let him know that tendeth any other course that he shall not attaine vnto the light of the truth which he shal grope after in darknes To be short saith he what soeuer is said since the apostles times is cut off it beareth no authority with it c. Hieronym in Psal 87. how holie prudent soeuer the Authors thereof might be S. August The Canonicall Scripture is set vpon a throne and euerie faithfull vnderstanding must be subiect thereunto If we yea if an Angel from heauen August contr Faust l. 11. c. 5. cont lit ras Petil. 6 lib. 2. contr Donatist c. 6. tract 2 in Ep. S. Iohan do teach any thing more then that which is contained in the Scriptures the Law or the Gospel let him be accursed In our cōtrouersies let vs bring this ballance these gold waights as out of the closet of God to iudge that of weight from that which is light Let vs there iudge of errors for God hath placed in the Scriptures a bright and cleare shining firmament to discouer confute them The Councels for saith he vnto the Arrians I alledge not vnto thee the Councell of Nice Cont. Maxim Episc Arrian l. 3. c. 14. De Ciuit. Dei l. 11. c. 1. Epist 166. De vnit eccles c. 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. 16. neither therefore doe thou alledge vnto me the councel of Rimini but let vs trie the maistry by the Scriptures which both you and I my selfe doe well approue c. The Church likewise for The citie of God doth beleeue in the Scriptures and by them is faith conceiued In the Scriptures saith he we haue learned Christ therein also haue we learned to know the Church we haue knowne the head and therefore cannot misknow the bodie thereof VVhether we or the Donatists be the Church the Scriptures alone will teach and instruct vs. Saint Chrysostome The ignoraunce of the Scriptures hath begotten heresies c. Though the dead should liue again or an Angel descend frō heauen Chrysost in hom de Laza. yet we must principally and before them beleeue the Scripture The Angels are but seruants ministring spirits but the Scripture is the Lord maister In Epi. ad Gal. hom 1. In 5. Mat. hom 43. 49. In 1. ad Thess homil 7. In 2. ad Corin. homil 33. In Psal 5.95.142.147 In at this gate doe both the sheepe and shepheard enter they driue away heretikes who so entreth not by them is a theefe The Scripture is the kingdome of heauen it is inclosed therein and fastned thereunto The gate of this kingdome is the vnderstanding of the Scriptures Setting our course and sailing after them wee haue the sonne of God for our patron and protector they are our rule and our squire As the light is vnto the eies so is the law of God vnto our spirits without it all our senses halt An heire doth willingly possesse himselfe of his fathers will and testament and so should we no lesse of the Scriptures the furniture and prouision for our warre against sinne and Sathan himselfe c. In which saith he in another place wee must either denie Christ or blot out the Scriptures or else become the obedient seruants of the Scriptures And if he said this then against the heretikes of his time then much more against Antichrist to come and vpon farre more iust causes and considerations For saith he when this cursed heresie the armie of Antichrist shall possesse the Churches there will not bee found any proofe or maner of helpe to trie and know Christendome by but the holy Scriptures By them alone a man shall know where and who shall bee the true church In this confusion and hurlie burlie there will bee no want of broching and blasing abrode of miracles for euen alreadie the counterfet Christians haue most but and if a man looke any other way then to the Scriptures hee cannot but bee offended perish and fall into the abhomination of desolation which shall bee in the holie places of the Church And therefore our sauiour Christ knowing afore hand that such confusion should follow in the latter daies will that we flie vnto the Scriptures And now also this is the cause why according to the aduertisement of Saint Chrysostome we call you thereunto we which thus alledge and contend with the hazard of our liues and for the working of your saluation and our owne that that Antichrist is alreadie come and seated in your Church and all this according to the Scriptures and by the Scriptures Hereto you replie If his Scriptures alone take place in this controuersie then what shall become of so many goodly traditions What becommeth them of the traditions 1. Cor. 11. What shall become of our Church Verely if you speake of diuine traditions such as whereof Saint Paule saith I haue receiued of the Lord Quod tradidi vobis whatsoeuer I haue deliuered vnto you of those which haue their foundation in the Scriptures and whereof Irenaeus saith vnto vs Looke what Gospel the Apostles preached the same they deliuered vnto vs tradiderunt inquit nobis in the Scriptures Of them saith Saint Cyprian which descend from the authoritie of the Gospel Cypri in Epi. 74. ad Pomp. and the writing of the Apostles Verelie we will be readie to defend them if you will beleeue vs with common armour we shall be both the one and the other quit and freed from all our paines and trouble for the Scriptures and they wil mutuallie acknowledge one another as doe the little riuers and their heads or springs being touched with the touchstone of the Scripture they will hold their value But if by Traditions you meane mans inuentions and doctrines that are without and out of the Scriptures then we tell you that Christ hath giuen definitiue sentence thereof In vaine do you serue me Matth. 15 9 teaching for doctrines the commaundements of men And thus spake he to the Pharisies who wholy rested themselues in the Church in the Sorbone of that time which said as you do of yours at Trent that it was no lesse grieuous an offence to commit against or omit any thing contained in their traditions In Thal. ord 4. tract 4. dist 10 Esay 29 13. then and if such commission or omission had beene in respect of any point of the law it selfe And there is great like lihoode that it is come vpon you which was forespoken by the Prophets They haue serued mee according to the ordinances of men Ierem. 8 8. and therefore wisedome shall perish from their wise men They haue cast behind them the worde of the Lord and there is no wisdome in them But if you suspect the soundnesse of the Scripture Iust in Tryph or rather the vprightnesse of God in his owne cause then let vs heare the fathers Iustine We must giue credite to God and his ordinances alone and not vnto humane traditions And that he ruleth them
them of vnsounde dealing seeing the auncient fathers of the Church did alwayes make their appeales vnto them against the heretikes and that in such sort as that when they once perceiued them to come within the bounds of their iurisdiction they held themselues victorers in their cause The holie Scripture say they to vs is not sufficient And what other sufficiencie doe wee looke for therein The scripture sufficient but to possesse God who is sufficient of himself euen for al maner of thinges or what other to be briefe but to come to saluation But and if thou wilt not beleeue the Apostle who telleth thee that the holy Scriptures are able to make thee wise vnto saluation by faith which is in Christ that is the man of God the Euangelist the teacher of others Iohn 5 39. Iohn 20.31 at the least beleeue the sonne of God who sendeth vs so expressely to the Scriptures Because saith he that we haue life in them And hast thou them to seeke and search for thine owne saluation The Lord commaundeth thee to search them diligently in them thou hast life Dost thou labour and seeke how to teach it others They are profitable to teach conuince correct and instruct By them the sonne of God the eternall word did teach his disciples Hast thou to deale against heretikes By the verie same hee stopte the mouthes of the Pharisies and confounded the Sadduces who did not admit of any mo parties then one The heretikes cannot keepe their holde before them yea they cannot possiblie defend themselues otherwise then by refusing them No sooner are they drawne thereto saith Tertullian but they are confounded whether Ebionites Hermogenists or Marcionites c. Yea and if the controuersie should bee against the diuell himselfe we know that from thence the Lord put him to silence that he coÌ„futed him in all his schoole points Apocal. and sent him backe againe to the bottomlesse pit of hell how much more the sonne perdition for the ouercomming and discomfiting of whom there are not any other armor or weapons spoken of As he that must be ouerthrowne with the breath of his mouth and beaten downe by the powerfulnesse of his Scriptures wherefore the Scripture hauing beene of such sufficiencie in those dayes both for the children of God and against his aduersaries where shall it sithence haue lost that his â—â—sufficiencie Or who shall not rather suspect that we are become ouer sufficient that is to say spoyled with presumption That we accuse it of insufficiencie because our pretended and deuised sufficiencies are not found therein And againe if it were so much at such times as the Church had no more but the olde Testament both vnto saluation and condemnation what shall we say of the times succeeding and those of the present According to the Fathers Iren cont haeres l. 2 c. 47. accompanied with the accomplishment of that in the person of Christ and made more cleare by the new And verilie the fathers also haue carefully kept themselues from this point rather to be tearmed infidelitie then errour or heresie Irenaeus saith We knowe verie well that the Scriptures are perfect for they are appointed and spoken by the worde of God and his spirit Tertullian Tertul. contra Prax. Hermoâ—g Cypr. de Baptism Christi I adore and reuerence the fulnesse of the Scriptures the scripture hath his reason and is sufficient of it self Saint Cyprian Speake on Lord thy seruant heareth Christian religion shall finde that out of this Scripture doe spring the rules of all manner of doctrine and that from thence riseth as also that thither returneth al whatsoeuer the discipline and gouernment of the Church doth containe Antonius the Hermite Antonius in suiâ— Epistolis Athanasius cont Idola Ad Serapion In Ep. Senten Dyonis Hillar l. 2. de Trinit The Scriptures are sufficient for all manner of knowledge of God and all manner of discipline Athanasius who notwithstanding hath to deale against the Arrians The holy scriptures are sufficient for the demonstration of the truth learne onely the scriptures for the lessons which thou findest there will be sufficient for thee Although saith he in another place I haue not found this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coÌ„substantiall yet so it is as that I haue found the thing it selfe Saint Hillarie vpon the same argument The word of God which by the testimonie of the Gospel hath beene transfused and conueyed into our eares is sufficient for the beleeuers for what is there belonging vnto mans saluation that is not to be found contained therein Or what is there therein either lame or obscure Verily euerie thing therein is full and perfect Basil de vera fide Homil. 29. In oratione Ethicaâ— In Esai c. 2. Chrys hom 9 in 2. ad Tim. c. Saint Basill attributeth it to the same pride and infidelitie to bring in any thing that is not written or to reiect that which is written The old and new Testament saith he are the treasure of the church All the commaundements of God are written and must be obserued All whatsoeuer is besides the straight and euen line of the Scripture is a cursed abhomination before God S. Chrysostome The holie Scripture teacheth thee whatsoeuer thou shouldest know or be ignorant of Thou art a Gentile and wouldest become a Christian but our controuersies doe trouble thee Thou knowest not to whom to goe for euerie man pretendeth and alledgeth the Scriptures c. Knowe that that which agreeth therewith is christian but that which disagreeth with the same In Acta hom 33. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aug. de bono Viduit De doct christâ— l. 2. c. 9. serm 88. ad fratres lib. de confes 7 c. 7. In S. Ioh. tract 49. vbi viamad vitam De consensu Euan. l. 1. c. v. t. is farre off from the rule of christianitie Likewise saith he in another place It is the propertie of the diuell to adde vnto the commaundements of God Saint Augustine The Scripture saith he doth prefixe and set before vs a law teaching vs not to be more wise then we ought looke not therefore that to teach thee on my behalfe and part is any other thing but to expound vnto thee the wordes of my master for euen saith he in the things that are openly taught in the Scriptures is fully found al that which is to be done or left vndone all that which appertaineth vnto faith or concerneth maners Some haue made choise to write of all that which may seeme to be sufficient for the saluation of the faithfull In thy Christ O Lord and in the holy Scriptures I perswade my selfe that thou hast placed the way of mans saluation Whatsoeuer he would haue that we should reade of his deedes or wordes Cyril Alexan. In S. Iohan. l. 12 c. vlt. that hath he commaunded his Apostles to write as if it had beene done with his own hands c. S. Cyprian Bishop of
ad Pammach Oceanum de Origen we should likewise speake doubtfullie of the Deitie of the holie Ghost with Saint Hillarie we should condemne children dying without Baptisme with Saint Augustine we should giue them the Eucharist with Saint Cyprian and the greatest part vntill the time of Charles the great euen vnto the mouthes of the dead as certaine Councels doe beare vs witnesse In a word we should haue made with lesse then nothing of the Church of Christ Augeas his Oxehouse Canus l. 7. de locis Theol. c. 3. Gen. Cent. 3. seq ad finem c. 4. VillavinceÌ„tius de ratione studiâ—â— Theolo l. 4 c. 6 obseru 1. 2. Baron annal tom 2. of Noes Arke a sinke of all superstitions and errours Which thing our greatest aduersaries themselues at this time not being able to dissemble doe say All the Saints such onely excepted as haue written the Canonicall bookes haue spoken by the Spirit of man and haue sometimes erred euen in the matters of faith both in worde and writing what profoundnesse of learning or innocencie of life soeuer that we can obserue and marke in them And they come so farre as to set downe their errors and that both by their names as also by their kinds concluding that the Scriptures are onely without error and exempted from lies As therefore there are rules for the expounding of the Scripture by the Scripture The Fathers must be admitted as expounders but not as law-giuers so there are also for the expounding of them by the Fathers the first whereof is alwayes this That they be receyued and read as expounders not as law-giuers and that they referre their expositions to the rule of faith and the articles thereof and not to make any new faith any new articles according to that which Saint Ierome saith vnto vs Hieron cont Iouinian August de Bono viduitat As oft as I expound not the Scriptures but speake freely of mine owne sense reprooue me who will And Saint Augustine The holie Scripture hath set vs a rule not to dare to knowe more then it behoueth My teaching of thee then may not be any other thing then to expound vnto thee the words of the Teacher that is of the Lord. Vincentius c. 2 22 41. And this is the same that Vincentius Lyrinensis saith vnto vs The Canon of the Scriptures saith he is perfect and superaboundantly sufficient in it selfe for all things Wee are not then to make any addition of the Fathers to make by them any supplie vnto the doctrine of the Scriptures but rather saith he seeing that they may bee interpreted in diuerse senses it is meete to ioine therewithall the authoritie of the Ecclesiasticall vnderstanding Not to adde vnto or alter any thing that is written but onely to make for the vnderstanding of it For saith he elswhere It is written Depositum serua That which hath beene committed of trust vnto thee not what thou shalt haue inuented That which thou hast receiued not what thou hast found out wherein thou must not be an authour but whereof thou art a gardiant not an ordiner but a disciple not a guide but a follower What thou hast receiued in golde redeliuer the same in golde c. And in the person of Timothie this is spoken vnto all Teachers it is spoken to the whole Church c. And what we say of one of the Fathers we take it as spoken of all togither for although all the men of the world could bee assembled and called togither and that euerie one of them were worth an Augustine they could not make or cause to be made one article of faith to binde the faith of a Christian to beleeue anie other thing necessarie vnto saluation then that which is in the holy Scripture Gaâ—â— following that which Saint Paule saith Though I my selfe or an Angel from heauen should preach vnto you any other thing then that which wee haue alreadie preached vnto you let him be accursed And a little after he setteth downe the reason For I haue not receiued or learned it of any man but by the reuelation of Iesus Christ c. And this hath beene renued by all the olde Fathers though but ill fauouredly kept by them which were their successours and whereupon notwithstanding our maister Gerson and Cardinall Caietan after him haue framed this conclusion That the Church of this time cannot any more neither hath bin able besides that which the Primitiue Church could to canonize any booke establish any article of faith c. The second is That we discerne in the workes of the Fathers the true and legitimate bookes from the faigned ones not to attribute them vnto them and by consequent sucke out of them an other mans errors in stead of their sound opinions not to receiue any doctrine for old when as the same shall be either new or else verie sparingly commended vnto vs of the ancients For it cannot be denied but that there are many such and those easily found out either by the stile being otherwise in one age then it is in another yea differing in some one time of some one father from that of another or by some apparance of contrarietie and that either in doctrine or exposition a thing hardly befalling any one authour or by the alledging of Authours which are notoriously knowne not to haue liued till after them or by the vsing of some tearmes and speeches not as yet practised in the Church in their time c. Of all which sorts the malice of men hath furnished vs with sufficient store of examples For the stile of the Epistles attributed to the first Bishops of Rome is meerely barbarous and Gottish in the times of the greatest flourishing of the Latine tongue and when there could not bee found in all Italie nor in all the Romane Empire either learned or idiot that could speake this language The stile of Denys the pretended Areoopagite is nothing like to Saint Pauls containing nothing of Apostolicall note or marke nothing of the spoiling of Ceremonies so oft repeated by the Apostle The treatise of Sina and Sion against the Iewes c. nothing of that vigor which was in Saint Cyprian his other writings against the very same but farre lesse of his elegancie zeale and doctrine The pretended Canons also of the Apostles how should they proceed from them when they forbid that which the others approue and command that which they do openly disproue and disallow And therefore by so much the more daungerous and poisonfull for hauing purloined the name of so soueraigne a drug And in such sort we are likewise to say of Saint Clement his reuises and Saint Peter his peregrination Hieronym in Apolog. cont Ruff in Epiph. haeres 27. which Saint Ierome and Epiphanius do witnesse vnto vs wittingly to hold and take part with the heresie of Eunomius and Ebion the most pernicious ones that haue been in the Church
as worthilie communicate therein Note that for the saluing of the honour of the Councell of Constance hee will haue the thing not to depend vpon the institutiō of Christ but vpon the custom of the church Againe how that hee maketh that to bee a matter of indifferencie in the Sacrament which is indeed essentiall vnto the same and further he will haue the Bohemians not onelie to take it thankefullie at his hands but also binde themselues that when hee hath solde them the blood of Christ they should quite claime and wholie burie in silence whatsoeuer other agreeuances which they had conceiued against the Church of Rome especiallie that of the iurisdiction and Primacie of the Pope If sayeth he the Bohemians persist to demaund this communion and according lie send their Legate with expresse commaundement to bee instant and importunate for the same then the holie Councell shall giue libertie to the Priestes of Morauia and Bohemia to administer the communion vnto their partishioners vnder both kindes but yet with condition sayeth Nauclerus that if so bee in all other thinges the onelie matter of communicating vnder both kindes excepted they doe conforme themselues vnto the faith Naucl. Gen. 48. f. 174. ordinances ceremonies of the church of Rome Wherfore were those deadlie and cruell wars wherefore was there so much blood shedde to purchase this decree in the end Let euerie man iudge if it were not vppon good ground and cause 1500. that Albertus Pigghius one of our great aduersaries said speaking of these two Councels That they haue made decrees against the law of nature against the cleare and manifest Scriptures against the authoritie of antiquitie and against the Catholike faith of the Church As also the Thomists doe holde that the Councell of Basill was assembled and called in ill sorte and ought to bee helde as no Councell And yet after these Councels the Doctors stoode not firme and well assured of the soundnes of their determinations so harde a thing is it for falshoode to get out of the clouches of Veritie and Truth for Gabriel Biel sayeth that The Priestes are more worthie then all the holie Laitie Gabr. Biel. Lect. 52. litera f. yea then the virgin Marie because that they doe communicate vnder both kindes And therfore the Sacrament vnder one kinde notwithstanding their concomitancie is more excellent then vnder both kinds And yet in another place he lancheth deeper That it is not sufficient to haue the grace of the communion by the taking of the bodie which is signified by the element of bread if we haue not the grace of redemption by the bloode signified by the element of wine otherwise sayeth hee The Sacrament is imperfectum alimentum that is an imperfect foode and nourishment In the ende wee are come to the Councell of Trent Concil Trid. Sess 6. wherein as appeareth by the tenor of the same it was required by many great Princes and estates of Christendom that the cup might be restored vnto the people which thing was put to be consulted vpon about the same was the whole summer in the yeare 62. passed ouer with great strife and contention in wordes some holding with the inhibition ordained in the Councell of Constance Consule Cassand de communione sub vtraque specie edita Coloniae 64. the hard tearmes onelie whereof they had been admonished by Gerson being somewhat qualified and others for the grant and allowance thereof made in the Councell of Basill vpon certaine conditions which being indifferent Talis confessio fieret sine detrimento imminutione plenariae potestatis ecclesiae Romanae such graunt and allowance should be made as might stand without the preiudice or diminishing of the ful power of the authoritie of the Church of Rome But manie words hauing passed to and fro they keeping a middle way ordayned That non conficientes that is such properlie as make not the sacrament but receiue it onely aswell Priestes as the Laitie are not bounde by the institution of Christ to receiue both kindes Wherein they doe not stretch the priuiledge of the Priestes but quo ad actum conficiendi so far foorth as it concerneth the acte of Consecration But what greater necessitie can wee looke for to bee laide vpon vs then the commaundement of God they goe about to proue That it hath beene alwayes in the power of the church to dispence of the Sacraments as hee shall thinke best salua eorum substantia that is reseruing their substance safe and entire vnto them But from whence shall wee learne the substance thereof but from the institution of Christ And yet notwithstanding they conclude That it is verie considerately and well done of the Church to ordaine the communion vnder one kind alone as if that the receyuing of it vnder two were not of the substance of the Sacrament But what is there notwithstanding that can bee more substantiall in the sacramentes then that which maketh them Sacramēts that is the signes instituted by Christ And moreouer That seeing that Iesus Christ is whole and entire vnder one of the two kindes it is not needfull to take anie moe then one and that those which take that one alone are not defrauded for all that of anie thing necessarie vnto their saluation Who doubteth that this Diuinitie was vnknowne vnto the Primitiue Church That Christ in what place soeuer hee bee is there whole and entire And notwithstanding who euer was so bold to draw from thence a conclusion directlie contrarie to the expresse institution and is the question in this place about the practising of that rule of naturall Philosophie That which may bee done by the fewer and lesse number should not be done by the greater c And if this might finde place who would not take vp some one colourable excuse and reason or other to reiect all the sacramēts seeing it is saide That Jesus Christ dwelleth in our heartes by faith Ephes 2. Heb. 3. Iohn 6. Calat 3. that we are made partakers of Christ by faith in his word that hee dwelleth in the belieuers and the belieuers in him that we put him on in Baptisme c. For who cannot conclude from thence Baptisme is sufficient what haue I to doe with the holie Supper The word sufficeth what neede haue I of the Sacraments if it were not that wee did giue that reuerend and Christian regarde vnto the institution of Christ to bound and limit all our conclusions within the tearmes of the same In the meane time it curseth all them which hold that the Communion vnder the two kinds is necessarie either in respect of saluation or otherwise in respect of the commaundement of God as all those likewise which say that the cuppe hath beene taken from the Laitie without anie manner of sounde ground or sufficient reasons and as for the sute and request amde by Princes that it might bee restored to them and their Subiectes they commit that to the
this venome as it were by a fire Marke this word As then the speeches here vsed do not deale with the fire of that materiall purgatorie And in deed he setteth downe S. Cyp. l. 3. testim aduers Iud. c. 57. Cyrill in Esa l. 1. c. 4. orat 3. Barnabas as one of this number S. Cyprian likewise The Lord hath reformed and amended me not giuing me ouer vnto death according to that which is written in Malachie c. For saith he God amendeth and preserueth his faithfull S. Cyrill expoundeth it of the operation of the holy Ghost in the regnerating and sanctifying of the faithfull and according to the same expoundeth the place of Esay 4. When the Lord shall wash the daughters of Sion c. But yet and if wee marke the text Behold the Lord saith he quasi ignis as a fire This then cannot be purgatorie but God which maketh this purging and not properly a fire but as a fire hee meaneth doubtlesse the fire of the spirit of Christ which purifieth our soules by his doctrine And so S. Ierome hath expounded it Hugo in Esa c. 4. in Malac. c. 3. Cardinall Hugo in like manner saith He will purge sinnes by the fire of his passion or of his spirit And by this meanes we conclude that there is no place throughout all the canonical bookes of the old Testament from which may bee gathered or proued this their purgatorie or any of the praiers or Masses for the dead neither yet according to the exposition of the fathers and that the most worthie and renowned amongst them any such torment as is giuen to them And this is freely acknowledged by Perion the Monke and thereof there is as yet some iarre and disagreement remaining amongst those of the Church of Rome namely whether there were any purgatorie in the time of the olde Testament or not There remaine the booke of Tobiah and the second of the Machabees both Apocrypha which we are to examine howbeit that wee could answere them in a word that all doctrines that haue no other ground approbation but in the Apocrypha bookes must needs themselues be Apocrypha Tobiah saith Tob. c. 4. v. 18. Cast thy bread liberally vppon the graues of the iust but giue nothing vnto the wicked The Israelites had beene amongst the Gentiles and so had Tobiah also now the Gentiles were wont to make feastes at the funeralles of their neere kinsmen Vnde parentare et parentatum The Iewes that they might not seeme to be behind the Gentiles in honouring of their parentes distributed victualles vnto the poore In like manner saith Saint Ierome they caried victualles to such as were sorrowful pensiue and which wept about the graues of their dead which hee gathereth out of the 31. of the Prouerbes And Cardinall Hugo Hee speaketh here of some fashion not knowne vnto vs or rather for the comforting of the kinsfolkes hee commanded feastes to be made after the buriall c. This is all that can be gathered out of this place That of the Machabees may seeme to minister vnto them some better matter for their purpose This is saith he a oly cogitation to pray for the dead 2. Micab 12. to the ende that they may bee deliuered from their sinnes c. First it is pittie that this doctrine of their pretended fire whereof they make so great accounts and for the defence whereof they haue kindled so many fires throughout Christendome should haue no other foundation then one only place and that out of the Apocripha bookes and that the rather in as much as they haue beene acknowledged such by all antiquitie and by the most auncient Doctors and Councels witnesse S. Cyprian S. Ierome S. Augustine S. Gregorie c. The primitiue Church gouerned by the holy Ghost Cypr. in Symbol Hieronym in lib. Sapient August contr Gaudentium Gregor l. 8. Moralium hath not iudged the books of the Machabees to be such without cause if afterward they haue been permitted to be read in the Church it was as S. Augustine telleth vs For the example sake of vertue and not for the grounding of any doctrines vpon them Saint Ierome saith They are read for the instruction of the people and not to authorize any doctrine c. S. Gregorie likewise They are not produced or alleadged for to testifie or confirme any thing as canonicall but onely for edification There are whole volumes to this effect And when as the Church hath not touched or had any dealing with the reportes and narrations contained in the second booke partly as not agreeing vppon the same matters with that of the first and partly for their being detected and conuinced of falshood by the whole storie of the ancient gestes of the Iewes as in that matter of the hidden fire of the Arke c. which Nehemiah and Esdras would not haue concealed c. We cannot but haue them suspected as also it fared with Pope Gelasius who would not admit of the first c. yea the Author himselfe giueth sentence of condemnation against himselfe as crauing pardon if he haue written amisse The holy Ghost who hath inspired and enlightened the authors of the canonicall scriptures would neuer haue written so In the second book it is certaine that from the time of the Machabees 2. Machab. 4.7.12 the Iewes by means of the familiaritie that they had with the Grecians began mightily to incline to Paganisme Now wee will shew hereafter that this doctrine is taken from the Paganes and it appeareth so to be by Iason who in fauour of Antiochus prouided an vniuersitie of paganisme in Ierusalem by other priestes who turned the sacrifices of the law into the manner of vsage that was amongst the Paganes 2. Machab. 3.13 sacrificing for the idolatrous kings for the Lacedemonians for the health of Heliodorus a piller and spoiler of the temple also by their suffering of the Paganes contrarie to the law to offer therein as namely vnto Antiochus Eupator the Emperor Augustus c. Philo de legatione ad Caium By the historie of Razias who laid violent hands vpon himselfe that so he might not fall into the enemies hands the opinion of al Paganes yet commended by this author of the second book of Machabees But after all this let vs come to the storie which is the same with that which is mentioned in the 1. book and 5. chap. Ioseph the sonne of Zachary and Azarias priestes 1. Mach. 5.57 in the emulation which the prowesse and valiantnesse of Iuda had stirred vp in thē contrarie to his inhibition made an enterprise against Iamnia but Gorgias comming out against them discomfited them so that there remained 2000. vpon the place And Israel had receiued a sore ouerthrow Because saith he that hee had not obeied Iuda and that they were not of those whom God had stirred vp for the deliuerance of Israel that is to say because they
bee so purged by this fire as that in the end they shall proue and trie the clemencie of God And he alleadgeth Origen thereupon concealing in the meane time the rest of his opinion for that it finally extended vnto the Deuils But what helpeth all this for the prouing of the purgatorie whereof wee speake which is made for the faithfull penitents and not for them which die in their sinne for to fulfil the punishment Sixt. Senens l. 5 and not to cleanse or wipe away the fault where sinnes haue no entrance much lesse merites where the wicked haue no place much lesse the Saints much lesse also the Apostles and much lesse the holy virgine which taketh his beginning so soone as death hath made an end and is imployed about his office euerie day without ceasing and without attending the day of iudgement And notwithstanding they are not ashamed to alleadge vnto vs these places which themselues condemne in their bookes That it was a disputable doctrine and which to be short cannot make any thing for them or against vs. Yea and that furthermore this was but an opinion wherein men were let alone and left to range according to the pregnancie of their wit and capacitie and not any doctrine receiued and admitted into the Church it appeareth clearely for Saint Augustine doth not faine or dissemble the gainsaying and disallowing of it neither yet the publike confutation thereof in his bookes and that not onely without all checke or dislike August de Genes contr Manich l. 2. c. 10 In Psalm 37. but with much praise and to the good liking of men for the same In a certaine place he suffered it to escape according to the opinion then currant As that after this life such as haue not husbanded their ground well are in daunger either of the fire of purgation or of eternall fire notwithstanding that hee vseth these wordes Videri apparere that it seemeth to be apparant and that these purgatorie punishmentes according to his owne iudgement De ciuit Dei l. c. 10.25 De ciuit Dei l. 21. c. 13. l. Cor. 3. are reserued vnto the last iudgement But in the booke of the Citie of God hee reckeneth vp all the opinions of Origen and others depending on him who carried themselues in his time in the Church as those who had founded themselues vppon the mercifull clemencie and fatherly mildnesse of God misexpounded and confuteth them all bringing them backe from their pretended likelihood of truth vnto the truth it selfe and from their conceited fantasie to the infallible scriptures Thou wilt saith he that the wicked Christians may in the end be saued by these pains of purgatorie because that God is mercifull it must then also follow that the Deuils may also bee saued that so hee may bee so much the more mercifull for it is said equally and indifferently to the one and the other 2. Cor 3. Goe into euerlasting fire c. If thou demandest the cause this it is and then the which there is none more iust neither yet more holy namely that the scripture which deceiueth not hath said so Some haue abused the place of the 1. Corinth 3. for Purgatorie but hee sheweth that this fire cannot bee vnderstood of hell because that so it should become common both to the good and euill but rather of tribulations and afflictions August de ciuit Dei l. 21. c. 16. seq Dicuntur which are the exercises by which God maketh cleane his floure in this world that after this iudgement also contrarie to Origen there is not any paines of purgatorie And as concerning those punishmentes and paines which men might imagine to happen betwixt both hee saith If in this distance of time which is betwixt the death of the bodie and the day of iudgement men say that the soules of the deceased doe suffer some such fire Secularia venialia August de fide operibus Quantum arbitror Idem in Enchirid c. 69. Idem in quaest ad Dulcitium and that whether it bee there onely or whether it be here and not there or whether it bee here and there both they find a fire of transitorie tribulation burning the veniall thinges of this world I find no fault with them for such their assertion because it may bee that it is true And in another place hee saith This exposition as I suppose doth not wander farre from the way of truth Againe That some such thing may be after this life it is not incredible Againe writing to Dulcitius after he had handled the question We haue written these thinges but in such forte as that wee would not haue any canonicall authoritie giuen vnto them Whereby wee see in the first place that hee condemneth Origen Saint Ambrose and Hillarie their purgatorie c. Secondly that what hee sayeth of that space betwixt death and the day of iudgement hee speaketh doubtfully and as it were interrogatiuelie affirming And thirdly That by the same hee doeth not vnderstande any materiall fire of the same nature with Hell-fire as our aduersaries doe but a fire of tribulation or temptation such as may fall out and happen in this life And it is not to be omitted how that the good fathers of Trent did not forget to cause to be raced out many good places of Viues Index Expurg pag. 38.39 August de tempore serm 66. De verb. Apostol serm 18. In ep 80. ad Hesich Hypognosticon l. 5. Hieronym in Ecclesiast Olympiod in Prouerb c. 11. intreating of this matter in his commentaries vpon Augustines booke of the Citie of God But in another place wee haue shewed that hee hath made but two places of abode as in heauen or in hell and that hee shutteth out all manner of purgation after this life and that hee cutteth it off quite and cleane As concerning the third place we know not any thing at all thereof we find not any thing at all thereof in the scriptures And what shall we say if S. Ierome speake no lesse resolutely Jn what place soeuer saith he the tree falleth there it lyeth be it towards the South or be it towards the North In like manner looke in what place death doth take thee in the same thou abidest for euer be it that thy last day do find thee cruell and vnappeasable or otherwise courteous and mercifull And Olympiodorus doth cleare him vpon the same place In whatsoeuer place whether light or darke a man is surprised and seazed vppon by death bee hee following after vice or bee hee following after vertue he continueth in the same state and condition and in the same degree for euer For either he resteth in the light of euerlasting happines with the iust and righteous men and Christ our Lord or els he is tormented in darknes with the vnrighteous and the Deuill which is their prince They obiect vnto vs that Saint Ierome saith in his commentaries vpon the Prouerbes That soules
of the Law The law leadeth to faith and the iustice of God to his grace cannot possibly faile by consequent to explaine and lay open vnto vs the benefite of grace leading vs from Moyses to Christ from workes to faith and from death wherein wee stand naturally euen from the time of our conception and whereinto also euen after the time of our regeneration we runne and cast our selues continually by our faults and offences vnto our life and righteousnesse which is hid in Christ We cannot liue by the Law for we cannot fulfill it wherefore we must haue recourse vnto his grace His grace that is to say the mercie of God freely exhibited in Iesus Christ who hath fulfilled the Law by his obedience and which hath borne our transgressions vppon the Crosse but for such as to whome God hath giuen by the same grace to feele the sentence of condemnation due in themselues and assuredly to belieue their saluation in him And this is the cause why these two points are ordinarily conioyned and coupled together both in the Scriptures and holy Fathers euen grace and faith opposed to the Law and workes namely that grace that is to say that gift which God hath bestowed vppon vs by the righteousnesse of his onely begotten Sonne yea of his Sonne and all that which hee possesseth for the abolishing of our sinnes that faith that is to say that abilitie and power which hee giueth vs by his holy spirite to receiue in humilitie and yet with all assurednesse and certaintie that incomparable good thing which hee bestoweth vpon vs here below as a pledge and earnest pennie of those which hee will consequently giue vs to possesse with him in the highest heauens Origen expounding these words of the Apostle Orig. in Ep. ad Rom. l 3. c. 3. Where is thy glorying it is shut out c. He saith saith he that the iustification which is of faith onely doth suffice although that the belieuer haue not wrought any worke And for an example wee haue the theefe for whose onely faith Jesus said vnto him This day thou shalt be with me in Paradice c. And so likewise the woman in the Gospell Luke the seuenth The Pharisie said Jf he were a Prophet he would know what shee is but for her faith onely Iesus said vnto her Thy sinnes are forgiuen thee c. And for this cause the Apostle doth not boast himselfe of his owne righteousnesse chastitie wisedome c. But of the Crosse of Christ in the Lawe of faith which is in Iesus Christ c. Saint Ambrose saith Ambros de Virgin l. 3. Christ hath not redeemed thee with siluer nor gold haue thy siluer readie thou art not arrested euerie day though thou be in debt He hath paid his bloud for thee thou art indebted vnto him this bloud for we lay pawned in the hands of a wicked Creditor We haue beene the cause of the bill of our owne blame and guiltinesse by our sinnes Idem de fide l. 3. c. 3. wee owe for the punishment of the same our bloud the Lord Iesus is come hee hath paid his bloud for vs c. Againe Our redemption is by the bloud of Christ our forgiuenesse and pardon by his power and our life by his grace Idem de bono mort c. 2. Ep. 72.73 Againe Eternall life that is the forgiuenesse of sinnes and the Lord Iesus is come to fasten our sufferings to his Crosse to forgiue vs our sinnes to nayle to the crosse our obligation and to wash all the world in his blood Otherwise Idem de Iacob beat vita l. 1. c. 5. Psalme 118. saith he wherefore should the Prophet haue said Haue mercie on mee if he had trusted vnto his owne righteousness if there be any thing but mercie which deliuereth from sin But hee that hath need of mercie is a sinner and therefore what soeuer good commeth to vs let vs impute it to the righteousnesse of Christ It is the mercie of the Lord that remission of sinnes is freely and liberally giuen vnto vs Let no man glorie or boast himselfe that he hath a chast hart c. Againe Idem de fide l. 3. c. 3. My wisedome that is to saie the crosse of Christ My redemption the death of Christ Again By the disobedience of one man many are made sinners by the obedience of one man many are made righteous Againe God hath taken vpon him our flesh to abolish the curse of our sinfull flesh Idem de fuga saecul c. 7. Iudicato he was made a curse for vs to the end that the blessing might swallow vppe the curse integritie sinne grace the sentence of death and life death it selfe for he likewise hath vndergone death to fulfill the sentence of death and to satisfie the iudge for the curse lying vppon sinfull flesh Faith receiueth and taketh hold of grace Idem de paenit l. 2. Ex Syngrapha Idem in ep ad Rom. c. 3. 4 euen to the death c. And here behold the poole of grace the fountaine of life freely set open who shall put vs into the poole who shall draw for vs out of that fountaine verily verily no other helping hand saith the Apostle but faith yea Onely faith saith Saint Ambrose Let vs hope and looke for saith he the pardoning of sinnes by faith and not as by debt or merite faith will obtaine it for vs as by vertue of couenant vnder writing that is to say of the promises of God by the which he hath bound himselfe vnto vs Praesumptio propior est arroganti quà m roganti c. Presumption that is that ouer high couceipt we haue of our workes is more incident to such as arrogate and challenge for their owne eternall life by their desertes then to such as acknowledging themselues to haue no parte therein as of themselues doe humblie craue the same by praier c. Againe They are iustified freely because they are iustified without doing or working for the same and because they giue not any thing in exchange for the same they are iustified by faith alone by the gift of God c. The wicked man impius is iustified before God by faith alone c. For Idem devocat Gen. l. 2. c. 8. He that dare saith he preach that the grace of God is giuen according to mens merites preacheth against the catholike faith c. Let no man therefore glorie in his workes for no man shall be iustified by them He that is iust he hath it of gift Tertullian calleth it Donatiuum for hee is iustified by being washed It is faith that deliuereth vs by the blood of Christ Idem ep 71. Blessed is he whose sinnes are remitted and hath his pardon granted c. Againe By the sinne of one all haue deserued to bee condemned sinning alike for in the righteousnesse of one all shall be iustified credentes that belieue If hee
in the law when he vnderstandeth not by reason of his time either some exquisite Latin or some Greeke word alledged by the lawier And yet the Councell of Trent who set it downe for their position to make errours authentike will haue this translation to be authentike and that in lectures disputations Sermons and Expositions it be vsed ordinarily yea and that before that of Pagnines or Arias Montanus who haue kept themselues nearer vnto the Hebrew And why Not for any other cause then that ignorance may continue so as that errour vnder the darknesse thereof may hide it selfe seeing it cannot stand before the truth true vnderstanding or the light The third is Scripture is expounded by Scripture That we expound Scripture by Scripture one place by another one by manie obscure and darke ones by cleare and plaine ones or one darke one by many plaine ones In which attempt we haue a farre greater facilitie then they who should assay the like in prophane authours because that we are assured that there is no contrarietie therein because also that there is a perpetuall correspondencie betwixt the new Testament and the old and both in the one and the other in it selfe betwixt the new Sacraments and the old and in the olde and new in themselues c. And finally because that in obscure places wee are not to search for or gesse out any thing that is new yea on the contrarie not any thing said Saint Augustine which is not clearely apparant in such places as are most cleare This is the order Nehem. 8.8 which we reade to haue beene practised by Esdras who saith Nehemiah read in the booke of the law of God and therewith gaue the meaning causing it to be vnderstood by the Scripture it selfe The question at that time was about the purging and casting out of certaine abuses Actes 17.11 which were crept into the Church during the time of the captiuitie by being mingled amongst the Gentiles And hence are they of Berea commended as conferring the Scriptures most diligently one with another to see if it were so as Saint Paule preached vnto them The question was of the resoluing of themselues by them against the opinion of the Pharisies and Doctors of the Law by the Scriptures Whether Iesus crucified were that Christ or not And this also is the precept which the Fathers teach vs. Irenâ—us The demonstrations which are in the Scriptures Iren. cont Haeres 1.2 c. 46. 67. Basil in asceticis 267 Chrysost hom 13. in Gen. in Psalm 147. Aug. de verb. dom serm 2. 11. Tho. 1. p. sum q. 1. art 9. Aegid l. 2. Dist 37. cannot bee shewed but by the Scriptures Againe The exposition which is according to the Scriptures is that legitimate and safe c. Saint Basil That which seemeth darke and ambiguous in one place of Scripture is cleare and plaine in another Chrysostome The Scripture is expounded by it selfe this is ourarmorie against the Diuell c. Saint Augustine The wordes of the Gospel doe carrie their interpretation with them Againe VVe vnderstand the darke places by the cleare what is darkly deliuered in one place is clearly set downe in another c. S. Thomas That which is spoken metaphorically in one place is spoken simplie in another Aegidius Romanus Of manie expositions we must take that which agreeth with the other scriptures and not that which hurteth any part of them Following also that which is said by the Canon Relatum Can Relat. That we must not seeke out a sense at our pleasure from the purpose to confirme it any maner of way by the authoritie of the Scriptures but take the meaning of the truth from the Scriptures themselues if the place may be drawne into diuerse senses The fourth is In all expositions the analogie of faith must be kept That we see that the exposition which we giue or take do alwaies retaine and keepe the analogie of faith that it be proportionable and correspondent to the bodie of Christian doctrine which some of the olde fathers haue called the rule of faith I say not to establish any new principles or articles of Christianitie but to conforme and referre themselues to those which haue beene receiued therein from all times For the holy Scripture is the vniuersall principle of our faith and it is well said That there are as many articles of faith as sillables in it because it is said of the least iota that it shall not passe and by consequent that we must most firmely beleeue it all But notwithstanding as this said Aegidius saith All the Scripture is resolued into certaine articles of faith to which all the doctrine therein is to be referred and those as principles abide firme in themselues and are not resolued into others And from these principles we deduct our Theoremes and answere our Problemes no lesse then the Mathematicians doe their Maxims 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Axiomes and demaunds but so much the more firmely by howe much wee are the faster founded vpon the Creator then vpon the creature vpon the Law-giuer to the whole world then vpon the law which he hath giuen it which is Nature Thom. in Sum. q. 1. art 5.6 8. And this is it which Thomas saith That the holy doctrine taketh not his principles from any humane science but from the wisdome of God from which as from the most soueraigne wisedome all our knowledge must take his direction and ordering and that this skill commeth not vnto vs from naturall reason but by reuelation that is from the Scripture diuinely inspired and therefore that it iudgeth of all Verie farre differing from them who dispute of diuinitie according to the principles of Philosophie or other sciences against the law of Logicke which saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. That we must not leape out of one science into another but rather from a true vse of Logicke discourse of reason from principles of one science to draw the propositions and consequences that belong to the same Our principles then are articles of faith against which we must beware that our expositions doe not strike and dash themselues but one the contrarie it is necessarie that they become conformable thereto To strike thereupon that is amongest the Mathematicians Deduci 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be brought to an impossibilitie that is to say froÌ„ out of the bounds of reason of Nature of true diuinitie this is according to the lawes of combate to rub against the bands or ropes that pale in their ground that is to bee ouercame to be conuinced of falshood Now the primitiue Church hath gathered them for vs into a briefe collection al those which the Councels put forth afterward are nothing but Commentaries thereupon and it is the same which Tertul. calleth RegulaÌ„ fidei Vnder which Tertul. de vela viâ—g de praes aduers Praxeam August de Symbol Beda in S. Ioh. l 1.
neither Canon nor beginning nor any note or marke of any part of this Office and seruice which now they vse more then the bare words of the institution which are repeated in the same Howsoeuer that Hugo de S. Victor Hugo de Sacram altaris Gabr. Biel. lectione 36 Innoc. 3. de celeb missae c. cū Marth et ib. glossae be not ashamed to say that the Canon of the Masse is of like authoritie with the Gospell and that Gabriell Biell haue much enhaunced the same saying That that onely worde Enim which they haue added to the wordes of our Sauiour Christ cannot be left out in that place by the Priest without committing of mortall sinne CHAP. II. That the Masses fathered vpon the Apostles and Disciples of Christ are notorious and meere suppositions WHat shall become then will you say of the Masses or Lithurgies which are so confidently builded founded vpon S. Peter S. Iames S. Mathew S. Andrew S. Marke S. Denis Areopagite S. Clement c. all Apostles Euangelistes or disciples I answere that we will in this Chapter take away whatsoeuer scruple of doubtfulnes or cloude of darknes that may arise to the troubling of any mans minde about the same Onely let the readers beare about them such care and diligent watch and attention as they would do in the receiuing of some paiment least they should be deceiued with false money or as they would vse in some suit for the auoiding of counterfeit writing or false euidence yea rather a great deale more because the sonne is much greater the inheritance of a far higher nature as containing in it our title and interest vnto eternall life Assuredly if these Masses rise from such authors as are the Apostles and Euangelists there is cause for vs to yeeld stoope for they were gouerned by the holy Ghost and the holy Ghost is alwaies like himselfe and so by consequent it must follow that wee giue vnto them the honour which wee vse to giue vnto their Epistles and Gospels But if on the contrarie it will be proued very clearely that they cannot be of the Apostles or Euangelistes then let vs confesse that that which they teach is worthily to be suspected of vs to be the meere seed tares of the enuious man which bestirred himselfe in the night yea and that in most abhominable manner For as there is none so hardie as to falsifie and counterfeit the coine of the Prince but such as in whom the spirit of lying and rebellion raigneth so there cannot any be found so bold and impudent as to counterfeit the spirit of Christ the style hand of his Apostles saue such as in whom the spirit of Sathan beareth rule and sway But I speake not this vpon any conceit of these pretended Masses which can nothing preuaile against vs seeing that our aduersaries themselues dare not auouch them for authentike seeing also that there is neuer a Priest of them all amongst the Latine Churches which can perswade himself to haue made a good consecration by following of their rules seeing also that we can fortifie and strengthen our owne cause diuers sorts of waies by them seeing the confession therein is not made vnto any but vnto God alone seeing the Communion is therein administred vnto all the people and vnder both kindes and for that also that the Canon thereof is farre differing from that of the Latine and finally for that they are said in a language that is commonly vnderstood of all and for many other reasons which shall be handled in their place And that the rather in good sooth for that it is our dutie for that testimonie sake which we do owe vnto the truth to make our selues parties against them and that the more by reason of the horrible hugenes of deceiuing lies so impudently broached in the matters concerning our saluation Then let vs enter into the listes The lithurgie of S. Iames. and trie the strength of that which they pretend make shew of to haue beene done by S. Iames. S. Iames the iust say they the brother of our Lord did first set downe the Masse in writing he hath offred sacrifice after the manner of the Iewes as also after the manner of the Christians and to him alone before all or any one of the rest of the Apostles it was permitted by the Iewes because of his tribe holines of life to go into the most holy place Iudge what apparance of truth is in these assertions when as S. Iames who had seene and learned yea did teach that the onely sacrifice of our Lord Sauior Christ did put an end to all the sacrifices of the law should not yet giue ouer but continue to offer sacrifices according to the Iewish fashion and manner that the Iewes who did abhorre and detest nothing so much as the Apostles persecuting S. Iames vnto the death and Ananias still holding the place of the high Priest wold euer permit suffer him to do any such thing that as they add with the garments of the high priests but principally in cōsideration of his stock and lineage a thing making him to be so much the more suspected of the Romaines who had the gouernment ouer Iudea But still they continue their claime and say Concil Constant 2. in Trul. Canon 32. that it was alleadged in the second Councell of Constantinople against thē who did not mingle water in the Sacrament of the holy Supper Let vs adde then that this was neere vpon seuen hundred years after that Christ was ascended that of all that time it had neuer a tongue to speake Whereas of a truth if it had beene true and known so to be from of old it wold not haue beene forgotten of the former councels seeing the power and authority thereof comming from so great an Apostle would haue beene able to haue put downe and made nothing worth all the controuersies though neuer so great that were moued and raised in the same In the Councels of Ephesus the first and the second where the controuersie was handled against Eutiches and Nestorius and where the Fathers produced no proofe of antiquitie besides a certaine place out of Eusebius and Origene in which the holy virgin is called the mother of God Iudge you and thinke what aduantage they had got against Nestorius if they had had forth comming this Lithurgie wherein fiue or sixe seuerall times she is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the virgine that did beare and bring forth God namely all that which may growe from the saying and testimonie of an Apostle yea all that which the testimonie of the spirite of God is able to afforde to the establishing of the truth of a doctrine of such importance and weight as also to the authorizing of the first and principall Canon of those Councelles And yet notwithstanding some holde that Proclus Archbishop of Constantinople was present at the first and disputed against
the furnace Also for that now the Church beganne to be very rich of gifts that the sacrifices that is the offerings of the people should be distributed and diuided equally into foure portions for the Bb. or Pastour for the Cleargie or ministers of the Church for the poore and for the repairing of the church And therevpon and that not without cause euerie one being hereby thus tickled and pricked forward to adde euery day some thing to the seruice as their fancie led them the Mileuitane Councell in the time of S. Augustine tooke the matter in hand ordaining that no other praiers prefaces supplications and masses that is Collects Recommendations or Impositions of hands should be vsed in the Church but those which were approued in that Councel or Synode Least as the same saith by negligence or ignorance there might slip some thing which might be contrarie to the faith this reason is likewise giuen afterward by the Africane councell and it came as yet timely enough if it had been well obserued by those which after came in place yea by Gregorie himselfe And thus be hold The vnlikenes of the Romish Masse we are come to the fiue hundreth yeares after Christ finding in all this time one seruice consisting of confessions and praiers Psalmes reading preaching blessing and distributing of the sacraments according to the institution of our Lord singing of praises vnto God during the time of the communion and a thankesgiuing for the end and conclusion c. without any new offering or sacrificing vp of the sonne of God without any inuocating of the creatures by praying vnto theÌ„ without adoring and worshipping of the sacraments and without as yet free from infinite other both impieties and superstitions and therefore by consequent far from the Masse vsed at this day and on the contrarie side comming much neerer vnto the manner of the holy supper as it is now vsed in the reformed Churches The Romish Masse which is the action of one onely man saying reading speaking by figures in a language not vnderstood that is voide of edification then eating drinking without communion all alone and yet speaking continually in the plurall number being a colde ceremonie if euer there were any The holy supper on the contrarie consisting of a feruent praier by the which the Pastour maketh open protestation The cokerâ—ce and agreement of the Lords Supper with that of olde and declaration of the miserie and destruction of mankinde for the people and himselfe of their serious repentance vnto amendement of life and of remission of sinnes by faith in Christ in Psalmes sung with one consent of heart and voice by all the people for to quicken and stirre vp their fainting and ouer dull spirits vnto God in the reading of the sacred word and the interpreting and applying of the same in his time place by the Pastour as namely after that he hath in solemne sort supplicated the Almightie creator in the fauour of his onely begotten that it would please him to open his mouth for to teach and deliuer the same profitably and the eares and hearts of the people for to vnderstand well in a generall praier for the necessities of the Church and of the whole world for Magistrates pastours the conuersion of Infidels the extirpation and rooting out of heresies the publike peace and all maner of generall and particular afflictions in the reading of the holy supper and expounding of the same by the which namely the faithfull are exhorted to come to the holy table in humilitie and deuotion in assurance of faith and ardent charitie with an earnest acknowledgement of their sinnes and notwithstanding in a stedfast affiance in the mercies of God manifested and reuealed in Iesus Christ admonished to renounce all rancour and hatred contentions and strife and carefully to labour to bee reconciled if so be that they bee broken forth and come to the knowledge of others but the impenitent and wilfull obstinate are debarred from the same and that not by the voice and declaration of the Deacon alone but by a seuere denunciation of the iudgement of God if they abuse the bodie of the Lord as likewise by the sence and feeling of their owne consciences or by the iudgement of the Church After which things all and euery one came neere vnto the holy table in decent order and due reuerence to communicate the bodie and bloud of our Lord they receiued the holie sacraments at the hands of the Pastors with the most significant words that are either in the Gospel or in any of the Epistles of the Apostles lifting vp their hearts on high and praying to God that it would please him by the vertue of his holy spirit to giue them the flesh of his sonne for their spirituall repast and foode and his blood for their drinke vnto eternall life seeing that of his infinit mercie he hath vouchsafed to make them bone of his bones and flesh of his flesh c that so they may abide liue and dwell continually in him And during all the time of this action the deuotion of the assemblie was cherished and nourished with the reading of the holy scriptures as most meete to declare the death of the Lord vntill his comming and to record the vnspeakable benefite of the same with singing of Psalmes also chosen out of purpose both for the calling to minde of man his miserie as also for giuing vnto them the sence feeling of Gods mercie and thirdly for the stirring of them vp to giue vnto God for the same all vnfained and solemne thankes And finally there followed the dismission of the assemblie with a praier of the whole people vnto God containing a briefe thankesgiuing for that it had pleased him to make them to see and taste the assurance of their saluation in the communion and participation of his welbeloued sonne ioyning therunto the singing of the song of Simeon vsed of the old Church as wee haue alreadie seene to the same end and purpose And after the solemne and accustomed blessing admonition being giuen them how they should witnes and testifie the coniunction vnitie which they feele and find in Christ by the way and manner of that liuelie sence and feeling which the members of the bodie haue with the head they were to distribute euery one according to his abilitie vnto the poor for whome the Deacons were to receiue what should be giuen I speake nothing of the order of Catechising both publikelie and priuatelie which was wont to bee appointed and practised certaine weeks before for the instruction and examination of such as should be partakers thereof the morning Sermon which ordinarily is spent in the expounding of the doctrine of the Sacrament vnto the people and that also of the after noone tending to the stirring of vs vppe to the giuing of thankes vnto God Now then let euerie man iudge without being partiall in the matter in which of these two
sound and large foote least it might ouerturne But and if there do any thing of the body or of the blood fall vpon the couering or pall of the Altar let them in any case cut it away and burne it and lay the ashes in some cleane place c a great matter if so be such regard care were so necessary that the ancient church should forget this or that the ancient church whereof we stand so greatly hauing neglected it we should notwithstanding hold it so needfull and necessarie Before the holy table The vaile whereupon the elements gifts or offerings were set there was especially in the Greek church a vaile drawne which after that they which were as yet to be catechised Chrysost in hom â—d Pop. Antioch hom 36. in 1. Cor. were departed gone forth was drawne together then they went forward with the blessing of the Sacraments Chrysostome in many places When thou hearest let vs pray altogether and therewithall seest the vaile drawne together then thinke that heauen is about to open and the Angels to discend c. This custome was retained as hauing beene first borrowed from the Iewes for they had a vaile in the midst of the temple and this vaile was clouen and rent in sunder in signe of the vniting of the Iewes and Gentiles the one with the other or els from the Gentiles for they likewise had vailes spread and drawne abroad before their altars Tertul. in Apol Apuleius saith Velis candentibus reductis the white vailes being drawne together Tertullian Conspectus caeterorum velo oppanso interdicebatur There were saith he not any but priestes that came neere for euen the very sight was kept from all others by the meanes of a vaile hanging before it And in these indifferent things the ancient church did apply it selfe very wisely sometimes to the Iewes and sometimes to the Gentiles But all this great adoe and preparation came in a long time after the Church through the corruption of the time proceeding by little and little from the inward to the outward from the center to the circumference from the substance to the circumstance and from the discipline of Christ to an imperiall statelinesse and eminencie in the world Now these sacraments being there placed wee haue declared the manner of the blessing consecrating and distributing of them to the faithfull with what prayers with what holy wordes c. But there is yet behind one circumstance which is whether these prayers and words were vttered in a language knowne and vnderstood of the common people or not which is a matter in controuersie betwixt vs and our aduersaries CHAP. V. That the old and auncient seruice was said in a language vnderstood of the people and by what degrees it was altered and chaunged ASsuredly That the seruice vsed in the Church of the Iewes was vnderstood of all the care that it hath pleased God to take for the instruction of his people throughout the whole course and cariage of the Church should bee able in a word to make this question friuolous and needlesse He that would haue all his people to know all his law and all the ceremonies likewise of the same at their fingers end who so much commanded them to get knowledge and condemned ignorance so sharpely who would haue it as a frontlet betwixt their browes and as a glasse before their eyes that the father should teach it vnto his children in the fields in his house lying standing c. cannot in any wise be thought that he would haue it kept hid secret from him by the barbarousnes of a language not knowne or vnderstood that is lockt and clapt vp in ciphers that it might not be comprehended or attained He likewise that so expresly commandeth fathers to teach their children the cause of the institution of his sacraments namely that of the Passeouer into whose roome that of ours called the holy Supper is come who would that children should question their fathers therof that fathers should answer their children that in the time of the shadows of the old Testament rudiments of the law shal not be vnderstood and taken to haue meant that his people should be taught in a language not vnderstood neither yet to haue taken it for an honour and worship to bee praied vnto and serued of them without vnderstanding And in deede the Sacramentes of the old lawe are instituted in the Hebrew tonge which was the vulgar and common language amongst the people And againe when he would terrifie and make them afraid hee threatneth them with a strange and barbarous language 1. Cor. c. 14 and with lips which they do not vnderstand And S. Paule concludeth saying Tongues are signes not to the beleeuers but to the infidels and vnbeleeuers And there is no cause why it should be here alleadged that from the time of Esdras vnto Christ the people had learned the Chaldee tongue vnder the captiuitie and that yet notwithstanding the Scriptures were alwaies read in the Church in the Hebrew tongue For the question is not in what tongue it was read but whether it were vnderstood of the people or not Nehem. 8.2 And for that let Esdras himselfe be belieued saying Esdras the Priest brought the law before a multitude of men and women and all those which could vnderstand So then it may bee seene hereby that not so much as the women but they vnderstood it He read the same vnto them in the street before the water gate froÌ„ the breake of the day vntill noone and the eares of all the people were attentiue to the booke of the law Wherefore were they thus attentiue but that they had a purpose and intent to vnderstand But that is more Nehem. 8.8.3 They themselues did reade distinctly plainly for to vnderstand did vnderstand it in reading of the same What is that other properly but to reade Esdras without hauing any purpose to vnderstand him But say they It is said that Esdras and the Leuites did expound the law vnto the people True but it is as plaine and cleare Nebe 8. v. 7.9 that it was the sence and meaning of the law and not the words or phrases of speech for this selfe same Chapter hath alreadie certified and assured vs that they vnderstood them And in the same sence it is said Act. 8.35 that our Lord and Sauiour expounded Esay in the Sinagogue whereat the people were rauished and the scriptures likewise vnto his disciples in Emaus Suk 24.27 that Philip expounded the 53. of Esay to the Eunuch Who will belieue that this great noble man did not vnderstand the words seeing he did reade theÌ„ seeing also he demanded whether the Prophet did speak of himself or of some other But in deed he did not know that this prophesie was of Christ For whereas they go about to make vs belieue that the Iewes did not vnderstand Hebrew
then for the Monks it is so much the more your sinne to thinke that one ought not to reade them then not to reade them your selues Such speeches cannot but come from a diuelish meditation We are assaulted by the weapons and fierie darts of the Diuell how shall we shun or quench them surelie by the reading of the scriptures for I tell thee and tell thee againe Idem in hom 3. de Lazaro that without the continuall reading of the scriptures no man can come to eternall life Euery artificer is furnished with such tooles and instruments as serue for his mysterie and occupation as are necessarie for his work and I tell thee O thou Christian that the bookes of the Prophetes and Apostles are the instruments of a Christian to amend his soule to redresse what is amisse and to renew that which is growne old in vs c. But thou wilt say happy is euery simple soule he that walketh simplie walketh surelie But S. Idem hom 16. in Ioh. Prouerb 10.9 1. Pet. 5.15 Colos 3.16 Peter hath saide vnto thee Be yee alwaies readie to render a reason to any whosoeuer shall aske you anie question of the hope that is in you And S. Paule let the word of Christ dwell plentifully in you c. The cause of all euill is that for the most part there is not any that know how to alledge anie places of scripture to the purpose for that which they speake for the simple is not there to be taken or vnderstoode of one that is a sot or an ignorant person but for that man which is not giuen to wickednes which is not giuen to guile deceitfulnes c. For otherwise how should our Lord haue saide Be wise as Serpentes but simple as Doues Chrysost hom 3. de Lazaro But I haue an occupation or office to attend vpon in the kinges Court or in some of the Courtes of the law I haue a trade I haue a wife yea but is it not the property of those that haue forsaken the worlde to reade the scripture Is it not the property of those which sit vppon the tops of the mountaines O man sayeth hee what wilt thou here say vnto vs hast thou nothing else to doe but to turne ouer the bookes of the scriptures and certainelie that a great deale rather then they for they being freed of these worldlie cares are as it were in a hauen But thou who art tossed continually amidst the waues of this worlde hast thou not so much the more neede to take vnto thee these same to bee thy consolation But certainelie they who shall vse such speeches I knowe not how they should bee worthie to liue and breath how they should not bee ashamed to looke vppon the Sunne But we cannot all haue bookes wee are too poore to buye them I pray thee tell me Idem hom 10. in Iohan. hast thou not as poor as thou art the tooles and instruments of thy craft occupation and wilt thou excuse thy selfe of pouertie when thou shouldest prouide thee instrumentes of thy professed Christianitie these implementes and tooles whereby there groweth so great commoditie But in the ende for hee stoppeth as it were by the way of prophesying of these latter times all the holes that our aduersaries doe set open Wee shall not it may be vnderstand that which we shall reade in the holie scriptures But sayeth hee will you doe well At the least vpon the sabath daye bee diligent to reade the Gospell Idem ibid. And before that you goe to heare the sermon repeate mee it oft at home take paine and diligentlie endeuour thyselfe for to finde out the sence Idem hom de Lazaro which will shew it selfe to be either plaine or obscure and darke or will seem to hang and agree well together or to disagree marke mee these thinges well and then prepare thy selfe to heare the sermon with all attention I tell thee moreouer that although thou doe not vnderstand the thinges which lie therein hidden and secret that yet there doth not cease to rise and come vnto thee a great measure of sanctimonie and holines Notwithstanding it is impossible that thou shouldest be euerie where alike ignorant in them seeing that the holie Ghost hath in such sort tempered them as that the Publicanes Fishers Dyers Shepheardes his simple Apostles and in a worde the vnlearned were saued by the same And that to the end that the most ignorant may not excuse themselues in that sort to the ende that it may appeare that the thinges which are there spoken of may appeare vnto all to be most easie to be knowne and finallie to the end that the artificer the seruant the widow the sillie woman and the most rude and barbarous may take profite by the reading of the same seeing they are not written vppon anie vaine glorie of them that were the Pen-men thereof as the bookes of the Pagans were but for the saluation of the hearers For it was the course of the Philosophers that although they deliuered that which was profitable yet they would folde it vppe in obscure tearmes the rather to be admired the Prophetes and Apostles their course was contrarie for they deliuered all thinges plaine and cleare they made them manifest and euident to all men as they which were the common Doctors of the vniuersall world insomuch as that euerie man may learne by the onely reading thereof the things that are deliuered therein Idem hom 3. in 2. Thessal Learne sayeth hee againe in an other place without a Preacher For saith he in that we haue Preachers it is but as the remidie of our negligence All thinges are cleare and plaine in the holie Scriptures all the necessarie doctrines therein are manifest And as for you which are otherwise addicted to bee hearers rather then readers you become delicate and giuen to seeke forth such Preachers as will please and flatter your cares But Thou aunswerest againe and sayest I vnderstand not the scriptures And tell mee why Are they written in Hebrew are they in Latine are they in any strange and vnknowne tongue hast thou not them in Greeke But thou aunswerest so in Greeke as that therein abideth much obscuritie From whence should this obscuritie come are they not stories which thou vnderstandest clearelie and dost thou speake vnto vs of obscuritie These are but excuses and vaine wordes Idem hom 12 in Genes Idem in Psal 95. 49. The scripture sayeth hee in an other place expoundeth it selfe it suffereth not him that giueth his eare thereto to erre So soone as the testimonie thereof is produced it confirmeth both his worde that speaketh and his spirite which heareth And that so farre as that the common people by them may bee able to iudge of Antichrist If you haue not sayeth hee recourse to the scriptures if your affections runne after other matters you will stumble and take offence you will perish you will not bee
we say of the Bbs. Bishoppes and Priestes in olde time were all one Paul in Ep. ad Philippens Acts. 20. Tit. 1. 1. Peter 5. 1. Timoth. 4. Hieronym in Ep. ad Titum in Ep. ad Euag. in the old church the same we say also of Priests and that by a much more stronger and more forcible reason first because there is no likelihoode that the Priest should haue power by his orders to sacrifice the Son of God and that it shold be denied vnto the Bb. secondlie because as we haue already said the minister or priest and the Bb. in ancient accompt were but one And indeed S. Ierome intreating of this matter proueth the same by many plain and expresse texts out of S. Paul as may be seene in the place and therupon he also inferreth that they were diuerse names of one and the same person the one hauing relation to the age of the partie the other to the dignitie of his office and that the Priestes had power in the olde time to laye their handes vppon such as were to bee ordained and that whereas the Priests did chuse one from amongst themselues to be Bb. it was not because indeede one was greater then an other but onely for the continuing of vnitie and cutting off of schisme and that by the law of God the Bb. could not assume or chalenge any more to himselfe then the Priestes and that the Priest or Elder did nothing which the Bb. did not Ambros in Ep. ad Eph. c. 4. Chrysost in 1. Timoth. Isidor D. 12. c. Clâ—ros Beda ad Philip. Sedul Scotus in Epist ad Titum Anselm Cantuar ad Titum and so on the contrarie that in his time Ordination giuing of Orders was allotted to the Bb. for the reasons abouesaid hee handleth this matter of purpose not by the way and that euen to the very bottom S. Ambrose S. Chrysostom Beda Isidore affirme the same concluding in fine that the Bb. had not any more to doe to giue Orders then the Priest wherupon it should come to passe that the controuersie would remaine alwaies vndetermined amongst the Schoolemen the Doctors of the Canon law the Schoolemen striuing to place the Bbs. in the Order of the Priests and the Doctors lobouring to make a seuerall Order for the Bbs. And of al this we conclude seeing that the office and charge of the Bb. and Priest was but one and that the Bbs. did not consist in anie thing as we haue seene but in the dispensation of the word and sacraments and in the conferring and exercising of discipline and ecclesiasticall policie that there were not besides these any Priestes sacrificing for the quick and the dead in the Primitiue Church In like manner we shall find as little of the Priestlie annointing in S. Of Vnction Dionys Hierar c. 5. Ambros de dignit Sacer. 5. Denys himselfe though he may seem to be wholie composed and compact of ceremonies for althogh he say that the Bb. did vse vnction or annointing in manie of his offices and functioÌ„s yet it is not mentioned that he euer vsed it about Ordination And from the practise of Bbs. we conclude the same of Priests S. Ambrose saith Man layeth on his hands but God giueth the grace Sacerdos the Priest laieth on Supplicem dextraÌ„ his right hand making request to God for him and God blesseth with his powerfull right hand So then this was his place for in this booke he intreateth expresly of the Priestly dignitie The very same is set down in the Councell of Africke which was helde in the time of S. Augustine Concil African c. 2.3.4 c from whence we haue heretofore brought and alleadged the Canons concerning Ordination yet all the ceremonies vsed thereabout are handled throughout the same In a word amongst so manie elections and promotions of Bbs. to be found in the ecclesiasticall historie there is not anie manner of mention made thereof except we wil belieue the Legends of one Simeon Metaphrastes who taught in the Colledge at CoÌ„stantinople about some 150. yeares agoe They obiect vnto vs S. Cyprian Cyp. de vnct Chrysin but Bellarmine himselfe is of iudgement that the booke of Chrisme is not his worke and for any place elsewhere he speaketh of the ordination of a Bb. not one word On the contrarie he maketh the true vnction or annointing coÌ„mon not onelie to all the Cleargie but vnto all Christians They themselues are ashamed of Anacletus his Epistle To be short the first that speaketh plainelie thereof is Gregorie the Great Gregor 1. Reg. 9. in the sixt age in his Commentaries vpon the Kings who asmuch as laye in him did cast vppon the Christian Church all the Iewish ceremonies for the abolishing whereof the Apostles tooke so great care and paine saying Now wee annoint them which are in Culmine that is which haue the principall charge in the Church as though the thing had but sprung vppe in his time The Greeke Church did not vse it as is confessed by Pope Innocent the 3. Innoc. 3. de vnct sacr in his time that is about the year 1200. neither in the ordination of Priests nor in the consecration of Bbs. He addeth moreouer that for this cause the Church of Rome was taxed of certain ancient Writers for hauing fashioned themselues to the Iewish Traditions Wee alleadge the text his proper wordes howsoeuer Bellarmine doe change it after his own fansie and wil that it should haue Aliqui Duran in Rational l. 2. c. 10 and not Antiqui And Lombarde saith by name that it is borrowed from the olde law Durand also saith that it was deriued from the Priesthood of Aaron commaunded by Moses Leuit. 8. Now therefore what may we iudge of the audacious boldnes of the Councel of Trent in pronouncing such accursed as should not thinke vnction to bee necessarie that is against the whole auncient Church We haue heretofore toucht the matter of garments The Priestlie garmentes but this place craueth that we shold say somewhat more thereof The simplicitie plainnes of the old Fathers made no difference thereof saue onely in respect of modestie and not of the fashion insomuch as that the habites or apparrell of a Minister when hee was to bee occupied in discharging his place did not differ from his ordinary garments Walafridus Strabo Walafr Strabo who hath written of the time of Charlemaine and since doth speake it verie plainely That in the Primitiue Church they used no other apparrell in the action of their Ministerie then their ordinarie and that likewise in his time in many places of the East they liued as then after that sort and maner The Councell of Gangres likewise held neere the time Concil Gangr when the Nicene Councell was doth excommunicate them which iudged that one garment was more holy then an other as our Monkes do at this day And Erasmus noteth vppon S. Ierome that the apparrell
Epistle which he writ vnto the Gnosians about the yeare 170. disswadeth Pynitus who laboured to bring in the condition of a single life amongst his brethren that is amongst his fellow ministers That he would not impose the heauie yoke of a single life vpon his brethren as of necessitie to be obserued but rather that he would haue regard vnto the infirmitie of many And it is to be noted that in the Index expurgatorius Ind. Expurg pag. 76. the Councell of Trent ordained that Langus should be raced which had noted the same in his annotations vpon Nicephorus And Spiridion vsed the like custome Sozomen l. 1. c. 11. Eccles histor l. 10. c. 5. Tripart l. 1. c. 10. who being ordained Bishop of Cypres was reported by Sozomene to haue beene neither worse in that which concerned pietie nor lesse diligent in his charge and whom the story calleth a person of the order of the prophets hauing a daughter whose name was Irene And so likewise in Dionisius Faustinian Syluerus Cecilius Sergius Hormysdas Talatus Valerius Tertullian Leo and Felix all Bishoppes and Priestes and confessed by our aduersaries themselues to bee maried Athan. in ep ad Dracont and in many others of these first ages of whome Athanasius reporteth that hee knew in his time many Bishoppes yea many Monkes that had children and this continued for many ages after To be briefe the determination of the Synode is expresly for the same as it was set downe in the first generall Councell of Nice about the yeare 330. where it hauing argued by many that from that time forward Bishops priestes Deacons and Subdeacons should not lie with their wiues Paphnutius a Confessor rose vp and said Mariage is honourable and the companie of a lawful wife is chastitie as we shall declare more at large hereafter Whereupon all the Councell being moued Socrat. l. 1. c. 8. Sozom. l. 1. c. 22. it was left to the libertie of ecclesiasticall persons to continue maried c. Neither will the lie or double dealing which Bellarmine chargeth vpon Socrates and Sozomene the ecclesiasticall historiographers in this place bee sufficient to salue the sore CHAP. IX What bath beene the manner of growth and proceeding of the ordinance of abstaining from mariage in the Romish Church vntill the time of Calixtus his decree ANd thus behold we are come to the first councel of Nice a notable Period of the Christian Church ended shut vp with a law containing great fauour to the cause which we defend But notwithstanding let vs not perswade our selues that this spirit of lying 1. Timoth. 4.2 wherewith the Apostle hath threatned vs was asleepe all this while but rather that vnder the shape of an Angell of light he was sowing the doctrine of the Deuill vnder the hypocriticall maske of chastitie he set vp the standart of shamefastnesse and honestie but in deed bringing in all lasciuiousnesse foolish loue adulteries and yet worse then all these into the world Abstinente from mariage proceeded from the Gentils Hieronym l. 2. contr Ioum. Clem. Alex l. 3 The Christian Church was compounded of Iewes and Gentils and was not wel at ease till it had brought their leauen into it Now the spirite of fornication had so blasoned marriage amongst the Gentiles as that it was forbidden to many of their Priestes namely to their Hierophantes who as we reade did make themselues chast with the vse of hemlocke to those which were consecrate to the Mother of the Gods and to those of Egypt c. And of them saith Clement the first heretickes learned to condemne marriage And the heretickes called Essaei about the time of the wearing away and declining of the Iewish religion had likewise learned of the Gentiles but especially of the Pythagoreans as saith Iosephus to contemne and dispise marriage Ioseph Antiquit l. 15. c. 13. l. 18. de bell Iudaic. c. 2. Philo apud Eus l. 8. Epiphan l. 1. t. 1. and those are they of whom Philo speaketh and not any Christian Monkes as wee haue obserued before Likewise Epiphanius teacheth vs that this superstition passed on euen to the Scribes and Pharisies whereby we need not doubt but that by the husbandrie of the spirit of lying it glided forward very smoothly First amongst the heretikes called Marcionites and Gnostikes who by Irenaeus and Epiphanius are reported to abhorre and detest mariage altogether grounding themselues vpon an vncertaine Gospell written as Clement saith by the Egiptians The Manichies also who defended the same at the least in their elect and chosen and finally by contagion into the Church of Christ The dispute which is in S. Paule affordeth a liuely round testimony as the thing is 1. Cor. 7. For let vs not thinke that Saint Paul fighteth there with his shadow but that he maketh way for his entrance into the matter namely that to liue and leade a single life is not fitting all men that hee hath no commandement from God for virgines that hee would not put a snare about their necke that he that cannot containe himselfe should marrie And in another place he stretcheth this generalitie vnto the seuerall kindes and sorts of people as meaning thereby to represse and beate downe the lightnesse of young widowes counselling them to marrie and to keepe the Bishops in the way of giuing good example to direct them in expresse and plaine tearmes euen so farre as to say Ehiphan l. 1. c. 2. haeres 25. that the forbidding of mariage is the doctrine of Deuils c. Then it infected Nicholas one of the seuen Deacons Epiphanius reporteth that he seeing that many were admired and highly accompted of by reason of the leading of a single life resolued and renounced his wife notwithstanding that she was a faire and beautifull woman then not being able to contain himself neither for shame to returne vnto her again he gaue himselfe as did likewise all his sect followers to all kind of vncleannes euen to the committing of Sodomitrie perswading himselfe that all was holy vnto him or at the least tollerable prouided that he came not neare his wife to touch her And as there is not any sect so infamous but it hath his followers so there was no wast of these kind of people in Asia being a delicious pleasant country who of their captaine were called Nicolaitanes But S. Iohn who taught in the cities of Asia did oppose and set himself in his holy and godly zeale against this seducing deceiuer and shut the Church dores against him The Apostles for the most part being dead Apocal. 2. and thereby the great lights wholy and for euer eclipsed the spirit of darknes assured himself the better to work his feats but the holy scriptures which they had in this point left so cleare and bright Apocripha bookes did stand in his way to his great trouble Wherevpon he opposeth and deuiseth others against theirs namely Apocripha
the cause why the verse saith O bone Calixte nunc omnis Clerus odit te Quondam Presbyteri poterant vxoribus vti c. And Polydore Virgil writeth that aboute the yeare 1100. marriage was taken from ecclesiasticall persons in the Westerne Church Polydor. l. 5. as shall appeare true hereafter in other nations Now our good Fathers of Trent haue not forgotten to note down in their Index Expurgatorius that these words Coniugium quando Sacerdotib Occidentalib interdictum should be raced out and others which we shall set down hereafter Index expurg pag. 195. CHAP. X. The further proceeding and growth of abstinence from Mariage and the full and peaceable establishing of the same vntill our time THis thing wil further verifie it selfe by the sequele of other nations In England Some holde that the Gospell came into England in the yeare 170. so that they heard not of abstaining from marriage till such time as Augustine the Monke was sent vnto them from S. Gregorie to establish the Romane ceremonies there The beginning there was with the preaching of the praises of chastitie and after by the planting of Monkes of the Order of S. Benet and in the end as other inuentions of Rome were laid for a foundatiō they assaied to bring in this single life Brithwoldus Bb. of Londō began about the year 714. assisted by the authoritie of Beda the Monks banding and opposing themselues against the Priestes the hypocrisie of the one against the loosenes which the people knew wel to be in the other but for this time without preuailing or profiting in their enterprise Otho Archb. of Canterburie about the yeare 950. declared marriage of Priestes to be hereticall but hee was conuinced mightilie by the authoritie of the scriptures and of the ancient Church so that his attempt tooke no better effect then his Predecessors On the contrary Elserus Prince of Marsh tooke vpon him the defence of the maried Priests against the Monks who had driuen them out of their Churches and set them in againe by force Polyd. Malmesburiens Dunstan a man much spoken of in stories for the Art Magicke doth reprehend and take him vp for the same verie sharpelie goeth to Pope Iohn the 13. at Rome and there offereth him his seruice a president example much commēded in the stories of that time bringeth backe with him the Archb. of Canterburie his Palliū for to succeede Otho as also thunderboltes newly forged and sharpened causeth a Councell to bee held at Winchester And yet notwithstanding the cause being debated and decided by the scriptures he was ouercome notwithstanding all the sophistrie that Etheluold the Monke whome he had brought from Scotland could bring out of his budget to help him withall Wherupon he presētly bethinketh himself of other sleights courses so it was fained that the Angel Gabriel had brought a certain schedule which condēned the mariage of priests And S. Paul saith vnto vs Although it shold be an angell from heauen c. Polyd. l. 6 M. Imsburiens And further in the heat of the disputation causeth a voice to be heard from behind a crucifixe These men do not well which maintaine the mariage of Priests The people being astonished vpon the cōming of the same the priests replied couragiously and saide that the voice of God could not bee contrarie to his own word And a Bb. of Scotland named Fathbodus amongst others being called thether by Elfred the K. as one recommended for his great godlines learning maketh all the faction and partakers of Dunstan to be ashamed and at their wits end Ranulph l. 6. c. 11. Capgranius Polyd l. 6. In which extremitie he hath recourse either to his magicke as some writers of that time do affirme or else to some other diuelish practise and saith I am now too old for to dispute but much more for to studie and yet you shall not carrie it away on this sort And by and by after hauing caused his aduersaries to bee called into a hall it shrunke vnder them and ouerwhelmed the greatest parte hee onely hauing prouided for his owne safetie stoode still vpright possessed his Archbishopricke in peace and established the Monkes of Saint Bennet in steade of the Priestes which were called Canons Regulars This was continued by king Canutus about the yeare 1020. in the Church of Cambridge and by K. Edward in that of Oxford c. And yet for all this priestes did not cease to take them wiues in England whether it were as some say that king William tooke a certaine tribute for to permit them or that the libertie thereof could not bee taken from them in so generall a contradiction and gainsaying at one blowe Anselm ad ad Arnulph The truth hereof appeareth by Anselmus the Archbishoppe of Canterburie his letters vnto Prior Arnulph which acknowledge that vnder the former king and Lanfranke the Archbishoppe his predecessor they had both Churches and wiues together Anselme then returning from Lyons out of exile helde a Councell at London aboute the yeare 1100. wherein after manie solemne protestations hee forbiddeth the Priests to marie A few yeares being ouerpassed there grew a general complaint throghout the whole realm that of abstaining from mariage they were come to fall to adulteries and incestes and from them to Sodomitrie and that it spreadeth by the infection and contagion thereof from the Cleargie to the Laitie and getteth whole Countries euen to the publike committing of the same Anselme thereupon made notable ordinances for the repressing of the same in a Synode held for the purpose in the Church of S. Paul in London he excommunicateth them which were conuicted of Sodomitrie vntill such time as they shal be thought worthy by reasō of their confession and penance to be absolued and the like to be done with thē who shal be furtherers vnto them in the cōmitting of this crime he ordaineth that such as are religious shal not be aduanced vnto higher order becomming by this his ouer mild and soft correction no lesse faultie then the offenders themselues On the contrary he excommunicateth the Priests who shall haue beene found talking with their wiues without two or three witnesses not contenting himselfe with hauing depriued them of their offices and benefices c. In the end the mischief cōtinuing he goeth being perplexed in his mind for a remidy vnto Rome wherupon the Pope in steade of hauing recourse to that which God hath ordained sent one Iohn of Creme a Cardinal into England with letters to the Cleargie of England that he should be receiued with all due reuerence as the Vicar of S. Peter and the like also to Dauid K. of Scotlād then keeping his Court at Roxbourg who caused the profession of a single and vnmaried life to become much more authentike that is caused the plant of Sodomie to propagate and multiplie far more plentifully in a Synode held at London Ranulph
not any other sacrifice but that of bread and wine which hee hath ordained and is like vnto that which Moses in the law called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a sacrifice of praise c. For therein wee praise God for the benefite which hee hath bestowed vpon vs sauing vs by his onelie Sonne c. Alexander Hales holdeth manie assertions that cannot agree with the Masse saying Iesus Christ hath offered a double sacrifice a spirituall and corporall the spirituall that is a sacrifice of deuotion and loue towardes mankind which he hath offered in spirit the Corporall the sacrifice of the death which hee vnderwent vpon the Crosse which is represented in the sacrament Marke represented The spiritual prefigured by the incense and perfume which was made vpon the inner Altar the corporall which hee offered in his flesh two waies that is to say sensibly vpon the Crosse and insensibly vpon the Altar obserue and marke again insensiblie That sensible sort being shadowed out by the sacrifiees of beastes but the insensible by the sacrificing of thinges that are incensible as fruites bread and wine both the one and the other vpon the vtter Altar The one of them to speake as hee speaketh propitiatorie for such were the sacrifices wherein beasts were offered with the shedding of their blood for sinne figuring out that sacrifice offered by Iesus Christ the other Eucharisticall onelie for such properlie were those of fruites and such like thinges Againe The sacrifices of the law were signes both of the true sacrifice of Christ Circumferimus as also of the spirituall sacrifices which we shall haue to offer vnto God That for the purging away of all our sinnes aswell originall as actuall these to haue relation to the mortification of our flesh inasmuch as we carrie about with vs Iesus Christ in our bodies to the end that his life may be manifested in vs. Lyranus handleth the matter more clearelie Lyranus in ep ad Heb. c. 10. That which cleanseth and wipeth away sinne must needes bee heauenlie and spirituall and that which is such hath perpetuall efficacie and by consequent ought not neither indeed can be reiterated and this that wee say of the oblation of Christ is because of the Godhead being vnited and conioyned with the manhoode for it being once offered ought not to be reiterated and yet is sufficient to deface and blot out al the sins that are alreadie or hereafter to be cōmitted You wil say yet behold the sacrament of the Altar is euery day offered vp in the church c. But the answere hereto is that this is no reiterating of the sacrifice but an ordinarie remēbring calling to mind of the only sacrifice offered vpon the Crosse wherupon it is said in Mat. 26. Do this in remēbrance of me c. Now manie such good people enflamed with a true zeale had stayed the course of this mischieuous monster but their owne infirmitie and weakenes did incumber and hinder them tyranous rule and gouernment astonished them and the multitude carried them away For on the contrarie to this error once so farre admitted of the multitude there is added an other heape of more then good measure Gab. Biel. lect 26. That it is cleane an other thing to be present at the Masse then to communicate in the holie supper That the Masse ex opere operato by the worke wrought that is to say by being onely present without receiuing anie thing or yet bringing anie good motion thereunto doth apply vnto euerie such person present al the merites of Christ Who could not now loue the Masse better then the holie supper which requireth a serious examination and tryall of the conscience that offereth life but representeth to the vnworthie receiuer the dreadfull horror of tormenting hell Againe That the Masse hath a most speciall a most great and an indefferent or middle power and efficacie a most speciall in respect of the Priest seeing that by it hee meriteth eternall life a most generall in respect of the Church and all the members thereof without anie exception and a meane or middle in respect of him or them that cause the same to bee saide c. Of the sacrament of the holie supper the institution of the Sonne of God of all the sacramentes together yea or of the verie death of Iesus Christ is there anie one of them that hath written so high tearmes of commendation But seeing that it hath such efficacie and vertue in it to what end is it so oft reiterated or multiplied so manie waies seeing that the oft administring and taking of a medicine as they saye themselues is a marke and note of the weakenes of the same But this question is not yet throughlie decided amongst them as those that haue too eager a stomacke to loose their fatte morsels They dare not saye that it is for anie wante of sufficiencie in the sacrifice neither will they saye that the vertue and efficacie thereof may bee so farre stretched and extended as the sufficiencie thereof woulde beare Some saye that none but Iesus Christ doth knowe how farre it concerneth euerie man Others that hee bestoweth the power and vertue of the Masse according to the determination and application of the Priest that sacrificeth it Gab. Biel. lect 26. And thereuppon Gabriel Biel is set in a chafe saying I praye you such as wauer in this sorte and doe not so much as giue but sell such vncertainties in the Church and that in so serious and waightie a matter can we otherwise call them then most pernicious and daungerous Impostors and deceiuers Now as all truth doth agree and hang together That the doctrine of the Masse is against it selfe so wee may see in this doctrine the figure of falshoode and broad stampe of a shamefull lye which as his nature is is giuen to destroye and ouerthrowe it selfe Sometimes they say that Christ hath offered his bodie vnto God in the supper for the Apostles and that in the Masse the promises of the new Testament euen those of the remission of sins are applyed and that thereby it becommeth propitiatorie yea ex opere operato Other sometimes they say that this sacrifice doth not worke sufficientlie and immediatelie Bellarm. l. 2. de Missa c. 4.2 Idem l. 1. c. 2. and that it is not properlie ordained of God the instrument to iustifie as Baptisme and Absolution are but that it serueth onelie to obtaine the gifte of penance by which the sinner would drawe neare vnto the sacrament and bee iustified by it Againe sometime that the Masse carrieth with it the remission of sinnes in asmuch as Christ hath sacrificed his body and his blood for the remission of the sinnes of his Apostles and that in the same howre wherein hee celebrated the supper with them and commaunded them to continue the same and therefore it is propitiatorie yea saith Caietanus infinitelie meritorious and satisfactorie Sometimes they conclude that
grieuous both the one and the other by pennance Now the truth is cleare how that purgatorie is not pennance as also that it is not ordained for sinnes but for punishment but and if it be as some would haue it for sinnes yet it is but for pettie and sleight sinnes Ireneus saith It is the word alone that washeth away the filthines of the daughters of Sion that washed the feete of his disciples and which sanctifieth their whole bodies Clemens Alexandrinus It is the good spirituall washing which cleanseth the soule Hieronym in Esa 4. whereof the Prophet speaketh The Lord hath washed away the filthines of Sion c. S. Ierome expounding this place saith in like sort That which is but lightly foule will bee washed cleane but that which is deeply stained and defiled by being burnt in the fire And this is that which Iohn Baptist said He will baptize you with the holy Ghost and with fire for man can giue but water but God fire and the holy Ghost which washeth away filthinesse and purgeth away the deadly and haynous sins Chrysostome Chrysost in Matth. hom 5. c. 4. Cyril in Esa c. 4. For men are baptised with fire by temptations that are present according to that in Esay In the spirit of feruencie and zeale c. Cyrill in like manner In the spirit saith he of iudgement that is to say by a iust sentence according as our Sauiour saith Now is the iudgement of this world for hee fighteth with the world and Sathan iustifying vs by faith c. And also in the spirit of zeale by the grace of baptisme which is not begotten in vs without the spirit c. For we are not baptised with bare water but with the holy Ghost with this diuine and intellectuall fire which wasteth in vs the vncleannesse of our vicious nature and melteth and burneth all the spots of sinne Haimo ibid. c. Haimo The same holy Ghost is called the spirit of iudgement and the spirit of zeale and feruencie of iudgement because that in baptisme Sathan is iudged and as it were condemned when his power ouer man is taken away from him of zeale because he inflameth the heartes of men with loue towardes their creator scouring away the canker of sin whereof it is said God is a consuming fire he will baptise vs with the holy Ghost and with fire c. And Hugo the Cardinall in like manner And thus you may see by these ancient fathers how they haue made a purgatorie of the holy Ghost and of the temptations and trials happening in this life the paines of purgatorie which cannot be except in the other And Lyranus In the spirit of iudgement for our Lord hath satisfied for the Church by the way of iustice in the spirit of zeale because he hath performed it in a great measure of charitie and loue And yet this is one of the textes whereby Bellarmine laboureth to make his cause so strong And here we are not to forget his vnsound and vnfaithfull dealing for that which S. Augustine hath spoken expresly De nouissimo iudicio of the last iudgement wherein saith he the daughters of Syon shall be refined graunt it saith he in as much as they shall be seperated from the wicked as the pure gold from his drosse in the furnace admit it also in this respect for that all creatures shall as then passe through the fire and likewise all manner of soules according to the opinion of that time this hee turneth and wresteth to help for the building of his purgatorie which they pretend to take place and seaze vpon men at the time of their departure out of this life And we are to request the reader to marke the deceit he worketh vpon the place Peter Abbot of Clugni abuseth either ignorantly or impudently another place Esay 8. Esa 8.19 Shall the people require a signe and vision of their God for the quicke and for the dead For so he alleadgeth it whereas the text saith Shall not a people inquire at their God shall they runne for the liuing to the dead reprouing such as did runne to south sayers sending them backe as is said afterward to the law and to the testimonie c. In deed the Septuagints haue translated it Shall they inquire of the dead concerning the liuing that is to say concerning the businesse and affaires of the liuing And the Chaldie paraphrast Euerie man saith hee inquireth and asketh counsell of his idolles so the liuing take counsell of the dead And Origen likewise You to whom God hath giuen his law will you go to inquire of the Deuils which are in verie deede dead Hieronym in Esa c. 8. And Saint Ierome vpon Esay saith As the infidels do aske counsell at their false Gods so the faithfull ought to runne to the true God and to the lawe and to the Prophetes inspired by him c. Lyranus saith as hee saith Saint Cyrill Cyril in Esa l. 5. orat 5. Would you aske counsell sayeth the Lord of the dead for the liuing you which are aliue is there any reason that you shoulde inquire of the deade of the bodies which lie in the graues or of the soules which it may bee are in hell Nay rather saith hee you which are quickned by the liuely worde of God will you go vnto sorcerers and Magicians which are dead in their soules Now the argument of Peter of Clugni was thus framed There are visions of the dead and therefore a Purgatorie but it is grounded as we haue seene vpon an vnsound Grammar or rather vpon the corrupting and deprauing of the old expositor wherein as some note there was as in S. Ierome Pro viuis à mortuis and not ac mortuis And this is the more likely in asmuch as for the most parte he applyeth himselfe to the Greeke text And in deed Cardinall Hugo said Amortuis of the dead for the liuing that is to say to aske counsell of images which are like vnto dead men which is a ridiculous and foolish thing Esay 9. Wickednesse saith the Prophete shall burne like a fire Esa 9.17 It shall deuoure the briars and the thornes and shall bee kindled in the thicke places of the forrest c. This is one of Bellarmine his maister-pillars There the Prophete threatneth the people of Israel From the head vnto the taile the boughes and the stumpe the Magistrate and the false prophete These are his wordes And after that hee hath denounced the anger of God to fall vppon the Magistrates and vppon the men in authoritie hee addeth That it shall not stay there but that it shall set on fire and deuoure the common sorte which hee compareth to bushes of thornes or to a thicke growne vnderwood And it is made plaine by the wordes following And the people shall bee as fewell or a baite for the fire no man shall haue pittie vppon his companion to spare him c What agreement is
had no calling to doe it There the first booke stayeth without speaking of any sacrifice or praier for the deade The second book goeth further Iuda saith it hauing beaten Gorgias came to carry away the bodies 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of his countrimen which had beene slaine before for to burie them who found vnder the garmentes of euery one of them which had beene slaine things sacrificed to idols Euery man iudged them worthily punished and gaue glory vnto God praying him that he would blot out this sinne or rather as it is in the best copies that they might not bee quite raced out that is to say that they might not bee vtterly rooted out for this sinne But Iuda did openly make knowne vnto the people this notable iudgement to the end they might beware and keepe themselues from sinne c. he maketh a collection of twelue thousand groates or rather according to the Greeke of two thousand which he sendeth into Ierusalem for to offer in sacrifices for the sinne For the sinne simply that is to say of the people to the end that it might not be as that of Achan namely imputed to all in generall and not for the sinnes of the dead Biblia impressa madatu Concil Trident â—ub Sixt. 5. Clem. 8. Missal in anniuersariis defunctorum triginta Missale reformatum Pii 5. as our aduersaries haue corruptly falsly turned the same in certaine of their Bibles and those imprinted by the authoritie of the Councell of Trent and as they reade it as yet vnto this day in their Masse bookes Hitherto according to the law Iosua 7. Deuteronomie 21. That which followeth goeth further that is that it pretendeth also that the oblation of these groates did serue for the purging away and blotting out of the prouocation of that sinne committed by the dead But now we are to see how farre this may make for purgatorie It appeareth that Iuda ought not to belieue or doe this either by reason of the law or in respect of any example of the fathers or yet by reason of any custome receiued in the church for it is not spoken of in all the scripture And in deed the Author himselfe giuing his iudgement theron sheweth sufficiently that he doth it by way of a particular discourse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dealing verie honestly and ciuillie saith he in discoursing vppon the resurrection And it is likewise as apparant that it was not in any consideration of Purgatorie but rather saith he of the last resurrection In so much as that the intention and drift of this prayer properly was that this sinne might not be imputed vnto them in the day of the iudgement of the Lord which shall bee at the generall resurrection a praier which conueieth not either good or euil vnto the dead no more then that of Paul for Onesiphorus when hee was aliue 2. Tim. 1. Ingolstadienses The Lord giue him to find mercie with the Lord in that day For as for that which certaine Iesuites say that hee speaketh of the mysticall resurrection from sinne and not of the actuall there needes no more but the reading of the text to refute them It appeareth likewise by our aduersaries their doctrine that this praier and sacrifice could not be to draw them out of Purgatory For the sinne according to their owne distinction was mortall being idolatrie which is treason against the Maiestie of God that in the highest degree Now purgatorie is not for mortall sinnes Againe God say they doth neuer punish one and the same thing twise But it was saith the Author for this sinne that they had beene slaine and that euerie man did iudge it so wherefore they were not to haue inflicted vpon them any more temporall punishment that is to say any purgatorie Againe purgatorie say they doth not satisfie for the fault but for the punishment and notwithstanding Iudas doeth there offer a sacrifice for sinne which was neuer offred in the law for the punishment onely but for the fault wherefore it followeth that in that his action hee had no mind of purgatory so much as to thinke once thereof so farre was he from the thing For the Author addeth He considered that those which were dead in a true godly sort could not faile to find grace and fauour which is saith he by a parenthesis a sound and wholesome thought And so it is in the Greeke text far differing from that which they pretend namely that all lesse or more may bee supposed to stand in need to bee freed from purgatorie But say they yet he praid for the dead let it be so How beit we shal see by and by that it is but an euill argument to go about to proue purgatory because of such praiers And on the contrary we haue reason to belieue seeing that according to the doctrine of the Church of Rome it selfe this place cannot stand with purgatory that this sacrifice hath no other end as may appeare by the text but to pray vnto God that in the last resurrection he wold be fauorable vnto theÌ„ But there is more in the matter Iudas did it say they therefore it is wel done That we deny How many actions do we reade of in the scriptures of famous men which notwithstanding are not to be imitated In the church of God men liue by his lawes not by our owne examples neither do we see in deed since the time of the Machabees vnto the comming of Christ that this example was euer followed in the Church The mourning also and lamentation made for Lazarus is contrarie hereunto Ioh. 11. And as concerning that the author of this booke doth approue it so hee did the fact of Razias who murthered himselfe And this is the cause why S. Augustine sayeth to the Donatistes which woulde haue made it a good consequent That these bookes ought to be read soberlie and the same libertie haue wee to aunswere our aduersaries after the same sort in a different and diuerse cause but about the same author To bee short this seconde booke of the Machabees doth approue prayer for the dead but to bring them to bee allowed by the Church it is requisite that they should first bee allowed of by the word and all this notwithstanding as wee haue seene doth not make any thing for Purgatorie Insomuch as that of so manie textes alleadged out of the olde Testament wee haue seene them by the confession of Perion to haue not so much as one left them besides this same as being put besides all holde and proofe in the Canonicall and tyed to one onelie Apocrypha text and that such a one as is the most Apocrypha of all the rest and yet euen that cannot stand match with Purgatorie Whereupon wee conclude here That Purgatorie hath not anie one foundation or ground in all the olde Testament not anie one in all the Church of Israel where notwithstanding it seemed to haue beene most
that the Saintes liuing in the time of the olde Testament were saued by the law of Moses and the Grecians by Philosophie That Christ and his Apostles did preach the Gospell in hell Origen his purgatory Orig. hom 8. in Leuit. Hom 25. in Numer Hom. 6. in Exod in ep ad Rom. c. 11. In psal 36. hom 3. In Hierem. Bellarm l. 2. de purgat c. 8. ¶ 8. septim Synod 5. c. 11. Synod 7. ex prato spiritualt Iohan. Diacon in vir B. Greg. l. 2. c 45. thereby to conuert the damned and that both in this worlde as also in that to come yea euen in hell there may bee vse and place graunted for repentance c. And the other building vppon this his maisters bad foundation a great deale worse As that all men how holy soeuer are to passe this Purgatorie euery one according to his proportion S. Peter S. Paul c. the one to be purged by fire and the other by water more or lesse c. And again that the most wicked the most miscreants yea the Deuilles themselues are purged are amended yea and saued by the same Now I desire to know of them if they will approue this Purgatorie of Origen And if they doe not approue it that then they would not obiect it any more vnto vs neither yet any of those places which haue relation thereunto seeing also that Bellarmine intreating of Purgatory doth acknowledge that the fift generall Synode condemned and cursed Origen no lesse then Arrius and Nestorius furthermore that the seuenth general Councell maketh mention of a reuelation wherein he was seene in hell amongst others the Arch-heretickes And the same is likewise confirmed by Iohan. Diaconus in the life of Gregorie But it is worth the noting how that Origen had not as yet learned that these punishmentes were mittigated and lightned by suffrages for there is not found any maner of print or note of any such thing in all his purgatorie These pollutions and sinnes go for no better then matter for the fire and torments without any hope of release or ransome And still as these fantasies continued and abode with some curious spirites they were condemned in the fift generall Councell by the East Church The Apologie of the Grecians presented by Michael Bishop of Ephesus Vincent Lyrinensis Lactan. de diuino praemio c. 21. and euen in that which concerneth their false foundation namely that Christ hath purchased the remission of sinnes but not of the punishment And this appeareth to bee so by the Apologie giuen by the Greekes in the Councell of Basill These fantasticall dreames of Origen notwithstanding by reason of the reputation of his learning did leaue their impressions in the Latine Church whereupon Vincentius Lirinensis had iust cause to say That Origen his knowledge and zeale was a great temptation to the Christian Church Lactantius saith That men are not iudged presently after their death but that they are kept in a common prison vntill the day of iudgement in which they are to bee tried by fire This place is ill alleadged by our aduersaries for they do not place together the good the bad the faithfull and vnfaithfull at the time of their departing out of this life neither do they hold that purgatorie sleepeth without doing any thing vnto the day of iudgement for they will haue it occupied about the dead from the day of their death Againe it is apparant that in the time of Lactantius the doctrine of the Church was cleane contrarie For Eusebius as we haue said comparing the opinion of the Platonistes therewith maketh but two estates and conditions after this life whereas they made three But let it be for the making of the comparison the more full that hee did not altogether forget the third But they alleadge vnto vs Saint Ambrose Saint Hillarie Saint Ierome c. The purgatorie spoken of by certaine of the old fathers is not the same with that of the Church of Iâ—ome Ambr. in psal 118. in psal 36. 2. ad Timoth 2. Then let vs see if wee shall be able to find such euidence as may make vs acknowledge this their purgatorie in them Verily there is no man that can bee ignorant how greatly Saint Ambrose did esteeme of Origen when as the most part of his expositions are translated word for word from him And thereupon likewise his opinion touching Purgatorie doth nothing differ and therefore also no lesse worthy to be condemned then his All men saith he which are haue beene or shall be the one onely Christ excepted shall be purged by fire The sonnes of Leui Ezechiel Daniel c. if they be not consumed yet at the least they shal be fired if they be not drowned yet they shall bee wette and dipt in the water for so was Iohn the Euangelist himselfe whom the Lord loued so much so was Saint Peter which receiued the keies of heauen There is not any one but Christ onely which doeth not smel of this fire who is the righteousnesse of God not hauing any sinne so that in him there is nothing found for this fire to consume or burne And this hee amplifieth by two seuerall Allegories the one taken from the glittering sword which was set at the entrance into Paradise the other from the people of Israel which went through the red sea c. He addeth hereto that this triall and proofe by fire shall bee made in the day of iudgement by the vniuersall burning of the world which shall vniuersally purge all men but euery one according to his nature euen as the fire doth melt the lead otherwise then it doth the gold c. S. Hillarie no lesse addicted to Origen Hilar. in comment in psal 118. holdeth the same opinion and proceedeth yet further saying If the virgine Marie the virgin of God must also vndergo the sentence of this iudgement of this fire hee spake before through which wee must all passe who is hee that dare desire to bee iudged of God And in another place hee saith Idem Canon in Mat. 3. Hieronym Amos 3. ex Amo 7.14 Ezech. 46. It remaineth that those which are baptised with the holy Ghost bee made perfect that is to say accomplished and fully refined by the fire of the last iudgement c. Saint Ierome likewise is infected with the like opinions by continuall reading of Origen He will call saith hee the fire vnto iudgement and behold it commeth at his summons and first of all deuoureth the depth that is to say all sortes of sinnes wood baye stubble and afterward it eateth at once the parte and portion that is to say it commeth to the Saintes which the Lorde hath made choice of to belong to him c. Againe Hieronym in vlt. cap. Esa Euerie creature is vncleane and must bee purged by the fire of God for the Sabbath day wherein hee shall haue eternall rest Likewise hee meaneth that euen wicked Christians shall
hauing these giftes either of Saints or Angels but on the contrarie this doctrine was then noted to be the doctrine of heretickes as of the Basilidians and Ophites c. Who praied vnto Angels in their workes and that by set formes of praier Idem l. 1. c. 23. 35. which Ireneus rehearseth O tu Angele ab a te or opere tuo c. And these had likewise their pretended Saints Iudas Cain c. Against whom Ireneus doth not oppose either Abell or S. Peter but onely Iesus Christ our Lord. But in the Epistle of the Church of Smyrna Idem in Ep. ad Sâ—â—yâ—nens apud Euseb l. 4. c. 15. we haue this whole question handled the Martyrs were much honoured in the Church and they deeply condemned that did not honour them and not without cause being vessels chosen of God to seale and assure by their testimonie the resurrection of the Lord. But how far did this honour extend They were buried with great regard and there is made yearely a rehersall of their martyrdome vppon a certaine day the day of their death is celebrated and solemnized by the name of the day of their natiuitie in stead of the Paynims their Genethliacks or birth-daies the Church commeth together into the common place of buriall there to praie vnto God that by the sight of their bones they may be stirred vp to the like constancie for at that time they had not yet any Churches Now in respect of any of al this may they iustly be said to haue either worshipped or praied vnto them Nay rather saith this Epistle The Iewes and the Gentiles came to intrcate the gouernour that the body of Polycarpus might not be deliuered to the Christians least they should honour it in stead of Christ. But how doth the Church defend it selfe They are abused through ignorance saith it for we can neuer forsake Christ who hath suffered for the saluation of all them which are to bee saued in the whole world neither can we euer 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 colere honour any other And note how it vseth the word which coÌ„prehendeth the seruice which was accustomed according to godlines to be giuen vnto Christ that is to say the seruing of him in calling vpon him seeking of our saluation in him But some said vnto them so greatly do you honour your Martyrs Yea saith the Church of Smyrna but we worship Christ as the true and naturall Sonne of God and we loue the Martyrs as his Disciples and followers and not without good cause for the incomparable loue which they haue borne to their king Schoolemaster we our selues greatly longing and earnestly desiring to become their companions and Schoole fellowes c. Finally We celebrate the natiuitie that is to say the day of the death and Martyrdome of Polycarpus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in remembrance of them that haue finished the combat before vs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and for the preparing and exercising of them which are to come thereto that is to say to stirre vp such as are present to the like constancie for the name of Christ Who giueth vs the grace say they and not the Martyrs to bee partakers of the like crowne Tertull. in Apol. c. And this Epistle was written about the yeare 160. Tertullian saith J pray not to any but him of whome I know that I may obtaine because it is hee onely which doth and giueth all things and I am one that haue need to beg and craue his seruant to honour him alone and to offer vnto him the best fattest sacrifice as he hath commanded euen a praier and supplication which proceedeth from a chast body an innocent soule and a holy spirit c. And in the booke of the Trinitie he yeeldeth a reason why hee praieth vnto him alone It is not proper or pertinent to any but God to know our secrets but Christ knoweth the secrets of our harts Jt belongeth not to any but God to forgiue sins but Christ forgiueth sinnes Reasoning from his all-seeing knowledge and from his Almightie power to proue his Deitie Godhead and froÌ„ the Godhead to the seruice of inuocation Againe Else how should a man be sought sued vnto in our praiers as our mediator seing that the inuocating of one only man is without any power or efficacie to saluation seeing also it is said cursed is that coÌ„fidence that is put in man c. To that aboue said they oppose and bring a place of Ireneus Obiections where there is comparison made betwixt Eue and the Virgine Marie As Eue saith he was seduced by the words of an Angell that is a wicked Angell to runne from God by transgressing of his word so the Virgine Marie receiued ioyfull tidings by the word of an Angell that is a good Angell to heare God by obeying vnto his word And as the first was seduced and drawne away to runne and flie from God so the second was perswaded to obey him to the end that of the Virgine Eue the Virgin Mary fieret aduocata might become say they the aduocate Here saith Belarmine what can be more cleare Yea rather say we vnto him what can be more obscure That the Virgine Marie should be Eue her aduocate with God being borne 4000. yeares after Eue and receiued likewise a long time after her into heauen when as likewise we shall haue regard to their opinion of the Limbes But in deed that which goeth before as also that which followeth sheweth clearely that Ireneus had no other drift but to oppose the good that came to mankind by the meanes ministerie of Marie to the maladie and mischiefe wherwith the same became infected by that transgression of Eue. And as for the word Aduocate some are of iudgement that Ireneus was translated out of Greeke into Latine for we haue great peeces of him as yet in Greeke and further it cannot possibly bee that euer any Latine writer would haue written in such a stile 2. Cor. 7. passim Ioh. 16 And in other places also hee is verie absurdly translated by his interpreter Now the case so standeth that in the Greeke one and the same word dooth signifie both an aduocate and a comforter that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and one and the same Verbe to comfort and to exhort as is often and commonly to be seene in the Scriptures So in S. Iohn that which is translated in the Gospell Comforter according to the old translation speaking of the holy Ghost the comforter of our soules is interpreted Aduocate in the Epistle of S. Iohn 1. Ioh. 2.11 Tertul. de Trinit c. 29. speaking of Christ the mediatour Likewise Tertullian where he speaketh of the holy Ghost translateth it Aduocatum so indifferently hath it beene taken either for the one or for the other And so the sence is as if Ireneus should say that as Eue was the ruine and ouerthrow of mankind so the
shall first be called away hence let them continue their amitie and loue without ceasing in the presence of God let their prayers neuer cease for their brethren and sisters crauing in their behalfe the manifolde mercies of the father That is Saynt Cyprian extending and stretching the care that the Saintes deceased should haue not vnto the Church in generall onely but by a continuance of holy affection vnto them whome they had loued in Christ here vppon earth And this although it haue no example in the scripture yet it is far off from our aduersaries their doctrine for he prayeth to the liuing and not to the dead Now the controuersie or question betwixt vs is not if they pray and to what end but if wee ought to pray vnto them at all I know well what they haue to alleadge out of the sermon of the starre and the wisemen of the East As that the infantes slaine by Herode are made Senators in Paradice and obtaine grace for them which doe not merite it c. But they are not ignorant that this sermon hath by themselues beene alwaies numbred amongst the deuised and faigned ones As likewise that which they bring out of the booke of S. Cyprian his penitentnes How that he had beene a Magician and that by the help of the Deuils hee would haue assailed the chastitie of a maide and that she calling vpon Iesus Christ her husband and afterward the virgine Marie was deliuered and thereupon also S. Cyprian conuerted But with what face seeing S. Ierome telleth vs that S. Cyprian was a Rhetorician and wonne vnto Christ Hieronym in epist ad Paul in Comment in Ionam c. 3. Cyp l. 2. ep 2. Gelas D. 15. c. Sancta Rom. partly by the familiaritie he had with Caecilius whereupon he was surnamed the Cecilian and partly by the reading of the Prophete Ionas And seeing that S. Cyprian in setting downe his owne conuersion saith not a worde of all this And as little is that which commeth to light by Pontianus his Deacon who hath written his life But which is more seeing that Pope Gelasius at the verie same time when the inuocation of Saints had rooted it selfe verie deeply did pronounce and affirme vnto them that this booke was Apocrypha And yet they are still abusing the common people with the name of the fathers For as concerning the sermon of Gregorie Nazianzene Marulla hath very well obserued that he hath made Cyprian of Damascus and Cyprian the Carthaginian all one whereas the first suffered in the time of Valerian and the second vnder Dioclesian And it hath beene noted by many others before and after him We are now in this place to bring in Dionysius the pretended Areopagite for hee cannot be so auncient as we haue proued as they would make him Dionvs eccles Hierarch c. 3. and this we say and affirme by the way that we need not doubt that the miracles which God wrought vppon the establishment of the Church at the sepulchers of the Martyrs made many to looke downe and to fixe their eyes vppon the Martyrs whereas they ought to haue lifted them vp and to haue caused them to looke vpon God alone and that so much the more because it was called and accompted to be the honouring of God in his Saintes as also for that it seemed to bee an instigation and pricking of men forward to suffer for the name of Christ Whereunto also you may adde as another cause the want of a Paule or Barnabas at the corner of euerie fielde to represse these disordered and vnruly deuotions of the people Actes 14. and to cause them to leaue the creature to betake themselues to the liuing God But so it is that this Denys rehearsing the causes for which he made mention of the Saintes in the seruice speaketh not but of those that follow To the end saith he that those that liue may learne by these examples to liue and die well in God and that they might bee admonished and taught that those that die in him doe liue out of this life in a better That God hath them in his remembrance according to that which is said God knoweth those that are his The death of the Saintes is precious before God That they are also one with Christ by an indissoluble vnion and bond that can not bee broken which are the causes saith he that this mention or rehearsall is made at the time of the celebrating of the Sacrament the Sacrament of the coniunction and vnion of Christ and his members That is to shew vnto vs that those that bee not the greatest parte in this world that yet they cease not to be a part of the Church The contention raised about the Arrians was a cause that for a certaine time men did speake without fault The Christians reasoned Christ is truely God for we are all agreed to pray vnto him but we pray not vnto neither call vppon any but God This argument had beene of no force if the Church at that time had vsed the inuocation of Saintes for the reply had beene verie readie But tell mee how many Saintes doe you pray vnto Hillar in psal 129. which you know to be no Gods And although S. Hillarie doe playe the Philosopher as others before him vppon the mediation of Angelles the protection of the Patriarkes and Apostles c. yet he reserueth inuocation for Christ alone Idem in Psal 123. Because saith he that he belieueth that he is very God that he is present by his nature when he is faithfully called vpon and for that he is present with him that belieueth in him c. Idem c. 27. in Matth. Athanas orat 2. cont Arrian Idem de incarnat verb. But in regard of the Saintes The virgines saith he doe answere that they cannot giue any oile because it behoueth euerie one to buy for themselues and that none doe expect trust to be helped by the merites and workes of another c. Athanasius in like manner The Saintes saith he doe not craue any helpe of the creatures but they crie and call vnto Christ in their necessities He is not therefore a creature hee is verie God Againe If thou worship saith he Christ as he is man because the word dwelleth in him then worship the Saintes because that God hath a little house or dwelling place in them c. which thing hee proueth to bee absurd What force should such a reason haue had if the sermon intituled of the virgine the mother of God were his wherein he praieth vnto her for succour by the names of Ladie Mistresse Queene c. But the learned know that the greatest part of the third and fourth Tome of Athanasius are suspected of vntruth as Nannius likewise hath confessed being publike professor in the vniuersitie of Louaine and hee that did translate them And this is one speciall marke thereof for that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 was not
to behold and looke vpon him as if you saw him and he you And yet more plainly in the funerals of his sister Gorgia Idem in suner Gorgon after many such flourishes hee checketh and represseth himselfe If thou hast any care or regard saith he of these honours if this honour be bestowed by God vpon holie soules in recompence if they discerne vnderstand and approue these thinges vnderstand and know also our purpose and speech c. All of them being phrases of speech that are full of doubting and by consequent a praier without faith whereas in matters as certaine as the Articles of our faith the Church is accustomed to say Fidelis sermo firmissimè tene nulla tenus dubites This is a true and trustie speech a doubtles faith And who so desireth to see further how farre they were carried with the streame of their Rhetoricke let him reade the Monodie of Nazianzene vpon the life of S. Basill for there hee maketh a comparison with Adam Henoch Noe Abraham Isaac Iacob Ioseph Moses Aaron Iosue Dauid Salomon and Elias euen to the preferring of him alone both before euery one of them in particular and all of them in generall but vnto S. Iohn Baptist and the Apostles in these wordes That he was sent an Apostle to reestablish faith in the world A charge and burthen saith he so much the more difficult and waightie by how much to settle a thing againe is ordinarily more laborious painfull then to worke it new And let this one tast of the feruencie of their speech serue as an admonition with wisdome and discretion to reade the like But let vs heare what was said at the same time The opinion of the churchmen and not of the commō people Theod. in ep ad Colos 2.18 not by any particular person but by the generall voice of the Church assembled in a Synode at Laodicea vppon this matter and that not in any Rhetoricall figure but in a well scanned Canon and that set downe in plaine tearmes Theodoret expounding these wordes of the Epistle to the Colossians Through humilitie and worshipping of Angels they saith he which defended the law perswaded them to serue Angels alleadging vnto them that the law was giuen by them And this vice continued a long time in Phrygia and Pisidia In so much as that the Synode assembled at Laodicea the chiefe cittie of Phrygia did forbidde them by an expresse law Ne colerent Angelos to worship Angels And as yet there are to be seene the Chappels of S. Michael amongst their bordering neighbours Now this their counsell was couered with the cloake of humilitie for they alleadged that the God of the vniuersal world is inuisible incomprehensible and not to be approached and therefore of necessitie man is constrained to vse them to the procuring of Gods fauour And this is it which S. Paul calleth through humilitie and worshipping of Angels And he addeth practising or intruding himselfe into matters which hee hath not seene that is to say vsing his owne conceipts And in the third Chapter S. Paul commandeth that they giue thankes to God the Father by Christ and not by his Angels But the Synode of Laodicea following this law laboured to cure this old disease and therefore ordained that they should not pray vnto Angels Niceph. l. 7. c. 50. ◠neither yet cast off Christ And of these Chappels of S. Michael Nicephorus speaketh also according to his time Now what is it that they can say to so cleare a testimonie Verily the wrangling and ouerthwart spirit giuen to crosse and gainesay Tom. 1. Concil Laodic c. 35. is neuer to seeke In the Councels which are come to our hands the Canon is laid downe in these tearmes Non oportet ecclesiam Dei relinquere abire at◠Angelos nominare alias angulos congregationes facere quae interdictae noscuntur Si quis igitur c. that it to say if you reade Angelos Angels We must not forsake leaue the Church and go away and nominate and call vpon the Angels and gather vnlawfull and forbidden asemblies And therefore if any man be found worshipping according to this hidden and secret idolatrie let him be accursed because he hath cast off our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of GOd and giuen vp himselfe vnto idolatrie But if you reade it Angulos that is to say Corners or angles you must not withdraw your selues into corners c. And yet notwithstanding there is no man that doth but once looke vpon this Canon but he may perceiue that some haue had a delight to corrupt it But by conferring of it with Theodoret it is made cleare and plaine That is that the question is not De angulis but de Angelis not of certain angles but of Angels For how should it be to the purpose to be an idolater to be accursed for seruing God in some corner seeing also that it is said When thou art disposed to pray betake thy selfe into thy priuate closet c. Neither doth the Synode forbid to name Angels for what offence were it to name them But of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say to call vpon them they haue made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say to name them For why should that be accounted to cast off the Sonne of God and to giue ouer himselfe to idolatrie The Breuiarie of Fulgentius and Ferrandus saith Vt nullus ad Angelos congregationem faciat And that of Cresconius intituleth this Canon De his qui Angelos colebant that is to say Of them which doe any manner of worship vnto the Angels And this the Greeke Canon calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To doe the seruice vsed of the Church in honor of them And thus they thinke themselues to haue auoided the places which are against them Epiphanius and Chrysostome principall Bishops of the East Church do yet yeeld vs a clearer testimony how they belieued in their time concerning this article Epiphanius I say who vpon occasion of certaine women in Thracia and Scythia which offered a cake to the virgine Marie which he calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 found cause to reproue and conuince not onely that particular abuse but all others of the like quality which were then suffered in the church vnder the shadow of deuotion and vnder the cloake of certaine famous persons And he goeth so farre what would he haue said of these times as to condemne them of heresie Let the Saintes be honoured Epiph. cont Antidicomarionitas contr haecresp aduer Hyndianes saith he and their rest glorious but we may not honour them more then is meete and conuenient but wee must honour the Lord for them And to the end we may not doubt what he meaneth by honoring Of the saintes themselues saith he we learne what honour is due vnto God and what vnto them but we may not giue them the honors after their death which liuing they themselues did giue vnto God
for feare saith he that veritas abeat in errorē the truth be turned and changed into error that is for as much as that which is performed duely vnto God can not chuse but be misplaced vnduely bestowed when it is performed vnto creatures Now these honors such as is adoration as also inuocation are parts of that which he calleth Latria For so he expresseth his meaning to be by the examples which he mentioneth of them in Ieremie that honour the hoasts Queene of heauen of Noe giuing thanks for his deliuerance by a sacrifice of Iacob crauing aide of the Lord in his necessity in powring the oile vpon the stone c. And whereas the abuse did grow more plausible by reason of the name of the virgine Marie There are some saith he which do not honor her sufficiently there are some that glorifie her too much The Deuil vnder the colour of doing good entreth into the spirits of men deifieth the nature of man to cause thē to worship the dead c. But although the bodie of Marie were holy yet notwithstanding it was not God she was a virgin to be honored and reuerenced but not to be adored worshipped she her selfe falling downe worshipping him that was borne of her according to the flesh whereupon he saith vnto her What haue I to doe with thee O woman for feare that any man admiring too much her excellencie might fall into heresie These are the reasons hee vseth in all this disputation In the first place It is not spoken of in the scriptures Where is saith he the scripture where is the Prophet that hath spoken it And for the second Rom. 1. It is an old error which must not rule ouer vs to forsake the liuing and to worship that which he hath made according to that which is written They haue worshipped the creature more then the Creator c. And therefore neither Helias nor S. Iohn nor Thecla nor Marie For if it be denied the Angels why should it be granted to the daughter of Hanna that is to say Mary And afterward also whole pages to the like purpose Let Ieremie saith he hold in these sillie simple women that they may not trouble the whole world that they may not haue any more to say we honor the Queene of heauen c. What other thing should he heare at this day in the deuotions of the Church of Rome Then he concludeth And this wee haue written for their sakes that are desirous to attaine the truth of the scriptures But if there bee any man that liketh better to heare the contrarie for this superstition did not want Monkes to support it he that heareth let him heare he that is disobedient let him be disobedient c. Chrysostome may seeme to haue taken to taske the pulling downe subuersion of this abuse he taketh such paines by all maner of meanes to vndermine the very foundations thereof Hee saw that the people were more inclined to receiue helpe from the suffrages of another then to amend their owne liues Therefore hee impugneth this opinion Nay saith he We are a great deale more assured certified Chrysost hom 5. in Matth. by our owne suffrages thē by the suffrages of an other neither doth God so soon grant our saluation at the praiers of another as at our owne For by that meanes was he moued to pittie the Cananitish woman by that meanes also he gaue the harlot to belieue thus also did the thief obtaine paradise there being neither aduocate nor mediator to moue him to any of these by intercession But Idem hom 12. in Matth. Thou saist I haue no good works I cannot trust to my good life hereupon it is that we are to betake our selues to his mercie the calme and quiet hauen of sinners where iudgement ceaseth wherein consisteth vnspeakable safety according to the example of the Cananitish woman who neither went to Iames nor Iohn nor Peter c. But in stead of all these she embraced as her dearest companion vnfained and hearty repentance and it was also vnto her as her aduocate going on her behalfe directly vnto the soueraigne head and fountaine And wherefore said she is he come downe to take humane flesh vpon him why is he made man but that I may speake vnto him In another place Idem hom de prof Euang. Wilt thou see saith he what more we do for our selues by our owne praters then by those of an other◠when the Apostles pray for the Cananitish woman they are repelled I am not sent but to the lost sheepe of Israel c. But when shee pleadeth her owne cause by prayer how great a sinner soeuer shee were euen then it was that shee obtained grace euen then it was that the Lord did graunt her petition Yea but the scripture commandeth vs to pray one for another Other mens praiers therefore are not vnprofitable Admit it yet it must be by the Saints that are aliue and not by them that are dead And of this intercession of the Saints it is that he speaketh and not of that of the Church of Rome When we offer saith he altogether vnto God Idem hom 44 in Genes 1. Idem hom 5. in Mat. Idem hom in 1. ad Thes Genes 18. Ierem. 7.16.11.14 that which commeth from our selues and the intercession of the Saints is ioyned therewith it doth greatly profite vs. For saith he in another place the praiers and supplications of the Saints are of great force power on our behalfe and therefore let vs not neglect them but rather let vs pray them to pray for vs and to lend vs their helping hand But what Saintes euen those that are liuing and wee know them by the examples and patternes that he giueth vs of them As of Abraham making intercession for Lot and of Ieremie whom God forbiddeth to pray for the people and many other Where in the meane time wee haue to obserue and note the faithfull and good dealing of the Doctors of the Church of Rome who alleadge the same of the Saints deceased and not of the faithfull liuing which are in all the scipture commonly called Saintes As concerning the Saints deceased he sometimes speaketh of them according to the common opinion Idem in Basil Martyr especially in his Panegyricks That the magnanimitie and vndaunted boldnesse of the Martyrs is a terrour vnto the tyrantes the deuils and the Prince of the deuils That they pray to God with confidence as soldiers are wont to shew their wounds vnto their Prince Idem in Iuuent Maxim That if S. Paule haue loued men here below he hath also in heauen a more feruent loue towards them but that this neuer reacheth either to praying vnto Saintes or vnto Martyrs on the contrarie in all his praiers we doe not heare of any other but onely God But haue they not purchased Paradise by their sufferings and merites
they know likewise not to bee his c. But S. Augustine did neuer thinke to winne heauen by any other meanes then the merite of the onely Christ for his Maxim is vniuersall August ad Hieronym de natura origi animarum Idem in quaest veter Nou. test q 73. That there is not any one soule in all mankind thus hee writ vnto S. Ierome for the deliuerance whereof the Mediator of God and men Iesus Christ the man is not requisite and necessarie Not so much as the Virgine Marie excepted seeing that he saith after many of the fathers going before That the Virgine in whome was wrought the mysterie of the incarnation of Christ did doubt as much in the death of our Sauiour Christ as shee was confirmed by his resurrection What doe we get by this discourse Verily that vnto the time of S. Chrysostome and S. Augustine that is to say neere hand fine hundred yeares after the death of our Lord there was no Inuocation of Saints in the Christian Church nor any mention of the same in the seruice of the Church that it was practised onely by the particular deuotions of some few which they had learned for the most part out of the Schoole of the Gentiles and that there were great personages at those times that laboured to represse them by the opposing and setting of the pure doctrine against them as wee haue seene by their disputations And if that they did speake so at such time as those myracles which it pleased God to worke for the confirmation of the faith and the approuing of his Martyrs were most fresh and new what would they haue said of that which we see at this day when wee pray not vnto God as then in the burying places of the Martyrs but vnto the Martyrs themselues yea and to all the sorts of pretended Saints both directly as the authors of good things and without any mention made of God and in their images And whereas they scrape together here and there some places that seeme to make for them some of them being true but ill translated some manifestly fained and deuised and some drawne from Rhetoricke to make proofes and reasons in Diuinitie what other thing may they seeme to be hereby but Spiders which out of most wholesome hearbs doe sucke poyson whereas the Bees doe gather sweetnesse out of the most bitter And here withall let vs not forget to obserue and note that at this time and manie ages after it was indifferent in the Church whether the faithfull departing out of this world were by and by gathered vnto God and inioyed his presence or else that they continued expecting the day of the resurrection in the bosome of Abraham in a place of most blessed rest from thence to bee receiued into heauen all together Which is more Ireneus Iustine Tertullian Origen Saint Ambrose Saint Augustine Saint Chrysostome Bernard Serm. 4. in sest omnium Sanct. Idem Serm. 3. Theodoret c. yea Saint Barnard no lesse then all the rest doe incline to belieue rather that they are reserued vnto the resurrection without the inioying of the presence of God Now the case so standeth that the Inuocation of Saints is grounded vpon intercession and their intercession vpon the sight and presence of God according to our Aduersaries their owne doctrine Whereupon it followeth that the Inuocation of Saints could not haue any ground to grow vpon in the Church all this time neither yet shall hereafter in any sure or certaine sort according to Saint Barnard his iudgement who liued not aboue three hundred yeares since seeing he stood more vppon this opinion then any other the Inuocation of Saints beeing such as could not match with this doctrine CHAP. XV. Of the growth and proceeding of the corruption of Inuocation both in the Greeke and Latine Churches NOw when these great lights of the Church S. Ierome S. Augustine S. Chrysostome Epiphanius and such like were put out there is no cause why we should maruaile if the Prince of darknesse The proceeding of the abuse in the Greeke church did thriue prosper mightily in a short time as also by the assistance of the ignorance which was brought into Europe at such time as the barbarous nations did ouerrunne and swarme in the same In the East Church they had beene drencht with the Apostrophes of Basill Nazianzene Ephrem and others but the Inuocation of Saints was not yet entred into their seruice onely they had receiued the Commemoration of them the prints and footesteps whereof remaine to be seene in these words In Liturg. Iacobo Basilio Chrysost attribut In calling to our minds the holy Virgine Patriarkes Prophets Apostles Martyrs c. We recommend them and our selues and our whole life vnto God c. Speeches so farre from bearing any inuocating of them as that they comprehend and include them in the same recommendation as also in the same worke of the grace of God with our selues following that opinion which they had currant amongst them that they were not as yet receiued into perfect blisse Likewise we haue a Church rule in S. Basill Basil in asceti c. 40. free from the fierie heate of his boyling Rehetoricke When saith he the Christians come to the Sepulchers of the Martyrs or into the adioyning places it must be looked vnto that it bee to no other end but to pray Idem hom 19 and to bee stirred vp to the imitating of their constancie by the recording and calling of them to mind For saith he in an other place by the calling to mind of their good deedes there ariseth profit vnto vs as of the vsing of an excellent parfume a good smel Anno. 500. Niceph. l. 15. c 18. But now one Petrus Gnapheus Bishop of Antioch ordaineth that in all publike praiers in his Church and note that his Patriarchall prerogatiue extended verie farre the inuocating of the Virgine Marie should bee vsed And this Peter was a most pernicious hereticke condemned in the fift generall Councell held at Constantinople for the heresie of the Theopaschites whereof hee was the Author teaching that God himselfe euen as hee was God was crucified and did suffer vppon the Crosse The mischiefe whose nature is neuer to bee idle went forward with speed The second Councell of Nice about the yeare eight hundred establishing the worshipping of Images ordained the Inuocation of Saints And it is likewise much about the same time that Euagrius the Monke brought in the King of Persia praying vnto Saint Sergius in these words That he and Syra his loue did hope in his power and belieue in him Damascen about the yeare eight hundred praieth himselfe vnto the Virgine Marie I shall saith he be saued by hoping in thee and hauing thee for my defence J will not feare any thing In thy Almightie helpe I shall put mine enemies to flight thou art the saluation of mankind open vs the doore of mercie c. And
such sort as that they are not apparant or to bee discerned notwithstanding that they be there neither yet any manner of distinction to bee made of them by reason of their incorporation euen so are we all incorporate both amongst our selues 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as also with Christ for wee are not nourished and fed this man of one bodie and that man of an other but all ioyntly of one and the same These are then the two principall endes of the Sacrament euen the growth and helping forwarde of our vnitie with Christ our head and of our vnitie with the brethren which with vs doe make one body in him which cannot bee accomplished more effectually then by the remembrance of the death of Christ which stirreth vp in vs a loue towards him who hath loued vs so much as to giue himselfe to death for vs euen that death which was due and iustly belonging to sinners c. So that wee not being able either to liue or die for any his emolument or profit for what good can there arise from vs to him we are incited and stirred vp to liue and die for his body which is the Church and not to spare any thing that is in vs no not our owne bloud for the edifying of the same or for the good and saluation of our brethren either begotten of Basil de Baptis in Moral or redeemed by the same bloud And this is the cause why Saint Basill saith What profit is there in these words Take this is my body To the end that drinking and eating we may euermore bee mindfull of him which is dead and risen againe for vs Who so calleth not to mind this remembrance is said to eate vnworthily c. And in another place What is the dutie of such as eate the bread and drinke the Cup of Christ Verily saith he to keep the remembrance of him which is dead and risen againe for vs perpetually c. Seeing saith likewise S. Ambrose Ambros de iis qui myst intiantur c. 3. That the Sacrament serueth not for any vse vnto saluation without the preaching that is to say the remembrance and commemoration of the crosse of Christ. And hitherto it may be that both wee and our aduersaries are of one mind in as much as we both the one and the other say That the bodie and bloud of Christ are in the Supper celebrated according to his institution and are truly and verily drunken and eaten in the same by the faithfull members of Christ in assurance of remission of sinnes and eternall life But the difference and disagreement betwixt vs is Wherein the maine difference lyeth for that wee say that they are receiued in the supper of the Lord with the Sacraments of the bread and wine They vnder the accidents of the whitenes roundnesse c. of the bread and vnder the rednesse and moysture c. of the wine the substance therof being at the verie instant of the vttering of the words by the Priest quite vanished and become nothing that so there may be place made for the bodie and bloud yea conuerted and turned into the bodie and bloud of Christ which they call Transubstantiation Againe that wee say that the bodie and bloud of Christ the nourishment of our soule which is spirituall are communicated with vs by the efficacie and power of the spirit of God and receiued of vs in like manner spiritually and by faith They that they are giuen by the hand of the Priest vnder the accidents of bread and wine and conuerted into flesh bloud by the pronouncing of the words which they call Sacramentall receiued into the mouth and swallowed downe into the stomack corporally and really c. and that not of the faithfull onely but of all both good and bad which receiue them c. So that the question or controuersie betwixt vs is not Whether there be a communicating of the body and bloud of Christ in the holy supper but How And this How is not raised by vs It proceedeth of the curiosity of our aduersaries neither yet by our incredulitie or curiositie but by our aduersaries who in stead of resting themselues in the simplicitie of the old writers haue so curiously pried into the same as that they haue wrapt themselues in an infinite sort of absurdities thereby causing doubts to arise yea and doubting themselues also of If in stead of making it plaine vnto themselues and others of the manner How Verily Saint Cyprian saith That it is an Apostolike thing and appertaining to the sinceritie of the truth to declare how the bread wine are the flesh bloud of our Lord. Saint Augustine likewise feareth not to demaund How the bread is made the bodie of Christ seeing that our Lord in the day of the Ascention caried vp his bodie into heauen But he hath also giuen vs rules by which these kinds of speeches ought to be expounded But this holy scanning and sifting out of the truth is verie farre from the prophane curiositie of our aduersaries they seeke the deciding of the matter in the nature of the Sacraments by comparing of Scripture with Scripture and by the analogie of faith and of the Creed according to the true and vndoubted rules of Diuinitie but these our aduersaries by destroying of the Sacraments the nature of Christ and the Articles of our faith our onely Diuinitie by destroying also the Lawes which God hath set in nature by a false kind of Philosophie So deeply haue they delighted and rooted themselues in an opinion contrarie to faith in the flesh which profiteth nothing contrarie to the word which is spirit and life and in the letter which is dead and killeth contrarie to the spirit which is liuing and quickning They say The literall sence neither can nor ought to be followed alwayes what is there any thing more cleare or plaine This is my bodie this is my bloud But againe is there any thing more plaine The rocke was Christ And of circumcision This is my couenant Againe The Lambe is the Passeouer These bones are the house of Israell Iohn is Elias I am the true Vine I am the bread of life which came downe from heauen c. And if the plainnesse and clearenesse of places should bee tied vnto the words and not to the sence and meaning then what clearer places can there possibly be then these Let vs make man according to our owne image and similitude And the Anthropomorphites haue heereupon concluded that God hath the shape of a man Genes 1. Luke 22 Who so hath not a sword let him sell his Coate and buy one And what then saith Origen Shall the Bishops put their hand to the sword thereupon I and my Father are one And Sabellius hath concluded thereupon that the Father hath suffered in the flesh I am the bread of life August de ciuit Dei l. 21. c. 25. he that shall eate this
bread shall liue for euer And in S. Augustines time there were that taught hereupon that if a man had communicated at the Lords supper how be it he should afterward renounce the Christian profession yet hee could not possibly perish and fall away for euer Wherefore as oft as euer wee shall reade such places we ought alwayes to remember and call to mind these rules The good and prudent Reader saith Saint Hillarius doth looke for the vnderstanding of that which is said Hilat. de Trin. l. 1. Hieronym in Mat. not by fetching it from any preiudicate opinion of his owne but from the cause of that which is said And S. Ierome The discreete Reader is verie carefull to keepe himselfe euermore from all manner of superstitious vnderstanding he frameth and squareth his sence and vnderstanding according to the Scriptures August cont aduers leg Prophet l. 2. c. 9. and not the Scriptures according to it And Saint Augustine handling this same matter One peece of Scripture must be expounded by an other and all the holy Scriptures according to the soundnesse of faith if we expound any thing done or spoken figuratiuely it standeth vs vpon to see that such expositions be drawne wisely and not negligently from other things and words which are contained in the holy writings But aboue all wee haue to consider in the matter of the Sacramentes what a Sacrament is and in the matter of the holy supper that therein is handled the most excellent of all the rest that is to say a great mysterie a profound and high secret and that so soone as wee heare the word Sacrament wee must lift vp our spirits from the beholding of these outward things to the apprehending of inward things from the skin to the marrow and from of the earth vp vnto heauen obseruing the nature of the misterie the signification of the word and what the thing doth permit suffer what the letter saith and what the meaning of the spirit is Thus These words This is my body cannot bee interpreted without a figure This is my bodie according to their sence and construction what shall it signifie Hoc this If it be meant of the bread then it must be thus taken This bread is my bodie But this is not their meaning for they confesse that it cannot bee two substances at one and the same instant And when two chiefe and primarie substances that is to say two Iudiuidua as the Logicians call them are called the one by the name of the other there must of necessitie be included a figure but this they wil not yeeld vnto Furthermore they doe not pretend that it is the body vntill the last word be vttered and wee are as yet but in the verie first And in the meane time then shall it not be the same which our Lord tooke blessed brake and gaue to his Disciples that is to say bread What shall then this hoc make The accidents of bread without the subiect namely whitenesse roundnesse c And what manner of speech were it to say The accidents of bread are my body which is giuen for you or else their Indiuiduum vagum and vage determinatum This I cannot tell what in the ayre which they can neither name nor point out so as that it may be comprehended How it may bee bread in the beginning of the vttering of the words and his body in the end What a number of obscure and straunge figures to how many contradictorie designments and deuises are they driuen and all to auoide one cleare and manifest figure and that such a one as is verie often and familiarly vsed in the Sacraments Afterward This is my bloud What shal be the meaning of this Hoc in this place It is said that taking the cup he blessed it and said Drinke ye all Bibite ex hoc omnes This Hoc then is the cup whereof he saith This is my bloud But can it possibly be that the cup should be called blood without a figure seeing that according to their owne assertions it is the wine and not the cup It followeth Est This is say they a verbe substantiue Let it bee granted but is it therefore a verbe transubstantiue This is my bodie that is to say This is made my bodie It is substantially turned it is transubstantiated into my bodie and bloud This is their meaning and they call this word in their affected tearmes and gibberidge an operatiue and practicke Est But if it be vnderstood of the bread then what figure is it And how will their fond deuised fantasie stand sith they hold that the bread is not changed or turned but becommeth nothing to the end it may giue place to the bodie And what shew of any figure will there then be here Hoc est that is to say this Vagum Indiuiduum which hath no name is transubstantiated into his bodie And if it bee wandring and vnstable it is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it hath not any substance Or els This bread is become nothing to giue place to the bodie c. But this word Est may it bee expounded by the word Fit factum est conuertitur transubstantiatur it is made turned transubstantiated Yea and also by Fiat conuertatur transubstantiatur that it may be made turned transubstantiated without a figure yea and which is more without any contradiction And of the cup particularly without acknowledging that it is transubstantiated But this they do not admit Let vs proceed Take eate but what Accidents but they are no proper obiects for the teeth to be occupied about The bodie of Christ then But as they say themselues it is not as yet there And then it is not chewed there it is not there broken What shall then the meaning bee of this word eate But to endeuour to eate to make semblance of eating c. But how much better had it been to haue expounded this place by the nature of other Sacraments whereof it is said This is my couenant as here This cup is the new Testament in my blood This is the blood of the new Testament c. all comming to the same sence Againe The rocke was Christ I am the bread of life as here The bread is my bodie the cup is my blood To expound it I say by Iesus Christ in S. Iohn My flesh is meate in deede and my bloud is drinke in deede Where in plaine tearmes he referreth vs vnto his death when hee saith Which I will giue for the life of the world As also here Which is giuen which is shed for you But saith he to the Capernaites The words that J say vnto you are spirite and life And therefore some are of iudgement that this whole speech of his was nothing else but a resolued and purposed Commentarie and a preparatiue to the right vnderstanding of the holy supper And finally to haue expounded it by Saint Paule Who giueth vnto vs that which he
he would and that because it was his will where he taketh for graunted the thing that is in question Although it bee the figure of bread and wine notwithstanding after the consecration we must altogether belieue that it is the body and bloud of Iesus Christ And al his arguments are drawne from the omnipotencie of God without any proofe of his will But would the masters of Transubstantiation approue and like of these words Paschas ad Prudeg The bread and wine are the flesh and bloud of Christ And yet notwithstanding he is much troubled in himselfe when hee considereth That there must be in the Lords supper the figure and notwithstanding the truth And how the one may bee without the preiudice of the other c. In so much as that he is forced to say That it is no maruaile if this mysterie be a figure and if the wordes thereof bee called figures seeing that Christ himselfe is called an ingrauen forme and figure Ideâ— de Corp. Sang. Dom. l. 4. euen hee which is the truth it selfe That we belieue that that is done spiritually and that we ought so to belieue it to be That he is offered for vs mystically That wee walke by faith and not by sight That our Lord hath left vs these visible figures ascending vp to heauen to feede our spirite and fleshe by faith in spirituall things c. Neuerthelesse notwithstanding the resistances and oppositions of the most learned the abuse ceased not to spread it selfe further into diuers countries abroad because that the ignorant people who haue alwaies the stronger side did perceiue and see that both authoritie and profit would grow vnto them therby We read by name that in England there rise a great schisme betwixt Odo Archbishop of Canterburie assisted by the meaner and inferiour sort of Priestes being the parties affecting Transubstantiation and the most learned of his Cleargie To whose arguments and places alleadged out of the Fathers hee opposeth authoritie and force And secondly to winne the Idiots and simple people he vseth illusions and false myracles whereof these ignorant ages did neuer want good store This was about the yeare nine hundred and fiftie But in Fraunce Berengarius Deane of Saint Maurice of Augiers about the yeare 1050. Anno 1050. Lauâ—ranc con Berengar displaieth againe the ensigne of truth and writeth a Treatise of the Lords Supper whereof wee haue nothing more then it pleased Lanfrancus his aduersarie to cite in his writings against him And yet notwithstanding such as that thereby he doth neither iniurie the truth nor his good name although he make it euident and apparant enough that hee hath not forgotten to weaken and detract from the force of his reasons so much as he possibly could This Berengarius therefore writ priuily to Lanfrancus a Millaner then Abbot of Bec-Heloin in Normandie what hee thought of the holy supper Lanfrancus being absent his Canons did open the letter and sent it to Rome In it he praised the booke of Iohannes Scotus written in the time of Charlemaine The letter is made knowne in a Synod holden at Rome and condemned the Author being neuer heard Lanfrancus is inioyned to refute it if so be he would cleare himselfe of all suspition of hauing any part in that pretended errour which was so much the more because of such intelligences as did in verie familiar sort passe betwixt him and Berengarius Scotus his booke was burnt two hundred and fiftie yeares after his death Berengarius continueth his vertuous course and had for his Disciples and followers diuers great personages in Fraunce amongst others Freward and Waldus Knights c. A thing verie likely seeing that the Popes otherwise more curious and carefull about worldly complaints then studious in questions of Diuinitie did so much molest and trouble them Leo the ninth therefore called a Councell at Verscillis in Piemont and came thither himselfe in person Berengarius durst not appeare but sent thither onely two of his friends to tender his reasons who were easily made afraid The Councell of Rome thereupon became the more emboldned and gaue order notwithstanding that the French Church should assemble a Councell at Towrs to cause Berengarius to stoope and become subiect This was in the time of Pope Victor the second and there was Hildebrand afterward Gregorie the seuenth on his behalfe the most violent and head-strong Prelate that euer liued There appeared Berengarius who declared vnto them That he did not teach bare and naked signes in the Eucharist but that the bread and wine there vsed were most vndoubted pledges and seales of the reall Communion in the true bodie and bloud of our Lord which all those haue and there receiue which take these signes with a true faith That the bread and wine notwithstanding doe not chaunge their substances but rather of common ones are made holy ones of elements Sacraments c. And that to conclude hee held for other matters as all the auncient Fathers haue written and according also to the sence and meaning of the Lithurgie ordinarily read in the Church c. Thus the Councell rested satisfied at his hands But Pope Nicholas II. perceiuing that this doctrine was on foote againe cited Berengarius to Rome the second time to appeare in the Consistorie of Lateran and thither hee came being drawne and allured by faire and flattering speeches The first argument that was framed against him was that if he did not retract his former opinions he should be burnt and thereupon Humbert the Burgonian afterward Cardinall drew a reuocation such as we reade in the Decree That hee doth confesse C. Ego Berengar de consec d. 2. that after the Consecration the bread and wine are the verie bodie and bloud of Christ That they are there sensibly and in truth handled with the hands of the Priests broken and brused with the teeth of the faithfull c. And that hee curseth all them which doe iudge otherwise c. that is to say the whole Romish Church at this day which holdeth these propositions for hereticall That the bread is the bodie that the bodie is brused with the teeth c. Lanfranc de Sacr. Alger Where it is also to be noted that he saith Of the faithfull not of all those that are partakers thereof a remnant and small parcell of the pure doctrine and a signe of the as yet imperfect deliuerie and teaching of the impure and corrupt And therefore the Glose of the Decree addeth thereunto Beware least thou shouldest not rightly vnderstand that which Berengarius saith here and so shouldest fall into greater and more grosse heresies then euer he did And the Glose vpon the Canon Vtrum hath these words C. Vtrum de consecr d 2. ex August vbi Glos It is not lawfull to eate Christ with the teeth Berengarius saith hee said the contrarie but hee spoke hyberbolically and went beyond the listes of the
according to the Scriptures appeareth by that which he said before That Dauid that the Euangelists that the Apostles doe teach vs c. Cyp. in Epi. 74 Saint Cyprian If it be commaunded in the Gospel if it be contained in the Epistles or acts of the Apostles let vs obserue it as diuine and holie But if it be not there then what followeth but the contrarie Saint Basil VVe must learne the Scriptures Basil regul 95 as concerning that which is to be practised in them as well to replenish our spirit with pietie as to leaue of to accustome humane constitutions Saint Ierome Hiero. in Esas It is no maruell saith he speaking of the Iewes if you follow your traditions seeing that euerie country goeth to seeke counsaile at their Idols but God verely hath giuen vs his scriptures and darknesse shall ouerwhelme you if you follow them not As also vnto Christians for euen in his time saith he it was come to the lees In. Matth. 23. VVo be vnto you wretched Christians to whom the sinnes of the Pharisies are translated and come euen that damnable tradition of theirs c. wee swallow downe against the commaundement of God the things that are great and hunt after the opinion of religion in the small and little ones c. And once for all The sworde Ad Laetam saith he of the Lord striketh at all those doctrines which are found bearing the shewe of Apostolicall traditions without the authoritie and testimonie of the Scriptures And this is the verie thing whereof Saint Augustine so greatly complained himselfe in his time that in the Church euery thing was full of presumption S. August in Epi. ad Iouin In S. Ioha tract 96.97 and preiudicate opinion that contrarie to the expresse worde of Christ the yoke of Christians was become more heauie and greeuous then that of the Iewes That men made lesse conscience of the law of God then of the least humane ordinances or rather fansies All this or the most part thereof comming from heretikes and certaine Apocripha bookes vnder the shadow saith he of this worde From the Lord I haue yet many things to say insomuch as that there is not the veriest foole that is that dareth not to abuse the same A place that some obiect against vs euen vnto this day about the same matter But saith he when the Lord hath kept any thing hidden from vs who is he that is so vaine as to goe about to gesse at it or so rash and foole-hardie as to take vpon him to reueale it And this is the cause why Saint Bernard wearie of those insupportable traditions Bern. Epist 91 ad Abba Suissioni congreg said I desire with all my hart to present my selfe as a partie in that Councel wherin traditioÌ„s are not obstinately defended nor suspersticiously obserued but rather the good and perfect will of God with all humilitie and diligence searched after and sought for And againe De precepto dispensat If there be any such as charitie hath beene the inuenter of it is iust that by the same charitie they bee ceased and giuen ouer if it bee so found expedient Againe The precepts which are of the ordinances of God are necessarie but those which are of humane constitution arbitrarie and at discretion c. And in deed the Ecclesiasticall historie doth witnesse vnto vs that the ancient fathers did leaue such things as were meere obseruations indifferent both vnto whole Churches and particular persons not inforcing any thing but what was of the pure and vndefiled commaundement of God as is to be read in Socrates Nicephorus c. Can not the Church then ordaine any thing Socrates Niceph. l. 12. c 14. Wherein or how far the authority of the Church stretcheth And wherein shall the authoritie thereof consist Nay let vs not feare that it hath ouer little to doe It is not a small thing in the blindnesse wherewith man is blinded and in the darknesse of this worlde to keepe it selfe from straying and wandring out of the way of life to keepe it selfe from loosing the heauenlie light through the sight of the eyes and to guide it selfe and others by the same And would to God it would haue contented it selfe to haue knowne this onely and to haue beene ignorant in all the rest Where as hauing toucht the forbidden tree and hauing transgressed this worde Deute 4. 12 Cursed be they which adde thereunto shee hath opened her eyes to these false and deceyuing fiers but shut them at the light and so consequentlie lost her puritie loyaltie and innocencie and leauing the truth of God is further become left vnto herselfe The ancient fathers verily The Fathers made faith the limits of the Church and the Scriptures the bounds limits of faith Colos 2.8 1. Cor. 4.6 Iohn 8.13 Not by succession Iren. l. 3. con heres c. 11. l. 4. c. 43. 44. Tertul. de prescript de pudicit Id verius quod prius Tertul. de virg â—â—land Con. Praxeam Tertul. de prescript Cypr. Ep. 55. De lapsis In tract de simplicit pontif in ep 74. Gregor Nazianz in orat habit ad laudem S. Athanas cont Arrian 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 haue not thought it any thing dishonoured when they tyed it to the obedience of her Spouse for they bounded it by faith and faith by the Scriptures And it would haue beene on the contrarie a verie strange doctrine vnto them that it shoulde haue spoken or heard any other language then her owne seeing it is said vnto her by the Apostle See that none spoile you through Philosophie or vaine deceitfulnesse according to the traditions of men Againe Learne of vs not to be wise aboue that which is written And in vs saith the Apostle that is to say by our example And by her Spouse himselfe If you abide in my worde you shall be truly my disciples Irenaeus saith The Gospel is the pillar and foundation of the Church It behoueth it to flie from all those which flie from and forsake the principal succession and cleaue vnto theÌ„ that keepe the doctrine of the Apostles Tertul. The Church is knowne to be apostolical not by nuber not by succession of Bishops but by the consanguinitie of doctrine And this doctrine again In this saith he in that the most ancientis most true that is most ancient which was from the beginning and that which is from the beginning is that which is froÌ„ the Apostles from the Apostles saith he who left the Scriptures for vs vpon whom are come the last ages the Scriptures by which the truth is defended and not by tradition or custome For how saith he could a man be able to speake of the things of faith but by the writings of faith Saint Cyprian Those are the Church saith he which dwell in the house of God But how Verily saith he who so is separated diuided
necessarie and requisite Wherefore there is no cause why we should meruaile if manie of the Church of Rome haue liked it better to say and hold That there was no Purgatorie in the time of the Iewish Church CHAP. VII That Purgatorie hath no foundation in the new Testament IT may be that this Purgatory so famous in the church of Rome will haue some better foundation and proofe in the newe Testament seeing that they haue made it an Article of faith and seeing that such great buildinges and so many foundations are laide thereupon Which thing wee haue now to examine and trie by taking a proof of all the places which they alleadge for the same In S. Mathew 3. S. Iohn Baptist sayeth Mat. 3. I baptize you with water vnto amendement of life but hee that commeth after mee is stronger then I c. Hee shall baptize you with the holy Ghost and with fire Hee hath his fanne in his hand and will make cleane his floore and gather his corne into his garner but hee will burne the chaffe with vnquenchable fire Of these two fires mentioned in this place which of them will they chuse to make a Purgatorie of That which shall neuer bee quenched hangeth not for their mowing seeing they holde that by the vertue of holie water and Masses theirs may bee quenched It must needes then bee that fire wherewith Iesus Christ baptizeth Acts 15. And what sense shall wee then make of this that hee baptizeth vs with the holie Ghost and with Purgatorie Here wee see water is euidentlie opposed and set against fire and the outward washing to the inwarde purifying But our Lord without our further seeking of any other expounder maketh it cleare inough elsewhere saying Iohn hath baptized you with water but you shall bee baptized with the holie Ghost within these few dayes And beholde the accomplishment thereof in the Actes 2. Actes 2. And the tongues saieth hee were seene vpon them clouen like fire which did sit vpon euerie one of them and they were all filled with the holy Ghost Then it followeth that the baptizing with the holy Ghost and the baptising with fire is all one And that is the cause why S. Marke contenteth himselfe to say Mark 1.7 Hee will baptise you with the holie Ghost The word fire adding nothing which was not contained in the former but onelie to expresse and set out the effectuall power thereof Hieronym in Matth. 3. Saint Ierome vpon this place And it is because that the holy Ghost is a fire Actes 1. Or it is because that in this world wee are baptized with the holie Ghost and in the world to come with fire 1. Cor. 3. And thus our aduersaries hauing chosen the second as they alwaies chuse the worst they will needes haue it to signifie Purgatorie whereas hee speaketh as all the olde writers doe of the last iudgement S. Basill against Eunomius He baptizeth with the holy Ghost Basil Contra Eunomium li. 5. Chrisost c. 3. in oper imper Euch. in quest in Nou. Testa those whome hee sanctifieth he sendeth them which are vnworthie into the fire deliuering them ouer to that euill one being themselues Diuelles Chrysostome He baptizeth the faithfull with water and the Infidels with fire and in an other place hee doth vnderstand it of temptations Theophilact expoundeth it better He will ouerflow vs with the graces of the holie Ghost Eucherius sayeth Because that sinne is burnt vppe in vs by the holie Ghost whereby there is giuen vnto vs sanctification whereby charitie is kindled in vs c. Lyranus He saith fire because that oftentimes in the Primitiue Church Caietan in Math. it appeared in visible forme as vpon the Apostles c. Caietanus Where it must be vnderstood of the holy Ghost the beginning of regeneration in euerie one or else of tribulations whervnto the professing of Christ is subiect Ferus likewise By how much the spirit is more pure then the body Ferus in Math. and fire more actiue then water by so much is his Baptisme more excellent then mine c. The sence then is He will translate and transforme vs by his holy spirit and rauish vs with heauenly things by the fire And these are their best and most famous Expositors for this time of all which not so much as one hath found Purgatorie in that place Let vs reason after a better manner The Baptisme of fire say they is Purgatorie and none Baptiseth with this fire but Iesus Christ no not Saint Iohn Baptist◠himselfe No man therefore can purge vs but Iesus Christ he alone and not any other is our Purgatorie In S. Mathew Math. 5.15 Luk. 12.52 5. Agree betimes with thine enemie whiles thou art in the way with him least he deliuer thee to the iudge and the Iudge to the Sergeant and so thou be cast into prison Verily I say vnto thee that thou shalt not come foorth thence before thou hast paide the vttermost farthing This prison they will haue to bee Purgatorie Now the literall sence is verie cleare and agreed vpon amongst all where our Lord exhorteth the faithfull to agree with their brethren with all speede setting before them the mischiefe and euill that happeneth or dinaril◠by being obstinately giuen to goe to the law And this is Chrysostome his Exposition in these words Chrysost in Math. hom 16 Hieronim in in Math. li. 1. It seemeth vnto me saith he that he speaketh of ordinarie and accustomed iurisdictions and prisons c. And S. Ierome likewise The sence and meaning is manifest namely that our Lord exhorteth vs to haue peace with all men in this world c. And yet there are some saith he which expound it either of the flesh and soule Hillar in Mat. or of the soule and spirit which cannot be maintained And the same saith Saint Hil◠arie and others also who by the aduersarie vnderstand the Diuell As if saith hee our Lord had purposed and decreed with himselfe in this place to commaund vs to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 verie watchfull and well aduised that the Diuell doe not seduce and deceiue vs c. But this is too absurd August de Salut document cap. 64. Idem de Doct. Christ l. 3 c. 10 And the same saith S. Chrysostome S. Augustine is of the number of those that expound it of the flesh and the spirit condemned here by Saint Ierome and sent backe to compare his dealings with his owne Law which is that a man should not hunt after or affect a figuratiue sence in that which easily affordeth a literall And yet it maketh nothing for them seeing hee referreth the same in plaine words vnto the last iudgement But and if we must needes fall to allegorize yet let vs learne to do it as our Lord himselfe who saith If you forgiue not men their sinnes your father will not forgiue you yours But on the contrarie hee will handle