Selected quad for the lemma: cause_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
cause_n	bring_v	king_n	see_v	1,770	5	3.2429	3	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A89890	A plea for the King, and kingdome; by way of answer to the late remonstrance of the Army, presented to the House of Commons on Monday Novemb. 20. Proving, that it tends to subvert the lawes, and fundamentall constitutions of this kingdom, and demolish the very foundations of government in generall.	Nedham, Marchamont, 1620-1678.	1648 (1648)	Wing N402; Thomason E474_2; ESTC R202961	27,530	32

expresse termes to the maintenance of them and these undoubtedly are the true Foundations of the publique Jnterest and the Supporters also of the Kings person and Authority By the Lawes of the Land the King is the only Soveraign and supreame and above the reach of all penall statutes which make it high Treason for any to attempt the least force upon his person Therefore to make such a construction of the Covenant upon pretence of any Clause in it that shall clash with the Lawes of the Land the maintenance whereof is one of the primary ends of it is absurd and rediculous And therfore as long as by the fundamentall Lawes and Constitutions of the Kingdom the King is exempt from all Criminall proceedings against him by his Subiects certainly all men that have taken the Covenant are absolutely and undeniably bound by it to defend his Maiestie from such horrid and treasonable intents and practises to the dammage of his person and destruction of Kingly power Moreover the Scotish nation who were the first Founders of the Covenant and both Houses of Parliament have published in severall Declarations and all their Priests in the Pulpits that the intent of the Covenant in respect of his Maiestie was only that His Throne should be established in righteousnesse and though they made use of that Clause thereby to suspend him from the Exercise of regall power till satisfaction given to the desires of the Parliament of both Kingdomes yet it was never in their thoughts to strain it so farr as that in case he stood out against their desires they would proceed in a Criminall way against their Lord and Soveraigne And therefore it is cleare against these Anarchists both from the primary civill end of the Covenant and the practise of its Founders that it obligeth all those which have taken it to defend the Person of the King 's most Excellent Maiesty according to the Fundamentall Lawes and Constitutions of the Kingdom against all treasonous illegall and arbitrary Proceedings by way of Criminall Accusation Now we are come at length to the Conclusion of this tedidious Remonstrance which consists of severall Propositions grounded upon the frivolous premises already confuted They are of two sorts In the first they propound such things as they pretend are for the satisfaction of publique Iustice In the second such as are for the setling or rather un-setling of the Kingdom In order to justice first they propound That the person of the King may be speedily brought to Iustice If I should cite the innumerable Testimonies of Antiquity and our Modern writters against this prodigious principle I might swell into a volumne it is contrary to the very law of nature reason the constitutions of all Kingdomes and the whole tenor of the Scriptures Impunity being an inseparable adiunct of Kings as they are Supreme in their Kingdomes For if there can be no true kingdome where the King is not invested in the Supremacy As King he is Iudge of Iudges and subiect to the judgement of none other but God himself For it is contrary to nature that the Superior should be judged by the Inferior but the people take them collective are Inferior to their Monarch for that cannot bee called a Monarchy which admits either of a Superior or an equall And therefore the People cannot exercise any power or Iurisdiction over their Soveraigne forasmuch as it proceeds from himself and cannot subsist one moment without him he being as it were the Fountain of Authority As say all our statute and Law-Books S. Peter bids us Submit to every Ordinance of man for the Lords sake whether it be to the King as supreme or unto Governours as those that are sent by him As free and not using your liberty for a Cloake of maliciousnesse but feare God Honour the King A text which plainly shewes that the people should not stretch their liberty to the preiudice of the royall authority Thou shalt not speak ill of the Governour of the people much lesse destroy him Give the people liberty once of iudgeing their King and all things are presently out of Order considering the ignorance the audacity the levity and inconstancie of the vulgar For by this meanes it falles out oftentimes that those Princes which diserve best are worst handled as histories do witnesse concerning Coriolanus Camillus Themistocles Phocian and divets others both antient and modern Scinditur incertum studia in contraria vulgus For such is the nature of the multitude that they are greedy still after Novelties and great admirers of them till they have a little experience and then they would willingly change again being led with vaine hopes of advantage upon every Innovation And therefore if Princes were under the correction of their Subjects both good and bad would suffer alike Such was the insolence of the Lacedemonian Ephori toward their Kings that they would call them to accompt for every Trifle and punished King Archidamus for no other cause but because he took a little woman to wife and it was usuall among the Goths in Spain to murther their Kings as oft as they distasted them Moreover should all Kings of this Nation remain lyable to question by the people as our Remonstrants require in time to come they must ever be subject to Slanders and Snares because then every ambitious popular person would be ready to pick holes in their Coates to bring them into disfavour of the People and so that would be sufficient cause of condemnation Admit these things once and who sees not how all things would run to confusion and how great mischiefes such a dissolute and licentious Liberty would bring upon Kings and Kingdomes But it happens also most often in these Cases That not all the People nor the major part do consent to the condemning of their King but some few perhaps that have gotten the power into the hands of their Faction These to set off their Actions cry up their own Interest for the Interest of the Common-wealth and so under pretence of the publick Good prosecute their private ends to the ruine of the Prince and condemne him as an Enemy to the People Quis furor ô populus quae tanta licentia Ferri An example of this we have among our neighbours in Henry the Third of France against whom some few Cities revolted at first which were headed by some small number of the Nobility afterwards more and more till at length the Rebels grew formidable and though they were but a contemptible part in comparison of the rest yet they assumed the Reputation of the whole pretended the publique Good declared against their King as a Tyrant to defend the Rights and Liberties of the People and at length proceeded so high as to give Sentence against Him and renounce the Allegiance to Him give publick Command that none should dare to acknowledge Him their King The Parallel to this was the Conspiracy occasioned by the Bastard Murray against that unfortunate