Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	church_n	holy_a	scripture_n	2,807	5	5.7899	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A40718	A parallel wherein it appears that the Socinian agrees with the papist, if not exceeds him in idolatry, antiscripturism and fanaticism / by Francis Fullwood ...	Fullwood, Francis, d. 1693.	1693 (1693)	Wing F2513; ESTC R38752	24,721	38

wrong the Socinian almost all their Books have something in them to bear me Witness Let Smalcius more then once be heard for the rest First in that famous place of his Credimus inquit etiam si non semel atque iterum sed satis crebro Tom. 1. Disp 6. Sect. 63. Apartissime Scriptum extaret Deum esse hominem factum multo satius esse quia haec res sit absurda sanae Rationi plane contraria in Deum blasphema modum aliquem dicendi comminissi quo ista de Deo dici quam ista simpliciter ita ut verba sonant intelligere i. e. Tho' we find it declared in Scripture not only once and again but very often and very plainly That God was made Man because this is absurd and plainly contrary to found Reason and Blasphemous against God We believe saith he that it is much better to find out some mode of speaking according to which one may say this concerning God then to interpret things simply and according to the Letter Again let us hear him to the same purpose if not more Smal. Hom. 8. in c. 1. Joh. p. 89. plainly in another place Nullam Esse Religionis particulam quae cum ratione non Conveniat Et quae cum Ratione non Convenit opinio eam etiam in Theologiâ nullum locum habere posse That is that there is no small point in Religion which doth not agree with Reason And whatsoever Opinion doth not agree with Reason can have no place even in Religion What can this signifie But that when an Article of Faith is plainly revealed in the Word of God if it square not with Socinian Reason we must reject the evidence of Gods Authority and hearken to Reason That is in plain English Reason and not the Scripture is both the Judge and Rule of Socinian Faith I must conclude with an excellent passage or two in that incomparable Book of our Great Primate lately Printed called his Sermons concerning the Divinity c. of our Saviour I do readily grant saith he pag. 79. that the Socinian Writers have managed the Cause of the Reformation against the Church of Rome with great acuteness and advantage in many respects But I am sorry to have cause to say that they have likewise put into their hands better and sharper Weapons then ever they had before for the weakning and undermining of the Holy Scriptures which Socinus indeed hath in the general strongly asserted had he not by a dangerous liberty of imposing a Forreign and forced Sence upon particular Texts brought the whole into uncertainty Again saith he to speak freely I must needs say that it seems to me a much fairer way to reject the Divine Authority of p. 78. 79. a Book then to use it so disingenuously and to wrest the plain expressions of it with so much straining and violence from their most Natural and Obvious sence For no Doctrine whatsoever can have any certain Foundation in any Book if this liberty be once admitted without regard to the plain Scope and Occasion of it to play upon the Words and Phrases with all the Arts of Criticism and with all the variety of Allegory which a brisk and lively imagination can devise CHAP. III. The Foundation of Socinianism Fanatical as well as of the Papacy WE have seen the Parallel with respect to the Term of Worship and the Rule of Faith We are now come to consider how the Socinian and the Papist agree in the Foundation of their Religion I know the pretenders to so much Reason who make Reason to be both the Judge and Rule of their Religion will ill bear the Title of Fanaticks and Enthusiasts but 't is possible that even such may be found vel cum vel sine Ratione Insanire If the Socinian appear to do so he must not take it ill to be rank'd with the Papist in this charge also and equally accused of Unreasonable Religion no better than Fanaticism or Enthusiasm as well as Idolatry and Antiscripturism That this charge may appear fare and just I shall first describe what I mean by Fanaticism and Enthusiasm or Enthusiastical Fanaticism and then I shall apply it to our present Subjects the Papist and Socinian and see their agreement in it SECT I. Fanaticism Described MOdern Fanaticism and Enthusiasm I reckon to be nothing else but a Religion if it deserve the Name that hath no Foundation either in the Word of God or sound Reason but is founded in Dreams or Phansies or pretended Inspiration or Divine Revelation besides and other then the Holy Scriptures Now whether I err in this Idea or Character of Fanaticism or no yet I am sure that Religion that may be thus described is a Wild or a Mad sort of Religion Socinians themselves being Judges Such is the Religion founded by Mahomet and is Fanatical and Enthusiastical plain enough as all Christians acknowledge And whether the Papacy as such is much better is doubted by all Learned Protestants and how far Socinianism is liable to the same Condemnation is to be enquired presently SECT II. Fanaticism the Foundation of Popery BUT First for the Papacy as such that this hath no Foundation in Scripture or Reason That 't is founded only in Dreams and Phansies and pretended Inspiration or Revelation will be easily granted if we consider how their several Orders were first founded namely in Fanatical Enthusiasm as is most evidently demonstrated by the excellent paines of a most Learned Prelate of our own now living Bishop of Worcester Moreover the very root of the Papacy it self hath no better ground I mean their Popes Supremacy as St. Peters pretended Successor is nothing but dream and Phansie or which is worse affected Arrogance and Presumption or precarious and violent Imposition upon the Christian World because they found it absolutely necessary for the support of a rotten or unsound Building And being without the help either of Scripture or found Reason it rests only upon and resolves at last into a feined Will of St. Peter that was never proved per testes by lawful Witnesses Doubtless the Papacy is Fanatical from top to bottom but how doth it appear that Sooinianism is so This is the next enquiry SECT III. Fanaticism at the bottom of Socinianism TO be clear in this enquiry we must consider the Fundamental point on which the Socinian Religion as such chiefly if not entirely rests and from whence it ariseth and 't is plainly this whether our Saviour had a being before he was born of the Virgin Mary On this hang all the great questions touching our Lords Filiation Natures Divinity Merit Satisfaction and Intercession and are decided and determined as that stands or falls Now this great point Whether our Saviour had a being before he was born of the Virgin hath an essential dependance on another which of absolute necessity must be evinced before in order to the determination of this and therefore this

and that is a very plain one and one would imagine beyond exception 'T is St. Stephen praying in these words Lord Jesus receive my Spirit Act. 7. 59. but behold the fineness of Fr. Davids Invention saith he 't is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and because 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 may be either the Genetive or the Vocative Case according to the usual art of Socinian reasoning it must be taken in that sence that will best serve a Turn tho' never so alien or contrary to the true interpretation and the Reason of the Context he must have it Lord of Jesus or else it will prove either that 't is Lawful to Worship our Saviour and to pray unto him or this first Martyr died with Idolatry in his mouth But this Criticism is not so fine as 't is forced and absurd The Learned observe that if Jesus had been the Genitive Case the Article would have been added 't would have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 We find the same words Rev. 22. 20. and there they cannot bear the sence of the Genitive and must be understood in the Vocative Case But besides the ilness of the Grammer the harshness of the Sence and the Novelty of this rare discovery two or three things might abate the Authors confident boasting of this Invention The Syriac is beyond the reach of it Domine Noster Jesu Some Copies have it plainer yet and Read it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 O Lord Christ And their admired Grotius's gloss is utterly inconsistent with it Invocantem nempe Jesum Christum But why should I trouble my Reader any farther about this Ridiculous shift of David which you may find was long since exposed and baffled by Socinus himself in a very strenuous confutation of it which its Author David had never courage or skill enough to encounter again that I can find Now my Brethren consider 't is eternal Reason that Reliously to Worship any Creature is Idolatry but we have found it the common practice of the best men in Scripture thus Religiously to Worship our Saviour Christ it seems to follow clearly that either these Holy Men so doing were Idolaters or our Saviour Christ is more then a meer Creature that is he is the True God I know you will deny the First I heartily wish you would confess the Second it would be so far well betwixt us However you do not undertake to defend the part of Socinus from Idolatry more haynous then that of the Papists which I hope I have demonstrated sufficiently before CHAP. II. The Socinians Antiscripturist as truly as if not more then the Papists HAving ended our First Parrable betwixt the Socinian and Papist with respect to the Term of Worship we come next to compare them with respect to their Rule of Faith the Canonical Books of the Holy Scriptures Herein also they both concur viz. In their endeavours to undermine their Authority And when they think they have occasion so to do they lay this Rule aside and set up another of their own in the stead of it That the Papists do so the Socinians readily grant and that the Socians do like the Papists and exceed them therein is as easily demonstrated SECT I. The Papists vilifies the Holy Scripture 1. FOR the Papists the World is sensible enough how vilely they deal with this Rule of the Holy Scriptures and make them indeed as they sometimes call them A Nose of Wax and a Leaden Rule They take upon them to sence them as they please and use them only as Tools to serve a turn and little otherwise Sometimes they will admit nothing but the bare Words without any reasonable Construction of them when they would advance their Transubstantiation At other times when the proper and Litteral Sence is against them O then the Scripture is a Killing a Dead Letter and must receive its Life and Sense from their Churches Interpretation how wild and absurd soever it be to serve their Hypothesis Thus when they have disparaged sleighted and set aside the True Rule 't is no wonder they introduce and obtrude another Rule of their own devising which they do not only make equal with it but prefer before it I mean their Oral Tradition and the Authority of the Roman Church Yea when they seem to allow the Holy Scriptures any Authority they at the same time rob them of it by transfering that Authority to themselves their own Sence and Sentiments tho' diverse from and even contrary to the Letter or plain and obvious meaning of the Written Word SECT II. The Socinians vilifie the Scripture more then Papists WHile I have been speaking of the Papist I have given you but an imperfect draught and Character of a Socinian in this point Verily the Papist seems to be the honester of the two His is an open and down-right attacking and villifying those Holy Books while the Socinian doth it in disguise and wounds it deeper lies in its Bosom and stabbs it to the Heart and with splended Colours of Honouring and Arguments proving its Divine Original and Authority makes it utter Non-sense bad sense or any sence that their cause requires Now seeing these men in other things are Masters of a great deal of Reason it may be worth a Question whether their Writing so much for the Divine Authority of the Holy Scriptures be from a real Opinion of the Truth of it or only in pretence to serve their own purpose and varnish their designs For how is it possible if their Opinion of it were Real they should use it so slightly and after so trifling a manner as 't is pitty to see they do With how much gravity and solemn circumstances do they make the Word of God Felo de se not so much by opposing as by Apposing one part to another and by the idlest Phansies or an odd kind of skill peculiar to themselves make a weaker text take off the life and sense of a Stronger and by a likeness or sameness or neerness of expression when there is no other reason in the World for it to enervate the strength of the best Arguments it affords for the God-head of Christ and the Sacred Trinity To make this out beyond exception give me leave only to mention some Instances of it The mention only is shame and reproach enough one would think as well as confutation in the sense of an Indifferent or modest Man 1. When we prove Three Persons and each of them God from the great Commission for Propagating the Christian Church by Baptising in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost They gravely answer and would have us take it for a full Answer That 't is said the Israelites were Baptized into Moses and in the Cloud and that they believed in God and his Servant Moses 2. When we urge John 1. 1. In the beginning was the Word they reply that it must signifie the Beginning of the Gospel or New Creation And their