of God neither can we do all that we would But because our regeneration is as it were onely begonne and not as yet perfect so that whereas we were before wholly flesh now we consist partly of the spirite and partly of the flesh Gal. 5.17 which do cōtinually fight the one against the other that what good things we would them wee cannot performe but in our spirite we serue the lawe of God Rom. 7.25 but in our flesh the law of sinne Therfore we beleeue that which wee also knowe by experience in the regenerate that much bondage still remaineth much darkenesse in the soule and peruersnesse in the heart and weakenesse in all the faculties of minde and bodie that wee haue still neede of new help from God and new grace whereby both our mindes may be more and more enlightened and our willes made better better and our strength to do good more increased and perfected And therefore while wee remaine in this flesh our free choise is neuer truely and meerely free that is neuer able inough of it selfe to auoide ill and doe good especially sith the euent of all things is not in our power but in the hand of God and that it must needs bee that all those thinges come to passe Act. 4.28 not which we thinke but whatsoeuer his hand and purpose hath decreed shal bee done VIII That God so gouerneth the mindes and wills of the godly that in the very conflict of tēptations and of the flesh he suffreth them not altogether to fall from him Meane while wee hold this that they which be alreadie ingrafted into Christ their minds and willes being now indued with the holie ghost are so gouerned and vpheld by God for Christs sake Ier. 32.40 Luc. 22.32 Rom. 8.35 that although they may be weakned many waies and by manie temptations yet they are neuer suffred wholly and altogether to be beaten downe and so to perish IX Errors We condemne them which either denying or extenuating this new birth will haue a mā regenerate to be as vnable to doe good and as much the seruant of sinne as he was before he was borne againe against so many and so manifest testimonies of holie scripture concerning the deliuerance of the regenerate frō the bondage of sinne and their choise to doe good to saye nothing of that bigh iniurie which is done to the holie ghost which dwelleth and worketh in vs. Againe wee disallow those likewise which will haue a regenerate man to bee so deliuered out of the bondage of sinne that he can by no meanes sinne anie more which all the whole scripture in generall and our daily experience gain-saieth For although wee bee not suffered to sinne vnto death yet it is verie apparent that we commit manie sinnes in their owne nature worthy of death Therefore on the other side wee also disallow their opinion which do so extenuate or make smale the force of the spirit in the regenerate and so enlarge set out thereliques and remainder of the flesh that they saye the working of the spirite is often times quite extinguished by the forces of the old man and teach that the same regenerate man may vtterly fall out of the fauour of God and so eternally perish which God gaine-saith by the Prophet I will giue my feare into their hearts Ier. 32.40 2. Tim. 2.19 Phil. 1.6 that they shall not slippe from me And the Apostle affirmeth that the foundation standeth sure c. And He which beganne this good worke in you shall perfect it vnto the ende CHAP. XXI Of good workes I. They which are ingrafted into Christ haue both whereby they themselues do liue and bring forth the workes of their life for others and this is the principall ende of their ingrafting AS the braunch doth not onely draw sap and nourishment from the vine whereby it liueth it selfe but also taketh from it whereby to bring forth fruite vnto vs so also we beleeue that the faithful haue not onely life from Christ in whome they are planted whereby they liue themselues but all force power whereby they shewe forth fruites of good works to the glorie of God and edification of the church Ioh. 15.5 c as Christ saith I am the vine and you the braunches he that abideth in me and he in whome I abide he shall bring forth much fruite Wherunto this also pertaineth we are his workmanship Eph. 2.10 created in Christ Jesus vnto good vvorkes vvhich God hath ordained that vvee should vvalke in them II. What we meane by the name of good workes But by the name of good workes 2. Pet. 1.5 we vnderstand all those actions which are done by men regenerate after the rule of Gods will reuealed in his word and by a liuely faithin Christ 1. Tim. 1.5 and a pure heart through the holy ghost For Rom. 14.23 as euerie thing which is not of faith is sinne so all things which are of faith and so out of a pure heart and good conscience must needes be good works wherefore we do not thinke that those deedes can bee numbred among good workes and acceptable to God Col. 2.18.23 which are done of the vngodly without faith and without the worde of God Mat. 15.8.9 and not through the guiding of the holie spirit howsoeuer they may carrie a shew of great pietie and seruice of God III. Good works are done of vs by power of the holy ghost For as the braunch of the vine or the wild oliue boughes being grafted into a good oliue tree bring forth fruits not of themselus but by the vertue of the vine the tree where into they are ingrafted so wee also doe not good workes of our selues but by vertue of Christs spirit to whome we are incorporated and from whome wee draw that life whereby we liue Christ himselfe working in vs by his spirite both that wee may will that which is good Phil. 2.13 Ioh. 15.5 and performe the same For without me said he yee can do nothing IV. Good works are not the cause but the effect of our vniting to Christ and of our iustification and life Likewise as these braunches and boughes doe not therefore bring forth good fruites that they might by them bee planted in the vine or the oliue tree or that they might liue therein but therefore they bringe fruite because they are already planted and doe liue and so their good fruites are not the causes of their planting and life but the effects and manifest testimonies thereof after the verie same manner wee beleeue that it is betweene vs Christ as also Augustiue fully teacheth who also saith that good works do not goe before him that is to be iustified but follow him that is iustified And therefore wee constantly confesse that a man speaking properly and of the iustification of his life is not iustified by works but by them declared to be iust V. Although we
laid vp in him requireth onely these three things First that being touched with an earnest griefe of our whole life ledd amisse wee might desire from our heart to haue our mindes and so all our affections chaunged renued into the obedience of the diuine will and that we might earnestly pray and doe our best endeuour that it might be so Secondlie that imbracing Christ by a true faith withall his treasures wee might beleeue firmely and without any wauering that all our sinnes are for euer pardoned of the fauour and mercie of god through Christ alone and we receiued into grace made the children of God and heires of euerlasting life Lastly that beeing thus perswaded of the free and eternall saluation through Iesus Christ wee should thence foreward labour by all meanes to obserue whatsoeuer Christ hath commaunded to the glorie of God and profite of our neighbour so as faith do euermore accompanie vs to the ende whereby we beleeue that howsoeuer in this new obedience we err or do offend yet for Christs sake it shall not be imputed to vs but contrariewise by the perfect obedience iustice and holinesse of christ imputed vnto vs our imperfect obedience shal be perfected and shal be taken and reputed for most perfect in the sight of God And to three thinges are all the preceptes of christ referred namely that renouncing all vngodlines worldly desires wee should liue in this world in respect of our selues soberlie in respect of our neighbour iustly in respect of God godlie Tit. 2.12 looking for that blessed hope and the comming of the glorie of the great God This wee beleeue to bee the summe of those thinges which christ requireth of vs in the doctrine of the gospell and therefore that they bee true gospellers and christians indeede that bende their whole studie and care hereunto VII Jn what thinges especially the Gospell differeth from the Law And nowe of that which is alreadie saide it appeareth that we do not confound the Law with the Gospell For albeit wee confesse that God is author aswel of the Law as of the gospell and that of it selfe it is as well holie iust Exo. 20 and good as the gospell Rom. 7.12 yet we hold that ther is no smale difference betwixt them both not onely because the Lawe was deliuered to the Israelites alone and the gospell pertaineth to al people and nations and also not onely because that was for a time and to continue but till christ and the gospell is euerlasting and also not onely because that was deliuered by Moses and declared by the Prophets and the gospell was brought by christ and published to the whole world by the Apostles But indeed and most especially for these causes First because the matter of the law is onely commandementes with irreuocable curses thereunto ioyned if they bee broken neuer so little It hath also promises not onely of earthlie but also of heauenly blessings but al of them with the condition of perfect obedience and none merely free But the gospell is properly a happie message setting before vs gratis christ the redeemer forgiuing sinnes and sauing vs yea and requiring nothing at our handes for the obtaining of life euerlasting but a true faith in christ which faith cannot bee without true repentance nor without a care to doe the will of God that is to liue so berly iustly and godly as is aboue declared Moreouer because the law did not performe that which it required nether had it power whereby to saue therefore was vnsufficient and a killing letter the minister of wrath and death more prouoking then taking away sin But the Gospell what it requireth the same it performeth and therefore whatsoeuer it offereth the same also it truely imparteth vnto vs For as much as the holy ghost is by it powerful in the elect at the preaching of the Gospell stirring vp in them that true faith wherby they apprehend christ offred and with him eternall life For faith is by hearing of the Gospell Rom. 10.17 but obedience is not by hearing of the Lawe because the holie spirite giueth no man strength to the hearing of the Lawe by which hee might obserue the same as he stirreth vp faith in the elect to the hearing of the gospell For which cause as the Lawe is called a killing letter so is the Gospell called a quickning spirite and therefore is a true and forcible instrument to saluation vnto euerie beleeuer Whereon also followeth the third difference namely that the Law was not written in their hearts but remained written onely in tables and therfore did not chaunge men But the Gospell is written by the holie ghost in the hearts of the elect therefore it chaungeth and renueth them 2. Cor. 3.18 because it is the instrument of the holie ghost to sanctifie and to saue vs. VIII The Law of Moses is partly taken away and partly not taken away by the Gospell Of this which we haue said it also plainelie appeareth what our faith is of the abrogation of the law by the gospell First wee beleeue that in the gospell so farre forth as it declareth all things which in the old Testament did figuratiuely foreshew of Christ to bee fullfilled in this Iesus as is saide before in the 11. chapter we are taught that the law of Moses concerning cerimonies sacrifices and all Moses outward worship are simply abrogated according to that saying of the Apostle Heb. 9.10 Ioh. 1.17 that all these things vvere inioyned vntill the time of reformation and that The Law was giuen by Moses but the trueth came by Jesus Christ Moreouer so farre forth as the gospell is the instrument of the holy spirit whereby we are ingrafted and vnited to Christ made partakers of redēption and saluation as is said before in the 12. chapter So far also we confesse that the morall law touching the cursse against the transgressors is abrogated by the gospell of Christ according to that of the Apostle Rom. 8.1 There is no condēnation to them that are in Iesus Christ where of this is a token that they walke not after the flesh but after the spirit But now so farre forth as the doctrine of the Gospell requireth our repentance and the holinesse of life and that we liue soberly righteously and godly therein it taketh not away the law concerning māners for it is wholy consonant and agreeable with the doctrine of the gospel of eschewing vices and following vertue Lastlye in as much as Christ in his gospel did not take away the politicke lawes of the nations which were not contrarie to the law of nature Therefore wee thinke it lawfull and free for any gouernors to bringe among their subiectes such politick lawes as were deliuered to the people of Israell and by the same then which none are more iust to rule and gouerne the people Therefore they do exceeding great iniurie to the Gospell of Christ that saye it troubleth or
Christ and he shall raigne in the house of Iacob for euer and the Apostle that he is as the sonne ouer his owne house and this house we are that is the church and in another place that he is the head of the church Eph. 5.23 the same is the Sauiour of his bodie II. Christ ordereth his church partly by himselfe and partly by assistance of fellowe labourers But the gouernment wherewith Christ guideth his church we know to be two fold one wherein he of himselfe and by his holy spirit without any help or seruice of man Phil. 2.13 Eph. 1.23 raigneth inwardly in the hearts of beleeuers and worketh in them to will and to performe and is euen all in all and mooueth vnto that which is good defending vs from euill against Sathan the worlde and all our enemies The other wherein he so guideth the church as hee also vouchsafeth to vse the help and ministerie of others aswell Angells as men especially to the preseruation of the church As of Angells the Apostle speaketh Heb. 1.14 They are ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes which shal bee heires of saluation 1. Cor. 3.5.9 and of men he saieth Wee are Gods ministers by whome yee haue beleeued For like as in a man the head of it selfe by vertue of the minde which liueth worketh chieflie therein doeth so rule the whole bodie that it also vseth the helpe of euerie member to the profite of the whole bodie so Christ the head of the church doth in like sort beare himselfe in the gouernment thereof not for his owne cause or that hee needeth our ministerie but doth it for our necessitie yea for our manifest commoditie and honour III. A difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men By the way wee acknowledge a difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men sith the Angells are not sent either to teach in the church or to administer Sacraments but to performe other dueties those for the most part inuisible neither come they ordinarily alwaies and to all but at such time and to such persons as God sendeth them but the ministerie of men is apparent and perpetuall and pertaineth to euerie one IV. Jt was most aduisedly done that Angells should not teach in the church but men And wee know it was most wisely and aduisedly done of God that Christ should teach in his church not by Angells but by men both because we can not more willingly suffer our selues to be informed familiarly of our equalles then to be taught of spirits of a farre diffring nature with an vnaquainted maiesty and also because we might more easily be deceiued of Satan falsly faining himselfe to bee sent of God and transforming himselfe to an Angel of light And those surely in our iudgement are two not the least causes why the sonne of God when he was to fulfill the office of a teacher in the church would bee made a man and our brother and familier and like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onely excepted whereto that same tendeth Heb. 4.15 Heb. 2.12 Heb. 1.1 I vvill declare thy name to my brethren in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee and that same In these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his sonne namely being nowe made man and liuing familiarlie in the church V. There be two kinds of men especially whose ministery Christ vseth to the gouernment and preseruation of the church And although there be not one member in this whole great body of the church but Christ vseth the same to some profite of the other mēbers 1. Cor. 12.7 and so of the whole bodie as Paule teacheth yet wee acknowledge two principall kindes of men whose help and seruice he is wont to vse for the gouernment and preseruation of the church namely first teachers and others to administer the word sacraments other ecclesiasticall dueties then godly princes and magistrats whose ministeries or offices we confound not but acknowledge them to be distinct and verie diuerse among which differences this also is not the least that the ministerie of teachers is alwaies verie necessarie to the church but of politicke magistrates not so sith the former the church cannot bee without but the other it often hath wanted and may want them VI. About what matters especially the ecclesiasticall ministerie is imployed But as the summe of christian pietie consisteth in three things in faith in Christ in continual repentance that is in the mortification of our flesh and of our sinnes and quickening of the spirite and lastlie in charitie towards our neighbour so also wee acknowledge three principall parts of the ecclesiasticall ministerie First to teach and to preach the worde of the gospell and also to administer the sacraments and offer vpp the publike sacrifice of praise to God through Iesus Christ Secondly to declared by the Apostles and lastly to do all such things which though they be not expressed in the scriptures yet doe belong to order and to decencie and do make for edification and not for destruction according to the generall rule giuen by the Apostle 1. Cor. 14.40 that all things ought to be done in the church in order decently and to edification Neither thinke wee that any authoritie is giuen vnto ministers beyonde the boundes of the word of God or to any other ende then for edification therefore we denie that one Bishop or all Bishops together haue authoritie to appoint any thing against the scriptures to adde or detract any thing or chaunge any thing in them to dispense with the commaundements of God to make new articles of faith to institute new sacraments to bring new rites into the church to prescribe any lawes which may binde consciences or may be thought equall to gods law to forbid any things which God hath graunted and left free or lastly to commaund any thing without the word of God as necessary to saluatiō sith not the whole church can haue or truely be said to haue this authoritie XXI The Bishops which are also princes their politicall authoritie is not denied By the way we disallow not but that bishops which are also princes besids their ecclesiasticall authoritie they haue also their politicall rites and secular powers euen as other princes haue the law of commaunding in secular causes the law of the sword some of them the law of choosing and confirming kinges and emperors and of directing and ordering other politicall matters and to constraine people that are their subiects to do them obedience and therefore we confesse that their politicall commandements which may be kept without breach of Gods law are to be obeyed by their subiects not onely for feare but also for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 For we know that all power is of God Rom. 13.1.2 and vvhosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and that kings are to be honoured 1. Pet. 2.17 and that we
ought to be subiect to our princes and rulers in all feare not onely to the good and curteousse but also to the frovvard and vniust XXII Marriage ought to be free aswell to ministers of the church as others Of marriage And we beleeue that this is verie necessary and behouefull to honestie to the saluation of ministers and to the honor of the ministerie it selfe and consequently to the true gouernement of the church that it should be permitted as freely vnto them as it is to al Lay men as they cal them to marrie sith Christ forbad it to no kinde of men nay speaking of single life he said that not al mē do receaue this namely to lead a single life meaning that which the Apostle in round wordes expounded 1. Cor. 7.9 Heb. 13.4 namely he which cannot containe he must marrie a wife For marriage is honourable among all men the bedd vndefiled as with the Apostle wee confesse XXIII Jt is good and commendable if any being indued with the gift of continencie abstaine from marriage Meane while we denie not but they which are indued of God with the gift of a pure single life they may more fittly attend vpon diuine causes and more easily serue the church then they which are married by reason of manie greeuous cares and troubles which marriage bringeth with it and whereby often times euen against our wills wee are drawne awaye from following the diuine causes to deale in domesticall and troublesome businesses of this life as the Apostle also saieth the vnmaried careth for the things of the Lord 1. Cor. 7.32 howe he may please the Lord but he that is married careth for the thinges of the worlde howe he may please his wife And therefore as these men haue their iust commendation which do therefore take a wife that they maye liue with a cleane and pure conscience to God So also do we thinke them worthie to be commended who therefore choose to themselues a chast single life that they may the better employ their labour on the church and in the same do liue so long as they can XXIV Mariages are to bee contracted in the Lord and are reuerently to be esteemed And we know and confesse 1. Cor. 7.39 that all mariages ought to bee contracted in the Lord by the law of nature and the law of God yea and by honest customes of all places and are reuerently to be esteemed Mat. 19.9 and that no man may put away his lawfull wife vnlesse it be for fornication but if any vnbeleeuing woman through hate of religion will not remaine with a beleeuing husband he ought not by force to keep her for one that is faithfull is not in subiection in such thinges 1. Cor. 7.15 but God hath called them in peace XXV Both he which hath put away an adulteresse hee which is forsaken of an vnbeleeuer may no lesse contract newe mariage then hee vvhose vvife is dead We also beleeue that aswell he which hath lawfully put away an adulteresse or is forsakē of an bnbeleeuer maye marie againe as he whose former wife is dead For that saying of the Apostle is euer most true and profitable to all vnmaried persons and widowes Jt is good for them if they remaine euen as I but if they can not containe let them marie 1. Cor. 7.8 for it is better to marie then to burne XXVI That some should bee appointed in the church which should iudge of matrimoniall controuersies But we allow not that any of these thinges bee done in the church without the lawfull knowledge iudgement and sentence of the church and some christian magistrate if there be one and therefore that some godlie skillfull and wise men ought to bee appointed in the church which may discerne and iudge of matrimoniall causes and these matters that nothing be done rashly or vnaduisedly least euerie one should thinke lawfull whatsoeuer he listed but all thinges should be done lawfully to edification and without iniurie to any 1. Cor. 14.26 Rom. 2.24 and least the name of God should through vs bee euill spoken of among the infidells XXVII They which are rulers in the church ought to take care that the children of the faithfull may be christianly instructed and that they may be taught in learning and honest artes With these is ioyned the care of children wee therefore beleeue it is verie necessarie to the continuall preseruation of the church not onely that each seuerall man haue a care to instruct his children in true godlinesse in christian dueties in learning and honest artes but also that the whole church haue a speciall regard thereunto that they may be made fitt and profitable both for the church and common wealth whereto belong both publicke grammer schooles exercises of honest artes and ecclesiasticall catechizings XXVIII Ministers with their families ought to bee maintained Of stipends and church godds with honest and liberall stipends Wee also beleeue that the church cannot well bee gouerned vnlesse such necessarie maintenance be bestowed on the ministers as whereby they and their family may liue in an honest estate For no man except he haue whereupon to liue Mat. 10.10 can do his duetie Christ saieth the workeman is worthie of his wages and the Apostle writeth largely thereof in more thē one place 1. Cor. 9.7 c. shewing by many reasons that ministers which serue the churches ought to receiue of the same church what so is needfull for them 1. Tim. 5.17 c and that they haue good right to demaund the same so farre from offence is it that they should take it as some would cauill yet notwithstanding couetousnesse aswell in all other as chiefly in ministers we do with the Apostle vtterly condemne 1. Tim. 3.3.8 as also wee allow not prodigalitie and we teach that both these faultes are to be shunned and auoyded XXIX The church goods should not be wasted but be bestowed on the maintenance of ministers and other godly vses And whereas manie goods haue in times past and yet in some places are giuen to churches by the liberality of princes other godlie persons wee iudge that if any church haue such goodes great care is to be had that the same be not wasted nor conuerted into prophane vses and much lesse into sacriligious vses nor fained to bee so conuerted but to bee onely bestowed vppon that purpose whereto they were giuen euen to a godly intent And wee well allowe of that auncient partition of church goods where one part went to the bishops that is to the teachers Deu◠〈◊〉 and ministers of the word and their families another to the clerkes that is to students and such as were ordained to the ministerie of the church and to them that attended on the church the third part to poore people and trauelers a fourth part to repairing of churches and schooles to which parte also belong not onely the houses of
personally vnited to the diuine therefore the gifts of God conferred vpon the same are without measure as is declared in the aphorisme following The 12. aphorisme Although when I wrote this confession I thought to my selfe that I had hādled al things which belong vnto this article of the person of Christ yet I thought for the better explaining thereof to ioyne this also which followeth to that which I said before 1 There is and euer was one onely person of Christ For there is but one onely begotten sonne of God and one and the same Christ 2 This person being from all eternitie by the naturall begetting of the father is proper vnto the word but in time was made common to the humaine nature taken to it by vertue of the personall vnion For in the word the essence which it hath common yea the verie same with the father the holie ghost is to bee distinguished from the proper manner of subsisting whereby it comes to passe that it is a certaine Hypostasis or person distinct from the father and the holie ghost and therefore is and is called the Hypostasis or person proper to the sonne or to the worde But this eternall Hypostasis proper by nature vnto the word is by this vnion made common as we said with the diuine nature and the humaine taken vnto it namely that the vvorde doeth no lesse subsist really in this humaine form thē it doth in that diuine form in that respect is no lesse true and perfect man then true and perfect god yet the natures properties and actions remaining safe and distinct 3 Therefore into the vnitie of that immeasurable most pure and most perfect person was taken the humaine nature that is that lumpe consisting of the reasonable soule and flesh of man finite compounded and needing many things But how not so as that for example it cōtained that infinite person within the boūdes or limitts of it owne finite or determinate substance or that it spredd it selfe as it were stretched out into the largenesse of it And that which wee say of this propertie the same is to bee thought and beleeued of all the rest because they all remaine vnchaungeable and vnmixed How then was the humaine nature taken surely it was so taken into vnitie of the same person that yet it is not made the verie person but rather existeth in the person is borne and sustained of the person and euer dependeth wholly vpon the same For this vniō of the natures according to the Hypostasis or vniting of the Hypostasis is made without alteration confusion or diuision 4 Whereby it also followeth that the nature taken to speake properly is not a part of this person as is aforesaid For like as of the vnion of the two natures there is not framed a third nature so neither by taking the humaine nature into vnity of the diuine person is there framed as it were a new person which should be the proper person of Christ and should differ from the person of the word which is the word it selfe For it is altogether the verie same nor doth it differ from it selfe except herein that the same which subsisted onely in the forme of God and was onely God now subsisteth also in the forme of a seruant is also man and before was as a king naked but is nowe clothed with our flesh as with a purple garment so that for this cause the fathers not amisse called the same in some sort a compounded person But marke also this difference besids the rest that the garmēt pertaineth not to the essence of a king but the humaine nature in Christ is in such sorte that without it cannot be defined what Christ is 5 Which is the cause why the humaine nature thus takē is to be reputed acknowledged as it were a part of the person of Christ namely because it is so taken into vnity of his person that as the vvorde with this humaine flesh is said to be and is man so also this flesh in the word and with the word God is said to be and is God as Athanasius Gregorie Nazianzene Damascene and other fathers haue proued out of the scriptures for that flesh is God not by nature but by Hypostasie in which sense the same flesh is omnipotent and present in all places whereuppon it comes also that what honour belongeth to the word of it selfe the same is also to bee giuen to the flesh in the word and for the word because of them both there is but one and the same Hypostasie 6 Add this moreouer for better explications sake that the word although wheresoeuer it bee and it is in all places there also the same is not onely god but also man and that because it hath in all places the humaine nature vnited therunto by Hypostasie yet where soeuer it is it selfe it doth not make it selfe an Hypostasis or personal to the humaine nature but only there where the same nature existeth namely so as that nature is sustained borne and wrought or mooued by it For how should the same be said to bee sustained where it doth not exist the feete are sustained by the soule not wheresoeuer the the soule is be it in the head but onely where they themselues are existing When the flesh was in the virgins wombe the word being then personally vnited vnto it did not thē sustaine the same out of the wombe of Marie but onely it was Hypostasis vnto it in the womb which sustained the same there and not in any other place which is also to bee said of all the time of Christs life when he liued in diuers places Likewise after his death it was Hypostasis vnto his bodie when it was dead and buried sustained the same in it selfe but where surely not in heauen where the bodie was not but onely in the graue euen as also it was Hypostasis to his soule separated from his bodie not in the graue but out of the graue sustained the same in it selfe And now it sustaineth both the soule and bodie together in heauen not in earth much lesse euerie where 7 Neither doth it follow vppon this doctrine that the personall vnion is dissolued neither doeth it come to passe that the whole person is not Hypostasis to the flesh but onely in parte The reason is because this person of the word as it is infinite so also is it most simple and pure and therefore both is wholly Hypostasis to the flesh wheresoeuer the flesh existeth is also wholly Hypostasis in other places where the flesh existeth not being it selfe existing in the forme of god Indeed the soule as is aforesaide is wholly Hypostasis to the head giuing life to it and sustaining it but where not in euery part of the body but onely in that where the head it selfe is and out of the head is also wholly hypostasis to the feet sustaining them too not where the head is but where the
repentance and the faith of Christ but seing they were as Luke reporteth onely baptized into Iohns baptisme which notwithstanding they knew not what it was and were altogether ignorant of the baptisme of Christ that is of the spirit he baptized them shewing vnto thē what Iohns baptisme was and how he baptized into Christ not into his owne sprinkling or dipping of the water as though that could be any profite vnto them He therefore baptized them with this baptisme of Iohn that is as Iohn vsed to do into the name of the Lord Iesus and by by after laying on his hands he baptized thē with the baptisme also of Christ that is with the spirit For immediatly the holy ghost came on them as it is there read This there And vpon the epistle to the Ephes chap. 4. the same Bucer writeth thus Hereby it is also manifest that the twelue men at Ephesus which knew not whether there were an holie ghost or no whome Paule baptized were not baptized with the baptisme of Iohn that is with that which he administred but as they witnessed themselues they were baptized into Iohns baptisme For Iohn preached vnto all whome hee baptized that Christ should baptize them with the holy ghost and exhorted them that they would beleeue in him and that of him they might receiue the holy ghost And therefore these Ephesiās could not haue beene ignorant of the holy ghost if they had bin washed with that baptisme which might truely be called Iohns which also the Apostles words to those men doth sufficiently declare Iohn verily baptized with the baptisme of repētance saying vnto the people that they should beleeue in him which should come after him that is in Christ For by these wordes he would teach vs that they neuer receiued Iohns baptisme who as yet knew not Iohns preaching of Christ and the promise Thus farre Bucer Seing then the fathers expound this place in Act. 19. as wee haue nowe declared who I pray am I that I should dare or that I ought to gaine-say so many and so learned men in such an exposition of this scripture which neither doth any whitt wrest the text nor contrarieth any other scriptures nor is against the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities For if any man shall obiect out of the text that same truely and but it prooueth nothing against the fathers exposition seing it is no vnusuall thing with the Apostle where hee saieth first truely not alwaies to ioyne the aduersatiue particle but Rom. 3. ver 2. Coll. 2. ver 23. and in other places And vnto this truely another but which Luke for breuitie sake left out might bee vnderstood verie fittly as hereafter we will shew so that it is no necessitie with this truely to ioyne that but which followeth in the 5. verse in which verse the fathers will haue not Paules speach but Lukes to be continued Therefore the fathers exposition is not repugnant to the text nor yet with any other scripture For if any man say Paule writeth to the Corinthians that he is gladd he baptized none but the house of Stephana it may be answered it is true namely at Corinth but these twelue were baptized at Ephesus and besides he speaketh of such as were baptized with his owne hand but these twelue he might baptise by some other to dispute no longer about the circumstance of the time And it is most certaine it is not repugnant to the analogie of faith nor bringeth with it any absurdities because the fathers do not speake of a baptisme rightly administred as though Paule had repeated that again This expositiō therefore of the fathers in my iudgement cannot easily be refelled And this therfore is the chiefest cause why I haue euer thus thought and yet thinke of this action of Paule although indeed I cannot consent vnto them all in the cause why Paule baptized them but onely to Ambrose and Hierome That Iohns Baptisme Christs Baptisme did differ the fathers teach both by this that Iohn saide how he baptized onely with vvater but Christ should baptize with the holy ghost with fire and also by this that the baptisme of Iohn is called the baptisme of repentance but Christes baptisme is said to bee giuen for the remission of sinnes And because that he prepared the waye to this as Tertull. speaketh that baptisme of repentance was as it were a sueing for the remission of sinnes and sanctificatiō in Christ which was to follow after Read Tertul. of bap pag. 707. So Cyprian also in his sermon of the baptisme of Christ and of the manifestation of the Trinitie pag. 430. So August To. 7. against Petil cap. 7. But all of vs doe not knowe what the father 's mēt by this differēce of the baptisme For they ment not that the one diffred from the other in the matter or in the signe or in the doctrine and forme of baptisine but onely in efficacie that namely although remission of sinnes was giuen to them which were washed with Iohns baptisme yet the same was not of Iohns baptisme that is of water but by the baptisme of Christ which is the baptisme of the spirite whereunto that belongeth I baptize with water but he with the holy ghost And with this baptisme of the spirit were they only baptized which beleeued in Christ whome Iohn saide was then come though all knewe him not Therefore Iohn in his baptisme did inculcate and often repeate this faith as Paule witnesseth in that place of the 19 of the Actes They therefore are deceiued who for this diuersitie did thinke the baptisme of water was to be repeated August against Petil. as we touched a little before sheweth how some held opinion that the 12 did lye vnto the Apostle when being asked vnto what they were baptized they answered vnto Iohns baptisme So by this that first those Ephesians saide vnto him that they had not yet heard whether there were that is whether that holy ghost did exist or not namely the giuer of those giftes whereof the speach was the Apostle might be said to conuince thē of a lye by this argument Whosoeuer haue bin baptized they haue professed faith in Christ as the sonne of God and consequently in the father and in the spirite of them both For Iohn did require this faith according to the same he baptized men and in baptizing he alwayes vrged that Iesus Christ was he which should baptize in the spirit But you by your owne cōfession do not know this spirite c. and so beleeue not rightly in Iesus Christ Therefore c. But surely to saye that these twelue did lye vnto the church and to the Apostle it seemes to me to be to hard and vile a thing in mē which professed Christ And for this cause we did euer better allow of the opiniō of Ambrose Hierome that the 12 did say truely whē they said they were baptized vnto Iohns baptisme but yet not by
not as euerie art hath it owne proper wordes and names Then if there be any collection or argumētation darke or intricate they explaine the same by Analysis or resolution and set it forth by examples and by generall precepts they teach particular things and declare how largelie the same are ment and taken And this is properlie to teach Now though this bee in faithfull and sound deliuerie of instruction yet a true faithfull teacher not contenting himselfe thus doth also rehearse and often taketh accompt of that which he teacheth and is still at hand among his schollers that of such things as they doubt they may euer require and aske the plainer exposition of himselfe Moreouer the thinges which he hath taught them he also propoundeth to be decided and handled in publike disputations that no whit of doubt may remaine To these thinges also he adioyneth oftentimes exhortations to encourage them forward in the same instructiō and exhortations from such matters as may hinder the same and also generall admonitions reprehensions and childings Lastlie such a maister marketh diligentlie what profite euerie one of his schollers taketh if he finde anie one to loyter in his learning he both priuatelie corrects him and admonisheth him of his duetie if he perceiue anie to goe through his learning lustilie him he encourageth commendeth and whetteth on to follow the studie of it more more From the seuen dueties of teaching were brought into the church 7. orders of ministers All these seuen points of teaching did our Lord Christ also obserue In the Synagoge at Nazareth he read the 61. chapter of Esay and expounded it Luc. 4. He expounded the commaundements of God vpon the mount Math. 5. And he taught in all places and exhorted he reprehended out of the word of God And he made aunswer to al that asked him aswell good as badd and also asked them as Matt. 22. He also catechized his disciples and he himselfe was present at a catechizing Luc. 2. Sith then the ministerie of teaching doth require such manifold labour there haue bin also many sorts or orders of ministers appointed to this ministerie And first of all readers whose office was in some pulpit or high place to rehearse the diuine scriptures Now this rehearsall of the scriptures was instituted to this ende that the language and manner of phrase in the scripture and the scripture it selfe also might so bee made better knowne and more familiar to the people For within one yeare they reade ouer all the bible to the people where as they which shall expound the scriptures are not able to performe more thē some one parte and that not greatnether in one yeares space And meane while by the onely reading of the holie Bible to the people the knowledge of all the principles of our saluation was wōderfullie confirmed for the same are still againe and againe repeated in each of the holie books and are declared by other other words so that the people might often by the following readings learne that which by the former they could not so wel conceiue And by this verie meanes the peoples iudgement was strengthened aswell in religion as also in the expositions of scriptures and in all doctrine which was brought vnto them either by the lawfull curats teachers of the church or by others For this cause this office of onely reading the Scriptures to the people was greatly esteemed in the auncient churches neither were any chosen for this ministerie vnlesse they were commēded for singular piety Which we may knowe aswell by other monuments of the auncient fathers as especially by two epistles of Saint Cyprian as the fiue Epist of Aurelius the reader ordained the 5 3. Epist booke 2. of Saturus and in the 4. booke of Celerinus Celestinus To these readers were afterwardes also added queristers or singing men which ordered and directed the singing of the psalmes and hymnes For the reading of the holie Scriptures it is by Gods grace verie well appointed in the churches of England if so bee that there were meete men ordained which might add a grauitie and a religion worthy the diuine ministerie in the holie readings Let them therefore diligentlie weigh consider whose mouth they make themselues which read the holie books vnto the people in their sacred assemblies euen the mouth of the Lord Almightie as also of what force and of what dignitie the words at which are read which be the words and precepts of eternall life Lastlie vnto what manner of men and for what purpose the readers of the diuine Scriptures ought to serue For they serue to administer the worde euen to the children of God for whose saluation the first begotten sonne of God powred out his precious blood and to whome by them the same saluation is more and more declared made perfect All which things whosoeuer weigheth with himselfe in true faith what grauitie decencie religiousnes can be vsed in any action which such a reader may ouerslipp And this they whosoeuer be appointed for that office ought euermore to haue in the sight of their minde that the things which are read must effectually serue for the edificatiō of faith in the hearers which is then done when the same things are well vnderstood and receiued as the very words of god To both which is requisite a pronunciation verie plaine discreet graue and religious Hereby it is knowne that they are not Christs ministers who do so read the holie Scriptures as if onely this were to bee required that as little tarrying as may be might be made in rehearsing the same Now another duetie is the interpretation of the doctrine which is to be disposed namly a more plaine declaration of the wordes and sentences This office was performed by bishops and Elders and sometime by them of the order of Deacons and subdeacons sometime also they employed vnto this function some of the laitie whom they found by the holie ghost to be made fitt for the profitable executing of the same So Origen also a lay man was called vnto this office in the church at Cęsarea in Palestine by Alexander bishop of Hierusalem by Theoctist bishop of the same church at Caesarea So Euelpis was called by Neonus bishop of Larandi and Paulinus by Celsus bishop of Iconium and Theodorus of Atticus bishop of Sinadi This we read in Eusebius his sixt booke of his ecclesiasticall storie chap. 20 and out of the epistle of those two bishops Alexander of Hierusalem and Theoctist of Caesarea in Palestine vnto Demetrius bishop of Alexandria who had reprehended the deed of these two bishops concerning Origen as a thing neuer heard of that a lay man where bishops were present should speake to the people in the congregation But this the same bishops manifestly affirmed was not true but that godlie bishopps had euer vsed to exhort such as they knewe meet men among the laitie to profite the people by interpreting the Scriptures and
chaunge nor confusion among themselues or among there proprieties so also the actioÌ„s are so the actions of one and the same person that yet they are truely distinguished betwixt themselues and so distinguished that those which proceed from the one nature and are proper thereunto they although they be done with the communion of the other yet it is not lawfull to say that they be done by the other or that Christ doth them according to the other nature 13 Where fore like as wee allowe the fathers when they saye that Christs actions in redeeming sauing vs were are done by god man so also we greatly commend that famous saying of Leo the bishop of Rome in his epistle to Flauianus we teach that it is with a stedfast faith to be holden namely Each forme vvorketh with communion of the other that which is proper to it selfe as the word working that vvhich is proper to the word and the flesh performing that which is proper to the flesh 14 For he suffred for vs died and was buried according to the flesh but he gaue the grace of deseruing and redeeming to his suffring by which he redeemed vs according to his deitie but all these he willed according to both the natures 15 Also he rose from the dead ver 20.21 and ascended in a visible and locall ascension into heauen exalted aboue all Angels according to his humanity yet he wrought the same resurrection ascension and exaltation according to his diuinity but he willed it according to the will of both the natures 16 Like as then we beleeue that Christ redeemed vs according to both the natures according to that God purchased his Church by his owne blood so also we doubt not but the same Christ sitteth at his Fathers right hand and resteth in the heauenly places gouerning all thinges with his Father and dispenseth and communicateth the grace of redemption and euerlasting salvatioÌ„ to the wholle church which is his bodie and to euerie member according to both his natures the word working that which is proper to the word the flesh that which belongeth to the flesh 17 For although he vseth the ministerie of the word and sacraments by men to the imparting of salvation vnto vs yet the same Christ both as he is God and as he is man is properly the very same which calleth vs giueth vnto vs faith and repentance and he iustifieth regenerateth quickeneth and bringeth into eternall life all that beleeue by the working of the power of his might 18 For this cause also our faith whereby we take holde of saluation in Christ and eternall life must not respect and rely vpon either the one or the other nature of Christ severally but on whole Christ himselfe as the Ephesians were said to haue faith in the Lord Iesus 19 Whereon it followeth that who so do deny either the one or the other nature in Christ or deuide the one from the other or confouÌ„d theÌ„ both together so that they acknowledge him not for true God and true man in all things sinne excepted like vnto vs and imbrace him not for such and therefore for a true and perfect redeemer they can neuer be made partakers of redemption and eternal saluation 20 For as he that beleeueth in Christ such as he is hath life eternall so he that beleeueth not cannot haue it Of those thinges which are spoken of our Lord Iesus Christ after the vnion and in what sort they are spoken Out of the 1. to the Ephesians Positions Anno 1582. 1 THe Apostle writeth that Christ was raised from the dead and therefore he truely diâ—â—â—â—â—d in another place The Lord of glory was 〈◊〉 yea we often read howe the sonne of man was deliuered vnto death But in all these enunciations the speach is ever of the same person namely the sonne of God incarnate Therfore the person of Christ which is in these propositions the subiect or that whereof another thing is spoken is vsed to be signified by 3. kindes of names namely by those which betoken the divine nature onely and that sometime in respect of the essence sometime in respect of the hypostasie or persons as The lord of glory the onely begotten sonne of God or which betoken in like sort the humaine nature onely as Man the sonne of Mary or which betokeÌ„ both natures togither as Christ Immanuell god incarnate 2 We adde herevnto that Christs verie persoÌ„ is signified by those names also which are taken from the offices of a mediatour as these Amediatour a Redeemer a Saviour a high priest an Advocate and such like But these may be referred to the third kind because by them are shewed and made known both the natures in one person 3 The concrete names which haue denomination of the natures as Man of the humanity and God of the diety when in speaking of Christ they be the subiects or the first part of the enunciation or sentence they haue two significations one formall as the schooles say and the other materiall of which by the former is meant the verie nature by the other the person which hath such a nature whereof it taketh denomination 4 For as names in the abstract do signifie only the nature and propriety which is in a thing so all names in the concreat doe betokeÌ„ both the nature and qualitie which is in the thing and the hypostasis wherein it is as for examples sake the name of Iust betokeneth both Iustice wher with one is made iust him which is Iust both together 5 Therefore by these Subiect names which hauing their denominations from the natures do shewe the person of Christ sometimes is declared the propriety of the natures sometime the vnity of the person and therefore the Subiects must be vnderstood and expounded according to the diversities of the Praedicates that is of those things which are spoken thereof 6 In this proposition the sonne of God is eternall the subiect namely the sonne of God must be expounded according to the proprietie of the nature But in this the onely begotten sonne of God suffered the subiect the onely begotten sonne of God must be vnderstood according to the vnity of the person For he suffered which was not onely man but also God yet the dietie remaining vnpassible 7 We denie not but manie times are found wordes in the abstract which are the Subiects as the light came into the world as also some which are Predicats as Christ is the light of the world our righteousnesse our peace but these stâ—Ì„d in steade of concretiues as the light came into the world that is he which lighteneth vs. Wherefore for the manner of such like words they are to be referred to some of the foresaid three kindes 8 Furthermore there are three kindes of attributes which vse to be spoken of the same person of Christ God and man by what name soeuer it be signified For some are propper to the divine nature and