Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	court_n	judge_n	king_n	3,392	5	4.2214	3	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A29745	A brief remonstrance of the grand grievances and oppressions suffered by Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar, knts., deceased as also by their heirs, executors, administrators, and creditors : humbly represented to both Houses of Parliament, prorogued to 21 October 1680 : faithfully collected out of several courts of record, orders of counsel, and treaties of peace and common alliance : with several remarks thereupon for the improvement of naviagation, trade, and commerce / by John Brown.	Brown, John, of London.	1680 (1680)	Wing B5025; ESTC R27230	34,787	30

Godileive of Brugit under the Colour of Iacob Neitz Andreas Vanden Bogaerd Michael Vander Plancken Merchants of Brugis and others as owners upon a Voyage to France for Wine Brandy and Salt Captain Tyrence Byrne Commander of a small Frigat named the Royal having a Commission from the said George Carew persuant to the Letters Patents aforesaid for Reprizals against the Dutch Seized the said Ship near Port-land Bayin the Month of Iuly 1666. Laden with Wine Salt and other Goods from France bound for Amsterdam as by the Bills of Lading appeared The Master and Seamen being Examined by Mr. Exton the Mayor and other Magistrates of Chichester upon a Commission sent by Mr. Suckling out of the Admiralty Court at the instance of Ionathan Frost part owner of the Royal Frigat the whole Ships Company confessed themselves to be Hollanders and Zealanders Born that the Ship was taken by de Ruiter under the circumstances aforesaid and that they were bound for Amsterdam the Goods being Assigned to Merchents there Whereupon Sir Lyonell Ienkins decreed that there was good cause of Seizure and condemned the pietended owners of the said Ship Godileive in Expences but in regard one Peter Gerrard a French-man appeared by Mr. Francklin his Proctor and claymed the said Ship and Goods in the names of the said Iacob Neitz and others the King of Spains Subjects the Judge Ordered and decreed that upon payment of the Costs aforesaid and giving Bayl to abide the Sentence of the Court upon hearing the Cause that then the Ship and Goods should be delivered to the Claymors unto which the Captors Consented But Gerrard refusing to do the same Arrested the Captain in an Action of 1000 l. Valuing the Ship and Goods at that rate and the Captain being committed thereupon to the Marshalsea gave sufficient Bayl to the liking of the said Gerrard and his Proctor who neglected to proceed thereupon But upon new examinations of the Master and Seamen Exparte procured a sentence for discharging the said Ship and Goods and a Writ of Restitution whereupon the Vicadmiral and the Customhouse-waitors in whose Custody they were delivered the same accordingly Then finding some Imbezelements of the Salt and Wine in the Port of Chichester and other Damages by lying so long in dispute through their own default Gerrard and Francklin depending the Process against Byrne Exhibited a Lybel joyntly against Sir Edmond Turnor George Carew Tyrence Byrne and Ionathan Frost in the names of Iacob Neitz and the other Claymors and Procured an Arbitrary and unjust sentence against them all for 1800 l. Damages in spoyling their Voyage and Imbezealing their Goods From which Sentence Sir Edmond Turnor and George Carew appealed by themselves to the King in the High Court of Chancery Whereupon the Lord Keeper Bridgeman appointed the Lord Chief Iustice Rainsford Iudge Wilde Iudge Windham and Baron Littleton as adjuncts with Sir Richard Lloyd Sir Timetly Baldwin Sir Edward Low Dr. Pinfold Dr. Trumbal Dr. Digby and Dr. Briggs or a Competent number of them by Commission to re-hear and determine the same But the Judges upon several debates being divided in their opinions Concerning the Law of England in Cases of Personal Injuries and that Turnor and Carew ought not to suffer for the Trespass of another the Case depended undetermined until the Year 1678. Then one Peter Victorine appeared for the Claymors Peter Gerrard being run away and procured the Commission to be renewed by the Lord High Chancellor who appointed the Lord Chief Iustice North who had denied a Prohibition in the Case in the room of Justice Rainsford And said the Cause of appeal being appointed to be heard at Serjeants Inn in Chancery Lane on the 16th of March 1678. Sir Francis Winnington Sir Thomas Exton Mr. Thursby and Mr. Molloy being of Council for the said Turnor and Carew insisted as the truth was that no proof appeared in all the Process transmitted against them and that upon the said Neitz vander Plancken c. Their own shewing the Imbezelements were done in the Port of Chichester after the Capture which was in the body of the County of Sussex and therefore Tryable at the Common Law by Jury the Admiralty having no Jurisdiction therein several Statutes in the time of King Ric. 2. Edw. 3. and Hen. 4. Expresly forbidding those Incroachments upon the Common Law of England Yet the Lord Chief Justice North over-ruled all that was offered and confirmed the said unjust and Arbitrary Sentence and Signed the same whereupon Judge Wild and the rest followed and did the like The Sentence and Confirmation being brought ready drawn and Ingrossed in Parchment by the said Francklin for that end and purpose who caused the said Judges to Admonish the said Carew being then present to pay the said 1800 l. Cum Expencis before the first day of Easter Term following against which Sentence Confirmation and Admonition the said Carew protested openly before the said Judges as Erronious Arbitrary and unjust and also appealed to the last Parliament for a nullity thereof As also for Caution for his Costs and Charges unjustly sustained and to be sustained therein to be given by Mr. Foot a Merchant in Rood Lane and Mr. Hungerford who after Victrine Died Insolvent appeared for the said Claymors and Likewise for satisfaction of 500 l. with Interest from Mr. William Walker a Gouldsmith detained in his hands from the said Carew ever since the 24th of Iune 1669. under pretence of being obliged to the said Peter Gerrard upon the said Carews Appeal from the first Sentence But the Parliament being Dissolved the whole matter depends in statu quo for Redress according to the Judgment of Parliament the Justice and Equity of the Nation FINIS An. 1567. An. 1606. An. 1630. An. 1631. An. 1632. An. 1635. 10. August 1672. Old stile Referrees Lord Arlington Lord Ashley Mr. Treasurer Mr. Secretary Trevor Sir John Duncomb Register of Writs 126. Register of Writs 129. De arrests facto super bonis mercatorum alienigenium pro transfacta mercatoribus Angliae * ☞

Ravon who obtained several Sentences and Executions thereupon The like at Amsterdam at the Suit of Sir Richard Ford upon Actions for Assurance depending before and after the Treaty Likewise upon several Actions depending at Midleburgh against Peter Boudean and his Heirs at the Suit of George Carew upon Merchants accompts as aforesaid and Legacies whereupon Boudaens Exceptions were over-ruled by the Magistrates and Iudges there in the year 1675. and Sentence given that the Defendants Boudaens should positively Answer to several Charges in the said Plaintiff Carew's Bill which they had delayed so many years together And by a later President in Amsterdam upon two several Actions brought against George Carew in the year 1676. at the Suit of Paulus Buys an Advocate and Arnold Vingbooms a Proctor of the said City Buys for 113 Gilders and a 11 Stivers and Vingbooms for 51 Gilders and 18 Stivers for Fees and Salaries in a Cause Renvoyed from the Hague depending many years before the Treaty against Jacob Pergens upon an obligation for 3000 l. Lent by Sir William Courten unto which Actions of Buys and Vingbooms the said Carew having appeared by Alexander Rynd his Proctrr The Escheevens or Judges there viz. Mr. David de Wilhem Hendrick Becker Mr. Cornelis Cloeck Joan Appelman Mr. Everart Scott de Jonge Dr. Dirk Boelensz Lieve van Loon. Jan van Dijck Mr. Jacob Popta GAVE Sentence against the said Carew for the said Monies and Costs which were Levied by Execution upon the said Carew accordingly as by the Proceedings in the said Court at Amsterdam appears Notwithstanding at the same time the said Iudges were daily Sollicited to Pronounce Sentence against the said Pergens in the Original Action which they refused to do upon the said Obligation in which Cause the said Fees and Salories were recovered by Buys and Vingbooms and also upon his Covenant for 5500. Sterling with Dammages in another Action brought in the same year 1676. against the said Pergens by Mark Fletcher Merchant for Monies received by Pergens in trust for Mr. Courten and his Assigns but the said Iudges possitively denied to pronounce any Sentence thereupon in regard the States of Holland at Pergen his request had by Express Order as aforesaid Dated the 10th of September 1676. Peremptorily Prohibited them from doing any Iustice therein Alledging that moving upon the said Actions and Pretences were publick Breaches of the Peace concluded in the year 1667. and 1674 And so the said causes remained in Statu quo ever since upon the said Extrajudicial Order The said Boudaens having also taken advantage thereof contrary to all Equity Reason and good Conscience and even to the Presidents of their own Courts of Iustice Which were no small Reflections upon the great Interest of His Majesties Honour and the Reputation of his Kingdoms and Dominions being taken notice of by all Forraign Ministers at the Hague and Merchants of other Nations Resident in Amsterdam It 's remarkable that the greatest Ministers of State are subject to gross Errors and Mistakes for that in the first Proclamation Dated the 10th of August 1666. Mentioned in the Order aforesaid it 's recited in the said Proclamation that divers great and Notable Misdemeanours were committed by Sir Edmond Turnor and George Carew and their Assigns And in the Month of September following by an Order of the Council-Board Sir Edmond Turnor was Cleared as a Person never Acting in the said Commission his name being used only in Trust and that Mr. Carew as Administrator and Assignee of Sir William Courten and others solely prosecuted that Affair and so Sir Edmond Turnors Innocency appeared upon hearing the matters of Fact contained in his Petition And after they had Proclaimed him Guilty without calling him to Answer for himself it was Published in the London Gazet for an unadvized Resolution or a hasty Mistake Memorandum That Sir Ieffery Palmer who was Directed to make a Draught of the said Proclamation refused to do it so then Sir Heneage Finch Sollicitor General for the time being very Readily and Officiously did the same Some further Reasons and Arguments Offered in Defence of the Administrators Assignees and Creditors of Sir VVILLIAM COURTEN and Sir PAUL PYNDAR QUeen Elizabeth gave it in Charge to all her Ministers of State that they should have a care of Her Honour which She held as a Iewel so Incomparable that nothing was esteemed more sacred in Her Eyes then Her Honour and Reputation If any Person should now question the Legallity the Iustice or the Equity of the Kings Grant under those Conditions and Limitations in the Letters Patents for Reprizals contained they would not only Arraign the Wisdom and Iudgment of the most Reverend and Learned Ministers and Officers of State and Trust in the Kingdom under whose hands the Grant Passed but lessen the Kings Prerogative-Royal in the Protection of his Subjects The Acts of Parliament expressly Declaring that the Injured Persons shall have the Law of Marque without Fraud or delay the Hollanders Zealanders and other Merchants Strangers having Complained of the old Law and craved Exemptions from the Writ in the Register following in these words REX Ballivis villae de Lenn Episcopi salutem Ex gravi querela dilecti nobis S. accepimus quod cum ipse nuper apud C. partibus de Spinia in villa de C. causa Mercandisandi moram traxisset Bona Cattalla ad valentiam centum librarum emisset I. T. alii malefactores dictae Villae mercatores de dictis partibus de S. praefatum S. apud dictam Villam de S. vi armis ceperunt imprisonaverunt bona cattalla sua praedicta ab eo abstulerunt alia c. ei intulerunt contra legem rationem in ipsius S. damnum non modicum depauperationem manifestam Et licet idem S. adsumptus non modicos penes Dominos partium illarum fuerit prosecutus pro justitia super transgressionibus praedictis habend ipse tamen non potest Justitiam inde obtinere sicut per quosdam fide dignos qui tunc temporis in dictis partibus extiterunt coram nobis est testificatum super quo nobis supplicavit ut sibi de remedio providere faciamus Nos ad testimonium praedictum considerationem habentes nec non injuriore de pauperationi ipsius S. compatientes in hac parte vobis mandamus sicut alias mandavimus quod corpora praedictorum T. I. si ipsi seu eorum aliquis in praedicta villa de Lenn inventi fuerint nec non bona cattalla ad valencia quadraginta librarum quam citius ibidem inventa fuerint arrestari sub arresto salvo custodiri fac quousque praedicto S. de transgressione praedicta ac de damnis de perditis quae occasione praedicta sustinuit fuerit satisfactum Mandavimus etiam ballivis villarum magnae Yernemouth quod ipsi ad valentiam quadraginta librarum de bonis cattalis

to call Copies of Orders of Council Citations who should have understood better being bred an Advocate that the Council Board was no Court of Iudicature and that Citations could not Issue from that Board Yet without the least Summons Sir Ioseph Williamson one of the Principal Secretaries of State for the time being gave a warrant to a Messenger who with a Constable and a Smith on the 4th of October 1677. Broke open Mr. Carew's Chamber and Study doors in his absence and took away what Papers and Writings they pleased and afterwards Seized upon Mr. Carew himself who was Committed to the Gate House by another Warrant Signed by the Earl of Danby Sir Ioseph Williamson and others on the 24th of October 1677. and there detained from all his own private Affairs all the whole Michaelmas-Term The Judges of the Kings-Bench Bar refusing to take Bail which was ready in Court upon the return of several Writs of Habeas Corpus but still the said Carew was Re-manded back into Custody at the instance of the Kings Attorney General and Sollicitor General until he should comply with the said Ambassador's desires who by his Secretary demanded that the said Carew should acquit all his pretences whatsoever in a most Solemn manner as appeared by the Affidavit of Mr. Robert Ayleway the Copy whereof hereafter follows A perfect Copy of Mr. Ayleway's Affidavit RObert Ayleway of London Gentleman maketh Oath that he this Deponent Adressed himself with two several Petitions from George Carew Esq the Copies whereof are hereunto annexed and are true Copies as he this Deponent believed the one to the King and Councel on the 9th Instant November and the other to the Dutch Ambassador on the 10th Instant both Importing the said Carew's Liberty out of his Restraint in the Gate-House And this Deponent as to the first he delivered it into the Kings own hand at the Council Board Whereupon it was Ordered the same Evening that Mr. Carew should be discharged upon the Ambassadors Certificate that he is satisfied or to that effect then this Deponent delivered the other Petition to the said Ambassadors Secretary the next day following who Read the said Petition and said it was well and told the Deponent that he would shew his Excellency the said Petition and speak to him about it and this Deponent should receive his Answer thereupon the next day at White-Hall if this Deponent would meet him there which he this Deponent accordingly did and after some Conference and Debate of the matter the said Secretary told him this Deponent in the presence of Mr. Robert Coke and other Gentlemen that his Excellency was not satisfied And now the said Carew must lye in Prison untill he hath satisfied the World that he hath abused the States and that he hath no Title to any such Pretentions and that his Excellency expected that Mr. Carew should quit his Pretentions in such an Extraordinary and Solemn manner that there should never be the least mention made of them again and repeated the same several times over or words to that effect And at last said I might be assured that it was Expected and would be insisted upon so that it was in vain to make any further application unless he would meaning Mr. Carew quit his Pretentions Robert Ayleway Jurat 13 Die Novembris 1677. Coram me William Wilde SO the said Carew was continued in Prison until he was forced to Subscribe a Paper drawn by Mr. Secretary Williamson worded to this Effect that the said Carew had caused the said Ambassador to be cited by two Orders of the Councel-Board and also caused the said Orders to be Printed without Licence for which he asks his Excellency Pardon upon which he was Discharged paying Serjeant Dike his Fees Afterwards the said Paper was caused to be Printed and most Scandalously fixed upon the Exchange and White-Hall-Gate pretending to vindicate the Dutch Ambassador who got neither Credit nor Honour by this Transaction from any Intelligible Persons either upon the Exchange or even amongst the Dutch Congregations in London and elsewhere in England In this Juncture of time the Creditors and Petitioners could not be heard at Councel-Board upon the said two Orders A new Alliance by a Marriage being in agitation between the Prince of Orange and the Lady Mary the Duke of Yorks Daughter which was promoted and effected by the Earl of Danby's procurement as the Author of the Impartial State of the Earl of Danby's Case Affirms for Rooting out the French Interest at Court and securing the Protestant Religion Then a small Memorial in writing of the Services of Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar for the Crown of England was delivered into His Majesties own Hand and several Lords of the Council-Table but not to lay any stress upon that as to the Merrits of the Forraign Causes in the two Orders of Council being Honorary Ingagements upon the Crown and Incumbant upon the King his Heirs and Successors for Debts contracted for Diamonds and other Jewels of the Crown as also for vast Sums of Money after the return of Sir Paul Pyndar from Constantinople where he had served King Iames and the Turky Company Eleven Years as Ambassador to the Grand Seigneur and much improved the Levant Trade which Debts are still owing yet nothing would procure so much as a Conference or the least Overture of any satisfaction or reparation for the Bona Esperanza c. The States General having made Peace with France and in a Common Alliance with their Confederats at Algiers The Creditors and Proprietors concerned in the Letters Patents for Reprizals aforesaid in the Month of April 1680. Looking upon it then a very seasonable opportunity to repair themselves the Dutch being at Peace with all the World a season that no Common Claymours could appear Whereupon they resolved to Equipp and set forth three several Ships and Pynaces in pursuance of the Authority granted as aforesaid and to that end and purpose concluded upon the Ships Names the Commanders viz. Captain Compton Gwyther Captain Reger Hawkshead and Captain Thomas Wood with their number of Men Guns and Victualling and entered the same in the Admiralty accordingly Captain Tyrence Byrne being appointed for one Ship while he was fitting himself with Men and Ammunition the Sails were taken away by an Officer pretending he had a lawful Warrant for the same from the Lords of the Admiralty as also to Arrest Richard Chappel Master of the Ship who was forced to give Bayl to answer a Charge as a Criminal And the said George Carew having a Summons from Sir Lyonel Ienkins to appear at the Councel-Board on the 11th of May 1680. He appeared and delivered this Petition following into the hands of the Right Honourable Iohn Earl of Radnor Lord President of the Councel To the Kings Most Excellent Majesty and the Lords of His most Honourable Privy Council The Humble Petition of George Carew Esq Administrator of the Goods and Chattels of

Sir William Courten and Sir Paul Pyndar K t s Deceased with their Wills annexed and Thomas Coppin Esq on the behalf of themselves and divers others Interested and Concerned Sheweth THat in Pursuance of two several Orders of the Council-Board Dated the 24th of July 1677. Your Petitioners and other Proprietors Interested have often attended with their Councel Learned in the Law to be heard concerning relief for the matters therein contained according to Iustice and Common Right Humbly Praying that the Ambassador of the States General Resident in England might have notice thereof to make what Defence he could by his Advocates or others against your Petitioners just Complaints but to this day your Petitioners could not be heard although several times were Assigned for that purpose Your Petitioners do therefore most Humbly Pray that Your Majesty would be most Graciously pleased to appoint a Peremptory Day that your Petitioners may be heard at the Council-Board and that the Dutch Ambassador may have notice thereof from one of the Principal Secretaries of State with Copies of the said Orders to make what Defence he can by his Advocates or others if he please that Right may be done according to the Merits of the Cause And Your Petitioners shall ever Pray c. George Carew Thomas Coppin THe said Petition being Ordered to be Read and Sir Philip Lloyd Clerk of the Councel having Read the same accordingly on the 12th day of May 1680. The Lord High Chancellour was pleased to tell Mr. Carew that he should not be heard but that He and others that offered to put the said Letters Pattents or any Commissions derived from thence in Execution should be Hanged as Pirates And notwithstanding the said George Carew informed the Councel-Board that two or three Ships were out upon the Coast of Spain and other parts in Pursuance of certain Articles and Agreements between him and the Creditors yet nothing would prevail for a hearing upon the Petition or upon the former Order of Councel aforesaid but this new Order was made Ex parte upon a Memorial given in by the Dutch Ambassador stuft with Impertinent falsities as follows At the Court at White-Hall the 12 th of May 1680. Present The Kings most Excellent Majesty His Highness Prince Rupert Lord Archbishop of Canterbury Lord Chancellor Lord President Duke of Albemarle Marquess of Worcester Earl of Ossory Lord Chamberlain Earl of Bridgwater Earl of Sunderland Earl of Essex Earl of Bathe Lord Bishop of London Mr. Hide Lord Chief Justice North. Mr. Finch Mr. Secretary Ienkins Mr. Chancellor of the Exchequer Sir Thomas Chicheley Mr. Godolphin THis day a Memorial presented to His Majesty by his Excellency the Ambassador Extraordinary from the States General of the United Provinces was read in Council setting forth how that according to Information given upon Oath Sir Edward Graves K nt and George Carew Esq were Equipping and Arming a small Frigat called the Mary under the Command of Tyrence Byrne to be imployed against the Subjects of the States General and particularly to surprize and seize the Ship called the Emperour wherein a part of the said Lord Ambassadors Equippage was Imbarqued in order to his return to his own Country which Equipping and Arming was by colour of a Commission or Letter of Reprizal bearing date the 29th of May in the 17th year of His Majesties Reign that now is and granted in favour of the Creditors of Sir William Courten and others And praying that the said Letters of Reprizals might be Revoked His Majesty considering that the said Commission was Suspended by His Majesties Proclamation bearing Date the 10th of August 1666. for divers great and notable Misdemeanors committed in Execution thereof and that by the Treaty of Peace and Alliance made with the States General of the United Provinces at Breda the 21 of July 1667. It is agreed that all Suits and Pretentions that the Subjects of His Majesty or the States General might or could move or prosecute one against another for any matter or thing before the Date of the said Treaty shall remain void Obliterated and Disanulled and that all Letters of Reprizal Marque or Countermarque both general and particular are by the said Treaty Inhibited and Revoaked which said Treaty was restored in its former Uigour and Confirmed by a Subsequent Treaty made at Westminster in the Month of February 167 3 4. By which Treaties all Letters and Commissions of Reprizal are intirely Revoaked and Annulled His Majesty likewise foreseeing of what Mischievous Consequence it would be to all his Loving Subjects if the States General upon the Execution of the said Letters of Reprizal contrary to the meaning of the said Treaties and after the anulling of them by the same should Grant Letters of Countermarque against the said Subjects and their Goods to the hindring of Commerce and the Ruine and Dammage of many particular Men although unconcerned in the Case of such Reprizal His Majesty doth therefore hereby Order Sir Creswel Levins His Majesties Attorney General to prepare the Draught of a Supersedeas to pass the Great Seal of England whereby the said Letters of Reprizal may be in due form of Law Superseded Revoked and Declared to be void and Determined to all effects and purposes whatsoever to the end the States General may rest satisfied of his Majesties care to have his Treaties duly executed and that it be made known and may appear of Record to all his Loving Subjects that the said Letters of Reprizal are Revoaked and Declared void to the end also that none may hereafter presume to Act by vertue thereof and if any do that they may be proceeded against as Pirats acting without Commission and as Infractors of the Peace and Alliance between His Maiesty and the States General A true Copy Ex. FRANCIS GUYN IT may be remarqued from hence what Dangerous consequences would attend the Subjects of England in their Estates and Properties if such an Order of the Councel-Table should be of force to Supersede a Iudicial Grant upon Record under the Great Seal of England without a Scire facias or hearing the Parties or to Discharge and Release particular Mens-Rights and Interests in the Hands of Forreigners upon private and Land-Contracts in Trade and Commerce without any Restitution or Satisfaction for the same Under such presidents no Man can be safe It 's very remarkable that civil Actions and Pretences for several Matters and Things were not Obliterated or made void by the Treaty at Breda as appears by several Presidents of both sides in the Courts of Judicature at the Hague Amsterdam and Middleburgh viz. By the cause in the Supream Court of Judicature between James Boeve and the Heirs of Peter Boudaen depending many years before the Treaty at Breda and prosecuted several years after to a Definitive Sentence and by other actions in Zealand that had long depended before the Treaty in the Zerick-sea which were prosecuted afterward by Sir William Lower John Monson and Roger