praeter Regni consuetudinem ab Anselmo factiâ—atum indignè ferentes asserebant sese nunquam tam iniquo Papae decreto assensos vel assensuros et potius tam Anselmum regno exterminaturos et ab Ecclesia Romana penitus discesâ—uros quam hanc Papae sententiam A IURE REGIO REGNIQUE CONSUETUDINE PRORSUS ALIENAM ratam haberent After many publike meetings and debates between the King Prelates Nobles and Anselm about this business it was agreed that Anselm and William Werelast the Kings Ambassadour should goe to Rome to Pope Paschal the 2. and debate this business before him where the said William appearing and vehemently urging before the Pope in the Kings behalf Dedecus ei et videri et esse si Antecessorum suorum jura perderet quos ipse et animi magniâ—udine et opum affluentia longe praerivit c. Adding in the close Quod Dominus meus nec pro amissione Regni patietur sibi Ecclesiarum investituras auferri To which the insolent Pope presently replied with a stern countenance Nec ego pro capitis sui redemptione eum investituras permittam impune habere Whereupon they decreed the cause for Anselm against the King and in a Synod at Lateran ratified the former Decree of Pope Urban in the Council at Rome which this Pope by his consolatory Epistle to Anselm informed him of incouraging him openly and boldly to appear and speak in this cause for the Churches divine Liberty Anselm hereupon wrote thus to King Henry inviting him to return into England and to doe him that service as his predecessors had done to his Ancestors Ut autem sim vobiscum ita ut Antecessor meus erat cum patre vestro facere non possum quia NEC VOBIS HOMAGIVMFACERE nec accipientibus de manu vestra Investituras Ecclesiarum propter praedictam Papae Prohibitionem me audiente factam audeo communicare But though Ludovicus Crassus K. of France was so pusillanimous as by his Charter dated An. 1137. to exempt his Archbishops Bishops and Clergy from doing any Homage or Fealty to him for their temporalties before or after their Consecrations granting them Quod canonicam omnino gauderent libertatem ABSQVE HOMAGII IURAMENTI seu fidei primum datae obligatione Yet K. Hen. the first though he were contented at last to part with his investitures to Bishopricks and Abbies yet he would upon no terms exempt any Bishops or Abbots from the homage due unto him for their temporalties after their elections and before their Consecrations not from the Oath of Fealty they alwayes doing homage to him and his Successors at least wise before their consecrations though seldom after them and that in the self-same form as Laymen did without omitting this Clause I become your man as appears by Glanvil l. 9. c. 1. Bracton l. 2. c. 35. Fleta l. 3. c. 16. Britton ch 66 of Homages and 17 E. 2. Of the manner of doing Homage and Fealty prescribing only one and the self-same form of homage as well to the Clergy as Laity as well as the same Oath of Fealty which they equally performed though Littleton and he alone makes a difference between their forms of Homage Hence in the Parliament at Salisbury Anno Dom. 1116. Comites Barones CUM CLERO TOTIUS REGNI in praesentia Regis Henrici 1. sibi et Willielmo filio suo HOMAGIUM FECERUNT FIDELITATEM IURAVERUNT as the Chronicle of Bromton and other of our Historians record I shall illustrate this discourse touching Homage and Fealty with these memorable clauses in the Charter of King Stephen touching the agreement made between him and Henry Duke of Normandy c. in a Parliamentary Assembly of the Bishops and others of the Realm at Wallingford Anno Gratiae 1153. wherein King Stephen declaring him the right hereditary heir to the Crown of England after his death and he reciprocally agreeing that Stephen should enjoy the Crown and Kingdom quietly without interruption by him during his life thereupon Dux propter hunc honorem et donationem et confirmationem sibâ— Ã me factam HOMAGIUM michi et Sacramento securitatem fecit scilicet quod fidelis michi erit et vitam et honorem meum pro suo posâ—e custodier per conventiones inter Nos praelocutas Ego etiam secuâ—itatem Sacramento Duci feci quod vitam et honorem ei pro posse meo custodiam et sicut fiâ—ium haeredem meum in omnibus in quibus potero eum manuâ—enebo et custodiam contra omnes quos poâ—ero Willielms autem filius meus HOMAGIUM et securitatem Duci fecit c. Comites Barones Ducis qui homines mei nunquam fuerunt pro honore quem Domino suo fâ—ci Homagium et Sacramentum michi fecerunt salvis conventionibus inter me et Ducem factis Coeteri vero qui ante Homagium michi fecerant fideliâ—atem michi fecerunt sicut Domino Et si Dux à praemissis receâ—erit omnino a servicio ipsius cessarent quousque errara corrigeret c. Comites etiam et Barones mei LIGIUM HOMAGIUM DUCI FECERUNT salva mea fidelitate quamdiu vixero et regnum tenuero Simili lege quod si â—go à praedictis recederem omnino à servicio meo cestarent quousque errata corrigerem Cives etiam Civiâ—atum et homines Castrorum quae in Dominio meo habeo ex praecepto meo homagium et securitatem Duci fecerunt salva fidelitate mea quamdiu vixero et regnum tenuero Archiepiscopi Episcopi atque Abbates de regno Angliae ex praecepto meo FIDELITATEM SACRAMENTO DUCI FECERUNT Illi quoque qui in regno Angliae Episcopi deinceps fiâ—nt vel Abbates IDEM FACIENT In the Recognition of the antient Customs of the Realm of England used in the reign of King Henry the 1. and his Ancestors quae observari debebant in regno ab omnibus teneri drawen up and agreed upon Febr. 8. Anno Dom. 1164. in the famous Parliamentary Council of Clarindon in the presence of the King and of all the Archbishops Bishops Abbots Priors Earls Barons and Great men of the Realm who all juraverunt firmiter in verbo veritatis promiserunt viva voce tenendas et observandas Domino Regi et HAEREDIBUS SVIS bona fide et absque malo ingenio in perpetuum I finde these Articles pertinent to my purpose Archiepiscopi Episcopi et universae personae regni qui de Rege tenent in capite habeant possessiones suas de Rege sicut Baroniam et inde respondeant Justiciariis et Ministris Regiis et fequentur et faciant OMNES CONSUETUDINES REGIAS et sicut caeteri Barones debent interesse judiciis Curiae regis cum Baronibus quousque pervenitur ad diminutionem membrorum vel ad mortem Cum vacaverit Archieplscopatus Episcopatus vel Abbatia vel Prioratus in dominio Regiâ— esse debet in manu ipsius
is evident not only by the memorâ—ble prâ—sidents of 3 H. 6. rot Parl. n. 10. to 14. 27 H. 6. rot Parl. n. 19. 14 E. 4. rot Parâ— n. 25. in Controversies of this Nature there recorded but by these two presidents of laâ—er times remembred by Mr. Cambdeâ— In the Parliament of 39 Eliz. Anno 1597. Thomas Baron de la Ware peâ—iâ—ioned the Queen to be restored to his anciâ—nt place and â—eat in Parliamenâ— whose case was this His father William by judgement of Parliâ—ment in the reign of Edward the 6. for endeavouring to poyson his Unkle the Lord de la Ware to gain his inheritance and honour was disabled to enjoy any inheritance or honour that might descend to him by his Unkles death Afterwards in Queen Maries reign he was condemned of High Treason and not long after intirely restored as if he had not been condemned Being disabled by his first Sentence to inherit his Unkles honor upon his death he was by Queen Elizabâ—ths special Favour and Letters Patents created Baron de la Ware de novo and sat only as a younger Baron then newly created during his life After his death his son petitioning to enjoy the place of his Ancestors in Parliament the Queen referred the business to the Lords in Parliament who finding the judgement against William his Father to be only personal and not to bind his children and that the judgement given against him under Queen Mary was no obstacle both because he could not lose that Dignity and Honor by it which then he had not his Unkle being then alive and because he was soon after intirely restored and for that the anâ—ient Dignity and Barony was not extinct by his new Creation but only suspended during his life being not vested in him at the time of his late Creation the Lords thereupon locum â—i avitum ADJUDICAVERUNT inter Barones Willoughbeium de Eresby Berkleium in quo ritè locatur In the same Parliament it was resolved by the Lords in the case of Thomas Howard Baron of Walden Knight of the Gâ—rter who being sick and unable to come to the House himself Baron Scroop as his Proxy was brought into the Lords House in his Parliamentary Robes between two Barons the chief King of Arms going before him where presenting his Patent and Creation when the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal had read it he was placed below all the rest of the Barons though he were the younger son of a Duke whose sons by an Order of Parliament made in the 6. year of King Henry the 8. ought to take place of all Viscounts and other Barons which the Lords then resolved to be intended out of Pâ—rliament but they ought to sit in the Parliament house only according to the time of their being created Barons as Mr. Cambden relates out of the Lords Iâ—urnal 36. That the Prelates Earls Barons and Great men of the Realm are the Proper Iudges of all Causes and Controversies there debaâ—ed between the King and his people and are all bound by Oath as well as the King to observe defend and maintain the rights of the Realm and Crown of England and that more especially by their Oath of Fealty and Homage whereby they were tied to the King and charged to appear when summoned in the writs of summons as you may read more at large before in Spelmans Glossarium Tit. Fidelitas Homagium ligeantia and in Mat. Paris who records Aâ— 1209. that K. Iohn caepit HOMAGIA de omnibus hominibus liberè tenentibus et etiam duodecim annorum pueris quos omnes post FIDELIT ATEM FACTAM in osculum pacis recepit ac demâ—sit Et Wallenses quod anteactis temporibus fuâ—raâ— inauditum venientes ad Regem HOMAGIA fecerunt ibidem licet tam divitibus quam pauperibus esset oâ—erosum Then passing into Ireland with a great Army there came to Dublin to meet him plus quà m viginti Reguli illius regionis qui omnes timore maximo perterâ— iti HOMAGIUM ILLI ET FIDELITATEM FECERUNT as the highest Obligation of their future Loyalty fidelity and subjection to him Upon which Account Homage is frequently stiled HOMAGIUM LIGEUM LIGEANTIA LIGANâ—IA by Bracton l. 2. c. 35. f. 79. Glanvil l. 7. c. 10. Guliclmus Neubrigensis Hist. l. 2. c. 37. Chron. Iohannis Bromton col 1005. Fleta l. 3. c. 16. Britton ch 68. De Homages Custumar Vetus Normanniae c. 43. Cooks 7 Rep. Calvins case f. 7. 1. Instit. f. 65. a. Hornes Myrrour des Iustices ch 35 36 37 38. Spelmans Glossarium Homagium Ligeantia because iâ— most strictly unites and binds the King and his Subjects together hunc ad protectionâ—m justum Regimen illos ad reverentiam tributa et dâ—bitam Subjectionem â—t obedâ—â—ntiam as they resolve whereupon the Lords are enjoyned in their writs of summons personâ—lly to appear in Parliaments and Great Councils in fide homagio QUIBUS NOBIS TENEMINI as I formerly observed 37. That the nâ—mbers of Earls Barons Temporal Lords and Great men summoâ—ed to our Parliaments and Great Councils andentred after the Eodem modo and Consimiles literae in the Rolls and Liâ—ts of Summons are oft times very various and different there being many more of them summoned to some Parliaments and Great Councilâ— than to others as you may easily discern by comparing their Numbers which I have here presented you with in the grosse after every writ the Prince of Wales himself the Duke of Lancaster and other Dukes and Earls as well as inferior Lords Barons and Great men being left out of some Lists of Summons one two or three Parliaments and Great Councils together or more and then inserted again into others the true reasons whereof I apprehend to be these ensuing 1. Their absence in forein parts or elsâ—where in the warrs or â—pon other special services of the King in which cases no wrâ—ts of Summons issued to them and if their names were entred in the Lists of the summons they were usually cancelled or rased out of them witness the forecited entrys in the Lists oâ— Claus. 11 E. 3. pars 2. dors 11. And Claus. 12 E. 3. pars 3. dors 32. 2ly Their abode beyond the Seas upon their own particular occasions Both which causes frequently happened during the wars with France Scotland and Ireland and whiles our Kings and Nobles had any Lands and Possessions in France Aquitain Normandy Anjow Picardy and other parts beyond the Seas Many of the Earls Lords Barons Great men and our Kings themselves being oft times by reason of Warrs Treaties Embassies and defence of their Inheritances absent in forein parts when Parliaments were summoned and held in England by the Custos Regni or Commissioners at which times I generally finde there were fewer Earls Barons and Noblemen summoned to our Parliaments and Great Councils than in times of Peace or when our Kings were personally present in
et inde percipiet omnes reditus et exitus sicut Dominicos reditus suos Et cum ventum fuerit ad consulendum Ecclesiam debet Dominus Rex mandare poâ—iores personas Ecclesiae et in Capella ipsius Regis debet fieri electio assensu ipsius Regis et Concilio personarum regni quas ad haec faciendum advocaverit et IBIDEM FACIET ELECTUS HOMAGIVM FIDELITATEM REGI SICVT LIGIO DO MINO SVO de vita sua et de membris et de honore terreno salvo ordine suo priusquam consecretur Indeed Angelus de Clavasio in his Summa Angelica Tit. Homagium and other Canonists hold it to be Symonie and unlawfull prore ' spirituali puia Beneficio Ecclesiastico HOMAGIUM EXIGERE But our Lawes resolve it an antient Legal duty and Service Of which see more in Spelmanni Glossarium Tit. Fidelitas Homagium in William Somners Glossarium Tit. Homagium and in Bracton Britton and Fleta 4. That this clause in the writs to the Temporal Lords in fide homagio implies they were all or most Barons by tenure And whereas Sir Ed. Cook and Sir Henry Spelman assert That of antient time the temporal Lords were commanded by the Kings writ thus to appear In fide et homagio quibus Nobis tenemini and in the reign of Edward 3. in fide et ligeantia and sometimes in fide et homagio but at this day constantly in fide et ligeantia because at this day there are no feudal Baronies in respect whereof Homage is to be done which in 21 E. 3. was the true cause of this alteration If this observation of theirs That in fide et homagio feodales propriè respiciat Barones denoting only such Barons who were Barons by tenure or Barony for which they did their Homage and swore Fealty and Allegiance to the King then this is a most convincing argument that all the Lords and Barons summoned before 11 E. 3. were Barons only by tenure not by writ alone because they were all regularly summoned to appear in fide et homagio not in fide et ligeantia 2ly It is a clear mistake that this alteration of homagio into ligeantia was made in 21 E 3. for it was not till 25 E. 3. pars 1. dors 5. in fide et homagio being used both in the writs of 21 22 23 24 E. 3. 3ly The reason of this alteration could not be this they rendâ—r because all or most of the Lords and Barons then summoned did not hold of the King by Barony but were Barons only by writ not tenure First because all the writs to the Prince of Wales â—and Earls then summoned who held of the King by Homage and Barony issued in this form in fide et ligeantia to them as well as to the inferiour Lords and Barons 2ly Because the self-same Prince Earls Lords summoned in this form in 25 E. 3. in the very next years of 26 E. 3. d. 14. and 27 E. 3. d. 12. were twice summoned again iâ— fide homagio et ligeantia quibus Nobis tenemini and 28 E. 3. d. 26. in fide et homagio after in 29 E. 3. d. 8. 7. 31 E. 3. d. 21. 1. they are summoned in fide et ligeantia but yet in 32 E. 3. d. 14. 36 E. 3. d. 16. 37 E. 3. d. 22. 38 E. 3. d. 3. 39 E. 3. d. 2. 42 E. 3. d. 22. 43 E. 3. d. 24. 46 E. 3. d. 9. all the writs to the Prince Earls Lords and Barons run again in fide et homagio only and some between and after them in fide et ligeantia only though issued to the self-same persons or their heirs Therefore ligeantia in these and subsequent writs is put only as a Synonima signifying only Homagium as the coupling them together in two writs in fide homagio et ligeantia and the placing of Homagio thus interchangeably for ligeantia and ligeancia for homagio evidence beyond contradiction The rather because there is the highest promise and bond of Allegiance expressed in the very words and form of homage done to the King as the words I become your man from this day forwards of life and member and of earthly worship and unto you shall be true and faithfull and bear you faith and this clause saving the faith that I owe unto our Soveraign Lord the King when done to a common person import and Glanvil l. 9. c. 1. Bracton l. 2. c. 35. Fleta l. 3. c. 16. Sir Edward Cook in his 1 Institutes on Littletons Chapter of Homage Sir Hen. Spelman and Somner in their Glossaries Tit. Homagium Fidelitas at large demonstrate Therefore homage may be properly stiled ligeantia and be put in lien of homagio as doubtless it is in all those writs that use it 3ly I find sundry Homages for Dutchies Earldoms and Baronies done to our Kings by the Duke of Aquitain the Dâ—ke of Hereford Henry Percy the Duke of Norfolk and other Peers who were then and afterwards summoned in fide et ligeantia not homagio and I doubt Sir Edward Cooke and those of his opinion can hardly name any Dukes Earls Vicounts Lords or Barons summoned to Parliament under Henry the 3. R. 2. H. 4 5 9. or E. 4. who was not a Lord by Tenure or Barony as well as by Patent or a special writ of creation the very names of their Baronies as Sir Edward Cooke and Mr. Selden inform us being usually expressed in all later writs of Summonâ— Therefore this their conjecture of altering the writs from homagio to ligeantia because they held not by homage must needs be erronious and groundless in my judgemenâ— and the assertions of such who hold that the Kings bare general writs of summons issued to those who held not by Barony did create them and their issues Barons if they sate in Parliament without any special creation by some Clauses in the writs or by Paâ—ent grounded on this mistake must vanish into smoke else that Clause of creation in the writ to Sir Henry Bromfleet Cl. 27 H. 6. d. 24. would have been both superfluous and ridiculous 5ly That this clause in fide et homagio or in fide ligeantia quibus Nobis tenemini is sometimes omitted out of the writs of Summons to the Prince of Wales and other times inserted into them 6ly That the Prince of Wales in the writs of Summons and adjournment is sometimes stiled Princeps Walliae only sometimes Princeps Aquitaniae et Walliae other times Princeps Walliae Dux Cornubiae et Comes Câ—striae when all these titles were conferred on him by the King 7ly That in the writs issued to Dukes Earls and Temporal Lords of the Kings Progeny royal bloud and alliance they are usually stiled Carissimo filio nostro Fratri Regis Fratri nostro Avunculo Regis Avunculo nostro Nepoti nostro Consanguineo nostro c. and the other Earls and Temporal Lords
one general Councill in 32 E. 3. d. 14. 5ly That after King Edward the 3d. his reigne there is not one president of any Archbishop Bishop Abbot Prior or religious persons summoned to any Parliament to my remembrance but only of those who held by Barony and were constantly summoned as Spiritual Peers to all our Parliaments And very few Presidents if any of a Knight Gentleman or other Layman whatsoever summoned by any general Writs to the Lords House to treat and consult together with them unlesse they were ancient Earles Lords or Barons of the Realm or newly created such by special Patents before their summons or by special clauses of creation in the Wriâ—s by which they were summoned as all the lists of summons in the Clause Rolls the precedent Table the Statutes of 5 R. 2. Stat. 2. c. 4. 31 H. 8. c 10. and Mr. Martyns Catalogue of them at the end of his History clearly manifest 6ly That in my best observation there is no president from 49 H. 3. till the last Parliament of King Charles nor in any age before where any of the ancient Nobility Peers Lords or Barons of the Realme at least any considerable number of them unlesse such who were actually outlawed or attainted of High Treason or absent in forreign parts or in actual service in the Wars or under age were omitted out of the Writs of summous or secluded from sitting in the Lords House in any Parliament by force or frand unless by Morâ—imer in the Parliament at Salisbury An. 2. E. 3. and in 21 R. 2. nor of others who were no real Lords Peers by Patent Tenure or other legal creation summoned to the Lords House out of England much lesse out of Scotland and Ireland to supplant them or supply their places under any name notion or pretext whatsoever Neither were they or any of them secluded disinherited of their seats Votes Peerage in Parliament without or before the least legal hearing trial impeachment or conviction whatsoever of any capital crime which might forâ—eit their Peerage against all the Great Charters Statutes Records Declarations Orders Ordinances Votes Protestations Oathts Covenants mentioned in my Plea for the Lords and House of Peers which ratifie and perpetuate this their Birthright to them and their Posterities and the very law of all Nations 6ly It is very observable that both Houses of Parliament in their Propositions sent to King Charles at their last Treaty with him in the Isle of Weight to prevent the creation and introduction of any New Lords into future Parliaments to the prejudice seclusion or overvoting of the Ancient Nobility or Commons house did amongst other things propound That BY ACT OF PARLIAMENT all LORDS and PEERS made by the King since Edward Lord Littleton deserted the Parliament and carried away the Great Seal the 21. of May 1642. should be unlorded unpeered set by and their Titles of Honour Patents revoked declared null and void to all intents and never hereafter put in use And that NO PEER WHICH SHOULD BE HEREAFTER MADE BY THE KING HIS HEIRES OR SUCCESSORS who have onely and solely a just legal power to create them and none else as they hereby declare SHALL SIT IN THE PARLIAMENT OF ENGLAND WITHOUT CONSENT OF BOTH HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT Which the King then fully and freely consented to without any limitation or exception whatsoever Since which Proposition of both Houses and concession by the King how any person or persons who assented to or approved thereof in any kind as reasonable or beneficial to the publick without any special Patent or creation from the King his heires or successors and without the consent of the House of Lords and ancient Peers of the Realme the only proper members of Iudges in it of the Commons House yea against both their consents and approbations can justly by any other authority Patent Writ or instrument whatsoever assume unto themselves the Titles of Lords or Barons of the Realme or of the Lords House it self to the disseasing disinheriting suppressing of the ancient undoubted Peers and House of Lords Or how any who have Voted down declared against and abolished the Lords and Lords House in sundry printed Papers as Uselesse Dangerous Inconvenient Oppressive to the People obstructive to the Proceedings in Parliament and the like and afterwards by several Votes and printed New Knacks took and subscribed themselves and prescribed to all others under severest penalties a publick Engagement To be â—rue and faithfull to the Commonwealth of England as it was then established as they thought by themselves though the event soon after proved the contrary Without a King or House of Lords can or dare become this very Selfsame Vselesse dangerous oppressive obstructive grievance c. themselves and against their own Votes Declarations Acts Subscriptions Engagements stile or assert themselves to be either real Lords or an House of Lords without the greatest Praevarication Contradiction to and Apostacy from their own former Principles or how they can ever probably expect that either the ancient Lords or Commons of England should submit unto them as such let their own judgments consciences and reasons resolve them The rather because divers of the Earles Nobles made by King Stephen were stiled yea deposed as meer Imaginary false Earles and Lords Quosdam Imaginarios et Pseudo-Comites and both their Titles and Crown lands given them by Stephen though King de facto resumed by King Henry the 2. right heir to the crown because Stephen was an Usurper Chartae Invasoris praejudicium legitimo Principi minime facere deberent as the Chronicle of Normandy the Book of the Abby of Waverly Mr. Selden out of them Gulielmus Neubrigensis and Chronicle of Bromton Col. 1046. inform us Whose President may justly deterre them from any unjust disseisin of the ancient Lords and setting themselves in their Places And thus much for my Observations on and from the Writs in this second Section SECTION 3. Of Writs of Summons to the Kings Counsil and other Ordinary Assistants to the Lords in Parliaments and Parliamentary Councils with annotations on them THe next Writs of Summons after those to the Spiritual and Temporal Lords entred in the antient Clause Rolls are those to the Kings Counsil different only in one or two Clauses from the former in which else they usually accorded These persons commonly summoned to Parliaments as the Kings Counsil by distinct writs from the Lords as ordinary Assistants both to the King and them in all causes controversies Questions of Moment were mostly the Kings Great Officers as well Clergymen as Secular persons who were no Lords nor Barons of the Realm as namely his Treasurer Chancellor of the Eschequer Judges of his Courts at Westminster Justices in Eyre Iustices assignes Barons of his Eschequer Clerks Secretaries of his Counsil and sometimes his Serjeants at Law with such other Officers and Persons whom our Kings thought meâ—â—o summon The
fatetur et cognoscaâ— Et idem Archiepiscopus in fide c. fatetur et dicit quod in veniendo de Curia Romana apud Paris bene audivit intellexit per praedictum Iudeum quod praedicta pecunia ei debebatur et quod idem Iudeus eum rogavit ut ei pro Deo esset in auxilium ad praedictam pecuniam suam â—ecuperandam Et postea ut praedictum est in visitatione sua ad domum praedictam hoc idem invenit per confessionem praedictorum Prioris et Conventus et eis dixit quod â—ic facerent quod animas suas salvarent Et quia idem Archiepiscopus bene cognoscit quod POST EXILIUM DICTI JUDAEâ— ALIORUM JUDAEORUM DE REGNO ISTO à praedicto Iudeo intellexit quod pecunia praedicta â—ibi in regno isto debebatur et POST EORUM EXILIUM omnia quae sua fuerunt et in regno isto remanserunt tam debita quam alia bona quaecunque ipsi Domino Regi remanserunt et Catalla sua fuerunt et super hoc incontinenti POST EORUM EXILIUM solempnis Proclamatio siebat per totum regnum et quod omnes qui debita aliqua alicui Iudeo debebant aut de eorum debiâ—is t is bonis catallis aliquid sciebant Domino Regi aut alicui de Consilio suo scire facerent de qua quidem Proclamatione nullus dedicere potest quin scivit aâ—â— scivisse debuit Et idem Archiepiscopus de debito praedicto scivit prout fatetur tam per Iudeum quam per Priorem Conventum nec de hoc Domino Regi aut alieui de suìs constare fecit Immo debitum illud concelando et à Domino Rege alienando contra fidem qua Regi teneâ—ur injunxit praefato Priori et Conventui quod animas suus-salvarent quod tantum valuit quantum si dixisset quod Iudeo satisfacerent concordatum est quod praedictus Archiepiscopus remaneat in misericordia Domini Regis pro concelamento transgressione praedicto c. et idem Dominus Rex sibi ipsi reservat Tax ationem illius misericordiae From these 2. Records I shall observe That the General Banishment of the Iewes out of England and the escheat and forfeiture of their Lands Goods and Debts to the King by this their generall exile is no lesse then 10. severall times precisely mentioned in these 2 Records and the very groundwork of them besides some hundreds of other Records and Authors cited by me in the 1. and 2. Part of my Demurrer to the Iewes long discontinued Remitter into England And therefore I must admire Sir Edward Cooks peremptory denyal of it in print in his Commentary on the Statute de Iudaismo in the very date whereof he is mistaken as well as in most of his Comments thereupon as I have largely proved in my Demurrer 2. That it is a breach of the Oath of Fealty and Allegiance in any Subject and an offence for which he is punishable to conceal from or defraud the King of any of his just debts and rights especially when engaged by Proclamation to discover them 3ly That the King and his Counsell gave judgment in these causes and that in the later of them the King reserves the taxing of the Amerciament of the Archbishop for an offence against him wholly to himself The 3. case is that of Iohn Saâ—veyn his wife and her sister in the Placita coram ipso Domino Rege apud Westmonasterium in Parliamento suo in Octabis Nativitatis beatae Mariae Anno regni Regis Edwardi filii Regis Henrici 33. which is very memorable and thus recorded Iohannes Salveyn Margareta uxor ejus Isabello soroâ— ejusdem Margaretae filiae haeredes Roberti de Ros de Werk per Petitionem suam in forma sequenti ostendunt Domino Regi et petunt quod cum Dominus Rex de gratia sua speciali concessit et ordinavit Quod omnes gentes de regno Seotiae cujuscunque fuerint et quae ad pacem suam venerint exceptis aliquibus personis in eadem Ordinatione nominatis admittantur secundum conditiones subsequentes videlicet quod salva sit eis vita et membra et quod quieti sint de imprisonamento et quod non exhaeredantur Ita quod de eorum exemptione et emendis de Transgressionibus qnas ipsi Domino Regi solummodo fecerint et de estabilamento terrae Scotiae staret ordinationi suae sicut plenius continetur in Ordinatione supradicta Et inâ— super Dominus Rex concessit omnibus qui secuti fuerint seisinam de terris quas ipsi et eorum Antecessores tenuerunt in principio Guerrae In quorum manus terrâ—â— illae devenissent quod ipsi Iohannes Margareta Isabella uti possent et gaudere concessione et Ordinatione praedictis quoad terras quae dictus Robertus tenuit in Anglia Scotia in principio guerrae Ita quod non sinâ— exhaeredati Et Willielmus de Ros de Hamlake qui tenet praedictum Manerium de Werk ex dono et concessione Domini Regis per praemunitionem sibi factam venitâ— et tam pro seipso tanquam tenenti dictum Manerium quaÌ„ pro Domino Rege quo ad alias terras et tenementa quae fuerunt dicti Roberti tam in regno Angliae quam in terra Scoâ—iae dicit Quod praedicti petentes nichil in eisdem per medium praedicti Roberti clamare possunt ut ipsius haeredes nec ad illa petenda seu aliquam partem earundem audiri debent prout petunt Dicit enim quod ipsi petunt tenementa praedicta ut haeredes praedicti Roberti et virtute câ—jusd â—m Ordinationâ—s quam Domâ—nus Rex nuper fecitet concessit illis hominibus de terra Scotiae qui in ultima guerra in eadem terra ad pacem suam venerunt et admissi suerunt et per illa verâ—a videlizet quod non â—xâ—aeredentur Et etiam petunt quod ipsi uti possunt et gaudere concessione et Ordinatione praedictis quo ad terras quas dictus Robertus tenuit in Anglia in Scotia in principio guerrae Ita quod non sint exhaeredati prout in sua petitione continetur quod nullo modo admitti debent Quia dicit quod praedictus Robertus diù ante principium istius gueriae ad quod tempus Ordinationi praedicta reddito terrarum et concessio se extendunt Inimicus Domini Regis devenit maniâ—estus parti Scotorum Contra Homagium et Filelitatem suam felonice et traditiose adhâ—rendo et sic omnes terras et tenementa sua ubicunque infra Dominium et potestatem Domini Regis existentia simul cum aliis bonis suis quibuscunque totaliter forisfecit nec unquam postea in vita sua ad pacem Domini Regis rediit set in inimicitia sua ut Felo et Traditor obiit Occasione cujus Inimicitiae sic commissae Dominus Rex
17. E. 1. made and agreed on at Nottingham By the assent of our Counsell there being By the Preface to Articuli Cleri 9. E. 2. In our Parliament holden at Lincolnâ— the 9th of our reigne We caused the Articles underwritten with certain Answers made to some of them to be rehearsed before Our Counsell and made certain Answers to be corrected and to the residue of the Articles underwritten answers were made By us and our Counsell of which Articles and Answers the tenours here ensue By the Statute of Gavelet An. 10. E. 2. It is provided by our Lord the King and His Iustices c. By the Statute De Terris Templariorum 17. E. 2. It was moved in Parliament in the presence of the Prelates Barons Nobles and Great men of the Realm and others there present Whether the Order of the Templers being dissolved the King and other Lords of the fees might retain them by the Law of the Realme and with safe conscience Whereupon the Greater part of the Kings Counsell as well the Iustices as other Lay-Persons being assembled together the said Iustices affirmed precisely That our Lord the King and other Lords of the fees aforesaid might well and lawfully by the lawes of the Realme retain the foresaid Lands as their Escheats in regard of the ceasing and dissolution of the Order aforesaid But upon other grounds of Conscience they setled them on the Hospitall of S. Iohns of Ierusalem by this Statute 1. E. 3. c. 3. But it is not the mind of the King nor of His COUNSELL that they who have sold ther Lands c. should have any benefit of this Statute The Prologue of the printed Statute of 1. E. 3. Parl 2. At the request of the Commonally by their Petition made before the King and HIS CONSELL in Parliament by assent of the Prelates Earles and Barons c. 9. E. 3. c. 1. Our Sovereign Lord the King desiring the profit of his people by the assent of his Prelates Earles Barons and other Nobles of his Realm summoned at his present Parliament and By the aâ—vice of his Counsell being there c. hath ordained and established the Statâ—â—te of Money 9. E. 3. c. 7. When and where it shall please us and OVR COVNSELL to make Exchanges 11. E. 3. c. 1. Till by the King and his COVNSELL iâ— he otherwise provided 14. E. 3. c. 5. The Chancellor Treasurer the Justices of the one Bench and of the other and other OF THE KINGS COUNSELL 14. E 3. Stat. 3. Of the Clergy Prologue Wherefore Wee their petition seen and regarded and there upon deliberation with the Peers of the Realme and other of OVR COVNSELL and of the Realm c. have granted c. And ch 5. Our Chancellour and Treasurer taking to them other of our Counsell c. 20. E. 3. Prologue By the assent of the Great men and other wise men of Our Counsell We have ordained these things following And c. 5. We have ordained to come before us at a certain day or before them whom we shall depute of Our Counsell 23. E. 3. c. 8. should be converted to a publick and common profit by advise of His Counsell And alwayes it is the intent of the King and of His Counsell that according to the first Ordinance it should be lawfull and shall be lawfull for every man c. 25. E. 3. of Labourers Prologue It was ordained by our Sovereign Lord the King and by assent of the Prelates Earles Barons and other of His Counsell 25 E. 2. Stat. 2. Of those born beyond the Seas Our Sovereign Lord the King willing that all doubts and ambiguities should be put away and the Law in this case declared and put in a certainty hath charged the said Prelates Earles Barons and other wise men of his Counsell assembled in this Parliament to deliberate upon this point which of one assent have said That the Law of the Crown of England is and alwayes hath been such c. 25. E. 3. Parl. 5. c 2. of Treasons And if percase any men of this Realme endeavour covertly or secretly against any other to slea him or to rob him or take him or retein till he hath made fine or ransome or to have his deliverance it is not the mind of the King Nor His Counsell that in such cases it shall be judged Treason but shall be judged Felony or Trespasse according to the Laws of the Land of old time used and according as the case requireth And chap. 4. It is accorded assented and stablished that from henceforth none shall be taken by petition or suggestion made to our Sovereign Lord the King or to his Counsell unlesse it be by Inditement or presentment of his good and lawfull neighbours 25. E. 3. Parl. 6. Statute of Provisors Whereas in the Parliament of Edward King of England Grandfather of the King that now is the 25. of his reigne holden at Carlile the Petition heard put before the said Grandfather and HIS COUNSELL by the Commonalty of his Realm c. 27. E. 3. c. 1. Provisors shall have day containing the space of two moneths by warning to be made to them c. to be before the King and HIS COUNSELL or in his Chancery or before the Kings Justices in his places of the one Bench or the other or before other the Kings Justices which shall be deputed to the same to answer in their proper persons to the King of the contempt done in this behalf ch 2. It is assented by the King and all his Counsell 27. E. 3. of the Staple ch 21. That the same Mayor and Constables do not ordain any thing contrary to these Ordinances nor make interpretation nor exceptions to them otherwise then the words purport but if there be any thing that is doubtfull it shall be shewed unto Our Counsell and there declared by good advise ch 23. And in case that debates arise betwixt them upon the discussing of any plea or quarrell the tâ—nour of the said Plea or quarrell shall be sent before the Chancellor and other of Our Counsell to be by them determined without delay ch 25. And now late it is done Us and our Counsell to understand by the complaint of the said Merchants ch 28. And in case any thing be to be amended added changed or withdrawn of any of the said points in time to come by a true cause we will that the same be done by deliberation and advice of the Great men and Other of our Counsell in Parliament 31. E. 3. Stat. 2. c. 3. It is accorded by our Sovereign Lord the King the Great men and all the Commons in this present Parliament that the Chancellor and Treasurer taking unto them the JUSTICES and OTHER THE KINGS COUNSEL such as to them shall seem meet shall have power to ordain remedy of the buying and selling of Stockfish of St. Botulfs and Salmon of Barwick and of Wines and Fish of Bristow and elsewhere and that the Ordinances by
away the Court commonly called the Starr-chamber fit to be put in vigorous execution against the transcendent infringers of it By all which it appears that the Kings Iustices and Counsil in Parliaments as well as out of them had formerly a principal hand in making Laws Ordinances and resolving points questions of Law and other matters of moment I shall close up my Observations on this Section with these 4. memorable Records relating to the Kings Counsell and the Nobles in Scotland and Ireland as distinct from his Counsell and Parliamentary Assemblies in England Cl. 37. H. 3. d. 9. Rex mandat quod Abbas Westm. -moretur in Anglin de Consilio Reginae propter recessum Regis ad partes Vasconiae Et mandatum est eidem Reginae quod ipsum ad hoc admittat accepto ab eo prius corporali Sacramento quod officium illud fideliter intendat T. ut supra Cl. 38. H. 3. dors 13. Rex H. Cantuar. Archiepiscopo salutem Cum quaedam ardua urgentia negotia Statum nostrum Regni nostri tangentia habeamus Vobis communicanda quae sine consilio Vestro aliorum Magnatum nostrorum noluimus expediri Vobis mandamus in fide quia Nobis tenemini firmiter injungentes quatinus sicut Nos honorem nostrum diligitis nullatenus omittatis quin à die Sancti Hillarii proximo futuri in quindecim dies sitis apud Westm. coram Regina nostra R. Com. Cornub. fratre nostro aliis de Consilio nostro super dictis negotiis tractaturi nec retardetis adventum vestrum quin sitis ad dictum diem tempestive Teste A. Regina R. Com. Cornub. apud Westm. The cause of this meeting is at large related in another Writ to this Archbishop forecited p. 3. 4. Upon the same occasion the King issued this Writ to the King of Scots entred in the same Roll and dorse Rex Regi Scotiae salutem Quia ratio Vinculi foederis inter nos contracti requirit quod Vobis fidelibus Vestris ardua urgentia negotia Statum nostrum terrae nostrae tangentia communicemus Vos Nobis vice versa Serenitatem vestram ex toto corde requirimus quatinus in Quindena Purificationis beatae Mariae prox futur apud Castrum puellarum de Edenburgh personaliter interesse velitis convocantes inducentes Praelatos Magnates Regni Vestri ut ad dictos diem locum representent se coram Vobis modis omnibus Nullo enim modo expediret honori proficuo nostro vestro quin modo praedicto ad praedictos diem locum compareatis audituri per nuncios nostros qui de Vasconia Vobis ibidem occurrent praedicta negotia arduissima urgentissima in quibus necesse est quod vos fideles vestri consilium vestrum pariter auxilium apponatis T. ut supra per Reginam Comitem It is observable that the King by this Writ doth not summon the King of Scots and his Nobles to his Parliament or Counsell of England as members thereof to advise and assist him in this necessitie notwithstanding the strict alliance and league between them but to assemble together at Edenburgh in their own country by themselves alone as the Officers and Nobles of Ireland were then also required to meet in Ireland by themselves by this ensuing Writ of the same date with the former Rex Mauricio filio Giraldi salutem Quia Rex Castell cum multitudine Exercitus Christianorum Saracenorum terram nostram Vasconiae in Quindena Pasche prox futur ingressurus est hostiliter non solum ad eandem terram destruendam occupandam set ad terras nostras Angliae Hiberniae per introitum dictae terrae si eam optineret quod absit invadendas aspirat Nos in propria persona nostra cum eodem Rege bellum campestre aggredi proposuimus de universa fidelitate vestra quam in agendis nostris fructuosam semper invenimus plenam gerentes fiduciam vos requirimus in fide qua Nobis tenemini affectuosè rogamus quatinus sicâ—t Nos honorem nostrum indempnitatem corporis nostri diligitis in hac necessitate nostra non parcentes personae aut rebus vestris nulla ratione seu occasione differatis quin poteritis vos praeparare ad veniendum ad nos in Vasconiam omnes amicos vestros ad hoc idem inducentes Ita quod sitis apud Waterford in Octabis Pasche prox futur cum equis armis bona gente prompti parati statim naves ascendere ad transfretandum ad Nos in terram praedictam Scitote indubitanter qui Nobis in hac parte subvenerint eorum amici erimus benevoli imperpetuum qui Nos in hac urgenti inexuperabiâ—i necessiâ—ate relinquerint de eis alias minus confidere poterimus eis minus grati erimus Nunquam etiam futuris temporibus tanta Nobis imminebit necessitas consilii auxilii sicut in presenti negotio Et ad regerendum vobis plenius pericula nostrorum Inimicorum Iohannem filium Galfridi Justiciarium nostrum Hiberniae ad partes illas misimus cui apud Dublinum ad in stantem mediam Quadragesimam una cum aliis Magnatibus nostris Hiberniae quibusâ—id mandavimus accedatis audituri voluntatem nostram cum ipâ—o super praemissis plenius tractaturi T. ut supra An Exact Alphabetical Table of all the Kings Counsil whether Judges Serjeants at Law Officers of State Deans Archdeacons 〈◊〉 other Clergy men or Laymen from 22 E. 1. till 23 E. 4. with the Yeares Rolls Dorses of each King wherein they were summoned to Parliaments By which you may finde who were Chief Justices Judges Officers in each Kings reign A IOhn Abell 5 d. 17. 6 d. 31. 7 d. 27. 8 d. 29. 9 11 d. 8. 14. 14 d. 23. E. 2. Magister Richard de Abyngdon 1 d. 8. 11. 19. 2 d. 11. 20. 5 d. 17. 6 d. 31. 16. 7 d. 2. 8 d. 29. 9 d. 22. E. 2. Magister Robert de Aileston Archidiac Berks 6 d. 9. 19. Thesaurarius Regis 7 E. 3. Richard de Aldeburge 3 d. 19. 7 8 E. 3. Peter Arderne 23 25 27 29 31 33 twice 38 H. 6. 1 2 6 E. 4. Magister Robert de Ashton 1 2 3 d. 13. 19. R. 2. Henry Asty and Astee 49 50 E. 3. 1 â— 3 d. 13. 19. 4 5 6 R. 2. William de Ayremine 6 d. 16. 7 d. 11. 27. E. 2. William Ayscogh 20 23 25 27 28 29 31 H. 6. William Ayshton 23 25 27 28 29 31 33 38 H. 6. 1 2 E. 4. B VVIlliam Babington 7 H. 5. 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 13 H. 6. Iohn Bacun 11 d. 8. 14. 14 d. 23. E. 2. Thomas Bacoun 7 p. 2. d. 3. 8 d. 18. E. 3. Magister Robert de Baldock 11 d. 11. 19. Archidiac Midd. 12 d. 11. 29. 13 d 13. 14 d. 23. E. 2. Iohn de
all other lawfull Members both of the Lords and Commons House ought to enjoy the self same Protection Priviledge Freedome immunity and no wayes to be interrupted molested disturbed by any other Officers Subjects Persons or Members whatsoever from freely repairing to residing in or returning from our Parliaments much lesse to be forcibly secluded out of them by armed guards new oaths or popular tumults Neither may can ought the House of Commons alone nor any prevailing party in it to exclude eject any duly elected returned Member once admitted without any Legall accusation tryal cause at all nor yet for betraying of his trust or misdemeaning himself as a Member after his election nor for any real offence as a Member without and against the Kings and Lords concurrent Judgments and assents in whom alone the power of Iudicature resides in such as well as in all other causes as I have elsewhere evidenced by unanswerable Presidents and the rules of right reason he being summoned only by the Kings Writ and authority impowred trusted by his electors only as their peculiar Trustee Atturney not his fellow Knights Citizens Burgesses to do and assent to such things as shall be ordained by the King Nobles and Common Counsell of the Realme touching the weighty publike affairs of the King and Kingdoms and obliged antiently by Manucaptors and since by their Indentures of retorn and our Laws not to depart from the Parliament without the Kings special license under pein of his indignation and other penalties Therefore no more to be suspended secluded ejected imprisoned by his fellow-Commoners without the Kings and Lords concurrent Judgements and Assents than one Judge or Justice on the Bench can unjustice unjudge uncommission another one Trustee Executor or Attorny discharge his fellow Trustees Executors Attornies of their trusts one Grand-Jury man thrust another out of the panell without the Judges consent or one Common Counsel man of a City or Livery man of a Company disfranchise and discommon another without the consent or judgement of the Mayor and Aldermen of the City or Master and Wardens of the Company whereof they are Members Whatever exorbitant irregular practices have of late times been usurped by or presidents made in the Commons House to the contrarie almost to the total if not final subversion of all future Parliaments and their privileges It being a Maxim in Law and Reason Par in parem nonhabet Imperium multo minus Superioritatem especially in the Kings own Parliament and Supreme Court of Justice wherein himself and his Nobles only sit as supreme Iudges not the Commons as a distinct Court and independent Judicature of themselves as some would fancy them in their Utopian brains and practises much less can they â—eâ—â—ude vote down any Members of the House of Peers or the whole antient House of Lords or dishinherit them of their Birthrights as some furious Bedlam Members of a dismembred dissolved House of Commons have most insolently and injuriously without hearing trial against their own Acts Declarations Protestations Vowes Covenants Commissions Trusts attempted to intrude themselves into their places and Tribunals and make themselves more than Lords and Caesars not only over their Fellow-Commoners but our Kings Peers Parliaments and Kingdomes which they have trampled under their Papall feet and metamorphosed at their pleasures into sundry mishapen mutable unsetled new models to our apparent approaching ruine if God of his infinite mercy prevent it not by their reestablishment upon their ancient bases and foundations 20. That if the forcible seclusion or disturbance of any Lord or Member of the Lords House duly summoned who ought of right to sit vote in the Lords House be so great a breach of Priviledge Injury as I have evidenced then the forcible suppression seclusion of all the ancient Peers and House of Lords by any real or pretended Members of the late House of Commons contrary to the expresse Clauses Formes of all ancient Writs and the very writs in 16. Caroli without any legal jurisdiction hearing triall must needs be a greater breach of trust Priviledge Injustice in them fit to be redressed for the future peace Justice settlement of our distracted Nations and restoring our Parliaments to their pristine Splendour Honour ends uses for the redressing of all publick Grievances If any Republicans Army Officers New Grandees or others here object as some now do That it will be both perillous and inconvenient to the Subjects the House of Commons and its Members to restore the ancient Lords and House of Peers to their pristine Rights Priviledges Jurisdiction Judicature over them in that latitude I have asserted evidenced it by Histories and Records in my Plea for them without prescribing some new just bounds and regulations unto them by the Commons House I answer 1. That the Lords being the only original ancient Members of our Great Councils Parliaments many hundreds of years before any Knights Citizens Burgesses or House of Commons were called admitted to them by the King and House of Lords and receiving no power Judicature or Jurisdiction at all from the Commons but what they have of right enjoyed exercised in all precedent ages without the least complaint opposition or contradiction of the Commons in any former Parliaments before 17. Caroli The Commons have no more authority right reason â—urisdiction to limit or restrain this their ancient right Judicature Priviledge much lesse to abrogate then the Grand or Petty Jury have to limit regulate the Judges or Justices Commissions Authority on the Bench or the Tenants the Jurisdiction of their Lords Courts or every Committee of the Commons House the Excesses of the House it self or the Unparliamentary Iuncto which voted them down and engaged against them without the least colour of Jurisdiction Law reason hearing impeachment triall had to usurp such a transcendent power over them not to be paralelld in any age nor now approved by assenting to it 2ly That the old Lords and House of Peers in no cases ever exercised such an exorbitant arbitrary tyrannicall Jurisdiction Illegall power in all kinds as the Commons House and every of their Committees and Sub-Committees of Examinations Sequestrations Compositions Sale of Delinquents estates Crown Lands Obstructions Appeales Scandalous Ministers and High Courts of Iustice have done without the least Report to the House it self of their proceedings both over the King and his Posteritie the Peers of the Realme their fellow Members secluded secured imprisoned close imprisoned ejected exiled by them without any cause or hearing at all and their fellow Commoners of all sorts deprived of their Inheritances Estates Offices Liberties Callings Lives and the benefit of the Lawes themselves for not taking their new Oathes and Engagements contrary to Law and their former legall Oathes Leagues and Solemn Covenant and Protestation wâ—â—hout a legal Indictment or trial by a Jurie of their equalls or witnesses viva voce upon Oath since their slighting suppressing of the old