Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
cause_n church_n great_a schism_n 1,418 5 9.7695 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A60585 A sermon concerning the doctrine, unity, and profession of the Christian faith preached before the University of Oxford : to which is added an appendix concerning the Apostles Creed / by Tho. Smith ... Smith, Thomas, 1638-1710. 1682 (1682) Wing S4249; ESTC R17775 29,525 52

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

A SERMON Concerning the Doctrine Unity and Profession OF THE Christian Faith Preached before the UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD To which is added An APPENDIX concerning the Apostles CREED By THO. SMITH B. D. and Fellow of St. Mary Magdalen Colledge OXON London Printed for Walter Kettilby at the Bishop's Head in St. Paul's Church-Yard M. DC LXXXII Admodum Reverendo in Christo Patri ac Domino HENRICO D. Episcopo LONDINENSI Sacelli Regalis DECANO Regiae Majestati à Secretioribus Conciliis Natalium Splendore Morum Sanctitate Fide Prudentiâ ac invictâ animi fortitudine contra infensissimos Eccl. Ang. hostes Caeterisque dotibus quae Virum Apostolicum planè decent Illustri T. S. Concionem hanc de Unitate fidei coram Academicis Oxoniensibus in Templo B. Mariae non ita pridem habitam una cum Appendice de Symbolo Apostolico gratitudinis observantiae ergo L. M. D. C. Q. Ephes. 4. Ver. 5. One Lord one Faith one Baptism IT is sad to consider how that Christianity has suffered more by the Factions and Feuds of Christians themselves than by the Fury of its Professed Adversaries that Schism has done more Mischief to the Church of God than all the Persecutions of the Heathen Roman Emperours who made it their business to abolish and destroy the very name of Christian out of the World and that Christians should treat one another with that despight and Malice as if good Nature and Charity and a mutual forbearance were things of meer indifference As it has happened between Churches of different Communions in the East and West and in these Northern parts of the World since the Reformation either because they would not own an Usurpt and pretended Universal Authority or else because of some little disagreement in Opinion or the Usage or Non-usage of a Ceremony which every particular Church in dependence upon and in conjunction with the Civil Power has a right to Ordain and Constitute and which all its Members are Obliged to conform to out of a Principle of Conscience For hitherto must be referred as to their chief and proper Causes all those horrid Tumults and Separations of Parties which have so much distracted the Peace of the Church from its first Beginnings and Infancy to this day however blancht over by some with subtilty and Artifice of Wit and by others with pretensions of Zeal to colour their Ambition and their Pride and to render their ill Designs the more plausible and successful Here it is for I cannot be so unjust and partial as to charge the Romanists only with the fault though they are deepest in the Guilt and more blameable than the rest that all take Sanctuary and think to justifie their ill will one to another this way that they from whom they divide and separate themselves entertain different Notions of some points of Religion though perchance they be not Essential to the Faith or else use other Rites in their Religious Worship which yet may be as decent and as useful and as significant as if this were to renounce Christianity and to forsake the Communion of the Catholick Church How has this fond Opinion broken Christendom into pieces and shut Unity and Peace out of it Private Passion and a false Zeal corrupting our Judgments and Practises so far that instead of joyning in the same Publick Worship and Service of Christ our Common Saviour and Living together in Holy Communion and Love we can scarce think well one of another we are afraid of one anothers Company in a Church at least as if it were Infectious we use most unjust and most unchristian Censures we malign and hate one another to the Death and as much as in us lyes we send one another to Hell by our evil and uncharitable surmises and by peremptory Sentences of Excommunication To prevent which dismal and bloody effects of Schism the Apostle in the beginning of this Chapter lays down and prescribes a Method which would prove most effectual if we understood our Duty and our Interest so much and had but the Honesty and the Conscience to put it in practise and execution which is to walk worthy of the Vocation wherewith we are called v. 1. That is to adorn the Doctrine of God our Saviour with a suitable Conversation and as it becomes true followers of Christ to live up to those Excellent Rules and Institutions which he has Publish'd and not only to make an outward Shew and Profession of Christianity but to justifie and demonstrate the Truth and Power of it by the Example and Practise of the severest Virtues and especially in this great Instance of it With all Lowliness and Meekness and Long-suffering to forbear one another in Love v. 2. That is to make some allowances for the faileurs and imperfections and infirmities of the Understanding not to be peremptory and dogmatical in matters of Opinion to the prejudice of Unity nor to be over-fierce and severe in Condemning little mistakes and mis-apprehensions of things but to keep the Unity of the Spirit in the bond of Peace v. 3. That is to maintain this Spiritual Communion with all Peaceableness and Moderation as being all Members of one Body the Catholick Church actuated by one Spirit and called together in one Hope of our Calling v. 4. That is by virtue of the same common Christianity all alike pretending to the hopes of the same common Salvation all Disciples of the same Lord and initiated into the same Faith by Baptism So long as there is no breach made upon the Articles of Faith and the form of sound Doctrine is retained in its full sense and meaning there can be no just cause for Censure and dis-union All other differences of Opinion in Matters of Doctrine should be tolerated and forgiven if they have no evil influence upon Religion Morality and Government if there be no Schism or Sedition in practise or behaviour and so long as the Unity of Faith is preserved entire and kept inviolate there being as but one Lord so but one Faith and one Baptism From which words I shall endeavour to make good these three following Propositions 1. That the Doctrine of Faith is to be derived only from the Revelations of Christ. One Lord one Faith 2. That the Unity of Faith only respects the Fundamentals of the Christian Religion And 3. That all who are Baptized and consequently are by this Sacrament of initiation admitted and received into the Communion and Society of Christians are to make Profession of this Faith One Faith one Baptism 1. That the Doctrine of Faith is to be derived only from the Revelations of Christ. One Lord One Faith That it is not in the Power of Humane Wit how prying and industrious soever to raise it self up to the Contemplation and Knowledge of Supernatural Truths without the assistances of Divine Revelation and Grace is no disparagement to our Reason to acknowledge it being the effect of an irrational Pride and a
Constantinople under Theodosius the Emperor by which enlargement all good Christian People were to be establish'd in the belief of the Catholick Doctrine declared so to be according to Scripture and Universal Tradition By these mighty Arguments they convinced the Hereticks and justly subjected them to the Punishment which their refractoriness and guilt deserved They settled the Peace of the Church and secured the Faith from the like assaults in after-times Their Creed was the Test by which they discerned Truth from Heresie and it was received and acknowledged as such by all the Orthodox Christians in the Churches of Greece the lesser Asia Syria and Egypt and taught the Catechumeni as a necessary qualification of their admission into the number of the Faithful which is the true reason that the other short form which had been in use hitherto the sum and substance of it with all its necessary deductions being transfused into this began to be dis-used and in process of time wholly omitted and left out of their Liturgies Whereas at Rome and in the other Churches of the West where those Controversies about matters of Faith which had exercised the Wits and Curiosities of the Orientals whose prying and restless Genius drove them upon those subtilties never were admitted or made no considerable progress among them they continued constant and steddy in the profession of the Ancient Faith and therefore stuck to and retained the old form of words as they are summ'd up in the Creed which we call the Apostles with some little addition and needed not a larger explication 2. It follows from this that the Doctrine of Faith must necessarily be one and the same every where according to the assertion of the Text It was the common Faith Tit. 1. 4. not appropriated to any particular Sect but it lay in common and open to all The whole Faith that is so much as was necessary to denominate them true Believers was received by all without any difference in the main points of it For how could it be otherwise while they adhered so close to the Doctrine of the Apostles who all Preach'd the same Faith in the most distant parts of the World between which there could not possibly be as the times stood then that is before the Polarity or directive vertue of the Load-stone was known any communication or intercourse There was a perfect agreement and harmony of Confessions among all who had embraced the Doctrine of Christianity The Christians here in Britain believed no otherwise than those at Jerusalem and those in India whom St. Thomas Converted and all who lived in the intermediate spaces between those two vastly distant extreams which were the boundaries of the then known World exactly agreeing with both Though they differed in Language Customs Laws Behaviour and way of Living and were under different Governments yet they all held the same thing Which Argument is excellently handled by Irenoeus in his 1st Book 3d. Chap. adv Hoereses There cannot be a more convictive Argument of the truth of the sense of the Articles of Faith which the Hereticks reject than the profession of them in all Churches of the World For how came this universal Consent establish'd but from the soundness of the Doctrine and the Authority of its first Publishers Among that great variety of Opinions which prevailed every where there were certain essential points of Faith wherein they were all unanimous and so long as they were held and maintained a liberty of Judgment and Opinion was allowed in lesser matters witness those Ancient forms before-mentioned long before the Civil Power took the Christian Religion into its protection which whosoever admitted and processed was received into their Communion So that from this Unity of Faith which was received every where by the whole number of Christians except some obstinate Heretical Dissenters who were a small and inconsiderable Party at first in comparison of the rest the Christian Church was styled Catholick or Universal just as the great Ocean is one and the same though it receives particular denominations from the several shores which it washes as the Brittish Cantabrian Atlantick and the like and not from any pretended subjection to one Sovereign Pastor And the word Catholick became another name for Orthodox and the Bishops afterwards subscribed themselves Bishops of the Catholick Church of such a place as founded on the Doctrine of Christ and his Apostles Universally received throughout the World and by vertue of the same Faith in Communion with all Christians Upon these two Suppositions I shall lay down these following Propositions That 1. Diversity of Opinions in matters of Religion of less moment does not interrupt and dissolve the Unity of Faith Opinions arise either from want of Evidence in the things themselves which causes a fluctuation and unsettlement in the mind as not knowing where to fix and rest to which we yield a wavering kind of assent more or less according to greater or lesser degrees of Probabilities or else from the weakness of the understanding which not being able to take a comprehensive view of things and resolve them into their first Principles and Original Causes or for want of a sure Foundation whether of Nature or Reason or Authority or Revelation takes up with Arguments and motives of assent which fall short of certainty and which cannot quiet the mind and secure it from all suspicion and fear of the contrary And indeed considering the great variety of mens tempers and complexions Education and Interests and the greater or lesser degrees of Knowledge Industry Curiosity and the like there is a Moral impossibility that Opinions should be one and the same And where God has left a liberty no Power upon Earth can oblige the Conscience and Understanding to admit them any otherwise than as Opinions That is either as true in their kind but far from the Infallibility of Divine Revelations or as piè credibilia Or as means and instruments of Agreement and Uniformity in Judgment to prevent Schism and Confusion so as yet no one particular Church shall prescribe to another but leave each to its liberty of securing their peace and quiet by what Confessions they judge best for that end and nothing be imposed as a matter of Doctrine which thwarts the Ancient Christian Doctrine and the Catholick Tradition of the Church 2. All truths are not fundamental and necessary to be believed with the same firmness of assent For several Propositions may be true and useful and yet not necessary and essential to the Faith the ignorance or dis-belief of which does not throw a man out of the Communion of the Church The neglect of this distinction has been one great cause of the troubles and turmoils of Christendom whilst fierce and eager Disputants have been engaged in the defence of several tenents which have no necessary dependance on the Doctrine of Faith and which are not determined in the Scriptures and by reason of their difficulty
and the various apprehensions and prejudices of men not like ever to be fully and satisfactorily decided and which indeed are but niceties and trifling subtilties in comparison while they put a greater value upon them than the nature and matter of them will bear and whilst they Sacrifice Unity and the Peace of the Church and the grand and real concerns of Religion to Passion and Humour 3. Much less are doubtful Consequences and Philosophical Opinions to be admitted and reckoned in the number of Fundamentals At first certainly and for several Ages together there was no great subtilty required in order to be a good Christian. The Institutions of Christianity were not Laborious and perplext Nothing was required but a firm assent of the mind to a few Propositions whose matter indeed was Mysterious but what had the highest ground of Credibility to make the assent to them just and rational but when once a bold Curiosity and an unlawful and an over-affected subtilty made men depart from the simplicity of Faith and Religion instead of being the Rule of Life and Discipline became an Art of Disputing and Scripture and Antiquity no longer made the Judges of Controversies but every mans particular Reason though never so much byassed and perverted by the prepossessions of fancy and by the heat and influence of his Passions then Articles of Faith began to multiply and every nicety and far-fetch'd consequence was called by that name and Magisterially imposed and the Philosophy of Aristotle and Plato was brought in to their assistance till the substance of Christianity was even lost in the Quarrel and the very Foundations of it undermined and Faith swallowed up in wantonness of Wit and Peace shut out of the World by Faction and Schism The result was that they were the worse Christians more talkative and curious perhaps but less strict and Religious and Charitable nay less knowing than they were before they let loose the Reins to their fancy and leapt over those boundaries which God and the Church had set 4. Whatsoever was not Fundamental in the Apostles time cannot be so now If it be a true way of defining an Article of Faith that it was revealed by Christ to the Apostles and as such imposed by them upon their Proselytes without the embracing of which they could not be Christians and that it is to be found in the writings which they left behind them either expresly or by necessary consequence Then the contrary also that is whatsoever is not found in their writings either directly or by just and necessary consequence and was not proposed to the first Believers cannot be Fundamental and consequently no one is bound to believe any Doctrine but what was then revealed and afterward acknowledged by the Catholick Church and what-ever proposal is made by the Church is no farther to be believed than as it is consonant to the Scripture and the Doctrine of the Apostles this declaration not being of it self sufficient to make an Article of Faith but as it is founded upon Scripture and Apostolical Authority How had the Peace of Christendom been still preserved if these Rules had been followed and kept in after-ages That is if new Opinions whereof some are very dangerous to which the Christian Church was a stranger for several Centuries of Years and all uncertain at the best if meer fancies to which Superstition and Ignorance have given Birth and if the niceties and subtilties of the Schools and things impossible to be throughly known and matters of meer speculation that tend to the disservice of Religion and do not slow in the least from its Principles had not been adopted Articles and Points of Faith all which we justly object to the Church of Rome and made necessary conditions of Communion How might we have adorsed before the same Altars and gone together to the House of God as Friends and have been partakers of the Mysteries of the Body and blood of our Saviour if they had not determined the manner of the presence of Christ in the Sacrament and brought in a new Doctrine which contradicts the whole circle of Sciences and the sense and experience of all mankind and tyed all others to believe an unnatural sense of the words of the Institution making the differences irreconcileable by their Trent Canons and shutting out all possible hope of Peace till God shall open the eyes of the Christian Princes of that Communion to see the fallacies and cheats of the Court and the errors and corruptions of the Church of Rome to call a free and truly General Council to debate the differences which are now on foot to the great scandal of Christianity upon the Principles of Scripture Primitive Antiquity and genuine Apostolical Tradition and which considerations of Worldly Interest and Grandeur keep up this being the only way left to restore Unity to the divided Catholick Church 'T is the glory as well as happiness of the Church of England that the Rites she uses in her Religious Worship are decent and Solemn and every way serving the purposes of Religion that her Goverment is Apostolical that her established Liturgy is according to the Primitive Standard and which no wise and good man can justly be offended at unless perchance he thinks this a just reason because it is a set form that she holds nothing as necessary and essential to Faith but what was held so in the first Ages of the Church and can be proved out of the Scriptures that she rejects no Tradition that can prove it self to be Apostolical that she receives the Articles of the Catholick Faith held Anciently for such in their received sense and as they are laid down in the three Creeds and admits all who receive them into her Communion that her determinations of Opinions in her Articles are modest and far from the high-flown pretence of Infallibility and designed as an Instrument of Union that she is willing to communicate with Christians of what denomination soever where the terms of the Communion are Lawful so as it may be done without sin without prejudice to truth and the Fundamentals of Church Government confirmed by universal Practise and Canons of Councils and without violating the Rights and Priviledges of the Catholick Church as well as her own in particular Let the Romanists single out any one of her professed Tenents which she holds as essential to Faith and necessary to Salvation which is not exactly agreeable to the first Antiquity They cannot deny that she holds nothing amiss herein only they pretend that she does not hold enough That is that we reject Transubstantiation and the Sacrifice of the Mass Invocation of Saints and Angels Worshipping of Images that we do not admit the Pope to be the visible Head and Monarch of the Church and the Vicar of Christ and that it is necessary to Salvation to be Subject to him and the like All which are meer Fancies and Usurpations But if the Primitive Christians were