manifest which it will be worth the while to know that for convocating the Church ordinarily more days were set apart after the Apostles death than the former Church observed Concerning the Assemblies of the Church while the Apostles were yet alive some things observable do occurr in the Evangelists the Holy Ghosts amanuenses and the faithful describers of the Acts of the Apostles in declaring whereof we will first consider what is recorded of the Apostles in this thing and then of the other members of the Church And first of all we will shortly touch upon the assemblies of the Apostles although they cannot truly be reputed amongst the ordinary conventions of the Church because which way soever the Apostles turned they took every occasion to preach the Gospel because they open us a way to understand others After the saving Passion of Jesus Christ our most merciful Redeemer the mention of the first of these at which were present the rest excepting Thomas occurrs Joh. 20. 19. in which Christ vouchsafed his presence The occasion of which meeting is not mentioned but doubtless as all Interpreters conjecture this was done that by their mutual presence they might comfort one another For as many as are Christs do perpetually incline to communicate all things whether their sorrows or joyes among themselves and then their Lord being gone their greatest fear was of the Jews for which cause we read that the place wherein they held their meeting was shut and barred when the Apostles were assembled they conferred among themselves of what divers related of Christs Resurrection the time of this meeting is noted in John it was the first day of the week and about evening of that day or after Sun-set at which time Christ having conquered the grave and death presented himself to them alive Secondly after eight dayes or the eighth day current from his appearing the same Evangelist tells us John 20. 26. that they were all met together where Jesus came again and stood in the midst of them Here some make a question whether the day of their second meeting was the eighth from the first or after the eighth day Cyril affirms it was the eighth or Lords day the first and last being reckoned neither doth it hinder that it 's said after eight dayes Christ taught that the Son of man must suffer many things c. and after three dayes rise again Mar. 8. 31. yet Christ rose from the dead on the third day from his burial not after the third day So also 't is said Luke 2. 21. When eight dayes were accomplished for the circumcising of the Child i. e. on the eighth very day for the H. Ghost speaks of the eighth day current and not finished so here after eight dayes or on the eighth day are all one It must be added also that Christ appeared in the evening of that day Afterwards some of the Apostles were together when they went to fish to whom also Jesus appeared Thirdly the General convention of all the Apostles is declared Act. 1. 4. in which they were commanded not to depart from Jerusalem but there wait for the promise of the Father and thither they came after the glorious Ascension of Christ where being gathered together they tarried for the Spirit promised of God the Father and Christ Luke reports that women also were present at this Congregation of the Apostles where they continued their meeting till the Feast of Pentecost abiding with one accord in Prayer and Supplication which fell out also on the first day of the week So thinks Isychius who sayes the day of Pentecost fell out on that day which our Saviour rose on and indeed whoever shall compare his reckoning with the Law of God about keeping Pentecost will find that Isychius in this misses not the truth at all For the day of Pentecost which the Scripture elsewhere calls the Feast of Weeks or of New-fruits because on that day the Shew-bread was offered out of the new fruits was the fiftieth inclusively from the day of offering the First-fruits Lev. 23. which was the day immediately next after the Passover on which the Lord Jesus who was the first-fruits of the dead lay in the Grave and the fiftieth day from that inclusively was the first in the week upon which the H. Ghost descended on the Apostles as they were that day assembled Act. 2. These are the meetings which the Holy Scripture testifies the blessed Apostles held upon the fiftieth day from Christs resurrection which being held upon the first day of the Week Christ oftentimes honoured with his presence But why they met on that and not another day it is not easie to declare although one may guess at the cause of the first and last meeting yet hath the Holy Ghost shewn us nothing of the second occasion And it 's uncertain whether Christ before his death or for those forty dayes wherein he reasoned with them after his resurrection of things pertaining to the Kingdome of God gave his Apostles any command for setting apart some new time for their meetings Epiphanius sayes they knew very well that the Sabbath was at an end from his converse with them and Doctrine before his Passion This at least is an indubitable truth that they met on the first day of the week and that Christ made renowned their meeting held on that day by his own gracious presence and mission of the Holy Ghost And St. Cyril must be credited Holy Congregations are held at this day of right in Churches because on that day Jesus appeared to his Apostles as they were met together Nor doth Isychius think otherwise in the place afore quoted Therefore according to those most grave Fathers because the eighth day was made famous with the presence of Christ and the gifts of the Holy Ghost sent down from Heaven it is at this day also by the Church solemnized with a more honourable worship Afterwards the Apostles together with the faithful are said daily to meet to hear the word of God and receive bread Act. 2. 46. Yea the Apostles ceased not to teach from house to house and in the Temple Act. 5. 42. And these are the things which the Holy Ghost hath afterwards left us written in the Holy Scriptures concerning the Apostles meetings to the solemnizing whereof we read not that they observed a certain or set time because they had to do with the Jews to whom before others according to the ancient prophecies the Gospel was to be declared Therefore the Apostles were often present at the Jews assemblies â—nd that upon their Sabbaths And whether the Apostles when first they went forâ—â—â—o preach the Gospel met apart from the Jews amongst themselves on other daâ—â—s the Holy Ghost is silent in the Scriptâ—re But at that time the Candidates of Christianity being hindred with fear of the Jews could not without great difficulty meet together We must then think they held their
de Idol cap. 14. saith the Sabbaths are extraneous to Christians and that Holy dayes were sometime time beloved of God The Nazaraei observing the Sabbath are branded for Heresie by Epiphanius l. 1. num 30. and likewise the Ebionites If it had been the Christians duty to observe Sabbaths why had the Catholicks imputed its observation as a fault to the Hereticks which yet they have done more than once as sure as sure can be But Christians have celebrated their Lords day every where without brand of heresie or any other crime and therefore since the festivity of the Sabbath was not every where in use with the Christian Church nor doth any where occurr any Apostolical ordination for continuing it in the Church we do by good right affirm that Christians are not obliged to its celebration which to affirm of the Lords day that was observed in the Apostles age and ever after is an heirrous thing 2. When meetings were held on Sabbath dayes they met not weekly on all Sabbaths as they came about for on one Sabbath publick Conventions were to be omitted if we may believe the foresaid Constitutions so it 's ordained Constit Ap. lib. 5. cap. 19. and what that is they explain the Sabbath in the great week Constit Ap. c. 24. lib. 7. The Sabbath of the Lords burial on which it's fit we should fast but not celebrate a festival So also August to Casulanus Ep. 86. but for the omitting Church-assemblies on the Lords day as often as it came about and were safe for the Church for the Persecution of the Tyrants we read nothing was ever ordained of the ancients There is a sanction in the same Constitutions that the Lords day should be celebrated without intermission Lib. 7. cap. 31. 3. In populous Cities where without dammage to their Estates they could be present at reading of Scripture and their interpretation meetings were more frequently kept Therefore the Council of Laodicea decrees that the Gospels should be read on the Sabbath Can. 16. Ambrose treated of Prayer the same day de Sacram. lib. 4. c. 6. But all the exercises of piety were not every where performed in those assemblies that yet were not omitted on the Lords day Augustine saith in another place On the Lords day only the Communion of the Lords Body and Blood is used Socrates doth not record that they of Alexandria and Rome did celebrate those mysteries on the Sabbath While Chrysostom requireth it of the rich Lords of Villages that they build Churches in them Hom. 18. in Act. he distinguisheth those congregations that were on other days from those that were held upon the Lords day Upon those Congregations Prayers and hymns were had in these an oblation was made on every Lords day and for that cause the Lords day is in Chrysostom called dies panis i. the day of bread Athanasius purgeth himself of a calumny imputed to him for breaking the cup because it was not the time of administring the holy mysteries for it is not saith he the Lords day Whence it is evident that the Lords Supper was administred on the Lords dayes otherwise the argument wherewith Athanasius purgeth himself were of no weight Although therefore they met upon the Sabbath day yet did they not every where observe it equally to the Lords day on which they celebrated all the mysteries of Religion 4. The people were free to be present or absent from Sabbath-day meetings as they saw good that is they were not obliged by any necessity of law to meet on that day for the Sabbatarii contending for a necessary observation of the seventh day were of the whole Christian Church condemned of heresie in this behalf as I have briefly shewn before I confess Origen reproves his hearers which came seldom to hear the Word of God that scarce did come to the Church on Feast dayes Gregory Nyssen in that Oration which he made against those that would scarce endure reproofs nips the people that met not on the Sabbath With what eyes saith he lookest thou on the Lords Day that despisest the Sabbath Dost thou not know that these dayes are Sisters that if thou reproach the one thou offendest the other But he speaks of those who had oftener liberty to meet for hearing the Word which they regarded not to embrace out of a certain supine negligence or being puffed up with pride despised the Church-meetings on Sabbath-dayes Whether it was the sluggishness or arrogance of these men it was deservedly blameable whenas they might divers dayes meet at Church without dammage of their worldly affairs which yet to do they were not easily moved although the duties of their calling would bear it In the old Testament some hours in a week were consecrated to Gods Worship Numb 28. 3. but yet all the day long the whole people of Israel should not attend on the holy duties of piety this was only enjoyned to them that could commodiously do it So in the Churches planted by the Apostles they met on other dayes as often as they could besides the Lords dayes but on the Lords dayes appointed for this end they were bound to be present at the publick assemblies and their absence for a certain time from these on the Lords day was to be reprehended by the sentence of the first Concil Eliberitan Can. 21. And yet where are any Canons established for punishing their absence from Sabbathday-meetings Although the Fathers do often reprove those that come seldome on the Sabbath and other dayes to hear the Word 5. Although on the Sabbath dayes they might meet to hear the holy Oracles of God yet when that dayes meetings were ended they might not be idle but an Anathema is denounced to them that work not on that day Conc. Laodic Can. 29. Ignatius in an Epistle to the Magnesians exhorts them to spend the Sabbath in labours without rest and therefore the Sabbath had not its vacation from labours So Athan. de semente Ambros Ep. 72. which we never read was ordained of the Lords day on which it's a sin to give our selves to labour And let these things suffice for the Lords dayes prerogatives above the Sabbath by which we find that the Sabbath day was not kept holy of the Church i. e. the ancients did not separate it from common use and labour nor consecrate it wholly to God in an holy rest that on it the acts of Divine Worship and those things that pertain to a spiritual life should only be exercised neither were the conventions on that day to be compared with those held on the Lords day which things surely once to define had been much to our profit For the Institution of other dayes to hold meetings on it 's not needful to take much pains since we have nothing writ of it in the Word of God as of the Lords day and many things which were not instituted of the Apostles but first arose in
particular Churches were introduced by little and little into other which at length in process of time are made more common which Socrates ascribes to the Bishops of divers Churches and those that received such rites from the Bishops transmitted them as a law to Posterity as in other things so in the meetings of the Church it 's to be observed whose original was not used by the Church in the Apostles age Epiphanius in Panario tells us of Synaxes Ecclesiae quarta Prosabbato Dominico fartas Constantine the Great ordained by Law the Parasceve to be celebrated of which nothing is yet extant in Scripture but Sozomen seems to touch upon the cause of its institution who sayes that Constantine gave great honour to the holy Cross both for the help that was brought him in managing his wars against his enemies through its vertūe and also for the heavenly Vision that was offered him about it which things teach us that Constantine if we may say so of so godly an Emperour did very superstitiously worship the Cross whence it happened that he attributed more to the Cross than was fitting and for that cause instituted that day to be set a part for meetings in memorial of Christs Passion on that day accomplished Yet who will from that sanction compare the observation of that day ordained of Constantine and not of the Apostles with the Lords day which was long before Constantines dayes observed of the Church which we must take for certain did so often meet to hear the word of God as it fitly could Afterwards we shall see that the Fathers did treat to their people out of the Scriptures almost every day yet I trust none will equallize every day on which these assemblies were holden to the Lords day But these assemblies were free neither was the universal Church obliged by any law to keep them which yet we acknowledge of the Lords day therefore I will add no more of them And from what hath been said the attentive Reader will easily perceive that no day was observed of the whole Catholick Church with that solemnity that the Lords day was and that on the Sabbath day the Christians did not intermit their ordinary labours Now having gotten out of a very troublesome disputation I hasten to that which in the third place I thought to enquire about namely Whether Anniversary Feasts were observed of the Church with greater solemnity than the Lords day as some think especially because amongst the ancients they were sometimes equalled to the Lords day and sometimes far preferred to it From the Passover-holy-dayes until Pentecost being intentive on Prayers they did no more bend the knees than on the Lords dayes yea the answer in Justin affirms the same things that Pentecost was in equal power with the Lords day The same is ordained in the twentieth Canon Conc. Nic. 1. Mention also is made of this custome in other Fathers Basil de S. Sancto cap. 27. Tertul. de corona milit cap. 3. Hieron advers Luciferianos Aug. Epist 118. cap. 15 17 c. From their freedom from kneeling some conclude the equality of these dayes which I acknowledge was interdicted on those dayes and they were glad for their immunity at that time from their Fasts and yet I do not think that those dayes are to be compared with the Lords Verily if these prerogatives had constituted an holy day they that for this cause judge the dayes of Pentecost to be equalled to the Lords had said something but if they so think I doubt not at all but they are mistaken and what St. Austin sometime answered Urbicus disputing against those that dined on the Lords day is hither to be referred Austin concludes the Lords day must be preferred to the Sabbath for the faith of the Resurrection not for custom of refection that is they prefer not the Lords day to the Sabbath because they remit fasting on it which yet they do not on the Sabbaths but because it was declared to the Christians to be the Lords day by the Resurrection of the Lord and thereupon began to have its own festivity So we say here the dayes of Pentecost are not to be compared with the Lords Day although as well on those as on this the time was passed without bowing and fastings because the ordination whereby bowing and fasting were interdicted them was merely humane Austin thinks it is not defined by the Lords command or the Apostles on what dayes to fast and not many ages since while the Lords solemnity remained in the Church that ordination was vanisht No body therefore that 's alwaies one can by right compare the solemnity of Pentecost with the Lords whose institution afterwards we will prove Divine neither is there in the places cited made any comparison of that with this amongst the Fathers but only in regard of that immunity Ambrose saith For these fifty dayes the Church knoweth not fasting as the Lords day Afterwards he addeth they are all as the Lords day because upon them as he said as on the Lords day there was a relaxation of fasting After the same manner are Justin Martyr and Tertullian de cor mil. to be understood That I may therefore dispatch in a word if the Lords day had not been celebrated in the Apostles age and if it had been honoured with no other prerogatives than immunity from bowing and fasting then certainly they would have equallized them to this day but that this is false even as the Proverb is the blearcyed and barbers know and so they conclude arguing like Sophisters from that which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And thus far of the equality of some dayes with the Lords which some men dream of It will farther also be worthy our consideration to know whether some Feasts which they call anniversary were preferred of the Church to the Lords day To those that think thus it is enough to answer them once after this manner Whereas we cannot read that the Holy Ghost in Scripture affords a testimony to the institution or observation of these they are to be received as humane institutions which omitting others may be cleared by this one argument If those feasts had been instituted of the Apostles then they had been observed every where by the Church in the same manner and time according to the rule of Vincentius Lirinensis yet the contrary doth plainly appear by Ecclesiastical Writers and Fathers which it will not be irksome to demonstrate in some of them If the Feast of the Passover had been ordained by the law of Christ or his Apostles sayes the learned Chamier then that law had unanimously been propounded of the Apostles and accordingly celebrated of all Churches in the same manner at least at the beginning But that is not to be found which the unhappy controversie about this matter whereby the concord of divers Churches hath wonderfully been interrupted sheweth
by God for the use of the Ministers of the Church they must of necessity grant that God hath appointed a time in which they must attend his worship to whom in their opinion he hath granted Tythes because it is the same authority that must both define the Worship and a fit time for performing of that Worship Now for establishing the Divine institution of this day we must not have recourse to that spurious scroul that as it 's reported in the third tome of Councils was sent down from Heaven to Hierusalem because that what things the Holy Ghost hath revealed to us in Scripture they do demonstrate it to all to be Divine of those that embrace the truth and for the fabulous fooleries about this matter we leave them to the Papists whose Kingdome had long since fallen without their support and we will briefly according to our manner examine what light may be brought out of the New Testament to manifest the truth in this matter Here three things come to be examined First Whether in the compass of every week must the Church keep holy a certain day by Gods institution Secondly Whether the Jewish Sabbath be abrogated Thirdly What can be brought out of the books of the New Testament to confirm the keeping holy the first day in the week The first of these is more obscure the other two may plainly enough be observed out of the Holy Scriptures and Fathers and one of them depends upon another Of the last many things have been observed out of the Scriptures in our second third c. Chapters but the truth about the two former Questions being made manifest by the testimonies of the ancients it will appear with little ado what is to be enquired into in the third place CHAP. VIII Within the compass of a week one day was sanctified from the beginning of the world this is affirmed both by Jews and Christians How Adam had need of the Sabbath The mention of observing the seventh day amongst the Heathens The authorities are weighed wherein the observation of the Sabbath among the Patriarchs is denied Why the Heathens are not upbraided with the abuse of the Sabbath AS to the first Question namely That in the compass of seven dayes one is to be set apart for spiritual operation as saith Chrysostom why should I fear to affirm it Especially since this opinion is approved by the suffrage of the greatest Divines and clearly enough taught by the manifest testimonies of the ancients We shall see that the Church of God since the History of the Creation was known did alwaies set apart one day of the weekly systeme for his worship the verity of which thing may be observed in the three Epocha's or junctures of years the first whereof is from the Creation to Moses the second from Moses till the Gospel was preached by the Apostles the third follows to be considered from that time till the end of the world in all which we shall find that one of the seven was alwayes set apart for the publick worshipping of God We read it was so done from the beginning of the world till Moses from Moses till the Resurrection of Christ from thence to this very day The controversie at this day is chiefly about the first and last Epocha none doubts of the second In demonstrating the first that the Sabbath was observed before Moses yea from the first beginning of the world both the Holy Scriptures and the Reverend Fathers their faithful Interpreters do attest it to prove the truth whereof we will first bring the authority of Moses which is had Gen. 2. 2 3. of which places divers have given the genuine sense and especially the Learned Rivet in Gen. and doth Orthodoxly enough defend his Exposition against those that think otherwise in his dissertation de Sabbato chap. 2. and removes a Prolepsis that is devised by the modern in commenting upon Moses's Text for Moses in the foresaid place doth not relate what God did when he writ the History of the Creation but what God did after that the stupendious work of Creation was finished namely that he ceased from creating any new work and ordained by a Law promulgated that the seventh day should be set apart by men to his worship in memorial of the Creation This is related by Moses Neither was that fore mentioned prolepsis which the best amongst the Christians allow not known to the Jews And if we follow the simple and literal sense of Moses his words they all make for us For how unjust is it when all the Verbs are of the same Mood and Tense Vajecol Vaijsboth Vajebarech and be finished and ceased and blessed to restrain the two former to the present and to extend the latter as some do to a time to come two thousand years after this would be too harsh a construction of the words But let us see how the Jews understood this place Tertullian tells us of them that they affirm that God from the beginning did sanctifie the seventh day by resting on it from all the works that he made and thereupon Moses said to the People Remember to keep holy the Sabbath day c. Where Tertullian delivers the Jews opinion of the Sabbaths observation from the beginning of the world and then he affirms that according to the Jews the Command in the Decalogue for keeping it respects the original observation of the Sabbath namely because God at the Creation sanctified the seventh day This was the opinion retained amongst the Jews in Tertullians age which he produces when he disputes against them and no where doth Tertullian deny that the seventh day was sanctified from the beginning Neither do the Jews themselves deny this The title of Ps 92. apud Jonath who translated the Bible into the Chaldee is thus A Praise and Song which the first man spoke for the Sabbath day From which inscription it appears that the ancient Jews even before the first coming of Christ thought that Adam observed the Sabbath For. Jonathan lived according to Galatinus forty two years before Christs Nativity Josephus a very learned Jew acknowledgeth that God rested on the seventh day and ceased from his works and for that cause do the Jews celebrate a vacation on this day which they call the Sabbath Josephus therefore confesses that the Jews ceased from their works on the Sabbath because the Lord ceased from the Creation on the seventh day Of the same opinion is Philo the Apostles contemporary After saith he that nature was perfected in six dayes the Father added honour to the seventh day following which when he praised he vouchsafed to call it holy Also de vita Mosis lib. 3. he confesses that the Sabbath day had a priviledge by nature since the birth day of the world And a little before in the same book he saith Moses thought it sitting that all those who were enrolled in this City should following the law of Nature
celebrate the Sabbath He grants then that the Sabbaths observation was according to the law of Nature that is that it was constituted by God at the Creation of Nature St. Austin sayes also that the Jews acknowledge that God sanctified a day since which he began as it were to rest from his labours So Solomon Iarchi in Gen. 26. By whom is cited R. Simson in Is 58. Aben Ezra in Exod. 20. Da. Kimchi Manasses Ben-Israel in Deut. 5. and all the Doctors of the Jews excepting Maimonides These things shew that the Jews had knowledge that the Sabbath was observed from the Creation from whom the observation of the Sabbath was very well known to the inhabitants of the whole World Of the Christians also divers both antient and modern were of this opinion a few of whose testimonies we will lightly touch Theophilus Antiochenus lib. 2. ad Antolicum saith That God finished the work that he made on the seventh day and blessed the seventh day and sanctified it because on it he rested from every work he made c. He saith not that God did consecrate the seventh day that afterwards only it might be sanctified of the Israelitish Church but so soon as the work of Creation was consummate the seventh day was of God both blessed and sanctified Afterwards he acknowledges that the seventh day was solemnized amongst all men which the Hebrews call the Sabbath and Greeks the seventh day although most know not the cause of that name And what cause was unknown to the most namely the holy resting of God on that day and its sanctification whereof Theophilus made mention a little before Tertullian saith that Christ fulfilled the Law while he made the Sabbath day which was holy from the beginning by the blessing of the Father more holy by his own doing good on it Cyprian confesseth that the Seventh day Holy day from the Creation of the world obtained authority because in six dayes Gods works were finished and the seventh consecrated to rest as holy and sanctifying honoured with a solemnity of vacation and entitled to the sanctifying Spirit Lactantius is of the same opinion God finished the world and this admirable work of the Creation in six dayes space and then ordained the seventh day whereon he rested from his works This is the Sabbath day Lactantius therefore fetcheth the sanctification of the Sabbath from the Creation and not from the History of Manna St. Athanasius saith that God rested when he had finished the former Creation and therefore the men of that generation observed the Sabbath on the seventh day Where he acknowledges that the Sabbath was observed from the Creation till Christ for he saith that all men of that generation did observe the Sabbath where he speaketh of the whole time from the beginning of the world till Christ Greg. Nyssen Lo here is for thee the Sabhath blessed from the beginning of the world mark it by that Sabbath this Sabbath the day of rest which God hath blessed above other dayes Chrysost God hath blessed and sanctified that day What is it that he hath sanctified it he hath set it apart from other dayes After when he tells us the cause why he hath sanctified it he addeth because on that he rested from all his works which God began to make Now God intimateth to us this Doctrine from the beginning teaching us that within the compass of a week one whole day is to be set apart and spent in spiritual work Therefore according to Chrysostom the Sabbath Day since the Creation was set apart from other dayes and plainly it appears that for that ordination the world is bound to dedicate one whole day of the week to the worship of God Aug. ult cap. postrem lib. de Civitate Dei while he is describing that everlasting Sabbath which the Saints shall enjoy in heaven he referrs the institution of the Sabbath to the resting of God from the work of creation He doth the like in Epist. ad Casulanum where he saith that God sanctified the seventh day when he rested on it from all his works and afterwards gave command about its observation to the Hebrew people Augustine therefore doth acknowledge that the use of the Sabbath was amongst the ancients before it grew common amongst the Hebrews namely first at the beginning before Moses and afterwards in the Church of the Jews Theodoret. He hath bestowed a blessing on the seventh day instead of creating lesâ— that day only above others should want its hoâ— nour and he hath put Hallowed it foâ— set it apart And afterwards In blessing the seventh day he hath shown that he thought it not an unprofitable and superfluous day but hath ordained it to be applied to rest Who doth not see that in Theodorets opinion from the beginning the Sabbath was set apart for the worship of God from other dayes So when he answers the question why he commanded not the Sabbath to be celebrated on another day because the God of all hath created every thing in six dayes but on the seventh day he made nothing but honoured this day with a blessing as it is added in six dayes the Lord thy God made Heaven and Earth and rested the seventh wherein he teaches us that even then this day was consecrated of God to rest and sanctification from the beginning of the world Alexander Hales affirmes that the Sabbath before the Law was observed of the Fathers and of the same opinion are divers of the Schoolmen Now if any have a mind to reckon up the grave opinions of the aforesaid Fathers he will not deny that the Sabbath day was solemnly kept from the very beginning of the world because by the judgment of them all the Sabbath was sanctified by God nor do the Fathers speak of the purpose of God as though it was not then really set apart for the worship of God but according to his purpose it was only destined for this that after two thousand years it should be set apart for this end for say they when God had finished his work of Creation the Sabbath was sanctified from the beginning or from the creation of the world when he had rested from his works from the Creation till Christ c. and therefore they acknowledge that the Sabbath day was solemnized amongst all men or all men of the former generation that is from the beginning of the world till Christ a long time before its use was established amongst the Jews All these things are affirmed in round words by the Fathers Out of which it clearly appears that one day of the week was alwayes set apart to the worshipping of God publickly And as the best of the ancients were of this opinion so the chief of our late writers that have flourished in the Reformed Churches do affirm that God did from the beginning of the world sanctifie the seventh day for his
any one till his ground on the Lords day he violates the holy rest but if the refore he leaving his husbandry be drunk or commit whoredome shall he not be thought to profane the holiness of the Lords Day If all profaneness and carnal delight ought to be banished from the Church then especially it should when man doth peculiarly apply himself to the worship of God If Tertullian thought it an uncomely thing and altogether alien from the Religion of publick joy to celebrate those dayes which were dedicated to the Nativities of the Emperours with that vanity which the Heathens abused in such kind of Festivals whereas what was acted on the solemn birth-dayes of Princes would not be thought comely on other dayes with what spirit are they acted to whom unchaste dancings obscene sports and mad tripudiations shall seem lawful on the Day dedicated to our Lords honour Shall the licentiousness of evil manners be piety an occasion of Luxury be reckoned Religion We must rather say with Tertullian That it is for men of the true Religion to celebrate both the Emperours solemnities and the Lords day out of conscience rather than licentiousness And if any like dancing I earnestly ask it of him that he would apply his mind to those spiritual dances which Chrysostom mentions in which there is much comeliness and modesty with which Christians must dance not to the measures of harp and pipe for they themselves ought to be both harp and pipe to the Holy Ghost and when others lead the dance to the Devil these being in the Church offer themselves the organs and vessels to the Spirit and afford their souls as musical instruments which the Holy Ghost should play upon and move and they give their hearts as Organs into which he may inspire his grace These are those dances of the Angels and what can be more blessed than upon the earth to imitate the dance of Angels approved by the Holy Ghost and worthy the Christian name in which he that on the Lords day shall diligently be busied will not bend his mind to those immodest leapings or dancings which Chrysostom calls Diabolical Hom. 55. in Gen. because where this wanton dancing is there the Devil is Chrysost Hom. 49. in Math. so often condemned but will refresh his soul wearied with the sad burden of his fins by the spiritual joy of these dances and prepare himself the better to celebrate that eternal Sabbath in the Heavens which must be observed for ever with all the Saints And that this is the solemnity which beseemeth the Feasts of Christians Gregory Nazianzen sheweth at large and exhorts us to take hymns for timbrels singing Psalms for filthy and ribald songs a clapping of hands when we give thanks for clapping the hands in the Theatre gravity for laughter prudent speech for drunkenness comliness and honesty for delicious pleasures And if it be convenient for thee when thou celebratest a Festival merrily to dance then dance yet not the dance of Herodias but of David when he danced for the resting of the Ark by which I think mystically is meant the nimbleness and volubility of our holy journeying and that which is pleasing to God Thus he Ephrem Syrus gives the same counsel whose testimony deserves to be added here Let us honour saith he the Lords Festivals divinely not in a worldly manner but spiritually not after the custome of the Heathens but Christians let us not lead dances nor effeminate our ears with pipes and harps You both small and great men and women let us in a Christian manner celebrate the Lords Festivals in Psalms and Hymns in spiritual Songs and Angelical melody That blessed Soul uttered this about the Lords Festivity the reason of all which is extant in Chrysostom There is saith he a time for Prayers not for drunkenness and that alwayes and especially at solemnities For a solemnity is therefore instituted not to live filthily nor to abound in sin but to extoll present things These and many other testimonies of the Ancients do shew that all carnal following of worldly delights whereby the sparks of the Holy Ghost being stirred up in the Lords day holy exercises of piety are choaked by which either Divine worship may be hindred or the fruit thereof prevented ought far to be banished from the Christian Church For it is as sure as can be as sometimes Ruffinus that when we are idle and negligent when we lift not up our mind in heavenly desires when we grow cold in the love of our Lord when we spend the day in fables and wicked cogitations then we more attend upon the Devil than God And after The enemy derides our Sabbaths when they see us to be at leisure for the idleness and vanities of the evil spirit If Plutarch thought that the Jews did worship Bacchus on their Sabbath because they then strove at their cups and riotings and gave themselves wholly to drunkenness and for that cause called the Sabbath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifies Bacchus or the son of Bacchus how much more truly might he at this day say it of many in the Church if he observed how they are given to Bacchus Venus sports and mad dances and yet these sins do rage all abroad without danger of punishment to the great ignominy of the Christian name for there is no wickedness so heinous which is not most of all committed on the Lords holy day While the greatest part of men do daily more and more spend the rest of Festival dayes not in praying not in hearing the Scriptures for which cause the rest was given but for all manner of encreasing the corruption of good manners saying that they do it for their mind sake as if they were altogether of Plato's mind who said that for that very purpose did God institute such holy Festivals And he repeats the same complaint in his Exposition of the Lords Prayer when he explains the fourth Petition and thus laments At this day no time is usually more spent in all manner of sports in dances wanton love company-keeping dicing bargains and fairs These do abundantly shew that dancings sports and sights were both forbidden of the Emperours and Fathers that they should not at all be kept on the Lords day which he that views the sacred Decrees of the one and the grave Records of the other will not deny Yet when all is done lest some think whom the Doctrine of the â—…e delights and those who release their minds to pleasure more than is fitting that not all but some kinds of those sports were forbidden and that only while the Church-assemblies were held as though the Christian people were at their liberty to use certain kinds of dances and sights even upon the Lords day when the publick Church-assemblies were finished to whom it seems such extrinsecal solaces of the eyes and ears do nothing interrupt the Religion in their mind and conscience
other Heathens which I think needless to rehearse here because if any will not believe my relation the aforesaid testimonies of the Poets in Clemens may make the incredulous to believe Euseb de praepar Erang saith that God having finished his works allowed us a day for rest from our labours This he confirms by the authorities of divers Poets And the learned Rivet in dissertat de Sabbato cap. 5. proves that these testimonies are to be understood of the seventh day of every week While Suetonius describes the moderation of Tiberius exhibited even towards his inferiours he tells us amongst other things that Diogenes a certain Grammarian being wont to dispute on the Sabbath dayes at Rhodes would not admit Tiberius to hear him out of his order but by his servant put him off till the seventh day Whence it appears that the seventh day was known to Diogenes although the learned Casaubon on that place of Suetonius thinketh that the observation of weeks which holds at this day used among the Greeks was not commonly received before the times of Tiberius Yet the learned Rivet loc citato proves by divers testimonies that it was in use amongst the Latines so to distinguish their dayes Lampridius in Alexand. Severo tells us that when he was in the City he went up to the Capitol on the seventh day and frequented the Temples We meet with more testimonies to this purpose in the learned Amesius of pious memory in Medul Theolog. lib. 2. cap. 15. sect 10. And now I will conclude with the testimony of Josephus against Appion l. 2. That there is no nation either of Greeks or Barbarians or any where else amongst whom the custome of the seventh day which the Jews used to keep holy was not grown common With whom as we have seen agreeth Clemens Alexandrinus That the custome therefore of celebrating the seventh day was common amongst the Heathens can be doubted by none whether as I said from the instinct of nature or by the ordination of God which came by tradition to the posterity of Adam However if we may credit the fore-mentioned Authors it is certain that the Festival of this solemnity was known to the whole world although most know not the cause of this solemnity which Philo de vita Mosis lib. 3. observes and Theophilus Antiochenus in the fore-cited place Theophilus saith that all men call the seventh day the Sabbath but most know not the cause of its appellation Now that cause which most knew not was Gods resting on it when he had finished in six dayes that stupendious work of Creation which was obliterated amongst the Heathens by a long tract of time although they observed the day as appeareth by the mentioned testimonies This Irenaeus teacheth more at large in the end of the thirtieth chapter of his fourth book whither I send the Reader In the last place I will satisfie the second Question viz If the Gentiles were obliged to observe the Sabbath and the custom of observing it was grown common amongst them why are they never in Scripture reproved of God for profaning the Sabbath who can deny that the Gentiles as well as the Jews were obliged by the instinct of nature to worship God their great Creatour Besides divers of the Heathen had got the knowledge of God the Creation and Sabbath as Clemens Alexandrinus Eusebius c. have plainly taught us Furthermore let him tell us who can why they as well as other men should not be obliged to observe the Sabbath by the Divine Law for we know that a determined time to perform a certain worship is no less necessary to them than others But many reasons there were for which God might reprove the Heathen and yet move no controversie against them about the Sabbath either because its institution was grown obsolete amongst many of the Gentiles though not all or because they had violated the whole worship of God for which cause he reprehends them yet he reproves them not for the Sabbath by name as being the time of worship because the Sabbath was onely ordained for performing the true worship of the true God now the Gentiles worshipped not God but Idols therefore God accuseth them of Idolatry and not for neglecting the Sabbath and in vain would they have had regard of the Sabbath while on the Sabbath they worshipped Idols and not God the author of the Sabbath I might also add here that it 's not manifest that all the sins committed by the Heathens were reprehended in Scripture particularly But the famous Rivet doth answer this objection more at large in whose learned answers they that do not abhorr the truth cannot but acquiesce And thus much for the reasons against the opinion of the Sabbath being observed from the beginning of the world Now to the authorities by which others busie themselves to infringe this opinion these are in number three The first whereof is that of Irenaeus who lib. 4. cap. 30. tells us that Abraham believed God without Circumcision and without the Sabbath The second is of Justin Martyr in his Dialogue with Trypho the Jew in whom it 's read that Abel and Enoch were just without the observation of the Sabbath and after them Abraham and his posterity untill Moses pleased God And after he adds Before Moses there was no need of celebrating the Sabbath In the third place Tertullian is produced in whom they read that neither Adam nor his off-spring Abel or Noah or Enoch did keep the Sabbath These are the chief places which are brought against the contrary opinion to which before I answer I might say that the Judgments of other Fathers that affirm it might be opposed to the authorities of them that deny it But lest by so saying I should seem to set together the grave Fathers amongst themselves I answer first He that equally weigheth the foresaid testimonies shall easily observe that the Fathers intention in the foresaid places was this that they might teach that men were not justified by observing of the Jewish Sabbath This at the first blush will appear to him that views the places Irenaeus he speaks of the multitude of them that were just before Abraham the Patriarchs and Moses and were justified without these namely without Circumcision and the Sabbath It was therefore Irenaeus his purpose to prove that the Sabbath or Circumcision were not the perfecting of righteousness neither doth Irenaeus simply speak of the observation of the Sabbath but of its observation in order to justification which thing his words do declare And Justin Martyr had the same meaning who disputed against Trypho the Jew propounding to himself means by which mercy might befall him from God as Trypho speaks amongst which he reckons the Sabbath and Circumcision that he might have some hope of salvation Whilst the blessed Martyr opposeth himself to this mans purpose he affirmeth that all the foresaid Fathers who kept the Sabbath pleased
authority of this command then that morality doth plainly perish when now there is not any other weekly Sabbath besides the Lords day without which as I said the Moral part of the Sabbath in the New Testament would not remain By right therefore as Alexander Hales hath it the vacation of the Lords day is the Moral part of the Decalogue in the time of grace as the seventh day in the time of the Law Moreover some may with great reason doubt why the Jewish Sabbath should be translated to the Lords day which yet we see hath been done for above one thousand six hundred years if so be that Christians be not obliged to observe the fourth Command as it is moral whenas otherwise there would be no need of any festival to succeed in place of the ancient Sabbath But because that Law doth perpetually bind all the worshippers of God to the observation of the Sabbath it necessarily follows that the day on which the Sabbath is to be observed must be determined by some positive Law and is designed by God for this purpose to be the seventh day in the Old Covenant and the the first in the New For it 's not for man saith Alexander Hales quaest 32. fol. 128. to determine but God when that time is c. It 's in Gods power only to define a fit time for performing his worship But we read this question of the Morality of the fourth Command discussed at large by divers amongst whom the famous Wallaeus doth it most excellently who to the great fruit of the Church hath copiously taught us what is Ceremonial and what Moral in writing of that Command of the Sabbath I will not therefore add any more about this question but do send the Reader to the learned labours of others in which this question is examined I will only add this one thing for a conclusion out of the observations of this Learned Divine namely an explication of the Sabbath's being a sign between God and men Since saith he it is in bred by nature in all Nations that in the external worship of that Deity which they take for supreme they should have some Symbole of Document which may shew to others whom they take for God as may be observed in the sacrifices of Bacchus and therefore in the Revelation they that worshipped God and the Lamb are read to have the mark of God in their foreheads Rev. 14. 1. and they that worshipped the Beast received his mark in their forehead or hand Rev. 14. 9. which were nothing else but external tokens by which they would plainly signifie that they worshipped either God or the Beast So of old we read that the Sabbath was instituted of God that it might be a symbole or sign to manifest to all the world who was the God of the Jews So Ezek. 20. 20. the Sabbaths are said to be signs between God and them that it might be known that the Lord was their God Now what it was that was shewn by that sign Moses tells us in divers places especially in Exod. ch 31. 16 17. Therefore the children of Israel shall observe the Sabbath throughout their generations for a perpetual Covenant It is a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever he speaks of the Sabbath for in six dayes the Lord made Heaven and Earth and on the seventh day he rested and was refreshed As if he should say the pious observation of the Sabbath amongst them when every seventh day returns doth intimate that the Almighty Creatour of Heaven and Earth is their God In this sense Athanasius de Sabbatho Circumcisione saith The Sabbath is a sign whereby the day might be known on which the Creation was finished which being known they might ascend to the knowledge of the Creatour And by observing the Sabbath they attained unto that two manner of wayes First inasmuch as one day of the seven was solemn or because after they had ended their labours in the six dayes they must rest on the seventh Secondly by determining that rest on the last day of the weekly compass both wayes the Jewes signified that they worshipped none other than God the Creatour of Heaven and Earth because whereas they sanctified the seventh day after the six dayes labours were ended they openly professed that they were worshippers of that God who created Heaven and Earth and having finished his labour in beautifying that stupendious work on the seventh day he ceased from working for which cause he enjoyned them the observation of the seventh day that they might follow his fore-going example both in working and in resting He hath commanded saith Philo de Decalogo that whosoever received these Institutions as in other things so in this also they should follow God in working six dayes and resting the seventh and attending on the contemplation of things and study of VVisdome c. Afterwards Follow God thou hast Gods example and prescript in working six dayes And farther they set apart no other day in the weekly course but the seventh for the exercises of piety that they might profess they were the servants of that God which redeemed the Israelites out of the Land of Egypt and brought them out of the house of bondage which is collected from the repetition of the Decalogue Deuteronom 5. 15. where Moses omitting the argument taken from the Creation which he had used in the Decalogue doth excite them to sanctifie the Sabbath from their being freed out of the Land of Egypt namely because whenas they served in the Land of Egypt the Lord their God brought them out thence with a strong hand and stretched out arm and therefore he commanded them that they should observe the very day of the Sabbath in whose morning watch they came out of Egypt as the Learned Junius observes in his notes on Deuteronom 5. out of Exod. 12. 15. This seems to have been the cause of appointing this day rather than any other And thus much of the Jews Sabbath whereby as by a manifest document they professed to worship the Lord the Creator of this universe and their mighty Redeemer out of Egypt for which cause the Sabbath was had for a sign between God and them CHAP. X. A day in every week is to be sanctified under the Gospel which is not the seventh but first the celebrating of the Jewish Sabbath Col. 2. 16. and Gal. 4. 10. examined the places whereon the observation of the Lords Day in the New Testament is bottomed The Fathers acknowledge its Divine authority neither can the Church change that day and substitute another in its place A Stated Day in every Week being granted to perform Gods Worship on it remaineth now farther to find out what day is determined by God for his worship since the Light of the Gospel was up and down dispersed And whereas thus far we have spoken of the Jews Sabbath it remains in the second place to be considered Whether Christians or
cloyed with luxurious banquets drunken feasts and lewd drunkenness cannot devoutly consecrate the Lords day to God so they that delighting in luxury do give up themselves to pleasures are unfit for the sanctifying thereof because with their pleasures they defile the Lords holy day pleasure is the individual companion of drunkenness and intemperance in many becomes a cause of lasciviousness as we say in the Proverb When the belly is well filled then follow dances we read that these have been condemned with great fervour of mind and most holy zeal with the old friends of sincere piety which Chrysostom Hom. de Eleemosyna would not have any attend on and no wonder for all such worldly spectacles with Chrysostom are called Sathans Festivals from which he exhorts his hearers to abstain and sharply reproveth Parents that bring their children to spectacles and exhort them not to Doctrine Cyril was sorry as we have seen in the former Chapter that Christians should on feast dayes run to playes pageants and dancings because in his judgment these things cannot be done without mocking of Gods name and violation of the day for the holiness of festivals is miserably distained by petulant dancings therefore Leo and Authemius those good Emperours ordain that festivals being dedicated to the most High Majesty are by no pleasures which afterwards in detestation of them they call obscene to be defiled They say also We decree the Lords day alwayes to be so honourable and reverent that it be excused from all executions c. And after Nor yet do we relaxing the rest of this holy day suffer any one to be witholden by obscene pleasures Let the scene of the Theatre or the fights in the Cirque or the doleful sights of wild beasts challenge nothing to themselves on that day and if any solemnity fall out to be celebrated on our Birth-day let it be deferred If any one shall ever be present at â—â—ghts on this Feast-day he shall sustain the loss of his command in the Militia and the sale of his patrimony and likewise the Serjeant of every Judge that under pretence of either publick or private business doth believe that these things which are ordained in this law are to be violated The Fathers in the Council of Carthage were of the same mind who provided that no sights should be shewed on the Lords day or any other of the festivals Yea even in the thickest darkness of Popery so solemn was the splendour of this day that the Cimmerian darkness of Antichristianism could never overcome it Therefore it was provided Can. 10. part 9. of the Provincial Council of Colen that there should be an abstinence from these Wherefore say they it is our mind that on these dayes they speak of Festivals Fairs be prohibited Taverns be shut Riot Drunkenness Expences Strifes wicked Sports Dances full of madness evil Communication Bawdy Songs be avoided briefly all Luxury for by these and the blasphemies and perjuries which usually attend these the name of God is profaned and the Sabbath which admonisheth us to cease from doing perversly and learn to do well is defiled In the third Council also of Millain they decree Let the Bishop carefully prohibit and see to it that it be done that not only no leapings and dancings but no riot playes in honour of the Saints and other profane actions unmeet for the worship of those festival dayes and pious institutions be any wayes publickly acted on these dayes or brought in under pretence or occasion of them If men brought up in the Cimmerian darkness of Antichristianism declining the pure light of the Gospel like Owls yet could not through the splendour of truth but bear an illustrious testimony to the Lords festival and thereupon condemned what was opposite to its sanctification as dances which they call full of madness and wicked sports by which the Sabbath on which Christians are to cease from doing evil is violated if by no means under any pretence they permit leapings and danings to be acted to how tremendous a judgment do the ill-employed Libertines of this age expose themselves who now having the face of the Church happily discovered by the sacred Light of the Gospel are not afraid to tread under foot the holiness of this day by giving the reins to pleasures and dances running out into folly so often condemned by the Fathers As if they made haste to pass over into the heretical tents of the Heicetae who in other things following the Churches authority in their Monasteries by a company of Monks praised God using tripudiations and dances thereunto A wickedness indeed more becoming Hereticks than Christians What once the learned Morton in his Catholic Apolog lib. 2. cap. 14. related of Tollet we will apposirely apply to the Patrons of dancing on the Lords day Tollet affirms that a man is bound under a mortal sin to sanctifie a Festival but he is not bound to SANCTIFIE IT WELL. On the other side Morton cryes out and that justly What the foul ill what a sanctifying is this that wants Well without which no action can be acceptable to God So these mens sanctifying of this day while they grant the Lords day must be sanctified but labour not to sanctifie it Well is rather to be reckoned a profanation than sanctification thereof Alas Are these fruits beseeming so long a preaching of the holy Gospel while men do on the Lords day so profusely serve the pleasures of the flesh The primitive Christians whose souls are now in rest celebrated not so the Lords day who made conscience of intermitting its solemnity upon any occasion If on holy dayes we must abstain from lawful and necessary labours must we therefore attend upon unlawful vain and unhonest works God forbid The women of the Jews had better on the Sabbath day spin than dance on their New Moons as Augustin judgeth And on Psal 39. It is better to dig than dance on the Sabbath But these things are not so to be expounded as if St. Austin had commended the undertaking of gainful labour on that day but that grave Father doth praise the scope of those men rather who do apply their just and lawful labour than their unlawful vanities as otherwhere he relates of Socrates that swore by flesh a stone or any thing that was at hand to swear by not that he approved Socrates's fact but by this means he would instruct his hearers that although neither be agreeable to reason yet it is better to transferr Gods honour to Gods workmanship than to the works of mens hands So although we must not attend on the Lords day on labour undertaken for gain-sake but only on Divine worship yet the good Father judged it better on that day to employ our pains about labours lawful on other dayes than about vanities alwayes unlawful and severely condemned of God although neither will very well agree with the solemnity of that day If
of mind that the State of his Kingdom waxed worse and that he fought with unhappy success against the Goths the source of so great an evil being a little more deeply sought out he reproved the Bishops which sed not with Gospel Doctrines the people committed to them who by their profligate manners stirred up the wrath of a revenging God against him to prevent which evil for the future it was ordained in a Council That the Lords day should be kept religiously The pattern of this most Christian King while the victory in this our age inclineth to the enemies perswades us devoutly to keep the L. day solemnity for which we have â—ought unsuccessfully almost these twenty years against the enemies of our liberty that have roared in the Churches of God to our great sorrow When we count the causes of this will why should we not apply our minds with Gunther amnus to bewail the heynous violation of the Lords day and with the ancient Fathers who observed that the Lords day was not reverently kept ordained That first of all the Priests then Kings and Princes and all the Faithfull should chiefly see to it that the due observation and Religious Devotion of so great a Day now in so great a part neglected be hereafter for a sign of Christianity more devoutly exhibited and that the Christian Magistrates excellency be humbly desired of the Priests that in honour and reverence of so great a Day all may be put in fear that men presume not to keep markets do their own pleasure and works on this Holy and Venerable Day For when this solemnity is either taken away or neglected there is no more hopes of the other parts of Religion than there is of the bodies safety when the head is cut off Neither can there be used a more excellent remedy for curing the other malady than the holy observation of this Festival for the zeal of Religion waxing cold and purity of holy Doctrine being obscured what will be more fit to heal errours and stirr up the languishing strength of zeal than that an entire Worship be offered up both publickly and privately to God on this day while the holy Word of God is piously preached attentively heard the Sacred Mysteries devoutly and according to Christs institution celebrated Prayers poured into the hearts of the Faithful by the Holy Ghost are with all humility offered up to God Sacred Hymns sound in the Church with a godly joy the afflicted members of Christ and the poor provided for bountifully by the rich and those that are sound in mind do mercifully comfort them that are sorrowful These are those exercises of the Lords Day which will uphold Religion when it is falling which if they be religiously observed of the Church every one seeth how great an access will be made from thence to the Christian Religion which we all profess And these are the things Most Holy Church of Christ which in this elaborate Treatise I do not utter foolishly of my self but humbly offer all things to Thee as they are taken out of the Holy Scriptures where they afforded me any light in discussing of this dispute and the lights of purer Christianity not because as sometime Chrysostome Homil. post prioris exilii reditum Thou stand'st in need of my Doctrine which indeed I acknowledge to be but small but that I might testifie my good will to thee and that at length thy natural Sons to whom Religion is both their care and their pleasure may in some sort see what works they are to attend on that Day and from what to abstain and with what authority the institution of this solemnity is supported With Gods assistance I will briefly shew from the Holy Scriptures and Fathers of better credit asserting all these things Thou hast therefore most Beloved Mother the purpose of my mind in sending forth this little work Do thou then of thy humanity to thy friends pardon the mistakes how great soever they be in collecting these things and take in good part the slenderness of my wit which endeavoured according to its power to benefit chiefly thy natural sons that sojourn in Germany which I love upon many accounts This doth he humbly ask of thee Who loves Thee and Thine with a sincere Love in Christ Theophilus Philo-kuriaces Loncardiensis AN INDEX OF THE CHAPTERS BOOK 1. THe Preface in which first is propounded the Scope of this Treatise Secondly is shewn why we meet with more things about the duties of the Lords Day in the later than in the former Councils Thirdly how far the Church at this day may be obliged by the authorities of Provincial Councils that ordain these duties although some things of lesser value be put among their Canons Fol. 1. Chapter 1. That to the solemn Worship of God a determined time is necessary Concerning the Assemblies of the Apostles and how they were present in the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath day 1. Chap. 2. The ordinary time observed for celebrating the publick worship of God after Christs death was the Lords day solemnly used by the Christian Church in the very Apostles age Three Texts of the New Testament namely Acts 20. 7. 1 Cor. 16. 2. and Rev. 1 10. are briefly weighed 14. Chap. 3. After the Apostles death the Church met upon other dayes than the Lords The antient Christians observed the Sabbath not as an holy day the differences between the observation of the Lords day and Sabbath How Constantine the Great ordained the Parasceve to be observed Anniversary Festivals were not celebrated with that solemnity as the Lords Day Anniversary Festivals not to be preferred to the Lords days anciently they bowed not the knee on the Lords Day 30. Chap. 4. The chief of the Fathers make mention of the Lords day solemnity the authority whereof depends not upon the Emperours Constitutions When it was first ordained that Judges should cease from hearing Law-suits on the Lords day the Christians were punished for observing it VVhat it is Dominicum agere 52. Chap. 5. The reason of observing the Lords Day It 's called the first day of the week by the Evangelists and Fathers and the Lords day Sunday also and why the Sabbath and Christian Sabbath VVhy the Fathers used so seldome the name Sabbath VVhat Synaxis may signifie with the Ancients 66. Chap. 6. The whole Lords Day is to be sanctified to God and not onely some part thereof 77. Chap. 7. The ordinance of the Lords day is not properly to be reckoned amongst unwritten Traditions It was instituted of Christ by the Apostles The Apostles prerogatives above other Ministers of the Church the things ordained by the Apostles are of Divine right 90. Chap. 8. In the compass of a week one day was sanctified from the beginning of the world This is affirmed by Jews and Christians How Adam had need of the Sabbath Mention of a seventh day observed amongst the Heathen The authorities are weighed wherein the observation
not appoint any new thing but renew the old Moreover in the Council of Friuli Can. 13. all Christians were commanded to observe with all reverence the Lords Festival in which as in other Canons of that Council they acknowledge they do not institute new rules but having recited the sacred pages of their fore-fathers Canons they persist to embrace with greatest devotion and 〈…〉 with a fresher style the things that were digested by them and promulgated by a wholsome pen. There came out also a new Decree in a Council at Paris for the strict observing the Lords day of which this reason is assigned by the Fathers because a due observation and the religious devotion of that day was in a great measure neglected That was not then the first time they decreed a religious institution of the Lords day but it being grown into a disuse they labour Postliminio to renew it and call to remembrance the neglected or obscured use thereof and the dissolute manners of Christians in performing on that day the exercises of Religion have produced new Canons about observing this solemnity whenas yet the solemnity it self and the holy duties thereof were well enough known to the former Church and so the things which were neglected through the carelesness of the people were afterwards with great labour inculcated Another reason also is to be added for the ordaining new Canons about this Festival The Heathen Emperours being haters of the Christian name provided by their Laws that the Christians should not have liberty on the Lords day to keep their meetings Which the wicked Edict of Dioclesian touching this thing informs us of How therefore would they observe out of the writers of that age all the mysteries of godliness to be performed on that day whenas not without great peril of life they did celebrate the Lords dayes not on the day time but on the night yet all Authors of any note as I said do acknowledge that the day it self was to be celebrated from the beginning of the Church and if they had had liberty they had executed the same offices of Religion on that day by which it was celebrated in the succeeding Church And these are the things for whose cause the Fathers of the succeeding Church being moved have treated more at large concerning the Lords day duties than those of the foregoing There remains one other rock upon which lest any dash I judge them also to be advertised Many of the Canons upon whose authority a great sort of the duties of Religion on that day to be performed do lean were set forth by Councils which were Provincial perhaps therefore some will object that none but the Churches of those Provinces are obliged to keep those Canons But indeed since the Decrees of Provincial Councils serve for the profit of the whole and not of any particular Church onely why should they not be received of other Churches professing the same Faith with them although not by vertue of any Provincials authority but of Divine truth albeit determined in a particular Province And since the reason of a Provincial Synods determination is universal why should not Canons so determined even in that respect oblige other Churches although not to undergo the punishment For the imposing of the punishment is particular where the Law in respect of equity may be general And whenas we see the authorities of particular Fathers to be esteemed amongst all we should be too partial towards them if we should set at nought the Canons of Provincial Councils at which several Fathers and Bishops were present unless some body will think that a sentence approved by the judgments of many be of less weight and authority than when it 's pronounced by one single person apart Because Pauls Epistles were written to particular Churches they are not therefore rejected of others for that in Gods intention they pertain to the Churches of all ages and Nations nor do they less agree with their moral state and condition than with those for whom they were primarily designed Moreover if in any Province there be Churches rightly constituted and according to the rule of Gods Word doubtless they are to be honoured with the name and title of Churches and the right hands of Christian fellowship are to be given them neither is there extant at this day a Church which upon occasion does not freely use the authorities of some Provincial Councils in confirming the truth to which yet this is by none imputed as a fault and why may not its assertors sometimes have liberty to use the Provincial authorities of Canons for propagating the truth about the Lords day The Orthodox Fathers anciently when any question arose by which the peace of the Church was disturbed did advise and mutually help one another The French Bishops in the case of communion with Felix consulted the Bishops of Rome and Millain whose Letters were read in the Council of Tauritan as appeareth by the fifth Canon of that Council The Spanish Bishops in the case of the Priscillianists profess they will not communicate with the lapsed although reclaimed without the consent of the Roman Bishop and Simplicianus of Millain Liberius Bishop of Rome writes to Athanasius and begs it of him before God and Christ that if he be of his mind he would subscribe his Epistle A pud Athanas p. 397. That was indeed a sweet communication and modest prudence in the ancient Bishops that one act and one consent should be kept according to Gods Laws amongst them all And hence it was that they entirely studied to use one common counsel about the profit of Church-administration and did not reject with a supercilious disdain that which seemed best to be done to their fellow Bishops although distant from them in other Provinces but the association of Priests although large was so coupled together with the glew of mutual-concord and bond of unity that one falling into danger the rest helped him Whatever therefore was thought just by Pastors of other Churches especially those that were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Petrus Alexandrinus sayes in Sozomen of the Roman Bishop although congregated in a Provincial Council or out of Council was by good desert not rejested of other Bishops of the same Faith but they helped one another by mutual counsels and labour Whence it follows that Canons ordained although in Provincial Councils about the Lords Festival are not to be rejected But I will stay no longer to take this remora out of the way One Objection remaineth which lest any thing be wanting to the knowledge of the truth must be prevented Some having no care of the Lords Festival do contend that the Fathers in those latter Councils do stick in small things and do mingle I know not what matters of little value with their Canons about observing the Lords solemnity for whose sakes they judge whole Canons to be nothing worth as in some Councils it 's
ordained that what sometime the Priest Abimelech asked of David 1 Sam. 21. 4. that should 〈…〉 done by Christians on the Lords Day So in the Council of Friuli Can. 13. this is reputed by some for a trifle Concerning which thing it yet troubled not St. Paul to make a Canon for the married in case of Prayer and Fasting 1 Cor. 7. 5. Put for that part of Friuli's Canon wherein it 's ordained to abstain from our Wives on that day whether it was added by the Fathers or foisted into the Canon by some Sciolist on the Marginal explication of a Carnal work I dispute not I onely assert this if it be their grief that trifles repugnant to the Word of God are obtruded on the Church of Christ in this I commend and accept very well their temper who set at nought whatever point is dissonant from the Holy Soâ—iptures however approved in the judgments of many men but if under the name of trifles as they call them they shall reject those Canons that contradict not the reverend authority of writers I cannot approve their fact in this at least I would be taught this thing of them which they may find out by the whole huge Volume of Councils All the things therein ordained are not approved now adayes by all and yet those Councils are not therefore rejected by wise men Some things enacted in the first Council of Nice which have come to our hands if the authentick acts of the Council have not perished through the injury of time or cunning of the Arrians are over orude which savour not of Athanasius Ofius or Paphnatius's wit and other approved Fathers which were present at the Council and which things are now also antiquated shall we therfore judge all things in the reverend Council which hath so many witnesses to be rejected far be it from us In that Council also it 's ordained that there must be no bowing of the knees on the Lords Dayes or from the Passover to Pentecost in pouring out prayers to God Perhaps there will be some that will think this ordinance worthy derision rather than observation who will not yet for that cause reject the Council Once in a Council at Trulla Spiritual affinity as they call it was forbidden yea there we read an injunction for the fifth Canon says 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. for avoiding ridiculous jesters and other spectacles at any time but at this day they esteem it a trifling Canon who judge those tumblers to be rejected not alwayes but even on the very Holy day do permit Christian people to be present at the childish arts of tumblers when the publick exercises of Religion are ended and yet they refuse not all the Canons of that Council I can bring forth many more other examples of Canons determining small matters but I 'le spare this labour At least I add but this when in Provincial Councils of every Province Questions were handled Conc. 1. Constantinop Can. 2. T. 1. p. 510. and nothing was brought to the General Council but what could not fitly be determined in the Provincial it was needful for the Fathers to determine of the propounded questions of what kind or weight soever they were and so if any minute things which by some are reckoned trifles do occurr in the Canons they are rather to be ascribed to others who propounded them to the Fathers assembled in Council than to them determining of them These are the rocks which in the following Treatise by Gods help shall be more clearly explained in their places of which things most courteous Reader I judged it expedient to admonish thee before I dismiss thee to read it over lest in any place thou be at at a stand In which things having briefly prefaced by Gods assistance I hasten to my purpose THE Lords-Day THE FIRST BOOK In which is demonstrated the Solemnity and Antiquity of the Lords Day CHAP. 1. That to the Solemn Worship of God a determined time is necessary Concerning the Assemblies of the Apostles and how the Apostles and other Christians were present in the Jewish Synagogues on the Sabbath Day THat some certain time is to be assigned by Divine Institution on which men ceasing from common affairs are diligently to bend themselves to Divine Worship for Gods glory and the Churches good although no Religion be placed in Holy-dayes I think to be without controversie the custome received amongst Nations of all Ages that namely at a stated time and upon certain dayes all should meet to invocate and worship that Deity which they took for their supreme doth witness this and reason it self doth require the same Conventions also for performing exercises of Piety were alwayes used by the Christian Church in which said exercises it practised what pertained to godliness and the worship of God for which cause the Apostle Heb. 10. 25. allows not of that readiness in Christians to forsake 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i.e. that coming to the Synagogue or meeting together and if Christ disdained not to come himself to the Temple and the Jews Synagogues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luk. 4. 16. 1. As his custome was who will he be that shall think the places dedicated for the Churches assemblies are not to be gone unto by Christians But the necessity which Chrysostom at large decyphers de verbis Isaiae of these Assemblies of which more afterwards being admitted we must at this time briefly enquire out the fit season without which the exercise of Divine worship cannot fitly be acted in them for holding of them for the best sign of the time which was solemnized by the Church must be observed from the publick conventions which were held for performing of the Duties of Religion The time assigned for Divine worship amongst the ancient Christians was either extraordinary or ordinary solemnly to celebrate the extraordinary time they were called upon only by an extraordinary occasion when it sell out so while the Apostles were living Luke tells us Acts 12. that many were gathered together in Maries house during St. Peter's imprisonment and for his sake poured out Prayers continually 10 God the occasion of which convention was extraordinary yet did they not therefore intermit the ordinary time of meeting the ancient writers do also witness that such were the meetings of the Christians after the Apostles times when a just occasion was offered who as often as persecutions or publick calamities sell out they then joyned Prayers in their meetings congregated on that occasion and so as it were by making a band in their Prayers to God they compassed him about as they prayed which thing we read was done by the Apostles and Church Acts 4. 23. 31. When the Elders of the People forbad the Apostles they should not preach Christ the Church poured forth Prayers to God The ordinary time for the exercises of Piety was at which they attended Divine worship upon a stated and determinate day to
called did occurr therefore since he tarried there but only for one Sabbath it cannot be said he preached to them on one of the Sabbath◠neither is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as divers observe ever read in the New Testament for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It follows therefore from thence necessarily that Sabbatum should be taken for the whole week and then on one or the first of the Sabbaths will be all one In which sense that phrase occurrs else where as in Mar. 16. 2. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. very early in the morning the first day of the week as in the ninth verse of the same chapter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 there the Evangelist expounds 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. one by the first And so the Greek Fathers next the Apostles times interpreted 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr Dial. cum Tryph. sayes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. One of the Sabbaths remaining the first of all the dayes according to number the spaces of all the dayes being run again into a circle is called the eighth and remaineth the first as it is p. 201. Chrysoft Hom. 43. in Act. Apostol expounds one of the Sabbaths by the Lords Day So Hieronymus Nor otherwise Augustine Ep. 86. One of the Sabbaths sayes he was then called that day which now is called the Lords which is more plainly found in the Gospel Some also by breaking of bread understand a private banquet not the Lords Supper of which doubt this seems to be the cause In that age the Christians meeting in the Church did sup together and also received the H. Eucharist and so both tables the common and sacred were joyned together as Chrysostom teaches Hom. 26. in 1 Cor. Upon set dayes they made common tables and when the assembly was ended after communion of the Sacraments they went to eat and drink together And hence it was as Chrysostom thinks that they Acts 20. 7. met to break common bread because when the communion was celebrated the common table followed and Chrysostom affirms in the beginning of that Hom. that the day on which they met was the Lords and that all things that there were done were joyned to preaching But the breaking of bread in the foresaid place is to be expounded of the Holy Eucharist for there were sundry there and Paul took bread not at Supper time but mid-night In that Text therefore the duties of a Christian Sabbath such are an holy assembly breaking of bread or admistration of the Lords Supper preaching of the Word devout Prayers c. are read to be performed of the Church on that day which holy duties were not performed of them on another day otherwise Paul having stayed there the space of seven dayes could not have deserred them to this day especially when he was to depart the day following neither doth Luke affirm the Apostle to have proclaimed this meeting of the Church as extraordinary because he was to depart the day after but he teacheth that the Church met namely as it was wont to break bread and not to take leave of the Apostle and St. Augustine consesses that Pauls departure was the express cause of continuing his speech because he desired sufficiently to instruct them The received custome therefore of the Church and not the blessed Apostles departure from Troas gave occasion to this assembly For he stayed there seven dayes not so much for the Eucharist as waiting for the Lords Day Whence it appears that that Text shews that the Apostolical Church kept solemnly the Lords Day in the publick exercises of Religion But upon what authority the Christians met on that day we will afterwards examine here it 's enough for me only to demonstrate that they did meet on that day The second Text out of which the celebration of the Lords Day is shown is 1 Cor. 16. 1. 2. Now concerning the collection for the Saints as I have given order to the Churches of Galatia even so do ye 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. upon the first day of the week c. The former place taught us that the Apostle Paul did celebrate the Lords Day with the Church this that he commands it to be celebrated by the Church And his practise is not here only recorded but here is mention made of his Apostolical ordination about that thing Where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 must be taken distributively for upon the first day of every week In which Apostolical command nothing is commanded the Church of Corinth which is not also required of the whole Church of Christ according to the golden rule of Tertullian very profitable for understanding of the Scripture Some things saith he uttered specially are to be understood generally which rule cannot but have place in this Text because what things the Apostle writ to the Church of Corinth the same belong to all that call upon the name of Christ in every place he himself being witness 1 Cor. 1. 2. Moreover who will deny that all who have given their name to Christ are bound to relieve their necessities For you must not think sayes Chrysostom that these things were written to the Corinthians alone but to every one of us and all that shall be after us Let us do therefore as Paul prescribes us and let every one of us lay by him at home on the Lords Day the Lords riches i. to be employed for such use as the Lord hath prescribed and hereupon let it become a low and immutable custome c. Therefore in Chrysostoms judgment the Apostle applies the manner of the Church in collecting almes on the Lords Dayes for the benefit of afflicted brethren which were then at Hierusalem which office of Christian Charity although no brethren liv'd in that place ought not to be omitted of Christians but in Chrysostoms opinion is to be established by an inviolable law for ever as it was done even as it appears by Justin Martyr and Tertullians Apologies in the succeeding Church I only add this Although a general law for making collections on that day to the use of the poor be set down by the Apostle yet they that at this day do it at other times must not be judged transgressors of the Apostles law That kind of collection was not so affixed to the Lords Day as it could not be done on other dayes although a peculiar reason was in it why they did rather on that than another day namely for the Church-assemblies held at that time and no time as Chrysostom witnesseth which we shall see afterwards is more fit to perform that office on than the Lords Day Others again set to another Engine by which they oppose the usual interpretation of the Apostles foresaid phrase and contend that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth signifie every day of the week singulam Sabbatum This they assert not because it 's the probable construction of the Apostles words but that they might
some do daily partake of the Lords blood and body on the Lords day which all the ancients do witness was done in the Church-assembly and others only on the Sabbath and Lords day and in other places only on the Lords day Hierom acknowledges the Christians did observe Quartam Sabbati Parasceven and the Lords day although he shews they differed from the Jews in the observation of those dayes The testimonies of the Fathers hitherto mentioned do shew that although the use of the Lords day grew every where yet the Church had in some places oftener in others more rarely their weekly meetings whereupon it seemed equal and just to some to ordain other dayes which the succeeding Church proclaimed for publick meetings to be equallized with the Lords day and that chiefly for three causes first the publick meetings of the Church were held on other dayes besides the Lords Secondly the Christians were bound to the same duties of Religion on other dayes appointed by the Church for meetings which were required by the Church on the Lords day Lastly some Feasts the Anniversary namely were more esteemed in the Church than the Lords and these things are confidently enough affirmed that they might shew if by any means they could that the original and obligation of the Lords day and other Festivals is the same both which they set forth to the world for humane but let them look to it to whom they affirm it lest they be twit with that of Ezek. 43. 8. But that the prerogatives of the Lords Day above others may more clearly appear let us by Gods help weigh of what value the reasons are with which they contend for other feasts to be equallized with the Lords day which that it may be done with plainness we will first clearly distinguish the Church-assemblies held on the Sabbath dayes from others which were held on the Lords day relying upon the gravest testimonies of the ancients then by Gods assistance we will shew the peculiar excellency of the Lords Day for the dignity whereof it is superiour to other dayes while others contend against it in vain First we affirm that excepting the Lords there was no other weekly we speak of stated and ordinary holy day with the whole Church next the Apostles We have heard in the first Chapter that the Christians met on the first day of the week and for the allegations in this chapter out of the Fathers and Historians for the observation of the Sabbath they cannot demonstrate that the Sabbath was observed by the Christian Church as an holy day which unless it be first explicated they that peruse the records of the Ancients will haply fall into a troublous matter After the Apostles death Socrates Sozomen Epiphanius Hieronymus Augustine and if there be any more say that the Church in the publick assembly did perform the duties of piety as the Sabbaths came about yet whoever shall say that the Sabbath was neither accounted holy nor equalled to the Lords day will do no wrong to the truth Who will say the Sabbath is holy when in the holy Records a tittle cannot be read of its institution or observation in the Christian Church as is of the Lords day but that the Lords day was instituted of the Apostles indued with extraordinary power and moved by the Holy Ghosts inspiration we will afterwards by the Grace of God inform you Yea let him tell who can that the Christians in the Apostles age met by themselves on Sabbath dayes which thing yet they did on the Lords dayes is apparent enough from the Scriptures but after the Apostles death I deny not that the Christians met together on Sabbath dayes although they accounted not the Sabbath holy and those assemblies were chiefly in use with the Oriental people according to some because the Jews dispersed in the Orient and accustomed to the Sabbatical solemnity could not easily be contented to be plucked from it although they observed the Lords Day which what is it else to do but brand them with Ebionism or as Baronius thinks because certain Hereticks reproached the Sabbath that the God of the Hebrews whom they called Evil rested on that day therefore they fasted on the Sabbath Contrariwise the Catholicks not Judaizing but that they might worship him as God the Father Creator of heaven and earth with a solemn celebrity said that in honour of him the Sabbath as well as the Lords day to the glory of Christ ought to be celebrated Thus they To whom Vedelius in his notes on Ignatius's tenth Epistle numb 6. doth answer Learnedly and Orthodoxly enough Or because the Sabbath hath 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. a regard of creation as is defined in the Constitutions which they call the Apostles But how much these kind of conjectures are to be valued that are supported with no reasons of any authority or genuine testimonies of the Fathers let others judge It 's without controversie that the Oriental Christians and others did at that time hold assemblies on the Sabbath day although upon what reasons they were chiefly moved to this it is not well enough known by the Writers of that age Yet did they not hold the Sabbath day holy The difference of the Eastern from the Western Church in observing the Sabbath teacheth this while the Oriental people kept holy day on the Sabbath most in the West fasted I say the most of them because they of Millain though in the West and divers others of the West were not attentive to fast on Sabbath dayes but dined soberly Ambrose had a custome to dine on the Sabbath Witness Paulinus Ambrose confesseth this of himself in Augustine Augustine acknowledgeth he dined on the Sabbath without superstitious vacation Ep. 86. Yet the Roman Church and some others and at length every where even they of the East fasted on the Sabbath These things about those who fasted on the Sabbath do not declare that they acknowledged it for a Feast or holy day on which fasting was altogether to be forborn according to the custome of the Church Aug. Ep. 86. and other Authors being witnesses yet that the Lords day was accounted holy at that time is granted of all Moreover the Sabbath was not every where amongst the Christians observed with that solemnity of the Church as the Lords day For the meetings were not held in the same manner on Sabbaths as on the Lords dayes Some things touching both observed out of the Fathers will shew this 1. What things are reported of Historians and others about observing the Sabbath touching gathering assemblies were not used in every Church every where For in the Churches of Rome and Alexandria the manner of meeting on the Sabbath held not Witness Sozom. Hist l. 7. c. 19. and afterwards in other Churches it grew out of use Athanasius Hom. de semente glorieth that he never medled with the Sabbath after the Jews manner namely Tertul.
manner as the Church did in remembrance of the Lords Resurrection doth make mention of this day whence it is collected that the Church did celebrate the Lords day otherwise Eusebius had not affirmed that the Ebionites had done it after the same manner as the Church did And the testimonies which follow teach us the same Cyprian mentions this day which he calls the first after the Sabbath Basilius M. saith the Church standing up made their supplications on the first day of the week which he calls the beginning of dayes De Sp. Sanct. c. 27. Chrysostom saith on the first day of the week or the Lords day the Christians ceased from all labour that by their relaxation and holy dayes the minds of the offerers might become more cheerful Ambrose on the Lords day after the readings and treating of the Creed communicated Baptism to the Competentes i. to those who being instructed in the Christian faith sought Baptism Aug. Retract lib. 1. ch 17. libro de Fide operibus cap. 6. at the Fonts of the Church We meet with frequent mention of this day in St. Austin Ep. 119. c. 13. and in the end of those Books De Civit. Dei lib. 22. c. 30. also Serm. 15. de verbis Apostoli and many times elsewhere Hilary saith the Church doth joyfully celebrate a Festival on the eighth day which is also it self the first of a perfect week Prol. in Psalmos Amongst the Holy-dayes confirmed by the laws of the Emperours Valens Theodosius and Arcadius the Sundayes which their Ancestors rightly called the Lords-dayes were reckoned Leo also and Athenius ordain the Lords day to be alwayes venerable and honoured a Leo in the same place by his eleventh law ordains that all should cease from their labours on the Lords dayes I can also bring forth many more testimonies for confirming the truth of this solemnity yea of all that have flourish'd in the Church of Christ to this very day But I will add no more lest I should seem to lend light to the Sun and those that have been cited hitherto do abundantly enough declare that the Lords day was alwayes solemnly kept of the Church because the holy Fathers acknowledge it for the chief yea for an holy day On it the Church ceased from their labours on it solemn assemblies were kept or they rejoyced in the festival of the Sabbath perfected on it the Scriptures were handled the Sacraments were administred on it the Church made supplications and therefore it is numbred amongst the chief solemnities of the Christians and is provided for by the laws of godly Emperours that studied all they could to promote the Worship of God that the holy solemnity of that day should not be defiled by labours or any pleasures But although those most Religious Emperours ordained the Lords day as was fitting to be celebrated it would be ridiculous from thence to conclude that the Lords Festival was not celebrated in the Church before they came to the Empire The Christians as hath appeared from the premises attended to celebrate this Festival when as yet there were no Magistrates Christian on whose authority the ordination of the Lords day doth not depend even over the whole world when the preaching of the Gospel came For which cause as we shall by and by hear divers under Dioclesians Reign were punished But when the Emperours became Christian they ordained that the solemnity which was before observed of the Christians by Christs authority should also by their own laws be celebrated and took care that others should not defile it by worldly businesses or the pleasures of the Flesh but they did not institute it at the first Constantine the Great the first of the Christian Emperours having got the whole Roman Empire by publick Edict commanded his Subjects that they should observe the Christian Religion as witnesseth Sozomen yet no man well in his wits will thence inseâ—r that the Christian Religion was then first known to the world although the free exercise of it was not safe before he was set happily over the Government of the Empire So must we think of the Lords solemnity which the Church of God observed not without great danger before the Emperours embraced the Christian Faith but after that the Emperours became nursing-fathers of the Christian Religion they did it freely a Law being made of the Emperours for this end Moreover let none be offended that before the times of Constantine publick Judges did attend the hearing of Law-suits on the Lords day which to do was declared unlawful in his Reign as though if the Lords day had been formerly known to the World Magistrates had been forbidden the exercise of publick judicatures on that day that most godly Emperour greatly contended by all means that he could to promote our Religion and for the greater solemnity of this Festival provided that all Court clamour should on that day cease Before his most auspicious Government the publick Magistrates did attend Judicatures even on the Lords day and no wonder for before he got the stern of Government the Judges were not Christian but under his Reign the Christians began to bear almost all the Offices of the Roman Empire most whereof he dignified with authority some with the Senators office many also with the Consular dignity But after the Judges embraced the Christian truth they submitted themselves to this law of celebrating the Lords day with greatest good will and did rest the parties from their controversies in honour of that day I might also add this It was needful that one law being made for observing the Lords day by another he should interdict the Judges from the cognizance of causes on that day For it was provided by the Roman Laws That no Judge should presume on his own authority to make any holy dayes He therefore made this Law in favour of the Judges who might know on what dayes they should attend the Office which the Emperour committed to them and on what they should keep holy dayes free from the same These things thus being weighed in an equal scale it appeareth that the Law for not hearing Law-suits on the Lords day doth detract nothing from the honour of its solemnity but rather much conduce to favour it That I may at length put an end to this Chapter We have seen how the Fathers have piously admonished the Church to celebrate the Lords day and the Emperours by their Laws made for this purpose very carefully provided that the Christian people should obey their admonitions so also we may find it observable from the Writers of those times that the Christians did celebrate this day's solemnity with as much devotion of Religion as they could and therefore while they prayed on that day towards the East they fell into a suspicion of worshipping the Sun with the Heathen amongst whom they lived that hated the Christian name Yet could they by
no punishments be deterred from celebrating the same but when they were by the Heathens carried to punishment they demanded of the Christians whether they had kept the Lords day as we may see in the Acts of the Martyrs by Baronius As sometimes the bloudy Papists when other arguments failed wherewith they might stop the Protestants mouths who with singular dexterity and great acuteness of wit being happily illuminated with a notable light of the Scripture did refute their dotages at length setting upon them with this Question would fish out what their opinion was of the Sacrament of the Altar as they speak incongruously whereupon then as they desired they might have a pretence to pronounce them guilty of death according to the cruel laws enacted by them so the Heathens asked of the Christians whether they had been at their Collect and kept the Lords day and when they confessed they had been at the Collect and celebrated the Lords day with a congruous devotion of Religion as St. Dativus then had they whereupon to threaten the sentence of cruel death against them inasmuch as having done against the Emperours command Yet the Martyrs answered to this Question with an unanimous consent that they could not intermit the Lords day because they were Christians and the Law namely of God as the Martyrs themselves expound it num 51. not of the Church as is noted by Baronius in the margin num 48. had warned them to keep it So the Martyrs But it will be for the Readers profit here more throughly to weigh what it is Dominicum agere or celebrare especially for the sake of Baronius's candor in rehearsing the Acts of these Martyrs he contendeth that by Collecta Collectio and Dominicus in the Acts of the Martyrs must alwayes be understood the sacrifice of the Mass but whoever shall look more narrowly into their acts will easily perceive that Baronius's Gloss deceives the Reader Dominicum agere and Dominicum celebrare in the acts of the Martyrs are both one and this is that I may use Hieroms words the same as if they should say they celebrate the Lords day having received the Lords body or according to Tertullian it is to celebrate the Lords solemnities which by the succeeding Church were called Solemnities appointed by God So in Concil Tarraconensi Can. 4. And those were celebrated of the Church being gathered together Tertullian witnessing it in the place fore-cited and were all the exercises of Religion which Baronius foolishly following the use of his age comprehendeth under the name of the Mass altogether unknown to the Church of that age dedicated to Divine Worship and performed on the Lords day in whose number the administration of the Lords Supper is reckoned which in those first times was oftentimes celebrated every Lords day but never without other publick duties of Christian Religion of which solemnities more hereafter by the Grace of God when we treat of the Sanctification of this day Let this for the present suffice the Reader that the Martyrs being asked by the Proconsul de Dominico answer se Dominicum egisse and we meet with Dominicum in the African Writers for the Lords day Cyprian Ep. 33. saith of Aurelius an ordained Reader Dominico legit where without doubt he meaneth the Lords day It is sometimes put for the place that 's set aside for the Church to meet in comest thou in Dominicum without a sacrifice saith Cyprian de opere eleemosynis Sometimes also for the Symboles of the Lords Supper Numquid saith Cyprian Dominicum post coenam celebrare debemus In the foresaid Acts of the Martyrs the word Dominicum is taken in all its significations whenas therefore they answer se Collectam Dominicam egisse what can it be else but as they add that se ad Scripturas Dominicas legendas in Dominicum i. e. there was a publick meeting for the Church although for the Persecution they met in private houses because as they answer they were all present aderat prebyter convenisse or ex more Dominica Sacramenta celebrasse Num. 36. that is all the Mysteries of Christian Religion at that time prohibited of the Heathen Emperours were faithfully performed on the Lords Dayes in the assemblies of the Christians For when any thing is opposed to a negative command we must consider it from the nature of the thing forbidden therefore the genuine sense of this phrase Dominicum agere Dominicum celebrare in Dominicum convenire c. in the Acts of the Martyrs cannot better be demonstrated than from the very words of the Emperours edict in which charge is given for burning the Scriptures destroying the Temples and prohibiting the Christians meetings which they celebrated on the Lords day Saturninus because he gathered together the Martyrs against the Emperours Mandates was brought to punishment When therefore the Proconsul demands of them Why Dominicum egissent c it is the same as if he should ask Why they kept their meetings as the Proconsul himself expresseth it or Dominicam Collectam egissent in which the duties of piety were observed And when were such sort of meetings kept but at that time whereon the congregations of the common people were made as Austin of the same Martyrs in breviculo Collationis tert diei cap. 4. that is but upon the Lords dayes according to the command of Christ and the custome of the Church founded upon this command and in those meetings of the Martyrs they did perform all the rites and offices of their Religion entirely for which cause as I said they were aceused namely because Collectam Dominciam celebrarunt i. e. they met or synaxes egerunt in the Lords name to celebrate the Lord on the Lords day Dominicum i. e. the offices of the Christian Liturgy which were prohibited by the Imperial edict under the name of a meeting as they expound it afterâ—â—â—d cum fratribus celebrarunt namely ad Scripturas Dominicas legendas in Dominicum convenerunt Dominica Sacramenta ex more celebranda idque ex authoritate legis Dei These are the excellent offices of Piety which were performed of them with the greatest devotion 〈…〉 Religion although they were interdicted by the Emperour for whose sake as I said they were complained of by the Proconsul From which things it 's plain to any that Dominicum agere or celebrare is the same amongst the Martyrs that Dominica solemnia celebrare was to their Countrey-man Tertullian whose Phrase doth in a Parallel answer to this of the Martyrs or to perform solemnities for the honour of God on the Lords day By what hath been said it is also manifest that the authority of the Lords Day was great in the Church because the Christians would not intermit the celebrating of it according to the law prescribed them by God although they were straitly forbidden of the Emperours upon great danger of life
not God Yet doth he not affirm that the observation of the Sabbath was unknown to them but he grants that the Fathers were not justified by it which they also confess who hold fast the foresaid opinion confirmed to be true by a long series of authorities It was not therefore the purpose of the Reverend Fathers to define whether the Sabbath was simply observed of the Patriarchs or not Onely they affirm that by its observation they obtained not righteousness before God nor for that cause did they observe it as the Jews did contend in this question with whom the Fathers had to do And Tertullian is not to be expounded otherwise who attended this also that he might shew against the Jews that the Fathers were not justified by Circumcision the Sabbath or the works of the Law His words do testifie this For he sayes advers Jud. c. 2. He that contendeth that the Sabbath is yet to be observed as a medicine of salvation must teach that those who observed the Sabbath formerly are just c. and thereupon what were formerly objected do follow which in this manner being understood according to the scope of the Author without any injury to the words do make nothing against the observation of the Sabbath from the Creation especially whereas Tertullian himself as formerly we observed hath asserted that the Jews do confess that Gods resting on it did from the beginning sanctifie the seventh day The truth of which assertion Tertullian no where calls into question for if he had not taken it for true then he would not have granted it without a reproof in any wise for their sakes but would have used one or other interpretation either to avoid or clear that place out of Genesis 2. 2 3. which yet he no where does The sanctification therefore of the seventh day from the Creation for which the Jewes stood is granted by Tertullian out of whom it is fetch'd that there was the use of the Sabbath before the Mosaical Law which also Tertullian granteth must continue when that ceaseth Therefore in the second place I answer that these and the like places if any be amongst the Fathers which seem to intimate that the Sabbath was not observed before Moses are not so much to be understood of the Sabbath it self or the observation of the seventh day as of the Jewish observation thereof and its abuse to Justification before God for they contend either that for its observation eternal life befell not the Patriarchs or that it was not observed before Moses according to the Ceremonies wherewith it was afterwards celebrated of the Jews neither ought it to be observed after the coming of Christ which things are affirmed by none at all Thirdly In the foresaid testimonies the Fathers had to do with the Jews who obtruded the Jewish Sabbath on the Christians for which cause when the Fathers mention the Sabbath they speak of it somewhat dishonourably if we look at the Name and Ceremonies of the Sabbath but if we understand the thing it self i. e. the Lords day they have extolled the Sabbath with wonderful praises therefore when they plead against the Jewish Sabbath they altogether reject it but when they appoint it to be celebrated in the Christian manner they greatly honour it Fourthly The Criticks which are well exercised in the writings of the Fathers teach us that it is an usual thing with the Fathers while with all their might they decline one errour they oftentimes do either fall into another or seem in a certain sort to fall into it like Husbandmen as prettily the learned Rivet in Prolegom in Crit. saâ—r cap. 11. who labouring to straiten a crooked stick do sometimes exceed measure and bend the plant into a contrary and diverse form so they know it very often falls out with the most grave Fathers who peruse their disputations with their adversaries for while they contend with their enemies out of an earnest desire to smite them they have sometimes even struck their own companions St. Austins heat against the Manichees carried him from the explication of the Text and those things which he purposed to assert This thing Austin himself when he had finished his Treatise signified to Possidonius and others that dined with him So Possidonius relateth it in the Life of Austin chapter 15. And as the truth of this thing hath appeared in other questions so in this of the Sabbath For while Tertullian and before him Justin Martyr have declared the foresaid opinions about the Sabbath their work was with the Jews who as we said obtruded the Sabbath on the Christians as though without its observation none could obtain eternal life Which errour while the grave Fathers studied to shun they declare this opinion of the Sabbath if in the testimonies cited this was their meaning being observed all that time from the Creation until Moses in expounding of which opinion although they thought to smite the Jews yet considered they not how unwarily they wounded their own companions who to their power were diligent to defend the contrary whose opinions we have formerly recited in this Chapter Lastly None that is but meanly conversant in the writings of the Fathers can be ignorant that some more hard sayings do often occurr in them which unless they be expounded by other places in them are not easily to be admitted Chrysostom saith in his later Sermon De utilitate ex obscuritate prophetiarum in Savils Edition Before Christs coming faith in Christ was not required of the Jews which words without a candid interpretation are not to be admitted for if they be taken absolutely they agree not with the Holy Scriptures as appears from Hebr. 11. in which it is related that the Saints before the former coming of Christ did rely upon him by Faith and for their Faith are commended therefore the genuine sense of this place is to be found out of another place in his former Sermon pag. 652. where of the Jews he saith they looked for the Lamb of God to come that should take away the sins of the world of which the later place affordeth no small light to the Interpretation of the former In like manner are we to judge in examining the foresaid testimonies of the Fathers wherein the Sabbath is denied to be observed from the beginning of the world whose meaning is to be expounded from those Fathers in other places or from others that were their contemporaries If any therefore have a mind to find out Tertullians mind Adv. Jud. cap. 2. let him compare him with Tertullian adv Mercion lib. 4. cap. 12. where he shall find him acknowledging that the Sabbath was holy from the beginning We may judge the same of the other authorities which are cited whose sense is to be sought out either by other places of those authors or by other writers that were contemporaries with them The words of Irenaeus and Justin Martyr do roundly enough expound their scope as before we
Church when the image is removed Ruffinus contendeth for observing the Sabbath though not carnally or in Jewish delights To these let be added a place in Constit Apost lib. 7. cap. 37. which tells us that the Lords day supplies the room of the Sabbath All these things argue that the pious Fathers did not under the Gospel explode that precept in the Decalogue about the Sabbath and therefore sometimes under the name of the Sabbath which to them the Lords day is signified as we have seen chap. 3. For they yield that Christ fulfilled and not destroyed the Law by his coming and that Christians are to rejoyce on the Sabbaths festival and that the solemnity of this festival is grounded on the Command in the Decologue and seem only to stand for this that now it should not be in that manner celebrated of Christians that the Sabbath was amongst the Jews They celebrated the Sabbath on the seventh day and flinging off the weighty care of godliness gave themselves up to idleness and delights of this world but the Fathers taught that Christians ought not so to keep the Sabbath who should keep the first day of the week holy not carnally but spiritually For they judged it far better under the light of purer Christianity as after shall appear to labour on the Sabbath than to attend on the alluring pleasures of the world But though they abhorred the Jewish manner of observing the Sabbath yet they alwayes ordained one day of the seven as Chrysostom speaks to be bestowed in the worship and service of the common Lord of us all And therefore passing by the abrogating of observing the Sabbath in the Jewish manner being confirmed by testimonies both of Scriptures and Fathers Thirdly it remains to be considered what may be brought from the same fountains to assert the authority of observing the Lords day For it is most sure that the Apostle although he call back in the foresaid places the Church from observing the festival of the Sabbath in the Jewish manner doth not forbid Christians all observing of every day otherwise the Apostle himself had given an offence to the Church in keeping the Lords day with a Church which it appears he did Act. 20. which to think of him the candour of a Christian mind will not admit Therefore we doubt not but by the Apostle's sentence whom we believe did not ordain it by that ordinary power which yet continueth in the Church a certain day is to be employed about spiritual labour otherwise the Church had not met at a stated time in the dayes of the Apostles And whereas a certain day is appointed whereon weekly Divine worship is to be attended only that neither diminisheth nor abolisheth Christian liberty it only directeth Christians that their minds fluctuate not in observing it which is not to destroy Christian liberty but rightly to instruct Christians in the use thereof the better that they miss it not in performing service to their God Now for the weekly conventions of the Christian Church no day was deputed of the Apostles but the Lords day the first mention whereof in their writings we meet with is Rev. 1. 10. where John saith that he was in the spirit on the Lords day And although that be the first time that it 's mentioned in the Scriptures under that appellation yet might it before John writ the Revelation be known in the Church by that name No Evangelist before St. John called Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. the Word yet the same author being witness In the beginning was the word Joh. 1. 1. So that day doubtless was called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Lords day before not as by some new institution which lately was established in the Church but as a thing well known to the Church otherwise he would not so have named that day without farther explication but that he knew for certain it was named in the Church by that agnomination Which shews that the Lords day was celebrated in the Church before that John was in the Spirit Neither could the Lords day be so solemn throughout all Churches in John's time but that all the Apostles before him had dispersed abroad this Doctrine Secondly it appears from Scripture also that this day was by Apostolical ordination destined to the collecting of almes 1 Cor. 16. 2. Where he gives order that upon the first day of the week every one should lay by him in store the Collection for the Saints of which he had spoken in the former verse The primary intention indeed of that place is to give order about the collections made for relieving the necessity of the poor but since he orders that they may be made on the Lords day there is no doubt but he changes them to celebrate the day it self For whenas he requires the end why should he not also prescribe the means directly conducing to that end without doubt the effect which was on that day to be performed presupposeth the day it self and in commanding the end the command of the means is alwayes included without which we obtain not the end To Chrysostom that searches out the causes of this Apostolical ordination that time seems very commodious to exercise mercy on First because the mind being free from labours it is more easily perswaded to commiâ—eration And secondly because the communicating of celestial holy things being had on that day will strongly provoke men to the duties of mercy Tertullian and Justin Martyr do testifie that almes were collected on that day doubtless by authority of the aforesaid Apostolical ordination which they had laid by them in store till this day as we have seen in the second chapter These collections were by the Christian people observed of their own accord as pledges of piety as Tertullian which Iustin Martyr affirms in his second Apology were on the Sunday deposited with the President out of which provision was made for pupils widows and those who were in want through sickness or any other cause Thirdly it also appears by the Scripture that on that day assemblies were held for hearing the Word and administring the Eucharist which are chiefly to be counted amongst the sacred offices of holy dayes St. Paul as in the second Chapter although he abode seven dayes at Troas we read not that the Disciples met to break bread but on the first day of the week Whence it is collected conveniently that even then the Church had on that day solemn conventions to perform the sacred exercises of Religion on in the preaching of the Word and administration of the Sacraments neither did this custome grow out of use with the succeeding Church as after when we shall treat of sanctifying the Lords day we will shew but the devout preaching of Gods Word being happily begun on that day by the Apostles Acts 2. 1. was ever after continued at the same time to the honour of God and
rural works have been slain with Lightning others punished with contraction of their limbs others having their bodies and bones also consumed in an instant by visible fire and on a sudden resolved into ashes have died in great torment as many other terrible judgments have been and to this day are by which it is declared that God is offended at the dishonour of so great a day These tremendous judgments of God do shew that God the avenger of all sin is angry as the Fathers speak at the impious violators of this solemnity But if the holy festival of the Lords Day were not Gods own ordinance his severe anger would not be so hot upon those that are guilty of the violation thereof We therefore of right do esteem the Lords Day above other dayes and that by reason of its solemnity because it was by a positive determination of Christ by the Apostles set apart from other days in the week that it might supply the room of the ancient Sabbath that it might preserve Religion and the external Worship of God both publick lest the disorderly congregating of the people should diminish their faith in Christ and also private that all might be obliged to attend meditations and pious exercises on a certain stated day which otherwise would seldome or never be done by men attending on the world rather than God therefore is the Lords day ordained that they being at liberty from worldly things might give up themselves wholly to Divine matters Lastly It only remaineth that this question may sufficiently be satisfied Whether it be in the Churches power to abrogate the Lords Day and substitute another in its room Surely he that saith that so innocent a custome so long received of the Church and that through authority of God by the Apostles caught not to be troubled with a change seems to be in the right unless any think that now greater authority doth reside in the Church than the Apostles were endued with wherewith it being endued it can change those things which were ordained of the Apostles or unless some greater occasion than the Resurrection of Christ do occurr than which the world never saw a greater miracle And Chrysostom calls the Lords day or the first day of the week Hom. 2. Tom. 6. because of Christs Resurrection the birth day of the whole humane nature Lastly if the custome of the Church from which arguments are not once fetched by the Apostle as 1 Cor. 11. 26. grounded on the word of God be of any right amongst Christians I see not why the Lords Festival celebrared first by them of Hierusalem secondly by them of Troas thirdly by the Galatians and Corinthians fourthly by them of the Isles Rev. 1. fifthly by the Greeks and Latines and lastly by the whole Churh through the world professing Christs name I say why this innocent custome which is attended with no incommodity but much profit happily continued from the very Apostles age hitherto should not be by us derived to our posterity Whilst Julius blames the preposterous irruption of Georgius the Arrian into the Bishoprick of Athanasius he uses this argument It is not fitting that this new manner of canons should be brought into the Church for where is there such an Ecclesiastical Canon or such an Apostolical tradition so we say here It is by no means fitting that a new custome should be introduced against an innocent order so long received by the Church which is neither supported by the Canons of the Church or tradition received from the Apostles None in this found mind can grant that things ordained by the Apostles can be changed of the Church I confess all the ordinances of the Apostles were not of the same kind for some of them pertained to Doctrine some to rites as Wallaeus observes chap. 7. those are perpetual neither any wayes obnoxious to change he must be anathematized that preacheth any other Gospel than what we have received from the Apostles Gal. 1. 8. but these which respect the rites or circumstances of Divine worship are of a double nature for either their causes were singular and such as perpetually should not have place in the Church therefore these ordinances were to be varied because when the cause was taken away the ordinances themselves ceased but other ordinances respecting rites were not to be changed whose occasions perpetually continued in the Church such was the laying on of hands in the ordinations of Ministers and therefore when the causes of ordinances made by the Apostles are changed the ordinations themselves are to be changed but while the cause remains the ordinances also remain unmoved Which things being considered it 's easie to see that the ordinance about the Lords day is not to be varied because no greater cause than what it 's bottomed on can ever occurr for whose sake it should be changed neither hath the Church ever thus far since the Apostles age once attempted this Therefore the foresaid question is superfluous that I may say no worse and altogether unworthy a farther answer especially whenas we know that many priviledges necessary for a Church to be founded were granted by God to the Apostles which were not derived from them to the Doctors of the Church founded for they were personal and could not lawfully be challenged by others which is shewn more at large in the seventh chapter CHAP. XI In what things the sanctification of the Lords day doth consist Where about resting from gainful labours which the Fathers carefully cautioned against that they should not be used on that day A place of Chrysostom Gregory and the Council of Laodicea is explained also a Canon of the Council of Matiscon WE have seen by the judgment of the Fathers that the Lords Day is to be sanctified and that by Divine authority Now it remaineth which we undertook in the third place to be proved to find out in what the solemn observation thereof consisteth The Fathers think that to Christians the Lords day succeeded in place of the old Sabbath and therefore as Hilary speaketh is to be celebrated with the festivity of the Sabbath that is as August Serm. de Temp. 251. even as the ancients observed the Sabbath Now it appeareth by the Scriptures of the Old Testament that the observation of the Jewish Sabbath consisted first in the rest and secondly in the sanctification of this rest and in the observation of these things their records will inform us that the Lords day was solemnized by the ancients As for the rest the Church of Christ hath used it not as necessary of it self to the worship of God but only as an help thereto without which the worship commanded of God could not conveniently be performed of the people For while men are intangled in the affairs of this world they cannot religiously attend as is fitting on the things that pertain to God and his worship The Sabbath was not allowed for idleness but that men
being withdrawn from the cares of temporal things its rest should be spent in spirituals as Chrisostom Hom. 1. de Lazaro Athanasius of the same judgment de Sabbat Circumcis for he saith the end of the Sabbath was the knowledge of the creation and not idleness that men keeping holy that day they might know God who rested on that day having finished the work of Creation In the third Council of Orleans it 's provided that men abstain from rural labour and they shew the end of this abstinence that they might go more easily to Church to pray Therefore by the very dictates of nature the Priests affirmed that Holy dayes were polluted if any work was done upon their proclaimed and moveable Feasts Numa Pompilius ordained that alwayes on the Priests Festivals the Cryers should go before them through the city who should give charge that men should rest and cease from their works He thought it was fit that he who worshipped the Gods should be freed from other things and in worshipping of the Gods to apply the mind as to a thing greatly conducing to piety Therefore the minds of men without a cessation from worldly things cannot be applied in a holy devotion to Divine Worship Handy labour saith Cyril is forbidden on a Feast day that you may exercise your selves more entirely in Divine matters The ancients thus ordained that we must cease on a Festival day from all secular works and no worldly thing is to be done on that day which may hinder its sanctification Now in worldly matters men are intent either upon gain or pleasure but here must be a cessation from both First and foremost the observation of the Lords day is not to be profaned by gainful labour for which cause it was provided for by the ancients that Christians should wholly abstain from all things whereby the body is either wearied or the mind alienated from divine to humane things Which clearly enough shews that they were not of that opinion which Austin reports Seneca sometimes was Seneca derided the Jews especially for their Sabbaths that lost the seventh part of their life time in idleness and did not many urgent affairs in their season Christians were not so intent upon their labour for profit as not to be pulled from it to attend Religion They would not give themselves up to their commodities when the season called for obedience When Origen describes how a Christian ought to observe the Sabbath he concludes nothing of worldly actions must be done and he must abstain from all secular works as we have observed before in Chap. 10. where we cited a place in which there is a truly golden and pious image of the Christian Sabbath which Origen divinely inspired hath happily drawn to the life as they say and in which are elegantly described what things are on that day by Christians to be followed and what to be fled while he teacheth us that leaving earthly works on the Lords day we must attend on Divine which that it may be done with greater advantage we must go to the Church in which he exhorts us to attend on the things of Religion and if men shall faithfully do this they will make it evident to all that they have a greater care of their hope for the future inheritance reserved in Heaven than of the profits of this present life Chrysostom confesses that the Lords day is free from business and labours and hath a rest appointed for it and elsewhere Hom. against those that run to playes he accuseth those that meddle with worldly cares on that day although they may pretend poverty necessity of getting food and other urgent occasions But although Chrysostom seems manifestly â—o think that gainful labour is not on the Lords day to be undertaken by Christians yet some make a question whether according to Chrysostom all the day or only so long as the publick assemblies of the Church are held there ought to be an abstinence from labours especially whenas he doth indulge his hearers when they are returned from the Church-assembly if they shall repeat the Scriptures and discourse of that which they have once heard then go to look after the things which are necessary for this life But I will set down the very words of the Father lest I should either keep in suspense the well-minded Reader or seem to darken the truth You must not saith he when you are returned from the Church-meeting intangle your selves in businesses contrary to this exercise but returning home straightway repeat the holy Scriptures and call your wife and children together to confer of those things that have been spoken and these things being fixed more deeply and thoroughly in their mind than to go and look after the things which are necessary for this life c. it never came into St. Chrysostom's mind who asserts that the Lords day should be free from labour and doth not so much as grant any on the Lords day to labour for getting food or avoiding poverty to give any liberty that they should freely attend any worldly affairs which hinder piety And he that sayes thus will do Chrysostom no wrong but rather he who affirms that he indulges men to use these kind of labours on that day which he often finds fault with will fasten the lye on him And I fear not to say this of them that so assert that by their crooked interpretation they do apply the words of that grave Father to quite another sense than Chrysostom thought of This will be evident with a small adoe to him that observes the cited place and compares him with other places that do occurr in him in which it is Chrysostoms purpose to check them who though in the Church they did attentively enough hear what was said yet being departed and forth with mingling themselves with their secular affairs do extinguish the fire of devotion which the Word praeach'd had kindled in them For this evil he prescribes this remedy that so soon as they are returned home they read the holy Scripture and commune amongst themselves about those things that were spoken which things being deeply fixed in their mind then to go and look after those things that they judge necessary for this life they may freely for him as afterwards Bedâ— relates after the exercises of piety are finished there was liberty to take care to refresh the flesh but to care for any other secular businesses than those that pertained to their sustenance he gave them no liberty Which also we read was done by Gunteramnus Baron 588. 26. Because first the very phrase of Chrysostom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may in a sense commodious enough be expounded of things pertaining to life so Arrianus translates the words of Chrysostom even Trapezuntius one of Greece approving it for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth properly signifie life to which death is opposed or sustenance and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
they in City were obliged to be present at Church-assemblies Which things being considered I see not to what purpose any should conclude out of the Elib Council that they which live in the Countrey are not to attend on the Lords Festival although in the Canon there be express mention of those who live in Cities because the Bishops and Presbyters to whom it belonged to go before the other members of the Church in celebrating the Lords day did dwell in the Cities and in that age there was not every where a supply of them afforded for the Villages therefore the Fathers of that Synod by name did express these who were supplied with them that laboured in the Word And a long time after the Eliberitan Council was gathered divers Villages were not furnished with Churches witness Chrysostom Hom. 18. in Act. Besides when it 's plain that the unlearned and unbelievers were admitted into the Church-assembly in the Apostles dayes 1 Cor. 14. 23. why should not the Countrey men after the Apostles death be bound to be present at the assemblies of the Church as if they who had bestowed their pains in tilling the earth had forthwith forsworn their barbarity And because they who live in the Countrey are as well Members of Christ as Citizens why should not Christ impart his communion as well to these as those in the exercises of Religion on the Lords dayes It is expresly commanded in the Constitutions which they call the Apostles that on the Lords day servants attend in the Church to hear the Doctrine of Religion And Sozomen tells us that amongst the Arabians and Cyprians he found ordained Bishops in Villages If at that time Bishops were set over some Villages then certes they who inhabited them were instructed by the Bishops in the Doctrine of Christ on all especially the Lords dayes as the custome of the Church was Eusebius also confesseth that men and women old men and children bond and free noble and ignoble learned and unlearned did almost daily assemble together in every place where-ever the men lived to receive the discipline of Christ from the rising of the Sun to the setting thereof If all men of whatever condition or quality were daily intent upon the Doctrine of Christ then they that lived in the Countrey did not refuse it on the Lords day Yea the same Author as formerly we have seen affirmeth that Christ hath prescribed all the inhabitants of the world whether at land or sea to celebrate the Lords day Eusebius therefore acknowledges not that it 's only for Noble men and others of great name to be present at Church-assemblies from which servants and those of inferiour condition should be excluded but saith that the Lord himself hath otherwise commanded Also in Theodoret that pious Emperour Theodosius witnesseth that the doors into the holy Temple are open for servants and beggars and therefore in this age they were present with other Christians in the Church-assembly and were not excluded from the same But let us return to examine that indulgence granted by the Emperour Constantine to Countrey men for working their labours on the Lords day Where first we may make a question with the learned Divine Mr. S. A. Whether any such was ever granted of him for the countrey mens sakes or no since Eusebius who was Constantius's contemporary and who well enough knew all things that the Emperour did speaking of the Law he made about observing the Lords day makes no mention of this indulgence Euseb de vita Constantin l. 4. c. 18. but only relates how the Emperour commanded that all should rest from their works In the same manner Sozomen recites the same law although lib. 1. c. 18. and in both there be a deep silence about excepting country labours Which things being considered it may justly be doubted whether ever such an indulgence were granted by that Emperour of blessed memory But come on and granting this indulgence for the authority of the Book relating it let us seek out the reason and sense thereof This was the true reason of that liberty if there was any granted Because Constantine subjected all the subjects of the Roman Empire whether they had embraced the Christian faith or had not yet tasted it to the law of observing the Lords day witness Eusebius Which though it could be known by no other argument might be judged of by this that he calls not that day in the Church manner as Baronius The Lords day but by the Heathen manner Sunday Thence I say may it be gathered that the same Law was not prescribed by him to Christians only but Heathens also for whose sake he uses an appellation peculiar to them Since therefore the Gentiles also were to rest from their labours by virtue of the Law made by â—…stantine therefore he granted them a liberty to look after their countrey labours Whereas he knew that those who were not turned Christians could not easily be brought in to be bound by the Christians lawes he yielded something for these mens sakes and Constantine was sufficiently hated by them for neglecting their idolatry and therefore by little and little he studied to draw them to the true worship of God as Eusebius ubi supra Moreover the liberty of medling with countrey labours on the Lords day was granted to countrey men only in case of necessity which thing the very words of the indulgence do declare lest through occasion of a moment the profit yielded by the heavenly providence perish by the occasion of one moment the profit of fruits might perish therefore in gathering in the fruits sometimes a regard of a moment may be had no labours are therefore permitted but to undergo which they were induced by a certain necessity lest the fruits should perish in which case also we have observed worldly labour is permitted That exception therefore of Constantine cannot be brought to patronize labour used upon no necessity because he indulged this liberty for the sake of the Heathen only whom he with all lenity studied as far as he could to perswade them to embrace the Christian faith and in case of necessity which being afterwards continued a while Leo declares void by a new law set forth to the contrary and calls that indulgence a decree differing from the Apostles But because Leo doth very aptly answer the reason of this indulgence assigned by Constantine I will set down his very words for the Readers sake Because saith he it is apparent that another law doth contradict that law which commands all to reverence the day of the Lords Resurrection by a cessation from labours which determines that all generally are not prohibited working others have a liberty to work for it saith Let all Judges c. as above in the Law of Constantine the cause of which profaning that day is grounded on no reason for although the preservation of fruits may be pretended yet that is of
example of Dorcas Now I must answer to the authority of the Council of Orleans which was but a Provincial and consisted onely of twenty five Bishops for performing all labours on that day excepting rural in the same manner as sometimes Hierom to Euagrius while he was shewing what difference there was between a Bishop Elder and Deacon he would not have the custom in some sort contrary to his opinion of one City namely Rome to be brought out against him for he being judge the authority of the world was greater than the Citie 's And so I must say here If an indulgence for them had grown into use with the rest of the Church or had been supported by reason or any authority then the sentence of this though Provincial Council had been of some weight but in this their custome being rejected of the Church up and down dispersed is not to be obtruded as a law upon all Then secondly the Bishops being congregated in that Council purposed to obviate as they speak the Jewish observation of the Sabbath And they yield these things lest they should rather seem to set up a Jewish institution than Christian liberty and the very words of the Canon do intimate that the people were perswaded that these things ought not to be done I 'le add nothing of the corrupting that place which Binius judges to be depraved only let others judge what authority is to be given to it it suffices us that the Fathers with one consent do interdict all Christians earthly affairs and worldly works on Lords days although some abounding in their sense do seem to think otherwise Lastly that I may put an end to this Chapter two things now remain to be considered in the Emperours Laws made about the Lords Day which according to some do mightily prejudice its solemnity the first of these is considered in their Manumissions and the second in some certain transactions to be done on the Lords day and since both of these are a civil office some think that certain worldly things for that cause were to be done on that day which were not works of piety To add somewhat of both these offices will not be far from our purpose The indulgence for making free and manumitting granted by the Christian Emperours and to be done on the Lords day could not hinder its religious solemnity which that it may appear the reason of that institution is a little better to be enquired into Constantine of blessed memory studied by laws and all other means to promote the worship of God amongst other things he granted liberty to the Church by law that whoever were made free the Priests being witnesses they should be inrolled into the number of the Roman Citizens So Nicephorus Hist l. 7. c. 46. and Sozomen Hist l. 1. c. 8. And if any desire to see the form of these Manumissions it is extant in the fragments Conc. Toleran and in the learned Instellus his notes in Canones Africanos Can. 64. whither I refer the Reader because it is only my purpose to touch something of the time wherein these Manumissions were done which by Historians and the Emperours laws we see fall out to be on the Lords day and that especially for the honour of the Church and increase of Christian Religion while they by the Bishops were performed in the Church the Bishops were had in greater esteem among the people till as the learned Instellus very well observeth as formerly servants were manumitted in the Temple of the Goddess Feronia so afterwards by the Emperours Constitutions together with their liberty they obtained to be Roman Denizens in the Church No otherwise then as among the Egyptians the cubit wherewith the inundation of Nilus was wont to be marked was no more brought as the custome was to the Temples of the Heathen but from that time to the Churches of the Christians Sozomen 1. c. 8. After this manner the Emperour did earnestly regard the worship of God in making his laws to encrease which he also established that about Manumissions to be made on the Lords day in the Church Moreover servants those for the most part whom their Masters discharged against their will obtained their freedome not without great difficulty as Sozom. therefore the servants as saith Zonaras in Can. 88. Carthagin fled to the Church and if the Bishop determined equally they were manumitted Thereupon the Emperour ordains that all who were by the Priests testimony set at liberty in Churches should be made Denizons of the Roman Commonwealth And afterwards in process of time the Fathers of the Synod thought good to advise the Emperour that this might be done Conc. Carth. Can. 88. Now the benefit of liberty of which the Emperour was desirous as tending to the glory of God was very acceptable to God and for charity sake on that day whose holiness works of charity do not dishonour was also to be performed I could also name another cause assigned in the fragments Conc. Toletan Some thought that they did a thing very acceptable to God and profitable to their own souls if in the Church of some Saint in the presence of the Bishop or the Priests there standing or the noble Laity before the horn of the Altar of that Church send out their servants free by a charter of absolution and freedom from all bonds of servitude But these superstitious Manumissions for remedy of the soul as they speak were observed about the four hundredth year after Christ but that formerly mentioned by Zonaras Sozomen and Nicephorus was the true cause why first the pious Emperours lookt to that these Manumissions were performed on the Lords day which we do not see hindred the Lords solemnity As Manumissions do not obscure this solemnity so certain transactions are lawful on the Lords day Nor can this hinder it that Leo a most earnest defender of the Lords festival did indulge those that were at odds amongst themselves leave to meet on the Lords day vicaria poenitudine whereon they might conferr of their bargains speak of their transactions These which were offices of charity could not destroy the Lords solemnity For that holy man Leo would have adversaries freely and without fear to meet together vicaria poenitudine which the interpreter of the Law expounds by repentance which ought to return by course that is on the Lords dayes or vicaria poenitudo is that which one expecteth from the other by turn be reconciled to one another to effect which reconciliation they might be at their liberty to confer of their bargains and speak of their transactions But all these things were granted by the Emperour not for any worldly end but for renewing their lost friendship which could not obscure the honour of the festival on which the things that pertained to peace and concord were permitted for they then as it were leaving their gift before the Altar went their way that they first might be
reconciled to one another and then come and offer their gift which reconciliation could not be made without mention of their bargains and transactions upon whose account they were at difference And thus much for avoiding worldly affairs and especially gainful labours on the Lords day CHAP. XIII The Lords Day not to be profaned by surfeiting Servants not to be called off from sanctifying the Lords day we ought not fast on the Lords Day whether Ambrose was wont to banquet on that day EVen as the solemn observation of this day is not to be profaned by labour tending to our profit so neither is it for us to give our selves to the pleasures or delights of the world on it We do not saith Primasius in Gal. 4. celebrate festival dayes in luxury and banquettings and that justly for if a work be for bidden on a feast day that by the body may be exercised for necessity of life that we may more entirely attend on Divine matters are not those things by better right prohibited which cannot be done without sin and grievous offending of God It 's for Christians therefore neither by surâ—eiting nor sports to defile the religious observation of this day In celebrating festivals divers of the Fathers do to their power reprove rioting and drunkenness Greg. Naz. when he describes the manner how Christian festivals are to be celebrated admonisheth that we rejoyce not with the varnish of the body nor change of garments and their gorgeousness not in rioting and drunkenness whose fruit you have learned chambering and wantonness are nor let us crown our streets with flowers nor our tables with the deformity of oyntments neither let us adorn our porches nor let our houses shine with a visible light nor sound with a concord and shouting of Minstrels for this is the manner of Heathens celebrating their festivals c. when he judgeth all kind of luxury is to be removed from Christians in their festivals not only because the body being stuffed with meat and overcharged with wine easily falleth into wantonness but because amongst the Heathens with whom the Church in celebrating festivals ought to have nothing common this was an usual thing Festivals are not to be celebrated in drinking off cups of wine but in renewing the spirit of the mind and purging the heart for he that facrificeth to the belly and Bacchus doth more stir up to anger the Lord of the celebrity Scholion 5. in Johannis Chinacâ— gradum decimum quartum de Gula. It grieved Cyril that so many amongst the Christians did on festival dayes give up themselves either to honest sports surfeiting dances or other vanities of the world and he affirms that these rites tend to no other end than the derision of Gods name and slighting of the day and they that follow these things do grievously sin the rather that they go about these things at a more holy time for surely they that give the reins to the belly and pleasures cannot celebrate a festival day St. Chrysostom by two arguments of great weight and authority doth perswade his hearers spiritually to observe the Lords day In the first place from the various good things which we do enjoy on that day and secondly from our happy freedome from evils and at length descends to remove those means whereby that spiritual honour is wont to be hindred not by banquetting not by pouring out wine nor attending on drunkenness in his judgment such wicked deeds as these do no little detract from the honour of the Lords day Yet many in this our age especially the richer sort for these causes cannot avoid a just reprehension who above measure on the Lords day filling themselves with surfeit keep their servants at home to prepare meat finer than ordinary to satisfie their insatiable luxury and think much to give them leave to go to Church to feed their souls with the holy bread of life It once grieved Ambrose that a certain Christian in the time of a fast did draw with him to an hunting some servants that were accidentally hasting to the Church because thereby he heaped others sins on his own pleasures not knowing that he would be both guilty of his own offence and the perdition of the servants And why should not we as well grieve when we see divers professing themselves Christians to the world not to be more careful for promoting the salvation of their Christian servants whilst they hinder them from the publick assemblies of the Church on the Lords day that they may serve their lust Especially while as saith Ambrose they do not consider that although they be servants in condition yet are they brethren by grace for they have as well put on Christ partake of the same Sacraments and have the same God for their father which their Masters have St. Paul would eat no flesh whilst the world stood rather than that his eating should make his brother to offend 1 Cor. 8. 13. David scrupled the very once tasting of the water which was drawn out of the well of Bethlem by his Worthies with the great peril of their lives 2 Sam. 23. With how more heinous a spot do they brand themselves therefore who do expose the souls of their servants whom they detain at home from the publick meeting of the Church to serve their vanities unto so great a danger a wickedness it is rather beseeming those that sacrifice to Bacchus than those that keep a festival to God In the Council of Paris this very same wickedness grieved the Fathers for though the Lords day seemed to be kept in some reverent manner by certain Masters yet was it found very seldome to be observed with due honour of their servants under subjection I wish that the Christian Religion even defiled with the blot of this wickedness in our age were not ill spoken of amongst divers At least I beseech in Christ those that are the cause of others absence from the publick exercises of piety that they would with their servants which they keep at home be pleased to do that which Chrysostom requires of his hearers namely to discourse of what they heard with them that were absent by which means they might hear and learn from them what they lost themselves in preparing of corporal food being held from spiritual Let them consider this who cause those that are under them to be hindred of spiritual food that they may prepare corporal meat for their use Gregory allowed not at all the custom of Laicks feasting ordinarily on Lords dayes from which they could not easily be moved In the mean while I am not ignorant that in the old Church divers Canons are extant of not keeping fasts on the Lords day Although they condemned not a Fast of it self and in the general as a work contrary to Gods command or that is repugnant to his Word because divers illustrious examples thereof are afforded in the rules both
of Old and New Testament yet did they judge that Fasts on that day were to be relaxed To the Africans he that fasteth on the Lords day is no Catholick to Ignatius he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a killer of Christ Yea in Concil Gangren Can. 18. an anathema is denounced against the observers of this fast and prohibitions of this nature are frequent amongst the ancients the cause whereof Zonaras seems to teach while he saith the time of fasting is appointed for sorrow but a festival celebrity for mirth and joy He teaches the same in Can. 18. Concilii Gangrensis Therefore because the Lords day being consecrated by Christs Resurrection from the dead it is a day of joy to the Church thereupon the rejoycing Christians gave thanks on that day to God and relaxed their fasting and abstained from every right that might inferr any sorrow They were stirred up to this also by the pranks of Hereticks who denied the Resurrection of Christ amongst whom the Manichees acted with a Diabolical spirit and studying to diffuse this errour that they might extinguish the joy of Christians for the saving Resurrection of Christ have prescribed Fasts on the Lords day to their followers whose errours and others which held the same that the Orthodox might prevent they have lookt to it that on overy Lords day the Fast should be relaxed But although we reject not the Canons set out by the Church in detestation of Hereticks yet we affirm that provision was made in them about this matter was ordained by the Fathers and not by the Apostles Otherwise St. Austin had missed it when he said It is not defined by our Lords command or of the Apostles on what dayes we ought not and on what to fast And if this had been a true Apostolical ordinance it had been lawful for the Church to fast on the Lords day when no occasion was offered But Hierom thinks otherwise while he wisheth that we might fast at every season he excepts not the Lords day and sayes that Paul and the faithful with him fasted on the Lords day yet doth he not accuse them of the Manichean Heresie And because we read not that the aforesaid Canons were ordained by the Apostles therefore they are grown out of use in the Church because like as the impious madness of Hereticks adulterating the Christian faith hath given the Church occasion to ordain divers ceremonies in the external worship of God by which they might both extinguish their poison and better confirm the minds of Christians in the truth once received which as before those Herefies did put up the head were not in use so those being extinct they grew into disuse again Therefore whatever we meet with in the ancients of prohibiting Fasts on the Lords day doth not at all enervate my opinion of avoiding surfeit on that day which is confirmed with the gravest sayings of the approved Fathers neither do they make any thing against me to fast and surfeit do differ far enough between which extremes a third thing is given namely a sober and moderate dinner the use whereof none will deny to Christians on the Lords day unless any think with Urbicus that not to fast is to be drunk Austin who used a sparing and frugal table tells us that he entertained at dinner with him a man miraculously restored to his former health on the Lords day because he shewed hospitality as Possidonius Arbogastes being entertained at a feast by the King of France and asked Whether he knew Ambrose answered that he knew the man and was beloved of him and often was wont to feast with him Some interpret this as if St. Ambrose fared delicately on the Lords day on which day and the Sabbath and when the birth-dayes of Martyrs were celebrated Paulinus reports he was wont to dine because on that day Noble men were entertained by him but Paulinus relates not that Ambrose did entertain to a Feast Count Arbogastes on the Lords day Arbogastes boasteth in Paulinus that he often feasted with Ambrose but whether he spoke the truth in this is a question although Baronius reporteth it for a truth who yet mentions not the day on which he held this feast Arbogastes also glories that he was beloved of Ambrose but it 's easie to conjecture that there was but small friendship between Ambrose and Count Arbogastes whenas Ambrose so hated his sacrilege for which cause Arbogastes being incensed vowed that he would make a stable of the Church of Millain and would try how the Clergy could fight Therefore it 's not certain whether what he spake of the feast was true He might perhaps insinuate to the King who highly esteemed Ambrose the Bishop of Millain that he was prized by him somewhat that he might be more highly regarded of the King However it was when Ambrose himself would never be present at a feast in his own countrey being invited it may be judged whether it 's likely that he would invite others to a feast on the Lords day who refused to be present at other mens feasts himself Lastly if it were granted that Ambrose did entreat Count Arbogastes at a Feast whether will any believe it who considers the austere life of Ambrose chastizing his body with that discipline as Paulinus ibidem that he observed a daily Fast that he would distain himself with feasts on the Lords day which hindred the exercises of Religion either publick or private Nay truly He might perhaps dine on the Lords day as the custome of the Church required but we must not believe that the grave Father did fare so daintily on that day as that he could not attend the duties of piety concerning which nature of feasts we are here speaking in which number that is to reckoned which Baronius mentions out of Gregor Turonens who tells us of a certain Presbyter invading the Bishoprick of Avergue after the death of Sidonius Apollinaris who when the Lords day came having prepared a banquet commanded that all the Citizens should be invited into the Church a wickedness indeed beseeming the author that he who had ambitiously invaded the Bishops See against the Canons of the Church should violate the Lords solemnity by his feast that hindred the duties of Divine worship which unlawful example I hope no body that relisheth any thing of Christ will follow And now I will conclude with St. Austin that none can rightly deny that a Christian may on the Lords day be refreshed with a moderate and sober dinner and also will affirm with that grave Father that those who fear God must not riot on the Lords Day CHAP. XIV Sports are not at all to be held on the Lords Day by the judgment of divers Fathers and Emperours Four kinds of shows condemned by the Fathers and not to be acted on the Lords Day and that not only while the sacred meetings are kept THey that are
other interpreting of the law used under the former Temple besides that which the Prophets being extraordinarily called undertook Which opinion being once admitted it will not be easie to avoid the aforesaid incommodities as to any one it will appear by a more narrow search into them Unto whose conjecture we will with their good-leave oppose the authorities both of Jews and Christians in that particular being bottomed upon the Holy Scripture Flavius Josephus whom according to Cunaeus we are to believe next to the Pen-men of Holy Writ pleading the Cause of the Jews against Appion in his Apology which in the famous Cunaeus opinion is learned to a miracle in express words affirms that Moses would have us hear the Law not once or twice or oftner but he commands all men leaving their other works to meet together to hear the Law and perfectly to learn it c. Thus he And if this Ordinance of a weekly meeting to hear and learn the Law was in force in Moses age then was it long before the Babylonish Captivity While Philo Judaeus contends that the Playes and ridiculous spectacles of Fools and Dancers ought to be put away he saith that it was the manner to study Philosophy on Sabbath dayes the Prince going before and teaching what was needful to be done or spoken the rest giving ear Whereupon he also affirms that they now should play the Philosophers upon Sabbath dayes more patrio in their country manner and he acknowledgeth that Oratories in Cities were for Schools of Virtue More credit therefore is deservedly to be given to the Jewes relating their countrey customes than to other mens conjectures of them Among the Christians divers very learned men treating of the Hebrews Common-wealth have taught the same Amongst whom Carolus Sigonius de Rep. Hebraeorum l. 5. c. 10. and Cornelius Bertramus p. 96. The famous Cunaeus to whom the Christian Church is much beholden for his labours in explaining the antiquities of the Hebrews saith that the right observation of Sabbaths consisted in the holiness of all their words and deeds and in Divine worship and Prayers All which doth plainly evidence that they used to read the Law and interpret it to the peoples capacity on the Sabbath dayes otherwise neither their words nor deeds had been noted for holiness or how else could the minds of the Jews have been furnished piously to conceive Prayers on Sabbath dayes without the explaining of the Scripture Yea the Learned Cunaeus confesses that the Levites in the Synagogues did deliver to the people in the Towns of Judaea the chief knowledge of all Laws both of Humane and Divine things and when could the Levites do this with greater profit than on the Sabbath dayes In a word although we deny that at that time the Talmudical interpretation of Scripture was grown in use which we confess the ancient Church of the Jews knew nothing of yet we cannot affirm this of the vocal interpretation of the Scriptures by the Levites But to return to our purpose We find that under the Old Testament the Scriptures were read and opened in the Jews assemblie even the Holy Ghost being witness although some doubt of the period of time at which their interpretation on Sabbath dayes began As for the Churches in the New Testament planted by the Apostles they could not so long as their Peace was disturbed with a storm of Persecutions meet together without very great difficulty for which cause as we said Chap. 1. they had their meetings sometime on the night and sometimes on the day neither again was it safe for them to hold a meeting all the day For which cause Tertullian judges that it was best for Christians if the Lords dayes solemnities could not be celebrated on the day time for persecutions whereof he speaks then ought they to keep them on the night if not with every one of them yet at least with three These things teach us that the Church was not permitted in that age with safety and as often as they list to meet together on the day time to perform the exercises of piety He therefore that requires of us some one example for expounding Scripture twice while the fire of Persecution raged with which that age abounded I desire him to tell me whether the Christians did during that Persecution twice every Lords day keep their meetings For if it were safe for them to meet why may they not as well be believed to meâ—t for interpreting of Scripture and Prayer to God since these duties are joyned by the Apostle 1 Cor. 14. and observed by Cyprian as he faithfully expounded the Scriptures Especially when it was the custom of the Church so often as Scripture was read to interpret the same This we have largely enough shewn out of Justin Origen Tertullian Ambrose Augustine and other Fathers of great authority chap. 4. Since therefore in the Jewish Apostolical and other Churches succeeding the Apostles there followed after the reading of the Scriptures an exposition of them it seems necessarily to follow that if they had liberty to meet on Lords dayes then they used to treat twice out of Scripture of which there is frequent mention in their assemblies And it 's certainly evident from the continual practiâ—â— of the Church that from the very Apostles times prayers and reading were reckoned both together which were celebrated both morning and evening No man therefore can judge it unreasonable to say that there followed an interpretation of those things which were read because reading was used to instruct the people But how could the people be instructed in the Scripture read without an interpretation The Eunucâ— answered Acts 8. 31. that he could not understand what he read except some one should guide him Yea they were wont to Treat out of the Reading or Lesson as was formerly said The calamitous condition also of those times wherein so many cruel persecutions were stirred up required the same Daily exhortations were very needful to the Christians for to bear the Cross of the Gospel patiently Neither must we think that these skilful Pastours who were set over the Church by the Apostles and Apostolical men did not endeavour as often as they could to instruct the People committed to them in the matters of Faith St. Cyprian Ep. 40. professes that he was sore troubled when he could not go to and exhort every one as the Lords and his Gospel Ministry required while he was in his banishment If it were a grief to this vigilant Bishop that because being hindred by his exile he could not provoke all who were commended to his inspection and care by his holy Exhortations to piety and patience certainly when he was with his people if he took care that by a Reader the bare reading of the Gospel was recited to them although he stirred not them up by his Exhortations to practise what they had heard read he would never in very deed have thought
Apost l. 2. c. 39. and the doctrines that were raised out of the Scriptures yet were they judged unworthy to be present at the Prayers of the Church Baron ubi prius So Zonaras in Can. 11. Conc. Nic. The third degree of these was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the Prostrate when they that had repented stood within the compass of the Church behind the Pulpit separate from the place of the Faithful yet within their â—ight where they were present at none of the holy offices save the reading of the Holy Scripture expounding of the Gospel and prayer that was rehearsed for them and the perfect Catechumeni that is the Competentes and a little while after the going out of the Catechumeni having made Prayers for them they went out Can. 19. Conc. Laodic Baron ibid. Zonar in Can. 4. 5. Conc. Anoyrani Here the Penitents stood sorrowful and being not yet made partakers of the Eucharist since the commission of their sin for which they were bound of the Church with spiritual bonds they threw themselves down on the earth with weeping and lamentation and for this prostration the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was assigned to this degree Then on the other side the Bishop running to him lamenting falls likewise upon the ground with pitiful lamentation and last of all the whole multitude of the Church falls a weeping too After this the Bishop rises â—â— first and raises them that were fallen down and having for a convenient time prayed for sinners that repented he dismisses them Thus Sozomen de Ecclesiae Romanae consuetudine lib. 7. cap. 16. where it's manifest he speaks of the Penitents called â—ubstrati The form of prayer used for them after the Deacon had admonished the Church to pray for them by the Bishop is extant Constit Apost l. 8. c. 8 9. which being ended they went out of the Church-assembly The fourth degree was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when they that had repented were called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because they stood with the Faithful and went not out with the Catechumeni or the Penitents called Substrati Baron ibid. These were with the Faithful present at Prayers but were not admitted to the Holy Eucharist Conc. 1. Nic. Can. 11. they are said to partake of Prayers with the people but without oblation So Can. 12. ibid. Zonaras in Can. 4. 5. Concil Ancyr for which cause St. Ambrose said he could not offer if Theodosius would stand by Ambr. Ep. 28. The last degree of Penitents was of them who having fulfilled the time of repentance prescribed them by the Church were by her perfectly received and after the aforesaid offices of the Liturgy at which the Subsistentes were present they were admitted also to participate of the Lords Body and Bloud with the body of the Faithful Of which Zonaras Can. 4. 8. Concil Ancyran There are some that distinguish not the fourth degree of Penitents from the fifth But the Subsistentes are distinguished from these Can. 11. 1. Conc. Nic. where 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â— they were partakers of Prayer with the people without offering And so those that were placed in the last degree were superiour to those Penitents of the fourth degree because they were admitted together with the Faithful to partake of the mysteries Yet that I may ingeniously confess the truth the finishing of the repentance rather than the degree of Penitents is in this to be attended Now he that will apply his mind to weigh the aforesaid records of antiquity more narrowly shall easily observe who were to be present at all the exercises of Religion and who were excluded from the same or some of them by the custom of the Church while in the mean time the assembly of the Faithful after they were gathered into one performed all the aforesaid offices piously and with great devotion of mind But to speak of these a little in transitu is enough CHAP. XV. Of places in which the Churches publick assemblies were held WE have observed that meetings were gathered by the Church to perform the duties of Religion and we have seen what was done in them In the third place something remains to be added of the places in which these meetings were kept For a place is required where the people of God being gathered together may exercise themselves in the things that pertain to his publick worship And that some places designed to Divine Worship are necessary I trust no body will doubt for without them the publick assemblies of the Faithful the use of which is formerly shewn to worship God could not without inconvenience be held Therefore this place requireth that something be added of their names situation and use and other circumstances that declare these places But I will spare the labour of putting these things in writing lest I gaggling like a Goose amongst the Swans seem to stammer upon a subject which hath been happily treated on by other judicious men Others have managed the charge of describing this argument with great commendation Especially the Learned Hospinian a man of profound Learning and various Reading in his learned Treatise De Templis In which is described what is necessary to be known of places that are destined to the publick meetings of the Church which to me at this time is enough to point at And thus much for the publick exercises of Religion that were observed by the Church on the Lords Day CHAP. XVI Private Duties of Religion to be performed on the Lords Day Where first is considered the examination of what was heard Conferring upon the same Meditation of the life to come and gathering of Almes for the use of the poor THus far of the Sacred Exercises of Religion wherein the observation of this day was solemnized which were performed in the publick assemblies of the Church now follow the private Those were observed of sundry members of the Church being assembled together but these were devoutly performed by them when they were dismissed from the publick assembly For although they met publickly lest the disorderly meeting of the people should diminish their faith in Christ and to procure the greater gladness amongst them by a mutual seeing one another yet their publick Church meetings did not determine the sanctification of the Lords Day because publick conventions were held at certain hours and the Lords Day iâ— to be celebrated in memorial of that happy Resurrection of our Saviour on a perfect and entire day as we have shown in the first Book and fifth Chapter Some things then remain to be done by Christians after the Church meetings are ended and these are various Some whereof I will mention for the godlies sake who make conscience of sanctifying the Lords Day First of all they that preached the Word of God in the publick assemblies when those were ended they did sometimes examine the people of what they had heard Which we read the Ancients did perform with
great industry And for this cause Prosper De vita contempt lib. 2. cap. 2. contends it is that Bishops are called Watchmen Because they watch the actions of all men and with an aim of religious curiosity spie out how every one liveth with his houshold in his house how with his Citizens in the City what good men they approve they confirm by honouring them whom they observe to be vicious they amend by reproving them St. Prosper judged it to be the Bishops duty whom the Lord hath appointed to be the Watchmen of his Church not onely to attend preaching of the Word in the Church assembly but also when that was ended and the people dismissed diligently to observe the manners and conversation of the people that they might promote godliness if by any means they could while they excited those whom they saw to walk according to what they heard in publick to a farther progress in godliness and sharply admonished those that turned not what they heard into works Which office if ever we believe they did faithfully perform on the Lords Day which we may see in St. Chrysostome who when he observed any not to be attentive enough to his publick Treatises promised that he would when he had finished his Treating by interrogatories make tryal whether they retained what they had heard Homil. 4. in Hebr. Yea he tells them that when the assembly was dismissed he would discourse some time with his Auditors about what they had heard in the conclusion of Hom. 6. ad Pop. Antioch And elsewhere he declares the reason of his diligence Hom. 9. ad Pop. For saith he if it be no reproach for a Physician to ask his patient how it is with him neither is it amiss in us to be still inquiring about our Hearers salvation for we being thus advertised what to do and what to leave undone shall apply remedies according to congruous discipline And this diligence he calls a sollicitude not of curiosity but provision where by an argument from the less to the greater he illustrates the necessity of the aforesaid industry For if a Physician who attends the cure of a frail body doth diligently enquire of the state of his patients health after he hath administred his medicines why doth it not much more lye upon Bishops to whom the inspection of souls is committed ex officio to observe whether their people lead their life according to what they have heard after that they have prescribed unto them wholsome admonitions and exhortations whereby on every emergent occasion they may prescribe necessary remedies Chrysostom himself confesses that he undertook private labours in teaching some of his Hearers while he inculcated some things to them who entred communication with him privately Thus he speaks of himself Hom. prim de Lazaro It grieved St. Cyprian to the heart while he was in exile that he could not have liberty to go to every one that was committed to his care and to exhort them cording to the Ministry of the Lord and of his Gospel He commends the Presbyters and Deacons that supplied his place for strengthening all by their daily exhortations Ep. 40. If therefore Cyprian set upon all that were commended to his care with his exhortations and commended others that did the like he thought that something more after the Church-meetings were ended in which he could not go to them severally was to be done by him Possidonius in the Life of Austin chapter 12. mentions his private labours that he frequently undertook in instructing and exhorting the Catholick people All these vigilant Fathers did not onely propound the Word in Church meetings but also shewed us by their own example that it is privately to be inculcated upon the minds of the Hearers and their own testimonies teach us that this was done by them daily Secondly he that shall consult the Fathers touching the observation of the Lords Day will observe that they did frequently stir up their hearers to a religious meditation and discoursing of what they had heard in the publick assembly Chrysostom more than once doth labour what he can to perswade his hearers that after they are returned home from the Church friends among themselves parents with their children masters with their servants meditate and strive how they may do what they are taught Homil. 5. ad Pap. Antioch which he elegantly explains by divers similitudes Even as saith he many that depart out of a meadow do take a Rose or Violet or some such flower and carrying it about a while in their fingers do depart and others returning home out of an Orchard do carry the boughs of trees that bear fruit others again bring to their kinsfolks fragments of the table from sumptuous suppers so also thou when thou depart'st carry back an admonition to thy children wife and all thy kindred For this admonition is of more use than a meadow an orchard and a table These roses never wither this fruit never falls off these dishes never are marred Afterwards Think what a thing it is setting aside all other things both publick and private to be alwayes discoursing of Gods Laws at table and in the market and in other Conventicles c. Homil. 6. ad Populum Where by an induction of divers similitudes he declares what Christians are to do after they be returned home from the publick assembly namely that they conferr at home of what they heard in the Church In the beginning also of the second Homil. on John he requires of his hearers that they talk not only with one another publickly but at home of what they had heard and when he reproves those that went out of the Church who did not well remember what they had heard he prescribes this remedy for that malady namely that when they are return'd home they read the Holy Scriptures and call their wife and children together to confer of those things that were spoken It 's an excellent place which the Reader shall find lib. 5. chap. 12. We wish saith Origen that you would study what you have heard not onely hear the Word of God in the Church but in your houses be exercised and meditate in the Law of the Lord day and night for Christ is there and every where present to them that seek him From the fore-mentioned testimonies it appears that the Fathers treated seriously with their people to conferr among themselves of what they had heard Now if any one think that they meant conferring of what they had heard on other dayes than the Lords Dayes I doubt not but he is deceived that perswades himself of this For if they require of their Hearers to conferâ— of the Word heard on other dayes which he will not deny they did that looks into their writings do they therefore judge that the Word of God which was handled on the Lords Day must be forgotten Nothing less especially when elsewhere they counsel their hearers to conferr with