Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	court_n	justice_n	law_n	3,065	5	4.7299	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A88212	The legall fundamentall liberties of the people of England revived, asserted, and vindicated. Or, an epistle written the eighth day of June 1649, by Lieut. Colonel John Lilburn (arbitrary and aristocratical prisoner in the Tower of London) to Mr. William Lenthall Speaker to the remainder of those few knights, citizens, and burgesses that Col. Thomas Pride at his late purge thought convenient to leave sitting at Westminster ... who ... pretendedly stile themselves ... the Parliament of England, intrusted and authorised by the consent of all the people thereof, whose representatives by election ... they are; although they are never able to produce one bit of a law, or any piece of a commission to prove, that all the people of England, ... authorised Thomas Pride, ... to chuse them a Parliament, as indeed he hath de facto done by this pretended mock-Parliament: and therefore it cannot properly be called the nations or peoples Parliament, but Col. Pride's and his associates, whose really it is; who, although they have beheaded the King for a tyrant, yet walk in his oppressingest steps, if not worse and higher.	Lilburne, John, 1614?-1657.; Lenthall, William, 1591-1662.	1649 (1649)	Wing L2131; Thomason E560_14; ESTC P1297; ESTC R204531	104,077	84

juster or better way of tryall and they 〈◊〉 to provide for our weale but not for o●r woe ● par book Doc. p. 150. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doe what they list but what they ought 1 par ●ook dee p. 172. 205. 214. 266. 267. 〈◊〉 494. 497 499. 656. 660. 666. 696. 706. 707. 〈◊〉 2 par fol. 95. Declarat 17 March 164● p. 6. 21 28 27. For all the idle pratings of any new upstart ' SONS OF BELIAL amongst us such as the Author of the late abominable Book called the DISCOVERER which is commonly reported to be partly Master Frosts Secretary to the 〈◊〉 call●d the 〈◊〉 of 〈◊〉 and p●incipal●y that Apostate IOHN CAN law if 〈◊〉 and now of the Parish of B●w whose conscience by that appeares so bread 〈◊〉 it will without doubt lead him to worship with the Turks Alkeron if it were in 〈◊〉 and fat livings to be got by so doing But let all men in Authority and great place● 〈◊〉 value thei own heads and lives Remember Dudly and Epsons punishments Privy Co●cellors to H●n●y the● eve●●● for proceeding by the rules of their discretion i● 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 laying aside the tryals by Juries of twelve men the ancient and undoubted birthright of the Subject 4 part inst fol. 41. for which they lost their heads as Traytors for subvert●ng the fundamentall Liberties of the people although they had an Act of Parliament viz. 11 Hen. 7. ch● 3. recorded 4 par inst ●ol 40 made by as unquestionable power in Law as ever was in being in England in a free and full Parliament c●●sisting of King Lords Spi●ituall and Tempor●ll and Commens to authorise and beat them out in what they did of whom you may read most excellently in Cooks inst viz. 2 par fol. 51 4 par fol. 41. 197 198. 199. And in my musing with my self of their conditionn my thoughts were something to this purpose the actions done and acted by them were either crimes or no crimes crimes as to men they could not be unlesse they were transgressions of a knowne and declared law in being in the Nation before their acts were done for saith the Spirit of Truth Where there is no Law there can be ●● transg●ession Rom. 4. 15. and if so then to punish them for their acts or facts any other wayes or by any other rules manner or methods then is by those Laws against which they had transgressed is expressed and pres●ibed is very grand injustree and the most righteous and justest men in the world under such practises can never be safe or secure but are alwayes liable in liberty estate and life to be levell●d and destroyed by the will mallice and pleasure of the present s●aying grand faction in which condition a man differs nothing from a brute beast but in shape But the High Court of Justice erected to try them was a pretended Court of Justice not knowne to the visible and declared law of England being in its constitution altogether against all the English Rules of justice No nor in being when their facts were committed And therefore had no pretence at all being but a new constitution to meddle with Judging of their facts committed before it had a being or was brought forth into the world Besides the erection of it I mean a High Court of Justice to try men for siding with the King in the late warrs against the Parliament is a meer and cleer giving away and surrendring up the legallity of their cause in o the Kings hands telling the people in effect hereby its true we have waged warre against the King but if his sword had been as long as ours he might easily if he had pleased have hanged us all by the rules of Justice for transgressing ● l●w in being But we having by the chanc● of war prevailed against him alass we have no law of our sides by the rules of which we can hang any of his party but must be forced to take away their lives by the rules of our own wills and power by rules of pretended Law m●de after their facts committed and for the demonstrating of this unto all that have adhered unto us we Erect a New High Court of Justicely new rules never known in England to try them that so our friends that have adhered to us may see where they are and betimes provide for their own safety and never trust or beleeve OUR DECLARATIONS AND REMONSTRANCES ANY MORE for though we formerly told you we had the Law of our sides yet by our setting up this High Court of Justice to be both parties Jury and Judges we plainly tel you there was no such thing but that then what we told you was lyes and falshood● and that you should beleeve us no more for though then we told you we would maintaine the Law especially of Liberty and Propriety and that it was ● transcenden● wickednesse in us to destroy it and by our votes at our wills and pleasures to disposeor levell all the peoples estates liberties and properties yet now we iell you we never in our hearts intended any such thing but that our designe was totally if we did overcome never to keep any of our promises but absolutely to destroy all Law and by our absolute will by all manner of new erected engins to debase and breake the peoples Spirits and to dispose of their liberties estates and lives by the absolute rule of their own wills and as a cle●● demonstration to your understanding that we never intended otherwise we erect this HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE composed of suck 〈◊〉 we know will obey and execute the absolute dictats of our wills ●e they 〈…〉 without ever examining whether our commands be consonant to law reason eq●ity justice or conscience being of as absolute implicite faith in belcl●ering of us because we have promised they shall ●aign with us or under us as ever any papish in the world were believing the Pop● Thirdly Admit this had been an unquestionable representative of the people Parliament who by ve●●●● th●●●●f hath had a power to levy what mony they had judged conven●●nt upon the peopl● b●●●neral tax for the common safety of the Nation which act both by law and reason ●h●y may do yet they cannot in law equity or reason lay all tha● tax upon th●ee o● four men alone and make them bear all the charges of the publick ev●n so although the Parliament may erect Courts of Justice for the good of the people to administer Law in ●esinitely to all the people of England alike without exe●p●ion of per●ons yet they can neither by Law nor Reason erect a Court of Justice on purpose to try three or four individual persons and no more because it is against common equi●y ●● Englishmen o● people being all born free alike and the liberties thereof equally intasted to all alike and therefore in common equity and justice three or four individual persons ought not to be burthened with an iron yoake when

I am acquitted thereby my Lords by the Law of England from any more question about that 〈◊〉 although it should be granted I was never so guilty of it Unto which they replyed to my remembrance in these words A pox on you for a cunning subtill Rogue are you so cunning in the Law that we cannot lay hold of you here but yet for all your parts we will have you to the gallows for leavying Warr upon the traiterous commands of the Parliament against the King● And here ●aid they wee are sure the ●aw will reach you Whereupon I was immediately a●ter laid in●●●tons and brought to the Bar before the Lord Chief Justice Heath Sir Thomas Gard●ed Recorder of London c. and by Indictm●●t a●●o●ding to the rules of the Common Law a●r●igned for a traytor for levying War in Oxf●●dsh●●e against the King But my Plea to the businesse of W●stminst●r and the P●enti●●● was admitted for good law That being once judiciall●●●ed and acqui●ted I could no more be troubled therefore neith●r indeed was ● But according to the punct●li●es of the Law they gave me all the lair play in the world that the Law would allow me s●ffering me to say for my self at the Bar what I pleased releasing me of my close imprisonment and i●ons and allowed me pen ink and paper which the Jaylor kept from me upon my pleading before the Judge such usages being altogether contrary to law and that no such usage ought to be exercised in the least upon any prisoner whatsoever that w●● 〈◊〉 bea●●ly rude in his imp●●lonment and that no supposed ●raitore● 〈◊〉 by law could be put to any pa●● or torm●nt before co●riction And truly Colonel Te●●le I shou●d be very sorry and blush for shame 〈◊〉 considering my ●●rong zeal in the Parliaments cause to see the day that the Parliament of England a● least th●se that so stile themselves that hath pretended so much righ●●●●ness and justice should be no more just to the Covaliers against whom they have fought for injustice and and oppression in denying them the benefit of the Law ●h●n they are in their power and mercy then the Kings Jadges were to me and other of your prisone●● when their lives were in their power and mercy in the hight of War and of their 〈◊〉 prosperity and yet granted us the benefit of Law in all things we claimed it in as Capt. Vivers of B●n●ury arraigned with me can witnesse as well as my self Now Sir to make application the Parliament not long since when in its po●e● it was more a●un●●ntly unquestionable then now it is after its new force cond●●●●ed CAPEL HAMBLETON HOLLAND c. to banishment for the very 〈◊〉 now to their charge an● th●refore in Justice and Law cannot a second time cause them to be adjudged to die for the ve●y same things It s nothing to me nor to the King●om for you to say that when that J●dgment pass'd they had so many friends sitting in the House as over-voted the honest Common-wealth's-men to the pr●judice thereof for the maj●r part is Parliament or else th●re ●s no parliament Therefo●e Sir I reason thus E●ther that wherein that Judgment pass'd was a parliament or no Parliament ●if a Parliament then their judgment ●s to themselves especially was binding and the benefit of it they ought not to deny to them whose live● are cons●rved in it 〈◊〉 it were unjust in it self ●● to the Nation But if you or any other man shall say it was no Parliament as having forfeited their trust in treating with the King again and so their Judg●●nt not valid then with much more confidence say I this that now fits is no Parliament and so by consequence the High Court of Justice no Court of Justice at all and if for then to execute them upon their Judgment is absolute Murder But I would fain see that honest and valiant man in your House that du●st pretest against them for no Parliament But Sir besides this mark the consequence of it to all we Parliamenteers that have acte● under you and by vertue of your commands by these Proceedings First You have sold the Bishops Lands and given them th●● bought them as they suppose good security for their quiet enjoyment of their P●rchas●s I but within a little wh●le after part of the very same Parliament alters their mindes and being becom●th ma●or part by forcible Purgations illegall new Recruits or by any other ●ricks ●●●●vi●es and they vote all those barg●ins are unjust and the Purchasers ought to lose both ●e●r Land and M●n●y where is then that stable security of Parliaments And yet such doings would be as just as your present dealings with CAPEL c. whose preceden● 〈◊〉 a precedent for that and much more of the same nature B●t secondly The sam● Parliament that condemded Capel c. to B●nishment pass'd mul●itudes of Compositions with severall Cav●lier● as guilty of T●eason in the 〈…〉 of it ●s they And by the same rule●o● now cond●●n CAPEL 〈◊〉 after you have judged them to banishment you ●●y adjudge all the compounding C●v●●eers to ●●●ange● after you have adjudged them to composition and so put the Kingdom by 〈…〉 people desperate in an everlasting flame that never will have end bec●●se 〈◊〉 is ●o certainty in any of your proceedings but are ●s changeable as the wind th●● 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thirdly and most principally it is a common maxim● in Law and Reason both and so declared by your selves 1 part Book Declarat page 281. That those that shall guide thems●lves by the judgment of Parliament ough● what-ever happen to be secure and free from all account and penalties B●t divers honest men as you now judge them ●ave acted and gu●ded themselves by the judgment of Parliament as they account y●u in taking away the King's life and y●t by your dealings with CAPEL c. they are liable to be hanged as ●rayt ●s 〈…〉 a major part of your very House by force or other 〈…〉 shall vote that act 〈◊〉 and all the Actors therein Traitors So that Sir if I have any judg●●n● in ●●e by his very single act towards them you shake the v●ry to●ndation of the validity of all the Parliam●nts Decrees and Judgments at once and m●ke 〈◊〉 all the Se●uri●y and ●ndemnity that those in ●q●●ty ought to enjoy that have acted by you commands a●d guided themselves by the judgment o● Parliament By mea●● of which you will finde in time you have demolished your own Bulwarks an destroyed your own Fences And for time to come for my part I shall be a tho●sand times more wary how I obey all your Commands then ever I was in my life se●ing yo● are so fickle and unstable that no man knows rationally where to find you or fixedly to what to hold you But if you shall object as some do That that judgment of B●nishment was onely in ●●ference to the peace with the King and that being broke yo● are absolved

proceedings in the said Action And being demanded by the then Chairman of this Committee whether I had caused such an Action to be commenced yea or no I positively declared I had and that I had very good ground in Law so to do considering that the Law of England which is my Birth-right and Inheritance requires That I shall not be deprived of my Liberty but by due processe of Law according to the Laws of the Land and that if any shall detain my body in prison without legall Authority he is liable in Law to make me satisfaction therefore but Mr. Wollastone had kept me in prison divers weeks by vertue of a pretended Warrant of the single House of Lords who in Law I will maintain it have not the least power in the World to commit my body to prison yet they did upon the tenth day of June 1646 laying no crime to my charge command me to be kept for all my short eternity in this world for the Warrant is during their pleasures and then by another illegall Warrant within fourteen dayes after dated the 23 of June 1646 they for no cause in the world commit me close prisoner and command that I be not permitted to have pen ink nor paper and that none shall have acceffe unto me in any kinde but onely my Keeper untill the Lords otherwise please Which most illegall Warrant Mr. Wollastone executed upon me with a great deal of severitie and barbarism not permitting my Wife to come into the prison yard to speak with me at a distance out of my grates nor suffering me to receive either meat drink or money or any other necessaries from the hands of my Wife servant or friends nor suffering me to see their faces when they sent me in my diet All which usages are against the Laws and Statutes of this Kingdom and therefore I have cause and ground enough in Law to seek for my remedy in Law against the said Mr. Wollastone and I hope the Members of this Committee have taken too many Oaths to maintain the fundamentall Laws of the Land and the Liberties of the People then now to go about to deprive me of the benefit of them It is true you sit here by verue of an Ordinance of both Houses to indemnifie all those that have acted or done or commanded to be acted ordone any thing by sea or land by the Authority or for the service or benefit of this present Parliament But under the favour of this Committee I do conceive That the said Ordinance which is your Commission doth not in the least authorise you to meddle with my present case forasmuch as I do not prosecute Mr. Wollastone for actions done by the Command and Authority of Parliament but for actions done directly against their Authority publickly declared in the Laws of the Kingdom and their own Declarations and I hope this Committee will not so much undervalue their own House as to adjudge the House of Lords singly to be the Parliament of England nor their single Order to be the Parliaments Authority of England and if not then I cleerly conceive that upon your own principles you have nothing to do with my business before you neither can I conceive that you can in the least judge Mr. Wollaston's illegal and barbarous actions done upon me to be for the service and benefit of the Parliament but rather the quite contrary by rendering them odious and adominable in the eyes of the people if they shall 〈◊〉 such tyrannicall doings after they have taken so many Oathes 〈…〉 the Laws and Liberties of the Kingdom and caused so much English bloud to be shed pretendedly therefore Whereupon after a little debate amongst the members of this Committee by themselves my L. Munson the Chairman thereof was pleased to tell me then the business was weighty and did concern the Priviledges of the Lords Houses and therefore they judged it convenient to put it off till this day and to acquaint the Lords with it that so if they pleased some of them might here be present and you also ordered me to fit my self with a formall Answer to the Petition which accordingly I have done and with the favour of this Committee giving me free leave to speak I am ready to deliver unto you and do deliver it unto you thus My Lord I read in the Statutes of 4. Edw. 3. ch 4. and 36. Edw. 3 ch 10. and in the tyrannical Act made this Parliament 16 C. R. and in the 4 part Cooks Instit fol. 9 11. 37. 38. 39. 41. 42. and 1 part Book Decl. pag. 701 702. that Parliaments are principally called for the maintenance of the Laws and for the redresse of divers mischiefs and grievances that daily happen and sutable to this are the ends contained in the Writs that summon them and the intentions of those that chuse the Members and send them And if Parliaments be principally called for the maintenance of the Laws and redresse of mischiefs and grievances then not for the destruction of the Laws not for the increase of mischiefs and grievances And therefore when this present Parliament in the dayes of their verginity and primitive puritie in their Actions Declarations and Remonstrances expressed much zeal for accomplishing of those ends for which they were trusted in providing for the safety of the Kingdom and peace of the people which you call God to witness is your only aime protesting in the presence of the all seeing deity that the foresaid ends is the only end of all your counsels and indeavours wherein you are resolved to continue freed and inlarged from all private aims personall respects or passions whatsoever and persevere in the vigorous indevoring to preserve the Laws and Liberties of this Land though you should perish in the work calling upon God that sees your innocency and that you have no aims but at his glory the publick good for protection in your straits I say yet notwitstanding all this the King to make you odious and to be deserted of the people in several of his Declarations Declares that all these were but guilded dissimulations it being your reall intentions to destroy Liberty and property meum and mum and to subvert the Lawes and introduce new forms of arbitrary government and to introduce Anarchy a paritie and confuon by levelling of all degrees conditions and to monopolise into your hands all the rich and great places in the Kingdom for your own particular advantage and profit and to get such a power into your hands as thereby to enable you inevitably to destroy all that opposed you and that the maintenance and advancement of Religion Justice Liberty Propertie and peace are really but your stalking horses and neither the grounds of the war nor of your demands and that for all your fair pretences to the people you will extirpate the Law root and branch alter the whole frame of Government and leave not any thing like Law Liberty or

In all your Declarations you declare that binding and permanent Laws according to the Constitution of this Kingdom are made by King Lords and Commons and so is the opinion of Sir Ed. Cook whose Books are published by your own Order and who in the 2 part of his Institutes fol. 48. 157 and 3 part fol. 22. and 4 part fol. 23. 25. 48. 292. saith that Act that is made by King and Lords in Law binds not nor by King and Commons binds not or by Lords and Commons binds not in Law if so then much more invalid is the single Order of the Lords made against Law and can indemnifie no man that acts by vertue of it and your Ordinances made this Parliament in time of extream necessitie during denounced Wars are by your selves in abundance of your own Declarations esteemed adjudged declared but temporary and invalid as durable Laws which is evidently cleer out of the 1 par Book Decl. p. 93. 102. 112. 142. 143. 150. 171. 173. 179. 207. 208. 267. 277. 303. 305. 382. 697. 705. 709. 727. your expressions in the last page are we did and doe say that the Soveraign power doth reside in the King and both Houses of Parliament and that his Majesties Negative voice doth not import a Liberty to deny things as he pleaseth though never so requisite and necessary for the Kingdom and yet we did not nor do say that such bills as his Majestie is so bound both in Conscience and Justice to passe shall notwithstanding be law without his consent so far are we from taking away his Negative voice And if such Ordinances and Bills as passe both Houses are not Lawes by your own Doctrine without the Kings Consent then muchlesse can the Order of the single House of Lords be Lawes or supersedeaes to the Lawes And besides when divers honest and well-affected Citizens it may be out of a sensible apprehension of the mischiefs that acrue to the Kingdom by having the Supream authority lodged in three distinct Estates which many times so falls out that when two Estates grant things essentially good for the wellfare of the Kingdom the third Estate opposeth it and will not passe it which many 〈…〉 occasions war and bloud-shed to the hazard of the being of the Kingdom for the preventing of which they framed a Petition to your House Entitling it To the Supream Authority of this Nation the Commons assembled in Parliament in which they intreat you to be careful of the mischief of Negative Voices in any whomsoever which said Petition your House upon the 20 of May 1647. Voted to be burnt at the Exchange and Westminster by the hands of the Common Hangman and lately as I am informed there was a Petition of Master John Mildmans presented to your House and it was rejected by them for no other cause but because it had the foresaid title and therfore you your selves having rejected to be stiled the Supream Authority of this Nation I can see no ground or reason how you can upon your own Principles grant a supersedeas to Master Wollaston to overule my action at law against him and so de facto exercise the Supream Authority which in words you would have the Kingdom beleeve you abhorre neither can I i● reason or Justice conceive that if now you should own your selves for the Supream Authority of the Nation and the single and absolute Law-Repealers and Law-Makers thereof how you can deprive me of the benefit of those just Laws viz. Magna Charta Petition of Right and the Act that abolished the Star-Chamber that you have not avowedly and particularly declared to be void null and vacated as never to be in use any more in England Again yet in your Protestation in your Vote and Covenant and in your League and Covenant swore to maintain the Laws and Liberties of the Kingdom with your estates and lives and make the Kings Person and Authority but subservient thereunto or dependant thereupon And you have been so zealous to make Votes to disfranchise all those that will not take your Covenant as unfit to bear any Office in the Common-wealth or to give a Vote to chuse an Officer and can it stand with your Justice and Honour to deny me the benefit of that viz the Law which you have been so zealous in forcing the People of England to swear to maintain or can you in Justice and Honor be angry with me for standing for that viz. the Laws and Liberties of England which you have ingaged incited and forced thousands and ten thousands of the people of England to loose their Lives and Blouds for which I amongst others have upon zealous and true principles as hazardously ventured my life for as any man in England O let such an abominable thing be farre from men of honour conscience and honesty and let the fearfull judgments that befell the Hungarians as it were from God from heaven for breaking violating and falling from their faith and Covenant made with Amurah the Second the Sixt Emperor of the Turkes Recorded in the Fourth Edition of the Turkes History sol 267. 269. 273. 277 deterr all Covenant Makers and Covenant takers from breach of their Oaths Covenants and Contracts the breaking of which is highly detested and abhorred of God as a thing that his soul loathe as he declares in Scripture as you may read Exo. 20. 7. Lev. 19. 11 12. Deut. 23. 21 22 23. Psal 15. 4. Eccels 5. 45. Ezek. 17. 13 14 15. 10. 17 18. 〈◊〉 5. 3 4 8. 16. 17. Yea I say let the fearfull judgements wrath and vengeance Recorded by Sir Walter Rawley in his excellent preface to his history of the World that befell Tyrants and Oppressors whoafter they had broke their Oaths Faith Promises and Lawes made with the People and then turned Tyrants deterr you from such practises but especially the fearfull judgments of God that befel the most execrable thirty Tyrants of Athens who after the people of that City had set them up for the Conservators of their Laws and Liberties and who did many things well til they had got power into their own hands which they had no sooner done but they turned it poin blank against the people and fell a murthering robbing spoyling and destroying the innocent people and raised a Guard of three or foure thousand men of their own Mercenary faction whose destruction was fatall by the steeled resolution and valour of seventy faithfull and brave Citizens as you may ●●ad in Sir Walter Rawleys History Lib. 3. Ch. 9. sec 2 3. Yea the Tyranny of Duke d' Alva cost his Master the King of Spaine the revolt of the Hollanders to his unimaginable losse But to returne did not you and the Lords the other day pass Votes and Communicated them to the Common Councel of London to declare to them and the whole Kingdom you would continue the Government by King Lords and Commons and can it new stand with your Honour and

all the parts of the Act for the avoyding of the 〈…〉 absurdity that might follow received a particular interpretation is 〈…〉 ●●●ks in cases of far lesse inconvenience and absurdity Plo. Com. in Stowels Case fol. 369. The Preamble is to be 〈…〉 it is the key to open the meaning of the makers of the Act and mischief 〈…〉 intend to remedy The Judges of the Law have ever in such sor● 〈◊〉 the intents of the meaning of the makers of such Acts of Parliament as they 〈◊〉 ●●pounded Acts g●nerall in words to be particular where the intent 〈◊〉 been 〈◊〉 Which are the words of the Book And therefore upon that rule i● is there adjudged That where the Statute of 7. Edw. 6. i● generall IF ANY RECEIVER OR MINISTER ACCOVNTANT c RECEIVE O● ANY PERSON ANY SVM OF MONEY FOR PAYMENT O● ANY FEES c. HE SHALL FORFEIT vis viii d. FOR EVERY PENNY That this do not extend according to the generality of the words to the Receiver of common persons because these words subsequent be added otherwise 〈◊〉 be lawfully may by former Laws and Statutes Now the Judges restr●ined the generality to a particular to the Kings Receiver onely for that no Law ●●●●tute was formerly made concerning common persons Receivers c. But i● the Case in question as well the precedent clause of Restitution as the 〈…〉 expressing offences in particular and the words in the same generall sentence viz. VNDER YOUR HIGHNESSE c. and principally the cause of the 〈◊〉 of this Act do qualifie the generality of the words And yet notwithstanding ●● was resolved by all the Court in the said case of Stradling fol. ●0● 〈…〉 Receiver of common persons were within the words of the said 〈…〉 it is said that if a man consider in what point the mischief was before the 〈◊〉 and what thing the Parliament meant to redresse by this be shall 〈…〉 intent of the Makers of the Act was to punish onely the Ministers of the King 〈◊〉 a little after the Judges say That the stile of this Act is AN ACT FOR 〈◊〉 TRUE ANSWER OF THE KINGS REVENUES And by this 〈◊〉 intent of the makers of the Act is to be collected and these be the words of the 〈◊〉 which is a far stronger case then the case in question 4 Ed. 4. fol. 4. 12. Every Statute ought to be expounded according 〈◊〉 intent of them that made it where the words thereof are doubtfull and 〈◊〉 and according to the rehearsall of the Statute and there a generall Stat●●● 〈◊〉 strued particularly upon consideration had of the cause of making of the Act 〈◊〉 the rehearsall of all the parts of the Act. To conclude this point with a generall R●le allowed by all Laws 〈◊〉 ●●struction of Statutes viz. Although the Law speak in generall terms 〈…〉 ●o be bound up or accepted That WHERE REASON CEAS●TH TH●●● TH● LAW CEASETH FOR SEEING REASON IS THE VERY LIFE AND SPIRIT OF THE 〈◊〉 IT SELF the Law giver is not to be esteemed to respect th●● which 〈…〉 Reason although the generality of the words at the first sight or after the 〈…〉 otherwise Mark I intreat you these last words well for they are 〈◊〉 and full And much more i● there to this purpose for he is 〈…〉 said Statute of 1 Eliz. 1. And that this equitable and intentionall 〈◊〉 of expounding Laws in dubious eases or where absurdities or mischiefs do depend upon the taking of it in the litteral sens● is justifi●ble legall and good is unquestinably demonstrated out of your own 1 part Book Dec. pag ●50 〈◊〉 these very weeds viz. That there is in the Laws an equitable and literall sense His Majestie ●et it he granted ●● intrusted by Law with the Militia but 't is for the good and preservation of the Republique against forraign Invasions and domestick Rebellions For it cannot be supposed that the Parliament would ever by Law intrust the Militia against themselves or the Common-wealth that intrusts them to provide for their WEALE NOT FOR THEIR WOE So 〈◊〉 when there is certain appearance or grounded suspicion that the letter of the Law shall be improved against the equity of it that is the publick good whether of the body reall or representative then the commander going against its equity gives liberty to the commanded to refuse obedience to the letter For the Law taken abstract from its originall reason and end i● made a shell without a kernell a shadow without a substance and a body without a soul ●t is the execution of Laws according to their equity and reason which as I may say is the spirit that giveth life to Authority the letter kils Nor need this equity be expressed in the Law being so naturally implyed and supposed in all Laws that are not meerly Imperiall from that analogie which all Bodies politick hold with the naturall whence all Government and Governours borrow a propo●●ionall respect And therefore when the Militia of an Army is committed to the Generall it is not with any express condition that he shall not turn the ●outhes of his Canons against his own souldiers for that is so naturally and necessarily implyed that its needlesse to be expressed insomuch a● if be did attempt or command such a thing against the nature of his trust and place it did 〈◊〉 facto estate the Army in a right of disobedience except we think that obedience binds 〈◊〉 to cut their own throats or at least their companions Yea the very title of the Act in hand literally declares it was never intended to be perpetuall no nor to extend to so long a time as to be mi●chievous to the Common-wealth by subduing the SOUL of all our Liberties frequent 〈…〉 Parliaments 〈◊〉 wholly and 〈…〉 for it is called An Act●o prevent inconvenientes which may happen by the 〈◊〉 adjour●i●g 〈◊〉 or d●sso●●ing of this present Parliament Mark● the words well and it puts all out of dispute that th●● Act was ●at meerly done to tie the Kings hands for a certain reasonable time that so it should not be dissolved u●timely and the Title declares it was made to avoid Inconveniences and therefore 〈◊〉 to beget and increase them which it must needs do as is already fully proved if it 〈◊〉 frequent successive 〈◊〉 Parliaments But yet once again more fuller Reason and Nature it self sai●● yea and the Law of England saith That when 〈◊〉 Act of Parliament is against 〈◊〉 Right or Reason or 〈◊〉 or impossible to be performed or kept the common Law shall 〈◊〉 it and adjudge this Act to be void they are the words of the Law 1 pars Dr. Bo●●am's Case fol. 118. 8. Ed. 3. fol. 3. 30. 33. E. cess●vil 3● 27. H. G. 〈◊〉 41 1 Eliz. Dier 313. 1 part Cooks Institutes lib. 3. chap. 11. ● 209. fol. 140. 2. An Act of Parliament that a man shall be a Judge in his own case is a void Act in Law Hubbert fol. 120.

and the ● part Cooks Reports in Dr. Bo●hams case See the Army Book Declarat pag. 35. ●9 61. 63. 143. First therefore let us begin with Common Right and we shall easily see this perpetuall Act is against that For it is against common Right that indebted men as most if not all Parliament men ar● should not pay their debts Or that if any Member of ●●●liament do any of the People of England w●ong as daily they do by unjust and 〈◊〉 r●●●ble 〈◊〉 of him o● them of hi● la●d or disp●ssessing him of his goods 〈…〉 of his fame or doing violence to his person by beating wounding or imprisoning c. that 〈◊〉 sons during their lives by a priviledge of Parliament that was intentionally 〈◊〉 and just in its institution when Parliaments were often and short should be 〈◊〉 and s●●●red from all manner of question at the Law by any parties so wronged by them is absolutely against common Right Nay and more That this should extend 〈◊〉 ●●ltitudes of persons besides that are their servants or attendants and also that any o● all of these shall have the benefit of the Law in any Court of Justice in England at their pleasure against any man whom they shall pretend wrongs them are such trans●●de●● and grievous enormities that common Right abhors and yet this with a thousand 〈◊〉 as much more as bad as these are the fruits of a perpetuall Parliament if they please which tends to the utter destruction of all mens Actions reall personall or mixt who have ●o do with Parliament men as appears expresly by the Statute of Limitations of the a● of James chap. 16. which strictly confines all manner of Suits to be commenced within 〈…〉 after the occasion given Secondly For common Reason Parliaments were ordained and instituted as is before truly and legally declared for remedies to redresse publick and capitall griev●●ces th●● 〈◊〉 where else could be redressed but it is against reason and the very end of the Institution of Parliament that Parliaments should make and create multitudes of publike and insufferable grievances The law of the Land allowes no protection for any ma● i●ployed in the service of the Kingdom but for a yeer at most as to be free from Sui●s and in many Suits none at all howbeit he be in such services But a perpetuall 〈◊〉 may prove a protection in all manner of wickednesse and misdea●●eanours 〈◊〉 against other men not of the Parliament amongst any of whom they may pi●k and chuse whom they please to ruinate and destroy and that no● for a yeer but for ever which is against all manner of Reason or the shadow or likenesse of it And therefore a● 〈◊〉 Sir Henry Vane said against Episcopal Government in the beginning of his larg● 〈◊〉 of the 11 of June 1641 now in print at a Committee for passing the Bill against ●●●●pall Government so say I of an everlasting or of any Parliament that shall do 〈◊〉 you have done in largely sitting beyond the time of your Commission c. That 〈…〉 thing is destructive to the very end for which it should be and was constituted to be 〈…〉 onely so but does the quite contrary as your House in every particular doth cer●ai●ly we have cause sufficient enough to lay it aside and not onely as uselesse in that it 〈…〉 its end But is dangerous in that it destroyes and contradicts its end Thirdly For Imp●ssibilitie The death of th● King in law undisputably dissolves the Parliament spoken of in the foresaid act which is pretended to be perpetu●ll for 〈◊〉 Writ of Summons that is directed to the Sheriffs by vertue of which Parli●●●●● 〈◊〉 are chosen runs in these words King Charles being to have conference and 〈…〉 c upon such a day about or concerning as the words of the T●ie●●●ial Act hath it the high and urgent affairs concerning his Majestie and he writes US the State and the 〈◊〉 of the Kingdom and Church of England But I would fain know how it's possibl● for a Parliament to confer or treat with King CHARLES now he is dead it 's impossible Se● 2 H. 5. Cook in Parl. 3. part And therefore the whole current of the Law of England yea Reason it self from the beginning to the end is expresly That the Kings death doth ipso facto dissolve this Parliament though it had been all the time before 〈◊〉 so intire and unquestionable to that very hour and it must needs be so he being in Law yea and by the authority of this very Parliament st●led the head the begi●●ing and end of Parli●ments See Co●ks 4 part Institutes fol. 1. 3. Mr. Py●●'s for 〈…〉 Stra●●ord pag. 8. S. John's forementioned argument against Strafford pag. 42. And therefore as a Parliament in l●w 〈◊〉 begin without the 〈…〉 in it 〈◊〉 person 〈◊〉 representatives Cook ibid. so 6. so it is pos●●ively 〈◊〉 by his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thereby not only the true declared but intended end of their assembling which 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and confer with King CHARLES is ceased and thereby a final ●nd is put 〈◊〉 the means that are appointed to attain unto that end And therefore it is as 〈◊〉 for this Parliament or any Parliament to continue as long as they please a● for a Parliament to make King Charles alive again Fourthly For Repugnancy That which is but for a time cannot be affirmed to have continuance for ever it is repugnant but this Parliament in the intention of the makers of the Act was to be but for a time not above a yeer at most after the d●●e of the Act as is before proved and declared from their own words And therefore it cannot be reputed perpetual for there is a repugnancy betwixt them Again The King's Writ that summoned this Parliament is the Basis in law an● Foundation of this Parliament If the Foundation be destroyed the Parliament falls But the Foundation of it in every circumstance thereof is destroyed And therefore the thing built upon that Foundation must needs fall It is both a Maxim● in Law and Reason But if it be objected The Law of Necessity requires the continuance of the Parliament against the letter of the Law I answer First It s necessrry to consider whether the men that would have it continue as long as they please be not those that have created the necessities on purpose that by the colour thereof they may make themselves great and potent and if so then that Objection hath no weight nor by any rules of Justice can they be allowed to gain this advantage by their own fault as to make that a ground of their justification which is a great part of their offence And that it is true in it self is so obviou● to every unbiased knowing eye it needs no illustration but if it shall be denyed by any of their pens if God please to give further opportunity I shall prove it to the full Secondly I answer There can no necessity be pretended that can be