Surely I think that it cannot be said that Ezechias or Iosias who were the posterity of Dauid did in Dauid murther Vrias 4. I will say somewhat more Adam while hee liued committed many sinnes yet I thinke that onely that first sinne of Adam was imputed to his posterity because onely by this sinne he violated that couenant which was made with him as with the author of mankinde 5. And if any one at this day is depriued of the light of the Gospell because some of his ancestors a thousand yeeres since refused the Gospell as Arminius thinks there is no cause why on the other side one may not be called effectually to saluation because some one of his ancestors beleeued the Gospell For why shall the infidelity of the great-Grandfather be imputed to the great-grandsonne and his faith be not imputed But that the faith of one is imputed to another Arminius himselfe is not of opinion when he saith out of Habacuk 2. The iust shall liue by his owne faith and not by anothers Nor because Adam beleeued the promise of his seede that should breake the serpents head is this his faith therefore imputed to any of his posterity Arnoldus doth seeme to consent to this but I cannot be brought to thinke that the other sectaries doe beleeue the same 6. To beleeue that any one is reprobated because hee resused the Gospell in his greatgrandfathers or their Fathers is plainely conrâ—ary to the opinion of Saint Paul 2 Cor. 5.10 where he saith that euery one shall receiue the things done in his body whether it be good or euill therefore not according to those things which he hath done in anothers body 7. I let passe he absurdities into which Arminius by this meanes would plunge himselfe For it may come to passe that ones Grandfather by the fathers side hath beleeued the Gospell his Grand-father by his mothers side hath refused the Gospell It may come to passe that ones Grandfathers or greatgrandfathers so vpward part haue beleeued and part haue not beleeued I demand of which of them in the purpose of God shall respect be had Shall the faith of the one or the infidelitie of the other be imputed to their posteritie Then also as often as the Gospell is offred to any Nation or Citie there is nothing so likely as that some of those people were borne of Ancestors that were Infidels and that some of them were borne of faithfull Ancestors yet is the Gospell offred to all without any difference Also it will come to passe that some one proceeding of faithfull Ancestors may refuse the Gospell and on the otherside one proceeding of Insideâ—s may be conuerted 8. And if one may be an Infidell by anothers infidelity and may be said to haue refused the Gospell in his Ancestors because some one of his progenitors refused the Gospell a thousand yeares before there will scarce be any of the godly that after this manner hath not refused the Gospell 9. But what will they say to this That it is found by experience that the worst and most wicked progeny of very wicked Ancestors haue beene conuerted to the faith and as the Apostle saith Rom. 5.20 Where sinne abounded there grace abounded What were the ancient Romanes but theeues depopulating and wasting the world and a scourge in the hand of God What was Corinth but the stewes of all Graecia and the Mart or faire of most foule lusts yet neuerthelesse in those cities God by the preaching of the Gospell raised vp most flourishing Churches and there were very many in those dregges which did belong to the election of God 10. But if at any time the posterity is punished for
the sinnes of their Ancestors Arminius ought not to extend it to so many ages seeing the law doth not extend the visitation of the iniquity of the fathers vpon the children beyond the third and fourth generation And that because a man can scarce liue so long as to see his issue beyond the third or fourth generation For therefore are children punished their fathers beholding it that griefe might thereby increase to their parents and that the fathers might be punished by the misâ—ries of the children which is a cause to me of suspecting that this visitation of the sinne of the fathers vpon the children ought to be vnderstood of temporall and not of eternall punishments VII But to that which was said that the punishment was greater then the sinne because they which in Adam sinned onely in power are for his sinne punished in act it is easie to answere For wee so sinned in Adam in power that also the sinne was in vs in act neither doe we onely beare the punishment of anothers sinne but also of our owne nor is it any maruaile if God hath pardoned Adam and doth not pardon many of his posterity for Adam beleeued and repented but these refuse the grace of God offred and persist in impenitency CHAP. X. Of the propagation of the sinne of Adam to his posteritie where also of the traduction of the soule and of sinne it selfe WE haue already said that the sinne of Adam is conueyed to his posterity two manner of wayes by Imputation and Propagation Of imputation it hath been spoken now we are to speake of Propagation I. That the sinne of Adam hath infected all mankinde with an hereditary deprauation and that this contagion hath farre spred it selfe hath beene abundantly proued by those places by which we haue declared that euery man was conceiued and borne in sinne As by one man sinne entred into the World and death by sinne so death went ouer all in whom all men sinned Rom. 5. II. And if any one would exactly view the manner and circumstances of Adams sinne he shall finde that in euery man the character and no obscure image of that first sinne is deepely impressed for there is engrafted in euery man curiosity desire of knowing those thin gs which pertaine nothing to him and also a distrustfull haesitation and doubting of the word of God And as Adam laid the fault vpon his wife and his wife vpon the Serpent so is it naturall to euery man to couer his fault with anothers fault Also flight and trembling at the meeting of God lying dissembling and a sense of vndecent nakednesse are in all men by nature and are deriued into posterity from that fountaine and to these things we are not taught but made not instructed but infected To these things we doe not onely not need a master but contrary to the teaching of masters and to discipline all stayes and barres being broken wee returne to them nature being conqueror III. As therefore the egges of the Aspe are iustly broken and serpents new bred are iustly killed although they haue yet poysoned none so infants are rightly obnoxious and subiect to punishments For although they haue not yet sinned in act yet there is in them that contagious pestilence and that naturall pronenesse to sinne IV. But hence ariseth a question hard to be dissolued to wit by what meanes sinne is traduced from parents to their posterity and how mens soules may draw this deprauation For seeing all things that God doth are good it is not credible nor likely that God put Originall sinne into mens soules For how should he punish those soules which hee himselfe had corrupted And if he created the soule pure and iust but being included in the body it is defiled with the contagion other discommodities no whit lesse doe arise For to include a pure and innocent soule in a stinking prison and to thrust it as it were into a bridewell that it might bee corrupted there doth not seeme to agree with the iustice and goodnesse of God V. Hereto is added also that sin is the deprauation of the soule not of the body for sin is a spirituall thing a vice of the will the body therefore cannot giue that to the soule which it hath not And seeing the body doth not sinne but when the soule doth vse the body as an organ to sinne Rom. 6.13 it is manifest that sinne doth passe from the soule into the body and not from the body into the soule to which thing the very sinne of Adam is a cleere testimony to vs For Adam first sinned in will before hee stretched forth his hand to the forbidden Apple Caluin saw this who in the first chapter of the second booke of his Institutions hath these words This contagion hath not its cause in the substance of the flesh or of the soule but because it was so appointed by God that what gifts hee had bestowed vpon the first man he should haue them and also loose them both for himselfe and his VI. Here is a way that is obscure and slippery in which we must goe with wary steppes I doe not propound to my selfe to satisfie them that are braine-sicke and wickedly acute I will onely set downe those things which seeme to mee to be agreeable to the word of God and to reason whereunto that the way may be made plaine some things are to be spoken of the originall of the soule and of the traduction of it VII Origen following Plato was of opinion that all soules were at first created together with the Angels and afterwards put into bodies This hee disputes lib. 1. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chap. 7. Tertullian will haue the soule to be conueyed with the seede and the soule of the sonne to be from the soule of the father which is not to be marueiled at in him who doth contend that the soule is the body lib de anima Chap. 5. Saint Ierome in his Epistle to Marcellina and Anapsychia doth witnesse that the greater part of the west were of the same opinion Saint Austin hath writ foure bookes of the originall of the soule in which he leaueth this question vndecided neither dares hee rashly determine any thing And his second booke of retractations Chap. 56. doth witnes that hee continued in that doubt to his death Yet in his 157. Epistle hee doth debate with Tertullian and doth more incline to the contrary opinion VIII But we determin that the reasonable soule is infused into the * i e. The childe conceiued and not yet borne embryon but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to come from without as Aristotle would haue it lib. 2. de generat animal Cap. 3. But we thinke that it is formed by God in the fruit and in the rudiment of mans body being led thereto by the authority of the Scripture whereunto reason and the nature of the soule it selfe doth agree IX Moses Numb 27.16 saith thus to God Let the Lord the
his posterity which he had receiued for himselfe and his posterity Not to giue supernatural light to the minde is not to put into the will although peruersenesle of will doth afterwards follow the blindenesse of the minde For the will being destitute of this light and of the knowledge of supernaturall good things cannot moue it selfe to things vnknowne but onely to things that are present and knowne such as are the pleasures of the body riches c. Which although they be naturally good yet they turne the will from the study and desire of supernaturall things Then also selfe-loue which is naturally good and necessary doth beginne to be morally euill because it doth inuade that place which is due to the loue of God Hence is that pronenesse to euill which is in that inordinate selfe loue which supernaturall illumination doth not direct which light God not giuing to the soule doth not therefore put sinne into it No otherwise then if one doth take away from the Traueller the light of the Sunne by putting darkenesse betweene be doth not force the Traueller to stragle nor doth turne him from the right way but onely he doth take away that without which the right way cannot be knowne XVIII The temper of the body doth increase this contagion For it is found by experience that sanguine men are bloudy and libidinous cholericke men are rash and angry melancholicke men are suspicious and stedfast in their purposes deepely hiding their malice blacke and yealow choller are as sparkes and tinder put to the appetite by which it catcheth flames and burnes And according to the temper of the body one laughes vnder the scourge another weepes with a blow The humours of the body therefore are not causes but prouocations of sinne neither doe they compell the will but allure it nor doe they impresse sinne on the soule but doe put forward the sinfull soule and there being may waies open to sinne they doe incline the soule hither rather then thither CHAP. XI Whether the power of beleeuing the Gospell is lost by the sinne of Adam I. IT is demanded whether by the sinne of Adam we haue lost the power of beleeuing the Gospell Arminius that maruailous artificer of deuising doth deny it For that he might proue that God is bound to giue to euery man power of beleeuing in Christ and obtaining faith he doth contend that Adam before his fall had not power of beleeuing in Christ nor was it needfull for him therefore we could not loose in Adam that which Adam himselfe had not He saith also that faith was not commanded by the law and therefore Adam was not bound to faith because onely the law was giuen to him he addeth also that no man can beleeue but he that is a sinner And if Adam did not receiue power wherby if he fell he might rise again he did not receiue power of beleeuing the Gospell by which we rise out of this fall II. Seeing these things tend thither that Arminius might make a way for himselfe to that impious and vngodly opinion whereby he affirmes that God is bound to giue to all men power of beleeuing and that God is prepared to giue faith to all men if they themselues will This question is of no small moment nor to be perfunctoriously and lightly handled III. We therefore contend against Arminius that mankinde by the sinne of Adam together with their originall purity and righteousnesse lost also the power of beleeuing in Christ For by the fall of Adam we lost the power of louing God and of obeying him Now saith doth include the loue of God and it is a certaine kinde of obedience IV. Adam indeede before his fall was not bound to beleeue in Christ because he was not declared to him neither then was there neede but he was bound to beleeue euery word of God whatsoeuer should afterward be this bond passed to his posteritie but it had not passed if Adam had not beene tyed to the like bond So the israelites in the time of Dauid were not bound to beleeue Ieremy foretelling the instant captiuity into Babylon because Ieremy then was not neither was it needfull for them to know this and yet the Iewes in contemning the prophesie of Ieremy violated that law by which the same people was held and bound in the time of Dauid Hee were a foole who would say that hee that hath lost his sight hath not lost the power of seeing that house which was built foure yeares after or that hee that is blinde by his owne fault hath not lost the faculty of seeing the collyria or plaisters which the Physitian bringeth him some moneths after Surely Adam before his fall had power of beleeuing in Christ after the same manner that he had then power of succouring and helping the sicke and miserable although before the fall there was no misery nor could there be Adam was in the remote power to beleeue the Gospell as a sound man is in the remote power to vse the remedies of a disease that will or may come But that he did not beleeue in Christ it was not because it did exceede the power giuen him by God but because it was not needefull Finally seeing Adam by his incredulity lost the power of beleeuing the word of God it must needes be that hee lost also the power of beleeuing that word by which God was to bring a remedy to this euill V. In vaine doth Arminius thinke that it is vnaptly spoken if it be said that Adam had power of beleeuing when hee had no neede which power was taken from him when hee began to haue neede of it For neither was the power of beleeuing wanting to Adam nor was it taken from him but hee willingly lost it when he lost the power of obaying God And God of his meere grace doth restore the same to whom he will not because we will but because he worketh in vs that we will VI. But that is ridiculous which Arnoldus cap. 14. doth say that Adam before his fall did not receiue power by which he might rise if he should fall For that power whereby men rise after the fall is not giuen before the fall seeing the power is lost by the fall but after the fall is repaired There is no doubt but that Adam before his fall had strength whereby he might rise againe if hee had not lost it by his fall Arnoldus therefore thus speakes as if I should say that hee to whom God hath giuen sound and cleare eyes hath not receiued power by which he might see with those eyes after he is made blinde VII Finally as many as are the posterity of Adam are bound to fulfill the law this is a naturall debt and the law commands vs to loue God and to obey him and therefore to beleeue him speaking Whensoeuer then Christ is preached the doctrine of the Gospell cannot be refused but with the contempt of the Gospell the law also is
be for sin But to reprobate men to be willing to condemne are the same thing euen as to elect to be willing to saue is the same thing Therefore God doth not reprobate vnlesse it be for sinne IV. Furthermore it cannot be denied but that reprobation or reiection of the creature from God is the punishment which can be inflicted on the reasonable creature because eternall torments doe necessarily follow it which if we get to be granted it will thence follow that it is not the part of infinite goodnesse and highest iustice to forsake his owne creature and that not because he hath sinned but because it so seemed good to God that hee might seeke matter for his glory out of the desertion and forsaking of the soule which hee created Can the father who knoweth that the happinesse of his sonne depends on him without the crime of cruelty and want of naturall affection forsake his sonue that is innocent and found guilty of no wickednesse especially if by this forsaking his son should fall into eternall torments and by it be made not onely most miserable but also most wicked V. Neither should God deale iustly if he should giue more euill to the creature by infinite parts then he hath giuen good To which when he had giuen esse a beeing a while after without any fault of it he gaue it male esse an euill and miserable being for euer Indeede if God should onely take away that he hath giuen and should bring the creature to nothing there were no cause at all of complaining But to giue an infinite euill to that creature to whom he gaue a finite good and to create man to that end onely that he might destroy him that out of this destruction he might get glory to himselfe the goodnesse and iustice of God abhorreth VI. Yet this is the most grieuous thing that by this eyther reprobation or desertion of man being considered without sinne the innocent is made not onely most miserable but euen most wicked For the auersion and turning away of the will doth necessarily follow the denying of the spirit of God and seeing according to this opinion God hated man that was made by him before man hated God it cannot come to passe but that the hatred of God whereby he hates man by the same opinion should be made the cause of that hatred whereby man hates God and so God should be made the author of sinne VII And if God hated Esau being considered in the vncorruptible masse as not a sinner it must needes be that God hates the innocent creature and hatred in God although it is not an humane affection nor a perturbation yet it is a sure and certaine will of punishing and punishment cannot be iust if it be without offence neither can a man be iustly punished vnlesse he be considered as a sinner VIII If any man should say that God is obnoxious or subiect to no lawes and therefore his actions are not rightly examined according to the rule of iustice seeing hee is tyed to no rules I will anfwere that the nature of God is more mighty then any law That naturall perfection by which it is impossible that God should lie or that he should sinne is also the cause why he could not hate his guiltlesse creature or appoint man to eternall torments for no fault of his Yea if these things were true it were the part of a wise man to suppresse these things not to moue this anagyris or offensiue matter and rather to command silence or ignorance to themselues then to breake into these secrets which being declared doe cast in scruples and doubts and yeeld occasion to the aduersaries of defaming the true religion and by which no man is made fitter to the duties of a Christian or of a ciuill man or to any part of piety IX That could not escape which should say that by reprobation men are not appointed to damnation but onely are passed by or not elected Thus they seeke gentler words that by them the same thing might be said for it is all one whether God doth appoint a man to damnation or doth that from which damnation must necessarily follow Whosoeuer God doth not elect whether hee be said to be omitted and passed by or to be reprobated hee is alwaies excluded from the grace of God damnation doth certainely follow this excluding because without the grace of election there is no saluation For seeing it is manifest to all that men by election are appointed to saluation I would haue it told mee to what they that are not elected but passed by are appointed Surely if election doth appoint men to saluation it is plaine that by reprobation which is called omission or passing by the rest are excluded from saluation and appointed to destruction X. And if God haue appointed the innocent creature to destruction it must needes be that hee hath appointed it to sinne without which there can be no iust destruction and so God would be the impulsiue and mouing cause of sinne Neither could man iustly be punished for that sinne to which he is eyther precisely appointed or compelled by the will of God XI That the decrees of God are eternall and that he hath fore-knowne all things from eternity doth not hinder this opinion which doth maintaine God in election and reprobation to haue considered man as fallen before he considered him as condemned For although the decrees of God are certaine yet there is some order among them as the eternall decree of ouerthrowing the world by fire was in order after the decree of creating the world So although God from eternity had appointed the wicked to punishment yet nothing hinders but that the consideration whereby hee considered men as sinners should be in order before that whereby hee considered men as reprobate or appointed to punishment XII Neither doth it follow of the opinion of the reuerend Synod and the confession of our Churches by which man fallen is the obiect of predestination that God created man to an vncertaine end or to haue missed of that end which he propounded to himselfe The last end propounded to God was the illustration and setting forth of his glory by the manifestation of his goodnesse and iustice that hee might come to this end hee decreed to create man iust but mutable and free The fore-knowledge of the fall of man doth follow this decree not in time but in order and election and reprobation doth in order follow this fore-knowledge XIII They are very farre from the truth which would haue God in electing and reprobating to haue considered man as not created for they doe as much as if they should say that God considered man as nothing and therefore as not man Surely in that very thing that they call him a man they call him somewhat but to consider something as nothing is a thing well-nigh a dreame He that will saue or punish a man must necessarily first haue
willed him to be a man For if God had appointed man to punishment before he had appointed to create him he should so doe as if any one should determine to beate his children before he hath determined to beget them XIV Finally seeing the first act of his omnipotency was busied about nothing it must neede be that it went before the act of his mercy or iustice which cannot be busied but about something that hath being XV. They say the same thing in other words which would haue God in predestinating to haue considered man as one that might be created and might fail For he which saith he might be created saith he was not yet created and hee that saith hee might fall saith that he had not fallen but that to other inconueniences they adde this increase that they put a power and potentiall faculty in that thing which is nothing In God indeede there was the actiue power of creating the world before he created it But there was not in the world the passiue power for creating before it was created So neither could there be power for the creation or for the fall in man being not created and it is plainely contrary to reason that of him which is not it should be said that he may fall Then also if God elected man that might be created what doth hinder that it may not be said that he elected some whom hee neuer would create For these also may be created but if God elected those whom he presupposed hee would create the will of creating must needes goe before the election CHAP. XIV That the Apostle Saint Paul in the ninth to the Romanes by the word Masse vnderstood the corrupted Masse I. SAint Paul keepes himselfe within these limits in the ninth chapter to the Romanes where hee speaketh more fully and more exactly of the election and reprobation then any where else For if he had written with a beame of the Sunne it could not more cleerely appeare that he speakes of the corrupted masse and of the will of God by which of sinfull men one is chosen and the other reprobated II. The scope of the Apostle is to beate back the vaine confidence of the Iewes who boasted in the law and in the righteousnesse of their workes to whom it did seeme an absurd and impossible thing that the Israelites or the greater part of them fell from the couenant of God and were not reckoned among the sonnes of God That hee might pull this scruple out of their mindes and might wash away this pride he fetcheth the matter from the very originall and doth deny that carnall propagation or the righteousnesse of workes is the cause why any one is to be reckoned the sonne of Abraham but the good pleasure of God and the free election of grace by which God of the issue of Abraham chose whom he would and whom he would hee reiected hath mercy of whom he would and whom he would hee hardned and of the same masse hath prepared some vessels for honour and hath patiently endured the vessels prepared for destruction To which purpose he bringeth two paire of examples Isaac and Ishmaell Iacob and Esau and he doth lay downe Isaac and Iacob as sonnes of the promise and examples of the free election of grace but Ishmaell and Esau as examples of reiection And he doth seeme of purpose to adde the example of Esau and Iacob for a prolepsis or preuention of an obiection For the Iewes might except that therefore the difference was betweene Isaac and Ishmaell because the one was of the seruant the other of the free woman Then also because when Isaac was borne Ishmael already had shewed the signes of an euill disposition and had done those things for which hee ought to be excluded from the couenant The Apostle doth fitly preuent this obiection by the example of Iacob and Esau who both were the sonnes of the free woman and neither of them had done any good or euill yet God loued the one and hated the other III. All these things are brought by the Apostle that he might teach in what respect God chose some of the Iewes and reprobated others although they were puft vp with the opinion of legall righteousnesse This nation seeing it was impure and corrupt it could not be compared to the pure masse And the Apostle should plainely speake besides the matter if he should vse the example of the vndefiled masse to teach how God out of a corrupted nation chose some and reprobated others IV. The examples of Iacob and Esau doe conuince and proue the same thing of whom when they were in the wombe and had done neither good nor euill God doth pronounce that he loued Iacob that hee hated Esau Now God could not consider these twins in the wombe but he must consider them such as they were they were corrupted defiled with originall sinne Surely he cannot be said to be preferred before the other because he was better when he was in the womb seeing neither of them had done good or euill This is that with which S. Paul doth stop the mouth of these questionists and will not haue any to plead against God or answere him againe seeing there is no cause but the meere good pleasure of God why of two that were equally euill he preferred the one before the other V. Neither is there any small force in these words I haue hated for God could not hate the creature whom he considered as pure and voide of sinne VI. It is no light thing that hee so describeth the elect to wit that they are they whom God will haue mercy on ver 18. whence also ver 23. they are called the vessels of mercy for mercy presupposeth misery They force the words of the Apostle who by misereri to haue mercy vnderstand simply benefacere to doe well I should doubt and make conscience to affirme that God had had mercy on Christ as man on whom yet he hath bestowed more gifts then on any other creature VII There is great weight also in the word hardning he hardneth saith the Apostle whom he will As by those on whom God will haue mercy the Elect are vnderstood so by them that are hardned the reprobate are vnderstood And to thinke that God determined to harden that man whom hee considereth as pure as in the incorrupted estate is great wickednesse and contumelious against the iustice of God By this meanes God should not onely punish the innocent but also depraue and corrupt the guiltlesse For obduration and hardning is a species and kinde of punishment and therefore after sinne God hardneth none but he who is already hard so he hardned Pharaoh he being already stubborne and prone to rebell of his owne disposition VIII Neither is there neede of much wit to perceiue that Pharaoh is no fit example of reprobation out of the incorrupted Masse and of a man considered without sinne IX It is also greatly to be
frowardnesse by what meanes it doth blow vp a man while he burst and lift him vp on high that it might throw him downe headlong For one that is filled with Armianisme may say thus God indeede is willing to saue me but he may be disappointed of his will hee may be defrauded of his naturall defires which are farre the best Those whom God will saue by his Antecedent will hee will destroy by his Consequent will Also his election doth rest on the fore-seeing of mans will I were a miserable man if my saluation depended vpon so vnstable a thing The same man will also reason thus God giueth to all men sufficient grace but hee hath not manifested Christ to all men therefore there is some grace sufficient without the knowledge of Christ Also the same man will easily beleeue that God doth mocke men for he hath learned in the schoole of Arminius that God doth seriously desire intend the saluation of all and singular men and yet that neuerthelesse he doth call very many by a meanes that is not congruent that is by a meanes in a time and measure which is not apt nor fit by which meanes whosoeuer is called doth neuer follow God calling But what doe I know whether he calleth by a congruent and agreeable meanes or no Adde also these famous opinions that vnregenerate men doe good workes that they are meeke thirsting after and doing the will of the Father that faith is partly from grace and partly from free-will Nay what that any maintainer of the sect of Arminius shall dare to set lawes to God himselfe and to say that God is bound to giue to all men power of beleeuing And that the iustice of God doth require that he may giue to man that which is his owne and that man himselfe may determine and open his owne heart to receiue the word of God O your fidelity Are these your famous incitations to holinesse of life Doth Arminius traine vp men to piety by these instructions Surely if any one is stirred vp to good workes by these things hee is thereby the more corrupted For God had rather haue sinnes with repentance then righteousnesse with pride God will not stirre vp men to repentance with the losse eyther of our faith or his glory Nor are we onely to doe our endeauour that men be stirred vp to repentance but we must also see that it be done by meanes that are conuenient and not contumelious against God CHAP. XXV Whether Christ be the cause and foundation of Election I. WE say that no man is saued but by and for Christ and that Christ is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and price of our redemption the foundation and meritorious cause of our saluation But we doe not say that he is the cause of election or the cause why of two considered in the corrupted masse one is preferred before another There are not wanting examples of most wicked men to one whereof God so dispensing the Gospell hath beene preached whence it came to passe that he was conuerted and did beleeue but to the other the Gospell hath not beene preached The Scripture doth not say that the death of Christ is the cause of this but doth fetch the cause from the good pleasure of God who hath mercy on whom he will For the loue of the father doth alwaies goe before the mediation of the sonne seeing that the loue of the father to the world was the cause why he sent his sonne Yea truely seeing Christ himselfe as he is man is elected and the head of the elect hee cannot be the foundation and cause of election For as hee is the head of men as he is a man so is he the head of them that are predestinated as he is a man predestinated to so great honour which came to him by the meere grace of God II. Wherefore the Apostle calleth Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the price of our redemption and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the propitiation Coloss 1. Rom. 3. but he doth not say that he is the cause why some men should be elected rather then others III. Reason it selfe doth consent For as the recouery of the sicke-man doth in the intention alwaies goe before the vsing of the Phisitian so it must needes be that in the minde of God the thought of sauing men was not in time but in order before the thought of sending the Sauiour IV. Adde to these that the mediation and redemption of Christ is an action whereby the iustice of God is satisfied which is not signified by the word Election for it is one thing to be a mediator and another thing to be the cause of Election or of the preferring of one before another in the secret counsell of God Whence it is that Christ is the meritorious cause of our saluation but not of our election which is as much as if I should say that Christ is the foundation and cause of the execution of the decree of Election but not the cause of Election it selfe V. It is of no small moment that Christ Iohn 15.13 saith That he layeth downe his life for his friends chap. 10. v. 11. he calleth himselfe the good shepheard that layeth downe his life for his sheepe And if Christ be dead for his friends and for his sheepe it must needs be that when he died for them he did consider them as being already friends and sheepe although many of them were not then called as Christ himselfe doth testifie who in the sixteenth verse of the same chapter doth call those also his sheepe who were not yet conuerted And if Christ dying for vs considered vs as his friends and sheepe it is plaine that before the death of Christ there was already destinction made betweene his friends and enemies betweene the sheep and goates and therefore that the decree of Election was in order before the death of Christ and that the opinion of Arminius is to be hissed out as an opinion subuerting the Gospell whereby hee thinkes that the election had not place when Christ died Certainly he that died for his sheepe died for the elect and not for them who were to be elected after hee was dead By these things it is plaine that by those friends and sheepe for which Christ died are not vnderstood those onely who loue God and follow Christ but all those whom God loueth and whose saluation hee decreed for whom Christ died when they did not yet loue God and when they were enemies to him And therefore they are called enemies Rom. 5.10 because they did not loue God but yet euen then they were highly loued by God and were appointged to saluation in Christ For in a diuers respect they were both friends and enemies sheepe and goates Friends because God loued them enemies because they did not yet loue God VI. Neither is iniurie done to Christ if the loue of the Father and his good pleasure be said to goe in order
them to iust and deserued punishments for their sinnes IV. The definition of Thomas doth not please me who saith that the decree of Reprobation is the will of permitting one to fall into sinne and of laying vpon him the punishment of damnation for his sinne For the permission whereby God doth permit doth not belong to predestination but to his prouidence although it serue to predestination V. It is the opinion of the Arminian sect that Reprobates may be saued For saith Arminius that decree is not of the power but of the act of sauing Very ill spoken For where the act of God is determined by his decree in vaine is the power by which this act may be resisted This opinion doth draw with it other opinions no better then it selfe for errors are tyed together among themselues like serpents egges For if a Reprobate may be saued he that is not written in the booke of life may effect that hee be now written in and so the number of the elect will not be certaine nor the decree of Reprobation be irreuocable and peremptory as they speake vnlesse after finall perseuerance in incredulity Also hence it will follow that a reprobate may if he will obtaine faith and conuert himselfe whence it would come to passe that faith should not be of the meere grace of God which wee shall see hereafter to be the opinion of Arminius VI. God is after the same manner the cause of Reprobation as the iudge is the cause of the punishment of them that are guilty and sinne is the meritorious cause Seeing therefore the consideration of sinne doth moue the iudge and the iudge doth condemne to punishment it appeareth that sinne is the remote cause of damnation and not onely a condition necessarily fore-required and that the iudge is the next and neerest cause VII Furthermore although sinne be the cause of appointing to punishment yet it is not the cause of the difference betweene the Elect and Reprobate For examples sake Two men are guilty of the sâ—me crime and it pleaseth the king to condemne one and to absolue and free the other his sinne indeede that is condemned is the cause of his punishment but it is not the cause why the king is otherwise affected to the other then to him seeing the fault on both sides is alike The cause of the difference is that something thing steppeth betweene which doth turne the punishment from one of them which in the worke of predestination is nothing else but the very good pleasure of God by which of his meere good pleasure he gaue certaine men to Christ leauing the rest in their inbred corruption and in the curse due vnto them For which difference it is great wickednesse for vs to striue with God seeing hee is not subiect nor bound to any creature and punisheth no man vniustly giuing to one the grace that is not due and imposing on the other the punishment that is due VIII Here it is demanded what is that sinne for which God doth reprobate to wit whether men are Reprobated onely for the sinne which is deriued from Adam and for that blot which is common to Reprobates with the elect or whether they are also reprobated for the actuall sinnes which they are to commit in the whole course of their life The answere is at hand For although naturall corruption be cause sufficient for Reprobation yet it is no doubt but that God hath decreed to condemne for the same cause for which hee doth condemne and hee doth condemne the Reprobates for the sinnes which they haue committed in act For in hell they doe not onely beare the punishment of originall sinne but also of actuall sinnes Therefore also God hath appointed them to damnation for the same sinnes Now to Reprobate and to appoint to punishment are all one God doth so execute any thing in time according as he from eternity decreed to execute it Now he doth punish in time for actuall sinnes therefore also hee decreed from eternity to punish for them Thence it is that the punishments of the men of Capernaum was to be greater then the punishment of the Sodomites and the punishment of him that knew the will of his master greater then the punishment of him that knew it not because there is a great difference betweene the actuall sinnes for which they are punished Nothing hindreth that God considering a man lying in his naturall corruption and deprauation should not also consider him as poluted with those sinnes which he was to commit by that naturall deprauation IX Arminius doth not thinke that any man is Reprobated for originall sinne for he contends that Christ hath obtained the remission of it for all mankinde But he will haue man to be reprobated onely for the fore-seeing of actuall sinnes that is for the breach of the law and the contempt of grace In which thing he doth seeme not to be constant to himselfe For seeing all actuall sinnes doe flow from originall sinne it cannot be that the cause and fountaine of actuall sinnes should be remitted by God and yet the sinnes that flow from thence should not be remitted As if God should forgiue a man intemperance but should punish him for adultery for actions doe flow from habits and naturall inclinations as the second acts doe flow from the first X. Without doubt incredulity and the reiection of the Gospell are among the sinnes for which any one is reprobated For by this reiection we sinne against the Law by which God will iudge vs For the law commandeth that God be loued with all our heart and that he be obeyed in all things and without exception and therefore also that he be beleeued when he speaketh and that hee be obeyed when hee commandeth vs to beleeue whatsoeuer it shall be which he shall eyther command or shall say XI That hee should be Reprobated for reiecting the Gospell and despising the grace of Christ to whom the Gospel was neuer preached is against all reason For whom the Gospell doth not saue it leaueth vnder the law to be iudged by it which law doth then binde a man to beleeue in Christ when Christ is preached to him Nor is it the Schoole master to Christ but to them who haue meanes to come to the knowledge of Christ After the same manner as the law did not binde them to belecue the prophecy of Ieremy who neuer heard of the name of Ieremie nor could it be knowne to them XII And although reprobation cannot be said to be the cause of sinne because sinne goeth before reprobation yet it cannot be denied but that reprobation is the cause of the denying of grace and of the preaching of the Gospell and of the spirit of adoption which is peculiar to the elect For seeing this denying is a punishment it must needes be that it is inflicted by the will of a iust iudge These are the words of Arminius Page 58. against Perkins Effectuall grace is denyea by
and common to all another particular which is onely peculiar to the elect VIII We doe very much differ from this opinion We acknowledge that Christ died for all but we denie that by his death saluation and forgiuenesse of sinne is obtained for all men Or that reconciliation is made for Cain Pharaoh Saul Iudas c. Neither doe wee thinke that remission of sinnes is obtained for any one whose sinnes are not remitted or that saluation was purchased for him whom God from eternity hath decreed to condemne For this were a vaine purchaâ—e We denie that election is after the death of Christ as for many other causes so also because Christ in the very agony of death gaue a notable proofe of election in the theefe whose heart he affected and enlightned his minde after an vnvtterable manner the other theefe being left and neglected And seeing Christ doth euery where say that he died for his sheepe and for those whom his father gaue him he doth sufficiently declare that he died for the elect IX And when we say that Christ died for all we take it thus to wit that the death of Christ is sufficient to saue whosoeuer doe beleeue yea and that it is sufficient to saue all men if all men in the whole world did beleeue in him And that the cause why all men are not saued is not in the insufficiency of the death of Christ but in the wickednesse and incredulity of man Finally Christ may be said to reconcile all men to God by his death after the same manner that we say that the Sunne doth enlighten the eyes of all men although many are blinde many sleepe and many are hid in darkenesse Because if all and seuerall men had their eyes and were awake and were in the middest of the light the light of the Sunne were sufficient to enlighten them Neither is it any doubt but that it may be said not onely that Christ died for all men but also that all men are saued by Christ because among men there is none saued but by Christ After the same manner that the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 15.20 that all men are made aliue by Christ because no man is made aliue but by him CHAP. XXVIII That reconciliation remission of sinnes and saluation is not obtained nor purchased for all and particular men by the death of Christ I. FIrst whosoeuer saith that by the death of Christ reconciliation is obtained for all and singular men although hee consider Pharaoh and Iudas not as reprobates but simply as sinners yet hee saith that reconciliation is obtained for them who haue neuer beleeued nor neuer were to beleeue And seeing it is not equall nor iust that reconciliation should bee obtained for such the death of Christ is vsed wrongfully to obtaine something that is vniust and to doe something which is contrary to the iustice of God II. And who but hee that doth willingly shut his eyes will euer beleeue that the reconciliation of Iudas was obtained by the death of Christ seeing that the death of Christ was the very crime of Iudas and by it he was brought to the halter III. And seeing that at the very time in which Christ did die many were already tormented in hell he must needes be of a shallow braine who thinketh that by the death of Christ saluation or reconciliation was obtained for them IV. Also by this doctrine God is openly mocked For Christ is imagined to obtaine that from his father which he knew would neuer profit as if God should grant to his sonne the saluation of that man which from eternity he decreed to condemne For if Christ obtained reconciliation and remission of sinnes for Pharaoh and Iudas whether considered as Reprobates or considered as sinners hee knew well enough that that obtaining of it would not be for their good or profit Christ therefore is brought in asking this of his father I pray thee receiue into grace those whom I know thou wilt neuer receiue into grace and whom I know certainely are to be condemned For Christ in his death and before his death knew full well the secrets of election Surely these men seeme to doe their endeauour that Christian Religion should be made a laughing stocke V. Also they expose God to derision while they will haue God at the same time to loue and hate the same man to loue him because hee giueth his sonne for him and would haue reconciliation to be obtained for him but to haue hated him because from eternity he decreed to condemne him VI. And if Christ obtained remission of sins for Iudas it must needs be that God granted that to Christ asking it that he forgaue the sins of Iudas Which if it be true it necessarily followeth that God doth abolish his owne acts and condemning Iudas punished those sins which were remitted and so men should be punished for those sins the pardon whereof is obtained the testament of Christ by which they wil haue saluation to be purchased for all men should be made void VII Neither is God onely thus mocked but also he is made to mocke mankinde For it is manifest by vse and by the experience of all ages that the Gospell is scarce preached to euery tenth man and that the name of Christ is vnknowne to the greatest part of the world which thing that it is done by the prouidence of God so dispensing there is none that will deny vnlesse he that thinkes that all things are carried confusedly and that they doe proceede without reason or order And if reconciliation and saluation by Christ be purchased for all men why doth not God publish this benefit through the whole world Why doth he suffer this reconciliation to be vnknowne to the greatest part of mankinde Why doth he keepe in and hide from so many men the grace which doth belong to them and which is obtained for them without the knowledge of which no man can be saued They answere that God doth it because men shew themselues vnworthy of this grace As if any man could be worthy of it or could shew himselfe worthy of it Who knoweth not that the Gospell is preached to them that are most vnworthy And where sinne hath abounded Rom. 5.20 there grace hath abounded And if God is hindred by the vnworthinesse of man that he should not make knowne to him the reconciliation obtained the same vnworthinesse could and ought to hinder the obtaining of reconciliation For when reconciliation was obtained God did then fore-know the vnworthinesse that would follow with no lesse certainty then if it had beene present VIII And when they say that Christ died for all as concerning the obtaining of saluation but not as concerning the application of it they doe plainely confesse that Christ did not obtaine that this reconciliation should be applied to all Whence it commeth to passe that this obtaining of reconciliation is vaine yea and ridiculous For they speake as much as if
spirit of Adoption is a prerogatiue of the sonnes of God therefore also these are more loued VIII Doth not God visite some people from on high and doth vouchsafe them the preaching of his word others being neglected as Saint Paul teacheth Acts 14.16 saying God in times past suffred the Gentiles to walke in their owne wayes At this time also there are very many nations drowned in deepe darkenesse to whom not so much as the report or name of Christ hath come IX Were the Corinthians and Philippians who liued before the time of the Apostles so much loued by God as their posteritie was who by the preaching of Saint Paul were conuerted to the faith Can it be said that God did alike wish the saluation of them as of these X. What should I speake of the men of Tyre and Sydon whose saluation if Christ had wished as well as he did the saluation of the Iewes it were a maruaile why he would not make knowne the Gospell to them especially seeing he giueth them this testimony that they were more prone to repentance then the men of Capernaum XI Acts 16.6.7 Paul endeauouring to preach the Gospell in Asia and Bythinia the spirit of God forbiddeth him and commandeth him to passe ouer into Macedonia Certainely it appeareth that God did not equally will the saluation of the Bythinians and the Macedonians seeing he would haue the Gospell rather to be preached to these then to them and presented the necessary meanes of saluation to these when he denied it to them I confesse indeede that after some yeares the Gospell came into Bythinia but in the meane time many dyed in Bythinia who had not the meanes of comming to the knowledge of Christ whose saluation that God did equally desire as hee did the saluation of the Macedonians to whom he commanded Paul to hasten there is no man will beleeue but he that doth willingly harden his minde to resist the truth No otherwise then if I should say that the Physition doth equally desire the recouery of two that are sicke of the same disease and yet doth prouide physicke for the one and will not prouide for the other XII When Christ saith Iohn 10.16 that he hath other sheep which he hath not yet gathered did he loue those sheepe which were not yet gathered but were to be gathered in his time no more then other men whom he hath not onely not drawne by his word but not so much as vouchsafed to call Surely if God did equally will the saluation of all and singular men he would equally supply to all men the meanes of saluation and he would not giue to many people onely a shadowed light and such meanes by which being alone the Arminians themselues haue not yet dared to affirme that any man hath come to saluation XIII Notable is that of Christ Mat. 11.25 where he giueth thanks to his father that he hath hidden the doctrine of saluation from the wise and had reuealed it to babes But why did he as much loue them from whom he had hid the doctrine of saluation Arnold pag 413 414. doth depraue and corrupt the words of Christ For he will haue Christ to giue thankes because his father had reuealed to babes those things which were hidden from men of vnderstanding But Christ doth not onely say that these things were hidden from the wise but doth expresly say that God hid these things from them XIV That place of Saint Paul Rom. 9. doth trouble the Sectaries where it is said that God loued Iacob and hated Esau before they had done good or euill We haue therefore God himselfe professing that he doth not equally loue men that are equall by nature and whereof neither is better then the other and that not because any one hath done any good or shall doe any good but of his meere good pleasure whereby he hath mercy on whom hee will For although Malachie saith that the dominion of Iacob ouer his brother was an effect of this loue and hatred yet the Apostle conscious and priuie of the minde and meaning of God will haue this to be an example or a type of Election according to his purpose and doth extend the words of God to the worke of our saluation Wee neede not be diligent in so cleâ—re a matter XV. The Arminians doe couer themselues against this shower of Arguments with that their distinction of the antecedent and consequent will of God They say that God doth loue some men more then other by his consequent will that is by that will which is after the faith and repentance of man For God doth loue them most whom he fore seeth will beleeue and by their owne free-will are to vse grace well But by his primary and antecedent will God doth alike loue all men and doth equally desire the saluation of all and therefore he doth giue to all men sufficient grace for faith and so for saluation And the cause why the Gospell is not preached to all they say is not the will of God but either the negligence of Christians or the indignity and vnworthinesse of the people or else the sinnes of their ancestors who haue reiected grace being offered XVI Certainely this is a deadly speech and is directly contrary not onely to the Scripture but also to it selfe For while they bring reasons why God doth not offer his Gospell to all vnawares they yeeld to our party for they lay downe the causes why God doth not equally loue all But the question is not why God loueth some men more then others but whether God doth loue all men equally therefore they entangle themselues And how absurd that distinction is of the will of God into antecedent and consequent how contumelious against God in that sence in which it is taken by the sectaries wee haue taught at large Chap. 5. XVII Moreouer they teach that God is often disappointed of his antecedent will and that the loue of God to vs is then mutable if he loue vs with his consequent will that is by his will which is after our loue and faith and our owne will It is a wicked thing to desire that the immutability of the loue of God towards vs should be after our loue and should depend on our will for the loue of God cannot be certaine if it be grounded on the loue wherewith we first loue him That therefore the loue of God to vs might be certaine and immutable it must needes goe before our loue as Saint Iohn teacheth 1. Epist 4.19 Ye loue him because he loued you first XVIII And if God by his consequent will loued one man more then another because hee foresaw hee would beleeue and vse grace well then God shall not sâ—perate man but man seperate himselfe contrary to that of Saint Paul 1 Cor. 4.7 Who seperateth thee c. And this man shall be loued more by God then another because he loued God more XIX Then also that speech of the
gouerned by the will In these actions the will is free vnlesse when some externall force compels or some vnauoidable necessity doth vrge men being vnwilling XII There are also some actions that are ciuill as to sell to buy to bargaine to play to build to paint In these things the will of man is free and doth freely incline it selfe to one or other For hee that doth these things at the command of another yet is willing to obey him that commandeth and therefore is driuen to doe it not onely by anothers will but also by his owne Of this liberty the Apostle speaketh Corinth 7.37 He that standeth stedfast in his heart hauing no necessity but hath power ouer his owne will hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin doth well For in this place the Apostle vnderstandeth by that which is done well not that which is done agreeable to Gods law but that which is done prudently and fitly to the present time and purpose XIII Also in actions that are ciuilly honest the will of man is moued by its owne pleasure as when a heathen man helpes vp him that is fallen or sheweth the way to him that is out of it XIV The like liberty is in the obseruation of Ecclesiasticall pollicy and in those workes commanded by the law of God which doe belong to an outward operation for the most wicked men doe performe holy rites and religious ceremonies doe bestow almes doe heare and reade the word of God XV. But especially in euill actions man is free For hee is not onely of his owne accord carried to sinne but also of two or more euills most freely hee doth choose eyther and doth voluntarily apply himselfe to that to which his minde leads him Wherefore seeing man that is naturally euill is gouerned by his owne euill will and that one is for that cause said to be free because he doth what he listeth it is manifest that man is therefore the seruant of sinne because he is in subiection to his owne will and because he doth sinne voluntarily and freely and that man is therefore a seruant because he is free XVI They that say that an vnregenerate man by this seruitude naturall deprauation doth necessarily sin ought not to be reprehended for an vnregenerate man must needes sin Thus the diuels doe necessarily sinne but yet freely for they sinne being not constrained nor determined and appointed to any one thing onely by any outward cause forcing them But they are led by their owne motion by their ingrafted wickednesse and with their knowledge after the same manner that the Saints that are glorified are necessarily and immutably good but yet voluntarily and freely For it is not credible that the Saints haue lost their liberty by their glorification There is a kinde of necessity which is voluntary neither is liberty contrary to necessity but to constraint and seruitude Wherefore Saint Austin Enchirid. Chap. August lib. 22. de ciuit Cap. 30. Nec ideo libertō arbitrium non habebunt quia peccata eos delectare non poterunt c. Enchirid cap. 105. Multo liberius◠erit arbitrium quod omnino non poterit seruire peccato 105. ciuitat lib. 22. Cap. vlt. doth teach that by the necessity of not sinning which shall be in the Saints their free-will shall be rather increased and confirmed then diminished What is more free then God And yet he is necessarily good and doth good things For as Thomas saith Tom 8. De libro arbitrio Quest 24. Art 3. It is no part of free-will to be able to choose euill The same man doth in many places say that constraint and not necessity is contrary to the liberty of the will but especially in the same Tome Quest 10. De process diuin personarū Art 2. XVII There are moreouer habits and actions that is vertues and workes which doe helpe forward to saluation and which are proper to the faithfull Such as are the true knowledge and feruent loue of God saith and repentance and holy actions flowing from these vertues In and about these things the will of a man that is vnregenerate and standing in his pure and meere naturals is not free here is no free-will of man no inclination no disposition Surely it had beene a very hard thing to finde in Paul raging against the Church and in the theefe crucified for his robberies whom Christ conuerted in the very agony of his death any dispositions or preparations to repentance XVIII I doe not deny but that there are memorized many things of heathen men which were done honestly and profitably for ciuill society for concord and for the defence of their countrie But seeing Without faith we cannot please God Heb. 11.6 And seeing that that action alone is acceptable to God which is done with Faith for Whatsoeuer is done without faith is sinne Rom. 14.23 and which is referred to the glory of God as the Apostle commandeth 1. Cor. 10.31 It is plaine that those honest deedes of the heathen were not without fault and that they could not come to saluation by such ciuill vertues nor that any one could by them be disposed to faith or true repentance The right outward duties of ciuill vertues are of one sort the duties of faith and Christian piety are of another sort And truly in my iudgement the heathen iudge who in giuing sentence and in diuiding possessions doth iudge equally and well is no more iust before the tribunall of God then the theeues who equally and iustly diuide the pray among themselues For whosoeuer doth want faith in Christ is not the Sonne of God and therefore cannot be an heire and iust possessor of worldly goods although he excell in ciuill vertues For a kinde of doubtfull light and some seedes of equity are left in man for ciuill society And they to whom the light of the Gospell doth shine if they giue themselues ouer to vices should be confounded with shame being vrged by these examples XIX But after God hath enlightned the minde of any one with his light and hath touched his heart with repentance and hath wrought in him faith in Christ then the will of man beginneth to moue it selfe willingly and freely to holy actions to which it is not forced by phisicall or naturall necessity but it is so turned by a milde and effectuall eyther perswasion or influence that the will may freely and willingly follow God calling For otherwise that were not a good worke whereunto one should be drawne by constraint or should be compelled by a naturall necessity He that doth good vnwillingly doth wickedly Such a man is sufficiently rewarded if God pardon his obedience for although God hate euill yet he will not therefore compell to good Because a good worke is not good but when it is voluntarily XX. And although man is freely moued to the workes of piety yet the whole praise of the good worke is due to God who worketh in vs
moued to gine a greater measure of grace But it is so farre that God in beginning regeneration should haue respect to fore-going dispositions that on the contrary they are called who are the greatest strangers from the kingdome of heauen and who are ouer whelmed in greatest darknesse Let the Thiefe on the crosse be an example also the Romanes the people of Alexandria of Antioch the Corinthians and the Ephesians then which people there were neuer any more wicked in lust nor more effeminate in luxurie of greater ignorance or of more prodigious idolatry whom yet so euill affected and dispoled God called by an effectuall calling and hauing sent his Apostles to them gained them to Christ that where sinne did more abound there grace also might more abound XVII And that regeneration is not alwayes wrought by degrees the example of the conuerted Thiefe doth shew who in the extreame inuasion of spirituall agony in one moment passed ouer an vnmeasurable space and oâ— the contrary that the resurrection of the body may be done by degrees Ezechiel teacheth Chap. 37. XVIII That is no truer which they say that regeneration is wrought free-will remayning For if free-will doth remaine in regeneration it must needes be that it goeth before regeneration but in things that are spirituall and which belong to saluation there was no free-will before regeneration XIX It is of the same sort yea farre worse which they adde that in an vnregenerate man there are some reliques of the spirituall life for so they aske that to be granted to them which is the question and which we haue already proued to be false XX. Neither yet is that true which they say that God doth not speake to a dead corps for Christ spake these words to Lazarus that was dead Lazarus come forth Luk. 11. And Eze. 37.4 God doth thus speake to the bones that were long before withered Oye dry bones heare the word of the Lord. God calleth those who are not as if they were but in that he calleth them he causeth that they may be The words of Christ Iohn 5.25 are direct to this purpose The dead shall heare the voice of the sonne of God and they that heare shall liue For as God with his light doth so enlighten the blinde that he also giueth them eyes so by his word he doth so speake to the dead that by that word he doth make them aliue XXI Maruailous is the wittinesse of the Arminian conferrers at the Hage who doe thence proue that there is some ability left in man that is spiritually dead because we acknowledge that man may resist grace Passing well spoken for they proue that a man is not dead in sinne because he can resist the spirit of God as if the remainds of our spirituall life were placed in the faculty of resisting God when on the contrary a man is therefore dead in sinne because he can doe nothing but resist They doe therefore as much as if they should say that a man is not therefore dead in sinne because he is dead in sinne XXII And that which they say that he which is dead cannot resist his resurrection but hee that is vnregenerated may resist his viuification maketh for vs and doth burden the cause of these innouators For thence it followeth that the death in sinne is farre the worse death and that he that is dead in sinne is bound with stronger bonds if he resist his owne resurrection not onely in the beginnings of his regeneration but also in the progresse of it Yea that very inclination to resist God is the chiefest part of that death and naturall corruption XXIII In the meane while the Reader shall obserue how artificiall a couert Arnoldus doth vse while he saith that he which is dead cannot resist his resurrection but he that is dead in sinne may resist his viuification The opinion of the Arminians is that an vnregenerate man hath free-will by which he may vse sufficient grace or not vse it beleeue or not beleeue Arnoldus therefore ought thus to haue framed his comparison saying he that is dead cannot hinder or further his owne resurrection but hee that is vnregenerate may hinder or further his regeneration But Arnoldus doth not here make mention of that helpe that he might put by the enuie and suspâ—tion of Semipelagianisme Thus they are wont to doe that are ashamed of their owne opinion XXIV That is not to be passed ouer with silence which the Arminians of the conference at the Hage pag. 81. doe say For there they make two kindes of vnregenerate men some who being left without any calling of God doe walke in the vanity of their minde and thoughts These they confesse are dead in sinne but there are some who are already called and stirred vp by the grace of God whose vnderstandings being enlightned and their affections being enflamed doe stirre vp the will to the apprehension of the truth They deny that those are dead in sinne because their vnderstandings and appetites are viuified although the will is not yet drawne here are many absurdities First because they thinke that some are vnregenerate who are already viuified and made aliue when yet viuification and regeneration are the same thing For if ones minde be quickned it must needes also be regenerated Secondly With the like error they place viuification there where there is not faith seeing as the Apostle witnesseth the iust doth liue by faith and it is impious to acknowledge any viuification to be in an infidell and vnregenerate man Thirdly And they dispute vntowardly when they iudge it to be possible the vnderstanding being enlightned with the knowledge of the truth and the appetite enflamed with the loue of it that the will should be auerse from this truth And that a man may be quickned in his minde and affections and yet his will remaines without life For what should turne away the will when they two doe instigate and stirre it vp seeing that the will is moued by these two alone Nor doth the will euer stand in doubt but when reason stirreth it vp one way and the appetites draw it another way and the will is forced hither and thither by the contrary suggestions of the minde and the appetites Fourthly Nor doe they agree to themselues when they say that there are some left without any calling of God seeing that they maintaine with great contention that all men are called to saluation not onely by an outward but also by an inward calling and that sufficient grace is administred to all Fiftly Finally I demand whence they haue these two kindes of vnregenerate persons If out of the Scripture let them shew the place If out of their owne coniecture wee doe not beleeue them XXV Arnoldus against Tilenus Page 134. doth say that it may come to passe that of two men furnished with an equall helpe of grace one may be conuerted one not But he ought also to shew whether it may come to passe
would odiously burden our cause They say that by our doctrine an vnregenerate man doth necessarily sinne and nothing but sinne That it is not sinne which is committed necessarily and cannot be auoided Arminius against Perkins pag. 106. The necessity and immutability of sinning doth excuse the sinne and doth free from punishment the committing of that act And Arnoldus pag. 188. Necessity doth excuse the sinne It is in vaine commanded if it be impossible to be obayed God saith Arnoldus doth require nothing of vs to which he doth not giue vs sufficient power yea saith hee if God should require of man any thing and should not giue him sufficient power to doe it he should gather where he hath not scattered The same things doth Vorstius reckon vp pag. 28. Collatâ— in Piscat II. This Pelagian Colewort these Sectaries do again set before vs and a thousand times they sing one and the same song which we must needes exactly consider of although they boast of these things rather for ostentation and to trouble weake wits then that they thinke as they say III. First we say that necessity of sinning doth not excuse sinne if it be voluntary and if this necessity be procured by his owne fault So Arist Ethic. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. 3.7 saith that at the first vniust and intemperate men had power not to be such but after that by their owne will they were made such they cannot but be such nor are they therefore to be excused Also he saith that it is a shamefull thing if one by his drunkennesse should bring blindnesse vpon himselfe And if it be so in the vices of the body into which when any one hath fallen by his owne fault hee doth wish he had not fallen into them and would redeeme it with a great price how much more is it in the vices of the minde which seeing they are procured by habit and generation are loued by him who is voluntarily euill For herein is placed the greatest part of the disease that he which is vicious doth loue his vices and will not be amended for there is a necessity which is voluntary and therefore free Nor is it sufficient to say that such a necessity is spontaneus and of a mans owne accord seeing euen beasts led by instinct are carried of their own accord without knowledg but he that is necessarily euill is euill not onely of his owne accord but also voluntarily because it is with ludgement and knowledge So God is necessarily good but yet freely and Sathan is necessarily euill but with a most free will and the Saints in heauen are freely good and yet necessarily for it is not credible that they haue lost their liberty by their glorification Nor can it be said that the Saints in heauen therefore cannot sinne because there is no occasion of sinning and no temotation for the Angels before their fall had no more occasion of sinning By the very gifts of God wherewith they were abundantly furnished they tooke occasion of too much louing themselues and by it were made more slacke to the contemplation of God staying in the admiration of themselues whence came their pride and from their pride their rebellion It must needes be that the necessity of the perseuerance of the Saints doth rest on another foundation to wit the election of God who doth furnish those whom he predestinated from eternity and gaue to Christ with gifts and necessary meanes to perseuere in that state whereunto they were appointed Further also there is a certaine vision and beholding of God to which when the creature is admitted he is necessarily transformed into the likenesse of God no otherwise then the glasse doth burn at the sunne Of which vision it is spoken 1 Iohn 3. We shall be like him because we shall see him as be is and Psal 17.15 Finally if hee is vniustly punished who doth sinne necessarily although he sinne voluntarily and hath brought vpon himselfe the necessity of sinning by his owne fault then he also shall vniustly haue benefits and glory bestowed and heaped on him who cannot sinne and who is necessarily good such as we haue proued the Angels and Saints in heauen to be IV. Wherefore Saint Austin in many places hath not doubted to say that there is in man a necessity of sinning So Disput 2. contra Fortunat. After that man sinned by his free will wee who discended from his stocke are necessarily fallen into a necessity of sinning And in his booke de perfect iustitiae Ratio 9. Because the will sinned there followed the sinner a hard and forcible necessity of sinning Arminius differeth from him whose words against Perkins Page 106. are these It is impossible that that which one doth freely he should doe necessarily Yea Page 144. he is bold to pronounce that God by all his omnâ—potency cannot make that that which is done necessarily should be done freely For it is familiar to this man as to make lawes to Gods iustice so to set bounds to his omnipotency And if God is necessarily good and not freely Page 106. in Perkitâ—â— as Arminius is of opinion and it be farre more excellent to be good freely then not freely without doubt man shall be better then God and the blasphemy of Seneca is to be subscribed to who in his 53. Epistle saith that a wise man doth goe before God himselfe because man is wise by the benefit of nature but God by his owne Therefore as God is freely good and yet cannot but be good and as Satan is necessarily euill but yet freely and voluntarily so also a man that is dead in sinne doth necessarily sinne but yet voluntarily and therefore freely V. In which thing so great is the force of truth that it often falleth from them vnawares for Arnoldus eyther vnwittingly or else on purpose doth acknowledge this necessity of sinning Page 394. where according to Arminius Idem habet Page 398. he saith That man vnder the state of sinne can vnderstand will or doe nothing that is good And hence it is that he doth necessarily sinne onlesse God gratiously take away that necessity He doth therfore confesse that man sinneth necessarily before God taketh away that necessity of sinning and that man sinneth necessarily euen then when he sinneth freely For as Arminius confesseth it were not sinne vnlesse he sinned freely But perhaps Arminius and Arnoldus are of opinion that God taketh that necessity of sinning from all men Let vs therefore heare what Arnoldus in the same place doth adde Arminius saith he doth determine that God is prepared for his part to take away that necessity of sinning In which words he doth not obscurely confesse that God doth not take that necessity from all but that he is prepared to take it away if themselues will but that hee doth not take it away from all is our owne fault as Arnoldus himselfe doth acknowledge Page 398. The same man Page 399. according to
come and that heart-turning might of the holy-Ghost whose efficacy cannot be explained Surely there is a certaine perswasiue necessity and a perswasion more mighty then any command which doth so bend those that are willing that they would rather endure any thing then not to will what they desire Reason it selfe doth adde credit to these things and the nature of mans will in which it is engrafted to moue it selfe to the prescript and perswasion of the minde vnlesse when the indocible affections doe resist reason But as often as reason doth conspire and agree with the affections it is impossible but the will should moue it selfe thither whether the minde doth perswade it and the appetites doe incite it for what should call it away seeing it can be moued with no other impulsion Nor is it any doubt that God who doth throughly know our soules and the most fit occasions by which the soule being apprehended cannot resist him calling and doth know in what part it is more flexible should not be able so to enlighten the minde and imprint on the fancy which hath the naturall command ouer the appetites so cleere an image so terrifie the conscience by the propounding of punishments so stirre it vp by laying before it the eternall rewards so gently inuite and so fitly perswade that presently all resistance should cease and all contrariety fall to the ground Wherefore Arnoldus against Tilenus pag. 251. spake inconsiderately when hee said that the liberty of the will consisted in this that all things which are required to an action being granted and being present the will might suspend and stoppe the action He ought to haue said that the liberty of the will consisteth in this that it doth with a free and spontaneus motion apply it selfe to those things which the vnderstanding and the appetites doe perswade or if the appetites doe disagree with reason and diuers obiects are propounded that the will may by a free election moue it selfe to what part it will Let the soules which doe enioy the sight of God in heauen be for an example to whom all things are fully supplied which are required to stirre vp the will to loue God yet their will cannot suspend that action nor forbid and auert that act of loue wherewith they loue God Neither can it be said although it maketh little to the present matter that the cause why they cannot hate God is because occasions of hatred and incitations to sinne are wanting For the Angels before the fall had no greater occasion The same occasions of sinning which ouerthrew the Angels were neuer wanting The too much admiration and too great loue of themselues and by it a more slacke contemplation and a more backward loue of God carried those most excellent creatures headlong and stirred them vp to rebellion The will indeede is affected to two or more things and betweene two propounded obiects doth freely choose vnlesse when the last and best end is desired But it doth often so strongly apply it selfe to some one thing that it cannot resist it selfe And if the efficacy of the holy-Ghost turning the heart working in the elect shal also come to it which doth so draw gouern the raines of the affections that it may bend and turne the will following of its owne accord what meruaile is it if such a rider cannot be finally shaken off although the appetites doe so much resist and doe hardly giue ouer that rule and command which besides right and equity they haue ceased on All these these things pertaine thither that we may teach that the euent of conuersion is not thereby vncertaine or as these innouators speake resistible although God should moue the heart by a morall perswasion and should allure the will by a congruent and meete invitation But yet whosoeuer shall heare the Scripture or shall descend to examples and to experience shall finde that the efficacy of the holy-Ghost working in mens hearts ought not to be restrained to morall perswasion For it is a hard thing to conceiue in ones minde what perswasion God vsed in the conuersion of Saint Paul who was cast downe as it were with lightning and whose stubbornnesse kicking against the pricks was broken The same may be said of the Theefe into whom in the midst of torments and in the very agony of death God did infuse faith after an vnvtterable manner For what Doe these Sectaries thinke that he obtained faith by vse and by the frequent actions of pietie Surely that cannot be said seeing that in one moment he came from the height of incredulitie and from most desperately wicked manners to a most strong faith Was he inuited by a gentle perswasion No surely For whatsoeuer things were present before him were so many disswasions and they so powerfull that the faith of the Apostles themselues did then faile The very torments which the miserable man did then suffer could easily haue taken away the sense of that allurement and perswasion vnlesse the secret power of the spirit of Christ had broken through all obstacles Would the Apostle Paul Ephes 1.19.20 and Coloss 2.12 say that that power of God whereby he doth effectually worke in the hearts of beleeuers is the same with that whereby hee raised Christ from the dead if hee should onely conuert mens hearts by a morall perswasion and by a gentle invitation Saul being fully determined to kill Dauid came to Naioth whither Dauid was fled 1 Sam. 19. but as soone as he came thither vnmindfull of Dauid he is catched with a propheticall inspiration Where is there here any morall perswasion or invitation If therefore God changeth the mindes of wicked men without any morall perswasion why shall hee not exercise the same power towards his elect And I doe not see how those speeches of creating a new heart of raising man from the dead and of giuing new life by which the Scripture doth expresse our conuersion may be applyed to note out morall perswasion The new man is not created by perswasion but by the infusion of new life and it must needes be that some supernaturall thing must come which cannot be explained by man And if God should allure men to beleeue by a meere perswasion and invitation God should not be the efficient cause of faith For hee that doth onely exhort and perswade that we may beleeue doth not giue beleeuing it selfe no nor he who doth suggest the powers of beleeuing as we haue said before but hee doth moue metaphorically and intentionally as wee are moued by Obiects and by a knowne end And that here is something else beside perswasion may hence be gathered in that you see some men are vehemently set on fire by a small perswasion some on the other side who know the truth are yet in the midst of some euident and most certaine perswasions cold and not at all affected Former times and our owne age hath brought forth many Martyrs who haue beene vnlearned and but lightly
in themselues Wee doe not deny that doubtings doe sometimes creepe on godly and good men but yet those doubtings must needes diminish little by little as they are more affected with the sence of the grace of God and as their faith is increased But it is not needefull that he who is already conuerted and doth beleeue should feele himselfe to be drawne vnresistibly that is to be so drawne as he cannot resist For wee place the infallible certainty of conuersion not in the sence of man who doth feele that hee cannot resist but in the decree of God by which it must needes be that they come to Christ whom hee hath elected to saluation So the cause that the bones of Christ could not be broken was not in the hardnesse of those bones but in the purpose of God who forbad they should be broke And therefore it may come to passe that they who shall certainely be saued by the decree of God doe not certainely know of their saluation and are often troubled with rising doubts There are some to whom after many yeeres of their life led soberly and godly the confidence of saluation is at last giuen them at their death Nor is it needefull that the faithfull man should trie himselfe whether hee be drawne with an vnresistible power but whether after serious and earnest repentance hee doth so wholy rest himselfe in the death of Christ and in the promise of God that thereby he might be stirred vp to piety and to the feare of God Whosoeuer doth feele himselfe to be thus affected ought not scrupulously to weigh and examine the poyses and drammes of the efficacy of the spirit of God and of vnconquerable grace but so to order himselfe that he may represse his rising doubts by prayer and by the remembrance of the promises of God and that hee may breake and bruise the serpentine power of his lusts resisting the Spirit XXIV And if any one doth otherwise we are not they who can preuent all euils or cure vices knowing that by the best documents and lessons the occasion of sinning may be taken and that the best things may be wrested to the worse part XXV I omit that these Sectaries ioyne those things which cannot be coupled together and doe make those things apposite and agreeing which are opposite and disagreeing For they faigne that hee that hath true faith may doubt whether he be seriously and indeede conuerted Which surely is impossible for true faith doth stirre vp in man serious and true repentance and the loue of God which cannot be in man but it must be felt XXVI Finally the discommodities which these Sectaries doe pick out of our doctrine may be auoided but the doctrine of the Arminians doth enwrap mens consciences in vnauoydable euills For hereby is man puffed vp with pride teaching that man can separate himselfe that he can conuert himself that he can conuert himself before he be conuerted in act by God that man hath wherof he may boast that God is bound to giue him sufficient grace that God doth giue to man what he is indebted to him that the grace of God is not the totall cause of faith that the grace of God is subiected to mans free-will And on the other side Arminianismâ— doth vexe mens consciences with a carefull doubting For who can be certaine of his saluation if our saluation is not certaine by the election and decree of God And if the number of the elect be not certaine by the will of God Or if God hath elected no man but being considered as already dead Or if the certainty of saluation doth rest on the strength of free-will in the power whereof it is to perseuere or not to perseuere to beleeue or not to beleeue to cause that God should be partaker of his desire or should faile of his propounded end Surely if there be place giuen to this deadly doctrine faith and Christian humilitie is lost For it must needs be that they must be most doubtfull who are most proud It must needes be that the expectation of those men must hang in suspence who make the will of man a floating and vnstable thing the foundation of their hope Surely Satan doth therefore puffe vp these men with pride that they might be burst in pieces and doth lift them vp on high that being cast downe from on high he might more grieuously break them and crush them to pieces XXVII But to that our obiection by which we said That if God doth worke in vs onely by the manner of perswasion he is not the efficient cause of faith but onely the stirrer vp thereof by the manner of an obiect as Satan himselfe doth make it manifest who is not the efficient cause of the sinne of man although he doth stirre vp and instigate and worke effectually in the sonnes of rebellion to this obiection the Arminians answere nothing But they obiect on the contrary side If God say they doth conuert those which are his which are farre the lesser part vnresistibly and Satan doth auert and turne away the greater part resistibly therin Satan is of more power then God who by lesse and inferiour helpes can execute his purpose in many more men These good men doe alwaies put that their word vnresistibly for certainely and infallibly But to the purpose I deny that they whom God doth draw and effectually conuert are fewer then they whom Satan doth auert and turne away Indeede it is not to be doubted but that some in the beginnings of their conuersion are remoued from that beginning by the subtlety of Satan But these are but few in comparison of them who neuer felt any assaults or pricks of repentance Satan doth not auert these seeing these are auerse by their owne nature And whatsoeuer Satan doth is but small in comparison of the efficacy of the spirit of God in the elect For Satan found men prone to sinne and thrust them foreward that were falling nor is it any doubt but that the reprobates are not carried so much by the impulsion of Satan as by their owne Certainly it is a greater thing to heale a few that are deadly wounded then to exacerbate and make more angry grieuous the wounds of many and to poure vinegar on the Vlcer It is farre more easie to thrust them forward that are falling then to raise them that are fallen to kill ten that are about to die then to restore one to life that is dead XXVIII And here they exclaime that mans nature is auerted and ouerthrowne while it is necessarily determined and limited to one thing I answere If by the word necessitie be vnderstood not constraint nor naturall necessitie such as is the poise and inclination of all heauy things to the center of the world but an infallible certainty and that voluntary and spontaneus by such a necessity nature is not ouerthrowne The nature of Angels is necessarily determined and limited to that which is good and yet