the reconciliation would be easily effected as to what concerns Gods interest were it not impeded and hindred by our own Hence it is also that many under a pretence of settling and regulating Religion do indeed disturb and disorder it and in stead of rightly guiding the Christian do indeed misguide him whiles they stand so much upon ceremonals which are of their own making as that they much more neglect morals which are Gods undoubted commands and so desire to have their converts be some of Paul some of Appollos some of Cephas as they little regard and less care to see they be truly all of Christ. And yet amidst all these grand miscarriages of men which no Rhetorick can sufficiently express no repentance can sufficiently bewail though we finde much that may trouble us in the practise of Religion yet we finde nothing that can excuse us if we practise it not for there is matter enough uncontroverted on all sides to engage the whole soul of man if we would take notice of that engagement Satis ampla pietatis exercendae materia est in iis rebus de quibus utrinque convenit nam de side in Christum mortuum resuscitatum pro nobis collocandâ de charitate Deo proximo exhibendâ controversia nulla est at in his duobus capitibus pietatis summa consistit saith the most judicious and pious Cassander in his book De officio pii viri What pitie is it that there should be the greatest defect where is the least controversie amongst Christians This made the forenamed Authour profess that he was nothing at all satisfied with those men who pretended that the contentions of Christians hindred their progress in Christianity for saith he There is matter enough for the exercise of piety which is quite exempted from all controversie for all sides agree that we must be saved by faith in Christ crucified for our sins and raised again for our justification and by the love of God for his own sake and of our neighbour for Gods sake and in these two heads saith he of faith and charity is comprised the sum of all true Christianitie Saint Paul had said no less before him 1 Tim. 1. 5 6. The end of the commandment is charity out of a pure heart and a good conscience and of faith unfained which Aquinas thus proves most substantially Omnes enim virtutes de quarum actibus dantur praecepta ordinantur vel ad purificandum cor à turbationibus passionum sicut virtutes quae sunt circa passiones vel saltem ad habendam bonam conscientiam sicut virtutes quae sunt circa operationes vel ad habendam rectam sidem sicut illae quae pertinent ad divinum cultum haec tria requiruntur ad diligendum Deum nam cor impurum à Dei dilectione abstr ahitur propter passionem inclinantem ad terram conscientia vero mala facit horrere divinam justitiam propter timorem poenae fides autem ficta trahit affectum ad id quod de Deo fingitur separans à Dei Veritate 22 ae qu. 44. art 1. All the vertues whose acts are commanded in the Law directly tend either to the purging of the heart from the disturbances of the passions as those vertues which teach us to order our affections or they tend to the getting and keeping of a good conscience as those vertues that concern our works and operations or they tend to the getting and keeping of a true Faith as those vertues which immediately concern the worship of God and all these three are required to the true love of God 1. A pure heart for that else will cleave to the earth by its impurity 2. A good conscience for that else will run from God because of its guiltiness 3. an unfained faith for that else will follow a fiction in stead of God and falsities in stead of his truth This being taken for granted which cannot rationally be denied the meanest man that is will finde little cause to be discouraged or disheartened in the Christian Religion by reason of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from all which S. Paul so exceedingly dehorts S. Timothy that there are amongst Christians so many strifes about words and so many vanities and novelties and emptinesses in those strifes for if he will have a diligent care of his own heart that it may be pure of his own conscience that it may be good and of his own faith that it may be unfained he will not dangerously neglect his duty either towards himself or towards his neighbour or towards his God but will always finde matter enough to busie his soul here and take a sure course to save his soul hereafter it is evident from the ensuing words that none but they who swerve from these three scil a pure heart a good conscience and a faith unfained do turn aside unto vain janglings And for this cause our blessed Saviour chides not onely the Scribes and Pharisees but also the meanest of the common people for not following and embracing the undoubted truth though there were at that time as great contentions in the Jewish as are now in the Christian Church S. Luke 12. 54 56 57. And he said also unto the people Ye hypocrites can ye discern the face of the sky and of the earth But how is it that ye do not discern this time yea and why even of your selves judge ye not what is right He chides them for being quick-sighted in matters of earth but as it were pur-blinde in the things of heaven that they could of themselves judge rightly of the seasons for their profit not so for their amendment and notwithstanding he professeth that he came not to give peace on earth but rather divisions such as should divide the nearest and dearest relations from and against themselves yet he gives no writ of ease to any man that he should leave off being a judge in matters of his salvation for if divisions hinder them not from judging what is right in husbanding their lands why should they hinder them from judging what is right in husbanding their souls To apply this to our present purpose since 't is not in our power to doubt either of Christian faith or Christian Charity as necessarily required and immediately conducing to salvation why should it be in our will to neglect them both for this is in effect to proclaim that we had rather with Martha be troubled about many things then with Mary choose that good part which shall not be taken from us it is in effect to declare that we will have a Religion rather to serve our selves then to serve our God rather agreeable with mens present humours then with Gods eternal truth otherwise our whole labour would be to conform our selves to that eternal truth in our understandings by faith in our wills by charity which two would make us
that call evil good and good evil Isa. 5. 19. here is truly the reprobate minde in its sin for it calls evil good and good evil and in its punishment for it is under a curse Wo unto them So again Prov. 17. 15. He that justifieth the wicked and he that condemneth the just whether Person or Thing or Action for the adjunct is put without any one of these particular subjects to shew it belongs alike to all even they both are an abomination to the Lord Their sin is in their own false judgement their punishment in Gods true judgement who judgeth them as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a thing profane unclean abominable not to be endured by God or man Let me then pray that I may cordially and sincerely study not onely the knowledge but also and much rather the practise and exercise of the true Christian Religion lest the neglect of the practise and exercise bring me to the dislike and contempt of my Religion and I begin to finde fault with my Church when I should finde fault with my self all men being apt to condemn that which they do neglect that they may justifie their own neglects for to finde fault with the true and laudable exercise of Religion is to call good evil which was all we did at first and then it will be just with God to deliver me over to so much Irreligion as to call evil good which is that we do now CHAP. 2. The certainty of Religion may be without the assurance of it by reason of our Hypocrisie profaneness and perversness though scarce by reason of our ignorance and that perversness is the way to the worst kinde of Irreligion or Atheisme REligion may be sure in it self and yet may not be sure to us It is in it self the certainty of all certainties yet it is often in too too many men the more is the pity if against their will the more is the shame if with their will one of the greatest uncertainties in the world For there may be a certainty of the object or of the thing when there is little or no certainty of the subject or of the person that is in plain English the certainty may be great yet the assurance little or none at all and so it is in this case for Religion hath without doubt the greatest certainty of the object or or of the thing because that wholly depends upon Gods immutabilitie or unchangeableness there is the greatest certainty but it hath ofttimes the least certaintie of the subject or of the person because of mans great hypocrisie and greater inconstancy there is the least assurance for this is the common bane of Religion that men do profess it hypocritically and therefore cannot profess it constantly they seek a Religion that will rather save their estates then save their souls and consequently will more settle their conditions then their consciences thus they are first hypocrites and then they cannot stick to be apostates for there is in hypocrisie Simulatio sanctitatis defectus sanctitatis saith Aquinas first the pretence of Religion and then also the defect or want of it for what is meerly in pretence is certainly not in being and Religion could not be pretended were it not wanting onely in hypocrites the pretence appears first but at last also the want or defect of godliness so that were their Religion unfeigned it would not be inconstant but because they have hypocrisie so far as to profess religion out of custome they cannot have constancy so far as to persist in their profession out of conscience we have the pattern of both kinds of professours real and formal in the first chapter of Ruth The one in Ruth the other in Orpah For the pleasure the delight of this world saith unto us all as Naomi said to her two daughters in law Go and return each to her mothers house and the formal professours do as Orpah did leave their mother the Church the onely true Naomi because she is Gods delight when she is in distress Orpah non Religione sed humanitate socrum secuta est saith Iunius Orphah followed her mother not out of Religion but meerly out of common courtesie therefore she turns back again so do all those that are of any Christian Church rather for good manners then for a good perswasion rather for custom then for conscience but the real professours who have followed Religion out of conscience and therefore have their consciences established in Religion are ready to say to their Church as Ruth said to her mother Naomi Whither thou goest I will go and where thou lodgest I will lodge thy people shall be my people and thy God my God As if she had said I will never leave the land of Israel nor the communion of the God Israel for so Aben Ezra glosseth her words Thus she resolves verse 16. and she strengtheneth her self in this resolution verse 18. for so it is in the Hebrew she strengthened her self which we fitly translate she was stedfastly minded for they who most strengthen themselves in good resolutions are most stedfastly minded and will not be guilty of unstedfastness and thus do all they strengthen themselves who have not onely a speculative but also an affective knowledge of Religion who do not onely know what they do in the worship of God but also love what they know They taste and see that the Lord is good Ps. 34. 8. and by that spiritual gust know themselves to be in the way of blessedness and consequently will not be diverted or turned out of that way Thus we see there may be a certainty of Religion without an assurance thereof but if there be so the fault is our own that we are Hypocrites or formal professours looking after the outside rather then the inside of Religion that is looking more after the form then after the power of godliness for the form of godliness may happily direct us to a conformity with men which is like to be as changeable as their humours but it is the power of godliness alone that directs us to a conformitie with Christ and makes us as it were unchangeable conforming us with our Saviour and confirming us in our selves that is to say in our own consciences wherefore from the form we must go to the power and that will make us pass from conformity to conscience not so as to loose the conformity but so as to keep the conscience for which cause the school Divines do teach that divinity is not onely a speculative science in teaching the knowledge of God there 's for the conscience but also a practical science in commanding and ordering the actions of men there 's for the conformity and as it is a science so it hath in it self that certainty which belongs to sciences nay it hath a greater certainty saith Alensis then any other science whatsoever for asking this question An modus sciendi in Theologiâ sit certior quà m in
all even as the first cause hath a stronger influence then the second and all that come after it Will you then ask me why God rewards the best of men the righteous far above their deserts 't is because his mercy first made them men to be capable of righteousness and made them righteous to be capable of reward and that being the first cause must needs have the strongest influence Will you ask me again why God doth not reward the worst of men impenitent sinners according to their ill deservings I must answer again 't is the same mercy because that was the first cause of the creation and therefore cannot but have the strongest influence upon the creature and consequently though his justice do as it were force him to punish for his law must be satisfied either by our active or by our passive obedience yet his mercy will not let him punish to the utmost and hence comes in the citra condignum in the Schools that even the damned in hell shall be punished much less then they have deserved If you ask me in the third place why God forgives so much sin in the best of sinners the true penitents that he may discharge them from all punishment you must still be contented with the same answer for 't is nothing but mercy which having been the first cause of his working will have the greatest preeminence and the strongest influence amongst all his works nay over them all as saith the Psalmist his mercy is over all his works Ps. 145. 9. Deusnon miseretur nisi propter amorem in quantum amat nos tanquam aliquid sui saith the same angelical Doctour Gods mercy is from his love and his love is from himself he sheweth us mercy because he loveth us and he loveth us because he seeth something of himself in us nothing else being truly good and lovely in us but what the fountain of goodness and love hath made so and hence it comes to pass that where is the most of God there is also the most of mercy where is most of his image either by the first righteousness that of innocency or by the second righteousness that of repentance there also is most of his love there is some of his love towards the worst men because there is some of his image in them which they had by their creation but there is very much of his love towards the best men because there is very much of his image in them which they have from their sanctification We are all dull of our apprehensions and cannot easily discern Gods mercies by a right valuation but more dull of our affections and will not easily profess and acknowledge them by our thankfulness but the Apostle whose eyes were opened to discover whose heart was opened to perceive whose mouth was opened to express the goodness of God towards men breaketh forth into this great exclamation but greater admiration for us all O altitudo divitiarum O the depth of the riches who hath first given unto him and it shall be recompenced again Rom. 11. 33 35. here in the words is mentioned 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but in the thing is made good 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a sigure notorious in Rhetorick for want of words and so called because the latter clause of the sentence doth not contribute or give its part to make up the full sense as Exo. 32. 31. If thou wilt forgive their sin S. Luk. 13. 9. if it bear fruit where nothing more is said to make up a perfect sense but the rest is left to be understood from the silence of the speaker this figure is notorious in Rhetorick the very art of speaking meerly for want of speech but 't is much more notorious in Divinity the art of doing meerly for want of deeds for if when we have done all we are unprofitable servants what shall we say of our selves that we can do nothing this is indeed a true 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for here is nothing to be given back again God hath given us all but we can give him nothing and that he might be sure to leave nothing ungiven he hath given us him who is all in all he hath given us himself in our creation he hath given us his Son in our redemption he hath given us his holy Spirit in our sanctification but who either first or last hath given unto God and it shall be recompenced unto him again If we give any thing to him 't is but what we first received from him and we cannot give that so entirely as we received it it came better to us then it can return from us so that we must needs confess all that is given is given onely on one side without any the least recompence on the other and consequently none of Gods gifts to man can properly come under the consideration much less under the claim of justice but all of them flow from the inexhausted fountain of his free and undeserved mercy by this mercy alone it is that he willeth our salvation and hath given us his oath that he wills it As I live saith the Lord I have no pleasure in the death of the wicked but that the wicked turn from his way and live Ezek. 33. 11. which made the ancient Father fall into a rapture and break forth into this exclamation O nos soelices quorum causa jurat Deus O miserrimos si ne juranti quidem Deo credimus O happy we for whose sakes God hath been pleased to swear O most unhappy if we do not beleeve him upon his oath by this mercy alone it is that he inviteth us to repentance the onely means of salvation that in his invitation he condescendeth to our infirmities and beareth with our delays by this mercy alone it is that upon our repentance he actually delivereth us from the bondage of sin and Satan working that deliverance by his Son and sealing it by his holy Spirit and that altogether freely that is to say so far without our good deservings as above them so far with our ill deservings as against them so saith the Apostle Rom. 3. 24. Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus what did we do for Christ that he hath redeemed us what can we do for God that he should justifie us It is reasonable that we first shew what we have done towards our redemption before we presume to boast what we can do towards our justification Restore unto me the joy of thy salvation and uphold me with thy free Spirit saith the Psalmist thereby shewing that the salvation he beseecheth God to restore unto him is as free as the Spirit whereby he restores it Eodem modó retinetur quo acquiritur no more merit is to be pleaded for our retaining of Gods Spirit then was for our first receiving him the Spirit was free when he first laid hold on us and is as free now he still upholds
keep his Oath in slaying those who brought him the head of Ishbosheth so carefull was God of David and David of himself that though he were made King yet he made not his own way to the possession of the kingdom nay yet more after another persecution he is still the same man 1 Sam 26. 8 9 10 11. and will rather flie for the safety of his own life then seek to destroy his Sovereign he was afraid to go a King-catching for fear that might teach him to go a King-killing therefore he saith There is nothing better for me then that I should speedily escape into the land of the Philistines 1 Sam. 27. 1. and at last when the Amalekite had done this horrid act of killing King Saul for no Israelite would do it the Armour-bearer that was not afraid to kill himself was afraid to kill his King 1 Sam. 3. 4 5. you see how David punished him for doing it caused him to be put to death and said unto him Thy bloud be upon thy head for thy mouth hath testified against thee saying I have slain the Lords Anointed 2 Sam. 1. 14 15 16. and moreover cursed the place where it was done v. 21 The mountains of Gilboa must have no more dew nor rain because upon them had been spilt the Kings bloud and He bids not tell it in Gath nor publish it in the streets of Askelon lest the daughters of the Philistines rejoyce lest the daughters of the uncircumcised triumph v. 20. He looks upon this act as the reproach of Israel though it were done by an Amalekite how much more if the Israelites themselves had done it and in truth they were very much guilty of it for it was their not destroying Amalek within that made God leave Amalek without to destroy them for as this Amalekite had not been left to kill King Saul if Saul had obeyed Gods commandment of utterly destroying Amalek 1 Sam. 15. 3. so questionless If Israel had destroyed the spiritual Amalek for warring against them which is the reason why Amalek was to be destroyed 1 Sam. 15. 2. That is the sinfull lusts of the flesh which warred against the Spirit and made them in their hearts return into Egypt God had not suffered Saul to spare the temporal Amalek without them 't was once in their power to have destroyed Amalek but now 't is in Amaleks power to destroy them and they may pronounce that as a sentence which their brethren afterwards pronounced onely as a wish or imprecation His bloud be upon us and upon our children 't is our not destroying the spiritual Amalek hath given the temporal Amalek power to destroy both our King and us and our childrens children In all these particulars of Samuels mourning of Davids relenting lamenting and weeping of Sauls perishing not by an Israelite but by an Amalekite of the Amalekites being put to death and mount Gilboas being put out of heavens blessing the Word of God doth as it were make Proclamation in the name of the King of heaven That it is it can be no other then a fire from hell that cannot be quenched but by a Kings bloud But what should the Preacher talk of hell to Amalekites that look not after another world so they may enjoy this Let us therefore see what success of disloyaltie he bids them expect even in this world and sure 't is like to be none of the best for there is upon earth a Power if not a Person left to punish it even the very same power which such men abuse and therefore will not be tardie may not be sparing 1. their punishment as it follows in the next words For he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him Be not hasty to go out of his sight much more Be not hasty to put him out of thy sight stand not in this evil thing For he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him This doctrine of Allegiance is inforced by reasons that concern both the inward and the outward both the spiritual and the carnal man that if it work not upon us as called to the inheritance of another world yet it may as loving the inheritance of this The Preacher sets down both reasons The first concerns the spiritual man who looks after his conscience to him he pleads the Oath of God The second concerns the carnal man that looks after his interest to him he alledgeth the power of Kings For he doeth whatsoever pleaseth him And this is S. Pauls method after him who writes the most demonstratively of all the Apostles in all the doctrines of Christianitie yet in this doctrine doth he after a sort strive to go beyond himself for in this he doth not onely use demonstrative or convincing arguments taken from the nature of the cause but also prevailing or perswading arguments taken from the condition of the Person this great Doctour in other doctrines thinketh it enough to use those prooofs which we call argumenta ad rem but in this he is moreover industrious to apply those proofs which we call argumenta ad hominem not onely fit to prove the thing but also fit to reprove and charm the man that gainsays it In other documents of Christianity he preacheth by the demonstration of the spirit 1 Cor. 2. 4. But in this he useth another kinde of demonstration which we may call A demonstration of the flesh for so he argues Rom. 13. 4. He is the minister of God to thee for good as if he had said If not for Gods sake yet for thine own sake thou must be subject if not for thy Conscience yet for thy convenience if not for the good of thy soul yet for the good of thy body if not for thy everlasting salvation yet for thy temporal preservation Thus after the confounding arguments of resisting Gods Ordinance and receiving damnation to work upon the Conscience he brings his perswading argument He is for thine own good to work upon the man He is the minister of God to thee for good and the same method that he useth in his preaching he useth also in his praying 1 Tim. 2. 1 2 I exhort therefore that first of all supplications prayers intercessions and giving of thanks be made for all men For Kings and for all that are in authoritie that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty Nor are these very words In all godliness and honesty an argument to work onely upon the conscience but also upon the condition or the person of the man who though he may cast away the practice yet is loth to cast away the repute of godliness for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is honestie properly Honesta quaedam morum gravitas quae reverentiam conciliat saith Beza so then he that will be godly or will be thought godly must zealously pray for Kings he that will have the power of godliness in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or the form of godliness in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the reason will extend to
and gives this reason why he requires it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We were ordained and appointed of God to preserve the faith holy and incorrupt as we received it the Pope will now tell the Emperour so sed non fuit sic ab initio from the beginning it was not thus no nor in many hundreds of years after and in the sixteenth Action of this Council the acclamations of the Bishops to the Emperour at first calling him Another Constantine another Martian another Theodosius another Justinian are a proof beyond exception for no History is so irrefragable as the Acts of a Council that those Emperours had called the forementioned Councils and the petitions at last of the same Bishops praying for him as the Defender of the Orthodox Religion as the bulwark of the Church and as the Defender of the Faith cannot but assure us that they thought it the Emperours duty to call those Councils because they thought them bound to defend the Faith and to protect the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 You see the title of Defender of the Faith to a King is of much greater antiquity then our Henry the eight as well as the reason of it and so many several laws in the Code and in the Novels of the Catholick Faith of the Sacraments of Churches of Bishops of Synods of Hereticks will be an evidence to the worlds end of the Supremacy of Kings in causes Ecclesiastical no less then those other titles in the institutes and digests that concern liberty and property and the affairs of this world will be an invincible evidence of their Supremacy in civil causes But I may not insist longer upon this Argument such kinde of quotations being fitter for the school then for the pulpit I will onely add this one more from Pope Adrian's own mouth to Charles the Great of France whom he calls Spiritualem Compatrem that is either his Spiritual Godfather for his patronage and care over his Person or his Fellow-Father in spirituals for his jurisdiction and government over the Church and he labours to give him such punctual satisfaction in all particulars concerning the second Nicene Council as if he feared that of Franckford called by Charles would as indeed it did over ballance that of Nice procured by himself no less in truth then it did in authority but we think his Compater to his Lord and Master a little too high though his Successours will not stoop so low for as we allow the Supreme no superiour so we must allow him no equal which is my second conclusion No person but is inferiour to him in power as no power but is inferiour to his in causes whether Ecclesiastical or Civil so no person or persons whether Ecclesiastical or Civil but is and are inferiour to him in power we understand not that Singulis major Universis minor or if we understand it think that Omnis anima speaks as well Universis as Singulis and therefore not onely one and one by himself but also one and all Subjects together all are inferiour to their Sovereign because they are all bound to submit unto him Let every soul be subject to the higher powers Rom. 13. 1. Their convening together doth as much take off their souls as it doth their subjection 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 can never agree but the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is joyned with the universis in the text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 therefore of them also no less then of single persons must the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the next verse be necessarily understood Whosoever resisteth or How many soever resist both alike are comprehended in They that resist and they shall receive to themselves damnation The word here used 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subordinetur let every soul be subordinate a word that more particularly points at the Ordines regni in the very signification of it because they can never want power to make resistance and seldom want chaplains that encourage them to make it but Ordines sunt ordinandi and subordinandi or else Ordines will be Confusiones Orders must be ordered and subordinate or though called States yet will be Ruines though called Orders will turn Confusions both of the text and of the kingdom and certainly the reasons alledged by S. Paul as equally concern Ordines regni as other Subjects and those as well all as some Universos as well as Singulos First Gods ordinance which may no more be rejected by all then by some by all together then by single persons in particular Secondly Damnation which may be incurred by all as well as by some by a Parliament as well as by Private Gentlemen 'T is true the King may not be so great a terrour to all as to some because all joyning together may not be afraid of his power What then yet I hope all have consciences as well as some and though happily it may not be said of the all of the whole kingdom Ye must needs be subject for wrath because all subjects holding together need not fear their Kings wrath yet it may and must be said of them all Ye must needs be subject for Conscience sake as 't is in the first verse For be they never so many that combine together that will give no satisfaction to the Conscience in regard of it self nor release in regard of God and yet even this very objection is sufficiently answered in the verse before in that he is said To bear the sword as the Minister of God and therefore Not to bear the sword in vain For though happily or rather unhappily in regard of his Person he may bear the sword in vain and perish under it yet in regard of his office he cannot for so he is the Minister of God and consequently a revenger of wrath that cannot fail of his revenge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith Epiph. Haer. 40. adversus Archontichos He hath from God the right of the sword not from any other and he hath it for revenge Would to God those men who follow these Hereticks in multiplying powers and principalities though not in heaven yet in earth and in some other things too for these Archontici did abhor baptism and slight the Communion 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiph. ibid. I say would those men who follow these Hereticks in this gross opinion would likewise seriously go along with this learned Father in his solid confutation there would never again be any cavilling disputes upon the 13 to the Romans His confutation in brief is this You Archontici think by multiplying powers in heaven to overthrow the dominion and power of one God but indeed you rather establish it For if in earth there may be so many principalities and powers in one kingdom all subject not repugnant to one King then much more so in heaven 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In every kingdom upon earth there are many principalities but they are all under one King Nothing