and meekenesse than Moses did albeit they had no such occasion of murmuring as their forefathers had For their Fathers murmured in their hunger or thirst whereas this great Prophet had prevented this occasion of murmuring by feeding them plenteously before they had sought to him for food That which Moses saith unto the murmuring Israelites Exod. 16. 8. was now exactly fullfilled The Lord saith he heareth your murmurings which you murmur against him and what are wee Your murmurings are not against us but against the Lord. These Jewes murmur against the son as they suppose of Joseph and Mary lesse weening that in murmuring against him they did personally murmur against the Son of God then their Fathers did when they murmured against Moses that they had murmured against their God But the same Lord which heard their murmurings then by the mediate presence or infinite knowledge of his God head heares them now with the eares of man as immediately and as sensibly as Moses heard their Fathers murmur Now as God in the wildernesse though he heard their Fathers murmurings did yet grant them their desire at evening ye shall eat flesh in the morning ye shall be filled with bread and ye shall know that I am the Lord your God Exod. 16. 12 So the same Lord now albeit this foolish people murmur against him to his face not for denying but for proffering them the true food of life is so farre from chiding them as Moses did that he presseth them to make try all of his bountie and to accept his proffer with greater vehemency of words yet with more meeknesse of language than Moses did at any time use Murmur not saith he amongst your selves ver 43. c. I am that bread of life your fathers did eat Manna in the wildernesse and are dead This is the bread which cometh downe from heaven that a man may eat thereof and not dye I am the living bread that came downe from heaven if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever and the bread that I will give is my flesh w ch I will give for the life of the world 48 49 50 51. And here again they increase their murmuring for they strove among themselves saying how can this man give us his flesh to eat v. 52. Thus as their Fathers tempted God in their hearts by asking meat for their Lust Ps 78. 18. so have their posteritie They fought him out that they might have their bellye 's filled with corporal bread and yet when he had given them this in great abundance by meanes miraculous they will not beleive that he is able to give them what he promiseth bread from heaven or his flesh to eate which is the bread or staff of life So incredulous their Fathers had been that after the sight of many miracles in Egypt they would not trust him in the wildernesse after the experience of one miracle in the wildern esse they would not trust him for a second They Spake against God they said can God furnish a table in the wildernesse Behold he smote the Rock that the waters gushed out and the streames over-flowed but can he give bread also can he provide flesh for his people therefore the Lord heard this and was wroth so a fire was kindled against Jacob and anger came up against Israel because they beleived not in God and trusted not in his salvation But now this Salvation of God even God himself made their Jesus or Salvation for all is one is come neerer unto this later people and yet they will not beleeve him they will not trust in him Yet his anger is not presently kindled against them for not beleiving The more they doubt the more they question the more they murmur or strive the more he presseth the necessitie of eating his flesh upon them first Negatively verily verily I say unto you except yee eat the flesh of the son of man and drink his blood yee have no life in you then Affirmatively Who so eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternall life and I will raise him up at the last day vers 53 54. And lastly he gives the reason as well of the negative as of the affirmative For my flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drink indeed vers 55. So that in him these Jewes were to expect the fulnesse of the body of all those contentments for whose shadowes their Fathers so greedily longed in the wildernesse and for want of which they so murmured against Moses as these men now do against the Lord which appeared to Moses for giving them assurance of them 4. In what sense Christs flesh is said to be truely meate and his blood to be truely drink I have shewd elswhere The summe was this His flesh is meat indeed his blood is drink indeed non Formaliter sed Eminenter meat indeed and drink indeed not in respect of the natural qualities of corporal meat and drink for these must be swallowed concocted digested and finally converted into our bodily substance That Christs flesh according to these qualities is truely meat or his blood truely drink the Romish Church doth not avouch For if his body should be concocted or digested or converted into our bodily substance it should suffer corruption And to be swallowed only and not concocted is no propertie of meat or drink Christs Flesh then is said truly meat and his blood drink indeed in respect of the End whereto all manner of food is destinated The best End of all bodily food is to preserve or continue bodily life And that is the best food or diet which most effectually procureth this End Howbeit bodily life cannot be first given or implanted by the best bodily meat that is but only continuated or preserved But Christs Flesh was given not only to continue life but to give life unto the world it is the root of life as well as the food of life If we speak of life spiritual or Everlasting which onely is life indeed And in as much as his flesh and blood are the rootes and fountaines of this kind of life the one is most truely said to be meat indeed the other most truely drink indeed That is meat and drink more effectuall and more necessary for the attainement of everlasting life than bodily food is for life temporal Again Temporal or bodily life cannot be continued or preserved otherwise than by the corruption or destruction of the bodily meate which preserves it But Christs flesh and blood preserve life spiritual or our soules and bodies unto everlasting life because they are incorruptible and cannot be changed be not so much as subject to alteration Now if all other meat besides this must suffer corruption and lose its nature before it can become a cause or meanes of preserving bodily life Such meat cannot be truely said to remain in us much lesse can wee be said to remain or abide in it But of Christs flesh and
imagining the stars or host of heaven to be the adaequate or total causes of Sublunary Effects or alterations They might err again in Calculating the Course of the Starrs and for ought I know they did err in denying or not avouching the Immortalitie of the soul But herein they come the nearest to us Christians in this Article That they held it possible and agreeable to Nature for one and the same body for one and the same man consisting of body and soul which had been dissolved for many thousand yeares before to be restored to life again But whereas they thought the conjunction of stars to be the full and total cause of sublunary effects let us suppose Gods Will or Powerfull Ordinance to be the sole cause of all things and there will be no contradiction or impossibilitie in nature why the self same men which have been may not bee again albeit they had died more then 5000. years ago For his Will as it is more powerfull then all the influence of stars so is it more truly One and the same then any conjunction or aspect of stars can be yea His Will or His Power was the true immediat or total Cause of the Matter of every thing as well as of its forme or soul The true cause likewise of the conjunction of the soul and body 6. It being then admitted that the Genethliaci did deny the Immortalitie or perpetual duration of the reasonable Soul which to deny is a gross heresie in Christianitie yet this Errour in them was more pardonable by much then the Inference which some Christians make who holding the Immortalitie of the soul hold it withall to be an Antecedent so necessary for evincing the future Resurrection of the body or restauration of the same man who dyes that if the soul were not immortal there could be no resurrection of the body no Identical restauration of men that perish and are consumed to dust They which deny the Immortalitie of the soul do therefore erre because they know not the Scriptures nor the Will of God revealed in them concerning the state of the soul after death For if the soul of Christ as man were as we must believe it was of the same nature that our souls are of if his soul did not die with his body our souls shall not die with our bodies Now Christ at the very point of death or dissolution of soul and body did commend his soul into his Fathers hands And God the Father took a more special care of his soul then either Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea did of his body That God likewise did take the souls of the faithful into his custody at their departure from their bodies our Saviour long before had taught us in his Answer to the Sadduces Matth. 22. 31 32. As touching the resurrection of the dead have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God saying I am the God of Abraham and the God of Isaac and the God of Jacob. God is not the God of the dead but of the living And as St. Luke addeth Chap. 20. ver 38. All live unto him not alwayes in their bodies but alwayes in their souls which alwayes expect a second conjunction or re-union to their proper bodies And St. Stephen when his persecutors did destroy his body commends his soul into Christs hands as Christ had done His Soul into the hands of his Father So that no man can doubt of the Immortality or perpetual duration of the soul unless he be altogether ignorant of these and many like passages in the Scriptures But they which deny all Possibilitie of the Resurrection or Identical restauration of the same man to bodily life in case his soul were mortal or might utterly cease to be with the body do err not only out of ignorance of the Scriptures or of The Will of God revealed in Scriptures but this their ignorance supposeth an ignorance or denial of the Power of God For God who is able out of stones to raise up children unto Abraham is no less powerful perfectly to restore the self same body and soul which now are and really to represent the self same man which now is albeit both body and soul should at his death not only die but be utterly annihilated that is although no more either of body or soul did remain after death then was extant before the first Creation of all things Now before the first Creation there was not so much as a particle or least portion either of mans soul or body For all things were created out of Nothing and all things might be created the same again that now they are albeit they were by Gods power or by substraction of his influence totally resolved into nothing 7. All these Propositions following are most true 1. That as God did make all things of nothing so he is able if it should please him to resolve all things into nothing This is essentially included in the Article of Omnipotencie So is this Second likewise Although all things created were resolved into nothing God is able to make them again the self same substances that they sometimes were or now are So likewise is this Third Albeit the bodies of men be not utterly resolved into nothing when they die but into the Elements of which they consist or are compounded as into the Earth Air Water c. yet every mans body at the day of final appearance before our Judge may be Numerically the same that now it is All these Propositions are Objectively Possible that is they imply no Contradiction in nature and not implying any contradiction in nature they are the proper Objects of Omnipotent Power That is God is able to work all these Effects in nature which unto Nature or natural Causes are impossible But that either the souls or bodies of men shall be annihilated or resolved into nothing we are not bound to believe because the Scripture doth no where testifie Gods Will or purpose so to resolve them Their annihilation or dissolution their re-production or re-union meerly depends upon the Will or Powerful Ordinance of God And albeit the Resurrection of one and the same man may be demonstrated to be in Nature possible Yet That this Possibilitie shall be reduced into Act That every Man shall undoubtedly rise again in the body to receive that which he hath done in his body Or With what manner of body for qualifications they shall arise This cannot be taught by Nature but must be learned or believed from Scripture To begin with the Second Proposition Although all things created were resolved into nothing God is able to make them again the self same numerical substances that they sometime were or now are For Proof of this Proposition I take as granted That all things which by Creation took their beginning had a true Possibilitie of being numerically what they were before they actually were otherwise it was impossible for them actually
mitto lapidem in Sionem I lay or place a stone in Sion the meaning is as if he had said I lay or found Sion the spirituall Sion or new Jerusalem in a Stone or cheif corner stone elect and pretious But whether this be the grammatical or literal sense of the prophet I leave for Criticks in the Hebrew dialect to determine Both constructions the ordinary and this Critical are true and compatible both in respect of the matter are necessarie Christ God and man was layd in Sion as a sure foundation stone as Imus angularis Lapis as the lowest corner stone unto which S. Peter for precedencie of time so far wee yeild unto his primacie was first annexed Peter was the first living stone which was Built upon this foundation stone the other Apostles were layd not upon Peter but upon the same foundation stone whether one after another or all together wee will not dspute However all that beleive as Peter and the other Apostles did or shall so beleive unto the worlds end are immediately layd upon the same foundation stone not one upon another no one of them upon Peter or upon any other Apostle their union or annexion unto Christ is as immediate as Peters was and is or shal be as indissoluble as his was to Christ albeit their growth be not so great nor for qualitie so glorious The best inscription of this edifice thus immediately erected upon the same stone would be that of the Poet Crescet crescentibus illis As the number of living stones which are layd upon this foundation stone increase so the foundation or corner stone which God did promise to lay in Sion doth still increase As every particular living stone increaseth or groweth from a stone into a pillar of this house of God from a pillar in the house of God unto a temple of God so this foundation stone that is Christ as man still groweth still increaseth not in himselfe but in them For they grow by his growth in them or by diffusion of life from him into them 23. But though Christ be often called A stone a rock a living stone a living rock or a stone which being cut out of a mountain became a Mountain which filled all the earth yet the manner of his growth in us or the manner of his inlarged habitation through the Church may be best conceived by the manner of the soules growth or diffusion of his Vertue throughout Vegetable or sensible bodies that is through trees or plants or through the bodies of men of beasts or such as wee call living creatures There is a vegetable soul in the Ake-corn when it is first set or planted and this soul we may truely say dwelleth or abideth in the Akorn and is the cause why the Akorn sprouteth into a rod the same soul is the cause why the rod or twig groweth greater the true cause why this twig growes into a stemme why the stemme grown greater spreads it self into branches why every branch beareth leaf blossom or seed Now the greater the stemme doth grow the further the vegetable soul doth spread it self The same vegetable soul which was in the Akorn diffuseth it self into the stemme into the branches into the leaf into the blossom into the Fruit or seed None of these could thrive or prosper at all unlesse the vegetable soul did abide or dwell in them none of them can thrive or prosper any longer than the vegetable soul abideth or dwelleth in them Thus was Christ the root out of which S. Peter sprouted the soul of Peter as he was a living or Spiritual man He had no life but from Christ he grew by Christ dwelling or abiding in him And as he did grow by Christ abiding in him So he bare fruit by Christs dwelling in him by the diffusion of life and vegetation from Christ And so all they that abiding in Christ do grow in faith grow by Christ dwelling in them and spreading his vertue through them after such a manner as the vegetable soule doth diffuse it self throughout the Branches which spring from the root or stemme or through the branches which are ingrafted or inoculated into it And this manner of the vegetable souls diffusion of it self or of its vertue into all the Branches which are ingrafted into the same stock or root doth better resemble the manner of Christs dwelling in us than the diffusion of life or vegetation from the root into the stemmes stovens or branches which without ingraffing or inoculation naturally spring from it 24. But this later similitude of the Stock and Grafts although it well expresse the manner of Christs abiding or growing not in himself but in us and the manner of our abiding or dwelling in him it may seem to fail in this That ordinarie Stocks howsoever the ingrafted branches be supported by them and receive life and nutriment from them yet do they not receive their specifical kind of life from the stocks into which they are ingrafted but still retain their own native qualitie As a good Apple or Pear grafted into a Crab stock or Thorn doth not degenerate into a Crab or Thorn but reteins its native sweetnesse and bears the same fruit which it would have done although it had grown up into a Tree from its own root or from the root whereof it was a native Branch It would be a Soloecism to say That any such stock doth remain or dwell in the Graft because it doth not diffuse its specifical qualitie into it But Christ in this manner abideth or dwelleth in us He is the Root and Stem and we the Grafts and inset branches and yet he is said as truely to dwell in us as we in him This argues that the manner of our ingrafting and abiding in him is not natural because the Stock or Stem is for nature and qualitie much better than all the Branches or Grafts which are supported by it which receive life and nutriment by it Hence saith the Apostle Rom. 11. 24. That we Gentiles were cut out of the Olive tree which was wild by nature and were grafted contrary to nature into a good Olive tree This ingraftment is contrary unto nature two wayes First In that the Grafts being wild by nature without any root or fat or sweetness in themselves grow better qualified then they were by participation of the sweetness of the Stock Secondly In that the Stock whereinto they are ingrafted is a good Olive whereas the Olive tree naturally admits no ingraftment or incision being by nature so fat that it seems to envie or scorn to participate his fatness unto any other Branches In arbore pingui non vivunt insita Grafts do not thrive or prosper in any fat tree or stock saith A late Naturalist And as an Hebrew Doctor hath Observed the Olive being the fattest of Trees will admit no incision nor ingraftment Nor will any Olive Graft thrive or prosper unlesse it be ingrafted in an hungry
its course it could not without a positive force or power communicated unto it from The Creator in whom as the Apostle speakes it moves But it ceased for a while to move without any positive force or power to inhibit or restrain its course But as we said by meer substraction of that power by which it moves So long as it continues its course it both moves and hath its Being in God and it is partaker of two branches of His Almighty Power But when it stood still it onely had its Being in him The influence of the other branch of Power was intercepted Now the Argument drawn from those works which we call The works of nature unto works miraculous or supernatural would in this case hold a majore He that dayly makes the Sun to compasse the world is able to stay its course when he pleaseth 4. A miracle likewise it was and a great one too that The three Children should be untouched in the midst of the flaming furnace yet neither was there a greater nor more immediate positive effect of Gods Power in the restraint of that fire then then was in the sustaining other Fire which at other times devoured the bodies of his Saints The Holy Martyrs who loved not their lives unto the death but gave them up for the Testimonie of the Lord Jesus For Without the co-operation or concurse of Gods Power the fire could not have touched their bodies Wherein then did the Miracle Recorded in Daniel and experienced in the three children properly consist Not so much if at all in fencing their bodies from the violence of the flame by imposition or infusion of any new created qualitie into their bodies as in substracting or withdrawing his ordinary Co-operation from the fire whose natural propertie is to consume or devour bodies combustible such as the bodies of the three Children by nature were The only cause why the fire did not burn them was the substraction or withdrawing of Gods Co-operative Power without whose strength or assistance the hottest furnace that Art or experience can devise cannot exercise the most natural operation of fire For as the substance of the fire cannot subsist or have any place in the Fabrick of this universe unless it be supported by Gods Power sustentative So neither whilst it subsists or hath actual being amongst Gods creatures can it work or move without the assistance of Gods co-operative or all-working Power In Him both these Powers are one both as he is are infinite But as communicated unto his creatures they are not altogether one but two participated branches of his infinite Power And in the burning of the Martyrs or in other destructions made by fire both branches as well of his sustentative as of his co-operative power are manifested Whereas in the preserving of the three Children from the violence of the flaming furnace the one branch only to wit His Power sustentative was communicated to the fire the other branch to wit the participation of his co-operative or working Power was for the time being lop't off from the body or substance of the fire Now this withdrawing of his co-operative Power from the fire was a true document or proof that he is the God and guide of nature That without him the fire even whilst it is for nature and substance most compleat cannot perform the proper work or exercise of its nature The necessary consequence of which Proof or experiment is this That he is the Author or fountain as well of all the works or exercises of natural causes as of natural bodies or substances themselves And if we consider his Power not in it self but as communicated to his Creatures or natural Agents it is and ought to be acknowledged greater in those works which we call works of nature and of which we have dayly experience then it was in either of these two Miracles before mentioned Both of them were for this Reason only Miraculous in that they were most unusual and without the circuit of any experiment or observation in the course of nature before the times wherein they hapned 5. To raise Mens Bodies out of the Grave or out of the Elements into which they have been dissolved is far more unusual then to raise up Corn out of putrified seed and in this respect the Resurrection which we hope for must be acknowledged a work more Miraculous and wonderful then the yearly springing of Corn of fruits of herbs or grass But may we say in this Case as in the former that the Power of God is no less but rather greater in these ordinary works of nature as in causing herbs fruit or corn to sprout or fructifie with advantage of increase then it shall be in the Resurrection of the dead which is a work not of Nature but miraculous and supernatural a work in which natural Causes shall not be entertained nor imployed by God No there shall be a manifestation of greater Power then either of Gods Sustentative Power by which all things that were created are still preserved or of His Co-operative Power without whose participation nothing which is so preserved can work at all or perform the exercises of its proper nature The Power indeed by which He Preserveth all things is the self same Power by which He Made all things out of nothing The Preservation of things that are is but a continuation or proroguing of the first Creation As all things are made of Nothing so would they instantly return into Nothing were they not continually supported and preserved by the self same Power by which they begun to Be when they were not Creation and preservation differ onely in sensu connotativo only in relation not in substance Creation includes a Negation of Being before For all things that are took their beginning by Creation Conservation supposeth a beginning of things that are and includes a Negation of their returning into nothing These Two Negations being abstracted or sequestred the Creation of all things and their Conservation are as truly and properly the same Power or work of one and the same party as the way from Athens to Thebes and from Thebes to Athens is the same But if the Continuation of things that are be a Creation or if the self same Almighty Power be still manifested in the preservation of things temporal that was manifested in the first Creation what greater power can be manifested in the Resurrection from the dead then is daily manifested and ought to be acknowledged in the preservation and daily increase of herbs of fruits of corn sown and springing out of the earth Or if any greater power shall be manifested in the Resurrection from the dead then is daily experienced in these works of nature how shall we justifie our Apostles Argument in this place to be an Argument of proportion or an Argument as we said before from the greater to the lesse or an Argument à pari from The like Case or Instance The Argument
it is fitting that we refer the particular manner how our bodies shall be intirely restored unto God himself We will not dispute whether the Resurrection of every man in his own body shall be wrought de facto by recollecting of the dust into which men are turned or of the same material parts which every man had when he died or whether it shall be wrought by Creation of some new matter or only by preparing some other Elementary matter prae-existent and working it into the same individual temper or constitution into which our bodily food or nutriment was wrought whilst we lived It sufficeth to have shewed that every man may arise with his own body by any of the former wayes or partly by one partly by another Lastly the Recollection of the same material fragments or reliques into which our bodies are dissolved is no more necessary by the Principles of nature or true Philosophie unto the constitution of the same bodies at the day of the Resurrection which before have been then the recollection or regresse of the same matter or nutriment whereof our blood or flesh was made or by which our life was preserved in childhood is unto the continuance or constitution of the same life flesh or blood in old age The life of every man in old age is the same the body the same the flesh the same the blood the same which it was it childhood albeit the blood or greatest part of our bodies in childhood was made of one kind of nutriment and the blood which we have in mature or old age be made of another much different nutriment Yea albeit we alter our food or diet every year yet our bodies remain still the same every finger the same whilst it continues in the body and whilst this bodily life continues For albeit the nutriment be of divers kinds yet nature or the digestive facultie works all into one temper and this temper continues the same in divers portions of the matter which is continually fluent and the same only by Equivalencie Now if nature by Gods appointment and co-operation can work divers kinds of food or nutriment into the same form or constitution it will be no improbable supposall to say that The God of nature can work any part of the Element of water of ayre or of earth any fragment or relique of Adams body into the same individual form or mould wherein the bodily life of the man that shall be last dead before Christs coming to Judgement did consist Yet will it be no hard thing for God to make Adam the self same body wherein he died out of the reliques of this mans body To work this mutual exchange between the material parts of several mens bodies without any hinderance or impeachment to the numerical Identity of any mans body or without any prejudice to this truth That every man shall arise with his own body which we Christians believe is impossible to nature or to any natural causes they can be no Agents in this work yet it is no wayes impossible for it implyeth no contradiction for nature thus to be wrought and fashioned by the Creator and preserver of mankind In avouching thus much we say no more then some I take it meer Philosophers have delivered in other Termes Quicquid potest prima causa per secundam idem potest per se sola Whatsoever the first cause doth by the instrumental Agencie or service of second causes the same he may do by his sole Power without the service of any instrumental or second cause Now God by the heart by the Liver and by the digestive facultie as by causes instrumental or secondary doth change the substance of herbs of fruits of fish of roots into the very substance of mans body without dissolving the unitie of his bodily life and therefore if it please him may change the material parts of one man into another mans body or substance without the help or instrumental service of the nutritive or digestive faculty or any other instrumental cause All this he may do immediatly by His sole Power But whether it be His Will so to do or no at the last day be it ever reserved with all reverence and submission to his infinite wisdom alone 9. One scruple more there is wherewith ingenuous minds and well affected may be sometimes touched The doubt may be framed Thus. Although it be most true and evident from the Book of nature that the natural or digestive faculty of man doth preserve the unitie of bodily life entire by diversitie of mater or nutriment yet the living body so preserved is one and the same by continuation of existence or duration His dayes whilst natural life continues are not cut off by death he doth not for a moment cease to be what he was But when we speak of Resurrection from death when we say the dead shall arise with their own bodies here is a manifest interruption of bodily life or of mans duration in bodily life His body ceaseth to be a living body as it was And therefore if he must live again in the body the body to which his soul shall be united at his Resurrection may be called his own body because it shall be inhabited or possessed with his immortal soul but how shall it be The same body which he formerly had seeing the existence or duration of him or of his soul in the body is divided by death and division destroyeth unitie This leaf or paper is one yet if we divide it in the middle it is no more one but two papers The question then comes to this short and perspicuous issue Whether the uninterrupted continuance of duration or existence or unitie of time wherewith the duration of mans life is measured be as necessary to the Unitie or Identity of his bodily Nature or Being as Unitie or Continuation of Quantitie is unto the Unitie of Bodies divisible or quantitative The determination or Judgment is easie The Book of Nature being Judge it is evident That Unitie of Time or continuation of mans life without interruption is but Accidental to the unitie of bodily nature or being It is a circumstance only no such part of the Essence or nature as continuation or unitie of quantitie is of the unitie of bodies divisible for time and quantitie are by nature divisible whereas the nature of man or other things that exist in time is indivisible It is true Division makes a pluralitie in things that are by nature divisible but not in natures indivisible Every thing that is divisible though it be unum actu yet it is plura in potentiâ In that it may be divided it is not purely simply or altogether one but may be made two or more And whilst it remains one it is one by conjunction of parts The entire substance of any natural bodie as it is divisible or subject to dimension cannot be contained under one part of quantitie but part of it is
the other to be more Prophane and then taking occasion by the increase of their prophanenesse to be more irregularly Precise Both parties being by their daily Bandyings far worse then being sundred they would have been Whilest in the mean time true Religion and sober Devotion suffers on both hands betwixt them Thus upon the Lutherans Hyperbolical manner of expressing the Exaltation of Christs Man-hood the Helvetian Churches took occasion to grant a lesse measure of Dignitie then was fitting and the lesse They granted the more the Lutherans still added to the advancement of his Humanitie or the miraculous manner of his Bodily Presence in the Sacrament as if they had thought themselves bound in conscience to make a Super-allowance for the others Arrears or detractions as they at least conceiv'd And thus the missed Truth oft times lies betwixt disagreeing Parties as it were offering it self to be surveyed by unpartial by-standers or sorrowful Spectators of causelesse ruful broyses betwixt brethren To add any Excellencie to Christs Divine Nature by derogating from his Humanitie we cannot for being Infinite It cannot admit of any addition And to derogate any thing from his Humanitie whereof it is or for ought we know may be Capable from That Special Union which it hath with the Divine Nature we dare not For this were to derogate from or deny the Power of God But doth he derogate any thing from Christs Humane Nature that denyes it to be Infinitely Exalted It may be he doth that doth deny the Exaltation of his Humane Nature since his Ascension and Sitting at the Right-hand of God the Father to be in Any sort Infinite The diverse acceptions of Infinitie or diverse branches of it to mans apprehension are almost infinite more by many then are fit to be displayed or mentioned in this place It shall therefore suffice First to shew In what Sense we must denie Christs Humane Nature to be infinitely Exalted And this must quash the Lavish Hyperboles of some modern Lutherans Secondly In what Sense Christs Humane Nature may be said to be or at least may not be denyed to be infinitely Exalted 4. Christs Bodie may be conceived to be Absolutely Infinite or to be Actually Infinite only but not absolutely or to be Potentially Infinite only To be Absolutely Infinite or to be Infinite Simply in Being is proper to God who is Very Being it self and as he hath no Cause of Being so he can have no limits or bounds of Being either for number of several sorts of Being or for degrees of several Perfections What kind of Perfection soever we can conceive to be in any created Substance that we must acknowledge to be Infinitely greater in him Again we may conceive an Actual Infinitie of Being only in One or Two Kinds as in respect of Place of Strength or Power And though God be not Infinite only in respect of these Two Branches of Being yet he Only is Actually Infinite according to these Two Branches of Infinitie The One we call his Immensitie the other his Omnipotencie No created substance can actually be every where at once No creature can be Omnipotent or actually Infinite in strength for so it should be as strong as God though not so wise or eternal as God Now upon these Two Branches of Divine Infinitie that is upon his Immensitie and Omnipotencie the modern Lutherans make the Humane Nature of Christ to incroach as a Real Participant or equal sharer with the Divine Nature or Blessed Trinitie if we may judge of their meaning by their words or of their intended Conclusions by their Premisses expresly avouched and stiffly maintained After their Doctrine of Christs Real presence in the Sacrament by Consubstantiation began to be impugned and shaken the later Lutherans sought to support it by A new Butteresse or pillar which the Ancienter did not rely upon in this Argument and that was the Ubiquitie of Christs Bodie or Humane Nature Indeed if Christs Bodie were every-where present it should be Consubstantially present in the Sacrament But so it should be present in many other places where none of the Ancients did ever imagine it to be where no good Christian is bound to seek it 5. But to hunt out their Meaning at least the Truth concerning which their Meaning I hope is better then their Expression When they say Christs Glorified Bodie is Every-where they grant it to be in Heaven They should then in the First place tell us whether in heaven it be not as visible and conspicuous to Angels and Saints as it shall be to all men at his coming to Judgement Secondly Whether this Visibilitie of it doth not include a visible or comprehensible Distinction of parts in it as of his Head from his Feet or his Right-hand from his Left This I presume they will not deny for Christ shall only visibly change the place of his Residence not the substance form or fashion of his Bodie when he shall come from the Right-hand of God to Judge the quick and the dead This being granted when they say Christs Bodie is every where they should in the Third place tell us Whether it be Every-where according to this Distinction of Parts or no. Si di Christi If that of Christ which they hold as somewhat of Christ besides his Divine Nature they hold to be Every where have no Distinction of parts Let them call it what they list it is not in any Language besides their own and the Modern Romish Churches a Bodie as having no Properties of a Bodie If they will be content to deny all Distinction of parts in That of Christ which they make to be the Subiect of this Ubiquitarie presence we shall be content to take this their Real denyal for an approach to a Comprimise or agreement If they will call that A Bodie which we would call A Spiritual Influence or a Virtual presence so we may know what they really mean by this Word Bodie let them enjoy their Dialect If they admit a Distinction of Parts in that which they call Christs Bodie and which they make the Subject of this Ubiquitarie presence they should tell us whether it be Every where present according to every part or whether it be Every where present according to all its parts respectively As whether the Hands of Christ be Every where his Heart Every where his Head Every where or whether there be no place in the world wherein some Part of Christs Bodie or Humane Nature is not yet so that they will have his Head to be in one part his Feet in another his Right-hand in a third and his Left-hand in a fourth place or dimension of this visible world If they say Christs bodie is in this Latter sort present Every where they make him a Gyant not such a Man as we conceive him to be they do not Exalt but rather Extend him according to his Humane Nature the intire frame of whose bodie no man shall see no not at the day
work let us still call to mind that it now is in Executione Officii and its Office is to be our Remembrancer of that which our Apostle admonisheth us 1 Cor. 11. 31. If we would judge our selves we should not be judged In this Judgment or examination of our selves Nature her self would teach us thus much so we would be observant of the Process That seeing Conscience is not onely the Lamp of the Lord but also a part of our selves a principal Ray or beam of our souls it could not be so suspitious of our actions or so inquisitive after every circumstance that may make against us when we do evil unless it were deputed by a supreme Judge to bring us to a Judgment and either in this life to acquit us by perswading us to judge our selves or in that last day to accuse and condemn us It would teach us again That albeit there be a General day for final Judgment appointed wherein Christ himself shall sit as Judge yet he every day holds or cals A private Sessions within our brests wherein Conscience sits his Atturney or Deputy Again let us still remember that albeit the work of the Law be written in our hearts so it was in the hearts of the very heathens that albeit we give Conscience full Audience and leave to examine us by the Law of God whether written in our hearts or in the sacred Book yet is it but a small part of our accounts which we shall be able to read in the Register of our own Consciences in respect of what is to be found written in that Book or Scrowl which shall be opened and unfolded in the day of final Iudgement Rev. 20. 12. Howbeit even so much as every man which will diligently hearken to his own Conscience shall in this life be able to read and hear distinctly will make deep impression in his heart and wound his very spirit And as Solomon speaks a wounded Spirit who can bear rather who can heal it None but he that shall be our Judge Yet may we not look that when he shall come to judge all he will vouchsafe to heal any He healeth all our infirmities as he is our High-Priest not as he is our Judge And so healed by him our Consciences must be in this life otherwise the wound will prove deadly and incurable in that last day Nothing besides the wounds of Christ can cure the wounds and sores of our spirits and consciences Therefore was he smitten and bruised therefore was he wounded unto death that his blood poured forth might be as a Fountain of Oyl or Balm to cure and heal the broken hearted For The broken hearted onely are his true Patients All of us one time or other must feel the sting of Serpents more fiery then such as stung the Israelites in the wilderness even the sting of death and of that old Serpent which in our first Parents envenomed our nature before we can thirst after this fountain of life with that fervencie of spirit which he requireth in his Patients without this thirst thus occasioned by this sting of conscience and poyson of sin in some measure apprehended by us we cannot drink the water of life or suck in the balm of health and salvation which issued out of Christs wounds in such a plentiful measure as may cure the festered wounds of our souls and consciences and purge us from that corruption which we and our Fathers have sucked from our first Parents or contracted by the incessant overflow of our actual and daily sins 10. Yet is not this apprehension of our actual and daily sins or the smart or sting of conscience so perpetually uncessant in any one of us but that we may feel or perceive some interposed gleams of joy and comfort some Gratulations of our Consciences for businesses sincerely managed by us or for those particular actions or good deeds which in respect of some one or other circumstance we have done amiss but for their substance well and with a good intention and without a sinister respect to our own private temporal ends or to the prejudice of others with whom we live So that no man unless he be much wanting to himself can want undoubted Experiments in himself of a future and Final Judgement or of the Two-fold sentence which in it shall be awarded to all according to the diversity of their ways As often then as any of us shall feel the sting or perceive the check of our consciences for the evils we have done let us take this irksomness or indisposition of our minds and souls not for a meer effect of natural Melancholie though that perhaps may concur as a cause to increase our heaviness but rather take all together as a Crisis of that disease growing upon our souls which unless it be cured by our heavenly Physician in this life will prove incurable in that last and dreadful day and will bring upon us perpetual weeping and wailing and gnashing of teeth If our Consciences again at any time shall Congratulate us for well doing we may take these Congratulations or Applauses of our souls and spirits as so many undoubted pledges or earnests of that unspeakable and uncessant joy which the supream Iudge shall award to all that by constancy in well-doing acknowledge him for their Soveraign Lord and expect him as their supream Iudge If we cease not to continue these good actions or performances he will not cease to renew the undoubted pledges or earnests of eternal Joy unto us daily For so S. Paul saith He will render to every man according to his deeds To them who by patient continuance in well doing seek for glory and honor and immortalitie eternal life But unto them that are contentious indignation and wrath tribulation anguish c. 11. The best use which the Heathens as meer Heathens made of such Notions as nature had implanted in them of a future Judgement or rather their misapplications of what nature did rightly suggest unto them to this purpose cannot better be resembled then by the use or applications which men naturally make of Dreams Now of Dreams some are vain and idle as arising onely from the Garboils of the Phantasie most frequent in men sick or distempered or from such thoughts discourses or speeches as we have entertained by day or been entertained with for some short time before Of these Dreams and of their serious observation that of The Son of Sirach Eccl. 34. 1 2 3. is most true The hopes of a man void of understanding are vain and false and dreams lift up fools Who so regardeth dreams is like him that catcheth at a shadow and followeth after the wind The vision of dreams is like the resemblance of one thing to another even as the likeness of a face to a face Howbeit even such Dreams may be resolved into some natural Causes precedent Nor do men fail in the apprehension of particulars represented
arraign accuse and judge our selves for our former frequent neglect of our Vow in Baptism Secondly To request Absolution and pardon of God which no man humbly and seriously doth but he solemnly promiseth amendment of what is past Thirdly To implore the special aid or assistance of Gods Spirit for better performance of our Vow and of what we now promise And all this only for the merits of Christ and through the efficacy of his Body and Blood I will conclude with that of the Psalmist Vovete vota reddite Jehovae CHAP. XX. ROMANS 6. 21. 21. For the end of those things is Death 23. For the wages of sin is Death The first and second Death Both literally meant The wages of Sin Both described Both compared and shewed How and wherein the Second Death exceeds the First The greater deprivation of Good the worse and more unwelcom death is Every member of the Bodie every facultie of the Soul the Seat and Subject of the Second Death A Map and Scale The Surface and Soliditie of the Second Death Pain improved by inlarging the capacitie of the Patient and by intending or advancing the activitie of the Agent Three Dimensions of the second Death 1. Intensiveness 2. Duration 3. Un-intermitting Continuation of Torment Poena Damni Sensus Terms Co-incident Pains of the Damned Essential and Accidental Just to punish momentanie sin with pain eternal The reflection and revolution of thoughts upon the sinners folly The Worm of Conscience 1. DEath and life have the same Seat and Subject Nothing dieth unless it first live and Death in the General is An Extinction of life Death in Scripture is two Wayes taken First For bodily Death which is the First Death Secondly For the Death of both Body and Soul which is called the Second Death Both are here literally meant both are the wages of sin The former Death is common to all excepting such of the Godly as shall be found alive at Christs coming to Judgment they shall not die but be changed First then of bodily death and secondly of supernatural or the second death and wherein it exceedeth the first death The Opposition between Bodily Death and Bodily Life is meerly Privative such as is between light and darkness or between sight and blindness And this death must be distinguished according to the degrees of life of which it is the Privation Of life the degrees be three The First of meer Vegetables as of trees of plants of herbs or whatsoever is capable of growth or nourishment The Second is of Creatures indued with sense The third is the life of man who besides sense is endued with reason The reasonable life includes the sensitive as the sensitive doth the life vegetable Whatsoever bodily creature is endowed with reason is likewise endowed with sense But many things which are endowed with sense are uncapable of reason And again what Creature soever it be which is partaker of the life sensitive is partaker likewise of Vegetation of growth or nourishment But many things which are nourished and grow as trees herbs plants grass and corn are uncapable of the life sensitive and yet even these are said to die as they properly do when their nutriment fails But albeit the first beginning of mans life in the womb be only vegetative not sensible or reasonable yet no man dieth according to this kind of death only For such as fall into an Atrophie which is a kind of death or privation of the nutritive facultie yet are they not to be accounted as dead so long as they have the use of any sense no nor after they be deprived of all outward senses so long as their hearts do move or their lungs send out breath So that the bodily death of man includes a privation of sense and motion This difference again may be observed in the degrees of bodily death 2. Trees and vegetables alwayes die without pain so do not man and beast For that both of them are endowed with sense and motion both of them are capable of pain And pain if it be continued and extream drawes sensitive death after it Nor can this death approach or finde entrance into the seat of life but by pain And in as much as this kind of life is sweet death which is the deprivation of it is alwayes unpleasant and terrible unto man not only in respect of the pain which ushers it in but in respect of the loss of vitall sweetness which it brings with it The pains of dying may be as great in beasts as in man so is not the loss of that goodness which is conteined in life for reasonless creatures perceive it not A memorie they have of pains past a sense or feeling of pains present and a fear of death when it approacheth But no fore-thought or reckoning of what followes after death This is proper to the reasonable creature Now this Fore-thought of what may follow after makes death more bitter to man then it can be to reasonless creatures And amongst men the more or greater the contentments of life have been and the better they are provided for the continual supply of such contentments the more grievous is the conceipt or fore-thought of death natural unto them The summons of death are usually more unwelcome to a man in perfect health then to a crased body So it is to a man of wealth and credit more then to one of a forlorn estate or broken fortunes So saith Ecclesiasticus Chap. 41. 1. O death how bitter is the remembrance of thee to a man that liveth at rest in his Possessions unto the man that hath nothing to vex him and that hath prosperitie in all things yea unto him that is yet able to receive meat Yet is not the loss of life of sense or the foregoing of worldly contentments the only cause why men naturally fear death For though it deprive them of all these yet doth not the death of man consist in this deprivation The body loseth all these by the divorce which death makes betwixt it and the soul But seeing the substance of the soul still remains the greatest fear which can possess a natural man is the future doubtful estate of the soul after this dissolution Many which never hoped or expected any Re-union or second marriage between the soul and body after death had once divorced them had yet a true Notion that the soul did not die with the body and out of this conceipt some were more afraid of death then any brutish or reasonless creature can be Some other few became as desirous of it as Prisoners which hope to scape are of a Gaol deliverie and thought it a great freedom especially in their discontented melancholy passion to have the keyes of this mortal prison in their own keeping to be able to let their souls and life out at their pleasure But though it be universally true that the corruptible body during the time of this