opposed in such manner Pyrnn's Exact Hist vol. 2. as hath been related yea totally neglected or seldome put in use in times of Popery by those which made them as Lyndewood himself acknowledgeth in his Epistle to Henry Archbishop of Canterbury before his Provinciale SECT V. 5. The King's Prohibition disobeyed by the Popes Warrant is another Grievance complained of in those days For Pope Eugenius hath The Kings Prohibitions Contemned so decreed That no Spiritual Judge shall stay from proceeding in any Cause termed Ecclesiastical in regard of the Kings Prohibitions c. Decernimus Extra de judiciis The Prohibitions sent by our Kings their Council Courts Judges to Archbishops Bishops Archdeacons Officials and other Eccâ—esiastical Persons were some of them against admitting Clerks to Benefices or Prebendaries till the Title were tried in the Kings Courts Some against holding â— lea of Advowsons of Chappels Churches Prebendaries or determining the Rights of Patronages to Churches Chappels and Prebendaries in Eclesiastical Courts or before Popes Delegates Against Alienation of Lands in Capite in Mortmain or otherwise Against granting Administrations of Intestates Goods Debtors or Accomptants to the King till the Kings Debts satisfied Against Appeals to Popes or any other in cases of Certificates of Pryn's Hist of Popes Usurpations Vol. 2. p. 393 394 878 879. Bastardy to the Kings Courts or trying Bastardy in Spiritual Courts their Canons crossing the Common Law therein Against Abbots or Convents borrowing or others lending them Moneys upon Bond without their joynt consent and the Kings c. Against Archbishops Consecrating Bishops Elect not approved of by the King after their Election Against their holding and meeting in Convocations or Council or acting and doing any thing in them prejudical to the King or Kingdom Some Prohibitions were against Bakers imprinting the sign of the Cross Agnus Dei or name of Jesus upon Sale-bread Some against Bishops and other their Officers citing Lay Persons to make Inquisitions Presentments or give testimony upon Oath or excommunicating them for not taking Oaths in any case except in matters of Matrimony and Testament being against the Kings Prerogative Law or Custom of the Realm c. Against their holding Plea of any Chattels or Goods which concerned not Marriage or Testament or of Goods Testamentary for which there is Suit in the Kings Exchequer Against their Citing Excommunicating or Interdicting any of the Kings Barons Bailiffs Judges Officers Sheriffs for executing the Kings Writs or Misdemeanours in the execution of their Offices or any of his Tenants in Capite or of his Demesne Lands Cities Castles without his special License or Lieutenants c. Against Archbishops Bishops Convents or others presenting to Livings or Prebends belonging to the King during Vacations Against disturbing the Possessions of the Kings Clerks presented by him to Benefices or Prebends or Judgments in his Courts by any process out of Ecclesiastical Courts or from the Pope or his Deligates Against Suits in Ecclesiastical Courts Pro lasione fidei or breach of Oaths in civil Contracts Against suing there for Lands devised by Custom or Actions of Debt devised by the Testator Against Ordinaries malicious Excommunications or Arresting or Imprisoning Persons unjustly Excommunicated by them or for bringing Prohibitions to prevent them Against the bringing of any Bulls Letters from or sending any Letters to the Pope or Court of Rome prejudicial to the King or Realm Against citing or drawing any of the Kings Subjects for any Suits to Rome or out of the Realm by the Pope his Delegates or others Against collecting any Aid Disme or Money for the Pope or others by the Popes Authority without the Kings special Licence and Consent by Popes Nuncioes Legats Bishops or any others Against Popes Provisions to Benifices Prebendaries c. belonging to the Kings Presentation in right of his Crown or by his Prerogative in Vacant Bishopricks Monasteries Wardships or to his free Chappels or Churches impropriated Against Clerks and others going to Rome without taking a special Oath to procure nothing to the Kings or Kingdoms damage Against Popes Legates or Agents coming into the Realm unless sent for and taking an Oath to do or bring nothing to the prejudice of the King Church or Kingdom Against receiving or assisting a Bishop or Archbishop made by the Popes Provision Against Popes and their Delegates Sequestration of the Temporalties Goods and Profits of Monasteries Against Sheriffs or Gaolers detaining Clerks in Prison after demand by their Ordinaries Against the Cruce signati or others going over Sea out of the Realm without the Kings special Licence Against offering violence to the Goods or Persons of Clerks Churches or Church-yards Against removing Moneys of Delinquents and Alliens out of Monastories Against offering Violence to Jews or their Goods Against Noblemens siding with Bishops in their Quarrels Against Suits between Persons for Tithes when the Patron may be prejudiced or for the Money of Tithes sold until it be discussed by the King and Council whether the Right belongs to the King or whether the Cause belong to the King or the Ecclesiastical Court. Against Examining things in the Ecclesiastical Court that have been judged in the Kings Courts in cases of Presentations to Churches and the like Against Womens Marriages who held Castles or Lands in Capite without the Kings Licence SECT 6. 6. Another Grievance was That the King was forbidden in Restraint of the Common Law causes of Clerks to use the Canon Laws of his Realm but is commanded to decide them only by the Common Law c. Quod Clericus de foro competenti Some Causes ever taken to be meerly Civil and to appertain to the Crown were drawn to the Ecclesiastical Usurpation against Common Law Authority As namely The right to determine Questions of Patronage whereof Pope Alexander the Third wrote to the King of England that it was to be tried by Ecclesiastical Laws and before an Ecclesiastical Judge cap 3. Extra de judiciis Again in some Causes Civil the King was restrained from the use of the Common The King not permitted to use the Common Law in some Cases of Lay Persons Law of his Realm though the same concern Lay Persons As when a Woman by Oath maketh release of her Joynture or Dower the temporal Judge is compellable by the Ordinary his Excommunication to judge of the Oath according to the Canon Law c. Licet jure jurand And where again an Ecclesiastical Judge hath determined any Cause according to the Canon Law if the same Matter be brought before a Temporal Judge he must allow the Judgment of the Spiritual Judge that it be pleaded before him cap. ult Extrade exeptionibus But contrariwise If a Clerk be first Condemned by a Temporal Judge the Canon Law hath no regard thereof nor receiveth any thing for proof that was done before him c. At si Clerici de judiciis SECT 7 7. That under the general colour of their Authority to maintain Civil
England Enslaved UNDER POPISH SUCCESSORS BEING A True HISTORY OF THE OPPRESSIONS this NATION Groaned under in Times of POPERY LONDON Printed for Jonathan Wilkins at the Star in Cheapside next Mercers Chappel MDCLXXXI ENGLAND'S Grievances in Times of POPERY SECTION 1. IT appeareth as well by the Pope's Laws delivered in Decretal Epistles which were particularly and upon sundry occasions directed to the Bishops and other Clergy-men of this Realm of England in Popish times as also by the report of our English Histories that at such time as the Bishop of Rome had his full â—way in this Realm the Authority of the King was so obscured as there was hardly left any shew of his Sword and Dignity And on the other side the Subjects destitute of succour by their Natural Prince and left to a most miserable spoil and rapine of the Pope and of such as it pleased him to give them in prey whereof these special Grievances here collected may serve for testimony besidâ—s a number of others which come not to my memory but may be easily supplied by any indifferent mans careful Reading GRIEVANCES 1. The first Grievance was The Exemption of the Clergy who being Exemption of the Clergy a considerable part of the Realm by reason that great numbers as well looking to Preferments that then were bestowed upon that State as also drawn by Priviledges and Immunities which they infinitely enjoyed above others sought to be of that number were wholly exempt or at least so took themselves to be from all Jurisdiction of the King and his Justices not in Ecclesiastical Causes only as then they were termed but even in Causes Civil and in Matters of Crime though the same touched the Prince and his Danger in the highest degree The Popes Laws to this purpose are to be seen in C. Clerici extr de Judiciâ—s C. seculares de fore compet enti in 6o. and a special Constitution Provincial of this Realm made by Boniface Archbâ—shop of Canterbury in the time of King Henry the Third in the Council of Westminster or Lambeth Anno 1270 or 1272. vid. Prynne's Exact History of Pope's Intollerable Usurpations upon the Liberties of the King and Subjects of England and Ireland Vol. 2. lib. 4. c. 3. Johan de Aton Constitut. Guil. Lindwood Touching the Practice it is recorded in the Deâ—retals that Pope Alexander III. in the timâ— of the Reign of King Stephen wrote to the Bishop of London to take Order by his Jurisdiction in a Civil Controversie of Goods left in the Custody of a Clerk c. 1. de Deposito Likewise it doth there appear that in the time of King Henry II. Pope Lucius III. wrote to the Bishops of Ely and Norwich to compel a Clerk to save his Sureties harmless And to like purpose he wrote in another Case to the Archbishop of Canterbury King Henry III. pretending Title by his Prerogative or by the Common Law to certain Lands which the Archbishop of Canterbury claimed to be parcel of the possessions of his Church was compelled to answer the Bishop in that Cause in the Court of Rome Mat. Paris fol. 494. Adam Tarlton or d'Orlâ—on Bishop of Hereford in a Parliament holden at London in the year 1324 was accused of Treason against King Edward II. as having aided the Mortimers with Men and Money against that King Being brought before the King and claiming his Priviledge to be judged by the Pope he was forthwith rescued by the rest of the Clergy After a few dayes the King caused him to be brought before him and when he should have been arraigned a thing till that time never heard of that a Bishop should be arraigned the boldness of the three Archbishops of Canterbury York and Dublin was very strange for they with ten other Bishops with their Crosses erected came to the Bar before the Kings Justices and took him from thence into their own Custody In his absence he was attainted with High Treason notwithstanding and his Temporalties were seized into the King's hand until such time as the King much by his device and machination was deposed of his Kingdom But though the King took away his goods yet he was not suffered to meddle with his Body Tho. Walsingham Hâ—st Angl. p. 98 99. SECT 2. 2. Whatsoever Laws the King in his Parliament made which in any Restraint of making Laws for Policy sort impeached the Priviledge or Liberty of the Clergy or touched their Lands or Goods were for that time holden by the Pope and his Clergy void and of no force And it helped not the King how just cause soever he pretended of any right appertaining to his Ancestors For so are the Popes Laws in precise terms save that some of the later sort reserve to the King Laws touching Services and some other rights in Church lands c. qu. Ecclesiarum de Constit c. Eccles Sanct. Alar c. Noverit c. Gravâ—m de Sententia Excommunicationis And some Popes were so jealous over Princes in the Point that they refused to allow Laws by them made to the benefit of the Church As where Basil Lieutenant to Odoacer King of the Lombards provided by Law in favour of the Church that no Prescription should make his Title good who had bought ought of the Church the Pope misâ—iking that a Lay-mâ—n should deal in those Causes disannulled the Law c. Pene quidâ—m Distinct 96. The practâ—ce of this injury is notable in the dealing of Thomas Archbishop of Canterbury with King Henry II. For whereas the King in his Parliament had made very reasonable Laws in maintainance of the Ancient Rights of the Crown against the licentious Liberties claimed by the Clergy Among which one was That Clerks in Causes of Felony and Murther should be tried by the Laws of the Realm for that it was shewed unto the Parliament that then an hundred So Nuburgensis noteth lib. 2. cap. 15. Mâ—rthers had been committed by Church-men not duly punished whereto the said Archbishop and the rest of the Prelats gave their consents and bound themselves to the observation of them by their Oaths the Archbishop afterwards grudging at these Laws departed the Realm obtained at the Pope's hand Absolution from his Oath and forced the King to answer for those Laws in the Court of Rome where the King finding no favour that Garboil insued which after fell out betwixt the King the Pope and the Archbishop and many Murthers committed upon Clerks by the Lay-subjects who greatly stomached this Indignity offered to the King The Pope fearing two such Potentates as the Kings of England and Mat. Paris Hist Angl. fol. 1â— 4 135. France determineth to labour a Reconciliation betwixt the King and the Archbishop and to make the French King a Mediator for the Archbishop This he effected and brought the two Kings together at Paris Thither also came Thomas Becket who being come into the King's presence falling down upon his knees used these words My Lord and Soveraign I do here
commit unto your own judgment the Cause and Controversiâ— between uâ— so far forth as I may salvo honore Dei saving the honour of God The King being much offended with that last Expression Salvo honore Dei turned himself about unto the French King and said See you not how he goeth about to delude me with this Clause Saving the honour of God for whatsoever shall displease him he will by and by alledge to be prejudicial to the honour of God But this I will say to you whereas there have been Kings of England Godwin's Catalogue of English Bishops many before me whereof some were peradventure of greater power than I the most far less and again many Archbishops before this man holy and notable men Look what Duty was ever performed by the greatest Archbishop that ever was to the weakest and simplest of my Predecessors Hereunto the Archbishop answered cunningly and stoutly That the times were altered his Predecessors which could not bring all things to pass at the first dash were content to bear with many things and that as men they fell and omâ—tted their Duty often times thaâ— what the Church had gotten was by the diligence of good Prelates whosâ— Example he would follow thus far forth as that â—f he could not augment the Priviledges of the Church in his time yet ye would nâ—vâ—r consent they should be diminished This Answer being heard all Men cried shame upon him imputing the cause of these stirs upon him and so they parted at that time without reconciliation Another instance I will give namely that of Cardinal Pool who in the Dispensation granted to the Realm in the time of Queen Mary for determining Church Lands c. Doth therein plainly declare that it was of favour and in regard of the Peace of the Realm that he so dispensed otherwise all Laws made in derogation of the Churches Rights were void SECT 3. 3. The Pope dischargeth the Clergy from all Payments of Money The King forbidden to lâ—vy Subsidâ—â—s upon the Clergy So are his Laws in c. adversus Ext. de Immunitate Ecclesiarum c. 1. de Immunit Ecclesiar in sext c. Clericis eâ—dem Roger Hoveden Anâ—al pars â—osteriorpâ— 1â— 817. Matth. Paris p. 146 15â— 194 Holinâ—hâ—d p. 143 1â—7 153 170 Gâ—dwin in his Life imposed by any Temporal Prince be it by way of Taxe or of Subsidy or for what necessity of his Realm soever except the Pope be first made privy thereto and give his assent And Clerks yielding to such Imposition do thereby fall into the Popes Curse King John demanding of his Subjects as well Spiritual as Tempâ—ral a thirteenth part of their Goods and Chattels Geâ—ffery Plantaginet Archbishop of York the Kings base Brother opposed it Sâ— saith Mr. Prynne out of divers Authors That he obstructed the levying of Carvage demanded and granted to the King by common consent and paid by all others on the Demesne Lands of his Church or Tenants beating the Sheriff of York's Servants excommunicating the Sheriff himself by Name with all his Aiders and interâ—icted his whole Province of York for attempting to levy it Wherefore the King incensed for these intollerable Affâ—onts summoned him to answer these high Contempts his not going over with him into Normandy when summoned and also to pay him 3000 Marks due to his Brother King Richard and by his Writs commanded all the Archbishops Servants where-ever they were found to be imprisoned as they were for beating the Sheriffs Officers and denying to give the King any of the Archbishops Wine passing through York summoned Geoffery into his Court to answer all these Contempts and issued Writs to the Sheriff of Yorkshire to seize all his Goods Temporalties and to return them into the Exchequer which was executed accordingly The King and Queen repairing to York the next Mid-Lent the Archbishop upon more sober thoughts made his Peace with the King submitted to pay such a Fine for his Offences as four Bishops and four Barons elected by them should adjudge and absolved William de S utvil the Sheriff and James de Paterna whom he had excommunicated and recalled his former Interdict King Edward the First was in a like case resisted by means of Robert Kilwarby Archbishop of Canterbury For when the King in Parliament holden at St. Edmonds-bury demanded there a Subsidy of his Subjects the Temporalty yielded an Eighth part of the Goods of Citizens and Burgâ—sses and of other Lay Persons the twelfth part but the Clergy encouraged by the Archbishop who had procured This is repâ—rted by William Thorn a Monk of Canterbury from Pope Boniface the VIII Immunity from Subsidies which I take to be the same that is before recited Ex. c. 1. de Immunitate Ecclesiarum in Sexto refused to yield any thing whereupon the King called another Parliament at London without the Clergy where the Goods of the whole Clergy were declared to be forseited to the King so as afterwards most of the Clergy were content with any condition to redeem that forfeiture SECT IV. 4. The Kings own Subjects were by the Pope armed with Censures Subjects Armed against their Soveraign of Excommunication Interdiction c. by them to be denounced against him for redress of such wrongs as iâ— pleaseth them to take themselves injured by Pope Innocent IV. hath decreed that a Prelate having wrong offered him by a Temporal Judge may defend himself with the Spiritual Sword of Excommunication c. Dilecto Dâ— sententia Excommunicationis in Sexto In the Fortieth year of King Henry the Third Boniface Archbishop of Canterbury made a large Constitution wherein he setteth forth how the Clergy shall proceed against the King by whose Writ a Clerk is called in his Court to answer for Matters pertaining to the Ecclesiastical Judge and declareth that it shall be lawful to interdict all the Kings Lands and Possessions This Archbishop had summoned a Council of Bishops and Archdeacons that like the Martyr Thomas saith Matthew Paris he might encounter the Enemies and Rebels of the Church and be a Wall of Defence unto it as was pretended The King directed his Prohibitions to him and the Bishops not to meet in this Council which they contemn The Articles and Canon made in that Council were against the Kings Prerogative Ecclesiastical and Temporal his Temporal Judges Courts Laws Prohibitions Writs and Judgments Exempting of themselves their Clerks Officers Lands and Goods from their Secular Jurisdiction and Judicatures Decreeing Interdicts and Excommunications against the King his Judges Officers Lands Castles and Lay-subjects for which Liberties they resolved to contend even unto Death The Archbishop was forced by the King and Barons to fly the Kingdom for this and other like Constitutions against whom they complained appealed and sent their Proctors to Rome Which Constitutions are yet printed in Lyndewood and Aton and urged for the Canon-Law of this Realm by some aspiring Prelates and Ignorant Canonists of late times saith Mr. Prynne though always
Wrongs made Causes Ecclesiastical Ecclesiastical Liberties some Wrongs oftered to Church Mon in their Lands and Possessions which otherwise were to be tried by the Laws of the Land are by them drawn to their Courts as where Entries be made by Lay Men upon Church Lands Simon Mepham Archbishop of Canterbury in a Constitution by him and the Clergy published in the year 1332 hath decreed that every one which invadeth the Possessions of an Ecclesiastical Person shall be judged a Violator of Ecclesiastical Liberty and for the same Excommunicate SECT 8. 8. Generally the Pope claimeth to be judge of his own Liberties The Pope sole Judge of his own Priviledges and suffereth no Man to examine or determine of them but himself c. Cum venissent extra dejudiciis Whereas it is an old Maxime in all Laws that Nemo in propria causa potest esse Judex That no Man can be judge in his own Cause especially if Judge and Witness too yea Pope Gregory the First and a whole Council denounced an Anathema against the Pope himself or any other that should presume to be a Judge in his own Cause Sive in rusticano sive in urbano pradio whence Bartholemeus Baxiensis Dr. John Thierry and other Canonists in their Glosses on Gratian do resolve down-right that Papa in sua causa Judex esse non debet That the Pope ought not to be Judge in his own Cause Yet Gratian Caus 16. qu. 6. Alvar. Pelag de Planctu Eccles l. 1. Artic. 34 35. Alvarus Pelagius affirms the contrary upon this strong Presumption and Supposition Quod non debet aliquam causa a se remittere immo non potest licet suspectus quamdiu est Papa Papa enim aut sanctus est aut sanctus praesumitur non enim praesumendum est quod alias facit Papa quam Christus vel Petrus cujus est Vicarius Successor That the Pope ought not to remit any Cause from himself yea he may not although suspected as long as he is Pope for saith he either the Pope is Holy or is presumed to be Holy for it is not to be presumed that a Pope can do otherwise than Christ whose Vicar he is or Peter whose Successor he is But this is a Maxime frequently resolved in Law Books by all the Judges of this Realm That none can be Judge in his own Case who have farther adjudged 〈…〉 â—â—rliament make any Man Judge in his own Caseâ— the very Act it self â—â— void in Law being against the Law of Nature â—hich 〈…〉 and all Judgments given thereon are void SECT 9. 9. The Pope challengeth to himself Judgement of 〈…〉 they extend and how they are to be taken and giveth order for redress of the breach of them Where therefore every Prince at his Coronation taketh an Oath for the good Government of his Realm Princes called in question for their Government he is compelled to answer to his own Subjects at the Court of Rome to every Quarrel and Pretence of his Misgovernment as Matters falling within the Popes Authority to examine and reform the breach of Oaths So did Pope Honorius the Third in a Cause of a King of Hungary as appeareth in the Popes Decretals c. Intellect Extra de jure jurando One of their Canonists of great Reputation and a Cardinal wriâ—eth thus Si a Procerbus acousâ—tur Princâ—ps apud Pontificem non satisfâ—ciat vel a apa se poni pote vâ—l a Prâ—ceribus voluntate Papa If a Prince be accused by his Nobles unto the Pope and doth not give Satiâ—faction either he may be laid aside by the Pope or by the Nobles at the â—opes pleasure c. Alius 15. q. 6. SECT 10. 10. He taketh upon him also to assoil Men from keeping their Oaths Assurance betwixt the King and his Subjects disturbed whereby do grow Disturbances not only of Leagues betwixt one Prince and another but also of that Assurance which a Prince hath of his own Subjects and which sometimes the Subjects have of the Prince in Composition of Quarrels that do happen between them Bellarmine in the Second â—hapter of the Book against Barckley saith Pontifex po est dâ—spensare in votis juramentis quae Deus ipse jussit reddi quâ—rum olutio est de jure divino The Pope can give Dispensations from Vows and Oaths which God hath commanded to be fulfilled and the keeping whereof is of Divine right And you need not wonder at this if Bellarm. lib. â— de Pontifice cap. 5. you consider what he saith elsewhere If the Pope did err saith he commanding Vices and prohibiting Vertues the Church should be obliged to believe that Vices are good and Vertues are evil unless she should sin against Conscience In the year 882. Marin or Martin attained to the Papal Dignity of whom Platina saith that he came to the Popedom by ill ways There was then one Formosus Bishop of Porto who by the will of Pope John IX had been obliged by Oath never to receive Episcopacy though it were presented unto him But that Marin delivered him from that Oath by a Dispensation giving him leave to be forsworn with a good Conscience At that time the Counts of Tusâ—ulum had such a Power at Rome that they made Popes such as they listed Marin being dead they promoted Adrian the Third to the Popedom and after him Stephen the VII to whom Formosuâ— succeeded who made no difficulty to receive the Popedom against his Oath This Formosus had but a shorâ— Reign he had Boniface the VII for his Successor whom Stephen the VIII succeeded who unburied the Body of Formosus and having arrayed him with his Priestly Robes put him in full Synod upon the Popes Seat Then having cut off his Fingers wherewith he gave the Blessing he caused him to be dragged and cast into the River Tiber declaring him a Perjured Man and an Unlawâ—ul Pope That Stephen for his Tyranies was taken by the Roman People and strangled in Prison To that Stephen Romanus succeeded and to him John the X both which restored Formosus again to his good Name For this John assembled a Councâ—l at Râ—venna where all the Acts of Formosus were made valid and his Perjury approved But Sergins that succeeded abrogated all that and again unburied the Body of Formosus with a thousand Reproaches It is a particular stain to that Age that in it the Pope began to authorize Perjury and to dispense from Oaths See the 6th Question of the 15th Cause of the Decree which is full of such Examples But leaving this let us return to the Matter in hand how Thomas Beckâ—t was discharged of his Oath it hath been shewn before and the Examples be many of Subjects that have sought and obtained like Liberty at the Popes hands in matter of their Allegiance and Duty promised by Oath King John had taken an Oath to observe the Laws of King Henry the First of Edward the Confessor and the great Charter of
fol. 735. value of One hundred Marks but so as they the Abbot and his Convent should farm the Benefice at his hands and pay him yearly 200 marks rent The same Author writeth of another Benefice and of the Treasureship Ibid fol. 815. of Sarum bestowed upon Innocent his little Nephew by one Martin at that time the Popes Legat in this Realm This Man was sent into England by Pope Innocent IV. to extort Moneys he was armed with Bulls to excommunicate to suspend and by manifold ways to punish all as well Bishops Abbots as others who opposed his Rapines and Extortions Provisions of Benefices Rents to the use of the Popes Clerks and Kinsmen He extorted Gifts Garments Palfreys from them suspending those who refused though upon reasonable Excuses till satisfaction He twice summoned the English Bishops and Clergy for a Contribution to the Pope and their Mother the Church of Rome against the Emperor The King sent a Prohibition to them not to give him any aid under pain of forfeiting their Baronies He suspended all to present to Benefices of ten Marks value or upward till his and the Popes Covetousness was satisfied The King sent memorable Prohibitions to him against his intollerable Provisions and Rapines who persevereth therein with a stony heart notwithstanding The Cinque-ports were guarded to interrupt the Popes Bulls and Provisions sent unto him His Messenger was imprisoned in Dover-castle but icâ—eased upon his Complaint to the King The King by advice of his Nobles sent Prohibitions to all the Bishops in England and Chief â—ustice in Ireland not to suffer him or any other Nuncio to collect â—ny Moneys for the Pope or confer any Benefices without his Privity or Consent The Nobles sent a Message to him in behalf of 〈◊〉 whole Kingdom to depart the Realm within three days else they would new him and all his in pieces And when he demanded the Kings Protection against the fury of the Nobles the King wished Mat. Paris p. 640. the Devil to take him whereupon he departed the Realm in a terrible Pannick fear The Abbot of Abingdon refusing to bestow upon a Roman the Benefice of St. Helens in Abingdon which was esteemed at the value of an hundred Marks and belonged to the Monastery of Abingdon because the King had demanded it for his Brother was cited to appear Idem fol. 1002. personally at Rome and could not obtain his Release until he had assured to the Pope a yearly Annuity of Fifty Marks to be paid out of his Monastery Pope John XXII bestowed the Bishopâ—ick of Winchester upon his Chaplain Rigandus in the time of King Edward the Second having before made reservation thereof and giving special charge that Tho. Walsingham fol. 90. no Election should take place though approved by the King We find in the Canon Law that in the time of King Richard the First though from the Records of the Tower we understand in the Reign of King John that Pope Innocent contriving how to usher in his Provisions into England by degrees without any observation imployed the Archbishop of Ragusa whom he discharged from that Church because he could not live quietly there to move King John to bestow a Bishoprick and other Benefices upon him in England to relieve his Necessities and support his Dignity whereupon the King out of his Royal Bounty bestowed the Bishoprick of Carlile the Archbishop of York and the Church of Melbourn upon him Of these Wrongs the People of this Land made often Complaints but could find no Redress The Usurpations of the Popes Legaâ— and Agents by Exactions Provisions Disposing Churches to Aliens and other Innovations became so intollerably Oppressive 〈◊〉 all sorts of People in England that by several Letters of Complanit disperled against them in the year 1231 1232 there waâ— stirred up a general Commotion and Opposition against theâ— throughout England for finding that most of the Ecclesiastical Livings of this Realm to be in the hands of Strangers they were 〈◊〉 offended that they set fire on their Barns in all parts of the Realm The Pope on the other side stormeth with the King and commandeth the Bishops of the Realm to excommunicate the Authors of the injury and withal to send them personally to Rome to receiâ—â— their Absolution at his hand Speed in his History relateth that it Speeds Chronic. in the Reign of King Henry III. was alledged by these Reformers that they had under-hand the Kings Letters Patents the Lord Chief Justices Assent the Countenance of the Bishop of London and the Sheriffs aid in divers Shires whereby the Armed Troops took heart every where violently to seize on the Romans Corn and their other Wealth which Booties they imployed to good purposes and for relief of the poor the Romans Roger de Wend. M. S. the mean while hiding their Heads for fear of losing them In the time of King Edward the Third Pope Clement granted to two Cardinals at one time Provisions of so many Spiritual Livings as would amount to the yearly value of Two thousand Marks Hereof the King complained to the Pope alledging that the Rights of Tho. Walsingham Hist in Edw. III. Patronages were disturbed the Treasure of his Realm spent upon Aliens in Foreign parts and that the Students his Subjects were thereby discouraged Which Reasons are delivered in a Statute by him made for restraint of Provisions from Româ— SECT 15. 15. The Pope claimeth to have one proper Authority which he Plenitudo Potestatis in Beneficialibus calleth Plenitudo Potestatis in Beneficialibus and is an infinite and unbridled Licence to do in Matters of Church-livings what himself listeth By force whereof he taketh from any Prelate or Beneficedman his Bishoprick or Benefice at his pleasure without yielding any Cause or Reason thereof He hath used to bestow Bishopricks of this Realm at his pleasure and when any of the Bishops died then the Pope claimed a Priviledge to have the Gift of them as Decedentes in Caria Romana and so kept them many years as Decedentes in Curia for they never came into England to die here as Salisbury and Worcester which were claimed by that Title in Queen Maries time Again the Pope might dissolve Ecclesiastical Dignities and Benefices at will and turn them into what shape it best liked him Moreover he might unite appropriate divide such Livings and do many strange things else about them no cause appearing to any man but his own will The Popes Legates also procured of the Kings of England Stipends and Provisions of good value out of Ecclesiastical Benefices and other Dignities Rustand the Popes Legate being in Favour with King Henry the Third procured from him besides the Livings he obtained by the Popes Provisions a Grant of Provisions out of the Ecclesiastical Benefices Dignities and Prebendaries which should first happen in his own Gift amounting to 300 Marks by the year to be preferred before all other a formerly granted by him one