one declared by the effects of both but as concerning the Object are both vniversally all Creatures even the vnreasonable which shall be freed from the servitude of corruption and generally all both Angels and Men and particularly that man of Sinne and Sonne of Perdition Antechrist e Mat. 29.32 1. Thes 4.17 Apoc. 20.12 The Forme is that whole order and proceeding of the most majesticall judgement comprehended in the very preparation both of the Iudge and of the Persons to be judged in the sentēce of the judgement and in the execution of the sentence f Mat. 25.32 1. Thes 4.16.17 The End Supreame is the glory of God himselfe and the accomplishmēt or Christs office Subordinate the iust condemnation of the wicked and the glorious felicity of the faithfull both which the infinitenesse and eternity either of joy or sorrow followeth g 2. Tim. 4 8. Particularly the State of man after this life after the time of that vniversall life resurrection and last judgement is eyther of life or death eternall Life Eternall is the life of glory wherein the Soule ioyned to our body enioyeth God for ever being advanced to the highest toppe and height of her felicity The cause of this life is God to wit the Father the Efficient the Sonne the Meritorious and the holy Ghost the sealing and applying Cause h Ioh. 14 2◠Apo. 21.3 1. Cor. 15.45 Rom. 8.11 The Matter which hath the respect of the Subiect are those good things which neyther eye hath seene nor eare heard nor can the mind of man comprehend i 1. Cor. 15 28. That which is of the Obiect are all the blessed and elect k Apo. 21.3 Mat. 25.24 The Forme is the most perfect knowledge vision and fruition of God himselfe and the exceeding felicity blessednesse of man which accompanieth the same which also consisteth both in the separation and absence of all evill things in the participation and presence of all good things both are both perfect and eternall l Apo. 22.4 Psa 7 15 1. Ioh. 3.2 Psa 16.11 The End is the glory of Gods grace and the glorifying of the elect m Apo. 21.3.5.12.11.17 1. Cor. 15.28 Death Eternall is the vnspeakeable and most miserable condition of the reprobates appointed or decreed of God whereby both their Soule and body are most justly adiudged to eternall punishments The Efficient Cause remote is God the most iust iudge the Instrumentall is Sathan the neerest is Sinne n Mat. 25.41 The Matter which hath the respect of the Subiect are Eternall punishments that which is of the Obiect are the Cursed and the Workers of iniquity o Ioh. 5.29 1. Thes 1 9. The Forme is the perpetuity and the infinitenesse of the punishments in Hell p Apo. 20.15.21.8 Esa 66.24 Mat. 4.42 The End Supreame is the glory of Gods Iustice The Neerest is the iust condemnation and punishment of the wicked OF MANS ESTATE after this Life The Part Confuting Touching the Resurrection I. THe Resurrection in the holy Scripture is two wayes taken Figuratiuely or Properly Figuratiuely eyther by a Metonymy it signifieth immortal life or by a Metaphor eyther a deliverance from danger or the regeneration of the Soules which is a spirituall resurrection and is called the First Properly Resurrection signifieth the quickning of the Bodie which shal be done at the last day which also is called the Second II. THere is one Resurrection Vniversall and Finall which no man shall escape an other Particular or foregoing whereof there are particular examples extant in the Scriptures Of the last Iudgement I. IVdgement in the Scriptures signifieth three things eyther the cause of damnation or an vniversall governement or the very Act eyther of condēnation or Iustification II. THere is a two-fold Iudgement of the Lord Particular or Antecedent When God in this life eyther defendeth his people or represseth the wicked Vniversall being the last which shall be done in the last day of the Resurrection III. THe Sonne is sayde to be the iudge of the world not exclusiuely or oppositely but by an appropriation for that by the Sonne in a visible forme the last iudgement shall be executed IIII. THe Sonne is said to be ignorant of the day of iudgement eyther because he would haue vs to be ignorant thereof or as touching his humane nature which by ordinary and naturall knowledge knoweth nothing of this matter or as touching his state of humility which as touching his voluntary dispensation hee hath taken vpon him Of Life Eternall I. THere are 3. kinds or differences of life there is a life of nature which the Apostle calleth Naturall There is a Life of Grace which the Sons of God alone doe enioy in this world there is a life of Glory which consisteth in the vision of God II. LIfe Eternall is two wayes taken Metonymically both for the way to life and for Christ himselfe Properly for the State of the blessed after this life III. THere is one Vision of God Naturall in the thinges created an other Specular or Symbolicall by resemblances and Signes an other of Faith by the doctrine and doings of Christ an other of Present sight or of glory to come when we shall see God face to face Of Death Eternall DEath is fowre-fold First Corporall which in the Scriptures is also called Temporall and the first death in respect of the wicked Secondly Spirituall and that eyther of the faithfull or vnfaithfull that of the faithfull is three-fold of Sinne which is called Mortification of the Law as it is the power of Sin of the world as the world is dead vnto them The death of the vnfaithfull is that which may be called the death of faith or of the soule Thirdly Eternall which is called the second Fourthly Civill death which of the Lawyers is sayde to be of them which are condemned to death FINIS
Substance Of his Benefits as well those which are conferred vpon vs by Imputation alone as by reall efficacy of his Substance because all the benefites and that quickning power which sustaineth our soules vnto life eternall cannot bee plucked asunder from the body and bloud of Christ to which it inhereth and so from Christ himselfe no more then the Effect can from his cause which containeth it or the quality from the Subject from which it issueth The Form of the Lords Supper which is inward and proper is the ioyning together of the Signes and the thing signified not naturall eyther by a substantiall touching and knittting together or by the vnion of the Accident and Subjects not locall by a neerenes or beeing in of one thing in the other but Relatiue and Sacramentall wholy consisting in this that the same beeing declared according to Gods ordinance by the Sacramentall word the Signes and the thing signified bee one certaine thing not in number not in speciall not in generall but by an Analogy and a reciprocall relation between themselues This conjoyning of the Relation doth chiefly consist in three thinges in the signification the sealing and presenting of the thing signified and sealed In Signification because of the Analogy or similitude of the properties and effects of the signe and the thing signified both in the very Substances and in the singular attributes of the Substance In the Substances because they haue â— great affinity betweene themselues for that as the bread and wine are the most fitte and chiefest Instrument of carnall nourishment so are also the body and bloud of Christ the onely â—nd alone food of the hungry soules wherevpon it is largely declared by S. â—ohn that the Flesh of Christ is meate â—ndeed and that the bloud of Christ is â—tinke indeed which whosoever shal â—ate and drinke hee should never â—unger nor thirst a Ioh. 6.31.32 and it is most vsuall in the Scriptures that the names â—f the Signes and of the thing signified â—re diversly changed by a kinde of Saâ—ramentall speaking b Exod. 12 11. 1. Cor. 5.7 In the singular Attributes of the â—ubstance because both the breaking â—f the bread and the powring of the â—ine into the cuppe doe mystically lay â—nd represent vnto vs before our eyes â—he truth power and efficacy of the â—illing of Christs body and the shedding of his bloud by which to wit he faithfull behold with the eyes of their mind Christ himselfe as it were beaten and broken vpon the Crosse with exceeding great torments and as though dropping clutters of bloud c 1. Cor. 11 14. Esa 53.3 In Sealing because the Bread Wine both are are to be calâ—d the seales or stampes of his body and bloud both for that they confirme the truth of the Similitude betweene the signe and the thing signified and also because they doe most certainely seale the efficacy of the vnion and conjunction of both together in the lawfull vse for we doe not simply and properly consider the Signe and the thing signified as they are things materiall and substantiall but as mysticall things d Entia rat onis and thinges that haue their being of the manner not naturall but of divine ordination seeing that Faith considering the Signes not in their owne nature but in the sacramentall word of Institution vseth them for the sealing of the partaking fruition of the thing signified In the Presenting or offering because that in very deed is offered which by the Signe is figured for the Sacramentall signes are exhibitiue for that by them Christ yeeldeth Ioh. 6.35 and exhibiteth himselfe the heavenly bread vnto our soules Wherefore in the Supper of the Lord things very different earthly and heavenly are proposed and delivered together in time though not together in place There is then no essentiall changing of the signes in this conjunction as if they should eyther by a dissolution bee resolved into their first matter or even into nothing or if by a simple or absolute change or according to substance they should bee converted into the substance of the true body and true bloud of Christ for the substance and nature of the signs being removed or taken away the affinity relation and Analogy of them to the thing signified should perish but it is wholy Sacramentall that is a change of the quality or condition of the vse and end of the Elements The end of the Lords Supper is two-folde Primary and Secondary The Primary is that wee in the lawfull vse of the Signes celebrating the memory of Christs death may bee confirmed both concerning our communion with him and our nourishmeÌ„t in him f Ioh. 6.57 1. Cor. 5.8 1. Cor. 10.17 vnto life eternall The Secondary that it might be a tokeÌ„ of our resurrection and testimony of our thankefulnesse a pledge of our mutuall loue lastly a publicke note or marke of difference and profession This resolution of the Definition by causes three additions or Corollaryes doe follow one of the Presence the other of the Communication the third of Adoration of the Lords body and bloud For the Presence of Christ in the Supper it is needefull that it bee distinguished and considered two waies First according to the verity thereof Then according to the maner of the verity thereof The Verity of Christs presence in the Supper in that the Supper of the Lord is coÌ„sidered not as an earthly actioÌ„ only but as a heavenly is that whereby in his Body and bloud hee is beleeved to be truely and really present in the Supper and that both in respect of the signes and in respect of the Communicants Of the Signes because the body and bloud of Christ are truly present together with the bread and wine the sacramentall signes not in respect of co-existence and place but in a Sacramentall manner in respect whereof this presence in the Schooles is commonly tearmed Relatiue Of the Communicants because Christ is in very deed present in the heartes of them that beleeue even altogether with the same and such a presence as the communion of his body is exhibited vnto them in the Supper g Mat. 18.20 and this presence is Reall yet neyther presence is corporall for by faith as Ambrose sayth Christ is touched not by body Of this Verity there are two grounds The Divine Promise and the Sacramentall Vnion The Promise for sith Christ in the instituting of his Supper hath promised the eating of his body and bloud and therefore also his Presence we must verily beleeue that Christ accomplisheth and performeth what hee hath promised h Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 1. Cor. 19.23 The Sacramentall Vnion for the Essentiall Forme of the Sacraments i that which maketh Consistence requireth that in the Supper the thing signifyed be no lesse certainely conferred then the very present signes are offered The manner of this Verity is not corporall naturall or Locall eyther by a conversion of the whole Substance
thing possible to be to reason that there is absolutely a being and partly because hee which taketh from bodies the spaces of places destroyeth the verity of a body The Second because the conclusion is of no strength from an Allegoricall forme of speaking to the proper The Third 4ª 5ª 6ª 7ª because there is no consequence from a miraculous pearcing through of dimensions from a singular prerogatiue of Christs Nativity which pertayneth not to the Essence of the body from the rowling backe of the stone done immediately by an Angell at the time of Christs resurrection from the Ascension of Christ into heaven which wâ—â— done as the Scripture speaketh by the opening and dividing of the Heaven from the punishment of the daÌ„ned all which destroy not the verity of a body from like miracles which are aboue nature but not against nature and detract not any thing from the substance of the thing from these I say to the â—llocality of the body there is no consequence IX CAp. 8. Lib. 3 The profes which are â—aken from the truth of God doe faile many wayes The First a Petit Principium iterateth the same matter in question for proofe or proveth one doubt with another The Second layeth down a false position for the truth and ancientnes of the consent of the church ought not to bee taken from the testimony of some certaine persons and from the times of Lanfrancus but from the testimonies of Scripture and the times of the Apostles The Third in their owne cause is suspitious For the Authority of Popish councels neyther can nor ought to prejudice the truth The Fourth reasoneth in consequently from humane authority in divine matters The Fift insisteth vpon the actions and narrations of persons which were eyther fabulous or farre set digressions The Sixt concludeth from Miracles the truth wherof is in controversie or the superstition noted or the falshood manifest X. CAp. 21. From the authority of the Romish church and of the counsels by the same celebrated nothing is concluded because the truth is to bee preferred before all humane judgementes XI THose things which are spoken concerning congruency according to reason or the manner are worthily rejected as incongruent and contrary to reason The First indeed concerning the absence of the Substance of Bread because neyther the Lords body is substantially vnder the accidents of Bread nor is the flesh of Christ simply adored as if it were vnder the bread but because it is hypostatically vnited to Christs Divinity neyther are the foode of the mind and the foode of the belly receyved with the same Instrument but the one is of the body and the mouth the other of the soule and faith nor doth abstinence from the vse of the mysticall bread cause fasting as neyther doth the receyving and vse breake off fasting But the Second concerning the accidents remaining because the accidents of Bread make not the Sacramentall Signe but the Substance of bread because no reall and substantiall change is made in the Supper but onely that which is Sacramentall both boundes of Relation nevertheles remayning because this is alone the merite of faith to trust to the merite of Christ because he which eateth not flesh in the proper forme thereof eateth not flesh really OF THE CHVRCH The Part Confirming CHAP. XIIII AFter that wee haue discerned the application of our redemption by Christ by the Degrees thereof the outward Meanes which God is wont to vse for the accomplishment of the same Now let vs see according to order concerning the Subiect of that application that is concerning the Church which Christ redeemed with his owne bloud and vnto which alone by the gratious election of God the vse and profession of the great and singular benefite of Redemption pertaineth For the Knowledge of this Subiect or Church a two fold explication is very necessary the one Nominall the other Essentiall the former whereof Generally expoundeth the EquivocatioÌ„ or divers signification of the word the latter the very manner or nature of the church in particular The Nature of the very word ought to be considered and expounded two wayes Etymologically and Logically Etymologically the Church is a company called forth by publicke authority Logically the Church is of the number of those thinges which the Logicians call Collectiue and gathered together that is such which are not some one thing absolutely but containe in themselues two things whereof the one is like to a multitude and a matter dispersed but the other to an vnity order and gathering together Being both wayes considered the Church hath a threefold signification the first most Generall vnder which not onely the Angels are comprehended but also Politically every civill assembly and Catachtestically the false church which is called Ecclesia malignantium the Congregation of the wicked a Psal 26.5 Apoc. 3.9 is vnderstoode The second is more Speciall and signifieth th t whole multitude of all persons which generally is esteemed by the outward â—allingling and profession The Third is most Speciall most properly signifying that part of men which is knit together vnto everlasting life which signification is vsually distinguished from the â— former as it were by foure properties and attributes that it is One Holy Catholicke and Apostolicke One in the Author of Salvation in â—he consent of Doctrine in the Subministration of the Spirite and in the holy communion of the members b Can 6.8 Eph. 4.4 1. Cor. 3.11 Holy in vse office affection and proceeding lastly in effect and perfection in Christ for it is sanctified for Gods vse it desireth after holinesse is perfectly cleansed by the bloud of Christ e Mat. 26 28. 1. Cor. 1.2 Eph. 2.20 Apostolicall in the Ministery and truth of doctrine Lastly Catholicke in resepct of the Places Persons Time and Partes d 1. Cor. 12 13 4.27 In this place we are to treate of the Church in the second third signification whereof according to that double significatioÌ„ there issueth a double notioÌ„ the one visible in which acording to the outward forme of the church others also are mingled with the good who properly are the Church that pertain not to the same but only because of the outward profession of the christian faith and calling e Mat. 18.17 Mat. 13.24 Luc. 3.14 The other Invisible which according to the Essentiall forme thereof comprehendeth the predestinated and Elect onely whose Faith cannot be discerned with the outward eyes f 2. Tim. 2 19. Rom. 11.3.4 The Former is esteemed by the outward calling generally the latter by the inward calling properly and particularly g Eph. 3 15. According to both Notions the Church is of vs to be defined both Generally and Distinctly Generally the Church is defined to bee the company of them whome God by his free calling doth call forth to the communion of his grace and glory h Mat. 11 29. Distinctly the Church visible is defined to be
Life but the Instrument and meane to attaine vnto life Neither doe the places which are cited proue any thing else which doe eyther note the quality of them that are to be saved and not the cause of Salvation Heb. 10.1 Tim. 2. Rom. 10. or doe intimate the way of righteousnesse by which men come vnto Salvation Phil. 2. 2 Cor. 4. Or lastly doe treate of the Effects from which as from that which is the a A Posteriori That is from the Effect to the Cause latter judgement both may and should be had of them that are truely justified and hereafter shal be glorified Mat. 25. Iac. 1. 2. Cor. 7. II. NEyther doth the reason alleadged from an absurdity and expressed in the ninth Chapter proue the contrary for Faith alone is sayde to saue vs aequivocally eyther in respect of faith because it is alone or of salvation because it alone saveth Faith is not alone without works but it alone saveth and justifyeth without workes as the eye onely seeth yet not alone but joyned together with the Body That the Law of God is not possible to be fulfilled by vs against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 11. I. THe Testimonies of Scriptures which are alleadged First Ma◠11. 1. Ioh. 5. treate not of the nature of the Law compared with the power of the Regenerate or not Regenerate for the fulfilling of the same but eyther of the burthē of the Crosse which the inward vertue and efficacy of Christs Spirite and the hope of eternal immortality doe ease or of Gods commandements in Generall aswell in respect of Faith as of good workes which are not so farre grievous that by them the faithfull should be oppressed for both the Spirite becommeth conquerour and whosoever beleeveth i◠freed from the curse of the Law Secondly those in Ioh. 14. Ro. 13 Gal. 5. Ioh. 15. doe not treate of our power for the fulfilling of the Law but eyther of our duety or of the effect of our loue towardes God Or lastly of the loue of our neighbour as a most evident Testimony of the whole obedience of the Law Thirdly in Psalm 118. 1. King 14. Act. 18. 1. Kin. 15. 2. King 23. 2. Chron. 15. 11. There is no speech concerning any perfection of the righteousnesse of those who are named righteous absolutely but eyther respectiuely or by relation vnto others or Inchoatiuely as touching themselues or by Imputation in respect of Gods acceptance Or lastly after a sort in respect of their owne sincerity opposed or set against Hypocrisie II. THe reasons which are alleadged Chap. 13. proue not the question in hand Not the First for it is grounded vpon a false presupposall and vpon that which by the Schoolemen is tearmed Petitio Principij Not the Second because it playeth vpon a false consequent for our bond remayneth albeit our weakenesse or want of power bee admitted like as the debt is wont to remaine though the debtor bee not able to pay Not the Third because God hath his reasons First he doth not require a debt in vaine and we are put in mind of our debt Secondly the Principles of nature are not in vaine stirred vp for the convincing of the wicked and the saving of the godly Not the Fourth because the Apostle discourseth Rom. 8. of the right of the Law not of Iustification and that right is not saide to be fulfilled of vs but in vs. Not the Fift because the operations of the Spirit are produced in vs according to the manner of the Instrument and the measure of our Infirmity Not the Sixt because as being Iustified they are born of God they performe the Law but as they are regenerate vnperfectly they performe and fulfil the same vnperfectly OF MANS ESTATE after this Life The Part Confirming CAP. VIII ANd this is the State of Mā in this life both according to the condition of his first Originall or Naturall corruption as also according to his regeneration by Grace or the truth of Christian calling Now the other State of Man which shal bee after this life next ensueth the same and it ought two wayes of vs to bee considered and declared eyther Generally in respect both of the godly and vngodly or Particularly in respect of these or those Generally the estate of man after this life is knowne by two degrees by the resurrection of the flesh and the last iudgment The Resurrection of the flesh is an iterated and indivisible coupling of the soule with the body wrought by the mighty power of God that when death shall be conquered men made immortall might liue for euer eyther in glory or in torment The efficient cause principal of the Resurrection is the whole Godhead For the father raiseth the dead the sonne quickneth whome he will and the holy Ghost with the father and the sonne giueth a fulnes of life aswell to the body as to the a 1. Cor. 15.12 1. Thes 4 14. 1. Cor. 15.25 soule but the instrumentall or ministeriall are the Angells the effectuall working of whome the scripture signifieth by a Metaphor of a sounding Trumpet The matter is mans body the same in number as touching the substaunce which wee beare in this life whether it bee of them which are dead or of those which shall bee found aliue at the last day b Dan 12.2 Ioh. 5.26.29 1. Thes 4.16.17 The forme according to the consideration of the matter shal be eyther a Restoring of the dead vnto life or that proportionable and conformable transformatiō of those which shal be foūd aliue This form the changing of the qualities of the body doth accompany being indeed a generall incorruption and immortallity but besides these in respect of the faythful there shal bee a particular glory power and spiritualnes of the bodyes The end principall is the glory of the righteousnes and grace of God Subordinate according to the considerations of the persons that rise agayne eyther the salvation and glory of the Elect or the punishment and casting away of the Reprobate The last or extreame iudgement is a iudiciall act whereby Christ in the last day with greate maiesty and glory shal giue sentence vpon all men vniuersally The efficient cause principall as touching indeed the iudiciall power and authority is God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost but as touching the maner of iudgment or exercise therof Christ is not onely as he is God but also as hee is man both because of the estate of glory which followeth together with the personall vnion of the divine and humane nature as also because of the agreeablenesse and affinitie of himselfe with men c Mat. 24.30 Luc. 21.27 2. Tim. 2.8 The Administring Cause shall bee the Angells whose Service God will vse both in the gathering together and in the separating and singling out of them that shal be judged d Mat. 24.31 1. Thes 4.16 The Matter as it respecteth the subject is the faith or infidellty of every
they are taken with the Fathers in generall in the former when they treate of the bookes truely canonicall in the latter when of the Apocryphal III. IT belongs vnto him only to prescribe giue and maintaine a Canon in the church who is the Author Lord and Preserver of his Church IIII. NEyther doth the Apocryphal confirme the authority of the Apocryphal nor the Councels of Florence and Trent nor the Ecclesiastical reading nor lastly the Fathers eyther by citing of places out of the Apocryphall or intitling the Apocryphal with the name of holy Scriptures for the Canon of ecclesiasticall reading is one and the Canon of saith is another Distinctions for the perfection of the Scripture VVHereas our Adversaries are wont to bring two kinde of Arguments against the perfection of the Scripture the one against the necessity the other against the sufficiency thereof wee will treate of both together Against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 4. Cap. 4. I. THere is a two-fold necessity the one absolute the other by an d Or supposition Hypothesis or something is sayed to bee necessary two wayes eyther as the Cause or the e Concausa Fellow-cause the word of God revealed is simply necessary to all men as the cause but the Scripture as the Fellow cause Now it followeth not thus to conclude the Fathers vntill Moses vsed the necessary cause without this the fellow-Fellow-cause therefore we may for a conclusion drawne from the change of time is deceitfull II. A Tradition onely is sayed to haue beene eyther b After a sort or in part Simply or Absolutely secundum quid that 〈◊〉 without the Scripture and so wee confesse a tradition to haue beene vntill Moses or simpliciter and that we denie for they had in stead of Scripture other innumerable Principles and Ruâ—diments III THe whole is sayde to be two waies eyther according to quantity or according to the perfection of the Essence thereof All the Bookes severally are sufficient in their owne Essentiall â—erfection though according to their â—ntirenesse and quantity they haue not the sufficiency of the whole but their owne IIII. THese Bookes which perished eyther were not Canonicall or their substance is found in those which are Canonicall V SOme precepts of God are expressed and manifest some other inwarde and hidden God commaunded his Word to be written downe both by the inward inspiration of the spirit generally and therefore is sayde to bee inspired i Divinitus of God as also expresly to certaine persons in particular k Reu. 1.11 Apoc. 1.11 VI. ALL thinges are contayned in the Scripture eyther expresly or Analogically so what wee are to thinkâ— of Women not circumcized of Infants dead before the eight day of the Gentiles saved we may know out of the Scripture Analogically VII A Principle of a Principle cannot be had nor ought to bee sought Now the Scripture is knowne to be divine not from Tradition but first from the inward testimony of the spirite of Christ secondly from the testimony of the Apostles as the publicke Notaries in the Church Thirdly from the testimony of the Scripture as a divine Instrument and lastly from the â—â—stimony of the Church of God openâ— and as it were in a pillar setting â—rth the testimony of the Apostles and â—f the Scripture VIII THe Scripture is not doubtfull in it selfe but vnto vs by accident and â—ther seemeth so to be through the corâ—uption of our vnderstanding but God 〈◊〉 an infallible Interpreter of the same â—y his Spirit and word written and â—f this divine tradition wee haue need â—r the vnderstanding of the Scripture or those things which it behooveth vs â—o know concerning the equality of â—â—e persons the proceeding of the Spiâ—ite originall sinne the descension of Christ into Hell are sufficiently declaâ—ed in the Scripture for our Salvation IX THose thinges which are spoken concerning the Virginity of Marie afâ—er the birth of Christ the Passeover to be celebrated on the Lords day the l Paedabaptismo Baptisme of Infantes and Purgatory eyther are not necessary as the first and the second or are found Analogically in the Scriptures as the third or are false as the fourth The Places which are cited by Bellarmine against the perfection of the Scripture 1. Tom. Lib. 4. Cap. 5. are these Ioh. 16.12 Ans The Place treateâ— of speciall thinges the knowledge oâ— which is infinite which therefore alsâ— are expressed in the Scriptures not iâ— particular and one by one but bâ— Word and in generall or else oâ— those thinges the Revelation whereof according to the dispensation oâ— time Christ would defer vntill thâ— time of that extraordinary and visiblâ— communicating of the holy Ghost 1. Cor. 11.2 Ans In the holy Supper of the Lord two things concurreâ— the very substantiall thinges of the Supper to wit the matter and forme seâ—â—ndly the meere Ceremoniall thinges the Rites Those are of themselues â—â—cessary and were most faithfully deâ—ered by the Apostles but these 〈◊〉 after a sort m SecunduÌ„ qu id for that which is morall 〈◊〉 them is necessary and therefore â—ly written downe of the Apostles â—t that which is Ceremoniall onely is 〈◊〉 Indifferent n Adiaphoâ—um and left free to the â—hurches 2. Thes 2.15 Ans The Word of â—â—adition is Equivocall for eyther in â—enerall it signifieth every doctrine â—owsoever delivered by Word or Wriâ—g or it signifieth in Particular or â—ppositely that doctrine which is not â—itten in the first signification the â—postle taketh it and not in the seâ—nd 1. Tim. 6.2 2. Tim. 1.13 Ans â—hat the pledge and patterne of wholeâ—me wordes cannot be otherwise exâ—ounded then of the Scripture it selfe â—nd the substance of christian doctrine â—ll the circumstances of the place doe teach 2 Ioh. 1.2 Ans That kinde of reasoning hath no consequence which is drawne from particulars eyther deedes or rytes which it was not needefull to expresse in writing but the case is altered concerning the very substance of the doctrine of Faith Distinctions for the playnenesse of the Scripture against Bellarmine 1. Tom. Lib. 3. Cap. 1. I. THe clearenesse or obscurity of the Scripture is two-fold the one to vs partly through the Nature of the thinges partly through our owne infirmity the other in manner and meane of the Scriptures every obscurity whereof mention is made among the Fathers is not of the Scriptures but eyther of the thinges in the Scripture for the maiesty therof or else ours who without the inward light of the spirite cannot know them those thinges which wee know wee know onely in part and after an vnperfect manner II. THe matters of the Scripture though for their maiesty they are vnto vs obscure yet as they are proposed vnto vs in the Scripture they are not obscure for the manner of speaking is every way perspicuous neyther is there in the Scriptures eyther any contrariety or ambiguity or falshood nor doe the speeches which go e
Rom. 8.30 Iustification and Glorification that is a gratious beginning â—roceeding together with a glorious peâ—â—ection of divine blessings by the perfect coniunction of Christ or by the perfect ioyning of them together with Christ The End Remote is Gods glory the o Subalterna meane or indefinite indifferent End is that we should be holy the last end is life and glorification p Eph. 1.6 And this is the manner of Predestination in it selfe and the causes therof simply wee must now consider of the opposites and contraries of the same Of these although there bee a diverse respect yet Sinecdochically it is wont to bee signified and shewed by the common name of reprobation in which significatioÌ„ it is distinguished both from eternall Predestination which abusiuely is called Reprobation as also from that part of Gods decree which eyther Logically is called Non Election or Theologically a q Preteritio passing by which properly is called Reprobation But forasmuch as being opposite to Predestination whereof wee haue treated it signifieth that whole fore-ordinance and maner of order vnto the end wherevnto the Reprobates are appointed of it we must speake in the first signification Now Reprobation is an Act of Gods pleasure or decree whereby God from everlasting hath purposed in himselfe to passe by the greater part of the Vniversality of Creatures as touching the communion of his healthfull and supernaturall grace and glory and the same also before hand to condemne that were not like to abide or 〈◊〉 in the integrity of their first originall estate according to his iustice for their sinnes to the setting forth of his glory The Cause Efficient of this reprobation first principall is God second impulsiue is his owne pleasure and will r Pro. 6.3 Eph. 1.11 Prou. 16.4 But this act which in God is simple vniforme as touching vs in respect of the order vnto the end ought two waies to be considered and distinguished for there is in God first an act of Å¿ Preteritionis passing by called of the Schoolemen a Reprobation Passiue and Negatiue before all thinges and causes that were like to be in the thinges or from the thinges whereof no other reason eyther can be giuen or ought to be sought besides the pleasure and will of God t Rom. 9.11.12.13 Mat. 1.23 Then there is an Act of the preparation of punishment or fore-condemnation from everlasting u 2. Thes 2.9 Rom. 6.23 called of the Schoolmen Affirmatiue and Actiue Reprobation before all thinges indeed but not before the causes fore-known and considered to bee like to bee in the thinges or from the thinges but it is a respectiue Act of sinne as the necessary Antecedent because as God in time iustly punisheth and condemneth man for sinne so God also from everlasting hath iustly decreede to punish man and fore-condemned him by or from the x Ex Hypothesi supposition of sinne The matter of Reprobation or rather the right obiect are all and singular Reprobates and the condition of this matter or obiect according to that double respect of the Act ought two wayes to bee considered for as touching that former Act of God and passing by the matter of Reprobation is considered to bee Man in generall without any respect of any quality y Rom. 9.11 but as touching the latter which is of Predamnation or appointment vnto punishment the matter of Reprobation is man in that he is a sinner or for his sinnes to be punished by the necessity of Gods iustice z Eph. 2.3.5 The form special is indeed the not appointment of theÌ„ into the adoption of Children but in common it is that whole manner of order vnto the end in respect of both the Acts to wit both of Preterition and Predamnation Of Preterition whereof this is the manner of order Prescience or fore-knowledge not that which is of speciall affection and good wil but that of vnderstanding and knowledge in God which otherwise is also called in the Scriptures the Purpose of God whereby God foreknew them that were to be reiected both who and how many they should be fore-appointment by which hee hath determined the Reprobation of them that were forknown in not choosing them by a speciall loue in Christ but in leaving them to themselues in their owne nature which fore-appointment is wont to bee signified sometime by the name of Preordaining sometimes of coagmention and sometimes of hatred a Rom. 9.22 Of Predamnation and the execution â—ereof this is the order a iust forsaâ—ng which is eyther of triall God â—ot giving his grace b Rom. 9.21 or of punishâ—ent God taking away all his saving â—tes and delivering them into the poâ—er of Sathan c Ioh. 13.2 1. Thes 2.9 10. Hardening and those things which â—se to accompany d Rom. 9.18 the same even vnâ—o the guilty condemnation of man which of some are called the Effectes of Reprobation but more fitly and truely â—he Consequents or degrees of order vnto the end The end of Reprobation first remote is the setting forth of Gods glory e Rom. 9. second the meane or Indifferent end the declaration of the liberty of God f 2. Rom. 9.21 the last and neerest g Rom. 9 28. the execution of his iustice in the punishment of the Reprobates OF PREDESTINATION The Part Confuting I. SOlutions or distinctions for the cause efficient Predestination signifieth two thinges the determination of thâ— end and the ordinance of the meanâ— vnto the end of both the first cause iâ—pulsiue is the will of God II. PRedestination is eyther taken moâ— specially for the Predestination oâ— the Saints and differeth not onely iâ— the thing but also in the manner from Election or more generally for every fore-appointment of order vnto the certaine end in which signification the three partes thereof may be put to wit the appointment of the beginning the means and end III. REprobation is taken eyther Negatiuely for not Election or affirmatiuely for the preparation of punishmeÌ„t IIII. IT is one thing to treat of the first act of Predestination and Reprobation which is Gods decree of choosing and 〈◊〉 choosing or passing by which is â—solute and another thing to treate 〈◊〉 the second which is respectiue of â—posing indeed vnto the means wherâ— the cause is in God onely but of â—t choosing vnto sinne whereof the â—use is in man but the ordination from â—od V. THe second Act of Reprobation or the ordination vnto punishment is â—â—stinguished into that which is simple â—â—d compound or comparatiue the one that whereby one is ordayned vnto â—unishment but the other whereby in 〈◊〉 vnequall condition the one is more â—en the other the cause of that withâ—ut God supposeth the merite of man â—ut of this without God no reason can â—e given The Places for faith fore-seene 2. Thes 2.13 Ans The conclusion is â—f no force from the cause of salvation â—nstrumentall to the
actuall both of these were in Christ yet properly he imputeth this onely V. ACtuall righteousnesse is eyther perfect or imperfect this is in vs that in Christ VI. PErfect actual righteousnesse of Christ consisteth in a double obedience whereof the one is called the obedience of the Law the other obedience vnto death VII THe obedience of the law which is truely and properly the effect of the person being the mediator neyther ought nor can bee called eyther a part making the person or a quality pertayning to the making of that person VIII THe places of Scripture which treat of Christes death are not to bee taken exclusiuely or oppositely but figuratiuely or Synecdochically for the last accomplishment of the whole obedience DISTINCTIONS in defence of the Formall Cause The Arguments which Bellarmine bringeth against the truth of this cause are of two sorts for first hee endeavoureth to proue by certaine reasons that our inherent righteousnesse is the formall cause of our righteousnesse Secondly he impugneth the imputation of Christs righteousnesse The first he endeauoureth to perform by 8. Testimonies Cap. 3. Lib. 2. De Iustificatione The first is in Rom. 5. Of which wee haue treated in the explication of those places which were alleadged against the true nature of the name or word The second is in Rom. 3. Answ First the Grace of God is taken in Scripture aequivocally First for the free and eternall favour of God wherby hee made vs acceptable to him selfe in his beloved Sonne and this is the Grace that maketh acceptable Secondly for the giftes by Grace whether outward or inward whether generall or particula and that in the place cited it is taken in that signification and not in this three thinges doe proue First because the Apostle excludeth the righteousnesse of the law which is of works to the end hee might establish the righteousnesse of faith the causes whereof hee reckoneth vp Secondly because what hee called freely hee expounded by grace that not onely the workes that goe before but also those that follow after faith might bee excluded Thirdly because the Apostle opposeth the very same Grace cap. 4.2.4 against Abrahams works howsoever proceeding from the renuing of the Spirite Secondly neyther in deed doth the conjoyning of those two words Freely and by Grace sith the one expoundeth the other according to the Scripturall Phrase of speaking nor doth the force of the Preposition by which is not found in the originall Text and very often in the Scripture noteth the efficient nor doth the Efficacy of Gods grace the effect whereof ought necessarily to be distinguished from the Cause nor lastly doth it because loue in Scripture is called any Grace whereas both the loue of God towards vs is a grace making acceptable and ours towardes God is a grace freely given any way infringe that interpretation The third 1. Cor. 6. To this wee haue aboue answered The fourth Titus 3. Answ First the Effect is badly confounded with the cause to witte Iustification with Regeneration and Renovation for the matter of that is the righteousnesse of Christ but of this our Inherent righteousnesse Secondly neyther doth the Apostle call Renovation Iustification sith hee expresly distinguisheth the one from the other Thirdly the Apostle sheweth not the cause but the vse of Renovation or good workes when he sayeth that being justified by the grace of God wee might bee heyres according to the hope of everlasting life The fift Heb. 11 Ans First there is a two-folde righteousnesse Imputed and Inherent by both they are called Iust or righteous but after a divers manner by that by way of Relation and perfectly before God by this Inchoatiuely Subjectiuely and vnperfectly Secondly the perfection which is ascribed vnto the faithfull in the Scripture hath a three-fold respect the first of Gods councell from everlasting Secondly of the foundation in Christ lastly eyther of comparison and opposition vnto other mēs vnrighteousnes or of the end or tearme of perfection vnto which it tendeth besides these respects there is no perfection of the faithfull in this world Thirdly the nearest cause in deede of a righteous worke is inherent righteousnesse but the chiefe and principall cause is the Spirit of Christ imputing his righteousnes to vs and by the power of that imputed righteousnesse working this inherent righteousnesse in vs. The Sixt Rom. 8. 1. Cor. 15. Ans first our Conformity with the Image of Christ whereof mention is made in the Scripture is threefold the one vnto the image of glory being opposite to that which is vnto the image of Christs afflictions And of this the Apostle treateth in the cited places The second vnto the image of Christs obedience which in deede in this world we performe vnperfectly but Christ applyeth the same to vs as perfectly performed for vs. The third is of the death buriall and resurrection of Christ Secondly of Christs righteousnesse there is a double vse the one principall of satisfaction and merite the other exemplary and of document as touching satisfaction Christs righteousnesse is imputed to vs as touching example it is the rule of our inherent righteousnesse Thirdly the opposition which is made betweene the image of the first Adam and the second according to the sense of the Apostle in both places hath respect vnto the mortality and immortality the earthly and heavenly qualities of the body not properly vnto sinne and Christs imputed righteousnesse The seaventh Rom. 6. Ans The word Iustification is taken two wayes properly and improperly Properly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the cause Improperly when wee are sayde to bee justified by the effects Secondly the Apostle treateth of our Sanctification and the two parts therof the mortifying of the old man and the quickning of the new of both which partes hee giues vs an example in the death and resurrection of Christ Thirdl◠to bee justified signifieth to bee freede according to the proper phrase of the Hebrewes who comprehend the Consequent with the Antecedent The eight Rom 8. Answere First the degrees of our Salvation Adoption and Iustification are badly confounded together Secondly of Adoption there are two considerations the one according to the truth and foundation thereof in the eternall counsell of our Election the other according to the fruition and accomplishment thereof in the other life In that signification Adoption goeth before Iustification but in thi Adoption is the bound and end of Iustification Thirdly it is one thing to call Iustification Putatiue and another Imputatiue that as being false is falsely also faigned vnto vs this is no lesse true then if we our selues had it subiectiuely because of the truths sake both of Gods promise and our coniunction with Christ That the FORMAL CAVSE of our Iustification is not the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse Bellarmine proveth by ten Arguments Cap. 7. Lib. 2. de Iustificatione To the FIRST IT is false for whereas there are two sorts of testimonies some expressed and some by
consequent the thinges that follow proue that both are found in the Scripture and with the fathers concerning the imputation of Christs righteousnesse there are two expresse testimonies among the rest in Scriptures Rom. 4.6 1. Cor. 1.30 And by Consequent these are speciall first That the remission of sinnes which is the second Part of Iustification is expressed in Scriptures by the name of not Imputing Rom. 4.7 8. Secondly that the Apostle denyeth any proper or inherent righteousnesse to the end hee might establish that which is of Imputation by faith Phil. 3.8 Thirdly because looke what the maner of our sinne is in Christ the same is also the manner of Christs righteousnes in vs to wit in both by imputation 2 Cor. 5.21 The testimonies of the fathers are also frequent To the SECOND FIrst whether you respect Gods truth Imputation of righteousnesse is conjoyned with the Remission of sinnes Dan. 9.24 Rom. 4.6 7. Or whether you respect our Salvation it was behouefull also that the two parts of Iustification should bee opposed to a double evill wherevnto wee were subiect to punishment remission of sinnes to offence imputation of righteousnesse Or lastly whether you respect the satisfaction of the Law two things were necessary the first that wee might bee freed from the punishment which the law threatneth secondly that wee might fulfill the law and so might bee made like vnto Christ Secondly neyther doe the places which are cited concerning the Remission of sinnes take away the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse sith the thinges which put themselues one with another cannot duely be put one against another Thirdly the opposition which is made in Rom. 5 hath not respect to the manner of inherence or imputation but to the Causes Effects and Subiects of salvation condēnarion The Causes of salvation being the obedience of the second Adam but of Condemnation the disobedience of the first The Effects that by the one wee are made iust by the other Sinners The Subiects on both sides there are many men found to witte in the cause of condemnation vniversally but in the cause of Salvation generally To the THIRD FIrst there is a double vse of the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse the one is to absolue vs before God the other to cover the imperfection of our righteousnesse that is Primary this Secondary Secondly the perfection which is attributed to Faith Hope and Charity is tearmed so aequivocally and is to bee expounded according to that three-fold respect thereof of which we haue before spoken To the FOVRTH FIrst wee are sayde to be Formally iust eyther subiectiuely or by relation subiectiuely by righteousnesse inherent in vs which is vnperfect relatiuely by Christs righteousnes which is perfectly imputed vnto vs. Secondly it is false that a thing should alwayes haue a name outwardly from the qualities which may bee inwardly sith even in naturall thinges the bodies of the starres shine not with their owne but with a b Ascititio borrowed light that is by the benefite of the Sunne Things subordinate doe not disagree neyther are they two contrary formes to wit the outward and the inherent sith that is both the fore-going and forming cause of this To the FIFT IF you respect the truth of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs wee are accounted truely righteous before God no lesse then Christ but if you respect the quantity and subiect Christ is more righteous then wee because hee is so actually wee imputatiuely hee subiectiuely wee relatiuely in him vnto him and therefore wee cannot nor ought to bee accounted Redeemers and Saviours for that of Christs actions there are two sorts the one is of them which being named in the Abstract or devided do not so much signifie the office of Christ as his benefite obtayned for vs the other of them which in the Concrete or conjunction doe not so much note out to vs the benefite as his personall office The names of those are wont to be changed but the names of these are bounded in the person of Christ To the SIXT OF the restoring of Gods image in vs by Christ there are two parts the abolishing of the depraved Image and the renuance of the same That is performed by the Imputation of Christs righteousnesse This is by the benefite of sanctification or inherent righteousnesse and both wee haue of Christ To the SEVENTH FIRst there is a double consideration of Christ the one as touching himselfe the other as touching vs whose person hee tooke vpon him in respect of the former Christ is sayd to be just holy c. In respect of the latter hee is saide to bee made sinne the curse c. Secondly albeit it sinne bee called a sacrifice according to the Hebrewes proper forme of speech yet the manner of opposition in the cited place requireth that hee bee rather sayde to be made sinne that is a sinner not in himself but by the guilt of all our sinnes imputed vnto him a figure of which thing the two he Goates were whereof mention is made Leu. 16. To the EIGHT FIrst there is a two-fold fairenesse of the Bride the one which shee hath of her Spouse by perfect imputation the other which shee bath in her selfe by a beginning in this life Secondly the beauty of Christ and of his church differ not in Forme but in the Subj ct and manner of propriety for in Christ is fayrenesse by manner of inherence in the church by manner of imputation Thirdly shee is sayd to bee faire among women not opposed to Christ but to other women To the NINTH FIrst the Purenes wherewith wee are prepared for the seeing of God is as well that which we haue by Imputation as that which is in vs subiectiuely in this life Secondly neyther is imputation a vaine thing onely which may seeme or onely be thought to be for it is in very deede applyed vnto vs whereas Relation is not an idle thing but an application vnto the bound thereof it must needes bee that this Imputation is some what which wholy consisteth in Relation To the TENTH HEb 9. Ephes 5. Tit. 2. Ioh. 16. Ans First the word Sanctification is c Homonyma of divers significations for it signifieth Iustification it selfe or the effect of Iustification and in the first signification it is taken in the cited places but not in the second Secondly these wordes Truely and Imputatiuely are badly opposed the one to the other sith those things also which are imputed vnto vs are as truely ours as if they were in vs subiectiuely OF THE COVENANT of GOD. The Part Confirming CHAP. X. ANd these are the degrees according to which God in this life by calling effectually and iustifying freely disposeth the benefit of redemption Now by order we are to see concerning the outward meanes by which God ordinarily executeth that dispensation The outward meanes ordinarie of the execution thereof on Gods behalfe are two the couenant and the seales and sacraments of the couenant
both of his bloud shed are giveÌ„ in Baptisme and of his body crucifyed in the Supper For the passion of Christ is as it were the materiall and meritorious cause of our salvation l 1. Pet. 1.7 2. Pet. 1.19 Mat. 20.28 Of his Benefites because looke what things Christ hath and did hee testifieth m Ioh. 6.53 Ioh. 15.4 Rom. 8.32 by visible signes in every Sacrament that hee had them to our good and did them for vs. Now the Scripture proposeth foure things which in very deed are the benefits of Christs person and the fruites of his merite n 1. Cor. 1.30 Righteousnesse which is the remission of sinnes and the absolution of the sinner before God Wisedome which is the perfect and true knowledge of Gods wil which no man hath without Christ Sanctification which is the denying of our selues joyned together with repentance and new life Redemption which is both a full deliverance from all evils yea even from our last enemy Death as also a small glorification And these are those things which are sealed in all Sacraments which of the Divines are otherwise wonte to bee expressed by the name of an invisible Grace as the signe it selfe by the name of a visible Forme From this consideration of the signe and the thing signified the agreement and difference of both may bee concluded The Difference because they are divers both in nature for the Signe is visible the thing signified is invisible and in the Obiect for the signe goeth but into the body the thing signified into the soule and in the Manner of communication for in respect of the signe the manner is corporall but of the thing signified it is spirituall the Agreement because those things which were otherwise really and very farre separated are joyned together by a Sacramentall vnion The inward and proper forme of a Sacrament is that excellent agreemeÌ„t of the Signe with the thing signified and the mutuall relation of the one vnto the other whereof that properly consisteth in the comparison and similitude of the Effects this in the ordayning of the signe to the thing signified Now this conjunction of the Signes and the thing signified in the SacrameÌ„ts is not naturall by a substantiall contraction or knitting together or by the vniting of the accidents and substances IndistantiaÌ„ Inexistentiam nor locall by the neerenesse and beeing of the one in the other nor yet spirituall as immediately quickning the very signes themselues but it is wholy Relatiue and Sacramentall consisting specially in three thinges in the signifying in the sealing Praebitione and in the exhibiting of the thing signified In the signifying because the signes by a most agreeable similitude and proportion as it were by a certaine introduction doe represent the o Gen. 17 10.11 1. Cor. 11.15.16 Ioh. 6.33 spirituall mysteries that is the things invisible by things visible In Sealing because the Signes are and are called the Seales or stampes of the thinges signified both for that they confirme the truth of the similitude betweene the signe and the thing signified and that also they necessarily and most surely seale the efficacy of both conjunctions in the lawfull vse thereof p 1. Ioh. 1.7 And this is called a coupling of the Sealing In Exhibiting because that in very deede is exhibited which is figured by the signes for God mocketh not by instituting Signes whereof there should be no truth but as in the audible word so also in the signe that is in the visible word he in very deed performeth what he promiseth and sheweth q 1 Pet. 3.2 Rom. 4.11 Eph. 3.7 And yet the exhibiting or receyving of the the thing signified are not referred to the Instruments of the body but to the heart of the beleever because it is spirituall according as the exhibiting and receyving of the Signes is corporall wee say spirituall for a double respect both by reason of the Efficient that is the hidden operation of the holy Ghost which is done in very marvailous maner that by the means of Christs flesh mystically communicated to vs the bloud and vertue of Christ-merite pearceth even vnto our soules Å¿ Col. 6.7 Ioh. 1.26 and by reason of the Instruâ—ent be cause faith by which we rece ue them is a spirituall instrument by the bond whereof the spirit most straitly conjoyneth those things together Col. 26.7 Ioh. 1.26 which otherwise are very faire distant each from the other t Eph. 3.17 From this inward forme of a Sacrament and the mutuall disposition of the signe and the thing signified doe arise two speciall kinds of Sacramentall Predications vsed in the Scriptures the first when the signe is pronounced of the thing signified that is when the signe is sayde to be the very thing signified as when Christ is called our Circumcision our Covenant our Paschall Lambe u 1. Cor. 5.7 Gen. 17.10 Act. 7.8 the other when the thing signified is pronounced of the signe that is when the very thing signified is sayde to be the signe as when the bread is called the body of Christ the wine the bloud of Christ x 1. Cor. 11.24 Mat. 26.28 And these Predications are wont to bee called Relatiue Analogicall and Metonymycall Relatiue because when the one separated thing is pronounced of the other a mutuall relation and respect of things like the one to the other is necessarily presupposed Analogical because the changing of the names is made in regard of the Analogy and exceeding great agreement betweene themselues Metonymycall because the signe is put for the thing signified so contrariwise The reason of these Predications in the mater of a Sacrament is the vnion which as it coÌ„sisteth in three in the signifying sealing and spirituall exhibiting so it maketh these Sacramental Predications true because of the signifying sealing and exhibiting The End of a Sacrament is two-fold Proper and Accidentall The Proper is eyther Primary or Secondary That is the visible sealing of Gods invisible grace and our conjunction with Christ y Rom. 6.4 1. Cor. 10.16 Gal. 3.27 This is a testifying of godlinesse towards God of loue towards our neighbour and of open profession whereby as by a marke wee are severed from other Synagogues of Sathan z 1 Cor. 10.17 Eph. 4.5 1. Cor. 11.29 The Accidentall is the condemation of them that vnworthily communicate for albeit the vnfaithfull receiue the SacrameÌ„ts yet for the abuse of the signes reproachful contempt against the thing signified they are made guilty of the contempt of Christ and therefore also of everlasting death and condemnation By this a An alysi opening of the definition through all the causes it may easily be coÌ„cluded what those things are which most properly may hold the name and nature of a Sacrament to witte those wherein there may be a concurrence of all these causes and of the conditions that issue out of these Such Sacraments as these are
some of the Old some of the New Testamēt Those which are of the olde Testament are of two sorts for some were Temporary Accidentall and Extraordinary which God vsed but once or for a certaine time and of these some resemble our Baptisme as the passage through the red sea the deluge the abiding vnder the Cloude some the Lords supper as the Manna given from heaven the water out of the rock some were firme and ordinary the vse wherof was vnto the time of the New Covenant which specially were two Circumcision b Gen. 17 10. Leu. 12. and the Passeover c Exod. 12 3. 2. Chr. 3 5 the one a token Sacrament of entrance and receyving into the Covenant the other of continuance in the Covenant which are called speciall partly because they were the Presidents of the New Testament and partly because they sealed vppe the promise o◠Grace and the application thereof made to every one for which two respects they are distinguished from all other Sacraments which were many in the old Testament The Sacraments of the New Testament are two the one of entrance to witte Baptisme which succeeded Circumcision d Col. 2.11.12 Act. 22.16 1 Pet. 13 21. the other of Nourishment or food namely the Lords supper which the Paschall Lambe shadowed forth e Luc 21.15 1. Cor. 5.8 1. Cor. 11.24 And as all the causes doe most evidently declare the verity of these two sacraments so they manifestly convince the vanity of the rest which commonly are wont to bee counterfeyted For of these two Sacraments God is the Cause Efficient by the worde of Institution that is of commaundement and promise which Efficient Cause the other fiue ambiguously called Sacraments haue not f Mat. 28 19. The Matter that is the signe and the thing signified is exhibited in these two Sacraments the former whereof notwithstanding Penance hath not simply but Matrimony Order Confirmation and Extreame Vnction haue it not by Divine Institution the latter of these none of them hath most neerely whether you respect Christ himself or his merite or his benefites The Forme of a Sacrament is only found in Baptisme and the Supper but the others haue indeede some signification but no sealing or presenting at all The Principall and Secondary end these two Sacraments haue joyntly together the other fiue eyther haue not or haue it severally or dividedly To these are added two conditions annexed to the institution of sacramēts whereof the first requireth that a sacrament be ordinary and perpetuall the second that the vse of a Sacrament bee common to all which professe the same Covenant and the same faith which two conditions doe concur in Baptisme and the Supper but in the others eyther the first of them is wāting as in the Extreame Vnction which onely in the time of the Apostles was as a Signe vsed not in sickenes past hope of recovery but likely to be recovered or the second is wanting as in Matrimony and Order or both as in Confirmation These Sacraments of the old and new Testament in divers respects doe both agree and differ They agree first in the Efficient that is God or the word of Institution Secondly in the g Genericis Naturall parts the Signe and the thing signified Thirdly in the Relation to the thing signified which in both places is the same h 1. Cor. 10.3 2. Cor. 5. Fourthly in the End to witte that they bee visible signes of Gods invisibe grace But they differ first in the outwarde Adiunctes the circumstance of time i Gal. 23 5.6 Secondly in the Manner of Signifiing Thirdly in the Quality of the Signs Fourthly in the Number Measure Poer and Easinesse For ours are for number fewer for profite better for the vnderstanding of heauenly things playner for vertue greater and for action easier OF SACRAMENTS in Generall The Part Confuting Distinctions in Defence of the Name and the signification of a Sacrament against Bellar. Lib. 1. of Sacraments cap 7. I. THe name of Sacrament is taken eyther Generally or Specially generally for every divine mystery Symbolical specially for a divine mystery Symbolical which is ordayned of God for the sealing of faith by the word of cōmandement and promise that is commonly this properly called a Sacrament II. EVery Mystery is not a Sacrament but every Sacrament is a Mystery for of the word Mystery there are three generall significations the first for a secret thing The second for a secrete divine thing The third for a secret divine thing proposed or set forth by certaine outward Symbols Signes and Types And in this signification a Sacrament is called a Mystery and not contrary wise The Places which hee citeth are these Dan. 2 Apoc. 17. 2. Thes 2. Eph. 5. Ans All circumstances doe shew that these places when they make mention of the word Mystery doe signifie not so much the signe of a secret thing as a secret thing it selfe For in the first place not the Image but the dream of the King is called a mystery that is a secret thing and not to be revealed but of God In the second the woman is not called a Sacrament but a secret thing of the woman that is concerning the woman is pronounced In the third Antichristianisme it selfe is called the Mystery of iniquity that is a secret iniquity or a secret impiety In the fourth the Apostles very restraint and limitation doth proue that not the joyning together of the man and woman but of Christ and the Church is called a Sacrament Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause against Bellarmine Lib. 2. De Sacram. cap. 19. I. THe Commaundement of God is considered two wayes eyther as it is given or as it is written as it was given it simply bound men at that time when it was given as it is written it simply bindeth since that time when it was written II. THere is a two-fold manner of the Institution of a Sacrament the one in respect of the Author the other in respect of them to whome it was written given or made in respect of the Author the Institution is alwayes of force whether written or not written but in respect of them to whome it is written it is of force as it is written whervpon also there is vsually a double testimony of the Institution of a Sacrament the one Immediat of the Author the other Mediat of the Instrument or scripture Now vnto vs it is not manifest concerning the will of the Author but by the Instrument or Scripture III. THe Promise is considered eyther as the effect or as the Efficient of the sacrament as the Effect it is sealed with the Sacrament as the Efficient it addeth an assurance of the sealing to the Sacrament For in a divers respect the Sacrament doth both seale the promise and hath the promise concerning the sealing IIII. THe word of Promise in Baptisme and the Supper is expressed and contayned in the words
cited as that of the Councell of Carthage and of Milevitum out of Augustine For those Councels doe treate against the Pelagians who at that time denied the baptisme of children and some are suspected as that of the Tridentine Councell and the Testimonies of the Popes III. INfants ought two wayes to bee considered eyther according to common nature or the singular manner of the covenant and grace that way they are conceived in sin but this way they haue obtayned remission of sinnes by the promise In Defence of the Effects of baptisme against the same Cap. 4 and the rest that follow I. SInne dwelling in vs is by baptisme taken away by three meanes and degrees First because it is not imputed Secondlie because by little and little the body thereof is destroyed Thirdly because in death it shall vtterly bee taken away by the power of the same bloud of Christ wherewith wee are washed in Baptisme II. IT is one thing to speake of the cause of Iustification and another thing of the Instrument thereof lastly an other thing of the sealing the cause is the merite of Christ the Instrument is Faith and the sealing is Baptisme III. THe new and vncertaine devise of the Schoolemen concerning the Character or Marke which cannot bee defaced is with the same facility denyed as it is affirmed chiefly whereas neyther Scripture teacheth nor necessary reason sheweth nor authoritie of Fathers proveth any such Character Adde further that the chiefe reason why Baptisme is not iterated is not the impression of the character but Gods onely Institution OF THE LORDES Supper The Part Confirming CHAP. XIII THe other Sacrament of the christian church immediately instituted of Christ for the perpetuall vse thereof is The Lords Supper whereof though there be divers appellations both in Scriptures and with the Fathers for in the Scriptures it is called The body and bloud of the Lord The New Testament The Communion The breaking of bread The Lords Table The bread and the cup The Communicating of the body bloud of Christ a Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.20 Act. 20.7 1. Cor. 11.25 1. Cor. 10.21 1. Cor. 10.16 which by the Fathers First it is called a gathering together The Eucharist or Thankesgiving Publâ—â—g Administration Secondly the Latâ—â—â— Offering because of collections and sacrifice for the remeÌ„brance of Christs Sacrifie yet most properly by this appellation Of the Lords Supper the thing it selfe hath most fitly beene expressed and indeed it is called The Supper with respect had both of the thing and of the time because it is a holy banquet of the soule and not of the belly instituted of the Lord and that in the Evening but the Lordes in respect both of the Author who is the Lord and of the End which is the remembrance of the Lord. Now it is defined to be A Sacrament of the New Testament instituted of Christ consisting of the Signe and the thing signified proportionable by an Analogicall Relation and action of themselues betweene themselues whereby the full growne members of Christ and his church are trayned vp and taught in the lawfull vse of the visible signes concerning the true and spirituall communication of the body and bloud of Christ vnto life eternall The Efficient Cause of the Lordes Supper ought to be considered eyther as instituting or as vsing and administring the same that is the principall cause but this is the serving or administring cause The Principall or Instituting cause is the Lord from whome it hath beene customably called the Lordes Supper to wit Christ God and man our onely Redeemer instituting the mystery of his body and bloud by the oblarion whereof hee redeemed vs b Rom. 15 18. 1 Cor. 11.23 Of this mysticall and divine Institution there are two parts Christs Deeds and his Words by the one wherof hee limitted and left an example of Administration by the other a doctrine of Institution Of Christs Deeds wherby the manner of the lawfull publicke office or administratioÌ„ is declared there are three partes according as concerning both signes which Christ receyved he orderly vsed holy and ceremoniall actions c Mat. 26.26 Mat. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11 24. The first is Blessing and Thankesgiving for the Scripture vseth those two words the one Mathew Marke vseth the other Luke and Paul both signifying the one selfe same thing to witte how Christ by prayers to God by thanksgiving and all that holy action prepared appointed and sanctified the Bread and Wine to a holy vse that they might bee a Sacrament of his Body and Bloud not by their owne nature but by divine Institution and this is that true Consecration or Sanctification of the Sacrament whereof mention is made among the Fathers The Second is The breaking of the Bread and the powring of the wine into the Cuppe which Christ vsed not onely for the cause of dividing and distributing thereof but for the representing of his death for it is an Essentiall and Sacramentall Ceremony of the Lordes Supper pertayning to the end forme thereof d Mat. 26.26 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.19 1. Cor. 11.24 The third is the offering and distributing of the Bread broken and the Wine powred in For Christ gaue not the same to his Disciples that they should distribute but that they should receyue that which was distributed e Mat. 26.26.27 Mar. 14.22 Luc. 22.56 because they were in that Supper not the dispensers of Gods Mysteries but the Guestes But Christ as being the Feast-maker with one labour instituted and with his owne hands dispensed the Sacrament of his Grace and withall sanctified the Ministeriall dispensation thereof And all these Actions are Sacramentall and ought diligently to be considered as farre forth as they are vsed for the signifying and sealing of Spirituall things by divine Institution To these Actions that wee may come to the second part of the Institution Christ added Words whereof some include a Commaundement some a Promise and lastly some an Explication These in Schooles haue vsually been tearmed Preceptiue the other Definitiue and Sacramentall Lastly these Expositiue The Words Preceptiue are those by which hee hath injoyned both vpon the dispensers a necessity of their administration and vpon the communicants a necessity of taking and hath prescribed vnto both a forme of both Administration by his deed whereof we haue aboue spoken and by his commaundement of Imitation ioyned therevnto e Mat. 2 6 26. 1. Cor. 11.24 Of Communicating by a double Precept by the one To take by the other To eate and to drinke The Taking is a Sacramentall Rite prescribed to him that commeth to the Lords Table whereby wee receyue with our hand the Bread and Cuppe of Thanksgiving for it cannot bee gathered eyther from the Story of the Institution of the Lordes Supper oâ— froÌ„ the fashion of Christs sitting down and his Apostles that Christ in the first Supper did put those signes into the mouth of every of the Apostles by which
God and man yet wee must not stay in the very signes neyther are the eyes of faith to be lifted vp to the place of the bread but vnto heaven x Col. 3.1 That this popish Adoration is Idolatrous both in it selfe and in the Adiunct Ceremonies wee proue divers waies In it selfe by three Arguments drawne from the cause from the manner and from the kindes of Adoration for seeing the cause of the Adoration of Christ is proper in his God-head for nothing is properly to bee adored but that which is God the worshipping eyther of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot be translated to the outward signs theÌ„selues without manifest sacriledge then seeing the manner of Christs adoration requireth that neyther the person be divided nor the natures equalled or the difference of them takeÌ„ away the bread cannot at all bee worshipped or the bodie in the bread but either the nature and the properties thereof should be confounded while the presence of Christs bodie is judged to bee in the bread or that which is not fitte for a humane nature but in regard of the person should Idolatrously bee attributed not onely vnto him simply and as touching himselfe but also vnto his Sacrament Lastly seeing there are two kindes of Adoration Praying Thanksgiving neyther of them can be applyed to the bread neyther properly nor Sacramentally whereas both belong to Christ as being God and man In the Ceremonies it is idolatrous whether you respect the reserving of Reliques the inclosing or carrying about or the Elevation of the Eucharist for albeit there were certain beginnings of these ceremonies in the ancient church yet seeing they were prescribed neyther by Christ nor his Apostles or observed in the most ancient and purest church they were for the good cause taken away in the churches of the Gospell OF THE LORDS Supper The Part Confuting Distinctions in Defence of the Interpretation and signification of the NAME I. THe Supper of the Lord signifieth eyther the signe or the action that is eyther it is taken Relatiuely or Absolutely Being Relatiuely it signifyeth the Symboles or Signes of Gods grace Absolutely taken 〈◊〉 signifyeth the whole Action comâ—â—sed of the visible and corporall 〈◊〉 â—ing of the Signes and of the invisible and Spirituall receiving of Christ and his benefites II. THe Lords Supper is considered eyther abstractly as touching it selfe or applyedly in the lawfull vse this way it is properly called a Sacrament that way it is not but abusiuely and improperly III. THere are fowre formes of speaking concerning the Supper of the Lord the sense whereof and manner of vnderstanding them is the same the First is wherein the Name of the thing signified is layed on the Signe as the Supper is the New Testament The 2. wherein the thing signified of the Supper in respect of the effect and efficacy thereof is given to the Signe as the Supper maketh vs partakers of the new Testament Thirdly wherein the offices of the signes are expounded in their proper signification as the Supper is the signe of the Covenant The fourth when in the lawfull vse of the Supper the Sacrament is conjoyned with the promise of grace as he which receiveth the bread and wine worthily shall eate the body and drinke the bloude of Christ Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause principall and First for the Subiect of Predication against Bellar. Lib. 1. De Sacra Euchar. Cap. 10. I. THe Pronounes demonstratiue and Relatiue aswell with the Greekes as Latines doe not alwayes according to rule agree with the substantiue following but sometimes also with that which goeth before and contrariwise not alwayes with that which goeth before but with that also which followeth Moreover the thing which is only a note in the vniversall and not in the particular according as bread was in the Supper is most vsually vttered by a Nowne vniversall of the Neuter gender II. THose things which are to be vnderstoode Tropically according to the nature of a sacrament ought not or may not be properly and simply taken Now there is a double Trope in the proposition touching the cuppe for by a Synechdoche the cuppe is put for the wine in the cuppe and by a Sacramentall Metonymy the Effect of the thing signified is given to the Signe In Defence of the whole Predication to Cap. 9. I. THe Stile of Scripture doth most manifestly proue that the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament as also Testaments compacts and covenants are found to haue beene instituted in Figuratiue wordes and the precepts to haue beene vttered Figuratiuely II. AN Argument drawne from a Figuratiue speaking to the obscurenesse of the same is inconsequent for it followeth not that if it be Figuratiue therefore it is not perspicuous or on the contrary if it be perspicuous that therefore it is not Figuratiue III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers are Sacramentally to be taken that is to bee expounded according to the maner and Trope which is agreeable to Sacraments Whence it is that they all haue judged that Christs words are to bee expounded not according to the Word spoken but according to his meaning IIII. THe appellation of the Word spoken or the sence of the wordes is taken sometimes in a larger and sometimes in a straiter signification in a strayter in regular Predications in a larger in those which are Figuratiue Wherefore in the very wordes of the Supper we retayne the very word spoken but sacramentall wherein not so much the letter and the sound of the words as the sure and certaine meaning thereof is to bee followed to wit that which may agree with the nature of a Sacrament Of the Wordes of Consecration against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 13. I. THe wordes of the Institution of the Lords Supper are of two partes some are the words of the Evangelists and some of Christ himselfe those are not onely recited as a history but doe admonish as well the Ministers as the Communicants what Christ did what he commaunded likewise to bee done of both These serue for consecration yet so that neyther the rest ought to bee omitted nor consecration bee circumscribed with foure or fiue wordes onely or lastly Prayers and Thanksgivings bee excluded seeing as well the former as the latter words of the Institution doe finish the consecration and the Substance of Bread and Wine is not changed by a certaine hidden vertue of those few wordes but on the contrary the consecration which is made in the Eucharist is called in the Scriptures a hallowing with thankesgiving II. THere was a double respect of the Apostles in that first Supper one of Pastors and dispensers of Gods misteries but the other of the church or the vniversall company of the faithfull which they represented in the first respect the commaundement to Doe ought to bee referred to all that which Christ did concerning the bread and wine in the second to all that which the Communicants ought to
miracle is vnwonted and vnusuall but those which are cited were eyther devised of superstitious men or false and put forth to deceyue the simple or lastly brought forth by the helpe and furtherance of the Devil according as Christ and Paul foretold of Antichrist Against the Communion vnder one kinde onely Bellar. Lib. 4. Cap. 24. I. TO reason from the Signes and Sacraments of the olde Testament which differ in the outward adjunctes in the circumstance of time in the maner of signifying and in the quality and number of the Signs to the Sacraments of the New Testament is inconsequent neyther is it needefull to require both kindes in those which eyther were not capable of both or in the lawfull vse whereof there is not extant a commaudement for both II. FRom a particular indefinite propositioÌ„ we badly conclud exclusiuely for albeit in some places there bee mention made of eating the other kinde therefore is not necessarily excluded for there is else where mention made of flesh and bloud together of eating and drinking the same yea foure times in the selfe same chapter III. THe consideration of meate and ordinary bread and of the mysticall and Sacramentall bread is altogether different not as touching the naturall substance quantity or quality but as touching the vse and office Now there was both in that miracle of the feeding of the people and in the Supper at Emaus not a Sacrament of Grace but a feast of nature Neyther haue the Fathers interpreted the bread concerning the true and naturall body of Christ but concerning the mysticall that is the church IIII. SYnecdoche is that which by name of the part compreheÌ„deth the whole very familiar in the Hebrew tongue wherein by the breaking of bread they are wont to signifie a dinner supper any feastes whatsoever from which feastes notwithstanding as drinke neyther ought nor can bee excluded so neyther may it from this Sacramentall feast whereof mention is made in the cited places whence it is also that the same Paul to whome this breaking is attributed expounding the Lordes institution teacheth that this Supper consisteth of bread and of the cup. V. IT is true that the Manichees communicated vnder the one kind of breade onely for they thought that the wine was the gall of a Dragon but that the ancient Church did not therefore reprehend them it is most false even those very men doe proue the contrary whom the adversary would haue to stand on his side to witte Leo the Bishoppe and Gelasius the Pope the former wherof called this mangling a sacrilegious counterfeiting and the latter a great Sacriledge VI. THe Consequence is of no force which is from examples whereof the former is of doubtfull credit as of which Chrisostome himselfe maketh no mention and because of the cunning and craft of a womanish wit ridiculous but the latter of a false and contrary credite as being that which by most certain proofe evidently sheweth that the communion was vsually and necessary vnder both kindes VII FRom extraordinary cases of necessity and those particular there is no conclusion to that which in lawfull ordinary and publicke celebrations of the Eucharist ought to bee observed Adde further that in all those rites and ceremonies though not alwayes yet for the most part there was vse of both kindes according as the constitution and custome of the Primitiue church doth most manifestly proue VIII TO reason from the authority of the Councels and Fathers for the establishing of some error is inconsequent Adde further that in the Primitiue Church the Communion for a long time was retained vnder both kindes even in the monasteries vntill the thousand three hundred yeare the mangling or maiming thereof was first by a publicke decree brought in by the Councell of Constance in the yeare 1484. IX FRom discommodities or inconveniences an argument concludeth nothing both because they leane vpon superstition and because the collection is faultie drawne from particulars and lastly because they being foreseen by Christ and the Apostles hindered not the Institution of the communion vnder both kindes In Defence of the Forme against Transsubstantiation Bellar. Lib. 3. Cap. 19. FRom a bad and insufficient Enumeration of the partes a false conclusion is drawn for every change is eyther Essentiall of the very Substance that is of the naturall matter and forme or Sacramentall of the office condition vse of the Elements both are true but after their manner that true Essentially by the manner of nature but this Sacramentally by the manner of Grace Now whatsoever change is in the Supper it is not essentiall or naturall but Sacramentall that is a Consecration appointment and setting apaâ—t of the Signes from a common to a holy and mysticall vse To the Testimonies of the Fathers which by Bellarmine are cited in the 20. and 21. cap. of the third booke and the whole second Booke I. THose Fathers who called the Eucharist the body and bloud of Christ vsed a Sacramentall manner of speaking wherby it commeth to passe that the names being changed the signe or Symbole is called by the tearme of the thing it selfe Now they vsed this for three causes First that they might declare whereto Christ had ordayned the Eucharisticall bread SecoÌ„dly that they might expresse the Analogy betweene the Signes and the things signified Thirdly That by the change of the names they might teach that there is a most true and indivisible conjunction of the things signified with the signes themselues in the lawfull vse II. THe Fathers who haue called the Eucharist the precious body the reverend mysteries the pledge of Salvation our ransome spake Hyperbolically of the very bread sanctified and not of any other body present by transubstantiation Now they vsed those Hyperbolicall Phrases for three causes First that they might extoll the dignity of the mystery Secondly least eating they should sticke in the outward signes Thirdly that with a great affection of godlinesse and reverence they might approach to that holy Communion III. THe Fathers which affirmed that the Body of Christ is touched seen and chewed with the teeth spake Figuratiuely For there is a double signification of the Sacrament and body of Christ to bee held for as a Sacrament is sometime taken Figuratiuely for one part and sometime properly for both parties so also is the body of Christ sometime properly and somtime Figuratiuely for the outward signe onely and â—n this sense by a figured and Metonymycall vse of speech the Fathers haue affirmed that the body of Christ is touched and seene that is the signe of his body IIII. THe Fathers who spake of the changing of the bread and wine in the Eucharist treated of the Sacramentall change whereof wee haue spoken in the first distinction and therefore willed and taught that their wordes should bee taken Figuratiuely and effectiuely V. THe Fathers who taught that our bodies are cherished nourished and fed with the body and bloud of Christ vsed a
a society of men called forth by an outward calling or communicating of the preaching of the word and Sacraments to the worshippe of Gods Glory i Mat. 18.17 And the Invisible Church the Society of men predestinated which are called forth by an effectuall and saving calling out of the state of corruption vnto the dignity of being adopted the children of God and are vnited vnto Christ as to their head not onely to the service and worshippe but also to the fruition of the glory of God k Luc. 1.33 Rom. 11.4 The Efficient Cause of both Churches is the one Primary the other Instrumentall or Serviceable The Primary and Principall ought 2. wayes to bee expounded according to the constitution of the church and according to the administration and ordering thereof The Cause Efficient of the Constitution of the church is God the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost as the beginning of all good in nature and aboue nature l Rom 2.29 Of this Efficient cause or beginning in respect of the vnity of the Essence there is one and a common Operation but in respect of the distinction of the Persons there is a distinct Manner of working A Common Operation because in divine matters the cause of working is common the worke it selfe the same The Cause of Working in the constituting of the Church is the good pleasure of Gods will whereby from everlasting thee hath appointed to call forth some of Mankind to the communion of his Grace m Eph. 1.5 Tit. 2.14 But the Worke it selfe is the n Eph. 1.13 fulfilling or complement of the church which is to bee consummated with those degrees of meanes and periods of times wherewith it pleased God Of which decree and worke God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost is the common beginning but the maner of Working is distinct For the Father is the Efficient cause of the Church of the Invisible by election but of the Visible by Creation The Sonne is the Efficient cause of the Invisible by effectuall Redemption but of the visible by the common offering of the same Redemption by the preaching of the Gospell the Holy Ghost is the Efficient cause of the Invisible by saving sanctification and new creation in Christ but of the visible by outward calling whereby hee worketh more or lesse And this is the manner of the Efficient cause in the constituting of the Church Now the cause efficient neerest of the Administration and ordinance thereof is Christ God and man by a voluntary disposition and dispensation of Grace whereby God the Father made and appointed Christ the head over all to his Church which is his Body o Rom 12 5. 1. Cor. 3.11.12 Col. 1.18 And it is so not by order of nature but by the divine ordinance of saving Grace for the Church is not sayde to be a Physicall and Mathematicall but a mysticall body of Christ Wherefore also by the same benefite of divine Ordination Christ ought to bee helde and esteemed the head of his body not many heades but one for the church is neyther without head nor yet having many heades But as the condition of the head over the body doth chiefly consist in three thinges in Order Perfection and Power in Order towards the members in Perfection in it selfe in Power towardes the whole Body so Christ also in order perfection and power performeth all duties after a most excellent manner which can or ought to be performed of the best head In Order because he being true man and true God holdeth the chiefty in all things having the supreminence not onely of dignity but also of Regiment and power whence it is that the Scripture doth very often affirme him to haue Beeing before all things and to be placed aboue all things In Perfection because Christ alone is the King Prophet and High Priest having all things in himselfe from the Father which any way may be required for the perfection of the head In Power and Efficacy because hee alone inspireth vigour sense motion and spirituall life into his members and is alone knit fast vnto the body by the bond of the Spirit yeelding that whole ioyning and fastening together of the members among themselues and with God to the whole Church The Cause of the Church Instrumentall and serviceable is Generally the word of God what way soever revealed and communicated whether inwardly or outwardly or ioyntly both wayes p Heb. 4.12 Act. 2 4â— 2. Pet. 2.23 1. Tim. 3.15 Whence it is also that the Word is in Scripture called the seede of the Church and the rule measure foundation of the truth which the Church hath as it were hanged vpon a pillar and as a sure prop vpholdeth the same But Specially the Instrumentall cause of the church Invisible is faith it selfe which sith it is inward is not indeede knowne by the judgement of men but yet it marketh or noteth out the true and essentiall manner and forme of a member of the church as being the onely Instrument of that inward and effectuall calling of God But of the Church visible chiefly and Primary are the Ministers of the Gospell who for that cause are called in the Scripture Builders and Master-builders q 1. Co. 3 10. Eph. 4.12 1. Pet. 3.5 to witte instruments vsed of God and the Lord Iesus Christ for the knitting together of the Saints for the worke of his Ministery and for the common edification of the Body of Christ r Eph. 4.7 2. Cor. 4.1 Now both the calling of these Instruments and their Office according to the Calling must be expounded Their Calling I meane whereby they are holily and lawfully called to a holy publicke function in the communion of Christ and of his Church Now they are called eyther of God inwardly by the Spirite or outwardly of the Church next after God in a holy and lawfull order The first manner if it be alone maketh the calling immediate and extraordinary which God alone causeth for the singular begetting and raysing of his church such as was that of the Prophets and Apostles whome the Lord extraordinarily called and informed by a singular revelation that their authority in teaching and writing might bee plainely divine Å¿ Luc. 21.14 Act. 13.1 Act. 21 4. The latter with the former maketh a calling mediat ordinate which God together with the church causeth by Order Ecclesiasticall t 1. Tim. 5 17. Of this Order there are two Essentiall partes The Choice and Confirmation the First is whereby a holy and lawfull examination is made both of life and doctrine u Tit. 2.7 2 Tim. 2.24 1 Tim. 3.10 The other is whereby a consecration and ordination to the Ministery is first made with Imposition of hands by the Cleargie the body of the Church therevnto consenting by Signe speech or free siâ—ence x Act. 6.6 â— Tim. 4.14 2. Tim. 1.6 And this calling for that it is Ordinary is also Successiue
not by naâ—ure as once the posterity of Aaron the Levites but by Ordinance and Institution But the Office of these Instruments â—s to administer the affaires of the Church according to Gods prescriptiâ—n Now the affaires of the church doe â—oncerne eyther the Doctrine or the â—ignes and Sacraments or lastly the â—cclesiasticall Iurisdiction and Disciâ—line of the Church Wherefore the â—ffice of all Ministers is contayned or â—ounded in the administration of Doâ—trine Sacraments and Ecclesiasticall â—overnement The Administration of Doctrine â—onsisteth in two partes in the assertiâ—n of the truth and in the contrary reâ—â—tation of falshood the right object of â—oth is the word of God y 2. Tim. 2 15 Tit. 1.9 The Administration of Sacraments hath two considerations one of the Persons to whome the Sacraments eyther ought or ought not to bee administred The other of the Manner that they bee wholy conveniently and intelligently administred Wholy as touching the Substantiall and Conveniently as touching the outward quality and forme Intelligently as touching the common Edification of the Church z 1. Cor. 1.23 Luc. 22 19 The administration of Ecclesiastical Discipline is chiefly exercised in two thinges in the punishing of faults and in the execution of Ecclesiasticall judgements as afterwards wee shall shew more at large a 1. Cor. 5.4 2. Cor. 2 8 The Matter of the Church hath respect eyther of the parts or of the Subject The Partes of the Church generally and materially are two The one Superior the other Inferior That 〈◊〉 the head of the Church to which the church is subject and from which alâ— vertue 〈◊〉 into the Church This is the body vnto which the members among themselues and with the head are vnited for the mutuall relation of these partes the one to the other maketh an essentiall manner or nature of the church But particularly the entire parts of the church Invisible are two according as there is vsually had a double respect of this church the one in the Beginning and progresse the other in the Perfection thereof that is commonly called the Militant this the Triumphant both which as touching the Essentiall nature of the church it selfe are but one albeit for the difference of the qualities which are in these partes they are as touching the place very diversly distinguished so that the one is in heaven which triumpheth and the other on earth which is in warfare b Heb. 12 22. Apoc. 21.2 Eph. 6.11.12 but of the church Visible as it is so considered there are two maine partes the Guides and the Flockes the Instructers and the Learners though extraordinarily it often happeneth that the one part is separated from the other the essentiall forme of the church it self still remayning The Subiect of the church Generally is Mankind c Mat. 28.19 Ioh. 10.16 Rom. 1.16 of which partly some are called dayly by the grace of God whosoever are ordained to life eternall and partly others are also called who being convicted of the grace offered might become for ever inexcusable But Particularly the Subject of the church visible are all those in generall which are called and outwardly professe the same faith in which common assembly of the church not onely the godly and elect are but also the vngodly and reprobate Those as touching the verity of the inward and outward forme these according to the shew and resemblaÌ„ce or counterfeiting of godlinesse Those Elect and called these called onely not elect Those the liuely these the dead members of the church d Luc. 8.13 Mat. 22.14 but of the church Invisible are they onely that are predestinated to life who indeed are inwardly affected with the calling of God and perceiue the same by faith according to the election and operation of Grace e Rom. 8.9 Eph. 1.23 Ioh. 14.23 Neyther are eyther the newly catechised Novices though yet not baptized nor those which are excommunicated if they repent excepted out of the visible church not those because albeit they haue not as yet receyved the outward signe yet being indued with faith and baptized with the inwarde Baptisme they ought to be taken for the members of the church according to the perfection thereof Neyther is it lawfull to exclude those from the communion of the church whome the Scripture doth not exclude from the communion of Salvation Not these because as they were conditionally excluded till there be hope of repentance so they must conditionally bee of the Church Now all Reprobates and those that liue wickedly without any pricke of conscience are excluded because whether they seeme to bee inwardly of the church or whether they are outwardly of the church yet they haue beene alwayes separated and continued so from the vnity of this church For this church is the communion of Saintes the Spouse and body of Christ without blemish the Temple of God the holy city c. The Forme of the church both generally according to it selfe wholy and specially according to the double notion thereof ought to be expounded as hath beene done in the causes precedent Generally the Forme of the church is two wayes considered Severally in it selfe and the Efficient cause thereof or ioyntly in her Subject After the former manner the Forme of the church is that divine and precious calling wrought in heaven according to the purpose of Gods will wherby hee decreede from everlasting the communion of himself with the church and of the church with himselfe in his beloved Sonne e Eph. 1.4.5 Ioh 10.27.48 Rom. 8.30 After the latter maner the forme of the church is a divine and gratious calling whereby the church of God is in this world fashioned and waiting vntill after the course of her calling here consummated it be advanced in Christ Iesus to the fruition of the heavenly calling And of this calling as the nature as touching it selfe is most perfect so the manner of the same is also two-fold the one immediate the other mediate that which God by himselfe maketh through the vertue of his Spirite this which he maketh outwardly by speech signe or working ordinarily or extraordinarily as it pleaseth him to make it known vnto men Specially the forme of the church Invisible is an effectuall and inwarde calling and by vertue of that effectuall calling that communion of Saintes both with their head and of themselues each with other g 1. Ioh. 1.12 And of this calling as the nature in respect of God is perfect so the inward and effectuall meane thereof is two-fold the Spirite and Faith the one in respect of him that calleth the other in respect of him that is called by the one God offereth and conferreth the effectuall calling by the other wee take holde of that which is offered and make answere to Gods calling for it is needefull that these two concurre together that the calling bee effectuall to witte the calling of God by the vertue and efficacy of his Spirite and our correspondent
expedient h Rom. 1 7.16.17 Rom. 10.8 Ioh. 3.8 The Matter of Faith ought onely three wayes distinctly to be considered acording as it hath respect vnto the Subject Object or parts The Subiect proper and neerest is the vnderstanding and will of man as both these faculties are regenerate by the supernatural grace and vertue of the Spirite and as the vnderstanding knoweth the supernaturall benefits of faith which are offered in Christ as true and the will applyeth the same to it self with a sure perswasion of the heart as good healthfull i Luc. 24.25 Eph. 4.23 Act. 16.14 Ro. 10.20 The Obiect in respect of the vnderstanding is Gods truth in respect of the will is Gods singular Grace laid open by his promises in Christ Iesus Now both are contained and limitted in the word of God which wholy and soly faith imbraceth as her levell object in the same Christ crucified together with all his benefites as her principall first neerest and proper Object k 1. Cor. 2.2 Heb 10.22 2. Cor. 3.4 Rom. 4.8 8.38 The Parts according to the maner of the Subject or Object are wont diversly to be considered In respect of the divine vnderstanding and will they are both a Knowledge an Assent the Knowledge is wherby we vnderstand the whole word of God as touching the principall heades thereof according to the measure of grace revealed l Esa 53.11 Ioh. 10.38 1 Ioh. 4.16 The assent is whereby wee most firmely resolue with our selues that all thinges which are knowne out of the law and the Gospell are most true and rest our selues perswaded in them m Rom. 7.16 Eph. 3.12 Eph. 1.22 In respect of the will the chiefe and principall part of faith is Trust which is a firm perswasion of the heart whereby every one of them that are truely faithfull do particularly appropriate to themselues the generall promise of Grace Which trust manifesteth it selfe by a double effect to wit by constant Indurance whereby faith opposeth it selfe to all dangers inward and outward and ful Persuasion whereby we surely trust in God concerning our salvation n Rom. 8 15.16 Eph. 1.13 Heb. 10 22. Heb. 11.1 The Forme of faith consisteth in Relation whereby every Elect after a particular manner applyeth to himselfe both the word of Truth and the particular promises of GODS Grace by appropriating vnto himself through a firme perswasion those things which are taught and promised particularly and o In Hypothesi by a Supposition though conceyved in a position and generally p In Thesi Ioh. 17.15 Mat. 9.2 Gal. 2.20 Ioh. 1.12 The Supreame and chiefe End is the glory of God the Author of our Faith and Redeemer q Rom. 11.35 Eph. 1.12 the neerest end is our Salvation which the holy Scripture calleth the end and reward of faith r 1. Pet. 1.9 Ioh. 3.15 16. Ioh. 20.31 By this opening of the Definition through the causes 2. things consequētly follow First that Faith is both one and divers One both in Special kind for faith ſ Species specialissima is a Speciall kind most speciall and in Object because the thing beleeved is one t Eph. 4.5 2. Pet. 1.1 Divers both in number and in degree In Number because every one hath his owne faith distinct from another In Degree because he hath it acording to the measure of Gods grace as it is more or lesse u Heb. 2.4 Mat. 9.22 Rom. 14.1 Secondly that faith is so far firme in all the elect that it can neyther totally nor finally ever at any time be lost to wit because of the certainety and vnchangeablenesse of the Election promise of God of the satisfaction and merite of Christ and of the sealing of the Spirite Wherefore faith after some degree is oftentimes diminished but as touching the forme it cannot perish x Ioh. 3.16 Phil. 1.6 Ioh 6.56 1. Ioh. 2.1 OF FAITH The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS In Defence of the Obiect of faith against Bellar. cap. 8. Lib. 1. De IVSTIFICATIONE I. THe Testimonies which are alleadged out of the histories of the Gospell doe eyther treate of faith in Christ expresly Mat. 16. Luc. 7. Ioh. 1 Ioh. 6. Ioh. 11. Ioh. 14. Ioh. 20. and so of the speciall mercy of God which God layed open in Christ singularly effectually or of Gods speciall mercie which Christ exhibited by will worke in the example of the Leaper Mat. 1. or they treate onely of an hypocriticall boasting of that speciall mercy of God as in the example of the Pharisie Luc. 18. Or lastly of the outward meanes and extraordinary miracles that further faith which make not a justifying faith but do eyther generally testifie or particularly confirme the same Mar. vlt. II. THose which are alleadged out of the Acts and Epistles are eyther Sermons touching Christ and so Metonymically concerning Gods speciall mercy Act 2.4.10.13.17 18. or do treate of Abrahams faith not in respect of the temporall or earthly but of the spirituall and eternall promises for he saw the day of the Messias by faith and therefore rejoyced Rom. 4. Or lastly they treate of the meane of speciall mercy procured vnto vs and confirmed by the resurrection of Christ Rom 10. 1. Cor. 15. Against Bellarmine cap. 10. I. THe Word of God is two wayes vsually considered eyther as the Word of truth generally or as the Word of promise and grace specially The one Faith respecteth as it is a Knowledge or assent but the other as it is a trusting or beleeving for albeit the promises are generally proposed in the Scriptures yet there is a speciall application of them by faith as the examples of the sicke of the palsie Mat. 9. Of the sinnefull Woman Luc 7. Of the Adulteresse Ioh 8. of Zacheus Luc. 19 and of the Thiefe Lu 23. doe teach II. FAith is the Instrument of Iustification and not the Cause which neither by time nor place can be discerned or separated from the things which it apprehendeth Neyther doth the faith of a speciall mercy follow Iustification because without it there is no Iustification III. IVstifying Faith taketh not away but proposeth the subordinate means of confidence such as are Prayer Sacraments good workes Baptisme and vseth them for the augmenting and confirming of the same IIII. THe confidence or assurance of faith dependeth not vpon the quality of the person beleeving or the quantity of his Faith but vpon the truth of God promising the will of Christ redeeming and the faithfulnes of the spirite sealing Of the Forme of Faith against Bellarmine Lib. 1. De Iustificat Cap. 5. THe Testimonies which are cited out of the 11. to the Hebrewes do not overthrow the forme of Faith but establish the same First the Apostles definition of Faith and the sence and interpretation of the two properties of faith whereof mention is made in that Definition For faith is sayde to be a Ground or substance not
inward disposition of the mind namely that we should hold both the truth of Gods worship which is expressed in the first precept the maner of that truth which is expressed in the second or they doe belong to the outward testifying of the body to wit that both in words which is in the Third and in works which is in the Fourth we should giue our selues to all exercises of godlines The good works which belong to humanity are most perfectly expressed in the six precepts of the second Table for first the foundation of them all is laid in the first precept to wit that mutuall relation of obedience duety of the inferiors towards the superiours and the superiors towards the inferiors then the chiefe and speciall kinds of humanity are reckoned vp vnto which all the rest must proportionally be referred The summe of these is not to hurt our neighbour neyther in deede nor word nor thought not in Deed eyther in respect of his person that hee must not kill or in respect of his goods that he must not steale or in respect of the Person which doth most neerely belong vnto him that he must not commit adultery Not in Word for he must beare no false witnesse against him Lastly not in mind and thought for very lust concupiscence is forbidden The Forme of good workes is a full perfect conformity in all the partes thereof with the Law of God both according to the outward shew and the inward truth c 1 Deut. 27.26 Gal 3.10 Rom. 7.14 for two thinges concur for the making of this Forme the outward goodnesse of the workes which the precepts of the Law doe outwardly shew and require and the inward holinesse of the same which the nature of the Law which is spirituall and of the Law-giver who being a spirit and a knower of the heart according to their manner doe declare necessarily presuppose and require And in respect of this double form the manner of good workes as touching themselues is most perfect but as touching vs most imperfect partly because of the reliques of sinne partly because of the continuall fight and wrastling of the old and new man in vs partly also because of the state degrees and increasings of regeneration Wherefore if there be said to be any perfection of workes while we are here That is spoken abusiuely eyther for the merite of Christ and the gratious acceptance of God or by relation vnto those who haue not as yet so proceeded in the Study or exercise of godlinesse and workes Or lastly after a humane manner according to outward discipline There is therefore no merite of good workes sith there is no proportion of equality betweene the reward and the workes sith also whatsoever works are granted for good are from another are due and are vnperfect d Rom. 7 23. 2 Cor. 3.5 Phil. 2.23 Luc 17.10 The End of good works is threefold according to the diversity of the Object to witte of God our selues and our Neighbour On Gods behalfe the supreame end is his owne glory wherevnto both the commaundement and al benefites corporall and spirituall are subordinate e Mat. 5.16 1. Cor 10.31 Phil. 1.11 On the behalfe of our selus the End is the confirmation of our election the outward testifying of our Faith and the due execution of our duty f Mat. 7.16 17. Phil. 1.11 Iac. 2.17 2. Pet. 1.10 Tit. 3 8. In our Neighbours behalfe the end is partly that the vnfaithfull by our good example might be provoked to faith and godlines partly that the faithfull might bee confirmed in godlinesse and faith g Luc. 22. â—2 Rom. 14.19 And this is the consideration of good workes generally but particularly the truth of good works must be discerned and declared chiefly and principally in two things namely in prayer and repentance whereof the one is properly exercised h Circa beneficia impetranda Circa malefiâ—ia perpetrata for good things which we would obtaine the other for evill things which we haue committed Prayer is a speciall worshippe of God whereby through Faith we craue for the Mediators sake necessary good things of God as being the fountain of all good things i Ioh. 4.24 Luc. 18.1 He. 10.22 Now we craue eyther for others that is Intercession or against others and that is Expostulation or for our selues and that is eyther Deprecation if we craue a deliverance from perils or Supplication if we desire the partaking of a new benefite k Psal 9 30. A Forme of asking or prayer wee haue in the Lords Prayer whereof there are three parts an Entrance a Narration and an Epilogue or Conclusion The Entrance contayneth the places both of will Our Father and of power which art in Heaven The Narration consisteth of 7. Petitions whereof the fowre first require Positiue Graces the three following graces Privatiue as they cal them The Graces Positiue respect eyther the Soule or the Body those which respect the soule doe eyther require the advancement of Gods glory both vniversally among all Hallowed bee thy Name and particularly in the Church Thy Kingdome come or doe expound or lay open the manner of both Thy Will be done Those which belong to the Body are Synechdochically included in that onely Petition of dâ—yly Bread The Graces Privatiue are three The Remission of sinnes Defence against the Divels Temptations deliverance from all evils Private and publicke The Epilogue contayneth causes Impulsiue and Finall the Causes Impulsiue are two The Kingdome the power The Cause Finall is onely one the Glory of God Repentance is a serious and healthfull changing of our wicked mind and will effected by the holy Ghost by the preaching of the Law and the Gospell l Ezek. 18.31 Ier. 4.1.3 Eph. 4 23 2. Cor. 7.10 Of this there are two entire parts according to the two bounds namely from which this change is made and whereunto the same tendeth which are the mortifying of the old man or the Flesh and the quickning of the new man or of the Spirite for by these true repentance is performed Mortification which is the first part of Repentance hath three properties or degrees the Acknowledgement of Sinne sorrow for sinne and God offended Lastly a Detestation an vtter avoyding of Sinne. The Acknowledgement is in the mind Sorrow in the Passion Avoyding or shunning in the action of the Will The quickning or vivification which is the latter comprehendeth three things contrary to Mortification an Acknowledgement and trust of Gods mercy in Christ Ioy springing from the same Lastly an earnest Desire or indeavour of holinesse righteousnesse and new obedience through our whole life OF GOOD WORKES The Part Confuting DISTINCTIONS That Good Workes are not simply and absolutely necessary to Salvation against Bellarmine Lib. 4. De Iusti. Cap. 7. I. THe Promise of life is sayde to bee conditionall not that the performance of the condition is proposed to be the Cause of
of this Sinne three thinges concurre First the Deniall of the Truth against knowledge and conscience Secondly an vniversall Backe-sliding from Christ not a particular sinne against the first or second Table of the Law Thirdly a Rebellion sprung from a hatred of the truth conjoyned with a tyrannicall sophisticall and hypocritical oppugning or withstanding and of these conditions there is a mutuall knitting and sequele of the one with and after the other Further it is called a Sinne against the Holy Ghost not in respect of the divine Essence and person of the Spirite but in respect of his office that is of Grace and illumination whereof the holy Ghost is properly the Worker or effecter but it is sayed to be vnpardonable for three causes First because of the just judgement of God who suffereth not his Spirite which is the Spirite of truth to bee reproved of a lie Secondly because of impenitency or the hardnes to repent Thirdly because of the truth and the dignity of redemption purchased by Christ For there remaineth no other sacrifice after men haue forsaken the sacrifice of Christ t Heb. 6.4 Heb. 10.20 The Formall of Adams first sinne is two-fold according as that sinne in a divers respect is eyther a Quality or Relation as it is equality the formall thereof is disobedience u Rom. 5.19 Rom. 5.14.15 1. Tim. 2.13 as it is a Relation The Formall of the same is guilt or obliging to everlasting punishment Disobedience passed by Act but guilt was spread on all the posterity by imputation z Rom 5 12. 1. Cor. 15.22 The Formall of Originall Sinne is likewise vsually taken two wayes eyther for guilt which neverthelesse is rather the necessary consequent of that sinne or the proper accident thereof or for that whole deformity of whole nature which was not infused nor yet gotten by imitation but naturall or as wee speake connaturall or begotten together with vs not by the vice of common Nature but by the vice of the first originall Instrument from which all descended naturally a Psal 52.7 Rom. 5.12 1. Cor. 5.22 Eph. 2.3 The Formall of actuall sinne is an inordinatene adioyned to that which is spoken done and lusted after against the Law which ought to be discerned frō the actions motiues as the defect from the effect For sinne is not formally the very action but the corruption or defect of the action and as the Actions of men are two-fold Immanentes trauseuntes to witte abiding in and passing from Whereof those come from the mind and will immediately but these by the members or Instruments of the body mediately so there is a two-fold inordinatenesse the one Inward the other outward b Rom. 24 1. Eph. 2 3 Gal. 5.16 Rom. 15 15. Col. 3.17 Rom. 6.19 The End of the first Originall and Actuall Sinne ought to bee discerned after one and the selfe same manner and consideration Now it is discerned two wayes First by the Accident in respect of God disposing sinne to the iust end and most wisely shewing forth his glory both by workes of justice against them who endeavour to sinne by workes of mercy towardes them whome he freeth from sinne for Christ Secondly according to it selfe in respect of man in whome sinne is in which respect an end of Sinne cannot properly bee granted but in steade thereof are granted two Consequents or effects guilt punishment c Gen. 2 17. Rom. 6.23 Eph. 2.3 2. The. 1.9 By the name of guilt we vnderstand that bond between sinne and punishment as a meane put betweene whereby the sinner is most strongly bound to the subjection of punishment and in the very subiection to the continuance thereof The punishment is both deathes both of the body temporall and of the soule together with the body eternall Wherevnto are conjoyned afflictions as the fore-goers of both and these through the goodnesse of God are in those which are truely faithfull eyther tryals or martyredomes or fatherly chastisements but in the wicked they are in theyr owne nature torments punishments and these two Effects do altogether hold all men bound being considered in the state of nature without any difference of age yea the very Infants who both haue a guilt and feele a most bitter punishment both of losse and sence vnlesse God gratiously avert it Now hee averteth it for the covenant sake in the Infants of the faithfull in whome sinne is taken away by Baptisme both in the lessening of it selfe and the releasing of guilt yet not that it giveth over eyther to be in all equally or to worke in them that are already of full yeares vnequally for that natiue or naturall corruption remayneth in Act even after Baptisme e Rom. 7.18 Exod. 34.7 Pro. 20.9 Iob. 9.20 OF SINNE The Part Confuting In Defence of the Efficient Cause of the First Sinne. DISTINCTIONS I. IN the Fall of Adam three beginnings concurre which must bee distinguished and discerned one Outward two Inward to witte Generall and Particular the Outward beginning vniversall is God in respect of the action The Inward Generall is nature which moveth man to the action naturall The Inward Particular is the will of man in the power whereof the principalnesse of causing consisteth Principalitas cousalitatis as it is such an action II. ADam is two wayes to bee considered eyther as a particular person or as the roote of all mankinde if after the former manner the disobedience of Adam was his owne proper sinne if after the second it was with him and vs common In Defence of the Efficient Cause of Originall Sinne. I. THe Efficient of this Sinne is eyther Totall as they speake or Partiall that which is partiall is improperly and accidentally sayde to bee a cause in respect of the occasion it selfe and it is the tree of life and the instigation of that old Serpent that which is totall is Man himself through the maner of propagation II. THe Propagation of Sinne is two wayes made partly by the manner of Generation and partly by the maner of Fault Of Generation because Sinne is transfused through the body of the Begetter into the body of the begotten materially but into his soule causally and that partly by Gods forsaking and partly by the contagion of the body into which the Soule is infused of Fault because Adam according to the condition wherein hee was created conveighed through his offence as through a certaine gate whatsoever evill was in himselfe into all his posterity III. THe Soule of Man is two wayes considered eyther according to her Essence or according to her Subsistence according to her Essence shee is from the Man that begetteth who communicateth vnto him that is begotten that singular manner of subsisting in the body IIII. THe whole of Nature should be distinguished from the whole Nature because wee haue that from common nature absolutely by Gods ordinance but this mediately from our Parents as the
Instrumentall beginning thereof In Defence of the Efficient Cause of Actuall Sinne. I. IN Actuall Sinne there are two thinges Being and Iniquitie Of Being God is the Author and Principall Efficient of Iniquity the Will of Man II. A Thing is sayde to be done by Gods permission two wayes eyther by it selfe or by Accident That which is done God permitting it by it selfe hath the respect of good but that which is done by Accident God permitting the selfe same in respect of God permitting it by accident is evill because God permitteth not evill as it is evill but as it is a meane of his glory In Defence of the Matter of the first SINNE That the first Sinne was not Pryde but vnbeliefe against Bellarmine Lib. 3. de Amiss Gratiae Cap. 5. 6. I. EEccles 10.14 There is a fallacy of the sense or vnderstanding of the word For Pride is not the beginning or cause of backe-sliding or departing from God but on the contrary the very backe-sliding departing from God which is comprehended in vnbeliefe is made the beginning and cause of pride II. TO b. 4. Ans The place treateth not of the order of diverse actes in the first sinne but of the Effect of Pride to witte Perdition the beginning whereof is truely and properly attributed to Pride yet not exclusiuely III. ROm. 5. Ans Disobedience comprehendeth the whole Sinne of Adam to witte the violating or breaking of Gods commaundement which if it should bee resolved into it owne parts the first shall bee not Pride but vnbeliefe IIII. THe Testimonies of the Fathers which are alleadged eyther do not â—reate of the order of the first sinne â—ut of the next Adjunct thereof or Synecdochically they vnderstand by pride vnbeliefe it selfe as the immediate â—ause thereof V. THe inner actions are two wayes discerned eyther in respect of the Inâ—ention or in respect of the execution whereof the one properly respecteth the end the other the meanes but when there is speech made of the first sinne it is not inquired what was the first thing in the intention of Adam Eue but what was the first act of committing the Sinne. In Defence of the matter of Original Sin That Originall Sin is a quality or Concupiscence against Bellar. Lib. 5. cap 15. I. THe Positiue cause of original Sin is held to be three-fold the First the actuall sinne of Adam Secondly the Law of Nature originally passing the third the Iustice of God II. THe positiue quality is traÌ„sferred to the posterity after the same manner as the Sinne it selfe is not as a certaine accident of nature concreated or together with it created which should follow or accompany the substance by it self but as a whole corruption of the whole maÌ„ which hath a foundation in Adam as in the first instrument of nature it selfe neyther are the habits gotten convayed into the ofspring as they are personall but as in the name of the whole Nature one for all gotte them III. IN Concupiscence two things concurre the very Act of lusting or coveting which by it selfe is not evil and the deformity of that act of that God is the Author of this he must by no meanes bee the Author IIII. THe first sinne was not onely the sinne of the Body but also of the Soule Wherefore it was not onely the eating of the fruit forbidden but also vnbeliefe and pride in the soule and so whole Sinne is transmitted into body and soule not onely by the law of generation by which man formeth or yeeldeth forth man but also according to the corruption of him that generateth wherby man as hee is corrupt begeteth corrupt man V. THe Quality was not diminished both because then it passed as it were into another nature as also because it cannot eyther bee diminished or abolished but by the singular grace of God VI. THe Concupiscence of the Flesh against the Spirite doth not onely signifie those first motions voyde of consent but also the very roote of evill and the whole corruption which is not onely of the coveting but also of the other faculties of the Soule VII ORiginall Sinne is taken away in this life by the regeneration of Baptisme not that it might not be but that it might not be imputed for sinne In Defence of the matter of Actual sinne against the distinction of Sinne Veniall and Mortall Bellar. Lib. 1. Cap. 9.10 I. THe Testimonies of Scripture doe not proue or confirme the Verity of the distinction according to the mind of the adversary Not the First Mat. 5. for hee treateth of the inequality not onely of sinnes but also of punishments by an allusion to civill or politicke punishments Not the Second Mat. 23. for hee treateth of the nature of Hypocrites who being carefull in small matters doe openly neglect the chiefest things and make not a difference betweene those things which by themselues and alwayes are necessary and those whereof not the want but the contempt doth make vs guilty or culpable Not the Third Luc. 6. for he treateth of them who hunt after prayse by the reprehending of others but doe neyther know nor reproue themselues being in others very quicke sighted but in themselues blind Not the Fourth Luc. 12. for hee speaketh of the duety of loue towardes our neighbour whereby wee are bound after the example of Gods goodnesse to forgiue even the least sinnes Not the Fift 1. Cor. 3. for hee speaketh of doctrine and the manner of teaching that by a supposition applyed to the Doctors of the Corinthians Not the Sixt Iac. 1. for hee speaketh of the degrees of sinnes which are three Vitiousnesse a vitious motion and vitious action And of all these Death is made the reward or wages Not the two Last Math. 12. for hee speaketh of the nature of Sinnes even the least or lightest for which notwithstanding we are presented guilty before God Eph. 5. because both the heavinesse of sinnes and the effect of the same are expounded Synecdochically II. THe Testimonies of Councels and Fathers are either suspected or in controversie as of the Tridentine Councell and of the Popes both Pius and Gregorie or doe treat of the inequality and divers degrees of sins as the Councell of Milevitum and of the Fathers Augustine Origen Chrysostome and Hierome III. THe reasons which are alleadged proue nothing Not the first because it is grounded vpon a double false presupposall Vppon the one that sinnes in the faithfull are not mortall For the Wages of Sinne of whatsoever manner it be vnlesse it bee forgiven is Death Vpon the oâ—her that the sinnes of the faithfull are lighter then the sinnes of the vnfaithfull and so in their Nature Veniall For in that sinnes are Veniall in the faithfull it is not from the nature of the sinnes but from the Grace of God and in that they are not so in the vnfaithfull it is not from God but from the nature both of the sinnes and sinners Not the Second because Sinne is not sayde