person of an Apostolical Spirit consonant unto the stile and writings of the Apostles themselves a precious Jewel and just Representation of the state and order of the Church in those days And sundry things we may observe from it 1. There is nothing in it that gives the least intimation of any other Church-State but that which was Congregational although there were the highest causes and Reasons for him so to do had there been any such Churches then in being The case he had in hand was that of Ecclesiastical Sedition or Schism in the Church of Corinth the Church or Body of the Brethren having unjustly deposed their Elders as it should seem all of them Giving advice herein unto the whole Church using all sorts of Arguments to convince them of their sin directing all probable means for their Cure he never once sends them to the Bishop or Church of Rome as the Head of Vnity unto all Churches makes no mention of any Metropolitical or Diocesan Church and its Rule or of any single Bishop and his Authority No one of any such Order doth he either commend or condemn or once address himself unto with either Admonitions Exhortations Encouragements or Directions He only handles the cause by the Rule of the Scripture as it was stated between the Church itself and its Elders I take it for granted that if there were any Church at Corinth consisting of many Congregations in the City and about it or comprehensive as some say of the whole Region of Achaia that there was a single Officer or Bishop over that whole Church But none such is here mentioned If there were any such he was either Deposed by the people or he was not If he were Deposed he was only one of the Presbyters for they were only Presbyters that were Deposed If he were not why is he not once called on to discharge his duty in curing of that Schism or blamed for his neglect Certainly there was never greater Prevarication used by any man in any cause than is by Clemens in this if the state of the Church its Rule and Order were such as some now pretend For he neither lets the people know wherein their sin and Schism did lye namely in a Separation from their Bishop nor doth once mention the only proper cure and remedy of all their Evils But he knew their state and order too well to insist on things that were not then in rerum natura and wherein they were not concerned 2. This Epistle is written as unto the whole Church at Corinth so in the name of the whole Church of Rome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Church of God which dwelleth or sojourneth as a stranger at Rome in the City of Rome to the Church of God that dwelleth or sojourneth at Corinth For although that Church was then in disorder under no certain Rule having cast off all their Elders c. yet the Church of Rome not only allows it to be a sister-Church but salutes the Brethren of it in the following words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 called and sanctified through the will of God by our Lord Jesus Christ. The Churches of Christ were not so ready in those days to condemn the persons nor to judge the Church-state and condition of others on every miscarriage real or supposed as some have been and are in these latter Ages 2. This Address being from the body of the Church at Rome unto that at Corinth without the least mention of the Officers of them in particular it is evident that the Churches themselves that is the whole entire Community of them had Communion with one another as they were sister-Churches and that they had themselves the transaction of all Affairs wherein they were concerned as they had in the days of the Apostles Acts 15.1 2 3. It was the Brethren of the Church at Antioch who determined that Paul and Barnabas and certain others should go up to Hierusalem to consult the Apostles and Elders See also Chap. 21.22 This they did not nor ought to do without the Presence Guidance Conduct and consent of their Elders or Rulers where they had any But this they were not excluded from And that Church the whole Body or fraternity whereof doth advise and consult in those things wherein they are concerned on the account of their Communion with other Churches is a Congregational Church and no other It was the Church who sent this Epistle unto the Corinthians Claudius Ephebus Valerius Bibo Fortunatus are named as their Messengers 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that are sent by us our Messengers our Apostles in these matters Such as the Churches made use of on all such occasions in the Apostles days 2 Cor. 8.23 And the persons whom they sent were only Members of the Church and not Officers nor do we any where hear of them under that Character Now they could not be sent in the name of the Church but by its consent nor could the Church consent without its Assembling together This was the state and order of the first Churches in that Communion which was amongst them according to the mind of Christ they had a singular concern in the welfare and prosperity of each other and were solicitous about them in their trials Hence those who were planted at a greater distance than would allow frequent personal converse with their respective Members did on all occasions send Messengers unto one another sometimes meerly to visit them in love and sometimes to give or take Advice But these things as indeed almost all others that bâ—long unto the Communion of Churches either in themselves or with one another are either utterly lost and buryed or kept above ground in a pretence of Episcopal Authority Churches themselves being wholly excluded from any concernment in them But as the Advice of the Church of Rome was desired in this case by the whole Church of Corinth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was given by the Body of the Church itself and sent by Messengers of their own 3. The description given of the state ways and walking of the Church of Corinth that is that whole Fraternity of the Church which fell afterwards into that disorder which is reproved before their fall is such as that it bespeaks their walking together in one and the same society and is sufficient to make any good man desire that he might see Churches yet in the world unto whom or the generality of whose Members that Description might be honestly and justly accommodated One Character which is given of them I shall mention only 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There was a full or plentiful effusion of the Holy Ghost upon you all so that being full or filled with an holy will holiness of will and a good readiness of mind with a pious devout confidence you stretched out your hands in Prayers to Almighty God supplicating his clemency or Mercy for the pardon of your involuntary sins sins fallen into by infirmity or
part of the Churches Unity doth or ever did consist in them In his Procedure hereon our Author seemes to embrace occasions of contending seeking for Advantages therein in things not belonging unto the Merit of the Cause which I thought was beneath him From my Concession that some at least of our Parochial Churches are true Churches he asks in what sense Are they Churches rightly constituted with whom they may joyn in Communion as Members I think it is somewhat too late now after all this dispute about the Reasons of refraining from their Communion and his severe Charges of Schisme upon us for our so doing to make this Enquiry Wherefore he Answers himself No but his Meaning is saith he that they are not guilty of any such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatrous Practise in Worship as should utterly deprive them of the Being and nature of Churches which I suppose are my Words But then comes in the Advantage doth saith he this Kindness belong only unto some of our Parochial Churches I had thought that every Parochial Church was true or false according unto its frame and constitution which among us supposeth the owning the Doctrine and Worship established in the Church of England I answer briefly it is true every Church is true or false according unto its Original frame and Constitution This frame and Constitution of Churches if it proceed from and depend upon the Institution of Christ it is true and approveable If it depend only on a National Establishment of Doctrine and Worship I know not well what to say unto it But let any of these Parochial Churches be so constituted as to answer the legal establishment in the Land yet if the Generality of their Members are openly wicked in their Lives and they have no lawful or sufficient Ministry we cannot acknowledge them for true Churches Some other things of the like nature do ensue but I shall not insist on them He gathers up in the next place the Titles of the Causes alledged for our refraining Communion with those Parochial Assemblies which he calls our Separation from them And hereon he enquires whether these Reasons be a ground for a Separation from a Church wherein it is confessed there are no Heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatrous Practise in Worship that is as he before cited my words as should utterly deprive them of the Being and Nature of Churches And it they be not then saith he such a Separation may be a formal Schisme because they set up other Churches of their own The Rule before laid down that all things lawful are to be done for the Churches Peace taking in the supposition on which it proceeds is as sufficient to establish Church Tyranny as any Principle made use of by the Church of Rome notwithstanding its plausible Appearance And that here insinuated of the Vnlawfulness of Separation from any Church in the World for that which hath pernicious Errors in Doctrine and Idolatry in Worship destroying its Being is no Church at all is as good Security unto Churches in an Obstinate Refusal of Reformation when the Souls of the People are ruined amongst them for the want of it as they need desire And I confess I suspect such Principles as are evidently suited unto the security of the Corrupt Interests of any sort of Men. I say therefore 1. That though a Church or that which pretends itself on any Grounds so to be do not profess any heynous Errour in Doctrine nor be guilty of Idolatrous Practise in Worship destroying its Nature and Being yet there may be sufficient Reasons to refrain from its Communion in Church Order and Worship and to joyn in or with other Churches for Edification That is that where such a Church is not capable of Reformation or is obstinate in a Resolution not to reform itself under the utmost Necessity thereof it is lawful for all or any of its Members to reform themselves according to the Mind of Christ and commands of the Gospel 2. That where Men are no otherwise Members of any Church but by an inevitable Necessity and outward Penal Laws preventing their own choice and any act of Obedience unto Christ in their joyning with such Churches the Case is different from theirs whose Relation unto any Church is founded in their own voluntary choice as submitting themselves unto the Laws Institution and Rule of Christ in that Church which we shall make use of afterwards 3. The Doctor might have done well to have stated the true nature of Schisme and the formal Reason of it before he had charged a formal Schisme on a Supposition of some outward Acts only 4. What is our Judgment concerning Parochial Assemblies how far we separate from them or refrain Communion with them what are the Reasons whereon we do so hath been now fully declared and thereunto we must appeal on all occasions for we cannot acquiesce in what is unduely imposed on us either as unto Principles or Practise To shew as he saith the Insufficiency of our Cause of Separation he will take this way namely to shew the great absurdities that follow on the allowance of them and addes These five especially I shall insist upon 1. That it weakens the Cause of Reformation 2. That it hinders all Vnion between the Protestant Churches 3. That it justifies the antient Schismes which have been always condemned by the Christian Church 4. That it makes Separation Endless 5. That it is contrary to the Obligation that lies on all Christians to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church Now as I shall consider what He offers on these several Heads and his Application of it unto the case in hand so I shall confirm the Reasons already given of our Separation if it must be so called from Parochial Assemblies with these five Considerations 1. That they strengthen the Cause of Reformation 2. That they open a way to Vnion between all Protestant Churches 3. That they give the just Grounds of condemning the antient Schismes that ever any Christian Church did justly condemn 4. That they give due bounds unto Sâ—paration 5. That they absolutely comply with all the Commands of the Scripture for the Preservation of the Peace and Vnity of the Church I shall begin with the consideration of the Absurdities charged by Him on our Principles and Practise The first of them is That it weakens the Cause of the Reformation This he proves by long Quotations out of some French Divines We are not to expect that they should speak unto our Cause or make any Determination in it seeing to the principal of them it was unknown But they say that which is contrary unto our Principles so they may do and yet this not weaken the Cause of the Reformation For it is known that they say somewhat also that is contrary to the Principles of our Episcopal Brethren for which one of them is sufficiently reviled but yet the Cause of Reformation is not weakened thereby The first
Testimony produced is that of Calvin A large Discourse he hath Institut lib. 4. cap. 1. against Causeless Separations from a true Church and by whom are they not condemned No determination of the Case in hand can be thence derived nor are the Grounds of our refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies the same with those which he condemns as insufficient for a total Separation nor is the Separation he opposed in those days which was absolute and total with a condemnation of the Churches from which it was made of the same nature with that wherewith we are charged at least not with what we own and allow He gives the Notes of a true Church to be the pure Preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution Where these are he allows a true Church to be not only without Diocesan Episcopacy but in a form and under a Rule opposite unto it and inconsistent with it And if he did at all speak to our Case as he doth not nor unto any of the Grounds of it why should we be pressed with his Authority on the one hand more then others from whom he differed also on the other Besides there is a great deal more belongs unto the pure preaching of the Word and the Administration of the Sacraments according unto Christs Institution then some seem to apprehend They may they ought to be so explained as that from the consideration of them we may justifie our whole Cause Both these may be wanting in a Church which is not guilty of such heynous Errors in Doctrine or Idolatry in Worship as should overthrow its Being And their want may be a just Cause of refraining Communion from a Church which yet we are not obliged to condemn as none at all Calvin expresseth his Judgment N. 12. I would not give Countenance unto Errors no not to the least so as to cherish them by flattery or Connivance But though I say that the Church is not to be forsaken for tristing Differences wherein the Doctrine of the Gospel is retained safe and sound wherein the Integrity of Godliness doth abide and the use of the Sacraments appointed of the Lord is preserved and we say the same And this very Calvin who doth so severely condemn Separation from a true Church as by him stated did himself quietly and peaceably withdraw and depart from the Church of Geneva when they refused to admit that Discipline which he esteemed to be according to the Mind of Christ. It is certain therefore that by the Separation which he condemns he doth not intend the peaceable Relinquishment of the Communion of any Church as unto a constant participation of all Ordinances in it for want of due means of Edification much less that which hath so many other Causes concurring therewith For the other Learned Men whom he quotes unto the same purpose I see not any thing that gives the least countenance unto his Assertion that our Principles weaken the Cause of the Reformation It is true they plead other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome than those insisted on by us with respect unto the Church of England and indeed they had been otherwise much to blame having so many things as they had to plead of greater importance Did we say that the Reasons which we plead are all that can be pleaded to justifie the Separation of the Reformed Churches from the Church of Rome it would weaken the Cause of Reformation For we should then deny that Idolatry and fundamental Errors in Faith were any Cause or Ground of that Separation However we know that the Imposition of them on the Faith and Practise of all Christians is more pleaded in Justification of a Separation from them then the things themselves But allowing those greater Reasons to be pleaded against the Roman Communion as we do it doth not in the least follow that our Reasons for refraining Communion with Parochial Assemblies doth weaken the Cause of the Reformation However let me not be misinterpreted as unto that expression of destroying our Faith which the Communion required with the Church of England as unto all the important Articles of it doth not do and I can subscribe unto the Words of Daille as quoted by our Author out of his Apology If saith he the Church of Rome hath not required any thing of us which destroys our Faith offends our Consciences and overthrows the Service which we believe due to God if the Differences have been small and such as we might safely have yeilded unto then he will grant their Separation was rash and unjust and they guilty of the Schisme He closeth his Transcription of the Words of sundry Learned Men who have justifyed the Separation of the reformed Churches from the Church of Rome wherein we are not in the least concerned with an Enquiry What Triumph would the Church of Rome make over us had we no other reasons to justifie our Separation from them but only those which as is pretended we plead in our Cause I say whereas we do plead confirm and justifie all the Reasons and Causes pleaded for the Separation of the Reformed Churches from them not opposing not weakning any of them by any Principle or Practise of ours but farther press the force of the same reasonings and causes in all Instances whereunto they will extend I see neither what cause the Papists have of Triumph noâ— any thing that weakens the Cause of the Reformation He adds further how should we be hissed aâ—d laughed at all over the Christian World if we had nothing to alledge for our Separation from the Roman Church but such things as these I answer that as the Case stands if we did alledge no other Reasons but those which we insist on for our refraining Communion with our own Parochial Assemblies we should deserve to be derided for relinquishing the Plea of those other important Reasons which the Heresies and Idolatries and Tyranny of that Church do render just and equal But if we had no other Causes of Separation from the Church of Rome but what we have for our Separation from our Parochial Assemblies at home as weak as our Allegations are pretended to be we should not be afraid to defend them against all the Papists in the World and let the World act like itself in hissing Whereas therefore the Cause of Reformation is not in any thing weakened by our Principles No Argument no Reason solidly pleaded to justifie the Separation from the Church of Rome being deserted by us neither Testimony Proof nor Evidence being produced to evince that it is weakned by us I shall in the Second place as was before proposed prove that the whole Cause of the Protestants Separation from the Church of Rome is strengthened and confirmed by us There were some general Principles on which the Protestants proceeded in their Separation from the Church of Rome and which they constantly pleaded in Justification thereof The first
in compliance with the political State and other circumstances of Times and Places as may be thought to tend unto their advantage That which we affirm is that no alteration of their state from the nature and kind of particular Churches is of divine institution 4. Such Churches whose frame constitution and power are destructive of the Order Liberty Power Priviledges and Duties of particular Churches are so farr contrary unto divine Institution and not to be comply'd withall Hereon we affirm That whereas we are excluded from total Communion in our Parochial Assemblies by the imposition of things unto us unlawful and sinful as indispensible conditions of their Communion and cannot comply with them in their Rule and Worship on the reasons before alledged it is part of the Duty we owe to Jesus Christ to gather our selves into particular Churches or Congregations for the celebration of Divine Worship and the observation doing or performance of all his Commands These are the things which in this case we adhere unto and which must all of them be overthrown before any colour can be given unto any charge of Schism against us and what is spoken unto this purpose in the Drs. Discourse we shall now consider Only I desire the Reader to remember that all these Principles or assertions are fully confirm'd in the preceding discourse That which first occurs in the Treatise under consideration unto the point in hand is the exception put in unto a passage in my former discourse which is as follows We do not say that because Communion in Ordinances should be only in such Churches as Christ hath instituted that therefore it is lawful and necessary to separate from Parochial Churches but if it be on other grounds necessary so to separate or withhold Communion from them it is the Duty of them that do so to joyn themselves in or unto some other particular Congregation I have not observed any occasion wherein the Dr. is more vehement in his Rhetorick then he is on that of this passage which yet appears to me to be good sence and innocent 1. Hereunto he says 1. p. 221. That this is either not to the business or it is a plain giving up the cause of Independency If he judge that it is not to the business I cannot help it and he might as I suppose have done well to have taken no notice of it as I have dealt with many passages in his Discourse But if it be a giving up of the cause of Independency I say whatever that be let whoso will take it and dispose of it as it seems good unto them but in proof hereof he says 1. Wherefore did the dissenting Brethren so much insist upon their separate Congregations when not one of the things now particularly alledged against our Church was required of them I Answer 1. If any did in those times plead for separate Congregations let them answer for themselves I was none of them They did indeed plead for distinct Congregations exempt in some few things from a penal Rule then endeavoured by some to be imposed on all But there was no such difference nor restraint of Communion between any of them as it is at present between us and Parochial Churches 2. It is very possible that there may be other reasons of forbearing a conjunction in some acts of Church Rule which was all that was pleaded for by the dissenting Brethren then those which are alledged against total Communion with Parochial Churches in Worship Order and Discipline 2. He adds secondly but if he insists on those things common to our Church with other reformed Churches then they are such things as he supposes contrary to the first institution of Churches c. I fear I do not well understand what this means nor what it tends unto but according as I apprehend the sence of it I say 1. I insist principally on such things as are not common unto them with other reformed Churches but such as are peculiar unto the Church of England These vary the terms and practice of our Communion between them and it 2. The things we except against in Parochial Churches are not contrary to their first institution as Parochial which as hath been proved is the only kind of Churches that is of divine institution but are contrary unto what is instituted to be done and observed in such Churches which one observation makes void all that he would inferre from the present suppositions as 3. He enquireth hereon what difference there is between sâ—perating from our Churches because Communion in Ordinances is onely to be enjoyed in such Churches as Christ hath instituted and separating from them because they have things repugnant unto the first institution of Churches The Dr. I fear would call this Sophistry in another or at least complain that it is somewhat odly and faintly expressed But we shall consider it as it is 1. Separation from Parochial Churches because Communion in Ordinances is only to be enjoyed in such Churches as Christ hath instituted is denied by us it is so in the assertion opposed by him and I do not know whether it be laid down by him as that which we affirm or which we deny 2. There is great Ambiguity in the latter clause of separating from them because they have things repugnant unto the first institution of Churches For it is one thing to separate from a Church because it is not of divine institution that is not of that kind of Churches which are divinely instituted and another to do so because of things practised and imposed in it contrary to divine institution which is the case in hand 4. But he after saith Is not this the primary Reason of separation because Christ hath appointed unalterable Rules for the Government of his Church which are not to be observed in Parochial Churches I answer no it is not so for there may be an omission at least for a season in some Churches of some Rules that Christ hath appointed in the Government of his Church and we judge his Rules as unto Right unalterable which may not be a just cause of separation So the Church of the Jews continued a long time in the omission of the Observance of the feast of Tabernacles But the principal Reason of the Separation we defend is the practising and imposing of sundry things in the Worship of the Church not of divine institution yea in our judgment contrary thereunto and the framing of a rule of Government of mens devising to be laid on all the Members of them This is the primary Cause pleaded herein But because the Dr. proposeth a Case on those suppositions whereon he seems to lay great weight though indeed however it be determined it conduceth nothing unto his End but argues only some keenness of Spirit against them whom he opposeth I shall at large Transcribe the whole of it Let us then saith he 1. suppose that Christ hath by unalterable Rule appointed that a Church shall
and Priviledges by vertue of the Law of Christ. Unto this Church which is his Spouse doth the Lord Christ commit the Keys of his House by whom they are delivered into the hands of his Stewards so far as their Office requires that Trust. Now this which we shall afterwards more fully confirm is utterly inconsistent with the committing of all Church Power unto one Person by vertue of his Ordination by another Nothing that hath been spoken doth at all hinder or deny but that where Churches are rightly constituted they ought in their Offices Officers and Order to be preserved by a successive Ordination of Pastors and Rulers wherein those who actually preside in them have a particular Interest in the orderly communication of Church-Power unto them CHAP. IV. The Especial Nature of the Gospel Church-State appointed by Christ. THE Principal Enquiry which we have thus far prepared the way unto and whereon all that ensues unto it doth depend is concerning the especial Nature of that Church-State Rule and Order which the Lord Christ hath Instituted under the Gospel of what sort and kind it is And hereunto some things must be premised 1. I design not here to oppose nor any way to consider such Additions as men may have judged necessary to be added unto that Church-State which Christ hath appointed to render it in their apprehension more useful unto its ends than otherwise it would be Of this sort there are many things in the World and of a long season have been so But our present Business is to prove the Truth and not to disprove the conceits of other men And so far as our Cause is concerned herein it shall be done by it self so as not to interrupt us in the declaration of the Truth 2. Whereas there are great contests about Communion with Churches or Separation from them and mutual charges of Impositions and Schisms thereon they must be all regulated by this Enquiry namely what is that Church State which Christ hath prescribed Herein alone is Conscience concerned as unto all Duties of Ecclesiastical Communion Neither can a chaâ—ge of Schism be managed against any but on a supposition of Sin with respect unto that Church-State and Order which Christ hath appointed A Dissent from any thing else however pretended to be useful yea advantageous unto Church Ends must come under other prudential considerations All which shall be fully proved and vindicated from the exceptions of Dr. St. 3. There have been and are in the World several sorts of Churches of great Power and Reputation of several Forms and Kinds yet contributing Aid to each other in their respective stations As 1 The Papal Church which pretends it self to be Catholick or Universal comprehensive of all true Believers or Disciples of Christ united in their Subjection unto the Bishop of Rome 2 There were of old and the shadow of them is still remaining Churches called Patriarchal first 3 then 4 then 5 of them whereinto all other Churches and professed Christians in the Roman World were distributed as unto a Dependance on the Authority and Subjection to the Jurisdiction and Order of the Bishops of 5 principal Cities of the Empire who were thereon called Patriarks 3 Various Divisions under them of Archiepiscopal or Metropolitical Churches and under them of those that are now called Diocesan whose bounds and limits were fixed and altered according to the Variety of Occasions and Occurrences of things in the Nations of the World What hath been the Original of all these sorts of Churches how from Parochial Assemblies they grew up by the Degrees of their Descent now mentioned into the height and center of Papal Omnipotency hath been declared elsewhere sufficiently 4. Some there are who plead for a National Church-State arising from an Association of the Officers of particular Churches in several Degrees which they call Classical and Provincial until it extend it self unto the limits of an whole Nation that is one civil Body depending as such on its own supreme Ruler and Law I shall neither examine nor oppose this Opinion there hath been enough if not too much already disputed about it But 5. The visible Church-State which Christ hath instituted under the New Testament consists in an especial Society or Congregation of professed Believers joyned together according unto his Mind with their Officers Guides or Rulers whom he hath appointed which do or may meet together for the celebration of all the Ordinances of Divine Worship the professing and authoritatively proposing the Doctrine of the Gospel with the Exercise of the Discipline prescribed by himself unto their own mutual Edification with the Glory of Christ in the Preservation and Propagation of his Kingdom in the World The things observable in this Description and for the farther Declaration of it are 1 The Material cause of this Church or the Matter whereof it is composed which are visible Believers 2 The formal Cause of it which is their voluntary Coalescency into such a Society or Congregation according to the mind of Christ. 3 The End of it is presential local Communion in all the Ordinances and Institutions of Christ in Obedience unto him and their own Edification 4 In particular these ends are 1 The Preaching of the Word unto the Edification of the Church it self and the Conversion of others 2 Administration of the Sacraments or all the Mystical Appointments of Christ in the Church 3 The Preservation and Exercise of Evangelical Discipline 4 Visibly to profess their Subjection unto Christ in the World by the observation of his commands 5 The Bounds and Limits of this Church are taken from the number of the Members which ought not to be so Small as that they cannot observe and do all that Christ hath commanded in due Order nor yet so Great as not to meet together for the Ends of Institution of the Church before mentioned 6 That this Church in its compleat State consists of Pastors or a Pastor and Elders who are its Guides and Rulers and the Community of the Faithful under their Rule 7 That unto such a Church and every one of them belongs of Right all the Priviledges Promises and Power that Christ doth give and grant unto the Church in this World These and sundry other things of the like Nature shall be afterwards spoken unto in their Order according unto the Method intended in the present Discourse Two things I shall now proceed unto 1 To prove that Christ hath appointed this Church-State under the Gospel namely of a particular or single Congregation 2 That he hath appointed no other Church State that is inconsistent with this much less that is destructive of it 1. Christ appointed that Church-State which is meet and accommodated unto all the ends which he designed in his Institution of a Church But such alone is that Church Form and Order that we have proposed In Christs Institution of the Church it was none of his ends that some men might be thereby advanced to
Obedience unto the Commands of Christ in its Integrity For the First the Scripture is full of Predictions all confirmed in the Event that after the days of the Apostles there should be various Attempts to wrest corrupt and pervert the Doctrine of the Gospel and to bring in pernitious Errors and Heresies To prevent or reprove and remove them is no small Part and Duty of the Ministerial Office in the Dispensation of the Word But whereas those who taught such perverse things did for the most part arise at first in the Churches themselves Act. 20.30 2 Pet. 2.1 1 John 2.19 as the Preaching of the Word was appointed for the rebuke of the Doctrines themselves so this Discipline was ordained in the Church with respect unto the Persons of them by whom they were taught Rev. 2.2.14 20. 3 Joh. 8.9 Gal. 5.12 And so also it was with respect unto Schisms and Divisions that might fall out in the Church The way of suppressing things of this Nature by external force by the Sword of Magistrates in Prisons Fines Banishments and Death was not then thought of nor directed unto by the Lord Jesus Christ but is highly dishonourable unto him as though the ways of his own appointment were not sufficient for the Preservation of his own Truth but that his Disciples must betake themselves unto the secular Powers of this World who for the most part are wicked Prophane and ignorant of the Truth for that end And hereunto belongeth the Preservation of his Commands in the Integrity of Obedience For he appointed that hereby care should be taken of the Ways Walkings and Conversation of his Disciples that in all things it should be such as became the Gospel Hence the exercise of this Discipline he ordaâ—ned to consist in Exhortations Admonitions Reproofs of any that shouâ—d offend in things Moral or of his especial Institutâ—on with the total Rejection of them were obstinate in their Offences as we shall see afterwards 2. The second End of it was to preserve Love entire among his Disciples This was that which he gave in especial charge unto all that should believe in his Name taking the Command of it to be his own in a peculiar manner and declaring our Observance of it to be the principal Pledge and Evidence of our being his Disciples For although mutual Love be an old Commandment belonging both unto the Moral Law and sundry Injunction under the Old Testament yet the Degrees and Measure of it the Ways and Duties of its exercise the Motives unto it and Reasons for it were wholly his own whereby it becomes a new Commandment also For the preservation and continuance of this Love which he lays so great weight upon was this Discipline appointed which it is several ways effectual towards As 1 In the Prevention or Removal of Offences that might arise among Believers to the impeachment of it Matth. 18.15 16 17 2 In that Watch over each other with mutual Exhortations and Admonitions without which this Love let men pretend what they please will not be preserved That which keepeth either Life or Soul in Christian Love consists in the exercise of those Graces mutually and the Discharge of those Duties whereby they may be Partakers of the fruits of Love in one another And for the most part those who pretend highly unto the Preservation of Love by their coming to the same Church who dwell in the same Parish have not so much as the carcase nay not a shadow of it In the Discipline of the Lord Christ it is appointed that this Love so strictly by him enjoyned unto us so expressive of his own Wisdom and Love should be preserved continued and encreased by the due and constant Discharge of the Duties of mutual Exhortation Admonition Prayer and watchful care over one another Rom. 15.14 1 Thes. 5 11 12. 2 Thes. 3.15 Heb. 3.12 13. Ch. 12.15 16. 3. A third End of it is that it might be a due Representation of his own Love Care Tenderness Patience Meekness in the acting of his Authority in the Church Where this is not observed and designed in the exercise of Church Discipline I will not say it is Antichristian but will say it is highly injurious and dishonourable unto him For all Church Power is in him and derived from him nor is there any thing of that nature which belongs unto it but it must be acted in his Name and esteemed both for the manner and matter of it to be his Act and Deed. For men therefore to pretend unto the exercise of this Discipline in a worldly frame of Spirit with Pride and Passion by tricks of Laws and Canons in Courts Forein to the Churches themselves which are pretended to be under this Discipline it is a woful and scandalous Representation of Christ his Wisdom Care and Love towards his Church But as for his Discipline he hath ordained that it shall be exercised in and with Meekness Patience Gentleness evidence of Zeal for the good and compassion of the Souls of men with Gravity and Authority so as that therein all the holy Affections of his mind towards his Church or any in it in their mistakes failings and miscarriages may be duly represented as well as his Authority acted among them Isa. 40.11 2 Cor. 10.1 Gal. 5.22.23 1 Thes. 2.7 2 Tim. 2.24 25 26. Jam. 3.17 1 Cor. 13. 4. It is in part appointed to be an Evidence and Pledge of the future Judgment wherein the whole Church shall be judged before the Throne of Christ Jesus For in the Exercise of this Discipline Christ is on his own Judgment Seat in the Church nor may any man pronounce any Sentence but what he believeth that Christ himself would pronounce were he visibly present and what is according to his mind as declared in his Word Hence Tertullian calls the Sentence of Excommunication in the Church futuri judicii praejudicium A Representation of the future Judgment 4. In all that Degeneracy which the Christian professing Church hath fallen into in Faith Worship and Manners there is no Instance can exceed the corruption of this Divine Institution For that which was the Honour of Christ and the Gospel and an effectual means to represent him in the Glory of his Wisdom and Love and for the Exercise of all Graces in the Church unto the blessed Ends now declared was turned into a Domination Earthly and Secular Exercised In a Prophane Litigious Unintelligible Process according unto the Arts Ways and Terms of the worst of Law Courts by Persons for the most part remote from any just Pretence of the least Interest in Church Power on causes and for ends forein unto the Discipline of the Gospel by a Tyranny over the Consciences and over the Persons of the Disciples of Christ unto the Intolerable scandal of the Gospel and Rule of Christ in his Church as is evident in the State and Rule of the Church of Rome As these are the general Ends of the Institution
which is become a principal Article of Faith in the Roman Church There was a Reformation attempted and attained in some measure by some Nations or Churches in the last Ages from the Corruption and Impositions of the Church of Rome However none of them ever pretended that it was compleat or perfect according to the Pattern of the Scripture as unto the Institution and Discipline of the Churches no nor yet to the Example of the Primitive Church of after Ages as is acknowledged by the Church of England in the beginning of the Commination against Sinners But suppose it to be compleat to conclude that because an outward Rule of it was established so long as that outward Rule is observed there can be no need of Reformation is a way to lead Churches into a Presumptuous Security unto their Ruine For whereas Men being secured in their Interests by that Rule are prejudiced against any Progress in Reformation beyond what they have attained which that it should be a Duty is contrary unto the whole nature of Christian Religion which is the conduct of a Spiritual Life in the growth and encrease of Light and a suitable Obedience so they are apt to think that whilst they adhere unto that Rule they can stand in no need of Reformation which is but a new name for trouble and Sedition though it be the Foundation on which they stand But generally Churches think that others stand in need of Reformation but they need none themselves If they would but give them leave to Reform themselves who judge that it is needful for them without the least Prejudice unto their Church Profession or secular Interest it is all that is desired of them 2. Where Churches do so stand in need of Reformation and will not Reform themselves being warned of their Duty the Lord Christ threatens to leave them and assuredly will do so in the time that he hath limited unto his Patience This is the Subject of five of his Epistles or Messages unto the Churches of Asia Rev. chap. 2 3. And where the Lord Christ doth on any Cause or Provocation withdraw his Presence in any kind or degree from any Church it is the Duty of any of the Members of that Church to remove from themselves the Guilt of that Provocation though it cannot be done without a Separation from that Church It it safer leaving of any Church whatever then of Jesus Christ. I suppose most men think that if they had a Warning from Christ charging their defection and calling for Reformation as those Churches of Asia had they would Repent and Reform themselves But whereas it doth not appear that some of them did so whereon they were not long after deserted and destroyed it is like that there are others who would follow their steps though one should rise from the dead to warn them of their danger But this Instruction that Churches who lose their first Faith Love and Works who are negligent in Discipline and tolerate offensive Evils in Doctrines and Manners among them who are Luke-warm as unto Zeal and dead for the greatest Part of their Members as unto the Life of Holiness are disapproved by Christ and in danger of being utterly deserted by him is given unto all Churches no less divinely then if they had an immediate Message from Heaven about these things Those therefore who being under the Guilt of them and do not reform themselves cannot claim the Necessity of a continuance in their Communion from any Disciples of Christ as we shall see afterwards 3. Reformation respects either Doctrine and Worship or Obedience becoming the Gospel The Debates about such a Reformation as concerns the retaining or removing of certain Ceremonies we concern not ourselves in at present Nor shall we in this Place insist on what concerns Doctrine and Worship which may afterwards be spoken unto But we shall confine our selves here unto the consideration of Gospel Obedience only And we say That the Church of England in the Generality of its Parochial Assemblies and in itself stands in need of Reformation by reason of the woful degeneracy of the Generality of its Members that is the Inhabitants of the Land from the Rule of the Gospel and Commands of Christ as unto Spiritual Light Faith Love Holiness Charity and abounding in the fruits of Righteousness unto the Praise of God by Jesus Christ. These things are the immediate ends of Church Societies the principal means whereby God is glorified in the World Where they are neglected where they are not attained where they are not duely improved by the Generality of the Members of any Church that Church I think stands in need of Reformation This Assertion may seem somewhat importune and severe But when the sins of a Church or Nation are come to that height in all Ranks Sorts and Degrees of Men that all Persons of Sobriety do fear daily that desolating Judgements from God will break in upon us it cannot be unseasonable to make mention of them when it is done with no other design but only to shew the Necessity of Reformation or how necessary it is for some if all will not comply therewith For if a City be on fire it is surely lawful for any of the Citizens to save and preserve if they can their own houses though the Mayor and Aldermen should neglect the Preservation of the whole City in General It might be easily demonstrated what great numbers amongst us 1. Who have imbibed Atheistical Opinions and either vent them or speak presumptuously according unto their Influence and Tendency every day 2. Who are prophane Scoffers at all true Christian Piety and the due expressions of the Power of Godliness an Evil not confined unto the Laity such things being uttered and published by them as should be astonishable unto all that know the Fear of the Lord and his Terror 3. Who are profoundly Ignorant of the Mysteries of the Gospel or those Doctrines of Christian Religion whose knowledge is of the highest importance and necessity 4. Who are openly flagitious in their Lives whence all sorts of gross Immoralities do fill the Land from one end unto the other 5. Who live in a constant neglect of all more private holy Duties whether in their Families or in Personal Retirements 6. Who are evidently under the Power of Pride Vanity Covetousness Profaneness of Speech in cursed Oathes and Swearing 7. Who instruct the worst of men unto an Approbation of themselves in such ways as these by petulant Scoffing at the very name of the Spirit and Grace of Christ at all Expectation of his Spiritual Aids and Assistances at all fervency in religious Duties or other Acts of an holy Converse These and such like things as these do sufficiently Evidence the Necessity of Reformation For where they are continued the Use and End of Church Societies is impaired or lost And it is in vain to pretend that this is the old Plea of them who â—aused Schismes in the
to be given of any man charged with Schisme for a Dissent from such a Rule Any such Rule and any Ecclesiastical Censure upon it is apocriphal not only unto the Scripture but unto that which I call primitive Antiquity The first Attempt of any thing in this kind was in reference unto the time and day of the Observation of Easter This was the first Instance among Christians of an endeavour to impose the Observation of humane or Church Constitutions or groundless Traditions on any Churches or Persons in them And whereas that which was called a Schisme between the Churches of Italy and Asia or some of them did ensue thereon we have a most illustrious Testimony from the best the Wisest and the Holyest of that Age for Irenaeus in France and Polycrates in Asia were not alone herein that the blame of all that Division and Schisme was to be charged on them who attempted to deprive the Churches of their Liberty and impose on them a necessity of the Observation of the Time and Season which they had determined on After a Rebuke was given unto the Attempt of the Judaizing Christians to impose the Observation of Mosaical Ceremonies from the pretence of their divine Institution on the Churches of the Gentiles by the Apostles themselves this was the Original of all endeavours to impose humane Constitutions for which there was no such Pretence upon the Practise of any And as it was an Original not unmeet for the beginning and foundation of such Impositions being in a matter of no Vse unto the Edification of the Church so it received such a solemne Rebuke at its first entrance and Attempt that had it not been for the Ignorance Pride Interest and Superstition of some in the following Ages it had perished without Imitation The Account hereof is given in Eusebius lib. 5. cap. 21 22 33 as also of the Rule which then prevailed though afterwards shamefully forsaken namely that an Agreement in the Faith was the only Rule of Communion which ought to be kept under any diversity in voluntary Observations And the Discourse of Socrates on this Occasion lib. 5. cap. 21 Concerning the Non-Institution of any days of Fastings or Feastings or other Rites or Ceremonies then in use with the Liberty which is therefore to be left in such things unto all Christians is the plain Truth whatever some except against it declared with much Judgement and Moderation This Beginning I say had the Imposition of unscriptural uninstituted Rites Ceremonies and Religious Observations among the Churches of Christ and this solemn Rebuke was given unto it Howbeit the Ignorance Superstition and Interest of following Ages with the contempt of all Modesty brake through the boundaries of this Holy Rebuke until their own Impositions and Observations became the substance of all their Church Discipline unto the total subversion of Christian Liberty Wherefore to allow Church Rulers or such as pretend so to be a Liberty and Power to appoint a Rule of Communion comprizing Institutions and Commands of sundry things to be constantly observed in the whole Worship and Discipline of the Church not warranted in themselves by divine Authority and then to charge Beleivers abiding firm in the Doctrine of the Faith with Schisme for a Non-compliance with such Commands and Appointments is that which neither in the Scripture nor in Primitive Antiquity hath either Instance Example President Testimony Rumour or Report to give Countenance unto it The Pedigree of this Practise cannot be derived one step higher than the fact of Victor the Bishop of Rome in the Excommunication of the Churches and Christians of Asia which was solemnly condemned as an Entrenchment on Christian Liberty 3. After these things the Notion of Schisme began to be mannaged variously according unto the Interest of them who seemed to have the most Advantage in the Application of it unto those who dissented from them It were an endless thing to express the Rise and declare the Progress of these Apprehensions But after many loose and declamatory Discourses about it they are gerally issued in two Heads The first is that any kind of Dissent from the Pope and Church of Rome is Schisme all the Schisme that is or can be in the World The other is that a causeless Separation from a true Church is Schisme and this only is so But whereas in this pretended Definition there is no mention of any of its internal Causes nor of its formal Reason but a bare Description of it by an outward Effect it serves only for a weapon in every mans hand to perpetuate digladiations about it For every Church esteems itself true and every one that separates himself esteems himself to have just Cause so to do In the following Times especially after the Rise and Prevalency of the Arian Heresie it was ordinary for those of the Orthodox Perswasion to forsake the Communion of those Churches wherein Arian Bishops did preside and to gather themselves into separate Meetings or Conventicles for divine Worship for which they were accused of Schisme and in sundry places punished accordingly yea some of them unto the Loss of their Lives Yet I suppose there are none now who judge them to have been Schismaticks The Separation of Novatus and Donatus from the Communion of the whole Catholick Visible Church on unwarrantable Pretences is that which makes the loudest noise about Schisme in Antiquity That there was in what was done by them and their Followers the General Nature and Moral Evil of Causeless Schismes and Divisions will be easily granted But it is that wherein we are not concerned be the especiall nature of Schisme what it will Nor did they make use of any one Reason whereon the Merit of the present Cause doth depend The Novatians the modester Sect of the two pretended only a Defect in Discipline in granting Church Communion unto such as they would not have received though they were apparently in the wrong proceeding on mistaken Principles The Donatists pleaded only some Personal Crimes in some few Bishops fallen into in the time of Persecution which they could never prove and thereon grew angry with all the World who would not condemn them and renounce their Communion as well as they These slight Pretences they made the Occasion and Reason of renouncing the Communion of the whole visible Catholick Church in all its distributions for Communion that is all particular Churches and confined Sacraments and Salvation absolutely unto their own Parties And hereon they fell into many other woful Miscarriages especially those of the latter sort It is indifferent by what Name any are pleased to call this Evil and Folly A Sin and Evil it was Schisme or what you please to term it and justly condemned by all Christians not joyning with them in those days And that which was the animating Principle of the Tumult of the Donatists was a Supposition that the Continuation of the true Church state depended on the Successive Ordination of Bishops
to choose out from among themselves Persons meet for an Ecclesiastical Office Act. 6. The same People who joyned with the Apostles and Elders in the consideration of the grand Case concerning the continuation of the legal Ceremonies and were associated with them in the Determination of it Act. 15. The same to whom all the Apostolical Epistles excepting some to particular Persons were written and unto whom such Directions were given and Duties enjoyned in them as suppose not only a Liberty and Ability to judge for themselves in all Matters of Faith and Obedience but also an especial Interest in the Order and Discipline of the Church Those who were to say unto Archippus their Bishop take heed unto the Ministry thou hast received in the Lord that thou fulfil it Col. 4. unto whom of all sorts it is commanded that they should examine and try Antichrists Spirits and false Teachers that is all sorts of Hereticks Heresies and Errors 1 Joh. chap. 2.3 c. That People who even in following Ages adhered unto the Faith and the Orthodox Profession of it when almost all their Bishops were become Arian Hereticks and kept their private Conventicles in opposition unto them at Constantinople Antioch Alexandria and other places and who were so many of them burned here in England by their own Bishops on the Judgement they made of Errors and Heresies And if the present People with whom the Dr. is acquainted be altogether unmeet for the Discharge of any of these Duties it is the fault of some body else beside their own This Principle of the Reformation in Vindication of the Rights Liberties and Priviledges of the Christian People to judge and choose for themselves in Matters of Religion to joyn freely in those Church Duties which are required of them without which the work of it had never been carried on we do abide by and maintain Yea we meet with no Opposition more fierce than upon the Account of our Asserting the Liberties and Right of the People in reference unto Church Order and Worship But I shall not be afraid to say that as the Reformation was begun and carried on on this Principle so when this People shall through an Apprehension of their Ignorance Weakness and Unmeetness to discern and judge in Matters of Religion for themselves and their own Duty be kept and debarred from it or when through their own Sloth Negligence and Vitiousness they shall be really uncapable to mannage their own Interest in Church Affairs as being fit only to be governed if not as brute Creatures yet as Mute Persons and that these things are improved by the Ambition of the Clergy engrossing all things in the Church unto themselves as they did in former Ages if the Old Popedome do not return a new one will be erected as bad as the other Thirdly another Principle of the Reformation is that there was not any Catholick Visible Organical Governing Church traduced by Succession into that of Rome 〈◊〉 all Church Power and Order was to be derived I will not say that this Principle was absolutely received by all the first Reformers here in England yet it was by the Generality of them in the other Parts of the World For as they constantly denied that there was any Catholick Church but that invisible of Elect Believers allowing the External Denomination of the Church unto the diffused Community of the baptized World so believing and professing that the Pope is Antichrist that Rome is Mystical Babylon the Seat of the Apostatized Church of the Gentiles devoted to destruction they could acknowledge no such Church state in the Roman Church nor the derivation of any Power and Order from it So farre as there is a Declension from this Principle so far the Cause of the Reformation is weakened and the principal Reason of Separation from the Roman Church is rejected as shall be farther manifested if occasion require it This Principle we do firmly adhere unto and not only so but it is known that our fixed Judgement concerning the Divine Institution Nature and Order of Evangelical Churches is such as is utterly exclusive of the Roman Church as a body organized in and under the Pope and his Hierarchy from any pretence unto Church State Order or Power And it may be hence judged who do most weaken the Cause of Reformation we or some of them at least by whom we are opposed A second Absurdity that he chargeth on our way is that it would make Vnion among the Protestant Churches impossible supposing them to remain as they are Sect. 24. pag. 186. To make good this Charge he insists on two things 1. That the Lutheran Churches have the same and more Ceremonies and unscriptural Impositions then our Church hath 2. That notwithstanding these things yet many learned Protestant Divines have pleaded for Vnion and Communion with them which upon our Principles and Suppositions they could not have done But whether they plead for Union and Communion with them by admitting into their Churches and submitting unto those Ceremonies and unscriptural Impositions which is alone unto the Doctors Purpose or whether they judge their Members obliged to Communicate in local Communion with them under those Impositions he doth not declare But whereas neither we nor our Cause are in the least concerned in what the Dr. here insist upon yet because the Charge is no less then that our Principles give disturbance unto the Peace and Vnion of all Protestant Churches I shall briefly manifest that they are not only conducive thereunto but such as without which that Peace and Union will never be attained 1. It is known unto all that from the first Beginning of the Reformation there were Differences among the Churches which departed from the Communion of the Church of Rome And as this was looked on as the greatest Impediment unto the Progress of the Reformation so it was not morally possible that in a work of that Nature begun and carried on by Persons of all for us in many Nations of divers Tongues and Languages none of them being divinely inspired that it should otherwise fall out God also in his Holy Wise Providence suffered it so to be for Causes known then to himself but since sundry of them have been made manifest in the Event For whereas there was an Agreement in all fundamental Articles of Faith among them and all necessary meanes of Salvation a farther Agreement considering our Sloth Negligence and proness of men to abuse security and Power might have produced as evil effects as the Differences have done For those which have been on the one hand and those which have been on the other have been and would have been from the corrupt Affections of the Minds of men and their secular Interests 2. These Differences were principally in or about some Doctrines of Faith whereon some fiery Spirits among them took occasion mutually and unjustly enough to charge each other with Heresie especially was this done among the Lutherans
they are occasioned by Ambition and desire of Preheminence like those that fell out among the Bishops of those days when their Parishes and claimes were not regulated by the Civil Power as now they are If they do so from a Desire to impose Principles and Practises not warranted in the Scripture on others as it was with Tertullian If for slight Reasons they rend and destroy that Church state and order which themselves approve of as it was with all the antient Schismaticks who were Bishops or would feign to have been if those that make them or follow in them deny Salvation unto all that joyn not with them and condemn all other Churches as being without Gods Covenant and the Sacraments as did the Donatists and those do who deny these things unto all Churches who have not Diocesan Bishops if there be not a sufficient justifiable Cause pleaded for it that those who make such a separation cannot abide in the Communion which they forsake without wounding their own Consciences and do give Evidences of their abiding in the Exercise of Love towards all the true Disciples of Christ we are satisfied that we have a Rule infallibly directing us to make a Judgment concerning it Our Author adds Sect. 26. p. 197. Another Argument against this course of separation is that these Grounds will make separation endless which is to suppose all the Exhortations of the Scripture to Peace and Vnity among Christians useless But why so Is there nothing in the Authority of Christ and the sence of the Account which is to be given unto him nothing in the Rule of the Word nothing in the works of the Ministry and exercise of Gospel Discipline to keep professed Disciples of Christ unto their Duty and within the bounds of order Divinely prescribed unto them unless they are fettered and staked down with humane Laws and Constitutions Herein I confess I differ and shall do so whilst I am in this World from our Reverend Author and others To say as he doth upon a supposition of the taking away of humane Impositions Laws and Canons that there are no bounds set unto separation but what the fancies of men will dictate unto them is dishonourable unto the Gospel and somewhat more To suppose that the Authority of Christ the Rule of the Word and the Work of the Ministry are not sufficient to prescribe bounds unto separation efficaciously affecting the Consciences of Beleivers or that any other bounds can be assigned as obligatory unto their Consciences is what cannot be admitted The Lord Christ hath commanded Love and Vnion among his Disciples he hath ordained order and Communion in his Churches he hath given unto them and limited their Power he hath prescribed Rules whereby they and all their Members ought to walk he hath forbidden all Schismes and Divisions he hath appointed and limited all necessary separations and hath truly given all the bounds unto it that the Consciences of men are or can be affected withal But then it is said if this be all separation will be endless if such a separation be intended as is an unlawful Schisme I say it may be it will even as Persecution and other evils sins and wickednesses will be notwithstanding his severe Prohibition of them What he hath done is the only means to preserve his own Disciples from all sinful separation and is sufficient thereunto Herein lyeth the Original mistake in this matter we have lost the Apprehension that the Authority of Christ in the Rule of his Word and Works of his Spirit is every way sufficient for the Guiding Governing and Preserving of his Disciples in the Church Order by him prescribed and the observance of the Duties by him commanded It hath been greatly lost in the World for many Ages and therefore instead of Faithful Ministerial Endeavours to enforce a sence of it on the Consciences of all Christians they have been let loose from it through a confidence in other devises to keep them unto their Duty and Order And if these devises be they Ecclesiastical Canons or Civil Penalties be not enforced on them all the World is made to beleive that they are left unto the dictates of their own fancies and Imaginations as if they had no concern in Christ or his Authority in this matter But for my part I shall never desire nor endeavour to keep any from Schisme or separation but by the ways and means of Christs appointment and by a sense of his Authority on their own Consciences The remainder of his Discourse on this Head consists in a lepid Dramâ—tical Oration framed and feigned for one of his Opposers wherein he makes him undertake the patronage of Schism before Cyprian and Austiâ— The Learned Person intended is very well able to defend and vindicate himself which I suppose also he will do In the mean time I cannot but say two things 1. That the Imposition on him of extenuating the Guilt of any real Schism is that which none of his Words do give the least countenance unto 2. That the Doctors attempt in his feigned Oration to accommodate his Principles or Ours unto the case of the Donatists for their Justification the weakness whereof is evident to every one who knows any thing of the case of the Donatists is such an instance of the Power of Interest a design to maintain a Cause causelessly undertaken by all manner of Artifices and Pretences prevailing in the minds of men otherwise Wise and Sober as is to be lamented We come at length in the 5th place Sect 28. p. 209. unto that which is indeed of more importance duly to be considered then all that went before For as our Author observes it is that wherein the Consciences of men are concerned This Argument therefore he takes from the Obligation which lyes upon all Christians to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church For the confirmation of this Argument and the Application of it unto the case of them who refrain from total Communion with our Parocâ—ial Assemblies which alone is the case in hand he lays down sundry suppositions which I shall consider in their Order although they may be all granted without any disadvantage unto our Cause But they will be so the better when they are rightly stated 1. His first supposition is that Christians are under the strictest Obligations to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church This being the foundation of all that follows it must be rightly stated And to that end three things may be enquired into 1. What is that Church whose Peace and Unity we are obliged to preserve For there are those who lay the firmest claim unto the Name Power and Priviledges of the Church with whom we are obliged to have neither Peace nor Vnity in the Worship of God 2. What is that Peace and Vnity which we are so obliged to preserve 3. By what means they are to be preserved 1. We are obliged to follow Peace with all men to seek Peace
impartial Consideration he chargeth on us with great Solemnity as we Love our own Souls Now although that passage in that great and Holy Person be not new unto me having not only read it many a time in his book but frequently met with it urged by Papists against all Protestants Yet upon the Drs. intimation I have given it again the Consideration required The Words as they Lye in the Author are to this purpose We shall also judge them who make Schismes being vain qui sunt immanes or inanes not having the Love of God rather considering their own Profit than the Vnity of the Church who for small or any causes rend and divide the Glorious body of Christ and as much as in them lyes destroy it speaking Peace but designing War straining at a Gnat and swallowing a Camel For there can be no rebuke of things by them to equal the mischief of Schisme Lib. 4. cap. 62. I know not why he should give us such a severe Charge for the impartial Consideration of these words that as we love our souls we should impartially and without prejudice consider them We hope that out of Love to the Truth the Glory of Christ and Care of our own Souls we do so Consider and have long since so considered whatever belongs unto the Cause wherein we ingaged and the Oppositions that are made unto it Nor will we be offended with any that shall yet Call on us to persist and proceed in the same way But why such a Charge should be laid on us with respect unto these words of Irenaeus I know not For although we greatly value the Words and Judgment of that Holy Person that great Defender of the Mystery and Truth of the Gospel and of the Liberty of the Churches from unwarrantable impositions yet it is the Word of Christ and his Apostles alone whereby we must be regulated and determined in these things if we Love our own souls Besides What are we Concern'd in them is every Separation from a Church a Schisme Our Author shews the contrary immediately Is refraining Communion in a Church state not of Divine Institution and in things not prescribed by the Lord Christ in the Worship of God holding Communion in Faith and Love with all the true Churches of Christ in the World a damnable Schisme or any Schisme at all hath the Reverend Author in his whole Book once attempted to prove it to be so though this be the whole of the matter in difference between us is our Forbearance of Communion in Parochial Assemblies upon the Reasons before pleaded especially that of humane impositions of the same Nature with the Schisme from the whole Catholick Church without pretence of any such Impositions Doth he judge us to be such as have no Love unto God such as prefer our own profit before the Unity of the Church I heartily wish and pray that he may never have a share in that profit and advantage which we have made unto our selves by our principles and practise Poverty Distress Ruine to our Families Dangers Imprisonments Revilings with Contemptuous reproaches Comprize the profit we have made unto our selves Is our refraining Communion in some outward Order Modes and Rites of Mens institution our want of conscientious submission unto the Courts of Chancellours Commissaries Officials c. a rending and destroying of the glorious Body of Christ is it Cemented United and Compacted or fitly framed together by these things They formerly pretended to be his Coat and must they now be esteemed to be his glorious Body when they no way belong unto the one or the other Is the Application of these things unto us an effect of that Love Charity and Forbearance which are the only preventive means of Schisme and whereof if men are void it is all one upon the matter whether they are Schismaticks or no for they will be so when it is for their Advantage Wherefore we are not concerned in these things Let whosoever will declare and vehemently assert us to be guilty of Schisme which they cannot prove we can cheerfully subscribe unto these Words of Irenaeus It may not be impertinent on this occasion to desire of some others that as they Love their own Souls and have compassion for the Souls of other men they would seriously consider what state and Condition things are come unto in the Church of England how much Ignorance Profaneness Sensuality do spread themselves over the Nation what Neglect of the most important Duties of the Gospel Yea what scoffing at the power of Religion doth abound amongst us What an utter decay and loss there is of all the primitive Discipline of the Church what Multitudes are in the way of Eternal Ruin for want of due Instruction and Example from them who should lead them How great a necessity there is of an universal Reformation and how securely Negligent of it all sorts of Persons are What have been the pernicious Effects of imposing things unnecessary and unscriptural on the Consciences and Practises of men in the Worship of God whereby the Church hath been deprived of the labour of so many faithful Ministers who might have at least assisted in preventing that Decay of Religion which every day encreaseth among us How easie a thing it were for them to restore Evangelical Peace and Vnity amongst all Protestants without the loss of their Ministry without the diminution of their Dignity without deprivation of any part of their Revenues without the Neglect of any Duty without doing any thing against their light and Consciences with respect unto any Divine Obligation and thereon set themselves seriously to endeavour the Remedy of these and other Evils of the like nature under a sense of that great Account which they must shortly give before the Judgement seat of Jesus Christ. He proceeds to Consider the Cases wherein the Scripture allows of Separation which he affirms to be three The First is in Case of Idolatrous Worship This none can Question they do not see from whom yet we all separate as from Idolaters The second is in Case of false Dostrine being imposed instead of true which he confirms with sundry Instances But there is a little Difficulty in this Case for 1. It is uncertain when a Doctrine may be said to be imposed Is it when it is taught and preach'd by the Guides and Governours of the Church or any of them without controul if so then is such preaching a sufficient cause of Separation and will justifie them who do at present separate from any Church whose Ministers preach false Doctrine How false Doctrine can be otherwise imposed I know not unless it be by exacting an express Confession of it as Truth 2. What false Doctrine it is which is of this Importance as to justifie Separation is not easily determinable 3. If the Guides and Governours of the Church do teach this false Doctrine who shall judge of it and determine it so to be and that ultimately so as
to separate from a Church thereon shall the People do it themselves are they meet are they Competent for it are they to make such a Judgement on the Doctrine of their Guides do they know what is heresie have they read Epiphanius or Binius How comes this allowance to be made unto them which else where is denied The Third is in Case Men make things indifferent necessary to Salvation and divide the Church on that account But 1. I know not which is to precede or go before their Division of the Church or the just Separation nor how they are to be distinguished but it was necessary to be so expressed 2. There are two things in such an Imposition first the practise of the things imposed Secondly the Judgement of them that impose them The former alone belongs unto them who are imposed on and they may submit unto it without a Compliance with the Doctrine as many did in the Apostles days For the Judgement of the imposers it was their own Errour and concernment only 3. Why is not the imposing of things indifferent so as to make the observation of them necessary unto mens Temporal Salvation in this World so as that the Refusal of it shall really affect the Refusers with Trouble and Ruine as just a Cause of Separation as the imposing of them as necessary unto Eternal Salvation which shall never affect them 4. This making things indifferent necessary unto Salvation and as such imposing of them on others is a thing impossible that never was nor ever can be For it is the Judgment of the Imposers that is spoken of and to judge things indifferent in themselves to be in themselves necessary to Salvation is a Contradiction If onely the Judgment of the Imposers that such things are not indifferent but necessary to Salvation be intended and otherwise the things themselves may lawfully be imposed I know not how this differs from the Imposition of indifferent things under any other pretence In his following Discourse concerning miscarriages in Churches where no Separation is enjoyned we are not at all concerned and therefore shall not observe the mistakes in it which are not a few But may there not be other Causes of peaceable withdrawing from the Communion of a Church besides these here enumerated 1. Suppose a Church should impose the Observation of Judaical Ceremonies and make their observation necessary though not to Salvation Yet unto the Order and Decency of Divine Worship It may declare them to be in themselves indifferent but yet make them necessary to be observed Or 2. Suppose a Church should be so degenerated in the Life and Conversation of all its Members that being immersed in various sins they should have only a form of Godliness but deny the power of it the Rule of the Apostle being to avoid and turn away from them 3. Suppose a Church be fallen into such decayes in Faith Love and fruits of Charity as that the Lord Jesus Christ by his word declares his Disapprobation of it and in that State refuses to reform itself and persecutes them who would reform themselves Or 4. Suppose the Ministry of any Church be such as is insufficient and unable to dispense the Word and Sacraments unto Edification so as that the whole Church may perish as unto any Relief by or from the Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospel I say in these and such other Cases a peaceable withdrawing from the Communion of such Churches is warrantable by the Rule of the Scripture SECT III. THE third Part of the Drs. Discourse he designs to examine the Pleas as he speaks for Separation And these he refers to four Heads whereof the first respects the Constitution of the Church And those which relate hereunto are four also 1. That Parochial Churches are not of Christs Institution 2. That Diocesan Churches are unlawful 3. That our National Church hath no Foundation 4. That the People are deprived of their Right in the Choice of their Pastors The first of these Namely that our Parochial Churches are not of Christs Institution he begins withal and therein I am alone called to an Account I wonder the Dr. should thus state the Question between us The meaning of this Assertion that our Parochial Churches are not of Christs Institution must be either they are not so because they are Parochial or at least in that they are Parochial But is this my judgement have I said any thing to this purpose yea he knows full well that in my judgment there are no Churches directly of divine Institution but those that are Parochial or particular Churches We are not therefore to expect much in the ensuing disputation when the state of the Question is so mistaken at the entrance If he say or intend that there are many things in their Parochial Churches observed practised and imposed on all their members in and about the Worship of God which are not of divine institution we grant it to be our judgment and part of our plea in this case But this is not at all spoken unto Wherefore the greatest part of the ensuing discourse on this Head is spent in perpetual diversions from the state of the case under consideration with an attempt to take advantage for some reflections or an appearance of success from some passages and expressions belonging nothing at all unto the merit of the cause a course which I thought so Learned a Person would not have taken in a case wherein Conscience is so nearly concerned Some mistakes occurring in it have been already rectified as that wherein he supposeth that my Judgement is for the Democratical Government of the Church as also what he alledgeth in the denyal of the gradual declension of the Primitive Churches from their first original Institution hath been examined I shall therefore plainly and directly propose the things which I assert and maintain in this part of the Controversie and then Consider what occurrs in opposition unto them or otherwise seems to be of any force towards the End in general of charging us with Schisme and they are these that follow 1. Particular Churches or Congregations with their Order and Rule are of Divine institution and are sufficient unto all the ends of Evangelical Churches I take Churches and Congregations in the same sence and notion as the Church of England doth defining the Church by a Congregation of Beleivers otherwise there may be occasional Congregations that are not stated Churches 2. Unto these Churches there is committed by Christ himself all the ordinary power and priviledges that belong unto any Church under the Gospel and of them is required the observance of all Church Duties which it is their sin to omit 3. There is no Church of any other form kind nature or constitution that is of Divine institution Things may be variously ordered in and amongst Christians or their Societies may be cast or disposed of into such respective Relations to and dependance on one another
3. This therefore is that which he opposeth namely that there was a Deviation in various degrees and falling of from the Original Institution Order and Rule of the Church until it issued in a fatal Apostasie This is that which on the present Occasion must be further spoken unto For if this be not true I confess there is an end of this contest and we must all acquiesce in the State Rule and Order that was in the Church of Rome before the Reformation But we may observe something yet farther in the Vindication and Confirmation of this Truth which I acknowledge to be the Foundation of all that we plead for in point of Church Reformation As 1. That the Reasons and Arguings of the Doctor in this Matter the Necessity of his Cause compelling him thereunto are the same with those of the Papists about the Apostacy of their Church in Faith Order and Worship wherewith they are charged namely when where how was this Alteration made who made opposition unto it and the like When these Enquiries are multiplyed by the Papists as unto the whole Causes between them and us he knows well enough how to give satisfactory Answers unto them and so might do in this particular unto himself also but I shall endeavour to ease him of that trouble at present Only I must say that it is fallen out somewhat unexpectedly that the Ruins of the principle Bulwark of the Papacy which hath been effectually demolished by the Writings of Protestants of all sorts should be endeavoured to be repaired by a Person justly made eminent by his Defence of the Protestant Religion against those of the Church of Rome 2. But it may be pleaded that although the Churches following the first Ages did insensibly degenerate from the Purity and simplicity of Gospel Faith and Worship yet they neither did nor could do so from an Adherence unto and abiding in their Original constitution or from the due Observation of Church Order Rule and Discipline least of all could this happen in the Case of Diocesan Episcopacy I Answer 1. That as unto the Original of any thing that looks like Diocesan Episcopacy or the Pastoral Relation of one Person of a distinct order from Presbiters unto many particular compleat Churches with Officers of their own with Power and Jurisdiction in them and over them unto the Abridgement of the exercise of that Right and Power unto their own Edification which every true Church is entrusted withal by Jesus Christ it is very uncertain and was introduced by insensible Degrees according unto the effectual working of the Mistery of Iniquity Some say that there were two distinct Orders namely those of Bishops and Presbyters instituted at first in all Churches planted by the Apostles But as the contrary may be evidently proved so a supposition of it would no way promote the cause of Diocesan Episcopacy until those who plead for it have demonstrated the State of the Churches wherein they were placed to be of the same nature with those now called Diocesan Wherefore this Hypothesis begins generally to be deserted as it seems to be by this Author Others suppose that immediately upon or at or after the Decease of the Apostles this new Order of Bishops was appointed to succeed the Apostles in the Government of the Churches that were then gathered or planted But how when or by whom by what Authority Apostolical and Divine or Ecclesiastical only and humane none can declare seeing there is not the least footstep of any such thing either in the Scripture or in the Records that remain of the primitive Churches Others think this new Order of Officers took its occasional Rise from the Practice of the Presbyters of the Church at Alexandria who chose out one among themselves constantly to preside in the Rule of the Church and in all matters of Order unto whom they ascribed some kind of Preheminence and Dignity peculiarly appropriating unto him the namâ— of Bishop And if this be true as unto matter of Fact I reckon it unto the Beginnings of those less harmful Deviations from their Original Constitution which I assigned unto Primitive Churches But many Additions must be made hereunto before it will help the Cause of Diocesan Episcopacy What other occasions hereof were given or taken what Advantages were made use of to promote this Alteration shall be touched upon afterwards 2. Why may not the Churches be supposed to have departed from their original Constitution Order and Rule as well as from their first Faith and Worship which they did gradually in many successive Ages until both were utterly corrupted The Causes Occasions and Temptations leading unto the former are to the full as pregnant as those leading unto the latter For 1. There was no vicious corrupt disposition of Mind that began more early to work in Church Officers nor did more grow and thrive in the Minds of many then Ambition with desire of Preheminence Dignity and Rule It is not to be supposed that Diotrephes was alone in his Desire of â—reheminence nor in the irregular actings of his unduly â—ssumed Authority However we have one signal Instance in him of the Deviation that was in the Church with him from the Rule of its Original Constitution For he prevailed so far therein as by his own single Episcopal Power to reject the Authority of the Apostles and to cast them out of the Church who complyed not with his humour How effectually the same Ambition wrought afterwards in many others possessing the same Place in their Churches with Diotrephes is sufficiently evident in all Ecclesiastical Histories It is far from being the only Instance of the Corruption of Church Order and Rule by the Influence of this Ambition yet it is one that is pregnant which is given us by Amâ—rose for saith he Ecclesia ut Synagoga Seniores habuâ—â— quorum sine consilio nihil agebatur in Ecclesia quod qua neglâ—gentia obsoleverit nescio nisi forte doctorum desidia aut magis superbia dum soli volunt aliquid videri In 1. ad Timoth. cap. 5. It seems there was some alteration in Church Rule and Order in his Time whose Beginning and Progress he could not well discover and trace but knew well enough that so it was then come to pass And if he who lived so near the Times wherein such Alterations were made could not yet discover their first Insinuation nor their subtle Progress it is unreasonable to exact a strict account of us in things of the same nature who live so many Ages after their first Introduction But this he judgeth that it was the Pride or Ambition of the Doctors of the Church which introduced that Alteration in its Order Whereas therefore we see in the Event that all Deviations from the Original Constitution of Churches all Alterations in their Rule and Order did issue in a compliance with the Ambition of Church Rulers as it did in the Papal Church and this Ambition was signally noted
of the Roman Empire then of the Roman Church as unto its Rise by Holiness and Devotion and its Ruine by Sensuality Ambition the utter neglect of the Discipline of Christ and Superstition But yet let any man peruse that Historian who wrote with this express Design he shall hardly fix upon many of those instances whereby the Empire came into that deplorable condition wherein it was not able to bear its Distempers nor its Cure such as was the State of the Church before the Reformation But besides the common difficulty of discovering the Beginnings and gradual Progression of Decays Declensions and Apostacy those which we treat of were begun and carried on in a mysterious manner that is by the effectual working of the Mystery of Iniquity As this almost hid totally the work of it from the Ages wherein it was wrought so it renders the Discovery of it now accomplished the more difficult Passengers in a Ship setting out to Sea oftimes discern not the progressive Motion of the Ship yea for a while the Land rather seems to to move from them then the Vessel wherein they are from it But after a Season the consideration of what Distance they are at from their Port gives them sufficient Assurance of the Progress that hath been made So is this Declension of the Churches from their Primitive Order and Institution is discoverable rather by measuring the Distance between what it left and what it arrived unto then by express Instances of it But yet is it not altogether like unto that of a Ship at Sea but rather unto the way of a Serpent on a Rock which leaves some slime in all its turnings and windings whereby he may be traced Such Marks are left on Record of the Serpentine Works of this Mystery of Iniquity as whereby it may be traced with more or less Evidence from its Original Interests unto its Accomplishment The principal promoting causes of this Defection on the part of men were those assigned by St. Ambrose in one Instance of it namely the Negligence of the People and the Ambition of the Clergy I speak as unto the State Rule Discipline and Order of the Church for as unto the Doctrine and Worship of it there were many other causes and means of their Corruption which belong not unto our present purpose But as unto the Alterations that were begun and carried on in the State Order and Rule of the Church they arose from those springs of Negligence on the one hand and Ambition on the other with want of skill and wisdom to mannage outward occurrences and incidencies or what Alteration fell out in the outward state and condition of the Church in this World For hence it came to pass that in the Accession of the Nations in general unto the Profession of the Gospel Church Order was suited and framed unto their secular State when they ought to have been brought into the spiritual State and Order of the Church leaving their Political State entire unto themselves Herein I say did the Guides of the Church certainly miss their Rule and depart from it in the dayes of Constantine the Emperour and afterwards under other Christian Emperours when whole Towns Cities yea and Nations offered at once to joyn themselves unto it Evident it is that they were not wrought hereunto by the same Power nor induced unto it on the same Motives or lead by the same means with those who formerly under Persecution were converted unto the Faith of our Lord Jesus Christ. And this quickly manifested itself in the Lives and Conversations of many yea of the most of them Hence those which were wise quickly understood that what the Church had got in multitude and number it had lost in the Beauty and Glory of its holy Profession Chrysostome in particular complains of it frequently and in many places cries out What have I to do with this Multitude a few serious Believers are more worth than them all However the Guides of the Church thought meet to receive them with all their Multitudes into their communion at least so far as to place them under the Jurisdiction of such and such Episcopal Sees For hereby their own Power Authority Dignity Revenues were enlarged and mightily encreased On this Occasion the antient Primitive way of admitting Members into the Church being relinquished the consideration of their Personal Qualifications and real Conversion unto God omitted such Multitudes being received as could not partake in all Acts and Duties of Communion with those particular Churches whereunto they were disposed and being the most of them unfit to be ruled by the Power and Influence of the Commands of Christ on their Minds and Consciences it was impossible but that a great Alteration must ensue in the State Order and Rule of the Churches and a great Deviation from their original Institution Men may say that this Alteration was necessary that it was Good and Useful that it was but the Accommodation of general Rules unto especial Occasions and circumstances but that there was an Alteration hereon in all these things none can with Modesty deny And this is enough unto my present Design being only to prove that such Alterations and Deviations did of old fall out Neither ought we to cover the provoking Degeneracy of the Generality of Christians in the 4 th and 5 th Centuries with those that followed The consideration of it is necessary unto the Vindication of the Holy Providence of God in the Government of the World and of the faithfulness of Christ in his dealing with his Church For there hath been no Nation in the World which publickly received Christian Religion but it hath been wasted and destroyed by the sword of Pagan Idolaters or such as are no better then they At first all the Provinces of the Western Empire were one after another made desolate by the Pagan Nations of the Northern Countreys who themselves did afterwards so turn Christians as to lay among them the Foundation of Anti-Christianisme Rev. 17.12 13. The Eastern Empire comprehending the Residue of the Provinces that had embraced the Christian Religion was first desolated in the chief Branches of it by the Saracens and at length utterly destroyed by the Turks And I pray God that the like Fate doth not at this day hang over the Reformed Nations as from their Profession they are called Do we think that all this was without câ—use Did God give up his Inheritance to the spoil of Barbarous Infidels without such provocations as the passing by whereof was inconsistent with the Holiness and Righteousness of his Rule It was not the Wisdom nor the Courage nor the Multitude of theâ—r Enemies but their own Sins Wickedness Superstition and Apostacy from the Rule of Gospel-Order Worship and Obedience which ruined all Christian Nations But to give farther Evidence hereunto I shall consider the causes aforementioned distinctly and apart And the first of them is the Negligence of the people themselves But in this
distributed the Faithful at Rome into distinct Titles or Parishes with distinct Presbyters of their own For it is apparent that in those days wherein Persecution was at its height the Meetings of Believers were occasional with respect unto their Security oft-times by Night sometimes in Caves under the Earth or in deserted Burial places at best in private Houses And they had for what they did the Example of the Apostolical Churches Acts 1.13 14. Acts 2.46 chap. 4.24 31. chap. 12.12 chap. 18.7 chap. 20.8 chap. 21.18 Instances of such Meetings may be multiplyed especially in the Church of Rome And to manifest that they took this course upon Necessity when Peace begun to be restored at any time unto them they designed Temples that might receive the whole Multitude of the Church together The Distribution mentioned into Titles and Parishes began a long time after and in very few places within 300 years In this State it is easie to conceive what Alterations might fall out in some Churches from their Primitive Order especially how the People might desert their Diligence and Duty in attending unto all the concerns of the Church And if those things which the Apostles wrote unto them in their Epistles the Instructions Directions and Commands how in all things they should act and deport themselves in the Church be esteemed to be Obligatory in all Ages I cannot see how after the second Century they were much complyed withal unless it were in the single Instance of choosing their own Officers or Rulers But Secondly After these there ensued greater Occasions of greater Variations from the Primitive Institution and Order of the Churches on the Part of the People For 1. Such Numbers of them were received into a Relation unto particular Churches as was inconsistent with the Ends of their Institution and the Observance of the Communion required in them as will afterwards appear And the Reliefes that were invented for this Inconveniency in distinct Conventions supplyed with the Administration of the Word and Sacrament from the first Church or by stated Titles did alter the State of the Church Among those Multitudes which were added unto the Churches especially in the fourth Century many if not the most did come short inexpressibly in Knowledge Gifts Grace Holiness and uprightness of Conversation of the Primitive Christians as the Writers of that Age complain And being hereby uncapable of walking according unto the Order Rule and Discipline of the Apostolical Churches there seemed to be a Necessity of another Rule of other ways and means for their Government without their own concurrence or consent then what was at first appointed which were gradually introduced Whence the original of a Multitude of those Canons which were arbitrarily invented afterwards for their Rule and Government is to be derived And it may be made to appear that the Accommodation of the Rule yea and of the Worship of the Church in the several Ages of it unto the Ignorance Manners and Inclinations of the People who were then easily won unto the outward Profession of Christian Religion was one means of the Ruine of them both until they issued in downright Tyranny and Idolatry But much more of the cause of the Deviation of the Churches from their Primitive Rule and Order is to be ascribed unto the Ambition and Love of Preheminence in many of the Clergy or Rulers of the Churches But this is no Place nor Season to manifest this by Instances besides it hath been done by others I shall therefore enquire only into one or two things in particular which are of principal consideration in the Declension of the Churches from their Primitive Institution Order and Rule And 1. It is evident that there was an Alteration made in the state of the Church as to its Officers For it issued at last in Popes Patriarchs Cardinals Metropolitan and Diocesan Bishops who were utterly forreign unto the State and Order of the Primitive Churches and that for some Ages Nor were these Officers introduced into the Church at one or in one Age nor with the Powers which they afterwards claimed and assumed unto themselves It was done gradually in many succeeding Ages working by a Design to accommodate the State of the Church unto the Political State of the Empire in the distribution of its Government 2. The Beginnings of this great Alteration were small nor at all perceived in the days wherein they were first acted Nor is it agreed nor as far as I see will it ever be agreed among Learned Men when first a Disparity among the ordinary Officers of the Church in Order Degree or Power did first begin nor by what means it was brought about The Apostles were all equal among themselves no one had either Office or Office-Power above others So were all the ordinary Bishops and Presbyters mentioned in the Scripture as shall be proved afterwards No intimation is given of any Preheminence or Superiority amongst them of one over others Yet afterwards in the third and fourth Centuries much of that nature appears It begins to be granted that the Bishops and Elders mentioned in the Scripture were the same and that there was no difference in Name Office or Power during the Apostles times which was the Judgment of Hierome and our Author seems to me to be of the same Mind p. 267. But they say that after the Decease of the Apostles there were some appointed to succeed them in that part of their Office which concerned the Rule of many Churches And this they say was done for the prevention of Schisme but with ill success For as Clemens affirms that the Apostles foresaw that there would be Strife and Contention about Episcopacy even when it was confined unto its Original Order because of the Ambition of Diotrephes and others like him so it became much more the cause of all sorts of Disorders in Schismes and Heresies when it began to exalt it self in Dignity and Reputation The first express Attempt to corrupt and divide a Church made from within itself was that in the Church of Hierusalem made by Thebulis because Simon Cleopas was chosen Bishop and he was refused Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 21. The same Rise had the Schismes of the Novatians and Donatists the Heresies of Arius and others Neither is there any thing certain in this pretended Succession of some Persons unto the Apostles in that part of their Office which concerns the Rule of many Churches by one Overseer No Intimation of any such Appointment by the Apostles or any of them no record of the concurrence of the Churches themselves in and unto this Alteration can be produced Nor is there any Analogy between the extraordinary Power of every Apostle over all Churches and care for them and the ordinary Power of a Bishop over a small Number which Lot or Accident disposeth unto him Besides it cannot be proved no Instance can be given or hath been for the space of 200 years or until the end of the
second Century of any one Person who had the care of more Churches than one committed unto him or did take the charge of them on himself But whereas this change did fall out and appears evidently so to have done in the fourth Century we may briefly enquire into the Causes and Occasions of it Churches were originally planted in Cities and Townes for the most part not absolutely for the Word was preached and Churches gathered by the Apostles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Clemens testifieth In such Cities there was but one Church whereunto all Beleivers did belong I mention this the rather because our present Author who is pleased frequently to mistake my Words and Principles affirms that the thing which I should have proved is that there were more Churches at first planted in one City than one I know not why I should be obliged to do so because I never said so I do believe indeed that there may be more particular Churches than one in one City and that sometimes it is better that it should be so then that all Beleivers in the same City should be kept up unto one Congregation to the Obstruction of their Edification But that there were originally or in the days of the Apostles more Churches than one in any one City or Town I do wholly deny though I grant at the same time there were Churches in Villages also as will appear afterwards But though there was one Church only in one Town or City yet all the Believers that belonged unto that Church did not live in that City but sundry of them in the Fields and Villages about So Justin Martyr tells us that on the first day of the week when the Church had its solemn Assemblies all the Members of it in the City and out of the Country the Fields and Villages about met together in the same place In process of time these Believers in the Country did greatly encrease by the means of the Ministry of the City-Church which diligently attended unto the Conversion of all sorts of men with some extraordinary helps besides But hereon the Example of the Apostles was overseen For on this account of the Conversion of many unto the Faith in the Towns and Villages of any Province they erected and planted new Churches among them not obliging them all unto that first Church from whence the Word went forth for their Conversion But those who succeeded them being hindred by many Reasons which may be easily recounted from Thoughts of the Multiplication of Churches chose rather to give the Beleivers scattered up and down in the Countrey occasional Assistance by Presbyters of their own than to dispose them into a Chrch State and Order But after a while their Number greatly encreasing they were necessitated to supply them with a constant Ministâ—y in several Parcels or Divisions The Ministers or Elders thus disposed amongst them for their Edification in the Administration of the Ordinances of the Gospel did still relate unto and depend upon that City first Church from whence they came But the Numbers of Beleivers dayly encreasing and a Succession of Presbyters in their distinct Assemblies being found necessary they came to be called Churches though continuing in dependance both for a supply of Officers and for Rule on the first or City Church whereunto they esteemed themselves to belong This was the way and manner of the Multiplication of Christian Assemblies throughout the Roman Empire And hereby all the Bishops of the first Churches became by common consent to have a distinction from and Preheminence above the Presbyters that were fixed in the Country and a Rule over those Assemblies or Churches themselves And therefore when they met together in the Council of Nice among the first things they decreed one was to confirm unto the Bishops of the great Cities that Power over the Neighbouring Churches which they had enjoyned from this occasional Rise and Constitution of them Hereby was a Difference and Distinction between Bishops and Presbiters between Mother and Dependant Churches introduced equally almost in all places without taking any notice of the departure which was therein from the Primitive Pattern and Institution But these things fell out long after the Days of the Apostles namely in the third and fourth Centuries there being no mention of them before But Secondly There was another Occasion of this Alteration which took place before that insisted on For in many of those City Churches especially when the number of Beleivers much encreased there were many Bishops or Elders who had the Rule of them in common This is plain in the Scripture and in the ensuing Records of Church Affairs And they had all the same Office the same Power and were of the same Order But after a while to preserve Order and Decency among themselves and in all their proceedings they chose one from among them who should preside in all Church Affairs for Orders sake unto whom after a season the name of Bishop began to be appropriated Whether the Rule they proceeded by herein was to choose them unto this Dignity who had been first converted unto the Faith or first called and ordained to be Presbyters or had respect unto the Gifts and Graces of those whom they chose is not certain But this way began in those Churches wherein some extraordinary Officer Apostle or Evangelist had long resided It cannot therefore be doubted but they had some Design to represent hereby somewhat of the Dignity of such an Officer and a Resemblance of the continuance of his Presence among them And this I suppose fell out early in the Churches though without Ground or Warrant And the Principal Pastors of other Churches which had not any great Number of Elders in them yet quickly assumed unto themselves the Dignity which the others had attained Justin Martyr in the Account he gives of the Church its Order Rule Worship and Discipline in his Days mentions one singular Person in one Church whom he calls 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 who presided in all the Affairs of the Church and himself administred all the sacred Ordinances every Lords Day unto the whole Body of the Church gathered and met out of the City and the Villages about This was the Bishop and if any one desired this Office he desired a good work as the Apostle speaks Whatever Accessions were made unto the Church these 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which were either the first converted to the Faith or the first ordained Presbyters or obtained their Preheminence non pretio sed Testimonio as Tertullian speaks upon the account of their Eminency in Gifts and Holiness were yet quickly sensible of their own Dignity and Praelation and by all means sought the enlargement of it supposing that it belonged unto the Honour and Order of the Church it self Under this State of things the Churches encreasing every day in Number and Wealth growing insensibly more and more indies magis magisque decrescente disciplina into a form and
the Church since the days of the Apostles first Reformers or those that followed them to judge that they were not infallible that their work was not absolutely perfect like the work of God whereunto nothing can be added nor ought taken away Wherefore 3. We are not obliged to make what they did and what they attained unto and what they judged meet as unto the Government and Worship of the Church to be our absolute Rule from which it should be our Sin to dissent or depart They never desired nor designed that it should be so for to do so would have been to have cast out one Papacy and to have brought in another And the Arguments of the Papists for their absolute Adherence unto the Men of their Veneration those who have been formerly of great Reputation in their Church for Learning Holiness and Devotion are as forcible unto them as any can be unto us for an Adherence unto the first Reformers in all things but yet are they not excused in their Errors thereby Had we received a Command from Heaven to hear them in all things it had altered the case but this we have received only with respect unto Jesus Christ and shall therefore in these things ultimately attend only unto what he speaks And we have sundry considerations which confirm us in the use and exercise of that Liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free to enquire our selves into our Duty in these things and to regulate our Duty in them by his Word notwithstanding what was done by our first Reformers For 1. They did not think themselves obliged they did not think meet to abide within the bounds and limits of that Reformation of the Church which had been attempted before them by Men Wise Learned and Holy even in this Nation Such was that which was endeavoured by Wickliffe and his Followers in giving Testimony whereunto many suffered Martyrdom and prepared the way unto those that were to come after They approved of what was then done or attempted to be done for the Substance of it yet esteemed themselves at Liberty to make a further Progress in the same Work which they did accordingly Surely such Persons never designed their own Judgment and Practice to give Boundaries unto all Reformation for Evermore or pretended that they had made so perfect a Discovery of the Mind of Christ in all things belonging unto the Rule and Worship of the Church as that it should not only be vain but sinful to make any farther Enquiries about it Some thought they were come unto the utmost limits of Navigation and discovery of the Parts of the World before the West-Indies were found out And some men when in any kind they know as much as they can are apt to think there is no more to be known It was not so with our Reformers 2. They did not at once make what they had done themselves to be a fixed Rule in these things For themselves made many Alterations in the Service Book which they first composed And if they judged not their first Endeavour to be satisfactory to themselves they had no Reason to expect their second should be a standing Rule unto all future Ages Nor did they so but frequently acknowledged the Imperfection of what they had done 3. The first Reformers both Bishops and others both those who underwent Martyrdom at home and those who lived in Exile abroad differed among themselves in their Judgments and Apprehensions about those things which are now under concest Whereas they perfectly agreed in all Doctrines of Faith and Gospel Obedience The Publick Records of these Differences do so remain as that they cannot modestly be denied nor handsomly covered And this must needs weaken the Influence of their Authority in the Settlement of the Church which was an Act only of the prevalent Party among them 4. They differed in these things from all other Reformed Churches with whom they did absolutely agree in Doctrine and had the strictest Communion in Faith and Love For it is known that their Doctrine which they owned and established was the same with that of the Churches abroad called particularly Reformed in distinction from the Lutherans But as unto the State Rule and Order of the Church they differed from them all I press not this consideration unto the disadvantage of what they attained unto and established in the way of Reformation or in a way of preferring other Churches above them but only to Evidence that we have reason enough not to esteem our selves absolutely obliged unto what they did and determined as unto all Endeavours after any farther Reformation 5. In their Reformation they avowedly proposed a Rule and Measure unto themselves which was both uncertain and in many things apparently various from the original Rule of these things given by Christ and his Apostles with the Practice of the first Churches And this was the state and Example of the Church under the first Christian Emperours as our Author confesseth This Rule is uncertain For no man living is able to give a just and full account of what was the State and Rule of all the Churches in the World in the Reign of any one Emperour much less during the Succession of many of them continual Alterations in the State or Order of the Church following one upon another And that in those days there was a prevalent Deviation from the Original Rule of Church Order hath been before declared We dare not therefore make them and what they did to be our Rule absolutely who missed it so much in the choice of their own 6. We may add hereunto the Consideration of the horrid Darkness which they newly were delivered from the close Adherence of some Traditional Prejudices unto the best of Men in such a Condition the Difficulties and Oppositions they met withal as unto their whole Work their Prudence as they judged it in an endeavour to accommodate all things unto the Inclinations and desires of the Body of the People extreamly immersed in their Old Traditions which might not be destructive unto their Salvation in Heresie or Idolatry all which could not but leave some Marks of Imperfection on their whole Work of Reformation Upon these and the like Considerations it is that we are enforced to assert the use of our own Liberty Light and Understanding in the Enquiring after and Compliance with the true Original State and Order of Evangelical Churches with our Duty in reference thereunto and not to be absolutely confined unto what was judged meet and practised in these things by the first Reformers And the Truth is if present Interest and Advantage did not prevail with men to fix the bounds of all Church Reformation in what was by them attained and established they would think it themselves a Papal Bondage to be bound up absolutely unto their Apprehensions from a confinement whereunto in sundry other things they declare themselves to be at an absolute Liberty Wherefore neither we nor our Cause
are at all concerned in the Rhetorical Discourse of Dr. Still concerning the first Reformers and their Reformation neither do we at all delight in reflecting on any of the Defects of it desiring only the Liberty avowed on Protestant Principles in the Discharge of our own Duty Nor Secondly Are we any more concerned in the long story that ensues about the Rise and Progress of Separation from the Church of England with the Mistakes of some in Principles and Miscarriages in Practise who judged it their Duty to be Separate For as in our refraining from total Communion with the Parochial Assemblies of the Church of England we proceed not on the same Principles so we hope that we are free from the same Miscarriages with them or any of an alike Nature But it is also certain that after the great Confusion that was bâ—ought on the whole State and Order of the Church under the Roman Apostacy many of those who attempted a Reformation fell into different Opinions and Practises in sundry things which the Papists have made many a long story about We undertake the Defence only of our own Principles and Practises according unto them Nor do we esteem our selves obliged to justifie or reflect on others And it were no difficult Task to compose a Story of the proceedings of some in the Church of England with reference unto these Differences that would have as ill an Aspect as that which is here reported Should an Account be given of their unaccountable Rigor and Severity in that through so many years yea Ages they would never think of the least Abatement of their Impositions in any one Instance though acknowledged by themselves indifferent and esteemed by others unlawful although they saw what woful Detriment arose to the Churches thereby Yea how instead thereof they did to the last of their Power make a Progress in the same course by attempting new Canons to enflame the Difference and encreased in Severities towards all Dissenters should an Account be given of the Silencings Deprivings Imprisonings by the High Commission Court and in most of the Diocesses of the Kingdom of so great Numbers of Godly Learned Faithful Painful Ministers to the unspeakable disadvantage of the Church and Nation with the Ruine of the most of them and their Families the Representation of their Names Qualifications evident usefulness in the Ministry with the Causes of their Sufferings wherein the Observance of some Ceremonies was openly preferred before the Edification of the Church and a great Means of the Conversion of Souls would give as ill a Demonstration of Christian Wisdom Love Moderation Condescension Zeal for the Propagation of the Gospel as any thing doth on the other hand in the History before us It would not be omitted on such an Occasion to declare what Multitudes of pious peaceable Protestants were driven by their Severities to leave their Native Country to seek a Refuge for their Lives and Liberties with freedom for the Worship of God in a Wilderness in the Ends of the Earth and if it be said that what some did herein they did in discharge of the Duties of their Office I must say I shall hardly acknowledge that Office to be of the Institution of Christ whereunto it belongs in a way of Duty to ruine and destroy so many of his Disciples for no other cause but a desire and endeavour to serve and worship him according unto what they apprehend to be his Mind revealed in the Gospel Should there be added hereunto an Account of the Administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline in the Courts of Chancellors Commissaries Officials and the like as unto the Authority and Causes with the way and manner of their proceedings in the exercise of their Jurisdiction with the woful Scandals that have been given thereby with an Addition of sundry other things which I will not so much as mention I suppose it would as much conduce unto Peace and Reconciliation among Protestants as the Story here given us by our Author But setting aside the Aggravations of things gathered out of Controversial Writings wherein few men do observe the due Rules of Moderation but indulge unto themselves the Liberty of severe Censures and sharp Reflections on them they do oppose the Sum and Truth of the Story concerning these things may be reduced into a narrow Compass For 1. It is certain that from the first dawning of the Reformation in this Nation there were different Apprehensions among them that jointly forsook the Papacy as unto its Doctrine and Worship about the State Rule Order and Discipline of the Church with sundry things belonging unto its Worship also I suppose this will not be denyed 2. There doth not remain any Record of a due Attempt and Endeavour for the composing these Differences before one certain way was established by those in Power And whereas the State and condition wherein they were at that time from the confusions about Religion that were then abroad and the pertinaciousness of the Generality of the People in an Adherence unto their old ways and Observances in Religion with a great Scarcity in able Ministers the greatest part of the Bishops and Clergy disliking the whole Reformation they found themselves as they judged necessitated to make as little Alteration in the present state of things as was possible so as to keep up an Appearance of the same things in the Church which had been in former use On these Grounds the State and Rule of the Church was continued in the same form and posture that it was before under the Papacy the Authority of the Pope only being excluded and the Power of disposal of Ecclesiastical Affairs usurped by him declared to be in the King So also in imitation of that Book of Worship and Service which the People had been accustomed unto another was established with the Ceremonies most obvious unto popular Observation 3. This Order was unsatisfactory unto great Numbers of Ministers and others who yet considering what the necessity of the Times did call for did outwardly acquiesce in it in several Degrees in hopes of a farther Reformation in a more convenient season Nor did they cease to plead and press for it by all quiet and peaceable meanes abstaining in the mean time from the use of the Ceremonies and full compliance with Episcopal Jurisdiction 4. Hereon those who were for the Establishment having secured their Interests therein and obtained Power began after a while to Oppress Excommunicate Silence Deprive and Imprison those who dissented from them and could not come up unto a full practical compliance with their Institutions and Rules Yet the Generality of those so silenced and deprived abode in Privacy under their Sufferings hoping for a Reformation at one time or another without betaking themselves unto any other Course for the Edification of themselves or their People 5. After sundry years some men partly silenced and deprived as unto their Ministry and partly pursued with other Censures and Penalties began
to give place unto severe Thoughts of the Church of England and its Communion and withdrawing themselves into forreign Parts openly avowed a Separation from it And if the extremities which many had been put unto for their meer Dissent and Nonconformity unto the Established Rule which with a good Conscience they could not comply with were represented it might if not excuse yet alleviate the Evil of that Severity in Separation which they fell into 6. But hereon a double Inconvenience yea Evil did ensue whence all the Advantages made use of in this Story to load the present Cause of the Nonconformists did arise For 1. Many of those who refused to conform unto the Church in all its Constitutions yet thought it their Duty to wait quietly for a National Reformation thinking no other possible began to oppose and write against them who utterly Separated from the Church condemning its Assemblies as Unlawful And herein as the manner of men is on such Occasions they fell into sharp Invectives against them with severe Censures and Sentences concerning them and their Practice And 2. Those who did so separate being not agreed among themselves as unto all Principles of Church-Order nor as unto the Measures of their Separation from the Church of England there fell out differences and disorders among them accompanied with personal Imprudencies and Miscarriages in not a few Neither was it ever scarcely otherwise among them who first attempted any Reformation unless like the Apostles they were infallibly guided These mutual Contests which they had among themselves and with the Nonconformists who abode in their private Stations in England with their Miscarriages also were published unto the World in their own Writings and those of their Enemies Hinc omnis pendet Lucilius These were the things that gave advantage unto and are the Substance of the History of our Author concerning Separation wherein all I can find unto our present Instruction is that Iliacos intra muros peccatur extra There are and ever were Sins Faults Follies and Miscarriages among all sorts of Men which might be farther evidenced by recounting on the other hand what were the Ways Acts and Deeds at the same time of those by whom the others were cast out and rejected And whereas it was the Design of the Reverend Author to load the Cause and Persons of the present Nonconformists with Prejudice and contempt it is well fallen out in the Merciful disposal of things towards and amongst us by the Providence and Grace of God that he is forced to derive the principal Matter of his Charge from what was done by a few private Persons three or fourscore years agoe and more in whose Principles and Practises we are not concerned And as for the Difference that fell out more lately among the Divines in the Assembly at Westminster about the Ways Means and Measures of Reformation and mutual Forbearance which he gives us a large account of in a long Transcription out of their Writings I must have more Health and Strength and Leisure than now I have which I look not for in this World before I esteem my self concerned to ingage in that contest or to Apologize for the one side or other The things in Agitation between them had no Relation unto or present Dissent from the Church of England being here insisted on meerly to fill up the story with Reference unto the General End designed Neither to my Knowledge did I ever read a Book wherein there was a greater Appearance of Diligence in the Collection of Things Words Sayings Expressions Discourses unto other Ends which might only cast Odium on the Cause opposed or give advantage for Arguings unto a seeming Success very little or no way at all belonging unto the Cause in hand than there is in this of our Reverend Author though much in the same way and kind hath been before attempted But Separation it is and Schisme which we are all charged withal and the Evil thereof is aggravated in the Words of the Author himself and in large Transcriptions out of the Writings of others Schisme indeed we acknowledge to be an Evil a great Evil but are sorry that with some a pretended unproved Schisme is become almost all that is Evil in the Churches or their Members so that let men be what they will drenched yea overwhelmed in Ignorance Vice and Sin so they do not separate which to be sure in that state they will not do for why should he who hath Plague Sores upon him depart from the Society of them that are infected they seem to be esteemed as unto all the concerns of the Church very unblameable The Truth is considering the present State and Condition of the Inhabitants of this Nation who are generally Members of the Church of England how the Land is filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel God giving us every day renewed Tokens and Indications of his Displeasure no compliance with his Calls no publick Reformation being yet attempted it seems a more necessary Duty and of more importance unto them upon whom the care of such things is incumbent to endeavour in themselves and to ingage a Faithful Ministry throughout the Nation both to give a due Example in their Conversations and to Preach the Word with all diligence for the turning of the People from the Evil of their ways then to spend their time and strength in the Mannagment of such Charges against those who would willingly comply with them as unto all the great Ends of Religion amongst men But this must be farther spoken unto I say therefore 1. In General that whereas the whole Design of this Book is to charge all sorts of Nonconformists with Schisme and to denounce them Schismaticks yet the Author of it doth not once endeavour to state the true notion and nature of Schisme wherein the Consciences of Men may be concerned He satisfies himself in the Invectives of some of the Antients against Schisme applicable unto those which were in their days wherein we are not concerned Only he seems to proceed on the general Notion of it that it is a Causeless Separation from a true Church which departs from that of the Romanists who will allow no Separation from the Church but what is Causeless To make Application hereof unto us it is supposed 1. That the Church of England is a true Church in its National Constitution and so are all the Parochial Churches in it which can be no way justified but by a large extensive Interpretation of the Word True For there is but one sort of Churches instituted by Christ and his Apostles but National and Parochial Churches differ in their whole kind and therefore cannot both of them be of a Divine Original 2. That we are Members of this Church by our own Consent How we should come to be so otherways I know not If we are so by being born and baptized in England then those who are born beyond Sea and baptized there
Preservation of Church Peace and Unity All the Dispute is whether we keep unto this Rule of Christ or no wherein we are ready at any time to put our selves upon the Trial being willing to Teach or Learn as God shall help us Secondly We say that this Rule in general is the Rule of Faith Love and Obedience contained and revealed in the Scripture and in particular the Commands that the Lord Christ hath given for the Order and Worship that he requires in his Churches It may seem strange to some that we should suppose the due Observance of the Rule of Faith Love and Obedience that is of Faith real and unfeigned Love fervent and without Dissimulation and of Universal gracious Evangelical Obedience to be necessary unto the Preservation of Church Peace and Unity But we do affirm with some confidence that the only real Foundation of them doth lye herein nor do we value that Ecclesiastical Peace which may be without it or is neglective of it Let all the Christian World or those therein who concern themselves in us Know that this is our Principle and our Judgment that no Church Peace or Vnity is valued by or accepted with Jesus Christ that is not founded in that doth not arise from and is the effect of a diligent Attendance unto and Observance of the entire Gospel Rule of Faith and Obedience In the Neglect hereof Peace is is but Carnal Security and Unity is nothing but a Conspiracy against the Rule of Christ. Add hereunto in particular the due Observation of what the Lord Christ hath appointed to be done and observed in his Churches as unto their Order Rule and Worship and they who walk according unto this Rule need not fear the Charge of Schisme from the fiercest of their Adversaries Wherefore we say Thirdly Those who recede from this Rule in any material Branch of it are guilty of the Breach of Church Vnity according to the Measure of their Exorbitancy As suppose that any Preach Teach or Profess Doctrines that are contrary to the form of wholesome Words especially with reference unto the Person Offices and Grace of Christ which are the Subject of Doctrines purely Evangelical they break the Peace of the Church and we are bound to separate or withdraw Communion from them which is a Means of preserving the true Peace and Unity of the Church Speciosum quidem est Nomen Pacis pulchra Opinio Vnitatis sed quis ambigat eam solam unicam Ecclesiae Pacem esse quae Christi est saith Hilary Suppose that men retain a Form of Godliness in the Profession of the Truth but deny the Power of it acting their habitual Lusts and Corruptions in a vitious Conversation they overthrow the Foundation of the Churches Unity and we are obliged from such to turn away The like may be said of those who live in a constant neglect of any of the Commands of Christ with respect unto the Order Rule and Worship of the Church with a contempt of the Means appointed by him for their Edification All these according unto the Measures of their Deviations from the Rule of Christ do disturb the Foundation of all Church Peace and Unity And therefore we say Fourthly That Conscience is immediately and directly concerned in no other Church Vnity as such but what is an effect of the Rule of Christ given unto that End We know what is spoken concerning Obedience unto the Guides and Rulers of the Church which is a part of the Rule of Christ. But we know withal that this Obedience is required of us only as they teach us to observe and do all that he hath commanded for other Commission from him they have none When this Rule is forsaken and another substituted in the room of it as it quickly diverts the Minds of Men from a Conscientious Attendance unto that Rule of Christ as the only means of Church Vnity so that other doth either proceed from mens secular Interests or may easily be accommodated thereunto And whereas the Lines of it must be drawn in the Feilds of pretended Indifferencies and real Arbitrariness it will be the cause of endless Contentions whilst whatever some think themselves to have Power to appoint others will judge themselves to have Liberty to refuse Fifthly It is Vnity of Christs Appointment that Schism respects as a Sin against it and not Vniformity in things of Mens Appointment And Lastly Those who charge Schisme on others for a dissent from themselves or the refraining of Total Communion with them must 1. Discharge themselves of the Charge of it in a consistence with their charge on them For we find as yet no Arrows shot against us but such as are gathered up in the Feilds shot at them that use them out of the Roman Quiver Neither will it avail them to say that they have other manner of Reason for their Separation from the Church of Rome than any we have for our withdrawing Communion from them For the Question is not what Reasons they have for what they do but what Right and Power they have to do it namely to separate from the Church whereof they were constituting a new Church state of their own without the consent of that Church and against the Order and Authority of the same 2. Require no Communion but by vertue of the Rule before declared In no other are we concerned with respect unto the Peace and Unity of the Church 3. Give a farther Confirmation than what we have yet seen unto the Principles or Presumptions they proceed upon in the Mannagement of the Charge of Schisme As that 1. Diocesan Bishops with their Metropolitans are of Divine Institution 2. That the Power of Rule in and over all Churches is committed unto them alone 3. That the Church hath Power to ordain Religious Rites and Ceremonies no where prescribed in the Scripture and impose the Observation of them on all Members of the Church 4. That this Church they are 5. That no Mans Voluntary Consent is required to constitute him a Member of any Church but that every one is surprized into that state whether he will or no. 6 That there is nothing of force in the Arguments pleaded for Non-compliance with Arbitrary unnecessary Impositions 7. That the Church standeth in no need of Reformation neither in Doctrine Discipline nor Conversation with sundry other things of an alike Nature that they need unto their Justification But yet when all is done it will appear that mutual Forbearance first removing Animosities then administring Occasion of inoffensive Converse unto the revival of decayed Affections leading unto sedate Conferences and Considerations of a more entire conjunction in the things whereunto we have attained will more conduce unto Universal Peace and Gospel Unity than the most fierce contentions about things in difference or the most vehement Charges of Schisme against Dissenters But I must return to the Argument and shall add something giving Light into the Nature of Schism from an
Heaven as a Divine Institution But I have treated of this subject in other Discourses 2. The Name Pretence and presumed power of the Church or Churches have been made and used as the greatest Engine for the promoting and satisfying the Avarice Sensuality Ambition and cruelty of men that ever was in the world Never any thing was found out by men or Sathan himself so fitted suited and framed to fill and satisfie the lusts of multitudes of men as this of the Church hath been and yet continues to be For it is so ordered is of that make constitution and use that corrupt men need desire no more for the attainment of Wealth Honour Grandeur Pleasure all the ends of their Lusts spiritual or carnal but a share in the Government and power of the Church nor hath an interest therein been generally used unto any other ends All the Pride and Ambition all the flagitious lives in Luxury Sensuality Uncleanness Incests c. of Popes Cardinals Prelates and their Companions with their hatred unto and oppression of Good men arose from the advantage of their being reputed the Church To this very day the Church here and there as it is esteemed is the greatest means of keeping Christian Religion in its power and purity out of the world and a temptation to multitudes of men to prefer the Church before Religion and to be obstinate in their oppositions unto it These things being plain and evident unto wise men who had no share in the conspiracy nor the benefit of it how could they think that this Church-State was from Heaven and not of Men. 3. By the Church so esteemed and in pursuit of its Interests by its Authority and Power innumerable multitudes of Christians have been slain or murdered and the earth soked with their Blood Two Emperours of Germany alone fought above eighty battels for and against the pretended power and authority of the Church It hath laid whole Countreys desolate with fire and sword turning Cities into ashes and Villages into a wilderness by the destruction of their Inhabitants It was the Church which killed murthered and burnt innumerable holy Persons for no other reason in the world but because they would not submit their Souls Consciences and Practices unto her commands and be subject unto her in all things Nor was there any other Church conspicuously visible in all these parts of the world nor was it esteemed lawful once to think that this was not the true Church or that there was or could be any other For men to believe that this Church-State was from Heaven is for them to believe that cruelty bloodshed murther the destruction of mankind especially of the best the wisest and the most holy among them is the only way to Heaven 4. The secular worldly interest of multitudes lying in this presumptive Church and the state of it they preferred and exalted it above all that is called God and made the greatest Idol of it that ever was in the world For it was the faith and profession of it that its authority over the Souls and Consciences of men is above the Authority of the Scripture so that they have no Authority towards us unless it be given unto them by this Church and that we neither can nor need believe them to be the Word of God unless they inform us and command us so to do This usurpation of Divine Honour in putting itself and its Authority above that of the Scripture or Word of God discovers full well whence it was In like manner those who assumed it unto themselves to be the Church without any other Right Title or Pretence unto it have exalted one amongst them and with him themselves in their several capacities above all Emperors Kings and Princes Nations and People trampling on them at their pleasure Is this Church-State from Heaven Is it of Divine Institution Is it the heart and center of Christian Religion Is it that which all men must be subject to on pain of eternal damnation who that knows any thing of Christ or the Gospel can entertain such a thought without detestation and abhorrency 5. This Pretence of the Church is at this day one of the greatest causes of the Atheism that the world is filled withal Men find themselves they know not how to belong unto this or that Church they suppose that all the Religion that is required of them is no more but what this Church suggests unto them and abhorring through innumerable prejudices to enquire whether there be any other ministerial Church-State or no understanding at length the Church to be a political combination for the Wealth Power and Dignity of some persons they cast away all regard of Religion and become professed Atheists 6. Unto this very day the woful Divisions Distractions and end less Controversies that are among Christians with the dangerous Consequences and effects of them do all spring and arise from the Churches that are in the World Some are for the Church of Rome some for the Church of England some for the Greek Church and so of the rest which upon an acknowledgment of such a state of them as is usually allowed cannot but produce Wars and Tumults among Nations with the oppression of particular persons in all sorts of calamities In one place men are killed for not owning of one Church and in another for approving of it Amongst our selves prisons are filled and mens goods spoiled divisions multiplied and the whole Nation endangered in a severe attempt to cause all Christians to acknowledge that Church-State which is set up among us In brief these Churches in the great Instance of that of Rome have been and are the Scandal of Christian Religion and the greatest cause of most of the evils and villanies which the world hath been replenished withal And is it any wonder if men question whether they are from Heaven or of Men For my part I look upon it as one of the greatest mercies that God hath bestowed on any professed Christians in these latter Ages that he hath by the Light and knowledge of his Word disentangled the Souls and Consciences of any that do believe from all Respect and Trust unto such Churches discovering the vanity of their pretences and wickedness of their practices whereby they openly proclaim themselves to be of Men and not from Heaven Not that he hath led them off from a Church-State thereby but by the same word revealed that to them which is pure simple humble holy and so far from giving occasion unto any of the evils mentioned as that the admittance of it will put an immediate end unto them all Such shall we find the true and Gospel Church-State to be in the following Description of it He that comes out of the Confusion and Disorder of these humane and as unto some of them hellish Churches who is delivered from this mystery of iniquity in darkness and confusion policies and secular contrivances coming thereon to obtain a view of
Church and nothing else But it was the Will of God that there should be all those things in the Gospel Church-State also or else why do men contend about them And if this were the Will of God if they were not all revealed appointed prescribed legalized by Christ where is his Faithfulness in Answer to that Moses But no Instance can be given of any Defect in his Institutions that needs any supplement to be made by the best of men as unto the end of constituting a Church-State Order and Rule with rites of Worship in particular 4. How it is derogatory unto the Glory of the Scripture as unto its Perfection shall be elsewhere declared 8. There is no more required to give Authority obliging the Consciences of all that do believe unto any Institution or Observation of Duty or Acts of Rule in the Church but onely that it is made evident in the Scripture to be the Mind and Will of Christ. It is not necessary that every thing of this Nature should be given out unto us in form of a Law or precise Command in express words It is the Mind and Will of Christ that immediately affects the Consciences of Believers unto Obedience by what way or means soever the knowledge of it be communicated unto them in the Scripture either by express words or by just consequence from what is so expressed Wherefore 9. The Example and Practice of the Apostles in the Erection of Churches in the Appointment of Officers and Rulers in them in directions given for their Walking Order Administration of Censures and all other holy things are a sufficient Indication of the Mind and Will of Christ about them We do not say that in themselves they are Institutions and Appointments but they infallibly declare what is so or the Mind of Christ concerning those things Nor can this be questioned without a denial of their Infallibility Faithfulness and Divine Authority 10 The Assertion of some that the Apostles took their Pattern for the State and Rule of the Churches and as unto divers Rites of Worship from the Synagogues of the Jews their Institutions Orders and Rules not those appointed by Moses but such as themselves had found out and ordained is both temerarious and untrue In the pursuit of such bold Conjectures one of late hath affirmed that Moses took most of his Laws and Ceremonies from the Aegyptitians whereas it is much more likely that many of them were given on purpose to alienate the People by Prohibitions from any compliance with the Aegyptians or any other Nation whereof Maimonides in his Mene Nebuchim gives us sundry Instances This Assertion I say is rash and false For 1 As unto the Instances given for its confirmation who shall assure us that they were then in use and practice in the Synagogues when the Apostles gave Rules unto the Churches of the New Testament We have no Record of theirs not one word in all the world of what was their way and practice but what is at least 250 years younger and later than the writings of the New Testament and in the first of their writings as in them that follow we have innumerable things asserted to have been the Traditions and Practises of their Forefathers from the days of Moses which we know to be utterly false At that time when they undertook to compose a new Religion out of their pretended Traditions partly by the Revolt of many Apostates from Christianity unto them especially of the Eliâ—nites and Nazarenes and partly by their own Study and Observation coming to the knowledge of sundry things in the Gospel Churches their Order and Worship they took them in as their own undeniable Instances may be given hereof 2 Wherein there is a real coincidence between what was ordained by the Apostles and what was practised by the Jews it is in things which the light of Nature and the general Rules of the Scripture do direct unto And it is dishonourable unto the Apostles and the Spirit of Christ in them to think or say that in such things they took their Pattern from the Jews or made them their example Surely the Apostles took not the Pattern and Example for the Institution of Excommunication from the Druids among whom there was some things that did greatly resemble it so far as it hath its Foundation in the light of Nature CHAP. III. The Continuation of a Church-State and of Churches unto the end of the world what are the Causes of it and whereon it depends THAT there was a peculiar Church-State Instituted and appointed by Christ and his Apostles acting in his Name and Authority with the infallible guidance of his Spirit hath been declared But it may be yet farther enquired whether this Church-State be still continued by Divine Authority or whether it ceased not together with the Apostles by whom it was erected There was a Church-State under the Old Testament solemnly erected by God himself And although it was not to be absolutely perpetual or everlasting but was to continue onely unto the time of Reformation yet unto that time its continuation was secured in the Causes and means of it The Causes of the continuation of this Church-State unto its appointed period were two 1. The Promise of God unto Abraham that he would keep and preserve his Seed in Covenant with him until he should be the Heir of the World and the Father of many Nations in the coming of Christ whereunto this Church-State was subservient 2 The Law of God it self and the Institutions thereof which God appointed to be observed in all their Generations calling the Covenant the Statutes and Laws of it perpetual and everlasting that is never to cease to be abrogated or disannulled until by his own Soveraign Authority he would utterly change and take away that whole Church-State with all that belonged unto its Constitution and Preservation 2. The Means of its continuance were three 1 Carnal Generation and that on a twofold account For there were two Constituent Parts of that Church the Priests and the People the continuation of each of them depended on the priviledge of Carnal Generation For the Priests were to be all of the Family of Aaron and the People of the Seed of Abraham by the other Heads of Tribes which gave them both their foundation in and Right unto this Church-State And hereunto were annexed all the Laws concerning the Integrity Purity and Legitimacy of the Priests with the certainty of their Pedegree 2 Circumcision the want whereof was a bar against any advantage by the former Priviledge of Generation from those two Springs and hereby others also might be added unto the Church though never with a Capacity of the Priesthood 3 The Separation of the People from the rest of the World by innumerable Divine Ordinances making their Coalition with them impossible From these Causes and by these Means it was that the Church-State under the Old Testament was preserved unto its appointed season Neither
the outward Calamities that befel the Nation nor the sins of the generality of the People could destroy this Church-State but it continued its Right and exercise unto the Time of Reformation And if it be not so if there be not Causes and Means of the infallible continuance of the Gospel Church-State unto the Consummation of all things the time expresly allotted unto their continuance then was the work of Moses more honourable more powerful and effectual in the Constitution of the Church-State under the Old Testament than that of Christ in the Constitution of the New For that Work and those Institutions which had an efficacy in them for their own infallible continuation and of the Church thereby throughout all Generations must be more Noble and Honourable than those which cannot secure their own continuance nor the Being and State of the Church thereon depending Nothing can be more derogatory unto the Glory of the Wisdom and Power of Christ nor of his Truth and Faithfulness than such an Imagination We shall therefore enquire into the Causes and Means of the continuation of this Church-State and therein shew the certainty of it as also disprove that which by some is pretended as the onely means thereof when indeed it is the principal Argument against their perpetual continuation that can be made use of 1. The Essence and Nature of the Church instituted by the Authority of Jesus Christ was always the same from the Beginning that it continues still to be But as unto its outward Form and Order it had a double State and it was necessary that so it should have from the Nature of the thing it self For 1 The Church may be considered in its Relation unto those extraordinary Officers or Rulers whose Office and Power was antecedent unto the Church as that by vertue whereof it was to be called and erected 2 With respect unto ordinary Officers unto whose Office and Power the Church essentially considered was antecedent for their whole Work and Duty as such is conversant about the Church and the Object is antecedent unto all Acts about it The first State is ceased nor can it be continued For these Officers were constituted 1 By an immediate call from Christ as was Paul Gal. 1.1 2. which none now are nor have been since the decease of them who were so called at first 2 By extraordinary Gifts and Power which Christ doth not continue to communicate 3 By Divine Inspiration and infallible Guidance both in preaching the Word and appointing things necessary in the Churches which none now pretend unto 4 By Extensive Commission giving them Power towards all the World for their Conversion and over all Churches for their Edification Of these Officers in their distinction into Apostles and Evangelists with their Call Gifts Power and Work I have treated at large in my Discourse of Spiritual Gifts The State and Condition of the Church with respect unto them is utterly ceased and nothing can be more vain than to pretend any Succession unto them in the whole or any part of their Office unless men can justify their claim unto it by any or all of these things which concurred unto it in the Apostles which they cannot do But it doth not hence follow that the Church State instituted by Christ did fail thereon or doth now so fail because it is impossible that these Apostles should have any Successors in their Office or the Discharge of it For by the Authority of the Lord Christ the Church was to be continued under Oâ—dinary Officers without the Call Gifts or Power of the others that were to cease Under these the Church State was no less Divine than under the former For there were two things in it 1 That the Offices themselves were of the Appointment of Christ And if they were not so we confess the Divine Right of the Church-State would have ceased The Office of the Apostles and Evangelists was to cease as hath been declared and it did cease actually in that Christ after them did call no more unto that Office nor provided any Way or Means whereby any one should be made Partaker of it And for any to pretend a Succession in Office or any part of their Office without any of those things which did constitute it is extream Presumption It is therefore granted that if there were not other Offices appointed by the Authority of Christ it had not been in the Power of man to make or appoint any unto that Purpose and the Church-State itself must have ceased But this he hath done Eph. 4.11 12. 1 Cor. 12.28 2 That Persons were to be interested in these Offices according unto the Way and Means by him prescribed which were not such as depended on his own immediate extraordinary actings as it was with the former sort but such as consisted in the Churches acting according to his Law and in Obedience unto his commands This Church-State was appointed by the Authority of Christ. The Direction which he gave in his own Person for Addresses unto the Church in case of Scandal which is an obliging Institution for all Ages Mat. 18.17 18 19 20. proves that he had appointed a Church-State that should abide through them all And when there was a Church planted at Jerusalem there were not only Apostles in it according to its first State but Elders also which respected its second State that was approaching Act. 15.23 The Apostles being in Office before that Church State the Elders ordained in it So chap. 11.30 And the Apostles ordained Elders in every Church Act. 14.23 Tit. 1.5 1 Tim. 5.17 whom they affirmed to be made so by the Holy Ghost Act. 20.28 The Churches to whom the Apostle Paul wrote his Epistles were such all of them under the Rule of ordinary Officers Phil 1.1 Rules and Laws are given for their Ordination in all Ages Tit. 1. 1 Tim. 3. And the Lord Christ treateth from Heaven with his Churches in this State and Order Rev. 1st 2d 3d. He hath promised his presence with them unto the Consummation of all things Mat. 28.20 chap. 18.20 and assigned them their Duty until his Second Coming 1 Cor. 11.26 with other Evidences of the same Truth innumerable Our Enquiry therefore is Whereon the Continuation of this Church-State unto the end of the World doth depend what are the Causes What are the Means of it whence it becomes infallible and necessary I must only premise that our present Consideration is not so much de facto as unto what hath fallen out in the World unto our Knowledge and Observation but de jure or of a Right unto this Continuation And this is such as makes it not only lawful for such a Church-State to be but requires also from all the Disciples of Christ in a way of Duty that it be always in actual Existence Hereby there is a warrant given unto all believers at all times to gather themselves into such a Church-State and a Duty imposed on them so
duely discharged the Office of Episcopacy Other distinction and difference of ordinary Officers besides that of Bishops or Elders and Deacons the Church at Rome in those days knew not Such ought to be in every particular Church Of any one single person to preside over many Churches which is necessary unto the Constitution of a Church-state distinct from that which is Congregational Clemens knew nothing in his days but gives us such a description of the Church and its order as is inconsistent with such a pretence 6. I shall add no more from this excellent Epistle but only the account given in it of the first constitution of Officers in the Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Our Apostles therefore knowing by our Lord Jesus Christ that there would contention arise about the name of Episcopacy that is Episcopacy itself For this cause being indued with a perfect foresight of things they appointed those fore-mentioned their first Converts unto the Office of the Ministry for the future describing or giving order about the course of the Ministry that other approved men might succeed them in their Ministry These Elders therefore who were so appointed by them and afterwards by other famous men with the consent of the whole Church c. Sundry things we may observe in this Discourse 1. The Apostles foresaw there would be strife and contention about the name of Episcopacy that is the Office itself and those who should possess it This Episcopacy was that Office which the deposed Elders had well discharged in the Church of Corinth This they might foresee from the nature of the thing itself the inclination of men unto preheminence and the instance they had seen in their own days in such as Diotrephes with the former Divisions that had been in this very Church about their Teachers 1 Cor. 1.12 But moreover they were instructed in the knowledge of it by our Lord Jesus Christ through his Divine Spirit abiding with them and teaching them all things This therefore they sought by all means to prevent and that two ways 1. In that for the first time themselves appointed approved persons unto the Office of the Ministry not that they did it of themselves without the consent and choice of the Church whereunto any of them were appointed for this was directly contrary unto their practice Act. 1.15 22 23 26. Chap. 6.3 Chap. 14.23 But that the peace and edification of the Churches might be provided for they themselves spiritually tryed and approved of fit persons so to lead the Church in their choice Wherefore that which is added afterwards of the consent of the whole Church is to be referred unto those who were ordained by the Apostles themselves 2. They gave Rules and Orders namely in their Writings concerning the Offices and Officers that were to be in the Church with the way whereby they should be substituted into the place and room of them that were deceased as we know they have done in their Writings 3. After this was done by the Apostles other excellent persons as the Evangelists did the same These assisted the Churches in the Ordination and Choice of their Officers according unto the Rules prescribed by the Apostles And I know not but that the eminent Pastors of other Churches who usually gave their assistance in the setting apart and Ordination of others unto the Ministry be intended I have insisted long on this Testimony being led on by the Excellency of the writing itself Nothing remains written so near the times of the Apostles nor doth any that is extant which was written afterwards give such an Evidence of Apostolical Wisdom Gravity and Humility Neither is there in all Antiquitie after the writings of the Apostles such a Representation of the State Order and Rule of first Evangelical Churches And it is no small prejudice unto the pretensions of future Ages that this Apostolical person handling a most weighty Ecclesiastical cause makes not the least mention of such Offices Power and Proceedings as wherein some would have all Church-rule and order to consist The Epistle of Polycarpus and the Elders of the Church at Smyrna with him unto the Church of the Philippians is the next on Roll of Antiquity Nothing appears in the whole to intimate any other Church-state or Order than that described by Clemens The Epistle is directed unto the whole Church at Philippi not unto any particular Bishop 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This was the usual style of those days so was it used as we have seen by Clemens 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so it was used presently after the death of Polycarpus by the Church at Smyrna in the account they gave unto other Churches of his death and Martyrdome 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the same was the Inscription of the Epistle of the Churches at Vienna and Lyons in France unto the Churches in Asia and Phrygia as we shall see immediately And these are plain Testimonies of that Communion among the Churches in those days which was held in and by the Body of each Church or the Community of the Brotherhood which is a clear demonstration of their State and Order And those whom the Apostle writing to the Philippians calls their Bishops and Deacons Polycarpus calls their Presbyters and Deacons It behoves you saith he unto the Church there to abstain from these things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 being subject unto the Elders and Deacons Nor doth he mention any other Bishop among the Philippians And it may be observed that in all these Primitive Writings there is still a distinction made after the Example of the Scripture between the Church and the Guides Rulers Bishops or Elders of it And the name of the Church is constantly assigned unto the Body of the People as distinct from the Elders nowhere to the Bishops or Elders as distinct from the people though the Church in its compleat state comprehendeth both sorts Unto this time that is about the year 107 or 108 do belong the Epistles ascribed unto Ignatius if so be they were written by him For Polycarpus wrote his Epistle unto the Philippians after Ignatius was carried to Rome having wrote his Epistle before in Asia Many are the Contests of Learned Men about those Epistles which remain whether they are genuine or the same that were written by him for that he did write Epistles unto sundry Churches is acknowledged by all And whereas there have in this Age been two Copies found and published of these Epistles wherein very many things that were obnoxious unto just exception in those before published do not at all appear yet men are not agreed which of them ought to be preferred and many yet deny that any of them were those written by Ignatius I shall not interpose in this contest only I must say that if any of his genuine Writings do yet remain yet the Corruption and Interpolation of them for many Ages must needs much impair the Authority of what is represented in them as his nor am
Anâ—yra in Galatia about the year 314 Can. 13. and mention is again made of them in a Synod of Antioch An. 341. and somewhat before at the Council of Neocaesarea Can. 13. and frequently afterwards as any one may see in the late Collections of the antient Canons I verily believe nor can the contrary be proved but that these Chorepiscopi at first were as absolute and compleat in the Office of Episcopacy as any of the Bishops of the greater Cities having their name or denomination from the places of their Residence 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not for an intimation of any inferiority in them unto other City-Bishops But so it came to pass that through their poverty and want of Interest their Ministry being confined unto a small Country-Parish perhaps through a comparative meanness of their Gifts or Abilities the City-Bishop claimed a Superiority over them and made Canons about their Power the bounding and exercising of it in Dependance on themselves For a while they were esteemed a degree above meer Presbyters who accompanyed or attended the Bishop of the City-Church in his Administrations and a degree beneath the Bishop himself in a posture never designed by Christ nor his Apostles Wherefore in process of time the name and thing were utterly lost and all the Country-Churches were brought into an absolute subjection unto the City-Church something being allowed unto them for Worship nothing for Rule and Discipline whereby the first state of Churches in their Original Institution sacredly preserved in the first Centuries was utterly lost and demolished I shall add but one Argument more to evincâ— the true state and nature of Evangelical Churches herein namely that they were only particular Congregations and that is taken from the Duties and Powers ascribed in the Scripture unto Churches and the Members or entire Brotherhood of them It was observed before that the Epistles of the Apostles were written all of them unto the Body of the Churches in contradistinction unto their Elders Bishops or Pastors unless it were those that were written unto particular persons by name And as this is plain in all the Epistles of Paul wherein sometimes distinct mention is made of the Officers of the Church sometimes none at all so the Apostle John affirms that he wrote unto the Church but that Diotrephes who seems to have been their Bishop received him not at once rejecting the Authority of the Apostle and overthrowing the liberty of the Church which example was diligently followed in the succeeding Ages Joh. Epist. 3. ver 9. And the Apostle Peter writing unto the Churches on an especial occasion speaks distinctly of the Elders 1 Pet. 5.1 2. See also Heb. 13.24 the body of the Epistle being directed to the Body of Churches Wherefore all the Instructions Directions and Injunctions given in those Epistles as unto the exercise of power or the performance of duty they are given unto the Churches themselves Now these are such many of them as cannot be acted or performed in any Church by the Body of the People but that which is Congregational only It were too long here to insist on particulars it shall be done elsewhere and it will thence appear that this Argument alone is sufficient to bear the weight of this whole Cause The Reader may if he please consider what Representation hereof is made in these places compared together Matth. 18.15 16 17 18. Act. 1.12 23 Chap. 2.1 42 44 46. Chap. 5.11 12 13. Chap. 11.21 22 25 26 28 29 30. Chap. 12.5 12. Chap. 14.26 27. Chap. 15.1 2 3 4 6 12 13 22 23 27 28 30. Chap. 20.28 Rom. 15.5 6 14 25 26. Chap. 16.1 17 18. 1 Cor. 1.4 5. Chap. 5. throughout Chap. 12.4 7 8 9 11 15 18 28 29 30 31. Chap. 14. throughout Chap. 16.10 11. 2 Cor. 3.1 2 3. Chap. 7.14 15. Chap. 8.22 23 24. Chap. 2 6 7 8 9 10 11. Chap. 8.5 Ephes. 2.19 20 21 22. Chap. 5.11 12. Gal. 6.1 Philip. 2.25 26 27 28. Colos. 1.1 2. Chap. 2.3 Chap. 3.16 Chap. 4.9 12 16 17. 1 Thes. 5.11 12 13 14. 2 Thes. 3.6 7 14 15. Heb. 12.13 Chap. 10.24 25. Chap. 12.15 16. In these I say and other places innumerable there are those things affirmed of and ascribed unto the Apostolical Churches as unto their State Order Assemblies Duties Powers and Priviledges as evinces them to have been only particular Congregations CHAP. VI. Congregational Churches alone suited unto the ends of Christ in the Institution of his Church HAving given an account of that State and Order of the Gospel-Churches which are of Divine Institution it is necessary that we declare also their suitableness and sufficiency unto all the ends for which the Lord Christ appointed such Churches For if there be any true proper end of that nature which cannot be attained in or by any Church-state in this or that form it must be granted that no such form is of Divine Appointment Yea it is necessary not only that such a state as pretends unto a Divine Original be not only not contradictory unto or inconsistent with such an end but that it is effectually conducing thereunto and in its place necessary unto that purpose This therefore is that which we shall now inquire into namely whether this State and Form of Gospel-Churches in single Congregations be suited unto all those ends for which any such Churches were appointed which they must be on the account of the wisdom of Jesus Christ the Author and Founder of them or be utterly discarded from their pretence Nor is there any more forcible Argument against any pretended Church-state Rule or Order than that it is obstructive unto the Souls of men in attaining the proper ends of their whole Institution What these ends are was in general before declared I shall not here repeat them or go over them again but only single out the consideration of those which are usually pleaded as not attainable by this way of Churches in single Congregations only or that at least they are not suited unto their Attainment The first of these is Mutual Love among all Christians all the Disciples of Christ By the Disciples of Christ I intend them and them only who profess Faith in his Person and Doctrine and to hear him or to be guided by him alone in all things that appertain unto the Worship of God and their living unto him If there are any called Christians who in these things choose other guides call other Ministers hear them in their appointments we must sever them from our present consideration though there are important Duties required of us towards them also But what is alledged is necessary unto the constitution of a true Disciple of Christ. Unto all those his great command is Mutual Love among themselves This he calls in an especial manner his Commandment and a new Commandment as for other Reasons so because he had given the first absolute great Example of it in himself as also discovered
and Interest of the Papal See having no bottom for or supportment of their Church state and Order but Regal Favour and mutable Laws there have on such Causes and Reasons which I shall not mention ensued such Emulations of the Nobility and Gentry and such contempts of the Commonâ—People as leave it questionable Whether their Adherence unto the Government be not more burdensome and dangerous unto it than were their antient Contests and Oppositions CHAP. VII No other Church-state of Divine Institution IT may be it will be generally granted I am sure it cannot be modestly denied that particular Churches or Congregations are of a Divine original Institution as also that the Primitive Churches continued long in that Form or Order But it will be farther pleaded that granting or supposing this Divine Institution of particular Churches yet there may be Churches of another Form and Order also as Diocesan or National that we are obliged to submit unto For although the Apostles appointed that there should be Bishops or Elders ordained 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is in every City and Town where Christian Religion was received and Clemens affirmeth that they did themselves constitute Bishops and Deacons 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Regions or Villages and Cities yet there was another Form afterwards introduced Theodoret Bishop of Cyprus affirms that there were eight hundred Churches committed to his care Epist. 113. whereof many were in Towns and Cities having no Bishop of their own The whole Country of Scythia though there were in it many Cities Villages and Fortresses yet had but one Bishop whose Residence was at Tomis all other Churches being under him as Zozomen declares lib. 6. cap. 20. So it is at this day in divers Provinces belonging of old unto the Greek-Church as in Moldavia and Walachia where they have one whom they call the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Leader or Ruler that presides over all the Churches in the Nation And this Oâ—der of things that there should not be a Bishop in smaller Churches was first confirmed in the sixth Canon of the Council of Sardis in the Year 347. In Answer hereunto I shall do these two things First I shall shew that there is no Church Order State or Church-Form of Divine Institution that doth any way impede take away or overthrow the Liberty Power and Order of particular Congregations such as we have described Secondly I shall enquire into the causes of Churches of another State or Order as the Power of Magistrates and Rulers or their own choice and consent 1. There is no Form Order or Church state Divinely Instituted that should annul the Institution of particular Congregations or abridge them of their Liberties or deprive them of the Power committed unto them It is such a Church-state alone that we are now concerned to enquire after Whatever of that kinde either is or may be imagined that entrenches not on the State Liberty and Power of particular Congregations is not of our present Consideration Men may frame and order what they please and what advantage they make thereby shall not be envied unto them whilst they injure not any of the Institutions of Christ. But 1. These Churches as they are Churches are meet and able to attain the Ends of Churches To say they are Churches and yet have not in themselves Power to attain the ends of Churches is to speak contradictions or to grant and deny the same thing in the same breath For a Church is nothing but such a Society as hath Power Ability and Fitness to attain those ends for which Christ hath ordained Churches That which hath so is a Church and that which hath not so is none Men may if they please deny them to be Churches but then I know not where they will finde any that are so For instance suppose men should deny all the Parochial Churches in England to be such Churches as are intrusted with Church-Power and Administrations what Church in the first Instance could they require our Communion withal Will they say it is with the National or Diocesan Churches neither of these do or can as such administer Sacred Ordinances A man cannot Preach nor hear the Word but in a particular Assembly The Lord's Supper cannot be Administred but in a particular Congregation nor any presential local Communion of Believers among themselves like that described by the Apostle 1 Cor. chap. 12. and chap. 14. be otherwise attained No Communion is firstly and immediately required or can be required with Diocesan Churches as such Wherefore it is Parochial particular Churches that we are required to hold Communion with We say therefore these Parochial Churches are either really and truely so endued with Church-Power and Liberty or they are not If they are or are acknowledged so to be we have herein obtained what we plead for if they are not then are we required to joyn in Church Communion with those Societies that are not Churches and if we refrain so doing we are charged with Schism which is to turn Religion into Ridicule For 2. It is utterly forreign to the Scripture and a Monster unto Antiquity I mean that which is pure and regardable in this Cause that there should be Churches with a part half more or less of Church-Power and not the whole neither in Right nor Exercise or that there should be Church-Officers Elders Presbyters or Bishops that should have a partiary Power half or a third part or less of that which entirely belongeth unto the Office they hold Let one Testimony be given out of the Scripture or that Antiquity which we appeal unto unto this purpose and we shall cease our Plea But this is that which our Understandings are set on rack withal every day There is a National Church that is entrusted with Supreme Church-Power in the Nation whereof it is Here at the entrance we fall into a double disquietment For 1. we know not as yet what this National Church is here or in France nor of what Persons it doth consist 2. We know not whether this National Church have all the Power that Christ hath given unto the Church or that there is a Reserve for some Addition from beyond Sea if things were well accommodated Then that there are Diocesan Churches whose Original with the Causes and Occasions of their Bounds Limits Power and manner of Administrations I think God alone knows perfectly we do but guess for there is not one word mentioned of any of their concernments in the Scripture And we know that these Churches cannot be said to have all the Power that Christ hath entrusted his Church withal because there is another Church unto which they are in subjection and on which they do depend but it seems they have the next degree of Power unto that which is uppermost But whatever their Power be it is so administred by Chancellors Commissaries Officials in such ways and for such ends that I shall believe a dissent from them and it
lies therein To assert this expresly would be to exalt him above Jesus Christ at least to give him power equal unto his though really unto the Institution of the Gospel Church state and the Communication of Graces Offices and Gifts to make it useful unto its end no less than all power in Heaven and Earth be required Some plead that there is no certain Form of Church-Government appointed in the Scripture that there was none ordained by Christ nor exemplifyed by the Apostles and therefore it is in the power of the Magistrate to appoint any such form thereof as is suited unto the publick Interest It would seem to follow more evidently that no Form at all should by any be appointed for what shall he do that cometh after the King what shall any one ordain in the Church which the Lord Christ thought not meet to ordain And this is the proper inference from this consideration Such a Church-Government as men imagine Christ hath not appointed therefore neither may men do so But suppose that the Lord Christ hath appointed a Church-state or that there should be Churches of his Disciples on the Earth let them therein but yeild Obedience unto all that he hath commanded and in their so doing make use of the light of nature and rules of common prudence so as to do it unto their own edification which to deny to be their duty is to destroy their nature as created of God trusting in all things unto the conduct of the promised Divine Assistance of the Holy Spirit if any instance can be given of what is wanting unto the compleat state and Rule of the Church we shall willingly allow that it be added by the Civil Magistrate or whosoever men can agree upon as was before declared If it be said there is yet something wanting to accommodate these Churches and their Rule unto the state of the Publick Interest and Political Government under which they are placed whereon they may be framed into Churches Diocesan and Metropolitical with such a Rule as they are capable of I say 1. That in their Original Constitution they are more accommodated unto the Interest of all righteous Secular Government than any Arbitrary moulding them unto a pretended meetness to comply therewithal can attain unto This we have proved before and shall farther enlarge upon it if it be required And we find it by experience that those Additions Changes and Alterations in the State Order and Rule of the Churches pretended for the end mentioned have proved the cause of endless Contentions which have no good aspect on the publick peace and will assuredly continue for ever so to be 2. It is granted that the Magistrate may dispose of many outward concerns of these Churches may impart of his favour to them or any of them as he sees cause may take care that nothing falls out among them that may occasion any publick disturbance in and by itself may prohibit the publick exercise of Worship Idolatrous or Superstitious may remove and take away all Instruments and Monuments of Idolatry may coerce restrain and punish as there is occasion persons who under pretence of Religion do advance Principles of Sedition or promote any Forreign Interest opposite and destructive to his Government the welfare of the Nation and the Truth of Religion with sundry things of the like nature And herein lies an ample field wherein the Magistrate may exercise his power and discharge his duty It cannot well be denyed but that the present pretences and pleas of some to reduce all things in the practice of Religion into the power and disposal of the Civil Magistrate are full of offence and scandal It seems to be only a design and contrivance to secure Mens secular Interests under every way of the profession of Christian Religion true or false which may have the advantage of the Magistrates Approbation By this device Conscience is set at liberty from concerning itself in an humble diligent enquiry into the mind of God as unto what is its duty in his Worship And when it is so with the Conscience of any it will not be much concerned in what it doth attend unto or observe What is in Divine things done or practised solely on the Authority of the Magistrate is immediately and directly Obedience unto him and not unto God Whatever therefore the Supreme Power in any place may do or will be pleased to do for the accommodation of the outward state of the Church and the exercise of its Rule unto the Political Government of a People or Nation yet these two things are certain 1. That he can form erect or institute no new Church-state which is not ordained and appointed by Christ and his Apostles by vertue of his Authority and what he doth of that nature appoint is called a Church only equivocally or by reason of some resemblance unto that which is properly so called 2. To dissent from what is so appointed by the Supreme Power in and about the State Form Rule and Worship of Churches whatever other evil it may be charged with or supposed liable unto can have nothing in it of that which the Scripture condemns under the name of Schism which hath respect only unto what is stated by Christ himself That which in this place we should next enquire into is what these particular Churches themselves may do by their own voluntary consent and act in a way of Association or otherwise for the accumulation and exercise of a power not formally inherent in them as particular Churches but I shall refer it unto the Head of the Communion of Churches which must be afterwards spoken unto CHAP. VIII The Duty of Believers to joyn themselves in Church-Order UNto some one or other of those particular Congregations which we have described continuing to be the ground and pillar of Truth it is the duty of every Believer of every Disciple of Christ to joyn himself for the due and orderly observation and performance of the commands of Christ unto the glory of God and their own edification Matth. 28.18 19 20. This in general is granted by all sorts and Parties of men the grant of it is the ground whereon they stand in the management of their mutual fewds in Religion pleading that men ought to be of or joyn themselves unto this or that Church still supposing that it is their Duty to be of one or another Yea it is granted also that Persons ought to chuse what Churches they will joyn themselves unto wherein they may have the best advantage unto their Edification and Salvation They are to chuse to joyn themselves unto that Church which is in all things most according to the mind of God This it is supposed is the Liberty and Duty of every Man for if it be not so it is the foolishest thing in the world for any to attempt to get others from one Church unto another which is almost the whole business of Religion that some think
Life it self An Opinion Ignominious unto Christian Religion however vapoured withal by young Men whose Wit flies above all serious Consideration of things and their Circumstances and countenanced by others from an influence of Interest who otherwise would not be imposed on by such an Anti-Evangelical Presumption I shall therefore at the utmost distance from Interest or Passion briefly consider the Case proposed and give an account of my Thoughts concerning it 1. One or two things are usually premised unto the consideration of this case as namely 1. That those who refrain from that Communion with the Church of England which we insist upon do yet agree therewith in all important Doctrines of Faith which is the Foundation the Life and Soul of Church Union and Communion This I freely grant but with this Limitation that this Agreement respects the Doctrine as declared at the first Reformation and explained in the Age next ensuing thereon If there be a change made in or of these Doctrines or any of them by any in or of the Church of England we profess our Disagreement from them and do declare that thereby the Foundation of our Communion with them is weakened and the principal bond of it loosened 2. That not only as Christians but as Reformed Protestants we do agree in the Renunciation of the Doctrines and Worship of the Church of Rome which are opposed by the common consent of all those who are usually so called Yet this must be added thereunto that if any in or of the Church of England should make an Accession unto any Parts of the Doctrine and Worship of the Roman Church not avowed or warranted by the consent of the Church in its first Reformation we are not we cannot be obliged unto Communion with them therein and by their so doing the Original Bond of our Communion is weakened if not dissolved 2. These things being premised we shall enquire in the first place what is the Rule of that Communion with the Church of England in its Parochial Assemblies which is required of us If this be pleaded to be a Rule of divine Prescription we acknowledge that great diligence and humility are required unto the consideration of it that we be not mistaken And if it prove to be according to the Mind of Christ that is of his Institution if we fail of a compliance with it we are guilty of Schisme But if the Rule prescribing limiting and exacting this Communion be not so much as pleaded to be of divine Institution whatever fault there may be in our dissent from it Schisme it is not For Ecclesiastical Schisme neither hath nor can have respect unto any thing but divine Institutions For if it hath it is in the Power of any sort of men to make Schismaticks of whom they please as practically and in pretence it is come to pass at this day in the World Now the Rule of the Communion required is the Law of the Land the Book of Canons with the Rubrick of the Common Prayer If according to the Prescriptions Directions and Commands given in them we do joyn our selves in Communion with Parochial Assemblies then are we judged conformable to the Church of England and not else By and according unto these are all enquiries made concerning Communion with the Church and if they are observed the return is Omnia bene Now this Rule hath no divine Warrant for its Institution no Example in the Primitive Churches especially considering what are the things which it obliges us unto nor can be made consistent with the Liberty wherewith Christ hath made his Disciples free A Dissent from this Rule is as far from Schisme as any man need desire it For nothing is so but what respects some Command or Institution of Christ which immediately affects the Conscience It is true the Lord Christ hath Commanded that Love Union Peace and Order whereof Schisme is a disturbance and whereunto it is opposite But they are that Love Union and Order which he hath appointed To suppose that he hath left it unto Men to invent and appoint a new kind of Union and Order which is done in the Rule we treat of which he never required and then to oblige his Disciples unto the Observation of it be it what it will so as that their dissent from it should be Criminal and that for this Reason that it is so appointed of men is no small mistake And if all that Love Union Peace and Order which the Lord Jesus hath enjoyned his Disciples may be punctually observed without any respect unto this Rule as a Rule of Church Communion to dissent from it whatever fault of another kind it may be is no more Schisme than it is Adultery And if on some mens Arbitrary Constitution of this Rule and the Dissent of others from it such Differences and Divisions ensue as seem to have the general Nature of Schisme the Evil of them belongs unto those alone by whom the Rule is framed If indeed some should frame such a Rule of Church Communion because they suppose they see Cause for it and would then leave it unto others to observe as they see Cause if it be not of Use it would not be liable unto much abuse But whereas our Lord Jesus Christ hath given one and the same Rule equally unto all his Disciples in these things namely that they should observe and do all that he hath commanded them for some of them on any pretence or Plea whatever as of their being the Church or the like arbitrarily to frame a Rule of their own as an Addition unto his obliging all others unto a strict Observance of it because they have so framed it is that which neither the Scripture nor Primitive Antiquity know any thing of I will not enquire what is that Power and Authority whereby this Rule is constituted and confirmed nor in whom it doth reside The Name of the Church is usually pretended and pleaded But before any can be concerned herein all that hath been pleaded for the true state and nature of Evangelical Churches must be overthrown which will not be done speedily Railings Revilings and Reproaches will not do it But until this is done it will be believed that every particular Congregation is indispensibly obliged in itself to observe and do all the Commands of Christ and is left at Liberty so to regulate the outward circumstances of its Worship and Order as is best for its own Edification whereof it self is the most competent Judge But as for a Church of another sort invested with Authority to make a Rule not only as unto the outward Circumstances of those Actions wherein Church Order and Worship do consist but as unto sundry Religious Rites and Observances which thereby are added unto it and impose the Observance of it on a great Multitude of other Congregations without their consent whether they judge the things enjoyned to be for their Edification or otherwise it is apparently not from
Heaven but of Men. Wherefore leave Christians and Churches at that Liberty which Christ hath purchased for them wherewith he hath made them free and then let those who first break Union and Order bear the Charge of Schisme which they cannot avoid 3. The Church Communion required by vertue of this Rule is constant and compleat exclusive unto any other Church Order or means of publick Edification It doth not command or appoint that men should communicate in Parochial Assemblies when there is Occasion when it is for their Edification when scandal would arise if they should refuse it but absolutely and compleatly And whereas there are many things relating unto Church Order and Divine Worship enjoyned in that Rule there is no Distinction made between them that some things are always necessary that is in the seasons of them and some things wherein men may forbear a Compliance but they are all equally required in their places and seasons though perhaps on different Penalties And whoever fails in the Observation of any Ceremony time or place appointed therein is in the Power of them who are entrusted with the Administration of Church Power or Jurisdiction for the Discipline of the Church it cannot be called Suppose a Man would comply with all other things only he esteems the use of one Rite or Ceremony as the Cross in Baptisme or the like to be unlawful if he forbear the use of it or to tender his Child unto Baptisme where it is used he is to be cut off as a Schismatick from the Communion of the Church no less then if he had absolutely refused a Compliance with the whole Rule And therefore whatever Condescension and Forbearance in some things is pretended He that doth not in all things observe the whole Rule is in Misericordia Concellarii which oft proves an uneasie Posture If any men think that the Lord Christ hath given them such a Power and Authority over the Souls and Consciences of his Disciples as that they can bind them unto the Religious Observance of every Rite and Ceremony that they are pleased to appoint on the Penalty of Excision from all Church Communion and the Guilt of Schisme I shall only say that I am not of their Mind nor ever shall be so 4. This Communion contains a virtual Approbation of all that is contained in the Rule of it as Good for the Edification of the Church It is certain that nothing is to be appointed in the Church but what is so even Order itself which these things it is said are framed for is Good only with respect thereunto Now it is to be judged that whatever a Man practiseth in Religion that he approveth of for if he do not he is a vile Hypocrite Nor is he worthy the Name of a Christian who will practise any thing in Religion but what he approveth The Disputes that have been amongst us about doing things with a doubting Conscience upon the Command of Superiours and consenting unto the Use of things which we approve not of in themselves tend all to Atheisme and the eternal Dishonour of Christian Religon begetting a frame of Mind which an honest Heathen would scorn Wherefore unless men be allowed to declare what it is they approve and what they do not their Practise is their Profession of what they approve which is the whole Rule of Communion prescribed unto them 5. These things being premised I shall propose some of those Reasons on the account whereof Many cannot Conform unto the Church of England by joyning in constant compleat Communion with Parochial Assemblies so as by their Practise to approve the Rule of that Communion obliging themselves to use no other publick means for their own Edification 1. The Church of England in its Parochial Assemblies stands in need of Reformation For it is apparent that either they fail in their Original Institution or else have degenerated from it What hath already been discoursed concerning the Original Institution of Churches with mens voluntary Coalescency into such sacred Societies with what shall be afterwards treated concerning their essential Parts in matter and form will sufficiently evidence their present Deviation from the Rule of their first Institution Neither so farre as I know is it pleaded that they are distinct Churches of Divine Institution but secular Appointments as for other ends so for an accommodation of men in the Performance of some Parts of Divine Worship And if they are found no more they can have no concernment into the Enquiry about Schisme For with-holding Church Communion from such Societies as are not Churches is a new kind of Schisme unknown to all Antiquity And for that which takes it self to be a Church by a divine warranty suppose it be so to command constant compleat Communion exclusive unto all other Church Communion with that or them which are no Churches determining a refusal thereof to be Schisme is to undertake a Cause which needs not only great Parts but great Power also to defend it But let these Parochial Assemblies be esteemed Churches without a supposition whereof I know not what Ecclesiastical concernment we can have in them three things will be said thereon 1. That the Church of England as in other things so in these Parochial Assemblies stands in need of Reformation 2. That they neither do nor will nor can Reform themselves 3. On this supposition it is lawful for any of the Disciples of Christ to yeild Obedience unto him by joyning in such Societies for their Edification as he hath appointed which is the whole of the Cause in hand Nor doth any necessity from hence ensue of a departure from Communion with the Church of England in Faith and Love or the Profession of the same Faith and the due Exercise of all the Acts and Duties of Christian Love Unto the Proof of the first Assertion some things are to be premised As 1. Churches instituted planted ruled according to the Mind of Christ in all things may degenerate into a corrupt state such as shall stand in need of Reformation in a neglect whereof they must perish as unto their Church state and Priviledges This needs no confirmation for besides that it is possible from all the causes of such an Apostacy and defection that so it should be and it is frequently foretold in the Scripture that so it would be the Event in and among all Churches that had originally a divine Institution doth make uncontroulably evident The seven Churches of Asia most of them within few years of their first Plantation were so degenerated that our Lord Jesus Christ threatned them with Casting off unless they reformed themselves What a woful Apostasie all other Churches both of the East and West were involved in is known unto and confessed by all Protestants But yet the case of none of them was deplorable or desperate until through Pride and carnal Interest they fell some of them into a Perswasion that they needed no Reformation nor could be reformed
Church namely that bad men were mixed with the Good for which cause they rejected those Churches wherein that was allowed as no true Churches of Christ. For no such thing is included in what we assert nor doth follow thereon We do own that wicked Hypocrites may be joyned in true Churches and be made Partakers of all the Priviledges of them Neither is this a Cause of withdrawing Communion from any Church much less of condemning it as no true Church of Christ. But this we say that if such Hypocrites discover themselves in open scandalous sins which upon Examination will prove to be of a larger extent then some suppose with respect unto sins of Omission as well as of Commission if they are not dealt withal according as the Discipline of Christ doth require in such cases the Church wherein they are allowed especially if the Number of such Persons be many or the most the Generality of the People and their sins notorious doth stand in need of Reformation as the Church of England doth acknowledge in the Commination against Sinners The Substance of what is proposed under this consideration may be expressed in the ensuing Observations 1. The Generality of the Inhabitants of this Nation are joyned and do belong unto the Church of England in its Parochial Assemblies 2. That many walk and live without any visible compliance unto the Rule of Christ in Gospel Obedience Yea 3. Great notorious provoking sins do abound among them for which it ought to be feared continually that the Judgements of God will speedily follow as is acknowledged in the Commination 4. That hereon they all stand in need of Reformation without which the principal Ends of Church Communion cannot be obtained among them 5. That this Reformation is the Duty of these Churches themselves which if it be neglected they live in a contempt of the Commands of Christ. For 6. Unto them in the Preaching of the Word and exercise of Discipline are the means of this Reformation committed for we treat not at present of the Power or Duty of the Supream Magistrate in these things 7. That this state of Churches cannot hinder nor ought so to do if continued in the true Disciples of Christ from reforming themselves by endeavouring the due Observance of all his Commands 2. In this state the Church of England doth not and it is to be feared will not nor can reform itself But although the weight of the whole Argument in hand depends very much on this Assertion yet I shall not insist on its particular confirmation for sundry Reasons not now to be mentioned It is enough that no such work hath been as yet attempted nor is at this day publickly proposed notwithstanding all the Mercies that some have received the losses which the Church for want of it hath sustained the Judgments for Sins that are feared which ought to be Motives thereunto Yea the Generality of Ecclesiastical Persons seem to judge that all things among them are as they ought to be that there is no Crime or Disorder but only in complaining of their Good Estate and calling upon them for Reformation 3. This being the state of the Parochial Churches in England the Enquiry is Whether every Beleiver in England be indispensibly obliged by Vertue of any Law Rule or Direction of a divine Original to continue in constant compleat Communion with them so as not to make use of any other ways and means of Christ Appointment for their own Edification on the Penalty of the Guilt of Schisme Now although we do not as we shall see immediately lay the weight of refraining from their Communion on this consideration yet is there enough in it to warrant any Man in his so doing For a Man in his conforming thereunto makes it a Part of his Religious Profession not only that the Church wherein he is joyned is a true Church but that there is in its state and actings a due Representation of the Mind of Christ as unto what he requireth of his Churches and what he would have them to be The Lord Christ is the Apostle and High Priest of our Profession and in all things that belong thereunto we declare that we do it in compliance with his Will and we do so or we are Hypocrites This no man can do in such a Church state who is convinced of its defects without reflecting the greatest dishonour on Christ and the Gospel More weight will be added unto this Consideration when we shall treat of the Matter of Gospel Churches or of what sort of Persons they ought to consist In the mean time those who pretend a Reverence unto Antiquity in those things wherein they suppose Countenance to be given unto their Interest may do well sometimes to consider what was the Discipline of the Primitive Churches and what were the Manners the Lives the Heavenly Conversations of their Members Because in the 3 d. and 4 th Centuries there is mention made of Bishops distinct from Presbyters with some Ecclesiastical practices and Ceremonies in Worship not mentioned in the Scripture nor known unto the Apostolical Churches shall we judge our selves obliged to conform thereunto as our Rule and Pattern so as that in the Judgement of some they are to be esteemed no Churches who conform not their outward state and practice unto the same Rule and shall we judge ourselves at liberty to reject all that they did in the Exercise of Discipline and in the Preservation of Purity of Life and Holiness in the Churches and that according to the Command of Christ and Rule of the Scripture Who knows not upon what diligent trial and experience first obtained of their Knowledge Faith and Godliness they admitted Members into their Churches Yea such was their Care and Severity herein that they would not admit a Roman Emperour unto Communion with them unless he first confessed his Sins and joyned amongst other Penitents before his Admission Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 33. Who knows not with what diligence they watched over the Walkings and Conversations of all that were admitted among them and with what Severity they animadverted on all that fell into Scandalous Sins What was hereon their Conversation in all Holiness Righteousness Temperance Usefulness unto the World in Works of Charity and Benevolence as all other Christian vertues we have sufficient Testimony The Heathen who were morally Sober and Vertuous desired no more than that they might find out among them an Indulgence unto any sort of Sin Crime or Wickedness which because they could not charge any of them withal they invented those brutish and foolish lies about their Nightly Meetings But when a sober Enquiry was made concerning them their Enemies were forced to confess that they were guilty of no open Sin no Adulteries no Swearings or Perjuries as is evident in the Epistles of Pliny and Trajan the Emperour In particular they utterly rejected from their Communion all that resorted unto publick Stage Plays or other Spectacles a solemn
Renunciation whereof was required of them who were admitted unto Baptisme when they were adult See Clem. Pedag. lib. 3. cap. 12. If the Reader would have an account of the Lives and Manners of the first Churches in their Members he may find it in Clem. Epist. ad Cor. pag. 2 3 4. Justin Mart. Apol. 2. Tertullian in his Apol. and lib. 2. Ad Vxor de cultu faeminarum Cyprian Epist. 2. 12. Euseb. Hist. lib. 9. cap. 8. Athanas Epist. ad Solit. Epiphan lib. 3. T. 2 Sect. 24. and the multiplyed complaints of Chrysostome concerning the beginning of Degeneracy in this Matter with others If the Example of the Primitive Churches had been esteemed of any value or Authority in these things much of our present Differences had been prevented 2dly The Constitution of these Parochial Assemblies is not from Heaven but of Men. There is almost nothing which is required unto the Constitution of Evangelical Churches found in them Nor are they looked on by any as compleat Churches but only as conveniencies for the Observance of some Parts of the Worship of God What some have in their Wisdom found out for conveniency others are ingaged unto a compliance therewithal by necessity For being born within the Precincts of the Parish makes them to belong unto the Assemblies of it whether they will or no. To refrain from the Communion of such Churches whose bond of Relation consists only in Cohabitation within the Precincts of a political Constitution is a new kind of Schisme which may be cured by a removal out of those Precincts If it be said that these Parochial Assemblies have their Foundation in the Light of Nature and are directed unto in the Institution of particular Churches in the Scripture that they are not Mens Inventions for convenience but have somewhat Divine in them I say let them be left unto the Warranty which they have from these Causes and Principles let nothing be mixed in their Constitution which is contrary unto them nor let them be abridged of what they direct unto and there will be no more contending about them as unto their Constitution For instance whatever there is of Warranty in the Light of Nature or direction in Evangelical Institutions for such Assemblies they absolutely suppose these three things 1. That a Conjunction in them is a Voluntary Act of free choice in them that so joyn together in them Other kind of Assemblies for the Worship of God neither the one nor the other do give the least countenance unto 2. That they have in themselves sufficient Right Power and Authority unto the attaining all the Ends of such Assemblies in Holy Worship and Rule Other kind of Churches they know nothing of 3. That they are enabled to preserve their own Purity and continue their own Being But all these things are denied unto our Parochial Assemblies by Law and therefore they can claim no Warranty from either of those Principles Wherefore there can be no Obligation upon any Believer to joyn themselves with such Churches in constant Communion as are judged none by them that appoint them or partially and improperly only so or are of such a Constitution as hath in its essentially constituent Parts no Warranty either from the Light of Nature or Scripture direction so as that his dissent from them should be esteemed Schisme How far Communion with them for some Duties of Worship which is indeed all that they can pretend unto may be admitted we do not now enquire 3. There is not in them and therefore not in the Church of England as unto its present Profession a fixed Standard of Truth or Rule of Faith to be professed which every Believer may own and have his Part or Interest therein This I grant is not from the Original Constitution of the Church nor from what is established by any Law therein but from Persons who at present have the Declaration of its Profession committed unto them But from what cause soever it be it is sufficient to warrant any Man who takes care of his own Edification and Salvation to use his own liberty in the choice of the most effectual Means unto those Ends. Wherefore some things may be added in the farther Explanation of this Consideration As 1. It is the Duty of every Church to be the Ground and Pillar of Truth to hold fast the form of wholesome Words or to keep the Truth pure and uncorrupted from all mixture of false Doctrines Errors Heresies or the speaking of perverse things in it unto the hurt of the Disciples of Christ. 1 Tim. 3.15 2 Tim. 2.3 Acts 20.28 29 30. c. When any Church ceaseth so to be the Obligation unto Communion with it is dissolved 2. This is the principal End of the Ministry of the Church in particular Ephes. 4.11 13 1 Tim. 6.20 And where those who possess and Exercise it do eminently fail herein it is the Duty of others to withdraw from them For 3. Every private mans Confession is included in the publick Profession of the Church or Assembly whereunto he belongs And 4 Oneness or Agreement in the Truth whereby we come to have one Lord one Faith one Baptisme is the Foundation of all Church Communion which if it be taken away the whole Fabrick of it falls to the Ground If the Trumpet in any Church as unto these things gives an uncertain sound no man knows how to prepare himself for the Battle or to fight the good fight of Faith It will be said that this cannot be justly charged on the Church of England yea not without open Wrong and Injustice For she hath a fixed invariable Standard of Truth in the 39 Articles which contain its publick Profession of Faith and the Rule of its Communion Wherefore I say that it is not the primitive Constitution of the Church nor its legal Establishment that are reflected on but only the present practise of so many as makes it necessary for men to take the Care of their own Edification on themselves But here also some things are to be observed 1. These Articles at present are exceeding defective in their being a fixed Standard of the Profession of Truth with respect unto those Errors and Heresies which have invaded and pestered the Churches since their framing and establishment We know it was the constant invariable Custom of the Primitive Churches upon the Emergency of any new Errors or Heresies to add unto the Rule and Symbol of their Confession a Testimony against them so to preserve themselves from all Communion in them or participation of them And an usage it was both necessary and laudable as countenanced by Scripture Example however afterwards it was abused For no Writing such as all Church Confessions are can obviate unforeseen Heresies or Errors not broached at the time of its Writing but only that which is of Divine Institution wherein infinite Wisdom hath stored up Provision of Truth for the Destruction of all Errors that the Subtilty
the Discipline of Evangelical Churches 2. As unto the Manner of its Administration as it is that which the Lord Christ hath appointed to express his Love Care and Tenderness towards the Church Hence the Acts of it which are corrective are called lamenting or bewailing of them towards whom they are exercised 2 Cor. 12.20 Whatever therefore is done in it that is not expressive of the Love Care Patitience and Holiness of Christ is dishonourable unto him 3. The Object of it as it is Susceptive of Members is professed Believers and as it is corrective it is those who stubbornly deviate from the Rule of Christ or live in disobedience to his Commands Wherefore the general End of its Institution is to be a Representation of the Authority Wisdom Love Care and Patience of Christ towards his Church with a Testimony unto the certainty Truth and Holiness of his future Judgment The especial nature of it shall be afterwards considered Unto this Discipline either as unto its Right or Exercise there is no Pretence in Parochial Assemblies yea it is expresly forbidden unto them Whereas therefore it is a Matter of so great importance in itself so subservient unto the Glory of Christ so useful and necessary unto the Edification of his Disciples so weighty a Part of our Professed Subjection unto him without which no Church can be continued in Gospel Purity Order and Peace the total want or neglect of it is a sufficient cause for any man who takes care of his own Salvation or is concerned in the Glory and Honour of Christ to refrain the Communion of those Churches wherein it is so wanting or neglected or at least not to confine himself thereunto It will be said that this defect is supplyed in that the Administration of Church Discipline is committed unto others namely the Bishops and their Officers that are more meet and able for it than the Ministers and People of Parochial Assemblies What therefore is wanting in them is supplied fully another way so that no Pretence can be taken from hence for refraining Communion in them But it will be said 1. That this Discipline is not to be placed where and in what hands men please but to be left where Christ hath disposed it 2. That one Reason of the unmeetness of Parochial Churches for the Exercise of this Discipline is because they have been unjustly deprived of it for so many Ages 3. It is to be enquired whether the pretended Discipline doth in any thing answer that which Christ hath plainly and expresly ordained For it a Discipline should be erected whose Right of Exercise is derived from secular Power whose Administration is committed unto Persons who pretend not in the least unto any Office of Divine Institution as Chancellours Commissaries Officials c. every way unknown unto Antiquity forraign unto the Churches over which they Rule exercising their pretended Power of Discipline in a way of Civil Jurisdiction without the least regard unto the Rules or Ends of Evangelical Discipline mannaging its Administration in brawlings contentions revilings Fees pecuniary Mulcts c. in open defiance of the Spirit Example Rule and Commands of our Lord Jesus Christ it would be so far from supplying this Defect that it would exceedingly aggravate the Evil of it God forbid that any Christian should look on such a Power of Discipline and such an Administration of it to be that which is appointed by Jesus Christ or any way participant of the Nature of it Of what Expediency it may be unto other ends I know not but unto Ecclesiastical Discipline it hath no Alliance and therefore in its Exercise so far as it is Corrective it is usually applyed unto the best and most sober Christians Wherefore to deal plainly in this case Whereas there is neither the Power nor Exercise of Discipline in Parochial Assemblies or their Ministry not so much by their own Neglect as because their Right thereunto is denyed and its exercise wholly forbidden by them in whose Power they are and whereas in the supply that is made of this defect a secular Power is erected coercive by pecuniary and corporal Penalties administred by Persons no way relating unto the Churches over which they exercise this Power by Rules of Humane Laws and Constitutions in litigious and oppressive Courts in the room of that Institution of Christ whose Power and exercise is Spiritual by spiritual Means according to the Scripture Rules It is lawful for any man who takes care of his own Salvation and of the means of it to withdraw from the Communion of such Churches so far as it hinders or forbids him the use of the means appointed by Christ for his Edification Men may talk what they please of Schime but he that forsakes the conduct of his own Soul in things of so plain an Evidence must answer for it at his own Peril 4. This Defect in Parochial Churches that they are intrusted by Law with no Part of the Rule of themselves but are wholly governed and disposed of by others at their Pleasure in the ways before mentioned which shakes their very Being as Churches though there be in them Assemblies for Divine Worship founded in Common Right and the Light of Nature wherein Men may be accepted with God is accompanied with such other wants and defects also as will weaken any Obligation unto compleat and constant Communion with them I shall give one only Instance hereof The Peoples free choice of all their Officers Bishops Elders Pastors c. is in our Judgement of Divine Institution by vertue of Apostolical Example and Directions It is also so suitable unto the Light of Nature namely that in a Society absolutely founded in the voluntary consent of them who enter into it and doth actually exist thereby without any Necessity imposed on them from Prescription former Usage or the state of being born in and under such Rules and Laws as it is with men in their Political Societies the People should have the Election of them who are to Rule among them and over them there being no Provision of a Right unto a successive Imposition of any such Rulers on them without their own consent that nothing can rationally be pleaded against it And therefore whereas in all ordinarily settled Governments in the World setting aside the confusion of their Originals by War and Conquests the Succession of Rulers is either by natural Generation the Rule being confined unto such a Line or by a Popular Election or by a Temperature of both there hath been a new way invented for the Communication of Power and Rule in Churches never exemplified in any Political Society namely that it shall neither be Successive as it was under the Old Testament nor Elective nor by any Temperature of these two ways in one but by a strange kind of flux of it through the hands of men who pretend to have so received it themselves from others But whether hereon the People of the Church
in his laborious endeavour to stigmatize all Protestant Dissenters from the Church of England with the odious name of Schismaticks I have therefore altered nothing of what I had projected either as to Matter or Method in this first Part of the Discourse designed on the whole Subject of Church Affairs For as I have not found either Cause or Reason from any thing in the Doctors Book to make the least change in what I had writtâ—n so my principal Design being the Instruction and confirmation of them who have no other Interest in these things but only to know and perform their own Duty I was not willing to give them the trouble of perpetual diversions from the Matter in hand which all Controversial Writings are Subject unto Wherefore having premised some general Considerations of things insisted on by the Dr. of no great Influence into the Cause in hand and vindicated one Principle a supposition whereof we rely upon namely the Declension of the Churches in the Ages after the Apostles especially after the End of the second Century from the Primitive Institution of their State Rule and Order in the Preface I shall now proceed to consider and examine distinctly what is opposed unto the Defence of our Innocency as unto the Guilt of Schisme But some things must be premised hereunto As 1. I shall not depart from the state of the Question as laid down by our selves on our part as unto our Judgement of Parochial Churches and our Refraining from Communion with them Great Pains is taken to prove the several sorts of Dissenters to be departed farther from the Church of England then they will themselves allow and on such Principles as are disavowed by them But no Disputations can force our Assent unto what we know to be contrary unto our Principles and Perswasions 2. We do allow those Parochial Assemblies which have a settled unblamable Ministry among them to be true Churches so far as they can pretend themselves so to be Churches whose Original is from occasional Cohabitation within Precincts limited by the Law of the Land Churches without Church-Power to choose or ordain their Officers to provide for their own Continuation to admit or exclude Members or to reform at any time what is amiss among them Churches which are in all things under the Rule of those who are set over them by vertue of Civil Constitutions forraign unto them not submitted willingly unto by them and such for the most part as whose Offices and Power have not the least countenance given unto them from the Scripture or the Practice of the Primitive Churches Such as are Chancellours Commissaries Officials and the like Churches in which for the most part through a total Neglect in Evangelical Discipline there is a great Degeneracy from the exercise of Brotherly Love and the Holiness of Christian Profession whatever can be ascribed unto such Churches we willingly allow unto them 3. We do and shall abide by this Principle that communion in Faith and Love with the Administration of the same Sacraments is sufficient to preserve all Christians from the Guilt of Schisme although they cannot communicate together in some Rites and Rules of Worship and Order As we will not admit of any presumed Notions of Schisme and inferences from them nor allow that any thing belongs thereunto which is not contrary to Gospel Love Rules and Precepts in the Observance of Christs Institutions so we affirm and shall maintain that men abiding in the Principles of Communion mentioned walking peaceably among themselves refraining Communion with others peaceably wherein they dissent from them ready to joyn with other Churches in the same Confession of Faith and in the Defence of it and to concur with them in promoting all the real ends of Christian Religion not judging the Church state of others so as to renounce all Communion with them as condemning them to be no Churches continuing in the occasional exercise of all Duties of Love towards them and their Members are unduely charged with with the Guilt of Schisme to the disadvantage of the Common Interest of the Protestant Religion amongst us 4. Whereas there are two parts of the Charge against us the one for refraining from total communion with Parochial Assemblies which what it is and wherein it doth consist hath been before declared the other for gathering ourselves into another Church Order in particular Congregations as the Reasons and Grounds of the things themselves are distinct so must they have a distinct consideration and be examined distinctly and apart These things being premised I shall proceed to examine what the Reverend Doctor hath further offered against our former Vindication of the Non-conformists from the charge of Schisme and I desire the Reader to take notice that we delight not in these contentions that we desire nothing but mutual Love and Forbearance but we are compelled by all Rules of Scripture and natural Equity to abide in this Defence of ourselves For whereas we are charged with a Crime and that aggravated as one of the most heynous that men can incur the Guilt of in this World and to justifie men in severities against us being not in the least convinced in our Consciences of any Accessions thereunto or of any Guilt on the account of it I suppose the Doctor himself will not think it reasonable that we should altogether neglect the Protection of our own Innocency In the Method whereinto he hath cast his Discourse he begins with the reinforcement of his Charge against our refraining from total Communion with Parochial Assemblies If the Reader will be pleased to take a reveiw of what is said in the preceding Discourse unto this Head of our Charge in several Chapters he will easily perceive that either the Reasonings of the Doctor reach not the Cause in hand or are insufficient to justifie his Intention which I must say though I am unwilling to repeat it is by all ways and means to load us with the Guilt and disreputation of Schisme That which I first meet withal directly unto this Purpose is Part 2. pag. 157. The Forbearance of Communion with the Church of England in its Parochial Assemblies that is in the way and manner before described he opposeth with two Arguments The first respects those who allow occasional Communion with Parochial Churches but will not comply with them in that which is constant and absolute For he says if the first be lawful the latter is necessary from the commands we have to preserve the Peace and Vnity of the Church And the not doing it he says is one of the provoking sins of the Non-conformists but whether it be a sin or no is sub Judice that it is provoking unto some is sufficiently evident I shall not make this any part of my Contest Those who have so expressed their Charity as to give countenance unto this pretended Advantage will easily free themselves from the force of this Inference For it must be remembered that
the Guides of the Church and that in such a Church state as the Apostles knew nothing of have Power to frame such a Rule as that described and to impose the Observation of it on all Believers on the Penalties before mentioned It is manifest that no Advantage unto the Cause of Imposition and Uniformity as it is stated at present can be taken from these Words of the Apostle unless these two things be contained in them But that either of them are so our Author doth not say nor go about to prove in his large Discourse on this Place I might therefore forbear any farther Examination of it without the least disadvantage unto our Cause But that I may not seem to wave the consideration of any thing that is pretended Material I shall enquire into the Particulars of it He proceeds therefore to answer his own Quaries which he judged conducing unto his Purpose The first of them is whether the Apostle speakes of different Principles or of different Practises And I find nothing in the Discourse ensuing that hath the least respect unto this Enquiry until towards the close of it where he grants that different Apprehensions are intended such as were accompanied with different Practices But in Order hereunto he gives us a large Account of the scope of the Place and Design of the Apostle in it The Substance of it is That the Apostle treates concerning Judaical seducers that the things in difference were the different Apprehensions of men about the Law its Ceremonies and Worship with the continuation of them and the different Practises that ensued thereon Be it so What is our or his concernment herein For it is most certain the Apostle designed not the Imposition of these things on the Churches of the Gentiles nor did urge them unto an Uniformity in them but declared their Liberty from any Obligation unto them and advised them to stand fast in that Liberty whatever others did practise themselves or endeavour to impose on them What this conduceth unto his Purpose I cannot understand But on the Occasion of that Expression being otherwise minded He demands what sense can Dr. O. here put upon the being otherwise Minded Otherwise then what As many as be perfect be thus minded to pursue your main End but if any be otherwise minded did any think they ought not to mind chiefly their great end that is incredible Therefore the Apostle must be understood of somewhat about which there were then very different Apprehensions and that it is certain there were about the Law among Christian Churches Neither do I well understand these things or what is intended in them For 1. I never gave occasion to him or any else to think that I would affix such a sense unto the Apostles Words as if they gave an Allowance to men to be otherwise minded as unto the pursuit of their main End of living to God in Faith and Love with mutual Peace among themselves 2. What then do I intend by being otherwise minded even the same that he doth and nothing else namely different Apprehensions about some things in Religion and particularly those concerning the Law and its Ceremonies For 3. Let it be supposed that the Apostle in particular intends Dissentions about the Law and the Observance of its Institutions yet he doth not determine the case from the especial circumstances of that Difference so adjudging the Truth unto one of the Parties at variance but from a general Rule how the Disciples of Christ ought to deport themselves towards one another during the continuation of such Differences But 4. The Truth is the Apostle hath dismissed the case proposed in the Beginning of the Chapter ver 1.2 3 c. and upon the occasion of his Expression of his own voluntary Relinquishment and Renunciation of all the Priviledges which the Jews boasted in and of his Attainments thereon in the Misteries of the Gospel ver 12 13 14. he gives a general Direction for the walking of all Christians in the several Degrees and Measures of their Attainments in the same kind And herein he supposeth two things 1. That there were things all the fundamental Doctrines of the Gospel concerning the Person Offices and Grace of Christ which they had all in common attained unto Whereunto we have already attained Wee all of us in general 2. That in some things there were different Apprehensions and Practises amongst them which hindered not their Agreement in what they had attained if any one be otherwise minded one than another We that are perfect and those which are weak let us walk by the same Rule Wherefore although I cannot discern how any thing in this Discourse hath the least Influence into the Case in hand yet to give a little more Light unto the Context and to evidence its unserviceableness unto the Doctors Intention I shall give a brief account of the Judaical Teachers of those days The Jews were by this time distributed into three sorts 1. Such as being obdurate in their Unbelief and Rejection of the Person of Christ opposed persecuted and blasphemed the Gospel in all places Thus was it with the Generality of the Nation And the Teachers of this sort advanced the Excellency Necessity and Usefulness of the Law in contradiction unto Christ and the Gospel These the Apostle describes 1 Thes. 2.13 14 15. The Jews Who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own Prophets and have persecuted us and they please not God and are contrary unto all Men forbidding us to speak unto the Gentiles that they might be saved to fill up their sins alway for the wrath is come upon them unto the uttermost 2. Such as professing Faith in Christ Jesus and Obedience unto the Gospel yet were of the Mind that the whole Law of Moses was not only to be continued and observed among the Jews but also that it was to be imposed on the Gentiles who were converted unto the Faith They thought the Gospel did not erect a new Church state with a new kind of Worship but only was a peculiar way of proselyting men into Judaisme against which the Apostle disputes in his Epistle unto the Hebrews especially in the 7th and 8th Chapters The Teachers of this sort greatly troubled the Churches even after the Declaration of the Mind of the Holy Ghost in these things by the Apostles Act. 15. Those who continued obstinate in this Perswasion became afterwards to be Ebionites and Nazarenes as they were called wholly forsaking the Christian Church of the Gentiles These were generally of the Sect of the Pharisees and seem to be the least sort of the three For 3. There were others who acquiescing in the Liberty of the Gentiles declared by the Apostles Act. 15. yet judged themselves and all other Circumcised Jews obliged unto the Observation of the Law and its Institutions These legal Observances were of two sorts 1. Such as were confined and limited unto the Temple and unto the Land of Canaan
differences of lesser Moment whilst the general Rule of Faith and Love is attended unto 4. To be quiet and wait for further Instruction is the Direction given unto both Parties whilst the Differences did continue between them and that in opposition unto mutual Impositions 5. A Church that is really so or so esteemed may break the Peace with its own Members and others as well as they with it and where the fault is must be determined by the Causes of what is done 6. For what is added about gathering of Churches it shall be considered in its proper place But as unto the Application of these things unto the present Case there lies in the bottom of them such an unproved Presumption of their being the Church that is according unto Divine Institution for in their being so in any other sense we are not concerned of their Church Power and Authority by whom such Orders and Rules are made as we can by no means admit of I can more warrantably give this as the Apostles Rule than that of our Author What you have attained unto in the Knowledge of the Doctrine and Misteries of the Gospel walk together in holy Communion of Faith and Love but take heed that you multiply not new Causes of Divisions and Differences by inventing and imposing new Orders in Divine Worship or the Rule of the Church casting them out who agree with you in all things of divine Revelation and Institution He adds from my Words If the Rule reach our Case it must be such as requires things to be observed as were never divinely appointed as National Churches Ceremonies and Modes of worship to which he Replies And so this Rule doth in Order unto Peace require the Observation of such things which although they be not particularly commanded of God yet are enjoyned by lawful Authority provided that they be not unlawful in themselves nor repugnant unto the Word of God Answ. 1. Let the Reader if he please consult the place whence these Words are taken in my Discourse and he will find this Evasion obviated 2. What is intended by this Rule is it the Rule given by the Apostle Who that reads the Words can possibly pretend unto any such conception of their meaning If he understand a Rule of his own I know not what it may or may not include 3. I deny and shall for ever deny that the Rule here intended by the Apostle doth give the least countenance unto the Invention and Imposition of things not divinely instituted not prescribed not commanded in the Word on the Pretence that those who so invent and impose them judged them lawful and that they have Authority so to do He Objects again unto himself out of my Discourse that the Apostles never gave any such Rules themselves about outward Modes of Worship with Ceremonies Feasts Fasts Liturgies c. Whereunto he Replies What then I say then 1. It had been happy for Christians and Christian Religion if those who pretended to be their Successors had followed their Example and made no such Rules at all that they would not have thought themselves wiser than they or more careful for the Good of the Church or better acquainted with the Mind of Christ in these things then they were For that Multiplication of Rules Laws Canons about the things mentioned and others of an alike nature which the Apostles never gave any Example of or Encouragement unto which afterwards ensued hath been a principal means of altering the state of the Church from its Original Institution of corrupting its Worship Administring occasion unto scandal and endless Strifes 2. If the Apostles gave no such Rules themselves it may be concluded safely that it was because in their Judgement no such Rule was to be given Other Reason hereof cannot be assigned for if it might have been done according to the Mind of Christ and by vertue of the Commission which they had from him innumerable Evils might have been prevnted by the doing of it They foresaw what Differences would arise in the Church what Divisions the darkness and corrupt Lusts of men would cast them into about such things as these and probably knew much whereunto the Mistery of Iniquity tended yet would they not appoint any Arbitrary Rules about things not ordained by our Lord Jesus Christ which might have given some bounds unto the Inclinations of men in making and multiplying Rules of their own unto the ruine of the Church 3. Then I say we beg the Pardon of all who concern themselves herein that we scruple the Complying with such Rules in Religion and the Worship of God as the Apostles thought not meet to appoint or ordain But he addes It is sufficient that they gave this general Rule that all Lawful things are to be done for the Churches Peace Answ. What is to be done for the Churches Peace we shall afterwards consider To be done is intended of Acts of Religion in the Worship of God I say then the Apostles never gave any such Rule as that pretended the Rule they gave was that all things which Christ hath commanded were to be done and observed and for the doing of any thing else they gave no Rule Especially they gave not such a large Rule as this that might serve the turn and interest of the worst of men in imposing on the Church whatever they esteemed Lawful as not by vertue of any Rule of the Apostles but in an open Rejection of all they gave it afterwards fell out in the Church This is a Rule which would do the Work to the Purpose of all that have the Reputation of Governours in the Church be it the Pope or who it will For they are themselves the sole Judges of what is Lawful the People as it is pretended understand nothing of these things Whatever therefore they have a Mind to introduce into the Worship of God and to impose on the Practice of men therein is to be done by vertue of this Apostolical Rule for the Churches Peace provided they judge it Lawful and surely no Pope was ever yet so stark mad as to impose things in Religion which he himself judged unlawful Besides things may be Lawful in themselves that is Morally which yet it is not Lawful to introduce into the Worship of God because not expedient nor for Edification Yea things may be Lawful to be done sometimes on some occasions in the Worship of God which yet it would be unlawful to impose by vertue of a general binding Rule for all times and seasons Instances may be multiplied in each kind Therefore I say the Apostles never gave this Rule they opened no such Door unto Arbitrary Imposition they laid no such Yoke on the Necks of the Disciples which might prove heavier and did so then that of the Jewish Ceremonies which they had taken away namely that they were to do and observe all that should by their Rulers be imposed on them as lawful in their Judgement This
by all the Governours of the Christian Church that the Jewish Christians should be left unto their own Liberty out of respect unto the Law of Moses and out of regard unto the Peace of the Christian Church which otherwise might have been extremely hazarded But 1. The Governours of the Christian Church which made the Determination insisted on were the Apostles themselves 2. There was no such Determination made that the Jews should be left unto their own Liberty in this Matter but there was only a Connivance at their Inclination to bear their old Yoke for a Season The Determination was onely on the other hand that no Imposition of it should be made on the Gentiles 3. The Determination it self was no Act of Church Government or Power but a doctrinal Declaration of the Mind of the Holy Ghost 4. It is well that Church Governours once judged that Impositions in things not necessary were to be forborn for the sake of the Peace of the Church Others I hope may in due time be of the same Mind 2. He says The false Apostles imposing on the Gentile Christians had two circumstances in it which extreamly alter their Case from that of our Dissenters For 1. They were none of their lawful Governours but went about as seducers drawing away the Disciples of the Apostles from them It seems then 1. That those who are lawful Governours or pretend themselves so to be may impose what they please without Controul as they did in the Papacy and the Councils of it But 2. Their Imposition was meerly doctrinal wherein there was no Pretence of any Act of Government or governing Power which made it less grievous then that which the Dissenters have suffered under Were things no otherwise imposed on us we should bear them more easily 2. Saith he They imposed the Jewish Rites as necessary to Salvation and not meerly as indifferent things And the Truth is so long as they judged them so to be they are more to be excused in their doctrinal Impositions of them then others are who by an Act of Government fortified with I know not how many Penalties do impose things which themselves esteem indifferent and those on whom they are imposed do judge to be unlawful Whereas he addes that he hath considered all things that are Material in Discourse which seem to take off the force of the Argument drawn from this Text I am not of his Mind nor I believe will any indifferent Person be so who shall compare what I wrote therein with his exceptions against it though I acknowledge it is no easie thing to discover wherein the force of the pretended Argument doth lye That we must walk according unto the same Rule in what we have attained that wherein we differ we must wait on God for Teaching and Instruction that the Apostles Elders and Brethren at Hierusalem determined from the Scriptures or the Mind of the Holy Ghost therein that the Jewish Ceremonies should not be imposed on the Gentile Churches and Beleivers and that thereon those Churches continued in Communion with each other who did and did not observe those Ceremonies are the only Principles which in Truth the Doctor hath to proceed upon To infer from these Principles and Propositions that there is a National Church of Divine Institution for what is not so hath no Church Power properly so called the nature of its Power being determined by the Authority of its Institution or Erection That this Church hath Power in its Governours and Rulers to invent new Orders Ceremonies and Rites of Worship new Canons for the Observation of sundry things in the Rule of the Church and Worship of God which have no Spring nor Cause but their own Invention and Prescription and is authorized to impose the Observation of them on all particular Churches and Believers who never gave their consent unto their Invention or Prescription and hereon to declare them all to be wicked Schismaticks who yield not full Obedience unto them in these things it requires a great deal of Art and Skil in the Mannagers of the Argument SECT II. PArt 2. Sect. 21. pag. 176. Our Author proceeds to renew his Charge of Schisme or sinful Separation against those who though they agree with us saith he in the substantials of Religion yet deny any Communion with our Church to be lawful But apprehending that the state of the Question here insinuated will not be admitted and that it would be difficult to find them out who deny any Communion with the Church of England to be lawful he addes that he doth not speak of any improper Acts of Communion which Dr. O. calls Communion in Faith and Love which they allow to the Church of England But why the Acts hereof are called improper Acts of Communion I know not Add unto Faith and Love the Administration of the same Sacraments with Common Advice in things of Common concernment and it is all the Communion that the true Churches of Christ have among themselves in the whole World Yea this Church Communion is such as that 1. Where it is not there is no Evangelical Communion at all whatever Acts of Worship or Church Order men may agree in the Practise of if the Foundation of that Agreement be not laid in a joint Communion in Faith and Love they are neither accepted with God nor profitable unto the Souls of men For 2. These are the things namely Faith and Love which enliven all joint Duties of Church Order and Worship are the Life and Soul of it and how they should be only improperly that which they alone make other things to be properly I cannot understand 3. Where there is no defect in these things namely in Faith and Love the Charge of Schisme on dissenting in things of lesser Moment is altogether unreasonable It is to be desired that an overweening of our Differences make us not overlook the things wherein we are agreed This is one of the greatest Evils that attend this Controversie Men are forced by their Interest to lay more weight on a few outward Rites and Ceremonies which the World and the Church might well have spared had they not come into the Minds of some Men none know how than upon the most important Graces and Duties of the Gospel Hence Communion in Faith and Love is scarce esteemed worth taking up in the streets in comparison of Vniformity in Rites and Ceremonies Let Men be as void of and remote from true Gospel Faith and Love as is imaginable yet if they comply quietly with and have a little Zeal for those outward things they are to be approved of as very orderly Members of the Church And whatever Evidences on the other hand any can or do give of their Communion in Faith and Love with all that are of that Communion yet if they cannot in Conscience comply in the Observance of those outward things mentioned they are to be judged Schismaticks and Breakers of the Churches Unity whereas no
easily convinced that there is nothing wanting unto that Evangelical Union among Churches which the Gospel requires but only their own humble holy peaceable Christian walking in their several Places and Stations But where men put their own Interests and Possession of present Advantages cloathed under the Pretence of things necessary thereunto into Conditions of Communion or divest it of that latitude wherein Christ hath left it by new Limitations of their own it will never be attained on the true Evangelical Principles that it must proceed upon For however any may be displeased with it I must assert and maintain that there is nothing required by our Lord Jesus Christ unto this end of the Communion of Churches nor to any other end of Church Order or Worship whatever but that only in whose Observance and Performance there is an actual Exercise of Evangelical Grace in Obedience unto him 4. That all Private Members of these several Churches which agree in the Communion before mentioned be left unto their own Liberty and Consciences to communicate in any of those Churches either occasionally or in a fixed way and manner Neither Orders nor compulsory Decrees will be useful in this Matter in comparison of their own declared Liberty And so it was among the Primitive Churches 5. Where Men are invincibly hindered from total communion with any Church by Impositions which they cannot comply withal without Sin or by continuing in it are deprived of the due means of their Edification the Churches whereunto they did belong refusing all Reformation it is lawful for them in Obedience unto the Law of Christ to reform themselves and to make use of the means appointed by him for their Edification abiding constantly in the Communion of all true Churches before described I confess this is that which we cannot digest namely an Imagination that the Lord Jesus Christ hath obliged his Disciples those that believe in him to abide alwayes in such Societies as wherein not only things are imposed on their Obedience and Observance which he hath not commanded but they are also forced to live in the Neglect of expressed Duties which he requireth of them and the want of that means of their own Edification which without the restraint at present upon them they might enjoy according unto his Mind and Will Believers were not made for Churches nor for the advantage of them that Rule in them but Churches were made for Believers and their Edification nor are of any use farther then they tend thereunto These are the Premises whereon we proceed in all that we do and they are so far from being Obstructive of the Peace and Union of the Protestant Churches as that without them they will never be promoted nor attained And I do beg of this Worthy Person that he would not despise these things but know assuredly that nothing would be so effectual to procure the Union he desireth as an Vniversal Reformation of all sorts of Persons according unto the Rule and Law of Christ which it may be no man hath greater Ability and Opportunity in conjunction for than himself For wo be unto us if whilst we contend about outward Peace in smaller things we neglect to make Peace with God and so expose our selves and the whole Nation unto his desolating Judgement which seem already to be impendent over us The third Absurdity which he chargeth on our Practise is that it will justifie the antient Schismes which have been always condemned in the Christian Church and in the mannagement of this Charge he proceedeth if I mistake not with more then ordinary vehemency and severity though it be a Matter wherein we are least of all concerned To make Effectual this Charge He first affirms in general that setting aside a few things they pleaded the same Reasons for their Separation as I do for ours Which how great a Mistake it is shall be manifested immediately Sâ—condly He gives Instances in several Schismes that were so condemned by the Christian Church and whose Practise is justified by us In Answer hereunto I shall first premise some things in general shewing the Insufficiency of this Argument to prove against us the Charge of Schisme and then consider the Instances produced by him I say 1. In times of Decay the declining times of Churches or states it cannot be but that some will be uneasie in their Minds although they know not how to remedy what is amiss nor it may be fix on the particulars which are the right and true Causes of the state which they find troublesome unto them And whilst it is so with them it is not to be admired at that some Persons do fall into irregular Attempts for the redressing of what is amiss The Church where the instances insisted on happened was falling into a Mysterious Decay from its original Institution Order and Rule which afterwards encreased more and more continually But all being equally involved in the same Declension the Remedies which they proposed who were uneasie either in themselves or in the manner of their Application were worse then the Disease which yet lying uncured and continually encreasing proved in the issue the Ruin of them all But here lay the Original of the Differences and Schismes which fell out in the 3 d 4 th and 5 th Centuries that having all in some Measure departed from the Original Institution Rule and Order of Evangelical Churches in sundry things and cast themselves into new formes and Orders their Differences and Quarrels related all unto them and could have had no such occasion had they kept themselves unto their Primitive Constitution Wherefore those Schismes which were said to be made by them that continued sound in the Faith as those of the Andeans and Meletians as by some is pretended and Johannites at Constantinople with sundry other seeing they disserted not any Order of Divine Institution but another which the Churches were insensibly fallen into No Judgement can be made upon a meer Separation whether of the Parties at Difference were to blame I am sure enough that sometimes neither of them could be excused Whether the Causes Reasons Ends Designs and ways of the Mannagement of those Differences that were between them on which Schismes in their present Order did ensue were just regular according to the Mind of Christ proceeding from Faith and Love is that whose Determination must fix aright the Guilt of the Divisions that were among them And whereas we judge most of those who so seperated from the Church of old as is here alledged to have failed in these things and therein to have contracted Guilt unto themselves as occasioning unwarrantable Divisions and missing wholly the only way of Cure for what was really blame-worthy in others Yet whereas we allow nothing to be Schisme properly but what is contrary to Christian Love and destructive of some Institution of Christ we are not much concerned who was in the Right or Wrong in those Contests which fell out among the
Orthodox themselves but only as they were carried on unto a total Renunciation of all Communion whatever but only that which was enclosed unto their own Party 2. To Evidence that we give the least countenance unto the antient Schismes or do contract the Guilt with the Authors of them the thing aimed at there are three things incumbent on him to prove 1. That our Parochial Churches from whom we do refrain actual presential Communion in all Ordinances where it is required by Law which cannot be many and but one at one time do succeed into the room of that Church in a Separation from which those Schismes did consist For we pass no Judgement on any other Church but what concerns our selves as unto present Duty though that in a Nation may be extended unto many or all of the same sort But these Schismes consisted in a professed Separation from the whole Catholick Church that is all Christians in the World who joyned not with them in their Opinions and Practises and from the whole Church state then passant and allowed But our Author knows full well that there are others who long before our Parochial Churches do lay claim unto the absolute enclosure of this Church state unto themselves and thereon condemn both him and us and all the Protestants in the World of the same Schisme that those of old were guilty of especially they make a continual Clamour about the Novatians and Donatists I know that he is able to dispossess the Church of Rome from that Usurpation of the State and Rights of the antient Catholick Church from whence those Separations were made and it hath been sufficiently done by others But so soon as we have cast that out of Possession to bring in our Parochial Assemblies into the room of it and to press the Guilt of Separation from them with the same Reasons and Arguments as we were all of us but newly pressed withal by the Romanists namely that hereby we give countenance unto them yea do the same things with them who made Schismes in Separating from the Catholick Church of old is somewhat severe and unequal Wherefore unless the Church from which they separated which was the whole Catholick Church in the World not agreeing and acting with them and those Parochial Assemblies from whose Communion we refrain are the same and of the same consideration nothing can be argued from those ancient Schismes against us nor is any countenance given by us unto them For if it be asked of us whether it be free or lawful for Believers to joyn in Society and full Communion with other Churches besides those that are of our way and especial Communion we freely answer that we no way doubt of it nor do judge them for their so doing 2. It must be proved unto the End proposed that the Occasions and Reasons of their Separation of old were the same or of the same nature only with those which we plead for our refraining Communion from Parochial Assemblies Now though the Dr. here makes a flourish with some Expressions about Zeal Discipline Purity of the Church Edification which he will not find in any of their Pretences yet in truth there is not one thing alledged wherein there is a Coincidence between the Occasions and Reasons pleaded by them and ours It is known that the principal thing in general which we insist upon is the unwarrantable Imposition of unscriptural Termes and Conditions of Communion upon us was there any such thing pleaded by them that made the Schismes of Old indeed they were all of them imposers and separated from the Church because they would not submit unto their Impositions Some Bishops or some that would have been Bishops but could not entertaining some new Conceit of their own which they would have imposed on all others being not submitted unto therein were the Causes of all those Schismes which were justly esteemed Criminal So was it with the Novatians and Donatists in an especial manner Even the great Tertullian though no Bishop left the Communion of the Church on this Ground For because they would not admit of the strict Observance of some Austere Severities in Fasting Abstinence from sundry Meates and Watching with the like which he esteemed necessary though no way warranted by Scripture Rule or Example he utterly renounced their Communion and countenanced himself by adhering unto the Dotages of Montanus It is true some of them contended for a Severity of Discipline in the Church but they did it not upon any pretence of the Neglect of it in them unto whom the Administration of it was committed but for the want of establishing a false Principle Rule or Erronious Doctrine which they advanced namely that the most sincere penitents were never more to be admitted into Ecclesiastical Communion whereby they did not establish but overthrow one of the Principal ends of Church Discipline They did not therefore press for the Power or the Vse of the Keys as is pretended but advanced a false Doctrine in prejudice both unto the Power and Use of them They pretended indeed unto the Purity of the Church not that there were none impure wicked and hypocritical among them but that none might be admitted who had once fallen though really made pure by sincere Repentance This was their Zeal for Purity If a Man were overtaken if they could catch him in such a fault as by the Rules of the passaint Discipline he was to be cast out of the Church there they had him safe for ever No Evidence of the most sincere Repentance could prevail for a Readmission into the Church And because other Churches would admit them they renounced all Communion with them as no Churches of Christ. Are these our Principles are these our Practices do we give any countenance unto them by any thing we say or do I somewhat wonder that the Dr. from some general Expressions and casting their Pretences under new Appearances should seem to think that there is the least Coincidence between what they insisted on and what we plead in our own Defence He may see now more fully what are the Reasons of our Practise and I hope thereon will be of another Mind not as unto our Cause in general which I am far enough from the expectation of but as unto this invidious Charge of giving Countenance unto the Schismes condemned of old in the Church And we shall see immediately what were the Occasions of those Schismes which we are as remote from giving countenance unto as unto the Principles and Reasons which they pleaded in their own Justification 3. It ought also to be proved that the Separation which is charged on us is of the same nature with that charged on them of old for otherwise we cannot be said to give any Countenance unto what they did For it is known they so separated from all other Churches in the World as to confine the Church of Christ unto their own Party to condemn all others and to
deny Salvation unto all that abode in their Communion which the Donatists did with the greatest fierceness This was that which if any thing did truely and properly constitute them Schismaticks as it doth those also who deny at this day Church State and Salvation unto such Churches as have not Diocesan Bishops Now there is no Principle in the World that we do more abhor We grant a Church state unto all however it may be defective or corrupted and a possibility of Salvation unto all their Members which are not gathered in pernicious Errors overthrowing the Foundation nor Idolatrous in their Worship and who have a lawful Ministry with sufficient means for their Edification though low in its Measures and Degrees We judge none but with respect unto our own Duty as unto the Impositions attempted to be laid on us and the Acts of Communion required of us which we cannot avoid Nor can any man else let him pretend what he will to the contrary avoid the making of a Judgment for himself in these things unless he be brutish These things are sufficient to evidence that there is not the least countenance given unto the antient Schismes by any Principles of ours yet I shall add some farther Considerations on the Instances he gives unto the same Purpose The first is that the Novatians whose Pretences were the Discipline and Purity of the Churches wherein he says there was a Concurrence of Dr. O' s Pleas Zeal for Reformation of Discipline the greater Edificatian of the People and the asserting of their Right in choosing such a Pastor as was likely to promote their Edification I am sorry that Interest and Party should sway with learned Men to seek Advantages unto their Cause so unduly The story in short is this Novatus or Novatianus rather being disappointed in his ambitious Design to have been chosen Bishop of the Church of Rome Cornelius being chosen by much the Major Part of the Church betook himself to indirect means to weaken and invalidate the Election of Cornelius And this he did by raising a new Principle of false Doctrine whereunto he as falsly accommodated the Matter of Fact The Error he broached and promoted was that there was no place for Repentance such as whereon they should be admitted into the Church unto them who had fallen into sin after Baptisme nor as some add any Salvation to be obtained by them who had fallen in the time of Persecution This the antient Church looked on as a pestilent Heresie and as such was it condmened in a considerable Counsel at Rome with Cornelius Euseb. lib. 6. cap. 43 where also is reported the Decree which they made in the Case wherein they call his Opinion Cruel or inhumane and contrary to Brotherly Love As such it is strenuously confuted by Cyprian Epist. 82. ad Antonianum But because the Church would not submit unto this Novel false Opinion of his contrary to the Scripture and the Discipline of the Church he and all his Followers separated from all the Churches in the World and rebaptized all that were baptized in the Orthodox Churches they denying unto them the means of Salvation Cyprian ad Julian Epist. 73. Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 8. That which was most probably false also in Matter of Fact when this foolish Opinion which Dionysius of Alexandria in his Epistle to Dionysius of Rome calls a most profane Doctrine reflecting unmerciful cruelty on our most gracious Lord Jesus Christ Euseb. lib. 7. cap. 8. was invented to be subservient unto was that many of those by whom Cornelius was chosen Bishop were such as had denied the Faith under the Persecution of Decius the Emperor This also was false in Matter of Fact For although that Church continued in the antient Faith and practise of receiving penitents after their Fall yet there were no such number of them as to influence the Election of Cornelius So Cyprian testifieth Factus est Cornelius Episcopus de Dei Christi ejus judicio de Clericorum poene omnium Testimonio de suffragio Plebis c. Epist. 52. On that false Opinion and this frivolous Pretence they continued their Schisme Hence afterwards when Constantine the Emperor spake with Acesius the Bishop of the Novatians at Constantinople finding him sound in the Faith of the Trinity which was then impugned by Arius he asked him why then he did not communicate with the Church whereon he began to tell him a story of what had happened in the time of Decius the Emperor pleading nothing else for himself the Emperor replying only O Acesius set up a ladder and climb alone by thy self into Heaven left him Socrat. lib. 1 cap. 7. This Error endeavoured to be imposed on all Churches this false Pretence in Matter of Fact with the following Pride in the condemnation of all other Churches denying unto them the lawful use of the Sacraments and rebaptizing them who were baptized in them do if we may believe the Doctor herein contain all my Pleas for the forbearance of Communion with Parochial Assemblies and have countenance given unto them by our Principles and Practises Of the Meletians whom he reckons up in the next place no certain Account can be given Epiphanius reports Meletus himself to have been a Good honest Orthodox Bishop and in the Difference between him and Peter Bishop of Alexandria to have been more for Truth as the other was more for Love and Charity And according unto him it was Peter and not Meletus that began the Schisme Haeres 68. N. 2 3. But others give quite another account of him Socrates affirmes that in time of Persecution he had sacrificed to Idols and was for that Reason deposed from his Episcopacy by Peter of Alexandria Lib. 3. cap. 6. Hence he was enraged against him and filled all Thebais and Aegypt with Tumults against him and the Church of Alexandria with intolerable Arrogance because he was convicted of sundry Wickednesses by Peter Theod. Hist. lib. 1. cap. 8. And his Followers quickly complyed with the Arians for their Advantage The Error he proceeded on according to Epiphanius was the same with that of Novatus which how it could be if he himself had fallen in Persecution and Sacrificed as Socrates relates I cannot understand This Schisme of Bishop Meletius also it is thought meet to be judged that we should give Countenance unto All things are in like manner uncertain concerning Audus and his Followers whom he mentions in the next place The Man is represented by Epiphanius to have been a Good Man of an holy Life sound in the Faith full of Zeal and Love to the Truth But finding many things amiss in the Church among the Clergy and People he freely reproved them for Covetousness Luxury and Disorders in Ecclesiastical Affairs Hereon he stirred up the hatred of many against himself as Chrysostome did for the same cause afterwards at Constantinople Hereupon he was vexed persecuted and greatly abused all which he bare patiently and continued in
the Discharge of his Duty as it fell out also with Chrysostome Nevertheless he abode firmly and tenaciously in the Communion of the Church but was at length cast out as farre as it appears by him for the honest discharge of his Duty whereon he gathered a great Party unto himself But Theodoret and others affirm him to have been the Author of the impious heresie of the Anthropomorphitae his principal followers being those Monks of Egypt which afterwards made such Tumults in defence of that foolish Imagination and that this was the Cause why he was cast out of the Church and set up a Party of the same Opinion with him lib. 4. cap. 10. Yea he also ascribes unto him some foolish Opinions of the Manichees What is our concernment in these things I cannot imagine Eustathius the Bishop of Sebastia in Armenia and his Followers are also instanced in as Orthodox Schismaticks and as such were condemned in a Council at Gongrae in Paphlagonia But indeed before that Council Eustathius had been condemned by his own Father Eulanius and other Bishops at Caesarea in Cappadocia And he was so for sundry foolish Opinions and evil Practises whereby he deserved to be so dealt withal It doth not unto me appear certainly whether he fell into those Opinions before his Rejection at Caesarea where he was principally it not only charged with his undecent and fantastical habit and Garments Wherefore at the Council of Gangrae he was not admitted to make any Apology for himself nor could be heard because he had innovated many things after his Deposition at Caesarea such as forbidding of Marriage shaving of Women denying the lawfulness of Priests keeping their Wives who were married before their Ordination getting away Servants from their Masters and the like Socrat. Hist. lib. 2. chap. 3. These were his Pretences of Sanctity and Purity as the Dr. acknowledgeth and I appeal unto his Ingenuity and candour whether any Countenance be given unto such Opinions and Practises thereon by any thing we say or do This Instance and some others of an alike Nature the Doctor affirmes that he produced in his Sermon but that they were gently passed over by my self and Mr. B. I confess I took no notice of them because I was satisfied that the cause under Consideration was no way concerned in them And the Dr. might to as Good Purpose have instanced in forty other Schismes made for the most Part by the Ambition of Bishops in the Churches of Alexandria Antioch Constantinople Rome and sundry other places yea in that made by Epiphanius himself at Constantinople upon as weighty a Cause as that of those who contended about and strove for and against the driving of sheep over the Bridge where there were none present The story of the Luciferians is not worth repeating In short Lucifer the Bishop of Caralli in Sardinia being angry that Paulinus whom he had ordained Bishop at Antioch was not received fell into great dissention with Eusebius Bishop of Vercells in Italy who had been his Companion in Banishment because he approved not what he had done at Antioch And continuing to contend for his own Bishop it occasioned a great Division among the People whereon he went home to his own Place leaving behind him a few followers who wrangled for a time about the Ordination of Bishops by Arians by whose means Lucifer had been banished and so after a while disappeared I had almost missed the Instance of the Donatists But the story of them is so well known that it will not bear the Repetition For although there be no mention of them in Socrates or Zozoman nor the History of Theodoret yet all things that concerned them are so fully declared in the Writings of Austin and Optatus against them as there needs no other account of them And this Instance of an Heretical Schisme is that which the Papists vehemently urge against the Church of England itself and all other Protestants Here their Weapon is borrowed for a little while to give a wound unto our Cause but in vain Yet I know full well that it is easier for some men on their Principles to flourish with this Weapon against us than to defend themselves against it in the hands of the Papists In breif these Donatists were upon the matter of the same Opinion with the Novatians and as these grounded their dissension on the receiving those into the Church who had fallen and sacrificed under Decius so did these on a pretence of severity against those who had been Traditors under Maximinus Upon this Pretence improved by many false Allegations Donatus and those that followed him rejected Cecilianus who was lawfully chosen and ordained Bishop of Carthage setting up one Majorinus in opposition unto him Not succeeding herein on this foolish unproved Pretence that Cecilianus had been ordained by Traditor they rejected the Communion of all the Churches in the World confined the whole Church of Christ unto their own Party denied Salvation unto any other rebaptized all that came unto them from other Churches and together with a great number of Bishops that joyned with them fell into most extravagant Exorbitances Upon the Consideration of these Schismes the Dr. concludes that on these Grounds there hath scarce been any considerable Schisme in the Christian Church but may be justified upon Dr. O' s Reasons for Seperation from our Church Concerning which I must take the Liberty to say that I do not remember that ever I read in any Learned Author an Inference made or Conclusion asserted that had so little countenance given unto it by the Premises whence it is inferred as there is into this by the Instances before insisted on whence it is pretended to be educed All that is of Argument in this story is this that there were of old some Bishops with one or two who would have been Bishops and could not who to exalt and countenance themselves against those who were preferred to Bishopricks before them and above them invented and maintained false doctrinal Principles the confession whereof they would have imposed on other Churches and because they were not admitted they separated at once from all other Churches in the World but their own condemning them as no Churches as not having the Sacraments or means of Salvation for which they were condemned as Schismaticks therefore those who own not Subjection to Diocesan Bishops by vertue of any Institution or Command of Christ who refrain Communion from Parochial Assemblies because they cannot without Sin to themselves comply with all things imposed on them in the Worship of God and Ecclesiastical Rule without judging their state or the Salvation of their Members are in like manner as they guilty of Schisme But we have fixed grounds whereon to Try Examine Judge and Condemne all Schismes that are justly so called all such as those before mentioned If Separations arise and proceed from Principles of false Doctrine and Errors like those of the Novatians and Donatists if
Consist only of such a number of men as may meet in one Congregation so qualified and that those by entring into Covenant with each other whereof we shall treat hereafter become a Church and choose their Officers who are to Teach and Admonish and administer Sacraments and to exercise discipline by the Consent of the Congregation And let us 2 suppose such a Church not yet gathered but there lies fit matter for it dispersed up and down in several parishes 3 Let us suppose D. O. about to gather such a Church 4 Let us suppose not one thing peculiar to our Church required of these Members neither the Aerial sign of the Cross nor kneeling at the Communion c. I desire to know whether D. O. be not bound by this unalterable rule to draw these Members from Communion with Parochial Churches on purpose that they might form a Congregational Church according to Christs Institution either then he must quit these unalterable Rules and Institutions of Christ which he will never do whilst he lives or he must acknowledge that setting up a Congregational Church is the primary Ground of this Separation from our Parochial Churches c. The whole Design hereof is to prove that we do not withhold Communion from their Parochial Assemblies because of the things that are practised and imposed in them in the Worship of God and Church Rule but because of a necessity apprehended of setting up Congregational Churches I Answer 1. We know it is otherwise and that we plead the true Reason and that which our Consciences are regulated by in refraining from their Communion and it is in vain for him or any Man else to endeavour so to Birdlime our understandings by a multiplicity of Questions as to make us think we do not judge what we do judge or do not do what we know our selves well enough to do If we cannot Answer Sophismes against Motion we can yet rise up and walk 2. These things are consistent and are not capable of being opposed one to the other Namely that we refrain Communion on the Reasons alledged and thereon judge it necessary to erect Congregational Churches which we should have no occasion to do were not we excluded from Communion in Parochial Assemblies as we are 3. The Case being put unto me I answer plainly unto the Doctors last supposition whereon the whole depends that if those things which we except against as being unduely practised and imposed in Parochial Assemblies were removed and taken away I would hold Communion with them all the Communion that any one is obliged to hold with any Church and would in nothing separate from them This spoiles the whole Case But then he will say I am no Independent I cannot help that he may judge as he sees Cause for I am nullius addictus jurare in verba Magistria designing to be the Disciple of Christ alone 4. But yet suppose that in such Churches all the things excepted against being removed there is yet a defect in some unalterable Rule that Concerns the Government of the Churches that they answer not in all things the strictness laid down in the Drs first supposition although it is certain that if not all of them absolutely yet the most of them and of the most importance would be found virtually in Parochial Assemblies upon the removal of the things excepted against the Enquiry is what I would do then or whether I would not set up a Congregational Church gathered out of other Churches I Answer I tell you plainly what I would do 1. If I were joyned unto any such Church as wherein there were a defect in any of the Rules appointed by Christ for its Order and Government I would endeavour peaceably according as the Duties of my state and Calling did require to introduce the Practise and Observance of them 2. In case I could not prevail therein I would consider whether the want of the things supposed were such as to put me on the practise of any thing unlawful or cut me short of the necessary means of Edification and if I found they do not so do I would never for such defects separate or withdraw Communion from such a Church But 5. Suppose that from these defects should arise not only a real Obstruction unto Edification but also a necessity of practising some things unlawful to be Observed wherein no forbearance could be allowed I would not condemn such a Church I would not separate from it would not withdraw from Acts of Communion with it which were Lawful but I would peaceably joyn in fixed Personal Communion with such a Church as is free from such defects and if this cannot be done without the gathering of a new Church I see neither Schisme nor Separation in so doing Wherefore notwithstanding all the Drs Questions and his Case founded on as many suppositions as he was pleased to make it abides firm and unshaken that the Ground and reason of our refraining communion from Parochial Assemblies is the Practise and Imposition of things not lawful for us to observe in them And it is unduely affirmed p. 223. that upon my Grounds Separation is necessary not from the particular conditions of Communion with them but because Parochial Churches are not formed after the Congregational way For what form of Churches they have be it what it will it is after the Congregational way And it is more unduely affirmed and contrary unto the Rules of Christian Charity that this plea of ours is a necessary piece of Art to keep fair with the Presbyterian Party For as we design to keep fair as it is called with no Parties but onely so far as Truth and Christian Love require and so we design it with all Parties whatsoever so the Plea hath been always insisted on by us and was the cause of Non-conformity in multitudes of our Perswasion before they had any opportunity to Gather any Congregational Churches according to the Rule of the Gospel Such things will never help nor adorn any Cause in the Issue But he presseth the due Consideration of this Art that as I suppose they may avoid the snare of it on the Presbyterians by minding them what was done in former times in the debate of the dissenting Brethren and the setting up of Congregational Churches in those dayes For saith he Have those of the Congregational way since altered their Judgment Hath D. O. yielded that in case some termes of Communion in our Church were not insisted on they would give over Separation were not their Churches first gathered out of Presbyterian Congregations and if Presbytery had been setled upon the Kings Restauration would they not have continued in their Separation Answ. 1 There is no Difference that I know of between Presbyterians and those whom he calls Independents about particular Churches For the Presbyterians allow them to be of Divine Institution grant them the exercise of Discipline by their own Eldership in all ordinary cases and none to
much concern'd My Words are Vindic. p. 41. Though many Alterations were before that time introduced into the Order and Rule of the Churches yet it appears that when Cyprian was Bishop of the Church of Carthage that the whole Community of the Members of that Church did meet together to determine of things that were of their common Interest according unto what was judged to be their Right and Liberty in those dayes I thought no man who is so Conversant in the Writings of Cyprian as our Author apparently is could have denied the Truth hereof nor do I say it is so done by him onely he takes occasion from hence to discourse at large concerning the state of the Church at Carthage in those dayes in Opposition to Mr. Cotton who affirms that there was found in that Church the express and lively lineaments of the very body of Congregational Discipline Herein I am not concern'd who do grant that at that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Order and Rule of the Church but that the People did meet together unto the Determination of things of their common Interest such as were the choice of their Officers and the readmission of them into the Fellowship of the Church who had fallen through infirmity in time of Persecution or publick offences and divisions is so evident in the Writings of Cyprian wherein he ascribes unto them the right of choosing Worthy and of rejecting Unworthy Officers and tells them that in such Cases he will do nothing without their consent that it cannot be gain-said But hereon he asketh where I had any Reason to appeal to St. Cyprian for the Democratical Government of the Church which indeed I did not do nor any thing which look'd like unto it And he addes that they have this Advantage from the appeal that we do not suppose any Deviation then from the Primitive Institution whereas my words are Positive that before that time there were many Alterations introduced into the Rule and Order of the Church such things will partiallity in a Cause and aiming at Success in Disputation produce M. Cotton affirms that the lineaments of the Congregational Discipline are found in that Church that there is therein a just Representation of an Episcopal Church that is I presume Diocesan because that alone is unto his purpose It is not lawful to make any Church after the time of the Apostles the Rule of all Church State and Order nor yet to be absolutely determined in these things by the Authority of any man not divinely inspired And yet I cannot but wish that all the three parties dissenting about Church Order Rule and Worship would attempt an agreement between themselves upon the Representation made of the state of the Church of Carthage in the dayes of Cyprian which all of them lay some claim unto although it will be an Abridgement of some of their pretensions It might bring them all nearer together and it may be all of them in some things nearer to the Truth for it is Certain 1. That the Church of Carthage was at that time a particular Church There was no more Church but one in that City Many occasional Meetings and Assemblies in several places for Divine Exercises and Worship there were But stated Churches with Officers of their own Members peculiarly belonging unto them Discipline among them such as our Reverend Author doth afterwards affirme and describe our Parochial Churches to be there were none nor is it pretended that there were 2. That in this one Church there were Many Presbyters or Elders who ruled the whole Body or Community of it by common Advice and Counsel whether they were all of them such as laboured in the Word and Doctrine with the Administration of the Sacraments or attended unto Rule only it doth not appear But that they were many and such as did not stand in any peculiar Relation unto any part of the people but concur'd in common to promote the Edification of the whole Body as Occasion and Opportunity did require is evident in the account given of them by Cyprian himself 3. That among those Elders in that one Church there was one peculiarly called the Bishop who did constantly preside amongst them in all Church affairs and without whom ordinarily nothing was done as neither did he any thing without the advice of the Elders and consent of the People How far this may be allowed for Orders sake is worth consideration of Divine institution it is not But where there are many Elders who have equal interest in and right unto the rule of the whole Church and the Administration of all Ordinances it is necessary unto Order that one do preside in their meetings and consultations whom custom gave some preheminence unto 4. That the people were ruled by their own consent and that in things of greatest importance as the choice of their Officers the casting out and the receiving in of lapsed members had their suffrage in the determination of them 5. That there was no Imposition of Liturgies or Ceremonies or any humane invention in the Worship of God on the Church or any members of it the Scripture being the sole acknowledged Rule in Discipline and Worship This was the state and order of the Church of Carthage in those days and although there were some alterations in it from the first divine Institution of Churches yet I heartily wish that there were no more difference amongst us then what would remain upon a supposition of this state For what remains of the Opposition made unto what I had asserted concerning Congregational or particular Churches I may referre the Doctor and the Reader unto what hath been farther pleaded concerning them in the preceding discourse nor am I satisfied that he hath given any sufficient answer unto what was before alledged in the vindication but hath passed by what was most pregnant with Evidence unto the Truth and by a mistake of my mind or Words diverts very much from the state of the Question which is no other but what I laid down before yet I will consider what is material in the whole of his Discourse on this subject SECT 5. p. 234 He says I affirm that as to the matter of fact concerning the Institution of Congregational Churches it seems evidently exemplyfied in the Scripture for which I referre the Reader unto what is now again declared in the confirmation of it And he adds The matter of Fact is that when Churches grew too big for one single Congregation in a City then a new Congregational Church was set up under new Officer with a separate power of Government that is in that City But this is not at all the matter of Fact I do not say that there were originally more particular Churches then one in one City I do grant in the words next quoted by him that there is not express mention made that any such Church did divide it self into more Congregations with new Officers But this
is the matter of Fact that the Apostles appointed onely particular Congregations and that therefore they did not oblige the Christians about in a Province or Diocess to be of that Church which was first erected in any Town or City but they founded new Churches with new Officers of their own in all places where there were a sufficient number of Believers to make up such a Church And this I prove from the instance of the Church of Hierusalem which was first planted but quickly after there were Churches gathered and settled in Judea Gallilee and Samaria They planted Churches 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the Cities and Villages as Clemens speaks But what saith he is this to the proof of the Congregational way this it is namely That the Churches instituted by the Apostles were all of them Congregational not Diocesan Provincial or National but saith he the thing I desired was that when the Christians in one City multiplyed into more Congregations they would prove that they did make new and distinct Churches He may desire it of them who grant that the Christians did multiply in one City into more Congregations then one which I deny untill the end of the second Century although they might and did occasionally meet especially in times of Persecution in distinct Assemblies Neither will their multiplication into more Congregations without distinct Officers at all help the cause he pleadeth for for his Diocesan Church consisteth of many distinct Churches with their distinct Officers Order and Power as he afterwards describes our Parishes to do under one Bishop Yet such is his apprehension of the Justice of his cause that what hath been pleaded twenty times against it namely That speaking of one City the Scripture still calls it the Church of that place but speaking of a Province as Judea Galilee Samaria Galatia Macedonia it speaks of the Churches of them which evidently proves that it knows nothing of a Diocesan Provincial or National Church he produceth in the justification of it because he saith that it is evident theâ—ne that there was but one Church in one City which was never denyed There were indeed then many Bishops in one Church Phil. 1.1 Acts 20.28 And afterwards when one Church had one Bishop only yet there were two Bishops in one City which requires two Churches as Epiphanus affirms 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Haeres 68. S. 6. For Alexandria never had two Bishops as other Cities had Whether he intend two Bishops in one Church or two Churches in one City all is one to our purpose But the Dr. I presume makes this observation rather artificially to prevent an Objection against his main Hypothesis then with any design to strengthen it thereby For he cannot but know how frequently it is pleaded in opposition unto any National Church State as unto its mention in the Scripture For he that shall speak of the Churches in Essex Suffolk Hartfordshire and so of other Counties without the least intimation of any general Church unto which they should belong would be judged to speak rather the Independent then the Episcopal Dialect But saith he p. 236. I cannot but wonder what Dr. O. means when after he hath produced the Evidence of distinct Churches in the same Province he calls this plain Scripture Evidence and practise for the erecting particular distinct Congregations who denies that I say then it is incumbent on him to prove if he do any thing in this cause that they erected Churches of another sort kind and order also But saith he I see nothing like a proof of distinct Churches in the same City which was the thing to be proved but because it could not be proved was prudently let alone But this was not the thing to be proved nor did I propose it to confirmation nor assert it but have proved the contrary unto the end of the second Century This only I assert that every Church in one City was only one Church and nothing is offered by the Doctor to the contrary yea he affirms the same But saith he sect 6. p. 237. Dr. O. saith That the Christians of one City might not exceed the bounds of a particular Church or Congregation no although they had a multiplication of Bishops or Elders in them and occasional distinct Assemblies for some Acts of Divine Worship But then saith he The notion of a Church is not limited in the Scripture to a single Congregation Why so for saith he if occasional Assemblies be allowed for some Acts of Worship why not for others I say because they belong unto the whole Church or are Acts of Communion in the whole Church Assembled and so cannot be observed in occasional meetings do this saith the Apostle when you come together in one place And if saith he the number of Elders be unlimited then every of those may attend the occasional distinct Assemblies for Worship and yet altogether make up the Body of one Church and so say I they may and yet be one Church still joyning together in all Acts of Communion that are proper and peculiar unto the Church For as the meetings intended were occasional so also was the attendance of the Elders unto them as they found occasion for the Edification of the whole Church It may be the Dr. is not so well acquainted with the Principles and Practise of the Congregational way and therefore thinks that these things are contrary unto them But those of that way do maintain that there ought to be in every particular Congregation unto the compleatness of it many Elders or Overseers that the number of them ought to be encreased as the encrease of the Church makes it necessary for their Edification that the members of such a Church may and ought to meet occasionally in distinct Assemblies especially in the time of Persecution for Prayer Preaching of the Word and mutual Exhortation so when Peter was in Prison after the Death of James many met together in the House of Mary to Pray Acts 12.12 Which was not a meeting of the whole Church And that there were such private meetings of the Members of the same Church in times of Persecution among the Primitive Churches may be proved by a Multiplication of instances but still they continued one Church and joyned together in all Acts of Church Communion properly so called especially if it were possible every Lords-day as Justin Martyr declares that the Church did in his time For all the Christians saith he then in the City and Villages about gathered together in one place for the Ends mentioned But still these distinct occasional Assemblies did not constitute any distinct Societies or Corporations as the distinct Companies do in a City But saith he grant one single Bishop over all these Elders and they make up that representation of a Church which we have from the best and purest Antiquity I say we would quickly grant it could we see any warrant for it or if he could prove that so it was
from the beginning However this is no part of our present contest namely whether some while after the days of the Apostles in Churches that were greatly encreased and many Elders in them there was not one chosen as at Alexandria by those Elders themselves to preside among them who in a peculiar manner was called a Bishop But if I mistake not that alone which would advantage his cause is to prove that there were in one City or any where else many not occasional Assemblies of Christians or Church Members but many stated fixed Churches with Officers of their own peculiarly related unto them entrusted with Church Power and Priviledges at least as much as he afterwards pleads to be in our Parochial Churches all under the Government of one single Bishop making up a new Church state beyond that of particular Congregations by their Relation unto him as their common Pastor This I take it is that which should have been prov'd All the difficulty wherewith our assertion is accompanyed ariseth from the multiplication of Believers and the encrease of Churches in the Apostles time or presently after For this seems to be so great as that those in one City could not continue in one Church notwithstanding the advantages of occasional Assemblies The Church of Jerusalem had 5000 in it at the same time the word grew and prevailed at Ephesus and other places whereto I shall briefly answer as hastning unto a close of this unpleasing labour I say therefore 1. Whatever difficulty may seem to be in this matter yet in point of Fact so it was there was no Church before the end of the second Century of any other species nature or kind but a particular Congregational Church only as hath been proved before let any one instance be produced of a Church of one denomination National Provincial or Diocesan or of any other kind then that which is Congregational and I will give over this contest But when a matter of Fact is certain it is too late to enquire how it might be And on this occasion I shall add that if in that space of time namely before the end of the second Century any proof or undoubted Testimony can be produced of the Imposition of the necessary use of Liturgies or of stated Ceremonies of the practise of Church discipline consistent with that now in use in the Church of England it will go a great way in the determination of the whole Controversie between us 2. The admirable prevalency of the Gospel in those days consisted principally in its spreading it self all the World over and planting seminaries for farther conversions in all Nations It did indeed prevail more in some Cities and Towns then in others in some places many were converted in others the tender of it was utterly rejected how be it it prevailed not unto the gathering of such great numbers into any Church solely as might destroy or be inconsistent with its Congregational Institution For not all not it may be half not sometimes a third Part of them who made some Profession of the Truth and attended unto the Preaching of the Word and many of whom underwent Martyrdom were admitted as compleat Members of the Church unto all the parts of its Communion Hence there were many who upon a general account were esteemed Christians and that justly where the Churches were but small 3. It doth not appear that in the next Age after the Apostles the Churches were any where so increased in number as to bear the least Proportion with the Inhaâ—itants of the Cities and Towns wherein they were The Church of Smyrna in the dayes of Polyicarpus may justly be esteemed one of the greatest in those dayes both from the Eminency of the Place and Person who was justly accounted the great Instructer of all Asia as they called him when he was carried unto the Stake But this Church giveth such an Account of it self in its Epistle unto the Churches of Pontus about the Martyrdom of Polycarpus as manifest the Church there to have been a very small number in Comparison of the multitude of the other Inhabitants so as that it was scarcely known who or what they were Euseb. lib. 4. cap. 15. So in the Excellent Epistle of the Churches of Vienna and Lyons unto the Churches of Asia and Phrygia concerning the Persecutions that befell them as they declare themselves to have been particular Churches onely so they make it evident that they bore in number no proportion unto the Inhabitants of the places where they were who could scarce discover them by the most diligent search Euseb. lib. 5. cap 1. 4. As for the Church of Hierusalem in particular notwithstanding the great number of its original Converts who probably were many of them strangers occasionally present at the Feast of Pentecost and there instructed in the knowledge of the Truth that they might in the several Countries whither they immediately returned be instruments of the propagation of the Gospel it is Certain that many years after it consisted of no greater Multitude then could come together in one place to the Mannagement of Church Affairs Acts 15.20 21. Nor is it likely that Pella an obscure place whose name probably had never been known but on this occasion was like to receive any great Multitudes nor doth Epiphanius say as our Authour pretends that they spread themselves from thence to Coelosyria and Decapolis and Basanitis For he affirmes expresly that all the Disciples which went from Hierusalem dwelt at Pella Only he says that from thence the Sect of the Nazarenes took its original which spread it self afterwards in Coelosyria Decapolis and Basanitis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 speaking of that Sect 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They dwelled all at Pella Sect. 7. p. 239. He quotes another saying of mine namely that I cannot discern the least necessity of any positive Rule or Direction in this Matter seeing the Nature of the thing and the duty of Man doth indispensibly require it And hereon he Attempts to make advantage in opposition unto another saying as he supposeth of mine Namely that the Institution of Churches and the Rules for their disposal and Government throughout the World are the same stated and unalterable from whence he makes many inferences to countenance him in his Charge of Schisme But why should we contend fruitlesly about these things had he been pleased to read a little farther on the same page he would have seen that I affirm the Institution itself to be a plain Command which considering the Nature of the duties required of men in Church Relation is sufficient to oblige them thereunto without any new Revelation unto that purpose which renders all his Queries Exceptions and Inferences of no use For I do not speak in that place of the Original Institution of Churches whose Laws and Rules are Universal and Vnalterable but our actual gathering into particular Churches for which I say the necessity of Duty is our Warrant and the
can have that respect and Devotion unto them as they would have unto hereditary Rulers long Succession in Rulers being the great cause of Veneration in the People especially such as had a Succession one unto another by a Natural Descent through Divine Appointment as the Preists had under the Law or as unto those whom on the account of their Worth Ability and Fitness for the work of the Ministry among them they do choose themselves they may do well to consider who are concerned The necessity there is of maintaining a Reputation and Interest by secular Grandeur Pomp and Power of Ruling the People of the Church in Church Matters by external force with many other Inconveniences do all proceed from this Order of things or rather disorder in the Call of men unto the Ministry And hence it is that the City of God and the People of Christ therein which is indeed the only true free Society in the World have Rulers in it and over them neither by a Natural Right of their own as in Paternal Government nor by hereditary Succession nor by Election nor by any way or means wherein their own consent is included but are under a Yoke of an Imposition of Rulers on them above any Society on the Earth whatever Besides there is that Relation between the Church and its Guides that no Law Order or Constitution can create without their mutual voluntary Consent And therefore this Right and Liberty of the People in every Church to choose their own Spiritual Officers was for many Ages preserved sacredly in the primitive times But hereof there is no shadow remaining in our Parochial Churches sundry Persons as Patrons and Ordinaries have a concurring Interest into the imposing of a Minister or such whom they esteem so upon any such Church without the Knowledge Consent or Approbation of the Body of the Church either desired or accepted If there be any who cannot comply with this Constitution of things relating unto the Ministry because it is a Part of their Profession of the Gospel which they are to make in the World which yet really consists only in an avowed subjection unto the Commands of Christ they can be no way obnoxious unto any charge of Schisme upon their refusal so to do For a Schisme that consists in giving a Testimony unto the Institutions of Christ and standing fast in the Liberty wherewith he hath made Disciples free is that whose Guilt no man need to fear 5. What remaineth of those Reasons whereon those who cannot comply with the Conformity under Consideration are cleared in point of Conscience from any Obligation thereunto and so from all Guilt of Schisme whatever belongs unto the Head of Impositions on their Consciences and Practise which they must submit unto These being such as many whole Books have been written about the chief whereof have no way been answered unless railings and scoffings with contempt and fierce Reproaches with false Accusations may pass for Answers I shall not here again insist upon them Some few things of that Nature I shall only mention and put an end unto this Dispute 1. The Conformity required of Ministers consists in a publick Assent and Consent unto the Book of Common Prayer with the Rubrick in it which contains all the whole Practise of the Church of England in its commands and Prohibitions Now these being things that concern the Worship of God in Christ the whole entire State Order Rule and Government of the Gospel Church whoever gives solemnly this Assent and Consent unless he be allowed to enter his Protestation against those things which he dislikes and of the sense wherein he doth so assent and consent which by Law is allowed unto none the said Assent and Consent is his publick Profession that all these things and all contained in them are according to the Mind of Christ and that the Ordering of them as such is part of their professed Subjection unto his Gospel Blessed be God most Ministers are too wise and honest to delude their Consciences with Distinctions Equivocations and Reservations and do thereon rather choose to suffer Penury and Penalty then to make the least entrenchment upon their own Consciences or the honour of the Gospel in their Profession What they do and declare of this Nature they must do it in Sincerity as in the sight of God as approving what they do not only as pardonable effects of Necessity but as that which is the best they have or can do in the Worship of God with a solemne Renunciation of whatever is contrary unto what they do so approve And whether this be a meet Imposition on the Consciences of Ministers with reference unto a great Book or Volume of a various composition unto things almost without number wherein exceptions have been given of old and lately not answered nor answerable with Rules Laws Orders not pretending to be Scriptural Prescriptions is left unto the Judgment of all who have due thoughts of their approaching Account before the Judgment Seat of Jesus Christ. 2. The Conformity that is required of others being precisely and without Power of Dispensation in them by whom it is required to answer the Rule or Law of it before declared every Man by his so conforming doth thereby take it on his Conscience and make it Part of his Christian Profession that all which he so conformes unto is not only what he may do but what he ought to do both in matter and manner so farre as the Law or any Part of it doth determine or enjoyn them No man is allowed to make either distinction or Protestation with respect unto any thing contained in the Rules and therefore whatever he doth in compliance therewith is interpretable in the sight of God and Man as an Approbation of the whole Sincerity and Openness in Profession is indispensibly required of us in order unto our Salvation And therefore to instruct men as unto the Worship of God to do what they do not judge to be their Duty to do but only hope they may do it without Sin or to joyn themselves in and unto that Performance of it which either they approve not of as the best in the whole or not lawful or approveable in some Parts of it is to instruct them unto the Debauching of their Consciences and Ruine of their own Souls Let every one be perswaded in his own Mind for what is not of Faith is Sin 3. There is in this Conformity required a Renunciation of all other ways of publick Worship or means of Edification that may be made use of For they are all expresly forbidden in the Rule of that Conformity No Man therefore can comply with that Rule but that a Renunciation of all other publick wayes of Edification as unlawful is part of the visible Profession which they make Video meliora proboque deteriora sequor is no good Plea in Religion It is uprightness and Integrity that will preserve Men and nothing else He that