Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	court_n	king_n	law_n	5,153	5	5.1808	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A91309	Truth triumphing over falshood, antiquity over novelty. Or, The first part of a just and seasonable vindication of the undoubted ecclesiasticall iurisdiction, right, legislative, coercive power of Christian emperors, kings, magistrates, parliaments, in all matters of religion, church-government, discipline, ceremonies, manners: summoning of, presiding, moderating in councells, synods; and ratifying their canons, determinations, decrees: as likewise of lay-mens right both to sit and vote in councells; ... In refutation of Mr. Iohn Goodwins Innocencies Triumph: my deare brother Burtons Vindication of churches, commonly called Independent: and of all anti-monarchicall, anti-Parliamentall, anti-synodicall, and anarchicall paradoxes of papists, prelates, Anabaptists, Arminians, Socinians, Brownists, or Independents: whose old and new objections to the contrary, are here fully answered. / By William Prynne, of Lincolnes Inne, Esquire.	Prynne, William, 1600-1669.	1645 (1645)	Wing P4115; Thomason E259_1; ESTC R212479	202,789	171

dignities elective and prohibits provisions usurpations citations and Bulls of the Pope and Court of Rome under paine of a Praemunire banishment abjuration Imprisonment Fine and ransome 14. R. c. 2. Limits the exchanges of monyes to the Court of Rome 15. R. 2. c. 2. 6. concernes forcible entries into Benefices Offices of holy Church mortuaties to Religious persons Popes Bulls consecrations of Church-yeards and Appropriations of Churches and Almes 16. R. 2. c. 5 provides for presentations to Churches against the Popes usurpations Translations excommunications Bulls and Jurisdiction under paine of a Praemunire 21. R. 2 it prefaced To the honour of God and holy Church and c. 1. confirmes the Churches Liberties In King Henry the 4th his Parliaments I finde that the Prologues of the Statutes in 1. ● 4. 7. 9. and 13. H. 4. begin thus To the honour of God and reverence of holy Church c. and the first Chapter in each of them is That holy Church have and enjoy all her rights liberties and Franchises entirely and without imbleamishing Then follow temporall Lawes 2. H. 4. c. 3. 4. prohibits provisions of exemption from regular or ordinary obedience granted to any religious persons from Reme Buls of exemption from payment of Tithes granted to the Religious of the Order of Cysteaux under paine of a P●amunire and Cap. 15. provides for the suppression of Sectaries hereticall Preachers Conventicles heriticall Bookes Schooles and preservation of the Catholique faith enacting that Heritickes shall be imprisoned abjured and in case of relapse or obstinacy burned 4. H. 4. c. 2. 3. confirme all the Statutes formerly made in favour of the Church and Clergy and for preservation of their liberties Cap. 12. concernes appropriations of Churches Vicaridges Ordinaries the Bishop and Archdeacon of Ely and other Religious persons cap. 14. prohibits working or wages on holy-dayes Cap. 17. enacts that none shall enter into Religion unlesse he be foureteene yeares of age without the Parents consent Cap. 22. concernes presentations to Benefices 5. H. 4. c. 11. 12. concerne Tithes Chalices and ornaments of holy Church 6. H. 4. c. 1. prohibits provisions and the payment of first fruits or exacted fees to Rome under forfeiture of all their estates who offend herein 7. H. 4. c. 6. inhibits Religious persons under paine of a Praemunire to procure any exemption from payment of Tithes or any provisions from the Pope 9. H. 4. c. 8. forbids provisions and translations from the Pope under paine of a Praemunire and makes all elections of Archbishops Bishops Abbots Prebends Deans to be free without any interruption from the Pope or King 11. H. 4. c. 4 Prohibits unlawful games on Sundayes and other holy dayes 1. H. 5. c. 7. 8. prohibits the conferring of Ecclesiasticall living upon Aliens and orders their benefices and the lands of Priors aliens to be seised in times of Warre 2. H. 5. c. 1. provides for Ordinaries visitations of Hospitalls and reformation of them after the lawes of the holy Church Cap. 3. grants a prohibition to spirituall Courts where they deny a Copy of the Lible Chap. 7. for the preservation of the Christian faith the Law of God and holy Church with in this Realme and the punishment of Heresies and Hereticks enacts that Hereticks shall be apprehended and imprisoned by Sheriffs and upon conviction of Heresy forseit their Lands and goods and be burned 2. H. 5. Parl. 2. c. 2. limits the wages of Curates and Parish Priests 3. H. 5. c. 1. enacts that holy Church have all her liberties and franchsies C. 3. concerns Abbots and Priors C. 4. inhibits provisions from Rome under a Premiarie C. 8. concernes Probate of Wills and r●gulates exorbitant fees for procuring them C. 6. forbids the promotions of Irishmen to Beneficies or Ecclesiasticall dignities 9. H. 5. c. 9. limits the manner of collecting Dismes by Archbishops Bishops and their Agents 2. H. 6. c. 1 confirmes the Churches liberties 6. H 6. c. 3. prohibits worke on and wages for holy dayes 8. H. 6. begins thus To the Laud and honor of Almighty God and of the holy Mother the Church Ch. 1. provides for the priviledges of the Convocation 10. H. 6. c. 11. limits how Bastardy shall be tryed between the Common and Canon Law which differ therein 15. H. 6. c. 7. concernes Abbots and Priots 27. H. 6. c. 5. prohibits Faires and Merkets upon Sundayes and principle holy dayes as a great prophanation of them 28. H. 6. begins To the honour of God and of holy Church 33. H. 6. c. 6. concerns the exemption of the Abbot of Founteynes and other Abbots and Priors from Vexations sutes 1. Ed. 4. is prefaced To the honour of God and of holy Church C. 1. containes in it many particulars concerning Bishops Abbots and Clergymen 3. E. 4. hath the same prefaced and 12. E. 4. c. 7 prescribes excommunication 4. times a yeare to be denounced against the infringers of Magna Charta as other Acts formerly did King Richard the 3d. prefaceth the Acts of his first Parliament in his 1. yeare thus To the honour of God and of holy Church c. 14. limits the maner of collecting the Clergies Dismes King Henry the 7th begins his Statutes in the 1. yeare of his Reigne To the honour of God and his holy Church and Cap. 4. enables Archbishops Bishops and other Ordinaries to imprison Priests Clerkes and Religious persons for incontinency which they could not doe before The Statutes of 2. 4. 11. 12. 17. H. 7. as their Prologues attest were made to the worship of God and holy Church and for the common good of this Realme The Statutes of An. 1. 3. 4. all or most Parliaments in the Regine of King Henry the 8th are prefaced To the honour of God and holy Church and for the Common Weale and profit of this Realme In the Parliament of 21. H. 8. C-3 4. 13. there were Statutes made concerning Probat of VVi●s taking of mortuaries by Priests or others against Pluralities of Benefices and taking of farmes by spirituall men All of Ecclesiasticall Cognisance 22. H. 8. c. 15. containes the Kings generall pardon to his spirituall Subjects who were fallen into a Praemunire by submitting to Cardinall Wolsies power Legatine 23. H. 8. c. 1. abridgeth the power of Ordinaries and takes away the benefit of Clergy in some cases ch 9. enacts That no man shall be cited into any ecclesiasticall Court out of the Diocesse wherein he dwells unlesse in certaine causes ch 10. settles the Law concerning feofements and assurances to the use of any Parish-Church or Chapell 24 H. 8. ch 12. takes away all Appeales to Rome and excellently sets forth the Kings supremacy as well in and over Ecclesiasticall causes and persons as temporall as you may read at large in the Act it selfe denying exploding the authority of the Pope and Sea of Rome 25. H. 8. c. 14. conteines a Law for the punishment of HERESY and

from Laity and Clergy Protestants of all sorts as well Presbyterians a● Independents yea from Antinomians Anabaptists Brownists and Schismatickes of all sorts to reforme Religion especially Church-government set up the Ordinances and worship of God in their purity and settle all matters of Doctrine Discipline Government by Act of Parliament as neere as might be to the word by the assistance of a godly learned Assembly of Divines the daily calling of Ministers of all sorts upon the Parliam to pursue this work the prayers of all piously affected to Almighty God both publickly and privately to assist them extraordinarily from Heaven in this great weighty spirituall building together with the Assemblies submission of all their determinations to the Parliaments alteration approbation or rejection and the Independents own addresses Petitions late tender of the reasons of their dissent from the Assembly to them is to my weak approbation a most irrefragable Argument and publicke acknowledgement of their undoubted right and Legislative power in all Ecsiasticall affaires of what nature and quality soever and that all parties ought readily to submit to their just determinations in point of practise and obedience in all these particulars whereof they have thus unanimously and importunately from time to time petitioned them to be Iudges There is no party or Sectary whatsoever which hath formerly petitioned them in this kinde but would preach and write for universall obedience to that forme of Church-government the Parliament should settle and establish provided it suited fully with their particular way which they judge the truest and most consonant to Scripture and if they should once authorize or settle the Independents hitherto concealed way I am confident they would all preach universall obedience submission to it under pain of contumacy haeresie schisme and the severest penalties Ecclesiasticall or civill since they write as much in effect already in their Pamphlets and that this their way may reasonably yea and upon higher terms then of reason be thought in time that it cannot but overthrow all other sorts of Ecclesiasticall Government and stand up it selfe in their stead If then every side be of this minde in case the Parliament determine for their party then why should not all be willingly concluded satisfied with what they shall rightly determine be it for or against their way since they have all appealled to their judgements alike which must either be altogether fruitlesse and un-obliging to any or els indifferently binde all to voluntary or enforced conformity Add to this that all or most of our opposites in this point of Parliaments juri●diction and Legislative power in Ecclesiasticall matters have freely submitted themselves to the Protestation Vow and solemne Nationall Covenant imposed and prescribed by the Parliament which enjoyne them under paine of highest Perjury with their lives and estates to maintain and defend the ancient rights and priviledges of Parliament and this we now debate as well as any other That they have generally acknowledged and obeyed the Parliaments Iurisdiction in prescribing publick monethly Fasts and others upon speciall occasions with publicke dayes of thanksgiving together with their power and Ordinances to suppresse all prophanations of the Lords day with many other abuses Sects Errors in Church affaires which hath for ever estopped them to quarrell or deny the Parliaments Legislative Iurisdiction in any other particulars of Church-government Discipline or Religion which suite not with their humors or opinions I shall conclude this point concerning Our own Parliaments Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction with the determination of our incomparable Jewell which hath more reall worth and value in it then the contrary opinion of thousands of opposites being alwayes hitherto reputed the received Doctrine of the Church of England and with Bishop Bilson a very solid Writer This reverend learned Jewell in his Apologie hath this passage concerning the establishment of the Protestant Religion among us That the matter hath been treated in open PARLIAMENT with long consultation and before a notable SYNOD and CONVOCATION Master ●●●ding his Antagonist An●●gonist answering thereunto just as some Independen●● and others who protest they have abjured all Popery though they follow it herein to an haires breadth do now The Parliaments of these later dayes did make most of you and yet how open was it for you had ye any pla●e at all in it were ye admitted within the doores or had ye any thing to do in that assembly Did they tarry many moneths about it had they Bishops had they Divines and the most learned to reason too and fro with all Liberty c. How many of the spirituall Lords a great part of the Parliament and without all doubt the part which must be chiefly and only regarded when the questiones of Religion gave their voyce to your Gospell yea which of them did not resist it save 〈◊〉 alone c If they will needs have their matters to depend of THEIR PARLIAMENT let us not be blamed if we call it PARLIAMENT RELIGION PARLIAMENT GOSPEL PARLIAMENT FAITH This learned Bishop returnes the ensuing reply to him That the Parliament war summoned by royall Authority confirmed and concluded in Order as heretofore hath been used That a Parliament might be held and Acts passed without the consent and agreement of Lords Spirituall for which he produceth sundry examples Farther whereas ye call the Doctrine of Christ that now by Gods great mercy and to your great griefe is universally and freely preached a PARLIAMENT RELIGION and a PARLIAMENT GOSPEL for such sobriety becometh you well and may stand you instead when learning fayleth ye might have remembred that Christ himselfe at the begining was universally received and honoured through this Realme BY ASSENT OF PARLIAMENT and further that WITHOUT PARLIAMENT your POPE himselfe was never received no not in the late time of Queen Mary yea and even then his Holinesse was clogged with PARLIAMENT CONDITIONS that whatsoever had beene determined in Parliament and was not repealed were it never so contrary to 〈…〉 and Canons should remain still inviolable and stand in force 〈…〉 Holinesse had gone home again Such Master Harding is the Authority of a Parliament Verily it Parliaments of Realmes be no Parliaments then will your Pope be no Pope Therefore as you now call the truth of God we professe a Parliament Religion and a Parliament Gospel even so with 〈…〉 and gravity of speech you might have sayd our Fathers in old times had a Parliament Christ And your late Father● and Brethren had of late in the time of Queene Mary a Parliament Faith a Parliament 〈◊〉 a Parliament Pope Neither is it so strange a matter to see Ecclesiasticall causes debated in Parliament read the Lawes of King Inas King El●●ede King Edward King Ethelstan King Edmond King 〈◊〉 King Canute and ye shall finde that our Godly Forefathers the Princes and Peers of this Realme never vouchsafed to entreat of matters of Peace of Warre or otherwise touching the

Common State before all controversies of Religion and causes Ecclesiasticall had beene concluded King Canute in his Parliament holden at Winchester upon Christmas day after sundry Lawes and Orders made touching the faith the keeping of holy Dayes publike prayers learning of the Lords Prayer receiving of the Communion thrice in the yeare the manner and forme of Baptisme fasting and other like matters of Religion in the end thereof saith thus Iam sequitur institutum Legum secularium Now followeth an Order for temporall Lawes Thirdly we see that the Godly Catholique Princes in old times thought is their duty before all other offices of the Common weale first to determine matters of Religion and that even BY THE PARLIAMENTS OF THIS REALME In a Parliament holden by King William the Conquerer it is written thus The King for as much as he is the Vicar of the highest King is therefore appointed for this purpose that he should Rule and defend the Kingdome and People of the Lord and above all things the holy Church c. Hereby it appeareth that Kings and Princes are specially and of purpose appointed by God not only to defend but also to Governe and Rule the holy Churh How be it if any imperfection shall appeare in the former Parliaments we give God thankes for the same that is and trust that for his owne names sake he will confirme what he hath begun The hearts of Princes and determinations of Parliaments are in his hands If any thing want the arme of the Lord is not Shorted he is able to supply the same So our incomperable Iewell enough to satisfie and silence all our Opposites Thomas Bilson Warden and afterwards Bish of Winchester bringing in the Prelates and Iesui●s objecting against our reformed Protestant Religion that it was brought in and ratified not by a Councell and Synod of the Clergy but by the Prince Queene Elizabeth and the Parliament who say they had no power to determine or deliberate of those matters returnes this answer May not the Prince command for truth within hee Realme except your consents be first required and had● May not her Highnes serve Christ in making laws for Christ without your likeing Claime you this interest and prerogative that without you nothing shall be done in matters of Religion by the Laws of God or by the liberties of this Realme By the Lawes of the land you have no such priviledges Parliaments have beene kept by the King and his Barons the. Clergy wholy excluded and their Acts and statutes good And when the Bishops were present their votes from the Conquest to this day were never negative By Gods Law you have nothing to do with making Lawes of Kingdoms or Common wealthes You may teach you may not command persuasion is your part compulsion is the Princes If Princes imbrace the truth you must obey them If they pursue truth you must abide them By what authority then claim you this Dominion over Princes that their laws for Religion shall be voyde unles you consent seeing they are the maintainers establishers and upholders of the faith with publique power and positive Lawes which they and their Parliaments may make without a precedent councel of Clergy men to guid them as he there proves at large by sundry presidents If any Concurre not with me in this undoubted Ecclesiasticall Iurisdiction of Christian Princes and Parliaments after all these pregnant testimonies I must tell them in plaine english they directly violate their late vow and Covenant and symbol●e herein with Jesuites and Popish Prelates whose doctrines they have abjured by their Nationall Covenant and therefore cannot may not ever hereafter emb●ace without the highest Perjury and plaine Apostacy unto Popery I shall finish this Section of the Authority and power of Parliaments in matters of Religion Church-government Discipline and enacting Lawes in all and every of these particulars with some forraigne presidents in the Parliaments Diers Assemblyes of Estats in other Realme republikes Should I now relate unto you the many ecclesiasticall Laws of all sorts made in them I might swell this Treatise into many folio volumes I shal therefore only give you a brief touch catalogue of some few which the Studious may peruse make use of at their leisure For FRANCE you may survey the Decrees of King Childebert debated and agreed by him and his people in a Parliament de quibuscunque conditionibus una cum Optimatibus nostris c. 2. 4. c. 15. For sanctifying the Lords Day prohibiting the dressing of any but necessary food on it all Bodily labour under pecuniary mulcts The ecclesiasticall laws of Charles the great Ludovicus pius Charles the Bald collected into one volum by Abbot Ansegisus Benedictus Levita Lindebrogus others printed with some pettinent additions Parisijs 1640. stiled Capitula Regum Episcoporum Maximeque OMNIVM NOBILIVM FRANCORVM were made GENERALI CONSENSV PIDPLIVM SKORVM ET GENERALI CONSVLTV ET COMMVNI CONCILIO by generall consent of the King Bishops and especially of the Nobles and states of France in Common Councells Parliaments and Assemblies of the estates Who had so great a power in making rejecting Canons ecclesiasticall Lawes that when in the yeare 846. the Bishops of France and their suffragans had in their Synods compiled certaine Canons by the command of Charles the Bald and tendered them to him as he had commanded in Sparna● a Village of the Church of Rhaemes to peruse and approve the King Dissidentibus regni sui PRIMORIBVS ab eorundem episcoporum admonition● by reason that the Nobles and other men of his Realme differed from the Bishops in opinion in most of those Canons the King and Nobles out of all their Canons or Chapters haec tantum observanda complacenda sibi colligerunt Episcopis scripto tradiderunt dicentes NON AMPLIVS DE FORVM CAPJTVLIS ACCEPTASSE QVAM ISTA ET ISTASE VELLECVM PRINCIPE OBSERVARE which were Stiled Captule Regis CAROLI not the Bishops Canons By which it is evident that no ecclesiasticall lawes or Canons could be made in France to bind either Clergy or Laity but such at the King Nobles Parliament and three estates approved and confirmed I shall add to this that Anno 1307. King Philip the 4. of France assembled a Parliament at Paris wherein the Laity of France exhibited 65. Articles against the Clergy to regulate their jurisdiction and abuses which were there largely handled and debated as you may read at leisure in Masters Fox who records the passages very fully in the French Histories What the Parliament Estates in France have done enacted in matters of Religion Church-Government and discipline of ancient and latter times you may read at large in Liurentius Bochellus his Decreta Ecclesiae Gallicaiae in Carolus Molinaeus Contra parvas Datas c. in William Ranchin his Survay of the Councel of Trent but above all in Antonie Fontanon

Canterbury and Yorke to London to celebrate a Councell of all England there on the day appointed for the beginning of his Councell when all having taken their Robes and ensignes were about to go in Procession to it there fell out a vehement contention between the Archbishops themselves about the priority of place in the Councell For that rule of the Apostle in honour preferring one another was so abrogated by the Bishops of our time that neglecting their Pastorall diligence and care Bishops by how much the more stubbornly by so much also the more vainly contend about Praecedencie and almost all Episcopall Controversie is wholy conversant about the praerogative of their honours In conclusion Yorke comming soonest praeoccupied the first seate alleadging that the same belonged to him by the ancient decree of Saint Gregory by which it is known to bee enacted that of the Metropolitans of England he should be accounted the chiefe who was first ordained But Canterbury having made a solemne complaint of the preoccupying of his place as if he suffered prejudice refused the second seate Whereupon his subjects or Clerkes of his Province contending more fiercely for him presently the simple contention of words grew into a brauling Yorke the adverse party being stronger was thrust with ignominy from the place he had so early taken who exhibited his torne Myter to the Legate as a signe of the injury offered to him and cited Canterbury to the Apostolicall See The Metropolitans therefore thus contending and things thus disturbed the Councell was not celebrated but dissipated and they who had assembled as called forth to a Councell returned to their own homes Matthew Parker in his Antiquitates Ecclesiae Britannicae out of Gervasins and Radulphus de Duceto relates the story in these words A Legate called Flugonius came into England from the Pope at King Henry the seconds request that hee might both separate Queene Eleaner from him by a Divorce and comprimise the Controversie between the Archbishops of Canterbury and Yorke touching the precedency which had continued for many successions of Bishops and been oft times determined but never finally ended till the Statute of 31 Hen. 8. cap. 10. such was the pride and ambition of these Arch-Prelates whose more than civill contentions for superiority our Historians have at large recorded to their infamy This Legate assembled a Councell at Westminster in the Church of the infirme Monkes whither the Clergie of both Provinces plentifully assembled and when the day of beginning the Councell was come the Legate sitting on an high Throne gave the right hand to the Archbishop of Canterbury But Yorke hoping that the King would bee more propitious to him than to Canterbury refused the left hand and striving most impudently with his breech to sit between the Legate and Canterbury at last sate downe in the lap of his Primate He had scarcee touched Canterbury with his breech with which he strove to get the second place but he was shamefully reprehended both by many Bishops and also by many Clerkes and Laymen The Archbishop of Canterburies servants provoked with the indignity of this wicked fact and the vehemencie of the just reproofe pulling York out of their Lords bosome and throwing him down on the ground trampled him under their feet and his Archiepiscopall Robes being most shamefully pulled off and torne they buffeted him with their fists But Canterbury when as he could not call away nor hold off his servants enraged with so great anger departed out of the Councell that at least hee might draw them away with him by his departure The servants following their Master left Yorke lying prostrate on the ground environed with his torne Garments At last Yorke fetching many deep and frequent sighes ariseth halfe dead and goeth all bloody to the King who with his son was present in the Councell the thing for which I principally relate the storie and makes his complaint against Canterbury The King having received Yorks relation only was at first in censed against Canterbury but afterwards the truth of his owne rashnesse and impudency being manifested he dismissed Yorke who departed from the King with disgrace the most reviling him with clamors go go said they thou betrayer of Saint Thomas thy hands doe yet stinke with blood But he poore wretch did now welter in his owne not Thomas his blood Hugocius among these tumults perplexed with feare having pronounced a blessing sodainly dissolved so unluckie a Councell and appealled Canterbury to the Pope as guilty of this battery Yorke also did the like At last Canterbury least he should be overwhelmed with appeales on both sides submitted himselfe and his servants to the Popes protection by appealing both the Legate and Yorke to Rome so all equally appealed But the next day Canterbury who knew the manner of the Pontificians pacified the Legate with gifts and they thus reconciled remitted their Appeales on both sides Afterwards the Archbishop of Cant. and Geoffry of Ely were againe accused by the Bishop of York before the King that in the Councell of Westminster they had laid violent hands on him which when they had denyed and purged themselves upon Oath they were reconciled by the Kings command and by him a truce for five yeares was made between Canterbury and Yorke who promised betweene themselves upon Oath that they would firmely stand to the Arbiterment of the Bishops of Normandy and France as well concerning this battery as all other controversies depending between them And so this fray and Councell ended wherein you see the King Prince and Laymen were present it being in truth a Parliament accompanied with a Convocation Anno 1226. there was a Synod held at London under Otho the Popes Legate where the King with the Clergy Magnatibus Regni and the great men of the Kingdome assembled with many Bishops Priests La●corum Turbis and Troops of Laymen when they were all assembled Otho read the Popes letters to them before them all in which the Pope alleaged that it was a most ancient scandall and reproach to the Church of Rome that she was branded for coveteousnesse the roote of all evill and in this especially that no men could expedite any businesse in the Court of Rome unlesse by disbursing great summes of money and giving store of gifts but because the poverty of the Church of Rome was the cause of this scandall and infamy her naturall sons ought to relieve the want of their Mother for unlesse we should receive gifts from you and other good and honest men we should want necessaries to supply our lives which would be altogether incongruous to the Roman dignity Therefore utterly to roote out this scandall by the Councell of our Brethren the Cardinalls of the holy Church of Rome we have provided a certaine forme to which if you will consent you may free your Mother from scandall and obtaine Justice in the Court of Rome without giving any bribes Now the forme provided is this First of

HERETIQVES limiting the maner of proceeding against them defining what shal be heresie how it shall be punished and abridging the Authority of the Bishops and Canon Law ch 16. concernes Pluralities ch 19. containes the submission of the Clergy Convocation to the King declares the Kings supremacy in causes Ecclesiasticall the impotency of the Clergy or Convocation to make or promulge any Canons or Ecclesiasticall constituti●ns or to debate any thing in Convocation without his Royall Lycence and approbation The Nullity and invalidity of the Canon Law abolisheth all appeales to Rome and Authorizeth 32. persons whereof halfe to be of the Clergy the other halfe of THE LAITY to survay the Canon Law and to compile a body of the Canon Law to be authorized by the King under his Great Seale by vertue of this Act for to be the only Canon Law to be used within this Realme Chap. 20. takes away the payment of any Annates o● first fruits to the Bishop of Rome nullifies his usurped power and Buls settles the forme of electing and consecrating Archbishops and Bishops within this Realme and plentifully manifests the Kings and Parliaments Jurisdictions in Ecclesiasticall affaires chap. 21. doth the like exonerating the Kings Subjects from all exactions and Impositions heretofore payed to the Sea of Rome and enabling the Archbishop of Canterbury and his Officers to grant all Licences and dispensations within the Realme which were formerly granted at Rome only The Statute is worthy perusall consideration fully demonstrating the power of the Parliament in Church affaires 26. H. 8. c. 1. declares the Kings Highnesse to be supreme head of the Church of England under Christ making it a part of his Royall Title and to have Ecclesiasticall authority to redresse and reforme all Errors Heresies and abuses in the Church punishable by any spirituall or ecclesiasticall Law Chap. 3. enacts The payment of the first fruits of all Dignities Benefices promotions spirituall and tenthes to the King and his Heires abolishing the Popes usurpations and authority herein ch 13. abolisheth sanctuarie in cases of High Treason ch 14. Authorizeth the nomination and consecration of suffragan Bishops in sundry places of this Realme and both creates and limits their authority chap. 15. takes away some exactions of spirituall men within the Archdeaconry of Richmond 27. H. 8. c. 8. limits that the Kings spirituall Subjects shall pay no Tithes whiles they are in their first fruits ch 15. authorizeth the King to nominate 32. persons halfe of the Clergy the other of the Laity for the perusall and making of Ecclesiasticall Lawes and manifests the Convocations invalidity to make such lawes or Canons ch 19. Limiteth and abolisheth Sanctuaries and sanctuary persons ch 20. containes an Order touching the paying of Tithes throughout the Realme ch 21. Limits the maner of payment of Tythes within the City of London ch 27. suppresseth divers Monasteries Priories and Religious Houses vesteth their revenues in the King and erects the Court of Augmentations 28. H. 8. ch 10. extinguisheth thes authority of the Bishop of Rome prescribes an Oath of abjuration of it and Popery together with the Popes usurpations and excellently sets forth the Kings supreamacy the Parliaments authority in matters ecclesiasticall as you may read in the Act worthy perusall ch 11. enacts Restitution of the first fruits in time of vacation to the next incumbent ch 13. compells spirituall persons to residence upon their livings ch 16. Releaseth such as have obtained pretended Licences and dispensations from the Sea of Rome 31. H 8. c. 6. enables such as were Religious persons to purchase lands to sue and be sued in al maner of Actions which they were disabled formerly to do by the Common Canon Law ch 9. Enables the King to make Bishops by his Letters Patents only and to erect new Bishopricks which he did ch 13. disolves all Monasteries and religious Houses and vests them in the King wherein you may behold much of the Kings and Parliaments power in Church businesses ch 14. For abolishing of diversity of opinions in matters of Religion most fully and exactly demonstrates the Kings and Parliaments jurisdictions in matters of Religion as the whole Act sufficiently manifests though the Articles therein defined were erronious and the Act too cruell and bloudy 32. H. 8. cap. 8. provides for the true payment of Tythes and offerings chap. 10. containes the punishment of incontinent Priests and of women offending with them ch 12. concernes Sanctuaries and the priviledges of Churches and Church-Yards ch 15. prescribes the manner of proceeding against Heretickes and impugners of the Act for abolishing of enormious opinions in Christian Religion chap. 23 24. concernes Accounts of Bishops and subsidies granted by the Clergie chap. 25. Dispences the Kings marriage with the Lady Iane chap. 24. Dissolves the Hospitalls of Saint Johns of Ierusalem in England and Ireland for supporting and maintaining the supremacy and jurisdiction of the Bishop of Rome contrary to their duty and Allegiance chap. 26. Intitled An act concerning true opinions and Declaration of Christs Religion is most pregnant to our present purpose which you may peruse chap. 38. Concerning precontracts of marriages and degrees of consanguinity is likewise a most punctuall Act for the Kings and Parliaments Ecclesiasticall power and chap 44. 45 47. good evidences of it 33. H. 8. chap. 15. 27 28 29 30 31 32. Enabling Religious persons to sue and bee sued severing the Bishopricks of CHESTER and Isle of MAN from the jurisdiction of CANTERBURY to the See of Yorke making the Church of Whitgate a Popish Church by it selfe and severing it from the Parish of Over which I wish our Independents to observe and to learne from this and other Acts that no new Churches or Parishes can be erected legally but by act of Parliament which none of their Churches are 34. and 35. H. 8. c. 1. intituled An act for The advancement of true Religion and For the abolishing of the contrary is most pertinent to our purpose and c. 15. 17 19 35. H. 8. c. 9. for ratification of the Kings stile and Title of Defender of the Faith and supreame head of the Church of England and Ireland ch 6. Concerning the qualification of the Statute of the 6. Articles c. 16. concerning the examination of the Canon Lawes by 32. persons halfe of the Clergie and halfe of the temporalty to be named by the Kings Majesty during his life to compile a body of the Canon Law to bee used in the Realme 37. H. 8. c. 4. 12. but especially ch 17. That Doctors of civill Law may execute Ecclesiasticall jurisdiction though Laymen and married a Law worthy reading and chap. 21. For the union of Churches not exceeding the value of 5l which could not be done but by Act of Parliament are all most pregnant evidences of the Kings and Parliaments indubitable Ecclesiasticall jurisdictions in matters of Discipline Religion Church-government and all Church affaires whatsoever The Statutes made in King

them as men who invaded the very incommunicable royalties and priviledges of heaven and counted it no robbery to make themselves equall to God or to defame or draw an odium or contempt upon them and prepare the people before hand to oppose or reject whatsoever Church-Government they shall establish contrary to your Independent way for there can be no other reall end of these your Anti-parliamentary Sermons writings is such a transcendent crime and high affront against the Parliament as you are never able to expiate and is so farre from extenuating that it aggravates your former offences beyond expression Fourthly Your last clause And if continued c. intimates and speakes ●ound without any straining that the Parliament for the present are guilty of dashing their foote against Christ the Rocke of claiming the most sacred and incommunicable royalties and priviledges of heaven and making themselves equall to God And that if they persevere in the course they have begun in reforming our Church and setting up a Church Government according to the Word different from your new way it is such an high provocation against the most high as will kindle a fire in the brest of him whose name is Jehovah which will consume and devoure c. Could all the Malignant and Prelaticall party in England lay a greater wickeder or more unjust scandall in our Parliament then this or more defame them then by such a false report enough to fire the whole Kingdome against them as well as Gods wrath Certainly Master Goodwin I must tell you freely without malice or uncharitablenes and I beseech you pardon my zeale in this particular that your Iealousie and pen in this was set on fire of hell rather then heaven when you printed this passage and what ever censure you deserve I feare your Book demerits the fire to purge out this drosse yea all the late teares of Repentance you may shed will not be sufficient to quench those unhappy flames of contention your late Sermons and Pamphlets have kindled in our Church and State to omit your former Socinian Errors Thirdly Hee professeth that in case he hath said or written any thing detractory to the undoubted priviledges of Parliament yet my Inditement against him that he did it PRESVMTVOVSLY is such a charge which men whose ungrounded zeale hath not eaten out the heart of their Charity cannot lightly but recharge with unreasonablenesse and utter unlikely-hood Sir I dare affirme upon good grounds that you did this presumptuously as I charge it Grammarians Lawyers and Divines informs us that the Word Presumptuous comes from the verbe Praesumo which signifies to forestall to conceive before hand to usurpe or take that upon him which belongs not to him to doe a thing before a man bee lawfully called to it which belongs not properly to him or to doe a thing boldly confidently or rashly without good grounds or against Authority or Lawes or upon hopes of impunity He that doth ought in any of these sences may properly be said to do it PRESUMPTUOUSLY and that in Scripture phrase as well as in common parlance To apply this to your crime First you preached and printed these passages of purpose to forestall the Parliaments and Assemblies pious resolutions to settle one uniforme Church-Government and suppresse all private Coventicles of Sectaries or Anabaptists contrary to it 2. To establish support that Independent way which you had before hand without any lawful warrant conceived ere the Parliament had made choyce of or setled any Church-Government for you as the whole Tenor of your Bookes and Sermons evidence Thirdly It was no lesse then high presumption in you being a meere Divine and a man altogether ignorant of or unskilfull in the ancient Rights and Priviledges of our Parliament as your writings demonstrate and your selfe intimate p. 5. to undertake to determine and judge of them so peremptorily and in such manner as you have done When as if you had known any thing concerning the Rights of Parliaments you might have learned this among other things That Divines are no competent Iudges of Parliaments Priviledges That the Priviledges Rights and customes of our Parliaments are only to be judged and determined by the Parliament it selfe not in or by any other inferior Court much lesse in a Pulpit That the power and jurisdiction of the Parliament for making of Lawes is so transcendent and absolute as it cannot bee confined to causes or persons within any bounds and that the state and defence of the Church of England is the very first matter and care of the Parliament of England as all the premised Presidents manifest and Sir Edward Cooke with others might have informed you And for a man to undertake to judge of that which is above his power is expresly defined to bee presumption by Richardus de Media villa in 3. Sententiar Distinct 26. and other Schoolemen on that place and by Summa Angelica Tit. Praesumptus Fourthly You had no lawfull calling nor warrant from Gods Word or our Lawes to handle the Iurisdictions and rights of Parliament in your pulpit nor yet to dispute them in your writings in such a daring manner by way of opposition or to encourage people to disobedience to its Ecclesiasticall Lawes and descitions Therefore in this you were presumptuous by the Scriptures owne definition 2 Pet. 2. 10. Fourthly after you were questioned before a Committee of Parliament for these very passages in your first Sermon as exceeding scandalous Derogatory to the Members and priviledges of Parliament yet you in a daring manner whiles you were under examination audaciously preached over the same againe in substance in your Pulpit on a solemne Fast day and published them with additions in no lesse then two printed Bookes Yea since your very censure by the Committee for them you have in a higher straine then ever gone on to justifie them in print once more in your Innocencies Triumph like an incorrigible delinquent wherein you slander the Parliament more then before and shew your selfe a man dispising Government at least any Church-Government the Parliament shall establish not suitable to your fancy selfe-willed and even speaking evill of Dignities in your forementioned clauses others Therefore in this regard you are superlatively presumptuous by St. Peters resolution Yea most men whose ungrounded zeale to your new way hath not eaten out his braines and reason too must readily acknowledge it notwithstanding your two reasons to the contrary To wit First your former uninterrupted zeale to this Parliament and its cause you meane perchance before you were an Independent and since whiles you thought it would embrace your new way which doth but aggravate your subsequent opposition in presse and Pulpit against its undoubted jurisdiction Secondly The grounds and reasons you have given of your opinion which I shall examine in due place as if men might not do presumptuously against the lawfull power of Parliaments and

things to make good his Argument 1. That if there were no other particular Church in the world then one as that of Abrahams family should it not be a compleat Church untill there were other Churches on whose jurisdiction it should depend I answer yes But this is not the case nor question We in our Realme blessed be God have in all parts not only one particular christian family church but many thousand Parochiall Churches Congregations as our very Almanacks as well as Cosmographers will informe you What then Brother will you inferre from this sole Church in Abrahams family to our Churches now Will you argue Abraham in his dayes had a compleat absolute Independent Church in his own family onely Ergo now there ought to be such an Independent absolute Church in every family at least where there is a sufficient number requisite to make up a ministeriall body as you interpret it what then will become of your congregationall Churches and our Parochial consisting of many great families they must by this new Doctrine divide themselves presently into so many families or Independent Churches as there are great families in them and then I hope the Master of the family onely not an Independent Minister must be their Paster and Ruler as Abraham was in his and then farewell the office of Minister which some of your Lay Elders exercise without scruple denying the very calling of Ministers and all our Churches too Brother will you argue thus Adam was a compleat and absolute man alone therefore he needed not a helper or wife or family to be joyned to him Suppose you should take a single person who formerly lived alone by and of himselfe without relation to or communion with any other men like a Popish Hermite or Anchorite into your family Church or incorporate him into this City or any company in it will you say that because this man was absolute and under no command at first Ergo he must continue so still in your family Church this City and his company and neither you nor any of them may or can of right enact any thing to controle him I trow not When there were only single Families living remote from others in the world they were absolute and compleate Churches Republikes of themselves but when these single families multiplyed and combined themselves into Villages Cities Provinces Republikes Kingdomes they thereby lost their pristine liberty absolutenesse independencie compleatnesse and of intire small bodies Churches Republikes became onely parts and members of those larger ones to which they were thus combined So it is with particular Mother Churches when there was but one particular Church in the world or in one State or Kingdome the case of all the first Churches planted by the Apostles without any Neighbour Churches to combine with this Church being under no superiour Christian Magistrates was absolute and independent in it selfe there being no other Church to joyne with But if this one Church through the encrease of Christians shall swell so great as to spread it selfe over all the City or Republike wherein it is and so upon necessity must divide it selfe into sundry particular Congregations then all these Churches being under one and the selfe-same Republike and united together under one supreame Civill Magistrate as members of the same Nation Kingdom City Republike and of the self-same nationall or Provinciall Church doe thereupon lose their absolutenes and Independency and become subject to the Power Lawes Canons Determinations Government and Discipline of the whole Nationall Church and Kingdome of which they are but members which to preserve publike peace unity order amity ought constantly to be governed by the self-same generall Ecclesiasticall Lawes setled by the common consent of all their severall National Synods and Parliaments as Civill Lawes are which oblige all But this saith my Brother in the second place takes away the lawfull Jurisdiction and rights of particular Churches Ergo it is not to be admitted I answer first By the like reason you may argue the joyning of many particular persons into one family of divers families into one Parish of sundry Parishes into one City of divers Citie into one State of sundry States and Kingdomes into one Monarchy or Empire of divers Companies and Regiments into one Army of sundry Knights Citizens Burgess●● and Peeres into one Parliament and many Ministers into one Synod deprives them of their Independency their particular Rights Interests and subjects them to a new superiour power Iurisdiction command and to their publicke Lawes and Ordinances Ergo it is unlawfull intollerable and such Corporations Republicks Kingdomes Empires Parliaments Synods ought not to be If this be a good consequence you will subvert all humane Societies Corporations Republicks Synods Parliaments Independent Churches and Families to by like reason ● This takes not away the lawfull rights of particular Congregations but rather improves them for their owne particular and the publick good for Brother I pray informe me which is best of the two for a particular Church or Corporation to be subject only to such Lawes Rules Government and Discipline as shall be made decreed declared most agreeable to the Word of God and fit to be generally received in all Churches by an whole Parliament and Assembly of the most wise ablest and best experienced Christians Nobles Divines after long debate and consideration or by the private rash Opinions and perchance passions humours of two or three private persons perhaps directed swayed by particuler interests relations ends Which is justest safest or most remote from Tyrannicall Arbitrary and Papall Government for Churches States Persons to be all confined to certaine publicke Lawes and Canons enacted by common consent in Parliament limiting who shall be admitted to who secluded from the Congregation Sacrament communion of Saints c. and for what causes offences in certaine c. then to be left Arbitrary to the meer mercy wills determinations of the Ministers and Elders of every particular Congregation or to the pleasures of Princes or some few temporall Magistrates without any Lawes or limits to restrain them We all hold it the greatest happinesse freedome of our Kingdom and the chiefest part of our Priviledge which we enjoy as free-men of England That we neither may nor can be legally bound by any Lawes Canons Taxes or Commands but only such as are made and imposed on us by full consent in Parliament and not subject to the meere Arbitrary Lawes Ordinances wills commands of our Princes Magistrates Iudges Prelates or any other private men And shall it be then held the slavery injury and not rather the liberty or priviledge of particular Churches and their members to be subject only to such Ecclesiasticall Rules Canons Orders Covenants Government and Discipline as shall be publickly agreed on consented to and setled in Parliament to which all Churches Christians shall be equally obliged without exemption then to be left at six and