Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n
Text snippets containing the quad
|
ID |
Title |
Author |
Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) |
STC |
Words |
Pages |
|
A49108
|
Apostolical communion in the Church of England, asserted and applied for the cure of divisions: in a sermon preached in the Cathedral-Church of St. Peter, Exon: and since enlarged. By Tho. Long, B.D. and one of the prebendaries.
|
Long, Thomas, 1621-1707.
|
1673
(1673)
|
Wing L2959; ESTC R217728
|
38,652
|
77
|
2 Cor. 4.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that walk in craftiness and can make quidlibet ex quolibet our inventions a rack whereon to wrest and torture the Scripture until it speak our own sense but as of sincerity as of God as in the sight of God speak we in Christ It is nothing but a soul stomach and a vitiated palate that makes some men to disrelish wholesome food could we lay aside all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness all wrath and bitterness â—am 1.21 all hypocrisie and prejudice all pride and vain-glory and receive with meekness the sincere Milk of the Word we might have it from the Breasts of our Mother that hath born and nourished us hitherto more plentifully than from all those pretenders who like the Harlot in the history of Solomon seek to divide and Murther the Children that are not their own â— King 3.25 What can the Leaders of a people that cause them to err and separate from a true Church where all things necessary to Salvation may be had plead in their excuse If they say Animus Schismaticus in Ecclesiâ Catholicâ they preach the same Doctrine as we St. Cprian answers that men may be guilty of Schism and Division that remain in the same Faith Nobiscum estis in Baptismo in Symbolo in Spiritu autem unitatis in vinculo pacis in ipsa Ecclesia Catholica non estis The mark of Schism is not set on them that oppose the Doctrine of the Church but that make divisions in and cause separation from the Church Rom. 16.17 1 Cor. 3.4 5. How severely doth St. Paul chide the Corinthians not for following false Teachers but for making factions for true ones I am of Paul and I of Apollos and I of Christ Christ himself must not be pleaded in opposition to the Ordinances and Unity of the Church Phil. 1.16 this were to preach Christ out of envy When men begin to blow the Trumpet to Division and cry Every to his Tents they do ipso facto proclaim We have no Portion or Communion with the Church Dum conventicula sibi constituunt teritatis caput atque originem reliquerunt S. Cyprian Which is the second particular wherein the Communion of our Church with Christ and his Apostles is maintained i.e. in Government for so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifies a Society or Assembly Civil or Ecclesiastical 〈◊〉 Body corporate in which is superiority and subordination and which is governed by certain Laws and Customs Penalties and Priviledges proper to it self and when this order is observed in all Societies it is strange if that which makes up the Body of Christ should be a Monster the Apostle assures us to the contrary God is not the Author of Confusion 1 Cor. 14.33 but of Peace as in all the Churches of the Saints which the Apostle alledgeth especially to prove that there is superiority and subordination even among the Prophets i.e. the Ministers of the New Testament v. 33. The spirit of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets when therefore we read of fellowship with the Apostles we may not understand it of a confused parity either between the Ministers of Christ and his people as the Socinians and Anabaptists or of the Ministers of Christ among themselves as the Presbyterians imagine for we may both see and hear that the contrary hath been from the beginning Our Saviour appointed other seventy Luk. 20.1 Eph. 4.10 which were not of the same rank with the Apostles And when he ascended he gave divers offices to continue in his Church and therefore Christ did not only commission his Disciples To feed and govern his Church in their own persons Joh. 20.21 but by their Successors As the Father sent me so send I you that you may send others And lâ— I am with you to the end of the world Mat. 28.28 not in their persons but in their successors And it will be a very difficult work for some Pastors to prove such a succession But not to digress We read that while the Church of Christ was yet a little Flock Act. 15.6 1 Tim. 3.10 there were Apostles Elders and Deacons when that Flock increased and the planting and confirming of Churches abroad called them from their immediate superintendency they found out fit persons to whom they derived their own ordinary authority viz. For Ordination and Jurisdiction for the government of such Churches as they had planted St. James had his successors at Jerusalem St. Mark at Alexandria St. Peter and St. Paul the one being the Apostle of the Jews that believed the other of the Gentiles Eusebius l. 3. c. 23. had their successors at Rome St. Paul being to go into Macedonia left Timothy at Ephesus and Titus at Crete to succeed him in the Government of those Churches The Apostle had laboured about the space of three years to settle the Church of Ephesus Act. 20.17.28 for he had planted Elders there he visited them and gave them a charge to take heed to themselves and to their flocks over which the Holy Ghost had made them Overseers Episcopi gregis these were thought sufficient as long as the Apostle could be near them but when the Flock multiplied and the Apostle knew he should see these Elders no more Episcopus Presbyterorum gregis he devolved his charge to Timothy Surely he did not make two supream officers in that Church nor if the government of the Elders had been according to his mind would he have given Timothy so large a Commission Charge some 1 Tim. 1.2 that they preach no other Doctrine 1. Here is an inspection into the Doctrine of the Elders Par in parem non habet imperium who were their present Teachers and what were his charge worth if he had not a Jurisdiction over them 2. Timothy was to direct and order the publick Prayers of the Church ch 2. 1. for in v. 18. of ch 1. This charge I commit unto thee What is that charge 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 first of all That Prayers be made How made By the ex-tempore conceptions of every private Presbyter That is no making of Prayers in the Apostles sense for then Timothy could have no hand in the making of them whereas he was to provide that the Prayers that were used in the Church might be such as might stand with the publick necessities of all men with the welfare of their Governours and their own reputation and peace when none of their adversaries should find any just cause to accuse their solemn Devotions Again 3. Timothy is directed how to receive accusations against an Elder 1 Tim. 5.19 and the power of receiving accusations implies a power to judg and determine of them Herein saith Epiphanius the Apostles shews Quis sit Presbyter Haer. 75. quis Episcopus cum dicit Timotheo Presbyterum ne objurges And 4. v. 20. He
hath the power of Ordination committed to him Tit. 1.5 Titus had the same power in Crete To set in order the things that were wanting and to ordain Elders in every City for many Cities were under his inspection and many Teachers in those Cities but none of them had such a power as is committed to Titus These things are so evident that the Power of Bishops is not denyed them only it is said They were extraordinary persons and it did belong to them as Evangelists But first It cannot be proved that Titus was such a one and 't is a very weak proof to say that Timothy was such because he is bid to do the work of an Evangelist But it is acknowledged that the power and authority which Timothy had he was to commit to others 2 Tim. 2.2 Jus Divinum p. 160. that there might be a perpetual succession of government and the London Divines do there add That Apostolical Examples for the good of the Church and which have a perpetual reason and equity in them have the force of a Rule and by force of this Rule we infer that as St. Paul saw it necessary to derive a power from himself to Timothy over the Presbyters at Ephesus Timothy might and did propagate it to others successively for the well-governing the Church of God The truth of all this is acknowledged That there was a chief Governour appointed by the Apostles we will not contend for the name whether Evangelist or Prime Presbyter or Superintendent but Bishop is the name which the Church hath always used to have authority over the Presbyters and that this authority was to be continued in the Church by succession So Calvin Vnus aliquis authoritate consilio praefuit On Tit. 1.5 and he doubts not to call such an one a Bishop Instit. l. 4. c. 3. Jus Divinum Oct. 3. p. 11. Archippus says he was Bishop of the Colossians Then our Assembly grants that the Primus Presbyter had authority during his life And Videlius assures us of the name as well as the power for saith he in the days of Clemens Romanus the distinction of Bishop and Presbyter was in use The Presbyterians in their Papers to the King in the Isle of Wight grant that not long after the Apostles times Bishops in superiority to Presbyters are reported to be in the Church of God by Writers of those times and the Writers of those times knew what others had said before them None of the Ancients ever mentioning any other Government nor complaining of alteration of that which was established by the Apostles which had it been any other but that of Episcâ—pacy those Martyrs that laid down their lives for the truth would not so tamely have parted with the Government of the Church as not to open their mouths in behalf of that which was the chief Instrument of its peace Can any man conceive That the world was framed by the casual Concourse of Atoms is as probable That all the Governours of the Church should conspire to alter that Form which they received immediately from the Apostles and that presently after their decease Vincentius Lyrinensis tells us this was the practise of those primitive times that by how much any one was reputed more religious than another by so much the more readily he did oppose all Innovations To conclude we may suppose the dignity and power of the Bishop was not determined by the Apostles in every particular yet the Apostles determining that Government in general as most conducing to the unity and peace of the Church other particular circumstances which the exigence of after-times should require were under the power of the Church to appoint them for the unity of the Church being the end for which government was appointed the means that are conducing thereunto being agreed on by the rulers of the Church are as necessary in their kinds as the Laws appointed by Magistrates for the good of the Commonwealth And on this ground it was that Schismaticks have been so severely punished in all ages and their sin compared to the most abominable vices even to Idolatry Sacriledg Parricide Dr. Hammond of Schism for indeed it produceth all these Avoid divisions saith Ignatius as the beginning of all evils All this is Calvin's own sense Whereas it pleased not God to prescribe particularly what we ought to follow as to his outward Worship and Ceremonies by reason that he foresaw such things would depend on the condition of the times and that the same Form would not agree with all ages therefore we ought to consult the general rules which he gave us for the settling of such things as belong to decency and order as the exigency of the Church shall require and in such cases he pronounceth them Schismaticks which raise factions and tumults to the dividing of the Church which saith he cannot subsist but by the rules of its Governours These concessions are good arguments ad homines But the universal practise of the Church by all its members in every age and in all the parts of the world is an argument beyond all contradiction All the doubt is what was practised by the Church immediately after the Apostles age for of after-times there is no doubt and as little of the first age after the Apostles if we will be convinced by as clear evidences as can be produced for the proof of any History Quod ubique quod semper quod ab omnibus id verâ— Catholicum or matter of fact Ignatius was contemporary with St. John conversant with some of the Apostles one that saw Christ after his Resurrection he wrote seven Epistles which are mentioned by Polycarpe his contemporary by Irenaeus Origen Eusebius and others and he crowned all his works with Martyrdom for Christ The Copies of his Epistles which were set forth by Vossius from the Library of Laurentius Medices are by Biondel congratulated as a great treasury to the Church Now nothing is more clear throughout his Writings than the Superiority of Bishops to Presbyters this made the Presbyterians so industrious to prove that they were spurious Epistles knowing that their cause would stand or fall with them and is nothing yet how sacred soever could stand in their way they deal as barbarously with his works as the Romans did wiâ—h his person accuse him for a deceiver and then condemn him to the beasts But God who in all ages of the Church hath taken advantage by the venting of errors to vindicate the truth more clearly hath by the labours of the learned Vossius and Dr. Hammond and Dr. Pearson Epist ad Magn. Epist ad Trall put a gag into the mouths of all gainsayers he says Nothing ought to be done in the Church without the Bishop And they are men of an ill Conscience that assemble without him Clemens Romanus is another Apostolical person he was St. Pauls fellow-labourer Phil. 4.3 his Epistle to the Corinthians