Liberty Justice and the whole Realme would ensue If any therefore cavill at the Act for continuance of this Parliament till both Houses shall agree to adjourne or dissolve it or at the Bill for Trienniall Parliaments which when they meete shall not be dissolved without their consents for fifty dayes space next after their first meeting Let them now learne that this is no Innovation nor encroachment on the Crowne but an ancient Priviledge of Parliament both claimed practised and resolved in times of Popery in an higher degree then now it is And thus you see how in these particulars the Popish Parliament Prelates Lords and Commons in former times have claimed and exercised farre greater Priviledges and Jurisdictions than this or any other Protestant Parliament hath hitherto claimed or practised which I hope will forever silence the clamourous tongues of all ill Counsellours Courtiers Royalists Malignants Papists and Cavaliers against the present Parliament of whose highest yet moderate proceedings themselves alone have beene the occasions and therefore of all others have least cause to complaine against them BUT to returne againe to the first grand Objection Thirdly I answer that the High Court of Parliament and whole kingdome which it represents may in divers respects be truely and properly said to be the Highest Soveraigne power of all others and above the King himselfe which because it may seeme a dangerous paradox and tends much to the vindication both of the Priviledges Honour and Iurisdictions of our High Court of Parliament now so much undervalued because not really known to most and to the justification of the proceedings in this present Parliament which many out of ignorance and malice so much declaime against both by word and writing in a most licentious manner I shall take a little liberty to demonstrate the truth of it by such convincing reasons and Authorities as no rationall man I hope shall be able to contradict but must necessarily submit to First it is undeniable that the Court of Parliament hath a lawfull power to question all the Kings Patents Charters Commissions Proclamations Grants Warrants Writs and Commitments whatsoever whether they be Legall yea to cancell or repeale them in case they be illegall mischievous or onerous to the Subject not onely without but against the Kings consent and mandate to the contrary as appeares by infinite precedents in this and all foremer Parliaments the scourges of Monopolists Patentees and Projectors the Pests of the Commonwealth The like power have all other Courts of Justice within the kingdome in some degree when such Charters and Writs of the King are brought judicially before them because they are Courts of the Law to which the King and all his Actions are and must be subject Now that which can thus question cancell disanull revoke the Kings owne Royall Charters Writs Commissions Patents c. though ratified with the Great seale and regall power even against his will must certainely be a Soveraigne power and Authority which in point of Law and Justice is superiour to the King This is Bractons resolution l. 2. c. 16. f. 34. a and Fletaesl 1. c. 17. Where they affirme the Law and Parliament to be above the King because they may censure judge and rescinde the Kings Acts Charters legally and judicially even against his personall though not legall Will which is the Law Secondly It is unquestionably true that in all cases of difference betweene the King and all or any of his Subjects though they concerne the Kings Prerogative and the highest branches thereof the Parliament is the supreamest and most proper Judge and its resolution from which there is no appeale to any higher tribunall shall finally binde not onely all the Subjects but the King himselfe notwithstanding his owne personall disassent This is manifest by the many late resolutions given in Parliament against sundry Patents Commissions Writs Charters Impositions Loanes Shipmoney Forest-Bounds Marshall Law Pressing and Billetting Souldiers Imprisonment by speciall Command of the King or his Privy Counsell Tonnage and Poundage Knight-hood and Taxes the Commission of Array and the like which obliege both King and Subject the King in receiving justice in such cases being subject to the Law as well as the meanest of his Subjects as Bracton truely avers against all Royalists mistakes Now that which can thus finally conclude and binde the King himselfe even volens nolens in cases of highest concernment entrenching farthest upon his Prerogative Royall must doubtlesse be the most Soveraigne power Superiour to the Kings And in this sence every Court of Justice whose just resolutions and every petty Jury whose upright verdicts obliege the King because warranted by the Law which is Paramount the King as Bracton Fleta Fortescue King Iames Edward the Confessor yea and Aristotle resolve may be tâ—uely said to be above the Kings person which they binde but not above the Parliament which by its superlative power may examine all judgements and verdicts in other Courts by way of error or appeale and reverse them if there be cause when as the King in person cannot by law examine or reverse them but onely in his Courts of Justice by his Judges Thirdly Parliaments oft times doe and may as they see cause enlarge the Kings Prerogative and Royall power in sundry particulars in which the King had no such jurisdiction before these Acts witnesse the Statute de Praerogativa Regis The notable Parliament Roll of 1. H. 4. num 108. Where the Commons in Parliament grant the King that he shall be in as GREAT ROYALL LIBERTY as his Noble Progenitors were before him having formerly made the like Grant to King Richard the second who perverted it to the altering of the Lawes in many things as appeares by this Roll. 25 H. 8. c. 19 20 21. 26 H. 8. c. 1 3. 31 H. 8. c 9. 34 and 35 H. 8. c. 23. 27 H. 8. c. 15. 28 H. 8. c. 7. 17. 3 4 E. 6. c. 11 12. 1 Eliz. 1 2. with sundry other Acts. Now that Parliamentary power which onely can create and conferre on Kings a greater regall Authority and Prerogrative than they had before must needs be the Originall and supreame Authority for as we rightly argue That the Kings Authority is superiour to all other his greatest Officers and subordinate Ministers of Iustice because their power is by Patent or Commission derived from his So we may from the selfe-same reason conclude that the High Court of Parliaments power the representative Body of the whole kingdome is the most Primitive Soveraigne and greatest Authority of all other yea larger and higher than the Kings because it onely can enlarge the Kings Prerogative all whose originall or additionall Royalties proceeded not from the King himselfe or his Ancestors owne inherent hereditary power for what King could justly without his peoples consents usurpe a Crowne or lawfull Royall Prerogative to himselfe over an whole Countrey but
some sort lib. 3. cap. 9. f. 107. This Doctrine was so authenticke in those dayes and after times that in the great Councell of Basil. Anno 1431. when this mighty question was debated Whether a Pope were above a generall Councell or a Councell above him such a Councell was at last resolved to be above the Pope upon this reason among others The Pope is in the Church as a King is in his Kingdome and for a King to be of more authority then his Kingdome it were too absurd Ergo Neither ought the Pope to be above the Church In every well ordered Kingdome it ought specially to be desired that the whole Realme should be of more authority then the King which if it happened contrary were not to be called a Kingdome but a Tyranny And like as oftentimes Kings which doe wickedly governe the Common-wealth and expresse cruelty are deprived of their Kingdomes even so it is not to be doubted but that the Bishop of Rome may be deposed by the Church that is to say by the generall Councell At the beginning as Cicero in his Offices saith it is certaine there was a time when as the people lived without Kings But afterwards when Lands and Possessions beganne to be divided according to the custome of every Nation then were Kings ordained for no other causes but onely to execute justice for when at the beginning the common people were oppressed by rich and mighty men they ranne by and by to some good and vertuous man which shouâ—d defend the poore from injury and ordaine Lawes whereby the rich and poore might dweâ—l together But when as yet under the rule of Kings the poore were oftentimes oppressed Lawes were ordained and instituted the which should judge neither for hatred nor favour and give like eâ—re unto the poore as rich whereby we understand and know not only the people but also the King to be subject to the Law For if we do see a King to contemne and despise the Lawes violently rob and spoile his Subjects deflower Virgins dishonest Matrons and doe al things liâ—entiously and temerariously doe not the Nobles of the Kingdome assembâ—e together deposing him from his Kingdome set up another in his place which shall sweare to rule and governe uprightly and be obedient unto the Lawes Verily as reason doth perswade even so doth the use thereof also teach us It seemeth also agreeable unto reason that the same should be done in the Church that is in the Counceâ—l which is done in any Kingdome And so is this sufficiently apparent that the Pope is subject unto the Councell Thus the Bishop of Burgen Ambassadour of Spaine the Abbot of Scotland and Thomas de Corcellis a famous Divine reasoned in this Councell which voted with them Here we have a full resolution of this great Councell which the Papists call a generall one being approved by the Greeke and Romane Emperours and most Christian Kings and States and ours among others That the Kingdome in Parliament Assembled is above the King as a Generall Councell is paramount the Pope which they manifest by five reasons First because Kings were first created and instituted by their Kingdomes and people not their Kingdomes and people by them Secondly because they were ordained onely for their Kingdomes and peoples service and welfare not their Kingdomes and people for them Thirdly because their Kingdomes and people as they at first created so they still limit and confine their royall Jurisdiction by Laws to which they are and ought to be subject Fourthly because they oblige them by a solemne Oath to rule according and to be obedient unto the Lawes Fifthly because they have power to depose them in case they contemne the Lawes and violently rob and spoyle their Subjects This then being the Doctrine of Papists concerning the Power and Superiority of Parliaments Peeres and Kingdomes over their Kings they have least ground of all others to taxe this Parliament or its Advocates as guilty of Treason and usurpation upon the Crowne for a more moderate claime then this amounts to and the King or his ill Counsell no ground to expect more moderation and loyalty from Popish then Protestant Parliaments Secondly I answer that Popish Parliaments Peeres and Prelates have heretofore challenged and exercised a greater Jurisdiction over their Kings then this Parliament or any other since the embracing of the Protestant Religion ever claimed and doe in a great measure disclaime For first of all they have challenged and executed a just and legall power as they deemed it to depose their Kings for not governing according to Law for following and protecting evill Counsellours and Officers oppressing their Subjects and making warre against them This is evident not onely by the fore-mentioned passages of the Councell of Basil with infinite presidents in foraine Empires and Kingdomes which I pretermit but by sundry domesticke examples of which I shall give you a short touch Anno Dom. 454. King Vortigern when he had reigned sixe yeares space for his negligence and evill Government for which Vodine Arch-bishop of London told him he had endangered both his Soule and Crowne was deposed from his Crowne by his Subjects the Britaines generall consent imprisoned and his Sonne Vortimer chosen and crowned King in his stead After whose untimely death being poysoned by Rowena Vortigern was againe restored by them to the Crowne and at last for his notorious sinnes by the just revenging hand of God consumed to ashes by fire kindled by Auâ—elius and Vter as Heavens ministers to execute its wrath Sigebert King of the West-Saxons setting aside all Lawes and rules of true piety wallowing in all sensuall pleasures and using exactions and cruelties upon his Subjects and slaying the Earle Cumbra his most faithfull Counsellour for admonishing him lovingly of his vicious life the Peeres and Commons thereupon seeing their State and lives in danger and their Lawes thus violated assemblâ—d all together and provida omnium deliberatione rose up in Armes against him deposed and would acknowledge him no longer their Soveraigne whereupon flying into the Woods as his onely safeguard and there wandring in the day like a forlorne person and lodging in dens and caves by night he was slaine by Cumbra his Swin-herd in revenge of his Masters death and Kenwolfe made King in his stead Anno Dom. 756. Osred King of Northumberland for his ill government was expelled by his Subjects and deprived of all Kingly Authority Anno 789. So Ethelred the sonne of Mollo his next successor being revoked from exile and restored to the Crowne of which he was formerly deprived thereupon murthering divers of his Nobles and Subjects to secure his Crowne so farre offended his Subjects thereby that An. 794. they rose up in Armes against him and slew him at Cobre Thus An. 758. the people of the kingdome of Mercia rising up against Beornerd their King because â—e governed the people not by just Lawes but tyranny
the King in Parliament promiseth to abate his houshold and hereafter to live upon his owne so setling a new forme of his Court which is extant in many hands and intituled Ordinations for the Kings house Anno 3 E. 2. an Ordinance was made for the Kings houshold in ease of the Kings people oppressed with purveyance by reason of the greatnesse thereof and the motive of that Ordinance was to the honour of God and profit of holy Church and to the honour and profit of the King and the benefit of his people according TO RIGHT AND REASON AND THE OATH WHICH OUR LORD THE KING MADE AT THE BEGINNING of His Raigne Thus R. 2. did discard the Bohemians Anno 10. by an act of Parliament at the peoples petition surcharged by them Thus H. 4. did with the Gascoignes and Welsh in like sort overburdening and impoverishing the King and Realme with perpetuall suits so that in Court as the Record saith there were no men almost of substance or valiant persons as there ought to be but rascals for the greater part Hence was it that the wisedome of former times foreseeing the mischiefe the open hand of the Soveraigne might bring the state into made a Law 11 R 2. that whatsoever commeth to the King by judgement escheat forfeiture wardship or in any other waies shall not be given away and that the procurer of any such guift shall be punished This Law the Parliament continued 7 H. 4. untill the King was out of debt making frustrate the grants of these and ordaining a penalty of double value to every mover or procurer of such grants The like in Anno 11 H. 4. and that no Petition for any thing should be delivered to the King but in presence of the Councell who might examine it lest that the Kings wants should light upon the Commons And to keep the hand of H. 6. from wastfull giving the Councell enduced him to convey to the Archbishop of Canterbury and others all profits of wards marriages reliefes escheats and forfeitures to defray the charge of his house It is one of the greatest accusations in Parliament against the Duke of Sommerset for suffering the King to give away the possessions and profits of the Crown in manner of a spoile for so are the words of the Record And it was the first and chiefest Article to depose R. 2. for wasting and bestowing the Lands and the revenue of the Crowne upon unworthy persons and thereby overcharging the Commons with exactions Nor yet to mention the Parliaments Soveraigne Power and Jurisdiction in making or proclaiming Warre or Peace in which they have oft times not onely advised but overswayed the King in creating the highest Officers in ordering the Militia of the Kingdome by Sea and Land by setled Lawes of which more anon or in ordering the Coyne and Money of the Land together with the Mint or designing how the Subsidies and Aydes granted by them to the King shall be disposed of to the Kingdomes use of which there are sundry presidents All which together with the Acts concerning his Purveyance Pardons Charters Grants and all Revenues Royall are strong u evidences of its Soveraigne Authority Nor yet to remember that inâ—allible Argument to prove Kingdomes greater and more valuable then Kings that Kings as publique servants to their Realmes ought to hazzard their lives for their Kingdomes safety and preservation as many have done in warres against enemies but never ought the whole Kingdome to be lost or hazzarded to preserve the Kings Prerogatives that of Iohn 11. 48 49 50. and chap. 1814. being an undoubtted rule in Divinity and Policy That it is expedient that any one man though a King yea Christ the King of Kings should die for the people that the whole Nation perish noâ— rather then the whole Nation die for him Priorque mihi potior ejus officii ratio esâ— quod humano generi quam quod uni hominum debeâ— as Seneca de Benefic l. 7. Gentilis de Iure Belli l. 1. c. 16. resolve from the light of nature and common reason I shall onely adde this important consideration to illustrate this obscured truth It can hardly seeme probable much lesse credible that any free people whatsoever when they voluntarily at first incorporated themselves into a Kingdome and set up an elective or hereditary King over them would so absolutely resigne up their Soveraigne popular â—riginall authority power and liberty to their Kings their heires and successors for ever as to give them an absolute irrevocable uncontroulable Supremacy over them superiour to irrestrainable irresistable or unalterable by their owne primitive inherent Nationall Soveraignety out of which their regall power was derived For this had been to make the Creator inferiour to the Creature the Parent subordinate to the Child the Derivative greater then the Primitive the Servant for Princes are but their Kingdomes publique Ministers more potent then the Master of Freemen to have made themselves and their Posterity absolute slaves and vassals for ever and in stead of a Principality intended only for their greater safety and immunity to have erected a Tyranny to their perpetuall irremediable Oppression and slavery A most brutish sottish inconsiderate rash action not once to be imagined of any people quite contrary to the practice of the Lacedemonians Romans Germans Aragonians and most other Nations who still reserved the Soveraigne power to themselves and never transferred it to their kings or Emperours who were ever subject to their jurisdictions and censures too as I shall manifest at large in the Appendix no absolute Monarchy being ever set up in the world but by direct Tyranny and Conquest as Cassanaeus in his Catalogus Gloriae Mundi pars 5. Consid. 1. manifests at large not by the peoples free election and consents And had our Ancestors or any other Nations when they first erected Kings and instituted Kingly government been demanded these few questions Whether they meant thereby to transferre all their Nationall authority power and priviledges so farre over unto their Kings their heires and successors for ever as not still to reserve the supremest power and jurisdiction to themselves to direct limit restrain their Princes supremacy the exorbitant abuses of it when they should see just cause or so as not to be able ever after to alter or diminish this form of government upon any occasion whatsoever Or if their King should turne professed tyrants endeavouring to deprive them against all right and justice of their Lives Goods Liberties Religion Lawes or make open warres upon them to destroy them or bring in forraigne enemies upon them to conquer or subject them to a forraigne power without their free consents that yet they should patiently submit themselves to these their unnaturall tyrannicall destructive proceedings without any the least resistance of them by necessary defensive Armes or calling theÌ„ to account for these grosse
these Lords and their companions thus taking up Armes from any the least guilt of Treason and rebellion against the King because they did it onely for the advancement of the publike weale the setting the Realme in a better condition the removing ill Counsellors and publike oppressors of the Realme from about the King and to rescue his person out of their hands then questionlesse by their resolutions our present Parliaments taking up defensive armes upon the selfe-same grounds and other important causes and that by consent of both Houses which they wanted can be reputed no high Treason nor Rebellion against the King in point of Law and no just no rationall Iudge or Lawyer can justly averre the contrary against so many forecited resolutions in Parliament even in printed Acts. The Earle of Richmund afterward King Henry the seventh taking up armes against Richard the third a lawfull King de facto being crowned by Parliament but an Vsurper and bloody Tyrant in Verity to recover his Inheritance and Title to the Crowne and ease the Kingdome of this unnaturall blood-thirsty Oppressor before his fight at Boswell Field used this Oration to his Souldiers pertinent to our purpose If ever God gave victory to men fighting in a just quarrell or if he ever aided such as made warre for the wealth and tuition of their owne naturall and nutritive Countrey or if he ever succoured them which adventured their lives for the reliefe of Innocents suppression of malefactors and apparent Offenders No doubt my Fellowes and Friends but he of his bountifull goodnesse will this day send us triumphant victory and a lucky revenge over our proud Enemies and arrogant adversaries for if you remember and consider the very cause of our just quarrel you shall apparently perceive the same to be true godly and vertuous In the which I doubt not but God will rather ayde us yea and fight for us then see us vanquished and profligate by such as neither feare him nor his Lawes nor yet regard Iustice and honesty Our cause is so just that no enterprise can be of more vertue both by the Laws Divine and Civill c. If this cause be not just and this quarrell godly let God the giver of victory judge and determine c. Let us therefore fight like invincible Gyants and set on our enemies like untimorous Tygers and banish all feare like ramping Lyons March forth like strong and robustious Champions and begin the battaile like hardy Conquerors the Battell is at hand and the Victory approacheth and if wee shamefully recule or cowardly fly we and all our sequele be destroyed and dishonoured for ever This is the day of gaine and this is the time of losse get this dayes victory and be Conquerours and lose this dayes battell and bee villaines And therefore in the name of God and Saint George let every man couragiously advance his standard They did so flew the Tyrannicall Vsurper wonne the Field And in the first Parliament of his Raigne there was this Act of indemnity passed That all and singular persons comming with him from beyond the Seas into the Realâ—e of England taking his party and quarrell in recovering his just Title and Right to the Realme of England shall be utterly discharged quit and unpunishable for ever by way of action or otherwise of or for any murther slaying of men or of taking and disporting of goods or any other trespasses done by them or any of them to any person or persons of this his Realme against his most Royall Person his Banner displayed in the said field and in the day of the said field c. Which battell though it were just and no Treason nor Rebellion in point of Law in those that assiâ—ted King Henry the 7 th against this Vsurper yet because the killing of men and seising their goods in the time of Warre is against the very fundamâ—ntall Lawes of the Realme they needed an Act of Parliament to discharge them from suits and prosecutions at the Law for the same the true reason of all the forecited Acts of this nature which make no mention of pardoning any Rebellions or Treasons against the King for they deemed their forementioned taking up of Armes no such offences but onely discharge the Subjects from all suites actions and prosecutions at Law for any killing or slaying of men batteries imprisonments robberies and trespasses in seising of Persons Goods Chartels What our Princes and State have thought of the lawfulâ—esse of necessary Defensive Warres of Subjects against their oppressing Kings and Princes appeares by those aides and succours which our Kings in former ages have sent to the French Flemmings Almaines and others when their Kings and Princes have injuriously made Warres upon them and more especially by the publike ayde and assistance which our Queene Elizabeth and King Iames by the publike advise and consent of the Realme gave to the Protestants in France Germany Bohemia and the Netherlands against the King of France the Emperour and King of Spaine who oppressed and made Warre upon them to deprive them of their just Liberties and Religion of which more hereafter Certainely had their Defensive Warres against their Soveraigne Princes to preserve their Religion Liberties Priviledges beene deemed Treason Rebellion in point of Law Queene Elizabeth King Iames and our English State would never have so much dishonoured themselves nor given so ill an example to the world to Patronize Rebells or Traitours or enter into any solemne Leagues and Covenants with them as then they did which have been frequently renued and continued to this present And to descend to our present times our King Charles himself hath not onely in shew at least openly aided the French Protestants at Ree and Rochel against their King who warred on them the Germane Princes against the Emperour the Hollanders and Prince of Oâ—aâ—ge to whose Sonne hee hath married his elstest Daughter against the Spaniard and entred into a solemne League with them which hee could not have done in point of Law Iustice Honour Conscience had they beene Rebells or Traytors for standing on their guards and making defensive Warres onely for their owne and their Religions preservation but likewise by two severall publike Acts of Parliament the one in England the other in Scotland declaring the Scots late â—aking up Armes against him and his evill Counsellors in defence of their Religion Lawâ—s Priviledges to be no Treason nor Rebellion and them to bee his true and loyall Subjects notwithstanding all aspertions cast upon them by the Prelaticall and Popish Party because they had no ill or disloyall intention at all against his Majesties Person Crowne and Dignity but onely a care of their owne preservation and the redresse of thâ—se Enormities Pressures grievances in Church and State which threatnâ—d desolation unto both If then their seizing of the Kings Fortes Ammunition Revenues and raising an Army for the foresaid ends hath by his Majesty himselfe and his two Parliaments
MOST HIGH AND ABSOLUTE POWER OF THE REALME for thereby KINGS AND MIGHTY PRINCES HAVE FROM TIME TO TIME BEENE DEPOSED FROM THEIR THRONES and Lawes are enacted and abrogated Offenders of all sorts punished and corrupted Religion either disanulled or reformed It is THE HEAD AND BODY OF ALL THE REALME and the place where every particular man is intended to be present if not by himselfe yet by his Advocate and Atturney For this cause any thing that is there enacted is not to be withstood but obeyed of all men without contradiction or grudge and to be short all that ever the people of Rome might doe either Centuriatis Comitiis or Tribunitiis the same is and may be done by the Authority of Parliament Now the Romans in their Assemblies had power to enact binding Lawes to create and elect their Kings and Emperours and likewise to judge censure and depose them to create and elect all kindes of Officers and to change the very forme of their State and Government as I shall hereafter manifest Therefore by these Authours resolution the Parliament hath an absolute power to doe the like when they see just cause Sir Thomas Smith one of the Principall Secretaries of State of King Edward the 6. and Queene Elizabeth and a Doctor of Law in his Common-wealth of England l. 2. c. 1. in the old but 2. in the last Edition hath the same words in effect with Holinshed and addes that the Parliament giveth forme of Succession to the Crowne c. Our Kings Royall power being then originally derived to them conferred on them by the Peoples and kingdomes common consents in Parliament and all their new additionall Prerogatives too as the premises evidence it cannot be denyed but that the whole kingdome and Parliament are really in this sense above him and the most Soveraigne primitive power from whence all other powers were and are derived Fourthly This is undeniable because the whole kingdome in Parliament may not onely augment but likewise abridge allay abolish and resume some branches of the Kings royall power and prerogative if there be just cause as when it becomes onerous mischievous or dangerous to the Subjects inconvenient to or inconsistent with the kingdomes peoples welfare peace safety Liberty or the Lawes This is most apparent by Magna Charta Charta de Foresta Statutum De Tall agio non concedendo Articuli super Chartas Confirmatio Chartarum 1 E. 3. c. 6 7. 2 E. 3. c. 2. 8. 3 E. 1. c. 35. 9 E. 3. c. 12. 5 E. 2. c. 9. 10 E. 3. c. 2 3. 14 E. 3. c. 1. 14. 18 E. 3. c. 8. 25 E. 3. c. 4. Stat. 3. c. 1 2. Stat. 5. c. 8. 11. 36 E. 3. c. 10. 37 E. 3. c. 18. 42 E. 3. c. 3. 10 R. 2. c. 1. 11 R. 2. c. 1. to 7. 1 R. 3. c. 2. 4 H. 4. c. 13. 21 Jac. c. 3. 24. 7 H. 8. c. 3. The Petition of Right 3 Caroli most Statutes against Purveyens Pardons Protections and for regulating the Kings Charters Grants Revenues the Acts made this Parliament against Ship-money Knighthood Forest-bounds Pressing of Souldiers the Star-Chamber High-Commission the Trienniall Parliament the continuance of this Parliament whiles they please with sundry other Acts which restaine abridge repeale resume divers reall and pretended branches of the Kings royall Prerogative because they proved grievous mischievous dangerous pernicious to the people and kingdome This then answers that irrationall groundlesse position of Doctor Ferne That the Subjects neither lawfully may nor ought in any case to resume all or any part of that Regall power wherewith they have once invested their Kings by common consent though it prove never so mischievous and be never so much abused to the peoples prejudice Which as it is contrary to that received principle of nature and reason Eodem modo quo quid constituitur dissolvitur That all Governments created by mens consents especially being but officers in trust for their good and welfare onely to sundry presidents and Prophesies in Scripture concerning the Alterations Subversions Diminutions of Kings and kingdomes to the constant practise of all Realmes all States whatsoever from Adam till this instant who have undergone many strange alterations eclipses diminutions yea Periods of Government to the Resolution of Aristotle and all other Politicians who hold all formes of Government changeable and revocable without any injustice if necessary or convenient So likewise to the very end for which Kings have regall power as well as other Governours and Governements and for which they were ordained to wit their kingdomes peoples welfare safety peace protection c. Salus populi being not onely that Suprema Lex but principall end for which all royall power was instituted by God and Man and to which it must submit in case it becomes incompatible or inconsistent with the publique weale or safety What therefore that learned Father Augustine Bishop of Hippo long since resolved touching the now much contested for Lordly State of Episcopacy which he and neere three hundred African Bishops more were then ready to lay downe for the Churches peace I may fitly apply to the now over-much contended for supposed royall Prerogatives of Kings to effect peace in our State in these times of uncivill military that I say not bloody dissentions raised about them betweene King and Parliament Anâ— vero c. What verily did our Redeemer descend from heaven into humane members and shall we lest his very members he rent in pieces with cruell division feare to dâ—scend out of out Thrones we are ordained Bishops for Christian peoples sake what therefore may profit them for Christian peace that let us doe with our Bishoprickes Quod autem sum propter te sim si tibi prodest non sim si tibi obest What I am I may be for thee if it profit thee I may not be if it be hurtfull to thee If we be profitable servants why doe we envy the eternall gaines of our Lord for our temporall sublimities or Prerogatives Our Episcopall dignity will be more fruitfull to us if being laid downe it shall more unite the flocke of Christ than disperse it if retained If when I will retaine my Bishopricke I disperse the flocke of Christ how is the dammage of the flocke the honour of the Shepherd c. Old statute Lawes yea the common Law of England though above the King and his Prerogative may be and oft are repealed and altered by Parliaments when they become mischievous or inconvenient therefore by like or greater reason may any branches of the Kings Prerogative inferiour to these Lawes be restrained yea resumed when they prove grievous or dangerous to the Subject It is the Kings owne professed Maxime in full Parliament Printed and inrolled by his speciall command in all his Courts That the Kings Prerogative is but to defend the Peoples Liberties when therefore it either invades or subverts them it
Conquest tendered to and approved by the Conquerour himselfe newly Printed 1641. which in the Section Touching the Kings absence from Parliament resolves thus The King is BOUND by all meanes possible TO BE PRESENT AT THE PARLIAMENT unlesse he be detained or let therefrom by bodily sicknesse and then he may keepe his Chamber yet so as he lye not without the Manour or Towne at the least where the Parliament is held and then he ought to send for twelve persons of the greatest and best of them that are summoned to the Parliament that is two Bishops two Earles two Barons two Knights of the shire two Burgesses and two Citizens to looke upon his person to testifie and witnesse his estate and give Authority to the Arch-bishop of the place the Steward of England and chiefe Iustice that they joyntly and severally should begin the Parliament and continue the same in his name See 8 H. 5. c. 1. Cromptons Iurisdiction f. 13. a. 17. b. according herewith expresse mention being made in that Commission of the cause of his absence there which ought to suffice The reason is because there was wâ—nt to be a cry and murmure in the Parliament for the Kings absence because his absence is hurtfull and dangerous to the whole commonalty of the Parliament neither indeed OUGHT OR MAY HE BE ABSENT BUT ONELY IN THE CASE AFORESAID And whereas Malignants clamour that most of the Lords are absent as well as the King and therefore this can be no lawfull Parliament The same Authour will informe them That if the Lords be once summoned to Parliament and then appeare not or absent themselves the King may hold the Parliament with the Commonalty and Commons of the kingdome every of which hath a greater voyce in Parliament then the greatest Earle in England because he represents a whole County Towne or City the other himselfe alone without Bishops Earles or Barons because in times past before there was either Bishop Earle or Baron yet even then Kings kept their Parliaments but on the contrary no Parliament can be kept by the King and Peeres if all the Commons for the Kings misgovernment or such like cause should absent themselves This is the judgement of Master Iohn Vowel too who writes in this manner Yet neverthelesse if the King in due order have summoned all his Lords and Barons and they will not come or if they come they will not yet appeare or if they come and appeare yet will not doe or yeeld to any thing then the Kings with the consent of his Commons may ordaine and establish any acts or Lawes which are as good sufficient and effectuall as if the Lords had given their consents But on the contrary If the Commons be summoned and will not come or comming will not appeare or appearing will not consent to doe any thing illedging some just weighty and great cause the King in these cases cannot with his Lords devise make or establish any Law The reasons are these When Parliaments were first begun and ordained there were no Prelates or Barons of the Parliament and the temporall Lords were very few or none and then the King and his Commons did make a full Parliament which Authority was never hitherto abridged Againe every Baron in Parliament doth represent but his owne person and speaketh in the behalfe of himselfe alone But in the Knights Citizens and Burgesses are represented the Commons of the whole Realme and every of these giveth not consent onely for himselfe but for all those also for whom be is sent And the King with the consent of his Commons had ever a sufficient and full authority to make ordaine and establish good and wholesome Lawes for the Commonwealth of his Realme Wherefore the Lords being lawfully summoned and yet refusing to come sit or consent in Parliament cannot by their folly abridge the King and the Gommons of their lawfull proccedings in Parliament Thus and more Iohn Vowel in his Order and Vsage how to keepe a Parliament Printed Cum Privilegio And Sir Edward Cooke in his Institutes on Magna Charta proves that the Lords and Peeres in many Charters and Acts are included under the name of the Commons and Commonalty of England But we need not retire to this last doubtfull refuge the Honourable faithfull Lords now present though not so many as could be desired are the intire House of Peeres in judgement of Law as those present at the election of Knights of the Shire or Burgesses though the major part be negligently or wilfully absent are the whole Shire or Burrough and the wilfull absence of the residue though the greater number being contrary to Law contrary to the Priviledges of Parliament and their late Protestations tending to the very subversion of Parliaments for which high contempt they and their Posterities too may justly be disabled for ever to sit as members of that House which they have so dishonourably if not treacherously deserted even as well as Knights and Burgesses whose personall attendance is so necessary that if during the Parliament they absent themselves from it about any businesses of their owne without leave of the House or be so sicke or elected Mayors of a Towne or any other judiciall Officers so as they cannot attend the service of the House they may thereupon be lawfully expelled the House and a new Writ expressing the cause of their removall shall issue for a new election of others in their places to make the House compleat as was resolved by the Commons House 38 H. 8. Br. Parliament 7. can no more disable those now present from being a true and lawfull House of Peeres than the multitudes departing from the true Church of God to the faâ—se disprove it to be the true Church of Christ whose true flocke is but little In a word divers Parliaments have beene kept and held and Acts made without Bishops or Abbots heretofore even while they were reputed members of the Lords House and one of the three Estates in Parliament therefore this Parliament which hath taken away Bishops Votes for ever may be lawfully held notwithstanding any Lords or Commons wilfull absence from it in person who yet as long as they are members of the Parliament shall still be adjudged legally present whether they will or no. One puny Judge in the Courts of Westminster may and doth usually give judgement and make binding Orders though the Chiefe Justice and his fellowes be negligently or wilfully absent Much more then may the Lords and Commons now present doe the like in case of the Kings and other Members wilfull absence of purpose to ruine both Parliament and Kingdome against which they are now in armes and have levyed open warre Sixthly it is most apparent both by Scripture the verdict of all Politicians and writers of note the Statutes of our Realmes and Lawyers that kingdomes Subjects and Parliaments were not created by God for the
of conquest I would disinherit any man of his heritage franchise or other rights that he ought to have of right nor for to put him out of that which he now enjoyeth and hath hâ—d before time by custome of good Law of this Realm except such private persons as have beene against the good purpose and the common profit of the Realme And this speech thus finished all Sheriffs and other Officers were put in their Authorities which season for the time that the Kings Sea was void and after every man departed And at afternoon were Proclamations made in accustomary places of the City in the name of King Henry the fourth And upon the morrow following being wednesday and the first of October the Procurators abovenamed went unto the Tower of London and there certified Richard of the admission of King Henry And the foresaid Justice William Thyrning in the name of the other and for all the States of the land gave up unto Richard late King all homage and fealty unto him before him due in like manner and forme as before I have shewed to you in the deposition of King Edward the second And thus was this Prince deprived of all Kingly dignity and honour by reason of his evill counsell and such unlawfull wayes and meanes as he by his insolency in his Realme suffered to be used when he had reigned two and twenty yeers three moneths and eight dayes So Fabian and others verbatim Those Parliaments then and Nationall Assemblies which have thus disposed of the Crown and Kings themselves and exercised such jurisdiction over them must certainly be above them and the highest Soveraigne power True it is our Protestant Pâ—eres Commons and Parliaments never challenged nor exercised such jurisdiction and I presume they will not doe it However it is neither honourable nor safe for Kings and the most destructive policy their ill Counsellors can suggest unto them so farre to oppresse their Subjects or exasperate their Parliaments as to provoke them to use the extremity of their Soveraigne power and revive dead sleeping Presidents for their reliefe The consideration whereof when they were fresh made succeeding Kings more just and moderate in their governments and reclaimed many vitious oppressing Princes as Archigallo and others witnesse We know what Solomon saith Surely oppression maketh a wise man mad and if Kings or their evill Instruments shall so far mad their Subjects and Parliaments either by oppressions rapines misgovernment destroying making warre upon them or putting them out of their protections as to make them cry out as they did against King Iohn Iohannes factus est de Rege Tyrannus imo de homine in bestialem prorumpens feritatem Vae tibi Iohanni Regum ultime Anglorum Principum abominatio Nobilitatis Anglicanae confusio Heu Anglia vastata amplius vastanda c. Whereupon presently ensâ—ed a Nolumus hunc regnare Tandemque decretum est ut aliquem potentem in Regem eligerent per quem possint ad possessiones pristinas revocari eradextes quod nullus Iohanne peier vel durior pâ—ssit dominari tale miserabile statuentes argumentum Fortuna miserrima tuta est Nam timor eventus deterioris abest Cumque aliquandiu quem eligerent haesitassent demum in hoc pariter consenserunt ut Ludovicum filium Philippi Regis Francorum sibi praeficerent ipsum in Regem Angliae sublimarent Which they did to King Johns their own and the whole Kingdomes great prejudice We know what the ill advise of Rehoboams rough evill Counsellours produced 2 Chron. 10. And the King answered the people roughly after the advice of the young men saying My father made your yoake heavy but I will adde thereto my father chastised you with whips but I will chastise you with scorpions And when all Israel saw that the King would not hearken unto them the people answered the King though some say he came to the Crown by succession saying What portion have we in David and we have none inheritance in the Sonne of Iesse every man to your Tents O Israel and now David see to thine owne house So all Israel went to their Tents and elected Ieroboam for their King and fell away from the house of David to this day being never after united to it but continuing a distinct Kingdome from it This grosse impoliticke maxime of ambitious Princes now so much cryed up and prosecuted Aut Caesar aut Nullus hath utterly unkinged ruined hundreds of Kings and Emperours with their families and deprived them not onely of their Crownes but lives as it did Caesar himselfe with many of his successors whose tragicall ends should deter all other Princes from their destructive aspiring tyrannous counsels courses maximes Wherefore the best policy Kings can use to perpetutate their Thrones to them and their posterity is to treate their subjects so as may win their hearts and affections and not to straine their pretended prerogatives beyond the bounds of Law this being a most certaine experimented rule which Aristotle the Prince of politicians gives That there are two intestine causes most perilous and frequent of all others by which a Kingdome is usually lost and subverted The first is if the Nobles and people dissent from the King himselfe The second if Kings will reigne tyrannically and usurpe a greater domination or prerogative then the Lawes of their Kingdomes give them Then he addes Verily a kingdome is preserved by contrary remedies specially by a moderate kinde and temperate forme of Government For by how much the mâ—re moderate the King shall be and contented with smaller and fewer prerogatives by somuch the more constant and longer-lasting shall his kingdome necessâ—rily be For by this meanes it recedes farther from the domination of Tyrants and it comes nearer to the equability of manners and humanity of life and is lesse envyed by His subjects which he proves by the notable speech and example of King Theopompus And indeed this is the principall policy which God himselfe hath prescribed a King to prolong his dayes in his Kingdome he and his children after him to keepe all the words of this Law and those Statutes to doe them that is to governe himselfe and his subiects onely by Law not power to doe justice and judgement avoid oppression not to lift up his heart above his brethren as if they were his vassals and not men not Christians of the same kinde and quality as himselfe is Wherefore I shall close up this with old Bractons resolution Potestas itaque Regis juris est non injuriae Exercere igitur debet Rex potestatem Iuris sicut Dei vicarius Minister in terra quia illa potestas SOLIUS Dei est potestas autem injuriae Diaboli non dei cujus horum operum fecerit Rex ejus Minister erit cujus opeâ—a fecerit Igitur dum facit justitiam vicarius est Regis aeterni minister autem Diaboli dum
great trust and confidence his loving Subjects had in him in putting in his hands wholly the Order and Declaration of the Succession of this Realme by his Letters Patents under his Seale or his last will in writing signed with his hand for lacke of issue lawfully begotten of his body to give limit assigne appoint or dispose the imperiall Crowne of the Realme to what person or persons and for such estate in the same and under such conditions as it should please his Majesty The Parliament therein promising by one common assent to accept take love dread and obey as their Legall Governours and Supreame heads such person or persons onely as the King by authority of those Acts should give the Crowne unto and wholly to sticke to them as true faithfull Subjects Provided that if any of his Children or Heires afterward did usurpe one upon the other in the Crowne of this Realme or claime or challenge the said imperiall Crowne otherwise or in any other course forme degree or condition then the same should be given disposed or limited unto them by the King by vertue of those Acts. Or if any person or persons to whom it should please the King by authority of those Acts to dispose the said Crowne and Dignity of this Realme or the Heires of any of them should at any time hereafter demand challenge or claime the Crowne of this Realme otherwise or in any other course forme degree or condition then the same should be given disposed and limited unto them by the King by vertue and authority of these Acts That then all and singular offenders in any of the premises contrary to these Acts and all their Abettors Maintainers Factours Counsellours and Aiders therein shall bee deemed and adjudged HIGH TRAYTORS TO THE REALME and that every such offence shall be accepted reputed and taken TO BE HIGH TREASON and the offenders therein their ayders c. for every such offence shall suffer such judgement paines of death losses and forfeitures of Lands Goods and Priviledges of sanctuary as in any â—ases of high Treason And over that as well THE KINGS SAID HEIRES AND CHILDREN as EVERY SUCH PERSON PERSONS TO WHOM THE CROWNE SHOULD BE LIMITED AS AFORESAID and every of their Heires for every such offence above specified by them to be committed SHALL LOSE AND FORFEITE AS WELL ALL SUCH RIGHT TITLE AND INTEREST THAT THEY MAY CLAIME OR CHALLENGE IN OR TO THE CROWNE OF THIS REALME AS HEIRES BY DESCENT OR BY REASON OF ANY GIFT OR ACT DONE BY THE KING for his or their advancement by authority of those Acts or by any manner of meanes or pretence whatsoever And the Statute of 35 H. 8. c. 1. which entailed the Crowne upon Queene Mary after Edward the sixt his decease without issue 〈◊〉 this proviso That if thâ— said Lady Mary doe not keepe and performe such conditions as King Henry by 〈◊〉 Patents or last Will in writing 〈…〉 estate in the Imperiall Crowne 〈…〉 Imperiall Crowne shall be and come to the 〈…〉 lawfully begotten in such like manner and forme as 〈…〉 Mary were then dead without any Heires of her body begotten any thing in this Act contained to the contrary notwithstanding And the like provis there is for Queene Elizabeth That if she performe not the like conditions limited as aforesaid to her estate in the Crowne That then the said Imperiall Crowne shall be and come to such person or persons as the King by his Letters patents or last Will shall appoint By all which Acts worthy reading and consideration the Parliaments Supreame power of setling and disposing the descent and inheritance of the Crowne and giving Authority even to the King himselfe to dispose of it upon condition on paine of forfeiture as aforesaid which the King alone had no power at all to doe will easily appeare to the most malignant Spirits In the first Parliament of our late King Iames the first Bill then passed was an acknowledgement and confirmation of his immediate lawfull and undoubted succession and right to the Crowne of England as the next and onely Heire of the blood Royall to whom of right it descended which Dolman the Priest and some Jesuites opposed in Printed seditious Bookes So the Articles of Qu. Maries marriage with K. Philip were appointed and ratified by Parliament And the Imperiall Ecclesiasticall Jurisdiction usurped by the Pope and Prelates hath likewise by sundry Statutes beene restored and united to the Crowne and the Title of Supreame head and Supreame Governour in all causes and over all persons Spirituall Ecclesiasticall and Temporall setled upon our Kings and Queenes Who during their minorities have had Guardians and Protectors appointed to them by Parliament to summon Parliaments assent to Bills and execute all Royall Jurisdiction in their names and steads And as the Title and Right to the Crowne of England and the Jurisdiction thereof hath thus from time to time beene decided and setled in and by our Parliaments so hath the Title and jurisdiction of the Crowne of Scotland beene frequently discussed and setled in our Parliaments upon appeales made to them by the Kings of Scotland and their Corrivals to that Crowne Witnesse the famous case and competition for that Crowne long agitated and resolved in Parliament betweene the King of Norway Bailiol and Bruce to omit others in the Reigne of King Edward the first And this King Edwards Title to the Crowne of Scotland declared and resolved by our Parliament here All which are Recorded at large by Thomas Walsingham and Matthew Westminster in the life of King Edward the first and in the Parliament Rolls and Pleas of his Reigne with sundry other instances of this nature frequent in our Historians which for brevity I pretermit It is a cleare case without dispute that if the King should dye without any Heire the Crowne would escheate to the whole Kingdome and Parliament who might dispose of it in such a case to what person they pleased or quite change that forme of Government if they saw good cause no particular kinde of rule being so simply necessary by any divine Right or Law to any State or Kingdome but that as it was at first instituted so it may in such a case be changed by the whole Kingdomes generall consent upon sufficient grounds This appeares by the case of Charles the Grosse who being deposed from the Empire and his Kingdomes for a mad man and dying without any Heire the Kingdomes which before were subject to him Destitute of a right Heire began to fall in sunder on every side and to chuse Kings of themselves of another Family France elected Charles a childe sirnamed Simple for their King and after his simplicity displeased them they Crowned Otho Sonne of Robert Duke of Saxony in his place At the same time the people of Italy meaning to have a King of 〈…〉 not agree on the matter but some chose Beringarius 〈…〉 Kings in
Parliament dare trust one the other alone with the premises and it is neither Royall nor Honourable as many beleev for the King to trust the Parliament now alone with these who in their Declarations never desired but professed the contrary that the chiefest command of the Militia when indifferent Officers were appointed should still reside in his Majesty in as ample manner as before there is no other equall honourable just impartiall probable way left to secure or accord both parties in this particular but onely to commit the premises for a convenient time to the custody of such trusty persons nominated by the Parliament to the King or by the King to the Parliament as both sides ioyntly shall allow of and by a speciall Bill to prescribe them such an Oath as shall oblige them to keep and imploy them onely for the ioynt use of King Kingdome and Parliament by the joynt direction of King and Parliament and not by the single warrant or command of either of them whiles this Parliament continues Vnder paine of High Treason both against the King and Kingdome I shall close up this obiection with the words of Seneca Securitas securitate mutua paciscenda est Errat enim si quis existimet tutum esse Regem vbi nihil a regâ— tutum est Vnum est inexpugnabile munimentum Amor Ciuium which the King shall then be sure of when he takes up this resolution Non rempublicam suam esse sed se Reipublicae and shall really trust the Kingdome and Parliament as much as farre forth as he expects or desires they should trust him The Parliaments Right to Elect Privie Counsellours Great Officers and Iudges THe third grand Complaint of the King and Royalists against this Parliament is That they take upon them a power to recommend and nominate to the King his Privie Counsellours Iudges with other great Officers of State demanding that none of them may hereafter especially during Parliaments be ordained by his Majesty but by their Nomination or advice A great affront an intollerable encroachment on the Prerogative Royall as is pretended The lowd clamour against the Parliament if seriously examined will speedily vanish into nothing For first it is already cleared and Fortescue so resolves That Kings themselves the highest Officers and Justiciaries in their Kingdomes were both created and elected at first by the free generall votes of their people from whom alone they received all their Royall Authority having still no other nor greater lawfull power then they conferred on them onely for the defence of their Laws Persons Liberties Estates and the Republicks welfare which they may regulate augment or diminish for the Common good as they see just cause Therefore doubtlesse the people who thus created and elected their Kings at first did likewise constitute and elect all publike Councellours Officers Judges Ministers of the State giving both being and bounds to their severall Offices and Iurisdictions by publike Lawes which is most apparent not only in the Roman Lacedemonian and other Kingdomes but our own too by infinite Acts of Parliament creating regulating and limiting the power Charters Pattents Graunts and proceedings not onely of our Kings but of their Counsellours Chancellous Treasurers Keepers of the Great Seale and privie Seale high Stewards Admiralls Marshalls Masters of the Horse Presidents of the Marches and of York Masters and other Officers of the Court of Wards Iudges and Iustices of all Courts all kinds Sherifs Coroners Customers Searchers Escheators and all other Temporall or Ecclesiasticall publick Officers the right of whose elections remaining originally in the Kingdome and Parliament representing it was never yet irrevocably or totally transferred by them to the King by any publike acts that I have seene and therefore when they see just cause they may make use of this their primitive inherent right of Election without any reall incroachment on the Kings Prerogative Secondly I have already proved that the Heretochs Lieutenants Generall and Sherifs as likewise the Conservators of the Peace in every County through the Realme were anciently elected onely by the Parliament and People not the King though they had the custody power Command of the whole Countey without any impeachment to the Prerogative Royall why then may not these other publike Officers of the Estate be thus nominated and chosen by the Parliament likewise without any just exception or offence Thirdly All Coroners Majors Sherifs Baylifs Aldermen Recorders of London Yorke Bristoll and generally of all Cities Townes and Burroughs throughout the Kingdome which have the chiefe Government of these Corporations Verderers of the Forrest Constables and other Officers have ever anciently and are still at this day elected onely by the People not the King Yea all Arch-bishops Bishops Abbots Priors with other Ecclesiasticall Officers who were formerly Peers and Members of the Parliament and Rulers in the Church were anciently chosen not by the King himselfe but onely by the Clergie and people as sundry Presidents and Statutes manifest and the Conge de'sliers at this day for the Election of new Bishops more then intimate and all this without the least violation of the Kings Prerogative why then may not the Parliament nominate all those publike Officers to the King by Parallell Reason without Ecclipsing his Prerogative Fourthly The Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the Kings and Kingdomes greatest Court and Councell the Parliament the supreamest Counsellors and Iudges of all others to whom all other Courts Counsellors Officers Iudges are responsible for their actions Iudgements advice have alwayes of right beene and yet are elected onely by the Free-holders and Commons of the Realme yea all the members of the Lords house though summoned thither by the Kings Writ and not elected sit there of right not of grace or the Kings free choyse by the fundamentall Lawes and Constitutions of the Realme neither can the King by his absolute Prerogative elect any members of the Commons House or exclude any member of it or Peere of the Vpper House who by vertue of his Peerage ought to sit there without the Houses consents for then if he might elect or exclude one he might likewise choose and seclude more yea most of them by like reason at his pleasure and so subvert the subjects Priviledges and by a Packed Parliament impose what Lawes or Taxes he would on his people to their slavery and ruine Which freedome of the subjects Election and all Lords Summons is so essentiall and necessary to Parliaments that the Parliaments of 21 R. 2. at Westminster and of 38 H. 6. at Coventry were by the Parliaments of 1 H. 4. c. 3 4. Nâ— 21 22. and 39 H. 6. c. 1. adjudged and declared to be void and no Parliaments at all but unlawfull yea devillish Assemblies and Ordinances for this very Reason because in the first of them the Knights were not duly elected by the Commons according to Law
and custome but by the Kings pleasure and the Lords onely of the Kings party contrary to right and reason summoned to it by meanes whereof Will therein ruled for reason men alive were condemned without examination men dead and put in execution by privie murther were adjudged openly to dye others banished without answer an Earle arraigned not suffered to plead his pardon c. and because the latter of them by divers seditious evill-disposed persons about the King was unduly summoned onely to destroy some of the Great Nobles faithfull and Lawfull Lords and other faithfull liege people of the Realme out of hatred and malice which the said seditious persons of long time had against them and a great part of the Knights of divers Counties of the Realme and many Burgesses and Citizens for divers Burroughs and Cities appearing in the some were Named returned and accepted some of them without due and free Election some of them without any Election by meanes and labour of the said seditious persons against the course of the Lawes and Liberties of the Commons of the Realme wherby many great Jeopardies Enormities and Inconveniences wel-nigh to the ruine decay and subversion of the Realme ensued If then the grand Councellors and Judges of this highest Court are and ought to be elected only by the Commons not the King because they are to consult and make Lawes for the Kingdomes welfare safety government in which the Realme is more concerned then the King and Bishops Abbots and Priors likewise whiles members of the Lords House of Parliament were chosen by the Clergy People Commons not the King by semblable or better reason the whole State in Parliament when they see just cause may claime the nomination of all publike Officers of the Kingdome being as much or more the Kingdomes Officers 〈◊〉 the Kings and as responsible to the Parliament as to the King for their misdemeanours in their places without any diminution of the Kings Prerogative Fiftly the Parliament consisting of the most Honourable Wise Grave and discree test persons of all parts of the Kingdome are best able clearely and impartially to Iudge who are the fittest ablest faithfullest most deserving men to manage all these publike Offices for the Kings the Kingdoms honour and advantage better then either the King himselfe his Cabinet-Counsell or any unconsiderable Privadoes Courtiers Favourites who now usually recommend men to these places more for their own private ends and interests then the Kings or Kingdoms benefit therfore it is but just equitable that they should have the principall nomination and recommendation of them to the King rather then any others whomsoever that the King should rather confide herein to their unbiased Iudgements then to his most powerfull trustiest Minions who would out the Parliament of this just priviledge that they might unjustly engrosse it to themselves and none might mount to any places of publike trust but by their deare-purchased private Recommendations the cause of so many unworthy untrusty corrupt publike Officers and Judges of late times who have as much as in them lay endeavoured to enslave both us and our posterities by publike illegall Resolutions against their Oathes and Consciences Sixthly Though our Kings have usually enjoyed the choice of Judges and State Officers especially out of Parliament time yet this hath been rather by the Parliaments and peoples permissions then concessions and perchance by usurpation as appeares by Sherifes and Lieutenants of Counties Elections now claimed by the King though anciently the Subjects right as I have proved And if so a Title gained only by Connivance or Usurpation can be no good plea in Barre against the Parliaments Interest when there is cause to claime it however the Kings best Title to elect these publike Officers is only by an ancient trust reposed in his Predecessors and him by the Parliament and Kingdom with this tacit condition in Law which Littleton himselfe resolves is annexed to all Officers of trust whatsoever that he shall well and lawfully discharge this trust in electing such Counsellors Officers and Iudges as shall be faithfull to the Republicke and promote the subjects good and safety If then the King at any time shall breake or pervert this trust by electing such great Counsellors Officers and Judges as shall willingly betray his Subjects Liberties Proprieties subvert all Laws foment and prosecute many desperate oppressing Projects to ruine or inthrall the Kingdom undermine Religion and the like as many such have been advanced of late yeares no doubt the Parliament in such cases as these may justly regulate or resume that trust so far into their own hands as to recommend able faithfull persons to these publike places for the future without any injury to the Kings Authority It was a strange opinion of Hugh Spensers great favourites to King Edward the second which they put into a Bill in writing That homage and the Oath of Allegiancâ— is more by reason of the Crowne then by reason of the Person of the King and is more bound to the Crowne then to the Person which appeares because that before the descent of the Crowne no Allegiance is due to the Person Therefore put case the King will not discharge his trust well according to reason in right of his Crowne his Subjects are bound by the Oath made to the Crowne to reforme the King and State of the Crowne because else they could not performe their Oath Now it may say they be demanded how the King ought to be reformed By 〈◊〉 of Law or by 〈◊〉 By suite at Law a man can have no redresse at all for a man can have no Iudge but these who are of the Kings party In which case if the will of the King be not according to reason he shall have nothing but â—rrour maintained and conâ—â—med Therefore it behoveth for saving the Oath when the King will not redresse a thing and remove what is evill for the Common people and prejudiciall to the Crowne that the thing ought to be reformed by force because the King is bound by his Oath to governe his Lieges and people and his Lieges are bound to governe in aide of him and in default of him Whereupon these Spensers of their owne private Authority tooke upon them by Vsurpation the sole government both of King and Kingdome suffering none of the Peeres of the Realme or the Kings good Counsellours appointed by the State to come neere him to give him good counsell not permitting the King so much as to speake to them but in their presence But let this their opinion and private unlawfull practise be what it will yet no doubt it is lawfull for the whole State in Parliament to take course that this part of the Kings Royall trust the chusing of good publike Counsellours Officers Judges which much concernes the Republike be faithfully discharged by recommending such persons of quality integrity and ability to all publike places of trust and
were elected by the people who prescribed them Lawes Oathes and had power to question to punish remoove and censure them when they offended Solon and Aristotle with other great Politicians debating this Question Whether the power of Electing and censuring the Magistrates and chiefe Officers ought to resids in the people Conclude offirmatively That it is most necessary and convenient this power should rest in the people because else the people shall become both the servants and enemies of their Princes if they have not this power and because all the people together are more considerable and better able to judge of the goodnesse and fitnesse of Magistrates for them then any few select particular men which are more apt to be seduced with by-endâ— then a great multitude Whence among the Lacedemonians and in most Kingdomes and Republicks in Greece the people had both the election yea and correction of their Magistrates and chiefe State Officers as they manifest In the Kingdome of Aragon in Spaine their ancient Suparbiense Forum their Iustitia Aragoniae and Rici homines who are their principall Magistrates Great Counsell of State and Priviâ— Counsellours to their King both in Warre and Peace having power over their Kings themselves to examine and censure all their Actions and remove them if there be cause with all their Members Knights and Burgesses of their Parliaments held formerly once a yeâ—re but now once every second yeare by fixed Lawes anciently were and at this day are elected by the People and not the King In the Germane Empire the Electorship Chancellourship and all great Offices of State are hereditary and successive not chosen by the Emperour and the greatest part of inferiour Magistates are elected in most Provinces and Cities by the people In Polonia the Archbishop of Gnesne is by inheritance alwayes Chancellour of the Realme In Hungary the great Palatine the chiefest Officer of that Kingdome next to the King himselfe who at home determineth and judgeth all differences between the King and Subjects according to the Lawes of that Realme est enim apud Panonios in usu Regem si quid contra Legem fecerit legibus subijci and during the interregnum hath right to summon Parliaments and generall assemblies of the Estates yea the chiefe hand and power in electing a new King and the Soveraigne command in the Warres Adeo ut sontes punire bene de re publica â—â—ritis praemia discernere fundosque qui 20. vel 30. agricolarum capaces sunt juris haerâ—ditarij nomine conferre possit c. as Nicholaus Isthuanfus writes is elected by the States and Parliament of Hunâ—ary not the King And in this manner Bethrius was elected Palatine in a full assâ—mbly of the States Senatus Nobiliâ—tiâ—sque consensu Anno Dom. 1517. and the Vayvode put by In Venice the Senate and people chuse all the great publike Officers not the Duke In Poland where the King is elective by the Law of Sigismond Augustus all the Magistrates of every Countrey were to be chosen by the particular States of every Government and so they are now In Denmarke and Sweden and Bohemia the Kings themselves are Elective by the States and people and most of their publike Officers too When Rome and Italy were under the Gothish Kings they still elected their publike Officers as is evident by King Theodoricus Letter of approbation of their Election in these words Our consent Reverend Fathers doth accompany your jâ—dgement In Scotland Anno 1295. the Scots in King Iohn Bayliols Reigne considering his simplicity and unapâ—nâ—sse elected them 12. Peeres after the manner of France to wit 4. Bishops 4. Earles and 4. Lords by whose counsell the King ought to Governe the Realme and by whose ordination all the affaires of the Kingdome should be directed which was principally done in affront of King Edward the first by whom this Iohn was made King of Scotland in some sort against the Scots good liking some of them secretly murmuring against it In France it selfe where the King as some thinke and write is an absolute Monarch the greatest publike Officers anciently have sometimes been Elected by the Three Estates of Parliament Anno 1253. The States of France Elected the Earle of Leycester their Grand Seneschall and chiefe Counsellour of State to advise them and their desolate estate what to doe In the Yeare 1324. Arthur Duke of Brittaine was chosen Constable of France by the voice of all the Peers of the Great Counsell and Parliament and thereupon was admitted to that Grand Office In the Yeare 1357. the 7 th of King Iohn of France the Archbishop of Roan Chancellour of France Sir Simon de Bury chiefe Counsellour of the King and of the Parliament Sir Robert de Lorize Chamberlaine to the King Sir Nicholas Brake Master of the Kings Pallace Eguerrain Burges of Paris and Under-Treasurer of France Iohn Priest Soveraigne-Master of the Money and Master of the Accounts of the King and Iohn Chauneon Treasurer of the Kings Warres were all complained of by the Three Estates of France assembled in Parliament for misguiding the King and Realme their goods confiscated to the King themselves removed from these Offices and others elected in their places by the States In the Yeare 1408. by a Law made in the Parliament at Paris it was decreed That the Officers of the High Court of Parliament should be made by the Parliaments Election and those then vacant were so which Law was againe revived by King Lewis the 11 th in the Yeare 1465. And after him in the time of Charles the 8 th not onely the Presidents the Kings Counsellours and Advocates were made by election but even the Kings Atturney Generall the onely man of all the body of the Court that oweth not Oath but to King onely was chosen by the suffrages of the Court in the Yeare 1496. though their Letters of Provision and confirmation of their Election then were and yet are alwayes granted by the King About the Yeare 1380. the Earle of Flanders who had regall Jurisdiction exacting new Customes and Taxes from his Subjects contrary to their Liberties they thereupon expelled him with all his Family and Counsellours out of their Countrey And refused upon any termes to submit to his Governement unlesse he would remove all his evill Counsellours from him and deliver them into their hands to be punished Et recipere SOLVM VELIT CONSILIARIOS EX COMMVNIS VVLGI DECRETO and would receive such Counsellours onely as his people by common decree should assigne him which he was constrained sore against his will to condescend too ere they would restore him Since then the Councellours Magistrates Judges and Prime Officers of State in most other Kingdomes have beene thus elected by the people and Parliaments without any enchrochments upon their Kings just Regalities Why our Parliament now may not claime and enjoy the like Priviledges without any impeachment
the Lord Burnell And here upon the Prince in his owne name and of the other forementioned Lords prayed to be excused in case they could not finde sufficient to support their necessary charges And that notwithstanstanding any charge by them accepted in this Parliament that they may be discharged in the end of the Parliament in case nothing shall be granted to support their foresaid charges And because the said Prince should not be sworne by reason of the highnesse and excellency of his Honourable Person the other Lords and Officers were sworne and swore upon the condition aforesaid to goâ—erne and acquit themselves in their counsell well and faithfully according to the tenour of the first Article delivered among others by the said Commons and likewise the Iustices of the one Bench and other were sworne and tooke an Oath to keepe the Lawes and doe Iustice and equall right according to the purport of the said first Article And on the 9. of May being the last day of the Parliament The Commons came before the King and the Lords and then the Speaâ—er in the name of the said commons prayed the King to have full conusance of the names of the Lords of his Counsell and because the Lords who were named before to be of the said Counsell had taken their Oathes upon certaine conditions as aforesaid that the same Lords of the Counsell should now be newly charged and sworne without condition And hereupon the Prince prayed the King as well for himself as for the other Lords of the Counsell that forasmuch as the Bishop of Durham and Earle of Westmorland who are ordained to be of the same Counsell cannot continually attent therein as well for divers causes as are very likely to happen in the Marches of Scotland as for the enforcement of the said Marches that it would please the King to designe other Lords to bee of the same Counsell with the Lords before assigned And hereupon the King IN FVLL PARLIAMENT assigned the Bishop of Saint Davids and the Earle of Warwicke to be of his said Counsell with the other forenamed Lords and that they should bee charged in like manner as the other Lords without any condition A notable President where all the Kings Privy Counsell are nominated and elected by him in full Parliament and their names particularly declared to the Commons before they are sworne to the end that they might except against them if there were just cause who in their Petition and Articles to the King expresse in generall what persons the King should make choise of for his Counsellors and Iudges and what Oathes they should take in Parliament before they were admitted to their places Which was as much or more as this Parliament ever desired and the King may now with as much Honour and Iustice grant without any diminution of his Prerogative as this Magnanimous Victorious King Henry did then without the least deniall or delay In the fiâ—t Yeare of King Henry the fift This King undertaking a warre with France by Advise and consent of his Parliament as honourable to the King and profitable to the Kingdome toâ—which war they liberally contributed Iohn Duke of Bedford was in and by that Parliament made GOVERNOVR AND REGENT OF THE REALME AND HEAD OF THE COMMON-WEALTH Which Office he should enjoy as long as the King was making Warre on the French Nation the Summons of which Parliament issued out by this Duke in the Kings Name See H. 1. c. 1. In the Patent Rolls of 24. Hen. 6. 1 â— pars mem 16. The King grants to Iohn Duke of Exceter the Office of Admirall of England Ireland and Aqultain which Grant is thus subscribed Per breve de privato Sigillo AVCTORITATE PARLIAMENTI So that hee enjoyed that Office by apointment and Authority of the Parliament which was no set standing Office nor place of great Honour in former ages when there were many Admiralls in England designed to severall Quarters and those for the most part annuall or but of short continuance not for life as Sir Henry Spelman shewes at large in his Glossarie Title Admirallus to whom I referre the Reader and Title Heretocâ—us which Heretochs elected by the people had the command of the Militia of the Realme by Sea and Land and this word Heretoch in Saxon signifying properly a Generall Captaine or Leader as you may see there and in Master Seldenâ— Titles of Honour Pag. 605. 606. And sometimes though more rarely an Earle Count or Nobleman Earlederman or Prince Hengist and Horsa being called Heretogan in a Saxon Annall In the 1. yeare of King Henry 6. being but 9. months old when the Crowne descended the Parliament summoned by his Father Henry the 5. as Walsingham writes was continued in which By ASSENT OF ALL THE STATES Humfry Duke of Gloucester WAS ELECTED AND ORDAINED DEFNDER AND PROTECTOR OF ENGLAND in the absence of his elder Brother the Duke of Bedford and all the Offices and Benefices of the Realm were committed to his disposall In this Parliament a strange sight never before seen in England this infant king sitting in his Queen mothers lap passed in Majestick manner to Westminster and there tooke state among all his Lords before he could tell what English meant to exercise the place of Soveraigne direction in open Parliament then assembled to establish the Crowne upon him In the Parliament Rolls of the 1. yeare of this King I finde many notable passages pertinent to the present Theme of which for their rarity I shall give you the larger account Numb 1. There is a Commission in this Infant Kings name directed to his Vncle Humfrey Duke of Gloucester to summon and hold this Parliament in the Kings name and stead and commanding all the Members of it to attend the said Duke therein Which Commission being first read the Archbishop of Canterbury taking this Theame The Princes of the People are assembled with God declares 4. causes for which this Parliament was principally summoned 1. For the good governance of the person of the most excellent Prince the King 2. For the good conservation of the peace and the due execution and accomplishment of the Lawes of the land 3. For the good and safe defence of the Realme against enemies 4. To provide honourable and discreet persons of every estate for the good governance of the Realme according to Iethro his Counsell given to Moses c. Which Speech ended Numb 7. 8 9 10 11. The receivers of all sorts of Petitions to the Parliament are designed and the Speaker of the House of Commons presented and accepted Numb 12. The Lords and Commons authorize consent to and confirme the Commission made to the Duke in the Infant Kings Name to summon and hold this Parliament so that they authorize and confirme that very power by which they sate With other Commissions made under the great Seale to Iustices Sheriffes Escheators and other officers for the necessary execution of Iustice. Numb 13.
manner as the Noble Duke of Exceter was before appointed and designed to execute which charge he was sent for out of France the yeare following In the three and thirtieth yeare of this Kings reigne Richard Duke of York was made Protector of the Realme the Earle of Salisbury was appointed to be Chancellor and had the great seale delivered to him and the Earle of Warwick was elected to the Captainship of Calice and the territories of the same in and BY THE PARLIAMENT by which the Rule and Regiment of the whole Realme consisted onely in the heads and orders of the Duke and Chancellor and all the warlike affaires and businesse rested principally in the Earle of Warwick From which Offices the Duke and Earle of Salisbury being after displaced by â—mulation envie and jealousie of the Dukes of Somerset Buckingham and the Queene a bloody civill warre thereupon enfued after which Anno 39. H. 6. this Duke by a solemne award made in Parliament between Henry the sixth and him was againe made PROTECTOR AND REGENT OF THE KINGDOM By the Statutes of 25. H. 8. c. 22. 28. H. 8. c. 7. and 35. H. 8. c. 1. it is evident that the power and Right of nominating a Protector and Regent during the Kings minoritie belongs to the Parliament and Kingdome which by these Acts authorized Henry the eighth by his last Will in writing or Commission under hiâ— seale to nominate a Lord Protector in case he died during the 〈◊〉 of his heire to the Crowne and the Duke of Somerset was made Lord Protector of the King and Realme during King Edward the sixth his nonage BY PARLIAMENT And not to trouble you with any more examples of this kinde Mr. Lambard in his Archaion p. 135. Cowell in his Interpreter title Parliament Sir Henry Spelman in his Glossarium tit Cancellarius out of Matthew Westminster An. 1260. 1265. Francis Thin and Holinshed vol. 3. col 1073. to 1080. 1275. to 1286. and Sir Edward Cook in his Institutes on Magna Charta f. 174 175. 558. 559. 566. acknowledge and manifest That the Lord Chancellour Treasurer Privy Seale Lord chiefe Iustice Privy Counsellors Heretochs Sheriffs with other Officers of the Kingdome of England and Constables of Castles were usually elected by the Parliament to whom OF ANCIENT RIGHT THEIR ELECTION BELONGED who being commonly stiled Lord Chancellour Treasurer and chiefe Iustice c. OF ENGLAND not of the King were of right elected by the representative Body of the Realme of England to whom they were accomptable for their misdemeanors Seeing then it is most apparent by the premises that the Parliaments of England have so frequently challenged and enioyed this right and power of electing nominating recommending approving all publike Officers of the Kingdome in most former ages when they saw iust cause and never denuded themselves wholly of this their interest by any negative Act of Parliament that can be produced I humbly conceive it can be no offence at all in them considering our present dangers and the manifold mischiefes of the Kingdome hath of late yeeres sustained by evill Counsellors Chancellors Treasurers â—udges Sheriffs with other corrupt publike Officers to make but a modest claime by way of petition of this their undoubted ancient right nor any dishonour for his Maiesty nor disparagement to his Royall Prerogative to condiscend to their request herein it being both an honour and benefit to the King to be furnished with such faithfull Counsellors Officers Iudges who shall cordially promote the publike good maintaine the Lawes and subiects Liberties and doe equall iustice unto all his people according to their oathes and duties unfaithfull and corrupt officers being dangerous and dishonourable as well to the King as Kingdom as all now see and feele by wofull experience In few words If the Chancellors Iudges and other Officers power to nominate three persons to be Sheriffe in every County annually of which his Majesty by law is bound to pricke on â—lse the election is void as all the Iudges of England long since resolved and their authority to appoint Iustices of the Peace Escheators with other under Officers in each shire be no impeachment at all of the Kings prerogative as none ever reputed it or if both Houses ancient priviledge to make publike Bills for the publike weale without the Kings appointment and when they have voted them for lawes to tender them to the King for his royall assent be no diminution to his Soveraignty then by the selfe-same reason the Parliaments nomination or recommendation of Counsellors State-officers and Iudges to his Maiesty with a liberty to disallow of them if there be iust cause assigned can be no encroachment on nor iniury at all to his Maiesties Royalties it being all one in effect to recommend new Lawes to the King for his royall assent when there is need as to nominate meet Officers Counsellors Iudges to him to see these Lawes put in due execution when enacted So that upon the whole matter the finall result will be That the Parliaments claime of this their ancient right is no iust ground at all on his Maiesties part to sever himselfe from his Parliament or to be offended with them much lesse to raise or continue a bloody warre against them That the King hath no absolute Negative voyce in the passing of Bills of Common Right and Iustice for the publike good THe fourth great Objection or Complaint of the King Malignants Royallists against the Parliament is That they deny the King a negative Voyce in Parliament affirming in some Declarations That the King by his Coronation Oath and duty is bound to give his royall assent to such publike Bills of Right and Iustice as both howses have voted necessary for the common wealth or safety of the Realme and ought not to reject them Which is say they an absolute deniall of his royall Prerogative not ever questioned or doubted of in former ages To this I answer first in generall That in most proceedings and transactions of Parliament the King hath no casting nor absolute negative voyce at all as namely in reversing erronious Iudgments given in inferiour Courts damning illegall Pattents Monopolies Impositions Exactions redressing removing all publike grievances or particular wrongs complained of censuring or judging Delinquents of all sorts punishing the Members of either house for offences against the Houses declaring what is Law in cases of difficulty referred to the Parliament of which there are sundry presidents In these and such like particulars the King hath no swaying negative voice at all but the houses may proceed and give Iudgement not only without the Kings personall presence or assent as the highest Court of Iustice but even against his personall Negative vote or dissassent in case he be present as infinite examples of present and former times experimentally manifest beyond all contradiction Nay not only the Parliament but Kings Bench Common Pleas Chancery and every
Realme of England have heretofore suffered throught default of the law that failed in divers cases within the said Realm our soveraign Lord the King for the amendment of the land for the reliefe of his people and to eschew much mischiefs dammages and dis-inherisons hath provided established these Acts underwritten willing and commanding that from henceforth they be firmely kept within this Realme The Statutes of Westminster 2. in his 13. year begin thus Whereas of late our soveraigne Lord the King c. calling his Counsell at Glocester and considering that divers of this Realm were disherited by reason that in many cases where remedy should have been had there was none provided by him nor his Predecessors ordained certaine statutes right necessary and profitable for his Realm whereby the people of England and Ireland have obtained more speedy Iustice in their oppressions then they had before and certaine cases wherein the law failed did remaine undetermined and some remained to be enacted that were for the reformation of the oppressions of the people our soveraigne Lord the King in his Parliament holden c. the 13 ear of his reign at Westm. caused many oppressions of the people and defaults of the lawes for the accomplishment of the said statutes of Glocest to be rehearsed and thereupon did provide certaine Acts here following The sâ—atute of Quo Warranto An. 1278. the 6. year of this King made at Glocest. hath this exordium The King himself providing for the wealth of his Realm and the morefull administration of Iustice AS TO THE OFFICE OF A KING BELONGETH the more discreet men of the Realm as well of high as of low degree being called thither it was provided c. The staâ— of York 12 E. 2 hath this Prologue Forasmuch as people of the Realm of England and Ireland have heretofore suffered many times great mischiefs damage and disherison by reason that in divers cases where the law failed no remedy was purveyed c. our soveraign Lord the King desiring THAT RIGHT BE DONE TO HIS PEOPLE at his Parl. holden at York c. hath made these Acts statutes here following the which he willeth to be straitly observed in his said Realm In 9. Ed. 3. in a Parliament held at York the Commons desired the King in the said Parliament by their Petition that for the profit and commodity of his Prelates Earls Barons and Commons of his Realm it may please him WITHOVT FVRTHER DELAY upon the said grievances and outrages to provide remedy our soveraign L. the K. desiring the profit of his people by the assent of his Prelates c. upon the said things disclosed to him found true to the great hurt of the said Prelates c. and oppression of his Commons hath ordained and established c. In 10. E. 3. stat 1. there is this introduction Because our Soveraigne Lord the King Edw. 3. WHICH SOVERAIGNLY DESIRETH the maintenance of his peace and safeguard of his people hath perceived at the complaint of the Prelates Earls Barons and also at the shewing of the Knights of the shires and the Commons in their Petition put in his Parliament c. divers oppressions and grievances done to his people c. COVETING to obvent the malice of such felons and to see a covenable remedy hath ordained c. for the quietnes and peace of his people that the articles underneath written be kept and maintained in all points 14. E. 3. stat 1. To the honor of God c. the King for peace and quietnesse of his people as well great as small doth grant and establish the things underwritten The like we have in 15. E. 3. stat 1. and in this kings Proclamation for revoking it there is this passage We considering how BY THE BOND OF OVR OATH WE BE BOVND TO THE OBSERVANCE AND DEFENCE OF THE LAWES AND CVSTOMES OF THE REALME c. So in 20. E 3. Because that by divers complaints made to us we perceived that the law of the land which WEE BY OVR OATH BE BOVND TO MAINTAINE is the lesse well kept and the execution of the same disturbed many times c. WE GREATLY MOVED OF CONSCIENCE IN THIS MATTER and for this cause desiring as much for the pleasure of God and ease and quietnesse of our Subjects AS TO SAVE OVR CONSCIENCE AND TO KEEPE OVR SAID OATH by the assent of the great men and other wise men of our Counsel we have ordained these things following 23. E. c. 8. That in no wise ye omit the same as ye love us and the Commonwealth of this Realme 25. E. 3. stat 2. Because that statutes made and ordained before this time have not been holden and kept as they ought to be the King willing to provide quietnesse and common profit of his people by the assent c. hath ordained and established these things under-written The passage in the statute of Provisors 25. E. 3. Parliam 6. is notable Whereupon the said Commons have prayed our Soveraigne Lord the King that SITH THE RIGHT OF THE CROWNE OF ENGLAND AND THE LAW OF THE SAID REALME IS SVCH that upon the mischiefes and dammages which hapneth to his Realme HE OVGHT AND IS BOVNDEN OF THE ACCORD OF HIS SAID PEOPLE IN PARLIAMENT THEREOF TO MAKE REMEDY AND THE LAW OF VOIDING THE MISCHIEFES and dammages which thereof commeth that it may please him thereupon to ordain remedie Our Soveraigne Lord the King seeing the mischiefes and dammages before named and having regard to the statute made in the time of his Grandfather and to the cause contained in the same which statute alwayes holdeth his force and was never defeated nor annulled in any point and by so much AS HE IS BOVNDEN BY HIS OATH TO DOE THE SAME TO BE KEPT AS THE LAW OF THIS REALME though that by sufferance and negligence it hath been attempted to the contrary also having regard to the grievous complaints made to him by his people in divers his Parliaments holden heretofore willing to ordain remedy for the great dammage and mischiefs which have hapned and daily do happen to the Church of England by the said cause By assent of the great men and Commonalty of the said Realm to the honor of God and profit of the said Church of England and of all his Realme hath ordered and established c. 28. E. 3 The King for the common profit of him and his people c. hath ordained 36. E. 3. To the honour and pleasure of God and the amendment of the outragious grievances and oppressions done to the people and in reliefe of their estate King Edward c. grantâ—d for him and his Heires for ever these Articles underwritten 1. R. 2. To the honour of God and reverence of holy Church for to nourish peace unity and concord in all the parts within our Realm of England which we doe much desire We have ordained c. 3. R. 2. For the honour of God and of holy Church
and for the common profit of the Realme of England our Soveraigne Lord the king hath ordained c. for the quietnesse of his said people the Statutes and Ordinances following c. cap. 2. with 2. H. 4. c. 1. Our soveraign Lord the king greatly desiring the tranquility and quietnes of his people willeth and straitly commandeth that the peace within his Realme of England be surely observed kept so that all his lawful subjects may from henceforth safely and peaceably goe come and dwell after the Law and usage of the Realme and that Iustice and right be indifferently ministred to every of his said subjects as well to the poore as to the rich in his Courts 1. H. 4. Henry by the Grace of God c. to the honour of God and reverence of holy Church for to nourish peace unity concord of all parties within the Realm of England and for the reliefe and recovery of the said Realm which now late hath been mischievously put to great ruine mischief and desolation of the assent c. hath made and established c. 6. H. 4. c. 1. For the grievous complaints made to our Soveraigne Lord the king by his Commons of the Parliament of the horrible mischiefes and damnable custome which is introduced of new c. Our soveraign Lord the King to the honor of God as well to eschew the dammage of this Realme as the perils of their soules which are to be advanced to any Archbishopricks or Bishopricks c. hath ordained Divers such recitalls are frequent in most of our statutes in all Kings raignes viz. 37. E. 3. c. 2 3 4 5. 3. R. 2. c. 3. 5. R. 2. Stat. 1. 2. 6. R. 2. Stat. 1. 7. R. 2. 8. R. 2. For the common profit of the said Realme and especially for the good and just government and due execution of the common Law it is ordained c. 10. R. 2. Prologue c. 1. 11. R. 2. c. 1. 12. R. 2. 13. R. 2. Prologue c. 3 5 6. 14. R. 2. 21. R. 2. 1. H. 4. 5. c. 7. 1. H. 6. 8. H. 6. Prologue c. 25. 10. H. 6. c. 3. 12. H. 6. c. 12. 39. H. 6. Prologue 1. R. 3. c. 2. 6. 8. 3. H. 7. c. 5 6. 11. H. 7. c. 18. But I shall conclude with some more punctuall ones 18. E. 3. stat c. 1 2. To nourish love peace and concord between holy Church and the Realme and to appease and cease the great hurt and perils impertable losses and grievances that have been done and happened in times past and shall happen hereafter if the thing from henceforth be suffered to passe c. for which causes and dispensing whereof the ancient lawes usages customes and franchises of the Realm have been and be greatly appaired blemished and confounded the Crown of the king minished and his person falsly defrauded the treasure and riches of his Realme carried away the inhabitants and subjects of the Realme impovirished troubled c. the King at his Parliament c. having regard to the quietnesse of his people which he chiefly desireth to sustaine in tranquility and peacâ— to governe according to the Lawes Vsages and Franchises of this Land as HE IS BOVND BY HIS OATH MADE AT HIS CORONATION following the wayes of his Progenitors which for their time made certaine good Ordinances and provisions against the said grievances c. by the assent c. hath approved accepted and confirmed c. 2. R. 2. c. 7. Because the King hath perceived as well by many complaints made to him as by the perfect knowledge of the thing c. the King desiring soveraignly the peace and quietnesse of his Realme and his good Lawes and Customes of the same and the Rights of his Crowne to be maintained and kept in all points and the offenders duly to be chastised and punished AS HE IS SWORN AT HIS CORONATION by the assent of all the Lords c. hath defended c. And moreover it is ordained and established c. 3 R. 2. Rot. Parl. Num. 38. 40. The Commons desiring a grant of new power to Iustices of Peace to enquire into extortions the Bishops conceiving it might extend to them made their protestation against this new grant yet protested that if it were restrained only to what was law already they would condiscend to it but not if it gave any new or further power The King answers that notwithstanding their protestation or any words conâ—eined therein he would not forbeare to passe this new grant and that BY HIS OATH AT HIS CORONATION HE WAS OBLIGED TO DO IT And 6 H. 6. c. 5. We for as much as by reason of our Regality WE BE BOVNDEN TO THE SAFEGVARD OF OVR REALM round about willing in this behalfe convenient hasty remedy to be adhibite have assigned c. By these with infinite such like recitalls in our ancient and late statutes in the Kings owne Proclamations Commissions yea and in writs of law wherein wee find these expressions Nos qui singulis de regno nostro in EXHIBITIONE IVSTITIAE SVMVS DEBITORES plaenam celerem justitiam exhiberi facias Nos volentes quoscunque legios nostros in curiis nostris c. justitiam sibi c. nullatenus differri Ad justitiam inde reddendam cum omni celeritate procedatis Nos oppressiones duritias damna excessus gravamina praedictae nolentes relinquere impunita volent esque SALVATIONI QVIETI POPVLI NOSTRI hac parte PROSPICERE VT TENEMVR eidm celeris justitiae complementum debitum festinum iustitiae complementum fieri facies Nos huiusmodi praeindicio precavere volentes prout ASTRINGIMVR IVRAMENTI VINGVLO Quiaâ— iudicia in curia nostra cito reddita in suis roboribus manuteneri volumus defendi prout AD HOC IVRAMENTI VINCVLO ASTRINGIMVR TENEMVR c It is most apparent that the Kings of England both by their oath duty and common right even in point of justice and conscience are bound to assent to all publike Acts as are really necesâ—ary for the peace safety ease weale benefit prevention of mischiefs and redresse of greivances of all or any of their subjects without any tergiversation or unnecessary delayes when they are passed and tendered to them by both Houses and that in such acts as these they have no absolute Negative voice at all but ought to give their speedy free and full consents thereto unlesse they can give satisfactory reasons to the contrary Sixthly All our ancient Kings of England as the premises with all publike usefull statutes enacted in their reigne evidence have alwayes usually given their free and full consents in Parliament to such publike acts as these without deniall or protraction conceiving they were bound by oath and duty so to doe and if they ever denyed their royall assents to any Petitions or Bills of the Lords and Commons of this nature they alwayes gave such good
a Kingdome and society of men to governe as Aristotle Cicero Polibius Augustine Fortescue and all other Polititians accord before there could be a King elected by them for to governe them And those Kingdomes and societies of men had for the most part some common lawes of their owne free choice by which they were governed before they had Kings which lawes they swore their Kings to observe before they would crowne or admit them to the government and likewise gave them a further oath to passe and confirme all such subsequent lawes as they should make choice of for their publike benefit and protection as is evident by the Coronation oaths of all our own yea of most other Christian and some Pagan Kings continuing to this very day and these words in the Kings oath QUAS VULGUS ELEGERIT which intimates the choice of Lawes to be wholly and fully in the peoples free elections prove beyond Contradiction Yea those ancient law-givers Solon 〈◊〉 Liâ—â—rguâ— Numa with others who tooke paines to compile Lawes for severall Kingdomes and Republikes did only recommend them to the people whose voluntary aâ—â—ent unto them made them binding Which lawes they either altered or repealed as they saw cause Besides during Interrognums in sorraigne elective Kingdomes the Estates in Parliament have power to make new binding Lawes repeale and alter old as they did in Aragon after Sanchius his decease before they elected a new King whom they swore to observe the Lawes then made before they would admit him without any Kings assent at all who yet give their royall assent to Lawes made in their reignes And in our owne and other successive Kingdomes during the Kings infancy dotage absence the Kingdomes and Parliaments have an absolute power as I have already manifested to create Regents or Lord-Protectorsâ— to execute royall authority and give royall assents to publike acts in the Kings name and steads without their actuall personall assents which lawes being necessary for the Subject shall be as firme and obligatory to King and Kingdome as those to which they actually assent Yea if Kings chance to die without any heire the Kingdome in such a case may assemble of themselves and make binding necessary lawes without a King and alter the very frame of government by publike consent Therefore the royall assent to just necessary publike Bills is in truth but a formall Ceremony or complement much like a Kings Coronation without which he may be and is a lawfull King bestowed by the people upon Kings for their greater honour with this limitation that they must not deny it when they of right require it to any just or necessary law not simply to make but declare confirm a law already made and passed by both houses much like a Tenants attornment to the grant of a Reversion And therefore Kings may neither in law nor conscience deny it when it is necessarily demanded to any just publike Bills unlesse they can shew good reason to the contrary so farre as to satisfie their people why such lawes should not passe Tenthly Our very lawes in many cases deny the King an absolute negative voice or power even in matters of Prerogative because they are contrary to his oath and mischeivous to the Republike This appeares most clearly in matters of Pardons the Statutes of 2 E. 3. c. 2. 14 E. 3. c. 15. 13 R. 2. c. 1. 16 R. 2. c. 6. enact That Charters of pardon shall not be granted for man slaughters Roberies Fellonies and other Trespasse but ONLY WHERE THE KING MAY DOE IT BY HIS OATH that is to say where a man slayeth another in his owne defence or by misadventure or in case where he may doe it KEEPING AND SAVING THE OATH OF HIS CROWNE Soe the King cannot pardon nor release the repairing of a Bridge or Highway or any such like publike charges or any publike Nusances or offences against paenall Lawes pro bono publico because it is contrary to the trust and confidence reposed in him for the publike good because the republike hath an interest herein and the pardoning of them would be mischeivous for the common good In like manner the King cannot deny delay nor deferre Iustice nor stay the Iudges from doing present right and justice to any of his Subjects by his Letters under his great or privy seale because it is contrary to his oath and duty Neither can he by his absolute Prerogative impose any the least â—axe or imposition on his subjects without their common consent in Parliament nor yet authorize any other to kill beat wound imprison any mans person or take away his goods without due processe of law Yea the very lawes and custome of the Realme deny the King any absolute negative voice even in the Parliament House in reversing erronious Iudgments Charters Patents declaring what is law in difficult cases or in proceedings and sentences against Delinquents or in any one particular whatsoever which concernes the administration of right or common Iustice. Therefore by the selfesame reason the very law denies him any such negative voice in refusing his royall assent to Bills of common right and Iustice And as both Houses doe alwayes over-rule the King not He both Houses in the one so by parity and congruity of reason they ought to oversway him in the other there being the same reason in both cases and the one no greater an â—ntrenchment upon his Prerogative than the other Eleventhly This is infallibly proved by the usuall forme of our Kings answers to such Bills as they assent not to Le Roy so it a visera The King will bee advised or take further consideration which is no absolute deniall but a craving of longer time to advise upon them and thereupon to assent to them if he can see no just cause to the contrary or else to give satisfactory reasons why he cannot assent Which answer were not proper nor formall had the King an absolute negative voyce to reiect Bills without rendering a sufficient satisfactory reason of his refusall of them Twelfthly publike Bills for the Subiects common good are formed for the most part by the Lords and Commons themselves who in truth as I have elsewhere proved are the chiefe Law-makers who as Aristotle defines know better what is good and necessary for their own benefit then the King their publike Minister for their good Itaque majorum rerum potestas jure populo tribuitur is Aristotles resolution Therefore in passing such Bills there is greater â—eason that both Houses should over-rule the King then the King them It is usuall in all inferior Counsells of State Law Waâ—ie of the Kings own choise for the Counsell to over-rule the King in matters of State Law Warre unlesse the king can give better reasons against than they doe for their conclusive advise and kings in such cases doe usually submit to their Counsells determinations without
these â—iberties and that which we have sworne ALL OF US ARE BOUND TO OBSERVE But where the Acts to which the assent is gained are unjust or illegall such to which the King was not bound by Oath or duty to consent but meerely out of necessity to avoid imminent danger of death or other mischiefe and where the whole Parliament was enforced as well as the King there the acts may be avoided by Duresse as is evident by the Statutes of 11. and 21. of R. 2. c. 12. by the Statute of 31 H. 6. c. 1 which makes voyd all the Petitions granted by this King in a former Parliament the 29. of his Reigne and all indictments made by Duresse through the Rebellion Tyranny and Menaces of Iack Cade and his rebellious rout of Traytors and by 39. H. 6. c. 1. 15. E. 3. stat 2. and 17. E. 4. c. 7. Yet these enforced unjust Bills being publike Acts done in a legall forme are not meerly void but good in Law till they be repealed and nullified by a subsequent Parliament as is evident by the next forecited Statutes even as a Marriage Bond or deed made by Duresse or Menace are good in Law and not meerly void but voidable only upon a Plea and Tryall And if subsequent Parliaments refuse to repeal these forced Laws and to declare the Royall assent thereto by coertion void or illegall the King cannot avoid them by Duresse because his Royall assent is a judiciall Act in open Parliament which his oath and duty obliged him to give and the Lawes are rather the Parliaments Act which was not forced then his owne but they remaine in full vigour as if he had freely assented to them which is most evident by the Statutes made in 10. and 11. R. 2. which though extorted from the King by Duresse against the will and liberty of the King and right of his Crowne as is pretended and declared in the Statute of 21. R. 2. c. 12. yet they continued in full strength for ten yeares space or more during which time there were no lesse then 8. Parliaments held under this King because these Parliaments refused to reverse them upon this pretext of Duresse and the Parliament of 1 H. 4 c 2 3 4. received and confirmed them From all which premises I humbly conceive I may infallibly conclude That the King in passing the fore-mentioned kinde of Bills of Common Right and Iustice for the Kingdomes and the Subjects weale and safety hath no absolute negative voyee but must and ought of common right and Iustice by vertue of his Royalloath and duty to give his ready and free assent unto them without any tergiversatiâ—n And so the Parliament in their Declarations to this purpose hath no wayes invaded nor injured his Majesties just Prerogative royall in this particular Nor yet those members in it eclipsed his royall grace who have upon occasion given affirmed the Petition of Right the Bills for Trieniall Parliaments which before by Law were to be annuall at least the continuance of this Parliament without adjournment for the Kingdomes necessary preservation the acts against Shipmoney Forest-Bounds c. illegall new invented grievances and oppressions not heard of in former Kings Reigns and the Statutes for the suppression of the Star-Chamber High Commission Knighthood and Bishops votes lately growen intollerable grivances and mischeifes to the Realme Especially since his Majesties Reigne to bee no acts of most transcendent Grace such as never any Prince before vouchsafed to his people as they are daily cried up in Presse and Pulpet but Bills of meere Common Right and Iustice which the King by his Royall Office Oath Duty in Law and Conscience ought to assent unto and could not without apparent injustice deny to passe when both Houses urged him thereunto the rather because the unhappy fractions of all Parliaments and Grievances of these Natures under his Majesties own Reign and Government occasioned by his evill Councellers were the sole grounds and just occasions of enacting these necessary Laws for the Subjects future security if the sword now drawen to suppresse the Parliament and cut these Gordians or rather Cobwebs as Diogenes once termed Laws a sunder deprive them not of their benefit before they scarce enjoy it I should now here proceed to manifest the Parliaments taking up of defensive Armes against his Majesties Malignant Army of professed Papists Delinquents and pillaging murthering Cavaleers whose grand designe is onely to set up Popery and an absolute tyrannical Government over our consciences bodies estates in defense of their own persons priviledges the Subjects Laws Liberties Properties and our Protestant established Religion devoted by Papists to eternall ruine as we have cause to feare to be just lawfull and no treason nor rebellion at all against the King neither in point of Law nor conscience And that the Parliaments assessing of men towards the maintenance of this necessary defensive warre by an Ordinance of both Houses onely without the Kings assent now wilfully absent from and in armes against his Parliament and People with their distraining and imprisoning of such as refuse to pay it and their confinement and securing of dangerous Malignants to be justifiable by Law and ancient presidents with other particulars not yet so fully discussed by any as is desired But this part being already growne somewhat large and having lingred much longer at the Presse then I expected I have thought it more convenient to reserve the remainder for a future Treatise by it selfe then to hinder the state of the present benefit which it may receive by this through Gods blessing ere the other can â—ee compleated which I hope will fully un-blindfold the hood-winkt world and either satisfie the consciences or stop the mouthes of all who are not wilfully malicious against the Truth and Parliaments proceedings and the Soveraigne Power of Parliaments and Kingdoms over their Kings themselves which I shall more copiously manifest in the Appendix FINIS partis secunda THE THIRD PART OF THE SOVERAIGNE POWER OF PARLIAMENTS and KINGDOMES Wherein the Parliaments present Necessary Defensive Warre against the Kings offensive Malignant Popish forces and Subjects taking up Defensive Armes against their Soveraignes and their Armies in some Cases is copiously manifested to be Iust Lawfull both in point of Law and Conscience and neither Treason nor Rebellion in either by inpregnable Reasons and Authorities of all kindes Together With a Satisfactory Answer to all Objections from Law Scripture Fathers Reason hitherto alledged by Dr. Ferne or any other late opposite Pamphleters whose grosse Mistakes in true Stating of the present Controversie in sundry points of Divinity Antiquity History with their absurd irrationall Logicke and Theologie are here more fully discovered refuted than hitherto they have been by any Besides other particulars of great concernment By WILLIAM PRYNNE Utter-Barrester of Lincolnes Inne 2 Sam. 10. 12. Be of good courage and let us play the men for our People and for the City of
onely the beating but killing of such persons who assault their Masters persons goods or houses as is expresly resolved by the Statute of 21. E. 1. De malefactoribus in Parcis By 24. H. 8. cap. 5. Fitzherbert Corone 192. 194. 246. 258. 261. 330. 21. H. 7 39. Trespas 246. Stamford lib. 1. cap. 5. 6. 7. 22. Ass. 46. 11. H. 6. 16. a. 14. H. 6 24. b. 35. H. 6. 1. a. 9. E. 4. 48. b. 12. E. 4. 6. a. 12. H. 8. 2. b. Brooke Coron 63. Trâ—spas 217. Therefore they may justly defend themselves resist oppose apprehend and kill his Majesties Cavalliers notwithstanding any Commissions and make a defensive Warre against them when as they assault their persons houses goods or habitations without any Treason Rebellion or Crime all against the King or Law Thirdly It is past dispute That the Sheriffes Iustices of Peace Mayors Constables and all other Officers of the Realme may and ought by our Lawes and Statutes to raise the power of the Counties and places where they live and command all persons to arme themselves to assist them upon their Command when they see just cause which commands they are all bound to obey under paine of imprisonment and fines for their contemptuous disobediene herein to suppresse and withstand all publicke breaches of the Peace Riots Routs Robberies â—raies Tumults Forcible Entries and to apprehend disarme imprison and bring to condigne punishment all Peace-breakers Riotors Trespassers Robbers Plunderers Quarrellers Murtherers and Forces met together to doe any unlawfull Hostile act though by the Kings owne precept and in case they make resistance of their power they may lawfully kill and slay them without crime or guilt if they cannot otherwise suppresse or apprehend them yea the Sheriffes and all other Officers may lawfully raise and arme the power of the County to apprehend Delinquents by lawfull Warrants from the Parliament or Processe out of other inferiour Courts of Iustice when they contemptuously stand out against their Iustice and will not render themselves to a Legall triall in which service all are bound by Law to assist these Officers who may lawfully slay such contemptuous Offenders in case they cannot otherwise apprehend them All which is Enacted and Resolved by 19. E. 3. cap. 38. 3. Ed. 1. cap. 5. 2. R. 2. cap. 6. 5. R. 2. cap. 5. 6. 7. R. 2. cap. 6. 17. R. 2. cap. 8. 13. H. 4. cap 7. 1. H. 5. cap. 6. 2. H. 5. cap. 6. 8. 19. H. 7. cap. 13. 3. E. 6. cap. 5. 1. Mar. cap. 12. 31. H. 6. cap. 2. 19. E. 2. Fitz Execution 247. 8. H. 4. 19. a. 22. Ass. 55. 3. H. 7. fol. 1. 10. 5. H. 7. fol. 4. Register f. 59. 60. 61. Fitz. Coron 261. 288. 289. 328. 346. Stamford lib. 1. cap. 5. 6. Cooke lib. 5. fol. 92. 9. 3. with sundry other Bookes and Acts of Parliament and Walsingham Hist. Angliae pag. 283. 284. Yea the Statute of 13. Ed. 1. cap. 38. recites That such resistance of Processe out of any the Kings Courts much more then out of the Highest Court of Parliament redounds much to the dishonour of the King and his Crowne and that such resisters shall be imprisoned and fined because they are desturbers of the Kings Peace and of his Realme And the expired Statute of 31. H. 6. cap. 2. Enacted That if any Duke Marquesse Earle Viscount or Baron complained of for any great Riots Extortions Oppressioâ—s or any offence by them done against the Peace and Lawes to any of the Kings Liege people should refuse to obey the Processe of â—he Kings Court under his Great or privie Seale to him directed to answer his said offenes either by refusing to receive the said Processe or despiting it or withdrawing hâ—mselfe for that cause and not appearing after Proclamation made by the Sheriffe in â—he County at the day prescribed by the Proclamation that then hee should for this his contempt forfeit and lose all his Offices Fees Annuities and other possessions that he or any man to his use hâ—th of the gift or grant of the King or any of his Progenitors made to him or any of his Ancestors And in case he appeares not upon the second Proclamation on the day therein to him limited that then he shall lose and forfeit his Estate and place in Parliament and also All the Lands and Tenements Whâ—ch he hath or any other to his use for terme of his life and all other persons having no Lands not appearing after Proclamation were to be put out of the Kings Protection by this Act. Such a heinous offence was it then repuâ—ed to disobey the Processe of Chancery and other inferiour Courts of Iustice even in thâ— greatest Peeres how much greater crime then is and must it be contemptuously to disobey the Summons Processe and Officers of the Parliament it selfe the supremest Court of Judicature especially in those who are Members of it and stand engaged by their Protestations trusts and Places in it to maintaine its honour power and priviledges to the uttermost which many of them now exceedingly vilifie and trample under feete and therefore deserve a severer censure then this statute inflicts even such as the Act of 21. R. 2. c. 6. prescribed to those Nobles unjustly fore judged in that Parliament That their issues males now begotten shall not come to the Parliaments nor to the Councells of the King nor his heires nor be of the Kings Counsell nor of his heires Therefore it is undubitable that the Sherifes Iustices of Peace Majors Constables Leivtenantes Captaines and other Officers in every County through the Realme may by their owne Authority much more by an Ordinance and Act of association of both houses raise all the power of the County all the people by vertue of such commands may lawfully meete together in Armes to suppresse the riots burglaries rapines plunders butcheries spoyling robberies and armed violence of his Majesties Cavaleers and apprehend imprison slay arraigne execute them as common enemies to the kingdomes peace and welfare even by the knowne Common Law and Statutes of the Realme and feise Delinquents notwithstanding any royall Commission or personal commands they may or can produce Fourthly it is most certaine that every Subject by the very Common Law of the Realm yea Law of Nature as he is a member of the State and Church of England is bound both in duty and conscience when there is necessary occasion to Array and Arme himselfe to resist the invasions and assaults of oâ—en enemies of the Realme especially of Forraigners as is cleare by infinite * Presidents cited by the Kings owne Councell and recited by Iudge Crooke in his Argument concerning Ship-money in both the Houses two Remonstrances and Declarations against the Commission of Array and the Answer of the first of them in the Kings name all newly Printed to which I shall referre the Reader for fuller Satisfaction and by the expresse statutes of 1 E. 3. c.
dispositio râ—rum a Domino sit collata potestas And using likewise these memorable Speeches in those blind daies against the Pope and his usurped Supremacy with liberty Vt quid ad noâ—se extendit Romanorum insatiata cupiditas Quid Episcopis Apostolicis Militiae nostrae Ecce successores Constantini non Petri non imitantur Petrum in meriâ—is vel operibus nec assimulandi sunt in Potestate Proh pudor marcidi ribaldi qui de armis vel liâ—eralitate minime norunt jam toti mundo propter excommunicationes suas volunt dominari ignobiles usurarij Simoniales O quantum dissimuâ—es Petro qui sibi Petri usurpant partem c. I conceive this Excommunication rather justifies then disproves the lawfulnesse of this their taking up of armes and the warre insuing it being but for their owne just defence when the King afterwards with fire sword and bloody barbarous Forraigne Forces wasted his Realme in a most inhumane tyrannicall maner Factus de Rege Tyâ—annus imo in bestialem prorumpens feritatem c. which necessitated the Barons for their own preservation and the Kingdoms devoted by this unnaturall Prince to Vassallage and utter desolation to elect Lewâ—s of France for their King Who together with the Peeres and Estates of France assembled at Lions concerning this Election resolved it to be just and lawfull and the Barons Defensive Warres against and rejection of King Iohn for his Tyranny and oppressions to be just and honourable since they did but flee to these extraordinary remedies and seeke for justice abroad when they were denied it by him that should give it them in as orâ—inary way at home chosing as King in place of a Tyrant as Matthew Paris with the generall History of France written by Iohn de Serres and Englished by Edward Grimston mâ—re largely manifest Secondly the Lawfulnesse and justnesse of the Bâ—rons Warres in Defence of Magna Chartâ— with other their Hereditary Rights and Liberties appeares most evidently by the resolution of all those Parliaments summoned by King Herry the 3d. Edward the 1 â— 2. 3. Richard the 2 d and other our succeeding Kings which have many times even by force of Armes or Menaces and sometimes by faire termes caused these Kings by new Acts of Parliament of ratifie Magna Charta the Chartâ—r of the Forest with other Fundamentall Liberties thus forcibly extorted from King Iâ—hn at first and constrained them to confirme hem with their Oathes and solâ—mne publicke Excommunications to be published by the Bishops in their Diocesse twice every yeare oft solemnly vowing and protesting both in and out of Parliament to defend these Lawes and Liberties with their estates armes lives blood which their ancâ—stâ—rs had purchased with their blood as I have manifested in the two first parts of this Discourse All which they would no doubt have forborne had they deemed it high Treason or Rebellion in point of Law to take up armes against their Kings in defence oâ— these Lawes and Privileges neither would our Kings and Parliaments in times of Peace have so frequently confirmed these Lawes and Immunities as just and necessary for the peoples welfare had they reputed their former purchases and confirmations by warre and armes no lesse then Treason or Rebellion And if it were neither Treason nor Rebellion in the judgements of our Ancestors and those Parliaments which procured and ratified Magna Charta to take up armes in defence thereof much lesse can it be Treason or Rebellion in the Parliament and Subjects now by Votes by Ordinances of both Houses with force of armes to preservâ— not only these their hereditarie Charters Lawes Priviledges but their very Lives Estates yea the Privileges and being of Parliaments themselves which are now invaded endangered What opinion the world had of the lawfulnesse of most of the Barons Warres in King Henry the 3d. his Raigne against this troublesome perfidious King in defence of their Lawes Liberties Estates appeares first by the Dialogue betweene Agnellus a Frier minorite one of King Henry his Counsell purposely sent to the Earle Marshall then in armes against the King and this Martiall Earle in the Abbey of Morgan Anno 1233. I will first relate the true state of that Warre and then their Dialogue concerning it King Henry by the ill counsell of Peter Bishop of Winchester removed all his English Officers Counsellors and Servants from his Court and put Poictovines and Forraigners in their places being ruled wholly by them withall he puts the English Garisons out of all his Castles and substitutes Forraigners in them which dayly arived both with Horse and armes in great multitudes and much opprested the people calling them Traitors so that the power and wealth of the Realme was wholly under their Command The Earle Marshall seeing the Noble and Ignoble thus oppressed and the rights of the Kingdome like utterly to be lost provoked with a zeale of Iustice associating to himselfe other Noble men goes boldly to the King reproves him in the hearing of many For calling in those Poictovines by evill Counsell to the oppression of the Kingdome and of his naturall Subjects and like wise of Lawes and Liberâ—ies Humbly beseeching him hastily to correct these excesses which threatned the imminent subversion both of His Crowne and Kingdome which if he refused to doe he and the other Nobles of the Realme would withdraw themselves from his Counsell as long as he harboured those Strangeâ—s To which Peter of Winchester replyed That the King might lawfully call in what strangers he would for the Defence of his Kingdome and Crowne and likewise so many and such as might compell his proud and rebellious Subjects to due Obedience Whereupon the Earle Marshall and other Nobles departing discontented from the Court when they could get no other answer promised firmely one to another That for this cause which concerned them all they would manfully fight evâ—n to the separation of Soule and Body After which they seeing more Strangers arrive with Horse and armes every day sent word to the King That hee should foorthwith remove Bishop Peter and all his Strangers from his Court which if he refused they all would BY THE COMMON CONSENT OF THE WHOLE REALM 〈◊〉 him with his wicked Counsellours out of the Realm and consult of chusing them a new King After these and some other like passage the King raysing an Army besiegeth one of the Earles Castles and not being able to winne it and ashamed to raise his Seige without gaining it he sent certaine Bishops to the Earle and requested him that since he had besieged his Castle and hee could not with Honour depart without winning it which he could not doe by force that the Earle to save his Honour would cause it to be surrended to him upon this condition That hee would restore it certainely to him within 15. dayes and that by advise of the Bishops hâ— would amend â—all thing amisse in his Kingdome for performance of
of England and Scotland beene resolved and declared to be no Treason no Rebellion at all against the King by the very same or better reason all circumstances duely pondered our Parliaments present taking up Armes and making a Defensive Warre for the endes aforesaid neither is nor can be adjudged Treason or Rebellion in point of Law or Iustice. In fine the King himself in his Answer to the 19. Propositions of both Houses Iune 3. 1642. Confesseth and calleth God to witnesse That aâ— the Rights of his Crowne are vested in hâ—m for his Subjects sake That the Prinâ—e may not make use of his high and perpetuall power to the hurt of those for whose good he hath it nor make use of the name of publike Necessity for the gaine of his private Favourites and Followers to the detriment of his people That the House of Commons may impeach those who for their owne ends though countenanced with any surreptitiously gotten Command of the King have violated that Law which he is â—ound when he knowes it to protect and to protection of which they were bound to advise him at least Not to serve him in the Contrary let the Cavalleers and others consider this and the Lords being trusted with a Iudiciary power are an excellent screene and banke betweene the King and people to assist each against any Incroachments of the other and by just Iudgements to preserve that Law which ought to be the Rule of every one of the three Therefore the power Legally placed in both Houses Being more then sufficient to prevent and restraine the power of Tyranny by his Majesties owne Confession it must needs be such a power as may legally inable both Houses when Armes are taken up against them by the King or any other to subvert Lawes Liberties Religion and introduce an Arbitrary government not onely to make Lawes Ordinances and Assessements but likewise to take up Armes to defend and preseve themselves their Lawes Liberties religion and to prevent restraine all forces raysed against them to set up Tyranny else should they want not onely a more then sufficient but even a sufficient necessary power to prevent and restraine the power of Tyranny which being once in armes cannot bee restraned prevented repulsed with Petitions Declarations Lawes Ordinances or any Paper Bulwarkes and Fortifications or other such probable or possible meanes within the Parliaments power but onely by Armes and Militarie Forces as reason and experience in all Ages manifest From all which pregnant punctuall domesticke Authorities and resolutions of Ancient Moderne and present times I presume I may infallibly conclude That the Parliaments present taking up necessary Defensive Armes is neither Treason nor Rebellion in iudgement of Law but a iust and lawfull Act for the publicke benefit and preservation of King Kingdome Parliament Lawes Liberties Religion and so neither their Generall Souldiers nor any person whatsoever imployed by them in this War or contributing any thing towards its maintenance are or can be Legally indicted prosecuted or in any manner proceeded against as Traitors Rebels Delinquents against the King or Kingdome and that all Proclamations Declarations Indictments or proceedings against them or any of them as Traitors Rebels or Delinquents are utterly unlawfull uniust and ought to be reversed as meere Nullities It would be an infinite tedious labour for me to relate what Civilians and Canonists have written concerning Warre and what Warre is just and lawfull what not In briefe they all generally accord That no Warre may or ought to be undertaken cut of covetousnesse lust ambition cruelty malice desire of hurt revenge or fer booty propter praedam enim militare peccatum est Whence Iohn Baptist Luke 3. 14. gave this answer to the Souldiers who demanded of him what shall we doe Doe violence to no man neither accuse any man falsly and be content with your wages Ne dum sumptus quaeritur praedo grassetur Which prooves the Warres of our plundring pillaging Cavalleers altogether sinnefull and unjust And that such a Warre onely is just which is waged for the good and necessary defence of the Common-wealth by publike Edict or consent or to regaine some thing which is unjustly detained or taken away and cannot otherwise be acquired or to repell or punish some injury or to curbe the insolency of wicked men or preserve good men from their uniust oppressions which Warres ought onely to be undertaken out of a desire of Peace as they prove out of Augustine Gregory Isidor Hispalensis and others In one word they all accord That a necessary defensive Warre to repulse an Injury and to preserve the State Church Republike Freedomes Lives Chastities Estates Lawes Liberties Religion from unjust violence is and ever hath beene lawfull by the Law of Nature of Nations yea By all Lawes whatsoever and the very dictate of Reason And that a necessary defensive Warre is not properly a Warre but a meere Defence against an unlawfull Violâ—nce And therefore must of necessitie be acknowledged lawfull because directly opposite to and the onely remedy which God and Nature have giuen men against Tyrannicall and unjust invasions which are both sinnefull and unlawfull And so can be no Treason no Rebellion no crime at all though our Princes or Parents be the unjust assailâ—nts Of which see more in Hugo Grotius de Iure Belli l. 2. c. 1. I shall closeup the Civillians and Canonists Opinions touching the lawfulnesse of a Defensive Warre with the words of Albericus Gentilis Professor of Civill Law in the Vniversitie of Oxford in Queene Elizabeths Raigne Who in his learned Booke De Iure Belâ—i Pacis Dedicated to the most illustrious Robert Devoreux Earle of Essex Father to the Parliaments present Lord Generall determines thus Lib. 1. cap 13 pag. 92. c. Although I say there be no cause of warre from nature yet there are causes for which we undertake warre by the conduct of nature as is the cause of Defence and when warre is undertaken because something is denied to to be granted which nature it selfe affords and therefore because the Law of nature is violated Warre is undertaken We say there is a three fold Defence one Necessary another Profitable a third Honest yet wee shall deeme them all Necessary He who defends himselfe is said to be necessitated neither will Baldus have us distinguish whether he defend himselfe his goods or those under his charge whether neere or remote His defence is necessary and done for necessary defence against whom an armed enemy comes and his against whom an enemy prepares himselfe and to such a one the same Baldus truly teacheth ayde is due by compact whom others likewise approve This warre we may say was anciently undertaken against Mithridates and against his great preparations Neither ought wise men to expect till he had professed himselfe an enemy but to looke more into his deeds then words Thus whiles we say necessity we speake not
properly but we understand that necessity which is not rare in humane affaires and hath wont to bee called neede which yet precisely is not that true necessity c. It is a most unjust conflict where the one side being agent the other is onely patient There is a just defence and slaying although the slayer might flee without danger and so save himselfe whether the slayer who defends himselfe be of that condition that it would be a disgrace to him to flee or whether it would be no disgrace Which opinions are received in the causes of private men and to mee are much more approved in publike causes Defence even in Bruites is a Law of nature it is perswaded and constituted in us not by opinion but by a certaine imbred faculty and it is a necessary Law for what is there saith Cicero that can be done against force without force This is the most approved above all Lawes All Lawes all Rights permit to repell force with force There is one Law and that perpetuall to defend safety by all meanes All meanes are honest of preserving safety this reason to the Learued necessity to Barbarians custâ—me to Natâ—ons nature it selfe to wilde Beasts hath prescribed and this is no written but borne or native Law Likewise to defend our Estates is a necessary defence and this is a just cause of defending if wee bee assaulted by â—arre though wee our selves have demerited the warre which things others and Paulus Casâ—ensis have taught And it will follow and adde this reason because the Law or Force of warre is not enâ—ed by â—btaining the things first demanded but walkes according to the conquerers pleasure Who is content to repay so much revenge onely as he hath received wrong saith Augustine and all know it This arbitrary power all not subdued may justly decline and therefore defend themselves against it with Armes Witnesses Iudges who are enemies are repelled although they against whom they proceed gave the cause of the enmity To one in Armes he gives all things who denies just things said Caesar. Neither doe we heare make question of that blamelesse moderation where there is no superior These things therefore are avoyded and therefore the cause of Romulus shall be said right to me who defended himselfe by war against the invading Sabines albeit he had given them cause of warre and offence by the rape of their women The force of necessity is so great when men are pressed with Armes that those things which are unjust may sâ—â—me most just as Bodin well warre is just to whom it is necessary pia arma quibus nulla nisi in armis relinquitur spes and Armes are pious to those to whom no hope is left but in Armes Extreame necessity is exempted from all Law And yet I restraine not the present definition to extreame necessity or take extreame according to the condition of mens affaires for be it so let it be no necessitie which may be no necessity Romulus might have avoyded warre by restoring the ravished women yet he might likewise defend himselfe against the enemies even soone after marching against him I stay not in this definition for that is a question belonging to Citizens He who being banished may be hurt without danger yet he may defend himselfe CHAP. XIIII De utili Defensione He proceedes thus I Call that a profitable defence when we move warre fearing least we our selves should be warred upon no man is sooner oppressed then he which feares nothing and security is the most frequent beginning of calamity This first Next we ought not to expect present force it is more safe if we meete that which is Future There is more hope and more courage in him that infers force then in him who repels it he hath more courage who inferres danger then he who repulseth it Livy and Vigetius if the enemie should once prevent all things are disturbed with feare it behoves them therefore saith Nicephorus an historian of no contemptible authority who would live without danger to meete with and prevent impendent evills and not to delay or expect that thou mayst revenge the received injury with danger if for the present thou maist cut out the root of the growing plant and supprâ—sse the endeavours of an enemie who thinkes ill And Suidas yea Demosthenes warre is not to be delayed but urged least being first injured we be compelled to repulse force This as the Latin De nâ—sthenes Cicerâ— saith is likewise a disgrace that if thou mayst prevent future thou wouldest rather redresse Present evils That rude youth likewise so hath nature it selfe prescribed this Law I would rather looke to our selves then I would be revenged having received injury But Philo most excellently that we presently slay a serpent at the first sight although he hath not hurt us nor perchance will hurt us so carefull are we of our selves before he move himselfe Am I not over-tedious to thee in naming these Authors which yet are none of ours But the consent of various and many authors is great reason c. Neither yet omit I things held in lieu of proverbes and therefore prove much what they signifie Meete the approaching disease Withstand beginnings else medicines are provided over-late Neglected fires are wont to gâ—t strength Behold something out of the Authors of Law It is better to keepe Lawes unviolated then afterwards to seeke remedy It is lawfull to prevent One providing to offend I offend lawfully and others of this nature which are more defined to humanity and approved by mens judgements No man ought to expose himselfe to danger no man ought to expect himselfe to be smitten or slaine unlesse he be a foole We ought to meete the offence not onely which is in act but that likewise which is in possibility to act Force is to be repelled and propulsed with force therefore not to be expected in which expectation there are also both other the foresaid certaine evils and that likewise which is mentioned in the causes of private men least perchance by giving the first stroke we be slaine or lest we yeeld by flying and be oppressed lying downe But not to flye is to repell force all these things are cleare and tried and most apt to warlike tractates What followes hath some doubt when the thing may seeme to come to that passe that we must now run to this profitable defence A just cause of feare is required suspition is not sufficient Now a just feare is defined a feare of a greater evill and such as may deservedly happen unto a constant man But here in this great cause of Kingdomes a feare that no dammage should happen although not very great or if there be an evident cause of feare although the danger be not true but the cause onely of feare just is sufficient but not when
another Prince neither doe I suffer those things to bee distinguished which are most firmely glued together by nature I meane that kinred with all among all Neither here otherwise may one Prince have inspection over another Prince but such as may happen by every other Warre wherein one Prince carries himselfe as a judge both of himselfe and of another If a question were among private men it were most unjust to goe to a Forraigne Prince about it Also if there arise a difference betweene a private man and his Soveraigne there are Magistrates appointed which may be sought unto But when the controversie is touching the Common-wealth there neither are nor can be any judges in the City I call that a publike matter when such and so great a part of the Subiects is moved that now there is need of Warre against those that defend themselves by Warre And as if those should come into part of the Principality of the publike and are Peeres to the Prince who can doe so much as hee Even as one King is said to be equall to another who can resist another offering wrong however greater and more powerfull although I say not these things of the Subjects themselves unlesse it be in respect of Forraigne Princes which will ayde the Subject against their Soveraigne and who can ayde them no otherwise then in a controversie as I have expounded of the Common-wealth And indeede if the Subjects be used more cruelly and unjustly this opinion of defending is approved even of others who both bring that laudable example of Hercules the Lord of Tyrants and Monsters There is also the example of Constantine who ayded the Romans against Maxentius as I noted before We defend Sonnes against injust Fathers Adde now those golden Sayings of Seneca That being cut off whatsoever it was whereby he did cleave unto me the Society of humane right is cut off If he doe not impugne my Countrey but is burdensome to his owne and being bannished my Countrey doth vexe his owne yet so great naughtinesse of minde hath cut him off although it maketh him not an enemy yet hatefull unto mee And the reason of the duty which I owe unto mankinde is both more precious and more powerfull with me then that which I owne to one single man Thus verily or else we make all men forreigners to all Princes if we determine that they can doe according to their pleasure and lust Now what if the cause of the Subject be unjust The foresaid Authors deny that men ought to ayde uniust Forraigne Subjects least any by so ayding introduce the same Law into his owne Kingdome which the Corinthians did before Yea Aristotle thinkes that neither a wicked Father is to be loved nor assisted with helpe But this is false of a Father as I taught in a certaine Disputation perhaps it is more true that those may be defended of us by war who are unjust For if it be a just warre which is to repulse a wrong although they that repulse an injury have given occasion to the warre the same it seemes may be determined in the defence of others even of Subjects for the same reason Surely there is that iniquity in Warre that it will make the same man to pronounce law to himselfe in his owne cause or verily willing to pronounce it Vpon which pretence another Prince may bring ayde on the contrary side that things may more civelly be composed without warre And this is that which Pyrrhus did when he came to ayde the Tarentines against the Romanes he admonished them first that they would by their owne endeavour put an end to the Controversie although neither the Romans would not unjustly hearken unto the King or because they might deservedly suspect him as being sent for by enemies armed with enemies ready to fight for enemies and of kinne to enemies Hee that stands armed with another is said to bring helpe and ayde unto him neither is there neede to proove any thing against that at all Even he that armes himselfe is beleeved to thinke upon warre And if he that is the friend of an enemie bee excluded from being a witnesse much more from being a Iudge For it is easier if any be received for a witnesse then a Iudge The friend of my enemy is not presently ment my enemy as neither my friends friend is my friend but there is a great suspition of them both and of the friend of an enemy the more But I returne to the question We are bound both to defend justly unjust Sonnes against the cruelty of a Father or Servants against the cruelty of a Master and we laudably indeavour that by fury here is Warre no not wicked men should be chastened and punished for fury and warre have no measure And he that led by humanity or pitty or any other approved and just cause hath received another mans Servant is not bound by the Statute of a corrupt Servant and that reception is accompted in the nature of good c. Even he is commended who being angry with his servants committed them to be punished by another this commendation being added because he himselfe was angry Therefore a good Prince will have the Liberty of rage against his own Subjects to be taken from him being angry as a good Father as a good Master and he will alwaies judge That Kingdomes were not made for Kings but Kings for Kingdomes which is most true This also of Plato availeth that we ought to use Eloquence chiefely to accuse our friends to whom it is the best thus to be drawn from future evils And so I thinke that we may defend unjust Forreigne Subjects yet to this end onely for the keeping off immoderate cruelty and too severe punishment Seeing it is not inhumane to doe good to those that have offended Yet I dare affirme that this reason of bringing helpe doth seldome stand alone but that another of necessity and profit may be pretended or truely shewn as is said before Behold now is the greatest question If the English have justly ayded the Hollanders because their cause was unjust the Hollanders were even now Subjects to the Spaniards both which notwithstanding are false It was said that a Warre was to bee undertaken upon that occasion that a good Peace might be obtained of the Spaniard which otherwise as is thought could not have beene had And so truly Warre is lawfully undertaken as our men alledge And the most wise reason of the Physicians maketh for it That if any Feaver be slow which holds the body and which yeelds to no cure then the Disease is to be changed yea to bee augmented and heightned For when it doth not receive cure for the present as it is it may receive that cure which is future But even Warre might have beene undertaken without that evill of an unfaithfull Peace As there be many bonds of neerenesse
more by the fundamentalls of that State then our Great Councell will or can But now the Emperour being supreme as S. Peter calls him or the Higher Power as S. Paul here there is no power of resistance left to any that are under him by the Apostle 4 Was there ever more cause of resistance then in those dayes Were not the Kings then not onely conceived to be inclined so and so but even actually to be enemies of Religion had overthrown Laws and Liberties And therefore if any should from the Apostles reasons that he gives against resistance in the 3 4 5 Verses for Rulers are not a â—error to good works but evill and he is the Minster of God to thee for good replie That Rulers so long as they are not a terror to the good but ministers for our good are not to be resisted the consideration of those times leaves no place for such exception because the Powers then which the Apostle forbids to resist were nothing so but subverters of that which was good and just The Emperors did then indeed rule absolutely and arbitrarily which should have according to the Principles of those dayes beene a stronger motive to resist But how did they make themselves of Subjects such absolute Monarchs was it not by force and change of the Government and was not the right of the People and Senate according to the Principles of these dayes good against them with as much or more reason then the right of the people of this Land is against the Succession of this Crown descending by three Conquests 5. The prohibition doth not onely concern Christians but all the people under those Emperors and not onely Religion was persecuted but Liberties also lost the people and Senate were then enslaved by Edicts and Laws then inforced on them by Nero and other Roman Emperours yet notwithstanding the Apostle prohibits them to resist By all which conscâ—ence will clearly see it can have no warrant in Scripture for resistance to wit of the King or his invading Forces by way of necessary defence So the Doctors and other Obâ—ectors hence conclude To give a satisfactory Answer to this grand Objection I shall in the first place inquire Whether there be anything in this Text prohibiting subjects to resist with Force the armed unjust violence of their Princes persons or instruments especially when they are bent to overthrow Religion Laws Liberties the Republike and turn professed Tyrants And under correction I conceive there is not the least syllable or shadow in this Text for any such inhibition as is pretended Not to insist upon the words higher Powers odained of God c. which extend not unto Tyrannie and illegall exorbitant oppressions of which hereafter I shall deduce my first Demonstrations to prove this negative Assertion from the occasion inducing the Apostle to insert these objected Verses into this Epistle Dr Willet recites 7. Reasons of it all fortifying my assertion I shall mention onely the three most probable most received of them and apply them as I go First the Roman Magistrates being then infidels the new converted Christians among them either did or might take themselves to be wholly exempted from any subjection or obedience to them reputing it a great incongruity that Christians should owe any subjection to Pagans To refute which error the Apostle informs them that though the Magistrates themselves were Ethnicks yet their Authority and Power was from God himself therefore their profession of Christianitie did rather oblige them to then exempt them from subjection Thus Haymo Soto Calvin Guather Marlorat Willet Pareus with others on this Text. Turn this Reason then into an Argument and it will be but this Non sequitur Christianity exempts not subiects from due obedience to iust Pagan Magistrates Ergo Tyrants may not be resisted neither ought the Parliament and their Forces to resist the Kings Cavalleers unjust assaults as the case is formerly stated Pretty Logick and Divinity 2. The Gaulonites as Iosephus records with other Iews being Abrahams seed held it unlawfull for them to yeeld any subjection or tribute to the Roman Emperors or other Heathen Princes reigning over them whereupon they demanded this question of Christ himself Is it lawfull to pay tribute to Caesar Matth. 12. which error perehance spread it self into the Christian Church by reason of Evangelicall Libertie grounded on Ioh. 8. If the Son shall make you free then are ye free indeed Mat. 17. Theâ— are the Children free and Ro. 6. We are not under the Law but under Grace To refell this mistake the Apostle inserted these passages into this Epistle Thus Soto Calvin Peter Martyr Willet and others Whence nothing but this can be properly concluded Neither the Prerogative of the Iews nor Liberty of Christians exempts them from due subjection to lawfull heathen Magistrates because they are Gods Ordinance Ergo No Subjects can with safe conscience defend themselves in any case against the unjust invasions of Tyrannicall Princes or their Armies A palpable Inconsequent Thirdly the Apostle having formerly taught that Christians might not avenge themselves lest some might have inferred thereupon as many Anabaptists have done that it was not lawfull for Christians to use the Magistrates defence against wrongs nor for the Magistrate himself to take vengeance of evill doers To prevent this the Apostle argues That the Magistrates are Gods Ministers appointed by him to punish Malefactors and take vengeance on them So Gualther Willet and others To conclude from this ground Oppressed Subjects may seek redresse of their grievances from the Magistrates who may lawfully punish Malefactors Ergo they may not resist with force Tyrannicall bloody Magistrates or their wicked Instruments when they actually make war upon them to ruine spoyl enslave them is but a ridiculous Non sequitur There is nothing therefore in the occasions of the Apostles words which gives the least colour to disprove the lawfulnesse of such resistance or of the Parliaments just defensive war Secondly this is manifest by the whole Scope of this Text which in summe is onely this That Christians ought in conscience to l be subject to all lawfull higher Powers so farre forth as they are Gods Ordinance Gods Ministers for their good to the praise of the good and punishment of evill doers and not to resist them in the execution of their just Authority Or Christianity exempts not Christians from obedience unto faithfull Civill Magistrates to inferre from thence Ergo it is unlawfull for Christians in point of conscience to resist their Magistrates when they warre upon them to subvert Religion Lawes Liberties slâ—y plunder them is but a meer non-sence deduction Thirdly this appeares most perspicuously from the motives to obedience and reasons against resistance of Magistrates specified by the Apostle in the text it selfe First the higher Powers must be submitted to and not resisted because they are ordained of God and are Gods Ordinance vers 1. 2. But they are ordained
but the quite contrary Should Tyrants enjoyne men as some have done to offer sacrifice to Idols to renounce Christianity abjure Iesus Christ and yeeld up their chastity to their unruly lusts Gods Law and conscience in such cases enjoynes them of necessity to disobey and resist those commands even for conscience sake as every man endued with conscience must acknowledge Therefore this Text extends not to resistance of such exorbitant powers in such lawlesse cases Eighthly the Apostle thus proceeds Vers. 6. For this cause also pay you tribute for they are Gods Ministers attending continually upon this very thing What doe men pay any Tribute to Princes or Magistrates for this cause that they may subvert Religion Lawes Liberties that they may plunder murther warre upon and expose them to the rapine of their ungodly Malignant Cavaliers Or are Magistrates Gods Ministers attending continually upon this very thing to ruine Parliaments Church State people would any men thinke you give Tyrants wages for such a service to cut their throats to devoure and undoe them in soule body estate Or do not they pay tribute to and Magistrates attend continually upon quite contrary imployments If so as none can contradict then the resistance here is onely intended of lawfull Magistrates who continually attend upon their charge to protect the good and punish Malefactors not of Tyrants who doe quite contrary and therefore are to be resisted Ninthly he infers from the premises Vers. 7. Render therefore to every man his due tribute to whom tribute custome to whom custome feare to whom feare honour to whom honour By what Law of God are obedience feare and honour due to Tyrants in their ungodly exorbitant unjust commands to subvert Religion Lawes Liberties Certainly the Apostle hath no where in this Text nor God himselfe in any other Scripture expressed such obedience resistance feare or honour to be due unto them and Elisha his speech to King Iehoram 2 King 3. 13. 14 compared with Ezek. 21. 25. Iob 12. 19. 21. Ch. 34. 19. Nehem. 4. 7. to 20. Ch. 13. 17. Isa. 1. 23. Ch. 41. 25. Lam. 1. 6. Ch. 5. 2 proves directly that they are not their due Therefore this Text extends not to them but onely to lawfull Magistrates Lastly he concludes hence Vers. 8. Owe no man any thing but to love one another for be that loveth another hath fulfilled the Law Now no such Love is owing to Tyrants who subvert Religion Lawes Liberties but we are to hate them with a perfect hatrâ—d as enemies both to God and man borne for the publike prejudice Psal. 139. 21. 22. Psal. 109. 1. to 21. 28 29. but onely just and upright Magistrates Therefore this Text is intended onely of them By all these premises it is undeniable that the resistance here prohibited is onely of lawfull Magistrates in the due execution of their Offices according to the Lawes of God and the Realmes they live in not of tyrannicall oppressing Princes Rulers or their instruments forcibly indeavouring to ruine Religion Lawes Liberties Parliaments Kingdomes which fully refutes the Doctors fourth Observation of which more anon I now proceed to some farther disquisitions for the finall clearing of this Text and herein I shall examine First what is meant by higher powers whether Kings or the Roman Emperor onely as our objectors pretend or all civill Magistrates whatsoever as well as Kings Secondly whether the Roman Emperour in Pauls time were the highest Soveraign power in that State or the Senate Thirdly whether Tyrants and unjust oppressing Magistrates as they are such be within the intendment of this Text and not to be resisted in any case Fourthly whether Kings and kingdomes be Gods Ordinance or an institution jure divino or a humane ordinance jure humano and how farre divine or humane Fiftly what resistance of the higher powers is here prohibited For the first of these By the higher Powers it is cleare that Kings and Emperours onely are not meant as our opposites dreame but all kinde of civill Rulers and temporall Magistrates whatsoever from the King himselfe to the Constable and Tithingman As is apparent first by the word higher Powers used indefinitely in the plurall number without mentioning any speciall kind of power Secondly by those words There is NO POWER but of God the powers THAT ARE that is all lawfull powers whatsoever now in being are ordained of God which universall Negative and Affirmative must necessarily include all lawfull civill powers Thirdly by the following words For Rulers c. that is all Rulers in the plurall number a Title common to all inferiour Officers witnesse Exod. 18. 21. 22. 25 26. See 1 Chron. 12. 14. And Moses chose able men out of all Israel and made them HEADS over the people RVLERS of thousands Rulers of hundreds Rulers of fifties and Rulers of tennes such as our Tithingmen are and they judged the people at all seasons So that the Tithingman is a Ruler a higher power within this Text. Fourthly the word Ministers For they are Gods Ministers c. in the plurall too extending generally to all officers Fiftly by v. 6 7 8. Render therefore to ALL their dues that is to all Magistrates whatsoever as these ensuing words evidence tribute to whom tribuâ—e is due custome to whom custome feare to whom feare honour to whom honour Owe nothing to ANY MAN c. that is to ANY Magistrate or Ruler of what kind soever Sixtly by parallel Texts extending as well to inferiour lawfull Magistrates and Officers as to Kings as â— Tim. 2. 1. I exhort therefore that first of all supplications prayers c. be made for all men for Kings and ALL THAT BE IN AVTHORITIE c. Titus 3. 1. Put them in minde to be subject to principalities and powers to obey Magistrates all in the plurall 1 Pet. 2. 13. 14. Submit your selves to EVERY ORDINANCE of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreame or unto GOVERNORS in the plurall as unto those that are sent by him for the punishment of evill doers and the prayse of them that doe well Compared with Iosh. 1. 16. 17. 18. Ezra 7. 25 26. Ephes. 6. 1. 5. Col. 3. 18. 20. 23. 1 Tim. 6. 1. Heb. 13. 17. Exod. 22. 28. Chap. 18. 21 22. 25 26. 2 Kings 11. 4. Seventhly by all Expositors generally on this Text ancient moderne Protestants Papists who grant that this Text extends to all civill Magistrates as well inferiour and subordinate as superiour and many sticke not to straine it even to Ecclesiasticall ones So Origen Ambrose Hierome Remigius Theodulus Chrysostome Theodoret Primasius Haymo Rabanus Maurus Theophylact Oâ—cumenius Haymo Aquinas Anselm Iyra Bruno Gorran Hugo de Sancto Victore Tostatus Luther Calvin Erasmus Melanchthon Gualther Musculus Bucer Hemingius Ferus Fayus Soto Alexander Alesius Peter Martyr Pareus Beza Piscator Zuinglius Tollet Willet Wilson Nacclantus Snecanus Vignerius Wenerichius Winckelman Estius Faber Cornelius a Lapide Salmeron Catharinus
particular person not that he was the Soveraigne highest power above the Senate and people collectively considered And the occasion of these words will discover the Authors intention to be no other which was this The Christians in that age were persecuted and put to death by Scapula President of Carthage to whom Tertullian writes this Booke because they refused to adore the Emperour for a God to sweare by his Genius and to observe his solemnities and triumphs in an Ethâ—icall manner as is evident by the words preceding this passage Sic circa Majestatem Imperatoris infamamur c. and by sundry notable passges in his Apologeticus In answer to which accusation Tertullian reasons in the Christians behalfe that though they adored not the Emperour as a God yet they reverenced him as a man next under God as one onely lesse then God as one greaâ—er then all others whiles lesse onely then the true God and greater then the Idol Gods themselves who were in the Emperours power c. Here was no other thing in question but whether the Emperour were to be adored as God not whether he or the Roman Senate and people were the greatest highest Soveraigne power And the answer being that he was but a man next under God above any other particular officer in the Roman State is no proofe at all that he was paramount the whole Senate and people collectively considered or of greater Soveraigne power then theâ— which the premises clearely disprove Adde that this Father in his Apologie thus censures the Pagan Romans for their grosse flattery of their Emperours whom they feared more then their Gods appliable to our present times Siquidem majore formidâ—ne callidiore timiditate Caesarem observatis quam ipsum de Olympo Iovem c. â—deo in isto irreligiosi erga deos vestros deprehendimini cum plus timoris humâ—no Domino dicâ—tis citius denique apud vos per omnes Deos quam per unum genium Caesaris pejeratur Then he addes Interest hominis Deo cedere satis â—abeat appellari Imperator grâ—â—nde hoc nomen est quod a Deo tradetur negat illum imperatorem qui deum dicit nist homo sit non est imperator Hominem se esse etiam triumphans in illo sublimissimo curru admonetur Suggeritur enimei a tergo Respice post te hominem memento tâ— Etiam hoc magis gaudet tanta se gloria coruscare ut illi admonitio conditionis suae sit necessaria Major est qui revocatur ne se deum existimet Augustus imperii formator ne Dominum quidem dici se volebat et hoc enim Dei est cognomen Dicam plane Imperatoâ—em Dominum sed mâ—re communi sed quando non cogor ut Dominum Dâ—i vice dicam Concluding thus Nullum bonum sub exâ—eptione personarum administramus c. Iidem sumus Imperatoribus qui vicinis nostris Male enim velle male faceâ—e male dicere male cogitare de quoquam ex aequo vetamur Quodâ—unque non licet in Imperatorem id nec in quenquam quod in neminem eo forsitan magis nec in ipsum qui per deum tâ—ntus est c. From which it is evident that the Christians did not deifie nor flatter their Emperours more then was meet and deemed they might not resist them onely in such cases where they might resist no others and so by consequence lawfully resist them where it was lawfull for them to resist other private men who did injuriously assault them If then the Roman Emperors were not the highest Soveraigne power in the Roman State when Paul writ this Epistle but the Roman Senate and State as I have cleared and if the Parliament not the King be the supremest Soveraigne power in our Realme as I have abundantly manifested then this objected Text so much insisted on by our opposites could no wayes extend to the Roman Senate State or our English Parliament who are the very higher powers themselves and proves most fatall and destructive to their cause of any other even by their owne Argument which I shall thus doubly discharge upon them First that power which is the highest and most soveraigne Authority in any State or kingdome by the Apostles and our Antagonists owne doctrine even in point of conscience neither may nor ought in what case soever say our opposites to be forcibly resisted either in their persons ordinances commands instruments offices or Armed Souldiers by any inferiour powers persons or subjects whatsoever especially when their proceedings are just and legall under paine of temporall and eternall condemnation But the Senate among the Romans not the Emperour and the Parliament in England not the King really were and are the higher Powers and most soveraigne Authority Therefore by the Apostles owne Doctrine even in point of conscience they neither may nor ought to be disobeyed or forcibly resisted in any case whatsoever either in their Persons Ordinances Commands Instruments Officers or Armed Souldiers by the King himselfe his Counsellors Armies Cavaliers or by any inferiour powers persons or Subjects whatsoever especially when their proceedings are just and legall as hitherto they have beene under paine of temporall and eternall condemnation I hope the Doctor and his Camerads will now beshrew themselves that ever they medled with this Text and made such a halter to strangle their owne treacherous cause and those who have taken up armes in its defence Secondly that Power which is simply highest and supreame in any State may lawfully with good conscience take up Armes to resist or suppresse any other power that shall take up armes to subvert Religion Lawes Liberties the Republike or the juâ—t Rights and Priviledges of the Subject or of this higher power This is our opposites owne argumentation Therefore the Parliament being in verity the highest supreame Power in our State may lawfully with good conscience take up Armes to resist or suppresse his Majesties Malignant Popish Forces or any other power which already hath or hereafter shall be raised to subvert Religion Lawes Liberties the Republike just Rights and Priviledges of Parliament or the Subjects and every man with safe conscience may chearefully serve in such a warre upon the Parliaments encouragement or command without guilt of treason or rebellion either in Law or Conscience For the third Question Whether Tyrants or unjust oppressing Magistrates as they are such be within the intendment of this Text and not to be resisted in any case I have fully cleared this before from the occasion scope and arguments used in this Chapter that they are not within the compasse of this Text as they are such and may be resisted in their Tyranny and oppressions notwithsâ—anding this inhibition I shall not repeat but onely fortifie this Position with some new reasons and authorities First then that which is not the ordinance of God but rather of the Devill and the meâ—re sinne and enormity of the Governour himselfe
sundry others hereafter mentioned Some elective others successive some conditionall others absolute as I have plentifully mentioned in the Appendix Therefore they are not of divine ordination in the objectors sense Fiftly If Kings were of divine ordination in this sense then their kingdomes and people upon their Elections Institutions and Coronations could not justly prescribe any conditions oathes or covenants to them upon promise of performance whereof they onely accept of them to be their Kings refusing else to admit them to reigne over them and such conditions oathes covenants would be meere nullities since men have no power at all to detract from Gods owne divine institutions or to annex any conditions or restrictions to them But our Antagonists themselves dare not averre that Kingdomes and Nations upon their Kings Coronations Institutions and elections may not lawfully prescribe conditions oathes and limitations to them upon promise of performance whereof they onely submitted to them as their Soveraignes it being the received practise of our owne of all or most other Kingdomes whatsoever especially elective ones and confirmed by divine Authority 2 Chron. 10. 1. to 19. Therefore they are not of divine institution in the objected sense Sixthly All Lawyers and most Orthodox Divines determine that Kings have no other just or lawfull royall Authority but that which the Lawes and customes of their Kingdomes allot them and that the Law onely makes them Kings from which if they exorbitate they become Tyrants and cease to be Kings Their Royall authority therefore is of humane institution properly not Divine from their people who both elect constitute them Kings and give them all their regall Authority by humane Lawes enacted not from God as the onely efficient cauâ—e Seventhly All Kingdomes Monarchies Policies are mutable and variable in themselves while they continue such yea temporary and alterable into other formes of Government by publicke consent if there be just cause without any immediate command or alteration made by God himselfe or his divine authority There being no positive Law of God confining any Nation whose humane earthly condition is still variable to a Monarchicall or any other constant forme of government only much lesse for perpetuity without variation Therefore they are not of divine institution in this sense Eightly St. Peter expressely defines Kings and Monarchies in respect of their institution to be humane creatures or institutions 1 Pet. 2. 13. Submit your selves to every ORDINANCE OF MAN for the Lords sake whetâ—er it be to the King as supreame c. And they are common to Pagans who know not God as well as to Christians Therefore they are not simply divine but humane Ordinances Ninethly Our Antigonists will yeeld that other formes of Government whether Aristocraticall Oligarchicall Democraticall or mixt of all three are not absolutely and immediately of divine institution nor yet Dukes Principalities with other inferior Rulers though the Apostle in this Text makes them all equally Gods Ordinance and Divine Therefore Monarchy Kings and Kingdomes are not so Tenthly The very Text it selfe seemes to intimate that Royalties and higher powers are not of God by way of originall or immediate institutionâ— or command for the Apostle saith not that all powers whatsoever were originally instituted and ordained by God himselfe but There is no power but of God The powers that be are not were at first ordained or rather ordered of God that is where powers and Governments are once erected by men through Gods generall or speciall providence there God approves and orders them for the good of men 2. If Monarchies and Kings themselves be not of divine institution and Gods ordinance in the former sense as is most apparent Aristotle Plato all Politicians grant Then they are so onely in some other sense in what I shall truely informe you First They are of God and his Ordinance by way of imitation as derived from Gods owne forme of Government which is Monarchicall Whence he is called The only God God alone the King of Kings and Lord of Lords Secondly By way of approbation He approves and allowes this kinde of Government where it is reâ—â—ived as well as other formes Thirdly by way of direction he gives divers generall rules and directions to Kings and to other Rulers and Magistrates also as well as them in his sacred word how they ought to demeane themselves towards him and their Subjects and likewise to Subjects how they should carry themselves towards their Kings and all other Rulers and Governours temporall or spirituall in which sense they may be properly said to be ordered and ordained too of God Fourthly By way of speciall providence and incitation God excites and moves some people to make choyce of Kings and Monarchicall formes of Government rather than others and to elect one man or family to that dignity rather than others yea his providence mightily rules and swayes in the changes the elections actions counsels affaires of Monarchies Kingdomes Kings States to order them for his own glory the Kings the Subjects good or ill in wayes of Justice or Mercy as is evident by Dan. 2. 21. c. 4. 17. 25. Hos. 13. 11. Ier. 27. 5 6 7. Isa. 45. 1 2 3. c. 10. 5. to 20. Psal. 110. 5. Psal. 113. 7 8. Iob 12. 18. to 25. Dan. 5. 26. 28. The genuine dâ—ift of all these Texts Fifthly Kings may be said to be of God and his Ordinance because they and so all other Rulers Judges Magistrates as well as they in respect of their representation and the true end of Government are said to be Gods to be Gods Ministers and Vicegerents to sit upon Gods Throne and ought to reigne to judge for God and to rule Gods people according to Gods Word with such justice equity integrity as God himselfe would Governe them Exod. 22. 28. 2 Chron. 9. 8. Rom. 13. 4 5. 2 Sam. 23. 3. Psal. 78. 72 73 74 2 Sam. 5. 2. Prov. 8. 15 18. Psal. 82. 1. 1 Cor. 8. 5. Isa. 32. 1. c. 9. 7. c. 16. 5. Deut. 1. 17. Sixthly Ill Kings and Tyrants may be said to be of God by way of permission and of Ordination too in reference to the peoples punishment Iob 34. 30. Hos. 13. 11. 1 Sam. 8. 18. In these regards common to all other Governours and lawfull Governments as well as Kings and Monarchies Kings and Kingly Authority are and may be said to be of God and Gods Ordinance yet not immediately or properly in the first acception here refuted but so as that still they are really the institutions and ordinances of men of humane not divine right and authority As for the objected Scriptures to prove Kings jure Divino as Prov. 8. 15. By me Kings Reigne c. Ergo they are of immediate divine institution and have all their authority from God not from the people and may in no case be resisted censured deposed or put to death for any misdemeanours the consequences thence inferred
ever used by the Apostles Evangelists Jewes to expresse the Emperour by but that of Caesar not this of King Therefore Peters Text speaking onely of the King not Caesar cannot be intended of the Romane Emperour as ignorant Doctors blindly fancie Fifthly This Epistle of Peter the Apostle of the Iews was written onely to the dispersed Iews thorowout Pontus Galatia Cappadocia Asia and Bythinia 1 Pet. 1. 1. over whom Herod at that time reigned as King by the Romane Senates and Emperours appointment who had then conquered the Iews and made them a tributarie Province as is evident by Matth. 27. 17 21. Mark 12. 14 16 17. Luke 20. 22 24 25. chap. 23. 2. Acts 17. 7. chap. 25. 8 10 11 12 21. chap. 27. 24. chap. 12. 1. to 24. compared together and by Iosepâ—us the Century writers Baronius Sigonius and others The King then here mentioned to be supreame was Herod or King Agrippa or some other immediate King of the Iews who was their supreame Governour not absolutely but under the Romane Senate and Emperours and made so by their appointment whence called in the Text an Ordinance of man not God Now this King of the Jews as is evident by Pauls Appeal to Caesar from Festus and King Agrippa as to the Soveraign Tribunall Acts 25. and 26. by Iosephus Pâ—ilo Iudâ—us de legatione ad Caium and the consent of all Historians was not the absolute Soveraigne Power but subordinate to the Romane Emperour and Senate who both created and bad power to controll remove and censure him for his misdemeanours yet Peter calls him here Supreame because the Highest Governour under them as we stile our Kings Supreame Governours under Christ. Therefore having a Superiour Governour and Power over him to which he was accountable and subordinate Supreame in the Text cannot be meant of a King absolutely Supreame having no Power Superiour to him but God but onely relatively Supreame in respect of under Governours there actually residing whose Supremacie being forcibly gained onely by conquest not free consent and the ancient native Kings of the Iews being inferiour to their whole Senates and Congregations and to do all by their advice as Iosephus Antiq. Iud. lib. 4. cap. 8. 2. Sam. 18. 3 4. Jer. 38. 45. 1. Chron. 13. 1. to 6. attest will no way advantage our Opposites nor advance the Prerogative of Kings since it extends onely to the King of the Jews that then was who was not simply Supream but a Subject Prince subordinate to the Romane State and Empire and one appointed by a Conquerour not freely chosen and assented to by the people So as all the Argument which can hence be extracted for the absolute Soveraigntie and irresistibility of Kings over their whole Kingdomes and Parliaments is but this The King of the Iews was in Peters time the Supreame Magistrate over that Nation by the Romane Senates and Emperours appointment to whom yet he was subordinate and accountable the Romanes having conquered the Iewes by force and imposing this government upon them without their consents Therefore the Kings of England and all other Kings are absolute Soveraigne Monarches Superiour to their whole Parliaments and Kingdomes collectively considered and may not in point of conscience be forcibly resisted by them though they endeavour to subvert Religion Laws Liberties How little coherence there is in this Argument the silliest childe may at first discern From these Scriptures I descend to Reasons deduced from them against resistance which I shall contract into three ArgumentS The first is this Kings are the Fathers Heads Lords Shepherds of the Common-wealth Ergo They ought not to be resisted in any their exorbitant proceedings it being unlawfull unseemly â—or a Son to resist his Father the Members the Head the Vassals their Lord the Flock their Shepherd To this I answer1 First They are Fathers Shepherds Lords Heads onely in an improper allegoricall not genuine sence therefore nothing can thence be properly inferred They are and ought to be such in respect of their loving and carefull affection towards their Subjects not in regard of their Soveraigne Power over them Therefore when their Tyrannie makes them not such in regard of care and affection to their people their people cease to be such in regard of filiall naturall and sheep-like submission When these Shepherds turn Wolves these Fathers Step-fathers the Subjects as to this cease to be their Sheep their Children in point of Obedience and Submission Secondly If we consider the Common-weal and Kingdom collectively Kings are rather their Kingdoms children then Parents because created by them their publike servants ministers for whose benefit they are imployed and receive wages not their Soveraigne Lords their subordinate Heads to be directed and advised by them not Tyrannically to over-rule them at their pleasure Therefore Paramount and able in such cases to resist them Thirdly Parishioners may no doubt lawfully resist the false Doctrinâ—s and open assâ—ults of their Ministers though they be their Spirituall Shepherds Citizens the violent oppressions of their Maiors though they be their Politique Heads Servants the unjust assâ—ults of their Masters though their lawfull Lords who may not misuse their very Villaines by Law And if Parents will violently assault their naturall children Husbands their Wives Masters their Servants to murther them without cause they may by Law resist repulse them with open force Fourthly A Son who is a Judge may lawfully resist imprison condemne his naturall Father A Servant his Lord A Parishioner his Pastour a Citizen his Major a meer Gentleman the greatest Peer or Lord as experience proves because they do it in another capacity as Judges and Ministers of publike Justice to which all are subject The Parliament then in this sence as they are the representative Body of the Realm not private Subjects and their Armies by their authority may as they are the highest Soveraign Power and Judicature resist the King and his Forces though he be their Father Head Shepherd Lord as they are private men Fifthly This is but the common exploded Argument of the Popish Clergy To prove themselves superiour to Kings and exempt from all secular Iurisdiction because they are spirituall Fathers Pâ—â—stors Heads to Kings who ought to obey not judge and censure them as Archbish. Stratford and others argue But this plea is no ways available to exempt Clergy men from secular Jurisdiction from actuall resistance of parties assaulted nor yet from imprisonment censures and capitall executions by Kings and Civill Magistrates in case of capitall Crimes Therefore by like reason it can not exempt Kings from the resistance censures of their Parliaments Kingdoms in case of tyrannicall invasions We deride this Argument in Papists as absurd as in sufficient to prove the exemption of Clergy men I wonder therefore why it is now urged to as little purpose against resistance of Tyrants and oppressing Kings and
Magistrates The second reason is this The Invasions and oppressions of evill Kings and Tyrants are afflictions and punishments inflicted on us by God Therefore we ought patiently to submit unto them and not forcibly to resist them I answer First The invasions of Forraign Enemies are just Iudgements and punishments sent upon men by God as were the invasions of the Danes Saxons and Normans in England heretofore of the Spaniards since Ergo we ought not to resist or fight against them The present rebellion of the Papists in Ireland is a just punishment of God upon this Kingdom and the Protestant party there Ergo Neither we nor they ought in conscience to resist or take Arms against them Every sicknesse that threatens or invades our bodies is commonly an affliction and punishment sent by God Ergo We must not endeavour to prevent or remove it by Physick but patiently lye under it without seeking remedy Injuries done us in our persons estates names by wicked men who assault wound rob defame us are from God and punishments for our sins Ergo We may not resist them Yea Subjects Rebellions Treasons and Insurrections against their Princes many times are punishments inflicted on them by God displeased with them as the Statute of 1 Ed. 6. c. 12. resolves and the Scripture too Ergo Kings ought not to resist or suppresse them by force of Arms If all these Consequences be absurd and idle as every man will grant the objection must be so likewise I read That in the persecution of the Hunnes their King Attila being demanded of by a religious Bishop of a certain Citie who he was when he had answered I am Attila the scourge of God The Bishop reverencing the divine Majesty in him answered Thou art welcome ô Minister of God and ingâ—minating this saying Blessed be he that cometh in the Name of the Lord Openeâ— the Church door and let in the persecutor by whom he obtained the Crown of Martyrdom not daring to exclude the scourge of the Lord knowing that the beloved sonne is scourged and that the power of the scourge it self is not from any but God Will it hence follow That all Christians are bound in conscience to do the like and not to resist the barbarous Turks if they should invade them no more then this Bishop did the bloudy Pagan Hunnes because they are Gods wrath I trow not One Swallow makes no Summer nor this example a generall president to â—inde all men The third reason is thiâ— Saints forciâ—le resistance of Tyrants begets civill warres great disorders and many mischiefs in the State Ergo It is unlawfull and inconvenient I answer First That this doctrine of not resisting Tyrants in any case is farre more pernicious destructive to the Realm then the contrary because it deprives them of all humane means and possibilities of preservation and denies them that speciall remedy which God and nature hath left them for their preservation Laws denyall of Subsidies and such like remedies prescribed by Doctor Ferne being no remoraes or restraints at all to armed Tyrants Wherefore I must tell thee Doctor Theologorum utcunque dissertissimorum sententiae in hâ—â—c controversia non sunt multo faciendae quia quid sit Lex humana ipsi ignorant as Vasquius controvers Illustr 81. 11. determines Secondly The knowledge of a lawfull power in Subjects to resist Tyrants will be a good means to keep Princes from Tyrannicall courses for fear of strenuous resistance which if once taken away there is no humane bridle left to stay the Inundation of Tyranny in Princes or great Officers and all Weapons Bulwarks Walls Lawes Armes will be meerly uselesse to the Subjects if resistance be denyed them when there is such cause Thirdly Resistance only in cases of publike necessity though accompanied with civill warre serves alwayes to prevent farre greater mischiefs then warre it self can produce it being the only Antidote to prevent publike ruine the readiest means to preserve endangered to regaine or settle lost Liberties Laws Religion as all ages witnesse and to prevent all future Seditions and Oppressions Fourthly Desperate diseases have alwayes desperate remedies Malo nodâ— malus cuneus When nothing but a defensive warre will preserve us from ruine and vassalage it is better to imbrace it then hazard the losse of all without redemption Ex duobus malis minimum All Kingdoms States in cases of necessity have ever had recourse to this as the lesser evill and why not ours as well as others The last and strongest Objection as some deem it is the sayings if some Fathers backed with the examples of the primitive Christians to which no such satisfactory answer hath hitherto been given as might be The first and grandest Objection against Subjects forcible resistance and defensive warre is that speech of Saint Ambrose Lib. 5. Orat. in Auxentium Coactus repugnare non audeo dolere potero potero flerâ— potero gemere adversus arma milites Gothos Lachrymae meae arma sunt talia enim sunt munimenta sacerdotum ALITER NEC DEBEO NEC POSSVM RESISTERE This chiefe Authoritie though it makes a great noise in the world if â—olidly scanned will prove but Brutum fulmen a meer scar-crow and no more For first Ambrose in this place speaks not at all of Subjects resisting their Princes or Christians forcible resisting of the persecuting Romane Emperours but of resisting Valentinâ— and the Arms and Souldiers of the Gothes who at that time over ran Italy and sacked Rome being mortall Enemies to the Romans the Roman Emperourâ— Saint Ambrose and Millain where he was Bishop This is evident by the expresse objected words I can grievâ— I can weep I can mourn to wit for the wasting of my native Country Italy by the Invading Enemies the Gothes against Armes Souldiers GOTHES marke it my tears are Weapons c. If any sequell can be hence properly deduced it must be that for which the Anabaptists use it from whence our Opposites who tax the Parliaments Forces for Anabaptists when themselves are here more truly such and fight with this their weapon That it is unlawfull for Christians to fight or make so much as a defensive warre against invading Forraign barbarous Enemies of whom this Father speaks And then if the Irish Rebels Danes Spaniards French should now invade England both against the Kings and Kingdoms Wills we must make no forcible resistance at all against them with Arms in point of conscience but onely use prayers and teares This is the uttermost conclusion which can properly be hence deduced which our Antagonists will confesse to be at least erronious Anabaptisticall if not Hereticall Secondly You must consider who it was that used this speech Ambrose a Minister then Bishop of Millain who by reason of this his function being an Ambassadour of Peace had his hands bound from fighting with any other weapons even against invading
the Statutes of 26 H. 8. c. 13. 1 E. 6. c. 14. 5 E. 6. c. 11. 1 Eliz. c. 6. 13 Eliz. c. 1. words against the King delivered even in Preaching are made and declared to be high Treaeson as wel as bearing Armes and striking blowes yea the Statute of 1 2 Ph. Ma. 6. 9. makes certaine prayers against this persecuting Queen high Treason and by the Statute of 25 E. 3. c. 2. it is high Treason for any man to COMPASSE OR IMAGIN the death of the King Queen Prince as wel as to slay or leavy warre against them If then we may by the Objectors confession the practises and examples of the Primitive Christians against Iulian and others fight with our Tongues Prayers Teares Imaginations against our Soveraignes who turne Tyrants and Persecutors and thereby suppresse conquer confound them of which none make scruple though our Statutes make it no lesse then high Treason in some cases then questionlesse they may by the selfe same reason and ground resist them with open force notwithstanding any inhibition in Scripture We may not must not resist any lawful King or Magistrate in the just execution of his office so mush as with a repugnant wil thought prayer teare we may yea must resist an oppressing persecuting Tyrant with all these therefore with any other Armes meanes Hezekiah David Moses Abijah Asa resisted their invading enemies and conquered them with their prayers but yet they provided to repulse and vanquish them with other externall Armes The Christians resistance and vanquishing their Emperour Iulian with the one is an infallible argument they might doe it with the other too there being no such distinction in the objected Scriptures that we may fight against and resist them with our prayers teares not armes Fourthly this Father saith not that it was unlawful for the Christians to use any other weapons but teares against Iulian the onely thing in question No such â—yllable in the Oration but onely that they had no other Armes to resist and conquer him with being utterly destitute and spoyled of all other humane helpe Therefore their want of other Armes and helpe not the unlawfulnesse of using them had they had them was the onely ground they used prayers and teares not aâ— meâ— To argue then those who are destitute of all Armes but prayers and teares must use them onely Ergo those who have other Armes besides prayers and teares may not lawfully use them to resist a Tyrant is but Scholastical Nonsence yet this is the very uttermost this authority yeelds our opposites In one word this Father informes us that this Apostate Emperour Iulian would not make open warre at first upon the Christians because this would altogether crosse the end he aimed at marke the reason Nos enim si vis inferatur acriores obstinatioresque futures ac tyrannidi obnixum pietatis TUENDAE STUDIUM OBJECTUROS cogitavit Solent enim fortes generosi animi ei QUI VIM AFFERRE PARAT CONTUMACITER OBSISTERE non secus ac flamma quae a vento excitatur quo vehementius perflatur eo vehementius accenditur Which argues that the Christians would have forcibly resisted him had he at first with force invaded them therefore he weakened subdued disarmed them first by policy and then fell topersecute them with force when they had no meanes of resistance left The third authority is that of Bernard Epist. 221. to King Lewis of France Quicquid vobis de Regno vestro de animâ coronâ vestrâ facere placeat NOS ECCLESIAE FILII matris injurias contemptum conculcationem omnino dissimulare non possumus Profecto STABIMUS ET PUGNABIMUS USQUE AD MORTEM si ita oportuerit pro matre nostrâ ARMIS QUIBUS LICET non scutis gladiis SED PRECIBUS ET FLETIBUS AD DEUM Therefore it is unlawfull for Christians to resist with force of Armes I answer first that Bernard was both a Monke and Clergie-man prohibited by Scripture and â—undry Canons to fight with military Armes against any person or enemy whatsoever and he utters these words of himselfe as he was a Clergie-man servant and sonne of the Church in the selfesame sence as Saint Ambrose did before It was then onely his Calling not the cause which prohibited him forcibly to resist King Lewis Secondly I answer that this authority is so farre from prohibiting resistance of oppressing Princes endeavouring with force of Armes to subvert Liberties Lawes Religion that it is an unanswerable proofe for it even in our present case King Lewis to whom Bernard writes had then raised a civil warre in his Realme against Theobald and others who desired peace which the King rejecting Bernard doth thus reprehend him in the premisses Verum vos nec verba pacis recipitis nec pactae vestra tenetis nec sanis consiliis acquiescitis Sed nescio quo Dei judicio omnia vobis ita vertitis in perversum ut probra honorem honorem probra ducatis tuta timeatis timenda contemnatis quod olim sancto glorioso Regi David Ioab legitur exprobrasse diligitis eos qui vos oderunt odio habetis qui vos diligere volunt Nâ—que enim qui vos instigant priorem iterare maliciam adversus non merentem quaerunt in hoc honorem vestrum sed suum commodum imò nec suum commodum SED DIABOLI VOLUNTATEM ut Regis quod absit potentiam concepti furâ—ris hâ—beant effectricem quem suis â—e posse adimpleâ—e viribus non confidunt INIMICI CORONAE VESTRAE REGNI MANIFESTISSIMI PERTURBATORES Our present case in regard of the Kings evil seduâ—ing Counsellors Then immediately followes the objected clause At quicquid vobis c. After which he gives him this sharpe reproofe Non tacebo quod cum excommunicatis iterare faedus societatem nunc satagis quod in nâ—cem hominum combustionem domorum destructionem Ecclesiarum dispersionem paâ—â—perum raptoribus predonibus sicut dicitur adhaeretis juxta illud Prophetae si videbas furem curreâ—as cum eo c. quasi non satis per voâ— mala facere valeatis Dico vobis non erit diu inultum si haec ita facere pergitis c. Here this holy man prohibited by his orders to fight against this King his Soveraigne with his Sword fights strongly against and resists his vioâ—ence with his Penne. And although he may not use a Sword and Buckler in respect of his calling to defend his mother the Church against him yet he is so farre from yeelding obedience to and not resisting him according to Pauls and Peters pretended injunctions that he expresly tels him to his face That HE WOULD STAND AND FIGHT AGAINST HIM EVEN UNTO DEATH â—f there were need with such weapons as he being a Monk and Minister might use to wit with Prayers and teares though not with Sword and Buckler which were more prevalent with God against him then
divers destructions by them moved and for certaine Articles appointed by the Lords upon the charges given to them by our Lord the King in Parliament and by the said Lords it was specially accorded That four persons to wit the Kings Confessor the Abbot of Done Master Richard Derham and Crosseby of the Chamber shall be quite ousted and voided out of the Kings house whereupon the ninth of February the said Confessor Master Richard and Crosseby came before the King and Lords in Parliament and there the King in excusing the said four persons said openly that he knew not by them any cause or occasion in speciall for which they ought to bee removed from his houshold notwithstanding our said Lord the King well considered that what the said Lords and Commons shall do or ordaine was for the good of him and of his Realme and therefore he would conforme himselfe to their intentions and did well agree to the said Ordinance which charged the said Confessor Master Richard and Crosseby to avoid his said Court and like charge should have beene given to the said Abbot had he been present And our Lord the King said further That he would doe the like with any other which was about his royall Person if he was in hatred or indignation with his people And Numb 37. To the end that good and just government and remedy may bee made of divers complaints grievances and mischiefs shewed to our Lord the King in this Parliament our Lord the King to the honour of God and upon the great instances and requests to him divers times made in this Parliament by the Commons of his Realm for the ease and comfort of all his Realme hath ordained certain Lords and others underwritten to be of his great and continuall Councell to wit the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishop of Lincolne Chancellour of England the Bishops of Rochester Winchester Bath and Baâ—gor the Duke of Yorke the Earles of Sommerset and Westmerland the Lord Roos Treasurer of England the Keeper of the Great Seale the Lord Berkley the Lord Willoughby the Lord Furnevall the Lord Lovell Mounsier Pierce Courtney Master Hugh Waterton Master Iohn Cheyne Master Arnald Savage Iohn Northbury Iohn Doreward Iohn Cawsou In the Parliament of 7. 8. Henry 4. Numb 31. The 22. day of May the Commons came before the King and his Lords in Parliament and then Iohn Tibetot their Speaker reheased how they had prayed the King in the beginning of the Parliament and after to increase the number of his Councell for the better government of the Realme and prayed the King to put it in execution and further rehearsed how that the Archbishop of Canterbury had reported to them That the King would be counselled by the most sage Lords of the Realme the which ought to have the survey of all that which shall be done for the good government of this Realme which thing the King agreed to doe and rehearsed with his own mouth That it was his entire will And thereupon a Bill made by the King himselfe by his own will was delivered containing the names of the Lords which shall be of his Councell the tenour of which Bill ensueth It is to bee remembred that our Lord the King considering the great labours occupations and diligence which he ought necessarily to imploy about the good government of his Realme and other his possessions as well on this side the Sea as beyond it First of all for the preservation of our Lord the King and of his Crowne and that the revenues of the same may be the better collected to his profit and increase as much as a man may jâ—â—rly doe to the end that he may the better sustaine his honourable estate And secondly for the confirmation of the Lawes and Statutes of the Realme to the end that equall right may be done to every one as well poor as rich Our Lord the King of his proper and good will desirous to be supported in the foresaid causes because that he cannot attend thereunto in proper person so much as he would for the great love and good affiance which he hath among others in the most reveâ—end Fathers in God the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishops of Winchester and Excester the Duke of Yorke the Earle of Somerset the Lord Roos the Lord Burnet the Lord Lovell the Lord Willoughbie the Chancellour Treasurer and Keeper of the privie Seale the Steward and Chamberlaiue Master Hugh Waterton Master Iohn Cheyney and Master Arnald Savage hath chosen and charged them to be of his counsell praying and commanding them that in all the foresaid causes they will put to their intire diligences for the profit of our said Lord the King and likewise for the confirmation of the Laws and Statutes aforesaid In the Parliament of 2. Henry 6. num 15. After divers speciall requests of the Commons of the Realme being in the present Parliament made to my Lord of Glocester Commissary of the King and to other Lords Spirituall and Temporall there for to have notice and conusance of the persons assigned and elected to be of the Kings Councell to their great ease and consolation By advice and assent of all the Lords Spirituall and Temporall aforesaid were elected and named certaine persons as well spirituall and temporall to be Councellours assistant to the governance of the Realm whose names here ensue The Duke of Glocester the Archbishop of Canterbury the Bishops of London Winchester Norwich Worceâ—â—er the Chancellour Treasurer and Keeper of the privie Seale the Duke of Excester the Earle of March the Earle of Warwick the Earle Marshall the Earle of Northumberlâ—nd the Earle of Westmerland the Lord Cromwell the Lord Fitz Hâ—gh the Lord Bourchier the Lord Scroop Master Walter Hungerford Master John Tiptoff â—homas Chaucer William Allington In the Parliament of 29. Henry 6. num 6. Vpon the Petition of the Commons against divers Lords Bishops Knights Esquires and others to the number of 29. who mis-behaved themselves about the royall Person of the King and in other places by whose only meanes it was suggested the Kings possessions had been greatly diminished his Laws not executed the peace of the Realm not observed to the great hurt and trouble of the liege people of the Realm and likely subversion of the same of which misbehaviour universall noise and clamour was openly received thorowout all the Realme upon the same persons specified in the Petition all of them except the Lords and some few others without further evidence against them were by the King now removed from his presence and Court for a whole yeeres space within which time any man that could and would object against any of them should be patiently heard and intended to Those few fresh Presidents added to the precedent and to such forraign examples of this nature cited in the Appendix will abundantly cleare the Parliaments right and Kingdoms interest in nominating placing and displacing the great Officers of the Kingdom and
in regulating the Kings own meniall servants in some cases when they either corrupt or mis-counsell him And thus much touching the unhappy differences between the King and Parliament concerning matters of his own royall Prerogative The Parliaments Right and Iurisdiction to impose Taxes and Contributions on the Subjects for the necessary defence of the Realm Laws Liberties without the King in case of the Kings wilfull absence from and taking up Arms against the Parliament and Kingdom briefly vindicated from the calumnies against it THe severall grand Objections of consequence made by the King and others against the Parliaments pretended usurpations upon the just Rights and Prerogatives of the Crowne being fully examined and refuted in the Premises so far I hope as to satisfie all ingenuous men in point of Divinity Policy Law Reason Conscience I shall next proceed to the remaining materiall Accusations which concerne the Subjects onely in regard of Property and Liberty wherein I will contract my Discourse into a narrow compasse partly because the debate of the fore-going Differences between the Kings Prerogative and the Parliaments Soveraigne Jurisdiction hath in some sort over-ruled the Controversies betwixt the Subjects and both Houses representing them partly because these accusations are not so universally insisted on as the former which concerne the King the justnesse of them being generally acknowledged willingly submitted to by most except such who calumniate and traduce them either out of covetousnesse onely to â—ave their Purâ—es or from a groundlesse Malignity against the Parliament or out of a consciousnesse of their owne Delinquencies subjecting them to the Parliaments impartiall Justice or out of some particular interests which concern them in their gains honours preferments or such who by their restraints for not paying Parliamentary Assessements hope to save their purses for the present or to gaine favour and preferment by it for the future If these private sinister ends were once laid by this second sort of accusations would speedily vanish especially with men of publike spirits who prefer the Common-weale before their owne particular interests The first of these Cavillatory Objections against the Parliaments proceedings is That both Houses without the Kings Royall Assent have contrary to Magna Charta the Petition of Right the Statutes De Tallagio non concedendo and other Acts by their Ordinances onely imposed late Taxes on the Subjects amounting to the twentieth part of their estates and since that monethly or weekly Assessements to maintaine a war against the King a grand incroachment on the peoples Properties contrary to all Law and Iustice. This Objection seems very plausible and cordiall to covetous Earth-worms being politikely contrived to Court the close-handed niggardly party by those who are guiltiest in themselves of that they thus object against others But it will easily receive an answer as to the Parliament and recoyle with infinite disadvantage on those that make it First 〈◊〉 anâ—wer That the Parliament is the absolute Soveraigne power within the Realme not subject to or obâ—iged by the letter or intendment of any Laws being in truth the sole Law-maker and having an absolute Soveraignty over the Laws themselves yea over Magna Charta and all other objected Acts to repeale alter determine and suspend them when there is cause as is undeniable by its altering the very common Law in many cases by repealing changing many old Statute Lawes and enacting new ones every Sessions as there is occasion for the publike safety and defence This the practice of all Parliaments in all ages yea the constant course of all Parliaments and Assemblies of the Estates in all forraigne Kingdoms too abundantly manifests The Parliament therefore never intended by all or any of these objected Acts to binde its owne hands but onely the Kings and his Ministers with inferiour Courts of Justice neither is the Parliament within the letter words or meaning of them therefore not obliged by them 2. The King with his Officers Judges and inferiour Courts of Justice only are included and the Parliament is directly excluded out of the very letter and meaning of all these Acts as is apparent First in generall from the occasion of enacting all these Laws which was not any complaints made to the King of any illegall taxes imprisonments or proceedings of our Parliaments to the oppression of the people but onely the great complaints of the people and Parliament against the illegall taxes impositions imprisonments and oppressions of the Subject by the King his Officers Judges and inferiour Courts of Justice as all our Hâ—stories with the Prefaces and words of the Acts themselves attest to redresse which grievances alone thâ—sâ— Lawes were made by the Parliaments and peoples earnest solicitations much against the Kings good will The Parliament then who would never solicit them king of a Law against or to restrain it selfe being cleare out of the orignall ground and mischiefe of enacting these Lawes and the King with his Ministers and inferiou◠〈◊〉 is only within them they can no way extend to the Parliament but to them alone 3. The Parliament 〈◊〉 the making of these Acts hath alwayes constantly enjoyed an absolute right and power without the least dispute of granâ—ing and imposing on the Subjâ—cts whatsoever Taxes Subsidies Aids Confiscations of Goods or restraint of Liberty by temporall or perpetuall imprisonment it thought meet and necessary for the publike defence safety and tranquility of the Realm as the severall Tâ—xes Subsidies and Poll-monies granted by them in all ages the many Statutes enjoyning confiscation of Lands Goods corporall punishments banishments temporary or perpetuall imprisonments for divers things not punishable nor criminall by the Common Law or when Magna Charta and the ancient Statutes in pursuance of it were first enacted abundantly evidence past all contradiction none of all which the King himselfe his Officers Judges or inferiour Courts of Justice can doe being restrained by the objected Acts. Therefore it is altogether irrefragable that the Parliament and Houses are neither within the words or intentions of these Acts nor any wayes limited or restraiâ—ed by them but left as free in these particulars in order to the publike good and safety as if those Acts had never beene made though the King with all other Courts Officers Subjects remaine obliged by them 4. This is evident by examination of the particular Statutes objected The first and principall of all the rest is Magna Charta cap. 29. But the very words of this Law Not We shall not passe upon him nor condemne him but by the lawfull judgement of his Peeres or by the Law of the Land We shall deny nor deferre to no man either Justice or Right compared with the Preface to and first Chapter of it Henry c. know ye that We c. out of meere and free will have given and granted to all Archbishops Bishops Eâ—rles Barons and to all free men of this our Realm of England and by this our present
moderation By which meanes he verily weakned the power of the Kingdome but yet certainely setled it more lasting and stable Whence Theopompus gave this answer to his complaining and upbraiding wife whether he was not ashamed to leave the Kingdome lesse to his Children then he had received it from his Father No truly saith he for by this means I leave it more stable and lasting A Speech well worthy the consideration of the very greatest hereditary kings These Lacedemonian kings whose honours writes Xenophon were not much better then those of private men Etenim neque Regibus animos addere Tyrannicos voluit Lâ—curgus neque civibus eorum potestatem invisam reddere tooke an Oath every month to governe the Kingdome according to the Lawes enacted I finde that the Cumaeans had a Magistrate whom they called Phylactus whose office was to come into the full Senate and hold the Kings hands who stood in judgement before them untill by the Senators decree their reward or punishment was appointed By which it is apparent that the Cumaean Senate was above their kings and did usually arraigne and punish them iudicially if they saw cause as they rose up in Armes against Aristodomus their king who tyrannized over them by Zenocrita her instigation slew him and so recovered their Liberties The ancient Carthaginians had two kings whom they stiled Suffites who were but annuall removed every yeare Yea the Iberians and Parthians had two joynt kings in ancient times the one to judge the other to governe the people In Meroe where they elected their kings by their beauty strength or wealth their Priests had the chiefe power who had so great authority that sometimes like the Pope and his Nuncioes they would send a Messenger and command the king to be put to death and make another in his steed Which custome was after abolished by one of the kings who violently assaulted and slew all the Priests and in Meroe if the king offended after the Priests power was abolished they inflicted no corporall punishment on him but all with â—rew themselves from him and avoided his company till he was killed with griefe and consumption The Indians will not permit their king to sleep in the day time and if he be drunken at any time if any wâ—man of whom he hath a guard kill him whiles he is drunkeâ— she is so farre from being guilty of Treason that for a reward she shall be married to his Successour much like the ancient publike institution of the Sclavonians recorded by â—axo Grammaticus that the assassinate of evill Kings should succeed them in their kingdomes a things frequently practised in many kingdomes and Empires though very ill enacted in any The Sabaeans confined their Kings to their Palaces and used to stone them if they went forth of their bounds The Mosseriaei whose kings were elective used to punish them when they offended by keeping them fasting a whole dayes space Among some of the Indians if the king dyes having male children of his owne or cosen-gâ—rmans or brothers children they shall not succeed him in the kingdome but his sisters sonne if there be any if not then his next alliance and that ex gentis instituto by the institution of the Nation the reason is because their Priests used to destâ—ure the Queene whose issue is held to be illegitimate In Thracia the people elect a king who is well qualified mercifull grave for his age and one who hath no children For no Father though never so well qualified is admitted to raigne and if he fortune to have issue while he reignes he is deprived and so kept lest the kingdome should become hereditary Yea though the king be never so just yet they will not that he should have the whole power but appoint him 40. Governours left hee alone should judge in capitall causes And if he be convicted of any offence he is punished with death yet not by laying violent hands on him but by publike consent all food is kept from him so as at last he perisheth with famine The Taprobani had this custome that no man who had any children should be chosen king lest he should claime the kingdome as hereditary and make it so The Athenians Ionians Milesians Marchomanni Quadi Persians Sicilians Corinthians Parthians Meroes Gordii Medes Paphii Cathians Aetheopians Sydonians Germans Swedes Danes and other Nations had severall Customes Lawes Rules over-tedious to recite by which they elected and inaugurated their kings of which you may read in Alexander ab Alexandro Strabo Boemus Peter Martyr Purchas and others and different degrees of power and government derived from their kingdomes and people the soveraigne Authority still residing in them to prescribe both Laws and limits to their kings and call them to publike account for their grosse offences and misgovernment The ancient Aethiopians elected the most fanatique Priest for their king whom though they adored and honoured for a God yet Vitam agere STATVTAM LEGIBVS DEBET iuxta patrios mores he ought to live such a life as the Laws appointed him according to the manners of the Country neither ought he to reward or punish any man himselfe though chiefe parâ—s of Royalty The old German kings had no free nor infinite but are strained and bounded power by the Lawes Diodorus Siculus writes that the first Egyptian Kings lived not like other Monarchs to rule all things according to their wills Nullis obnoxii censuris as obnoxious to no censures but all things not only their publike actions but even the regiment of their daily life were conformed to the rule of the Lawes as hethere manifests in sundry particulars botb in respect of their attendants dispatches devotions recreations moderate spare dyet and the like neither was it lawfull for them to judge nor doe any thing nor punish any man out of petulancy or anger or any other unjust cause contrary to what the established Lawes required concerning every of them Whiles they observed these things customarily it was so farre that they tooke it ill or were offended in minde that on the contrary they thought they lived a most blessed life For other men rashly giuing indulgence to the affections of nature acted many things accompanied with losses and dangers yea some men ofttimes although they foreknew they should sinne did notwithstanding perpetrate evill things being led away with love or hatred or some other perturbation of minde but they imbracing the rule of life approved by the most prudent men resolved not to erre from their duty in the least degree Whiles Kings used this Iustice towards their Subjects they had their Subjects bound unto them in greater benevolence and love then their very kindred For not only the Colledge of Priests but the whole Nation of the Aegyptians and likewise every one of them were not so carefull of their wives and children and private goods as of the safety of their Kings Wherefore they preserved the estate of the Republike intire for
father was the cause of his râ—jâ—ection being then also very young whereby it appears that the right of succession was not in those dayes practised in Spain Sillo his brother-in-brother-in-Law succeeded him after whose death by generall consent the kingdom was given to Alphonsâ— Ramir the tenth king of Oviedo did that which all other Princes abhor for he received his son to be companion with him in his kingdom and caused his brother Garcia to reigâ— with him so as there were now two kings and Courts in Oviedo both agreeing well together Anno 894. Froila dying without issue because his children were too young to reign the Nobles conferred the kingdom on Alphonso the fourth who after five years turned Monke Ramir the third twentieth king of Leon abandoning himself to a voluptuous life contemned all good counsell so as the Earls and Noblemen of Gallicia seeing his folly and discontented with his vices scorned him and would no more acknowledge him to be their king electing Bermund for their Soveraigne and intituled him king of Gallicia which title he enjoyed ten years About which time the Moors in Spain which had one king reigning at Cordova after the death of king Mahomet made so many petty kings as there was scarce any good town in Spain but had a particular King which made strict alliances among themselves for the preservation of their estates Anno 1071 Garcia king in Gallicia growing a tyrant spoiled and ill intreated his Subjects governing himself after the appetite or a base woman who put the Nobilitie and Gentry in favour or disgrace with the king as she pleased so as in the end growing insupportable certain Knights slew her in the kings presence His brother Sancho taking advantage of the peoples harted entred his Realm with a great Army who thereupon being deserted generally by his people sled to the Moors for ayd and fell to spoil his own Countrey after which he was defeated taken prisoner and so kept in the Castle of Lune with a good Guard till his death I read in Iohn Mariana that in the Councill of Florence under Pope Victor the second Anno 1055. Hildebrand a Cardinall Deacon Embassadour to Henry the second Emperour of Germany complained in the Councill against Ferdinaâ—d king of Spain in the Emperors Name That against the Custom of his Ancestors and prescript of Laws he did with incredible aâ—rogancy and levity hold himself exempt from the power of the Roman Empire which iniury himselfe could gladly suffer if there were no other losse but of his own honour But since the estate of Chrâ—stendom could not well subsist and the Popâ—s Authority would likewise be impaired unlesse all Christian kingdoms were united and knit to gether under one temporall head the Emperour whom they should obey they ought to suppresse the springing temerity in the Wombe lest by their neglect spreading it self into other Provinces animated with the sweet and oft-times deceitfull name of libertie the sacred Majestie of the Empire and Popedom should be reduced to an empty title wherefore he desired them to interdict all Spain and excommuniate the King which if they did he would be assistant to the Churches honour and Republikâ—s safety then indangered Bâ—t if they refused it out of fear he would not be wanting to the honour of the Empire would certainly look to himself in private The Pope after some deliberation approved this motion as just thereupon sends Legaâ—s to Ferdinand in his own and the Councils name to satisfie the Emperors demands fourthwirth under pain of present excommunicaâ—ion The King doubtfull and fearfull whether to obey or not summons a generall Assembly of the Estates of the Realme The Clergy and religious sort of men perswaded submission for fear of the Popes excommunication the fearfuller sort concurring with them by reason of the Emperours power and their own weâ—knesse and destraction and the Kings desires of peace inclined most to their opinion But â—ome heroick spirits thought that a most grievous yoke should thereby be laid on the liberty of Spain Which being once admitted on their â—ecks they should hardly shake off again that it was better to die fighting then that the Republike should be involved in so great a mischief and indignitie Rodoricus Diacius a noble Spanyards opinion then absent from the assembly being required by the king and it answered That this was no matter of Counsell that what was gotten with Arms was to be defended with Arms that it seemed most unjust that the fruit of others valour should return to those who in their lost condition had not communicated in the labour and danger which recovered it a that it was better to die valiantly than to lose the liberty gained by their Ancestors to become a mocking-stock to a barbarous and cruell nation who contemned all men bus themselves whose ears were proud whose speeches contumelious whose accesse difficult riotings new cruelty inhumane Shall we who have yet hardly escaped the servitude of Moors undergo anew bondage prepared from the Christians They will deride both us and ours Doth the whole world as farre as Christianity extends it selfe obey the German Emperours Shall all the grace power honour riches gained by ours and our Ancessors blood give place to the Germans Shall they leave dangers repulses iudgemen want to us Shall Germany again lay on us the yoke of the Roman Empire which our Ancestors have shaken off Shall we be a vulgar people without grace without Empire without authority obnoxious to those to whom if we had vigorous mindes if we were men we might be a terrour But it is difficult to resist the Emperous endeavours not to obey the Roman Pontifs commands verily it a basnesse of spirits for an uncertain fear of war to involve the Commonwealth in most certain dangers many things are effected by triall which seemed difficult to slothfull men I know not what stupidity hath seized on many whom neither glory moves nor the infamey of the wretchednesse thinking it great liberty enough if they be freed from scourges I suppose the Popes ears will not be so averse to our affairs that he will not be moved with our most just prayers and the equity of the cause Let some now be sent who may boldly defend the cause of our liberty before him and teach him that the Germans demand unjust things Mine opinion is that the liberty gained by our Ancestors it to be defended with arms against the attempts of all men and with this my sword I will maintain THAT THEY ARE MOST WICKED TRAITORS TO THEIR COVNTREY who out of a simulation of a fond Religion or shew of preposterous caution shall give contrary advice neither shall resolve that servitude is to be repudiated with greater care by us then domination is affected by them So farre forth as every one shall addict himself to the liberty of his Counâ—rey so far shall I be a friend unto him or a deadly enemy This opinion of Roderic prevailed in
18. 1. c. 19. 1. c. 21. throughout with the Books of Ezra Nehemiah Iudges Esther Maccabees the four Euangelists touching Christs arraignment and death Acts 4. 5. 22. 23. 24. and 25 chapters or consulted with Iosephus Philo Paul Eber Godwin Cunaeus â—igonius BertraÌ„ or any others who have written of the Jewish Antiquities or Republike he could not have had the impudency to have published such grosse untruths and should have found not onely divers kings in Scripture created by the voyce of the people but an hereditary kingdom oft changed into an elective yea into an Aristocraticall and no Royall government and an Aristocracie and Democracy to even among the Jews themselves whose government before their kings was meerly Aristocraticall as Iosephus Antiqu. Iud. l. 4. c. 8. Carolus Sigonius de Repub. Hebr. l. 1. c. 5. Cunaeus Sâ—hickardus Bertram Paul Eber and all others that I have seen except this Animal irrationale risibile punctually determine they having no kings of their own before Saul nor any after Zedekiah Therefore I shall spend no more waste paper to refute this palpable errour so confidently asserted by parisiticall Court Doctors who make no conscience of writing any though the grossest untruths which may advance the absolute Soveraign Arbitrary tyrannicall government of kings to oppresse and inslave the people Thirdly that the Kings of Iudah and Israel were no absolute Soveraign Princes but took their Crown with and upon such Divine conditions for breach whereof they and their posterities were oft times by Gods command just judgement and speciall approbation deposed disinherited destroyed and the Crown translated to other families This is evident by direct Scriptures Deuter. 17. 14. to the end Thou shalt in any wise set him King over thee whom the Lord thy God shalt chuse one from among thy Brethren shalt thou set King over thee thou maist not set a stranger over thee which is not thy Brother Here is an expresse limitation and condition in respect of the person of the King the conditions in regard of his royall administration follow which are partly Negative partly positive But he shall not multiplie Horses to himself nor cause the the people to return to Egypt c. Neither shall he multiply wives to himself that his heart turn not away neither shall he greatly multiply to himself silver and gold And it shall be when he sitteth on the throne of his Kingdome that he shall write him a Copie of this Law in a Book out of that which is before the Priests the Levites and it shall be with him and he shall read therein all the dayes of his life that he may learn to fear the Lord his God to keep all the words of this Law and these Statutes to do them That his heart be not lifted up above his brethren and that he turn not aside from the Commandment to the right hand or to the left to the end that he may prolong his dayes in his Kingdom he and his children in the midst of Israel Here all the kings of the Israelites when their kingdoms should be erected are strictly bound by God himself to negative and positive conditions upon performance whereof they and their children should prolong their dayes in the kingdom and perpetuate their thrones in the midst of Israel and upon breach whereof they and their posterity should lose both their lives and kingdom to as the last clause insinuates and the subsequent Texts in direct terms averre But what if the king should violate these conditions might the people lawfully resist him Iosephus in his paraphrase on this very text which I shall cite at large resolves they might Truely the government of the best meâ— or Aristocraticall government is best and to live in a Republike thus administred nor is there cause why you should desire any other kinde of government but it is best that contenting yâ—â—rselves with this you continue with in the power of your Laws and of your selves But if the desire of a king shall possesse you let there be none unlesse he be of your stock and blood and one to whom justice with other vertues are cordiall He whosoever he shall be let him attribute more to the lawes and unto God than to his own wisedome AND LET HIM DO NOTHING WITHOVT THE HIGH PRIESTS AND Sâ—NATES ADVICE neither may he nourish many wives nor possesse very much money and many Horses with the plenty of which things he may easily become a contemner of the laws and if he shall addict himself to these things more then is meet OBSTANDVM EST ne potentior fiat quamrebus vestris expedit HE IS TO BE RESISTED lest he become more potent then is expedient for your affairs So he Yea Zuinglius with B. Bilson expresly resolve that the people were bound to resist question and depose their kings for their idolatry and breach of these conditions and that God himself justly punished them for Manasses sins and wickednesse because they resisted and punished him not for them as they were obliged to do as I have elswhere manifested to which I shall refer you This condition most clearly appears in other Texts as in the 1 Sam. 12 13 14 15 25. Where when Saul the first king of the Israelites was crowned at their earnest importunity against Gods and Samuels approbation Samuel used these speeches to them Now thereforebehold the King whom ye have chosen and whom ye have desired c. If ye will fear the Lord and serve him and obey his voyce and not rebell against the commandment of the Lord then shall both ye and also the King that reigneth over you continue following the Lord your God But if ye will not obey the voice of the Lord but will rebell against the voyce of the Lord then shall the hand of the Lord be against you as it was against your fathers c. But IF ye shall do wickedly ye shall be consumed both ye and your King After this Saul being distressed by the Philistines weary of staying for Samuel and presuming to offer sacrifice without him hereupon Samuel said to Saul Thou hast done foolishly for thou hast not kept the Commandment of the Lord thy God which he commanded thee for now would the Lord have established thy kingdom upon Israel for ever but NOW THY KINGDOM SHALL NOT CONTINVE for the Lord hath chosen him a man after his own heart and the Lord hath commanded him to be captain over his people BECAVSE THOV HAST NOT KEPT THAT WHICH THE LORD COMMANDED THEE Lo here the breach of Gods conditions by king Saul forfeited his Kingdom and disinherited his posterity of it So when he performed not Gods command in utterly destroying Amalck sparing Agag and the best of the things Samuel sharply reprehending him for this offence said unto him Behold to obey is better then sacrifice and to hearken than the fat of Rams for Rebellion namely king Sauls rebellion against Gods command not subjects rebellion against their
Priests sometimes in the Kings and Princes They doe too foolishly who here dance in a narrow compasse and suppose that the honour of this name appertaines not but to Kings For what people soever useth its owne Republike and its Lawes Is recte Glorâ—ari de Imperio deque sceptro potest it may rightly boast of Its Empire and Scepter It is recorded that at Ierusalem even at that time when not the Princes but the Elders governed the people in the midst of the great Councell which they called the Sanhedrin there hung a Scepter which thing verily was a certain Ensign of its Majesty which Marcus Tullius in a particular Oration saith Esse magnitudinem quandam Populi in ejus potestate ac jure retinendo quae vertitur in imperio atque omnis populi dignitate Not Kings not Princes but Consuls and the Senate managed the Roman Common-wealth whence this Law of Truce was given to the Aetolians which Livy reports That they should conserve The Majesty of the People of Rome without mal-engin And the very same thing was commanded all free People who by any league but not 〈◊〉 would come into the frindship of the Romanes as Proculus the Lawyer witnesseth in l. 7. F. de Captiu Post. reversis Neither think we it materiall to our purpose of what Nation or Tribe they were who moderated and ruled the Iewish affaires for although the Hasmonaean Lâ—vites held their Kingdome for many yeeres yet the Republike was of the Iewish people That most wise Master Seneca said to Nero Caesar That the Republike was not the Princes or of the Prince But the Prince the Republikes Neither verily was the opinion of Vlpian the Lawyer otherwise for he at last saith that That is Treason which is committed against the Roman People or against their safety l. 1. s. 1. F. ad Legem Iul. Majâ—st Now Vlpian lived in those times when the people had neither command nor suffrages left them but the Emperours held the Empire and Principality and yet he who is wont most accurately to define all things saith That Majesty is of the People From all which it is apparant that not onely in the Roman Empire and other Kingdomes but even among the Iewes themselves the Majesty and Soveraign Power and Scepter resided not in the Kings but in the whole State and People Hence Will. Schickardus in his Ius Regium Hebraeorum Argent 1625. p. 7. determinesthus The state of the Iewish Kingdome was not Monarchicall as our Court Doctors falsely dream but mixt with an Aristocracie for the King without the assent of the Sanhedrin Could determine nothing in great causes They constituted not a King but in it c. attributing the Soveraignest power to the Congregation and Sanhedrin who had power to create elect and in some cases to resist and depose their Kings Hence Huldericus Zuinglius writes expresly That the Kings of the Iewes and others when they dealt perfidiously contrary to the Law of God and the rule of Christ might be lawfully deposed by the People This the example of Saul manifestly teacheth whom God rejected notwithstanding he had first elected him King Yea whiles wicked Princes and Kings were not removed all the people were punished of God as is evident by Ier. 15. 1. to 6. where they were punished with four judgements and plagues for Manassehs sinnes In summe if the Iewes had not permitted their King to be so wicked without punishment they had not beene so grievously punished by God By what means he is to be removed from his Office is easily to conjecture thou maist not slay him nor raise any war or tumult to do it but the thing is to be attempted by other means because God hath called us in peace 1 Cor. 7. If the King be created by common suffrages he may again be deprived by common Votes unlesse they will be punished with him but if he be chosen by the election and consent of a few Princes the people may signifie to them the flagitious life of the King and may tell them that it is by no means to be endured that so they may remove him who have inaugurated him Here now is the difficulty for those that do this the Tyrant will proceed against them according to his lust and slay whom he pleaseth but it is a glorious thing to die for justice and the truth of God and it is better to die for the defence of justice then afterwards to be slain with the wicked by assenting to injustice or by dissembling Those who cannot endure this let them indure a lustfull and insolent Tyrant expecting extream punishment together with him yet the hand of the Lord is stretched out still and threatneth a stroke But when with the consent and suffrage of the whole or certainly of the better part of the multitude a Tyrant is removed Deo â—it auspice it is done by God approbation If the Children of Israel had thus deposed Manasseh they had not been so grievously punished with him So Zuinglius Hence Stephanus Iunius Brutus in his Vindiciae contra Tyrannos in answer to Machiavels Princeps a most accursed mischievous Treatise and justification of the Protestants defensive wars in France to preserve their Religion and Liberties Anno 1589. determines positively That as all the people are Superiour to the King so are those Officers of State and Parliaments who represent them Superiour to Kings collectively considered though every of them apart be inferiour to them In the Kingdom of Israel which by the judgement of all Polititians was best instituted by God there was this order The King had not onely private Officers who looked to his family but the Kingdom likwise had 71 Elders and Captains elected out of all the Tribes who had the care of the Commonweale both in time of peace and war and likewise their Magistrates in every Town who defended their severall Cities as the others did the whole kingdom These when ever they were to deliberate of greatest affairs assembled together neither could any thing be determined without their advice which much concerned the commonwealth Therefore David called these all together when he desired to in vâ—st Solomon in the Kingdom when he desired the policy restored by him should be examined and approved when the Ark was to be reduced c. And because they represented all the people all the people are then said to have assembled together Finally the same rescued Ionathan condemned to death by Sauls sentence from whence it appears that an appeale lay from the King to the people But from the time the Kingdome was divided through the pride of Rehoboam the Synedrin of Ierusalem consisting of 71 men seems to be of that authoritie that they might judge the King in their assembly as well as the King judge them when they were apart The Captain of the House of Iudah was President over this assembly that is some chief man chosen out of the Tribe of Iudah as even the chief
not hear you in that day Therefore their Kings were absolute Monarchs not bound to Laws nor responsible to their subiects for their oppressions not yet resistible by them To which I answer that this is a direct description of a Tyrant and not of a lawfull King as is evident First by the very occasion of the words Vttered purposely by Samuel to disswade the People from electing a King changing their former Aristocraticall Government into a Monarchicall because their kings would many of them prove more oppressive Tyrannicall and burthensome to them then their Iudges or his sons were whose bribery and perverting of judgment moved the people thus earnestly to affect a change of Government as is evident by the 1 2 3 4 5 6 and 9 Verses Iosephus and the consent of all Expositors Secondly by the introduction to and the words themselvs This will be the maner of the King that shall reign over you He will take and he will do thus and thus not this ought to be the manner he ought to do or lawfully may do thus and thus Thirdly by the things themselves which he would do which are directly contrary to Deuter. 17. 14. to the end and all other Scriptures expresly enjoyning Kings to judge their people righteously to do justice and judgement and not any wayes to oppresse or spoyle them I shall instance onely in two particulars First the law of Gods expresly prohibits all men and Kings as well as others to covet their neighbours Houses his menservants his maidservants his Oxe or his Asse or any thing that is his Neighbours If their Kings then might not lawfully so much as desire or covet much lesse might they lawfully take away their Houses Sonnes Daughters Manservants Maidservants Asses Sheep Corn Vineyards or any thing else that was theirs without their free consents as Samuel tells them their King would do this therefore must need be onely a declaration of what their Kings would Tyrannically do not of what they might lawfully or justly execute Secondly it is Gods expresse Edict Ezek. 46. 18. The Prince shall not take the Peoples inheritance by oppression to thrust them out of their possessions but he shall give his Sons inheritance out of his own possession that my people be not scattered every one from his possession And Ezek 45. 8 9. The Land shall be the Princes possession in Israel and my Princes shall no more oppresse my people and the rest of the Land shall they give to the house of Israel according to their Tribes Thus saith the Lord God Let it suffice you O Princes of Israel remove violence and spoile and execute judgement and justice take away your exactions or expulsions from my people saith the Lord. Whence Ahab King of Israel for coveting and unjustly depriviâ—g Naboth of his Vineyard which he refused to sell him because it was the inheritance of his Fathers and taking possession thereof after his unjust condemnation had a most severe judgement dâ—nounced against him even the utter extirpation of himself Q. Iezabel and their posterity afterwards executed Which punishment God would never have inflicted on them had it been lawfull for the Kings of Israel to take the peoples Fields Vineyards Oliveyards c. and possesse or give them to their servants as Samuel here tels them their Kâ—ngs will do This clause then of taking their Field Vineyards c. from them by the King without their consents being thus dâ—ametrally contrary to these Texts of Ezekiel and such a capitall Crime in King Ahab yea contrary to the practise of Ioseph and the Aegyptian Heathen King Pharaoh who took not away but bought the Aegyptians Cattell and Lands for Corne Gen. 47. 14. to 27. can to wayes be warranted as a just royall prerogative lawfull for their Kings to use but must needs be branded for a Tyrannicall Oppression Fourthly this is evident by the consequences of it Ye shall be his servants not subjects And ye shall crie in that day because of your King which ye have chosen you and the Lord will not hear you in that day Verse 17 18. Certainly the people neither would not ought to crie to god against the proceedings of a just upright King but onely of a Tyrant and Oppressour therefore this Text must needs be meant of such a one who should be a scourge and punishment to them as Tyrants are not a blessing as good Kings alwayes be Fifthly consult we with all Polititians whatsoever this description suites onely with a Tyrant not with any lawfull King and that it is meant of such a one we have the testimony of Iosephus the generall concurring suffrage of all Commentators and Expositors one the place see Lyra Hugo de Sancto Victore Carthusian Angelomus Lexoviensis Calvin Brentius Bugenhagius Beda Bertorius Martin Borrhaeus Peter Martyr Zanchius Piscator Serrarius Strigelius Doctor Willet Deodate the English Bibles notes with others and of sundry who descant on this Text in other writings by name of M. Iohn Calvin Instit. l. 4. c. 20. sect 26. Bishop Ponet his Politicall Government p. 44. Iunius Brutus Vindiciae contra Tyrannos qu. 3. p. 121. 122. 134. 135. 153. 154. 155. 159. De Iure Magistratus in Subditos p 270. 271. Bucholceri Chronichon p. 208. Petrus Cunaeus de Repub. Hebraeor l. 1. c. 14. Bertrami Politia Iudâ—ic p. 53. Shickardus jus Regium Iudae p. 64. Albericus Gentilis de jure Belli l. 3. c. 15. p. 613. Hugo Grotius de jure Belli Pacis l. 1. c. 3. Adnotata p. 72. Governado Christiano p. 87. Georgius Bucananus de jure Regni apud Scotos p. 44. Doleâ—-man p. 68. 70. Haenon disp polit p 432. Weemse 2. Vol. 2. Part. p. 14. Hotomani Franco-Gallia c. 10. Amesius de Casibus Conscienciae p. 306. and to name no more in so plain a case of Doctor Ferne himself in his Resolving of Conscience sect 2. p. 10. where hee writes That Samuel here tels the people how they should be oppressed under Kings yet all that violence and injustice done unto them is no cause of resistance c. This Text then being cleerly meant of their Kings Oppression violence injustice against Law right and a clear descript on of a Tyrant not a King I may safely conclude from all the premises that even among the Israelites and Iews themselves their Kings were subjâ—ct to the Lawes and that the whole Congregation Kingdom Senate Sanhedrin not their Kings were the Supreme Soveraign power and Paramount their Kings themselves whom they did thus freely elect constitute and might in some cases justly censure resist depose if not put to death by common consent for notorious grosse Idolatries and publike multiplied crimes as the forecited authors averre All which considered eternally refuâ—es subverts confonnds the erronious false Positions and Paradoxes which Doctor Ferne Griffith Williams Bishop of Ossery the Authour of The necessitie of Subjection with other late ignorant Pamphletters have broached to the contrary without
cease to be a King or at least be lesse a King those verily who shall study the profit of the Kingdom are truly the Kings friends those who neglect or subvert the profit of the Realm are truly his Enemies and as thou câ—nst by no means separate the Kingdom from the people nor the King from the Kingdom so neither the friends of the King from the friends of the Kingdom or people yea verily as those who truely love Caesar would rather have him to be a King then a private man nor can they have him a King without a Kingdom in good â—ooth those shall be the Kingdoms friends who are Caesars and those who would seem to be more the friends of Caesar then of the Kingdom or people are truly to be reputed Flatterers and most pernicious enemies But and if they bee truely friends is it not manifest that the King will become more powerfull and stable as Theopompus said of the Ephori when instituted by how much those shall be more and more powerfull to whom the profit of the people or Realm shall be commanded and committed But perchance thou wilt say You tell me of the Senators Peers and Officers of the Realm but I on the contrary see nothing but Ghosts and as it were ancient Cote-Arms in Tragedies but I scarce any where discern any foot-steps of ancient libertie and authoritie Finally you may see most men every where to look to their own affairs to flatter kings to cheat the people scarce any where maist thou finde one who takes pity of the mascerated people much lesse who will give help to the miserable but if there be any who are truely of that minde or thought to be so they are judged Rebels or Traitors they are banished and they are compelled to begge even their very food What the thing is thus It seems almost alwayes and in every place the audacitie of Kings or partly the prevarication partly the slothfulnesse of the Nobility hath been such that kings may seem to have usurped that licentiousnesse wherewith most of them at this day seem to wax insolent by a long prescription of time but the people may seem to have determined their Authority or to have lost it by not using it For so it happens for the most part that no man takes care for that which all are bound to take care of that which is committed to all no man thinks it is commended to him Yet notwithstanding against the people neither this prescription nor prevarication doth any thing It is a vulgar saying that no prescription can hurt the king or Exchequer much lesse all the people who are potenter then the King and for whose sake the Prince hath this priviledge for why else is the Prince only the administrator of the Exchequer but for the people the true proprietors as shal be after proved Furthermore is not this a known truth that no violence no not in the longest lasting servitude can be prescribed against liberty But and if thou objectest that Kings were constituted by the people who perchance lived above five hundred yeer since not by the people extant at this day I answer that although kings doe die the people in the mean time as neither any other Universitie never dyeth for as flowing waters make a perpetuall river so also the vicissitude of birth and death an immortall people Therefore as the Rheine Seine Tyber is now the same as it was above a thousand years agoe so likewise the Germane French Roman people are the same unlesse Colonies shall have casually intervened neither can their right be any wayes changed either by the flux of water or change of individuals Besides if they attribute the Kingdom received not to their people but to their Father he to his Grandfather and so upwards could he transfer more right to another then himself first had But and if he could not as it is certain he could not is it not manifest whatsoever he shall arrogate to himself besides that he cannot any more usurp it then any theef But on the contrary the people have a right of perpetuall eviction Therefore that the Nobles have been for a long space oppressed in any Kingdom can no way prejudice the people but rather as the servant should not be heard who in that he hath a very long time detained his Lord captive should boast that he was not onely a Free-man but would likewise arrogate to himself a power of life and death over his Lord nor yet a Theefe who because he hath robbed 30. yeers or is the sonne of a Theefe should think himselfe to be without fault yea rather by how much the longer he hath been such a one the more severely should he be punished So likewise a Prince is not to be heard or endured who because he hath succeeded to a Tyrant or hath for a long time used the people like a bondslave from whom he hath received his kingdome or hath offered violence to the Nobles should think that what ever he lusted should be lawfull to him and ought to be granted of right Neither doe yeers substract any thing from the peoples right but adde to the injury of the King But what if the Nobles themselves have colluded with the King what if in betraying the cause they have betrayed the people as it were bound into the hands of a Tyrant shall the authority of the people by this prevarication or treason seem to be plainly transferred upon the King whether I say by this fact is any thing taken away from the liberty of the people or adjoyned to the licentiousnesse of the Prince You will say they may impute it to themselves who made choise of such men of perfidious faith But yet these are as patrons to patronize the publike profit and the peoples safety and liberty Therfore as when an Advocate shall make a compact with the adversary of his Client concerning the value of the suit as they speake if he had betrayed his cause he should not hurt him at all so this conspiracie of the Nobles as it were made to the dammage and destruction of the people cannot verily detract any thing from their right but even they themselves shall fall into the penalty of the Law which is promulged against prevaricators and the Law permits the people to chuse another patron and to prosecute their right againe For if the Roman people condemned their Emperors to punishment who at the Caudine Gallowes had dishonourably contracted with the enemies although by compulsion and reduced to greatest straits and judged that they were no wayes obliged by that paction shall not the people be much lesse bound to suffer that yoke which not by force but willingly not for feare of death but out of desire of gain hath been thus treacherously put upon them Or if those who ought to shake it off shall impose it or those who might doe it shall tolerate it He hath many other pertinent passages to the
against the tyranny of the Prince if they be able c. Thus and much more this Lawyer almost verbatim out of Iunius Brutus I might add to him the like determinations of Henricus Bocerus De jure pugnae hoc est Belli Duelli Tractatus Methodicus Tubingae 1591. lib. 1. cap. 5. c 29. p. 141 Justus Eccardus De Lege Regia the last Edition Alhuseius Polit. c. 4. p. 146. to 153. Haenon Disputat polit The Treatise De Iure Magistratus in Subditos where this Position is largely and learnedly debated confirmed both from Law History Theology Reason Hugo Grotius de Iure Belli pacis lib. 1. c. 4. sect 7. to the end p. 87. c. Albericus Gentilis de Iure Belli l. 1. c. 11. p. 84. c. 25. p. 205. l. 3. c. 9. 22. p. 546. 686. with others But since Iunius Brutus compriseth the quintessence of all the rest I shall trouble you onely with his Discourse Vindiciae Contr. Tyrannos Quaest. 3. p. 177. to 106. To passe by his Discourse concerning the resisting of Tyrants who usurp a Dominion without any Title whom every man may justly resist and suppresse and are bound in duty so to doe as he there proves at large I shall only transcribe what concernes them who have a lawfull Title First saith he we ought to consider that all Princes are born men We cannot therefore expect to have only perfect Princes but rather we ought to thinke it well with us if we have gained but indifferent ones Therefore the Prince shall not presently be a Tyrant if he keep not measure in some things if now and then he obey not reason if hee more slowly seek the publike good if he be lesse diligent in administring Iustice or lesse fierce in propulsing warre For seeing a man is not set over men as if he were some God as he is over beasts but as he is a man born in the same condition with them as that Prince shall be proud who will abuse men like Beasts so that people shall be unjust who shall seek a God in a Prince and a Divinity in this frail Nature But truly if he shall willingly subvert the Republike if he shall wilfully perveâ—t the Lawes if he shall have no care of his faith none of his promises none of Iustice none of piety if himselfe become an enemy of his people or shall use all or the chiefest notes we have mentioned then verily he may be iudged a Tyrant that is an enemy of God and men Therefore we treat not of a Prince lesse good but of the worst not of one lesse prudent but of a malicious and subtile one not of one unskilfull in Law but of a contemner of Law not of an unwarlike one but of an enemy of the people and waster of the Realme A Senate may assist him with prudence a Iudge with the knowledge of the Law a Captain in the skilfulnesse of warre but this man wisheth the Nobles Senators Captains of Warre one neck that he might cut them off at one stroake neither hates he any more then them The first verily though he may lawfully be removed yet however he may be tolerated the latter contrarily by how much the longer he is tollerated the more intollerable he becomes Moreover as euery thing is not lawfull to a Prince so often times that which is lawfull to the people is not expedient For frequently it may fall out that the remedy which is used may be worse than the disease Therefore it becomes a wise man to try all things before he use the hot Iron and use all remedies before he take up armeâ— If therefore those who represent the people perceive any thing to be done against the Republike by force or fraud let them first admonish the Prince neither may they expect till the mischiefe grow heavie and acquire forces Tyranny is like an heptick Feaver which at first is easie to be cured difficult to be discerned afterward it becomes easie to be known but very difficult to be cured Therfore they shall withstand the beginnings neither should they pretermit any thing though the smallest But if he shall proceed and not repent though frequently admonished but tend onely to this that he may commit any thing without punishment then verily he is really guilty of Tyranny and they may act against him whatsoever they may use against a Tyrant either by Law or just force Tyranny is not onely a crime but the head and as it were the heap of all crimes A Tyrant subverts the Republike makes a prey of all lyeth in wait for the life of all violates faith to all contemnes all the Religion of a sacred Oath Therefore is he so much more wicked then any Theefe murtherer sacrilegious person by how much it is the more grievous to offend many and all then particular persons Now if all these be reputed enemies if they be capitally punished if they suffer paines of death can any one invent a punishment worthy so horrid a crime Moreover wee have proved that all Kings receive their Royall Dignity from the people that all the people are better and higher then the King that the King is onely the superiour minister and Ruler of the kingdome the Emperour of the Empire but the people are the true head Therfore it follows that a Tyrant who commits felony against the people as the Lord of the fee hurts the sacred Majesty of the Realm and Empire Becoms a Rebel and therfore falls into the danger of the same Lawes and demerits more grievous punishments Therfore saith Bartolus he may be deposed by a Superiour or be most justly punished by the Julian Law for publike violence Now all the people or those who represent them as Electors Palatines Nobles the Assembly of the Estates c. are his Superiour But and if he shall proceed so farre that he cannot be expelled but by armed violence then verily it shall be lawfull for them to call the people to Armes to raise an Army and to practise force policy stratagems as against an adjudged enemy of his Country and of the Common-weale Neither shall the Officers of the Realm in this case fall into the crime OF SEDITION For in a sedition there must needs be two points which when for the most part they contend about contradictories it followes that the cause of one is just the other unjust That cause must verily be just which defends the Lawâ— which protects the common good which shall preserve the Realme especially by this meanes contrarily that cause is uniust which violates the Laws defends the breakers of the Lawes protects the subverters of the Countrey That is iust which will destroy tyrannicall government that uniust which would abolish iust government That lawfull which tends to the publike good that unlawfull which tends to the private Therefore saith Thomas because a tyrannicall kingdome which is not ordained to the common good but principally for the benefit of the
stretch out an helping hand to an afflicted people and a prostrated Commonweale But thou must do it in such sort that thou mayest not looke after thine owne profit but the good of humane society altogether For since Justice wholly lookes abroad injustice onely regards it selfe thou shalt at last doe this justly if thou shalt have no regard of thine owne profits Briefely if a Prince violently passeth over the fixed limits of piety and justice a neighbour may piously and justly leape over his limits not that he should invade anothers but that he should bid him be content with his owne yea he shall be impious and unjust if he neglect it If a Prince exercise tyranny over the people he may no lesse or lesse slackly assist them than him if the people should move sedition yea he ought to doe it the more readily by how much it is more miserable that many suffer than one If Porsena reduce Tarquin the proud to Rome much more justly may Constantine sent for by the people and Senate of Rome expell Maxentius the Tyrant out of the City Finally if a man may become a Wolfe to a man nothing truely forbids but that a man may be a God to a man as it is in the Proverbe Therefore antiquity hath enrolled Hercules among the number of the gods because he punished and tamed Procrustes Busyris and other Tyrants the pests of mankinde and monsters of the world in every place So also the Roman Empire as long as it stood free was often called The Patrocinie against the Robberies of Tyrants because the Senate was the haven and refuge of Kings People Nations So Constantine sent for by the Romans against Maxentius the Tyrant had God the Captaine of his Army whose expedition the Universall Church exalted with powerfull prayses when yet Maxentius had the same authority in the West as Constantine in the East Likewise Charles the Great undertooke a Warre against the Lombardes being called by the Nobles of Italy to their aide when as yet the Kingdome of the Lombards was long before established and he could claime no right to himselfe over them Likewise when Charles the Bald King of France had by Tyranny taken away the President of that Country which lyeth betweene Seine and Liger Duke Lambert and Iamesius and the other Nobles of France had fled to Lewis King of Germany Charles his Brother by another mother to crave aide against Charles and his mother Iudith a most wicked Woman He in a most ample Assembly of the Germane Princes heard these suppliants by whose unanimous Counsell a warre was publickely decreed against Charles for to restore the exiles Finally as there have beene some Tyrants in every place so likewise among all Historians there are every where examples extant of tyranny revenged and people defended by neighbour Princes which the Princes now at this day ought to imitate in curbing the tyrants both of bodies and Soules of the Republicke and of the Church of Christ unlesse they themselves will be named Tyrants by a most deserved right And that we may at last conclude this Treatise in one word piety commands the Law of God to be observed and the Church to be defended justice that Tyrants and the subverters of Law and the Republike should be curbed charity that the oppressed should be releeved and have a helping hand extended But those who take away these things take away piety justice charity from among men and desire them to be altogether extinguished So he If this then be an irrefragable verity that forraine States and Princes are so farre obliged to assist and relieve those of the same Religion and all others whose liberties rights priviledges are forcibly invaded which our Parliament and State by their assistance of the Netherlands and other Protestant States both in Quaene Elizabeths King Iames and King Charles his reigne approved and justified both by words Acts of Parliament and reall performances then certainly those of the self-same Church Nation Kingdom and fellow Subjects under the self-same Prince betweene whom there is a farre nearer relation much stricter obligation and more strong ingagements ought mutually to aide and assist each other to the uttermost of their abilities when their Religion Lawes Liberties be violently invaded their dearest native Countrey wasted sacked plundered burned ruined in a hostile warre-like manner with open force of Armes either by the King himselfe or a prevailing Malignant Popish faction who have surreptitiously possessed themselves both of his person and affections which they have gotten into their owne over-ruling power How much then it now concernes every reall Protestant within this Realme of England and all other his Majesties Dominions to unite all their common forces together unannimously to protect defend maintaine and propagate our established reformed Religion fundamentall Lawes Liberties the very Priviledges of Parliaments their estates liberties lives the peace welfare and common good of their dearest native Countrey and our three united Realmes against all Popish Malignant forces now in armes to invade eclipse impaire subvert sacke ruine them and how monstrously unnaturally unchristianly and detestably impious treacherous perâ—idious all those English Irish and Scottish Protestants proclaime themselves to the present and future age who now trayterously joyne their forces with the Malignant Popish party or prove uncordiall false treacherous and perfidious to their Religion Liberties Countrey and the Parliment who have not onely waged imployed but confided in them and contribute their uttermost endeavours to betray enslave undermine and to sacke burne and totally overturne them as many we finde have done to their eternall infamy I here referre to every mans judgement and conscience seriously to determine Certainly such unnaturall monsters such trayterous Judasses such execrable infamous Apostates as these can expect no other reall remuneration of this their treachery and perfidiousnesse but the ruine of their credits the detestation of their persons memories the confiscation of their estates the extirpation of their families the execrations of all good men the severest judgements of God and utter confusion with horrors of conscience tormenting them constantly day and night whiles they continue languishing under all these miseries here and the sharpest torments the very largest punishments the hottest flames in hell for ever hereafter and those Antichristian Papists who now are and have beene so faithfull active zealous couragious industrious liberall bountifull if not prodigall to prosecute their owne interests designes to maintaine and propagate their false erroneous detestable Religion superstitions idolatries both in England and Ireland with the effusion of their bloud expence and forfeiture of all their estates and never yet deserted or became treacherous to their false execrable cause or Religion in the least degree shall all joyntly rise up in judgement against them both here and hereafter to their sempiternall infamy reproach and most just condemnation O consider this all yee who now so much forget neglect betray both your God your Christ Religion Lawes