soule did descend into hell And this consent in this point of doctrine to be in the olde and pure Church doth M. Caluin on the 16. Psalme himselfe confesse his woordes be these I confesse saith Caluin that the olde Interpreters both Gréek and Latin haue drawen those woordes to another meaning that the soule of Christ was brought from hell but it is better to tarry in the naturall simplicity of the wordes that we be not mocked of the Iewes For as much then as Caluin can not deny that all the olde Interpreters both Gréek and Latin haue consented in this pointe of doctrine I meruaile that M Caluin would draw it to a Iewish interpretation In the 10 of the Acts ver 43. Luke maketh this a strong argument to proue Christ to be the Sauiour of the world Because al the Prophets did witnes it in like manner because all the Prophets and Interpreters in the pure Church haue concluded this doctrine to be true I doubt not but this knot of vnity in verity was made by the God of peace and spirit of truth Farther as Sheol signifieth the soule and Sheol hell so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or sanctum signifieth the body as it may be proued out of the 1. of Luke ver 35. And that holy thing which shall be borne of thee shal be called the Sonne of God And thus doth S. Augustine on the 16. Psalme truelye vnderstand it his enterpretation is this neither shalt thou suffer my soule to be possessed in hell neither shalt thou suffer my holy hody whereby others are sanctified to sée corruption And the body of Christ is called holy for two causes the one because sinne was neuer committed in it the other because by it all others are sanctified And this is made plaine also by the woord corruption which can not haue relation but only to the body for as a learned man saith death is the seperation of the body from the soule but corruption is a resolution of the members other partes into the earth So Iob vseth this woord in his 17. Chapter ver 14. I haue saide vnto corruption thou art my Father Luther in the 2. Chapter of Genesis thus writeth For this is singuler in Christ thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell neither shalt thou suffer thy holy one to sée corruption for neither hell could holde his soule sleeping or resting neither the graue his bodye that it might corrupt as Martha said of Lazarus Lord he stincketh for he hath béen buried foure dayes The like hath S. Augustine in his 57. Epistle ad Dardanum that was spoken of his soule which came from hell so quickly this of his body which could not corrupt by reason of his spéedy resurrection Not vnlike hath Erasmus on the 2. of the Acts thus his body albeit it was laide in graue and was without life did not corrupt but God which can not lye brought his soule from hell and restored it to the body Wherfore thus I end with S. Augustine writing on the 85. Psalme wherefore this is his voice in the Psalme not by any mans coniecture but by the exposition of the Apostle thou shalt not leaue my soule in hel neither shalt thou suffer thy holy one to sée corruption In this discourse by the woord of God and the auntient Fathers I haue proued Nephesh to signifie y e soule seperate from the body Sheol to signifie hell 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or sanctum to signifie the bodye and why it is so vsed Therefore they y t deny this place to proue the discending of Christ into hell must néedes fall into these absurdeties First that life or person must be in a graue or else a dead mans carkas must be accounted life or a person both which are absurd in diuinity and philosophie Secondly that the soule of man is in a graue and so buried which proueth the Soule to be mortall Thirdly that the Gréek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is translated a graue which properly signifieth hell and so occasion is giuen to the Atheists to think there is no hell For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is compounded of the particle α 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because nothing in hell can be séene and for this cause in the Euangelists Christ calieth hell vtter darknes Fourthly we strengthen the error of the Iewes by following their interpretation which was deuised to take away the comfort of this article Fiftly it maketh voide all the arguments of the Fathers against Arrius Appollinaris and all other Heretiques which denied Christ to haue a true soule Lastlye it is an introduction to the error of the Saduces which denye that there is any Angell spirite or any soule For if there be any then as Ciril noteth it was necessarye that as he was in body and soule with them that then were liuing so was it as necessary that his soule should be present among y e soules to shew that he was a true man The falsehoode of the argument of the aduersaries of this doctrine is called fallatia compositionis that is when those thinges are ioyned together which ought to be sundered For they that deny this place of the 16. Psalme to proue the descending of Christ into hell doo affirme animam sanctum soule and holy one hell and corruption to be one wheras they are diuers as in parte I haue proued already and shal by Gods grace proue more plainely out of the 2. chapter of the Acts where Peter interpreteth this place in such wise that credit must néeds be giuen vnto it of all Gods children Peters Sermon is thus Acts. 2. 29. 30. 31. Men and Brethren I may boldlye speake vnto you of the Patriarch Dauid that he is both dead and buried and his sepulcher remaineth till this day Therefore seeing he was a Prophet and knew that God had sworne by an oathe that of the fruite of his loynes he would raise vp Christ concerning the flesh set him vpon his throne hee knowing of this before spake of the resurrection of Christ that his soule was not left in hel neither his flesh should see corruption which words S. Augustine in his 57. epistle ad Dardanum thus expoundeth of the flesh of Christ that it was put into the Sepulchre the Gospell is manifest but that his soule went down into hell the doctrine of the Apostle proueth it For blessed Peter doth proue this out of the Psalme where he sheweth it was foretolde of him for why thou shalt not leaue my Soule in Hell neither shalt thou suffer thy holye one to sée corruption And in his 99. Epistle ad Enodium he hath these woords quae ne quisquam aliter sapere auderet in actibus Apostolorum Petrus exponit Of which woords that any man should not be so bolde to thinke otherwise Peter himself expoundeth them that is Nephesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1. soule and Sheol 〈◊〉
determining circumscribing the woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is which were disobedient dooth altogither seperate the time of their incredulitye from the time of this iourneye and preaching For if the meaning of the enemies of this doctrine were true Peter would haue ioyned this annotation of time which the iourney and preaching of Christ and would haue said being quickned in spirit in the which in times past when the patience of God was looked for in the daies of Noah when the arke was a preparing he went and preached to the spirites now holden in prison But Peter ioyneth the time of disobedience not with the iourney or preaching of Christ but with the first incredulitye and preaching of Noah and on the other side knitteth together the prison with this iourney and preaching which if he would haue disioyned he would haue said to the spirits which are now in prison but he simply said he went and preached to the spirits in prison that is which thē were in prison whē he went and preached vnto them This also may be added that it is to no purpose to make mention of a prison or to name them the vnbeléeuing spirits or soules of y e olde world for Noah preached not to spirits or soules only but to whole and beléeuing men the woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot be taken for men endewed with bodies for Christ prouing his resurrection vseth these woords Luke 24. 39. Behold my hands and my feet for it is I my self handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue It was no néed also to shew where these vnbeléeuers are or be holden for this both maketh nothing to the matter and also would be vnderstood he holding his peace vnlesse it was the purpose of the Apostle to shew that y e soule of Christ went down to this prison that is to hell and so sheweth first that death parted them as in the 2. of the Acts. Secondly that the body was in the graue and the soule was in hell Thirdly that it was not in hell idle but did manifest his death to them which beléeued it to be but a fable to reproue their incredulitie and to captiue them that we should not feare them Fourthlye he did rise againe triumphing ouer them in his owne person Lastly he did ascend into heauen and there sitteth Lord of heauen and of the Angels of earth and of the inhabitantes of hell and of the very diuels For the diuels are of him imprisoned and chayned that they can doo no more then hee permitteth them Farther where as some doo affirme that there could be no preaching in hell because there is no conuersion to this I answere that this preaching was not vocal but real neither was there in this preaching edification exhortation or consolation but as it is saide before of Damascene a redargution or vpbrayding of those vnbeléeuing soules in this or the like manner beholde ye vnfaithfull and broodes of the serpent how in season and out of season my eight preacher of frée righteousues and other the Patriarkes haue often preached vnto you that there should come a blessed séed of the woman according to y e promise made vnto Adam that both should iustifie the beléeuers deliuer and saue them from the corporall and spirituall deluge and also that he should destroye the serpent with the vnbeléeuing séed for euer but to you being incredulous that promise was a fable But now beholde O ye wretches me to be exhibited of the true God and by my passion the head of Satan and his vnbeléeuing séede is broken and the worlde is ouercome and on the other side you shall be forced to know by liuely experience that the faithful are saued And to conclude you now doo beholde me the conqueronr of Satan and his members against your will and to your great sorrow in soule and shall sée me héereafter in the last iudgement both in body and soule And this manner of spéech is vsed in the Scripture that a verball preaching is put for the reall opperation of a thing so Heb. 11. 4. By faith Abel offered vnto God a better sacrifice then Cain by the which he obtained witnes that he was righteous God testifying of his gifts by which faith he being dead yet speaketh So Gen. 4. 4. God saith vnto Cain the voice of thy brothers bloud cryeth vnto me out of the earth Abels bloud is saide to cry while truely by his example of true faith and of the doctrine of saluation and of martirdome yet dayly not verbally but really and effecttually by speaking he teacheth Last of al the word prison signifieth hell as we may sée in the names of hell Cent. 1. li 2. ca. 4. Now let vs sée the iudgement of the auntient and learned Fathers on this point and especiallye of the Gréeke Fathers Athanasius woords to Epictetus Bishop of Corinth are cited by Epiphanius in the heresie of the Dimerites haer 77. The bodye of Christ was laide in the graue when he went to preach to the spirits that were in Prison as Peter saith Athanasius in his book of the incarnation of the world hath thus written In the death of Christ his body being carried into the graue his soule went into hell the places being far a sunder and a little after he saieth for death could not preuaile on his humaine soule to tye him there neither corruption by tiranny inuading his bodye could shew his force on him to putrefaction as thinges not wel séene vnto For to think so of him were a wicked thing and euen as Adam had a double punishment inflicted on him for his disobedience the one was on his body earth thou art and to earth thou shalt returne again and so by this decrée the body of the Lord departed to the earth the other on his soule thou shalt dye the death héerof it commeth to passe that man is diuided into two partes and is condemned to departe to two places and therefore it was necessarye that by the selfe same iudge which had made this decrée that he by himselfe being vnder the colour of a condemned man shewing himselfe vncondemned and sincere from sinnes should frée from that sentence all beléeuers The like hee hath in his tracte against Appollinarius of the wholesome comming of Christ and in his Sermon against all heresies You sée good Reader how Athanasius a very auntient Father in the Gréek Church shewing the cause of Christs descending into hell proueth out of Gen. that as our body was punished by death for sinne so was our soule and for this cause both partes in Christ must descend that our soule may be deliuered from hell and our body rise to glory For as Fulgentius writeth in his 3. book and 7. chapter to King Thrasimunde he did know that God the suscepter of whole man was wholy with his flesh in the graue wholy with his
Paul saith Heb. 11. 35. Their women receued their dead raised to life Both these say the childe was dead therfore it is vntrue that Carleil affirmeth in his booke fol. 144. that the childe was not dead and as the wise man saith it was a wōderous déed but it is no wonder to quicken one that is in a swoun as Nephesh in this place doth signifie the soule so dooth it in many other places Pro. 23. 14. Thou shalt smite him with the rod and shalt deliuer his soule from hel Farther y t Nephesh signifieth the Soule it is manifest by this for y e interpreters called Septuaginta haue translated it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 There were in times past many Heretiques that did deny that Christ had a soule of whom Appollinaris was one against whom Athanasius thus writeth in his book of the wholsome comming of Christ neither his body was left in the graue neither his soule was left in hell for this the Prophet writeth Thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell nor suffer thy holy one to see corruption And a little after for if the Godhead had béen seperated from the body and death had shewed his force on him how could the body depriued of the immortall God shew forth incorruption or how could the woord finish his going downe to hell or arise from hell Epiphanius writing against the Heretiques called Damaeritae vseth the same proofe haer 77. Fulgentius ad Thrasymundum in his 6. Chapter thus writeth concerning this matter whose flesh neither the diuinity forsooke in death neither did it leaue the soule in hell as the Prophet saith thou shalt not leaue my soule in Hell And in his 8. Chapter alleadging the 2. of the Acts 16. Psalm he addeth these words there blessed Peter being lightned indéede by the holy Ghost and made according to the woord of the Lord the light of the world did shew by the manifest light of preaching how we should vnderstand this place least any man in Christ should so vnderstand the true flesh that he should deny the true soule In this therfore the diuinity of Christ did shew his impossibilitie because hée is present alwaies and in all places and after an vnspeakable manner and was as concerning his soule in hel without sorrowes and as concerning his bodye laye in the Sepulchre without corruption for hee neither was absent from his flesh when he did not suffer his soule to be gréeued in Hell neither did he leaue his soule in hell when he kept his flesh in the graue without corruption But most plaine of all others is Ciril who in his book of the true faith to Theodosius the Emperour thus writeth it is not lawfull to saye that the flesh coupled to the Godhead could be subiect to the corruption at any time and y t diuine soule to be holden within the gates of hell for he was not left in hell as S. Peter saith For we may not saye that that nature which cannot be subdued by death that is the deitye of the onely begotten Sonne should returne from those dennes vnder earth neither should this thing haue any miracle vnlesse the Sonne of God by the efficacy and nature of the diuinity had tarried in hell fulfilling all things marueilouslye and aboue the reach of reason and working in all things for God is aboue measure place circumscription and magnitude he himselfe is comprehended of none This also is wonderfull that his body rose againe being corruptible by nature and his soule being vnited to the Godhead by the vertue and power of the Godhead did appeare to the soules that were there In these places Ciril Fulgentius and Athanasius doo proue y t Christ had a true body and a true soule and to proue that he was a true man in respect both of body and soule they alleadge this text of the 16 Psalm out of S. Peter If then Nephosh doth not signifie the soule the reasons of those learned Fathers were of no validitye And for this cause in the interlineall glosse you shall read this interpretation animam quam haheo vt verus homo My soule which I haue as a true man And thus M. Hutchinson in his most learned woork of the Image of God vseth this Scripture against the Arrians to proue that Christ had a true soule As then Athanasius Epiphanius Fulgentius and Hutchinson with all the rest of the auntient fathers doo vnderstand Nephesh heer to be the Soule euen so doo I with them séeing no reason why I should beléeue otherwise Peter Martyr in the 1. Cor. 15. teacheth vs a doubtfull place of Scripture must be interpreted First saith he it must be conferred with the like places of Scripture Secondly we must sée what the Fathers especially of the Gréek Church which day and night did exercise this book of God in their hands and conferred it with all the books they could doo write of it So haue I doone in handling this place First I haue proued by the woord of God that Nephesh signifieth y e soule seperate from the body Secondly by the Gréeke Fathers who translated it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth the soule Mat. 10. 28. Feare ye not them which kill the body but are not able to kill the Soule but feare him that hath power to cast both bodye and soule into hell As Nephesh signifieth the soule so Sheol doth in the 16. Psalme signifie Hell this phrase of Scripture is in other Psalmes as in the 86. 13. For thy mercye is great towards me and thou hast deliuered my Soule from the nethermost hell and in the 9. Psalme verse 17. The wicked shal be turned into hell and al the people that forget God So in Deut. 32. 22. Iob. 21. 13. Psal. 30. 4. 54. 16 138. 8. Esa. 5. 14. Ose. 13. 14. Habac. 2. 5. Mat. 11. 23. In these and many other places of Scripture it can not be denyed but Sheol signifieth hell and so doth it in this place as by Gods grace I wil proue First Sheol com ming of Nephesh which is to ask signifieth such a place as ne uer is satisfied but alwaies asketh and this is most properly hel which albeit it hath receiued infinite soules yetas it is in y e 5. of Esay His mouth is alwaies open and gapeth for more Secondly it is translated by the Septuaginta 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which woord fignifieth in the Scriptures hell alwaies and neuer the graue as yon may sée Mat. 11. 23. Luke 16. 23. Apoc. 1. 18. 6. 8. 20. 13. 14. And therefore to translate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a graue which signifieth a place where nothing can be séene is a forced and false translation for sith the holye Ghost doth vse it alwaies for hell I meruaile how any man dareth to translate it graue Theophilact translateth it thus Non derelinques animam meam apud orcum Thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell vsing the
soule in hell wholy in the world wholy in heauen wholy in the vnity of the nature in the Father of whom he came and wholy by the omnipotency of his diuinity in all y e creatures which he made The Apostle kéeping this vnitye of person doth thus confirme the Church of Corinth in the faith of the truth For first of all I haue deliuered you that which I haue receiued that Christ died for our sinnes according to the Scriptures and that he was buried and rose againe the third day according to the Scriptures He saith not that the body of Christ was dead but Christ that he might kéep the vnity of the person of God and man and that he might shew the substantial propriety of the deity and humanity In another place he sayth for although he was crucified of infirmie yet he liueth by the power of God Héer we are taught that the whole humanity was assumpted into the Godhead and that death albeit it did sunder the body and the soule yet it it did not sunder the Godhead from either parte and for this cause the Godhead being with the flesh in the graue it conld not corrupt and the same Godhead vnited to the soule the soule could not he left in hell but euen as his body was in graue to shew him to be true man and it rose againe without corruption to shew him very God so his soule was iu hel to shew himself a true man it came from hel to shew himself a true God and a most glorious conquerour of al his enemies both in earth and in hell The like hath Ciril in his treatise of the right faith to Theodosius the soule of Christ being coupled to his Godhead descended into hel vsing the power of God did appeare to the soules that were there And writing on Iohn in his 12. book and 36. chapter and when the time was come that he should preach to the soules that were in hell for he came to be Lord of the liuing and of the dead he dyed for vs and this proper passion of our nature he willingly took on him as concerning this flesh albeit as God he is life naturally that hell being spoyled he might be the first fruites of them that fléepe and being made the first begotten of the dead as the Scripture calleth him he might giue to our nature a returne to life And of this iudgement is Oecumenius interpreting the Scripture Christ dyed for the vniust not only for them which were after him but also for them that were before him and therefore went down into hell As the death of Christ was auaileable vnto thē that dyed before him so the descension of Christ into hell was profitable to them that liued before Christ as well as to those that liued after him Vigilius also in his 2. book and 3. chapter thus saith the flesh of Christ was not in Paradice nor in hell but lay in the graue without life the soule for y t 3. dayes was in hell and not in the graue and yet we say well that out Lord Iesus Christ lay in the sepulchre but in his onlye fleshe and that our Lord Iesus Christ was not lefte in hell but in his only soule and albeit Christ is in all these and euerye one of these yet it is but one Christ whereof one parte of his humanity was so in the graue and another in hell that he notwithstanding is one wholy euery where albeit he hath seuerally deuided himselfe by places and therfore we say the Lord lay in the graue but in only flesh and the Lord went down to hell but in only soule Alesius one of the first reformed Ministers of Scotland in his learned treatise vpon the Gospell of S Iohn thus writeth concerning this controuersie but this encourageth me that I haue a manifest place and text in Peter that Christ preached in hell to them which in the dayes of Noah were vnbeléeuers that is condemned in the nethermost hell then he alleageth the place of Ephe. 4. before by me alleadged and therupon thus concludeth I expound therefore this article simply and againe I meruaile what men meane that they deny that Christ descended into hell Alesius did wonder that any man would deny this article because it hath so many confirmations and in euery confirmation in such order as they are set in the Créed are proued the death descending into hell resurrection and ascension of Christ together For in the 16 Psalme he beginneth with the death of Christ in the 10. verse but in the last verse he speaketh of his resurrection and of his exaltation at the right hand of God So in the Act. 2. chap. First he speaketh of the death of Christ in the 29. verse Secondly of his buriall in y t same verse of his descending into hell in the 13. verse of his resurrection in the 32. verse and of his ascending and exaltation to glory and his giuing of the holy Ghost in the 33. verse so in the 4. chapter of the Ephe there is not onlye mention made of Christ descending into the lowest partes of y e earth but also it is saide in the 10. verse that he ascended far aboue all heauens And also in the 3. chap. of the Philippians not only the Apostle declareth the humility of Christs death but also setteth downe his presence in hell and that euerye knée did bow vnto him and euery tung did confesse him to be the Lord and thus he sheweth first who was highly exalted he that hath made himselfe of no reputation from whence he was exalted from those that were vnder earth where he was exalted that is farre aboue al heauens and lastly who exalted him that is God his Father So in this place Peter proueth in the 18. verse the death of Christ in the 19. verse the descending of Christ into hell in the 20. verse the end of his descending that is to reproue them of ther disobedience to the preaching of Noah in the 21. ver he speaketh of the resurrection of Christ in the 22. verse he endeth the ascending vp into heauen vnto the right hand of God that all Angels powers and might might be subiect vnto him In all these Scriptures the order of our Créed being kept and all these thinges plainlye proued very great cause of maruell is giuen to Alesius and many learned men why this article should be denyed which is confirmed by the scriptures that the death buriall resurrection and ascension of Christ are confirmed and therefore those that deny these Scriptures to proue the descending of Christ into hell may aswell deny the resurrection of Christ for the resurrction being the ioyning of both partes of the manhood of Christ together cannot cléerely be proued vnlesse it be shewed from whence both partes seuered came which is proued before to be thus the soule of Christ from hell and the body from the graue Further where it is
into Heauen and therefore our praiers are hard when we pray vnto him and he giueth vs gifts for our ministery and so he shal come to iudgement at the last day to giue vs perfect blessednes You confesse that Christ was borne in déed liued and fulfilled the law in the likenes of our flesh sinne excepted he dyed in déede he was buried indéed he arose and ascended indéede and yet you will not confesse that he personallye descended How can all these articles going before and comming after be vnderstoode of the person of Christ and of his humanity and not this Therefore you denying this personall descending of Christ into hell take away the great comfort of our deliuerance from hell You say we are deliuered from hell by Christs death so are we too by his birth For if Christ had not bene borne he had not dyed so if there had not béene a seperation of the bodye and soule of Christ he could neuer haue conquered death or hell for by descending into y e graue and that personally he conquered death and hath deliuered vs from death and by going downe into hell personallye he hath conquered hell And for this cause the Scripture applieth it to the death of Christ because death was as Paule saith Phil. 3. A dissolution of body and soule and these 2. partes being dissolued Christ came from the graue and from hell and so Christ did conquere both and triumph ouer them in him selfe as it is Col. 2. 15. These Iewes doo aske a signe from heauen Math. 22 38. Luke 11. 29. to whom Christ said A wicked aduoulterous Generation doth aske a signe but no signe shalbe giuen thē but the signe of Ionas the Prophet for as Ionas was in the whales belly three dayes and three nights so shall the sonne of man be in the hart of the earth three daies and three nights Which woords Basilius Magnus interpreteth very well These woords a signe is a matter made manifest conteyning the declaration of some thing that was hidden as the signe of Ionas representeth the descending of Christ into hel and the resurrection of Christ and as Bede saith and Rhabanus also he gaue them a signe but not from heauen because they were vnworthy to see it but from the deapth of hell Therfore M. Humes this is a most comfortable doctrine that Christ doth deliuer vs from hell which albeit you agnise aswell as we yet because you deny the meane whereby it was purchased you deny a most comfortable doctrine for not only the body of Christ was in the hart of the earth but the Sonne of man which signifieth the whole humanity that is the soule and the body Ionas was in the whales belly aliue and yet came forth Christ was in the graue dead in flesh and aliue in hell and yet came forth Therefore to take away this maner of descending taketh away from the Church a singuler comfort and openeth a gapp to many errors confuted already by the Fathers For if Christ did conquere hell by the power of the Godhead only and not as he is man what néed had he to take vpon him our nature but because as man he might be Lord not of heauen and the Angells but of the earth and the inhabitants therofand of hell and the diuells You say the worlde is sory for me In the worlde saith Christ you shall haue affliction And he telleth me the world will hate me I way not these thinges for I am no man-pleaser nor louer of the worlde But if in my Sermon I had disagréed with Dauid Ezechiel Esay Peter Paule and Christ himselfe as you haue done in your answere I hope I should be both sory and ashamed Touching M. Chalfoult whom you terme a man without iudgment and that he spake impudently and enuiously I neuer saw him before that time and but ouce since but by that spéech and conference which I had with him I finde him to be learned and voide of gall Such of his neighbours as I haue talked with did giue him the deserued praise of a learned and honest man And forasmuch as he hath preached sound doctrine in preaching the affirmatiue and that doctrin which is allowed by the learned conuocation of this land it doth not become you to libell against him for in speaking against him you traduce all those reuerend and learued men which made an Iniunction for kéeping of vnitie that no other Catechisme should be taught of any Schoolemaister then M. Nowels Therefore because you are a strauger you ought not be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and speake euill of those Ministers which vpholde the doctrine established and because you are a Schoolemaister you ought to teach and not to gainsaye it Qui pergit dicere ea que vult audiet ea que non vult As you reuile at M. Chalfoult so doo you and your freends priuily against me calling me a Bishoppling and a timeseruer Indéed I was brought vp vnder Bishop Iewell who catechised me in this faith therfore I will not easily or rashly departe from it I confesse my selfe also to be a timeseruer for it is the day time of saluation accepted Let them murmure with Martin that list I praye God my dayes may end with this time and my time may continue no longer then these daies of the state of our Church that now is do continue I haue séene the beginning I haue séene the propagation of the Gospell I haue séene God hath defended our Church mercifully and miraculously from heauen God graunt that I and all my Auditors may walk worthy of our calling Godly iustly and soberly Therefore I end with this saying of S. Paule 1. Cor. 4. 3. As touching me I passe very little to be iudged of you or of mans iudgment And in the 5. verse Therefore iudge nothing before the time vntill the Lord come who shall lighten things that are hidden in darkenes and make the counsels of the hart manifest and then shall euery man haue praise of God The conclusion to M. Humes M. Humes in the latter end of your answere you request me to recant if your answere did please me as it doth you I would be as willing to recant as you and your fréendes would be glad to heare it But I will plainely set down my reasons why I do not recant The first is I alleadged Act. 2. and proued out of Peters sermon my assertion and to the reasons I drew out of that place you haue answered nothing Secondly I alleadged Syrach 17. 21. To proue that this phrase the nethermost partes of the earth doth signifie hell to this you haue in like manner saide nothing Thirdly in all your answeres to my allegations you haue disagréeed with the word of God In answering of the 16. Psalme you say my allegation is to be vnderstoode of the passion of Christ And Peter Act. 2. saith it is spoken of y e resurrection whether is to be beléeued of Peter or you
THE DEFENCE OF the Article Christ descended into Hell With Arguments obiected against the truth of the same doctrine of one Alexander Humes All which reasons are confuted and the same doctrine cleerely defended By Adam Hyll D. of Diuinity Magna est veritas praeualet AT LONDON Printed for William Ponsonbie 1592. To the right reuerend Father in God Iohn by the grace of God Archbishop of Caunterburye Adam Hyll Minister of the woord of God Wisheth grace peace and life euerlasting DIuers causes most reuerēd Father haue moued me to present this tretise vnto your grace The one because your grace hath been charged to defend an error maintaining this doctrine that Christ in Soule descended into hell The other for that there is like to be as great strife about the true vnderstanding of this Article in England as there was in Germany about the true meaning of This is my body For the better preuention whereof I thought it my parte though the vnwoorthiest of all the Ministers of the Church of England to set down in this short discourse a plain demonstration of the truth and a refutation of the contrary out of Gods Booke and godly Interpreters The last reason that hath moued me to evulgate these my labors is this I see diuers Ministers whome for their learning and life I do honor very often to preach against the true interprutation of this branche of our Creed wherby the Papist reioyceth the Atheist is hardned and the common sort of people deuiding themselues as they affection The Prechers do vpon this occasion striue more bitterly one against another then either of both do against our common aduersarye and by this meanes turning our swords into our own bowels we are a pray to our enemies and a scorne to the world If therefore this controuercie be not shortly by the prouidence of almighty God and your grace his ministery decided there will grow among vs enuy strife sedition and al manner of euill workes Sith then as there is but one God so there is but one truth My humble sute vnto your grace is that if the doctrine contained in this booke be Apostolicall It may be authorized to proceede and they that preach the contrary in this respect may haue their mouths stopped for if one builde and another destroy how can our building prosper if one gather and another scatter what profit will there be in our gathering sith it is more easie to destroy and scatter then to build or gather Agathon said Euery Gouerner must learne these 3. lessons the one that they rule men the other that they must rule by the laws the 3. that they shal not rule foreuer In that vnder her most excellent Maiestie you rule men you must vse continuall care and vigilancy In that you must rule by lawes you may not for feare of superior or multitude for loue of freends for hatred of enemy nor for desire of reward leaue the lawes of your Countrie vnexecuted In that you shall not rule for euer you are put in minde that you shall appeare one day before the God of order being the Iudge of the quick and of the dead who wil seuerely punish you for the disorders which are in the Church of England vnpunished except you endeuour as much as you can to reforme thē Some preach what they please some do what they fancy some liue as they list and the most are impatient of vniformyty for some weare surpleases and they are called Time seruers some gownes and they are like Citizens some clokes and they are like trauailers some Coates and they are like fugitiues Nazianzene saith in his oration of moderation to be vsed in diuine matters Confusion hath engendred thunders in the aire tremblings in the earth shipwrackes in the Sea warres and strifes in Cities and houses sicknes in bodies and sinnes in the soule So that by this learned mans iudgemēt the air the sea the earth euery house Cittie body and soule is ouerthrown by confusion For the purest things as the aire is it infecteth the calmest things as the sea is it troubleth the strongest thinges as Citties are it weakneth the richest thinges as the house is it impouerisheth the vnitedst things as the bodye is it serueth the holyest things as the soule is it profaneth God the giuer of all good gifts giue to our Church a beautifull order that he may dwell among vs least our puritye be turned to vncleannes our stedfastnes to tottering our peace to warre our strength to weaknes our riches to pouerty our vnion to ciuill discension and our religion to Atheisme For the head of this monster Confusion is the diuell the hart is enuy the eares are euill reporte the eyes are trouble and vexation the hands are vprore and sedition the feete are woe and destruction From the which God deliuer my sweete countrey for his sonnes sake Christ Iesus To whom with the holy ghost be all honor and glory for euer and euer Amen Your graces most bounden Orator Adam Hyll Christ descended into Hell THat Christ descended into hell it is an article of our faith and is to be beléeued as the rest of the articles are for it is proued by many and manifest Scriptures as it shal hereafter appeare The first Scripture that proueth that christ went down into hell is the 16. Psal. 9. 10. 11. verses Wherfore my hart is glad my tung reioyceth and my flesh also shall rest in hope for why thou shalt not leaue my soule in hell neither suffer thy holy one to see corruption thou shalt shew me the path of life in thy presence is the fulnes of ioye and at thy right hand are pleasures for euermore They that deny this place to proue the descending of Christ into hell say that the woord Nephesh or soule doth signifie the person of Christ and Sheol the graue But the place it selfe doth confute them for as in the 11. verse he sheweth the resurrection of Christ and his ascension so the 10. containeth his buriall and descending into hell from whence he did arise Some there be that deny that Nephesh the Hebrew word dothsignifie the soule seperated from the body but they are reproued in the 1. of King 17 ver 21. 22. where Elias thus praieth for his Hostesse childe O Lord my God I pray thee let this childes soule come vnto him again then the Lord heard the voice of Elias and the soule of the childe came into him againe and he reuiued wher Npehesh signifieth thesoule seperated from the body Carleil séeing this place to ouerthrow that which he goeth about busily toproue saith that this childe was not dead but in a swoune but the Sonne of Sirach saith otherwise Sir 48. 4. 5. O Elias how honourable art thou by thy wonderous deeds who may make his boast to be like vnto thee which hast raised vp the dead from death and by the woord of the most high out of the graue and
reconciling the world to himselfe in Christ First desdescended into the lower partes of the earth then he led captiuity captiue and not only we are deliuered from the captiuity of Satan sinne and damnation but also Christ triumphing ouer them as tirants hath ascended aboue all heauens to fulfill all things Uery aptly likewise doth Hemingius expound this place as by his death he conflicted with his enemy on the crosse so by his glorious descending into hell resurrection and ascention he triumphed as it is Ephes. 4. leauing his crosse lift vp as a monument of his victorye This then is an other end of Christs descending into hell to triumph ouer the diuell to strike perpetuall terrors into thē and to deliuer vs from the feare of their tiranny I end therfore with this worthy saying of Fulgentius to Thrasymunde in his 8. chapter the true humanity of the sonne of God neither was wholy in the sepulchre neither wholy in hell but in the Sepulchre he lay dead according to his true flesh but in his soule he descended into hell In his soule he returned from hell to the slesh which lay in the sepulchre but in respect of his diuinity he neither is holden in place nor lymited by bond he was wholy in the graue with his flesh wholy in hell with his soule and by this meanes was fully euery where Christ because God was not seperated from the humanity which he had assumpted which was both in soule in hell that from hell his soule might return a conqueresse and was with his flesh that by reason of his spéedy resurrection it might not be corrupted Therefore the sonne of God took all man with all his infirmities without sinne for vs and the same Christ was giuen wholy for vs in respect of his flesh he was dead but in respect of his soule he descended into Hell It is not vnknowne therefore that Eusebius Fulgentius Mollerus Musculus Hemingius with many others before by me named being accompted lightes of the world in their time haue confirmed this article of our faith by this Scripture which thing when we doo likewise we are reckoned to be deceiuers But God who knoweth our harts and intent knoweth that both by praier and study we trauell to know the truth in this controuersie and we are assured by his holy and eternall woord we stand therein An other place we haue in Scripture to confirme our position in the Epistle to the Ephes. 4. verse 9. 10. Now in that he ascended what is it but that he also descended first into the lowest partes of the earth he that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue all heauens that he might fulfil all things For the better vnderstanding of this place you must note that in the Hebrew tung there are 7. names of Hell Scheol Auaddon Bor Schachath Bor Scheon Tit Haijáuen Thalmáueth Erets Tachtiioth Erets Tachtiioth then signifying the lowest partes of the earth sith it is an appellation for hell this place must néedes proue manifestly the descending of Christ into hell For as ascend and descend are cōtrary so are heauen and the lowest partes of the earth I will therfore procéede by Gods grace in the expounding of this place as I haue doon in the rest First I wil proue by conference of Scriptures that the lowest parts of the earth signifieth hell In the 63. Psalme and 9. verse the Prophet thus writeth Therfore they that seeke my soule to destroye it shall goe into the lowest partes of the earth And in Ezekiel 31. verse 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. the Prophet prophecying the destruction of the Assirians saith They shall goe down into hell which he calleth in y e chapter 3. times Ercts tachtiioth that is the lower partes of y e earth The like manner of spéech is in the praier of Manasses ver 12. O Lord condemn me not by reseruing euil for me neither condemne me into the lower parts of the earth And so is this place vnderstood by Ambrose writing on the same place in his exposition of the 4. chapter of the Ephesians this man therefore comming downe from heauen into the earth was borne a man afterward he died and descended into hell from whence rising the third day he ascended into heauen before all mortall men aboue all heauens that he might shew death to be vanquished to euery creature So doth Augustine interpret this place in his 15. booke of the Trinity and 19. chapter and Chrisostom on the 4. chapter of the Ephesians And Athanasius expounding this parcell of Scripture thus explaineth the Apostles meaning into what place did he descend into hell truely which he calleth according to the common opinion of men the lowest partes of the earte For as Chrisostome saith he went to the partes of the earth beyond which was nothing lower and from thence he ascended into the heauens then y e which nothing is higher And in hell as he bound the diuell with the bandes of his iustice and power that he should not herafter hurt any of his members so from heauen he giueth his Saints giftes that they may resist the diuell and tread him vnder their féet Those men of worthy memory which com posed the centuries doo auouch y e in fimae partes terrae that is the lowest partes of the earth do signifie hel and proue it out of this text Ephes. 4. And for this cause Hierome in this place thus hath concluded and so doo I with Hierome that hell is vnder the earth no man doubteth for he that descended in soule into hell ascended with body and soule into heanen For as much then as the learned and godly Rabbins the Fathers both Gréeke and Latin haue consented that these woords doo signifie hell and the circumstances of the text doo proue the same it must néeds be confessed of all godly men that this place dooth proue this article of our faith strongly and no refutation béerof can be made by any deuise of man For as ascend and descend are contrary so hell and heauen are contrary and Christ did begin his triumph in hell make shew of it in earth and now hauing all power in heauen earth and hell is set down on the right hand of God not only as a valiant conquerour that hath made his enemies his footstoole but also as a terrible iudge that hath condemned y e diuels and as a glorious King that ruleth all creatures for euer If any man will not beléeue S. Hierome that hell is beneath let him consider these 2. Scriptures the 86. Psal. ver 13. and Pro. 15. ver 24. For great is thy mercy towards me and thou hast deliuered my soule from the nethermost hell The Hebrew phrase is Scheol Tachtiioth The other place is The way of life is on high to the prudent to auoid from hell beneath Now let vs examine the place of S. Peter who in his first Epistle and 3. chapter
first descended into the lowest parts of the earth He that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue all heauens to fulfill all things Now if the same Christ did first descend which did ascend then he descended in soule and body as he ascended in soule and body For both these must be effected in a wonderfull maner for they are reconed by Salomon amongst the most stupendious works of the Sonne of God Prou. 30. 4. Who hath ascended vp to heauen descended who hath gathered the winde together in his fyst who hath established all the ends of the world By this scripture I inferre that to ascend and descend are as miraculous works as to create gouern the world But if the soule of Christ did go to heauen immediatly as you affirme contrary to this text then the descending of Christ had not bin so maruelous as his ascending Besides as you after alleage there is but one ascending but if Christs soule first went to heauen and then his body then were there two ascensions But euen as Christ was but once borne and once dyed and was once buried and once rose from the dead and but once commeth into iudgement so as Cyprian saith in his Sermon of the ascending of Christ Christ did once descend into hell they shall sée God no more on the crosse nor they that are damned in hell Wherefore may it please you to accept the iudgement of Athanasius a Gréeke Father and a man persecuted for the truths sake by the Arrians he in his Créede saith thus who suffred for our saluation and descended into hell And interpreting the third Chapter of the first Epistle to the Corinthians he writeth Satan was enuious against our Sauiour for he killed him not knowing that it would make against himself for Christ after his crosse going downe into hell hath vāquished death because he knew not sinne he could not be holden of death Thus you sée that not only Hill Augustine Ierome doo say that Christ after he had vtterd these words into thy hands I will commend my spirit but Athanasius a gréeke father who better then you vnderstood the meaning of these words Therfore it is a wonder to sée how those of your side labour to extinguish this euerlasting light of Gods truth and set vp a consuming candle of your owne making Where you teach that Christs Soule did no more descend into hell then Dauids did therein you are deceaued for Christ was to deliuer vs from hell and Dauid also wherefore if Christs soule had not gone to hell Dauids must and mine and yours And for this cause as you say they are true in Christ figured but not in Dauid the figure And héerevpon Peter thus reasoneth that they could not be true in Dauid For Christs soule was in hell and yet not tormented and his body in the graue but not corrupted Whereas Dauids body saw corruptiō and if his soule had gone to hell it had found no redemption Therefore to be in graue and returne without corruption and to be in hell and returne with conquest of the diuell were two peculiar things to the Sonne of God and not to any other of the sonnes of men And héere you vtter an other blasphemy that Christs soule had no other prerogatiue then Dauids soule for by y e same reason you may argue that Christs body had no greater prerogatiue then Dauids body for as this is false so is the other For as Athanasius saith in his booke of the incarnation of the word Death could not preuaile on the humane soule of Christ to tye him there neither corruption inuading his body by tiranny could shew her force on him to putrefaction as things not well séene vnto for to thinke so of him so were a wicked thing for euen as Adam had a double punishment inflicted on him for his disobedience the one was on his body earth thou art and to earth thou shalt returne and so by this decrée the body of the Lord departed vnto the earth but to the soule he said Thou shalt dye the death Hereof it cōmeth to passe that man is deuided into 2. parts and is condemned to depart to 2. places and therfore it was necessary that the selfesame Iudge which had made this decrée that he by himselfe being vnder the colour of a condemned man should frée from that sentence all beléeuers Héere you sée by this learned Father that Christs soule went to hell to deliuer our soules from hell and his body to the graue to deliuer vs from death and by this meanes both body and soule personally and not potentially as you teach working our deliuerance from death hell haue those prerogatiues which Dauids soule and body had not And for this consideration though the one was in the graue the other in hell yet both were in the hands of the Lord. Héere then we must learne what the hands of the Lord do signifie Sometime the hand of God doth signifie the Sonne of God Psal. 144. 7. Send thy hand from aboue Sometime it signifieth the power of God Psalm 136. 12. With a mighty hand and outstretched arme Thirdly the bountifulnes of God Psal. 145. Thou openest thy hand and fillest euery liuing thing with thy blessing Fourthly it signifieth consolation Ezec. 3. 22. The hand of the Lord was with me comforting me Fiftly grace Psalm 118. 16. The right hand of the Lord hath done valiantly Sixtly it signifieth the gift of prophecie Ezec. 8. 1. The hand of the Lord fell there vpon me Seuenthly mercy Psal. 37. 24. Though he fall he shal not be cast off for the Lord putteth vnder his hand Eightly the protection of the Lord Psal. 31. 15. My times are in thy hand Ninthly the aide of the Lord Psal. 74. 11. Why withdrawest thou thy hand Tenthly the punishment of the Lord Iob. 19. 21. Haue pity on me o yee my friends for the hand of the Lord hath touched me Lastly it signifieth the gouernment of the Lord Psal. 95. 4. In his hand are all the corners of the earth This place therefore must néedes haue this construction into thy consolation mercy protection and gouernment I will commende my soule I hope you your selfe commende your soule into the hands of God euery day but yet you minde not to goe to heauen immediatly So said Dauid Psal. 30. 5. Into thine hands I commende my spirit but he went not to heauen in many yeares after neither did Christ ascend into heauen in many dayes after but went downe to hell where it was in the protection and gouernment of the Godhead which as you confesse descended into hell For as we being in the damned world are in the protection and hand of the highest so Christ being in the place of the damned after a wonderfull manner was also in the Lords aide and protection by meanes whereof he hath wrought our deliuerance from hell Therefore proue you that Christ went straitway to heauen and you
I referre it to the indifferent Reader Then I proued that Erets tacthioth that is the nethermost partes of the earth did signifie hell out of 63. Psalme and 9. verse In answering of this you dissent from Dauid and M. Caluin Now whether it be more safe to foliow Dauid or you let my enemies iudge I alleadged Ezechiel to proue that point also 31. Chapter 5. 16 17 18 19. In answering to that place you haue gainsaide Ezechiel Esay in his 14. chapter Lauaterus Munster and Pellicane Now whether it be more fit for me to beléeue you or Esay or Ezechiel let your owne fauourites iudge Then I alleadged the knowne place of Peter you trauailed much about this place yet in your interpretation of this woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is spirites which you interprete the soules of the men that liued in Noahs time you contradict the woords of our Sauiour Luk. 24. 39. For Christ saith a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me haue And yet you and your Masters say that this word spirit may signifie a man liuing Now whether it be more expedient for me to beléeue you or Christ I referre it to your owne iudgement You said my Sermon at Chippenham did confirme you and your fréends but I hope your owne answeres will not confute me but your selfe and cause your selfe and them both to recant You say you séeke to know the truth so do I as knoweth the knower of al harts wherfore whether you or I haue taught the truth let not Humes nor Hill iudge but the learned of the vniuersities For as Paule saith 1. Cor 14. 32. Yhe spirits of the Prophets are subiect to the Prophets That is the labours of learned men are to be iudged of the learned The God of patience and consolation giue vs grace that we may be like minded one towards another according to Christ Iesus that we may with one minde with one mouth glorifie God the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ. Rom. 15. 5. 6. To whome be all honor and glory world without end Amen 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Iamque opus exegi quod nec Iouis ira nec ignis Nec poterit ferrum nec edax abolere vetustas Psal. 16. 9. 10. 11. 1. King 17. 21. 22. Heb. 11. 35 Pro. 23. 14. Athanas. de aduentu Christi Epiphaâ—con contra Damaer haer 77. Fulgent ad Thrasym lib. 3. Cap. 6 Ciril de vera fide ad Theodosium Imper. cap. 13. To descend into hell is a miraculous thing Petrus Mar tir in 1. Cor 15. Mat. 10. 24. Psal. 86. 13. Psal. 9. 17. Theophilact in act â— Draconit in ps 16. Aepinus in psal 16. Felinus in Psal. 16. Fulgent ad Thrasy li. 3. cap. 8. Cal. in 16. Psalme Act. 10. 43. Luk. 1. 35. August in 16. Psalme Christs body is called holy one for 2. causes Iob. 17. 14. Luther in Gen. ca. 21. August in epist. 57. ad Dardan Erasm. in 2 Act. August in 85. Psalme Absurdities following the deniing of the descendiug of Christ into hell Ciril de vera fide ad Theodosin Imperatorem ca. 12. Act. 2. 29. 30. 31. August in Epist 75. ad Dardan August in epist. 99. ad Enodi Rabbi Lebaurish Ciril de vera fide ad Theod. August de essentia diuinitatis Act. 13. 17. Col. 3. 1. Hugo Cardinalis in col 3. Rom. 6. 5. Phil. 2. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 13. 1â— Ob. Sol. Mark 5-7 Mat. 8. 29. Damas. Rob. Samu el Martir Col. 2. 14. 15. Muscul. Euseb. de re sur Christi Mollet in psal 16. Musc. in psal 68. Heming Fulg. ad Thrasim. li. 3. cap. 8. Eph. 4. 9. 10 Psal. 53. 9. Ezek 31. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Orat Manas ver 12. Ambro in epist. ad Ephe cap. 4. August in lib. 5. de trinitate cap. 19. Chrisost. in cap. 4. ad Ephe. Athanasi ibidem Cent. ia li 2. ca. 4. Hiero in ca. 4. ad Ephe. Psal. â—6 13. Pro. iâ— 24. 1. Pet. 3. 18. 19 20. 1. Cor. 5. 3. 1. Ioh. 4. 5. Luk 24. 37. Ioh. 3. 8. 1 Cor. 14. 1â— 2 Cor. 3. 17 2 Thes. 2. â— Miche 2. 11 Psal. 104. 29 Pro. 25. 2â— 1 Thes. 5. 23 Ephe. 2. 22. 1 Tim. 4. 12 2. Cor. 36. Gal. 6. 8. 1. The. 5. 19 Esa 26. 18. Psal. 150. 6. Ephe. 4. 4. Act. 7 59. Ioh 4. 24. Matth. 4. 5. Mark 1. 12. Luke 4. 1. 1. Tim. 4. 1. Act. 8. 29. Aug. epist. 99. Gen. 6. 3. Luk. 24. 39. Act. 2. Heb. 11. 4. Gen. 4. 4. Cent. 1. li. 2 ca 4. Athanasius ad Epictet Episcop corinth Athanas. de incarnat verbi Fulgent ad Thrasim li. 3. ca. 7. Ciril de vera fidead TheodosiuÌ„ Occumenius Viglius li. 2 ca. 3. Alesius in Euang. Ioh. The coÌ„sent of scripture which proue the descending into hell Act. 2. Ephe. 4. Phillip 2. Ob. Sol. Ob. 1. Tim. 19. Sol. Ob. Sol. Ose. 15 14. 1. Cor. 15. 55. Luk. 4. 18. Act. 10. 38 Heb 9. 22. 1. Ioh. 1. 7 Ferus in psal Mat. 1. 22. Ephe. 4. 10. Ioh. 17. 4. Heb. 3. 39. Apoc. 12. 12. Inde 6 Rom. 16. 20 Ephe. 2. 2. 2 Tim. 2. 26 2. Cor. 2 4 1. Pet. 5. 6. Apoc. 12. â— 10. Orig. 1 Cor. 15. 1â— Petrus Mar ibidem Muscuius Apoc. 21. 4. Luc. 22. 43. Mar. 2. 7. Hierome in Luc. 22. 43. Psal. 7. 11. 2. Tim. 4. 8. Aug. in Luc 22. 24. Ambro. Ferus in Mat. 27. Damasc Apoc. 12. 13. Apoc. 10. 6. Psal. 2. 7. Act. 13. 32. 33. Heb. 15. Heb. 5. 6. Aug. Luk. 23. 46. Psal. 144. 7. Psal. 136. 6. Psal. 145. 16 Ezek. 3. 22. Psa. 118. 16 Ezek. 8. 1. Psal. 37. 24. Psal. 31. 15. Nehe. 2. 8. Psal. 74. 12. Iob. 19. 21. Psa. 102. 25 Psal. 95. 4. Ephe. 4. 9. Eras. in 4. ad Ephe. Ioh. 20. 17. Mat. 8. 11. Ignat. epist. ad eccles Trallis Athanas. in Symbolo Ambro. in Gal. 3. Ob. Sol. Cypria de ascensu Chr. This is Car leils argument Pomera in Psal. 16. Areti in probemat parte 2. Hiperi li. 3. de method diuinitat Pet. Mar in artic 〈◊〉 Nowel in catechis Artyc Syn. Lond. tempore Eduardi 6. Aug. de ciuitate dei li. 18. ca. 23. August li. contra Iud. Pap. Arri ca. 16. 17 Phil. 2. 10. 1â— Ios. 24. 15. Aug. ad Euodium Epist. 99. Hierome ad August Epist. 9. Clemens Alexand. stromatum li. 7. Chrisost. in Act hom â— Chrys. in Gal. 3. Cypria Epist 4. Hiler li. ad ConstantiuÌ„ Augustum Hierom ad Paulinum cap. 6. Nazians orat de moderatione in reb diui 1. Cor. 14. 33. 1. Cor 14. 40. Ob. Sol. Athana de in carnat verbi Greg. Rom. 14. 10 Luk. 6. 37. Caluin defide ca. 7. The scripture is corrupted by 3. means M. Hils answere to the place This day shalt thou be with me in paradice M. Humes disagreeth with Saint Peter Humes disa greeth with Dauid and Caluin Humes disagreeth with Esay Ezechiel Munster Lauater and Pellican M. Humes disagreeth with Mathew If this be true then Christ was not dead as Peter saith Humes disagreeth with the words of our Sauior Luk. 24 39 M. Humes disagreeth with Peter Paule and himselfe Fortissimum argumeÌ„tum He ioyneth it himselfe a litle after with triumph A litle before hee saith hee neuer read hell with triumph Humes is contrarye to himself Humes disagreeth with Peter and Paule 1. Pet. 3. 22. Phil. 2. 9. 10 Eph. 1. 20. 21. 22.