the ordinary Course and Courts of Justice declined 3. The proceedings in Civil Causes at Council-Board contrary to the Law and great Charter not limited to any certain time or season 4. That the Subject is in all the material parts thereof denied the benefit of the Princely Graces and more especially of the Statute of Limitations of 21 of Jac. granted by his Majesty in the Fourth Year of His Reign upon great Advice of the Councils of England and Ireland and for great Consideration and then published in all the Courts of Dublin and in all the Counties of this Kingdom in open Assizes whereby all Persons do take notice That contrary to His Majesties Pious Intentions His Subjects of this Land have not enjoyed the benefit of His Majesties Princely Promise thereby made 5. The extrajudicial avoiding of Letters Patents of Estates of a very great part of His Majesties Subjects under the Great Seal the Publick Faith of the King dom by private Opinions delivered at the Council-Board without Legal Evictions of their Estates contrary to Law and without President or Example of any former Age. 6. The Proclamation for the sole emption and uttering of Tobacco which is bought at very low Rates and uttered at high and excessive Rates by means whereof thousands of Families within this Kingdom and of His Majesties Subjects in several Islands and other parts of the West-Indies as your Petitioners are informed are destroyed and the most part of the Coin of this Kingdom is ingrossed into particular Hands insomuch that your Petitioners do conceive that the Profit arising and ingrossed thereby doth surmount His Majesties Revenue certain or casual within this Kingdom and yet his Majesty receiveth but very little profit by the same 7. The universal and unlawful encreasing of Monopolies to the advantage of a few the disprofit of His Majesty and impoverishment of His people 8. And the extream cruel Vsage of certain late Commissioners and other Stewards of the British Farmers and Inhabitants of the City and County of London-Derry by means whereof the worthy Plantation of that Country is almost destroyed and the Inhabitants are reduced to great Poverty and many of them forced to forsake the Country the same being the first and most useful Plantation in the large Province of Ulster to the great weakning of the Kingdom in this time of danger the said Plantation being the Principal Strength of those parts 9. The late Erection of the Court of High Commission for Causes Ecclesiastical in these necessitous Times the Proceedings of the said Court in many Causes without legal Warrant and yet so supported as Prohibitions have not been obtained though legally sought for And the excessive Fees exacted by the Ministers thereof and the encroaching of the same upon the Jurisdiction of other Ecclesiastical Courts of this Kingdom 10. The exorbitant Fees and pretended Customs exacted by the Clergy against the Law some of which have been formerly represented to your Lordship 11. The Petitioners do most heartily bemoan that His Majesties Service and Profit are much more impaired than advanced by the Grievances aforesaid and the Subsidies granted in the last Parliament having much encreased His Majesties Revenue by the buying of Grants and otherwise And that all His Majesties Debts then due in this Kingdom were satisfied out of the said Subsidies and yet his Majesty is of late as the Petitioners have been informed in the House of Commons become indebted in this Kingdom in great Sums And they do therefore humbly beseech That an exact Account may be sent to His Majesty how and in what manner His Treasure is issued 12. The Petitioners do humbly conceive just and great fears at a Proclamation published in this Kingdom in Anno Domini 1635. prohibiting men of Quality or Estates to depart this Kingdom into England without the Lord-Deputie's Licence whereby the Subjects of this Kingdom are hindred and interrupted from free access to address to His Sacred Majesty and Privy-Council of England to declare their just Grievances or to obtain Remedies for them in such sort as their Ancestors have done in all Ages since the Reign of King Henry the Second and great Fees exacted for every of the said Licences 13. That of late His Majesties Attorney-General hath exhibited Informations against many ancient Burroughs of this Kingdom into His Majesties Court of Exchequer to shew cause by what Warrant the said Burgesses who heretofore sent Burgesses to Parliament should send the Burgesses to the Parliament and thereupon for want of an Answer the said Priviledges of sending Burgesses was seized by the said Court which Proceedings were altogether Coram non Judice and contrary to the Laws and Priviledges of the House of Parliament and if way should be given thereunto would tend to the Subversion of Parliaments and by Consequence to the Ruin and Destruction of the Common-wealth And that the House of Commons hath hitherto in this present Parliament been deprived of the Advice and Counsel of many profitable and good Members by means thereof 14. By the Powerfulness of some Ministers of State in this Kingdom the Parliament in its Members and Actions hath not its natural Freedom 15. And lastly That the Gentry and Merchants and other His Majesties Subjects of this Kingdom are of late by the Grievances and Pressures before said and other the like brought very near to Ruin and Destruction And the Farmers of Customs Customers Waiters Searchers Clerks of Vnwarrantable Proceedings Pursevants and Goalers and sundry others very much enriched whereby and by the slow Redress of the Petitioners Grievances His Majesties most Faithful and Dutiful People of this Kingdom do conceive great fears that their readiness approved upon all occasions hath not been of late rightly represented to his Sacred Majesty For Remedy whereof the said Petitioners do humbly and of right beseech your Lordships That the said Grievances and Pressures may be speedily Redressed and if your Lordship shall not think fit to afford present Relief that your Lordship might admit a Select Committee of this House of Persons uninteressed in the benefit arising of the aforesaid Grievances to be licensed by your Lordship to repair to His Sacred Majesty in England for to pursue the same and to obtain fitting remedy for their aforesaid and other just Grievances and Oppressions and upon all just and Honourable Occasions they will without respect of particular Interest or Profit to be raised thereby most humbly and readily in Parliament extend their utmost endeavour to serve His Majesty and comply with His Royal and Princely Occasions and shall pray c. To this the Earl replyed that their Lordships might observe that it bore Date Feb. 22 1640. which was since his Impeachment and that it is followed by Faction and Confederacy and a strong Conspiracy against him as if he had time and opportunity he could make it appear And indeed the Complaints of the Irish Nation against him who had in all things endeavoured to promote and
no cause appeared or such only as was clearly Bailable by Law yet he remanded them where they remained Prisoners very long Which said deferring to grant the said Writs of Habeas Corpus and refusals and delays to discharge Prisoners or suffer them to be Bailed contained in this Article are destructive to the Fundamental Laws of this Realm and contrary to former resolutions in Parliament and to the Petition of Right which said Resolutions and Petition of Right were well known to him the said Sir Robert Berkley and were Resolved on and Enacted when he was the Kings Serjeant at Law and attendant in the Lords House in Parliament 11. That whereas there was a Cause depending in the Court-Christian at Norwich between Samuel Booty Clerk and Collard for two Shillings in the Pound for Tithes for Rents and Houses in Norwich and the said Collard moved by his Council in the Court of Kings Bench for a Prohibition to stay proceedings in the Court Christian at Norwich and delivered into the said Court of Kings Bench his suggestions that the said Cause in the said Court Christian was only for Tithes for Rents of Houses in Norwich which was determinable by the Common Law only yet he the said Sir Robert Berkley being one of the Justices of the said Court of Kings Bench and sitting in the said Court deferred to grant a Prohibition to the said Court Christian in the said Cause although the Council did move in the said Court many several times and several Terms for a Prohibition And he the said Sir Robert Berkley deferred to grant his Majesties Writ of Prohibition to several other Courts on the motions of divers others of His Majesties Subjects where the same by the Laws of this Realm ought to have been granted contrary to the Laws of this Realm and his own knowledge All which Words Opinions and Actions were so spoken and done by him the said Sir Robert Berkley Traiterously and Wickedly to Alienate the Hearts of His Majesties Liege People from His Majesty and to set a division betwixt them and to subvert the Fundamental Laws and Established Government of His Majesties Realm of England for which they do Impeach him the said Sir Robert Berkley one of the Justices of the Court of Kings Bench of High Treason against our Soveraign Lord the King His Crown and Dignity and of the misdemeanors above mentioned And the said Commons by Protestation saving to themselves only the Liberty of Exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Accusation or Impeachment against the said Sir Robert Berkley and also of replying to the answer that he the said Sir Robert Berkley shall make to the said Articles or any of them or of offering Proof of the Premises or any other Impeachments or Accusations that shall be Exhibited by them as the case shall according to the course of Parliaments require do pray that the said Sir Robert Berkley one of the Justices of the Court of Kings Bench may be put to answer to all and every the Premises and that such Proceedings Examinations Tryals Judgments and Executions may be upon every of them had and used as is agreeable to Law and Justice Upon the Articles of Impeachments of the Lord Chief Baron Davenport Mr. Baron Trevor and Mr. Baron Weston Mr. Hide by the Command of the Commons spake as follows My Lords THere cannot be a greater instance of a sick and languishing Commonwealth than the business of this day Good God! Mr. Hide 's Speech at the delivering of the Articles of Impeachment of the L. Chief Baron Davenport Mr. Baron Trevor and Mr. Baron Weston July 6. 1641. how have the guilty these late years been punished when the Judges themselves have been such Delinquents 'T is no marvel that an Irregular Extravagant Arbitrary Power like a Torrent hath broke in upon us when our Banks and our Bulworks the Laws were in the custody of such Persons Men who had lost their Innocence could not preserve their Courage nor could we look that they who had so visibly undone us themselves should have the Vertue or Credit to Rescue us from the Oppression of other Men. 'T was said by one who always spoke excellently That the Twelve Judges were like the Twelve Lions under the Throne of Solomon under the Throne in Obedience but yet Lions Your Lordships shall this day hear of Six who be they what they will be else were no Lions who upon vulgar fears delivered up the precious Forts they were trusted with almost without assault and in a tame easie Trance of flattery and servitude lost and forfeited shamefully forfeited that Reputation Awe and Reverence which the Wisdom Courage and Gravity of their Venerable Predecessors had contracted and fastned to the places they now hold and even rendred that study and profession which in all Ages hath been and I hope now shall be of an honourable Estimation so Contemptible and Vile that had not this blessed day come all Men would have had that quarrel to the Law it self which Marius had to the Greek Tongue who thought it a mockery to learn that Language the Masters whereof lived in bondage under others And I appeal to these unhappy Gentlemen themselves with what a strange negligence scorn and indignation the faces of all men even of the meanest have been directed towards them since to call it no worse that fatal declension of their understandings in those Judgments of which they stand here charged before your Lordships But my Lords the work of this day is the greatest instance of a growing and thriving Common-wealth too and is as the dawning of a fair and lasting day of happiness to this Kingdom 'T is in your Lordships power and I am sure 't is in your Lordships will to restore the dejected broken people of this Island to their former joy and security the Successors of these Men to their old Priviledge and Veneration sepultas propè leges revocare My Lords the iniquity of Judges is infectious and their craftiest Combination to leave us as few innocent as may be Your Lordships have heard of the justice of Two of the greatest Courts of Westminster and that you may know how little advantage the other of his Majesties Revenue the Court of Exchequer hath of its fellows in the Administration of Right I am commanded by the House of Commons to present to your Lordships Three several Charges against three Judges of that Court my Lord Chief Baron Davenport Mr. Baron Trever and Mr. Baron Weston Your Lordships will please to hear them read Here the several Articles were read Your Lordships observe that the great Resolution in Ship-mony was a Crime of so Prodigious a Nature that it could not be easily swallowed and digested by the Consciences even of these Men but as they who are to Wrestle or run a Race by degrees prepare themselves by Diet and lesser Essays for the main Exercise so these Judges enter themselves and harden their hearts by more
for a Prohibition to stay Proceedings in the Court Christian at Norwich and delivered into the said Court of Kings-Bench his Suggestions that the said Cause in the said Court Christian was for Tythes for Rents of Houses in Norwich which was determinable by the Common Law only yet he the said Sir John Brampston being Chief Justice of the said Court of Kings-Bench and sitting the said Court deferred to grant a Prohibition to the said Court Christian in the said Cause although the Councel did move in the said Court several Times and several Terms for a Prohibition And he the said Sir John Brampston deferred to grant His Majesties Writs of Prohibition to several Courts on the Motions of divers others of His Majesties Subjects where the same by Laws of this Realm ought to have been granted contrary to the Laws of this Realm and his own knowledg And the said Commons by Protestation saving to themselves only the Liberties of Exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Accusation or Impeachment against the said Sir John Brampston and also of replying to the Answer that he the said Sir John Brampston shall make unto the said Articles or any of them or of offering Proofs of the Premisses or any of their Impeachments or Accusations that shall be exhibited by them as the Case shall according to the Course of Parliament require do pray that the said Sir John Brampston Lord Chief Justice of the Court of Kings-Bench may be put to answer to all and every the Premisses and that such Proceedings Examinations Tryals and Judgments may be upon every of them had and used as is agreeable to Law and Justice Mr. Hollis also according to the Order of the House of Commons at this Conference made application to their Lordships in the behalf of Sir Randal Crew in this manner My Lords THese Gentlemen have represented unto your Lordships the sad object of Justice perverted Liberty oppressed Mr. Denzil Hollis his Speech about Sir Randal Crew July 6. 1641. of Judgment turned into Worm-wood the Laws which should be the Bars of our Gates to protect us keep us and all that is ours in safety made weak and impotent to betray us unto the hands of violence instead of Props to support us become broken Reeds to deceive us and run into our sides when we lean upon them even so many snares to entrap and entangle us And all this by the perfidiousness of those who are entrusted with our Laws who call themselves the Guardians and the Interpreters of the Law but by their accursed Glosses have confounded the Text and made it speak another Language and another Sense than ever our Ancestors the Law-makers intended Our Ancestors made Laws to keep themselves their posterity after them in the possession of their Estates these Judges could make the Law it self rob us and despoil us of our Estates Were we invaded and persecuted at any time for pretended Crimes or rather because they were free from Crime And did we put our selves upon a legal defence and shelter our selves under the Buckler of the Law use those Lawful Weapons which Justice and Truth and the Common Right of the Subject did put into our hands would this avail us No these Judges would make the Law wrest our Weapons from us disarm us take away all our defence expunge our Answers even bind us hand and foot and so expose us naked and bound to the mercilesness of our Oppressors were our Persons forced and imprisoned by an Act of Power would the Law relieve us when we appealed unto it No it would joyn hands with violence and add bitterness to our sorrow these Judges would not hear us when we did cry no importunity could get a Habeas Corpus Nay our cryes would displease them and they would beat us for crying and over-do the unjust Judge in the Gospel with whom yet importunity could prevail My Lords The Commons of England finding themselves in this lamentable condition by the wickedness of these Judges It is no wonder that we complain of them it is no wonder if the Knights Citizens and Burgesses Assembled in Parliament have sent up some of their Members to stand upon Mount Ebal to Curse these Judges to denounce a Curse upon them who have removed our Land-marks have taken away the Bound-stones of the Propriety of the Subject have left no Meum Tuum but he that had most might had most right and the Law was sure to be on his side It hath been the part of these Gentlemen who have spoken before me to pray for justice upon those men who would not do justice to others My Lords I come upon another Errand and yet for justice too for there is justice upon Mount Gerezim as well as upon Mount Ebal It is as great a point of justice to give a blessing a reward where it is due as punishment where punishment is due For reward and punishment Praemium poena be the two legs that Justice walks on and reward is her right leg the more noble and the more glorius Supporter of that Sacred and Divine Body that which God himself the Foundation of Justice doth more delight in Tradior ad poenas Deus est ad praemia velox Punishment is good as Physick in the Consequence Reward as wholesome and nourishing Food in the Essence the one we do because we must do it as necessary the other because we love to do it as being pleasing and delightful Your Lordships then I doubt not will as willingly joyn with the Commons in doing good to a good Judge as in punishing of the bad My Lords We honour them and reckon them Martyrs for the Common-wealth who suffer any thing by defending the Common Right of the Subject when they will not part with their own Goods contrary to Law when indeed their private interest goes along with it or rather before it and the publick Concernment seems to come but in a second place such were those many whom these Judges have oppressed yet these Men we magnifie and judge worthy of Praise and Reward But what honour then is he worthy of who meerly for the publick hath suffered himself to be divested and deprived of his particular such a Judge as would lose his place rather than do that which his Conscience told him was prejudicial to the Common-wealth Is not he worthy of double honour And this did that Worthy Reverend Judge the chief Judge of England at that time Sir Randol Crew because he would not by subscribing countenance the Loan in the first year of the King contrary to his Oath and Conscience he drew upon himself the displeasure of some great Persons about his Majesty who put on that project which was afterwards condemned by the Petition of Right in the Parliament of Tertio as unjust and unlawful and by that means he lost his place of Chief Justice of the King's-Bench and hath these fourteen years by keeping his innocency lost the
Brown Thomas Bourk Esquires Vlster Sir William Cole Sir James Montgomery The Remonstrance was as followeth addressed first to the L. Deputy Wendesford The humble and just Remonstrance of the Knights Citizens and Burgesses in Parliament Assembled Shewing THat in all Ages since the happy subjection of this Kingdom to the Imperial Crown of England The Irish Remonstrance it was and is a principal study and Princely Care of his Majesty and his most noble Progenitors Kings and Queens of England and Ireland to the vast Expence of Treasure and Blood That their Loyal and Dutiful People of this Land of Ireland being now for the most part derived from Brittish Ancestors should be governed according to the Municipal and Fundamental Laws of England That the Statute of Magna Charta or the Great Charter of the Liberties of England and other laudable Laws and Statutes were in several Parliaments here Enacted and Declared that by the means thereof and the most Prudent and Benign Government of his Majesty and his Royal Progenitors this Kingdom was until of late in its growth a flourishing Estate whereby the said People were heretofore enabled to answer their humble and natural Desires to comply with his Majesties Princely and Royal Occasions by their free gift of 150 Thousand pounds sterling And likewise by another free gift of 120 Thousand pounds more during the Government of the Lord Viscount Faulkland and after by the gift of 40 Thousand pounds and their free and cheerful gift of Six intire Subsidies in the Tenth Year of his Majesties Reign which to comply with his Majesties then Occasions signified to the then House of Commons they did allow should amount in the Collections unto a Hundred and fifty Thousand pounds although as they confidently believe if the Subsidies had been levied in a moderate Parliamentary way they would not have mounted to much more than half the Sum aforesaid besides the Four intire Subsidies granted in this present Parliament So it is may it please your Lordship by the occasion of infuing and other Grievances and Innovations though to his Majesty no considerable Profit this Kingdom is reduced to that Extream and Universal Poverty that the same is less able to pay Two Subsidies than it was heretofore to satisfie all the before-recited great Payments and his Majesties most Faithful People of the Land do conceive great Fears That the said Grievances and Consequences thereof may be hereafter drawn into Presidents to be perpetuated upon their Posterity which in their great hopes and strong belief they are perswaded is contrary to his Royal and Princely Intention towards his said People of which Grievances are as followeth 1. First The general apparent decay of Trades occasioned by the new and illegal raising of the Book of Rates and Impositions upon Native and other Commodities Exported and Imported by reason whereof and of extream Usage and Censures Merchants are beggered both and dis-inabled and discouraged to Trade and some of the Honorable Persons who gain thereby often Judges and Parties And that in the conclusion his Majesties Profit thereby is not considerably advanced 2. The Arbitrary decision of all Civil Causes and Controversies by paper Petitions before the Lord Lieutenant and Lord Deputy and infinite other Judicatories upon references from them derived in the nature of all Actions determinable at the Common Law not limited into certain time cause season or thing whatsoever And the consequences of such exceeding by immoderate and unlawful Fees by Secretaries Clarks Pursivants Serjeants at Arms and otherwise by which kind of proceedings his Majesty looseth a considerable part of his Revenue upon original Writs and otherwise and the Subject looseth the benefit of his Writ of Error Bill of Reversal Vouchees and other Legal and just advantages and the ordinary course and Courts of Justice declined 3. The proceedings in Civil Causes at Council Board contrary to the Law and Great Charter not limited to any certain time or season 4. That the Subject is in all the material parts thereof denyed the benefit of the Princely graces and more especially of the Statute of Limitations of 21 Jac. Granted by his Majesty in the Fourth year of his Reign upon great advice of Council of England and Ireland and for great consideration and then published in all the Courts of Dublin and in all the Counties of this Kingdom in open Assizes whereby all persons do take notice That contrary to his Majesties Pious Intentions his Subjects of this Land have not enjoyed the benefit of his Majesties Princely Promise thereby made 5. The Extrajudicial avoiding of Letters Patents of Estates of a very great part of his Majesties Subjects under the Great Seal the Publique Faith of the Kingdom by private Opinions delivered at the Council-Board without Legal Evictions of their Estates contrary to the Law and without president or example of any former Age. 6. The Proclamation for the sole Emption and uttering of Tobacco which is bought at very low rates and uttered at high and excessive rates by means whereof Thousands of Families within this Kingdome and of his Majesties Subjects in several Islands and other parts of the West-Indies as your Petitioners are informed are destroyed and the most part of the Coyn of this Kingdom is ingrossed into particular hands Insomuch as the Petitioners do conceive that the Profit arising and engrossed thereby doth surmount his Majesty's Revenue certain or casual within this Kingdom and yet his Majesty receiveth but very little Profit by the same 7. The universal and unlawful increasing of Monopolies to the advantage of a few to the disprofit of his Majesty and Impoverishment of his People 8. The extream and cruel usage of certain late Commissioners and other Stewards the British Farmers and Inhabitants of the City and County of London-Derry by means whereof the worthy Plantation of that Country is almost destroyed and the Inhabitants are reduced to great Poverty and many of them forced to forsake the Country the same being the first and most useful Plantation in the large Province of Vlster to the great weakening of the Kingdom in this time of danger the said Plantation being the principal strength of those Parts 9. The late erection of the Court of High-Commission for Causes Ecclesiastical in those necessitous times the proceedings of the said Court in many Causes without Legal Warrant and yet so supported as Prohibitions have not been obtained though legally sought for And the excessive Fees exacted by the Ministers thereof and the encroaching of the same upon the Jurisdiction of other Ecclesiastical Courts of this Kingdom 10. The exorbitant Fees and pretended Customs exacted by the Clergy against the Law some of which have been formerly represented to your Lordship 11. The Petitioners do most heartily bemoan that His Majesties service and profit are much more impaired then advanced by the Grievances aforesaid and the Subsidies granted in the last Parliament having much increased His Majesties Revenue by the buying of
Indictments where the Matter in Issue being that the said Brook refused to Administer the said Sacrament because the said Ingram and Carter would not receive Tickets with their Sur-Names before their Christen-Names which was a Course never used amongst them but by the said Brook He the said Sir Robert Berkley did then much discourage the said Ingram's Councel and over-rule the Cause for matter of Law so as the Jury never went from the Bar but there found for the said Brook And the said Sir Robert Berkley bound the said Ingram to the good Behaviour for the prosecuting the said Indictments and ordered him to pay Costs to the said Brook for wrongfully inditing him And whereas the said Carter not expecting the Tryal at the same Assizes he preferred his Indictment was then absent whereupon the said Sir Robert Berkley did cause to be entred upon the said Indictment a vacat quia non sufficiens in lege and ordered an Attachment against the said Carter which said proceedings against the said Ingram and Carter by the said Sir Robert Berkley were contrary to Law and Justice and to his own knowledge 10. That the said Sir Robert Berkley being one of the Justices of the Court of Kings-Bench and duly sworn as aforesaid in Trinity Term 1637. deferred to discharge or bail Alexander Jenings Prisoner in the Fleet brought by Habeas Corpus to the Bar of the said Court the return of his Commitment being that he was committed by two several Warrants from the Lords of the Councel dated the fifth of November 1636. The first being only read in Court expressing no cause the other for not paying Messengers Fees and until he should bring a Certificate that he had paid his Assessment for Ship-Money in the County of Bucks but remitted him And in Michaelmas Term after the said Jenings being brought by another Habeas Corpus before him as aforesaid and the same returned yet he the said Sir Robert Berkley refused to discharge or bail him but remitted him And in Easter Term after several Rules were given for His Majesties Councel to shew Cause why the said Jenings should not be Bailed a fourth Rule was made for the said Jenings to let His Majesties Attorney General have notice thereof and notice was given accordingly and the said Jenings by another Habeas Corpus brought to the Bar in Trinity Term after and the same return with this addition of a new Commitment of the Fourth of May suggesting he the said Jenings had used divers scandalous Words in derogation and disparagement of His Majesties Government He the said Jenings after several Rules in the end of the said Trinity Term was again remitted to Prison And he the said Sir Robert Berkley did on the fifth of June last defer to grant His Majesties Writs of Habeas Corpus for William Pargiter and Samuel Danvers Esquires Prisoners in the Gate-House and in the Fleet And afterwards having granted the said Writ of Habeas Corpus the said Pargiter and Danvers were on the eighth of June last brought to the Bar of the said Court where the Returns of their Commitments were several Warrants from the Lords of the Councel not expressing any Cause yet he the said Sir Robert Berkley then sitting in the said Court deferred to Bail the said Pargiter and Danvers and the eighteenth of June last made a Rule for a new return to be received which were returned the 25th of June last in haec verba Whereas His Majesty finding that his Subjects of Scotland have in Rebellious and Hostile manner Assembled themselves together and intend not only to shake off their Obedience unto His Majesty but also as Enemies to invade and infest this His Kingdom of England to the danger of his Royal Person c. For prevention whereof His Majesty hath by the Advice of his Councel-Board given special Commandment to all the Lord-Lieutenants of the Counties of this Realm appointed for their Rendezvouz in their several and respective Counties there to be conducted and drawn together into a Body for this Service And whereas His Majesty according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm and the constant Custom of his Predecessors Kings and Queens of this Realm hath Power for the defence of this Kingdom and resisting the force of the Enemies thereof to grant forth Commissions under His Great Seal to such fit Persons as he shall make choice of to Array and Arm the Subjects of this Kingdom and to compel those who are of able Body and of able Estates to arm themselves and such as should not be of able Bodies but of Ability in Estate to Assess them according to their Estates to contribute towards the Charge of arraying others being able of Body and not able in Estate to arm themselves And such Persons as should be contrariant to commit to Prison there to remain untill the King should take further Order therein And whereas the Earl of Exeter by vertue of His Majesties Commission to him directed for the Arraying and Arming of a certain number of Persons in the County of Northampton hath assest William Pargiter being a Man unfit of Body for that Service but being of Estate and Ability to contribute amongst others to pay the Sum of five Shillings towards the arraying and arming of others of able Bodies and wanting Ability to Array and Arm themselves And whereas we have received Information from the said Earl that the said William Pargiter hath not only in a wilful and disobedient Manner refused to pay the said Money assessed upon him towards so important a Service to the disturbance and hindrance of the necessary defence of this Kingdom but also by his ill example hath mis-led many others and as we have just cause to believe hath practiced to seduce others from that ready obedience which they owe and would otherwise have yielded to His Majesties just command for the publick defence of His person and Kingdom which we purpose with all convenient speed to enquire further of and examin These are therefore to will and require you to take into your Custody the Persons of the said William Pargiter and Samuel Danvers and them safely to keep Prisoners till further order from this Board or until by due course of Law they shall be delivered Yet he the said Sir Robert Berkley being desired to Bail the said Pargiter and Danvers remitted them where they remained Prisoners till the Ninth of November last or thereabouts although the said Jenings Pargiter and Danvers on all and every the said returns were clearly Bailable by Law and the Council of the said Jenings Pargiter and Danvers offered in Court very sufficient Bail And he the said Sir Robert Berkley being one of the Justices of the Court of the Kings Bench denied to grant his Majesties Writs of Habeas Corpus to very many others his Majesties Subjects and when he had granted the said Writs of Habeas Corpus to very many others his Majesties Subjects and on the return
be made acquainted by the Lords of the Council why they Committed and therefore Remitted him And in Michaelmass Term after the said Jenings being brought by another Habeas Corpus as aforesaid and the same returned yet he the said Sir John Brampston refused to Discharge or Bail him but remitted him And in Easter Term next after several Rules for His Majesties Council to shew cause why he the said Jenings should not be Bailed a fourth Rule made for the said Jenings to let His Majesties Attorney have notice which notice was given accordingly yet he remitted him And the said Jenings by another Habeas Corpus brought to the Barr as aforesaid in Trinity Term after and the same return with the addition of a new Commitment of the fourth of May 1638. suggested that he the said Jenings had used divers scandalous words in derogation and disparagement of his Majesties Government After several Rules in the end of the said Trinity Term he again remitted him to Prison And he the said Sir John Brampston about the ninth of July after at his Chamber in Serjeants-Inn being desired by Mr. Meawtis one of the Clerks of the Council-Board to discharge the said Jenings for that he the said Jenings had entred into a Bond of 1000 l. to appear before the Lords of the Council the next Michaelmas Term after and to attend de die in diem yet the said Sir John Brampston refused to discharge the said Jenings until he entred into Recognisance to appear the next Term and in the mean time to be of his good behaviour And the said Jenings was continued on his said Recognisance till Easter Term after And the said Sir John Brampston did on the fifth of June 1640. deferr to grant His Majesties Writ of Habeas Corpus for Samuel Danvers and William Pargiter Esquires Prisoners in the Gate-House and in the Fleet and when he had granted the said Writ the said eighth Day of June after the return being the Order of the Council-Table not expressing any cause he the said Sir John Brampston deferred to Bail the said Pargiter And the eighteenth of June after made a Rule for a new return to be received which was returned the five and twentieth of the said June in haec verba Whereas His Majesty finding that His Subjects of Scotland have in Rebellious and Hostile manner Assembled themselves together and intend not only to shake off their obedience unto His Majesty but also as Enemies to Invade and Infest this His Kingdom of England to the danger of His Royal Person c. For prevention whereof His Majesty hath by the Advice of His Council-Board given special Commandment to all the Lord Lieutenants of all the Counties of this Realm with expedition to Arm and Array a certain number of able Men in each County to be prepared ready to be conducted to such places as should be appointed for their Rendezvouz in their several and respective Counties there to be conducted and drawn together in a Body for this Service And whereas His Majesty according to the Laws and Statutes of this Realm and the constant Custom of His Predecessors Kings and Queens of this Realm hath Power for the defence of this Kingdom and resisting the Force of the Enemies thereof to grant forth Commissions under His great Seal to such fit Persons as he shall make choice of to Array and Arm the Subjects of this Kingdom and to compel those who are of able Body and of able Estates to Arm themselves and such as should not be able of Bodies but of Ability in Estate to Assess them according to their Estates to contribute towards the charge of Arraying and Arming others able of Body and not being able in Estate to Arm themselves And such Persons as should be contrariant to commit to Prison there to remain untill the King should take further order therein And whereas the Earl of Exceter by vertue of His Majesties Commission to him directed for the Arraying and Arming of a certain number of Persons in the County of Northampton hath assest William Pargiter being a Man unfit of Body for that Service but being of Estate and Ability fit to contribute amongst others to pay the Summ of five Shillings towards the Arraying and Arming of others of able Bodies and wanting Ability to Array themselves And whereas we have received Information from the said Earl that the said William Pargiter hath not only in a willful and disobedient manner refused to pay the said Money assessed upon him towards so Important a Service to the disturbance and hinderance of the necessary defence of this Kingdom but also by His ill example hath misled many others and as we have just cause to believe hath practised to seduce others from that ready obedience which they owe and would otherwise have yielded to His Majesties just command for the publick defence of His Person and Kingdom which we purpose with all convenient speed to enquire further of and examin These are therefore to will and require you to take into your Custody the Person of the said William Pargiter and him safely to keep Prisoner till further Order from this Board or untill by due Course of Law he shall be delivered And the like return was then made in all things mutatis mutandis concerning the said Danvers for not paying a Summ of Money assessed upon him Yet he the said Sir John Brampston deferred to Bail the said Danvers and Pargiter but remitted the said Danvers to the Fleet where he remained till the 12 of July 1640. and the said Pargiter to the Gate-House where he remained till the Ninth of November last although the said Jenings Danvers and Pargiter upon all and every the said Returns ought to have been discharged or bailed by Law and the Councel of the said Jenings Danvers and Pargiter offered in Court very sufficient Bail And he the said Sir John Brampston being Chief Justice of the Court of Kings-Bench denyed to grant His Majesties Writ of Habeas Corpus to very many other His Majesties Subjects and when he had granted the said Writs of Habeas Corpus to very many others His Majesties Subjects and on the return no Cause appeared or such Cause only as was clearly bailable by Law yet he remanded them where they remained Prisoners very long which said deferring to grant the said Writs of Habeas Corpus and refusals and delays to discharge Prisoners or suffer them to be Bailed contained in this Article are destructive to the Fundamental Laws of this Realm and contrary to former resolutions in Parliament and to the Petition of Right which said Resolutions and Petition of Right were well known to him the said Sir John Brampston 4. That whereas there was a Cause depending in the Court Christian at Norwich between Samuel Booty Clerk and Collard for two Shillings in the Pound for Tythes for Rents of Houses in Norwich and the said Collard moved by his Councel in the Court of Kings-Bench
because he had not sued out his Pardon and there continued till March 1637. The Lord Dillon deposed much to the same effect Lord Dillon Lord Ranulagh Earl of Cork only he said my Lord gave no Vote in the Sentence The Lord Ranulagh also deposed to the same effect and that during the Debate the Lord-Deputy spake not a word or gave them interruption The Earl of Cork deposed That when the Sentence was read in the Star-Chamber my Lord-Deputy said he would not lose his share in the honour of it Lord Dillon testified the same and that my Lord said it was a Noble and Just Sentence Then the Managers proceeded to the proving his Execution of Martial-Law upon another person and William Castigatt deposed Will. Castigat That one Thomas Denewit was hanged upon the bough of a Tree as was said for a quarter of Beef but knows not whether by a Jury and he takes it my Lord Strafford was present Lord Dillon testified the same and that it was for stealing Beef and running from his Colours The Earl Ranulagh deposed the same and that the Lord Conway offered Reasons why he should not die for the Fact his running away being occasioned by his Lieutenant's bidding him desiring to be discharged go and be hanged which he did leaving his Musket with the Corporal The Lord Conway said he remembred some such thing but imperfectly The Earl answered The Earl of Strafford's Defence That the Lord Deputies have ever Exercised Martial Law upon the March of the Armies as well in time of Peace as War That the Lord Mountnorris was condemned for Breach of two of those Articles Lord Wilmot wherein he was not Judge he produced the Lord Willmot who affirmed That he himself being General the Lords Faulkland Grandison and Chichester used it That in 3 or 4 Parliaments it was never complained of That to govern an Army without it is impossible occasions rise on a saddain in an Army and for Example sake must be suddainly redressed That there were Provost Martials in every Province From whence the Earl inferred Lord Dillon he had done nothing de Novo The Lord Dillon affirmed That Martial Law had been practised and men hanged by it in times of Peace as to Mountnorris his Sentence he offered a Letter to Secretary Cook Sir Robert Farrer to show that he was a Suitor to the King for him but it was not permitted to be read Sir Robert Farrer testified that my Lord Strafford said he would give no Judgment concerning the Lord Mountnorris and that he sate bare in token that he was no Judge That he desired the Court not to look upon him but go to the Cause Sir George Wentworth averred the same and that my Lord would not permit him to give his Vote in regard he was his Kinsman That what was done was by the Council of War and that before they met he did not acquaint them with the business That his design was only to discipline the Lord Mountnorris and teach him to govern his Speech with more modesty To Denwitt he confessed and justified it from necessity the Army being then upon march to Carlisle and if not punished it would have been of dangerous Example that the Facts were proved That he had before been burnt in the hand that the Law justifies him in it producing several Statutes of Ireland 20 H. 6. c 19. 7 H. 7. c 1.10 H. 7. which make running from the Colours Felony and are in force in Ireland The Managers Urged That the Statutes were against him for that Felony is to be Tryed at Common-Law and so intended by those Statutes Then the Earl of Ely was sworn who deposed That Martial Law was in use in the Kingdom of Ireland and was two-fold Summary and Plenary the first for Rebels and Kerns that kept the Wood the other in the time of War in the Field which ended when the Army was dissolved that the use of it was rare in regard of the damage to the King the party condemned losing only life not Goods and Estate To my Lord 's saying the Nobility lost their blood in the Conquest of Ireland They said This way their own blood may be spent in the Peace of Ireland and of England too Upon Monday they proceed to the 6th Article of putting the Lord Mountnorris out of Possession of 200 l. per annum Monday March 29. 7th Day Article 6. Lord Mount-Norris Mr. Anslow upon a paper Petition of one Rolstone The Decree was read and Lord Mountnorris deposed That he was put out by my Lord's Warrant August 29. 1637. Mr. Anslow deposed the same To this the Earl Answered That his greatest grief was that the Arrow came out of the Quiver of the House of Commons that in his grey hairs he should be misunderstood by the Companions of his Youth The Earls Defence if the Decree were just he hoped it would go far in the Case Justice knowing no priviledge of Peers above common persons that it was warranted by the Statute of H. 6. which saves the King's Prerogative as also by his Commission which authorized him to proceed secundùm consuetudinem terrae which was read That it was agreeable to the practise of former Deputies who Exercised it in the nature of a Court of Requests This he proved by Robert Dillon in the Lords Cork Ely Faulkland Robert Dillon Grandison and Chichester's times of Government Lord Dillon by Orders he had seen under their hands The Lord Dillon confirming it and that he had seen several Petitions under the Lord-Deputies hands alone That he never knew my Lord Strafford meddle with matters of Law with Equity he hath which the Earl confessed He further shewed the necessity of the procedure by Petitions the Irish being Poor the person that came against the Lord Mountnorris was in forma pauperis he produced several Warrants and Orders of former Deputies to that purpose one from the Lord of Cork and particularly in the Lord Mountnorris his Case as appeared by the Decree read it was for the relief of a poor man whom my Lord Mountnorris had oppressed and violently possest himself of Lands to the value of 200 l. per annum that the Lord Mountnorris was kept in prison for contempt at the King's Suit in Star-Chamber and not for refusing to sue out his Pardon which he proved by Mr. Slingsby and Sir Adam Loftus and had he not had so short warning said he could produce the Orders of the Castle Chamber to make it Evident which the Lord Dillon also testified concluding That having authority from the King follewing the Rules and Practice of former Governors relieving the Poor who cannot follow a legal Process not intrenching upon the other Courts he hoped could never rise up in Judgment against him as Treason either in it self or by application To this Mr. Glyn Replied Manager replies That he would not acknowledg a cumulative Treason but must have
Causes for a man can scarce think of a Cause which is not comprehended within the Instructions obtained after his coming thither but I shall put your Lordship in mind of two clauses of the Instructions procured in the Eighth year of this King and after he was President that is the Clause of Habeas Corpus and Prohibitions that no man should obtain a Prohibition to stay any Suit that should be commenced before him in the Council of York That if any man should be imprisoned by any Process out of that Court he must have no Habeas Corpus A Prohibition is the only means to vindicate the estate of the Subject if it be questioned without Authority A Habeas Corpus is the only means to vindicate his Liberty if he be detained without Law but these doors must be shut against the King's Subjects that if either they be questioned or restrained before him there must be no relief How far he could go further I am to seek there being no means for the Subject to relieve himself if he be questioned for his Estate without Authority no means to redeem himself if his person be imprisoned without Law And he had so incircled himself about that if the Judges should find the party that returns not the Habeas Corpus according to Law there was a Power and a Warrant by the Instructions to the Barons to discharge the Officers of that Fine And now I refer it to your Lordships judgments Whether this be not to draw an Arbitrary Power to himself For the execution of this Power it is true it is proved to be before the Instructions in the Eighth year of the King but then it riseth the more in judgement against him for your Lordships have heard how he went into a grave Judge's Chamber blaming him for giving way to a Prohibition granting Attachments against one that moved for a Prohibition and though this was done before the Instructions were granted yet the Instructions coming at the heels of it sheweth his disposition and resolution more clearly for he acts it first and then procures this colour to protect it and though he pretends there was no proof yet I must put your Lordships in mind that when these things were in question concerning the apprehension of a Knight by a Sergeant at Arms he kneels to His Majesty That this defect might be supplyed and this jurisdiction maintained else he might go to his own Cottage And here being the just commencement of his greatness if you look to the second it follows That at the publick Assizes he declared That some were all for Law but they should find the King 's little finger heavier than the loins of the Law He did not say it was so but he infused it as much as he could into the hearts of the King's People that they should find it so and so he reflects upon the King and upon his People the words are proved And to speak them in such a presence and at such a time before the Judges and Countrey assembled they were so dangerous and so high expressions of an intention to counsel the King or act it himself to exercise an Arbitrary Government above the weight of the Law as possibly could be exprest by words And this is proved by five Witnesses and not disproved nor is any colour of disproof offered but only by Sir William Pennyman who says he heard other words but not that he heard not these words If he doth he must give me leave not to believe him for five affirmations will weigh down the proof of a thousand negatives He stays not long in England with this Power though while he stays you hear how he vexes the Subject but then he goes into Ireland and as his authority increases so he ampliates his design and no sooner is he there but the third Article is laid to his charge That when the City and Recorder of Dublin the principal City of Ireland presented the Mayor upon a solemn Speech and Discourse concerning the Laws and Liberties as your Lordships know that is the subject matter of a Speech at such presentments as when the Lord Mayor of London is presented to the King I beseech your Lordships observe the words he then used They were a Conquered Nation and that we lay not to his charge but they were to be governed as the King pleases their Charters were nothing worth and bind but during the King's pleasure I am to seek if I were to express an Arbitrary Power and Tyrannical Government how to express it in finer words and more significant terms than these That the People shall be governed at the King's Will that their Charters the sinews and ligatures of their Liberties Lands and Estates should be nothing worth and bind no longer than the King's pleasure especially being spoken upon such an occasion and the words proved by two or three Witnesses of Credit and Quality From thence we descend to Articles that shew the execution of his purpose There are three things a man enjoys by the protection of the Law that is his Life his Liberty and his Estate And now my Lords observe how he invades and exercises a Tyrannical Jurisdiction and Arbitrary Government over them all three I shall begin with the fifth Article that is concerning my Lord Mountnorris and Denwit My Lord Mountnorris a Peer of that Realm was sentenced to death by procurement of my Lord of Strafford who howsoever he pretends himself not to be a Judge in the cause yet how far he was an Abettor and Procurer and Countenancer and drawer on of that Sentence your Lordships very well remember he was sentenced to death without Law for speaking words at a private Table God knows of no manner of consequence in the World concerning the treading upon my Lord of Strafford 's Toe the Sentence procured seven months after the words spoken and contrary to Law and himself being put in mind of it my Lord Mountnorris desiring to have the benefit of the Law and yet he refusing it And then it was in time of Peace when all the Courts of Justice were open and to sentence a man to death of that Quality my Lord of Strafford himself being present an author a drawer on of it makes it very hainous Your Lordships remember this Article was fully proved and though he pretends His Authority by a Letter from His Majesty I shall in due time give a full answer to that so that it shall rise up in Judgment against him to aggravate his offence and that in a great measure Here he exercises a power over Life his excuse was That he procured a Pardon for my Lord Mountnorris but the Power was exercised and the Tyranny appeared to be the more He would first sentence him to death and then rejoyce in his Power that he might say There remains no more but my Command to the Provost Marshal to do execution To exercise a power over his life and to abuse him
France was in subjection to the Crown of England there were at the beginning of the Parliaments Receivers and Tryers of Petitions for those parts appointed I believe your Lordships will have no Case shewed of any Plea to the Jurisdiction of the Parliaments of England in any things done in any parts wheresoever in subjection to the Crown of England The last thing I shall offer to your Lordships is the Case of 19 Eliz. in my Lord Dyer 306. and Judge Crompton's Book of the Jurisdiction of Courts fol. 23. The opinion of both these Books is That an Irish Peer is not Tryable here it 's true a Scotch or French Nobleman is Tryable here as a common person the Law takes no notice of their Nobility because those Countreys are not governed by the Laws of England but Ireland being governed by the same Laws the Peers there are Tryable according to the Law of England only per pares By the same reason the Earl of Strafford not being a Peer of Ireland is not tryable by the Peers of Ireland so that if he be not tryable here he is tryable no where My Lords In case there be a Treason and a Traytor within the Statute and that he be not tryable here for it in the ordinary way of Judicature if that jurisdiction fail this by way of Bill doth not Attainders of Treason in Parliament are as legal as usual by Act of Parliament as by Judgment I have now done with the Statutes 25 Edw. 3. and 18 Hen. 6 My Lord of Strafford hath offended against both the Kingdoms and is guilty of High-Treason by the Laws of both My Lords In the fifth place I am come to the Treasons at the Common-Law the endeavouring to subvert the Fundamental Laws and Government of the Kingdom and to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government In this I shall not at all labour to prove That the endeavouring by Words Counsels and Actions to subvert the Laws is Treason at the Common-Law if there be any Common-Law Treasons at all left nothing is Treason if this be not to make a Kingdom no Kingdom take the Polity and Government away England is but a piece of Earth wherein so many men have their Commorancy and abode without ranks or distinction of men without property in any thing further than possession no Law to punish the Murthering or robbing one another That of 33 Hen. 8. of introducing the Imperial Law sticks not with your Lordships it was in case of an Appeal to Rome these Appeals in Cases of Marriages and other causes counted Ecclesiastical had been frequent had in most Kings Reigns been tolerated some in times of Popery put a conscience upon them the Statutes had limited the penalty to a Praemunire only neither was that a total subversion only an Appeal from the Ecclesiastical Court here in a single Cause to the Court of Rome and if Treason or not that Case proves not a Treason may be punished as a Felony a Felony as a Trespass if his Majesty so please The greater includes the less in the Case of Praemunire in the Irish Reports that which is there declared to be Treason was proceeded upon only as a Praemunire The things most considerable in this is Whether the Treasons at Common-Law are taken away by the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. which is to speak against both the direct words and scope of that Statute In it there 's this clause That because many other like Cases of Treason might fall out which are not there declared therefore it is enacted That if any such Case come before the Judges they shall not proceed to Judgment till the Case be declared in Parliament whether it ought to be adjudged Treason or not These words and the whole scope of that Statute shews that it was not the meaning to take away any Treasons that were so before but only to regulate the Jurisdiction and manner of Tryal Those that were single and certain Acts as conspiring the Kings Death Levying War Counterfeiting the Money or Great-Seal Killing a Judge these are left to the ordinary Courts of Justice The others not depending upon single Acts but upon constructions and necessary Inferences they thought it not fit to give the inferior Courts so great a latitude here as too dangerous to the Subject those they restrained to the Parliament This Statute was the great security of the Subjects made with such wisdom as all the succeeding Ages have approved it it hath often passed through the Furnace but like Gold hath left little or nothing The Statute of the First H. 4. Cap. 10. is in these words Whereas in the Parliament held the 21 year of Richard the 2. divers pains of Treason were ordained insomuch that no man did know how to behave himself to do say or speak It is accorded that in no time to come any Treason be adjudged otherwise than it was ordained by the Statute of 25th of Edw. 3. It hath been said To what end is this Statute made if it takes not away the Common-Law Treasons remaining after the Statute of the 25th of Edw. 3 There be two main things which this Statute doth First it takes away for the future all the Treasons made by any Statute since 25 Edw. 3. to the 1 H. 4. even to that time for in respect that by another Act in that Parliament the Statute of 21 Rich. 2. was repealed it will not be denyed but that this Statute repeals more Treasons than these of the 21 R. 2. It repeals all Statute-Treasons but those in 25 Edw. 3. Secondly It not only takes away the Statute-Treasons but likewise the declared Treasons in Parliament after the 25th of Edw. 3. as to the future after Declaration in Parliament the inferior Courts might judge these Treasons for the Declaration of a Treason in Parliament after it was made was sent to the inferior Courts that toties quoties the like Case fell out they might proceed therein the Subject for the future was secured against these so that this Statute was of great use But by the very words of it I shall refer all Treasons to the provision of 25 Edw. 3. it leaves that entire and upon the old bottom The Statute of 1 Queen Mary Cap. 1. saith That no offences made Treason by any Act of Parliament shall thenceforth be taken or adjudged to be Treason but only such as be declared and expressed to be Treason by the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. Concerning Treason or Declarat on of Treason and no others And further provides That no pains of Death penalties or forfeiture in any wise shall ensue for Committing any Treason other than such as be in the Statute of 25 Edw. 3. ordained and provided any Act of Parliament or any Declaration or matter to the contrary in any wise notwithstanding By the first of this Statute only offences made Treason by Act of Parliament are taken away the Common-Law-Treasons are no ways touched the words And no others
for an Apostle much less a Bishop And abating the Unlawfulness which this Instance for ever will supersede there can be no Inconvenience but may be thought abundantly Recompensed in a Christian Common-Wealth by the Sage and Religious Advice of these Learned Reverend and Pious Prelates in framing Laws for a Christian Society and the good Government of the State which is imbodied into the Church in a Christian Commonwealth and when this is winnowed from his Lordship's Speech all the rest will be but Chaff The Lord General produced a Letter sent to his Excellency from Sir Thomas Glemham at Hull declaring the great Disorders The Soldiers Disorderly and Mutinous for want of Pay and Unruliness of the Souldiers there and of the Mutiny that lately was among them in which Uproar one of their Captains was killed and others threatned And he further informed the House That the Army through want of Money and Provisions is so dispersed into several places that they are no Security to those Parts in case the Army of the Scots should advance Whereupon it was resolved to have a Conference with the Commons about the state of the Army Mr. Munday June 7. Report of the Case between the Bishop of Ely and the Lady Hatton Whitlock Reports from the Committee to whom the Lady Hattons Complaint against the Bishop of Ely was referred That Richard Cox Bishop of Ely in the 18 Eliz. made a Lease of some Old Buildings and Lands next Ely House to Sir Christopher Hatton Lord Chancellor of England for 21 Years he intending there to make a Habitation for himself That 19 Eliz. Bishop Cox Conveyed the Inheritance to the Crown the Intention of it for the Vse of the said Chancellor Hatton to whom it came afterward In the Preamble of that Conveyance there was a Clause for the Bishop of Ely and his Successors to redeem the Premisses upon the repayment of such Moneys as the Lord Chancellor Hatton should disburse who disbursed in Building One thousand eight hundred and ninety pounds odd Money Chancellor Hatton intailed the Premisses and they were after Extended for a Debt to the Queen and an Act of Parliament was passed to Enable the Sale of them by another Sir Christopher Hatton who was seized by the Entail and who did for valuable Considerations 5 Jac. sell the premisses to the Lady Eliz. Hatton the Petitioner who since Expended in Building Repairing and Improving it Seven Thousand eight hundred pounds odd mony and ever since the purchase being 34 Years till Nov. 14 Car. when the now Bishop of Ely Dr. Wren preferred his Bill into the Court of Requests to have the House and Lands restored to his See by the Clause of Redemption in the Conveyance from Bishop Cox pretending she had notice of it She in answer upon Oath denies that she had any notice of the Trust and none is proved by the Bishop the Cause came to hearing in Nov. 15 Car. but no Judgment though the Lady Hatton moved they would do it and of this suspending of Judgment my Lady complains is a great prejudice to her Whereupon it was Resolved c. That the suspending of Judgment in the Court of Requests in the Case depending between the Bishop of Ely and the Lady Hatton is an unnecessary Delay Resolved c. That the Lady Hatton is a Purchaser upon valuable Considerations and hath been at great Expences in Building Repairing and Improving the said Estate Resolved c. That the Estate of the Lady Hatton being good in Law is not redeemable in Equity nor subject to the said pretended Trust Resolved c. That the Bill depending in the Court of Requests between the Bishop of Ely and the Lady Hatton ought to be dismissed upon the merits of the Cause After which the Lay-Preachers Spencer Lay-Preachers reprehended Green Robinson c. who had been sent for by Order of the House were called in and Mr. Speaker gave them a reprehension telling them That the House had a general distast at this their proceedings and that if they should offend at any time in the like kind again this House would take Care they should be severely punished It is Easy to Observe with what tenderness these Sacrilegious Invaders of the Calling of the Ministry were treated by these High-flown Pretenders to Reformation who were dismissed for this Offence against God and all good men only with fair Warning and a Gentle Reproof when at the same time the Orthodox and Regular Clergy who had a Lawful Commission to speak the Truth and stand up in Vindication of the Church were upon every frivolous complaint from their Enemies the Sectaries for every word which could be tortured to depose any thing against the Proceedings of the Commons sent for in Custody imprisoned Outraged Stigmatized and many of them and their poor and innocent Families utterly ruined and undone The House of Lords being adjourned into a Committee during pleasure to Debate the Reasons sent up from the Commons at the Conference touching the Bishops not Voting in Parliament and after a long Debate the House was resumed Then the Bill was read a third time Entituled The Bill against Bishops thrown out of the Lords House An Act for restraining Bishops and others of the Clergy in Holy Orders from intermeddling in Secular Affairs And being put to the Question Whether it should pass as a Law it was Resolved by the Major part That it should not Upon Letters this day Received from Sir Jacob Ashley Tuesday June 8. it was declared That notwithstanding the Information of Mr. Darley against him yet he was in the good Opinion of the House The House was then informed that the Forty thousand pounds and the Hundred and twenty thousand pounds promised to be lent by the City were yet unpaid in notwithstanding many motions Hereby it appears that Alderman Pennington did not always speak the Truth in that House when he informed them That upon the King 's passing the Bill of Attainder against the Earl of Strafford Money came in as fast as it could be told The Cessation of Arms continued a fortnight longer from the 24th of June upon the same terms The Bills for taking away the Court of Star-Chamber Star-Chamber and Council Table Bills read and passed Report from the Close Committee and Regulating the Proceedings of the Council Board were read a second time and passed Mr. Fines Reports from the Close Committee Matters concerning the Tower of London the French the Flight of the Gentlemen accused of a Conspiracy in the Army to bring them up to Aw the Parliament The Earl of Strafford's design to have made an Escape had he not been prevented The Papists resorting into Hampshire towards Portsmouth and the Fortifying of it Mr. Jermyn's desire to get Portsmouth into his hands And the French Troops drawing down to Callice Diep and Granville Exceptions were taken at the Lord Digby for words spoken concerning an Oath which Colonel Goring
confessed he had taken to be secret Exceptions taken against the L. Digby for words concerning Goring's Oath saying he was a perjured man After a warm Debate upon it and he had in his Place Explained himself yet the House not being satisfied with it he was ordered to withdraw A Petition was this day read in the House of Lords The Factious Sectaries disturb the People at the Communion declaring the great Disorders committed in the Parish Churches of Saint Saviours and St. Olaves in Southwark in time of the Administration of the Communion hereupon it was Ordered That the Names of the particular Offenders be given in to this House and then this House will give such Order therein as stands with Justice and the Desert of the Cause These were the Men for Reformation whom nothing not the most Sacred Duty of Christian Religion could keep within the bounds of Decency and Order The Lords finding themselves Extremely Pressed by the bringing Writs of Errors upon Judgments into their House whereby the Publique Affairs were much retarded Order of the Lords about Writs of Error made this Order Ordered That such persons that bring in Writs of Error into this House upon a Judgment given in a Court of Justice and if it appear that there is no Just Cause of Error in the said Judgment but merely for delay of Justice and Execution that then such Costs is to be given against the Parties that bring the Writ of Error as the House shall think fit to give in that Case And that the Record shall be remitted whence it came that the Defendant may take out Execution upon the Judgment The House of Commons Sitting late the last Night upon the Debate concerning the Lord Digby Wednesday June 9. and some persons calling for Candles which the major part opposed being inclined to rise but by mistake the Candles being brought in Sir William Widdrington and Sir Herbert Price sent to the Tower for bringing in Candles against the desire of the House and Sir William Widdrington and Sir Herbert Price taking them from the Serjeant without a General Command which occasioned a great disturbance in the House Mr. Hollis made a Speech in aggravation of their Offence shewing That the House of Commons being a Rule and Example of Order there ought to be no Disorders within those Walls for that if there were such within well might it be Expected there would be without and that it might be the occasion of shedding much blood among themselves if upon such a difference Parties should have sided one against another Whereupon though both the Gentlemen made their Submission and craved the Pardon of the House yet they were immediately committed Prisoners to the Tower during the Pleasure of the House The House then fell upon the last Nights Debate concerning Colonel Goring's Discovery and it was Resolved Vote in favour of Colonel Goring's discovery c. That Col. Goring in his Depositions concerning the Discovery has done nothing contrary to Justice or Honor but has therein deserved well of the Commonwealth and of this House By this time I doubt not but the Reader 's Curiosity will prompt him to know the meaning of this Conspiracy which made as much noise in London and indeed throughout England as ever the famous Conspiracy of Cataline did at Rome I will give him the best Information I can from the Memoires of the Lord Manchester and in his own words TO prevent the Earl of Strafford's Death An Account of the Conspiracy in the Army from the Memoires of the Earl of Manchester saith he several Designs had been upon the Wheel but all failed therefore it was consulted how to Engage the Army in the North to serve the King in order to his Freedom from the Parliaments Fetters metre le Roy hors d' paye as the Royalists termed it This occasioned several Addresses to the Principal Commanders in the North but they were fearful and backward to entertain any Motions or Propositions which might put them upon a breach with the Parliament But Mr. Percy and Mr. Jermin finding a great discontent in those Commanders of the Army who were Members of Parliament as Col. Wilmot Col. Ashburnham and Col. Pollard who thought that their Services had merited much better of the Parliament then that the Scotch Officers and Scots Army should be preferred before them in their Gratuities and in their Pay These Commanders owning that the Parliament had disobliged them gave Mr. Percy a rise to press with greater Earnestness his design of Engaging them to serve the King and to that End an Oath of Secrecy was â—amed and others were admitted into their Confederacy as Mr. Jâ—â—â—in and Mr. Goring and Propositions were framed But it fell out in this as in most Conspiracies of the like Nature that though the same Oath was taken by all that met together yet it was not taken by all with the same persuasion or intention For Col. Goring whose Ambition was not answered in being promised the Place of Lieutenant General of the Army and finding others employed whose persons he disliked he having a full Information from Mr. Percy and Mr. Jermin of all the Design thought it would tend most to his Security and Advantage to reveal the Conspiracy and being versed in all the Methods of falshood he chose the Time and Means which he thought would be most acceptable and obliging to the Parliament He therefore first imparts it to the Earl of Newport who was his particular Friend and desired him to bring him to some other Lords of the Parliament such as might be most likely to prevent that Mischief which was intended and accordingly the next day about Evening the Lord Newport brought him to the Earl of Bedford and the Lord Mandeville to whom he first made a Protestation of his Fidelity to the Parliament and of his readiness to run all hazards for the Safety of it Then he imparted the substance of the Design and desired them to make what Use of it they thought fit for their own and the Common-wealths Security but not to bring him as the Accuser of the Persons except Necessity did require it The Lords who had this Design revealed unto them thought it necessary to discharge themselves and communicated it to some Members of the House of Commons by whose Advice it was agreed That Goring should repair to his Government at Portsmouth and that so soon as he was gone the Persons whom he had discovered to be Actors in this Design should be apprehended but private Notice being given to Mr. Percy and Mr. Jermin they prevented the Justice of the Parliament by their Escape out of England Mr. Percy with some difficulty and hazzard took Shipping in a private Port in Sussex Mr. Jermin ventured upon Goring's Faithfulness to him and brought unto him a Warrant under the King's Hand to see him safely transported in one of his Frigots which he obeyed with Care and
Humphrey Davenport did then also without any cause Imprison the said Robert Hoblins and bound him to the good behaviour That whereas in the Month of April Decimo sexto Caroli the Officers of the Custom-House having Seized a Ship of one Samuel Warner Laden with Tobacco being the Goods of the said Warner the Bulk of the said Ship not being broken and no Information Exhibited for the King according to the course of the Exchequer for any Duty the Barons were moved that the said Ship might be restored to the Proprietors giving security to pay such duties as did belong to the King but upon the allegation of the Kings Attorney that there needed no information because there was no penalty the said Sir Humphrey Davenport being then Lord Chief Baron of His Majesties Court of Exchequer together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court did contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm deny the restitution of the said Ship unless all the duties demanded by the Farmers of the Custom-House were first paid Hereupon the said Warner brought an Action of Trover in the Office of Pleas in the Exchequer against the said Officers that Seized his Ship and Goods Whereupon the Kings Attorney General exhibited an Information by English Bill in the Exchequer Chamber against the said Warner setting forth that Customs and Subsidies upon Merchandise were a great part of the Kings Revenue and payable to him And that the said Ship was Seized for non-payment of the aforesaid duties notwithstanding the said Warner then Proprietor Prosecuted the Officers upon a Suit at Law and prayes that he may answer the said Information before any further proceedings be had at Law Thereupon the said Sir Humphrey Davenport together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court of Exchequer ordered that the Proprietor moving for the delivery of the said Goods should first answer to the Information after which the said Warner demurred to the said Information in regard no Title for any certain duty was set forth by the Information which demurrer yet remains not over-ruled but the said Sir Humphrey Davenport with the said other Barons without over-ruling the demurrer Ordered because Warner had put in a demurrer and not answered to the said Information that he should not proceed upon the Action of Trover The Proprietor being thus prevented of his remedy by Action at Law sued forth a Replevin and upon pretence of viewing the said Goods caused them to be brought forth of a Cellar hired by a Deputy to the Farmers to that use and being brought forth they were taken by the Sheriffs of London by vertue of the said Replevin and upon Oath made of the manner of the taking as aforesaid before the Barons and upon view of the President Inrolls the Case the said Sir Humphrey Davenport with the said other Barons adjudged that the said Goods were not Replevisable and granted an Injunction to maintain Possession of them as they were before And the said House of Commons by Protestation saving to themselves only the Liberties of Exhibiting at any time hereafter any other Accusation or Impeachment against the said Sir Humphrey Davenport and also of replying to the answer that he the said Sir Humphrey Davenport shall make unto the said Articles or any of them or of offering proof of the Premisses or any of their Impeachments or Accusations that shall be Exhibited by them as the Case shall according to the course of Parliaments require do pray that the said Sir Humphrey Davenport Lord Chief Baron of His Majesties Court of Exchequer may be put to answer to all and every the Premisses and that such Proceedings Examinations Tryals and Judgments may be upon every of them had and used as is agreeable to Law and Justice The ARTICLES against Mr. Justice Trevor were as followeth Articles of the House of Commons in the Name of themselves and of all the Commons of England against Sir Thomas Trevor Knight one of the Barons of His Majesties Court of Exchequer Impeaching him as followeth 1. THat in or about November 4. Car. divers Goods and Merchandises whereof John Rolls George Moore and other Merchants of London were Proprietors being Seized and conveyed into certain Store-Houses at the Custom-House by Sir John Worstenham Abraham Dawes and other the Farmers and Officers of the Customs and by them there detained because the said Proprietors refused to pay the Subsidy of Tonnage and Poundage pretended to be due and demanded by the said Farmers and Officers on His Majesties behalf for the said Merchandises whereas no such Subsidy or Duty of Tonnage or Poundage was due or payable for the same no Subsidy of Tonnage and Poundage having been granted by Parliament to His Majesty The said John Rolls and others the Proprietors of the said Goods having by reason of such unlawful Seizure and Detainer as aforesaid Sued forth one or more Writ or Writs of Replevin directed to the Sheriffs of London being the proper remedy provided by the Law to regain the Possession of Goods taken and with-held from the Owners contrary to Law the said Sir Thomas Trevor Knight then and yet one of the Barons of His Majesties said Court of Exchequer together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court upon Information to them given That the said Proprietors or some of them had Sued forth and did Prosecute such Writ or Writs of Replevin for the delivery of the said Goods did order an Injunction under Seal of the said Court to Issue forth directed to the Sheriffs of London commanding them thereby not to Execute the said Writ or Writs of Replevin or any like Writ thereafter to be Sued forth by any Person or Persons for the delivery of any Goods in the like nature detained And it did declare and order publickly in the said Court of Exchequer that the said Goods by Law were not Replevisable alledging for cause that the said Goods were in the Kings own Possession whereas the same did not judicially appear to them and they did well know that the said Goods were at that time in the Possession of the Farmers and Lessees of the said Customs and no Lawful cause to them appearing or suggested of the taking and detaining of the said Goods which Injunctions and Declaration so granted and made were and are against the Laws of this Realm and in subversion of the common right and remedy of the Subject for regaining the Possession of his Goods being taken and with-holden from him without Lawful cause That the Sheriffs of London for the time being served with the said injunction did forbear to execute the said Writ or Writsof Replevin by means whereof the said Goods continued so detained as aforesaid contrary to Law from the Month of November till the Month of June following That the said Sir Thomas Trevor and other the Barons aforesaid knowing the said Goods to be unlawfully Seized and Detained for the pretended Duties and
Subsidy of Tonnage and Poundage whereas no such were payable by Law did from time to time delay the respective Proprietors from having restitution of their said Goods being often in Court moved therein with intention thereby to force the Proprietors by wanting their Goods and the use thereof to pay all such Summs as the said Officers of the Customs pretended to be due to His Majesty That to the end aforesaid the said Sir Thomas Trevor and the said other Barons refused to accept of any Security to be given by the said Proprietors upon restitution had of their Goods for payment of all such Duties as should be made appear to be made payable to His Majesty in such manner as the said Barons should direct That the said Sir Thomas Trevor and other the Barons aforesaid knowing that the said Summs demanded on His Majesties behalf by the said Officers of the Customs not to be due by Law did refuse to order restitution of any part of those Goods so detained as aforesaid to the Proprietors thereof unless the said Proprietors would deposite all such Summs of Money as the said Officers respectively demanded of them for pretended Duties to His Majesty and the said Proprietors refusing to deposite the said Summs demanded the said Sir Thomas Trevor and other the Barons aforesaid did order the said Officers to detain double the value of the Summs by them demanded for pretended Duties to His Majesty and to restore the residue the said Sir Thomas Trevor and other the said Barons then knowing that the pretended Summs demanded by the said Officers were not by Law due or payable to His Majesty 2. That in or about January 4. Car. The said Officers having Seized several Merchandises of the Goods of Richard Chambers Merchant upon the pretences aforesaid did detain the same and the said Chambers Prosecuting by plaint to have his said Goods Replevied the said Sir Thomas Trevor together with the said other Barons did in like manner in the said Court of Exchequer declare the said Chambers his Goods not to be Replevisable and enjoyned the Sheriffs of London to proceed no further therein no cause to them appearing of such Seizure or Detainer And the said Sir Thomas Trevor and other the Barons of the said Court refused to order the delivery of the said Chambers his Goods upon good security offered by him to pay all such Summs as should be made appear to be due and for which the said Goods were pretended to be detained and the said Barons being often moved in Court therein did refuse to order restitution of any part of the said Chamber 's Goods until the 23. of November 5 Carol. and then ordered that the said Officers should detain in their hands double the value of the Summs by them demanded and restitution of the residue to be made to the said Chambers no cause of detaining any part of the said Goods to them in any wise appearing 3. That whereas in the Month of October in the fourth year of His said Majestie 's Reign the Farmers and Officers of the Custom-House having Seized great quantities of Currants being the Goods of Samuel Vassall Merchant and having conveyed them into certain Store-Houses at the Custom-House and detained them because the said Samuel Vassall refused to pay an Imposition of five Shillings six Pence upon every Hundred weight of the said Currants pretended to be due and demanded by the said Farmers and Officers on His Majesties behalf for the said Currants whereas no such Imposition was due or payable for the same but the said Imposition was and is against the Laws of this Realm And whereas also in Michaelmas Term in the said fourth year of His Majesties Reign His Majesties then Attorney General exhibited an Information by English Bill in the Exchequer-Chamber against the said Samuel Vassall setting forth that King James by his Letters Patents Dated the third of November in the second year of His Reign did command that the said Imposition of five Shillings six Pence upon every Hundred Weight of Currants should be demanded and received And that His Majesty that now is by His Letters Patents Dated the six and twentieth Day of July in the second year of His Reign did by Advice of his Privy Council declare His Will and Pleasure to be that Subsidies Customs and Imposts should be Levied in such manner as they were Levied in the time of King James and the same and the Farmers to continue until it might receive a setling by Parliament and commanded the Levying and receiving the same accordingly and that the said Samuel Vassall before the first Day of October then last past before the said Information Exhibited did bring into the Port of London in Ships four thousand six hundred thirty eight hundred weight of Currants and that Richard Carmarthen Surveyor in the said Port of London the said first day of October demanded of the said Samuel Vassall the said Imposition of five Shillings six Pence for every Hundred weight of the said Currants and that the said Samuel Vassall refused to pay the said Imposition and unjustly detained it from the King To which Information the said Samuel Vassal appeared and Pleaded the Statute of Magna Charta and the Statute De tallagio non concedendo and that he was a Subject Born under the King's Allegiance and a Merchant of London using that Trade and that the said Summ of five Shillings six Pence upon every Hundred weight of Currants was and is malum tolnetum and not antiqua seu recta consuetudo and that it was imposed without assent of Parliament To which Plea the said Attorney General demurred in Law and the said Samuel Vassall joyned in demurrer with him That he the said Sir Thomas Trevor being then and yet one of the Barons of His Majesties Court of Exchequer together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court knowing the said Currants to be unlawfully Seized and detained for the pretended Duty of five Shillings six Pence Imposition upon every Hundred weight of the said Currants whereas no such Imposition was payable by Law did from time to time delay the said Samuel Vassall from having restitution of his said Goods being often in Court moved therein with intention thereby to enforce the said Samuel Vassall by wanting the said Goods and the use thereof to pay all such Summs as the said Officers of the Customs pretended to be due to His Majesty and Imprisoned the said Samuel Vassall because he refused to pay such Summs of Money as were demanded of him for the said unlawful Imposition and that in Trinity Term in the sixth year of His Majesties Reign the said case coming to be argued in open Court upon the demurrer the said Sir Thomas Trevor contrary to his Oath and contrary to the Laws of this Realm and to the great impoverishment of the said Samuel Vassall did together with the rest of the then Barons of the said Court of Exchequer give
a Conference by the Earl of Bath to the Commons THese are to signifie to this House That whereas He sent an Answer this day to both Houses concerning the Third Head lest there should be any mistake upon the word Slander His Majesty declares he did not mean all of either House of Parliament or any Members thereof Upon the Reading of the Petition of the Arch-Bishop of Canterbury concerning his payment of Poll-mony It was Ordered Order of the Lords about the Arch-Bishops paying Poll-Money To be left to be paid according to the Act of Parliament The House for freer Debate was put into a Committee to consider of the Court of York and to give judgment herein and after much Debate the House was reassumed and it was Resolved upon the Question by the Major Part Resolves of the Lords concerning the Court at York That the Commission and Instructions whereby the President and Council of the North exercise a Jurisdiction is Illegal both in the Creation and Execution Resolved c. That this Commission and Instructions is unprofitable to His Majesty Resolved upon the Question Nemine Contradicente That this Commission and Instructions is inconvenient and grievous to His Majesties Subjects of those Parts Resolved upon the Question Nemine Contradicente That this House doth joyn with the House of Commons in beseeching His Majesty that the Present Commission and Instructions may be revoked and no such granted for the Future MEmorandum A Salvo for the Judges of the Court of York This House doth declare seeing the Commission and Instructions of the Court of York is Illegal in the Creation and Execution that the former Judges in the Court of York who have given Judgement and proceeded as they thought in their Consciences upon True and Legal Grounds shall not be liable to be Questioned but in case of Injustice and that none in that Case shall be barred of their Appeal And if it appear that there is a Necessity for the Ease of that Country to have a Court this House will advise with the House of Commons how one may be Established by Law for the Ease of those Parts And the Earl of Essex Earl of Bristol Viscount Say and Seal Bishop of Lincoln Lord Wharton Lord Kimbolton were appointed to prepare Heads for a Conference with the Commons concerning the aforesaid Particulars that so the Persons that were Judges and the Acts of that Court may have a Saving for them If humane Bodies and Minds are subject to the secret Influences of the Heavenly Bodies certainly England and the rest of the Brittish Dominions were at this time under the Aspects of some Violent and Malignant Configurations and there seemed to be an Universal Inclination in the People every where to Tumults Mutinies Violence and Injustice the Lords House was full of Complaints of the Disorders of this Nature throwing up Inclosures and disturbing the Possessions of others and that not singly but by Multitudes and with such Arms as Rusticks are wont to make Use of upon such Occasions of their Madness And of this the Lords were so sensible that they made this following Order WHereas daily Complaints are made unto this House of violent breaking into Possessions Order of the Lords concerning Violent and Tumultuous breaking into Possessions July 13. 1641. and Inclosures in Riotous and Tumultuous manner in several parts of this Kingdom without any due proceedings by Course of Law to warrant the same which hath been observed to have been more frequently done since this Parliament began then formerly it is thought fit and so Ordered by the Lords in Parliament That no Inclosure or Possession shall be Violently and in a Tumultuous manner disturbed or taken away from any man which was in Possession the first Day of this Parliament or before but by due Course and Form of Law and that such Possessions of all men shall continue and remain unto them as they were on the first Day of this Meeting of Parliament unless it have been or shall be by some Legal way of proceeding in some of His Majesties Courts of Law or Equity or by some Act or Order of the Parliament determined or ordered to the Contrary And in all such Cases where any such unlawful disturbance of the quiet Possession of any man hath happened or shall happen the High Sheriff of the County shall have Power by virtue of this Order together with two of the Justices of the Peace of the said County next or near to the place and such other or others as he or they shall think fit to take with him or them to repair unto the place where such Tumults happen to be and appease and quiet the Possession of the said Lands and Inclosures so disturbed as aforesaid and shall see to and cause that the Possession be continued unto the present Owners as aforesaid until by a Legal Course in some Court of Law or Equity or by order of Parliament it be determined or Ordered to the contrary The Lord Bishop of Lincoln Reported Report about the Officers of the Star-Chamber That the Lords Committees appointed to Consider of the Petition of the Officers of the Star-Chamber have fully heard their Cause and they are of Opinion and do not conceive of any fitter way of Relief for these Poor Officers the King's Servants then to remit them to the King's Mercy that His Majesty would be Graciously pleased to allow a Proportionable Relief for these Poor men out of such Fines as may accrue unto His Majesty in the High Court of Parliament to be apportioned by the Lords of the Committees or otherwise as their Lordships shall be pleased to approve thereof and Order it Upon Report this Day made unto the House by the Right Honourable the Lord Seymour that the difference between the Parishioners of St. Report about the Rioters at St. Thomas the Apostle's in pulling down the Rails Thomas the Apostle complained of to the Lords in Parliament was composed by his Lordship to whom the business was referred It is Ordered by the Lords Spiritual and Temporal in the High Court of Parliament Assembled that the said difference together with the Cause depending before their Lordships shall by virtue of this Order be fully ended and determined and Lastly that John Blackwell shall for himself others Petitioned against forthwith pay unto the Overseers of the Poor of that Parish upon sight hereof to the use of the said Poor the full Summ of ten Pounds of Lawful Money of England and hereof they are not to fail as they will answer to the contrary There being a Report spread abroad that His Majesty intended to send the Lord Digby abroad under some honourable Character Tuesday July 13. and as was said Ambassadour into France his Enemies in the House of Commons being extreamly nettled at it were resolved if possible to set a brand of Infamy upon his Lordship and therefore not content to have disgracefully Expelled him
which moved them to desire the Horse might be first Disbanded was of very special Importance and still inclineth them to continue the same expectation for those who are yet undisbanded but for the time past they rest satisfied in the answer and proceedings of your Excellency assuring themselves That though there was some difference in the way yet you fully agreed with them in the end which is to ease the Common-wealth and settle the publick Peace with as much expedition as may be for the more speedy effecting whereof there is already 23000 l. on the way and Order given for 27000 l. more to be sent with all speed and a Course taken by the House of Commons to quicken the payments of the Poll Money in the Nine Shires adjoyning to York and both Houses of Parliament have by an express Ordinance commanded the Sheriffs of eight other Counties to bring all their Money immediately to York whereby the House conceiveth and hopeth your Excellency will be supplied with Treasure sufficient to Disband the remainder of the Army at the time prescribed or sooner if it may be and that by your prudent and faithful effecting thereof the heavy burthen of Care and Pains which lies upon you in the discharge of this great Trust will be removed and shall end in the thanks and obligations of this House and of the whole Kingdom producing to your Excellency such an Increase of Honor and happiness as shall be suitable to your own Merit and the desires of Your Excellency's humble Servant Edward Littleton Custos Sigilli To stir up the City to lend more money the Commons fell upon the Debate of the Case of London-Derry and thereupon Mr. Whistler Reports from the Committee appointed to examin that matter the Case of London-Derry upon which it was 1 Resolved upon the Question Votes about London-Derry in Ireland That it is the Opinion of this House that the Citizens of London were sollicited and pressed to the under taking of the Plantation of London-Derry 2 Resolved c. That the Copy attested with Mr. Soams his Hand is a true Copy of the Sentence in the Star-Chamber given against the Mayor and Commonalty of the City of London and the Society of the Governor and Assistants of London of the new Plantation of Vlster in the Kingdom of Ireland 3 Resolved c. That the Order made in the Court of Star-Chamber Dated 8. May 8 Car. is unlawful both for the Matter Persons and time therein prefixed 4 Resolved c. That the King was not deceived in the Grant which he made unto the Society of Governors and Assistants of London of the new Plantation of Vlster in the Kingdom of Ireland in particular not in creating a new Corporation called the Society of the Governor and Assistants of London of the new Plantation of Vlster in the Kingdom of Ireland 5 Resolved c. That in creating the new Corporation of the Society of the Governor c. The King did not by that Patent grant more Lands then was by him intended to be granted nor was therein deceived 6 Resolved c. That it doth not appear by sufficient Proof that the Citizens of London were tyed to perform the Printed Articles and consequently not bound to plant with English and Scots nor restrained from planting with Natives 6 Resolved c. That though by the 27 Article the City was to build 200 Houses in Derry and 100 Houses at Colerain by the first Day of November 1611 admitting the Houses were not Built nor the Castle of Culmore repaired by the time prefixed yet this is no Crime nor cause for giving Damages in regard the City had not their Patent until the 29th of March 1613. 8 Resolved c. That there is no proof that the Governor and Assistants of London of the new Plantations or any of the twelve Companies did make any Lease unto any Popish Recusant nor of any decay of Religion there by default of the Planters 9 Resolved c. That there is no proof of any default in the Planters for not making of a sufficient number of Free-holders nor any Article that doth tye them thereunto 10 Resolved c. That there is no proof that the City of London or their Governor of the new Plantation have felled any Trees in the Woods called Glancanking and Killitrough contrary to their Covenant 11 Resolved c. That the not conveying of Glebe-Lands to the several Incumbents of the several Parish Churches in regard they did not enjoy the Lands is no Crime punishable nor cause of Seizure of their Lands 12 Resolved c. That the breach of Covenant if any such were is no sufficient cause to forfeit Lands 13 Resolved c. That the breach of Covenant is no Crime but Tryable in the ordinary Courts of Justice 14 Resolved c. That the Court of Star-Chamber whil'st it stood as a Court had not any power to examin or determin breach of Covenant or Trust 15 Resolved c. That the Court of Star-Chamber while it stood a Court had no power to examin Free-hold Inheritance 16 Resolved c. That the Sentence upon these two Corporations aggregate no particular Person being Guilty is against Law 17 Resolved c. That in all the proof of this cause there doth not appear matter sufficient to convince the City of London of any Crime 18 Resolved c. That upon the whole matter this Sentence in the Star-Chamber was unlawful and unjust 19 Resolved c. That this composition and agreement made with the City upon these Terms in this time of extremity ought not to bind the City 20 Resolved c. That this House is of Opinion that when the King shall be pleased to repay those Monies which he hath received upon this composition and such Rents as he hath received by colour of this Sentence that then His Majesty shall be restored to the same State he was in and the Patent thereupon gotten shall be cancelled or surrendred 21 Resolved c. That the Citizens of London and all those against whom the Judgment is given in the Scire facias shall be discharged of that Judgment 22 Resolved c. That the Opinion of this House is That they think fit that both the Citizens of London and those of the new Plantation and all under Tennants and all those put out of possession by the Sequestration or Kings Commissioners shall be restored to the same State they were in before the Sentence in the Star-Chamber The Plague which had for some time visited the City of London The Plague in London City Petition for a Fast began now to spread and increase upon which there was a Petition from the Magistrates Ministers and People of the City of London for a Day to be set apart for Solemn Humiliation and Fasting to implore the Divine Majesty to avert the impending Judgment of the Pestilence from the City and Nation This day it was moved Friday August 27.
concerning the Declaration of the House about Innovations the Committee have sent divers of them into the Country and have found that in some places where there were good Ministers It was designed for a Snare for the Loyal Clergy they were Entertained and in some other places they were neglected but for the most part it is by those that have been questioned here for other Matters The Committee took into Consideration the Intention of the House concerning the publishing of the Declaration therefore they gave Directions to require the publishing thereof in Churches and that the Churchwardens might see the Execution thereof Some Particulars concerning this will come in a Special Report which I shall now only touch upon in General in regard of the Great Importance of the Business first to be considered of this day touching the Troubles of Scotland of which I shall give you an account The next thing the Committee did take into Consideration was the Correspondency with the Committee in Scotland in receiving Letters from them and sending Answers to them I shall not need to produce their several Letters now it will take up too much time but the chief Point was touching the Disbanding of the Army and two Garrisons of Berwick and Carlisle for Carlisle it is totally Disbanded and the Soldiers sent into Ireland to be placed there as they were before in the King's Army for we did conceive it Fitter those new men now in the King's Army there should be dismissed and these that were formerly taken from thence should be entertained again for we hear a good report of their Carriage at Carlisle For the Garrison at Berwick that required longer time of Consideration at the Committee for besides the demolishing of the Works which was much pressed by the Scots and seconded by a Letter from his Majesty out of Scotland there was a want of Money yet the Committee got sufficient to Disband all and sent it down and because the Scots Commissioners desired to know a certain day of our Disbanding and then they would upon knowledg of that disband their Forces whereupon the Committee set down the 15th of October to be the last day of Disbanding and the Letter yesterday received from Sir Michael Ernley shows that he hath Money enough to disband all and that the Horse are disbanded and Five Companies of Foot and that on Friday last the other Companies of Foot had been disbanded but that a Letter came from Sir Henry Vane in his Majesties Name requiring to stay the disbanding of the rest till further Order of which you shall hear more when I come to that part of my Report month October 1641. For the Arms and Ammunition at Carlisle the Committee gave Order for the safe laying of them up to be well kept till the next Spring that it be more Seasonable to send for them away they being now five or six miles from the Sea side which would have taken now much time to have shipped them and Sir George D'alliston and other Members of the House are desired to take care of the safe keeping it in the mean time For the Ammunition at Berwick the Committee have sent six Ships to Transport the same to the Tower and agreed with them for a certain Sum for the doing thereof within such a time and if they stayed longer to have so much per diem for demurrage The next thing we took into Consideration at the Committee was concerning Tumults though we cannot say any great Tumults yet there were seeds sown which might have occasioned some in the Execution of the Order of the House touching Innovations but I shall make a particular Report of those Parishes where they were at blows and likely to come to blows if the Committee had not sought the prevention of it which was the Ground why the Committee entertained their Petition There was another like Trouble and sign of Tumult by the frequent resort of Troopers to Town and to the Committee who delivered in Thirty Petitions to the Committee in their own Names and the Names of other discontented persons in the Army We could not refuse to accept their Petitions lest they should grow to Tumults and of their Complaints and the Nature of them I shall give a particular Report but the Committee Voted nothing concerning them It will be very fit to resolve something concerning them that they may depart the Town for under the name of the Soldiers many Robberies are done which occasioned the Committee to give Order See here a Committee Exercise more power than they would allow the King and a pretty Evasion of the Order of Parliament in giving single Passes by which 20000 Men might have been as Easily Transported as 200. That all of them that desire to have Passes to go beyond Sea might have the same But this would not serve their turn unless they might have liberty to receive pay here to go in Companies under Commanders to the Service of Forreign Princes which the Committee could not give way unto in regard of the Ordinance of both Houses to the contrary There is another Head the Committee had in Charge concerning the King's Revenue All that we could do in that which I did by the direction of the Committee was to take Care for a Ballance touching the same and accordingly I spake with the King's Officers about it and a Ballance will be ready when you shall please to call for it The next was concerning the Exchange beyond Sea I think for that there will be a good return made for the Benefit of the Common-wealth Another thing was concerning the Irish Petitions but the Gentleman that used to be in the Chair for Irish affairs Mr. Whistler was out of Town and had most of their Petitions with him so we could do nothing only one Mr. Cope and Mr. Lomach who had long attended had their Case made known to the Committee the one desiring to have two Witnesses Examined upon a Petition here depending who are ready to go to Sea and the other Mr. Cope of English Parents and great Family is a Petitioner for recovery of an Estate of great Value which he conceives hath been long kept from him wrongfully and desires that a Committee may but consider of the Depositions already taken touching the same in several Courts of Record Whether these be not just Cause for him to have Relief and matter of Ground to proceed on in his Petition and if not he will desist in Petitioning the House Next thing in Charge was concerning the Delinquents in that we made but a small progress for we had a desire to have perfected the Charge against my Lord Archbishop of Canterbury but in regard those of the Long Robe of the Committee were for most part absent we could not proceed therein Next there came to me to my Lodgings at Chelsey Sir John Berkley and Sergeant Major Oneal who said That they were accused and had rashly withdrawn themselves but upon
this Parliament Assembled hath ordained ut sequitur in the Act. And these Acts made by the King the Lords Temporal and Commons only were upon the Clamorous complaints of the Commons about the giving of the Benefices of England to strangers and others who never were Resident upon the Benefices This Report being made the House took the same into Consideration and for the better debate of the Propositions the House was adjourned into a Committee during pleasure And the Question was Whether those Thirteen Bishops that stood Impeached of those Crimes by the House of Commons shall be suspended from their Votes in this House until they stand Recti in Curia After a long debate herein the House was resumed and it is Ordered That the further Consideration of the Propositions which came from the House of Commons and the Bill entituled an Act for disabling Persons in Holy Orders to Exercise any Temporal Jurisdiction shall be both deferred until the Tenth day of November next A Message was brought from the House of Commons by Arthur Goodwin Esquire to let their Lordships know That whereas at a Conference Yesterday touching the Bishops which were Impeached for making of Canons the House of Commons did tell their Lordships That they had a Witness a Member of their House Mr. Wheeler to prove that the said Bishops did Subscribe to those Canons he having seen the Register Book with their Names written with their own Hands all which he is now ready upon Oath to prove if their Lordships shall rest herein satisfied the Register Book being in a House which is visited with the Plague The Reader will see by these Arguments of Mr. Solicitor St. John the utmost Strength of the Reason which they had to exclude the Bishops from their Votes and Peerage Now in regard the same thing has been again moved and the Arguments revived by the Successors of the same Faction who still retain the old Principles and Kindness to the Lords the Bishops looking upon them as a kind of Supernumeraries in the House of Lords who may well be spared and not as in reality they are a third Estate to stop the Progress so far as I am able of such an Error dangerous to the very being and Fundamental Constitution of our Parliaments I here present the Reader with a short Abstract out of the Learned Piece writ upon this Subject Entituled The Grand Question concerning the Bishops Right to Vote in Parliament in Cases Capital Stated and Argued c. I confess I have not followed the Author's Method nor was it possible to do it without great Inconvenience his Book being an Answer to some Papers writ against the Peerage and Jurisdiction of Bishops c. But I hope I have not done him or the Subject any Injustice by making use of the Matter and accommodating it more to my purpose which is among such Infinite Plenty and Variety of Matter to study all the conciseness and brevity I can I have therefore reduced the Subject to these four Heads First That the Bishops are Pares Regni Peers of the Realm and Peers in Parliament Secondly That they have a Right to Sit and Vote in Parliament in all Causes whatsoever even in Causa Sanguinis in Capital Cases Thirdly That the Lords Spiritual the Bishops are a third Estate in Parliament Fourthly To answer such Objections as have been made against their Peerage and Jurisdiction Which Abstract follows First Position That the Bishops are Pares Regni Peers of the Realm An Abstract of the Grand Question about the Peerage and Jurisdiction of the Bishops in Parliament Marculph Form lib. 1. c. 25. and Peers in Parliament The Author Learnedly proves That as soon as ever Christianity was settled in these Northern Nations Bishops were admitted into all publick Councils and Courts of Judicature So he instances in France from the Testimony of Marculphus That the King Sate in Judgment unà cum Dominis Patribus nostris Episcopis together with the Lords and Fathers the Bishops and that the greater Causes were heard by the King himself or the Comes Palatii Episcopis proceribus Assidentibus the Bishops and Nobility being Assessors with him In Spain during the Gothick Race of Kings the greatest Affairs of State were managed by the greatest of the Clergy and Nobility Concil Tolet. 4. c. 75.5 c. 7.6 c. 17. passim albi as appears by the several Councils of Toledo and particularly in the 13 Council Cap. 2. A case of Impeachment of Treason was brought before them And yet from one of these Councils of Toledo it is that all the Dust hath been raised and the Canon Law objected urged against Bishops That they ought not to be present or concerned in Cases of Blood In Germany Goldastus Rer. Alem. An. To. 2. the first Laws that were published by Lotharius were composed 33 Bishops 34 Dukes 72 Counts besides the People being present and assisting Arumaeus de Comitiis n. 35. c. 4. n. 98. and Arumaeus a Protestant Lawyer informs us that the Bishops of Germany Sate in the Diet in a double Capacity as Bishops and Princes of the Empire which Constitution he applauds as prudent for the Administration of Justice Honourable and safe for Religion In Bohemia Goldast Bohem. lib. 5. cap. 1. the same Goldastus a Protestant too acquaints us that there were three Estates prelates Nobles and Commons till the time of Sigismund In Hungary Decret Ladisl p. 12. so soon as ever the Christian Religion prevailed and was settled the Laws were framed by the King with the Advice and Consent of Bishops Nobles Staravols Polon p. 263. Herbart Stat. Regni Pol. p. 262. and the whole Clergy and People In Poland the Constitution of the Government is composed of the Bishops Barons and Delegates who are called Nuncii terrestres who are Summoned to the Dyet by the King and that with the entrance of Christianity as the publick Religion the Bishops entred into the Senate and had the first Seat in that Court Adam Brem de Situ Dan. n. 85. Loccen Antiq. Sueco-goth c. 8. Jus aulicum Norvey c. 3. c. 36. In Norway Denmark and Sweden the same Constitution entred with the prevalency of Christian Religion viz. Bishops Nobles Knights and Deputies In England after the Conversion of the Saxons during the whole time of that Monarchy there is not in all our Records one Council wherein the Bishops had not a part From whence the Author strongly Argues that it would be a very unaccountable thing that we of all the Nations of the Christian World who profess to have the best Government and the best Reformed Religion should Exclude those from any share in that Government who were by all others admitted into it as soon as they admitted the Christian Religion to be the publick Profession of their Country That the Bishops since the coming in of the Norman Race were always Esteemed Peers of the Realm and Peers of Parliaments
grants and otherwise And that all His Majesties debts then due in this Kingdom were satisfied out of the said Subsidies and yet His Majesty is of late as the Petitioners have been informed in the House of Commons become indebted in this Kingdom in great Sums And they do therefore humbly beseech that an exact accompt may be sent to His Majesty how and in what manner his Treasure issued 12. The Petitioners do humbly conceive just and great fears at a Proclamation published in this Kingdom in Anno Domini 1635. Prohibiting Men of Quality or Estates to depart this Kingdom into England without the Lord Deputies License wherein the Subjects of this Kingdom are hindred and interrupted from free access to Address to His Sacred Majesty and Privy Council of England to declare their just Grievances or to obtain Remedies for them in such sort as their Ancestors have done in all Ages since the Reign of King Henry the Second and great Fees exacted for every of the said Licenses 13. That of late His Majesties late Attorney General hath exhibited Informations against many Boroughs of this Kingdom into His Majesty's Court of Exchequer to shew cause by what Warrant the said Burgesses who heretofore sent Burgesses to the Parliament should send the Burgesses to the Parliament and thereupon for want of an Answer the said Priviledges of sending Burgesses was seised by the said Court which proceedings were altogether Coram non Judice and contrary to the Laws and Priviledges of the House of Parliament and if way should be given thereunto would tend to the Subversion of Parliaments and by consequence to the ruine and destruction of the Common-wealth And that the House of Commons hath hitherto in this present Parliament been deprived of the Advice and Counsel of many profitable and good Members by means thereof 14. By the powerfulness of some Ministers of State in this Kingdom the Parliament in its Members and Actions hath not his natural Freedom 15. And lastly That the Gentry and Merchants and other His Majesty's Subjects of this Kingdom are of late by the Grievances and Pressures beforesaid and other the like brought very near to Ruine and Destruction And Farmers of Customs Customers Waiters Searchers Clerks of unwarrantable proceedings Pursivants and Goalers and sundry others very much enriched whereby and by the slow Redress of the Petitioners His Majesties most Faithful and Dutiful People of this Kingdom do conceive great fears that their readiness approved upon all occasions hath not been of late presented to his Sacred Majesty For remedy whereof the said Petitioners do humbly and of right beseech your Lordship that the said Grievances and Pressures may be speedily redressed and if your Lordship shall not think fit to afford present relief that your Lordship might admit a select Committee of this House of Persons uninteressed in the benefit arising of the aforesaid Grievances to be licensed by your Lordship to repair to his Sacred Majesty in England for to pursue the same and to obtain fitting remedy for their aforesaid and other just Grievances and Oppressions and upon all just and honourable occasions they will without respect of particular interest or profit to be raised thereby most humbly and readily in Parliament extend their uttermost endeavour to serve His Majesty and comply with his Royal and Princely occasions And shall pray c. Not long after the Lord Deputy Wendesford died Lord Deputy Wendesford dies viz. the Third of December following whereupon Robert Lord Dillon of Kilkenny-west and Sir William Parsons Knight and Baronet Master of the Court of Wards L. Dillon and Sir William Parsons made Lords Justices were Constituted Lords Justices of Ireland and were accordingly Sworn the 30th of December 1640. But the Lord Dillon whose Son had married the Earl of Strafford's Sister and who being a Person of great Parts and Abilities and passionately devoted to the Earl's Interests both by Alliance and Inclination was no way grateful to the Faction it was not long therefore before the King who in all things endeavoured to sweeten them by gratifying them in whatever they desired was prevailed with L. Dillon displaced and Sir John Borlase substituted in his room at the Importunities of the Irish Committees then at the Court to displace the Lord Dillon and appoint the aforesaid Sir William Parsons and Sir John Borlase to be Lords Justices of the Kingdom of Ireland These Gentlemen by His Majesties Command applied themselves to give such satisfaction to His Majesties Subjects of Ireland as in reason they could desire and among other things His Majesty was pleased to reduce the Subsidies from 40000 l. a Subsidy to 12000 a piece and all things seemed to be in a most quiet and peaceable Posture and Condition of Settlement But yet even then which seems much to confirm the Lord Macguire's Confession this Rebellion was upon the Anvil for about the latter end of the year 1640 the King received some advertisements of a Design then on Foot to raise some Commotions in Ireland whereupon the King whose care for the Security of his Kingdom and Protestant Subjects of Ireland was always awake caused Sir Henry Vane his Principal Secretary of Estate to advertise the Lords Justices Parsons and Borlase of it and to Command them to take care therein The Letter which I find in Dr. Borlase's History was delivered to the Lord Parsons and found after his Death in his Study by Sir James Barry Lord Baron of Santry and presented to His present Majesty and was in these Terms Right Honourable HIS Majesty hath Commanded me to acquaint your Lordships with an Advice given him from abroad Sir H. Vane's Letter to the Lords Justices concerning some Informations of danger in Ireland and confirm'd by his Ministers in Spain and elsewhere which in this Distemper'd Time and Conjuncture of Affairs deserves to be seriously consider'd and an especial care and watchfulness to be had therein which is That of late there have passed from Spain and the like may well have been from other Parts an unspeakable number of Irish Church-men for England and Ireland and some good old Soldiers under pretext of asking leave to raise Men for the King of Spain whereas it is observed among the Irish Friars there a whisper runs as if they expected a Rebellion in Ireland and particularly in Connaght Wherefore His Majesty thought fit to give your Lordships this notice that in your Wisdoms you might manage the same with that Dexterity and Secresie as to Discover and Prevent so pernicious a Design if any such there should be and to have a watchful Eye on the Proceedings and Actions of those who come thither from abroad on what pretext soever and so herewith I rest Your Lordships most Humble Servant Henry Vane White-Hall March the 16 th 1640. The preservation of this Letter appears very uncommon and looks as if Providence interessed in the Vindication of Oppressed Innocence had reserved it to clear the
and the Statute of 20 E. 3. 3. To the Third they say That it is part of their said Oath as Judges that they shall not Counsel or assent to any thing that may turn to the damage or disherison of our Soveraign Lord the Kings most Excellent Majesty by any manner of way or colour And that they give no Advice or Counsel to any man great or small in no Case wherein the King is a Party And that they shall do and procure the Profit of the King and his Crown in all Things where they may reasonably do the same And that in the Explanation of their said Oaths by the Statute of 20 E. 3. c. 1. It is declared That they shall give no Counsel to great Men nor small in case where the King is Party or which doth or may touch the King in any point And as your Lordships have been honourably pleased by an Order of this Honourable House bearing date the first of March Anno Domini 1640. Annoque Regni Regis Caroli 16. to give way That they should not be Compelled to Answer any part of the said Questions which did concern his Majesties Prerogative or were against their Oaths so they humbly represent unto your Lordships That they conceive that the Answering of the Particulars of this Question doth concern both for that the King 's Privy Council as the Questions terms it or Council Board is a Court of his Majesties high Prerogative where all Proceedings are before him and his Council or before his Governor who immediately to many Purposes represent his Majesties Person and the Council And where the great Affairs of State concerning his Majesties Honor Government Profit and of great Persons and Causes concerning the Common-Wealth which may not be conveniently remedied by the ordinary Rules of the Common-Law and many other Cases have been Treated of and managed And as his Majesty is the Fountain of all Justice within this Kingdom and may grant Cognizances of Pleas unto his Subjects and Corporations and may by his Commissions Authorize whom he shall think fit to Execute many Branches of his Authority so We humbly conceive That it doth not stand with our Oathes or Duties of our Places who are but Judges of the ordinary Courts of Justice before his Majesties Pleasure signified in that behalf to seek into the Commissions or Instructions of the Chief Governor and Council or to give any Opinion concerning the Limits Jurisdictions Orders Decrees Proceedings or Members of that High Court And that the King hath a Prerogative for hearing some of the Matters in this Question specified before his Chief Governor We beseech your Lordships to cast your Eyes on the Statute of 28 H. 6. c. 2. in this Kingdom where after Matters are directed to be sent to the Ordinary Courts yet the King's Prerogative is expresly saved notwithstanding all which his Gracious Majesty for whom it is most proper hath of late been pleased to Limit the Proceedings of that Board by his Instructions in Print 4. To the fourth they Answer as to the Third 5. To the fifth they say That generally all Grants of Monopolies whereby Trading Manufacture or Commerce is restrained and the Profit which should go to many is hindred and brought into a few Hands are against Law and the Liberty of the Subject and the Good of the Commonwealth tho they carry never so fair a pretence of Reforming Abuses And that the pretended Transgressors against such Grants are not at all punishable by any Rule of Law that they know of And yet they say That they conceive That his Majesty that is the Head and Father of the Commonwealth may restrain the Use and Importation and Exportation of certain Commodities or restrain the same into a few Hands for a time where there may be a likelyhood of his Majesties Profit which is the profit of the Commonwealth and no apparent prejudice to the Commonwealth doth appear And that when time shall discover such Prejudice then such Restraint ought to Cease So if a man by his own Invention at home or Travel Observation or Charge abroad doth introduce a new profitable or useful Trade or Profession into the Commonwealth in such Cases his Majesty may lawfully Grant and License the only making of such Commodity or teaching or using of such Trade for a certain time and the Transgressors against such Warrantable Grants may be punished by paying of Damages unto the Patentee in an ordinary Course of Justice or otherwise as the nature of the Offence and Matter doth deserve and as the Consequence and Importance of the matter may be to the King State or Commonwealth And they say That the Matter Manner Restrictions Limitations Reservations and other Clauses contained in such Grants or Licenses and the Commissions or Proclamations thereupon and undue Execution thereof and several Circumstances may make the same Lawful or Unlawful whereof they are not able to give any Certain Resolution before some Particular comes in Judgment before them neither are they otherwise able to answer the Generals in the Particulars of the said Question Of what in what Cases how where and by whom or which of them wherein whosoever desires further satisfaction he may please to have Recourse to the known Cases of Monopolies in printed Authorities and written Records and unto the Statute of 21 Jac. in Engl. concerning Monopolies and their several Exceptions and Limitations therein 6. To the Sixth they say They can no otherwise answer then they have already in their Answer to the Third Question for the Reasons therein set forth 7. To the Seventh they say That a Proclamation or Act of State cannot alter the Common Law and that Proclamations are Acts of his Majesties Prerogative and are and always have been of great use and that the Contemners of such of them as are not against the Law are and by the constant Practise of the Star-Chamber in England have been punished according to the Nature of the Contempt and Course of the said Court And although Acts of State are not of Force to bind the Goods Possessions and Inheritance of the Subject yet they have been of great use for setling of the Estates of very many Subjects in this Kingdom as may appear in the Report of the Case of Irish Gavil-Kind in Print And further to that Question they cannot Answer for the Reasons in their Answer unto the third Question set forth 8. To the Eighth they say That they know no ordinary Rule of Law by the which the Subjects of this Kingdom are made Subject to Martial Law in time of Peace and that they find the use thereof in the time of Peace in England complained of in the Petition of Right exhibited unto his Majesty in the third year of his Reign and that they conceive That the Granting of Authority and Commission for execution thereof is derived out of his Majesties Regal and Prerogative Power for suppressing of sudden and great Insolencies Insurrections among
Armies or Multitudes of Armed Men lawfully or unlawfully convented together the right use whereof in all times hath been found most necessary in this Kingdom And further to that Question they cannot Answer for that as they conceive it doth concern his Majesties Regal Power and that the Answer of the other Part of the Question doth properly belong to another Profession whereof they have no Cognizance 9. To the Ninth they say That as the taking of any Oath before any but such Judges or Persons as have Power to give or Demand an Oath for decision of Controversies is by most Divines in most Cases counted to be a rash Oath and so an Offence against God within the third Commandment so the perscribing or demanding of a set Oath by any that cannot derive Power so to do from the Crown where the Fountain of Justice under God doth reside Is an Offence against the Law of the Land and as for Voluntary and Extrajudicial Oaths altho freely taken before Arbitrators or others they say as this Kingdom is Composed in many Particulars as the Nature and Consequence of the Course or the Quality of the Person who taketh or before whom the same is taken may concern the Common-Wealth or the Members thereof such taking of such Oaths or Proceeding or Grounding on such Oath in deciding of Differences according to the several Circumstances that may occur therein or the Prejudice it may introduce to the Common-Wealth may be punishable by the Common Law or if it grow unto an height or general Inconvenience to the Common-Wealth or Members thereof in the Castle-Chamber for thô such an Oath be Voluntary yet in most Cases it is received by him that doth intend to ground his Judgment thereon and after the Oath is taken the Arbitrator or he that intends to yield Faith to the Party that took the Oath doth examine him upon one or more Questions upon the said Oath unto the Answer whereof he doth give Faith and Assent trusting on the said Oath And whereas Oaths by God's Institution were chiefly allowed to be taken before lawful Magistrates for ending Controversies yet common Experience doth teach in this Kingdom That oftentimes Orders and Acts grounded on such Voluntary Oaths beget Strife and Suits and commonly such Orders when they come to be measured by the Rules of Law or Equity in the King's Courts become void after much expence of Time and Charge that we say nothing of that that thereby many Causes proper for the King's Courts are drawn ad aliud examen are thereby the Justice and Courts often defrauded and declined 10. To the Tenth they say That they are not Judges of Rules of Policy but of Law and that they know no certain Rule of Law concerning Reducement of Fines the same being Matters of his Majesties meer Grace after a Man is censured for an Offence And that they know no Law that none shall be admitted to Reducement of his Fines or other Penalties in the Courts in the Question specified until he confess the Fact for which he was Censured But forasmuch as the admittance or Reducement after Conviction for an Offence is Matter of Grace and not Justice It hath been the constant Course of those Courts both here and in England for clearing of his Majesties Justice where the Party will not go about to clear himself by reverfal of the Censure or Decree not to admit him to that Grace until he hath confessed the justness of the Censure pronounced by the Court against him and that the rather for that commonly the Ability or disability of the Party doth not appear in Judgment before them but the Nature and Circumstances of the Offence according to which they gave Sentence against him or them in Terrorem after which when the Party shall make the weakness of his Estate to appear or that the Court is otherwise ascertained thereof they do of Course proportion the Censure or Penalty having regard to his Estate 11. To the Eleventh they say That neither the Judges of the King's Bench as they inform us that are of that Court or Justices of Goal-Delivery or of any other Court do or can by any Law they know deny the Copies of Indictments of Felony or Treason to the Party only Accused as by the said Question is demanded 12. To the Twelfth they say That where Lands are holden of the King by Knights-Service in Capite the Tenant by the strict Course of Law ought in Person to do his Homage to the King And until he hath done his Homage the Ancient Course of the Exchequer hath been and yet is to issue Process of Distringas out of the second Remembrancers Office to distrain the Tenants ad faciendum Homagium or ad faciendum finem pro Homagio suo respectuando upon which Process the Sheriff returneth Issues and if the Tenants do not thereupon appear and compound with the King to give a Fine for Respit of Homage then the Issues are forfeited to the King for the Contempt But if he appear then the Court of Exchequer doth agree with him to Respite his Homage for a small Fine wherein they regulate themselves under the Rate expressed and set down in England by Virtue of a Privy Seal in the 15th year of Queen Elizabeth wherein the Rates are particularly set down according to the yearly value of the Lands which Rates are confirmed by Act of Parliament in the first of King James c. 26. in England before which time there was not any such certainty but the same rested in the discretion of the Court by the Rule of Common Law and so it doth at this day in Ireland Howbeit we conceive that the Court of Exchequer here do well to regulate their discretions by those Rates in England and rather to be under then to exceed the same which the Barons there do as they do inform us that are Judges of the other Courts 13. To the 13th they say That they know no Rule of Law or Statute by which it should be Censurable in the Subjects of this Kingdom to Repair and Appeal unto His Majesty for Redress of Injuries or for other their Lawful occasions unless they be prohibited by His Majesties Writ or Proclamation or other his Command But they find that by the Statute of 5 R. 2. that the passage of the Subjects out of the Realm is prohibited without special License excepting Noblemen and others in the said Statute specially excepted and some inference to that purpose may be made upon that Statute of 25 H. 6. c. 2. in this Kingdom 14. To the Fourteenth they say That some Deanries and Dignities not Deans or Dignitaries as the Question propounds it are properly Et de mero Jure Donative by the King some Elective and some Collative according to the first Foundation and Usage of those Churches And they humbly desire that they may not be required to give any further Answer to this Question for that it may concern many Mens
Estates which may come Judicially before them 15. To the Fifteenth they say That they conceive that where Priviledges are claimed by any Body Politic or other the King's Council may exhibit a Quo Warranto to cause the Parties claiming such Priviledges to set forth and shew by what Warrant they claim the same and that the Court cannot hinder the issuing of Process at the Instance of the King's Attorney to exhibit such Information But when the Case shall upon the Proceedings be brought to Judgment then and not before the Court is to take notice and give Judgment upon the Merit and Circumstances of the Cause as upon due consideration shall be conceived to be according to Law in which Case the Judges nor the King's Attorney as they conceive ought to be punished by any ordinary Rule of Law or Statute that they know But for this particular Question of Quo Warranto for that it hath been a great Question in this present Parliament and concerns the highest Court of Justice in this Kingdom and also concerns two other of His Majesties Courts of Justice and therein His Majesties Prerogative in those Courts they cannot safely deliver any Opinion therein before it comes Judicially before them and that they hear it argued and debated by Learned Councel on both sides 16. To the Sixteenth they say That although the Jurors be the sole Judges of the matter of Fact yet the Judges of the Court are Judges of the Validity of the Evidence and of the matters of Law arising out of the same wherein the Jury ought to be guided by them And if the Jury in any Criminal Cause between the King and Party give their Verdict contrary to clear and apparent Evidence delivered in Court they have been constantly and still ought to be Censured in the Star-Chamber in England and Castle-Chamber here for this misdemeanour in perverting the right Course of Justice in such Fines and other punishment as the Merits and Circumstances of the Cause doth deserve according to the Course of the said Courts For that their Consciences ought to be directed by the Evidence and not be misguided by their Wills and Affections and if the Jury know any matter of Fact which may either better or blemish their Evidence they may take advantage thereof but they ought to discover the same to the Judges And they say That this proceeding in the Court of Castle-Chamber is out of the same ground that Writs of Attaint are against a Jury that gives a false Verdict in a Court of Record at the Common Law betwixt Party and Party which false Verdict being found by a Jury of 24 notwithstanding that the first Jurors were Judges of the Fact yet that infamous Judgment was pronounced against the first Jury which is next or rather worse then Judgment of Death and lay a perpetual brand of Perjury upon them for which reason it was Antiently called the Villainous Judgment And they say That the Law to direct the punishment for such Offence is the course of the said Court which is a Law as to that purpose and the Statute of 3 H. 7. cap. 1 2. and other Statutes of Force in this Kingdom 17. To the Seventeenth they say They can answer no otherwise then they have in their Answer to the next precedent Question 18. To the Eighteenth they say That in a Legal Construction the Statute of Magna Charta in which the words of Salvo Contenemento are mentioned is only to be understood of Amerciaments and not of Fines Yet where great Fines are imposed in Terrorem upon the reducement of them regard is to be had to the Ability of the Persons 19. To the Nineteenth they say That if one doth steal a Sheep or commit other Felony and after flyeth the Course of Justice or lyeth in Woods or Mountains upon his Keeping Yet he doth not thereby become a Traytor neither doth a Proclamation make him so the Chief use whereof in such a case is to invite the Party so standing out to submit himself to Justice or to forewarn others of the danger they may run into by Keeping him Company or giving him Maintenance or Relief whereby he may the Rather submit to Justice 20. To the Twentieth they say That the Testimony or Evidence of Rebels or Traytors under Protection or Thieves or other Infamous persons is not to be used or pressed as Convincing Evidence upon the Tryal of any man for his Life And so is his Majesties printed Instructions as to persons Condemned or under Protection yet the Testimony of such persons not condemned may be given in Evidence at the Tryal and being fortified with other Concurring Proof or Apparent Circumstances may be pressed upon any Tryal and for discovering their Fellows or Abettors or Relievers as the Circumstances may offer themselves in their Examination especially if before they Confess themselves guilty of the Offence in Imitation of the Approver at the Common Law whereof no Certain Rule may be given And it needs not be made a Question here Whether the Jurors or Judges ought to be Judges of the matter of Fact It being positively laid down in the 16th Question that they are and tho their false Verdict doth convince or not convince the Prisoner yet they may be questioned and punish'd for a false Verdict as in their Answer to the 16th is already declared 21. To the Twenty first they say That that Question is now judicially depending and hath been already solemnly argued in his Majesties Court of Wards in which Court their Assistance for declaration of the Law therein is already required And therefore they humbly desire they may not be compelled to give any Opinion touching that Point until it be resolved there 22. To the Two and twentieth they say That they do conceive there is no matter of Law contained in the said Question yet for further satisfaction of your Lordships they say That upon View of an Act of State bearing date at his Majesties Castle of Dublin the 24th of December 1636. grounded upon his Majesties Letters of the 5th of July last past it appears unto them that Four shillings in the pound as of his Majesties free Gift and Reward out of the first payment of the Increase of Rent reserved to his Majesty was allow'd unto the Judges that were Commissioners and attended that Service And they humbly conceive That the receiving of that Four shillings in the pound of his Majesties Bounty stands well with the Integrity of a Judge And those Judges did inform them That they did not avoid any Letters Patents upon those Commissions of Defective Titles but receive such to Compound as submitted for the strengthening of their defective Patents and Titles And such as would stand upon the Validity of their Grants were left to the Tryal of Law And that the Compositions made after the said Grants of 4 s. in the pound were made according to Rules and Rates agreed upon by all the Commissioners before his
according to the Command thereof upon due and convenient notice thereof given to him at the Charge of the Party or Parties who requireth or procureth such Writ or Writs and upon Security by his or their own Bond or Bonds given to pay the Charge of carrying back the Prisoner or Prisoners if he or they shall be commanded by the Court to which he or they shall be brought as in like Cases has been used such Charges of bringing up and carrying back the Prisoner or Prisoners to be always ordered by the Court if any Difference shall arise there about bringing or cause to be brought the Body or Bodies of the said Party or Parties so committed or restrained unto and before the Judges and Justices of the said Court from whence the same Writ or Writs shall issue in open Court and shall then likewise certify the true Cause of such his or their Deteinors or Imprisonment and thereupon the Court after such Return made and delivered in open Court shall proceed to examine and determine whether the Cause of such Commitment appearing upon the said Return be just and legal or not and shall thereupon do what to Justice shall appertain either by Delivering Bailing or remanding the Prisoner or Prisoners 7. Quest Of what Force is an Act of State or Proclamation in this Kingdom to bind the Liberty Goods Possessions or Inheritance of the Natives thereof whether they or any of them can alter the Common Law or the Infringers of them loose their Goods Chattels or Leases or forfeit the same by Infringing any such Act of State Proclamation or both And what punishment do the sworn Judges of the Law that are Privy Councellors incur that Vote for such Acts and Execution thereof Declarat An Act of State or Proclamation in this Kingdom cannot bind the Liberty Inheritance Possession or Goods of the Subjects of the said Kingdom nor alter the Common Law and the Infringers of any such Act of State or Proclamation ought not to forfeit Lands Leases Goods or Chattels for the infringing of any such Act of State or Proclamation and the Judges of the Law who do vote for such Acts of State or Proclamation are punishable as Breakers and Violators of their Oaths of Judges 8. Quest Are the Subjects of this Kingdom subject to the Martial Law And whether any man in the time of Peace no Enemy being in the Field with Banners displayed can be Sentenced to death If so by whom and in what Cases If not What Punishments do they incur that in time of Peace execute Martial Law Declarat No Subject of this Kingdom ought to be Sentenced to Death or Executed by Marshal Law in time of Peace and if any Subject be so Sentenced or Executed by Marshal Law in time of Peace the Authors and Actors of any such Sentence or Execution are punishable by the Law of the Land for their so doing as Doers of their own Wrong and contrary to the said Law of the Land 9. Quest Whether Volantary Oaths taken freely before Arbitrators for Affirmance or Disaffirmance of any thing or for the true performance of any thing be punishable in the Castle-Chamber or any other Court and why and wherefore Declarat No Man ought to be punished in the Castle-Chamber or any other Court for taking a Voluntary Oath before Arbitrators for affirmance or disaffirmance of any Thing or the true Performance of any thing in Civil Causes nor are the Arbitrators before such Voluntary Oath shall be taken Punishble 10. Quest Why and by what Law or by what Rule of Policy is it that none is admitted to Reducement of Fines and other Penalty in the Castle-Chamber or Council Table untill he confess the Offence for which he is Censured when as Revera he might be innocent thereof tho suborned Proofs or Circumstance might induce a Censure Declarat By the Laws and Statutes of the Realm no Man is bound or ought to be compelled to acknowledg the Offence laid to his Charge or the justness of any Censure past against him in the Castle-Chamber or at the Council Table nor ought to be deteined in Prison or abridged of his Liberty or the Reducement of his Fine stayed or delayed until he doth acknowledg such Offence or the justness of such Censure And it is further declared That no such inforced or wrested Confession or Acknowledgment can or ought to debar or hinder any Subject from his Bill of Reversal or Review of any Sentence or Decree past or conceived against him in the Castle-Chamber or in any other Court 11. Quest Whether the Judges of the Kings-Bench or any other Judges of Goal-Delivery or of any other Court and by what Law do or can deny the Copies of Indictments of Felony or Treason to the Parties accused contrary to the Law Declarat The Judges of the Kings-Bench or Justices of Goal-Delivery or the Judges of any other Court ought not to deny Copies of Indictments of Felony or Treason to the Parties indicted 12. Quest What Power have the Barons of the Court of Exchequer to raise the Respite of Homage arbitrarily to what Rate they please to what Value they may raise it by what Law they distinguish between the Respit of Homage upon the diversity of the true value of the Fees when as Escuage is the same for great and small Fees and are apportionable by Parliament Declarat The Barons of the Exchequer ought to raise the Respite of Homage above the usual Rates appearing in and by the Course and Precedents of the Court continued until the year of our Lord God 1637 and the raising thereof since that time was Arbitrary and against the Law And the Barons of the Exchequer ought not to distinguish between the Respite of Homage upon any diversity of the true values of the Knight's Fees 13. Quest Whether it be Censurable in the Subjects of this Kingdom to repair into England to appeal to his Majesty for Redress of Injuries or for other Lawful Occasions If so for why and in what Condition of Persons and by what Law Declarat The Subjects of this Kingdom may lawfully repair into England to appeal to his Majesty for Redress of Injuries and for other their Lawful Occasions and for their so doing ought not to be punished or questioned upon the Statute of 5 R. 2. nor by any other Law or Statute of Force in this Kingdom eminent Officers and Ministers of State Commanders and Soldiers of his Majesties Army the Judges and Ministers of his Majesties Courts of Justice and of his Highness Revenue and Customs whose Attendance is necessarily requisite by the Laws and Statutes of the Realm only excepted 14. Quest Whether Deans or other Dignitaries of Cathedral Churches be properly and de Mero jure Donative by the King and not Elective or Collative If so Why and by what Law And whether the Confirmation of a Dean de Facto of the Bishops Grant be good or valid in Law and no If not by what Law
Declarat Deanries and other Ecclesiastical Dignities of this Realm are not de Mero Jure donative but some are Donative and some Elective and some are Collative according to their respective Foundations and the Confirmation of the Bishops Grant by a Dean de Facto having actually stallum in Choro et vocem in Capitulo together with the Chapter is good in Law 15. Quest Whether the issuing of Quo Warranto's out of the Kings-Bench or Exchequer against Boroughs that antiently and recently sent Burgesses to the Parliament to shew Cause why they sent Burgesses to the Parliament be Legal If not what punishment ought to be inflicted upon those that are or have been the Occasioners Procurers and Judges of and in such Quo Warranto's Declarat The Issuing of Quo Warranto's out of the Court of Kings-Bench Court of Exchequer or any Court against Boroughs that anciently or recently sent Burgesses to the Parliament to shew Cause why they sent Burgesses to Parliament and all the Proceedings thereupon are Coram non Judice Illegal and void and the Right of sending Burgesses to the Parliament is Questionable in Parliament only and the Occasioners Procurers and Judges in such Quo Warranto's and Proceedings are Punishable as in Parliament shall be thought consonant to Law and Justice 16. Quest By what Law are Jurors that give Verdict according to their Conscience and are the sole Judges of the Fact Censured in the Castle-Chamber in great Fines and sometimes Pillored with loss of Ears and bored through the Tongue and marked sometimes in the Forehead with an Hot Iron and other like Infamous Punishment Declarat Jurors are the sole Judges of the Matter in Fact and they ought not for giving their Verdict to be bound over to the Court of Castle-Chamber by the Judge or Judges before whom the Verdict was or shall be given 17. Quest By what Law are men Censurable in the Castle-Chamber with the Matilation of Members or any other Brand of Infamy and in what Cases and what punishment in each Case there is due without Respect to the Quality of the Person or Persons Declarat No Man ought to be Censured in the Castle-Chamber in the Mutilation of Members or any other Brand of Infamy otherwise or in other Cases then is expresly Limited by the Statutes of the Realm in such Case provided 18. Quest Whether in the Censure in the Castle-Chamber Regard be to be had to the words of the Great Charter viz. Salvo Contenemento c. Declarat In the Censures in the Castle-Chamber especial Regard ought to be had to the Words of the Great Charter viz. Salvo Contenemento c. 19. Quest Whether if one that steals a Sheep or commits any other Felony and after flyeth the Course of Justice or lyeth in Woods or Mountains upon his keeping be a Traytor If not whether a Proclamation can make him so Declarat A Felon who Flies the Course of Justice and lyeth in Woods Mountains or elsewhere upon his keeping is no Traitor and a Proclamation cannot make him a Traitor 20. Quest Whether the Testimony or Evidence of Rebels Traytors Protected Thieves or other infamous Persons be good Evidence in Law to be pressed upon the Tryals of Men for their Lives or whether the Judge or Jurors ought to be Judge of the matter Declarat The Testimony of Convicted or Protected Rebels Traitors or Felons is no sufficient Evidence in Law upon the Tryal of any Person for his Life and the Credit of the Testimony of Persons Accused or Impeached and not convicted of Felony or Treason ought to be left to the Jury who are sole Judges of the Truth and Validity of the said Testimony 21. Quest By what Law are Fairs and Markets to be held in Capite when no other express Tenure is mentioned in his Majesties Letters Patents or Grants of the same Fairs and Markets Altho the Rent or Tearly Sum be reserved thereout Declarat The King grants Lands to be held in Free and common Socage as of a Castle or Mannor by Letters Patents under the Great Seal and by the same Letters Patents or by other Letters Patents Grants a Fair and Market reserving a yearly Rent or Summ without expressing any Tenure as to the said Fair or Market the said Fair or Market is not held by Knights Service in Capite or otherwise in Capite I cannot omit one remarkable passage which I find mentioned in Dr. Borlase's Hist of Ireland p. 12. Borlase's History which seems plainly to evince that during this time when they appeared so Zealous for the Redressing of Publick Grievances and removing the obstructions of Justice therein following the very same steps with the Faction of the Parliament of England and Scotland they were at the same time complotting to shake off the Soveraignty of His Majesty by an open Rebellion as the Scots had done in Effect and the English Parliamentary Faction presently after did Which may teach Posterity hereafter to be very Cautious of such pretences and pretenders who through the sides of the prime Ministers of State endeavour to wound Majesty it self and to cover the Designs of Teason and Rebellion with the Popular Cloak of Reformation which were the very steps by which these Three Rebellions one upon the neck of another advanced themselves within the compass of little less then three Years The passage was this During the Summer Sessions which began the 11th of May 1641. Some of the chief Conspirators and among whom the Lord Macguire was one the most busie pretending a suspition That some of the Servants of the late Earl of Strafford to revenge his death to which it seems by this their own guilt acknowledged the Irish very instrumental intended some mischief to the Parliament moved the House and accordingly had Orders that the Lords Justices would let His Majesties Stores for Powder and Arms be searched lest any should be placed near the Parliament Houses which being granted and a diligent search being made but nothing found yet were they not satisfied but procured a new Order to the Lords Justices to be admitted to see the Stores of Powder and Arms placed in other Rooms in and about the Castle To whom the Lord Justice Borlase answered That those were the King 's precious Jewels and not to be shewed without especial Cause but withal assuring them upon his Honor that there was no Powder underneath either of the Houses of Parliament with which answer they were not more discontented then his Lordship seemed surprised with this repeated Order which raised such a sudden Emotion in his blood that he could not but often after reflect upon the reiterated importunity of the enquiry as aiming at something further then was at present discernable Which plainly appears to be to get a perfect knowledge both of the quantity of the martial Stores and the certain place where they were deposited that thereby their intended surprisal of them might be with more ease effected To Sum up what hath
and Boats they have to Transport Men in and what Number of Men they are able to send over if need he and they find that they are able to Land a considerable number of Men in the North of Ireland and that with more speed and less charge then it can be done from any other part of the Kings Dominions and their Highlanders are conceived proper to fight with the Irish in their own Kind and Country amongst Hills and Boggs An Information was given in by one Col. Hunkes That two disbanded Troopers Moor and Mac-Miller had listed about 40 Men who were lodged near the Iron Gate of the Tower in St. Katharines and that one Bourk an Irish-man of Lincolns-Inn paid them 14 d. per diem that according to the Order of the House he had taken care to disarm them Whereupon Bourk being sent for and Examined confessed that he was an Irish-man and a Roman Catholique That he did this to advance his Fortunes being to Command them in the Service of the King of Spain against Portugal That he received Money from the Spanish Ambassador to pay them and that he did it upon the Order of the House of Commons dated the 26th of October last which gave Licence to Transport the disbanded Soldiers It appearing to the Lords that the Order did Expresly prohibit the Transporting of any of the Kings Subjects Natives of England or Ireland Bourk was committed to the Custody of the Gentleman Usher during the Pleasure of the House Moor and Mac-Miller were for a former misdemeanor in abusing the Lord General Sir John Conyers and assaulting and sending a Challenge to one Captain Trist committed before to Newgate Hereupon Order was sent to the Constable of the Tower to keep diligent Watch for the Safeguard of it The Justices of the Peace for Middlesex and the City of Westminster were also Ordered to make speedy and diligent search in and about the Suburbs of London and Westminster What Irish are residing in their several Jurisdictions and to cause their Names to be taken and return them into this House and to cause strong and good Guards to be set upon such as they find to be dangerous and suspected Persons untill the pleasure of this House be further known Directed To William Roberts John Hooker and Thomas Shepherd Justices of the Peace for Middlesex Upon the reading the Petition of the Bishops that are Impeached Council assigned to the Impeached Bishops shewing That the Councel that was assigned them by this House refuse to be of Council for them because they being Commoners are involved in all the Acts and Votes of the House of Commons Hereupon it was Ordered That Serjeant Jermin Mr. Hern Mr. Chute and Mr. Hales be sent for to give their Answers herein Order of the Lords to expel all Romish Recusants out of the Inns of Court and Chancery It was also this day Ordered by the Lords in Parliament That the Treasurers Recorders Readers and Benchers of the Societies of the four Inns of Court shall make or cause to be made diligent Search and Examination whether there be any Recusants of any Nation whatsoever admitted into their several Houses or into the Inns of Chancery belonging thereunto or live within the same Houses And if upon search any shall be found that they be forthwith dismissed and expelled out of the said Houses And it is further Ordered That no Romish Recusant shall hereafter be admitted into any the said Inns of Court or Inns of Chancery upon any pretences whatsoever Directed To the Treasurers Readers and Benchers of the Society of the Inner-Temple To the Treasurers c. of Grayes-Inn To the Treasurers c. of the Middle Temple To the Treasurers c. of Lincolns-Inn In the Commons House it was likewise Ordered Order of the Commons to tender the Oaths of Alleglance and Supremacy to Irish Recusants and others in the Inns of Court Order of the Commons to Examine all Irish endeavouring to pass over into Preland That the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy shall be tendred to the Irish Gentlemen and such others as are suspected for Recusants as are within the Inns of Court that are Students there and that the Lord Keeper shall be desired to award a Commission to that purpose to the Benchers of the several Inns of Court respectively It was also Ordered That all suspected Persons Irish and others that do endeavour to pass over into Ireland shall be Examined by the Mayor or other Officers of the several Ports where they endeavour to take Shipping upon such Instructions as they shall receive from this House and that the said Officers do tender unto all such persons the Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy and to Convict such according to Law An Information was this day given in to the Commons against one Mr. Carter a School-Master at High-gate for words spoken by him Viz. Chamberlain an Informer That Mr. Carter said That they were mad that would read the Order of the House of Commons of the 8th of September concerning Innovations And for the Protestation there were none but fools had taken it Whereupon Mr. Green who was also present said he had taken it Carter replied It was for want of information and he would maintain that it was against Reason Justice and Law and whereas said he it is to maintain the Priviledge of Parliament no Justice of Peace nor Constable but had as much priviledge as they had And said further That it was against the King and State I answered him Are you wiser than two Kingdoms for the Scots have taken it likewise What do you talk said he of a Company of Rebels and Rascals the Parliament hath dishonoured the King and Kingdom by making a Peace with them Upon which complaint it was Ordered That Carter should immediately be taken into Custody by the Sergeant at Arms. By which passage the Reader may plainly see the Genius of those times and of those Men who verified the saying of the Poet Nec Hospes ab Hospite tutus No person could in common discourse have the freedom of conversation but was in danger of these Zealous Informers who made it their business to run with informations to the House of Commons against such as durst oppose their Votes and Arbitrary Orders Tuesday Novemb. 9. Serjeant Jermin Mr. Chute and Mr. Hales appeared this day before the Lords and declared themselves willing to be of Council with the Lords the Bishops in the Impeachment brought up from the House of Commons The Bishops to answer their Impeachment upon Friday November 12. as they were formerly assigned by the House Whereupon it was Ordered That the Bishops that are impeached shall put in their Answers to the said Impeachment on Friday Morning next and that the Bill concerning the Bishops Votes shall be deferred until then Upon report of the Lords Committees for the Irish Affairs Earl of Leicester scruples raising men without the Kings Commission that
have been taken by them and do still remain in miserable slavery The enlargement of Forrests contrary to Charta de Foresta and the composition thereupon The exactions of Coat and Conduct Money and divers other Military Charges The taking away the Arms of the Trained-Bands of divers Counties The desperate Design of engrossing all the Gun-Powder into one hand keeping it in the Tower of London and setting so high a Rate upon it that the Poorer sort were not able to buy it nor could any have it without Licence thereby to leave the several parts of the Kingdom destitute of their necessary defence and by selling so dear that which was sold to make an unlawful advantage of it to the great Charge and detriment of the Subject the general destruction of the Kings Timber especially that in the Forrest of Dean sold to Papists which was the best Store-house of this Kingdom for the maintenance of our Shipping the taking away of mens right under colour of the Kings Title to Land between high and low Water-Marks The Monopolies of Soap Salt Wine Leather Sea-Cole and in a manner of all things of most common and necessary use The restraint of the Liberties of the Subjects in their habitation Trades and other Interest Their vexation and oppression by Purveyors Clerks of the Market and Salt-Peter-men The sale of pretended Nusances as Buildings in and about London conversion of Arable into Pasture continuance of Pasture under the name of depopulation have drawn many Millions out of the Subjects Purses without any considerable profit to his Majesty Large quantities of Common and several Grounds have been taken from the Subject by colour of the Statute of Improvement and by abuse of the Commission of Sewers without their consent and against it And not only private Interest but also publick faith hath been broken in seizing of the Money and Bullion in the Mint and the whole Kingdom like to be robb'd at once in that abominable project of Brass-Money Great numbers of his Majesties Subjects for refusing those unlawful charges have been vext with long and expensive Suits some fined and censured others committed to long and hard imprisonments and confinements to the loss of health of many of life in some and others have had their houses broken up their goods Seized some have been restrained from their lawful Callings Ships have been interrupted in their Voyages surprized at Sea in an Hostile manner by Projectors as by a common Enemy Merchants prohibited to unlade their Goods in such Ports as were for their own advantage and forced to bring them to those places which were most for the advantages of the Monopolizers and Projectors The Court of Star-Chamber hath abounded in extravagant censures not only for the maintenance and improvement of Monopolies and other unlawful Taxes but for divers other Causes where there hath been no offence or very small whereby his Majesties Subjects have been oppressed by grievous Fines Imprisonments Stigmatizings Mutilations Whippings Pillories Gags Confinements Banishments after so rigid a manner as hath not only deprived Men of the Society of their friends exercise of their professions comfort of Books use of Paper or Ink but even violated that near Union which God hath Establisht betwixt Men and their Wives by forced and constrained separation whereby they have been bereaved of the comfort and conversation one of another for many years together without hope of relief if God had not by his over-ruling Providence given some interruption to the prevailing Power and Council of those who were the Authors and Promoters of such peremptory and heady courses Judges have been put out of their places for refusing to do against their Oaths and Consciences others have been so awed that they durst not do their duties and the better to hold a Rod over them the Clause quam diu se bene gesserit was left out of their Patents and a new Clause Durante bene placito inserted Lawyers have been checkt for being faithful to their Clients Solicitors and Attorneys have been threatned and some punished for following lawful Suits And by this means all the approaches to Justice were interrupted and forecluded New Oaths have been forced upon the Subject against Law new Judicatories Erected without Law The Council-Table have by their Orders offered to bind the Subjects in their Free-holds Estates Suits and Actions The pretended Court of the Earl-Marshal was Arbitrary and Illegal in its being and Proceedings The Chancery Exchequer-Chamber Court of Wards and other English Courts have been grievous exceeding in their Jurisdiction The Estate of many Families weakned and some ruined by excessive Fines exacted from them for compositions of Wardships All Leases of above a hundred years made to draw on Wardship contrary to Law Undue proceedings used in the finding of Offices to make the Jury find for the King the Common-Law Courts seeing all men more enclined to seek Justice there where it may be fitted to their own desire are known frequently to forsake the Rules of the Common-Law and straining beyond their bounds under pretence of equity to do Injustice Titles of Honour Judicial places Serjeantships at Law and other Offices have been sold for great Sums of Money whereby the common Justice of the Kingdom hath been much endangered not only by opening a way of employment in places of great trust and advantage to Men of weak parts but also by giving occasion to Bribery Extortion Partiality It seldom hapning that places ill-gotten are well used Commissions have been granted for Examining the excess of Fees and when great exactions have been discovered Compositions have been made with Delinquents not only for the time past but likewise for immunity and security in offending for the time to come which under colour of remedy hath but confirmed and encreased the Grievance to the Subject The usual course of pricking Sheriffs not observed but many times Sheriffs made in an extraordinary way some times as a punishment and charge unto them sometimes such were pricked out as would be Instruments to execute whatsoever they would have to be done The Bishops and the rest of the Clergy did triumph in the suspensions Excommunications Deprivations and Degradations of divers Painful Learned and Pious Ministers in the vexation and grievous oppression of great numbers of his Majesties good Subjects The High Commission grew to such excess of sharpness and severity as was not much less then the Romish Inquisition and yet in many Cases by the Archbishops power was made much more heavy being assisted and strengthned by Authority of the Council-Table The Bishops and their Courts were as eager in the Country and although their Jurisdiction could not reach so high in rigour and extremity of punishment yet were they no less grievous in respect of the generality and multiplicity of vexations which lightning upon the meaner sort of Trades-men and Artificers did impoverish many thousands and so afflict and trouble others that great numbers to avoid their miseries departed
not to tender a thing called a Plea and Demurrer As also that the Commons conceive they ought to have been called in this Case for that they have desired it in both their Charges to be present at their Answer and that it was their Right to have been called Further They observe the long delay to the Commons for that they having charged these 13 Bishops long since for meer matter of Fact to be brought so late to Answer may introduce great inconveniencies in this particular and in the Consequences and is not Exampled by former Precedents That therefore upon these Grounds the Commons desire the Lords they may be admitted to make good their proof against these 13 Bishops and that they may be brought to Judgment It was this day Ordered by the Lords Tuesday Decemb. 7. Some Causes in Parliament determinable in no other Court That Forasmuch as the Cause between Smith and Busby in a Writ of Error decidable in no other Court but in Parliament in regard the Suit was Commenced by Original Writ and depending long before the Lords here it having been sundry days attended for Argument with Counsel And being it is a matter in Law the presence of the Judges is thought needful and so cannot be heard in the Term without prejudice to the several Courts of Westminster-Hall It is therefore Ordered by this House That the said Case shall be argued at this Bar on Thursday Sevennight next being the 16th of this Instant December and the Judges are desired to be present at the said Argument And further That the Parties of either side or their Council are to attend and come prepared for arguing and debating the Points in the said Case at their perils The following Commission to give Power to the English Commissioners of both Houses to Treat with the Scots Commissioners touching the Affairs of Ireland was read viz. CHARLES by the Grace of God The King's Commission to several Lords and Commons to treat with the Scots Commissioners concerning assistance for Ireland c. To Our right Trusty and right Well-beloved Cousin William Earl of Bedford and to Our right Trusty and right Well-beloved Cousin and Councellor Robert Earl of Leicester Lieutenant General and Governor General of Our Realm of Ireland as also to Our Trusty and right Well-beloved Edward Lord Howard of Escrick and likewise to Our Trusty and right Well-beloved Nathanael Fines Esq Sir William Armyn Baronet Sir Philip Stapleton Knight John Hampden Esq Greeting Know ye That We reposing assured Trust and Confidence in your approved Wisdoms Fidelities and great Abilities have Nominated Constituted and Appointed you to be our Commissioners and by these presents do give full Power and Authority unto you or any Three or more of you whereof the said Earl of Bedford Earl of Leicester or Lord Howard to be one to Treat and Consult with Our Right Trusty and Right Well beloved Cosins William Earl of Lothian and John Earl of Lindsay Our Commissioners of Our Scottish Nation of and concerning Our Irish Affairs for the quieting and suppressing of all Tumults Insurrections and Rebellions moved and raised in Our Realm of Ireland and settling Peace and Tranquillity therein according to such Instructions and Directions as you shall hereafter from time to time receive from Vs in that behalf Wherefore We Will Require and Command you or any three or more of you whereof the said Earl of Bedford Earl of Leicester and Lord Howard to be one forthwith with all diligence to attend the Execution of this Our Commission accordingly And whatsoever you shall do in this behalf according to the Tenor hereof this Our Commission shall be your sufficient Warrant and Discharge for the same Witness Our Self at Westminster the 7th day of December in the 17th Year of Our Reign c. The late Bishop of Lincoln now Archbishop of York Late Bishop of Lincoln now Archbishop of York Reports the Conference concerning the Bishops Impeached Reported the Conference with the Commons Yesterday concerning the Impeached Bishops which because it differs from the Heads Reported for that purpose by Mr. Glyn in the Commons Journal I thought it not amiss to insert His Grace Reported That Mr. Glyn said That the Knights Citizens and Burgesses of the House of Commons having lately received a Message from their Lordships that their Lordships had appointed this day to hear the Plea and Demurrer of the Bishops and that such of the House of Commons might be there as they thought fitting commanded him to deliver unto their Lordships these Particulars That the Canons and Constitutions in Question were voted by both Houses to contain Matters contrary to the King's Prerogative the Laws of the Land the Right of Parliament the Propriety and Liberty of the Subject and many matters tending to Sedition and of dangerous Consequence That thereupon the House of Commons to the intent to bring this Matter to Judgment brought up their Impeachment of the 13 Bishops 4th Augusti last which was read verbatim This was all that was acted 4o. Augusti But least this Impeachment might prove too general they brought up a second Charge or Impeachment 13 Augusti which was read in haec verba Whereas the Knights Citizens c. which to avoid Tautologies the Reader may see before in the Transactions of the 13 August By the bringing of this second Impeachment the House of Commons conceive they had satisfied two main Objections 1. That the Book of Canons and Constitutions was not particularly instanced upon in the first which now they punctually deliver with the Impeachment 2. That they had not before charged any thing in particular but now they did That all and every the said Canons and Constitutions and Grants of Benevolence c. were and are contrary c. as in the Vote And hereupon they desired the 13 Bishops might be put to their Answers and yet for all this Desire of the Commons 13. Augusti they had several times which spent almost a Quarter of a Year given them to answer in Their last and peremptory day was the 10th of November last and then they put in no Answer at all but a certain Writing which they are pleased to call a Plea and Demurrer Vpon notice hereof the House of Commons returned an Answer That whereas they had impeached 13 Bishops whereof one of them had pleaded Not Guilty and the rest had neither confessed nor denyed the Impeachment they desired a prefixed day to descend to Proofs and make good the Charge Soon after they received a Message from their Lordships That their Lordships had appointed this day to hear the Demurrer argued Hence it appears That notwithstanding divers daies are given to the Bishops to answer nothing is brought in but a Plea and Demurrer which was not to be admitted for two several Reasons 1. No Defence ought to be made to an Impeachment brought in by the Commons but in the presence of the Commons and it ought to be
but by Authority of Parliament and that a free Synod of this Nation * * That is from the Law which appoints it and gives the Members equal Privilege and Protection with the Members of the H. of Commons differing in the whole Constitution from the present Convocations of the Clergy now in Vse among us might be as the Petitioners apprehend of great Vse for that purpose and that not only this but all other your great Consultations might be much furthered by a more earnest and assiduous seeking of God by the joint and publick Fasting and Prayers of the whole Kingdom in these sad times so full of distractions and Hellish Conspiracies at home and bloody Cruelties of those Popish Rebels against our own Flesh and our Bones in Ireland The Petitioners humbly pray That you would vouchsafe to lay hold upon the first opportunity that your important Affairs will permit of reassuming into your further consideration their former Petition and to proceed thereupon as you shall find cause either by committing the same to the Debate and Disquisition of a free Synod or otherwise and in the mean time to become Mediators to His Gracious Majesty who could not take notice of their former Petition to this Honourable House for some relaxation in matters of Ceremonies and of reading of the whole Liturgy which as the Petitioners verily believe and hope to prove have been of late times urged further then ever the Law intended And a free Synod of Grave Learned and Judicious Divines of this Kingdom the Dominion of Wales and the Islands adjacent may be by the Authority of Parliament Indicted for the more through and fruitful Debate of the Premisses to expedite a full Reformation by the High Court of Parliament for the setling of a Godly and Religious Order and Government in this Church as your Wisdom shall find convenient And that a publick Fast may be Commanded and Religiously observed throughout the Kingdom once in every Month during your sitting in Parliament for the more effectual procuring of Gods protection of your Persons and of his blessing upon your proceedings and till the miseries of our Brethren in Ireland be happily put to an end And the Petitioners shall be ready further to attend the pleasure of this House with their Reasons of their present Suit for a free Synod of this Nation and of a new Constitution thereof differing from those now in Being when they shall be required and to pray without ceasing c. Were I to give Instructions to draw the Exact Pourtraicture of a Non-Conforming-Conforming Church Hypocrite with Peace in one hand and Fire and Sword in the other with a Conscience like a Cockle-shell that can shut so close when he is under the fear of the Law or losing his Living that you cannot Croud the smallest Scruple into it but when a tide of liberty wets him can lay himself open and display all his resentments against that Government in the Church to whose Laws he had sworn obedience and by that horrid sin of Perjury must confess himself a Villain of no manner of Conscience to Swear without due Consideration and to break his Oath without a lawful Determination that it was unlawful I would recommend this Petition as a rare Original to Copy after I cannot tell how it will relish with the Readers Palate but I must profess my self so tyred with this miserable Crambe that I am under the irresistable temptation of refreshing my self with laying aside for one moment the Gravity of an Historian and Burlesquing the intolerable Flatteries of this Petition and these Hypocritical Petitioners by making them speak Truth for in their Courtship to the Faction for whose Goust this delicate Petition was Cook't and Spiced when they recount their wonderful Atchievments in the Work of Reformation there is still I find a Supplement of some material Truth in matter of plain Fact wanting which I will make bold to add They acknowledge the Pains and Piety of the Faction manfested in many things of high concernment for the Glory of God by affronting his Solemn-publick Established Worship the Honor of the King by indeavouring to degrade him and divert him of the Beams of Majesty his Royal Prerogative the purging of the Church by purging it quite out of the Kingdom they commend their Zeal and Courage for the true Religion against all Popish Idolatry and Superstitious Innovations manifested by letting in a whole Flood of Errors Heresies Sects and Schisms at the Breach of the Banks of the Church-Government by tender Conscience in encouraging Preaching of Sedition and Disobedience to Laws Government and Governors and justling out all Praying out of the Church except the Wild Extravagant Dangerous Libelling Extempory Enthusiasms of bold and presumptuous Men who called their own acquired Art of Impudent Non-sence a gift of the Spirit as doubtless it was of that Spirit which rules in the Children of Disobedience in encouraging painful godly Ministers formerly set aside and justly for Preaching Sedition Schism and Faction for good Divinity in discountenancing bold and unmeet Men that darst Preach the Doctrine of rendring to Caesar the things of Caesar and to God the things of God that without sufficient calling presumptuously intruded into that Holy Office by only gently reproving them for the present and afterwards permitting Tagg and Ragg Godly Coblers and Gifted Tinkers Zealous Taylors and the most sordid illiterate Mechanicks to invade the Pulpit to vilifie the Petitioners with the Title of Hirelings dumb Dogs Baal 's Priests c. by Adonibezeck 's Law without Controul or Animadversion from the Honorable Faction for taking away the Tyranny of the High-Commission and Ecclesiastical Courts and setting Mens Tongues at liberty to Rail without Reason to Quarrel with their Superiors without Cause to affront them with impunity and in conclusion to Murther them Religiously and in the Fear of the Lord for their worthy Orders for removing illegal Rites and Ceremonies Superstitious and Scandalous Pictures and other Innovations and setting up in their stead the Bell and Dragon of these Mens Inventions and for bringing in the greatest Innovations a Church without a Bishop a Religion without Divine Service a Minister without Lawful Ordination a Christian without Baptism a Sacrament without Consecration and at last a Heaven without Repentance of any or all these horrid Sins and Incapacities For their Care to suppress the Irish Rebellion and Butcheries of the bloody Papists by imploying the Men and Money raised for that Service to butcher the Loyal Protestants in England who held the Popish and Malignant Doctrine that they ought to Fear God and Honor the King and die at the Feet of their Sacred Sovereign in defence of his Person Crown and Dignity against these Religious Rebels But Manum de Tabulâ I will not Tire my self and the Reader with Epitomizing their Villanies which are able to fill Volumes and with which he will find these stow'd Tuesday Decemb. 21. Message from the
prevailing Faction in such a light as will plainly discover their Ambition Cruelty and Revenge The Paper speaks this Language IT may be wondred at that The Lord Digbie's Apology giving an Account of the matter of Kingston c. after well nigh a Years groaning under the most insupportable Burthen of Publick Displeasure and Censure I should now consider my self so much as in a general Calamity to make an Apology to the World or should hope that at a time when so great clouds of Jealousie and disesteem hang over persons of the most clear and unblemished Reputations any thing I can say may reconcile me to those affections which have been transported with so much violence to my prejudice But whosoever knoweth me well and the great trouble of mind I indured when I found my self by what demerit God is my judge I cannot guess fallen from that proportion of esteem with my Country of which I was prouder then I can be of any worldly preferment into so eminent a degree of disfavour with the representative body thereof upon whose wisdom and Authority no man hath looked with more reverence and veneration that I was marked out as an Enemy to the Common-Wealth I am sure cannot but expect from me some discovery of that sence and that I should at least endeavour to distinguish my misfortunes from my faults whereby such who are not engaged in a peremptory uncharitableness may find cause to change the Opinion they have taken upon trust of me Nor am I out of hope that the experience men have since had of the times inclination to calumny by the declining of so many persons of Honour and integrity in the popular estimation may at the last open a way to so much justice and ingenuity on my behalf that all men may discern in their own right that if they shall so credulously consent upon general discourses to sacrifice a third mans Honour and Reputation they shall open a door to let in ruine to themselves and may quickly lose the advantage of their own innocence I shall begin my unfortunate story from the beginning of this Parliament reflecting no further back upon the precedent then in a remembrance of the great comfort I then receiv'd in my Countries acceptation of my first attempts in its service at a time as some were pleased to express it when the Court was at the highest whether to work upon mens ambitions or fears Before that time I am sure I was as unacquainted with Action as with Envy having kept more company with books then with men and being so well content with that society that I had as little ambition as merit to improve my condition To this Parliament I was sent on the behalf of the Countrey wherein I lived and truly if I brought any passion or affection thither with me it was my former warmth improved against those pressures and the persons who begot those pressures which were grievous to the people and against these I will without vanity say that I brought as great a resolution to discharge my conscience and my duty as any man in that Assembly and had the happiness for some Months to receive that testimony My conversation was and I made or indeavoured to make my friendships with those whose experience and abilities were most eminent for the publick service and to the reputation and authority of these men I confess for a while I gave my self up with as much submission as a man could without resigning the use of his own understanding In any thing that was necessary or but probably pretended to be necessary for the Common-Wealth we never differed in the least degree but in improvements in real alterations which were to be govern'd by prudential motives we were not always of one mind And whosoever remembreth the passages of that time must call to mind that the first declination I suffer'd from the interest I seem'd to have was in the business of the Church In which having had frequent consultations with the chiefest Agents for a Reformation and finding no three men to agree upon what they would have in the place of that they all resolv'd to remove I agreed not with the prevailing sense having not hardiness enough to incline to a mutation which would evidently have so great an influence upon the peace prosperity and interest of the whole Kingdom And thus from the first debate of Episcopacy upon the London Petition all men observ'd the date of my unmerited savour began to expire Then came on the Tryal of the Earl of Strafford in the which I must say I failed not of my duty in proving the charge and evidence before those who were to judge of both In the discharging of that duty it was my fortune by the unlucky acception of some expressions of mine to draw upon me a sharp malignity from some persons of much interest in the House which never failed to manifest it self after that accident upon every the least occasion About this time I was told by a Friend that I lost much of my credit by being observ'd to be so much at Court I replyed that I had not then the same justice with other men who were there more then I though they avowed it less that it was a principal joy to me to see those persons who had been the prime Actors in the happy Reformation of this Parliament so acceptable at Court and likely to have so great a share in the chief places there and the conduct of affairs for the future That since it had pleased His Majesty to give so Plenary a Redress to all the grievances of His Subjects and to secure them for ever from the like invasions by such a Wall of brass as the Triennial Bill I conceived that thence forward there was no more to be thought on but how in a grateful return to His Majesty to advance his Honour and Plenty according as before such happy settlements I had often heard those principal intendents of the publick good most solemnly profess and consequently that the Court and Countrey were in truth now to be all of a piece and there would hereafter be no more cause of jealousie between them Lastly that howsoever I thought my self as likely to do good there as to receive hurt The first Evidence I had of the disfavour of the House of Commons where I had served with all faithfulness diligence and humility was upon the printing of my Speech to the Bill of Attainder of the Earl of Strafford As for the Good-Fridays Exercise which the delivery of it in the House procur'd me I reputed that a most comfortable and eminent testimony of the continuance still of much justice and favour towards me in that Honourable House since after a dozen distinct charges upon the several passages of that Speech urged against me with great strictness and acrimony by that number of the most eminent persons there both in abilities and interests and at a time when
proved by the Testimony of many Witnesses upon consideration of the precedent concurrent and subsequent Acts and Intentions of my Lord of Strafford I shall not now run over my Lord Primate's Testimony or my Lord Conwaye's or Master Treasurer's or my Lord of Bristol's but make use of them in their proper places when I shall put all together to shew his design and to prove his speaking of the words Then he comes to the Five and twentieth Article which I shall not insist on though he pretends it not proved I shall refer that to my recollection that I may not answer to his pieces but bring all together and then the horror of his Fact shall more speciously appear Only this under favour I cannot pass over when he comes to justify an Advice and Counsel of the King 's being loose and absolved from all rules of Government and that he might use his Prerogative as he pleases he is pleased to mention the Argument of the Judges in the Ship-Money and what they should deliver he makes the Warrant of his Counsel Now your Lordships may observe he would Justifie his Actions by Law in some cases where it is to his advantage but in other cases he must be ignorant of the Law But my Lords for him to mention any thing in the Argument of the Judges concerning the Ship-money which is now condemned and to make that a ground of his Counsel and advice to the King and not the Judgment in truth but the Argument of the Counsel at Bar that therefore he is loose and absolved from all rule of Government for him to make the Parliaments deferring to give supply to be that necessity which was insisted upon in the Counsels Argument and to be such an unavoidable necessity as to beget an Invasion upon Propriety and Liberty it rests in your Judgments and the Judgments of all that hear me what Argument this is and what he declares his opinion to be this day In the latter part let me close hands and agree with him he sayes Proofs must be taken by themselves they must not be Judged by pieces but together and now in good time I shall joyn with him and shall desire the same Judgment that things may not be taken asunder but Judged together according to his own words For the twentieth Article he is thereby charged with being an Incendiary between both Nations and an occasion of drawing two Armies into this Kingdom and to incense the War My Lords I remember if I did not mis-conceive and my memory mis-prompt me my Lord said He could have no occasion to incense a War being a man of an Estate and should have no benefit by it having sufficient to live without it but in due time I shall make it appear to my apprehension and I believe to your Lordships when you have heard it that the incensing of this War and provoking of it was the principal instrument of bringing to pass his design of subverting the Laws through the whole work of it My Lords in the passage of this he takes occasion to speak of the Testimony of Mr. Secretary Vane who testifies That my Lord was for an Offensive and himself for a Defensive War Whence my Lord argues here is no great difference for both were for a War But my Lord Is there no difference between an offensive and defensive War in case of Subjects that live under one King is there no difference to bring an Army to offend them and for the King to raise a force to defend himself truly I think there is a great difference and a very material one too but your Lordships see he makes no difference between them My Lords In the four and twentieth Article he mentions That he is charged with being an occasion to break the Parliament and lays hold of that as in the other Articles That it was not proved but declined My Lords when he shall hear the repetition of the Evidence though part of the Article was not particularly insisted upon yet I believe it will appear to your Lordships and the world that he was the occasion of breaking the last Parliament and it is expresly proved by Witnesses enough and though he sayes How should any body think him an occasion of it that did so often advise Parliaments yet I shall shew anon that when he did advise them it was to compass his own Design and Plot without which his ends could not be brought to pass He came from the four and twentieth Article to the Seven and twentieth and he answers â—â—â—iâ—st that Article That when Armies are in the Field men cannot walk so peaceably as an Attorney with his Box and Papers in Westminster Hall I know â—ot wâ—at he means but when two Armies are in the Field they may raise War against the King's People as well as the King for his just defence it is the way to make his people terrified with Armies and to avoid them as a Serpent and therefore it is a dangerous aspersion as I conceive With these he concluded except some things that he took by way of artificial insinuation to perswade your Lordships That it was dangerous to raise a Treason that had lain asleep I know not how many hundred years and create a Treason A strange thing indeed it is That a man shall be charged with a Treason for subverting the Law A strange thing that one should be charged with Treason for killing a Justice sitting in the Seat of Justice and yet it should be no Treason to destroy King and Kingdom and People and all all which are destroyed if the Law be subverted And now having touched upon what he hath spoken with your Lordships good favour I shall crave leave to run the course I have propounded with my self and that very briefly that is upon the whole matter to shew how far the Evidence produced on the Commons part doth prove the Charge My Lords That laid to his Charge is a design and purpose to subvert the fundamental Laws of two Kingdoms and to introduce an Arbitrary and Tyrannical Government not that he did effect it but that he did intend it for if he had done it it had been too late to question it he had left no rule whereby to call him to Tryal but his intention and his endeavour are his Charge My Lords How far this is proved if your Lordships be pleased to call to mind the Articles and the Evidences produced on the Commons part your Lordships will find I believe that his Words his Counsels and his Actions do sufficiently prove his endeavouring to destroy In the first Article where my Lord of Strafford hath the first opportunity offered him to put this endeavour in execution that is the first place of eminency amongst his other Places and Commands which I take it was his being made President of the North he is no sooner there but there be instructions procured to enable him to proceed in that Court almost in all