couenant sacrifices worshippe of whom Christ came according to the flesâ— Rom. 3.2 and 9.4 notwithstanding all which prerogatiues the Lord destroyed them If it had been a Heathen people against whom this destruction had preuailed it had been worthie obseruation but much more when it is against Gods owne people Here then we learne that no outward priuiledge can auaile vs nor any oâ—â—ward meanes of saluation bee effectuall or fruitful to our good out of their right vse in faith and repentance Rom. 2.25 Circumcision is nothing vnlesse thou keepe the law Gal. 6. Neither Circumcision auaileth nor vncircumcision but a new creature Iudas had many great priuiledges and yet perished This made Paul though he had many priuiledges to account them all as dung in regard of the knowledge of Christ Phil. 3.8 We must not then content our selues with the meanes of saluation in the Word and Sacraments but vse them aright in faith and repentance otherwise they being out of their holy vse enioyed shall turne to our destruction and greater condemnation as they did to this people who notwithstanding them were destroied The second thing in the example is the time when the Israelites were destroyed that is after their deliuerance out of Egypt God had diuersly testified his loue to this people hauing chosen them out of all the people of the earth he called himselfe their God and hee gaue them many pledges of his loue but especially in that their great deliuerance out of the bondage of Egypt by such an outstretched arme yet for all this not long after they sinning against him hee destroyed them Whence learne that after many great blessings men not walking worthie of them but prouoking the Lord by their sins commeth a great vengeance The whole booke of the Iudges is a worthie proofe of this truth where wee shall see the people still forgetting their deliuerance and are forthwith left to Tyrants to bee afflicted for tenne twentie fourtie yeeres together The same appeareth in the Common-wealth of Israel vnder the Kings In the daies of Salomon the state was most florishing and glorious enioying a most happie peace but Salomon once forgetting the Lord and his Commandements and falling to the Idolatrie of his outlandish wiues there followed most fearefull accidents as the diuision and rent of the tenne Tribes from Iudah a long dissention and hot warre between Rehâ—boam and Ieroboam whose Idolatries brought much euill vpon their seuerall lands and at last vtter desolation the tenne Tribes being carried into Syria captiues and there ended their daies the other two Tribes into Babylon and there remained 70. yeeres which iudgements ouertook them about 400. yeeres after Iacob when hee went ouer Iordan made a vow to the Lord that if God would blesse him and giue him but food and raiment he would in way of thankfulnes returne to the Lord the tenth part of his goods Gen. 28.22 God blesseth him so farre as hee became a mightie man hauing the substance of a Prince in this abundance he forgat his vow or neglected it but what followed of it was there not horrible confusion in his familie Dinaâ— was deflowred Ruben ascended to his fathers bed Hamor was slaine and the Lord is glad to call to minde hiâ— vow Gen. 35.1 Vse This doctrine concerneth vs neerely in this land who by Gods mercie haue enioyed many of his best blessings in this our long peace hauing bin deliuered from the Egypt of Rome and haue 〈◊〉 vnder the Lords protection all the day long but as ouâ— blessings haue been and are many and great so haue been and are our rebellions raging amongst vs especially that sinne of falling from our first loue so as lâ—sse loue of God and religion is to bee found amongst vs than heretofore besides that our peace causeth men to make their heauen here vpon earth and to embrace and affect things below these sins vnrepented of will bring vpon vs daies of affliction wee hauing no more priuiledge than this people had who after their deliuerance were destroyed The third point in this destruction is the cause of it namely because they beleeued not here first obserue what kind of vnbeleefe this was To the answere of which we must know that first God had promised to Abraham that after 430. yeeres hee would giue to his posteritie the land of Canaan for their inheritance this promise they all knew well inough Secondly it was often repeated renued and namely to Moses vnto whom the Lord promised that he should be their guide yea and that himselfe would proâ—ect them in their iournie and safely conduct them thither Thirdly God sealed this promise by many and sundrie signes and miracles both in Egypt at the red sea and in the wildernesse yet for all this they beleeued not that God would accomplish these promises vnto them to bring them to that good land and further seeing the land of Canaan was a type of that heauenlie Canaan they beleeued not that God would bring them to heauen and giue them inheritance in that eternall rest by meanes of the Messias This vnbeleefe then of the promises of God was the cause of their destruction Secondly why are they destroyed for vnbeleefe rather then for their murmuring fornication and diuerse other sinnes which weâ— reade of to haue been rise among them Ans. Although they murmured blasphemed tempted God reuiled their guides c. yet this sinne of vnbeleefe was the foundation and ground of them all the which doth the more displease God in that it was the first sinne that euer was in the world and the mother of all transgression Secondly this sinne in a more speciall manner dishonoreth God in making him a lyer and so toucheth his honour more neerely Thirdly what was this destruction An. It was the destruction of their soules and bodies for their carcasses were left in the wildernesse where they fell and their soules haue their portion in the lake prepared for vnbeleeuers Reuel 21. For the furâ—her hatred of this sinne see 2. Kings 7.19 the Prince who would not beleeue the word of the Lord was troden to death and Moses not waiting but failing in his faith was barred the land of Canaan and onely saw it a farre off Vse Seeing destruction followeth vnbeleefe we must labour to see our vnbeleâ—fe and take out that exhortation Heb. 3.12 Take heede least there be in any of vs an euill heart of vnbeleefe to depart away from the liuing God which place well considered sheweth what are the degrees of falling away which are studiously to bee declined as first when a man is deceiued by sin and giueth himselfe libertie thereunto Secondly when the heart is hardened and made an euill heart Thirdly when infidelitiâ— taketh possession of the hart to rule it and cause it to call in question Gods promises and prouidence Fourthly then followeth apostasie and departure from God now wee must beware of the least and lowest of these degrees of this
God this being the same will that Adam had in the state of innocencie Obiect Good trees cannot bring foorth euill fruite therefore the Angels being good could not sinne of themselues Answ. A good tree remaining good bringeth foorth good fruite but being changeable may bring forth euill So much of the cause of the fall of Angels The second thing in their fall is the parts of it which here are two first They kept not their first beginning Secondly They left their owne habitation First they fell from their first estate which words are expounded Ioh. 8.44 they stood not in the truth By this truth is meant the image of God in righteousnes and true holines Eph. 4.24 and this image is truly called truth because it neuer deceiueth men as vnrighteousnes doth which maketh a glorious shew of pleasure or profit but indeede it deceiueth men who finde nothing lesse therein Secondly because herein is no hypocrisie it maketh no shew or appearance of other than indeed it is as the manner of falsehood is The sense then is that the Angels voluntarily departed from their originall condition and stood not in that image of God wherein they were created The second part of this one sinne is that they left their habitation which a man might esteeme but a small matter but yet the sinne is not small for God in the beginning appointed most excellent places for his seuerall creatures wherein they were to performe their seruice and homage vnto God as Heauen was the proper place assigned to Angels to man Paradise in his innocencie as after his fall the families of the Patriarches before and in Christs time the Temple since that time the societies and congregations of the faithfull are these places appointed for man to set 〈◊〉 the speciall praises of the Creator in Now the Angels leauing their place incurred two grieuous sinneâ— first they left the presence of God secondly their office and calling in which they ought for euer to haue been employed in the glorifying of God Ob. But doe not the Diuelâ— keepe in the ayre Ans. Some of them doe by Gods permission but not as in their proper place or first habitation for that was in the comfortable presence of God in heauen The third point in this sinne is the measure of it They left that is wholly and toâ—ally their condition they quite forsooke God his image heauen it selfe and that office which therein they were assigned vnto Obiect Here it may bee obiected If the Angels in their innocencie and excellencie fâ—ll wholy and vtterly from God much more 〈◊〉 sinfull man although beleeuers wholy fall from God and vtterly cut themselues by 〈◊〉 from Christ. Ans. But hereunto I answere that there is not the same reason of the grace of creation as iâ— of the grace of regeneration for that commeth farre short of this by the former the creature hath a power either to stand or fall to abide with God or depart from him and this power is in it selfe but by this latter grace of regeneration such feare of God is put into the hearts of the regenerate that they shall not depart from God Iere. 32.40 and this power of not falling is in them indeed but not from themselues neither is it strange that there should bee such difference betweene the state of nature and that which is aboue nature Againe as the grace of creation and regeneration is different so there is a difference of the will created and regenerate Created will hath a freedome to will that which is good so hath the will regenerate also Secondly created will hath a power to will to perseuere in that which is good so also hath the will regenerate The created will hath not the will it selfe neither the act of perseuerance wherein it differeth from the will regenerate which hath both these Heere the Schoolemen deceiued themselues and others in that they taught that in the conuersion of a sinner the will hath a freedome to receiue grace or not to receiue it so placing it in the will of man and putting it in his own hand and power to beleeue or not beleeue But the truth is that in the first conuersion of a sinner the will rebelleth and 〈◊〉 For none commeth to the Sonne vnlesse the Father draw him it is not the will it selfe but the conuersion of it that frameâ—â— i◠〈◊〉 willingnes making it of vnwilling willing to â—â—tertaine that which iâ— truly good Iâ— is vntrue that the will of man is now as the will of Angels was before their fall hauing a power to fall or not fall Vse First in thâ—â— the Angels were condemned for forsaking their first beginning we must bewaile this 〈◊〉 sin in our selues for we also had the same first beginning with them the same image of God 〈…〉 vpon 〈◊〉 which wee haue willingly departed 〈…〉 that remaineth for vs to doe which belongeth not 〈◊〉 them to vsâ— all meanes to obtaine ouâ— first beginnings againe that this image may be restored vnto vs and renued vpon vs vnto which three things are required first that our spirituall vnderstanding be cleered and enlightened secondly that a good heart and conscience bee gotten and preserued thirdly a subiection in our whole conuersation vnto all the lawes and commandements of God Secondly though we haue the same beginning by creation which is lost by our fall yet wee haue another beginning by a new birth and regeneration which they want we haue been borne baptized and brought vp many yeeres in the true faith and profession of Christ now our dutie is to bee more wise than before to be warie lest wee fall from this beginning as wee haue done from the former but cleaue to our faith and stand to our vow made in our Baptisme for otherwise our estate becommeth as remedilesse as the condition of the Angels themselues who are shut vp in the chaines of condemnation for euer Thirdly we see how farre the Scriptures may bee said to bee sufficient to cleere all doubtes and determine all controuersies seeing here it onely propoundeth a generall sinne of Angels and nameth no particular as Peter also saith they sinned and Iohn that they stood not in the truth Thus contenting it selfe with generall tearmes without particularizing the proper sinne deseruing this iudgement and determineth not that great question controuerted among Diuines of whome some say it was a 〈◊〉 in thought otherâ— that it was actuall others that it was enuie some Pride c. which maketh the Papists saye that the Scriptures are not sufficient to determine all hard questions But we must not imagine the Scriptures to be such a iudge 〈◊〉 decideth all doubts which the curiositie of mans braine may cast within it selfe whereof there are 〈◊〉 among the ancient Schoolemen such as this iâ— by scripture indeterminable nay of purpose the holy Ghost â—uâ—teth 〈◊〉 all cause of such curiositie by silence in such â—nnecessarie matters that 〈…〉 the rather 〈◊〉 to â—â—re
A GODLIE AND LEARNED EXPOSITION VPON THE WHOLE EPISTLE OF IVDE CONTAINING THREESCORE AND SIXE SERMONS PREACHED IN CAMBRIDGE BY THAT REVEREND AND FAITHFVLL MAN OF GOD Master WILLIAM PERKINS AND NOW AT THE REQVEST OF HIS EXECVTORS published by THOMAS TAYLOR Preacher of Gods Word WHERVNTO IS PREFIXED A LARGE ANALYSIS CONTAINING the summe and order of the whole booke according to the Authors owne method TO WHICH ARE FVRTHER ADDED FOVRE BRIEFE TABLES to direct the Reader in the finding of either 1. Common places of Religion 2. More generall doctrines 3. Questions determined 4. Places of Scripture either expounded or cleered from corruption REVEL 3.11 Behold I come shortly hold that which thou hast that no man take away thy crowne LONDON Printed by FELIX KYNGSTON for THOMAS MAN dwelling in Pater noster row at the signe of the Talbot 1606. TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE WILLIAM LORD RVSSEL BARON OF THORNEHAVGH Grace and all good blessings from God our Father and our Lord Iesus Christ. RIght Honorable as it cannot be but true which Truth it selfe hath vttered Him that honoureth me I will honour no more can it be but sure payment which such a creditor hath vndertaken and not by any suretie but by himselfe to be performed Bootlesly had the world been betrusted with such a charge which by suffering some to walke through dishonour and by powring out contempt vpon others vnwittingly suiteth the condition of the seruants to the case of the Sonne who said I honour the Father but ye dishonour me Well then is it with vs that he whose bare word is aboue all bonds hath said I will honour not those who by treading downe his honour honour themselues neither whom men honour nor who honour men but those who honour him by louing him as a Father and â—eaing him as a Lord. Not that any man can inlarge his honor the infinit perfection whereof is in it selfe vncapable of any accession nor â—hat any can of himselfe expresse this honour seeing himselfe worketh â—â—th such willes and deeds also of his owne good pleasure neither that if any â—ould hee might merit the returne of honour for all that were but his â—utie nor that if any could and would hee should thereby profit God â—o whom mans goodnes is not extended nor lastly if any could and â—ould not God should thereby be disprofited for if one be wicked he â—â—â—teth not him but because the Lord who delighteth to be the portion â—f Iacob is pleased to accept the broken and homely seruice of his chilâ—â—en as an high honour done vnto himselfe and themselues as honorersâ—f â—f him and such as he by crowning his owne worke in them cannot â—ut honour But what shall be done to the man whom this King will honour Ans. If Baltazer King of Babel were to promise his highest honours if Haâ—an were to aduise Ahashuerosh King of 27. Prouinces in the bestowing 〈◊〉 what honours himselfe could wish or hope if Pharaoh should call â—gaine his Nobles to consultation how to enlarge Iosephs aduanceâ—ents no more could be either promised expected or performed than â—â—at such a one should be arraied with royall attyre as cloath of purple 〈◊〉 fine linnen with a golden chaine about his necke the Kings Ring 〈◊〉 his hand his princely Diadem set vpon his head and withall by proâ—â—â—mation published the third man or Viceroy in the kingdom Which infinite in recitall and partly for that these haue most valiantly like Dauids worthies broken thorough these Philistims forces and brought vnto vs in despight of them the pure water of the well of life among whom this our Author last named was not the least nor of so small note through the Christian world that I can thinke by my penne to adde any moment vnto his whose writings so sauory and so innocent haue sufficiently proclaimed his profound knowledge in all learning his prudent zeale his mature iudgement with an admirable dexteritie and facilitie yea I may say felicitie for herein hee raigned that I may vse the phrase of the reuerend Deane of his Maiesties Chappel properly applied vnto him at his funerals which with singular approbation he performed in the direct resoluing the obscurest doubts of Diuinitie and the acute loosing and dissoluing the hardest knots of Papists so briefly and yet so perspicuously as that his most polemicall writings being first by himself in our vulgar tongue published could scarce meete euen amongst our common people with such an vncapeable reader if any whit catechised into whom they might not conuey some competent conceit and vnderstanding of the deepest and darkest differences betweene the Papists those patrons and defenders of darknes and our selues But besides these such a tongue of the learned had the Lord God giuen him that he knew to minister and ministred according to knowledge a word in due time to him that was weary the which most weighty duty of the Ministery was so familiar vnto him that he made it his holidayes exercise as his recreation to resolue cases of conscience In his ordinary Ministry how powerfull was he Which of his hearers cannot confesse that he spake as one hauing authority Adde now vnto these his labours an holy and harmelesse life for why should I disioyne them seeing they were so happily combined in him betweene which two both of them conspiring to the glory of God and his cause was such a sweete harmonie and concent that in reading his writings any man might see the manner of his life and in seeing his life he might also therein reade his writings for his life spakâ— what his pen writ and his person was the president of his written precepts Buâ— when these vnweariable labours had quickly worne out such a candle who so freeâ—ly spent himselfe to giue others light such a life was not shut vp but by a proporâ—tionall euen a religious and christian death of the which when God made witâ— some others my selfe a beholder I could not but conceiue him a messenger onâ— of a thousand singled out by God to giue directions to others both how to liue and that well as also in the right manner of dying well who himselfe waâ— so trained to a blessed death by a holy life whereby he became both in life anâ— death a most happie and blessed man for whose written precepts concerning both the whole Church is bound to blesse God with vs but especially we his ordinarâ— hearers in Cambridge who besides were also the beholders of both cannot be 〈◊〉 so much the more strengthned and confirmed our owne heedlesse ingratitude 〈◊〉 resisting or withstanding vs by how much the eye is quicker then the eare anâ— the sight a more certaine sense then can be the hearing But we will leaue hiâ— with God and omit those worthie works which himselfe whilest he liued accoâ—â—ding as the relaxation both from the weekely labours of his calling and the dayâ— weakenes of his body would
of this Iude at his birth giue him such a name as might moue not only himselfe but his child after him to thankfulnes and confession of Gods goodnes So ought euery father in imposing his childrens names with Alpheus and euery mother with Leah make such choice of names as themselues and their children may bee put in minde yea and stirred vp to good duties euen so often as they shal heare or remember their own names The second point in this name is the variety of the names of Iude hee was called Thaddeus Mark 3.18 and Lebbeus Matth. 10.3 all which signifie the same thin gand all put in minde of the same dutie Here two Questions may bee asked First why was he called by so many names Some thinke he had all these names giuen him by the people and multitude as signifying all one thing others which is more probable that hee was thus called by the Apostles themselues rather then by his owne name that the horrible fact of Iudas in betraying his Maister should bee vtterly with his name forgotten A second question is whether may a man change his name or no If the change thereof be no preiuidce to any man much lesse hurtefull to the Church or common-welth nor offendeth the faithfull but wholy tendeth to the glory of God and good of men it may be altred and changed As Saul a great persecutor being called to be a publisher and Patron of the Gospell changed his name into Paul as also Salomon was at the first called by his Mother Iedidiah Peter at first called Simon Bariones Christ afterwards gaue him a new name and he accepted it Yet hence the too common practise of the world cannot bee warranted who for fraud and deceite doe alter their names which when it is not intended may warrantably bee done as in time of persecution in the raigne of King Edward the 6. Bucer changed his name and both called himselfe and suffered others to call him Aretius Felinus so did diuerse other worthie men in those dayes seeking no other then the glory of God and good of the Church in their owne saftie and that the Papists not knowing their names might reade their writinges without preiudice The second thing in the person writing is his office being called a seruant of Iesus Christ which is not so generallie to be vnderstood as ment of euery professor of Christ and beleeuer who is a seruant of the Lord Iesus but of a speciall seruice namely of Apostleship to which he was deputed Wherein consider two thinges First that he was called to bee an Apostle and seruant of Christ to plant the Church of the Gentiles Secondly that he did faithfully execute his function and performed his seruice First he pleades his calling for two causes first in regard of others and secondly in respect of himselfe First that his doctrine might with more attention and reuerence be receiued of others seeing he run not vnsent but was called and that to an Apostleship and therefore he spake not of himselfe but whollie and immediately directed by God Secondly for the confirming and comforting of himselfe that the Lord who had called him would stand by him both in protecting his person and prospering his worke in his hand Vse Seeing the Apostle Iude before he writeth laieth down his calling so ought all Ministers to make their calling the foundation of all their proceedings containing themselues within the compasse thereof euen as they are to teach the same dutie vnto all sortes of men that they tempt not the Lord by passing the bonds and limites of their calling Secondly in that Iude though he was of the same Tribe yea of neare allyance vnto Christ yet hee passeth by all these respectes which hee might haue stood vpon and contenteth himselfe with the title of a seruant of Christ We learne to make more account and esteeme it a greater priuiledge to be a seruant of Iesus Christ than to bee of the kindred of Kinges and allyed to the greatest Monarchs of the world Christ himselfe shewes vs what kindred should take vp our chiefe delight when hee turned himselfe from his Mother and Brethren and beholding his hearers said those were his mother sisters and brethren that heare the word of God and keepe it this alliance in the faith was neerer and dearer vnto him then that in the flesh If then thou standest vpon thy preferment striue to be the seruant of Christ which is more honorable then to be the sonne of a King to be a follower of Chist is more then to goe before the Rulers of the earth But if thou aske how shall I come to this preferment Himselfe answereth thee thou must giue vp thy selfe to heare his word and doe it that is learne to know and obey his will this is the maine dutie of a seruant endeuour to please the Lord in keeping faith and good conscience thou art in the way of preferment and art admitted a seruant of Christ. Thirdly If wee bee admitted the seruantes and followers of Christ wee must serue no other Maister but keepe our selues from being intangled either with the offences or affairs of the world as to be vassals thereto no man can serue two much lesse more Maisters of such contrarie commaundes Let none pretend to bee the seruant of Christ who by louing pleasure more thē God or seeking earth more then heauen disgrace such a profession The third thing in the person writing is the allyance Brother of Iames of which name there were two first Iames the son of Zebedeus whose death is mentioned in the 12. of the Actes by Herod the second was the son of Alpheus here mentioned First that he might distinguish himselfe from the other Iudas the traytour Secondly that he might winne further credit and attention to his doctrine seeing hee was no vnknowne person but one that came of the worthiest stock that was vpon the face of the earth and for this cause hee mentioneth his brother Iames who was better knowne as being the President of the Councell at Ierusalem and a choise pillar of the Church in his time Act. 15.13 not to credit himselfe but this Scripture which otherwise is in it selfe sufficiently powerful by the mention of him Now followes the second thing in the Salutation that is the person to whom Iude wrote in these words vnto those who are called and sanctified by God the father and preserued by Iesus Christ it is the militant Catholique Church which is liuelie described to be the number of beleeuers dispersed thorough the face of the whole world who are effectually called and sanctified and preserued vnto life euerlasting Out of which description note First who and what they bee that are members of this Church namely no wicked or profane persons but onely the elect such as are chosen vnto life euerlasting who after receiue their calling vnto holines and therein are assuredly preserued vnto life which priuiledges no wicked
receiue it First God giueth it vnto vs when he giueth vs Christ himselfe for it is giuen with him and it is made ours when God in mercie esteemeth iudgeth and accounteth it to be ours for it is ours by imputation which appeareth by these two reasons First as Christ is made out sinne so are we made his righteousnes 2. Cor. 5.21 but hee is made our sinne by imputation and therefore his iustice being inhereÌ„t in him is made ours by imputation Secondly as the first Adams disobedience is made ours so Christs the second Adams obedience is ours Rom. 5.17.18 but that is ours by imputation and therefore Christs obedience also Secondly to make this obedience ours we must receiue it and that can be onely by faith which is the hand of the soule receiuing into it the things that are giuen vs of God where note by the way that a sinner is not iustified by the dignitie of his faith but as it is an instrument whereby Christs obedience is applied vnto the soule III. Point What workes are excluded from iustification Ans. The workes of Morall and Ceremoniall law workes of nature and grace That euen workes of grace are excluded appeareth by these reasons First a sinner must so bee iustified that all cause of boasting may be cut off Rom. 3.27 But if a man were iustified by workes of grace he might boast still yea though hee acknowledge the workes to be of God see the Pharisies example Luk. 18. Secondly if a man were iustified by the workes of the law then our iustification should stand by the law but that it doth not Rom. 4.14 for then the promise were made voide yea the tenour of that whole Chapter prooueth that Abraham hauing store of good workes was yet iustified by faith without the works of the law the which thing also that obiection in chap. 6.1 witnesseth What then shall we continue in sinne drawne out of the fiue former chapters thus If a man may be iustified by faith without workes we may continue in sinne which obiection were no obiection if that had not been the intent of the Apostle to prooue iustification by faith onely without the workes of the law Thirdly Paul was not iustified by any workes 1. Cor. 4.3 I know nothing by my selfe yet am I not therby iustified where he noteth two things of himselfe first that hee had a good conscience within him secondly that he was not thereby iustified where hee debarreth all works of grace Fourthly we are saued by grace without workes these workes excluded are workes of grace for they are all such as God hath prepared to walke in Ephes. 2.8 Fiftly a man must first be iustified before he can doe a good worke and therfore works follow iustification and cannot cause it Yea and as all workes are excluded so al vertues also excepting faith are here reiected For as in a man that standeth to receiue a gift no part doth any thing to receiue it but the hand yet hauing receiued it all other parts testifie thankfulnes the tongue the feete and all the bodie euen so wee receiue the matter of our iustification by faith alone not by hope or loue but after the receiuing of Christ these with the other graces work and shew themselues The second point in this ground is the weight of it appearing herein that he that ouerthroweth it ouerturneth the faith Rom. 4.14 If they of the law be heâ—res of life faith is made voide and the promise of none effect And Galath 2.21 If we be iustified by workes Christ died in vaine Aduersaries hereof First the home-aduersarie is the common sort of ignorant people and all naturall men who with the young man say What shall I doe to be saued They say they will be saued by faith in Christ but when it commeth to the point they will be doing somewhat and stand much vpon their good meaning and righteous dealing Secondly the forreine enemie is the Popish doctrine Romish religion which teacheth that there be two iustifications First when a man of an euil man is made a good man this is by grace of the holy Ghost put into the heart the latter is whereby a man is made of good better which is by good workes But what Church soeuer holdeth this is fallen from grace This is a peremptorie sentence will some say and no generall Councell hath so determined Ans. The more is the pitie But Gods word hath peremptorily determined it Galat. 5.4 They are abolished from Christ and fallen from grace whosoeuer will be iustified by the law as the Romane Church at this day They say our doctrine maintaineth loosenes of life by excluding all workes from iustification Ans. Though we exclude the best works from iustification yet we debarre them not from Christian conuersation but therein require them as fruits of the spirit plentifully Ob. But it is absurd say they that one man may be iustified by the righteousnes of another Ans. Adams sinne is made ours and they marueile not at it what greater absurditie is it that the second Adams obedience answering to the first Adams sinne should bee ours in like manner The 16. ground is this Except a man be borne anew of water and of the holâ—e Ghost he cannot enter into the kingdome of God Ioh. 3.5 In which obserue first the meaning secondly the weight thirdly the aduersaries In the first consider two points first what it is to be borne againe secondly of what necessitie it is For the former wee must know that there must bee in him that is borne againe three things first a reall change from one estate to another Secondly there must be a roote from whence this change may arise Thirdly a new life First the chaunge is when a man of a meere naturall man is made a new man not in regard of his bodie or soule or powers of them all which a man retaineth the same after his regeneration but in regard of Gods image restored and renewed by Christ Ephes. 4.24 This is the restoring of that new qualitie of righteousnes and holines lost in Adam for so the Apostle describeth this new birth in the place alleaged This change is attributed to water and the holy Ghost wherein by water our Sauiour alludeth to some speeches of the old Testament as Ezech. 36.25 where the Prophet speaketh of the clensing of the Church by powring cleane water vpon it that is infusing new graces into the heart which take place of the old corruption And by the holy Ghost he sheweth that this clensing of vs is by the inward working of the holy Ghost Obiect But it will be said if a man bee a new man hee must haue a new soule Ans. This new qualitie of righteousnes and holines is as it were a new soule for in a regenerate man there is a bodie soule and besides the spirit which is the grace of sanctification opposed to flesh and
sinnes and hereby they are conuinced to bee dreamers seeing they sleepe securely in the middest of such iudgements In handling the words wee will first speak of the fountain because it is first in nature and then secondly of their sinnes flowing from thence The originâ—ll of these sinnes is that they are dreamers which worde leadeth vs to a double cause of them first that they are sleepers made 〈◊〉 with sleepe and secondly in this sleepe of theirs they are deluded with dreames We are then to vnderstand first what thâ—â— sleepe is and in the next pâ—â—ce what bee the dreameâ— which in 〈◊〉 sleepe 〈◊〉 them This sleepe is not that naturall sleepe which oppresseth the bodie but a spirituall sleepe like vnto that in diuers things going ouer the soule binding vp the faculties of the same and bringing a heauines or deadnes rather into all the powers of man so far forth as they ought to be mouing in spiritual actions and affaires It causeth the mind neuer to thinke seriously of God or a mans owne estate the conscience neuer or seldom to accuse for sinne committed the will neuer or seldome to will that which is truly good the affections neuer or seldome to be mooued at Gods word or workes Thus it goeth ouer the whole soule and casteth it in a dead sleepe so as it is altogether vnfit to goe about the actions of an heauenly life Example hereof we haue in the old world they eat and dranke c. and knew nothing till the flood came they dreamed continually of many other things but neuer of their owne destruction Diues also was cast on such a sleepe he fâ—red deliciously euery day hee neuer thought of heauen for he was neuer to come there nor of hell fire till he felt the flame This spirituall sleep is three-foldâ— first the naturall sleepe of heart by which euery one is ouertaken so as by nature no man can so much as moue himselfe to the least good till God awake him and say to him Awake thou that sleepest and stand vp from the dead The second sleepe is a slumber and indeed the remainders of this naturall sleepe in the children of God being awakened out of their dead sleepe for euen they are ouertaken often with a spirituall slumber by reason of remainders of sin in them So the spouse acknowledgeth Cant. 5.2 I sleep but my heart waketh The third sleepe is the increase of that naturall sleepe and deadnes of heart by the custome of sinne when as the heart is made past feeling and altogether senselesse through continuance in sinne Ephes. 4.19 This last kind is that which is attributed here to these deceiuers for so the word notwithstanding importeth for although they knew the iudgements of God against sinne yet they are senselesse and carelesse in the middest of them Now in the next place let vs see what these dreames are here spoken of and they bee nothing else but wicked carnall and vaine imaginations arising from an impure heart and conceiued in a corrupted mind which in the end deceiue and delude men no otherwise than a dreame which while a man sleepeth seemeth to haue some truth in it but as soone as one awaketh it vanisheth away and indeed hath in it nothing lesse An example whereof wee haue in the rich man Luk. 12.19 who in his fulnes and encrease of riches dreamed of an happinesse and a continuance in it many yeeres when that night his soule was taken away The Angell of the Church of Laodices dreamed that hee was rich encreased with wealth and stood in need of nothing whereas hee knew not that hee was blinde poore miserable and naked Reue. 3.17 So the Pharisee dreamed that he was another manner of man than the poore sinfull Publicane but it was but a meere dreame for the other departed away iustified Doct. Hence we may note the cause why so few entertaine the doctrine of the Gospell so few forsake their sinnes and turne vnto God and that is because men are dreamers being cast and lulled asleepe in their sinnes and therein deluded with many false imaginations which draw them from God As first some pleade that they were neuer booke learned they could neuer write nor reade therefore they must be excused in their ignorance as not being bound to know the word of God they need not frequent so many sermons or if they doe they are not greatly to care to carrie them away Secondly others dreame that because they haue liued thus long and yet had neuer any such crosse as they see befall others therfore they are most happie men and God loueth them they finde the blessing of God vpon them in euery thing and therefore they serue God well enough or so much as serueth their turne Thirdly others haue learning and knowledge and begin to dreame that therefore they want nothing they blesse themselues in their naked knowledge and neuer haue care in their hearts to receiue Christ. Fourthly others are prophane and dreame that the Master will not come yet God will not yet call them they shall haue time enough to repent in for they craue but one houre on their death-beds and that shal they haue in the meane time they giue themselues ouer to riot and excesse neuer regarding though all the world crie shame vpon them vntill their Master take them vnawares Lastly it is a common dreame amongst men that the promise of life eternal is but a dreame and so many make but a dreame of the whole word of God and all religion that looke as Sarah did not so much regard the promise as she ought to haue done because she tooke it for a dreame and made a matter of laughter of it Gen. 18.12 and as those who were reduced from the captiuity of Babylon entertained the promise of their returne but as a dreame by their own confession Psal. 126. and Peter wheÌ„ he was deliuered by the Angel out of prison could not bee perswaded that it was so but that he had seene a vision or dreamed a dreame Act. 12.9 Euen so men hold the doctrine of the Gospell but as a dreame seeing they can hold it in opinion but neuer endeuour to reforme their liues by it but such dreames disappoint men commonly of saluation which while men bring to the hearing of the word it is no marueile if we haue such iust cause of complaint for want of profiting vnder it as appeareth euery where at this day The most powerfull Ministrie shall little preuaile so long as men come with their hearts ful fraught with their carnall imaginations and with such heauines of spirit Secondly in that these dreames are made the causes of all sinnes we are taught to learne the lesson of the Apostle Ephes. 5.14 Awake thou that sleepest and stand vp from the dead And 1. Thess. 5.6 Let vs not sleepe as others doe which that wee may doe consider first the reasons and meanes which may bee effectuall to
him such princely gifts as it is said God gaue him another heart his heart was changed in regard of other gifts than formerly he had so when Dauid was annoynted King and when Samuel had powred the horne of oyle vpon his head it is said 1. Sam. 16.13 that the spirit of the Lord came vpon him which furnished him with gifts and graces both of regeneration and regiment also In like manner the Lord tooke of the spirit of Moses and put it on the seuenty Elders Numb 11.17 whereby they were furnished with gifts of gouernment and enabled to beare rule and iudge iustly as Moses was such titles therefore as these are not ascribed vnto them without iust cause Yea how can they be fitlier called than Glories seeing there is no greater glorie in earth than to supplie Gods roome and to bee enabled with gifts for the sufficient discharge of it Hence learne that it is lawfull for Princes to beare an outward pompe in diet buildings costly apparell and troopes of men for they are dignities and their dignitie being outward in regard of men they may maintaine it by outward pompe to procure more reuerence and awe of men thereunto So Agrippa and Bernice came with great pompe and entred into the common hall which pompe is not there discommended but rather approued as by the circumstances of the text appeareth Secondly Magistrates ought especially to honour God because he especially honoureth them this must they doe by discountenancing and punishing vice and by setting vp and maintaining true religion and vertue Thirdly being in Gods place they are to execute iustice without corruption or partialitie in the face and feare of God 2. Chro. 9.7 Seeing the iudgement is the Lords let the feare of God bee vpon you take heede and doe it Deut. 1.17 Ye shall haue no respect of persons in iudgement but shall heare the small as well as the great ye shall not feare the face of man for the iudgement is Gods and herein stands a great part of their glorie Fourthly we are in all lawfull things to yeeld free subiection and obedience vnto our Magistrates and gouernours euen as vnto God himselfe whose roome they are in which duty the child oweth also to his father the seruant to his Master because they also are set ouer them in Gods stead Fifthly hence also is it lawfull for vs to giue to Princes the titles of Maiestie and Grace because it hath pleased the holy Ghost to ascribe them vnto them and by their titles to commend their persons and places vnto vs yea and to furnish them with such gifts of Magistracie as that they become not onely naked titles but iust significations of the true honour which God hath graced them withall Vers. 9. Yet Michael the Archangell when he stroue against the Diuell and disputed about the bodie of Moses durst not blame him with cursed speaking but said The Lord rebuke thee IN this verse is laid downe another reason amplifying their sin of these seducers by a comparison from the greater to the lesse and thus it standeth Michael the Archangell durst not so much as raile on the Diuell himselfe much lesse may these vpon Magistrates who are Gods and consequently their sinne is hainous who dare open their mouthes to reuile Princes and Magistrates Here one question is mooued namely whence the Apostle had this historie of the disputation betweene Michael and the Diuell concerning the bodie of Moses seeing it is not to bee found in the Scriptures I answere the substance of it is in the Scripture although though not the circumstances For in Deut. 34.6 is said that the Lord buried Moses but no man knoweth of his sepulchre till this day There is the ground of the historie the other particular concerning the contention of the Archangell and the Diuell wiâ—h this manner of rebuking is not found in the old Testament Quest. Where then had he this Ans. Either from some booke then extant among the Iewes which is not now to bee found or else from some tradition which passed amoÌ„g the Iewes from hand to hand as many things did as that 2. Timot. 3.8 where the Apostle saith that Iannes and Iambres withstood Moses the historie of which is not found in the old Testament Hence the Papists conclude that the word written is not sufficient and perfect in and of it selfe vnlesse the vnwritten word be added vnto it that is that word which is giuen by tradition both which say they make a perfect word but neither is perfect or sufficient alone grounding their opinion hence that Iude alleageth an example out of a tradition which is not found in Scripture But that is an hereticall doctrine and vntrue seeing the perfection of a thing is not to bee measured by euery thing that is wanting vnto it but by the perfect end of it for perfection is taken from the end Whence I reason thus If the written word be perfect and sufficient to the end to which it is ordained it is euery way perfect But it is perfect and sufficient to that end namely to the glorie of God in working out perfectly the faith saluation of man and is in nothing wanting for the atchieuing of this end but sufficiently teacheth all things to be beleeued and done and giueth perfect direction concerning faith and manners Ioh. 20.31 These things are written that they might beleeue and beleeuing might haue life thorough his name Rom. 15.4 Whatsoeuer things are written are written for our learning that wee through patience and comfort of the Scriptures might haue hope and therefore the word written is euery way most sufficient and absolutely perfect and neede no addition or tradition to helpe forward this end Ob. This place is a tradition and not written and many other true traditions were neuer written besides that the Church may make traditions Ans. We grant many true traditions are not in Scripture but such they are as a man may be ignorant of and not preiudice his saluation Againe the Church hath a power and hath had priuiledge to make constitutions and lawes which were to be knowne and receiued but these are such as only concerne the orderly gouernment of the Church and are not necessarie to saluation Ob. But some traditions are necessarie to saluation which are not contained in the written word and they alleage two first in Rom. 12.6 that Gods word must be tried by the rule of faith and so also by the same rule expounded This rule of faith is nothing else by their exposition but a general consent in the hearts of all true Catholikes together with the Pope assenting with them which of necessitie wee must beleeue and yet say they it is not in the Scripture and therefore some things must of necessitie bee beleeued which are not in the Scripture Ans. The rule of faith is not such a crooked rule as they would thrust vpon the world by their wicked exposition but the right rule of faith
Matth. 17. Againe when a man will needs reuenge himselfe of a wrong done against him hee takes vpon him the person of the accuser witnesse Iudge and executioner which is against all iustice and equitie besides that the Lord challengeth this as his own prerogatiue Vengeance is mine and I will repay Ob. But did not Elias pray for fire from heauen in way of reuenge whereby he destroyed his enemies Ans. He did but by instinct from God which is as much as a commandement Ob. But Christ when he was smitten said If I haue well said why smitest thou me Ans. We must put a difference betweene lawfull defence of our selues in our good cause and the offence of our aduersaries Farre was Christ herein from reuenge and so must we Ob. But this is hard and impossible vnto flesh and blood Ans. Yea but we professe our selues to bee children of our Father in heauen and therefore we are to haue more than flesh and blood in vs euen that grace of God which carrieth beleeuers further in Christs schoole than flesh and blood can leade them Vse Schollers and learned men that are to defend Gods cause and the truth of religion yea euen against very heretikes must abstaine from reuiling speeches if wee be reuiled by the peâ— of the aduersarie we must commit the iniurie to God Secondly people that goe to law with others for most part herein offend that they doe it in way of reuenge and to wrecke their malice vpon their aduersarie whereas the right vse of suiâ—e in law is only to defend a mans right all reuenge laid aside Thirdly hence men of valour are taught not to take a challenge into the field it is an honour not to accept of it seeing reuenge is to bee left vnto God let the wrong bee neuer so great Fourthly when men be at oddes and difference it is not lawfull to chide braule contend crie and lift vp the voyce in threatnings seeing all these are degrees and kindes of reuenge which wee must leaue vnto God Qu. What must a man doe that is to incounter with the Diuel either by temptation possession or otherwise Ans. Hee must follow the practise of the Archangel euen flie to God by prayer and intreate him to rebuke him The like practise must be taken vp by those who are to deale with heretikes who seeke the ouerthrow of religion The Lord must be intreated to restraine the malice of the Diuell that he may not in himselfe or instruments preuaile to corrupt or represse much lesse suppresse or supplant the truth Vers. 10. But these speake euill of those things which they know not and whatsoeuer things they know naturally as beasts which are without reason in those things they corrupt themselues IN the former part of this verse is laid downe a third argument which amplifieth the sinne of these deceiuers thus framed For a man to giue sentence and condemne that which hee knoweth not is a point of great iniustice and rashnes But these men condemning Magistracie condemne a thing they know not and therefore are iustly accused of rashnes and iniustice The like sâ—â—ne of these seducers hath been too vsuall in all ages In the daies of the Apostles themselues the Gentiles accounted the doctrine of the Gospell but foolishnes the Iewes an offence and yet neither of them knew what it was The same rashnes is at this day to bee descried in the Church of Rome who haue denounced the sentence of excommunication against our Churches and condemne the Protestants for heretikes when the most of them neuer knew our doctrine nor neuer heard what wee could say for our selues yea most iniuriously they mistake vs in sundry maine points of doctrine as when wee teach that workes doe not iustifie a man before God they crie out and say we condemne all good workes The same fault is exceeding rise amongst vs in these daies for let a man make conscience of his waies and endeuour to please God he is presently branded with names of reproch by those whose tongues are nimble to speake euill of things they neuer knew who are to know that a man cannot be too precise in keeping the commaundements of God and that themselues haue made a promise in Baptisme to walke in no other waies and ought to renew the same so often as they come to the Lords table And whatsoeuer things they know naturally In the rest of this verse is set downe the third sinne of these deceiuers which is the sinne of intemperance standing in the immoderate vse of meate and drinke apparell c. Touching this sinne two things are propounded first the proper cause of it that is naturall knowledge in these words Whatsoeuer they know naturally Secondly the sinne it selfe or the propertie of it In those things they corrupt themselues The cause is because they are guided with a naturall knowledge like the bruite beasts which are without reason There be three kindes of knowledge incident vnto the creature first naturall knowledge arising from the instinct of nature common to man and beast and consisting in the senses of sight taste touching c. by the benefit whereof the beast it selfe can discerne what is food fit for it selfe and what is not what is profitable and what is hurtfull and vnprofitable for it vnto which is ioyned a naturall appetite by the benefit of which the creature can chuse or refuse his food and meate in season The second is reasonable knowledge proper to man and is nothing els but the light of vnderstanding whereby he reacheth farre higher and discerneth meate drinke apparell and rest to be Gods good gifts and knoweth the ciuill vse of them with the which is ioyned election of will whereby hee can chuse or refuse the ciuill or vnciuil honest or dishonest vse of them This knowledge is in all men for euen the Gentiles themselues doe by nature the things contained in the law Rom. 2.14 that is ciuilly and outwardly thus many of the Heathen haue excelled in ciuill carriage and practise of iustice temperance and other ciuill vertues The third is spirituall knowledge not proceeding either from naturall instinct or reason it selfe but from the enlightening of the spirit of God and it hath sundrie fruits First it enableth men to know these things in their right causes as that these giftes of meates drinks such like proceed from God not as he is the God of nature only but as by grace in Christ he is our God yea our Father so they become pledges of his speciall mercie seeing they are now restored againe to the beleeuer hauing been formerly lost in Adams fall Secondly this knowledge causeth men to know them in the due measure of their goodnes and excellencie rightly discerning them from spirituall blessings so as the heart shall not be set vpon them in the first place but vpon the other as of farre higher esteeme yea they shall bee counted as dung in regard of these Thirdly it instructeth
was the seuenth from Adam Here two questions are to bee answered first whence had Iude this historie seeing it is no where recorded in the Scriptures and how knew he it to be Enochs I answere two waies first he either had it and learned it to bee his by some tradition which went from hand to hand or else written by some Iew or secondly he learned it out of some booke which went vnder Enochs name then extant in the daies of the Apostles though now lost it is certaine that one of these waies hee had it Hence the Papists gather that the Iewes had vnwritten traditions and consequently all their traditions are to be obserued Ans. We denie not all vnwritten traditions of which some are true and profitable but wee renounce and denie all those traditions which are made articles of faith rules of Gods worship necessarie to saluation for all such doctrines are written in the books of the Prophets and Apostles which containe perfect direction and rules concerning faith manners of which kind the Romane Church holdeth their traditions to be this is of another kind it being no article of faith nor necessary to saluation to knowe whether Enoch writ this prophecie or no. Againe from the second answere others who are no Papists conclude that some bookes of Canonicall Scripture are perished and lost But this is vntrue for then first the fidelitie of the Church which is the keeper of these Oracles should be called in question and secondly in the bookes Canonicall extant not one sentence or tittle no not the sense of any sentence is lost how then should whole bookes come to be lost It is alleaged that the books of Salomon are most of them lost Answ. The bookes of Salomon which were lost were bookes of humanitie and Philosophie for hee writ of all beasts birds trees euen from the Cedar in Libanus to the hyssop vpon the wall the books of humane truth might faile but no part of Canonicall Scripture Ob. Mention is made in the Scripture of the bookes of the Chronicles of the Iewes or Kings of Iudah but these are perished Ans. They were politique histories as are the Chronicles of England or other Countries Ob. The bookes of Nathan Gad Iddâ— Shemaiah and other Prophets are perished Ans. All these as is though by the learned are contained in the bookes of the Kings Chronicles and Samuel Ob. This book of Enoch is lost Ans. First it is doubted whether it was a booke or no or went by a tradition Secondly if it was a booke it was no part of Scripture for Moses was the first penman of Scripture who liued long after Enoch The second question why doth the Apostle make choise of this testimonie of Enoch rather than some other Prophet Answ. Himselfe giueth two reasons First he was the seuenth from Adam it is therefore an ancient testimonie to be receiued and reuerenced for the antiquitie but withall it sheweth what is true antiquitie namely when a doctrine of religion can bee prooued from some Prophet or Apostle for this testimonie was a prophecie and therefore that antiquitie which the Church of Rome challengeth to her religion and doctrine is but counterfeit because they are not able to iustifie the maine pointes thereof from any Prophet or Apostle yea in these wherein they dissent from vs they cannot bring their proofe and descent from within the first hundred yeeres after Christ. It is then a vaine plea and false pretence of them to boast of the antiquitie of their religion The second reason is in the word prophecied for Enoch spoke not this of his owne head or motion but from God for no creature Angell or man can foretell things to come it being a prerogatiue properly belonging vnto God Ob. Yes but the learned Physition can truely foretell the death of the patient to come Ans. He doth not properly herein foretell a thing to come for the death of the partie is present in the signes and causes of it Ob. But the Diuell could foretell Sauls death 1. Sam. 28.19 To morow shalt thou be with me and thy sonnes Ans. The Diuell could not properly foretell it but might see it in the causes and signes Againe hee might speake so to Saule because God had made him an instrument for the execution of that iudgement and destruction so as God only properly foretelleth that which is simply to come and no man or Angell The second point is the testimonie it selfe Behold the Lord commeth c. In which obserue three points first the comming of the Lord secondly the iudgement of the Lord thirdly the cause of it in the 15. verse To giue iudgement against al men c. First of the party comming Behold the Lord commeth Where the Apostle speaketh in the time present which is put for the time to come which forme of speech sheweth the certaintie of Christs comming to iudgement who shall as certeinly come as if he were now alreadie comming Concerning which certaintie it may be demaunded first whence commeth this comming of Christ to be so certaine Ans. From the vnchangeable will of God which hath certainly decreed the same For he hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnes And thus are all other the articles of our faith most certaine in that they are grounded on the vnchangeable will and word of God Secondly how or from whence may we know this will of God to be so certaine Ans. From the manner of propounding the doctrine of it wherein the euidence of the spirit plainly appeareth saying peremptorily the Lord commeth euidently expressing the certaintie as if it were now present And the same may be spoken of the whole scripture which in it selfe is most sure and certain because it is the most vnchangeable will of God but how do we know it so to be will some say I answere by the euidence of the spirit the authoritie puritie maiestie effect and ends of the doctrine it neede not seeke euidence elsewhere than from it selfe not from man or the Church it selfe The Romish Church confesseth it is of it selfe and in it selfe sufficiently certaine but not to me or thee except the Church say so but this is a false position The Scripture is certaine both in it selfe and vnto vs and we know it so to be though neuer a man would acknowledge it the heart seasoned with grace will make the mouth confesse it Secondly the Apostle speaking in this forme he commeth for he will come wee learne to set before our eyes the comming of the Lord Iesus to iudgement and to make account of euery present day as the day of his comming the Scriptures euery where commend watchfulnes vnto vs which is to do nothing else but to make reckoning continually of this day But some will say we cannot make account daily of it for we see it commeth not neither may we enquire into the time of it Answ. Although wee cannot exactly