Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	call_v	father_n	son_n	3,252	5	5.6495	4	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A77515	Two treatises the one, handling the doctrine of Christ's mediatorship : wherein the great Gospel-mystery of reconciliation betwixt God and man is opened, vindicated, and applyed. The other, of mystical implantation : wherein the Christian's union and communion with, and conformity to Jesus Christ, both in his death and resurrection, is opened, and applyed. / As they were lately delivered to the church of God at Great Yarmouth, by John Brinsley, minister of the Gospel, and preacher to that incorporation.	Brinsley, John, 1600-1665.; Ashe, Simeon, d. 1662.	1652 (1652)	Wing B4737; Thomason E1223_1; ESTC R22919	314,532	569

Thus are the properties of God attributed to him 4. And so in the 4th place is Dei Actio Argu. 4 Divine Actions and Works Divine Actions ascribed to Christ Creation they are attributed and referred to him As viz. Creation All things were made by him Joh. 1.3 By him were all things created that are in heaven and that are in earth visible and invisible Col. 1.16 By whom God made the worlds saith the Authour to the Hebrews Heb. 1.2 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Videtur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hic rectè accipi posse pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Grot. ad loc not propter quem as Grotius would evade that cleare Text For whom he made the worlds But per quem By whom So the Apostle to to put it out of doubt putteth them together Col. 1.16 All things were created by him and for him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Thus were the world 's made by him Not onely the New world the intellectuall world the world of mankind which is the chiefest part of the world whom God reformeth and restoreth by the mediation of Christ Dr. Lusshington Comment ad loc Heb. 1.2 by giving him a new state and condition by a new Covenant So indeed I finde a Divine of our own expounding that Text Borrowing his Exposition as I suppose from Grotius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Intellige omnia quae ad novam Creationem pertinent Grot. Annot. ad Col. 1.16 Similiter super versum 17. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Et haec vox inquit de veteri creatione ad novam traducitur upon that place forenamed Col. 1.16 who being there put to a straight maketh use of the same shift A miserable subterfuge What world 's the Apostle there speaketh of we may learn by comparing him with himselfe that Text Heb. 1.2 with that other Heb. 12.3 Through faith we understand that the Worlds were framed by the word of God These were the worlds which God the Father made by his Son even the whole Vniverse the upper world and the lower world the visible and the invisible world both continuing through severall ages And therefore called in the plurall number 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the worlds These worlds God the Father made by his Son and that not as an Instrument or inferiour Agent but a concurring cooperating and equall cause having the same efficiency with his Father onely differing in the order of working Providence And as Creation so Providence That we finde also ascribed unto Christ As the Father made the world by him so he governeth it by him So it there followeth Heb. 1.3 Who being the brightnesse of his Fathers glory and the expresse image of his Person he upholdeth all things by the word of his Power Thus doth Christ bear up all things continuing to the severall creatures their being ordering and governing them and this he doth by the word of his power 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christus verbo potentiae paternae id est jussu regit cuncta Grot. ad loc as Grotius would have it referring it to God the Father by whose order and command saith he Christ governeth the world by the word of his power but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The word of his own power i. e. his own powerfull word Verbo illo suo potente Beza as Beza renders it By this word he made the world He spake and it was done And by this word he governeth the world by his own mighty word the word of his Power Both these are divine Actions and being ascribed unto Christ evidence him to be no lesse then God 5. The fifth and last particular is Cultus Arg. 5 Divine Worship That we shall also finde given unto Christ Divine worship given to Christ When he bringeth in the first begotten into the world he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him Heb. 1.6 The Angels who refused divine honour to be given to themselves See thou do it not saith the Angel to John when John fell at his feet to worship him I am thy fellow-servant c. Rev. 19.10 and 22.9 yet they give and must give it unto Christ And so must all others Believing on him Ye believe in God believe also on me John 14.1 The same respect that Christians give unto God the Father they must also give unto the Son believing on him which is an honour due onely to God other creatures Men and Angels may be believed but not believed on rested on This were to make them Gods no lesse then Idolatrie And so invocating him It is the Saints Character they are such as call on the Name of the Lord Jesus Acts 2.21 and 9.14 Now put these together the Name and Titles of God the Son of God the Properties of God the Actions of God the Worship due only to God all these are attributed and ascribed to Christ A full evidence that he is and must be more then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dr. Lusshington in Heb. 7.22 meer man or yet a Divine Man as some of them stile him viz. Truely God as well as Man Upon this Subject I shall say no more neither should I at the present have said so much did I not take notice of a generation of men and those none of the meanest for learning and parts Socinians risen up in these shaking times who are not afraid to set their shoulders to this principle of Faith indeavouring to overthrow this main pillar of the Christians hope and of his Religion the Divinity the God-head of Jesus Christ Against them it is for the vindicating of the Truth of God from some of their evasions and false glosses and the confirming and establishing you in the faith which you have received that I have spent this little time and strength The Text cleered from the Socinian glosse Object But yet what say we to the words of the Text which hold forth Christ unto us onely as a Man The Man Christ Jesus Ans True so he is Man True Man Christ true Man but not meer Man but not meer Man Verus sed non merus The word is not to be taken exclusively as denying the Divine Nature No Elsewhere in this Epistle the same pen stileth him God as I have shewn you God manifested in the Flesh So as here is no ground for the Arian or Socinian to cast anchor upon By the like reason the Marcionites or Manichees might conclude against the truth of Christ's Humanity because else-where he is called God God blessed for ever Rom. 9.5 Thus is the same Person being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 both God and Man sometimes denominated from one nature sometimes from the other Sometimes called God and sometimes man Yet so as he is truely both And in that respect fitly said to be a Mediatour betwixt God and men having an Interest in and participating of both Natures Reas Reason Why

be cruell towards another when he putteth him to torment or pain without a cause or putteth him to great torment for a small cause The Chyrurgian that puts his patient to great pain for the saving of life or limb when there is no other way of Cure he is not therein to be accounted cruell Thus standeth the case here It was not without cause and great cause that God thus delivered his Son to the death This he did not only for those ends assigned by the Socinian that he might seal his doctrine with his blood and shew himselfe a pattern of Obedience but for a greater end then these viz. for the Redemption of a world as I showed you that when there was no other Remedy Grotius de satisfact cap. 6. Now as Grotius well presseth it against them this End being added to those by them alledged it cannot make Christs sufferings greater then they were which they themselves acknowledg were inflicted by God his Father and that without any Cruelty Nay by how much the ends propounded were more and greater so much the further were those sufferings from all appearance of cruelty So as our doctrine in this regard freeth the Majesty of God from such an Imputation far more then theirs Christ able to undergo and overcome them 2. Besides what is also considerable Though the sufferings of Christ were great yet was there no such Cruelty in inflicting them upon him who was able both to undergoe and overcome them This was Jesus Christ able to do As he had power to lay down his life so also to take it up again John 10.18 That burden which would crush a child a strong man will go lightly away with as Samson being inclosed within the walls of Gaza did with the Gates thereof which he took upon his shoulders and carried up to the top of the mountain Judg. 16.3 Thus did the Lord Jesus being inclosed in the Grave he carried away the gates of death which would have crushed all the sons of Men into the pit of Hell So as those sufferings though great in themselves yet to him they were not so great His dying was but a Tasting of Death as the Apostle calleth it Hebrews 2.9 but I will follow the Adversary no further You now see these his supposed strong-holdes in a good sense slighted Those locks wherein he conceived his strength to ly cut off the Arguments and Allegations producible in this cause with the severall improvements of them clearly answered and satisfied Quest Onely a Query or two is yet behind Whether God could not have pardoned sin without any such satisfaction which I shall send away with their Resolutions briefly and so dismisse this point Q. 1. Could not God have pardoned sin freely without any such Satisfaction And might he not have done it Answer 1 A. 1. To this it is answered From Power to Will no good Consequence 1. A posse ad esse or velle c. From Power to Act or from Power to Will the Consequence wil not hold Because a man can do or may do such or such a thing it cannot thence be concluded that he hath done it or wil do it Suppose that God might have pardoned sin in such a way yet it will not thence follow that he hath done it Answer 2 A. 2. But 2ly without any derogation from the perfection and absolutenesse of his Power How it may be said that God could not do this it may be said with a reverence that this was a thing which God could not do Onely let it be rightly understood Not that it is so in it self absolutely considered but ex supposito upon the supposition of his Decree Gods decree was that sin should be punished with death that the one should be the wages of the other And that decree was gone forth the sentence was past upon man to that purpose The day thou eatest thereof thou shalt dye the death Genesis 2.17 Now this being presupposed it may with reverence be said that God could not pardon sin without some such satisfaction as the Law required Neither is this to be attributed to any defect of Power in him but to the perfection of his nature Upon this account it is that wee say that God cannot do this or that which man can do He cannot sin he cannot Lye Tit. 1.2 It is Impossible he should do so Heb. 6.18 And why so The Apostle renders a reason for it 2 Tim 2.13 He cannot deny himself Gods Truth and Justice they are himselfe And being so he cannot go against them And thus is it in this case To pardon sin without any satisfaction supposing the foresaid decree and sentence it cannot stand with the Truth and Justice of God and therefore he cannot do it This is Gods 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as the Apostle cals it Rom. 1. last The Judgement of God Jus Dei saith Beza Gods right Justitia Dei saith Erasmus and the Vulgar Gods Justice that they which do such things are worthy of death This is not only a Positive Law but Lex naturae the very Law of nature a Law Originally ingraven in the nature of God himself and by him as a Counterpane from that Originall imprinted upon the nature of man And being so God could not go against it so as to let sin go alogether unpunshed This he could not do without wrong and injury to himself Repl. No may some say May not men without any wrong or injurie remit what they please of their owne right Whether men may alwayes remit what they please of their own right Answer To this it is answered 1. This is not universally true Some cases there are wherein men may not part with their owne right Parents may not remit that honour and Obedience which of right is due to them from their children Husbands must not part with their Headship which they have over their Wives And why because this were against the Law of God and the Laws of nature It is a good limitation which is given by Casuists to that vulgar Maxime A man may part with as much of his own right as he will to another but it must be Salvo jure tertii saving the right of a third Saving the right of God of the Law of the Magistrate of a mans Neighbour Where any of these are wronged or injured by the Concession a man may not part with his owne right Now thus standeth it here should God passe by sin without any satisfaction it would bee a wrong to his Law as well as to his Truth and Justice And therefore it cannot bee 2. But 2ly Suppose man might do this yet God cannot This may seem a Paradox but we shall find it a Truth Though man may part with his owne right yet God cannot How so Because Gods right is himselfe Deus ipse est jus suum Marke it Gods right is himselfe and therefore he cannot part with it Upon this

Two TREATISES The One Handling the DOCTRINE Of CHRIST's MEDIATORSHIP Wherein The great Gospel-Mystery of Reconciliation betwixt God and Man is opened vindicated and Applyed The Other Of MYSTICAL IMPLANTATION Wherein The Christian's Union and Communion with and Conformity to Jesus Christ both in his Death and Resurrection is Opened and Applyed As they were lately delivered to the Church of God at Great Yarmouth By JOHN BRINSLEY Minister of the Gospel and Preacher to that Incorporation London Printed by T. Maxey for Ralph Smith at the signe of the Bible in Cornhill near the Royall Exchange 1651. To the Christian READER EVery naturall man wil readily assent to this Assertion of Solomon Eccl. 11.7 viz. Truly the light is sweet and a pleasant thing it is for the eyes to he hold the Sun And every considerate experienced Christian valuing Gospel Sun-shine at a far higher rate doth with the blessed Apostle Phil. 3.8 account all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledg of Jesus Christ his Lord neither designing nor desiring to know any thing in comparison of him crucified 1 Cor. 2.2 Mal. 4.2 Pro. 2.10 Although every beam from this Sun of Righteousness is pleasant to the sanctified soul yet nothing in the mystery of Christ is more affectionately taking upon the heart which loves and improves him then the discoveries of his taanscendent transactions as Mediator betwixt his Father and the Elect in reference unto all soul concernments from their first Conversion to their full Glorification This Fundamentall truth of the Gospel viz. the happy execution of Christs Mediatorship in purchasing by his passion Heb. 7.25 and applying by his intercession whatsoever may conduce to the complete bliss of his people is very wel cleered and strongly defended from pregnant Scripture in this ensuing Treatise The reverend and laborious Author my ancient and worthy friend hath also added therunto another profitable Piece viz. A Discourse concerning the Beleevers Conjunction Communion with Christ Both which will I hope be found very usefull both for information and comfort unto them who shall seriously peruse them In them the understanding Reader shall taste the savouriness of the Authors spirit and see Scripture Authority backing all the particulars which he holds forth unto publick consideration England of late years hath been unhappily pestered with frothy and pernicious Pamphlets which have tended only to feed mens lusts and to satisfie the itching humours of vain hearts Oh that the Almighty would give us again to prize and rellish such wholsome Treatises whereby our souls may be edified in the knowledg and practical improvement of Jesus Christ In him I am Thy Friend and servant SIMEON ASHE Sept. 22. 1651. ΜΕΣΙΤΗΣ OR The One and Onely MEDIATOUR Betwixt GOD and MEN The MAN CHRIST JESUS Wherein The Doctrin of Christs Mediatorship is largely handled And the great Gospel-Mystery of Reconciliation betwixt GOD and MAN is Opened Vindicated and Applyed As it was lately presented to the Church of God at Great Yarmouth BY JOHN BRINSLEY Minister of the Gospel and Preacher to that Incorporation 2 COR. 5.18 God hath given to us the Ministry of Reconciliation PSAL. 11.3 If the foundations be destroyed what can the Righteous do London Printed by Tho. Maxey for Ralph Smith at the sign of the Bible in Cornhill neer the Royall Exchange 1651. Memoriae SACRVM To the Eternal Honour OF THE One and Onely Mediatour betwixt God and Men The MAN CHRIST JESUS His blessed SAVIOUR and REDEEMER J. B. The unworthiest of his Redeemed Ones in Testimony of his unfained Gratitude for so unestimable a Favour Humbly Dedicateth these His WEAK so far as they are his WORTHLESSE MEDITATIONS To the Pious and Judicious Reader Reader DOest thou expect an Account of the Preaching and Publishing of this Treatise take what the Frontispiece holdeth forth The Word of Reconciliation is that sacred Depositum which God hath committed to his Ministers not that it should be smothered in their private bosomes but that by them it might be transmitted and published to the world And such is the main Subject of this Discourse which is here Doctrinally opened and Practically applied As for the Polemicall and Controversall Part of it I wish it were not too justly occasioned through those pernicious errours of Socianisme which now among the croud of many other begin to walk abroad striking at the very Root or Foundation of that Religion which hath hitherto been called Christian And If the Foundation be destroyed what shall the Righteous do This it is which hath stirred my spirit to appear in this cause thus to † 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Jude v. 3. contend which I am required to do and that earnestly for that faith which was once delivered unto the Saints Wherein my designe is not so much to recover those who are already taken in this snare who are by others how justly let themselves see to it looked upon for the most part as men so wedded to their own carnall Reason as that they disdain to submit themselves to God's Reason not regarding the Authority of Scripture further then as it complieth with the genius of their naturall Principles So much their Master and Leader sticketh not to professe who hath in down-right terms published it to the world that as for * Nec si ubique clarissimis verbis testatum reperiremus sic tamen rem se habere nobis compertum esset Socin de Jesu Christo Servatore part 3. cap. 2. God's punishing our fin in and upon his Son Christ though he should find it every where attested in most expresse words in Scripture yet would he not take it for granted that so it is And again speaking of Christ's Satisfaction † Ego quidem etiamsi non semèl sed saepè id in sacris monimentis scriptum extaret non idcircò tamen itaà rem prorsùs se babere crederem ut vos opinamini Socin ibid. cap 6. Acts 8. 22. For my part saith he though I should not once but often meet with textant in sacred Records yet would I not for all that believe that it was so indeed Now if his followers be of the sane mind I shall leave them as I find them onely praying for them what Simon Peter willeth Simon Magus to do for himselfe that upon their Repentance this thought of their heart may be forgiven them It is for the sake of others that I have spent this little strength such whose veins are not as yet infected with this poison For them have I prepared this Antidote that their spirits being confirmed in the ancient and received Truths of God they may not by whatever devices of Satan or his Instruments be removed to another Gospell In the managing of this Controversie I must acknowledge what my Margin confesseth my selfe to owe not a little to the learned Grotius But whether to Grotius Orthodox or Grotius Heterodox more I must say I cannot readily tell I have made use of both

undertaking to answer and make satisfaction unto the Justice of God for them And in this respect it is chiefly and principally as Bellarmine and others rightly observe upon the Text that he is here called by our Apostle a Mediator In this respect principally called a Mediatour in the Text. Neque apud ineruditos tantùm sed apud eos qui elegantiùs loquuntur 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dicitur is qui placat aliquem Grot ' de Satisfact cap. 8. Object Here is no mention of Gods wrath or displeasure A Mediator betwixt God and men id est One that interposeth himselfe betwixt the wrath of God and them undertaking to satisfie their debts and so to reconcile them unto God Thus the word in the Text as Grotius noteth may fitly be rendred 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Plaactor One that pacifieth and appeaseth another by giving satisfaction and contentment to him And in this sense it is here applyed unto Christ Obj. Not so saith Socinus and his followers The word here signifieth no more then what it doth elsewhere Interpres Internuncius an Interpreter an Intermessenger betwixt God and Man Not a Peace-maker No here is not a word saith he concerning any wrath or displeasure of God against sin or sinners that might induce us to make such a construction of the Apostles meaning Ans But to this Pareus Answ Pareus in Heb. 8.6 returns him an Answer It is not to be conceived that what ever belongs to such or such a subject should be mentioned where-ever that subject is touched upon True the Apostle maketh no mention of Gods wrath against sin and sinners in this place This we finde elsewhere But elsewhere he doth sufficiently abundantly Romans 1.18 The wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodlinesse of men Cap. 5.9 Being justified by his blood we shall be saved from wrath through him Such is the state and condition of all men by nature They are all alike Children of wrath Ephes 2.2 Being out of Christ not beleeving on him the wrath of God abideth on them John 3. last A truth so sufficiently known so frequently inculcated by himself and others as that there was no need why the Apostle should here make any mention of it before he call Christ a Mediator But if this satisfie not look but a little after and there shall we finde what is by the Adversarie desired Who gave himselfe a Ransome for us In which words as Bellarmine well noteth upon it the Apostle assigneth the cause and Reason of what he had said plainly shewing in what respect it was principally that he called Christ a Mediatour viz. In as much as hee gave himselfe a Ransome unto God his Father making satisfaction for the sinnes of his people Objection Satisfaction But Object No mention of Christs satisfaction in Scripture Christoph Ostorodius contra Purgationem peccatorum Ar gum 1. Answer Pareus ad Rō 9. Dubio 12. Though not the word yet the thing is Grot. de Satisf cap. 7. in initio where doe wee meet with this word in Scripture thus applyed unto Christ and his Mediatorship So some demand of us Answ To whom Pareus and others soon return Answer that though the word be not found yet the thing is being set forth in other expressions which are equipollent and equivalent And this it is that our Adversaries contend against as Socinus acknowledgeth it not the word but the thing And this it is that we must with earnestnesse contend for against them for this truth of God is a part of that Faith which was once delivered to the Saints and a principall part of it a foundation-stone a principle of Christian Religion the maine hinge upon which the whole worke of our salvation turneth Take away this the satisfaction of Christ and what sure foundation shall our faith rest upon If this foundation bee destroyed then what shall the righteous doe They must then goe seeke for another way of Justification then by faith in the merits of Christ And so seek for a new way to heaven which none of their forefathers ever yet found Let me therefore take up a little time for the asserting and vindicating of this truth of God against the Adversaries and Opposers of it Wherein my aime shall be to deal as little as may be in a Polemicall controversall way in arguing and disputing the case with them but rather in demonstrating it against them by laying this foundation as sure as I can that so you may with more assured confidence adventure your soules upon it Christ is said to be a Mediator as a Surety undertaking and making satisfaction unto God for the sins of his people That he is so Christs Satisfaction evinced by Scripture Testimonies Scripture is clear to those who will but look upon it without prejudice To go about to call in all those Texts that speak to this purpose would prove a long if not a tedious work I shal single out some of them which I conceive to give in the clearest and most convincing evidence And here I shall begin with the old Testament Old Testament where I shall in the first place have recourse unto that clear Prophecie concerning Christ then which all the old Testament affords not a clearer which wee meet with Isaiah 53. Isa 53. Arg. 1. There shall we finde a mutuall compact and agreement betwixt the Father and the Sonne about this way of Reconciliation viz. by way of satisfaction This the Father imposeth And this the Sonne submits to The Father imposeth it by charging the sinns of his Elect upon him So you have it verse 6. Ver. 6. The LORD laid on him the iniquities of us all Not the sinns themselves not the evill in them or fault of them but the guilt and penalty belonging to them This GOD laid upon his Son charging it upon him as a Creditor chargeth a debt upon the surety requiring satisfaction from him Or as the margin readeth it according to the Originall He shall make the iniquity of us all to meet on him Even as many debts of severall persons are charged upon one common surety and so all meet together upon his head Thus did the sins of all God's Elect or all true believers for of such and onely such he there speaks as Diodate expounds it such as having union with Christ have a true spirituall Communion amongst themselves they all meet together upon the head of their common surety the Lord Christ Even as the sins of Priests and people met together upon the head of the Sacrifice being layed upon it by the Priests who to that end laid their hands upon the head of it as you may read Exod. 29.10 15 19. by that Ceremony putting and laying their own sins and the sins of the people upon the head of that Sacrifice which was to be offered up for them Even thus saith the Prophet did God the Father lay the sins of his

by those sacrifices Though God properly received nothing for it yet it was accepted of him But I shal no longer dwell upon this evidence neither shall I over-do the work in hand by alledging many more yet I must remember that Foundations cannot be too surely laid especially where Earthquakes are frequent as they are in the Church amongst us at this day And therefore let me yet subjoyn two or three In the next place what shall we say to those Texts of the Apostle Arg. 3. where he holdeth forth the death of Christ Christ the meritorious cause of our Reconciliation as the meritorious and procuring cause of our Reconciliation with God The places are wel known let them be seriously weighed and considered Rom. 5.10 When we were enemies we were reconciled unto God by the death of his Son Ephes 2.16 That he might reconcile both viz. Jews and Gentiles unto God in one body by the Crosse Col. 1.20 And having made peace through the blood of his Crosse by him to reconcile all things to himselfe In all which places the Apostle clearly holdeth forth the death of Jesus Christ as the proper meanes of procuring our Reconciliation with God Allegat Socinian Evasion Allegat To this the adversary answers as before True by this meanes wee are Reconciled unto God but not God to us As for God he was not an enemy to us but wee are enemies unto him He was ready to receive and imbrace us upon our returning to him by repentance Only wee were averse to him Enemies in our mindes through wicked workes Now this indeed Christ by his death effecteth say they reconciling us unto God Col. 1.21 by bringing us unto him in the waies aforesaid by repenting and believing To be reconciled to God the phrase cleared and vindicated Idem valet nos Deo conciliari Deum nobis Grot. de satisf cap. 7. Grot. ibid. ex Sophocle Repl. But hereunto we have returned answer already that for us to be reconciled to God and God to be reconciled to us imports one and the same thing This we have evidenced by shewing the use of the phrase in Scripture language To which might be added the consent of profane writers with whom 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 To be Reconciled to the Gods is as much as for the Gods to be reconciled to them who had offended them that so they might escape their anger and revenge But we shall not need to go down to the Philistines to sharpen this Goad In those very places alledged upon a serious review of of them we shall finde that the Reconciliation there spoken of is a reconciling of God to Man That to the Romans is cleare When we were Enemies wee were reconciled unto God How reconciled to him why so as to have peace with him ver 1. So as to have a standing in his grace ver 2. So as to be saved from his wrath ver 9. Such is the Reconciliation there spoken of by the Apostle which hee further maketh to be the proper and immediate fruit and effect of the death of Christ Reconciled by his death And consequently it must import not properly the Reconciling of our Natures unto God which is done in Sanctification and is an immediate fruit of the Spirit of Christ but the reconciling of our persons unto him by Justification which is the immediate fruit of his death In like manner in that place of the Ephesians chap. 2.16 Christ is said to have reconciled Jews and Gentiles unto God that by reconciling them first unto him he might reconcile them betwixt themselves Reconcile them to God in one Body And this he is said to have done by the Crosse Not by the Doctrine of the Crosse as Grotius in his later time going about to destroy what before he had built Cum crucem dicit simul intelligit doctrinam cruce sanoitam Grot. Comm. ad Eph. 2.16 Grotius de satisfact cap. 7. blancheth that Text the doctrine of the Gospel confirmed by his suffering upon the Crosse but by the merit of the Crosse as the same Authour in his first and better thoughts orthodoxly expounds it per vim scilicet placatricem by that pacifying appeasing vertue which is in his blood which he shed upon the Crosse By this meanes it was that he reconciled God to them and them to God And after the same manner in that other place Col. 1.20 God is said by Christ to reconcile all things to himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hîc sumendum ut suprà ver 16 sub ipso five ità ut ipsi pareant Grot. ad Col. 1.20 not In unum into one as Socinus would have it for then as Grotius noteth upon it it should have been 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 No nor yet as Grotius himself in his declining time expounds it sub ipso under him viz. under Christ or to him viz. that they might obey him but to him viz. to God the Father So that other place of the same Apostle explains it 2 Cor. 5.19 God was in Christ reconciling the world to himselfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And this he hath done by Christ viz. by and through his death So that Parenthesis there Col. 1.20 explains it Having made peace through the blood of his Crosse not the Doctrine of his Crosse but the blood of his Crosse viz. that bloody oblation made and offered upon the Crosse Sanguinis hîc fit mentio quîa per sanguinem foedera sancire solebant Idem ibid. wherby not only the Covenant was sealed as Grotius again there blancheth it but wherby the Justice of God was satisfied and so his wrath appeased Thus you see the adversary put by that muse also which being put to his shifts he made for and withall this evidence made out To which in the next place I shall subjoyn another near a kin to it Argu. 4 And that I take from Saint John who speaking of Christ calleth him the Propitiation Christ called the propitiation 1 John 2.2 He is the propitiation for our sins And againe chap. 4.10 God sent his Son to be a Propitiation for our sins the word in the Originall is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which properly signifieth Placamen somewhat wherby an other being offended is pacified That is the meaning of the Latine word made English Propitiation it imports somewhat whereby the anger of another is appeased and he is induced to be propitious mercifull favourable So much we may learn out of the Publicans Petition Luke 18.13 where hee prayeth God be mercifull to me a sinner The word is the same 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Placator or Propitius esto Be thou appeased towards me be thou propitious to me This is Propitiation From whence the Mercie-seat or lid which covered the Ark was called the Propitiatory Exod. 25.17 So the Apostle following the translation of the Septuagint calls it Hebrews 9.5 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉

far from mortifying of them When men shall leave sin being enforced so to do through the sense of some present inconvenience or through the clamorousnesse of an accusing conscience or meerly through fear of punishment temporall or eternall this is but a counterfeit Mortification True Mortification must be a voluntary action not Involuntary nor yet Mixt. I call that a mixt action which is partly voluntary and partly involuntary As in that fore-named instance of the Seaman casting his goods over-board Mortification altogether voluntary which he doth partly with his will and partly against it This must be altogether voluntary Not but that there may be some reluctancy betwixt the flesh and spirit about this work Such a reluctancy we find in the humane nature of Christ about his naturall death When he saw that bitter cup coming towards him he passionately deprecates it in that thrice repeated Petition Father if it be possible let this cup passe from me Mat. 26.39 yet was his death a true voluntary death So in the Christian's death unto sin there may be a reluctancy betwixt the flesh and the spirit Notwithstanding some reluctancy in the flesh and yet the action a voluntary action An action is said to be voluntary or involuntary according to the superiour faculties of the soul not the inferiour If the reasonable part be consenting the action may be called voluntary though there be some reluctancy in the sensitive appetite Thus in the Christian in whom there is nature and grace flesh and spirit an unregenerate and a regenerate part if the superiour and better part be willing and that will not a velleitas but a volitio not a wishing but a willing an advised deliberate will with full consent of the inward man now though there be some reluctancy in the flesh in the unregenerate part yet may this be said a true voluntary act And is our Mortification such Can we say with the blessed Apostle Rom. 7. ult that However with our flesh we serve the law of sin yet with our mind we serve the Law of God Delighting in it after the inward man ver 22. So that we are dead to sin according to the inward man the regenerate part If so now though we find a Law in our members rebelling against the Law of our minds yet be not discouraged this in God's acceptation shall go for true Mortification a true death unto sin In as much as it carrieth with it this resemblance of the death of Christ which was a voluntary death Thirdly 3. Resemb A violent Death The Death of Christ was a violent death though voluntary yet violent Violent because not naturall He did not die alone but was put to death So saith Saint Peter 1 Pet. 3.18 He was put to death in the flesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In course of nature Christ might have lived many a year upon the earth when he was crucified being then but about the three and thirtieth year of his age His death was a violent death He was brought as a lamb to the slaughter Isai 53.7 The materiall Temple did not fall down alone it was pulled down And so was the mysticall Temple of Christ's Body Destroy this Body John 2.19 And herein again was his death a true pattern of the Christian's Mortification his dying unto sin which is both voluntary and violent Voluntary in respect of the Person but violent in respect of the Sin Not when sin dieth alone but when it is put to death and that whilest it might yet live longer It is nothing to die to sin when sin dieth to us in us Herein lieth as I may say the life of this death herein is the truth of Mortification when a man as it were layeth violent hands upon his sins cutteth them off being yet in their flower strength vigour not when they die for age When he pulleth up these weeds not when they wither of themselves So much is insinuated in these fore-named expressions of mortifying of crucifying the flesh the body of sin c each importing a violent death Such is the death of sin in the Christian a violent death Another touchstone for Mortification Applic. And is it so Here then we have another touch-stone whereby we may discover a great deal of false and counterfeit mortification in the world Many have left their sins who have not mortified them No if their sins be dead they died a naturall death they died alone As for them they were so far from offering violence to their lusts from putting them to death that they would willingly have saved their lives if it had lyen in their power And being dead they follow them to their graves as they do their dear friends mourning and lamenting over them that they must part Thus doth the aged Adulterer part with his inordinate lust Rom. 4.19 being now gray-headed and his body dead as it is said of Abraham's he leaveth the tricks of his youth as he counts and calls them But no thanks to him they have left him His sin dieth according to the course of nature dieth for age And thus a man that was intemperate in his youth which yet is not ordinary sometimes he becometh sober and abstemious in his age But what is the cause of it why the reason inducing him to it is no other then that which old Barzillai gave unto David why he was not willing to follow the Court 2 Sam. 19.34 He was now grown old so as he could not discern betwixt good and evill he had no taste in that he eat or in that he drunk Upon the like ground the aged sinner leaveth his intemperance Time having snowed upon his head and plowed upon his forehead he cannot now find that sweetnesse that delight in his sin which formerly he did And upon this account they two part Sin dying to him not he to his sin Now here give me leave Applied to aged sinners I beseech you to make bold with every hoary head every wrinckled face that heareth me that looketh upon me this day and put you upon the triall a little whether you be truely dead to sin or no. It may be your sins the sins of your youth and you are parted but let me ask you the question Vpon what terms did ye part Whether did you forsake them or they you Which is it that standeth chargeable with this desertion Which was it that gave the bill of divorce to the other you to your lusts or your lusts to you Your sins are dead but what death died they A naturall or a violent death If the former that is no true Mortification For all this you may yet be alive to your sins though they be dead to you Hence is it that late repentance in an aged sinner is alwayes looked upon as suspicious and seldome found to be true because that sins then die alone without any violence offered to them Enquire how our sins died whether a