Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n church_n great_a schism_n 1,418 5 9.7695 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A87557 An exposition of the epistle of Jude, together with many large and usefull deductions. Formerly delivered in sudry lectures in Christ-Church London. By William Jenkyn, minister of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, and pastor of the church at Black-friars, London. The second part.; Exposition of the epistle of Jude. Part 2 Jenkyn, William, 1613-1685. 1654 (1654) Wing J642; Thomason E736_1; ESTC R206977 525,978 703

There are 5 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

saint themselves and to say If such an one were commendable and voiced by our Minister for a good man I thank God t is much better with me I never was guilty of halfe his extravagancies and I see I may be a good man yea and commended when I am dead notwithstanding my failings so he calls his allowed wickednesses though I be not so pure as such and such are Oh how unsutable is it that by funerall Sermons men should be made more unfit for death to paint those in the pulpit who are punisht in hell and that a Minister should be strewing that dead body with flowers whose soule is bathing in flames For my part though I should not deny due commendation even at a funerall to some eminently exemplary saint or publiquely usefull instrument yet mostly I thinke his speech concerning the deceased may suffice who said If he were good he did not desire If bad he did not deserve praise 2. When we so admire the persons of some instructers as to neglect and despise others who haply deserve better then they the sin of the Corinthians when the Apostle tells them 1 Cor. 3.21 of their glorying in men some teachers being so gloried in peculiarly as if they were onely worth the hearing and none else to be regarded Some accounted Paul the only teacher some delighted onely in Apollo some magnified Peter as the alone worthy man thus they thought of men above what was meet and they were puffed up for one against another They gloryed in some disdaining all others as not to be named with them though teachers of the same truth because they had an high conceit of their learning wit cloquence holinesse or the like qualifications A great sin doubtlesse and I fear the common sin of this City How unthankfull for the bounty of Christ doe men make themselves hereby who gave all the Ministers of the Gospell to be theirs for their good all things saith the Apostle are yours whether Paul or Apollo or Cephas 1 Cor. 3.21 22. It s unthankfulnesse to a bountifull Prince when he bestowes many Lordships on his favourite if he should regard one of them onely and despise all the rest Yea how injuriously is the Spirit of Christ hereby reproached For the despising of those who are of small gifts is a reproaching of the Spirit of God as if he were defective in his gifts whereas their variety sets forth the fulnesse and freenesse of Gods spirit who divideth to every man severally as he will and worketh all these 1 Cor. 12.11 Besides this sin is oft the maine cause of schismes in the Church It makes people to divide themselves under different teachers whom they admire and it causeth teachers to take away those that affect them from other teachers whom they affect not so much Now this sin of schisme in it selfe very great as afterwards shall be shewn God willing on the 19. ver is made much the greater by being occasion'd by those very gifts of men which God bestowed upon them to this end that there might be no scisme in the body but that the members should have the same care one of another 1 Cor. 12.25 Nor is there any sin which doth more expose Christian Religion to so much contempt and obloquy then this kinde of admiring of persons for hereby severall Companies of Christians are made like the severall schools of Philosophers some whereof followed Plato some Aristotle some Epicurus and the doctrines of faith are but accounted as the proper opinions of severall teachers and all zeal for them is conceived to arise not from a certaine knowledge of heavenly truth but from peculiar humour and strength of fancy And how great a stumbling block must this needs be to those who are without how will it hinder them from embracing the truth and lay it open to derision yet further the sinfulness of this sort of man-admiration appears in that hereby both the despised person is so greived and discouraged that he is infeebled and disabled in his work and also he who is admired is not onely puffed up with pride and thereby occasion'd to adulterate the word invent and broach errors that stil he may be advanced above all others by going in a different way from them but also put upon the pleasing of men by sinfull flatteries in stead of profiting them by faithfull reprehensions To conclude this consideration nothing begets so great an aptness in men to receive errors as this sinfull admiration nor hath any seed of heresies and superstitions proved so fruitfull as this affection commonly makes men take down falsities and error is easily received from them whom we much admire and God doth often leave admired teachers to erre for tryal of the people and the punishing of their vanity in making Gods truth to stand at the devotion of the teacher for its acceptance and trampling upon the holy and perhaps learned labours of those who are more seeing and faithfull than the admired 3. When we so admire mens persons as to give all respect to men in outward greatnesse though perhaps wicked despifing the poor Saints because poor this James reproves my brethren have not the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ in respect of persons James 2. When wickedness in robes is magnified and holinesse in raggs contemned Oh how unworthy is it that the gold ring and costly apparell should be prefer'd before the robe of Christs righteousnesse and the jewel of grace that godliness and good examples should be rejected for their want of a gold ring that he who shall have a throne in heaven must here be a footstool upon earth 4. When Elections and offices are passed and bestowed partially for freindship favour money kinred a sin by much agravated when men have taken oaths to a Corporation to the contrary and it s ost a great tentation to the party who enters by money to sell justice dear 5. When we so admire the person of one as to do injustice in judgment whether Civil or Ecclesiastical which is when our affection doth so blind our judgment by some outward respect or appearance that we will not determine righteously the cause being over ballanced with such forreign considerations as have no affinity with it Thus men are in judicature sometime swayed with foolish pitty sometime with cowardly fear both these the Lord forbids Levit. 19.15 Thou shalt not respect the person of the poor Deut. 1.17 nor honour the person of the mighty This sin would make God a patron of iniquity the sentence being pronounced from God OSERVATIONS 1. Obs 1. The oondition of men in greatest out ward emiuency and dignity is oft very miserable None have so many flatterers and therefore none so few freinds as they flatterers as worms breed in the best fruit When a poor illiterate man is admonished for sin a rich a learned man is admired in nay haply for sin As the bodies so the sonls of Kings and great men
the discontented person for but doing with his own as he pleaseth 4. In this is manifested the sin of a proud conceit of our own worth and deservings a sinful self-justification when Gods dispensations are severe and afflictive He who complains of Gods dealing secretly applauds his own deservings he who murmurs against Gods hand shewes that he is not angry with his own heart he alwaies saith see what have I lost how many comforts do I want but he never saith what have I done how many corruptions hath my heart which make me unfit to enjoy a fuller portion in the world All the fault is laid upon God nothing upon himself as if his sin never threw one mite into the treasury of his sufferings he counts God a hard master and himself a good servant and if it be a great sin in the courts of men to acquit the wicked and to condemn the innocent how inexcusable a wickednesse is it to condemn God and acquit our selves A discontented camplainer saith not with David I and my fathers house have sinned these sheep what have they don Nor with the humble soul The Lord is righteous and I wil bear the indignation of the Lord because I have sinned against him but flyes in the face of God in stead of falling down at his feet In one word this discontent is a shield for sin and is a sword against God 5. This sin unduly and sacrilegiously usurps Gods own seat and throne what doth he who complaines of Gods administrations but in effect profess that he would be in the room of God to order the world after his own mind and that he hath more wisdome care justice and therefore fitness to dispose of men and to alot them their portions than God himselfe Interpretatively he sayes like Absolom there is none that takes care to order mens affaires O that I were King of the world then should things be better ordered then now they are And he saith to God as that master of the feast to his self-advancing guest come down sit lower and give way to thy betters to sit above thee Whereas alas should such silly Phaetons as we but govern the world as they fable he did the chariot of the sun for one day we should set all things on fire nay should we be left to cut out our own portions and be our own carvers how soon should we cut our own fingars And how can he whose wil is the rule of rectitude do any thing unrighteously man doth a thing because its just but therefore is a thing just because God doth it far be it from God saith Elihu that God should do wickedness J●b 34.10 and from the Almighty that he should commit iniquity who can be more careful then he who is more tender over his than a mother is over her sucking child who so wise as the only wise God whose eyes run to fro throughout the whole earth nay who indeed is all eye to behold all the concernments of the sons of men 6. Lastly This sin of discontentednesse with our own private alotments takes men off from minding the more publick and weighty concernments of Gods Church making them to disregard and forget it in all her sufferings and hazards what doth more then this sin cause men to mind their own and not the things of Jesus Christ and to lose the thoughts thereof in a crowd of discontented cares for themselves It is impossible for him that is overmuch in mourning for himself to be mindful of or mournful for Zion Now what an unworthy distemper is this for men to live as if God had made them only to mind their own private conditions in the world to regard only the painting of their own Cabbins though the ship be sinking and so as it may be wel with themselves to be carelesse how it fares with the whole Church of Christ We should rejoyce that God would set up a building of glory to himselfe though upon our ruins and that Christ ariseth though we fal that his kingdome comes though ours goes that he may be seene and honoured though we stand in a crowd and be hidden OBSERVATIONS 1. God hath divided Obs 1. set out for every one his portion here in the world These seducers in complaining of their part and alotment shew that God appoints to every one his dimensum or proportion that he thinks fittest for them God is the great housholder of the world and Master of that great family and as it was the custome of ancient times to divide and give to every one his portion of meat and drink and his set allowance of either whence we read Psal 11.6 of the portion of the wickeds cup so God deals out to every one what estate he thinks meetest To some he gives a Benjamins portion in the world five times so much as to others he is the soveraign disposer of us and of all our concernments and he best knowes what is best for us and to his people he ever gives them that alotment which best sutes with their obtaining of the true good himself and ever affords them if not what they would yet what they want Oh how should this consideration work us to a humble contentednesse with all our alotments and make us bring our hearts to our condition if we cannot bring our condition to our hearts In a word when we see that the condition of others is higher then ours let us consider that it is better to wear a fit garment then one much too big though golden 2. Obs 2. No estate of outward fulness can quiet the heart and stil its complaints These seducers feasted sumptuously fed themselves to the full and fared high and yet for all that they murmured and complained The rich man in the Gospel in the midst of all his abundance cryes out What shall I doe Luke 12.17 Neither the life nor the comfort of the life consists in the abundance of the things which we enjoy None complain so much as they who have the greatest plenty Though Nabal had in his house the feast of a King yet soon after his heart dyed in him and he became like a stone 1 Sam. 25.27 Nabals heart was like the kidney of a beast which though inclosed in fat is it self lean Solomon in his glory reads a lecture of the creatures vanity Ahab and Haman were as discontented in heart as great in estate vast is the disproportion between the soul and all wordly objects for they being but momentany and vanishing dead and inefficacious earthy and drossie are unsutable to the souls excellency and exigencies T is not the work of wordly abundance to take away covetousnesse but of grace in the heart the lesson of contentment must be learned in a higher Schoole than outward plenty 3. Obs 3. They who deserve worst complaine and murmur most And are most ready to thinke that they are most hardly dealt with None are so unthankful as the
themselves from the Church were scorners and that these who were sensuall and void of the spirit did follow their ungodly lusts Or in the words Jude expresseth 1. The sin of these seducers in Separating themselves 2. The cause thereof which was 1. Their being sensuall and 2. their not having the spirit For the first their separation EXPLICATION Two things are here to be opened 1. What the Apostle here intends by separating themselves 2. Wherein the sinfulnesse thereof consists 1. segregantes separantes Disterminantes Exterminantes For the first The words in the Originall are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 severall wayes rendred by severall interpreters may signifie the unbounding of a thing and the removing of a thing from those bounds and limits wherein it was set and placed for the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifie to terminate or circumscribe a thing within limits and bounds and the preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 added to it may import * Thus the Preposition 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is frequently taken in Scripture the taking away or exempting a thing from those bounds and limits wherein it was contained and this interpretation of making themselves boundlesse as being a generation of Libertines that would be kept within no bounds or compasse of restraint by Scripture Magistrates Church-discipline c. doth both agree to the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and also the whole series of the Epistle and context in which the Apostle immediately before saith they walked after their own lusts and immediately after saith they were sensuall given over to sensuall pleasures These seducers were sons of Belial without a yoke like yokelesse heifers Scope and Liberty were their study They would needs make the way to heaven as he who went over a narrow bridge with spectacles before his eyes desired to make the bridg seeme broader then it was This interpreation I dare not reject I desire to present it to the learned but though upon my maturest thoughts I much incline to it yet seeing the streame of interpreters going another way I shall not refuse the second according to which the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imports the parting and separating of one thing from another by bounds and limits put between them and the putting of bounds and limits for distinction and separation between severall things it being thus a resemblance taken from fields or Countries which are distinguisht and parted from each other by certain boundaryes and Land-marks set up to that end and thus it s commonly taken by interpreters in this place wherein these seducers may be said to separate themselves divide or bound themselves from others either first doctrinally or secondly practically 1. Doctrinally by false and hereticall doctrines whereby they divided themselves from the truth and faithfull who were guided by the truth of the Scripture and walked according to the rule of the word hence these seducers were deceiving and deceved and it s said that they brought in damnable heresies and many followed their pernitious wayes and that they spake perverse things to draw away Disciples after them 2 Pet. 2. And thus they separated themselves from the Church 1. By holding that the grace of God gave men liberty to live as they pleased and by maintaining of unchristian libertinisme because Christ had purchased Christian liberty for us Whereas the word teacheth the contrary namely because the grace of God hath appeared therefore that we should deny ungodlinesse and worldly lust 2. By teaching that among the people of God there ought to be no Civil Magistrate no superiority nor any to restraine and hinder people from their going on in what wayes they pleased whereas the word commands every soule to be subject 3. By denying the day of judgment at which they scoft as at a vaine scar-crow because it was deferred whereas the faithfull were 1 Pet. 4.4 to account the long suffering of the Lord salvation to labour to be made meet for the approach of Christ and to look for the mercy of the Lord to eternall life 2. Practically they might separate themselves as by bounds and limits 1. By prophaneness and living in a different way from the Saints namely in all loosenesse and uncleannesse for as the faithfull separate and difference themselves from the wicked by their holy and heavenly Conversation so the wicked divide themselves from the faithfull by prophaneness and falling from the profession of godlinesse into all manner of loosenesse and irregularity and thus the ungodly make such bounds between themselves and saints as saints dare not break over ungodlinesse being too high a wall for a godly man to scale or rather too deep a mote for him to swim over and wade through 2. Calv. in loc discessionem faciunt ab ecclefiâ quia disciplinae jugum ferre nequeunt By Shismaticalness and making of Separation from and divisions in the Church Because they proudly despised the doctrines or persons of the Christians as contemptible and unworthy or because they would not endure the holy severity of the Churches discipline they saith Calvin departed from it They might make rents and divisions in the Church by schismaticall withdrawing themselves from fellowship and Communion with it Their heresies were perverse and damnable opinions their schism was a perverse Separation from Church-Communion the former was in doctrinalls the latter in practicals Schismaticos facit non diversa fides sed communionis disrupta societas Aug. Co●tr Faust l. 20. c. 3. The former was opposite to faith this latter to charity By faith all the members are united to the head by charity one to another and as the breaking of the former is heresie so their breaking of the latter was schism And this schisme stands in the dissolving the spirituall band of love and union among Christans and appears in the withdrawing from the performance of those duties which are both the signes of and helps to Christian unity as prayer hearing receiving of Sacraments c. for because the dissolving of Christian union chiefly appears in the undue separation from church communion therfore this rending is rightly call'd schisme It is usually said to be twofold 1. Negative Camero de schismate 2. Positive The first the Negative is when there is onely simplex secessio when there is onely a bare secession a peaceable and quiet withdrawing from Communion with a Church without making an he●d against that church from which the departure is 2. The other the positive is when persons so withdrawing doe so consociate and draw themselves into a distinct and opposite body setting up a church against a church or as divines expresse it from Augustine an altar against an altar and this it is which in a peculiar manner and by way of eminency is called by the name of schisme and becomes sinful either in respect 1. of the groundlesnesse or 2. the manner
buy or sell to have either religious or civil communion with them except they received the beasts mark in their hands and forheads All which considered we might safely forsake her nay could not safely do otherwise Since instead of our healing of Babylon we could not be preserved from her destroying of us we did deservedly depart from her and every one go into his own Country and unlesse we had so done Jer. 51.9 we could not have obeyed the cleare precept of the word Apoc. 18. Come out of her my people c. Apoc. 18.4 Timothy is commanded to withdraw himself from perverse and unsound teachers Though Paul went into the Synagogue 1 Tim. 6.3.5 disputing and perswading the things concerning the Kingdome of God yet when divers were hardned and beleeved not Acts 19.9 but spake evill of that way 1 Cor. 10.14 he departed from them and separated th● disciples And expressely is Communion with idolaters forbidden 2 Cor. 6.14.17 what fellowship hath righteousnesse with unrighteousnesse what Communion hath light with darknesse what concord hath Christ with Belial what agreement hath the temple of God with idols Come out from among them and be ye separate And Hos 4.11 Though thou Israel play the harlot yet let not Judah offend and Come ye not unto Gilgal neither goe ye up to Bethaven Though in name that place was Bethel the house of God yet because Jeroboams calf was set up there it was indeed Bethaven the house of vanity If Rome be a Bethaven for idolatry and corrupting of Gods worship our departure from it may be safely acknowledged and justified In vaine therefore do the Romanists Stapleton Nic. Sanderus de visib monar eccles praefat ad lect Staplet demonstrat Princ. fid l. 4. c. 10. Sanders others brand our separation from them with the odious imputation of Donatisme and schisme it being evident out of Augustine that the Donatists never objected any thing against nor could blame any thing in the Church from which they separated either for faith or worship whereas we have unanswerably proved the pseado-Catholick Romane-Church to be notoriously guilty both of heresie and idolatry and our adversaries themselves grant in what ever Church either of those depravations are found Communion with it Schisma aliud malum aliud bonum Malum quo bona bonum quo mala scinditur unitas Musc de schism is to be broken off I shall conclude this discourse with that passage out of Musculus concerning schisme There is saith he a double schisme the one bad the other good the bad is that whereby a good union the good that whereby a bad union is broken asunder If ours be a schisme it is of the later sort 3. Obs 3. The voluntary and unnecessary dividing and separation from a true Church is schismaticall When we put bounds and partitions between it and our selves we sin say some as did these seducers here taxed by Jude If the Church be not hereticall or Idolatrous or do not by excommunication persecution c. thrust us out of its Communion If it be such an one as Christ the head hath communion with we the members ought not by separation to rend and divide the body To separate from Congregations where the word of truth and Gospel of salvation are held forth in an ordinary way 1 Tim. 3.15 as the Proclamations of Princes are held forth upon pillars to which they are affixed where the light of the truth is set up as upon a candlestick to guide passengers to heaven To separate from them to whom belong the Covenants and where the Sacraments the seals of the Covenant Rev. 1.13 and for substance rightly dispensed where Christ walketh in the midst of his golden Candlesticks and discovers his presence in his ordinances whereby they are made effectuall to the Conversion and edification of soules in an ordinary way where the members are saints by a professed subjection to Christ and his Gospell and haply have promised this explicitely and openly where there are sundry who in the judgement of charity may be conceived to have the work of grace really wrought in their hearts by walking in some measure answerable to their profession I say to separate from these as those with whom Church Communion is not to be held and maintaind is vnwarrantable and schismaticall Pretences for separation I am not ignorant are alledged Frequently and most plausibly that of mixt Communion and of admitting into Church-fellowship the vile with the pretious and those who are chaff and therefore ought not to lodge with the wheat Answ 1. Not to insist upon what some have urged viz. that this hath been the stone at which most Shismaticks have stumbled and the pretence which they have of old alledged as having ever had a spiritum excommunicatorium a spirit rather putting them upon dividing from those who they say are unholy then putting them upon any godly indeavours of making themselvs holy as is evident in the examples of the Audaeans Novatians Donatists Anabaptists Brownists c. 2. Let them consider whither the want of the exact purging and reforming of these abuses proceed not rather from some unhappy obstructions and politicall restrictions whether or no caused by those who make this objection God knowes in the exercise of discipline then from the allowance or neglect of the Church it selfe Nay 3. Let them consider whether when they separate for sinfull mixtures the Church be not at that very time purging out those sinfull mixtures and is that a time to make a separation from a Church by departing from it when the servants of Christ are making a separation in that Church by reforming of it But 4. Let it be seriously weighed that some sinfull mixtures are not a sufficient cause of separation from a Church Hath not God his Church even where corruption of manners hath crept into a Church if purity of doctrine be maintained and is separation from that Church lawful from which God doth not separate did the Apostle because of the sinful mixturess in the Church of Corinth direct the fuithful to separate Must not he who will forbeare communion with a Church till it be altogether freed from mixtures tarry till the day of judgment til when we have no promise that Christ will gather out of his Church whatsoever doth offend 5. Let them consider whether God hath made private Christians stewards in his house to determine whether those with whom they communicate are fit members of the Church or not or rather whether it be not their duty when they discover tares in the Church in stead of separating from it to labour that they may be found good corne that so when God shall come to gather his corn into his garner they may not be thrown out Church-officers are ministerially betrusted with the ordering of the Church and for the opening and shutting of the doors of the Churches Communion by the Keyes of doctrine
prejudice against nor novelty an inducement to the entertainment of truth 6. Give not way to lesser differences A little division will soon rise up to greater small wedges make way for bigger Our hearts are like to tindar a little spark will enflame them Be jealous of your hearts when contentions begin stifle them in the cradle Act. 3● 38 Paul and Barnabas separated about a smal matter the taking of an associate 7. Beware of pride the mother of contention and separation Love not the preheminence rather be fit for then desirous of rule despise not the meanest say not I have no need of thee All schismes and heresies are mostly grafted upon the stock of pride The first rent that was ever made in Gods family was by the pride of Angels ver 14. and that pride was nothing else but the desire of independency 8. Avoid self-seeking he who seeks his own things and profit will not mind the good and peace of the church Oh take heed lest thy secular interest draw thee to a new communion and thou colour over thy departure with religion and conscience 1. Thus we have spoken of the First viz. what these seducers did separate themselves 2. The cause of their separation or what they were in these words sensual not having the spirit Wherein 1. Their estate is propounded They were sensual 2. Explained having not the spirit EXPLICATION But 1. In what respect were they Sensual In what respect were they 2. Not having the spirit 2. Why doth the Apostle here represent them to be such 1. For the first 1. The word here translated sensual in the Gr. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cometh from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 anima the soule so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth primarily one who hath a soule Animalis ab anima non ab ab animo And in Scripture the word is used three wayes 1. Sometimes it s joyned with the word body in opposition to a glorified body and then the body is called a naturall body that is such a body as is informed governed moved by the soule or is subject to animall affections and operations as generation nutrition augmentation c. or such a body as is sustained and upheld by the actions of the soule as it receives from it life and vegetation that is by the action of the vegetative power Vid. Aquin. Cajet Estium Pareum in 1 Cor. 15.44 Homo in puris naturalibus confideratus qui nihil eximium habet praeter animam rationalem Piscat Homo non alia quam naturalis animi luce praeditus Bez. the chiefe whereof is nutrition which cannot be without nourishment so that this naturall body wants the constant help of nourishment for its preservation in which respects it is distinguisht from a glorified body 2. This word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in Scripture opposed to regenerate and so imports one who hath in him nothing excellent but a rationall soule who is governed onely by the naturall light of reason who hath in him onely naturall abilities and perfections And when thus it s taken our learned translators translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by the word naturall 1 Cor. 2.14 intending one who is guided by naturall reason he being there opposed to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the spirituall man who is indued with and guided by a divine and supernaturall illumination 3. It s taken for one who being guided by no better light than that of his own naturall reason or rather who Anima significat animalitatem cum ab animo i. e. parte superiori distinguitur Lapide in Jude Sapim●● animo fruimur anima fine animo anima est debilis being altogether addicted to the service of that part which 1 Thes 5.23 is call'd 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the soule whereby is meant the sensitive and inferiour part of the soule the sensuall appetite common to man with the beasts as distinct from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the spirit or intellectuall and rationall part followes the dictates of that his sensuall appetite and the inclinations of his sensitive soule and his onely ben●●●nd intent is upon satisfaction by worldly delights his study and care is for the sensitive and vegetative part and for those things which belong to the animall and present life and hence it is that some learned * Vid. Lorin in loc men conceive that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sensuall comes from 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is in scripture used to denote life and the functions of life common to us with beasts Vox Arabica exponitur per sibi viventes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Oecum Haeretici vocantur animales ab animâ sensitivâ vegetativâ cui toti serviunt quia ut animalia non rationem sed sensum sequuntur vi●un●que in concupisce●tiis carnis non spiritus sed sensus puta gulae avaritiae libidinis c. Lapide Thus Christ Mat. 6.25 saith Take no thought for your life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 what you shall eat or what you shall drinke c. is not the life 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 more then meat c. And in this notion of sensuality Tertullian after he began to favour Montanisme took the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 when he fastned that odious name of Physici upon the orthodox because they refused to condemn second marriages And in this place likewise with submisson to more mature judgements I conceive that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is intended to denote their brutish and unruly sensuality Thus the Arabick interpreter and Oecumenius with sundry others likewise understand it Thus likewise our learned translators thought who interpreted the word sensual as conceiving that Jude intended that they altogether served their sensitive and vegetative soul and as beasts followed their senses and lived in the lusts of the flesh not according to the spirit prosecuting those carnall objects with all industry which tend to preserve their present life Ii dicantur animales qui animae indulgent et ea quae ad vitam tuendam valent curiosius sectantur Gnostici animales sunt mortalia bona avidè concupiscunt usque adeo ut ecclesiam potius sibi deserēdam putent quā corporeis voluptatibus careant Justinian in loc Praesenti loco congruit ea significatio quâ animales dicuntur qui sectantur eas cupiditates quae sunt secundum animam sensitivam i.e. qui senfibus acsensuum voluptatibus obsequuntur Estius in loc and chusing rather to leave the church then to abridge themselves of any bodily pleasures And the Apostle by this word seems to me to make their bruitish sensuality and propensions to be the cause of their separation as if he said they will not live under the strict discipline where they must be curb'd and restrain'd from following their lusts no these sensualists will be alone by themselves in companies where they may have their fill of all sensual pleasures and where