take hold when other sinnes leaue a man which caused Christ to forewarne his Disciples hereof in this place therefore it is our dutie to labour and striue the more earnestly to be purged from this euill minde and preserued from these euill practises of rash iudgement for which ende let vs lay to our consciences the reasons following I. The practise of rash Iudgement cannot stand with Christian charitie for charitie binds a man to walke in loue and loue suspecteth not euill but thinks the best alwaies and if it be possible thinks well of all II. When thou seest a man speake or practise any euill for which thou beginnest to thinke hardly of him then consider well of thine owne selfe how thou hast both that and all other sinnes in thee if we regard the roote of sinne and therefore doe not rashly condemne him for his fact because thou thy selfe hast done the like heretofore or els in time to come maist doe the like or worse then he hath done whome thou now condemnest III. Consider that God the father hath committed all iudgement vnto his Sonne who now executeth publike iudgement by the Magistrate in the common-wealth and by the Minister in the Church and priuate iudgement of admonition and iust dispraise by them whome he calleth thereunto if therefore thou iudgest another not beeing called thereto thou thrusteth Christ out of his office and robbest him of his honour which is a grieuous sinne and cannot be vnpunished IV. Consider also that thou art vnable whatsoeuer thou art to iudge aright of other mens actions beeing ignorant of many circumstances thereof for thou knowest not with what minde or to what ende the action was done thou knowest not the cause why he did it nor the state of his person nor manner of his temptation thereto and therefore why iudgest thou rashly of him V. He that giues rash iudgement of another is worse then a theefe that steales away a mans goods for he robbes him of his good name which as Salomon saith is to be chosen aboue great riches Prov. 22. 1. Againe riches may be restored so can not a mans good name beeing once blemished in the hearts of many Againe a man may defend himselfe from a theefe but no man can shunne an other mans euill minde or his badde tongue nay the backebiter is worse then a murtherer for he killeth three at once first his owne soule in thus sinning secondly his neighbour whose name he hurteth and thirdly the hearer who receiueth this rash and iniust report and for this cause the slaunderer is numbered among those that shall not inherit the kingdome of God Psal. 15. 3. 1. Cor. 6. 10. and the Apostle chargeth Christians to account of such raylers as of persons excommunicate 1. Cor. 5. 11. Here some will say if we may not giue our opinion of others freely as we haue done what must we doe when we haue occasion to speake of them Answ. Thy cariage towards others must be according to these rules I. If thou know any good thing by the partie of whome thou speakest when thou hast occasion thinke and speake of that if thou knew euill by him also conceale it from others and if thou maist admonish the partie thereof or els tell it to those who haue authoritie to correct his faults and thus shalt thou win thy brother Some will say I doe indeed sometime censure my brother for his faults yet onely in detestation of his sinne I loue the partie neuer the worse and I onely doe it to some priuate friend that will not tell it againe Answ. But this excuse and all such like are friuolous no colour of good intent can excuse rash iudgement if thou louest him why doest thou make knowne his fault to another for loue couereth a multitude of sinnes And if thy conscience answer it will tell thee that either ill will to the partie causeth thee so to doe or selfe-loue whereby through his defamation thou thy selfe seekest to be aduanced aboue him in the thoughts of others In thy censuring therefore looke to thine heart whether malice mooue thee not thereto and take heed to the end also for if it rise from a bad ground or tend to a wrong ende the whole action is nought II. Dutie We ought to thinke as wel of euery man as possibly we can yea of our enemie of his actions for loue thinketh not evill and in the practise of loue towards our enemies we become followers of God Math. 5. 44 45. III. Dutie If thou marke thy neighbours life and behauiour doe it for this ende to withdraw him from sinne and to further him in well-doing Lastly in all thy societies and dealings with others labour either to doe them good or to receiue good from them and by this meanes thou shalt eschew the sinne of rash iudgement Here two questions may be mooued concerning rash iudgement and that necessarily because surmises will arise vpon very small occasions I. Quest. When may a man doubt or suspect euill of another Ans. In all suspicion recourse must be had to the ground thereof whether it rise of iust and sufficient cause or not A sufficient cause of suspicion is that which in the iudgement of wise men beeing well considered with all the circumstances thereof is iudged sufficient and on the other side that is insufficient which wise men well waying with the circumstances thereof doe iudge insufficient if then the cause of suspicion be thought insufficient in the iudgement of the wise and godly we must suspend our suspicion as thus suppose some euill is reported abroad of such a man as that he is a theefe an adulterer or such like yet this fame riseth onely of some one mans report which because it may proceede from an ill minde on a priuate grudge we are not to yeild thereupon to suspect ill of the partie this report may well cause vs to search further into the case and mooue vs to looke vnto our selues that we be not hurt by him But if the cause be thought sufficient in the iudgement of those that are wise and discreete then we may without offence or breach of conscience yeild to suspect and iudge euill of another II. Question How may we giue vpright iudgement of all men with whome we liue and haue to deale Answ. This is as necessarie to be knowen as the former for as we are prone to thinke ill so we are also forward in iudging rashly therefore there are three things required in the iudging of others First we must haue recourse to the cause of our iudgement for if the cause be insufficient then our iudgement is rash and vnlawfull Before the Lord brought vpon the world the confusion of languages he is saide to goe downe among them to see their fact Gen. 11. 6. before he destroied Sodom and Gomorra with fire brimstone he is saide to come downe from heauen
to see whether they had done according to the cry that was come vp to the Lord. Gen. 18. 21. whereby the Lord would teach vs that before he enter into iudgement with any man or any people he first takes good consideration of the fact which causeth his punishment Secondly we must haue authoritie and warrant by calling to giue iudgement or els some thing which is answerable thereto though the iudgement be priuate as to giue admonition or iust dispraise yet without a calling we must not doe it he that giueth iudgement must be able truly to say the Lord hath called me thus to doe The Magistrate the Minister the master and euery superiour hath authoritie to iudge those that are vnder him and for priuate men in priuate iudgement though they want this authority by calling yet if they haue that which is answerable hereto that is the affection of Christian loue so as they can say with Paul the loue of God constraineth me then they may iudge Thirdly we must alwaies haue a good ende of our iudgement as well as a good beginning that is the reformation and amendment not the defaming of our brother And these three concurring in all hard speeches they cease to be rash and vniust censures Iohn Baptist calls the Pharisies and Sadduces a generation of vipers Matth. 3. 7. our Sauiour Christ calls them hypocrites and painted tombes and Herod a foxe the Prophet Isai calls the Princes and people of Iuda and Israel Princes and people of Sodom and the Apostle Paul calls the Galatians fooles Gal. 3. 1. and the Cretians lyars euill beasts slow bellies Tit. 1. 12 13. All which are hard speeches but yet no slanders because they had all of them a calling so to doe and likewise did this on good ground and for a good ende Thus much for the commandement Now follow two reasons to induce vs to make conscience of rash iudgement The former is laide downe in these words That ye be not iudged And it may be framed thus If ye iudge ye shall be iudged of men againe with rash iudgement But ye cannot abide to be iudged of rashly and therefore iudge not The second part is vnderstood but yet necessarily collected The conclusion is the commandement it selfe Iudge not This reason doth affoard vnto vs two instructions I. It giueth vs a tast and view of our owne naturall pride and selfeloue for when we heare God dishonoured by sweating or our neighbours name defamed by slandering we are not onely not grieued but oftentimes are the cause thereof and take great delight therein especially in hearing other mens faults ripped vp to their disgrace but yet we can in no sort brooke or suffer our owne good name to be called into question if our selues be ill spoken of we are presently filled with malice and enuie and cannot be at rest till we be requited or reuenged nay though we be in a good manner admonished of our fault euen in loue and after a friendly sort yet we can very hardly brooke it though the partie admonishing make knowne vnto vs that he doth it only for our good without all purpose of disgrace vnto our persons II. Instruct. Here also our Sauiour Christ affoardeth vnto vs a notable way whereby we may come to the knowledge of our own sinnes and of the hainousnes thereof When we behold sinne in our selues we hardly iudge it to be sinne we must therefore looke vpon our owne sinnes in the person of others and learne to iudge of it in our selues as we iudge of it in others When we consider of rash iudgement in others against our selues we count it a vile and grieuous sinne yea odious and intolerable and in like sort ought we to thinke of rash iudgement in our selues towards others and so for euery other sinne in our selues we ought to iudge of it as we doe when we see it in the person of others against vs otherwise if we looke onely to our selues we shall sooth vp our selues in sinne making great sinnes little sinnes and small sinnes none at all vers 2. For with what iudgement ye iudge ye shall be iudged and with what measure you mete it shall be measured to you againe This verse containes a double confirmation of the former reason drawne from the euent The first in these words For with what iudgement ye iudge ye shall be iudged as if Christ had said If ye iudge men rashly then men againe by the appointment of God in his wisdome and prouidence shall accordingly giue rash iudgement vpon you but if ye iudge men righteously then men againe by Gods appointment and prouidence shall iudge well of you for so I take the words to be meant of mens iudgement by Gods appointment in his prouidence and not of Gods iudgement immediatly Now in this proofe first we may obserue one true and maine cause of that personal defamation which is common in the world and it is to be found in the person himselfe that is defamed he hath rashly and vniustly censured others for which God in his prouidence doth most iustly cause others to defame him againe so as men themselues doe most of all wound their owne good names and by their bad cariage toward others iustly cause their owne disgrace In regard whereof we must learne first to set a carefull watch before our mouthes to keepe the doore of our lips gouerning our tongues by the word of God for when we censure others rashly we doe procure iudgement vnto our selues Secondly to be patient vnder the rash censures and slaunders of others For we must thinke that we our selues haue heretofore done the like to others and therefore it is iustice with God to reward vs in the same kinde wherewith we haue wronged others This is Salomons counsell Giue not thine heart to all the words that men speake least thou doe heare thy seruant cursing thee for oft â—imes also thine heart knoweth that thou likewise hast cursed others Secondly in this proofe wee may also obserue the right way how to get and keepe a good name to wit by iudging others with Christian iudgement carying a charitable opinion of euery one speaking the the best of them in all companies so farforth as we can with good conscience and neuer iudging hardly of any till we be indeed lawfully called thereunto hauing a good ground for our action and doing it for a good end If thou wouldst liue long saith the Prophet and see good dayes refraine thy tongue from euill and thy lips that they speake no guile that is speake not euill of any man though thou know ill by him till thou be lawfully called thereto Thirdly from the consideration of this prouidence of God whereby he ordereth and disposeth that defamers of others shal be rewarded in their kind and that by others we may gather that God knowes euery vnaduised thought of the heart and euery rash censure
rodde of men but not take his mercie quite from them 2. Sam. 7. 14. Secondly when God remooues the griefe with the causes thereof thus he comforted Manasses who for his abominable Idolatries and witchcrafts was carried captiue into Babylon and there laid in prison fettered in chaines of iron yet when he did mourne vnder that affliction and withall humbled himselfe vnto God for his sinnes the Lord comforted him by bringing him out of that captiuitie and prison to Ierusalem into his owne kingdome Thirdly when God giues inward comfort to the heart and conscience by his word and spirit In this case Paul said we reioyce in afflictions knowing that the loue of God is shedde abroad in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is giuen vs yea when he was exceedingly afflicted aboue his strength so as he receiued the sentence of death in himselfe hauing no hope of life yet euen then he professeth that as the sufferings of Christ abounded toward him so his consolations through Christ abounded in him Fourthly when God by death puts an ende to all their miseries and brings their soules to eternall life Thus was Lazarus comforted as Abraham saith vnto Dives Luk. 16. 25. and thus doth Christ comfort the Theefe vpon the crosse who with his bodily torment for his leud life was vndoubtedly touched in conscience for his sinnes and therefore desires Christ to remember him when he came into his kingdome by telling him that that day he should be with him in Paradise Here then we haue a notable remedie against the immoderate feare of death whether naturall or violent and of any other iudgement of God for when death it selfe or any other miserie whatsoeuer shall befall vs if we can there with bewaile our transgressions we neede not feare still holding fast this promise by faith in our hearts that we shall be comforted Secondly this promise well obserued may teach vs to auoide the perill of this false conceit That true faith doth alwaies minister present comfort Many doe herewith perplexe themselues measuring their estate towards God by that which they feele in theÌ„selues so as if in time of trouble they finde not present comfort they iudge themselues voide of faith and cast out of Gods fauour but herein they greatly wrong themselues for though the apprehension of comfort from God in distresse be a fruit and worke of faith yet a man may haue true faith that wants this sense and feeling of present comfort Doubtlesse none are blessed that want faith yet many are blessed that want feeling for here it is saide they that mourne for sinne are now blessed and yet it is not said they are now comforted but they shall be comforted meaning afterward in Gods good time Vers. 5. Blessed are the meeke for they shall inherit the earth This is the Third rule of Christ touching happinesse which as the former containeth two parts first the parties blessed secondly wherein this blessednes consists For the first The parties blessed be the meeke That we may know aright who be meeke I will somewhat lay open the vertue of meekenes and briefly handle these foure points first what meekenes is secondly what be the fruits thereof thirdly wherein it must be shewed fourtly the cause and ground thereof I. Point Meekenes is a gift of Gods spirit whereby a man doth moderate his affection of anger and bridle in himselfe impatience hatred and desire of reuenge II. Point The fruits of meekenes are principally two First it makes a man with a quiet and patient heart to beare Gods iudgemeÌ„ts which is a worthie grace of God and the greatest fruit of meekenes Levit. 10. 3. When Aarons two sonnes Nadab and Abihu were burned with fire from heauen which was a grieuous iudgement he went to Moses to know the cause thereof who told him that God would be glorified in all that came neere him which when Aaron heard he held his peace and was not mooued with grudging or impatience So Dauid beeing in great distresse through the hand of God vpon him doth notably shew forth this grace saying I was dumbe and opened not my mouth because Lord thou diddest it Secondly meekenes causeth one with a quiet minde to beare the iniuries men doe vnto him yea to forgiue and forget them and to requite good for euill referring all reuenge to God that iudgeth righteously When Dauids enemies laid snares for his life vttered sorrowes and imagined deceit against him continually yet by this vertue he suffered all patiently beeing as a deafe man that heareth not and as the dumbe which openeth not his mouth so farre was he from priuate reuenge And our Sauiour Christ sets forth himselfe a patterne of this vertue saying Learne of me that I am meeke and lowly in heart herein he left himselfe an example that we should follow his steppes who when he was reuiled he reuiled not againe when he was buffeted he threatned not but referred all to the iudgement of him that iudgeth righteously yea he praied for them that crucified him So did Stephen Act. 7. 60. Lord lay not this sinne to their charge so Zachariah the sonne of Iehoida beeing stoned saide onely this The Lord will see and require it at your hands 2. Chron. 24. 22. III. Point Wherein must this meekenesse be shewed Ans. Not in the matters of God when his glorie is impeached for therein we must haue zeale as hote as fire but in the wrongs and iniuries that concerne our selues Moses was the meekest man vpon the earth in his time Numb 12. v. 3. and yet when the Israelites had made a golden calfe in zeale to Gods glorie hee brake the two tables of stone put to the sword that same day three thousand men of them that had so dishonoured God Dauid also that held his tongue at his owne wrongs did consume away with zeale against his enemies that forgat Gods word Psal. 119. 139. And our Sauiour Christ who as a lambe before the shearer opened not his mouth for the wrongs done vnto himself did yet in rescue of his fathers glorie make a whip of cordes and driue the buyers out of the Temple who made his Fathers house a denne of theeues Math. 21. 12. IV. Point The cause and ground of this meekenesse is affliction and pouertie of spirit as the order of these rules declareth where it is placed after pouertie of spirit and mourning and therefore Psal. 37. 11. whence these words are borrowed the meeke person is called by a name that signifieth one afflicted to teach vs that hee that is meeke indeede is one who by affliction and distresse hath beene brought to mourne for his offences for hardly can he bee meeke and patient in spirit that hath not beene acquainted with the crosse Lamen 3. 27 28 29. The Church commendeth this bearing of the crâ—sse in youth because it maketh a man to sit
persecute you c. In handling the former verse we shewed the meaning of these words how they serue to expouÌ„d the former Rule The point here to be obserued is this That to reuile and slaunder yea as Luke saith to hate a man for a good cause especially for religion is persecution which shewes how fearefull the common sinne of the age is whereby men reuile their brethren with base and odious tearmes because they shewe some care to please God and to adorne their profession by a godly life But thou art a persecutor whosoeuer thou art that vsest this and therefore repent and leaue it for it is a preparation to a greater sinne in this kinde and most odious in Gods sight as the punishment hereof declares Gen. 21. 9 10. with Gal. 4. 29 30. S. Luke addes a second word And when they separate you whereby is meant excoÌ„municatioÌ„ out of the Temple and Synagogue a punishment which Christ foretold should befall his disciples This censure was put in execution in their Synagogues for besides the administration of ciuill Iustice Ecclesiasticall matters were there handled Now marke what Christ saith Though excommunication bee mine owne ordinance yet blessed are you when men excommunicate you out of the Temple and Synagogues for my names sake where hee maketh excommunication a kinde of persecution when it is denounced against men for righteousnesse sake Here then we may learne what to thinke of the Popes Bulls whereby he excommunicates Kings and Queenes and particular Churches for denying subiection to his chaire namely that they are the diuels instruments where with Gods children are persecuted and that all such as are thus excommunicated for defending the truth of the Gospel are blessed for excommunication is not the instrument of a curse to them that suffer it for good cause Secondly hence we learne that excommunication abused against Gods word is no powerfull censure though in it selfe beeing vsed according to Gods ordinance it be a most terrible thunderbolt excluding a man in part from the Church and from the kingdome of heauen and therfore all Churches must see that this censure be not abused for the abusers of it incurre the danger of the curse and not they against whom it is vniustly pronounced Vers. 12. Reioyce and be glad for great is your reward in heauen for so persecuted they the Prophets which were before you Here Christ drawes a conclusion from the former Rule for hauing said in generall that they which suffer for righteousnesse sake are blessed v. 10. and applied it in particular to his Disciples ver 11. hereupon hee infers that they must reioyce in affliction euen then or as Luke saith in that day yea they must be glad which word signifieth exceeding ioy such as we vse to expresse by outward signes in the body as skipping and dauncing such as Dauid vsed to testifie his ioy for the returne of the Arke of God to his citie This is a most worthy conclusion often vrged and commended vnto vs in Scripture Iam. 1. 2. Brethren count it exceeding great ioy when yee fall into diuers temptations Rom. 5. 3. We reioyce in tribulation knowing that tribulation bringeth forth patience and Act. 5. 41. The Disciples reioyced that they were counted worthy to suffer rebuke for the name of Christ. Here we learne then that Gods church and people that suffer in a good cause must reioyce and be glad This must be remembred for we â—aue bene many times in great danger of our enemies for the Gospels â—ake and it may please God to leaue vs in their hands for our manifold sinnes and great abuse of his heauenly blessings which if he doe what must be our behauiour must we be swallowed vp with sorrow and griefe no but humbling our selues for our sinnes we must remember for what we doe suffer and reioyce and be glad in that behalfe for though our outward man perish yet the inner man shall bee reuiued Now because it is a hard thing to reioyce in grieuous afflictions therefore Christ doth giue two reasons to mooue them hereunto first from the Recompense of reward after this life in these words for great is your reward in heauen This point I haue handled heretofore therfore I will here onely shewe how the Papists abuse this text to prooué the merits of mans workes of grace for hence they reason thus Where there is a reward there is merit But in heauen there is a reward for mans works of grace and therefore in this life there is merit by them To this it is answered diuers waies I will touch the heads of the principall First the word reward must not bee vnderstood properly but figuratiuely for Christs speech is borrowed from labourers who after they haue done their worke doe receiue their wages which is the reward thereof euen so after Christs disciples and seruants haue suffered afflictions for the name of Christ at the end of this life they shall receiue life euerlasting Secondly when wee read of wages and reward in Scripture wee must not dreame of any thing due by right of debt and merit but conceiue thereby that which is giuen by promise and of meere mercie like as when an earthly Father promiseth to his sonne to giue him this or that thing if hee will learne now the Fathers gift is not merited by the childe but is freely giuen the more to incite the childe to learne his booke Thirdly if we vnderstand reward properly then we must referre it not to our sufferings but to the sufferings of Christ for there is no proportion betweene our sufferings and life eternall the afflictions of this present life are not worthy of the glory which shall be shewed vnto vs Rom. 8. 18. The second reason is taken from the example of the auncient Prophets for so persecuted they the Prophets which were before you In this Reason Christ intendeth two things First to teach his Disciples and vs that persecuâ—ion for good causes is no newe or strange thing Secondly to comfort his Disciples and seruants in their sufferings for that thereby they should bee made comformable to the ancient worthy Prophets who were of old renowned among men and are now glori fied of God in heauen Hereto wee must compare the words of Luke ' spoken to the same purpose for after this manner did the Fathers to the Prophets By Fathers we must needs meane the auncient people of the Iewes for here hee speaketh to his Disciples and others that were Iewes by nation Now hence obserue a strange point to wit that the auncient Prophets who were most worthy men of God were persecuted in their time not so much by forrainers and enemies to religion as by those that were outwardly members of the Church of God and professors of religion This may seeme strange that men liuing in Gods Church should growe to this height of impietie to become persecutors of Gods Saints but Saint
sinnefull conception al which our Sauiour Christ was free from for at the very time when hee bare our sinnes hee was in himselfe more holy then all men and all Angels Fourthly it is said that if Christs righteousnesse bee made ours then wee are made Sauiours Answer It followeth not for Christs merits and righteousnesse are conuaied and applied vnto men not as they are in Christs person in whom they are sufficient to saue ten thousand worlds but as they serue to saue and iustifie that particular person onely to whom they are imputed so that this remaines an vndoubted truth that that righteousnesse which brings saluation is Christs righteousnesse onely Here some may say How is Christs righteousnesse made ours and wee assured of it Answ. It is made ours by sauing faith which the holy Ghost creates in the heart and soule as an hand whereby wee may laie hold on Christ and applie his righteousnesse vnto our selues as hee is offered vnto vs in the promises of the Gospel Some obiect that if Christs righteousnesse be made ours by our beleeuing it to bee ours then if a man beleeue his neighbours house to be his it is his also and so for any other thing Answer There is not the like reason in these things for it is a meere fancie and imagination for a man to beleeue his neighbours house to be his hauing no ground for it besides his owne conceit but when a man beleeueth Christs righteousnesse to be his he hath Gods commandement and promise for his warrant and assurance that it shall be imputed vnto him and withall that faith so grounded maketh Christs righteousnesse as truely his as any thing a man hath is his owne beeing giuen him of another Now this sauing faith laying hold on Christs righteousnesse for mans iustification is neuer seuered from sanctification by the spirit with the fruits thereof whereby the old man beeing mortified and the new man in Christ renued according to his image in knowledge righteousnesse and true holinesse the whole person is turned vnto God and made carefull to please him both in thought word and deede and hereby doe wee receiue assurance of our iustification for true sanctification is the earnest of the spirit of adoption in our hearts whereby we are sealed vnto the day of our redemption Doth that righteousnesse whereby we must be iustified and saued in the day of our Lord come from Christ onely and not from our selues then we see what iust cause we haue to humble our selues and to acknowledge our great vnrighteousnesse and want of all goodnesse in our selues and when wee can doe this vnfainedly wee haue gone one steppe in the way to true happinesse Secondly we also must hereby learne to esteeme all things as drosse and dongue with the Apostle in respect of Christ Iesus and his righteousnesse for he it is that brings vs to heauen and therefore wee must honour him aboue all and value his righteousnesse as that most pretious iewel which when a man hath found hee will sell all that he hath to get and keepe it Matth. 13. 46. Thirdly we must hunger and thirst after Christ and his righteousnesse for it is the fountaine of all blessednes and without it we are most miserable yea though wee had all the world beside yet without it wee loose our saluation Now what will it profit a man to winne all the world if he loose his soule Fourthly seeing Christs righteousnesse is made ours by faith we made assured of it by sanctification of heart and life wee must labour for true faith whereby our hearts may bee inwardly renued we must not content our selues with an outward holinesse for that will neuer bring a man to heauen but our endeauour must be for inward holinesse whereby we shal be preferred with God aboue all the Pharises in the world and get assurance of eternall happinesse And this faith wee must shewe forth in all holy exercises as when we heare the word wee must lend the inward eare of the heart with the bodily eare and when we fall downe to praier we must bowe the knees of our hearts and in fasting from meate wee must abstaine from sinne yea in all things wee must be carefull to serue God in spirit and truth for which cause wee must pray with Dauid Lord renue a right spirit within me that so feeling Christ to liue in vs by grace wee may bee assured that Christs righteousnesse shall bring vs vnto glorie Verse 21. Ye haue heard that it was said of olde Thou shalt not kill for whosoeuer killeth shall be culpable of iudgement Our Sauiour Christ hauing laid downe his Preface doth here begin his interpretation of the Law beeing indeed the onely true doctour of his Church and herein especially hee doth meddle with the second Table beginning first of all with the sixt Commandement touching Murther In the handling whereof hee obserueth this order First hee setteth downe the false interpretation of this law by the Scribes and Pharises in this verse Secondly hee sheweth the true meaning of it v. 22. And lastly hee propoundeth rules of concord and agreement betweene those that be at variance verses 23 24 25 26. For the first The Exposition Ye haue heard that is you Iewes which now heare mee whether Scribes Pharises or others you haue heard that it hath beene said of old that is by your auncient Teachers the old Scribes and Pharises who haue expounded this law vnto you and that this phrase must be vnderstood of the ancient Iewish Teachers may plainely appeare because in the next verse hee opposeth his owne teaching thereunto and would haue these his hearers that before had learned a false interpretation of this law from their old Teachers now to learne of him the true exposition thereof The Law is this Thou shalt not kill The exposition of the ancient Iewish Teachers was this for whosoeuer killeth shall be culpable of iudgement that is whosoeuer laieth violent handes on another to take away his life for they knew no other murther neither did they extend this commandement to forbid any sin but actual murther shall be culpable of iudgement that is shall be held guiltie of murther both in the courts of men and also before the iudgement seate of God where hee shall receiue the deserued punishment thereof This was the interpretation of the Iewes Here first obserue that Antiquitie is no infallible marke of true doctrine for this exposition of this commandement was ancient received from ancient Teachers and yet Christ the doctour of truth reiecteth it as false and corrupt and therefore the argument which the Papists vse for the stablishing of their religion drawn from Antiquitie is of no effect Secondly by these words of Christ ye haue heard it hath beene said of olde wee may easily gather after what manner the Scribes and Pharises expounded the law namely they left the Scriptures and followed
could wish and so might haue continued if he would for hee was the adopted sonne of Pharaohs daughter but yet Moses left them all and chose rather to suffer affliction with the people of God in Goshen then to enioy all the pleasures of Egypt And this he did because they were but the pleasures of sinne which hee could not enioy vnlesse hee would forsake the true feare and worship of God and all good conscience his example we ought to follow Now that we may auoid all the occasions of sinne and so put in practise this wholesome precept of our Sauiour Christ I wil here intreat of the occasions of sinne and shew withall how they may be auoyded By occasion of sinne I meane any thing that either of it selfe or by mans abuse becomes offensiue and prouoketh vnto sinne In this large acceptance an occasion of sinne extendeth it selfe not onely to such things as are euill but euen to things good and commendable in themselues which by mans abuse cause transgression against God Occasions of sinne are two-fold either giuen or taken An occasion giuen is that thing either word or action that is euill in it selfe the speaking or doing whereof stirres a man effectually to sinne Occasions giuen are two-fold either of one man vnto another or of man vnto himselfe The occasions whereby one man may prouoke another to sinne are many I will reduce them vnto sixe heads The first is badde counsell whereby one man perswadeth another vnto sinne This is a great cause of much euill in the world thus came the fall of our first parents for Sathan perswaded Eue and Eue her husband thus came the crucifying of the Lord of life for the high ' Priests and Rulers perswaded the people to aske Barrabas and to destroy Iesus Hence commeth seeking vnto wisards one friend perswades another for their outward good as they thinke yea from this bad counsel comes the common neglect of all good duties in Gods worship The second is consent or approbation of sinne and it is two-folde secret or open Secret approbation and consent is when men see sinne committed and are not grieued thereat for this cause the Apostle Paul checketh the Corinthians that they were not sorrowfull but rather puffed vp at the facte of the incestuous man whereby they did in some sort hearten him in his sinnes this is a great occasion of sinne in our daies The Prophet Dauid was of another minde his eies gushed out riuers of teares because men brake Gods lawes Open approbation of sinne is when men doe openly countenance sinners and lewd persons which make profession of badde practises this is a great occasion of many horrible impieties hereby the hands of the wicked are strengthened in their wickednesse as the Lord complaineth and this is the sinne of this age for who is so badde that hath not some patrone of his euill and some backe friend to sooth him in his sinne which makes sinne shameles and sinners impudent But all Gods children must follow Elisha who in great feruencie of spirit told Iehoram to his face though he were a king that if it had not bâ—ene for the preseuce of good King Iehosaphat he would not haue looked towards him nor seene him the Lord himselfe will not take the wicked by the hand neither can he endure that his children should helpe the wicked or loue them that hate the Lord. The third occasion giuen is prouocation vnto sinne when either by word or deed men excite or drawe on others to some euill as vnto anger reuenge hatred to drunkennesse or such like and this is a common fault of those that delight in drunken fellowship The fourth occasion is neglect of good duties vnto our brethren as of exhortation admonition instruction or rebuke Ioshua 7. Achan stole the execrable thing for himselfe alone yet all the people are charged with that fault and punished for it the cause was their neglect to keepe one another from that sinne according as God commanded theÌ„ chap. 6. 18. This is a great occasion of impietie among vs if neighbour would admonish neighbour and one brother an other sinne would not be so rife as it is But this dutie is not onely neglected of priuate men one to another but of publike persons who are more bound vnto it The Magistrate is negligent in punishing and the Minister in reproouing sinne and the master of the family carelesse in reforming those that are vnder him which causeth sinne to abound The fift occasion giuen is euill Example in the practise of any sinne whatsoener which may be knowne this is most dangerous like vnto wild fire that inflameth all places whereon it lighteth The truth hereof appeares among vs for let any one man or woman take vp a new fashion in attire and presently the same is generally receiued let a man inuent or sing a leud song and presently it is learned of all euen of little children that can scarse speake whence also comes it that crawling infants should sweare roundly and frame themselues to all impietie when they cannot speake readily but from the bad example of their Elders with whome they are brought vp Now among all men their bad example is most dangerous who make the greater profession of Religion They are like false lights vpon the shoare which lead the shippesvpon the sands And therefore such as shew any care or forwardnes in holy practises of religion must haue speciall watch ouer all their waies that if it be possible they may be blamelesse both in word and deede for all men haue an eye at them and the wicked would gladly spie holes in their coate The last occasion giuen is the priuate slandering of Gods Ministers and the disgracing of their Ministerie this is an offence as generall as the rest and it causeth many to contemne the meanes of their saluation When men meete together their common talke is of the Ministers and of their doctrine not to be edified by mutuall conference but onely to disgrace their persons and to make their ministerie contemptible but they little know what mischiefe this causeth and therefore it ought to be auoided These are occasions of sinning giuen by one man to another for the auoiding whereof which is the plucking out of the eye and cutting off the hand here commanded this Rule must be obserued We must hate and eschew the occasions of sinne as deadly poison and esteeme those persons that giue them vnto vs in that regard as ill as the deuill Thus Christ dealt with Peter his owne disciple when he went about to hinder him from doing his Fathers will in suffering for our sinnes saying Come behinde me Satan considering him in that action as if he had beene the deuill himselfe for we must know that the deuill comes not openly vnto men but cunningly conuaies himselfe in these
want thereof ought not to keepe the godly from this Sacrament for another mans euill conscience cannot defile thy good conscience another mans sinne cannot hurt thee vnlesse thou doe some way communicate with him therein Christ was more carefull in his dutie then euer man was and yet hee communicated with the wicked Iewes Scribes and Pharises in the seruice of God vnder the Law The fourth head from whence offence is taken is the state of the wicked principally in regard of their prosperitie Hence some holy ones suspect their owne estate and religion as either not good or not regarded of God This befell Dauid Psal. 37. when hee sawe the prosperitie of the wicked and their increase in riches with peace and ease hee said Certainly I haue clensed mine heart in vaine â—nd washed my hands in innocencie Hence also Ieremie reasons with God why the way of the wicked should prosper and they bee in wealth that transgresse rebelliously Hence vndoubtedly at this day many call into question the good prouidence of God Now the way to cut off this offence is to enter into the sanctuarie of God as Dauid did that is to come to the assemblies of Gods people where the word is preached for there a man shall see the manifold reasons why God will haue his owne people afflicted also the fearefull end of the pleasures of the wicked namely a fitting of them to further destruction Againe from this same ground doe many rich men take offence for hauing the world at will they blesse themselues with this perswasion that God loues them and thereupon take occasion to condemne all religion and to goe on in the pursuite of worldly profits and delights And this is one maine cause why among the rich we haue so few good and sound Professors because that from a false ground of outward things they perswade themselues of Gods loue fauour But to cut off this offence we must remember that mans case is the more fearefull when he wants all crosses for God chasteneth euery child whom he receiueth Heb. 12. 6. it is a marke of Gods child to be in affliction if he profit thereby the stalled oxe commeth sooner to the slaughter then the oxe that is vnder the yoke and the sheepe that goeth in fat pasture commeth sooner to the shambles then that which goeth on the bare commons so oftentimes God fatteth the wicked with the blessings of this life as hee did the rich glutton that he may more iustly condemne them in the world to come Lastly we must remember what Salomon saith No man knoweth loue or hatred of all that is before him that is of all outward things all things fall alike vnto all both good and bad therfore no man must so blesse himselfe with his outward estate that he be drawne to esteeme of religion as a thing needlesse or superfluous Verse 31. It hath beene said also whosoeuer shal put away his wife let him giue her a Bill of diuorcement 32. But I say vnto you whosoeuer shall put away his wife except it be for fornication causeth her to commit adulterie and whosoeuer shall marie her that is diuorced committeth adulterie Our Sauiour Christ proceeding further to restore the seauenth commaundement to his perfection doth here confute a false interpretation of a Politicke law of Moses giuen by the Scribes and Pharises For this ende first he laies downe the wordes of Moses politicke law but yet so as containing in them the false interpretation of the Iewish teachers ver 31. then hee opposeth the truth of God against their false interpretation and maintaineth the first institution of mariage v. 32. For the first Moses politicke law was That hee which put away his wife should giue her a Bill of diuorce This law the Iewish Teachers did falsly interpret for the better perceiuing wherof these three points are to be handled touching Moses politicke law 1. what kinde of law it was 2. the straitnesse of that law 3. what effect and force it had For the first the law is set downe Deut. 24. 1. when a man marieth a wife and she finde no fauour in his eies because he hath espied some filthinesse in her then let him write her a bill of diuorce and put it in her hand and send her out of his house This law was not morall but ciuill or politicke for the good ordering of the common wealth Now among their particular lawes some were laws of toleration and permission which were such as did not approoue of the euill which they concerned but did onely tolerate and permit that euill which could not be auoided for the preuenting of a greater euil which otherwise would fall out As when the sea hath made â— breach into the land if it cannot possibly be stopped the best course is to make it as narrow as may bee Such was the law concerning vsurie Deut. 23. 20. permitting the Iewes to exercise it vpon a stranger but not towards a brother and the like was the law touching polygamie Deut. 21. 15. If a man had two wiues the one hated the other loued and they both haue borne him children if the first borne be the sonne of the hated though shee were maried to him the latter yet her seed was legitimate and her sonne had the right of the first borne In both which lawes were tolerated that which God condemned onely for the preuenting of a greater euill Vnder this sort comes our law of vsurie for taking tenne in the hundred not approuing but permitting so much for the auoyding of greater vsurie Vnto this kind the Papists would reduce their law of permitting Stewes for the preuenting of greater sinnes but that law can haue no title to such permission for a law of permission is to diminish that euill which by man cannot possibly be cut off altogether now that sinne which they would preuent by their Stewes might be cut off among them if they would giue allowance to Gods owne ordinance of lawfull mariage vnto all sorts and sexes So likewise this law of Moses for diuorce was a law of permission not approouing of the giuing a bill of diuorce for euery light cause but tolerating of it for the preuenting of greater mischeife euen of murther for the nature of the Iewes was this if a man once tooke dislike to his wife he would neuer be at rest till he had shed her blood if they might not bee parted asunder Now this law of diuorce was giuen to restraine this great euill for hereby a man was tolerated to put away his wife when shee found no fauour in his eies lest hee should kill her yet so as he gaue her a bill of diuorce wherein hee must set downe the cause why hee put her away whereby also many were restrained from putting away their wiues because it was a great shame for a light occasion so highly to transgresse Gods holy institution who made them by mariage
religion allowed Ans. Christ by forsaking meaneth not that separation which is made by giuing a Bil of diuorcement but that which is caused by imprisonment banishment or by death 2. Obiect 1. Cor. 7. 15. If the vnbeleeuing depart let him depart a brother or a sister is not bound in such things Here say they is another cause of diuorce Ans. The malitious and wilfull departing of the vnbeleeuer doth dissolue the mariage but that is no cause of giuing a bil of diuorce onely adulterie causeth that Here the beleeuer is a meere patient and the diuorce is made by the vnbeleeuer who vniustly forsaketh and so puts away the other 3. Obiect Titus 9. 10. Auoide an heretake after once or twice admonition This say they is spoken to all Christians and therefore for heresie may a bill of diuorce be giuen Ans. First that commandemēt is not giuen to euery priuate person but to the Ministers of the church who after one or two admonitions are to excommunicate and cut off all heretikes from the Church Secondly it hindreth not but that the bond of mariage may remaine sure and firme though one of the parties be cut off from the Church for the beleeuing husband must not forsake his vnbeleeuing wife if shee will dwell with him 1. Corinthians 7. 12. 4. Obiect After mariage one partie may haue a contagious and incurable disease which may cause the other to giue a bil of diuorce Answer A contagious disease may cause a separation for a time but no diuorce and if that disease bee incurable and disable the partie from the dutie of mariage then such parties must thinke themselues as it were called of God to liue in single life 5. Obiect But maried persons may seeke to spill the blood one of another and therfore it is good to giue a bil of diuorce to preuent that euil Answer Such enmitie may cause a separation for a time till reconciliation be made but the bond of mariage must not therefore bee broken 6. Obiect Death maketh a diuorce Ans. Death indeede endeth mariage estate and setteth the partie liuing free to marrie in the Lord where he or shee will but this comes not by diuorce giuen of either partie so that the conclusion still remaineth firme that a man with good conscience cannot giue a bill of diuorce for any cause but for adulterie and therefore those lawes which permit diuorce for other causes are greatly faultie before God If any shall aske whether mens laws may not make more causes of diuorcemēt then this one I answer no for mariage is not a meere ciuill thing but partly spirituall and diuine and therefore God onely hath power to appoint the beginning the continuance and the end thereof If any yet aske why Idolatrie Magycke which be greater sinnes then adulterie may not breake mariage Ans. They are greater indeede against God but not in this ordinance of mariage for the sinne of adulterie breaketh onely the bond of mariage which may remaine still betweene two parties though one be an idolater a witch or an Atheist Now considering that Adulterie is so great a sinne that it cuts of the knot off mariage aboue all things those persons that are called to this estate must take heede of all sinnes so of this especially Thirdly here may be asked whether after diuorce for adulterie the parties diuorced may marrie againe without committing adulterie This point hath bin diuersly discussed wee will consider the reasons on both sides First for the lawfulnes of it especially to the party innocent 1. From Christs doctrine in this place for in his answer to the false interpretation of Moses politicke Law touching diuorce hee first propounds a generall rule and then puts an exception thereto the nature of which exception is alwaies to implie and put downe the contrarie to the generall rule As in this place the generall rule is Whosoeuer putteth away his wife causeth her to commit adulterie hee that marieth her committeth adulterie The exception then must bee contrarie namely that in the case of adulterie hee that puts away his wife lawfully conuicted thereof causeth her not to commit adulterie neither he that marieth her that is diuorced doth commit adulterie If it be said that Christ propoūdeth two rules one for the case of diuorce the other for the case of marying after diuorce applyeth his exception for adulterie only to the case of diuorce and not to the case of mariage after diuorce Ans. As the exception for adulterie is here in this chapter ioyned with the case of diuorce he that putteth away his wife except it be for fornication c. so in the 19. cha v. 9. the same exception for adulterie is expresly applied not only to the case of diuorce but also to the case of mariage after diuorce saying Whosoeuer shal put away his wife except it be for fornication and marie another committeth adulterie so that if in this place the exception make the diuorce lawfull for adulterie then in the 19. chapter it maketh it lawfull to marie againe after such diuorce without the guilt of adulterie 2. The innocent partie is not to bee punished for the wilfulnesse of the offender and therefore the partie that is faultlesse may with good conscience marrie againe after lawfull diuorce 3. God hath prouided mariage to bee a remedie against incontinencie for all persons 1. Corinth 7. 2. But if parties lawfully diuorced might not marie againe then they should want this remedie and bee depriued of this benefit If it be said they may reconcile themselues each to other and so haue remedie Answer But what if the partie offending liue in adulterie still then the partie innocent cannot in conscience ioyne him or her selfe to the other and reunite the bond of matrimonie for that were too much lenitie towards so foule a crime and a sinne against God for want of Christian reconciliation which requireth that this revniting should bee in the Lord and not in the flesh alone 4. The phrases of Scripture vsed by the holy Ghost concerning mariage after diuorce restraining it to some cases and allowing it in others seeme to take it for granted that after lawfull diuorce it is no sinne to marrie againe Reasons alleadged on the other side First Christs generall saying Whosoeuer putteth away his wife and marieth another committeth adulterie Hence some inferre that there may be no mariage at all after any diuorce But they abuse that Scripture for though Saint Marke put downe no exception yet Matthew hath made supply therof in two places Chapter 5. 32. and 19. 9. Now the Gospels were penned by seuerall men that that which was not fully expressed by one might bee supplied by another that so by conferring writer with writer the whole truth might be made manifest Secondly Matth. 19. 6. Whom God hath coupled let not man put asunder Therefore after diuorce they stil remaine man and wife before God and may not marrie to
brought before the Magistrate and made to sweare to this demaund or such like Whether they said Masse or knewe where Masse was said at such a time They answer vpon their oathes That they did not or knewe not though indeede they did which is according to their doctrine That vnto dangerous Interrogatories a man may frame a safe meaning vnto himselfe and sweare to it as in the former instance they sweare they knewe not where Masse was said meaning to reueale it to the Iudge But this is flat periurie for their oath is giuen them to answer according to the meaning of the Magistrates demaund and if a man might lawfully frame a meaning to himselfe in swearing hee might easily delude all truth and so should not an oath for confirmation be the ende of strife but the breeder thereof through surmise of false meaning in him that sweareth The third kind of periurie is The breaking of a binding oath as when a man vpon his oath promiseth to doe a thing that is lawfull and doth it not yet this is not alwaies periurie as First If God after the oath taken make the thing promised impossible to be done as if a man sweare to make another his heire of such and such lands now dwelling by the Sea side the Sea breaks out drownes all his land before he dieth Is this man periured because he performed not his promise bound with an oath no verely for God made the thing impossible Secondly if a man be bound in conscience to breake his oath Thus Dauid swearing rashly to slaie Nabal and his familie was yet staied from so doing by Abigals counsell and brake his oath and gaue God thankes for it for indeed his oath was vnlawfull beeing the bond of iniquitie and the doing of it had beene the doubling of his sinne Here it may well be demanded whether those that are sworne to the Statutes and lawes of societies and incorporations be periured if they breake the same Ans. The Statutes of incorporations bee of two sorts some are of the foundation of societies without which the incorporation cannot stand and these not beeing against the word of God cannot be broken without the guilt of periurie others are Statutes only of outward order and decencie as touching apparel gesture and such like as in some incorporations the Statutes require that euery man therein should weare the round cap hereunto many are sworne who alwaies weare it not now though I say not that they are faultlesse altogether yet they are not periured because this Statute of order binds not a man simply but either to obedience or to paie the mulct which if a man be content to paie he satisfies the Statute and benefits the societie as much as if he kept the Statute Hauing shewed what periurie is with the kinds thereof let vs see whether we be free from it After examinatiō it will appeare that mens liues are full of periurie for where is much swearing vsually there cannot but be much periurie because they that sweare in their common talke doe forget their oathes as they doe their communication But say we are cleare from periurie yet are wee in danger of Gods heauie iudgements for the breach of our vow in baptisme wherein wee promise to beleeue in God to serue him forsaking the world the flesh and the diuell now the breach of this vow is as ill as periurie for therfore may Baptisme be called a Sacrament because of the oath and vow which a Christian makes to God therein for the word Sacrament properly betokeneth the oath which a Souldier maketh to his Captaine for his fidelitie The breaking of Iosua his oath vnto the Gibeonites by Saul caused 3. years dearth and was not satisfied but with the blood of 7. of Sauls kindred And Zedekias periurie to the King of Babel was one cause of the Lords fierce wrath against Ierusalem and the Princes thereof Now shall one mans periurie cause such iudgements and shal we not thinke that among other sinnes this our periurie vnto God in breaking our vow in Baptisme bringeth vpon vs Gods heauie wrath by plague famine and vnseasonable weather Wherefore let the consideration hereof perswade vs to repentance and to a more conscionable care of performing our vow vnto God III. Point The grieuousnesse of this sinne of periurie which here the Lord forbids appeares by these three sinnes which are contained in it First the vttering or maintaining of a lie Secondly the calling on God to be a witnesse vnto a lie wherein men doe as much as in them lieth set the diuell himselfe the father of lies in the roome of God and so greatly robbe him of his honour and maiestie Thirdly in periurie a man praies for a curse vpon himselfe wishing God to bee a witnesse of his speech and a iudge to reuenge if he sweare falsly so as herein a man is his owne vtter enemie as much as in him lieth doth cast both bodie and soule to hell Quest. Seeing this sinne of periurie is so great whether may such a man be put to his oath as is certainely thought will periure himselfe if he be put to sweare I answer men that put others to sweare are either priuate persons or publike Magistrates a priuate man for his owne priuate cause may not put such a man to his oath for hee should haue greater care of Gods glorie and of the other mans soule then of his priuate gaine and therefore ought rather to depart from his temporall right then suffer his brother so to dishonour God and to hurt his owne soule But if a Magistrate bee to put such a man to his oath as is verely thought will periure himselfe he may lawfully doe it but yet he is first to aduertise the partie of the waight of an oath and of the fearefull sin of periurie and then if the order of Law and Iustice so require he may minister an oath vnto him leauing the euent to God for the execution of iustice must not staie on mans misdemeanour nor waite till they make conscience of sinne for if it did no common wealth could stand no warre could bee made Moses and the Leuites executed vengeance vpon the idolatrous Iewes without waiting for their repentance But shall performe thine oathes vnto the Lord. These words are not set downe in any of Moses bookes but are a collection from the former law of Moses gathered by the Iewish Teachers which collection though it be not expresly set downe yet is it the very sense of the Law for if a man cannot without periurie breake a lawfull binding oath then that Law which forbiddeth periurie bindeth man to performe all that he hath lawfully sworne vnto God Here then in this collection of the Iewish Teachers is set downe an excellent point touching the straitnesse of the bond of an oath In euery lawfull oath there is a double bond First it bindes one man to another for
Lord. And to cleare this point yet further consider this that the roote of hypocrisie and of Atheisme is in our nature whereby naturally wee doe these three things wee Loue feare and trust in men more then in God and therefore doe make men the Iudges of our actions 1. for Loue are wee not greeued when we our selues or our freinds are dishonoured and on the contrarie when wee our selues or our freinds are praised are we not glad and reioyce but when God is dishonoured who is greeued or whose heart doth leape for ioye when God is glorified which argues plainely that our affection of loue is more inclined towards our selues and to our freinds then vnto God 2. for feare are not most men more afraide when they offend a mortall man like themselues then when they offend the euerliuing God 3. for trust and confidence in the time of affliction most men are more comforted if some friend promise them helpe then they are by all the promises of God himselfe in his word But men will say that they loue and feare and trust in God aboue all This indeede is the ordinarie profession of ignorant people but the truth is that by nature we refuse God to be our iudge and our approouer and appeale vnto men and therefore we must labour to see and feele and to bewaile this hypocrisie and to be indued with the contrarie grace whereby we may simply and sincerely seeke to be approoued of God in all our actions Secondly in this example note one euident cause of the disorder which was among the Iewes in respect of their poore for they begged in the high waies in the streetes of the cities and gates of the Temple flat against Gods commandement who would not haue such a begger in Israel other occasions there were of this abuse but one principall cause is here noted namely that priuate persons were permitted to giue their priuate almes vnto the poore with their owne hands in publike places This was a great disorder and the cause of many beggers for priuate men could not discerne the particular wants of all that begged so and therefore God had otherwise prouided for them in the old Testament as he shewed before And in the new Testament there were chosen faithfull men called Deaâ—ons in euery congregation who were to looke-vnto their poore to collect for them and to distribute to euery one according to their necessitie It is not vnlawfull for a priuate man to giue Almes in publike place if neede require but where the poore are no otherwise prouided for then by such priuate releefe it is a great disorder like as it is in a family where the children and seruants know not where and when to haue their dinners for the poore are Gods children in his family and ought to be prouided for in better sort then by such priuate releefe and therefore where good order is wanting for prouision for the poore it ought in conscience to be begunne and where it is begunne men must carefully maintaine and continue the same Thirdly in this example of a corrupt manner of Almes-giuing see the concurrence of sundrie sinnes First here is noted hypocrisie which were enough to condemne a man but yet with this there goes ambition and with both an open contempt and breach of good order in prouiding for the poore which shewes euidently that no sinne goes alone but ordinarily hath his companions for sinnes are so infolded one in an other that he which commits one is not free from any other this may plainly be shewed by many examples In Adams sinne there was the breach of the whole law in euery commandement either directly or by consequence for he shewed euident want of loue to God in beleeuing Satan more then God therein he chose Satan for his God he worshipped Satan and tooke Gods name in vaine he shewed also euident want of brotherly loue for hereby he became a murtherer not onely of himselfe but of all his posteritie and thus doe sinnes concurie in euery wicked action in which regard it may be said with Iames that he which faileth in one commandement is guiltie of all which must admonish vs to make conscience of euery sinne for we cannot liue in any one but we must needes runne into many other Uerely I say vnto you they haue their reward These words containe the reason of the former prohibition wherein we may see the vanitie of this giuing of Almes for the praise of men is all their reward they haue none with God as we shewed in the former verse vers 3. But when thou doest thine Almes let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doth 4. That thine Almes may be in secret and thy father that seeth in secret he will reward thee openly These words containe Christs second commandement touching the manner of Almes-giuing with the reason thereof The commandement is in the third verse and it beareth this sense that if the left hand could vnderstand yet it should not know what our right hand gaue and therefore much more must we conceale the same from men Yet here Christ forbids not all giuing of Almes in open place or in the sight of men but his meaning is to restraine the ambition of the heart after the praise of men the giuer must not intend or desire that men should see him giue Almes that they might praise him but his heart must simply and sincerely seeke to approoue it selfe vnto God This will appeare to be the right meaning of our Sauiour Christ by comparing this verse with the first for here Christ renueth the commandement there giuen and forbiddeth the corrupt desire of the heart after vaine glorie in the giuing of almes Now for our better vnderstanding of this commandement first we will shew what is here forbidden and secondly what is commanded Here are two things forbidden first all desire or intention of mens beholding of vs when we giue our Almes secondly all respect and intent to please our selues in Almes-giuing for the left hand must not know what the right hand giueth The thing here commaunded is this that he which giues Almes must doe it simply intending and desiring onely to please God and to approoue his worke vnto God without all by-respects of mens praise or approbation Here then first is condemned the doctrine of the Church of Rome which teacheth men to doe good workes with opinion of meriting life euerlasting thereby at the handes of God for that is farre more then to doe them for this ende to get praise of men which yet is here forbidden and therefore the other must needes be abominable Secondly seeing in our weldoing we must simply intend to approoue our selues vnto God it shall not be amisse here to shew how we may so doe our good workes that God may approoue thereof Hereunto foure things are required faith loue humilitie and sinceritie or simplicitie For the first in euery good
garments of fiâ—e linen had a ring on his singer and a chame of gold â—â—out his necke Gen. 41. 42. And that which Luke saith of Agrippâ— and Bernice that they came in with great pompe to heare Paul Act. 2â— 23. may as well be taken in good part as in euill 30. Wherefore if God of cloath the grasse of the field which is to day and to morrow is cast into the ou 〈…〉 not doe much more vnto you O ye of little faith Here Christ propounds and applyes this reason to his disciples and hearers and in this application enforceth it by putting a manifest difference between men and the heaâ—â—s of the field preferring man farre before them The preheminence of man aboue the flowers of the field stands in these things first the hen 〈…〉 made for mans vse and not man for them for besides othe 〈…〉 y serue for feâ—ell to the ouen as Christ here noteth Secondly â—he hâ—aâ—b of the field is to day and to morrow is not for being buâ—nâ— or â—â—nsumed it ceaseth to be at all But it is not so with man for though he be burnt or consumed yet he is not brought to nothing but his beeing remayneth still by reason of his immortall soule which though it had beginning yet neuer shall haue end And herein he far excelleth them for though hearbs and trees liue for a time yet their life ariseth from the matter whereof they consist and so vanisheth with it but the soule of man is a different substance from the bodie and vanisheth not though the bodie perish This difference is plain in the creation for God commanded the earth to bring forth hearbs and trâ—es with their life and substance but when he created man though he made his bodie of the dust of the earth yet his soule came from God for he breathed into his face the breath of life And herein man excells not onely the hearbs of the field but all beasts and fowles for though they besides life haue sense and motion from their soules yet their soules whether they be qualities or substances it here killeth not arising from the matter wherof their bodies subsist are mortall and vanish to nothing when the bodie perisheth so as a beast burnt vp is no beast but a dead man is a man though his bodie be burnt to nothing because his soule liues for euer yea and his bodie though eaten vp of beasts or consumed with fire by vertue of Gods ordinance shall one day rise againe and be revnited to the soule yea the dead bodies of the elect by vertue of the couenant of grace haue not onely relation to their soules but a spirituall vnion with Christ for they sleepe in him and by his power shall one day be raised vp to glorie And this preheminence Christ would teach vs when he calleth God the God of Abraham who was dead in regard of his bodie long before and yet saith he God is the God not of the dead that is which haue no beeing at all but of the liuing Now this preferment of man aboue the creature doth greatly inforce the dutie vpon him to depend vpon Gods prouidence without distrustfull care for if God cloath baser creatures with glorious aray doubtlesse he will not suffer man his more noble creature to want as the conclusion following doth declare Shall he not doe much more vnto you O ye of little faith That is shall he not much more cloath you Now he amplifieth this conclusion by a reproofe whereby he would enforce his reason more strongly vpon them saying O ye of little faith In which reproofe two points are to be considered the persons reprooued and the cause thereof The persons are Christs chosâ—â— Disciples whome he doth not here reprooue for want of faith simply but for the weaknesse and small measure of it because their doubting and distrust in Gods prouidence was greater then their faith Here then we may obserue a distinction of faith in regard of degree and measure to wit that beside that full assurance whereby a man so resteth on Gods promises that he nothing doubteth through vnbeleefe as it is saide of Abraham Rom. 4. 20. there is a weake faith mingled with much doubting such as was in Christs disciples at this time And howsoeuer that doubting which is in weake faith be euill and here reprooued yet the faith it selfe is true faith and such as brings a man to the state of Adoption and of saluation for Christ before this reproofe acknowledged of his Disciples that they were Gods children calling God their heauenly Father If any shall say or thinke that this weake faith cannot saue a man because his vnbeleefe beeing more then his faith shall haue more force to condemne him then his faith to saue him I answer that no man is saued by his faith because it is perfect without doubting but because thereby he laieth holde on Gods mercie in Christ now a weake faith may doe this truly though not so perfectly and with such comfort as a strong faith doth and the doubting and vnbeleefe that is in weake faith cannot condemne vs if so be we bewaile our vnbeleefe and vse meanes diligently to come by a full assurance for by this weake faith we are in Christ and in him all our wants and sinnes are pardoned Which point must carefully be obserued and remembred for the stay and comfort of their soules that haue in them but this weake saith and are troubled much with distrust and doubting And this is many a true child of Gods estate for euery one cannot attaine to Abrahams full assurance but be not discouraged O thou of little faith thy doubting and distrust may trouble and grieue thee but if thou bewaile and lament it it shall not condemne thee onely labour diligently in the meanes for further increase and by thy weake faith desire to lay hold on Christ and so shal all thy wants be couered and thy sinnes pardoned for endlesse is Gods mercie in this behalfe he will not breake the bruised reed nor quench the smoaking flaxâ— Isay 42. 3. II. Point The cause why Christ doth thus reprooue them for their small faith is their distrust in God for raiment as if he should say wheras you doubt whether your heauenly father will prouide sufficient raiment for you notwithstanding you see he araies his baser creatures in glorious manner euen for this cause are you to bee blamed for small faith Here then we are to obserue a speciall point touching the propertie of true sauing faith namely that it doth not onely laie hold on the mercie of God for the pardon of sinne and life euerlasting in Christs but on his promises also for temporall blessings that concerne this life Neither must this seeme strange to any and to make it plaine consider that the promises of God in Scripture are of two sorts principall and inferiour The principall promise is of Christ our
is vsed Luk. 12. 27. Consider the lilies of the field that is looke vpon them and then consider well thereof in your minde And Iam. 1. 23. He that heares the word and doth it not is like vnto a man that BEHOLDS his naturall face in a glasse that is to one that sees and considers of his shape So that Christs meaning is as if he had said It may be thou seest but why doest thou not well waigh and consider with thy selfe of the beame that is in thine owne eye By beame is here meant great and notorious raigning sinnes in mans heart such as wound the conscience which are like vnto a beame in the eye which doth not onely blemish but quite dash out the fight Some may here aske in what sense this is spoken seeing the eye is not capable of a beame Ans. It is spoken by way of supposition as if iâ— had bin said if it were possible that a beame could be in the eye the rash censurers fault is as a beame in the eye this kind of spech is vsuall in Scripture If I could speake with tongues of Angels saith S. Paul 1. Cor. 13. 1. that is suppose Angels had tongues and that I could speake as eloquently as they The words of the 4. v. are for substance all one with the former in the 3. The difference between them is onely this in the 3. v. Christ speaks onely of rash iudgment coÌ„ceiued in the mind but in the 4. he speaks of rash iudgemeÌ„t vttered in speech How saist thou to thy brother c. So that in both verses the words are a parable bearing this sense with what face honestie or conscience canst thou finde fault with thy brother either in thought or speach thou thy selfe beeing tainted with greater faults and offences And hence the second reason may be thus conceiued He that hath greater faults must not censure him that hath lesser But he that giues rash iudgement hath greater faults then he whom he censureth And therfore no maÌ„ ought to vse rash iudgment The proposition or first part is omitted the Assumption expressely set downe in the 3. 4. v. whereupon the conclusion follows against rash iudgement Vpon this forme of speech How seest thou why saiest thou that is with what face and honestie and vpon what ground we may learne this instruction that our speaches yea our very thoughts must be conceiued and vttered vpon good ground and in a good manner Establish thy thoughts by counsell saith Salomon and by counsel make warre teaching vs to haue direction from the word of God for the ground and maner of our very thoughts and for all our affaires Our Sauiour Christ bids vs take heede how we heare Gods word and Salomon would draw vs to this heede attention in prayer also Be not rash with thy mouth nor let thy heart be hastie to vtter a thing before God now that which they speak of diuine exercises is in this place by our Sauiour inlarged to euery thought of the heart word of the mouth that coÌ„cerns our brother Further in these words Seest thou that is with attention and consideration beholdest our Sauiour Christ acquaints vs with a common fault wherewith our nature is generally stained and corrupted to wit that we are ouersharpe sighted into other mens liues and offences this appeares in that men can easily discerne small faults in others and cannot see great offences in themselues nay wheÌ„ they can find no iust fault yet they will make those faults which indeed be none at all Example hereof we haue in the Scribes and Pharisies in their censures against our Sauiour and his disciples they theÌ„selues were hypocrits tainted with grieuous sinnes yet they pried to finde motes in Christs â—ies for when he wrought miracles cured the diseased and did good vnto all they blamed him as a breaker of the Sabbath day and as a companion of Publicans and sinners though he conuersed with them for their good so they blamed his Disciples for eating with vnwashen hands and for plucking vp the eares of corne on the Sabbath day to satisfie their hunger and for their seldome fasting This fault was in the Corinthians who censured Paul and his ministerie for want of eloquence and excellencie of words which was in other Teachers among them as may appeare by his rebuking of them 1. Cor. 4. And the Christian brethren among the Romans condemned one another in the obseruation of daies and times and in the vse of the creatures of God Rom. 14. which was nothing els but rash iudgement And this no doubt is a fault which raignes in our congregations euen among the better sort at this day for deepely is our nature stained with this corruption and so prone it is to this sinne that euen they which haue receiued true grace can hardly abstaine from the practises of rash iudgement The consideration hereof must teach vs these duties First to take knowledge of this corruption of our nature and of the want of brotherly loue in vs for why should we so soone spie a fault in another but because we want loue and charitie to his person Wee may consider the vilenesse of this practise by resemblance in some bruite creatures for we account most basely of those rauening fowles which delight in nothing but in filthie carrions and such for all the world are these rash censurers all their delight is in other mens faults which makes them so sharp sighted to spie them out Secondly when we are about to censure any man we must in regard of this corruption suspect our selues and our speeches call our selues backe to a view and consideration of that which wee are to speake for oft-times we see that which we ought not to see and thereupon speake that which we ought in conscience to conceale Physitions giue this note of a frensie to begin to take vp strawes Now when the mind looks not into it selfe but pries into other mens actions then no doubt it is not right but is corrupt and infected with a spirituall frensie and therefore the danger of this disease must cause vs to looke vnto our selues Thirdly here we may obserue a reason of the strange behauiour of men in regard of sinne for this we may easily perceiue that men with open mouth will condemne those things in others which they like and approoue in themselues now the cause hereof is for that the affections doe followe the minde such as the minde is such are the affections and mans minde naturally lookes outwarde not inwarde it sees very little faults in others but will neither see nor condemne the same faults nor greater in it selfe nay rather it causeth man to loue those sinnes in himselfe which he detests in others And therefore in the amendment of our liues we must beginne in our owne hearts and turne the eye of our minde inward to see our owne sinnes and labour first to haue our
ordinarie meanes for the procuring of Gods blessings we therefore must giue our selues to the faithfull practise of this dutie Indeede if grace and other blessings were our owne or from our selues we might well spare this labour But what hast thou saith Paul to euery Christian that thou hast not receiued be not therefore secure and idle for Gods blessings come not when we snort vpon our elboes but in the vse of meanes and happie are we that may vse those meanes for in asking we receiue in seeking we finde and in knocking it is opened vnto vs. Secondly our Sauiour Christ by trebling this commandement to pray would giue vs to consider that there is some waightie cause we should be instant in this dutie and that is in regard of the great miseries and manifold dangers whereunto we are subiect in this life for as Peter saith the righteous shall hardly be saued and no maruell for we haue without vs the Deuill and all his Angels plotting our destruction and the world a daungerous enemie whereby the Deuill workes within vs we haue our owne corrupt hearts daily drawing vs to the practise of sinne the bane and poison of our soules Now what is to be done in this case surely our onely refuge is constant and seruent praier to God as Christ here implies by this threefold command for in all things we must let our requests be made knowne to God Philip. 4. 6. This hath alwaies beene the practise of all the faithfull as we may see in Gods booke But if we had no example this commandement were sufficient to perswade vs vnto this dutie Also doest thou want any grace of God as faith repentance knowledge zeale patience strength against temptation or assurance of Gods fauour why aske and thou shalt haue seeke and thou shalt finde And this must be our course in outward wants and for temporall blessings as health peace libertie plentie c. Indeede the wicked worldlings seeke to wise men and wise women in their miseries but this is to forsake God and to goe to the Deuill Gods people must goe to their God Isa. 8. 19. Thirdly the trebling of this commandement in diuers tearmes must teach vs to be instant and vrgent with God in prayer this is an holy and acceptable importunitie when the Christian heart giues God no rest Ierem. 29. 12 13. the Lord promiseth to his people That they shall erie vnto him and goe and pray vnto him and he will heare them they shall seeke him and finde him because they shall seeke him with their whole heart Isa. 62. 7. The Lords remembrancers are commanded not to keepe silence nor to giue the Lord any rest Matth. 15. 22. The woman of Canaan is commended because shee will take no answer nor repulse from our Sauiour Christ till her daughter was cured and Luke 18. 5. The poore widow by her importunitie preuailed with the vnrighteous â—udge which parable Christ propounds to teach vs to be constant and earnest in prayer We therefore must shake off our naturall coldnesse and negligence in praier which is the common sinne of the world in regard of this dutie And we must labour for knowledge both of our owne sinnes and miseries and of Gods mercies that so we may pray with vnderstanding and in zeale and feruencie as Christ here requireth Alas many pray not at all and others know not what they aske though they say the Lords praier or some other set forme of praier And most men that haue knowledge suffer their mindes to wander from God by vaine imaginations now all comes for lacke of that feeling in praier which Christ here requireth Thus much of the commandement in generall Now out of the wordes more particularly we may obserue two points First where Christ bids vs Aske seeke knocke he speakes not particularly to some but generally to all his seruants so that all must pray which plainely implies that his best and deerest seruants are during this life in want of some grace or blessing And indeede when God giues most excellent gifts and blessings to his children yet then he leaues them in some notable want or triall for their humiliation and prouocation to prayer Paul was taken vp into paradise and there heard words that cannot possibly be vttered by man in this life this was a great grace and prerogatiue but yet to humble him least he should be exalted out of measure there was giuen him a pricke in the flesh the messenger of Satan to buffet him hereby he was brought to pray most earnestly for deliuerance but yet he must rest contented with Gods grace for God will make perfect his power through the weakenesse of his seruants v. 8. 9. This point must be obserued to discouer to many secure persons their miserable state who feele no want of grace in themselues and therefore thinke all is well But what meanest thou to professe Christ if thou haue no neede of him nor of his graces oh know it when thou saiest in thine owne heart thou art rich and lackest nothing then thou art poore and blind and miserable and wretched And indeede if thou knewest the corruption of thine owne heart thou wouldest crie out with the Apostle in respect of thy wants Oh miserable man that I am who shall deliuer me from this bodie of death Rom. 7. 24. Secondly Christ saying not onely Aske but seeke and knocke doth hereby imply what is Gods dealing many times with his own seruants namely that he forsakes them for a time and in part and in some sort hides himselfe and as it were locks himselfe from them Now thus he dealeth for two causes First hereby to chast 〈…〉 and correct them for their sinnes for iniquitie separates betweene God and his people and their sinnes hide his face from them Isa. 59. 2. Secondly to make triall of his graces in his children to see whether they delight in his loue to shew them their owne weaknes and to mooue th 〈…〉 aue vnto him more inseparable By all which we see it stands 〈…〉 and to pray earnestly and continually for God may forsake vs for our sinnes and he may iustly take occasion to trie what we haue profited by his Gospel which we haue long enioyed with aboundance of peace Thus much of the commandement to earnest prayer Now Christ enforceth it by two reasons First by a promise infolded in this verse with the commandement and confirmed in the next Secondly by a comparison verse 9. For the first The reason from the promise in this verse may thus be framed If they which aske shall receiue if they that seeke shall finde and they that knocke shall be let in then doe you aske seeke and knocke But they that aske shall receiue they that seeke shall finde c. Therefore doe you aske seeke and knocke In this reason our Sauiour Christ teacheth vs that when we pray to God we must bring a speciall faith
one for killing himselfe which is the most cruell and dangerous murther that can be and the author also excuseth his insufficiencie in penning of it which beseemeth not him that is guided by Gods spirit In the song of the 3. children it is said the flame ascended 49. cubits aboue the furnace which seemes incredible especially that still they should then cast in fuell or approach so neere as to put any man into it Likewise in the storie of Susanna it is said vers 45. that Daniel was a young childe when he executed iudgement vpon the two false witnesses which was in the ende of Astiages raigne immediately before the raigne of Cyrus and verse 64. Daniel by this meanes is said to growe famous which cannot possibly accord with the true storie of Daniel neither for his age nor for his fame and reputation And the like may be said of the rest whereby it is plaine these bookes cannot be canonicall Scripture And yet they are not to be reiected but reuerently esteemed of as the books of worthy men Here some may say If Moses and the Prophets comprehend all Scripture that hath diuine testimonie then the bookes of the new Testament shall not be Scripture because they were not written by the Prophets Answ. They were either penned by the Apostles or by other Apostolike men and allowed by the Apostles as Saint Lukes Gospel and the Acts were written by Luke a Physition and Saint Marke that writ that Gospel was not an Apostle yet those bookes were approoued by Apostolike authoritie which is all one as if they had beene written by the Apostles and the Apostles in speaking and writing were of equall authoritie with the Prophets hauing the infallible assistance of the holy Ghost as well as the Prophets for Acts 15. 28. they say It seemeth good to the holy Ghost and to vs and Ephes. 2. 20. the Church is said to be built on the foundation of the Prophets and Apostles where the Apostles are made equall with the Prophets II. Point This reason also doth giue vs to vnderstand what was the first Scripture that euer was penned namely the bookes of Moses before which there was no word of God written which was for the space of 2400. yeares It may be asked what was then the booke of the warres of the Lord mentioned Numb 21. and the booke of the Righteous spoken of by Ioshuah Chapt. 10. 13. Answer These were the writings of men humane stories like to our bookes of Chronicles Yet it is said Iude 14. Enoch the seauenth from Adam prophesied Answ. That prophecie was not penned but went from hand to hand â—y word of mouth and if it were penned yet it was not done by Enoch himselfe but by some Iew in his name long after Moses for it cannot bee prooued that Enoch euer penned any part of Scripture Some will aske mee how the people of God did for that space of two thousand and foure hundred yeares before the Law was written what guide had they for to knowe the will of God Answer They had the word of God immediately taught them by word of mouth from God himselfe as we may see in the Patriarkes Abraham Isaac and Iacob and they to whom it was deliuered did also conuaie the same from man to man by tradition And because it may seeme strange how religion could for so long time bee preserued pure without writing wee are to knowe that before the lawe was written the Church of God from the beginning was the most part in one familie onely as in Adams Enochs Noes Abrahams c. whereby it was a more easie thing to preserue Gods word among them Againe those men that first receiued the word of God without writing were of long continuance liuing neere to a thousand yeares space whereby they might better see the word preserued and continued without writing by tradition Besides when religion was corrupted God himselfe restored the puritie thereof reuealing his will againe and renewing his couenant vnto his seruants as hee did to Abraham and the rest of the Patriarkes Here then behold how the heads of families preserued Gods word and true religion in the beginning of the world namely by teaching it to their posteritie and from them we may learne what is the dutie and ought to bee the practise of euery gouernour of a family at this day they must not thinke themselues discharged for that the word is written in the Church and euery man may read and heare the same but they must see the same bee taught vnto their children and to the rest of their familie that so it may bee preserued among them So God commandeth his people to teach their children the seruice of the Passeouer Exod. 12. 26. 27. and to whet the words of the Law vpon their children Deut. 6. 7. III. Point In this reason our Sauiour Christ takes for granted that the writings of Moses and of the Prophets are of infallible certaintie for it is all one as if he had said this must needes be euery mans dutie to doe as he would be done to for this is the Law and the Prophets and so answerable to them all other bookes of Scripture containe doctrine of infallible truth and certaintie Here some may aske how we should be perswaded hereof in our consciences Answ. By these Arguments which are all drawne from Scripture it selfe for as euery Science and Arte hath his grounds and principles so hath the holy Scripture which is not the Church but Scripture it selfe 1. from the causes 2. from the effects 3. from the properties 4. from signes 5. from the contraries 6. from the testimonie that is giuen hereof The 1. Argument Among the causes the first and principall is the Author thereof which is God himselfe to him doe Scriptures referre themselues also shew how God is their Author In Scripture we read that God spake to Adam to Enoch Noe Abraham and the rest and of Christ the new Testament giues most liuely testimony making him the Author subiect thereof Now nothing is falsly ascribed to God but God in time will bring the same to nought and therefore if Scripture had not beene Gods word it would long agone haue vanished Again the cause conuersant must bee considered the deuill by wicked men and heretickes hath laboured to take away Gods word from mens hearts and hands but yet it is still preserued in the Church which argues that it is kept by a greater power then is in all men and all angels that is by the power of God Thirdly the pen-men the instrumentall causes they were holy men of God Prophets and Apostles who for vertue and pietie farre exceeded other writers and if they had beene meere polititians their writings would haue shewed it for the pen-men of holy Scripture haue there in faithfully registred their own faults which no politike person would haue done Againe consider the matter of holy Scripture which stands in
bookes Diuine Ecclesiasticall and Humane Diuine bookes are the bookes of God penned by the Prophets and Apostles and they are all the word of God for whether we regard the matter of them or the manner of reuealing them they are all from God the Prophets and Apostles were onely Gods hands and instruments in penning them the holy Ghost gaue the matter the order and the very words from whence it must needs follow that they are of al-sufficient authoritie of themselues Ecclesiasticall bookes are bookes of diuine matters penned by learned men in the Church and they are either generall bookes or particular Generall bookes Ecclesiasticall I call those which were either made or confirmed by the whole Church as the Creedes of the Apostles the Nicene and of Athanasius and the foure first generall Councels and these haue Catholike allowance yet not absolute authoritie but depending on Scripture Particular bookes Ecclesiasticall I call the Catechismes and Confessions of particular Churches made by them or by particular members thereof which haue not authoritie of themselues but from the Scripture or from generall consent Now both these kindes of bookes may bee called Gods word so farre forth as they agree with Scripture and yet they are also the word of men because they were penned by men and haue both order and style from men and in this regard that they were partly mens workes they are not authenticall of themselues but depend vpon the authoritie of Scripture Humane bookes are bookes penned by men either of the Church or out of the Church concerning humane things as bookes of naturall Philosophie of Policie and other Artes and these are not the bookes of God but of men alone hauing both matter and style from men many of them containe excellent truthes in their kind yet gathered onely from experience and common reason but they haue not in them that truth which is truth according to godlinesse seruing to builde vp and to binde the conscience vnlesse it bee in one case to stoppe the mouthes of Atheists and Epicures and to conuince their consciences And thus by conference of all bookes wee see that Scripture alone is authenticall in it selfe and no bookes beside Uses 1. This teacheth vs that ministers in the dispensing of Gods word should content themselues with the testimony of Scripture alone for the end of the ministerie is to worke and confirme faith and to settle and build vp the conscience in the truth of religion and matters concerning saluation which no other word can doe saue onely the word of God in Scripture that hath sufficient authoritie in it selfe from which conscience cannot appeale and for which cause our Sauiour Christ the true Prophet of the Church contents himselfe with the testimony of the Law and Prophets alone and after him his Apostles did the like See this notably confirmed by Paul who in his preaching to the Iewes professeth himselfe to haue said none other thing then that whicâ— the Prophets and Moses said should come Other writings haue theâ—â— good vse in their time and place but not in the publike ministerie for authoritie and testimonie from Scripture is authenticall This the Scripture saith therefore it is so but authority from Councels and Father â—is sophistrie as Austin saith so therefore it is so this is no good reason for it implies that all that Austin said is true which indeede is false â—ee beeing as all men are subiect to errour 2. Use. This also sheweth that wee cannot beleeue vnwritten traditions thougâ— they be called Apostolicall The Church of Rome intend to deceiâ—e vs when they would beare vs in hand that halfe of those things tâ—â—t are to be beleeued are not written in Scripture but receiued by trâ—dition but these traditions we cannot beleeue by a diuine faith hovsoeuer by a common humane faith we may for they are contained in tâ—e bookes of Councels and Fathers which were worthie men yet subiect to errour 3. Vse Thâ—â— also sheweth that we must submit our selues with feare and trembling to the word of God for it hath absolute authoritie to iudge vs and to conâ—ince our conselence in all matters of faith manners that pertaine to saluation IV. Point Whâ—â—eas Christ alleadgeth Moses and the Prophets to confirme his ministâ—â—ie it may be demanded whether there be any difference for authoritiâ— between Christ and the Prophets for he that alleadgeth another mâ—â—s authoritie seemes to be inferiour thereto I answer if we coÌ„pare Câ—rist the Prophets we must distinguish between their doctrine thâ—ir persons The doctrine of Moses of the Prophets is equall to thâ— doctrine of Christ 2. waies First in certaintie of truth for it is as vndâ—ubtedly true as if Christ himselfe had taught the same Secondly in eâ—ficacie authoritie for the power of binding conscience for the doctâ—in of the Prophets binds conscience as fully truly as if Christ himseâ—fe had spoken it And yet the person of Christ is aboue the person of Moses of all the Prophets for he is the Sonne of God both God â—an they were men he is the author of truth they only the instrumeÌ„ts pen-meÌ„ therof froÌ„ hence it coms that Christs doctrine doth more bind vs to obedience then the doctrine of the Prophets because the person deliuering it is of more authority excelleÌ„cy and for this cause Christ alleadges Moses and the Prophets not for that his word is inferiour to theirs but that in regard of our obedience he might increase the authoritie of Moses and the Prophets because a greater measure of obedience is required to Christs word in regard of the dignitie of his person And this shewes that we now are more bound to obedience vnder the Gospel then the people vere vnder the law for we haue Christs doctrine which in regard of â—is person is of more authoritie then Moses and the Prophets see the point plainely laid downe by the Author to the Hebrewes in the irst Chapter he saith God in times past spake to hiâ— Church by his Propets but in these last dayes he hath spoken to vs by his sonne and in the second chapter verse 1. he laies downe the vse of this that now we haue Christ for our teacher namely that therefore we ought more aboundanly to giue heede to the things that we haue heard least at any time we le them slip c. shewing that our disobedience now shall be more seueâ—ly punished V. Point Ignorant people abuse this text to persvade themselue s that preaching is needlesse because no man can say moe then this doe as ye would be done to for this is the summe of the law aâ—d the Prophets But we wust know that this is not the summe of all tht the Prophets say but onely touching the matter of iustice and equiâ—e and indeede that we may attaine to saluation more is needfull for ve must not only know Gods word in generall but in particular
the vertue of his resurrection to raise and build vs vp againe in newnes of life learning to know Christ vnto our selues by experience in our selues for knowledge in the braine will not saue the soule but he that is truly founded on Christ feeles the benefits of his death and resurrection in some measure in himselfe IV. Point The effect and fruit of bad hearing that is fearefull ruine and destruction resembled by the issue of building on the sands v. 27. The raine fell the floods came c. Where two things are to be noted I. the cause of this fearefull ruine the falling of the raine and beating of the floods and windes II. the qualitie of this ruine it is great and fearefull The house fell and the fall thereof was great For the first Floods and winde and raine doe here betoken trialls and temptations which are here said to befal the professors of the name of Christ. Whence we learne that euery one that doth heare the word of God and professe true religion must looke for a day of temptation and triall It is Gods will that whosoeuer taketh vpō him the profession of his name should be tried what he is Thus he permitted Adam presently after his creation to be tempted and tried the smart whereof we all feele vnto this day and God gaue Abraham a commandement of triall to kill his onely sonne Gen. 22. 1 2. Soe he left Hezekias to himselfe to trie him and to know all that was in his heart 2. Chr. 32. 31. And Iohn Baptist saith of Christ that he hath his fanne in his hand to sift and trie the good corne from chaffe Matth. 3. 12. and Luk. 22. 31. the deuill sought to winnow the disciples as wheate And S. Peter makes it a thing requisite that the faith of Gods seruants should be tried by afflictions as gold is tried in the fire 1. Pet. 1. 7. Vse We now haue by Gods mercie true religion among vs and are freed from the bondage of the Turke Iewe and Papist we must therefore stand fast in our profession and not suffer our selues to be depriued of true religion for times will come when we must be tried and therefore in this happie time of peace and truth which is to vs the day of grace and mercie we must labour seriously to haue our hearts indued with some good measure of lasting grace as of faith hope and loue which as good gold may abide the triall of afflictions otherwise we shall not stand for all painted shewes of grace in time of triall will vanish away like drosse and stubble before the fire The second point in this effect is the qualitie of this ruine and fall it is great and fearefull It fell and the fall thereof was great The thing resembled hereby is most fearefull to wit that such professors of religion as in the daies of peace did not ioyne practise with their profession shall fall away in the time of triall and come to most fearefull perdition this is the principall point that Christ here aimes at whereby he intends to terrifie men from dissembled profession And the consideration of it must worke effectually in our hearts for we by Gods mercie and blessing haue had the light of the Gospel for many yeares together in such measure as neuer was in this land before and yet though all of vs be hearers where is our obedience alas some among vs grow to be flat and peremptorie Atheists denying God and Christ Iesus others and the most vnder the name of religion root their hearts in the world some in profits and some in pleasures and none of these almost regard religion others professe religion and yet liue in grosse sinnes as swearing drunkennesse vncleannesse c. making no conscience of grosse impietie in their liues so that if we looke into the generall state of our people we shall see that religion is professed but not obeied nay obedience is counted precisenesse and so reproached but we must know that in the ende this prophaning of religion will soone turne all Gods blessings temporall and spirituall into fearefull curses both of bodie and soule If euer any thing bring ruine vpon vs it will be the contempt of Gods word professed and therefore let vs in the feare of God endeauour our selues not onely to know and heare the word of God but to turne vnto God from all sinne and especially in regard of this sinne of disobedience to the word of God Lastly Christ notes the qualitie of this fall to be exceeding great to shew vnto vs the great daunger of hypocrisie for there is great difference betweene these three sorts of men a sinner that makes no profession of religion an hypocrite that makes a great shew of pietie in profession and a true beleeuer whose life and conuersation is answerable to his profession For a true professor may fall into sinne very fearefully as Peter and Dauid did and yet recouer againe Also he that is a most notorious sinner as Manasses was may be conuerted and repent But when a professor that is an hypocrite in religion is tried he falls quite from Christ and makes apostacie from his profession and in this regard his fall is called great And therefore seeing professors may thus fearefully fall away let vs in the feare of God labour in some truth of heart to yeild obedience to that we heare vers 28. And it came to passe when Iesus had ended these words the people were astonied at his doctrine 29. For he taught as one hauing authoritie and not as the Scribes These two verses containe the issue and euent of this Sermon of our Sauiour Christ in his hearers And in them we may obserue two points first the good fruit that came of this sermon v. 28. secondly the cause reason thereof v. 29. The fruit was the astonishing of the people which S. Matthew sets out by three circumstances I. of the time when it appeared to wit after the Sermon was ended II. of the persons in whom it was wrought the people that is the multitude III. of the matter whereat they were astonished namely at the doctrine of Christ. Touching this Astonishing of the people in it many things are to be obserued I. That though the person of our Sauiour Christ were lowly and base yet his doctrine in preaching was of that force in the minds of his hearers for it did amase and astonish them This caused the officers that were sent to take him to returne without him alleadging the maiestie of his doctrine for the reason of their fact Neuer man spake as this man did Ioh. 7. 46. and when the gouernours came with a band of men to apprehend him so soone as he did but tell them he was the Christ they went backward and fell to the ground Ioh. 18. 6. This sheweth vnto vs that the voice and sentence of Christ giuen at the last day of iudgement will be most fearefull and