or Congrâ—â—tions of Christ as are free from these corrupâ—ions I will descend to those grounds which â—re more familiar to us and then see how it â—ay reach the case depending between the â—earchers and their Brethren And first from Acts 15. 2. It appeareth that â—here was not only great disputation but dissention also in the Primitive Churches about matters of Doctrine which word dissention doth imply the discontinuance oâ— communion between Paul Baâ—nâ—bas with those which did adhere to them and that part of the Church which were zealous for Circumcision and the Law And yet we do not finde that they did one unchurch another but used the most effectual means thaâ— might be to put an end to the strife And very remarkable it is that though the Assembly aâ— Jerusalem did plainly determine the point oâ— Doctrine yet did they forbear their censure against the persons who erred in that case 〈◊〉 chusing to exercise all Longanimity rather then severity knowing that their power was given more for Edificationâ— then for destroying any mans attainments in the paths of Christianity Howbeit when this lenity would not effect thâ— Reformation of the ill manners of those corrupters or depravers of the Gospel then diâ— the Apostle lay greater weight upon them whâ— would not cease to trouble the Churches Gal. 5. 12. Nor is there any reason to doubt but that the Judaizers had generally been held at some distance in point of Communion or privileges in the Churches before Paul wrote to the Gallatians For seeing that Epistle written by Paul Siâ—vanus and Timotheus did impower the Church at Thessalonica to note such as disâ—beyed it with a note of diâ—inction from the rest of the Christians who conform'd themselves to its directions Then doubtless that Epistle Acts 15. written in the â—ame of the great Assembly at Jerusalem did every way as much impower all Churches to put â—he like note of distinction upon all that did not â—hey the same which note of distinction howsoâ—ver it might lie as a bar against their present Communion yet did it not destroy their Breâ—her-hood 2 Thes 3. 14 15. So that it is further evident that a people â—ay be esteemed Brethren in Christ or a Church 〈◊〉 Christ and yet justly be denyed communion â—â—th other Churches or Brethren in Christ For â—he matter in short lyeth thus As a Brother is 〈◊〉 member in respect of that Congregation or â—hurch to which he is immediately related â—o a particular Congregation is but a member in respect of the Church universal As therefore a man may be called a Christian Brother and yet justly for some cause be denyed present communion with his fellow Brethren So a Congregation may be accounted a Church of Christ and yet justly be denyed communion by her Sister Churches and chiefly when she is such a Church as causes divisions and offences contrary to the Doctrine which the Primitive Churches received from the Apostles All which being considered may well serve to satisfie our Brethren that we commit no absurdity in refusing to communicate with them though we grant them the Appellation of the Church of Christ and Brethren in particular as before we have said Having shewed that alâ— manner of Divisions which happen in the Church are not properly against her they being after a sort rather necâ—ssary for her Reformation then to bring heâ— to desolation when corruption in Doctrinâ— or manners have made in vasions upon heâ— Though it must needs be granted that eveâ— those divisions are accidentally against thâ— Church and that as for other causes so chiefly for that they are a scandal to the World and a stumbling to weak Christians It behoveth that we briefly shew what we mean by divisions which are properly against the Church and they are such as these 1. When both parties contending strive to set up some sinful thing or their own devices 2. When they divide about that which is not necessary but indifferent only 3. When the point in question is not so much the thing sought for as revenge upon the persons against whom the controversie is held Those and such like tend only to the ruine of Churches having no tendency at all to Edification The first of these shewed it self among the Corinthians when they strove to set up men some this man and others that and this in opposition one unto another 1 Cor. 1. 12. Which folly hath been the overthrow of Congregations where mens persons have been admiâ—ed and truth neglected The second is rebuked Rom. 14. But why dost thou judge thy Brother or set at nought thy Brother meaning for things indifferent Therefore who art thou that judgest another mans Servant to his own Master he stands or falls yea he shall be holden up for God is able to make him stand The third is detected Gal. 5. 15. for whatsoever the question was this was their sin they did bite one another Thus men may hold the truth in unrighteousness and without Charity preach Christ meerely of envy to add thereby some affliction to the bonds of their brethren Those kind of divisions in the ages bordering upon the Apostles became the Heathens sport and the Christians shame upon their â—pen Theaters Let us therefore now return to consider the Nature of that distemper which hath befallen our body about the fourth principle of Christ his Doctrine Heb. 6. 2. The Searchers have declared it to be the sin of Schism and the part distempered to be only the Congregations under the practice of Laying on of Hands as is evident from the whole Contexture of their search and the directon of the Epistle prefixed to it as if there were nothing amiss in this matter on their part who if I may so speak have made and defended a Schism in the principles of the Doctrine of our Lord and there withall divided themselves from a principle thereof And this word SCHISM is taken by the Searchers not in a mild sense such as wherein it may be taken by propriety of Speech to signifie division in some lower consideration as the word is translated 1 Cor. 1. 10. But they have hoysed it in their application of it to the Congregations professing the fourth principle to the most extream signification even that of Sedition yea to such a degree as if we unchurched all Churches but our selves As if it were a light matter to brand all those Churches for Schismaticks But they should have considered that bare abstaining from communion chiefly at the Table of the Lord which is all that hath been done generally if so much have been done and that upon such immergent occasion as hath at least in the time of hot contention been given for it is far from being sufficient to bear them out in this their rash charge against their Brethren Seeing our Saviour himself puts a bar for coming to the Altar while differences between Brother and Brother only remains undecided which being duly
A Sigh for Peace OR The Cause of Division Discovered WHEREIN The great Gospel Promise of the Holy Ghost and the Doctrine of Prayer with Imposition of hands as the way ordained of God to seek for it Is asserted and vindicated as the Interest and Duty of Christs Disciples in general In Answer to a Book Intituled A Search for Schism By Tho. Grantham a Servant of Christ Gal. 5. 7 8 9. Ye did run well who did hinder you that you should not obey the truth This perswasion cometh not of him that calleth you A little leaven leaveneth the whole lump I have confidence in you through the Lord that you will be none otherwise minded but he that troubleth you shall bear his burthen whosoever he be Wherefore love the Truth and Peace Zech. 8. 19. Printed for the Author 1671. The Epistle Dedicatory To the Church of Christ in London with the General Assembly of Messengers Elders and Brethren occasionally meeting together to consider of the Affairs of the Churches of Christ Salutation c. Brethren WHen I consider how much it is your desire and the desire of the Churches in general that brotherly concord peace and truth might possess the room of all our divisions in affection judgment and practise and particularly in the fourth principle of Christianity And how many Prayers are daily made to God for so great a Blessing And that hopeful way we lately seem'd to be in to lay hold of the thing which hath been so long desired And therewithal that most unhappy obstruction of our hopes as ye know arising from one who should rather have been a restorer of the antient path which many have forsaken and so a healer of the breach which hath been made by its being neglected Who being in reputation for Wisdome having therewithal great opportunity and I am perswaded really intended to do the Church of Christ much good Even then by a little solly following his own Councels doubtless through Satans malice who envied our good hath made himself and his enterprises obnoxious and our wound more grievous I say when I considered these things I could not pass them over without a Sigh even this which here I present unto you saying in my heart Why hath the Lord done this Which was no sooner conceived but I was immediately satisfied that the Lord was jealous for his holy way which had been grâ—sly prophaned by an hypocritical conformity thereunto And true for ever is that word Hosea 14. ult All the wayes of the Lord are right and the Just shall walk therein But the Transgressor shall fall therein And certainly as our Brethrens resusing to seek the Lord after the due order at the first so this prodigious hypocrisie at the last may too truly be called Perrez Ecclesia at this day Thou Lord art righteous thou knowest the Hearts of the children of men and hast discovered the hidden things thereof and hast pleaded the cause of thy precious though much abused Truth Even so Lord let our iniquities be ever corrected but yet in mercy forgive us our Trespasses But what shall we say shall we now no more go about this dreadfull work to bring the Ark the fourth principle of Christianity I mean to its proper place in the Churches or rather some irregular Churches to their due reverence unto it If it seem good in the eyes of the Lord let his servants still convene to consider of this matter perhaps we shall find grace in his sight for there is hope that we shall one understand another and with one consent seek and serve the Lord God of our Fore-Fathers And this I am the more induced to believe or hope for from not only the great desire which I yet find to be alive in the hearts of Christians generally that peace in this matter might be upon Israel But also from the great forwardness which I found in the Searchers themselves to consent unto certain Proposals for Peace the first of which is this That it be granted and professed on all sides by the formerly divided parties That that laying on of Hands Heb. 6. 2. is one of the Principles of Christs Doctrine and a part of the foundation This Proposition being considered it may appear that there wants but a step as it were to unity in the truth it self and so to a lasting Peace one with another And methinks it should be no impossible thing for us to agree about the particular service intended Heb. 6. 2. unless a spirit of perversness be mingled amongst us Towards the clearing of which difficulty something is said in the sequel which I desire may be considered Why the Searchers should so much declaim against you as if you unchurched all Churchâ—s but your selves I can see no reason having never understood that you did at any time by any agreement deliver such a Doctrine Nor is it so much your business to meddle with unchurching any body as to keep your selves from corruption in Doctrine and Manners Indeed the point of Communion with those who reject or oppose your Faith and practice in the case depending hath been much debated and resolved in the Negative èspecially touching the Table of the Lord but this is so far from being an Argument that you deny them to be Churches of Christ that it plainly Argues you own them for such but yet such as for their rejecting or opposing some truth of God are therefore uncapable of present communion with those that religiously observe the truth by them rejected and opposed For if you deem them to be no Churches at all what need any debate be had Whether it be orderly or safe to communicate with them at the Lords Table Now that persons may be allowed the Appellation of Christians and so of the Church of Christ and yet as the matter may be circumstanced concerning them ought to be held at some distance in respect of present Communion with other Christians or Churches implies no absurdity but is rather very necessary I hope the ensuing discourse will demonstrate Something also I have said in vindication of the Messengers Office which I perceive to be much questioned by some I confess my self nothing so fit a person to plead this cause as some other However if that which I have done may give occasion to any other to do more or more effectually in this point I shall think my pains well bestowed I commit all that I have said to the blessing of God and the Consideration of his Churches Your Brother and Servant Tho. Grantham To the Authors of the BOOK Intituled A Search for Schism Brethren WHen we consider how God is able to effect good things for his people by contrary wayes even by turning the unkindness of Brethren into means of preservation to the family Gen. 50. 20. we are made even against hope to believe in hope that the product of your doings in your Search and the Epistle prefixed may be good although its procedure in respect
generally are to wait upon him for the reception thereof which way is the prayers of the Church performed by her Ministers with the laying on of hands and this as a principle of Christian Relâ—gion belonging to them in the minâ—rity of their Christian state For explication of some parts of this Proposition it is meet that we shew first what we mean by the holy Ghost sith some now as well as heretofore Acts 19. either by reason of ignorance or some worse cause seem not to know whether there be any holy Ghost As if they had forgotten unto what they were Baptized Matth. 28. 19. By the Holy Ghost then we do not mean the Spirit of man in its most reformed and elevated state imaginable neither any created Spirit whatsoever But by the Holy Ghost we mean that Spirit by whose operation the Creation of the world was brought forth and formed Gen. 1. 2. Job 26. 13. And which knoweth all things even the deep things of God 1 Cor. 2. 10. And which is present every where Psal 139. 7 8. 9. Which Spirit we therefore believe to be one with the Father in nature and essence and therefore rightly said to be God Acts 5. 3 4 9. Secondly when we speak of mens receiving this holy Spirit we do not mean that he dwels in them essentially and personally for so they cannot contain him But he dwels in them by manifestation and operation By gifts according to 1 Cor. 12. By fruits according to 1 Cor. 13. 4 5 6 7. Galath 5. 22 23. And seeing the ground of this so much neglected truth the fourth principle of Christs doctrine lieth much in that great promise of the Spirit of God as the right of all the Disciples of Christ It behoveth that we open the nature of that glorious promise that being affected with the excellency and made sensible of the necessitie thereof we may the more devoutly seek for it not only in our private devotion but also in that special and publick way assigned in the holy Scripture for the obtaining so great a benefit Let it therefore first be considered that to be under the common influence and operation of the Spirit in the Ministery of the Word in order to conversion is one thing and the reception of the Holy Ghost as a Seal and confirmation of the souls of Christians as it is the earnest of their inheritance is another It is certain a person may be eminently under the operation of the Spirit in the first consideration and yet be a stranger to the reception of the Spirit in the other as appeared first in the Apostles themselves who though they were the persons which received the first fruits of the promised Holy Spirit yet were they for some time in the profession of the Gospel before they received it For they did not receive the Spirit of promise till after the Ascention of our Lord Acts 1. 4 5. But wait for the promise of the father which saith he ye have heard of me fâ—r John truly baptized with water but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost not many dayes hence John 7. 39. The Spirit was not yet given because that Jesus was not yet glorified In like manner the Samaritans were converted from the errour of their way by the preaching of the word and became the Disciples of Christ and yet the Spirit of promise was faln on none of them Acts 8. 12 15 16. The Ephesians also believed in God after they heard the Gospel of their salvation But were not sealed with the holy Spirit of promise till afterward Eph. 1. 13 14. Agreeable hereunto is that question of the Apostle Acts 19. 2. Have ye received the Holy Ghost SINCE ye believed The persons to whom this question was put were believers in Christ yea Baptized believers Whence we are to note that Baptized Disciples have right to the promise of the Holy Ghost and indeed hence it was that Peter could so confidently and universally promise in the word of the Lord the gift of the Holy Ghost to every one that doth repent of their iniquities and are baptized in the name of the Lâ—rd Jesus Christ for the remission of their sins Acts 2. 38. It appeareth therefore that persons may be under the operation of the spirit of God in the Ministerie of the Word to their illumination and conversion so far as to be brought into a certain state of Christianity for those that may be called Disciples are called Christians Acts 11. 26. and yet be without the enjoyment of the sealing and confirming spirit of promise in themselves which is yet more evident from John 14. 16 17. I will pray the Father and he shall give you another Comforter even the Spirit of TRUTH for he dwelleth WITH you and SHALL be IN you Note well this promise doth not respect the spirit as it worketh Miracles only but also and indeed much more the Spirit as it is a Leader into all Truuh called therefore the Spirit of Truth yea 't is the Spirit in such wise as shâ—uld â—bide with and in the Saints for ever yea it is the Comforter or Spirit of Comfort and is therefore that gift of the Spirit which pertaineth to Christians generally Secondly That this sealing and confirming Spirit of promise belongs to Christs Disciples generally whether male or female I conceive some necessity to demonstrate because the Searchers to the intent that at the least they may exclude â—omen from the benefit of prayer with the laying on of Hands will not have them included in the word THEM Acts 8. 17. but if we prove that women have right to the promise equally with men we shall not at all fear the trifling demands of the Searchers in their 29 Querie which only serves to shew the weakness of their cause for it seems if it be true that women as well as men had Hands imposed on them with Prayer by the Apostles for the Holy Spirit then their cavils against the universality of the practâ—ce of laying on oâ— Hands is at least the less considerable Now that the promise of the Spirit extends to Christian women as well as men appeareth from the Prophets foresight of the extent thereof Isa 44. 3. I will powr water upon him that is thirsty and flouds upon the dry ground I will powr my Spirit upon thy seed and my blessing upon their off-spring Joel 2. And it shall come to pass afterward that I will powr out my Spirit upon all flesh and upon the servants and upon the Handmaid in those dayes will I powr out of my Spirit Which glorious promise was first fulfilled to the Christians soon after the Assention of our Lord Acts 2. And now is the time as well as then for Christians to reap the fruit of that promise Acts 5. 32. the holy Ghost which God hath gâ—ven to them that obey him Because ye are sons God hath sâ—nt forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts Gal. 4. 6.
〈◊〉 seed of Abraham He is of one substance with â—is Church touching his Manhood and for â—hat cause he is not ashamed to call them Breâ—â—ren As they are partakers of flesh and â—loud he also himself likewise took part of the â—â—me He was made of a Woman raised up 〈◊〉 the fruit of Davids Loins according to the â—â—esh He is Davids Son called frequently a â—an and the Son of man He had the proâ—erties and infirmities of man in all things sin â—xcepted This his Birth Growth manner of Life and Death do declare I conclude then he of whom these things may be said is man by Nature The short is this Jesus the Saviour of the World was before alâ— things and he that made all things therefore he iâ— God by Nature Jesus the Saviour of the Worlâ— was born in time and suffered death or was slain 〈◊〉 therefore he is man by Nature Yet more shortly This Jesus is Immanuel or God-Man in onâ— Person The Third Part. SHeweth that our Brethrens rejecting and opposing the fourth principle of Christs Doctrine enforceth a distinction in Communion at least in part between them and thâ— Churches which walketh in the Religious observatioâ— of it and that all divisions which happen in thâ— Church are not properly but accidentally againâ—â— her as also that it is no absurdity to refuse to communicate with a people who may be allowed the appellation of a Church As it must ever be granted that a Kingdom divided against it self is brought to desolation and is very true when apply'd to the Church of God where Divisions are as Epidemical as in â—ny Societies of men whatsoever So also it must be denyed that all manner of divisions which happen within the pale of the Church â—re property against her self For seeing it cannot be denyed but that she may be and hath been corrupted divers ways â—â—om her first integrity both in respect of the â—orm and power of godliness even hence is enâ—orced a necessity that â—he be reformed Whereâ—pon divers worthy men in all ages have laboured 〈◊〉 restore the decayed parts if Christianity as well as to â—oot out such things as â—ave been obtruded by innovation And surely â—hat was the duty of some was more or less â—he duty of all and consequently the sin of â—â—ch as put not their shoulder to the work â—eh 3. 5. But much more theirs who not onâ—y would not do it themselves but hinder and â—iscourage them that would Saying in effect 〈◊〉 the corrupt part of the Church of old did in the days of the Prophet Jer. 44. 16 17. As for the word which thou hâ—st spoken unto us in the name of the Lord we will not hearken untâ— thee but we will certainly do as we have done 〈◊〉 and our Fathers c. Putting the mark of Antiquity upon their own ways and the note oâ— novelty upon the Doctrine of the Prophet oâ— God Something like to which is that saying of the Searchers where they tell us They caâ— well remember when Laying on of Hands was noâ— esteemed a Fundamental Doctrine which yet 〈◊〉 have reason to question when I consider thaâ— themselves do hold and say they ever diâ— hold Laying on of Hands Heâ— 6. to be 〈◊〉 part of the Foundation And I think nonâ— of its Assertors ever had less esteem oâ— it then they Neither doth the Moderation of its Assertors in the point of communion which it seems they held with thosâ— that did not receive that Doctrine for somâ— time after themselves had owned it argueâ— that those who received â—he Doctrine of Layinâ— on of Hand did not esteem it the same whicâ— now they do Sith reason wills that when anâ— part of the Church of God attains to thâ— knowledge of any principles of truth which by the corruption of the times hath been obscured they should exercise all long-suffering anâ— forbearance to see if by any means the contrary minded may be enlightned But now if after all endeavours used and patience extended some part of the Church remain wholly avâ—râ—e to Reformation and that in such weighty matters as the principles of Religion it cannot be reasonable nor is it Scripâ—ural that those whom God hath enlightâ—ed should be bound to continue with the â—bstinate in their by-paths but must at length â—eclare themselves in manner of speech like â—hat of Joshuah If it seem evil to you to serve 〈◊〉 Lord in this principle of his Doctrine chuse 〈◊〉 what you will do but as for us we are resolved â—â—rein to serve the Lord Agreeable whereunto 〈◊〉 that direction of the â—ord to the Remnant â—hat held to the truth with â—heir whole heart Jer. 15. â—9 Let them return to thee 〈◊〉 return not thou to them â—hence I note four things considerable to â—ur present occasion 1. That the parties here spoken of were â—oth of the Church of God 2. That there was a difference between â—â—em touching some necessary part of Religiâ—â— 3. That the Lord allows this division and â—â—courageth the continuation of it on the part of those that served him perfectly or according to his Word 4. That the Church-state of neither part is as yet taken wholly away or destroyed And therefore hence I infer this conclusion That in a time of theâ—â— Churches defection in the principles or any necessary part of Religion there may lawfully be held a distinction in communion between thâ— part defective and that which is sound or reformed and yeâ— the Church state of neither wholly destroyed And bâ— how much the principles 〈◊〉 points of Faith are greater or lâ—sser by so much thiâ— distinction is to be maintain'd with greater or lesâ— severity This I might confirm by the consideration of the state of the Jewish Church under thosâ— great distractions which happen'd among theâ— sometimes about principles of truth referring immediately to the Majesty of Heaven Hos 11. 12. And otherwhiles about those which being neglected would greatly impair the power oâ— godliness among men Iudâ— 19. 20 chuâ— Iâ— which distractions the Faithful laboured as iâ— were in the very fire to reform the part distempered without destroying their Church-state Judg. 20. and 21. Chapters Jer. 17. 12. to 17. during which combustions there must needs be a demur in the point of communion between the parts contending as may â—asily be gathered from their bitter and sanguiâ—â—ry conflicts if our very reason did not conâ—ince us But leaving the many and convincing Allegaâ—â—ons which might be brought from the state of the Jewish Church who were not denyed â—hat Appellation though under such defileâ—ents as rendred them unfit to Celebrate the â—oly Rites and Mysteries of the Law and â—herefore consequently very unfit for commuâ—ion with those who withstood their pollutiâ—ns which may sufficiently satisfie reasonable â—en and therefore the Searchers themselves â—hat it is no absurd thing to grant a peâ—ple the Apâ—ilation of a Church and yet hold them uncapable 〈◊〉 communion with such of the Churches
tendency of your 19th demand as if it would follow that because there were some sinfully suffered in some Churches of old who taught Gods people to commit fornicaâ—ion and to eat meats effired to Idols and to hold 〈◊〉 community of Women a thing so beastly as scarce fit to be named therefore we may not withdraw from such Churches as suffer such things Now when yet its evident that the Lord charges those sins so deeply upon those that suffered those Abominations that without speedy Repentance their Church-state must be removed But surely our Brethren cannot be ignorant that the Lord commends such of the Churches in Asia as could not bear but uncharched those that were evil who said they were Jews and Aposties and were not but were the Synagogue of Sathan and how vehemently â—he reproves those that did not thus separate from such evil workers whether Congregations or particular Members for sure there is but one Law for few or for many in this case True it is That God had mercy for great offenders upon repentance and there must be admoniton before they be spewed out of the mouth But what will this avail their case who being intreated and exhorted to turn from the errour of their way and diligently taught concerning the truth yet persist in their opposition The slight exposition which the Searchers gives us of 2 John 7. 9. Verses is no more to be commended as I conceive then their Adversaries unwary syllogism from thence Seeing it is not all that confess that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh that hath fellowship with the Father and the Son For that is the sense of the Searchers or else they must tell us how many of Christs Doctrines or teachings must be owned as necessary to mens communion with God and Christ which will puzzle the Searchers as much as any body else their flourishes and reflexions against others notwithstanding Nor need we say much to our Brethrens demands which they ground on a suppâ—sition of the truth of our opinion considering what we have said already for if that we hold bâ— the truth it is such a truth as may not be dispensed with or neglected without manifesâ— danger to the rest of the principles of Religion as hath been shewed It shall therefore now suffice for the tryal of the consciences of ouâ— Brethren in this matter that we appeal tâ— them touching the like service in another case namely the Laying on of Hands in the Ordination of Officers in the Church which some oâ— them will have to be that principle Heb. 6â— though others of them reject that as erroneous sâ— that our Brethren had litâ—le cause to upbraid uâ— about some differing apprehensions about the end of that Ministration sith themselves are divided both about the end and the principle it self I say put case now that some among you should deny the Layng on of Hands on Officers to be instituted of God and tell you it is an innovation of man to say no worse and that you have no command from God for it and thereupon they bring all the Arguments against you which you devise against us And not only so but they carry on all the Affairs of the Church without any regard had to that orderly way of ordaining men to Office by prayer with the Laying on of Hands Only because it s your humour to have men so ordained therefore in condescention to your weakness and that they may the better bring you off that usage they permit you once twice or thrice c. to preach up such a thing in their Congregations Do you now make so little conscience of that Laying on of Hands which you practice and that as a part of the Foundation say some of you as that you could maintain a free and chearful communion with such persons Howsoever you may shuffle in this case considering the liberty which you encline to in the other yet surely were you free from that temptation you would find no small difficulties to hold such communion with those who should not only make void but even despise for 't is no better that wholsome and Divine order which God hath left for the Government of his House As for general Assemblies which are ordained for general Controversies and which through the blessing of God are the best expedient under the Sun for composing divisions in the Churches Here the liberty of Christians should be yea must be maintain'd though they differ right much in their opinions in matters of Religion and therefore we have indeed very Christianly admitted the Searchers to such our Assemblies knowing well that not only the Christians in the ages bordering upon the Primitive but even the Apostles of our Lord did allow Christians of very different perswasions freely to deliberate on things propounded in such Assemblies But yet we little thought that our Brethren would have abused us in the sight of the World for this our Christian respect towards them as if we were inconsistant with our principles in such our condescentions unless we also communicate with them at the Lords Table Surely this kind of dealing is unlikely to effect the peace and concord of our too much divided Congregations For my part I could heartily wish that all the Congregations of Christians in the World that are baptized according to the appointment of Christ Math. 28. 19. Mark 16. 16. Acts 2. 38. would make one Consistory at least some times to consider of the matters in difference among them For if this be not admitted there is no means under Heaven remaining as I conceive to heal their divisions and consequently to obtain that peace which should rule in the hearts of all Gods people because they are thereunto called in one universal body And herein I conceive an union in the main may be held though in our particular communities for the avoiding otherwise inevitable inconveniencies we are constrained to hold some distinctions For it is one thing to forsake the Church of Christ and another to cease communicating with such a particular Congregation as in the time of Reformation will needs stay behind in the steps of irregularity The first can be no other than Schism sith there can be no cause to forsake the Church of God though there may be cause to forbear communicating with some particular Members or Congregations thereof The other is so far from Schism that it is more truly called Reformation nor doth it follow that because we efuse to communicate with our Brethren in rheir irregular proceedings in the matters of Religion that therefore we reject them in those principles of truth which they do religiously observe and zealously profess neither is our distinguishing our Congregations from theirs so much a separation from them as a Reformation of our selves so that the 10. and 11. demands of the Searchers might well have been spared sith as things stand among us they are not only unnecessary but I fear may prove very pernicious to