Null all Oaths of allegiance unless they will buy their Crownes of them and pay Tribute There is in our own English History a Manifest Example of the same in that noble King Henry the second who Complaines to his Parliament against the Bishops and the whole Clergy That in their Election of King Stephen his Predecessor who was a Collateral Heir they had imposed on him their own Conditions with all advantages to themselves whereby they Deprived his Mother Maud the Empress and him who was her issue and the right Lineal Heir of the Succession to the Crown And how they dealt with the People as well as with the King appears by the Complaint of the Lay-Nobility to the King at the same time That the Privileges of the Clergy hindred all Execution of Justice that the same could have no Passage through the Kingdom and having Exempted themselves from the Jurisdiction of the Magistrate there had been since the beginning of his Reign above an Hundred Man-slaughters Committed within the Realm of England by Priests and men within Holy Orders Dan. Hist 83. Such were the Fruits of Bishops and persons within Holy Orders and the three fine Knacks of Consecration Ordination and Excommunication wherewith they both Allured and Terrified the Superstitious People And such were the fruits of their pretended Divine Mission with the Olive Branch of Peace for tho Unction and Crowning of Kings who confected their Oyntment of the Ingredients mention'd in Psal 55.21 The words of his mouth were smoother than butter but War was in his heart his words were softer than oyle yet were they drawn swords 1. Of Gods Preservation of John Keysar notwithstanding his Excommunication and Delivery to Satan by an Arch-Bishop of Canterbury 2. Of Delivery to Satan by Bishops and their Prohibition to cast him out again by Fasting and Prayer without the Bishops Licence 3. All Excommunication and delivery to Satan by Bishops without a Sign of Mission from God if Malefice follow ought to be Punished as Witchcraft if not as a Cheat. 4. To grant a Bishop Power of Excommunication is to grant him Power to set up Idolatry to make all Sins equal to Pardon all Sins for Money Coke part 3.42 Ex Mich. 5. E. 4. Rot. 143. Coram Rege Keysar deliver'd to Satan protected by God John Keysar was Excommunicated by the greater Excommunication before Thomas Arch-Bishop of Canterbury and Legate of the Aposto lick See at the Suit of another for a reasonable part of Goods and so Remained Eight Months and the said Keysar openly affirmed That the said Sentence was not to be feared neither did he fear it and albeit the Arch-Bishop or his Commissary hath Excommunicated me yet before God I am not Excommunicated And he said he spoke nothing but the Truth And so it appeared for that the last Harvest standing so Excommunicate he had as great plenty of Wheat and other Grain as any of his Neighbours saying to them in scorn That a man Excommunicate should not have such Plenty of Wheat the Arch Bishop denying these words to be within the Statute of H. 4. concerning Lollards who were the Primitive Protestants and Protomartyrs of England did by his Warrant in writing comprehending the said Cause by Pretext of the said Statute Commit the Body of the said Keysar to the Gaol at Maidstone for that saith he in respect of publishing the said words Dictum Johannem non immerito habemus de Haeresi suspectum by reason whereof the said John Keysar was Imprison'd in Maidstone Gaol and in Prison detained under Custody of the Keeper there untill by his Councel he moved Sir John Markham then Chief-Justice Justice of England and other the Judges of the Kings-Bench to have an Habeas Corpus and thereupon as it ought a Habeas Corpus was granted upon which Writ the Gaoler Returned the Cause and Special Matter and withal according to the Writ had his Body there The Court upon mature Consideration and on Conference with Divines Resolved That upon the said words Keysar was not to be Suspect of Heresie within the said Statute as the Arch-Bishop took it and therefore the Court first Bailed him and after he was deliver'd for that the said Arch-Bishop had no Power by virtue of the said Act to Commit to Prison John Keysar hereby proved the Arch-Bishop to be no Incantor Messium but he thereby proved though he was no Witch yet he was a Cheat. Prohibition to cast out the Devil by Fasting and Prayer In the Book of Canons newly Printed 1673. the Canon 72. contains these words No Minister or Ministers shall without the Licence and Direction of the Bishop of the Diocess first had and obtained under his Hand and Seal attempt upon any pretence whatsoever either of Possession or Obsession by Fasting and Prayer to cast out any Devil or Devils under pain of Imputation of Imposture or Cozenage and Deposition from the Ministery The Bishops in prohibiting to cast out the Devil without their Licence imitate something the Popish Exorcists part of whose Exorcism is according to Mengus Flagell Daemon p. 36. The Exorcist ties a Stole about the Neck of the Party with three knots saying Oh ye Abominable and Rebellious Spirits I Adjure Conjure and Compell you wheresoever you have your Residence in this man by the Father and the Son and the Holy Ghost that ye immediately understand the words of my Conjuration and the virtue of it and that ye dare not depart from the Creature of God and Image of Christ without my Licence This is not only Anti-Protestant and the way to bring in all the Popish Magick and Exorcisms into the Church but is Anti-Christian for Christ himself affirms There is no holier or higher way of casting out the Devil than by Fasting and Prayer as appears Matth. 17.14 And when they were come to the multitude there came to him a certain man kneeling down to him and saying Lord have mercy on my Son for he is Lunatick and sore vexed for oft-times he falleth into the fire and oft into the water And I brought him to thy Disciples and they could not cure him And verse 18. And Jesus rebuked the Devil and he departed out of him and the Child was cured from that very hour Then came the Disciples to Jesus apart and said Why could not we cast him out And Jesus said unto them Because of your Vnbelief for verily I say unto you if ye have Faith as a grain of Mustard-seed ye shall say unto this Mountain Remove hence uâ—to yonder place and it shall remove and nothing shall be impossible unto you Howbeit this kind goeth not out but by Prayer and Fasting Christ agian will not suffer the Disciples to prohibit any to cast out the Devil as Mark 9.38 And John answered him saying Master we saw one casting out Devils in thy Name and we forbad him because he followed not us But Jesus said Forbid him not for there is no man that shall
Men to the height whom he himself if an Enemy appears in his Year is to lead in Person against him 8. The greater the number of Judges the greater the delay in the Proceedings 9. The greater number of Judges the more difficult to obtain Remedy against those of them who Judg wrong for they conceal their names as the Lords of the Session of Scotland being Fifteen and sometimes Eighteen compel the President to sign their Sentence in his name A. B. I. P. C. that is in praesentia Curiae though it be contrary to his Vote whereby it is as impossible to discover who gave the wrong Sentence as 't is in a Jury who gave the wrong Verdict deliver'd by the Mouth of their Foreman So in Athens the Court of the Areopagites were in number Twelve and they gave their Sentence into a Balloting Box by Black Beans and White Beans whereby it was impossible to know who gave the unjust Sâ—ntence on which Plutarch mentions a passage of Alcibiades who being sent for home out of Sicily to Athens to be question'd for his Life Fugam fecit and being askt by one saying Wilt thou not trust thy own Countrey who begat thee to be thy Judg No quoth he nor her who brought me forth lest she being Ignorant and not conceiving the Truth mistake a Black Bean for a White Amongst oâ—hers was the Custom to do it with Black and White Stones as Ovid Mos erat Antiquis niveis atrisque lapillis His damnare reos illis absolvere culpa They Sentenced with Stones of Black and White That know thou mightst not who Judged Wrong or Right 10. The Appeal must be to double the number as from a Jury of Twelve to a Jury of Four and Twenty which makes double the danger amongst so many they all concealing their Names in giving their Verdict as well as the first Jury 11. When a Jurisdiction is divided to two Judges which might have been exercised by one by the Interfereing of the divided Jurisdictions a man is pull'd to pieces to pay Tribute for the same Cause to both as between the Chancery and the Common Law Courts between the Kings-Bench and Common-Pleas one on Indictment of Trespass the other for Action of Trespass for the same offence so between the Common Law Courts and the Episcopal Courts a man is not only put to double Costs but is twice punish'd for the same offence and all Jurisdictions in the hands of several Judges will interfere except such as are divided by Territory and no other respect as the Jurisdiction of one County-Court is divided from another by Territory the County Palaâ—ines from the Westminster Courts by the Territory bounding them the Admiralty from the Common Law Courts by the Territory cover'd with the Sea 12. Where one Judg is sufficient to perform the Office of many with greater Expedition and Justice a multitude of Judges must be then a vast Charge to the Publick and a Prejudice as if to Justice the Romans had appointed Twelve Judges for every Province where one alone discharged the same it had been enough to have exhausted the Treasure of an Empire it is manifest that but three Judges only iâ— Westminster one in the Kings-Bench the other in the Common-Pleas and the third in the Exchequer let them have but the Jurisdiction of Fact Law and Equity as they ought to have may with as exact Justice and greater Expedition than now is done discharge all the Offices of the Twelve Judges of the Kings-Bench Common-Pleas and Exchequer save the labour of the Prerogative Court of Arches Court of Audience Court of Faculties Court of Peculiars Consistory Courts Court of the Arch-Deacon or his Commissary the Court of Delegates and all Episcopal Courts and Offices and likewise save the Labour and Charge of a distinct Chancery and of all original Writs and of all Commissions of Rebellion and of all Outlawries of all the intolerable Slavery of Sheriffs in making Pannels and of Free-holders serving in Juries and of Nisi Priuses and of Councels speaking to matters of Fact before Juries And that three Judges are sufficient to do this and many matters more I speak by experience for there were but four English Judges sent into Scotland and sometimes there were but three and sometimes but two there the other serving in Parliaments as they fell out and occasion required and we discharged all the Offices of Lords of the Session Lords of the Exchequer and of the Justitiar General in his Justice-Eir and in his particular Justice-Courts which did answer all the Offices and Power of the Judges in Westminster of the Chancery Kings-Bench Common-Pleas and Exchequer and of the Justices of Gaol-Delivery in their Circuit and besides these we Discharged the Commission for Plantation of Kirks through all Scotland and were Visitors of the Universities there were Judges likewise of the Seisures of all Ships except English Importing any Goods of the Production of Asia Africa America or Europe contrary to an Act made 1651. Cap. 22. for Increase of Shipping and encouragement of Navigation we likewise Discharged a Commission of Claims and a Commission for moderating the Fines laid on Persons who had been in Hostility to a Third part we likewise Discharged a Commission to Elect all Chief Officers in the Boroughs and made all the Sheriffs of Scotland yet had we not above Six Hundred Pound per Annum for all this and about Two Hundred Pounds to bear the Charge of a Circuit which was no profit to us but spent in entertainments for the Publick Honour neither did we take any Present Treat or Entertainment from the Sheriffs though of our own making and much less any Bribe or so much as Esculenta or Poculenta from them or any other now that which made it possible to us to Discharge so many Courts Offices and Commissions was that we were saved the labour of having Causes tossed and tumbled from Chancery to Common Law the Chancery and Common Law being there united and Pleas of Equity admitted in the same Court and there being no Juries in Civil Actions the same Persons were Judges of Fact Law and Equity another cause was that there were no Original Writs but the more compendious and just way of Summons used by serving the Defendant with a Copy of the Declaration another cause was that Councel could not speak to matter of Fact in Civil Actions before Juries or at Nisi Priuses there being none nor was so much as one of them suffer'd to speak or appear at the Bar when the Depositions of Witnesses are Advising or Reading as they do with us at Chancery-Hearings to the intolerable charge of Suitors and destruction of Justice and Equity another cause was that the Councel first excepted to the Law which we call a Demurrer and after that to the Fact which we call a Plea and had that liberty given both to demur and plead which kept the way so clear before them that they had never
the Servandes of the House or other famous Witnesse and sall execute their Offices and Charge and thereafter sall offer the Copie of the saidis Letters or Precept to ony of the Servands quhilk gif they refuse to do that they affix the samin upon the Èœett or Dure of the Persones Summoun'd and siklike gif they get na entress they first knockand at the Dure Sex Knockes they sall execute their Office before famous Witnesse at the said House and dwelling place and affix the Copie upon the Èœett or Dure thereof as said is quhilk sall be leiful and sufficient Summounding and delivering of the Copie and the Party and Officiar sall not be halden to give ony usher Copie bot at their awin pleasure And every Officiar in his Indorsation sall make mention of his awin Execution in manner fore said and the Partie at quhais instance the Letter or Precept is direct sall pay to the Officiar Executour the Expenses of the Copie affixed as said is and sall be taxed and given again to him the giving of the Decreet or Sentence gif he happenis to obteine And gif the Officiar heis foundin culpable in the Execution of his Office he sall be put in our Soveraine Lordis Prison and punished in his Person and Gudes at the Kingis Grace Will. Coke 4. part 99. saith The Common Pleas may in many cases proceed against their own Officers by Bill without Writ and why may not all the Subjects have the same Right as well as the Officers of the Common Pleas In London before the Mayor and Aldermen Debt and Personal Actions are determined by Bill without Writ City-Law 3. And so are Assises of Nusance ib. 4. and why may they not by Copy of the Bill be commenced better than by Writ over all the Kingdom The mischiefs of Original Writs from the Chancery Besides the Delays of Original Writs and Process by remoteness of Courts whither they are to be sent for and by the multiplications of Aliases and Pluries and the manifold dangers when gotten and executed to be again overthrown and nullified by Abatements for a multitude of frivolous Causes and Formalities and likewise for so many sorts of Variances as before mention'd of all which the Declaration might have been free if no Writ had preceded 1. It is excepted against Writs that Declarations are not amendable and it costs many times so much in amending the Misprision of Clerks in their Writs that the Plaintiff if he is not so poor as not to be able were better abate his own Writs and Declaration himself and pay Costs and buy Twenty new Writs than get one of the old amended 2. Writs Original are altogether useless except to get Money for nothing 3. They are saleable contrary to Magna Charta Nulli vendemus Justitiam and the Civil Law for Lege Julia tenetur repetundarum qui accepit aliquid ob Judicem delegatum dandum mutandum vel ob non dandum c. And what doth a Writ of Right a Justicies or any Original do besides but assign a Delegat Judg to hear the Cause in the Kings-Bench or Common-Pleas or Lords-Court or County-Court Then 't is contrary to Equity the Plaintiff should be compell'd to buy a Writ which is not only useless but pernicious to his Declaration and puts it in ten times more danger to be overthrown than if he might as he ought be permitted to use it without a Writ and the Plaintiff being to deliver a Copy of his Declaration Expensis Actoris to the Defendant 't is no reason he should be at any expence to pay Clerks for Writs impertinent 4. As to the Writ in Chancery of Subpaena Mischiefs of the Chancery Writ of Subpaena which is to be distinguished from the Writs to the Common Law Courts it is contrary to Magna Charta Nulli negabimus Justitiam for if a Poor man Sue a Noble-man there a Chancellour will deny a Poor man his terrible Writ which he uses to grant under a Hundred Pound Penalty in Terrorem Pauperum and he shall get no more of him if he do that at a greater price than the Writ would have cost but a poor begging Letter to the Noble-man to send his Answer to the Complaint against his Oppression which is no other than to bring into England the old Slavery of Rome whereby no Slaves were permitted to Sue their Lords before the Pretor or any other Judg were their Tyranny over them never so great and unjust What a wretched dishonour is it to Publick Justice which heretofore was blind to the Person that she turns now blind to the Cause and who heretofore carried the Sword in her hand Parcere Subjectis debellare superbus to have now lost her Sword and got a Crutch to become only a blind Beggar when she is to approach the Gates of Nobles neither is there any Law of God or man in England to justifie a Chancellour that he shall presume to use a different process of Concumacy against the Commons Chancellour hath no Power to Imprison Commons any more than Lords which he dares not use against the Lords for if it be not lawful for him to Issue Attachments or Commissions of Rebellion against the Lords or to imprison them then is it not lawful for him to Issue Attachments or Commissions of Rebellion against the Commons for both are equally Interested in Magna Charta and the Petition of Right not to be imprison'd without the lawful Judgment of their Peers and they being both Allies and Confederates by the said Acts to maintain the Commons Liberty The Liberty of the Commons is the Out-work which preserves the Liberty of the Lords if the Commons be Invaded though for the present such Invasion touch not the Lords yet when it hath destroyed the Liberty of the Commons the Lords will not be able to defend theirs when their Allies are lost The Liberty of the Commons is the Outwork which preserves the Liberty of the Lords the Liberty of the People is the Outwork which preserves the Liberty of the Parliament the Liberty of the Subjects is the Outwork which preserves the Safety of the King and as Solomon saith Prov. 20.28 Mercy and Truth preserve the King and if contrariorum contraria est ratio Cruelty and Fictions of Writs of Subpoena's in Chancery Latitats in Kings-Bench and Capiases without Summons in Common-Pleas wherewith they abuse the Kings name in false imprisonments of his Subjects without Crime or Cause destroys the prisonments of his Subjects without Crime or Cause destroys the Safety of the King himself and in a Case between the Duke of Lenox and the Lord Clifton M. 10. Jac. Though a Lord was not to be Committed for Contempt in a Poor mans Case yet in this Case between two Lords Chancellour Egerton said If Noble-men will commit Contempts they are to be Committed Now that the Imperial Power which hath been usurped by Chancellors to imprison the
Moral Law of God of Truth and Equity neither if these Writs were Formed according to the Truth and Equity of the Moral Law of God is it possible a sufficient number should be Formed for Writs are finite and Cases of Equity infinite and not to be put in Writs or written except by God in the Fleshly Tables of the Heart and in the Spiritual Tables of the Soul it self and Conscience It will be asked How could they subsist before H. 6. without a Sub paena and Equity from a Chancellour seeing the Common Law Writs could not supply it and what expedient is there now how Equity may be supplied To which I answer That Equity was then supplied by the Writ of Right and Justicies the Titles of both which Writs signifie Equity and likewise other Writs and the General Issues Formed on them of the Meer Right Not Guilty Null Tort Null dissersint Nihil debet guided the Jury to find according to Right and Equity by the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Law of Man till the Judges to wrest the Power belonging to Jurors into their own hands brought in the Tender of the Demy mark to turn the Issue of meer Right into a Possessary Issue and instead of Truth brought in the Pictions of Colours destroyed the Justicies by Writs of Remover gave way to false Laying of Counties in Transitory Actions changed Venues granted new Trials abated Declarations for Variance from the Bond and not Sueing for what was paid as well as for what was not granting Arrests of Judgment after Verdict and not permitting to demur first to the Law and after to plead to the Fact before Verdict prohibited on the Issue Not Guilty matters of Justification to be given in Evidence admitted Demurs to Evidence admitted special Verdicts caused Juries to be of an even and not of an odd number and the Verdict not to be according to the Plurality of Votes and many other ways they had to weary Juries from giving a Verdict according to Conscience and Equity or when they had so given it to same I conclude therefore to compell men to Commence Suites by Writs in the present Age is to condemn them without Hearing of the Equity and Merits of their Cause and to compell them to revive again those Ancient Writs and trie Equity by Juries hath many great inconveniences before mention'd to be incident to all Writs especially such as are Antiquated and not understood but all these mischiefs are salved by Commencing Suites by a Copy of the Declaration Sworn in stead of a Writ which cannot be Sworn and a Judg Commissionated with Jurisdiction of Fact Law and Equity under Appeal which single Judg in a Court by himself sitting without Vacation as a Chancellour hath Power to do will no doubt be able to dispatch more Causes without troubling any Writs Juries or Councel at the Bar and more justly and under Account in one Year then 't is possible for any Chancellour with Plurality of Offices or Court with Plurality of Judges Juries and Councel at the Bar to do in Seven 6. Men are condemned before Hearing on the Capias Vtlagatum and Excommunicato Capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunicato Capiendo against Imprisonment before Hearing A Papist and a Protestant Who used when they met to Rant About the Altar and the Rail Were both together Clapt in Gaol The first was catch'd by an Outlawry The last whose Conscience did vary From Bishops and their Common Prayer As Felon or a false Betrayer Was therefore Excommunicate And put to beg within a Grate Pap. Brother then quoth the Papist sad Are Protestants too grown so mad To have an Inquisition here Who thus can though no cause appear Forfeit our Goods and Selves at will In Prisons cold to starve and kill Before they Hear us doest not know Amongst our selves it is not so Who by Experience wiser grown Will Inquisition now have none Witness the Rich Venetian And wary Dutch who late began For Liberty against such Lords And Swisse with their two handed Swords For this Proud Aragon Rebell d And Naples Silk-men hardly quell'd And many more abhor'd such Tricks Yet are they all good Catholicks So Holland justly now prevents Imprisonment of Innocents And makes to help the Poor opprest Before a Judgment no Arrest Is this the Charta and of Right Petition for which you fight That every ' Torney and his Clerk Who use to live upon the shark Forge all the Outlawries they please Remedies worse than the Disease And that Poor men may be betray'd First Forge the County where 't is laid They Forge and Antedate the Writs Of Parchment cut in little Bits Then next they Forge the Sheriffs name And Forge Returns upon the same They Proclamations Forge and Feign And Exigends next without pain And all this Knavery you may spie Page Sixth of the Academy Which is their Mother and their Nurse Teachers to Forge and Steal of course Such Clerks deserve hanged to be As Nicholas Clerks upon a Tree And thus though made them to prevent They fool all Acts of Parliament For no Averment must deny The Shrieve or Clerk although they lie Is this the Liberty so proud You use to cry it up aloud And Property you so much Vant That every Papist it doth want What Purgatory can you tell Is worse than this on Earth your Hell Or what Hell is there more worth fearing Than Your Damnation without Hearing He neither shews me Time or Place Nor Witnesses brought Face to Face My Goods are all Confiscated My very Wives and Children's Bed The Bailies Seised without account Of Price to what they did amount Or Witness Writings Boxes Chest And Money too on a Suggest And Lies and Fictions in worse case I am than Felons in this Place Their Goods although the Law is strict Not Forfeit are until Convict But left to feed them Oh the blest Justice is shewn to men distrest By Protestants who only you Say have the Religion true But Christ says Know them by their Works Which shews you worse than Jews or Turks I have not left a Bit of Bread Witness these unfeign'd Tears I shed The Plaintiff asks of me a Sum As at the Dreadful Day of Doom I answer shall and God doth know I do not him a Farthing ow Yet can I not although I try Be brought to answer or deny His Forged Stuff or see the Face Of Judg or Jury on the Place But here to perish am designed And to this Dungeon confined Unless I give what e're he 'l ask This is my miserable Task I think you now turn Witches too The Rogues the mischief who did do To bring me here sure had a Spell What Language 't was I cannot tell 'T was written in a little scrow Half-words and dash't that none might know Or ratâ—er scratch'd it was in Soot With Devils Claw or Cloven Foot Prot.
and no Certificate of Bishops hath power to take that right from them 7. Here the wantonness of Widows is forbidden who are for new Husbands as soon as the old is put in his Grave whereby who are Fathers of their Children is made uncertain 8. Here is no false Fathering of Children on those who are within four Seas 9. Here is no punishing Men twice for one offence once by the Temporal Court and then by the Spiritual Court or contrary punishments by contrary Courts one by the Contentious Court and another by the Penitential Court 10. Here is no Auricular Confession of their Wives or Daughters by Priests in Temples or Chambers and defiling thereby of their Families 11. Here is no punishing of Women for bringing forth Children nor the Murders of so many Infants caused thereby as by the Papist Laws is continually done Yet I conclude though the Law of the Turk is far better than that of the Pope and shall rise in Judgment against such as plant his Canons in their Courts in defiance of the Law of God and Nature I think neither a fit Rule to judge Marriage Legitimation or Succession by CHAP. V. Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession not to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws THE Question is Whether Marriage Legitimation and Succession ought to be judged by Ecclesiastical Laws No English Lawyer can mention my Lord Coke without great honour but how he came so biass'd as to endeavour to set up Papal and Episcopal Laws under the name of Regal appears not Object 1 It is objected by Coke lib. 5.1 part 40. in Cawdryes Case That the Kingdom of England is an absolute Monarchy and if the King cannot Authorize by his Commission or Writ Ecclesiastical Judges to determin and judg those great and important Causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy by Certificate of the Bishop who is the Ecclesiastical Witness and Judg both of Fact and Law and by the Canon Laws which by use and custom are now our Ecclesiastical Laws Then he is disabled to be supreme Governour of this Realm in all Spiritual things or Causes as well as Temporal according to the Oath of Supremacy due to him And that he could not then cause Justice to be administred to his Subjects in these so great and important causes of Matrimony Divorce and general Bastardy on which depends the strength of mens Descents and Inheritances This I conceive though not in the same words yet in sence and substance to be the weight of my Lord Coke's Argument whereby he would make use of Marriage as one means amongst his many other to set up an Ecclesiastical Law and Judg over the Temporal Freeholds and Inheritances and other Birth-rights of the Subjects To which is answer'd First As to the words Absolute and Supream I suppose he intended no such absolute Monarchy or Supremacy as is not under the Law of God though it be not so express'd in the form of the Oath of Supremacy For though Regum timendorum in proprios greges Ecclesiastical Laws not needful to the King's Supremacy but hurtful Reges in ipsos imperium est Jovis then I think he doth not intend it to be above the Law of the Land seeing the King himself by his Oath is pleased to oblige himself to his People to govern according to that Law where it is not contrary to the Law of God Then as to the pretended want of Power of doing Justice concerning causes of Free-hold and Inheritance depending on marriage except by Ecclesiastical Laws and Judges that is very strange for how was Justice done in the times of Primitive Christianity for many Hundred Years after Christ when neither Bishops or any other Ecclesiastical Judges ever pretended Jurisdiction todetermin Temporal Right or Propriety but left the same to be judged by the Imperial Laws How was Justice done in the time of Henry the Second when the Jurisdiction of all Matrimonial causes remained in the Temporal Courts Richard the First his Son being the first as Matthew Paris writes whom the Clergy got by his publick Edict to give the Jurisdiction of Power and Gifts by reason of Marriage and of all Matrimonial causes to the Bishops Courts and the same Richard likewise gave them Jurisdiction of all breach of Faith Promises and Oaths whereby if much of the Power so rashly granted had not been by him so speedily resumed they had hookt to themselves the whole Jurisdiction from the King's Courts of all Contracts and Conveyances Bonds and Obligations as well as Marriages concerning Temporal Goods and Inheritances And why cannot general as well as special Bastardy be tryed at Common Law And how likewise are all Rights depending on all Marriages made during the late Civil Wars by pretence of any Ordinance of Parliament made by 12. Car. 2. cap. 33. to be tryed by a Jury and the Common Law and not by Certificate of the Bishop or any Ecclesiastical Judg to the advancement and not prejudice of Justice and a far greater expedition and advantage to the same would it be if by the like Act the Jurisdiction of all Marriages and Legitimations as it was in the time of Henry the Second were again restored to the Common-Law-Courts So likewise anciently Bastardy alledged in an Action of Trespass was triable by Jury but now usurped by Bishops as well in personal as real Actions 4. Edw. 4.35 Object 2 Coke lib. 5.1 part in the same case of Cawdry it is further alledged Circumspectè agatis gives no Jurisdiction of Marriage to Bishops That the Statutes of Circumspectè agatis made 13. Eliz. 1. of Articuli Cleri made 9. E. 2. Anno Domini 1315. of 15. E. 3. Cap. 6. of 31. E. 3. Cap. 11. give Jurisdiction of marriage to Bishops To which is answer'd That in the Statute of Circumspectè agatis there is not a word mention'd of marriage but only by it Jurisdiction is given to the Bishops of Fornication and Adultery which is not Marriage but rather Anti-marriage for Marriage is an Ordinance of God Fornication and Adultery are Ordinances of the Devil and whereas before the Jurisdiction of Fornication and Adultery as acknowledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 488. was in Leets under the name of Letherwit or more properly Lecherwit yet had Leets never Jurisdiction of Marriage or Divorce neither consequently could Bishops have it from them As for Articuli Cleri and the other Statutes there is not a word in them concerning Marriage nor so much as of Fornication and Adultery the Jurisdiction therefore pretended was never given by any Statute Linwood likewise expounds the words of the Statute of Circumspectè agatis which gives Bishops Jurisdiction of all deadly Sins as Fornication and Adultery and the like Non intelligas de omni peccato mortali sed de tali cujus punitio spectat merè ad forum Ecclesiasticum nam si de ratione cujuslibet peccati mortalis cognosceret Ecclesia sic periret temporalis gladii Jurisdictio
no Jurisdiction but by Usurpation of so Temporal a Right as Marriage before this Statute let any who thinks he can see Nine Miles into a Milstone once more look into the Statute of Merton before recited and try whether he can screw out of it any word giving the Bishops either a Jurisdiction of Marriage or general Bastardy or that this Statute ever forged so rude a Romish Tool as the two edged Sword of general and special Bastardy to divide the living Child or tear it in peices between the Bishop and the Temporal Judg or how it was then consistent with a Legale Judicium parium to expose a Child no Alien but the King 's Native Subject to be tried for all he had by a then Foraign Ecclesiastical Law and a Judg a sworn Canonical Subject to a Foraign Pope or that the wisdom of that Parliament intended to coin a Chimera of a Distinction without a difference of general and special Bastardy which neither they themselves understood nor any Lawyers which write to this day give any sensibly Interpretation or agree amongst themselves concerning it or that they who made the Statute to oppose the Bishops Jurisdiction of Marriage should create a Notion of general Bastardy which le Scrope says was not in Esse before to give them a new Jurisdiction which was to change the Laws of England which they positively refuse in the Statute it self to change Object 4 No Similitude of fetching the Laws of Athens to Rome and bringing the Romish Laws to England It is further alledged by Coke lib. 5.1 part 9. That as the Romans fetching divers Laws from Athens yet being approved and allowed by the State there they were called Jus Civile Romanorum And as the Normans borrowing all or most of their Laws from England yet baptized them by the name of the Laws and Customs of Normandy So albeit the Kings of England derived their Ecclesiastical Laws from others yet so many as were approved and allowed hereby and with general consent are aptly and rightly called the King's Ecclesiastical Laws o. England To which is answer'd That there is no similitude between making or changing the Laws of the Athenians which were Foraign Laws to become the Laws of the Romans and the making or changing either the Foraign Papal or native Provincial Canons or Ecclesiastical Laws into the King's Ecclesiastical Laws of England For First The Athenian Laws before they were made Denizons of Rome were not admitted in cumulo but Articulated and every Article examined one by one by the Decem viri or Ten Men as our usurped Ecclesiastical Laws were appointed to have been done by the Statute of 25 Hen. 8.19 by the Two and Thirty Men and likewise in time of Edward the Sixth by others but neither succeeded before the same was received for a Roman Law Secondly Such Athenian Laws as were pickt or garbled from the rest were by the Authority of the Legislative Power of Rome both Senate and People caused to be writ in Twelve Tables and inacted to be the Laws of Rome but in England there was never by Authority any Articulation selecting or garbling of Canon Laws effected nor the same reduced into Tables Written or Printed by any Act of Parliament Ecclesiastical Laws in an unknown Language Thirdly The selected Athenian Laws were written in the Roman Language to be understood by the People before they would be received as Roman Laws but there is no such thing in the Ecclesiastical Laws of the Holy-Church concerning Marriage or any thing else but they all still remain in the Language of the Beast and can be neither call'd the Laws of the Church which by the Scripture are forbidden to be spoke in an unknown tongue as appears 1 Cor. 14.19 It is said In the Church I had rather speak five words with my understanding that by my voice I might teach others also then ten thousand words in an unknown tongue It is as utterly unlawful therefore to make that a Law of the Church or an Ecclesiastical Law of Marriage which is in the unknown Language of Latin as it had been to have made any form of Prayer taken from the Romish Church though the Pater Noster it self the form of Prayer of the Church of England while it was in Latin for the Minister would then have been a Barbarian to the English man and the English-man a Barbarian to him and it is as bad for the poor English-man for his Law-sutes in Latin for a Wife in the Court of Arches and other Ecclesiastical Courts as it would be if his Prayers were again in Latin in the Church For though he pay his Lawyers dear to plead his Cause there he cannot understand for his Money whether they call him and his Wife Rogue and Whore or honest People or whether the Judg by his Sentence will give him his Wife or take her from him but by the implicit Faith of an Interpreter as let any one look on the Sentence of Divorce in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 E. he may understand or not understand the same Ecclesiastical Laws are not the Laws of the Land Fourthly The Athenian Laws were not obtruded on the Romans by Conquest of their Bodies by the Temporal Sword or their Souls by the Spiritual Sword of Excommunication but the Ecclesiastical Laws of Marriage have been obtruded on England ever since the Conquest by the superstitious Terrors or actual force of Excommunication either Papal or Episcopal and never by consent in Parliament The suffering of an oppression therefore is no consent nor an abuse against Law an Use Custom or Law neither can a wicked Oppression Use Custom or Law in name only be turned into a Law of England except by consent in Parliament or other humane Power besides it is by the very before recited Statute of Merton declared That the Laws of the Church are not the Laws of England for when the Bishop quarrel'd that the Law of England as to Marriage was not according to the Law of the Church and would have had them changed into the Law of the Church the Earls and Barons with one voice answer'd We will not change the Laws of England Whereby it 's plain the Laws of England and Laws of the Church are opposite Laws and not the same and this is confessed by Coke himself in the exposition of his Statute of Merton 2 part Inst fol. 98. where he saith Here our Common Laws are aptly and properly called the Laws of England because they are appropriated to this Kingdom of England as most apt and fit for the Government thereof and have no dependence upon any Foraign Law whatsoever no not on the Civil or Canon Law other then in Cases allowed by the Laws of England and therefore he saith the Poet spake truly hereof Et penitus toto divisos orbe Britannos So as the Law of England is proprium quarto modo to the Kingdom of England therefore Foraign Precedents are
just cause by Divorce one of another without publishing the cause and if there be no cause amongst the Children by taking away as much of their Portions as the offence deserves and giving the same to the innocent Children and by good instruction reproofs and virtuous example of the Parents which will prevent more offences in Children then Tribunals can ever reform though they have Witnesses So Lycurgus by commanding in his Laws That all Captains of Armies and Priests of Temples should marry and that Husbands themselves should come to their Wives Furtim verecunde and the Children be modestly Educated left Sparta so clean from unchast demeanour that when Geradas an old Spartan was asked by a stranger What was the Punishment of Adultery in Sparta for he could find no Law made by Lycurgus concerning that Crime Oh Friend says he There is no Adulterer with us When he reply'd But what if there should be any Geradas told him He should pay a Bull so big as should be able to stretch his Neck over Taygetus and Drink of Eurotas when the other laughing said There is not such a Bull to be found Neither quoth Geradas Is an Adulterer to be found in Sparta where Riches Luxury and wantoness of Apparel are counted a disgrace and Modesty and Obedience to Magistrates an Honour Where the Seminaries of Vices are not permitted how can Vices grow First Therefore as to Man and Wife as Bodin lib. 1. cap. 3. says Nothing seems more pernicious then to compel the cause of Divorce to be shewn before a Judg for in so doing the honour of one or both Parties is hazarded which would not be if neither of them were compel'd to prove the same before a Judg as Plutarch in Alcib relates That when the Wife of Alcibiades went to complain of him before the Judg he came after her into the Court and took her by force and carried her away home on his Shoulders Ne Secreta Fori Panderet whereat the Judg only smiled The Hebrews likewise used to make their Bills of Divorce without a cause neither is it prohibited by Christ if there were a true cause to put her away by private Bill without publick Tribunal or Judg for such were all the Bills of Moses and no publick Judg required to judg of the Cause but only the Conscience of the Party And Joseph having a just cause of suspicion against Mary his Wife did not bring her before a Judg and is commended for so doing to be a just man as Matth. 1.19 is said Then Joseph her Husband being a just man and not willing to make her a publick Example was minded to put her away privily So doth Plutarch in Aemil. relate of Paulus Aemilius Who according to the Custom of the Romans shewed no cause of putting away his Wife but affirmed her very honest wife and nobly descended and by whom he had also many fair Children but when he was press'd by her Friends to shew the cause why he would then Divorce he shewed them his Shoo which was very handsomely and well made and yet says he None of you know but my self feeleth where it wrings my Foot By which doing the Woman is not dishonour'd but may marry with another suitable to her quality and the same liberty had the Wives to divorce themselves from their Husbands without proving or shewing any cause before a publick Judg. This likewise preserves the repute of the Children who though innocent will likewise perpetually bear the reproach if the dishonour either of their Father or Mother be publish'd before a Judg. And further as to drawing the secret offences of uncleanness of Children especially of Daughters before a Judg who are under the Family Jurisdiction either of Father or Mother or Husband the same is an undoing to those who offend for though they never so much repent and amend yet there can be no repairing of their shame or name when publish'd and the innocent who are the Father and Mother and Husband and the other Children the dishonour can never be taken again from them Seneca therefore who in all other things was a great honourer of the virtue of Augustus yet blames as a great oversight in that wise Emperour that he punished the Adulteries of his Daughter Julia publickly by Banishment Quae potius saith he Principi tacenda quà m vindicanda sunt Secondly It makes every petty difference between Man and Wife irreconcilable and heightens Contention from a small spark by blowing it abroad to so great a flame that it is at last unquenchable for the publishing of many things neither criminous nor sinful may affect some modest Natures with as deep a sence of disgrace as those that are false as much as those that are true and when once published cannot by repentance be again revoked but may cause such hatred between the Parties as will never again admit them to live together Thirdly Where offences are not published they oft times may with honour be forgiven and the Parties reconciled which if publish'd cannot So Antonius Pius forgave the Adultery of Faustina and would not draw it to publick Judgment to prevent his own shame And Ael Spart writes That the Emperour Adrian did the like to his Empress who though he suspected yet put not away but only removed such Courtiers from his Court as he suspected Of the Law compelling Persons Married though mortal Enemies to Cohabitation Another great mischeif is in the Ecclesiastical Laws they compel Cohabitation of Men and Women when they are mortal Enemies and take off Exequenda Matrimonialia Officia and due benevolence when one insidiates for the life of the other of which take Bodin further Fol. 19. but says he If the Cause seem not sufficient to the Judg which he intends the Cause alledged of Divorce to an Ecclesiastical Judg or be not well proved it is therefore meet to inforce the Parties to live together in that Society which is of all other the straightest Test having always the one and the other the object of their grief still before their Eyes Truly says he I am not of that opinion for seeing themselves brought into extream servitude fear and perpetual discord hereof ensue Adulteries and oftentimes Murthers and Poisonings for the most part to men unknown And for this cause free Divorce to both Parties and non-Cohabitation was permitted by the Roman Laws not out of wantonness but out of the greatest necessity and Piety for preservation of those ends for which Marriage was instituted with the least danger and dishonour that might be to either Party wherein they must of necessity suffer if either free Divorce be tolerated or the examination of the causes of the same drawn to publick Tribunals One cause Cato the Censor complains of for which the freedom of Divorce and non-Cohabitation ought to be permitted was because he used to say That all Adulteresses were Poisoners and this likewise appears by Valer. Max. lib. 2. p. 8. where it is thus
Children the same ought to be wholly and intirely performed to such Sons and Daughters in all Successions whether to a Testament or an Intestate And in short that they ought not to be made unlike other Children in Successions whom Nature hath made like Hence it appears that the Civil Law wills the Succession of Children shall be according to the Law of Nature and not according to any Canon Law or Law made by the Priest Natura duce errare nullo modo potest Tul. 1. de leg Cum vero parentibus rediti deinde Magistris traditi sumus tum ita variis imbuimur erroribus ut vanitati veritas opinioni confirmatae natura ipsa cedit 3. Tusc Where nature is our Guide it is impossible to err but when we fall into the hands of Parents and are delivered to Shool-Masters we are then infected with so many Errors that all truth gives place to vanity and Nature it self yields to opinion accustomed To fight against Nature is like Giants to fight against God Cato major Of the Final Causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature The Final causes of Marriage which is the Ordinance of God and not of Man are not to fill Priests pockets with money or to satisfie their insatiable Covetousness and Ambition to set their Foot on the Necks of Emperours and Kings in their Legitimations and Successions and thereby to dispose of the Kingdoms of Princes and the Liberty Propriety and Goods of the Subjects at their Arbitrary will and pleasure But the Final causes of Marriage by the Law of God and Nature are three 1. Procreation of Children 2. That Man might have an Help-meet for him there being many necessities especially in time of sickness wherein Man cannot be without the help of a Woman 3. To make his life more pleasant and delightful Tristis sine conjuge lectus As for the first part which is the greatest and chiefest end of Marriage namely procreation of Children without which the World cannot be continued To be the shorter I shall only mention one Poet as follows Providei ille maximus mundi-Parens Cùm tam rapaces cerneret fati minas Vt damna semper sobole repararet nova Excedat agedum rebus humanis Venus Quae supplet ac restituit exhaustum genus Orbis jacebit squalido turpis situ Vacuum sine ullis classibus stabit mare Alesque Coelo deerit silvis fera Solis Aer pervius ventis erit Sen. in Hippol. Fates cruel Threats when the great Parent saw Against his Creatures by as great a Law He then Inacted all those whom it slew Sould by new Births perpetually renew Should Venus lease and should not still restore With fresh Supplies Natures exhausted store On squalid Earth no Beauty would remain No gallant Fleets would dance upon the Main No Deer in Woods no Birds would be in Skie Winds only through sad Air would sighing flie There could be neither King nor Parliament nor People nor Governours nor Governed neither could the Protestant Religion defend it self against Pope or Turk without Marriage for though it be Apocrypha it is truly said Esdras 4.15 Women have born the King and all the People that bear rule by Sea or Land The End of the First Book THE CONTENTS Of the Second Book BY what Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession ought not and ought to be Judged Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2 The Magistrate 3. The Souldier 4 The Parents 5. The King and Parliament 137 Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative ib. Except 1. They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of the King and Parliament ib. Of the Sign of Mission required by the Grand Seignior from Sabatai Sevi a counterfeit Jewish Messiah 139 2. They have falsely translated the Scripture in all words relating to Marriage 142 They have falsely translated Ish Isha Zona Kadesh Philiegesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Husband Wife Harlot Concubine c. 142 No such as word as Concubine in the whole Original Scripture ib. They have falsely translated the Seventh Commandment Lo Tinaph to be Adultery 145 They have falsely translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be Fornication ib. They have falsely translated the Tenth Commandment in the words Wife Man-Servant Maid-Servant 146 They have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard Wherein are noted the Errors of Coke Skene and Grotius in following Episcopal and other Popish translations ib. Of the absurdity of Common and Ecclesiastical Lawyers who make the Child born without the Ceremonies of a Priest and Temple no Sib Kin or of Blood to the Father who begot or the Mother who bare him 154 155 Further Reasons shewn that they have falsely translated Mamzer in the Old and Nothus in the New Testament Bastard 156 No such word or thing as Bastard in the whole Original Scripture or amongst the Hebrews Greeks or Romans 3. They have corrupted the Press both as to Scripture and Acts of Parliament and interdict Protestants to Print against or answer Papists 162 A Counterfeit Act of Parliament Printed by Bishops against Protestants and the true supprest 163 Mischiefs which follow the Interdiction of the Press to Protestants 164 165 4. By pretence of giving the King the name of Supremacy they have taken the thing to themselves 167 5. By pretence of giving the King Supremacy by the Ceremonies of the Coronation they take it from him to themselves 169 David Anointed and Crowned by his Parliament and not by the Priest 173 6. They assume in all matters concerning Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts 175 Of the abominable Judgement pass'd by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to Bishops and made them in all causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal ib. Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 180 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession ib. 2. They are totally ignorant of the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage 181 3. They Judg by a Chancellour and not in Person 4. They have Plurality of Offices and more than they are able to serve yet will be Judges of Marriage besides ib. 5. They are ambidextrous and amphibious Judges 182 6. They Judg Marriage by pretended Canons and Laws made by Bishops without assent of Parliament ib. 183 7. They take to themselves Fines and Penalties of their own Judgments 184 8. They Licence Dispence and Pardon all Crimes within their pretended Jurisdiction for Money 9. They cannot be known whether Protestants or Papists if Bishops 185 10. They Judg by Fictions and not by Truth 11. They Judg
by Ceremonies and not by Circumstances Of the manifold mischiefs from the Judgment of Marriage by the Ceremonies of a Priest and a Temple 192 1. It compels to enter into an indissoluble Obligation before the Parties can know each other whether they are sit for Marriage or no. 193 2. It give the Bishop the Monopoly of all Women and their Goods 196 3. It gives him the Monopoly of Successions both in private Families and Kingdoms 197 4. It gives him power to Judg of Marriage Filiation and Succession by Fictions ib. 5. It causeth in the Rich Excess and Vanity of Apparel Tilting Turneaments Masking Gluttony Riot and Drunkenness 198 6. It undoeth the Poor in their Marriages 199 7. It causeth Immodesty in Brides wanton Songs and Ceremonies promiscuous Dancing and corruption of Youth 200 8. It exposeth to publick view what God hath commanded to be secret 201 9. It causeth Community of Women Community of Children Fornication Adultery Stews Brothels and the dissemination of most contegious and deadly Diseases amongst the people ib. 10. It hath caused Prostitution of Brides to Priests Lords Guests and others 205 11. It hath caused Consecration of Incest Whores Sodomites to attend the Service of the Priests and the Temples ib. 12. It hath caused the Consecration and Adoration of Priapus Baal Peor Venus Adonis Flora and the first defiling of the Virgin World with Whoredom and Idolatry 207 13. It first destroyed in the World the Omnipresential Worship of God 208 Prayers in Temples and Synagogues except amongst persons agreed prohibited by Christ and why A Poem on the Omnipresential Worship of God and therein of Marriages in Temples 223 15. It caused the bloody Sacrifices of Virgins Children and Indian Wives 229 16. It lays punishments on lawful Child births and destroys Millions of Infants 234 17. It caused the Parisian Massacre wherein were an Hundred Thousand Protestants slain 240 Why the Ottoman Emperors Marry not by a Priest or in a Temple and of the bloody Murders ensued of the Sons of Solyman the Magnificent by his breaking the Custom and his being drawn by Roxolana to Marry her by a Priest 245 12. Bishops proceed to Judgment in the unknown Language of Law Latine 254 13. They Judg for Fees where of the inconveniences following maintenance of Judges and Officers by Fees and not by Satary Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Executive Power 1. They begin the Suit with Execution 263 2. They Pledg before Summons Summon before Copy Copy before Oath Punish before Contumacy Judg before Hearing and Arrest before Judgment all which preposteration begins with Execution 268 Of the Inconveniences ensue by Quorums or more Judges than one in a Court 276 A Satyr against the cruel Preposterations above mention'd both in Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts Of Summons to answer before a Copy given of what is required to be answer'd 286 Of giving a Copy before an Oath of no Calumny 288 Of the multitude of Fictions and Falsities ensue in Chancery and Common Law by neglecting the Oath of no Calumny ib. ad 305 Of Judgment before Hearing Part of a Satyr translated out of Seneca p. 685. on the settish Emperor Claudius who used to Sentence before Hearing 305 An enumeration of divers Forms of Judicial Proceeding wherein People are Condemned before Hearing 1. By repelling men from the Truth and merit of the Cause and compelling them to make their allegations in Formalities and Fictions 306 A Dispute between two famous Judges Fitzherbert and Brook 14 H. 8.25 concerning Truth and Good Sentence and Formality and Fiction in Judicial Proceeding 306 2. By compelling to Original Writs at Common Law and not serving the Party with a Copy of the Declaration without them 312 Mischiefs of Original Writs 313 3. By compelling to the Writ of Subpoena in Chancery and not serving the Party with a Copy of the Bill without it Mischiefs of Writs of Subpoena 4 By the Capias ut lagatum and Excommunicato capiendo A Satyr on a Papist and a Protestant Imprison'd one on an Outlawry the other on an Excommunication against Imprisonment before Hearing and Judgment 329 A Digression concerning the danger of the Three Kingdoms Condemning one another without Hearing by reason of the Non-Union of their three Parliaments in one House Of the Fatal Dangers attending a Non-Union and the inestimable Benefits of the contrary 335 Of matters requisite to perfect an Union An Elegy on the ill effects of Excommunication of Protestants by Protestants causing a Disunion in the late unhappy Civil Wars 343 5. By Excommunication it self The Form of the Jewish Excommunication 345 The Form of the Greek Excommunication against Thieves 347 The Form of the Popes Excommunication against Queen Elizabeth All Forms of Excommunication wicked and Anti-Christian 348 Of the strange Cheats and Superstition in Excommunications 352 Of the damnable mischiefs arise to Christian Princes and States by tollerating Popes or Prelates to Excommunicate without a Sign of Mission from God 362 All Excommunication Curses and Deliveries to Satan by Bishops or Priests without a Sign of Mission from God if Malefice follow ought to be punish'd as Witchcraft if not as a Cheat. 381 A Satyr in defiance of all Excommunication without a Sign of Mission from God 388 An Epode on Protestants Excommunicated by Papists Considerations concerning a True and False Test between Papist and Protestant 6. By Bishops condemning Protestants of Heresie by the Four first General Councils The other Exceptions against Judicial Forms and what was intended concerning the other Competitor-Judges I am enforced to break off abruptly by Disturbances at the Press Lib. II. Of the Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession CHAP. I. Of the Five Competitors to be Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. The Bishop 2. The Magistrate 3. The Soldiers 4. The Parents 5. The King and Parliament HAving before shewn unanswerable exceptions against the Ecclesiastical Laws by which Bishops pretend to judg I shall now propose exceptions Declinatory of the Authority and Jurisdiction usurped by them and likewise of their Personal disabilities and incapacities to be Judges of the matters in question all which are 1. In reference to the Legislative 2. The Judicial 3. The Executive or Military Power all usurped or abused by them Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Legislative They assume to be Judges Jure Divino without a Sign of Mission from God which overthrows the Legislative Power of King and Parliament For they assume to be Angels and Messengers of God Embassadors of Christ and Successors by his last Will and Testament of the whole Power of Judgment given to the Son yet do they shew no sign of Mission from God no letters of Credence from Christ nor any letters of Probat that they were nominated either Executors or Legatees in any such Testament or in the Testament of any Executor or Apostle of Christ or in the Testament of any Executor of such Executors
there is no such Miracle ensues from Episcopal Unction or Consecration neither do they shew any sign of Mission to Anoint as Samuel did but every man that is born hath a sign of Mission from God to Contract with that Prince under the protection of whose Sword he happens to be born to yield him Subjection for Protection and to concur with the whole Body of the other Subjects to present him with a Symbol or sign of the same with a Crown or Oil as here the men of Israel and Judah do to David 2. David anointed by his Parliament That the Anointing which gave David the Investiture of the Kingdoms was made by the Representative of the People in Parliament and not by the Priest for it is said That all the Tribes and all Israel and all the Elders which were a Senate or Parliament to treat for the People and make a League and Covenant with the King for it was impossible for him otherwise to treat with so great a multitude as all Israel had they not agreed to Elect a fit Representative for them therefore it is said The Elders anointed David and no mention made of the Priest neither had the Priest any Law of Moses to anoint Kings 3. That as there was no Crown sent David from Heaven for his Coronation whereby Pontifical men might pretend to have the disposing so there was no Oil sent thence for â—is Anointing but he received both from the People And surely the Mission of the Oil of Rhemes thence is as great a Fable as of the Crown of Nimrod or of the Image which fell from Jupiter neither did there need any Consecration of either for by the Customs of most Nations Crowns and Unctions were but civil Ceremonies of Honour given to the Parties which received them not only in Elections of Kings but almost in all other Solemnities as Military Triumphs Olympick and other Games yea even in their ordinary Feasts both of Aegyptians Greeks and Romans Habent Vnctae mollia serta Comae Ovid. Which shews both Crowning and Anointing of their Guests with Garlands or Crowns of Flowers and Unction with Oil of the Olive both which materials though more properly made by God than Crowns of Gold and Oils confected and Consecrated yet were esteemed but as civil Ceremonies and were a ministred by Lay-hands without a Priest And of this civil Festival Honour of Anointing used amongst the Jews as well as other Nations Christ is pleased to take notice Luke 7.36 My Head with Oil thou didst not anoint but this Woman hath anointed my Feet with Ointment And though both Coronation and Unction were but civil Ceremonies and of humane Institution where no Miracle testified a Divine yet is David called God's Anointed more truly than if he had been anointed by the Priest seeing God gave the Priest no Mission but yet himself turned the Hearts of the People by the civil signs of Coronation and Unction to acknowledg David for their Sovereign for which he himself giveth thanks and saith Psal 18.47 God subdueth the People under me 4. That David doth not make a League and Covenant with the High Priest but with his Parliament who were the Convention of Elders who anointed him 5. That though there had been long Civil Wars between Judah who followed David and Israel who followed Isbosheth the Son of Saul and Abner his General was dead and Isbosheth was dead and there remained with him Victorious and Veteran Armies yet neither Judah nor Israel anointed him till he had first made with them a League and Covenant 6. From hence may be discover'd the great Mystery of Iniquity whereby Popes have terrified Emperors and Kings as their Vassals to receive Crowns and Unctions from them which hath been only by persuading That none but Bishops could Crown or Anoint them the manifold mischiefs of which to Princes and People are too long here to be recited only whosoever will consider them will find it clear That Bishops who have pretended or may pretend to so dangerous a Tâ—nent as That none but they have Right to make Coronations and Unctions are no fit Judges of Successions to Crowns They assume in the Judgment of all matters concerning Marririage Filiation Aliment and Succession to be above Appeal to the Kings Courts It hath been already shewn that Bishops by assuming a Power Jure Divino without shewing a sign of Mission and by false translating Scripture and by corrupting and interdicting the Press exercise a Power superior or equal to the Legislative from which doth follow That such as are Legislators or assume or exercise such Power ought not to be Judges Delegate 1. Because Legislation Supream and Judgment Delegate are two distinct Offices and ought not to be confounded 2. Because it is Repugnant that a Legislator should be a Delegate to himself for in Presentia Majoris cessat potestas Minoris the lesser Power is lost in the greater 3. If wrong Judgment happen to be given there can be no appeal but to those who did the Wrong whereby they become Judges and Parties and Judg in their own Case 4 A Power Delegate to Judg without Appeal ceases to be a Delegate Power and is greater than the Legislative which Power that it is assumed by the Bishops in all Matrimonial Causes is the thing next to be shewn Of the abominable Judgment passed by the Common Law Judges in Kennes Case Coke lib. 7.42 whereby they gave away the Supremacy of the King's Courts to the Bishop and made them in all Causes Matrimonial subject to no Appeal Mich. 4. Jac. In the Court of Wards between Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife Plaintiff and Florence Lady Stallenge Defendant The Case was This Christopher Kenne Esq was seized of the Mannor of Kenne in the County of Sommerset holden by Knights Service in Capite and 37. H. 8. de facto married Elizabeth Stowell and had Issue Martha the Mother of Elizabeth one of the now Plaintiffs and after 1. 2. Ph. Mar. in the Court of Audience between the said Christopher Kenne Plaintiff and Elizabeth Stewell Defendant the Judg there gave a Sentence in these words Pretens ' tractat ' contract ' sponsalia Matrimonium quin verius Effigiem matrimonij inter Christopherum Kenne Elizabeth Stowell in Minore sua impubertatis aetate eorundem aut eorum alterius de fact ' habit ' contract ' celebrat ' fuisse esse eosdemque Christopherum Eliz. tam tempore contractus Solemnizationis dict' pretens ' matrimonij quam etiam continuo postea idem matrimonio pretens ' Solemnizationi ejusdem dissensisse contravenisse Reclamasse Reluctasse ac eo praetextu hujusmodi Pretens ' tractat ' sponsalia matrimonium de jure nullum nulla irritum irrita cassum cassa invalidum invalida minus efficax inefficacia fuisse esse viribusque juris caruisse carere carere debere Nec non Antedictos Christopherum Kenne
Eliz Stowell quatenus de factor fuerunt ad invicem matrimonio ut predicitur copulat ' ab invicem Separand ' divorciand ' fore debere pronunciamus decernimus declaramus Eosque Separamus Divorciamus eisdemque Christopher ' Eliz. licentiam Libertatem ad alia vota convolanda concedimus tribuimus impertimur per hanc Sententiam nostram definitivam sive hoc finale nostrum decretum quam sive quod ferimus promulgamus in hiis Scriptis c. And after the Divorce the said Christopher Kenne Espous'd and took to Wife Elizabeth Beckwith And after Anno 5th Eliz. before certain Commissioners Ecclesiastical the said Elizabeth Beckwith Libelled against the said Christopher Kenne That before the Marriage between them contracted he had Married with Elizabeth Stowell on which process was awarded against Elizabeth Stowell pro interesse And upon due examination of the Cause it was Sentenced That the Marriage between the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Beckwith was lawful and Sentenced them ad Exequenda Conjugalta obsequia c. And that the said Christopher Kenne was never lawfully Espoused unto the said Elizabeth Stowell and after the said Elizabeth Beckwith died after whose death the said Christopher took to Wife the said Florence by whom he had Issue one Daughter and called Elizabeth and died And Anno 36th Eliz. it was found by Office in the County of Sommerset by Force of a Mandamus after the death of the said Christopher Kenne that the said Elizabeth Kenne was his Daughter and Heir who was within Age Viz. of the Age of Ten Months The Queen granted her Wardship to Sir Nicholas Stallenge and the said Florence then his Wife on which the said Martha alledged her self to be Daughter and Heir to the said Christopher Kenne and with her Husband Silvester Williams Exhibited their Bill in the Court of Wards against the said Sir Nicholas and Florence alledging That the said Martha was Daughter and Heir of the Body of the said Elizabeth Stowell his lawful Wife and that they the said Christopher and Elizabeth Stowell at the time of their Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. were both of them above the Age of Consent and that they Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years before the said supposed Divorce during which Cohabitation the said Martha was procreate between them and therefore pray they may have License to Traverse the said Office To which Bill the said Nicholas and Florence put in their answer and the Plaintiff examined divers Witnesses and before Publication Sir Nicholas dies and thereupon the said Silvester and Martha exhibited a Bill of Reviver against the said Florence and after Martha having Issue Elizabeth the Wife of the now Pl. died after whose death the said Thomas Robertson and Elizabeth his Wife bring a new Bill of Reviver to revive the first Sute in which the Witnesses were examined and this Case was refer'd to Fleming and Coke Chief Justices and Tanfeild Chief Baron and Selverton and Williams Justices and Sing and Altham Barons of the Exchequer If it be asked for what reason was such a Sentence given my Lord Coke nor the rest will neither tie the Bishop nor themselves to shew any for he saith The lawfulness of Marriage belonging originally to be tried in the Ecclesiastical Court if the Ecclesiastical Judg that is the Bishop Sentence a Marriage Null We that is the Judges of the King's Courts ought to give Faith that is implicit Faith to their Sentence as they do to our Judgment whether true or false right or wrong reason or no reason and so he saith Where the original cause of Sute concerning Marriage belongs to the Common Law Courts the Ecclesiastical Judg is to give like Faith to them as 22. E. 4. in Corbets Case which was this Sir Robert Corbet had by Elizabeth his Wife two Sons Robert the Elder and Roger the Younger and dies Robert the Elder being under the Age of Fourteen takes to Wife one Matilda and they dwell together tâ—ll full Age Et habuerunt carnalem copulam cogniti reputati pro viro uxore palam And after the said Robert put off the said Matilda having no Issue by her and Married one Lettice in the life of the said Matilda and hath Issue by her Robert and dies Lettice Preached openly that she was the lawful Wife of Robert and her Son a mulier Roger the Son of Sir Robert Corbet sues in the Spiritual Court to Reverse these Espousals between Robert his Brother and Lettice for which Lettice sues a Prohibition In which Case it was Resolved 1. That if Robert and Matilda had had Issue and had been unjustly Divorced and after Robert had Married Lettice and had Issue and died that as long as the unjust Divorce had continued the Issue of Matilda could have had no remedy at Common Law the same gives so great Faith to the Sentence of the Bishop 2. That here Roger might sue at Common Law notwithstanding the second Marriage in regard the same was void being made while the first Wife lived On which may be noted the injustice of the Bishops being above Appeal in Judgment in these particulars 1. Here is a lawful Matirmony Consummate by the Birth of a Child and two Persons thereby indissolubly joined together by the Act and Law of God put asunder by the Bishop and his Papal Law Here is a Dispute from Generation to Generation concerning the Validity of a Marriage and Succession to an Inheritance Against the Marriage is alledged That the same was declared void by a Sentence of Divorce or rather of Nullity given by the Bishop Against it is answered by Elizabeth a Descendent of the said Marriage and the right Heir to the Inheritance that the cause of the said Sentence was false And she offer'd to prove that the said Christopher Kenne and Elizabeth Stowell were both above the Age of Consent to Marriage in Anno 37. H. 8. and were then lawfully Married and Cohabited together Nine or Ten Years and the said Martha was lawfully Procreate between them before the pretended Divorce was made Was there ever Probation more Relevant tender'd was there ever better Reason alledged by a poor Lady to defend her Inheritance On this Hoskins Bacon Dodridge and other Council Argued so long from Term to Term as was enough to spend a good Portion before it was got But alas to no purpose for had this Elizabeth been Queen Elizabeth her self these Judges will give no Relief or Hearing against a Bishops Sentence unless his Lordship will please to Revoke it himself And notwithstanding all Arguments to the contrary it was accordingly resolved by all the Justices and Barons That she must go without her Inheritance and her Mother Martha remain a Bastard till the Bishop who made her so should again unmake her which was in plain English to adjudg there should be no Appeal in any case of Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession from the Bishops to
the Kings Courts 2. He rests not there but says Iisdem licentiam ad alia vota convolanda concedimus So that here not only Licence may be had for Money to Marry but for the same to leave the old and make a new choice as often as they please And my Lord Coke will have the Common Law to give such Faith that they ought not to question these doings true or false right or wrong which sets all Women and Men to Sale for Money and gave the occasion to Cornelius Agrippa to call all Ecclesiasticks Panders General for their Profit 3. The Common Law Judges give the Bishop the same Supremacy of Power in Matrimonial Causes since the Protestant Religion hath made Marriage no Sacrament as they had in the time of highest Popery and made it a Sacrament though Sublata causa tollitur effectus The same ceasing to be a Sacrament and becoming a mear Temporal Contract the old superstitious Faith of a Sacrament ought not to be given those who are no Judges of Temporal matters 4. It is worth a smile in this Case were it not so wicked to see how hot the Common Lawyers were a while in the scuffle for Supremacy of Marriage But no sooner had the Bishops turn'd the muzzles of the Romish Canons against them and discharged their piece of Conjuring in a strange Language instead of a Sentence but our Worthies of the Law fell flat on their faces and yielded the Royal Fort of the Prerogative and all the Protestant Subjects Laws and Liberties eya Magna Charta it self to the Mercy of the Enemy by so abominable a Judgment that no Appeal lay to the Kings Courts against the Sentence of a Bishop touching Marriage Filiation or Succession true or false right or wrong with cause or without cause a Resolve deserving to be mark'd with a Note of perpetual Infamy and Razed out of all Records On which and other Reasons though in most parts of Christendom the Clergy generally composed one Estate of the Country yet since the Reformation they were excluded from being any part of the Estates and of Holland neither were they allowed any Vote in their Assembly and far less Reason have they in England seeing they have equal Privilege here with the Gentry and all other Lay-free-holders in Election of Knights of the Shire to assume any other Power in the Legislative Temporal or Spiritual either in Person or by any other Representative The like Practice is likewise in Venice though they are Catholicks where before the Council sits the Cryer with a loud Voice commands all Priests out of Doors lest they should discover the State secrets to the Pope and likewise assume the Supremacy of Judgment from the Temporalty to the Spiritualty to produce which effects they are a dangerous ingredient to be mixt in how small a quantity soever in any Supream Council and a little Leven of so active a Fermentation Leveneth the whole Lump A Reason is given by Aeneas Silvius why it was held by more That the Pope was above a Council than a Council above a Pope because Popes gave Bishopricks and Arch-Bishopricks but Councils gave none Which doth not only hold in meer Spiritual Councils but in such Spiritual Councils as are mixt with the Temporalty in which the Spiritualty are always Bribed and Pension'd by the gift of their Offices And this is apparent and needs no further proof And if any of the Temporalty receive the like Bribes and Pensions upon lawful proof thereof made it cannot be denied that neither of them are equal or fit Legislators and much less Judges of the Holy Laws of God of Marriage Filiation and Succession of Subjects and least of all of Kings Exceptions against Bishops being Judges in reference to the Judicial Power 1. They are prohibited by the example of Christ to Judg Marriage Filiation Aliment or Succession We Read Christ was at a Marriage-Feast but it was so poor a one they wanted Wine and 't is likely he would have helped them to none had the man been rich for he might have bought enough for his Money without Miracle But Christ shewed his Bounty to the Poor and the Rich he sent empty away We read likewise he taught the Doctrine of Marriage but it was according to the Moral Law of God and all Ceremonial Laws he Established neither did he or his Apostles ever join any hands by the Ceremonies of a Priest or Temple nor ever spake of any other joining Man and Woman together but by God only as it was from the beginning And as to the point of being a Judg of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession he utterly refused it though he knew the Fact and the Right far above any Bishop as appears Luke 12.14 And one of the company said unto him Master Speak to my Brother that he divide the Inheritance with me And he said unto him Man Who made me a Judg or a Divider over you To give Judgment in this Case according to Episcopal Doctrine Christ must first have enquired with what Ceremonies the Father and Mother were Married whereby the Marriage must have been first Judged Then Whether these two Brothers were begot before the Ceremonies or after and whether there were Witnesses at the begetting which concerns Filiation Then Whether the Inheritance which according to the Romish Law then Imperial in Judaea included both Lands and moveable Goods were left by a Testate or an Intestate which would have concerned the Aliment and Succession but Christ in a word refused to Judg any of these And those who alledg themselves his Successors ought to follow his Example who if he sent them sent them to teach and not to Judg. For he saith Go teach all Nations but there is not a word of Judging any Nation 2. They are totally ignorant in the Fact and were never Educated in the Laws by which they pretend to Judg Marriage That 't is impossible for them to know the Facts of Marriage or Filiation or to receive any Testimony of the same is already shewn and proved P. 104 105. and indeed the Cook with his white Sleeves who dress'd the Wedding-Dinner and the Tailor who made the Wedding-Cloaths and the Midwife and Gossips who eat the Pie and drunk the Bowl if any Certificate or Judgment were at all necessary as to the Fact of Marriage and Filiation besides that of the Parents were far more credible and fit than the Bishop's who was an Hundred Miles off at the time of getting the Child and of all these doings besides And as to the Law 't is known they were never Educated either in the Civil Canon Common or Statute Laws the knowledg of all which they themselves cannot but acknowledg are necessary to make up an Ecclesiastical Lawyer by which is manifest they are as ignorant of the Law of Marriage and Filiation as they are before proved to be of the Fact With what Face or Conscience can they undertake to be Judges of what they
whole People is to be intended only where the Case is reduced to that necessity that either one or other must be but in this there is no necessity Trial should be by Certificate of a Bishop at all and though uno absurdo dato mille sequuntur were there a Thousand inconveniences followed if the Certificate of a Bishop should be question'd for falsity it being first granted it belongs to him to make Certificates yet there is no necessity that absurdity should be first granted that it should belong to him to make Certificates for there are ways enough wherein no Inconveniences follow of Trial of Truth without Certificates of Bishops 2. The supposition is repugnant and impossible that any Case should happen or be shewn in the World wherein Fiction or Falsity ought to be suffer'd in Judicial proceeding or where Probation ought not by the Law of God to be admitted against such Fiction and Falsity notwithstanding the corrupt practice of Courts to the contrary and such suffering of a private mischief of that kind to a private Person is so far from preventing a publick Inconvenience that it will bring both a private and publick mischief and destroy both for it is as impossible to separate Truth from Justice as the Light from the Sun 3. That which is alledged for an inconvenience to the publick That one Bishop would make a Certificate contrary to another this is no more publick inconvenience than if Thieves should fall out and true men come by their Goods 4. As to what is said That the Certificate of the Bishop is in this Case the highest Trial in the Law we must distinguish the Law for it was then the Law of Popery was Predominant which gave Supremacy in Causes of Marriage Filiation and Succession to the Bishops above Kings and to the Sentences in Bishops Courts and made them above Appeal to the Kings Courts and the Foundation of that their Supremacy was That then by that Law Marriage was a Sacrament and Penance was a Sacrament but the Law being now changed from Popish to Protestant and the Supremacy being now given by the Protestant Law to the King above the Bishop as well in Causes Matrimonial as in all other Ecclesiastical Causes and the Protestant Religion taking away the two Popish Sacraments of Marriage and Penance which were the only Roots whence the Episcopal Jurisdiction of Marriage and the incidents to the same pretended to sprout Cessante Causa ratione legis cessat Lex the pretended Causes of the Jurisdiction ceasing the Jurisdiction it self ceases whereby now the Certificate of the Bishop is so far from being the highest Trial that it ought to be no Trial at all for the Sacraments ceasing the Jurisdiction ceaseth and the Jurisdiction ceasing the Power of Trial ought likewise to cease 5. For Councel to advise his Client to maintain a false Certificate of the Bishops knowing it to be false is as wicked as for the Bishop to make a false Certificate knowing it to be false or which is impossible for him to know to be true as all relating to Filiation are it being their own Rule Filiatio non potest probari except by the Parents wherefore ex Ore Suo they condemn themselves of false Judgment and are not therefore fit to be Judges 11. They Judg by Ceremonies and not by Circumstances As to the word Ceremonia some will have it derived à Cerere because they used divers Formalities in the Worship of the Goddess Ceres But this is not proper seeing all the Heathen Gods and Goddesses had as many Formalities in their Worship as she others derive it from Cerete a Latine Town whither as saith Valerius Maximus the Flamen Quirinalis and the Vestal Virgins fled with their Trinkets while the Gauls besieged Rome others derive it à Cereis from Torches and Tapers lighted made of Wax which amongst the old Pagans was a great Ceremony used in the Temples of their Gods and at their Marriages but this is likewise improper and only figurative to take species famosior pro toto genere and not natural so it appears the Etymology of it is either unknown or it is it self an Original not derived from any Rites which is a word usually joined with Ceremonies and much of the same Signification some will have derived à Ritualibus now the Rituales were old Magical and Superstitious Books of the Hetruscan Priests by help of which they either conjur'd their Gods or made the People believe so and they had all the Formalities written in them which were to be used at making Marriages at laying the Foundations of a City and how Altars Temples and Houses were to be Consecrated and how their Courts of Justice and Counties and Hundreds were to be divided for in all these the old Pagans used to Consult their Augurs Aruspices Bishops and Priests and were like our Books of Ecclesiastical Canons But it seems rather these ritual Books had their names derived from the Rites whereof they were made a written Collection and not the Rites from the Rituals and so Rites as well as Ceremonies may be words which none knows whence they came or whether they will But to come from the Etymology of the word Ceremony to the thing usually signified by it and the difference between a Ceremony and a Circumstance it seems A Ceremony is an Act accessary joined to a Principal not affecting the Principal Act with Good or Evil by the Law of God A Circumstance is an Act accessary joined with a Principal affecting the same Principal Act with Good or Evil by the Law of God Ceremonies are infinite but Circumstances are usually drawn to Seven Heads 1. The Cause of doing the Act which is divided into four kinds The Efficient Final Material Formal and these again subdivided into others 2. The Person by or with whom the Act was done 3. The Place where it was done 4. The Time when it was done 5. The Quantity continued or discrete 6. The Quality which is manifold 7. The Seventh and last Circumstance is the Event of the Act the Civilians expound very improperly and instance whether the Act is done by Fear Force Error Deceit Fault Chance or the like for how can these which are precedent Causes of the Act and therefore ought to be refer'd to the Cirstumstance of the Causes be said to be the Event of an Act which is always subsequent and not precedent to the Principal Act and in that sense is always used by the best Latinists as Cicero in Rhetor. Things are often judged from the Event than which there is nothing more unjust and the Poets agree in the same Careat Successibus opto Quisquis ab Eventu facta notanda putat Eventus Belli incertus wherein it is used for the Fortune and Success following the Battel and not the Fortune or Chance which began or occasion'd it So the Common Law in punishing the Event as the death of any Man within a Day or
to express his unnaturall Villany both heard and saw by a Travers from the other side of the Tent But was so far from being moved with Compassion that thinking it long till he were dispatched with a most Terrible and cruel Voice he rated the Villaines enured to Blood saying will you never dispatch that I bid you Will you never make an end of this Traitor for whom I have not Rested one night these ten years in quiet which horrible commanding Speeches yet thundring in their Ears those Butchering Mutes threw the Poor Innocent Prince upon the Ground and with the help of the Eunuchs forcibly drawing the knitted Bow-string both ways by the Commandment of a most wicked Father strangled him With like Barbarous Cruelty he shortly after caused Mahomet his Nephew Mustapha his Son to be strangled also This unnatural and strange Murther committed he presently Commanded the Bassa of Amasia Mustapha's Lieutenant to be apprehended and his head in his own presence to be struck off which done he sent for Trihanger yet Ignorant of all that was happened and in sporting wise as if he had done a thing worth Commendations bid him go meet his Brother Mustapha which thing Trihanger with a merry and chearful Countenance hasted to do as one glad of his Brother's Coming But assoon as he came unto the place where he saw his Brother lying dead upon the Ground strangled it is not to be spoken how he was in mind tormented He was scarcely come to the place where this Detestable Murther was Committed when his Father sent unto certain of his Servants to offer unto him all Mustapha's Treasure Horses Servants Jewels Tents and withal the Government of the Province Amasia But Trihanger filled with extream heaviness for the unmerciful Death of his well beloved Brother spake unto them in this sort Ah Wicked and Ungodly Cain Traitor I may not say Father take thou now the Treasure Horses the Servants the Jewels and the Province of Mustapha How come it into thy Wicked Cruel and Savage Breast so ungratiously and contrary to all Humanity I will not say the Reverence of thy own Blood to kill thy Worthy Warlike and Noble Son the Mirrour of Courtesie and Prince of Greatest hope the like of whom the Othoman Family never yet had nor never shall I will therefore my self provide that thou nor none for thee shall never hereafter in such sort shamefully Triumph over such a Poor Wretch as I am And having thus much said Stab'd himself with his own Dagger in the Body whereof he in short time dyed which so soon as it came to the Old Tygers Ears it is hard to say how much he grieved His dead Body was by his Fathers Commandment carryed from Aleppo in Syria to Constantinople and afterwards Honorably buried on the other side of the Haven at Pera. Hence appear the two great benefis the Ottoman Emperors receive from not medling at all with the Priest either in Coronations or Marriages but as to the first rather wear no Crown at all and are content with a Turbant than receive it from them or their Unctions and for their Marriages take what Wife they like in Private without them or their Solemnities For first the sparing a Coronation and likewise the Solemnity of any Marriage which cannot avoid if publick by a Priest the forementioned Excesses of Apparrel Tilting Turneaments Masking Gluttony Riot Drunkenness Dowers and Gifts on the Coronations and Marriages of so great Princes saves him a Vast some of Money to his Private Treasure and what is a greater benefit than the other secures his Supremacy against the Ecclesiastical Mufties and Caliphs who can make no pretence to depose him or take from him or his Successors that Government which they never gave him nor he would receive from them or his Sons from their Unctions or Certificates 12. They proceed to Judgment in the unknown language of Law-Latine That the Romish Bishops and Priests were the first who brought Latine into Churches and compelled the People to Pray to God in any Language they understand not I suppose none will doubt and I cannot think any will oppose but grant these likewise were the first who brought the same Barbarous Latin both into the Spiritual and Temporal Courts they themselves being at first the chief Judges and Clerks of both It will not likewise be denyed that William the Norman was the first who brought in his Barbarous French to this Nation and if we consider no further than that the Authors of these two Languages were Forrein Enemies and Papists I see no Reason any Protestant Divines or Lawyers have except filthy Lucre to be so fond of them as to continue such Exotick Gibberish to be not the least corruptions of our Religion and Justice and snares of Liberty and Propriety and somtimes of Life it self The final causes therfore which induce these uncouth and crabbed Languages and Characters both of Court and Chancery hands have been and are very wicked 1. One cause for which the Roman and likewise the Norman who was the others Ape put the Forms of Judicial proceeding into unknown Languages was to intrap the People Bak. Hist 27. 2. It hath been continued by Judges and Officers of Courts to Monopolize the Trade of Law 3. That Ignoramus and Dulman who had not been at Shool long enough to learn true Latine might write half Words and Dashes which the Country Men might not be able to understand and laugh at Scribe cum Dasho bene est 4. That motions at Bar and demurrers and arguments in Law may multiply and cut out the more Work for Counsel for often times many a Term is spent in Babling about the pedigree of a false Latine word Coin'd by Dulman to derive it as high as a Radix which grew in Babel and when they have done that as great a Task they have to make it agree with his Anglicè whereby all the Cost and many a good Cause is lost because the Clerk could neither Latine nor English right 5. But when there is a Mis-prision or Mis-pleader by reason of a Language the Clerk understands not what a World of money will it cost his poor Client to get an Amendment for him of one or Repleader of the other The best Counsel in the Town must be Retain'd and they must spend at least a twelve month from Term to Term before they can be all heard Pro Con to repeat over all the Acts of Parliament since Magna Charta and all the Rotulo's in such a Hillary and such a Michaelmas Term. And all the Bundles in Ragman-Bag and all the Records in the Tower to the amazement of the Poor Countryman who keeps Twitching them by the Sleeves and Crying out like him in Martial Non de vi neque caede nec veneno Sed lis est mihi de tribus capellis Vicini queror has abesse furto Hoc Judex sibi postulat probari Tu Cannas Mithridaticumque bellum Et
them durst adventure seeing Bajezet was of a furious Nature and in his Anger dangerous to be spoken with to mediate in their behalf no not Alis Bassa Charadin Bassa's Son whom of all men he favour'd most There was at that time in the Court an Aethiopian Jester who under some Covert pleasant Jest would often times bolt out to the King in his greatest heat what his gravest Councellors durst not speak to him in secret This Jester Alis Bassa requested to devise some means to entreat the angry King in behalf of these Judges promising to give him what he would desire if he could appease the Kings displeasure The Aethiopian without fear undertook the matter and presently put on his Head a rich Hat all wrought over with Gold and accoutred in all other his Cloths suitably presented himself before the King with a great counterfeit Gravity whereat Bajazet marveling asked him the cause why he was so Gay I have a Request unto your Majesty said he and wish to find favour in your sight Bajazet more desirous than before to know the matter asked what his Request was If it stand with your pleasure said the Aethiopian I would fain go as your Ambassador to the Empeperor of Constantinople in hope whereof I have put my self in this readiness To what purpose wouldst thou go said Bajazet To crave of the Emperor some Forty or Fifty of his old grave Monks and Friers to bring with me hither to the Court. And what should they do here said Bajazet I would have them placed said the Jester in the rooms of the old doteing Judges whom you intend as I hear to put to death Why said Bajazet I can place others of my own People who are better in their rooms True said the Aethiopian for Gravity of Look and Countenance and so would the old Monks and Friers serve as well but not so learned in the Laws and Customs of your Kingdom as are those in your displeasure If they are Learned why do they then contrary to their Learning pervert Justice and take Bribes There is a good reason for that too said the Jester What reason said the King That can he that there standeth by tell better than I said the Jester pointing to Alis Bassa who forthwith commanded by Bajazet to give the reason with great Reverence first done shewed that those Judges so in displeasure were not conveniently provided for and were therefore enforced many times for their necessary maintenance to take Rewards where they could get them to the staying of the due course of Justice which Bajazet understanding to be true commanded Alis Bassa to appoint them convenient stipends for their maintenance and forthwith granted their Pardon Whereupon the Bassa set down Order That of every matter in Suit exceeding One Thousand Aspers the Judges should have Twenty Aspers which Fees they yet take to this day Whence may be Observed 1. That to place Judges in Courts to undergo the incessant labours of hearing multitudes of Causes and not to allow them honourable maintenance is the ready way to make men of ordinary Principles Freebooters and to take the Prey for themselves So the meanness of the Salary in Russia being but an Hundred Marks per Annum makes the Judges extream Extortious on the People 2. That those who buy either Judicial or Ministerial places in Judicatories must sell again and the sale of either is contrary to the Law of God and of infinite Damage to the Publick turning the weights of Justice to the false weights of Merchandize as says the Poet Ergo Judicium nihil est nisi publica Merces Quid faciunt leges ubi sola Pecunia Regnat 3. That the Basha when he was appointed to provide the Judges maintenance by stipend providing the same by Fees made them worse then before and gave them a pretence to take Bribes of the People under the name of Fees and there are none more corrupt Judges for Bribery than the Turks to this day and well they may if they take Fees Neither Judg nor Minister to take Fees but Salary It was the Ancient Law of England that none having any Office concerning the Administration of Justice should take any Fee or Reward of any Subject for the doing of his Office Coke 2. part 176. and by the Statute Westm 1. cap. 25. neither Judicial nor Ministerial Officer as Sheriff Escheator Coroner Bailiff Gaoler Clerk of the Market Aulnager nor other inferior Minister or Officer of the King whose Offices do any way concern the Administration or Execution of Justice or the common good of the Subject or the Kings Service but shall be paid of what they receive from the King on pain the Offender against this Act shall pay double Damages of the Plaintiff and shall be otherwise punish'd at the Will of the King Marrying for Fees contrary to the Laws of God and of the Land By which appears that the Episcopal Judging of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession for Fees and the granting of Licenses of Marriage by Bishops and taking of Fees by a Priest for Banns or Marriage of any Persons in a Temple or elsewhere is wicked abominable and contrary to the Laws of God and Fundamental Laws of the Land and they ought to be punish'd for doing the same and had not Bishops corrupted the true Doctrine of Gods Ordinance of Marriage to obtain Fees and other covetous and ambitious Ends Men had at this day Married according to the Moral Law of God and not the Ceremonial Laws of Priapus and Venus The Inconveniences which ensue Judges and Ministers taking Fees are 1. As Coke saith 2 part 210. When neither Judges or Ministers had any Fees then had they no colour to exact any thing of the Subject who knew they ought to take nothing at all of them they being maintained by Salary from the King but when some Acts of Parliament changing the Rules of the Common Law gave to the Ministers of the King Fees in some particular Cases to be taken of the Subject whereas before all their Office was done without taking now no Office at all is done without taking and a gap being once open'd there was after no bounds to the breach so it causeth Oppression 2. It causeth corruption of Justice for if a Judg take Fees it is from the Plaintiff and Defendant and he will sell Justice to him who gives him the greatest but if he take a Salary he takes it from the Publick and will be for the Publick good and not partial to the Parties 3. The Publick by giving the Salary and receiving the Fees increases the Publick Treasury for the vast Income of Fees far exceeding the Merits of the Judges and Officers it is just the overplus should be applied to discharge Publick Burdens and not to fill private Pockets and what was unequally shared amongst Officers ignorant and idle by way of Fees The English in Scotland turn'd all the Fees of Courts into
Christ Commands for if as is the Modern practice in Scotland the Lords of the Session never read a word of the Libell'd Summons and they may be Blasphemy or Treason for ought they know yet they set their hands to them as fast as they can be brought and I have my self set my hand to Hundreds of them and that course of Summoning being by Act of Parliament made in time of Popery which we had no power to alter I thought that kind of Justice better than none at all though before Oblatio Libelli it serves to no more Use than our Latitat and Subpoena Offices and others to have a pretence of gathering Money for the People for doing nothing and perhaps if all Truth were spoken for doing Mischief Fourthly If as the ancient Practice was of Sir Thomas More when he was Chancellor of England who used to read over himself in Person every Bill was prefer'd in Chancery and consider whether it were just or no before he would grant a Summons of Subpoena and of Skene in Scotland who as I have been informed there would likewise read the Bills himself before a Summons was granted and if he found them not fit would tear them in pieces and throw them over the Bar. It hath been therefore to no purpose for the Plaintiff to have sent to Judges for Summons who might see that Injustice in his Bill which the Defendant perhaps might not see or might be willing to pass by if it had been first shewn to him at home Fifthly It is unjust for the Plaintiff to make his Oblatio Libelli first to the Judg and to get a Summons thereon before he doth it to the Defendant for the Defendant may perhaps if shewn him shew the Plaintiff so just exceptions against the Bill as may satisfie the Plaintiff himself and save both Parties the Trouble and Cost of going further to Law or he may amend his Bill on such exceptions and if he think it just after amended insist on the same further to shew his bill first therefore to the Defendant though his Enemy if he will except against it is more profitable to the Plaintiff for amendment than if he shewed it his own Councel for a Friend may never shew the Party his Faults as an Enemy will As it is more Just so it is therefore more safe first to make the Oblatio Libelli to the Defendant before it be done to the Judg. Sixthly The Justi dies or time of Returning an Answer cannot be agreed without great Trouble and Cost unless there be first an Emparlance between the Parties without troubling the Judg. Against offend the taking out of Execution on Judgment acknowledged by assent and on Recognizances and Statutes in England and on Registred Bonds in Scotland without Summons or Oblatio Libelli or Warning or Demand Seventhly Because Judges use to take Caution or Plegii de prosequendo of the Plaintiff and the like Pledges of the Defendant purposely to hinder Agreement according to Christ and to set them by the Ears to get in Fees to the Court. 2. That no man ought to be Summon'd before a Judg until a Productio Testium first made to him For Christ saiâ—h If he will not hear thee then take with thee one or two more that in the Mouth of two or three Witnesses every word may be Establish'd whence will follow that the Mock-Probation still falsely mention'd in the end of every Declaration Et inde Producit Sectam and Summons on Motions and Rules of Courts founded on the Infamous Credit of Affidavit-men are abominable Reliques of Popery and Anti-Christian 1. Because they are not produced to the Defendant where he dwells that he may except against their Persons if he hath cause and if he hath none he may see them Sworn and if they Swear false he may have his lawful Remedy against them 2. Because the Affidavit-men are single Witnesses whereas Christ Commands two or three Witnesses 3. They are both such as live in London and Westminster and such as come out of those Parts altogether unknown to the Judges and Masters who take their Oaths if therefore they will proceed on the Testimony of single Witnesses seeing by the Precept of Christ Actor Sequitur forum rei and the Plaintiff is to carry his Witnesses to the Defendant it is far more Just and Equal that the Affidavit be either taken by Commission in the Parish where the Defendant lives or every Minister be Authorized to take the Oath on notice given to his Parishioner to be present if he please at the Taking 4. Because generally the Affidavit-men are Knights of the Post and common Swearers for Hire who will Swear any thing for a Dinner 5. Because Probatio non admittitur in contrarium whereby Courts overflow with Perjury And as is said Jer. 23.10 Because of Swearing the Land mourns 3. That a Defendant can be guilty of no Contumacy till an Oblatio Libelli and a Productio Testium first made to him For Christ says The Plaintiff is not to tell the Church till two Refusals made by the Defendant one to hear him single the other when he haâ—h produced his Witnesses 4. That no Pledges or Distress ought to be taken till Judgment For Ezek. 18.7 says The Debtour ought to be restored his Pledg And Christ Commands on Contumacy shewn by two Refusals immediately to tell the Church so he is to do nothing further till the Sentence of the Church is pass'd and very just for thus far none hath Judged whether his Cause is just and his Brother Contumacious but himself and he ought not to be Judg in his own Case and much less be his own Carver of Execution by Pledges and Distresses on his own Authority without the Sentence of a Judg. Secondly Otherwise the Ass of the Fatherless the Ox of the Widow and the Pledg of the Poor would be taken from them without Hearing of their Cause and the Creditor Land-lord and every other Person would be Judges in their own Case and Carve Execution for themselves Thirdly Though the Poor may be able to give Convenotinal Pledges yet they are not able to give besides Judicial Pledges when they are enforced to sue for their Conventional unjustly seized and detained from them nor though they are able to Mortgage the Right of their little Living to be seized when they fail paying Interest for the Debt yet are they not able to leave Possession by which they must live if the Creditor unjustly enter before a Judgment Declaratory and a true Account made by him and a Return of the over-plus whereto the Mortgage amounted above the Debt So though a Poor man is able to grant a Rent-charge and a Clause of Distress if he be in Arere on paying Interest for the Debt yet if the Creditor wrongfully or excessively Distrain he is not able on a Replevin to give Pledges de Prosequendo and de Returno habendo to take a Conventional Distress therefore or
we thee an hungred or a thirst or a stranger or naked or sick or in Prison and did not minister unto thee Then shall he answer them saying Verily I say unto you in as much as ye did it not to one of the least of these ye did it not to me And these shall go away into everlasting punishment but the Righteous into Life Eternal It may be much doubted what account these inferior Judicial Proceedings of Exactions of Pledges and Bail before Summons Outlawries Excommunicato Capiendo's Penalties Forfeitures Confiscations Arrests and Imprisonment before Judgment will be able to give at the Supream Judgment they being all point Blank contrary to the Judicial Precepts of Christ And this Humanity and Mercy to Prisoners that are Poor and unable to pay hath so far prevailed amongst most Nations and with the Civil Law and with the Law of Scotland that in all these Cessio Bonorum if a Prisoner in Execution for Debt makes a Cessio Bonorum that is assigns his whole Estate he hath left by Inventary on Oath to the Creditor he ought to be set at liberty and certainly the Arresting of Debtors without giving warning or time necessary and who are not able to pay before Judgment or detaining them in Prison after Judgment is not only as hath been already said hurtful to the Creditor himself but to the Publick the same being destructive to Trade and likewise to the Peace for Civil Wars and Seditions have been caused both in the Grecian Roman and many other Commonwealths by the Cruel Prosecution and Imprisonments by Creditors of their Debtors and I remember we received often advertisement from our Army in Scotland to desire us to restrain our Letters of Caption from Arrests of Debtors and that we fill'd the opposite Army who were then in Hostility against us with greater Recruits of Debtors who fled from Arrests than they had been ever able of their Power to have done and of Debtors so Potent for the Privilege of Peers to be free from Arrest was then taken away as drew multitudes with them to the Hills who would if secured from Arrest have all stayed quiet Neuters at home 8. That in case of Contumacy of the Debtors Christ allows both to take Pledges Arrest and Imprison him after Judgment 9. That he allows not though after Judgment to detain the Debtor in Prison for Penalties and Forfeitures above the value of the Debt and Damage One single Judg. 10. That he allows on lawful Probation and Judgment Imprisonment to be by one single Judg. For he says in the Singular Number and the Judg deliver thee to the Officer and thou be cast into Prison Verily I say unto thee thou shalt by no means come out thence till thou hast paid the utmost farthing And at that time the Roman Judges both at Rome and in Judaea sate on single Tribunals in Courts by themselves and not with associates Judices delegati à principe fuerunt 12. in Civitate Romana Octo Erant Minores Quatuor Majores quilibet sedebat in suo Praetorio in Basilica glâ—in Rub. in § Rebus in Authent de Judicibus in Collat 6. In the City of Rome there were Twelve Judges Delegates made by the Emperor Eight Lesser and Four Greater and every one of them sate in his several Court in the Palace Hall This Christ seems to allude to Matth. 19.28 When the Son of Man shall sit in the Throne of his Glory ye also shall sit upon Twelve Thrones Judging the Twelve Tribes of Israel In the like manner they placed single Judges in the Provinces as Herod Felix Festus and others were all single Judges within their several Territories of Judaea And these single Judges were not only 1. Judges of Temporals but Spirituals till the Superstition of the Emperors divided the Supream Jurisdiction into Episcopal and Imperiâ—l giving the Supremacy to the Episcopal for before the Emperors the Roman Law was Rex Sacrorum Praeses esto as appears by the Laws of Romuâ—us and Numa of whom one was an Augur and King which was then their highest kind of Prophet and above a Priest and the other a Sacrificer and a King The Senate after the Expolsion of Tarquin took upon themselves to be Praesides Sacrorum and the Emperors after they had overtopt the Senate made themselves High-Priests and Emperors so did Julius Caesar so did Augustus and their Successors till as is before said Superstition again divided the Imperial Jurisdiction But likewise 2. the same Judg was of Civils and Criminals and 3. the same one Judg was of Fact Law and Equity and there was not amongst nor in any Empire in the World that unnecessary and unjust distinction of Chancery Common Law and Juries It is not here objected against the Bishops that they place more Judges than one in their Spiritual Courts or any Court where they can get Jurisdiction we know the contrary and too Ambitious and Subtle they were to draw any such Inconvenience on themselves but they rather studied to lay that Clog of unnecessary Number on the Layity in the Common Law Courts they themselves having usually been sole Judges in the Spiritual Courts concerning Marriage Testaments and Tiths under the name of Judg Spiritual or Ecclesiastical and in the Chancery concerning other Temporal matters under the name of the Judg of Conscience and Equity and in their Inquisitions Criminal concerning matters of Life and Death under the name of the Judg of Heresie have made themselves absolute Monarchs over the Religion Justâ—ce Estates and Lives of the People and Clogg'd them with numerous Judges and Juries that they might not be able to lift an hand or move a Tongue against them in the same manner as the Senate did deceive the People of Rome by multiplying their Tribunes under pretence of favour to them to no other intent but that the Defensors of their Liberty might be more easily divided against themselves and weaker to oppose the Senate I shall only give a touch of the Reasons why more Judges than one ought not to be admitted in any one Court except in a Court of Appeal or in Judges equally Elected by the Parties as Arbitrators and Commissioners for Examination of Witnesses use to be 1. Because as to Election of the Judges it is easier to find one Man of Ability and Integrity fit to be a Judg than Twelve Reasons why more Judges than one ought not to be admitted in one Court 2. The hearing of a multitude of Causes is extream tedious and toilsome where there is therefore a numerous Court they are apt to shift their Collar from the labour and leave all to the President while they either talk with one another more pleasant discourse or let their Wits run a wool-gathering or plainly nod and sleep upon the Bench. 3. Admit they do attend the Cause which they very rarely do except for a Friend or against an Enemy they may vary in their
any Delays by Jeofails Repleaders Arrests of Judgment or Writs of Error another cause was that both Parties and Advocates took the Oath of Calumny that they believed their Allegiance just and true Illud juretur quod lis sibi justa videtur which Oath keeps their Allegiances clean from falsity that I never found so much as one Fiction in all their judicial Proceedings and if the same Oath were but taken here as there I believe there would not one Bill in Chancery or Declaration at Common Law come in for Twenty which now are thrust in by heaps many other causes there are which lessen the labour of a Judg and of the Suitors which for Brevity I omit all which shew the Prudence of that Noble Kingdom where the People enjoy so great Justice with so little Cost and Contention Lastly we could have done more Business than we did had we been set to Act as the Roman Judges every one single without Associates in a Court by himself and how great an Addition to the Publick Treasury as well as advantage to Justice the lessening the number of Judges and turning Fees to Salary will cause is already mention'd A Satyr against the Cruel Preposteration of Ecclesiastical and Temporal Courts in Judicial Proceedings contrary to the Precept of Christ Matth. 18.15 AND will you never learn the skill Which first Subpoena is or Bill Or foremost know with all your wit If Declaration is or writ Or which precede should in your Tale The Capias or Original You which is best who make a pause To Sentence first or hear the Cause With Execution who begin Before a Judgment or a Sin Who grinde and eat the Poor distrest With Tongue and Teeth of Romish Beast For Grace in Anglice's who curse The Rent was bad the Patch is worse Who have no Summons but Surprize Who have no Laws but Treacheries Do you not know there is a Cry Gone up against your Cruelty The Prince himself of Righteousness So foul Oppressions to suppress Descended hath on Earthly Globe And glorious Dy'd his Scarlet Robe In his own blood to keep the Peace And from your Dungeons to release Twelve Trumpets hear 12 Apostles whose Silver sound Doth from the East to West rebound Proclaim'd the Sacred Edict have And Penalty whence none can save Which lest to you should be in vain Ye Adders deaf hear it again If Thee thy Brother or thy Friend Or Enemy hap to offend See thou to warn him do not grudg Twice at the least without a Judg And the last time see thou no less Shew him than thy two Witnesses Or three to make the Fact appear If he shall doubt to him more clear Nor shalt thou him for any thing Unto the Seat of Judgment bring Untill he Litis Contestate Or shew a Contumacious hate That if thou canst thou may'st him prove Thus first at home to win by Love Let every Plaintiff thus his Suit Begin or be for ever mute No form of Strife shall be but this Our express will and pleasure is The Nations Bow and struck with Awe Adore the Justice of the Law And to the dread Tribunal run High as the Clouds bright as the Sun With loud Appeals and further will Upon this Statute draw their Bill Both of Indictment and Complaint And of these Crimes you thus attaint That against this Divinest Act More Fees and greater to exact The furious Plaintiff false or true While hot you bind him to pursue The slow Defendant wrong or right You Bail or Goal to make him fight And Fines on Concords heavy lay To make them your unhappy prey The Debtor travailing to find The Creditor with honest mind Your Outlawries ambush the way And will not suffer him to pay But in your Tolls you take him there And bind him like a filly Dear Or what doth make him as forlorn To death you hunt him with the Horn To make his Skin and Carcass yours You cheat both him and Creditors And while his Plaint each sadly tells You take the Fish and leave the Shells Thus Innocents you lay in Chains Before they know who 't is complains Or what 't is for nor shall they see 't Till all Extortion's paid by Sheet You lay Imbargues and Prizes take Before the War proclaimed you make And Right by Battle try and Wounds Mortal before the Trumpet sounds Your Hell-hounds hunt without a noise Your Snake not rattles but destroys There 's nothing true and nothing Sworn Till Justice is to pieces torn And you who cite not but infest us With your Excessus Manifestus And us torment with great unfitness Dr. Cousins writes in defence of suppressing the names of Witnesses Accusers Excommunication ipso facto without Citation Because you will not name the Witness Your Ipso Facto's make us wonder At Thunderbolts without a Thunder And Bodies Judg in Hell to cast Before the Judgment day is past And deathless Souls make pale and wan Because you Curse before you Ban. No Plea deceives the Judg on high What will you do stand mute or flie All rather or who most repents Burn Popish Forms and Presidents Is it not better then to turn To Flames than you your selves to burn Some way with speed appease his Ire Your pain proclaimed is Hell and Fire Of Summons to answer before a Copy given of what is required to be answer'd This is in Scotland provided for by Act of Parliament and no man is troubled to appear before any Judg to answer before by their Libell'd Summons a Copy is deliver'd to the Person or affixed at the Door of his dwelling House containing all the matters at large to which his answer is required and though the People of England are not yet so happy as to enjoy so great a Privilege on which those invaluable Treasures of their Liberty and Propriety depend yet every Attorny and Clerk of a Court hath it and is free from giving appearance before a Judg or being Arrested till a Copy of the Declaration first deliver'd him and Judgment pass'd against him Attor Ac. 28. The reason why these Lay-Clerks who are Successors in Courts to the old Romish Spiritual Clerk Monopolize this from the whole People only to themselves is Filthy Lucre For first if the Plaintiff were compell'd as he ought to be to make Oblatio Libelli to the Defendant by giving or sending a Copy of his Bill in Chancery or of his Declaration at Common Law to the Defendant at his dwelling House and so likewise the Defendant bound to return his Answer Sealed up directed to be left for the Plaintiff in such Court having Jurisdiction of the Cause as the Plaintiff desired within Fifteen Days after the Service of the Copy at the dwelling House to be by the Officer of the Court deliver'd Sealed to the Attorney of the Plaintiff when he demands the same and the like done on Reply Duply Triply and Quadruply and all Exceptions of Fact or Law Postulations and Motions of
either Party both on matters principal and incident till there be a Contumacy to return Answer or a Litiscontestation made and a Commission desired to examine Witnesses and the Parties for Probation this would cause all those little Shreds of Sheeps-skins which so unnecessarily torment the Countrey and the dead Pots to be laid aside as the Popish Agnusses Dei or rather Agnusses Diaboli were and so the Successors to the Popish Clerks would lose their Fees in the one as well as the other to the great joy of all the Protestants 2. What is worse they would lose their Eight pence per Sheet for but Eight words in a Line and Fifteen Lines in a Sheet in Chancery and for Six half words in a Line with a Dash and Twelve Lines in a Sheet at Common Law all which a Boy would far better transcribe for a Peny per Sheet for want of which Oblatio Libelli by the Plaintiff a Rich man will of purpose draw his Bill in Chancery and stuff it with nothing but Falsi iâ—s so long to multiply the Sheets against a Poor man that it will cost him many times Three or Four Pounds for a Transcript for which he must send an Hundred Miles besides before he shall know what he must Answer So that the Rich need do nothing else to undo the Poor but suggest and throw him into the Lions Dens of Chancery Common Law and Checquer-Clerks for Copies of those Legends of Lies they themselves invented whereas if these rich and vexatious Plaintiffs were compell'd to serve Defendants by sending them from their Pallaces but a Copy to their poor dwelling Houses or Cottages what their wills and pleasures are to have right or wrong they would pay as far as they were able rather than if they told them they should first go so far to Clerks to buy Copies of their Will and Pleasure before they would vouchsafe to reveal the same and after be less able to pay than before 3. They would lose all the Gains of those unnecessary and hurtful Entries and Inrollments of the Bills Declarations and Pleas of the Parties in those huge heaps of Mouldy Rolls wherein it is easie for them to forge what they please for no Averment is allowed against Clerks and their Records which should be far better and more Authentick were the Copies delivered Signed by the Parties themselves and only filed orderly as received from the Parties and not Enter'd nor Inroll'd by the Clerks but kept by Filazers 4. They would lose all the Gains de Temere Litigantibus which is more than they have from â—uitors which Sue of necessity and for just Cause and would not have one Suit in Ten which they now have before them for the Countrey-man where the Writ is served before the Bill or Declaration think they shall Conquer presently their Adversary if they but Arrest Outlaw or have a Commission of Rebellion against him whereby they are encouraged by Attornies to rush blindly into unwarrantable Suits which many times undo them Whereas if the Law were as it ought to be by the Precept of Christ That every Plaintiff should first send a Copy of his Bill to the Defendant and heir his Exceptions against it or sind his Contumacy before he Summon'd him before a Judg he would before he would rashly en angle himself in Law-Suits consult Councel and have his Bill or Declaration drawn by them and hear the Exceptions of his Adverâ—ary against it after which there would not one of Twenty dare run headlong on a wrong Suit except Pâ—â—sons extreamly Litigious and shameless Whereas now on Summons and Arrests tolerated before a Copy of the Bill or Declaration given the Defendant vexations Contentions both in Chancery and Common Law are infinite and endless Of giving a Copy before an Oath of Calumny That he who gives it believes the same true and just The Oath of Calumny may by the Civil Law be required not only of the Parties Litigant but of their Advocates and Procurators who are in our Language their Councellors and Attornies and the same is appointed by an Act of Parliament of Scotland the Practice of the Courts there and the same is done not only to the Bill but to all parts of Process alledged either by Plaintiff or Defendant and is of excellent Use to clear those Contagious Plagues and Pests of Judicial Proceedings Fictions and Falsities and to restore Truth which is impossible to be kept alive in Religion or Justice without abolishing the other The Causes which introduce Fictions and Falsities into Judicial Proceeding are Four One the not using the Oath of Calumny The Second the not admitting Averment or Probation to the contrary The Third the not giving the Adverse Party notice of the time and place the Swearer is appointed to be Sworn and liberty to be there present himself or by his Commissioners to except against him if he have cause The Fourth is denial of Travers and Contrary Probation to all that is doubted to be false In the Civil Law there was but one Fiction which was Fictio Postliminii the occasion whereof was the Romans to incite their Soldiers to Conquer or Die which is to take no Quarter toucht by Virgil Jaciat si quem fati sors dura peremit and Horace p. 75. Si non perit immiserabilis captiva pubes If Captive Youth should not be suffer'd to perish without Pity and Redemption it would saith he be a pernitious Example to Posterity had this Cruel Law or Custom That who was a Captive lost the Rights of a Citizen and who died a Captive in the Power of the Enemy his Estate should be confiscated to the Publick Treasury and he should have no Heir to succeed him ff de Captiv postlimin To abate the rigor and severity of this Law the Judges helped the Captive by a Fiction feigning that he was never taken Captive but always remained in the City and the Legislative in imitation of the Judges that they might the less be taken notice of to derogate from their Military Discipline stretched the former Fiction a little further and enacted by their Lex Cornelia in favour of the Heir whose Father happen'd to die Captive to the Enemy a Charitable Fiction not to punish the Child for the Fathers offence that the Father died the next hour before he was supposed to have been taken Captive L. Si is qui pro Emptore in addit marg de Vsucapio And like that of the Midwives of Aegypt to preserve young Children from Destruction seems excusable if it was not possible to do it any way else but these Episcopal Fictions That Marriage is of Souls not Bodies of Spouses not Wives begetting of Children is by Husbands absent within the four Seas not by Adulterers within the Spouses Bed That Sons are not of the blood or kin to the Father who begot them but of him of whom the Bishop will please to certifie them these are not Mendacia Officiosa but
Pernitiosa not to preserve Children but to destroy them and not only those of Subjects but of their Prince though not captived in War yet exiled by War No Digression to father on Bishops the Fictions and Preposterations of Common Law as well as Spiritual Judges by which it was impossible to use the Episcopal Ceremonies of Common Prayer-Books in Marriage or without danger of his Life to Marry otherwise than by the Moral Law of God And let it not seem here a Digression that I am enforced to Father on Romish Bishops not only all the pernitious Fictions and Preposterations in Judicial Proceedings of Spiritual but likewise of Temporal Courts and to make it part of the Exception against them That they are not fit Judges of Marriage Filiation Aliment and Succession 1. Because Romish Bishops as is already shewn were the Formers of all the Common Law Writs in the Register and Forms of Judicial Proceedings in the Book of Entries and the Compile of the Common Laws was trusted to Britton a Bishop as well as the Forms of the Citations Libells Litiscontestations Compurgations Excommunications and Provincial Laws and Canons were to other Bishops and the Bishops have been the chief Judges in the Common Law Courts of Westminster and Chancellors in the Chancery and have rid the Circuit with the Earls in the Countries and after them with the Sheriffs which Earls and other Lay-Judges in time of Popery were only Assessors or Executioners of the Sentence of the Bishop and he only the pretended infallible Oracle both of Law and Gospel to Judg how he pleased 2. Because what is a good exception against a Common Law Judg is a good exception against a Spiritual Judg and what Fiction is a good exception against Succession by the Verdict of the Jury is a good exception against Succession by the Certificate of a Bishop 3. Because by a kind of Conspiracy between the Spiritual and Common Law Courts in time of Popery their Preposterations Fictions and Formalities are so complex'd and intangled one with another that 't is impossible to divide them or carry on a perfect Discourse of one without the other or of Preposteration without Fiction and Formality the one being commonly cause of the other 4. It is necessary to prevent any Excuse the Spiritual Judg may pretend if he should say The Common Law Judg is suffer'd to Summon and Arrest before Copy to Copy before Oath of Calumny and to use Hundreds of Fictions and Falsities in his Judicial Proceedings and why should not the Spiritual Judg be allowed as well as he but where they are both censured they can neither recriminate And how guilty they both are of nursing that viperous brood of the old Serpent who have eaten through the Bowels of Justice may appear by the particulars following The Subpoena in Chancery is a Writ or Summons formed by the Bishops themselves when Chancellors wherein notwithstanding the Holy Catholick Fathers formed as many Lies as Lines 1. It begins as West hath it Proceeding in Chancery p. 183. Jacobus Dei gratia Angliae Scotiae Franciae Hiberniae Rex Fidei Defensor Fictions and Falsities fomented in all Forms of Judicial Proceedings Subpana's full of Fictions c. A. C. salutem Quibusdam certis de causis coram nobis in Cancel ' nostra propositis This is not true for though here and in other Nations anciently Princes sat in their Courts of Judicature in Person 't is not so now neither are any Causes proposed coram nobis before the King in Person unless as some presume they will attribute the incomprehensible Attribute of Omnipresence to Humanity neither is it sufficient to reply that he is present there by his Delegate for a Delegate is only where the Prince is absent or will not himself receive the Complaint which is signified by the words of Absalom 2 Sam. 15.3 See thy matters are good and right for there is no man deputed of the King to hear thee Intimating if there had been a Judg Deputed he needed not fear the Kings presence to have his matters so severely weighed as if he had Judged in Person And we see to avoid the Fiction of Human Omnipresence in an Action of Debt returnable in the Common Pleas where the King sat not in Person but Judged by Delegates the Sheriff is commanded Sum ' per bonos Sum ' praedictum A quod sit coram Justitiariis nostris apud Westmonasterium and if it had been Coram Nobis it would have been a Fiction but that which makes the Certis de Causis coram nobis in Cancel ' nostra propositis not only a Fiction but a gross Falsity is that the Complainant hath taken out his Subpoena before he hath any Bill presented either to the King in Person or the Chancellor or the meanest Clerk in the Court It goes on and say Tibi praecipimus firmiter injungentes quod omnibus aliis praetermissis excusatione quacunque cessante Yet ought the Defendant to be admitted to offer a lawful cause of Excuse or Essoin Next it says In propria persona tua yet may the Defendant be admitted to appear by Attorney Next Sis coram nobis in dicta Canc ' nostra à die Paschae proxim ' futu◠' in unum Mensem Yet to appear Quarto die post the Return-day is sufficient then ubicunque tunc fuerit ad respond ' super his quae objicientur an Objection cannot be unless there is some allegation first put in by the Defendant any more than an Answer can before some Bill put in by the Plaintiff here is therefore a double Falsity and the Poor Countrey man is fool'd to ride up an Hundred Miles when he never put in a Bill himself to be objected against nor when he with much labour is got to Town weary quarto die post is there any Bill put in against him by the Complainant for him to Answer Then it is further said Et ad faciend ' ulterius recipiend ' quod Curia nostra consideraverit in hac parte yet had neither Party Plaintiff or Defendant a Bill or Answer in Court how can it then be said In hac parte where there is no Party Et hoc Sub poena Centum librarum nullatenus omittatis This is likewise a Menacing Fiction the Chancellor having no Power to impose any Fine or Forfeiture on any Subject of a Farthing Et habeas ibi hoc breve Teste meipso apud Westmonasterium when the King is a Hundred Miles off Westminster 12 die Febr. Anno Regui Domini c. George c. But if the Defendant is a Noble-man then no Subpoena is awarded but a Letter by the Lord Chancellor or Lord-Keeper thus A Note of the Fictions of the Episcopal Form of the Letter in Chancery usually sent to a Noble-man instead of a Subpoena to Answer The Superscription is which first comes to be read and is directed thus To my very good Lord I. L. D. These This
Lives by Fictions I hope such Popish Fictions will no longer be suffer'd in Protestant Courts of Justice Coke saith From the taking away of Oaths for the truth of the cause of Essoin by the Statute of Marlebridge cap. 12. there arose after Fourcher per Essoin by several Tenants alternis vicibus and making false Essoins ultra mare all endeavour'd to be taken away by Westm 1. cap. 43. 44. but when a mischief comes by making an ill Law or Statute it is never cleanly cured by after Statutes of Explanation or Limitation without clean repealing again the Statute which causeth the mischief additions of new Patches to old Garments making the Rent but worse Fictions in Essoins The mischief of Fictions of Husband and Wife to be but one Person have been sufficiently shewn P. 66 67. Fictions de Plus petitionibus In the Common-Law Declarations the next Fictions for want of the Oath of Calumny are de Plus Petitionibus Conrad 405. saith Olim triplum condemnabantur qui majorem Summam in libello assignaverant quam reus debebat but in more ancient times I find they forfeited only the Tenth part which with an Oath of Calumny might be now sufficient to restrain the lawless laying of Debt and Damage in their Declarations an Hundred times more than it is which is very mischievous and dangerous to Defendants when Plaintiffs pack and bribe Juries and they happen to misplead make defaults or have other Casualties fallen on them whereby they cannot attend their Suits Dr. Cowell says The Civilians are in no danger de Plus Petitionibus by reason of certain Cautelous Clauses they ordinarily have at the end of every Position or Article of their Libel or Declaration to this effect Et ponit conjunctim divisim de quolibet detali tanta quantitate vel summa qualis quanta per Confessionem partis adversae vel per probationes Legitimas in fine litis apparebit and again in the conclusion of all Non astringens se ad singula probanda sed petens ut quatenus probaverit in praemissis aut eorune aliquo eatenus obtineat But Civilians and Canonists make their Laws like Juglers-knots to tie with one finger and untie with the other they make a great noise of their Oath of Calumny and de Plm Petitionibus and by these secret Clauses in their Libels make it all again to no purpose All the Common Law Writs of Questus est nobis are now grown Fictions and Declarations Licet saepius Requisitus are likewise Fictions whereby men are surprized by Arrests before any Demand made the Inde producit sectam in the end of the Plaintiffs Declaration is now turned a Fiction which was heretofore a legal proof of Witness produced to prove his Declaration for the better Caution against the false Calumnies of Plaintiffs the former Taking of Pledges of the Plaintiff is now turned to a Fiction of Plegii de prosequendo John Doe and Richard Roe the Counter-pledges exacted of the Defendant are now turned to a Fiction John Den and Richard Fen. Courts of Justice compel to Fictions and Falsities It doth not satisfie Courts of Justice to tolerate Fictions and Falsity but they compel to them as the Defendant shall be compell'd to give colour a meer insensible Fiction and Lie he shall be compell'd at Common Law to answer Negatively or Affirmatively as if he were Omniscient and shall not be permitted to say Dubito or Ignoro though Juries of greater number may all say Ignoramus he shall be compell'd to a Plus petitio to avoid a Variance between his Obligation and his Declaration as Bro. Confess 37. If a man Sue an Obligation for Ten Pounds and the Defendant confesseth all except Forty Shillings whereof he sheweth an Acquittance the Plaintiff prays Judgment and says nothing of his Acquittance for if he confess it his Writ should have abated Fictions of Acts made the first day of the Session If an Act of Parliament come before them to judg when it was made they will judg it by Fiction to be made the first day of the Session 33. H. 6.17 the Case was this In the Exchequer-Chamber Fortescue Rehearsed how the Parliament last past made a special Act against John Pilkington Esq for the Rape of a Woman out of N. c. and Rehearsed the effect of the Act and how by the same Process was granted to be made to the Sheriff of E to make certain proclamations in a Ville that the said John ought to appear before the Lords at W. at a certain day c. to answer to the Trespass contained in the said Act c. and if he would not that then he should be attaint of the Trespass and pay a certain Sum to the Party c. and that the Proclamations were accordingly made and returned into Chancery and the said John made no Appearance c. and after the said John was taken and in the Kings-Bench committed to the Marshals-Ward for certain Causes on which a Transcript of the Act and a Mittimus was sent out of the Chancery directed to us c. whereupon the Marshal was charged with him for the same Condemnation contained in the Act and the said Prisoner comes now and alledges by his Councel That the Act of Parliament is not sufficient and therefore prays to be discharged c. for the Bill being directed to the Commons pass'd them well and was endorsed in this Form Let it be delivered to the Lords but whereas the Bill was That the said John should render himself before the Feast of Pentecost next ensuing the Lords endorsed the Bill in this Form The Lords grant that in case he appear not before the Feast of Pentecost which shall be Anno Domini 1452. c. to wit at Pentecost next after the Feast contained in the Bill And therefore the Lords granted a longer day then was granted by the Commons in which Case the Commons ought to have had the Bill deliver'd back again to them and they to have assented to the Grant of the Lords which was not done and therefore such Act of Parliament is void Fortescue It seems we ought to intend no otherwise but that the Act is good for the King hath written to us by his Writ and hath certified unto us That the Bill is confirmed by Authority of Parliament Illingworth Chief Baron This cannot here be intended as you say for the Writ which is made only by a Clerk of the Chancery cannot make an Act of Parliament good if it be vicious in it self c. And afterwards he sent for Kirkby keeper of the Rolls and for Faukes Clerk of the Parliament Fortescue Rehearsed the matter to them both on which Kirkby Sir The course of the Parliament is this c. But if any Bill is particular or other Bill which is first deliver'd to the Commons and pass'd they use to endorse the Bill in this Form Let it be
he ought to be punish'd in One Hundred Pounds to the King and Imprisonment one Year without Bail and One Hundred Pounds more to the Knight injured thereby or to any other Person who in his default will Sue for the same and is contrary to the two said standing Acts of Parliament of greater consequence than Magna Charta or the Petition of Right themselves for if there is a Protestant Parliament no doubt they will make and we shall not want Protestant Laws but if once there get in a Papist Parliament both Protestant Laws Religion and Protestants themselves will be all destroyed And as the Sheriff Returns Fictions to Courts so do they send Fictions to him and it is hard for him to know when they speak true and when false as if a Venire Facias be sent him to Return 12 Jurors he must Return 24 which is double the number or he shall be Fined for as they write their words in the Venire by halves so do they as it seems their Meaning by halves yet the poor Sheriff is bound to understand them to his Cost then if they send him a Pone per Vadios Salvos plegios the Sheriff must Return no other Plegii to answer their Fiction than his own Fiction of Plegii John Den and Richard Fen or they will teach the Party to have a false Imprisonment against him Suits are removed when the Plaintiff hath been at all the Cost and trouble and is ready for a Trial on meer vexation and to delay on Suggestion or Fiction of a Cause without any Oath of Calumny Attachments and Arrest of Goods and Persons is used in the City without any Oblatio Libelli or Oath of Calumny on meer Fictions and Suggestions City Law 22. but very wrongfully for a Citizen hath as good Right to Magna Charta as he hath to the Charter of the City and under the name of being free of the City doth not lose the liberty of a Subject to be free from Arrest before Judgment Coke Vind. Law 26. says Abuses of Fictions to Arrest before Judgment This brings to my remembrance how a Gentleman was Arrested for 1500 l. the same day that he was to have been Married without any colourable cause of Action spitefully to hinder his Match and was not able to give Bail but the Party being Non-suit the Gentleman notwithstanding could recover as I remember no more than 7 s. 2 d. Cost yet he lost his Monies and indeed himself by it for I know it was the occasion of his utter Undoing and a man that is Cannibally given may devour the Credit of 500 men Arresting them for 5000 l. a piece never declare yet pay no Cost though Party Arrested had better have paid 500 l. and this is so usual that 't is commonly said I 'le bestow a Bill of Middlesex on such a man to stay him in Town that I may have his company into the Countrey when I go down And I my self was informed by a Sea-Captain who was a Sufferer in such an Arrest That there happen'd to be two Merchants in London each of which designed a Voyage to the same Port of Barbary whether he who could arrive first was assured he should to his great gain obtain the Prime of the Market to which purpose they both strove with all diligence possible which should be foremost at the Spring and it happen'd that he who had his Ship first ready had entertained this Captain of my acquaintance to command her for him and all being ready to set Sail the Captain would needs walk into the City to take his parting Cup and Farewell of his Friends where unexpectedly he was Arrested for 5000 l. though not owing a farthing and the same being a Choak-Bail-Sum he knew he should get none to be Surety for him and thereupon sent to his Merchant to inform him how he was boarded before he could get aboard who being much troubled that his Captain was taken by a Land Pyrat repaired to him and understanding from him that he did not owe the Party at whose Suit he was Arrested a farthing and knowing withal that it was done by the Spite of the other Merchant to stop his Ship from getting before him he gave Bail for his Captain and sent him immediately on the Voiage All which Mischiefs happen because there is no Law to compel to give a Copy of the Declaration and Oath of Calumny before Arrest by which all Fictions are prevented All the Judicial Transactions of Fines and Recoveries are Fictions Fictions of Fines and Recoveries so though we have fled from Land to Sea and back again from Sea to Land we know not where to find Rest for the Sole of our Foot from Fictions We are next come to another horrible cause of their Increase which is that no Averment or Probation to the contrary is admitted against the Sheriff or the Clerk nor the Returns or Records how Records which are nothing but the Scribling of Clerks in false Latine and Court-hand for their Fees come to be of higher Authority than the Scripture it self is strange for it was never denied except against Mahomets Alchoran but Averment and contrary Probation might be brought against the false Copying false Translating or false Printing of any word or Clause in the Scripture or it would be very difficult to overthrow Popery What greater reason is there of so many Forgeries of Clerks but that there is no Averment allowed against their Records nor contrary Probation whereby they may for Money insert what Fictions and Falsities they please Estopples are another mischievous cause and the denial of liberty of Travers as bad or worse than the other Turpia quid referam vanae mendacia Linguae I am weary and ashamed to recite so much reflecting so deeply on the Honourable and necessary Profession of the Law Pudet haec opprobria nobis Et dici potuisse non potuisse refelli But all this may be easily taken away of Fictions and Falsities if so small a matter of Form were but alter'd as to give liberty to Traverse all is false and to cause the Plaintiffs and Defendants to give Copies of their Declarations and Pleas and to give their Oath of Calumny to them for I saw it by experience in Scotland which I must acknowledg and testifie to the Honour of their Form of Judicial Proceedings That I could never for the space of Six Years observe the least Fiction in the same which I can attribute to no other cause than the wise and just Act of Parliament concerning the Oath of Calumny Jac. 1. P. 9. C. 125. and the present Practice accordingly which Act being short I have transcribed That Advocates and Fore-speakers in Temporal Courts sall Sweare THrow the consent of the hail Parliament it is Statute and Ordained That Advocates and Fore-speakers in Temporal Courts and alswa the Parties that they plead for gif they be present in all Causes in the beginning or
Judicial Proceeding he sits amongst the Barristers and Attornies like an Ass amongst Apes he knows not when Disputes of the Cause ought to be permitted nor when they are to be restrained then lest he should restrain the necessary he lets loose the unnecessary and casts the Reins on the Pleaders necks to run whither they will and on every Trisle multiplies Delays and as the same Author further says p. 610. Vt nunc Status Judiciorum nostrorum habet viginti interdum Triginta dilationes Dari solent eaeque ex causis plerumque levissimis nec ad Prâ—bandum solum sed ad Excipiendum replicandum duplicandum triplicandum c. Sed conclusa Disputatione Judex etiam trium vel quatuor interdum plurium annorum Dilationem sibi sumit ad pronunciandum c. nâ—que ii qui reformandis Judiciis praeficiuntur tam Crassos Errores perspiâ—iunt sed si perspiciunt defendere tamen quà m Emendare malunt Vereor itaque ne juris peritorum eundem quem Clericorum Authoritas Exitum sit habitura As now the state of our Judicial Proceeding stands it useth to give Twenty sometimes Thirty Dilations and those on meer Toys and not only for Probation by Witnesses but to Except Duply Triply Quadruply c. As likewise when the Disputations are concluded a Judg will delay Three Four or more Years before he will pronounce Sentence neither do those who are set to preside in Judicial Proceeding see so gross Errors and though they do yet had they rather defend than amend them I fear therefore lest the Lawyers come to the same end which the Popish Judges and Clerks their Predecessors in their Courts did It is certain the Soldiers in the late Troubles were so much enraged that they would have cut all their Fictions and Formalities to pieces if any would have prescribed them a Form of Proceeding which should be intelligible to them Now all these Delays rise from Disputes or pretence of cause of them and all Disputes at Common Law rise from Formalities and how can it be otherwise seeing the Writs on which all Judicial Proceedings are founded are nothing but Formalities and all Demurs and Disputes relate only to the Gist of the Writ or the Form of the Declaration or Plea which are Relative to the Writ and there can be never any Demurrer or Dispute at Common Law on the Writ of the Merits of the Cause which though one Form of Writ will not bear another may and all Equity on which the true merit of all Causes depends is clean Excluded out of all Common Law Courts because to Judg by Formalities is more profitable and raises more Contentions than the Merit or Equity of the Cause 4. It is to be Observed how contradictory these Formalities are to themselves and one another as in the Case of Colour before mention'd a meer unintelligible piece of Non-Sense for what is more insensible than a Lie or Fiction yet will they force the Defendant to this Lie and not to plead the General Issue of Not Guilty not allow him to plead a Special Issue according to his Case as a Formality whereby they take the Cause from the Jury to themselves at their Arbitrary pleasure so as unintelligibly and Arbitrarily in all other Cases they compell poor men to take or leave the General Issue at their Fancy for Formalities so uncertain as they themselves often contradict themselves and sometimes they are all divided what Plea shall amount to the General Issue and what not or what ought to be given in Evidence on the General Issue or what ought to be pleaded specially and not given in Evidence on it and frequently spend the whole Term in unnecessary long tedious and costly Arguments de Lana Caprina on Demurrers on both when if they would give but a Formulary directive and not coercive how they would have men plead men were permitted but to speak the Truth of their Case in such Words and Language as their own Sense and Reason which God hath given to that end prompts them according to the same and where it fitted not their Case to wave it all this were saved and the merits of so many good Causes miserably destroyed for so petty and pitiful insensible Formalities preserved Coke Com. 282. acknowledges that by one mistake of giving matters of Justification in Evidence on the General Issue of Not Guilty the loss of most Causes depends yet would he and others keep it up still to what end none can tell unless to keep the same Piâ— open that so many more Causes might continue perpetually to be lost in it for the gain of Practicers pleading to Juries before whom it being matter of Fact they ought not by Law be suffer'd to speak And this Rule of not giving in Evidence but pleading on the Issue Not Guilty they will force the same man in one end of the same Room to plead his Justification and not give the same Evidence and in the other end of the Room to give it in Evidence and not plead his Justification As in a Trespass for Battery at an Assizes If at the Nisi Prius he will plead Not Guilty and give his Justification in Evidence That he beat the Plaintiff in his own defence he loses all And if at the Crown-side he who hath beaten and kill'd a Robber or Thief in defence of his own Life on the High-way or of his House by Night plead his Justification and will not say Not Guilty and give it in Evidence be he never so Innocent he loses all and well he may when he is to be Judged by those who contradict themselves and are not able in their Fictions to follow that necessary Rule Oportet mendacem esse memorem and forget at one end of the Hall the Formality they Commanded or Prohibited at the other 5. The Fifth Observable may be how great a prejudice and danger it must be to the People to be forced to put all their Estates on the hazâ—rd of such Forms as the Judges themselves understand not nor can agree about but are in perpetual Contention and Contest for one with another and the vast charge they must be at to maintain these Disputes to destroy themselves which would not be if Formalities were taken away and only the merit of the Cause examin'd in Judgment Most Noble Fitzherbert the first Flower of Judges which ever sprung in Westminster-Hall we may thank God for thee from Generation to Generation who first didst dare with the Sword of Justice oppose the whole World of Enemies to Truth and to give the monstrâ— us Romish Hydra of Formality and the Devil himself the Father of Lies and Fictions that wound in Judicial Proceedings whereof they shall never be cured 2. The Plaintiff especially if a Poor man is Condemn'd without Hearing by being compell'd to begin his Suits by the Purchase of Original Writs and so likewise the Defendant This excludes the Plaintiffs of the Poor out of
in the said Chancery-Orders Printed 1669. presumes to do in the Court of Conscience what was never heard of to be done in the Courts of Turks Infidels or the most Barbarous Judicatories in the World for he is not ashamed publickly to give License to Cursitors and their Clerks to commit Crimen Falsi which we call Forgery by Antedating Writs taking them out of Returns past or of a former Term by reason of which Forgery of Writs and Forgery of Returns Antedated Capiases Proclamations Exigends and Outlawries Antedated have been likewise Forged and Thousands of Poor men unjustly cast in Goals and miserably undone without any Summons or Hearing and these are likewise the damnable effects of the Chancellours Writs by which as by others the Plaintiffs so here the Defendants are destroyed without Hearing and certainly these Crimes of Antedating and Forgery of Judicial Acts though here Licensed by Orders of Chancellors and Protected by Courts by not Licensing Averments against them are by the Civil Law and Laws of Scotland and of many other Nations both of these and Instruments Death and even by our own the imbeselling of a Record by a Clerk and Counterfeiting of Fines is Felony and if the second time so is the Forgery of Deeds Writings and Court-Rolls and deservedly the Offender better deserving death than a Robber on a High-way and why any Crimes of this Nature should be publickly Licensed to the Ruin of all Truth and Justice by any Chancellour in his Chancery Orders is very strange the mischievous effects of which said Attachments on Affidavit and Antedating Writs and Forgery of Outlawries are notoriously known and not complained of here without good Cause and Testimony and some particular experience of my own to my loss who have as well as others suffer'd in an high degree by the false Affidavit of a Fellow who Subscribed and Swore it by a false name and not his own and likewise procured a Forged Outlawry antedated against me It belongs not to a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity in England 5. It belongs not to the Chancellours Office to be a Judg of Equity or to make Orders Edicts Laws or Writs and thereby to Imprison the Persons and dispose of the Lands and Goods of the Subjects Arbitrarily and at his Pleasure Coke 4. part 82. saith That all Statutes which give Authority to the Chancellour to determin Offences in Chancery are to be intended only in the Ordinary Court there which proceeds in Latine and is Secundum Legem c. and not in any Extraordinary Court which proceeds in English Secundum Aequum bonum and 37. H. 6.14 27. H. 8.18 it is Resolved That the Court of Chancery Proceeding by English Bill is no Court of Record and therefore it cannot bind either the State of the Subjects Lands or the Property of his Goods or Chattels and therefore they there admit he may Imprison the Person Chancellour cannot bind the Subject's Goods not Persons which is not only a Non sequitur but a contrary conclusion follows on it for if he cannot bind the Subjects Goods à Fortiori he cannot bind his Person For the Life is more than Meat and the Body is more than Raiment Luke 12.23 And though those Common Law Judge of H. 6. and H. 8. so sordidly deliver'd the Subject Prisoner to the Chancellour so as they might keep his Lands and Goods to themselves yet had they no more Law or Right to do it than they had to deliver him Prisoner to the Turks or to send him to the Barbado's for the Subject is no Slave neither ought he to be given or sold for one without his own Assent by his Representative in Parliament and having so good a Protection against the Chancellours and Common Law Judges and the Orders and Writs of both as Magna Charta and the Petition of Right both for his Lands Goods and Person they ought to shew some greater Laws than their Writs and Orders of Courts or Forgeries of Clerks before they presume to invade either 6. There being no Law in England which ever Ordained a Chancellour to be a Judg of Equity or to make Edicts or Orders concerning the same he can pretend no Title thereto unless from the Laws of France and to that effect Polydor Virgil saith The Chancery came in with the Conquest to which though my Lord Coke saith Perperam Erravit because the Mirror saith The Constitutions of the ancient Kings were that every one should have out of the Chancery of the King a Writ Remedial for his Flaint without difficulty yet he himself seems to be in the Error and not Polydore for though the name of Chancellour and Chancery was before the Conquest and divers other Countries use the name of Chancellour as well as England yet the greatest part of the Writs came from Normandy and are mention'd in their Customary as who will peruse it shall find but as to the Writ of Subpoena Centum librarum and Arbitrary Power of the Chancellour and to be a Judg of Equity came first from the Conquest and was never used before nor did it belong to the Chancellour's Office either of England or Scotland that having other employment and more than a Chancellour could do though he never troubled himself with Judgment but left the same to the Judges to whom the King Delegated the cause by Writ and this the very name of Chancellour testifieth who was Originally no other than a Master of Requests to the Prince whom he served and on Petitions deliver'd to him by the Subjects if unfit to be Granted he strook cross lines over them like Cancelli or Lettices by which he Cancell'd them and thence had his name of the Canceller or Chancellour as Turn lib. 11. advers c. 25. and not according to that Fictitious Verse of his Power Hic est qui Leges Regni Cancellat iniquas For when was ever any Chancellour in England allowed to Cancel any Roll or Act of Parliament And when these Petitions for Justice were deliver'd by the People to this Master of Requests call'd the Canceller of such of them as were Evil such as were Just he Cancelld not but on behalf of the Petitioner Granted the Princes Rescript or Warrant to the Praeses Provinciae where the cause of Action arose or the Defendant lived for Actor Sequitur Forum Rei which Rescript or Warrant we now call a Writ containing in it self 1. A Questus est nobis a short recital of the Complaint 2. Si A. fecerit te securum a taking Security or Pledges of the Plaintiff de Prosequendo 3. A Summoneas or Summons of the Defendant to appear before the Prince himself or such Judges as he Delegated though out of the Province or County where he lived which was the Reason of taking Pledges of the Plaintiff because he made the Defendant appear many times Hundreds of Miles from his Home when he might in those days implead him before the President
or Sheriff or Lord of the Barony in his County unless he excepted Partiality or other just cause against him 4. A taking of Pledges of the Defendant to appear 5. To make Return of the Writ and left Writs should be Counterfeit the Chancellour was Keeper of the Seal and Sealed them It appears by the Lex Julia de repetundis Chancellour not to sell Writs and Copies of Bills and Answers that the Master of Requests or Canceller was not to take any Fees for these Writs for giving or not giving a Judg out of the Province or County where the Defendant lived for it was a great vexation and oppression of the People to be Summon'd out of the Provinces on malitious Suggestions without cause and our own Parliaments in England have often complained against the same oppression here by the Pope on whose Citations and false Suggestions without cause men were compell'd to give personal Appearances at Rome as many and as often as he pleased if any would but buy there of his Officers a Citation and to prevent this vexatious exaction of Appearances on Writs of men out of their own Counties besides the requiring of Pledges on all Common Law Writs and the enjoining of Pledges to be taken in the Chancery-Writ of Subpoena as in the Lex Julia so is it mention'd in Magna Charta Nulli vendentus nulli negabimus Justitiam vel Rectum which is intended of a Writ of Right and all other Writs whereby Right is obtained for if the Chancellour were not to take Fees and sell his Subpoena's and other Writs he would not so often by them make men Travail thorough Nine Shires to Westminster when they may have better Justice done at home in their own County on no other cause than Fictitious and Malitious Suggestions of the Plaintiff and that he may take a Fee for the same and he would Cancel according to his Office more Petitions and Bills than he would Grant but assoon as Chancellours took Fees for Writs which Sale of Right 't is likely as Polydore says came from the French then no Suit could be begun without Writ all were driven to Westminster Parties Witnesses and Juries unnecessarily and to no purpose but to inrich the Judicatories and undo the People in like manner the Plaintiffs and Defendants ought to give one another mutually Copies of their Bills Declarations and Pleas at the expenses of the Giver which is very small and easie to the Parties and not to be compell'd to buy them of the Chancery or Common Law Officers so the Chancellour had neither his Jurisdiction to Judg of Equity or his Sale of all the Judicial Parts of the same and of the Law with it from the Law of England but A-la-mode de France from the Conqueror till Magna Charta abolished his Tyranny by the Judgment of Peers and of his French Comtes by the 28. E. 1. cap. 8. by which Act that gallant King grants every County the free Election of their own Sheriff after which the Land was free from the Chancellours Troubling men out of their own Counties by his Subpoena's till H. 5. Conquer'd France by which as is usual in other Conquests some Touch of the Diseases and Vices of the Conquer'd will be return'd on the Conquerors and accordingly in the time of his Son H. 6. the Subpoena and a Chancellour with a Pretorian Jurisdiction pretended of Equity with Power of making Laws Edicts and Chancery-Orders and Forms of Writs and to Sentence above all Appeal all which Powers belonged to the Roman Pretor of which the French Chancellour was the Ape and Ours of the French and this pretended Pretorian Jurisdiction ever since hath grown so much A-la-mode partly by making Bishops Chancellors who pretended Supremacy in all matters of Conscience and had in their hands amongst the Superstitious the flaming Sword and Thunder-bolt of Excommunication partly by their Power overtopping and overawing the Common Law Judges and partly by flattering the People with doing Justice in the English Tongue which was very grateful to them and would be as grateful now in the Common Law Courts if they could get it the Chancellours contrary to the greatest Fundamental Laws and Acts of Parliaments of the English introduced on them a most lawless Arbitrary Power and Servility of a Foreign Nation to dispose of their Lands Goods Persons Liberty and Propriety at their pleasure And what is more have assumed like the old Romish Pretors the Power of making Laws Edicts Forms Writs Obligatory to the Subject's Persons Lands and Goods for Coke on the Question In what Text the Common Law is to be found saith In Forms of Writs and Forms of Entries in Courts of Records And Bracton saith Breve ad similitudinem Regulae Juris Formatum So who assumes the Power of making Writs Judicial Edicts Forms and Orders assumes the Legislative Power notwithstanding and above Acts of Parliament to dispose of the Subject's Liberty and Propriety at pleasure yet this have Chancellours done Forming divers Writs in the Register out of their own Heads Lamb. Archeion which always are Formed for the greatest Profit of the Clerks and Courts which make them and not of the People and Episcopal Chancellours have so far in time of Popery deceived Parliaments that Westm 2. cap. 24. gives the Clerks of the Chancery as good as Power to make what Writs they will and the pretence is insinuated by the Clerks De caetero non recedant querentes à cur ' Regis sine remedio or Ne Curia Regis desiceret in Justitia exhibenda whereas none who understands the least part of the Forms of Judicial Proceeding there is who doth not know that the Kings Court if he please may do far better Justice if all the new Writs made by Clerks and all the old Writs in the Register were made a Bonfire all together and none but Copies of Declaaations served without them then 't is possible to do with them which Del gation of Power to Clerks to make Writs must be void for the making of Forms of Writs Edicts or Orders is an Act of Legislation and to give Votes in Legislation is a Personal Office of Trust reposed by the People in their Representative Elected by them and by the known Law no Office of Trust can be Assigned Granted over or Delegated if the Parliament therefore please to enact themselves any Judicial Forms or Orders of Proceeding they ought to be obeyed as Laws but it would be a great injury to the People if they should Grant over the Office of Trust in them to a Chancellour and Clerks never Elected or Intrusted by the People Chancellour of England or Scotland no Pretor Let a French Chancellour be therefore what he will 't is clear no English Chancellour ought to be a Pretor Judg of Equity maker of Laws Edicts Forms or Orders of Judicial Proceeding nor any Chancellour of Scotland the full of the matters of both whose Offices though they may differ
in the Fees are mention'd Stat. Mal. 2. cap. 2. that is to say 1. To Seal Writs 2. To Seal the Kings Pattents Grants and Commissions 3. Presentations to Churches 4. Pardons to such Malefactors as deserve them which Statute of Malcom 2. cap. 2. follows in these words 1. Item They Ordained to the Chancellar the Fie of the Great Seal that is for ilk Chartour of an Hundreth Pound Land and above that the Fie of the Seal Ten Pounds and to his Clerk for the Writeing twa Markes 2. Item For ane Precept of Suising conform to the Chartour to the Chancellar for the Fie of the Seale ane Mark and to his Clerk twa Shillings 3. Item For ane Letter of Attornay or Protection for the Fie of the Seale Twelve Pennies and to the Clerk for the writeing Thrie Pennies 4. Item For ane Brieve closed with Walx to the Chancellar Sex Pennies and to the Clerk for writeing Thrie Pennies 5. Item For are Letter of Remission given by the King for the Slauchter of a man to the Chancellar 40 Shillings and to his Clerk for the writeing Sex Shillings Aucht Pennies 6. Item For ane Letter of Presentation to ane Kirk or to ane Hospital to the Chancellar 40 Shillings and to his Clerk for writâ—ing Aucht Pennies 7. But that part of the Office of the Chancellour of Scotland which concerns Original Writs is since Reformed and all Writs Abolished except Seven Only Seven Writs left in Scotland which Skene de verb. sign tit Breve recites thus Bot Seven Forms of Brieves all anerlie are now commonly used The First The Brieve of Mortancestrie The Second The Brieve of Tutorie The Third The Brieve of Idiotry The Fourth The Brieve of Terce The Fifth The Brieve of Line or Linâ—ation of Lands and Tenements within Burgh The Sext The Brieve of Division The Seventh The Brieve of Perambulation Quhair of the Three first Brieves are Answer'd and retour'd again to the Chancellary and the uther Four receives na retour'd Answer And in all other Actions instead of Writs by an Act of Parliament of James the Fifth after mention'd the Defendant ought to be served with a Copy of the Declaration to begin the Suit Only one Writ in Wales for Real Actions Writs pull men out of their Houses Beyond Sea In Wales and some parts of the North they Trie all Real Actions by a Quod ei deforcâ—at 8. The mischiefs of Writs are they pull men out of their Houses before Judgment contrary to the Civil Law ff siquis in jus vocatus non ierit l. 21. de Domo sua nemo extrahi debet which is expounded by Bartolus Invitus quis de domo non debet extrahi sed ibi existens potest verbaliter citari contra contumacem fit Missio in possissionem 9. Writs help not for any matter rising beyond Sea unless by Fiction of the place beyond Sea to be in England so honest men are without Remedy and only Liars obtain it No Oath of Calumny can be to a Writ 10. No Oath of Calumny can be given of a Writ whereby it becomes full of Falsities and Fictions but to a Bill in Chancery or Declaration an Oath of Calumny may be given which will purge it from all Falsity and Fiction if no Writ but if there is a Writ false it will compell the Declaration to be false because it will otherwise be abated for Variance from the Writ 11. Writs make Declarations to be of double length and contain two Declarations one a vain repetition of the other for 7. H. 6.47 In every Action on the Case the whole Cause of Action at large ought to be contained in the Writ for it is not sufficient to have a general Writ and special Count whereby the Party is compell'd to Enter and the Defendant to Copy a double Declaration of huge length and often twice as long as a Chancery Bill and Four Judges on Demurs to have each a Copy and of the whole Process to the intolerable Charge of Suitors and Gains of Clerks and Officers of Courts though it be but a trifling Action for Words or the like 12. Writs must pass the hands of Under-Sheriffs who often times will delay and betray them as long as the Party will give them Money 13. The old Writs which are in the Register and all the new which have been coined or joined by Chancellours or Clerks are defective and insufficient to supply Justice in the multitude of Cases which happen 1. Because the greatest part of the Writs of the Register are Antiquated and never used but remain as Forms out of Fashion and matters as unprofitable Lumber 2. All real Actions are thrown aside and the truth is Lawyers are so ignorant how to manage them that like the old â—ion in his Den they draw all their Clients into Chancery whence Vestigâ—a nulla retrorsum 3. The two old Principal Writs of Droit Patent and Novel Disseisin the one to determine the Right the other the Possession no Lawyer now knows in them to join the Mise or arraign the Assise any more than he doth when he talks of Robin Hood to Shoot in his Bow whereby the two chief Writs which dispatcht more Justice than all the rest are utterly lost 4. It is as impossible for a Chancellour and Clerk though they make in their Officina Brevium a Thousand Forms of Writs more than they have to fit with them all that want Right any more than for a Shoe-maker in his Officina Calceorum though he hath a good stock of Shoes ready made to all the Feet with them which want Shoes yea more impossible for the Shoe-maker makes his Shoes of soft yielding Leather his Straps or Buckles open or shut them wider or closer his Shoeing-horn Weesel-skin or Fists draw pull and thump them off and on and many pretty tricks and Instruments he hath to curry shave stretch punch oil water and stand them on the Last to accommodate them for the Foot but a Chancellour makes all his Writs of Iron or Latine and puts in them so many Gravels of Fictions Falsities broken Words Repugnancies Absurdities Nonsense that it kills or creeples any Case to walk from its own Home to Westminster 5. That there is an intolerable defect in Writs to supply Justice to the People appears in this That though all Originals come out of a Court which inâ—itles it self a Court of Conscience and Equity yet there is not one Writ to Remedy a particular Case of either nor any Action on the Case for a Case of Conscience or Equity arising from the Moral Law of God but all fall down and worship the Themis or Great Idol of the Ceremonial Law of Man of Livery and Seisin Fines Recoveries Inrollments Writings Seals Forms of Entries Forms of Pleading Forms of Words Fictions and the like which are not able to give a Right to the least foot of Land or handful of Goods nor any other Law than the
intent that one Family might not by Marriage Gifts rob another always married in the same Family and Brothers and Sisters married making that Religion to marry in the Family which others made Incest and that Incest to marry out of the Family which others made Religion Portions and Jointures both to be limited This indeed secured all within the Family but there are many more Lawful ways before mention'd and amongst the rest the making all such Gifts forasmuch as is Super-alimentary void or at least to limit them by a Law That all Portions and Tenancies by Courtesie above the value of 0000 shall be void and all Jointures Dowers and Thirds above the value of 0000 shall be void A Satyr against Mercenary Marriage CVrsed the Female was or Male Who first did Beauty set to Sale For Love did then loose both his Eyes When Gifts and Gold did blind the wise And Venus which did shine on high From Heaven fell into a Stie Priapus then the God unclean Thereon his Temple built obscene And set the Steeple up and Spire That he might share both Whores and Hire And Sextons set to keep the Keys That none might enter without Fees And Cryer next to Curse and Ban Vnless well paid Woman and Man And Paritor about to ride With Bag for Money by his side All Women unto Court to bring Who did not Wed with a Gold-Ring Then Fathers left their Babes forlorn Who had no Licence to be born And Mothers fled Oh heavy Doom Because they were not called home Then Priests to make them greater Whores Fetter'd Fifteens to Fourscores And married dead to those alive Mâ—zentius Torment to revive Mouths bound to Mouths were Eyes to Eyes With Breasts to Breasts and Thighs to Thighs When Pralats in fine Linnen jetting Of Reverend Fathers own begetting Their Babes of Grace oh pretty things Made often Heirs to Peers and Kings This Palls and Miters first made shine And Missions to be Divine Thus Love and Hate together Yoak't The Hangman Priest together choak't And for the Murders clayms a Fee To his unholy holy See The Ambidextrous Lawyer enters And takes a share with his Indentures Lawyer nor Priest nor Book nor Bell Would have did they not Women Sell. If Money her or me must buy Loves Pedlars I you all defy Money did Solomon beguile 1 King 11.5 His first black Wife to setch from Nile And her because he lov'd not best With Thousand Wives to be opprest This was beginning of the Trick The wise turn'd after Lunatick The Goddess Astaroth to please Astaroth was the Moon Milcom was Priapus Who Ruled the Sidonian Seas And Milcom he the foul delight Adored of the Ammonite This Protestants made Papists Wed And fight and scratch in the same Bed Faith and Religion both Divine Lie Victims at Pecunia 's Shrine Of the Law giving Jurisdiction of the secret Causes of Divorce between Parents and secret Vncleanness of Children in their Parents Houses to publick Tribunals contrary to the Law of God It will be Objected How should those Sins of Carnal Uncleanness be punished if not brought before a publick Judge 'T is Answer'd Far better than by him First It not denied but publick Fornication and Adultery where there are Witnesses belong to publick Justice to punish as where Diogenes lay with a Woman in midst of the Market or as Leo Afer mentions where a Mahumetan Prophet lay with another man's Wife at a publick Bath in sight of a multitude of By-standers It is not denied likewise but Bawds Panders Stews Brothel-Houses where are Witnesses are and ought to be severely punished by the publick Magistrate But the Question is of such Fornication and Adultery which are generally so secret as none but the Parties themselves can witness against themselves these appear expresly by the Scripture it self that they belong neither to Priest nor Magistrate to judg or punish but only to God for it is said Deut. 29.29 Secret things belong unto the Lord our God but those things which are revealed belong unto us and our Children And Heb. 13.4 Marriage is honourable in all and the Bed undefiled but Whoremongers and Adulterers God shall judg It is not said man shall judg of secret sins but God And Deut. 17.6 It is said At the mouth of two Witnesses or three Witnesses shall he that is worthy of death be put to death but at the mouth of one Witness he shall not be put to death And 19.15 One Witness shall not rise up against a man for any Iniquity or for any sin in any sin that he sinneth at the mouth of two Witnesses or at the mouth of three Witnesses shall the matter be established And 1 Tim. 5.19 Against an Elder receive not an Accusation but before two or three Witnesses And there is very great reason that man should not presume to usurp on the Jurisdiction of God in things secret especially in these and other offences of uncleanness For First This many times indangers the lives of innocent Parties how many Joseph's how many Athanasiusse's how many Susanna's have been falsly accused How far from the Law of God or Justice Justices of Peace ought not to receive accusations of Fornication on the single Testimony of a leud Woman is therefore the proceedings of Ecclesiastical Courts and many Justices of Peace who without any other Witness then so incompetent a one as a leud Woman who is the Party and gains by it charge and punish men for Bastardy and Fornication and contrary to Magna Charta the Petition of Right and all the Fundamental Laws of the Land made for preservation of the Liberty and Propriety of the People the one by causing Excommunicatos Capiendo's the other by Warrants send whom they will to Goal and Imprison them at their pleasure And how far again from the Law of God or Justice is the compelling men for these Crimes to self-accusation when they can get no Witnesses as they ought to have Secondly Publick Inquisitions and Punishments of these Crimes of uncleanness do more corrupt then reform both Judg and People For the Judg example may be taken from Auricular Confessors who under pretence of injoining Penance to others learn to be above all others the most debauch'd themselves and as to the People it is either a licencing or incouragement to all such as are rich who for a little Commutation-Money buy the Pope's Pardon or what is equivalent the Bishops or the Kirks or if they will not suffer them to Commute the People when they see the Nobles in the Stools of Repentance will think it an honour to follow them and besides for People to hear or see the publick Examinations and Stories of uncleanness in publick Courts they oftentimes do but learn more wickedness then ever they knew or thought of before and are less corrupted at a Play-House then such a Scene of Justice All this is far better punished in every private Family between the Parents if there be