from the company of Tamar whenas he hated her because he had abused her but it was in Joseph that he refused to accompany his Mistress whenas he might have securely enjoyed her Nor is it any virtue for any man to do or forbear any thing for feare of punishment for so horses dogs and other irrational creatures will do or not do many things for feare of stripes which are commanded or forbidden by their Masters Nor is it any virtue in a Judg to pronounce true judgment if he be hired thereunto by any reward or bribe Where therefore neither worldly pleasure profit love feare hate nor any sublunary thing but it may be loss to all these do not move a man to the doing or not doing of what in conscience he ought to do or forbear there nothing less then Gods grace and power in such a man can be the true and efficient cause of such an action 6. It is a most admirable thing to consider how notwithstanding all Why only Man can do virtuous Actions the various natures dispositions and events of things this one Providence foresees and provides for all created things in the whole universe until she brings them all to their designed end Nor does this providence foresee and provide for all things from an eternal and fatal decree impelling all actions of all creatures For then there could be no such thing as good or bad men but God were the efficient cause of vice as well as virtue in men but by a mean foresight or knowledg does often determin necessary effects from contingent causes Which does not only plainly appear from very many places of Scripture as that the men of Keilah would have delivered David if he 1 Sam. 23. 12. had not escaped thence that God would have destroyed Niniveh within forty daies if the men had not repented that God would have gathered the children of Jerusalem together as a Hen gathereth her Chickens but Matth. 23. 27. they would not that if the mighty works had been done in Tire and Sidon which were done in Chorazin they had repented in dust and ashes c. Matth. 11. 21. but also all Gods promises and cursings upon men do depend upon their obedience or disobedience to what he commands And however this rigid opinion of Fate and the eternal determination of all things be asserted by the Stoicks yet do not I think that the most wicked man that ever was did ever attribute any wicked action to any such cause but pretended conscience pleasure profit or his own will never Gods It is true indeed that God hath made man in flesh and blood and so prone to desire many things which he ought not But though diverse men do naturally affect and desire things they ought not yet God hath so made every man a free Lord of all his actions that there is no man but may chuse whether he will do or not any thing to the attaining of his appetitions and affections And mans excellency above other creatures consists in this that his actions are not determined by his objects as other creatures are but he may freely do this action as it is moved in him from the appetition of pleasure profit pride c. or abstain from it as he apprehends it forbidden by him who may forbid And so may any man freely do or endeavor to do any thing which he ought to do though to his temporal disadvantage but this having no Temporal motive must proceed from Gods grace which no creature upon earth can do but only man only man therefore can do virtuous actions CHAP. III. Of Judgment 1. JUdgment is the definitive of him who by right commands permits What is Judgment or forbids a thing either by himself or instrument whether any thing be done conformable to a Law commanding permitting or forbidding it 2. Herein judgment differs from a Law A Law is the declared will of How it differs from a Law him who by right commands permits or forbids a thing together with a penalty annext for not observance after some reasonable time fixt whereby the obliged may take notice of such declaration Judgment is the sencence of him who so commands forbids or permits whether such an act were an omission or transgression of any Law so declared 3. Justice is the upright doing of any just or legal action conformable to the Law of him who by right commands Judgment is the discerning of How Judgment differs from Justice a good or bad action 4. All judgment must necessarily be the act of three persons at least What persons are necessary in Judgment viz. the Judge the accuser and the party accused or as we say the Judge the Plaintiff and Defendant 5. The end or ratio finalis of Judgment is either to determine differences The end of Judgment or punish offenders CHAP. IV. Of Equity 1. EQuity is twofold either a remission or moderation of the Laws How manifold is Equity when the execution of Laws will rather kill then cure a distemper in the Subject as when many Subjects either upon passion or being seduced have so far transgressed Laws that they have forfeited by Law their lives and estates yet in such case are not supream powers rigidly to exact all which the Law gives them but it is equity so to punish the principal Authors and other Subjects that others may be deterred from the like and the generality offending preserved So where the Law commands upon penalty and it becomes impossible for the Subject to perform as it ever was and will be there it is equity to remit the penalty Where therefore the Law obliges a Tenant to pay his Landlord such a Rent yet if by inundation of waters sterility of the season c. it comes to pass that the Tenant by no fault of his either cannot or it will be the ruine of himself and family to pay it there it is equity in the Landlord to remit or moderate what by Law he might justly exact Or secondly a supplement of the Law in cases wherein things in conscience ought to be done yet for want of some formalities or niceties they cannot in strictness of Law be exacted 2. Equity is when with a sincere intention men although it be to How Equity differs from Judgment their prejudice endeavor to please God Judgment a giving sentence according to Laws 3. In Courts of Judicature the Judges proceed according to the declared The necessity of Courts of Equity Laws and ought not in judgment to vary or swerve from them but proceed as they are impowred by Law and their Commission and Laws are made usually ad terrorem rather to affright men then to punish all offenders which Laws were they not moderated it were impossible for all men to subsist under the burden of them nor is there any man but has need of Gods mercy and the Kings Courts of Equity therefore are as necessary
case to him whether there be a King or no King in Israel for he will do what is right in his own eyes For our Author says In renouncing the power Pag. 25. of our Will we renounce our Understanding also Our Author for his part needs not fear it but sure he fears that if he do so because he cannot hope that he is qualified enough to be a Privy-Councellor that he has bound himself up from dabling with the Grounds of Obedience and Government Why he should do well to be of Counsel with Adam against God for the Devil and he agree in the same thing viz. That it is not liberty enough for Adam to eat of the other trees of the garden in Eden no Adam must not renounce his will and understanding too in order to his chiefest good the knowledge of good and evil and making himself like unto God by tasting the forbidden fruit To our Author it is not liberty enough for the Subject to square his actions to the Laws and Rules of his Country he must not renounce his will to be commanded by King or Laws but must have his will too in making of Laws Now let our Author tell me what a Government this is like to prove Who will hold the plough that is perswaded he may handle the scepter Who will live in an obscure cottage that hopes he may govern at the helm or eat his bread in the sweat of his brows who may expect to fare deliciously every day And now let me tell our Author once for all That humane Laws are made to retain Subjects in their obedience lest a worse thing happen unto them There must be no starting out or breaking loose from them For Laws are like the banks which encompass waters if there be the least hole in them the banks will be blown up and the waters lose themselves The Fifth GROUND That Fidelity is different from Obedience and wherein it consists Author NOw some good body help a lame Dog over the stile Here we find our Author taking monstrous pains and in a great sweat why what 's the matter trow What! Our Author undertakes to shew that Servants owe their Masters no obedience but fidelity only And this he would prove by a mighty argument viz. A man buyes a piece of Cloth or other merchandise of another and pays for it And therefore Servants owe their Masters no obedience And if this will not do it his Ipse dixit must or he loses an essential ingredient towards the patching up of his Fools paradise Observ Now herein our Author and I differ and I fear we shall never agree in any thing Our Author will trust his servant where he expects no obedience and I will make my servant obey me whenas it may be I will not trust him for a groat And indeed our Author will do more for his servant then I see in reason any man should do for him For pag. 141. he tells us In pure Morality he may falsifie and break promise if he save any thing by it and is better then his word I shall say no more in answer to this Ground but object the authority of the Holy Ghost against it Ephes 5. 6. Servants be obedient to them that are your Masters according to the flesh c. The Sixth GROUND In what consists Right or Due Author HEre our Author says The next Consideration may appear too Metaphysical a Nicety for a Moral Treatise Yet he armed Cap-a-pe in compleat Ignorance valiantly attempts it and will tell you of I know not what of Reason which takes nothing to be good but what is good for a mans self and makes it the rule of his actions to do what is fitting for him or conformable to his that is to a Rational nature But this is a rule by which he treats Horses Dogs Trees and Stones c. and runs through all his actions Observ Well But since the men of this world were never more unreasonable and every man so pretending to Reason and yet no man almost can tell what he means by Reason let us see what Ratio Reason is and what Reasoning is and why Man is onely said to be a reasonable creature Reason is properly that power of the soul by which a Man is discerned from other living creatures and by which he does excell and command them By Horace it is put for the reasoning and discoursing of the soul for finding out what is true Ratio ponitur pro ratiocinatione discursu animi ad investigandum verum Cicero lib. 2. ad Heren Ratio est causa quae demonstrat verum esse id quod intendimus brevi subjectione Reason is the cause which shews that thing to be true which we intend in a short view And Reason is many times equivocally used for Counsel as Cicero in Verr. Mea quidem ratio cum in praeteritis rebus est cognita tum in reliquis explorata provisa est My counsel is as well known in things past as throughly tried and provided in other things Sometime for Respect Habenda est ratio honoris Men ought to respect their honor Sometime for Care Habenda est ratio rei familiaris Men must look after their houshold-affairs Sometime for Business Rationem habet cum terra quae nunquam recusat imperium He busieth himself with his land which never disobeys him Thus far Calapine Sometime it is taken for Account Lu. 16. 2. Redde rationem villicationis tuae Give an account of thy Stewardship Ratio in the third Definition of the fifth Book of Euclide est duarum magnitudinum ejusdem generis mutua quaedam secundum quantitatem habitudo Reason is a certain mutual habit of two magnitudes of the same kind after their quantity As when two Quantities of the same kind two Numbers two Lines two Superficies two Solids c. are compared one to another according to their quantity that is accordingly as one is greater less or equal to another this comparison or mutual habit of one to another was by Geometricians called Ratio But now I know not by what habit or custom Proportio which definition 4º lib. 5. Euclid is Rationum similitudo And definition 5 consists in three terms at least for indeed it must consist in four for where it is in three the medium is iterated twice as what proportion four hath to six six hath to nine c. hath eaten the former quite up and is only used Or take Reason thus Reason is that by which men from given Principles do rightly infer and deduce Conclusions And Reasoning is twofold either à priori or à posteriori A priori from the cause nature and matter of necessary truths to shew what effects follow from thence and such Propositions are called demonstrative or scientifical shewn and known from the Causes such are all Propositions in Geometry and Mathematiques Or when the Effect is certain and the Cause probable and these are but probable
expected in this World and if that may then by what means it is to be attained but that I might by degrees accomplish my end I begin with man in his first Cause and being Man then in his first being is to be considered either as created or begotten as created sure no man in his wits will deny but that God was the prime and only efficient cause of his creation who without any ordinary concurrence of naturall causes did so create him and that this was not from a confluence of naturall causes is evident for otherwise it had been a Generation not a Creation and necessarily something must be Created before any thing can be Generated of it Nor is God if a man rightly considers it lesse the prime and efficient cause of man in his Generation then in his Creation for it must needs be evident to every man That male and female are not the first cause of Generation because then they would alike of themselves without the influence of a superiour cause be apted for Generation and so every Creature of it selfe in a like power of Generating one as much as another the contrary of which every one daily sees Nor are all Creatures at all times alike disposed to Generation but apted and disposed thereunto from some exterior cause as we see in Foxes about the Brumall solstice and Ravens in January other creatures generally about the Vernal Equinox and Deere about the Autumnall which without all doubt doth proceed from the influence of the Sun which in those seasons disposes them thereunto but that the Sun is not the prime and efficient cause of Generation is confessed by Aristotle where hee faith * That in omni creature divinum quid reperiri respondens Elemento stellarum Lib. 2. cap. 3. de Gen. Anim. esseque omnipotentis creatoris vicarium It is not therefore the Sun nor male and female which can be the first cause of a man or any other creature but that minde or Soul which governs the innumerable and vast bodies of the Univers and by a perpetuall motion of the Earth from West to East according to the new Hypotheses in Astronomy or of the Sun from East to West after the former Hypotheses through the divers Regions of the Earth doth apt and dispose all things therein to their production and dissolution So that God is the prime efficient cause as wel in the generation as creation of man other creatures the manner only is different God in generation from the confluence of necessary contingent causes doth Generate Man and other creatures and originally did create them without any confluence of causes Nor is God lesse the prime preserver of all Creatures then the first cause of the Creation and Generation of them for not all the sublunary meanes of eating drinking sleeping exercise physick c. can preserve any creature thus Generated or Created but some internall cause whether it be called anima or pars animae or quid animae or aliquid habens animam aut intellectus aut denique numen and this is it in every Creature which doth worke towards its end and orders all these things with unimitable and incomprehensible art and providence alwaies procures what is best as well for its being as well-being as well for defence as ornament Spiritus intus alit totamque infusa per artus Mens agitat molem Virg Aenei And though all these outward things however necessary for the preservation of every Creature are accidentall and may be more or less acquired and communicated by every creature yet this internall cause this numen this Lar familiare or anima which disposes and orders all these outward causes is not to be acquired or communicated by any Creature So that a man must needs confesse That in all Creatures as well as Man there is some particle of divine Aire which doth order and dispose of all sublunary meanes in a wonderfull and diverse manner towards their preservation untill by a propense naturall disposition they all resolve into their first Principles But these outward meanes are acquired and communicated by severall Creatures divers and severall waies Some doe acquire these outward meanes from an innate impulse never with understanding or reason moving them others rarely without their understanding or reason and this latter only is Man Yet how fraile a mans reason and understanding is even to the acquiring of things necessary for his preservation is evidenly seen almost in all men for there is no man in this world who can by his understanding and reason so govern his actions that those things so directed by him have alwaies a like event nay often times the same thing propounded by the same man upon the same grounds and reasons hath so contrary an event that at this time it ruins him which other while was of much advantage to him And this is daily seen among all sorts of men so that it is most manifest that a mans understanding or reason cannot preserve him as he is an intellectuall rationall Creature nor Justice Religion and Piety as a sociable but somthing superior to these What then shall we say to these things Is Religion Justice and Piety and a mans understanding and reason of no account because they cannot procure peace and preservation Nothing lesse for God having first created man and other creatures without the confluence of naturall causes did ever after their first creation cease to make any other but the species of all things have ever since been renewed by Generation but in Generation God doth not renew the species of all creatures from an absolute act of his own but from the coition of male and female disposed thereunto in perfect creatures oftentimes from matter disposed many creatures are aequivocally generated without the coition of male and female which thing is evidently seene from the yeerly renuing of of frogs caterpillars c. The antient Aegyptians from the observation of the very many creatures thus generated in the River Nile did believe that all perfect creatures were originally not from creation but from aequivocal generation Yet though these spurious and imperfect creatures are thus generated yet do they all generate their like Aristotle Hist Anim. only excepts the Eele and I could never yet see either Row or Milt in any of them But though God be the prime efficient cause of the generation all creatures and therefore absolutely necessary to the production of every creature and though the conditions which he hath ordained be absolutely necessary to the generation of every creature yet are not these conditions alwaies performed from any absolute necessity of the part of God but oftentimes from contingent causes and the will of the creature For example it is necessary that the influence of the Sun from matter disposed in standing pools should produce Frogs yet are not alwaies those Pooles necessary to be but are often made and often filled up
from voluntary and contingent causes of man so contactus naturalis in bodies apted and disposed doth necessarily generate yet is there no necessity that this contactus should bee but it might not have beene c. Universall causes in nature produce nothing of themselves but as meeting with particular and materiall causes disposed to production the universall causes are alwaies prime and necessary but their meeting with particular causes are not alwaies so but often times contingent and voluntary As God by the confluence of naturall causes is alwaies the first cause of all creatures by Generation so is he the first cause of the preservation of all Creatures yet doth not he preserve them by any absolute necessity of his part alone but by such meanes as he hath ordained for every Creature I say this meanes doth not alwaies come to passe from inevitable necessity of the part of God but often times from the will of men and contingent causes for example no man lives but as he daily repaires nature by eating and drinking yet there is no necessity that he should eat or drink but he may choose whether he will or not Nor is God less the prime preserver of intellectuall and rationall creatures yet doth he not preserve them as other creatures void of understanding but thus using the intellectuall and rationall faculty of their Soul yet there is no man but may chuse whether he will use his understanding and reason in his actions and that man who doth not use his understanding in his actions but only his affections and passions how great soever he be will live to see misery enough And though Religion and Justice cannot of themselves preserve men in Peace and Happinesse but some superior cause which must order and dispose them thereunto yet so necessary are they for the preservation of peace and happiness that whersoever they are neglected men did ever degenerate into straction confusion and prophanenesse this superior cause which dignifies men above all other creatures as well intellectuall as sociable is God who is the prime efficient and necessary cause of peace and happinesse among sociable Creatures and Religion and Justice are the necessary meanes which he hath ordained therefore But though Religion and Justice be necessary for the peace and happinesse of any Nation yet is it not alwaies necessary on Gods part men should be Religious and Just but men may chuse whether they will do religious and just acts or not God therefore is the first and necessary cause of peace and happinesse among men and Religion and Justice the necessary meanes which he hath ordained thereunto and this to be performed by man and let no man thinke that God will save any man in this world or blesse him in the world to come against his Will when men will not endeavor these things by such meanes as hee hath ordained Man therefore by Religion and Justice ought to endeavour through God's blessing to attaine to Peace and Happinesse as well in this World as in the next without which hee cannot reasonably hope for eyther Having thus far treated of the causes of all society and vindicated the Government and Lawes of my native Country and mother-Church of England It will not be amisse before I conclude to add a word or two in vindication of Sir Edward Coke my most honored Ancestor since by words and writing he is so traduced as indeed Quis ille a tergo quem nulla aconia pinsit by men so maliciously or ignorantly or both Among the rest one a late writer of a Pamphlet I will not call it because of the subject being the life of our late Soveraigne yet it is without name although I thinke few men but are sufficiently assured of the Author upon a seditious and reproachfull speech he sayes tending to the dishonour of his Majesties Government made by Mr. Coke after the wonted rate of his lavish pen without any more adoe makes him a Chip of the old Block But of all men I am content he next after one of our Mercuries should say it since if he be not traduced unjustly hee can asperse the Nobility upon the faith of a Mercury and so many others upon none at all and his Quotations upon his Geography So fals that upon search made by a Reader and scarce any to be found to be true upon the reprinting he blotted out the pages and only quoted the Authors and left the Reader to finde them where he could If these be true then certainly his ipse dixit is of small account if false then let him deny them But I can tell our Historian newes of his Soldier whom he page 156. made openly to be shot to death in Saint Pauls Church yard for as is confidently reported and beleeved he was apprehended about Whitehall June 17. and is at this time in faire election of being hanged And being no lesse a more famous Geographer then Historian though his second Edition suffers much for want of his expunged pages to finde out his quotations hee page 123. makes the Town and Castle of Conway a place of principall command on that narrow channell which runs between the County of Carnarvan and the Isle of Anglesey whereas the Town and Castle of Conway stand upon the River Conway which parts Denbighshire from Carnarvanshire a little below the mouth of the River Gessen nay let any man see whether the River Conway falls not into the Irish or Virgivium Sea but whether it fals into the Irish or Virgivium Sea or not yet certainly it cannot fall into the narrow Channell which parts Carnarvanshire from Anglesey which begins at Abermenay ferry and ends at Porthathir ferry whereas the mouth of Conway is little lesse distant from Porthathir ferry then that is from Abermenay Porthathir ferry being upon the matter equidistant from either What heed then is to be taken to the ipse dixit of such a Geographer and Historian let any man Judge Sure he had more need mend his own Errors then be so rash and lavish a Censurer of other mens Although I take not this mans tongue to be any slander so not worth an answering or at most a bare denyall of what he sayes were sufficient which I doe since it is but gratis dictum yet since other men have assumed to themselves such licence of aspersing him it will not ill become mee to shew how unjustly he is aspersed in those things whereof they traduce him as first this man makes him a seditious man certainly it is very strange that in the living of 83 yeeres the many of his writings and his many imployments doth not produce so much as any suspicion thereof that I ever heard of One thing yet pleases me that in all these seditious commotions Judge Jenkins and almost all the assertors of the Kings Cause have next after Divine Laws maintained it principally out of his writings nor doe I remember that any of the adverse part I am sure
be esteemed as the greatest goddess and that the greatest power ought to be ascribed to her overcoming and triumphing over all the oppositions of Men and verisimilitudes Nor can any reason be given that Polybius Livy Plutarch c. did either write such Histories or that such Histories written by them were truer then those which are lost and rejected by Men but only a kind of divine ayre informing Men of their truth whereas those books which are falsely and factiously written are exploded and neglected in a very short time and yet whether they were truly or falsely written few or no Men can judge from any thing known to the outward sence I say few or no Man can so judge of them for in that time when they were written there were many more false and factious Historians to delude Men then true and just to inform them Nor can Men in subsequent generations from any thing in their outward sences judge or discern whether any thing they record be true or false Nay further no Historian except Caesar and Xenophon and some very few others who recorded infinitely more things not known then known to them to be true did ever know whether what he recorded were true or not To evidence this yet more fully there was scarcely except Caesars Xenophons ever any History truly written in those times wherein the things were done that men might take information from their outward senses but Men were so carried by Faction or Interest that in recording of things they record things not as true or false but as advancing their Faction and Interest whereas Men in the subsequent generation not having those Passions and Appetitions nor any sense of these things subjecting all their Passions and Affections as it were assisted by a divine Election do make Election of those things which are true and reject others which the Malice or Faction of Men had imposed upon the World And a Man is as certain that there have been such Men as Caesar Hanibal Alexander c. and as assured of their Actions as if he had seen them 46. Since all things which proceed from God immediately and for Faith is an extraordinary Gift of God which no reason can be given by any Creature may be justly required for principles by intellectual and reasonable Creatures and since the Scriptures proceed immediately from God or they could not be the Word of God are therefore the principles of Faith And since there is nothing within man naturally which may assure him that those things revealed in Scripture were Gods Revelation it does necessarily follow That Faith or the Belief of God in the Scriptures is Gods gift supernaturally and extraordinarily Nor can all the Arguments of Tradition Church Excellency of stile Truth c. move one stone to the proof of them For they were the Word of God before any Church or Tradition c. was And if they had not been the Word of God before the Church received them and delivered them to posterity their Reception and Tradition could never have made them so Besides the Church having its being from the Scriptures it can never prove the cause of its being And what was it less then the power and grace of God extraordinarily given to Moses That the Bush burned and was not consumed And of all the miracles done by him and the other Prophets and more then those done by our Saviour and the Apostles and blessed Martyrs since And that by the Preaching of a few Fishermen against all the Temporal Powers in the World Christianity should be propagated generally over the face of the Earth and that I without any thing in me or desert of mine am baptised into this Faith And he that shall dispute the truth of the grace and power of God in the Old and New Testament and since recorded in Ecclesiastical and Prophane History ought as much to be confuted with clubs and hissing as he that denies or disputes his Principles in any Art or Science 47. All Principles are true or false just or unjust good or bad either All Principles are prime and necessary either necessitate absoluta or necessitate medii necessitate absoluta or necessitate medii Principles that are true or false necessitate absoluta are so that they are immutable by God himself as that two and two added should not make four or that things equal to the same thing should not be equal to one another or that any being should be superior to the cause of its being or that contradictions should be true or else true or false good or bad just or unjust necessitate ex hypothesi And these though they are necessary and principles to those to whom they are given and immutable by them yet are they not principles and necessary to them who made and gave them As the Laws of Nature and Gods revealing himself in the Scriptures are principles necessary and immutable by all the Men in the World yet are they not principles necessary or immutable by God but he might if it had pleased him made something else the Law of Nature or otherwise revealed himself in the Scriptures So Humane Laws must be prime necessary and immutable by Subjects or their conforming or not conforming their actions to them could not be just or unjust But they cannot be prime and necessary or immutable by the Legislator but as he sees occasion may alter or make something else which was not before Laws for the Subjects to conform and direct their actions to It is therefore absurd and wilde to suppose that the Law of Nature is Annotat. simply necessary and immutable by God or that the will of Men can make it mutable 48. All Science all Learning all Reasoning and all Conclusions by Contra negantes Principia non est disputandum the Authority of Aristotle is begotten from pre-existent principles for which no reason can be given by the Learner which being granted do nemonstrate the Conclusion but by the Authority of Aristotle and all Philosophers no Science or Conclusion can demonstrate the Principles Where therefore either by a defect in the Understanding Men cannot or by a stubbornness in the Will they will not apprehend Principles there all Reasoning Learning or Discourse is at an end If therefore I would learn a Man Geometry and he either cannot or will not apprehend the Axioms or common Notions of it it is impossible I should ever make him understand the constitution of an equilateral Triangle Or if a Man denies the Laws of my Countrey I cannot teach him whether such an action be just or unjust Or if a Man denies the Law of Nature I cannot prove that he ought to honor and obey his Superior and to deal justly and uprightly with all Men Or if a Man denies or disputes the Authority of the Scriptures there cannot be any Conclusion or Inference from them whether as Christians any thing ought to be or not to be done or believed
49. All demonstrative Science being begotten from certain and necessary From whence the Confusions and Distractions in Christendom have arisen pre-existent Principles the Laws of God and Man being pre-existent where they are clear and not inevident which is not always the imperfection of Mans Law nor can ever be of Gods Law Men may as clearly and as demonstratively demonstrate Conclusions from thence as from the Axiomes in Geometry And no question that all the Confusions which have lately hapned in Christendom were not caused from any want of understanding of the Laws of God or Man but from the perverse wills of Men who would not be restrained from their wickedness neither by the Laws of God or Man 50. Reason is a faculty of the Understanding which does prepare apt What is Reason and define things either in the outward sences or memory so as they may be comprehended by something before known to the Understanding or Reason is that which does dictate the doing of any thing conformable to something in the Understanding 51. All Propositions by the authority of Aristotle are demonstrable What is an Axiom or common Notion or indemonstrable Indemonstrable Propositions are those Propositions which are Axioms or common Notions for which no reason can be given and though indemonstrable in themselves do demonstrate all the Conclusions which follow from them An Axiom or common Notion is such an indefinite prime and necessary Proposition which comprehending any definite thing within its terms does necessitate such a Conclusion 52. A Definition is the comprehending every such individual thing What is a Definition in such a term as may express such a thing excluding every thing else 53. Although Definitions are properly terms comprehending individual Wherein a Notion and Definition differ things yet is there oftentimes a necessity of comprehending Notions or Axioms too under significant terms as a Law is a term which may signifie all rightful commands which are prime and universal Propositions to them who ow obedience to such commands which comprehending any action does necessitate such an action to be just So Geometry not onely comprehends all Propositions which have reference to surveying or measuring of Ground but also all the Propositions in Euclids Elements are comprehended under the terms or notion of Geometry c. Definitions are of Singulars Notions of Generals or Universals the Reason Memory and outward Senses are of Definitions the Understanding of Axioms or common Notions The Doctor does not onely confound the Memory and Understanding Annot. Pag. 21. de Gen. An. where he says Quod in ipsa visione sive actu videndi singulare clarum indistinctum erat id ipsum remoto visibili in phantasia vel memoria reservatum thereby making the phantasie and memory the same thing obscurum indistinctum apparet c. But also here and Page 27. he confounds Axioms and common Notions with Definitions where he says That from experience comes ratio Universalis Definitiones maxima sive Axiomata communia cognitionis certissima And the instances he gives of his meaning is quite awry and nothing to the purpose For idem eidem secundum idem esse non esse impossible is not onely not known from experiment but is as much known to any intellectual Creature before experiment as after And so omnis affirmatio negatio aut vera aut falsa est These Axioms are not Axioms because they are found true by experience but because universally known to be true before any experiment was made of them nor is it possible that experiment should be made of all things wherein they hold true the truth therefore of them cannot proceed from experience 54. Although divers Men do phansie the same thing seen or remembred Why some Men are more rational then others yet if they do not rationally phansie it viz. by comprehending that thing seen or remembred in something before understood to be true or false c. Then do they never conclude or agree in their inference Those Men therefore who do not rightly conclude a thing either the Object of the outward Senses or the Idea of it reserved in the Memory from something before understood but because they affect or desire it to be so conclude affectionately not rationally And Men who do so are less rational then other Men who do not 55. Knowledge is the knowing of a thing from the causes What is Knowledge 56. a Knowledge or Science how manifold All Knowledge or Science is either rational or sensible 57. b What is rational Science All Rational Science is a right Inference or Conclusion mediately or immediately from some universal Cause known to the Understanding 58. c How Science differs from Reason Intellectus sit Principiorum Scientia cum Ratione conjuncta Eth. lib. 6. cap. 6. Reason is the Instrument of the Understanding begetting Science is the thing which from the Understanding by the Reason is begotten 59. A Demonstrative Proposition is when the Predicate or Axiome What is a Demonstrative Affirmative Proposition understood comprehends the thing defined which is remembred Or any right Inference Conclusion or Dictate of Right Reason from Necessary and Universal Causes may be the Predicate of any Demonstrative Proposition 60. A Negative Demonstration is when Reason shews that the Subject What is a Negative Demonstrative Proposition cannot be comprehended by the Predicate 61. Logicians make three necessary parts or terms in every Proposition The necessary Parts of every roposition viz. the Nomen antecedens the Nomen consequens and the Copula The Nomen antecedens is the subject or thing in the outward sense or memory defined The Nomen consequens is the Predicate or something known to the understanding which comprehends the Subject And the Copula is that which joins these two As Omnis homo est animal Homo is the Subject or the thing seen or remembred Animal is the Predicate or Notion which comprehends Homo which is the thing understood and Animal does not only comprehend Homo and all other Creatures which a man has seen or heard of but all those Creatures which he shall ever see or hear of And est is the Copula which unites the Subject Homo with the Predicate Animal Annot. When I say the Subject is the thing sensible or remembred I always except Metaphysicks and Mathematicks which are considered without any sensible matter And indeed it is an admirable thing to consider how intelligibly Mathematicks are understood without any sensible matter more then any corporeal things are 62. It is truly observed that every perfect creature is generated from Rational Science is produced from the understanding by the reason and memory or outward senses matter and form diffused in several bodies and creatures and that this matter and form so long as it continues thus diffused in divers bodies is never qualified for generation or production of any
deceive them who take not heed whenas the Law of Nature which is immutable is not changed but the thing of which the Law of Nature does work receives some mutation For example If a Creditor to whom I am obliged takes what Lowe him now I am not bound to pay not because the Law of nature leaves to command to pay what I owe but because what I did owe ceases to be And to prove this he brings Greek in Epictetus Observ It is true that universal causes in nature produce nothing but as meeting with particular material causes the law of nature therefore of it self produces nothing but as meeting with particular material causes apted and disposed for the law of nature to work upon and therefore when these particular causes cease the obligation which the law of nature creates ceases also As Thou shalt honor thy Father and Mother is the law of nature but then there must be Parents Children or the law of nature creates no obligation and therefore when the particular cause ceases the obligation of the law of nature ceases also as when Parents are dead the law of nature in that particular can have no obligation upon their Children And so in the instance which Grotius gives a Debtor is by the law of nature obliged to pay his Creditor but this Debt being paid the particular cause ceasing the obligation of the law of nature ceases also What need therefore was there of Arrianus his Greek out of Epictetus to prove a prime and necessary truth which is of more authority then forty Arrianuses and all the Greek in Epictetus Grotius and all his Authors and Poets to boot Grotius goes on So if God commands any man to be killed or to take away any thing that is anothers It is not lawful that Murder or Theft be done which terms involve vice but it is not Murder or Theft which is done by God the Author of life and all things They say Nulla similitudo quatuor pedibus currit I am sure this similitude Observ 2. runs not upon one foot for in this last the particular cause remains whereas in the former it is taken away and if the law of nature be immutable by God and Thou shalt not kill or steal be from the law of nature then it is Murder and Theft although commanded by God Thus hath Grotius instead of clearly propounding his principles and orderly reasoning from them thatched a company of equivocal and contradictory principles with Poets and Authors brought in by head and heels so as not any one proposition is clearly stated and disputed but the whole Treatise a most perplexed and unsignificant thing God conferred upon Mankind generally Jus Right immediately after Lib. 2. cap. 2. Para. 2. the Creation and again when the world was repaired after the flood over all the things of this inferior nature There were as Justin saies all things common Lib. 43. Lib. 1. Para. 16. de jure Belli c. and undivided to all Men even as one Patrimony should be to all Men. God was pleased peculiarly to give rights dare jura to one only people viz. the Hebrews Observ Which is absurd and impossible by the ninth Notion of the first Book of Euclid viz. a part equal to the whole the Hebrews not being all mankind but a part Grotius goes on Hence it came to pass that every man gathered whatsoever Lib. 2. cap. 2. Para. 2. he could snatch to their own uses and consume what could be consumed and whatsoever any man had so snatched that could no man take from him but by injury but this State could not long continue Observ How 's this This is more monstrous and absurd then the other what God gave a Right to Mankind and that so immutable that it is unalterable by God himself and yet not possible long to continue To prove this first Common Right of all things common and undivided to Mankind he refers to Gen. 1. 29. 30. And God said I have given 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Septuagint has it to you in the plural number when Adam only was created every herb bearing seed which is upon the face of the earth and every tree in the which is the fruit of a tree yeelding seed to you it shall be for meat c. Now how could God speak to Adam in the plural number when Adam only was created It is said verse 27. So God created Adam in his own Image in the Image of God made he Man Male and Female created he them And therefore God speaks here to Adam and Eve Now whether God gave this Right to Adam and Eve in Community to both alike as Grotius would have it or to Eve in subordination to Adam I refer it to any Christian Man to judge Let the Woman learn in silence with all subjection c. and the 1 Tim. 2. 11. reason the Apostle giveth is Man was first made then Eve But suppose that God gave this Right not only to Adam and Eve but to all Mankind in Adam verse 13. and Eve yet by the authority of the Holy Ghost had Adam dominion over all Mankind because Adam was first made and therefore God at the Creation of Man made Government with Mankind Let us see whether Grotius has any better luck with his common and undivided Right of all things c. immediately from the time of the world repaired after the flood which to prove he refers to Gen. 9. 2. 3. And the feare 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of you and the dread of you shall be upon every beast c. every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you even as the green herb have I given you all things Observ Now then if this were not given to Noah his Wife and Noahs Children in subordination to Noah but as Grotius would have it in community to all alike then had Sem as much Right to all things as Noah Ham as Sem Japheth as Ham Sems wife was an intercommoner with Noah Ham with Japheths wife and Noahs wife with them all if this be true Mr. Hobbs makes Noahs Sons in an ill case where he saies filium in statu naturali intelligi non Annot. art 10. cap. 1. posse no Son can be understood in the state of nature and Sem Ham and Japheth are Bastards and not Noahs Sons Well if Noah and his Wife his Son and their Wives had all things in common that is every one of them get what they could snatch to their own uses and consume what might be consumed from whence did Noah snatch his Vineyard and drank the wine thereof untill he was drunken If you beleeve Grotius it was Sems Vineyard Verse 20. as much as Noahs Japheths Wives as much as Sems and Hams Wife had as much right to it as any body else Poor Noah thou hast taken great pains here to little purpose if Hugo be thy Judge Well Mr. Hobbs rather then he
possible that any Power in Government can be derived For to suppose by the Law of Nature all men to be equal and to have a common and undivided Right to all things it is impossible that they can create a power which may give Law Property and Power of Life and Death when as they themselves have none at all But suppose all Men are by nature equal and yet have a right to create a supream Power which may give Property yet then it must follow That all the Men of the World must be subject to one Individual Government For ex hypothesi the Inhabitants of Greece have as much right to all the things in Britain as the Inhabitants of Britain have and the Men of Spain have as much right to all the things in Italy as the Italians have and so have the French to all things in Italy Germany Persia c. Nor can the Inhabitants of France Germany Spain c. frame to themselves any Government for ex hypothesi by the Law of Nature the Persians Indians Moscovites c. have as much right in France Germany Spain c. as the French Germans and Spaniards have And to suppose that by the Law of Nature all Men have all things in common and to suppose that whatsoever is or shall be renewed in Spain England France c. is due by the Law of Nature only to Spaniards Englishmen and French c. is to suppose a contradiction and impossibility Nor is that Fancie less groundless which supposeth that Regal power or government was first instituted from an aggregation or consent of Families For how is it possible there should be a Family where there is no Supreme power which gave Property in that place and habitation where that Family is Nor where there is no Law precedent obliging can it be expected that any man will where he may be free at his own pleasure be a Servant Nor can it in reason be supposed that any man will contract with another to be his Servant whereas he may as well expect to be his Master It shall be therefore our endevour to find out the true Causes and Principles of Power and Subjection But before we proceed it will not be amiss to see in a short view the natural difference between Man and other Creatures of this inferior orb and why Humane or Politick Government is only necessary to Mankind Of all the Creatures of this inferior orb only Man uses Reason by which with the help of his Memory and Experience he proceeds from things manifest and known to the Understanding to find out things less known and more obscure yet still so that subsequent Generations may infinitely adde to what precedent Ages had found out whereas other Creatures do by an impulse of Nature being taught of no Creature nor from any observation by themselves insite and connatural with them at first attain to such perfection that in succession of time nothing is added to it Thus we see all Birds at their first trial make their nests with as much art and ingenuity as those that do live longest And so the younger Bees make the honicomb as perfect as those who had done it twice or thrice before And certainly it is an admirable thing to consider with how great providence these smallest Creatures and imperfect Animals do choose out places for their conceptions even before they be living creatures and but only so in power and with what unimitable art they build fortifie and hide the place wherein they repose them I have seen an Indian Birds nest which was made upon a small bough growing over waters which bough was too weak to support the weight of a Monky the Monkies in those parts of India use to prey upon young Birds and provident Nature points out these places to those Birds for the security of their young ones from the Monkies for of all terrestrial creatures only Men and Monkies and their kindes swim not naturally and the Monky if he in seeking to get the young birds falls into the water drowns himself I have with great admiration seen Frogs which are usually generated in the moneth of March confidently and carelesly swimming croaking upon one another upon the surface of the water whenas Horses and other cattel have been there but upon the coming of Ducks who naturally prey upon and devour them they have been all husht and gone and not one to be seen It being sure worthy admiration that Providence should so direct those spurious and imperfect animals and but of yesterdays being and not of much longer continuance to know without any apprehension of danger those creatures who are not hurtful to them and to fear and avoid those who are enemies and prey upon them Neither is Providence less seen in all creatures if a man considers it in the preservation of themselves and their young ones so that a man must needs confess that in them is some particle of Divine air and this their unlearned art and wisdom is rather to be admired their imitated by us Man by his observation and experience findes out what things and Creatures are hurtful or helpful to him other Creatures by an instinct of Nature at the first sight know what things and Creatures are hurtful to them or not thus we see the timerous young Hare feedes securely among Horses and Cowes and the oldest Hart flyes afrighted from the smallest dogge Man can never attain to the knowledge of what things conduce most for his corporal preservation and therefore the oldest and most experienced and learned Physitian may to morrow find what the day before he was ignorant of and yet shall never attain to the perfection of knowing what is best for his own body which other Creatures by avoiding those things which are hurtful and choosing those things which are most beneficial for themselves do The careful Navigator by the help of some Theorems of longitude and latitude and the use of his Card and Compasse sailes from one Coast to another whereas other Creatures by a propense disposition to this or that place without any observations and direction of their senses fly to other regions where they never were before So Faulcons Wildgeese Woodcocks c. come from other regions into England in the Autumn and at the Spring forsake us And Swallowes Martyns Hobbyes c. which brood with us in the Summer when the Antumn approaches leave this Clymate for another to which they cannot attain by any sense or observation of their own A Gentleman living in Buckingham-shire had a Beagle sent him by Sea from the most Eastern part of Suffolk to London and from thence was conveyed by water into Buckingham-shire some time after upon some distaste taken by the dogg he returned home to his old Master by land which was above an hundred miles But what is most admirable is that omne genus Balaenae as Dolphins Whales Porpices which do not keep in shoales or company and although
another if the other accepts of any thing in acknowledgement that he will do that thing both parties are obliged by the Law or upon the giving or doing of one party the Law obligeth the other 4. Absolute promises receive their obligation from a precedent or Wherein a bare promise and a Contract differ present consideration or condition as if for a benefit received or any present consideration I promise c. Contracts from a subsequent as if I promise to another that if he will do for or give me or another such a thing that then I will do for him or give him such a thing this being a conditional promise or contract upon the performance of the others consideration or conditions being subsequent to my promise I am obliged by Law to performe my promise made to him and therefore ex nudo pacto non oritur actio for I am not obliged by any act of the other to performe any thing All contracts are made by words of the futuretense as si aliquis dederit aut fecerit dabo aut faciam 5. A contract differs from a meere obligation in this a single obligation Wherein a Contract differs from a single obligation is when one or more for such a sum of Mony Lands Houses c. had and received from another acknowledgeth him or themselves liable to such a penalty to the other if they perform not such a condition as is specified in the obligation A Contract or Pact is when both or all parts are obliged to performe All Promises Vows Contracts and Obligations ought to be only of Annotat. things in possession and that are mens so as by an act of their wills they may be anothers as they are theirs and therefore where any man hath a meere right to any thing this being a shadow another having the substance or as our Lawyers say A chose in Action he cannot by any Contract or otherwise alien his right to another but he can only release it to him in possession otherwise the right remains still in him notwithstanding any Contract c. that he would alien it And I would gladly be satisfied how Mr. Hobbs in the generation of his Civitas can make meere rights to be tranferred and aliened by the Pacts of men and those natural rights too This being granted Mr. Hobbs may by his Contract with another Man make himself no Man but a Horse or an Asse notwithstanding that by nature he is a Man 6. Every Oath is either a calling God to witness that what a Man testifies is true or false or else a speech added to a promise whereby the What is an Oath promiser does renounce Gods mercy if he performs not what he promises But if a Man Promises Vows Contracts or swears to do any thing which is unlawful he ought not to performe it for it is ill done to promise c. but worse to do any thing unlawful 7. A League is when two or more do mutually give their faith to Foedus how different from a Pact observe such conditions as are agreed between them and herein it differs from a Pact or Contract A Contract or Pact is when there is a precedent humane Law obliging the parties contracting to performe all the conditions specified in the contract A league is where there is no humane Law obliging but only the Law of Nature And therefore all stipulations made by Princes one with another are confederacies or leagues not Contracts or Pacts because there is no precedent humane Law obliging them to performe their leagues 8. A Gift is what I do give to another so as it is mine do and Donum though a gift be alwaies in the present or preterperfect tense yet the Habendum may be in the future as if I make a lease freehold or create a State in taile to one and grant the reversion to another and his heires here though the deed or gift be in the presenttense yet the reversion or Habendum is in the future But no Man can give another any thing but what depends upon his will and is his so by some positive humane law that by his giving he may so make it anothers For whatsoever is mine by the Law of Nature cannot be aliened or made anothers by my Will nor by the Will of all the Men in the world for it is impossible natural causes and relations should be dissolved by Mans Will 9. Feoffment is derived of foedum a Fee quia est donatio foedi and this A Feoffment is the most ancient and necessary Conveyance which is used by the Common Law that is that Law which concerns tenures and estates used only here in England and this deed or conveyance is either of absolute estates of corporeal inheritances absolutely passed to another by livery and seisin made according to the intent and purport of such Feoffment he which conveys such estate of inheritance being called the Feoffor he to whom such inheritance is conveyed is called the Feoffee or of absolute estates of inheritance which are not corporeal as Advousons Commons rents issuing out of lands which do lye in grant and do not pass by livery and seisin but by delivery of the deed or feoffment 10. Do or dedi as our Lawyers say which implies a warranty to A Estates-Taile and his heirs for ever makes a Feoffment Do or Dedi to A. and the heires of his body lawfully begotten or to A. and the heires male or female of his body lawfully begotten or to A. and the heirs male or female on the body of such a Woman or to a Woman and the Heirs of her body lawfully begotten or heirs male or female of her body lawfully begotten by such a man creates a state taile and he which creates such an estate is called Donor he to whom such estate is granted Donee 11. Do or Dedi to such a man or woman for term of either of their Freehold lives or to such a man or woman during the life of another creates a freehold 12. Do or Dedi or concedo or concessi to such a man if he shall live so Lease long an estate for years or to such a man and his heirs for such a term reserving or not reserving such a rent or service creates a lease In both the latter he who gives is called Lessor he who takes Lessee and humane Laws oblige as well to gifts as contracts For natural Laws oblige in conscience only but men are obliged by mulcts and corporal punishments to contracts and gifts So that in most proper speaking In every gift it is the Law which gives the property to another by an act of the Donors will and the Donor is the instrument by which the Law conveys the property of any gift to another 13. Humane Laws therefore obliging men to the performance of No Law or Legislative Right arises from any Pact or Contract their Pacts Contracts and Gifts
thousand years I do exclude Conquest to be any cause of Regal power where God does not give it For either this Conquest must be made by power or force If it be made by power or one who is Gods Sword-bearer no new power ariseth from thence but only a dilatation of the exercise of the old which was formerly in him But if it be done by Sword-takers then is it no other then unjust usurpation and robbery The World being large and the Men in it alwaies ambitious I will not undertake to answer for the matters of fact which Men have done in all Ages nor do I doubt but that oftentimes the alterations and conversions of Government have happened from the will of God Object But it is evident by the Prophet Daniel c. 4. 23. 25. that God ruleth in the kingdoms of men and giveth them to whomsoever he pleaseth And if that he were pleased to make Saul David Solomon and Jeroboam who reigned over his peculiar people and Hazael Cyrus c. who knew not God Kings and yet neither by Lot Primogeniture from a rightful King or by right of First possession then for ought is known these alterations which have otherwise happened and do come to pass in the world may be from the will and gift of God Sol. I answer If it may be Gods will that these alterations and confusions happen in the world it may not be Gods will affirmanti incumbit probatio Let them therefore or they that make these alterations and confusions prove that Gods will and not their own perverse will was the first cause of them It is true and I grant that God does oftentimes for the punishment of a Nation convert the succession of their Kings into another line yet did he never so far chastise any Nation as to subject it to an Aristocracy or Democracy So it is necessary offences come yet shall that never excuse them by whom they come And so it many times happens that men cannot avoid Gods judgments and die it is no consequence therefore that men should run themselves into them or kill themselves It may be it is Gods will that my Father should die or that he will destroy my Country and Laws c. It does not therefore follow that a man may kill his Father destroy his Country or endeavor to subvert the Laws thereof Men are not alwaies obliged to conform their wills to Gods will but to do what he wills and commands them I am obliged to pray for my Parents and Country when it is Gods will they should be destroyed It was Gods will that Jeroboam for Solomons sin should be King of ten 1 King 11. 13. Tribes of Israel yet because the Tribes did will it and not upon Gods command he pronounced them eternal Rebels and Jeroboam a Rebel because 1 King 12. 19. he took it upon those terms 2 Chron. 13. 6. Nor do we find that ever Israel joyed good day after For the policy of Jeroboam to continue Comparethese times with these and see the event his dominion over them must be preferred before Gods worship and service in order thereunto Jeroboam must take counsel and make Calves which he says brought the Children of Israel out of Egypt any Priests were good enough to sacrifice to them no matter whether they were Priests or of the Tribe of Levi the lowest of the people would serve the turn 1 King 12. 32 33. yea forsooth Jeroboam himself could hold forth to the people and burn incense which before was peculiar to the Priests But it is a strange thing that this invented policie of Jeroboams for the keeping of the ten Tribes in their obedience to him should be the cause of so wonderful a Captivity 2 King 17. 21 22 23. that to this day it is unknown what became of them and their posterity 16. Parum est jus nisi sunt qui possunt jura gerere And men have always The miseries of men when the Supreme power is rejected or unknown by woful experience found that all Tyranny of a rightful and known Prince is not to be compared with the miseries and calamities where the Prince is not known or rejected but every popular and ambitious Man arrogates and usurps to himself what should be justly ascribed to the lawful Prince Nor does the calamities of miserable men in such a condition end so but God no where shewed so great a judgment as upon those men viz. Corah Dathan and Abiram who rejected their rightful and known Prince Num. 16. Nor does he ever denounce a more dreadful judgment then upon those men who resist Higher powers Rom. 13. How great then will his judgment be upon them who reject them 17. He is a natural Prince of right or by the Law of Nature who Who is a Natural Prince de jure truly prescribes from such Ancestors that no mortal creature can make any just exception or superior claim And so great a Lover of Men and Truth is God that scarce in all the world was it not known in any Nation who was the rightful Prince thereof when his Subjects did reject him 18. It is true that there is no visible power under Heaven but only Where there are diversities of titles which is to be preferred mens Consciences that can direct them where Titles of Princes come in question But where diversity of Titles are alleadged that which is truly and indubitably most antient is the best for it is a true rule in all descents whatsoever that Dormit aliquando nunquam moritur jus But this must be jus apparens for De non apparentibus de non existentibus eadem est ratio Whether the Title of the Heir general or Heir male be better we shall treat more at large in Cap. of Succession 19. Jus is duplex Proprietatis Possessionis And that this Right is Who is a Natural King de facto and not de jure divisible as well in Regality as private mens Estates is demonstrated by para 4. of this Chap. And if it be true as it is that no Being can be superior or better then the Cause of its being then will it necessarily follow that all Kings who inherit from Usurpers cannot have a better title then that which the Usurpers had so long as a superior or better claim can be made by another Nor do I fear to affirm Hen. 4. Hen. 5. and Hen. 6. were natural Kings of England and did inherit the Crown of England de facto but not de jure 20. Although nothing which is naught in the beginning can be How Usurpation may be bettered bettered by the continuance of time yet may Usurpation although naught in the beginning be bettered in time viz. if the Usurpation be of that continuance that it outlives all claim that can be justly made by another for Possession is title sufficient against all men who have no jus ad rem Hence it
to instance the Acts of Parliament which give one Jointenant a power to compell the others to sue a Writ of Partition which was denied at Common-Law and right of Entry where they were put to their Cui in vita c. It may suffice that in no Kings reign there have not been Acts of Parliament which have been so far from making declarations of the Common-Law that they have made manifest alterations in it And as the Common-Law hath no force nor reason against an Act of Parliament so hath no particular Custom any force or reason against it for no man can prescribe against an Act of Parliament and all Lands in Gavel-kind were particular Customs but taken away by Act of Parliament And many Acts of Parliament have not declared the Succession of the English Diadem according to the usual custom thereof but made manifest alteration thereof as in the Succession of Hen. 4. 5. 6. Rich. 3. Hen. 7. 8. which being unjust and the cause not depending upon Humane laws ought not to be obeyed Nor secondly is that a less error that Judicial Records are equivalent to Acts of Parliament for they are so far from being equal to Acts of Parliament that in truth they are no Laws but Inferences and Conclusions which are deduced from Laws For there is not any Judicial Record which is not unjust if it cannot truly and ultimately be resolved in some general or particular Custom Act of the Parliament or grant of the King So that Acts of Parliament the Common Law Particular Customs and Prescriptions and Royal Grants are as Axioms Postulata or Principles in Arts or Sciences and Judicial Records Reported Cases and Yearsbooks are Inferences Conclusions or Sciences deduced from Acts of Parliament the Common Law and particular Customs of this Land or Concessions of the King Touching Royal Government Royal Government being the ordinance of God and from the Law of Nature is paramount to all Humane laws and the prime and efficient cause of them they cannot therefore declare the cause so as to create any obligation of what they are but the effects and from whence derived We have thus far treated of the means by which the Kings of this Nation have until 1640. governed and preserved their Subjects internally But because it is the office of Kings to preserve their Subjects as well from foreign force as internal broil there is yet something wanting of which we have not treated viz. The power of making War and Peace and maintaining Alliance and Traffique Of these in regard they refer to Foreign powers and jurisdictions and are not subject to the Laws of the Nation we shall forbear to treat only affirming that it is necessary that at all times this power must be so vested in the King that at all times he may have the aids and assistance of his Subjects in prosecution of the Ends aforesaid The end of the Third Book The Contents of the Fourth Book HAving thus far treated of all created Rights and the causes of all Laws and created Powers and Vertues and these being previous and necessary to all Justice and Obedience We in this Book descend to treat of Justice in the first Chap. as the most eminent and noble of all Humane vertues it being that which not only conserves private Families but all Nations and Kingdoms in unity peace and society and demonstrate it neither to be in Geometrical proportion as Plato would nor Arithmetical proportion as Zenophon held nor in Harmonical proportion as Bodin taught Nor is that corrective and distributive Justice which Aristotle affirmed to be in Arithmetical and in Geometrical proportion The Second Chap. treats of Obedience and shews how that it necessarily proceeds and yet is different from Justice The Third Chap. treats of Judgment and shews how it differs from Law and Justice The Fourth Chap. treats of Equity and shews how it differs from Judgment and how necessary Courts of Equity as well as Judicature are THE FOURTH BOOK CHAP. I. Of Justice 1. JUstitia est habitus animi communi utilitate Cicero's definition of Justice servata suum cuique tribuens Societatem conjunctionis Humanae munifice atque aequè tuens Justice is a habit of the Minde common utility being conserved giving to every one their right and bountifully and equally Cicero lib. 1. de legibus defending the Society of Mankinde Et Justitia est quae suum cuique distribuit Justice is that which does distribute to every man what is his right Where he says That Justitia est obtemperatio scriptis legibus we will shew that is not properly Justice but Obedience onely 2. Justice is the upright doing of an act conserving Society in that Quid sit Justitia formality as it is commanded or permitted by him who by right may command or permit it Justice is the doing of a just action the doing of a just action is the upright doing of any act as it is commanded or permitted by him who by right may command or permit it preserving Peace and Society I say Justice must have these two properties viz. upright doing that is abstraction from all affections of love hate or self-interest and the Law or Command of him who by right may command or permit such an act Other actions proceeding from Wisdom Reason Experiment or Discourse c. are prudent profitable c. but none are just or honest actions which cannot be truly and ultimately resolved into the Law or Command of him who by right may command or permit such an act So Quotuplex that Justice is twofold either commanded or permitted 3. Injustice is the abuse or falsifying the Law or Command of him What is Injustice who by right commands to the hurt or prejudice of another As a Law preceding and Integrity are inseparable incidents to Justice so Hypocracy seeming just and yet abusing or falsifying a Law and the damage of another or more are incidents inseparable to injustice 4. Let us see who may by right command and who are obliged to do God commands by highest right in conformity to their Laws and Commands I say God by highest right ought to command all the created things in Heaven and Earth and all Creatures are chiefly and absolutely obliged to do whatsoever he commands without any reasoning or disputing why he so commands For the earth is Psal 24. 1. Job 41. 11. Psal 50. 12. the Lords and all that therein is the compass of the World and all that dwell therein And whatsoever is under the whole Heaven is Gods and the World is mine and the fulness thereof All Gods commands therefore have a like and equal influence upon all his Creatures all Creatures as compared to him are alike vile and between him and them is no proportion To abuse then or falsifie any Law of God or Nature to the hurt or prejudice of another is a sin of injustice in all Gods Creatures and
CHARLES IT is a thing very worthy of great consideration To thinke how the singular virtues and eminent qualities of so good and pious a Prince should come to so cruell so unfortunate an end for in him was all those amiable qualities which in another age would have rendred him reverenced and admired So singular Piety That the Portracture of King CHARLES in his sufferings will be a Character of it beyond all expression but his own so ardent a zeale in Religion that not any Regular in Religion was a more devout observer of his Order then the King was of the Rites and Liturgy of the Church So free from Simony that the suspicion of it in any man how deserving soever otherwise was sufficient bar from any advancement in the Church So just that though he every day saw the Puritan-faction budding out more formidably both in Church or State yet did he never proceede illegally or in an extrajudiciall manner against any man before the stormes of his Adversaries broke out upon him on every side So mercifull that the Scotish Lord Balmerino An. 1634. being legally convict of Treason was pardoned by him Nor was Louden proceeded against for holding correspondency with the King of France without the Kings privity and giving him the Title of Du Roy nor in all his Reigne how formidable soever the faction grew did he before the war brake out against him put any to death except one in the Lambeth conspiracy for fomenting and contriving the conspiracy against him To these may be added a profound Judgement in the affaires both of Church State how much it appeared in the former appears in the entercourse between him and Master Hinderson nor was his Pietie to his Parents lesse conspicuous being truly the principall Mourner at his Mothers funerall and chose rather to expresse the Piety hee owed to his Father in attending his dead body to his grave although contrary to the custome of his predecessors then to insist upon nicities of State So singular was his conjugall love and chastity to his Queene that a little before his death he commanded the Princesse Elizabeth his daughter to tell her Mother that his thoughts had never strayed from her and that his love should be the same to the last Jealous he was of the honour of the English Church and Nation and well understanding that where mens mindes are not well knit in Religion nothing will long keep their affections cemented He had a great desire to have finished King James his designe of uniting the Kirk of Scotland in an Uniformity with the Church of England who had made some progresse in an Assembly held at Aberdeen 1616. and afterward in another at Perth 1618. which King Charles got passed in Parliament of Scotland 1633. In him was a perpetuall love to the good and an infinite desire of doing good to all These noble vertues and graces towards God his Parents Wife and Subjects were adorned with most eminent and singular personall vertues and graces as moderation in prosperity magnanimity in adversity so wonderfull patience that after the fight of Cropredy-bridge in his march after the Earl of Essex it chanced that one of his Carriages brake in a narrow long Lane where his Majesty was to passe and gave a stop to him at a time when a great showre of rain happened to fall some of them who were neer about him offered to hew out a way through the hedges with their swords that he might get some shelter in the Villages adjoyning but he resolved not to forsake the Canon upon any occasion at which some seeming to admire his patience his Majesty lifting up his hat said That as God had given him afflictions to exercise his patience so he had given him patience to bear his afflictions So severe an observer of his words and actions that he was never observed to say any thing lightly or rashly or in his personall actions did any thing which might render his person or authority contemptible So temperate that in all his life he was never observed disorderly to exceed in eating or drinking affable yet conserving the dignity of his Majesty to all men free and open in his conversation little practicing the only lesson which Lewis the eleventh would learn his Son Charles the ninth Qui nescit dissimulare nescit regnare So frugall that though he had a Queen and plentifull Issue and expended much more in repairing the Navy for recovering the Soveraignty of the narrow seas then he received of his Subjects and the Exchequer left empty by his Father yet he encreased it before the first Scotish expedition to a greater mass then was ever found since it was exhausted by Henry the Eighth So elegant and pure a stile he had in writing that I expect to live to see it as much imitated by Englishmen as Caesar's was among the Romans Neither which is no lesse remarkable were any of these virtues stained with any suspected vice To the qualities of his mind were joyned Ornaments of his body every way answerable a venerable and gracious aspect yet best when he did not speak agility of members so disposed that in riding the great Horse running the ring vaulting shooting in the Crosbow Musket and sometime the great Ordinance He was thought to be the best Marksman and comliest manager of the great Horse of any man in the three Nations nor was lesse judicious in choosing a Winter Deere which is one of the hardest taskes of a Woodman then excellent in shooting a Deere Dr. Harvey Gen. Anim. exerc 64. pag. 422. propt med affirmes him to be delighted in observations the Dr. made of the causes of Generation from his dissection and Anatomies of the Deere in Hampton-Court c. but whether wanting that magnanimity of looking dangers in the face upon their first budding which is so necessary to the conservation of Regality or whether not having sufficiently understood that benefits conferred upon seditious men never begot any obligation of gratitude upon them but on the contrary they alwaies make advantage of them to get more untill not having more to expect grow jealous least their benefactors might by some means better reassume them then they extort them they hate them which usually ends in the murder of Princes but thinking to overcome his adversaries by his benefits example and clemency or to give satisfaction to all Factions of his Subjects he preferred all Factions in his Court and Councell though he excluded them out of the Church whereby he gave vent to all the Factions so as the veneration of the Royal name became every day more contemptible the Factions increased daily more formidable his counsels became distracted and betrayed and all the treasure he had gathered consumed in the first Northern expedition against the Scots where having many advantages to have subdued them he made a dishonorable peace with them io the increase of their reputation and losse of his own being destitute of treasure and