do as clearly perceive this Natural Idea of GOD as the most Holy Men or Angels If the Scripture then be true there is in Men a Supernatural Idea of GOD There is in all Men a Supernatural Idia of God which altogether differs from this Natural Idea I say in all Men because all Men are capable of Salvation and consequently of enjoying this Divine Vision Now this Capacity consisteth herein that they have such a Supernatural Idea in themselves For if there were no such Idea in them it were impossible they should so know God For whatsoever is clearly and distinctly known is known by its proper Idea neither can it other ways be clearly and distinctly known For the Idea's of all things are Divinely planted in our Souls for they are not begotten in us by outward Objects or outward Causes as the better Philosophy teacheth but only are by these outward things excited or stirred up And this is true not only in Supernatural Idea's of G0D and things Divine and in Natural Idea's of the Natural Principles of Humane Vnderstanding and Conclusions thence deduced by the strength of Human Reason but even in the Idea's of outward Objects which are perceived by the outward Senses As that Noble Christian Philosopher Boetius hath well observed Boetius a Christian Philosopher to which also the Cartesian Philophy agreeth For when I see any outward Object whether it be a Man or Horse or Bird the outward Object doâ— not treat in my Eye nor yet in my Mind the Idea of those things for the outward Object does nothing but Imprint in our sensible Organs a Corporal Motion Now there is nothing in a Corporal Motion that can form in us the Idea's of those things The Motions of the Body and Mind distinguisht for all Idea's are of a Spiritual Nature Now nothing that is Corporal can produce that which is Spiritual because The less Excellent cannot produce the more Excellent else the Effect would exceed its Cause which is against all sound Reason that it should bring forth what were of a higher and more Excellent kind Therefore all Idea's whether of Natural or Spiritual things are Divinely Implanted in our Minds Which nevertheless do not always appear but sometimes appear and sometimes are as it were hid in us and sometimes are stirred up in us by Causes outward or inward and again do as it were sleep and shun our observation and seem not to be otherways distinguished by our Minds but as Thoughts and Perceptions of the Mind from the Mind it self that is as the Mode from the Subject or as a Bodily Motion from the Body whereof it is the Motion For as is the Relation of a Bodily Motion to a Body so is the Relation of a Thought or Perception of the Mind to the Mind In this nevertheless they differ that the Mind can move it self and operate in it self which a Body cannot do but as a Body can be moved by another so also can the Mind after its manner be moved by another and that both by outward and inward Causes but Chiefly by GOD himself in whose Hand all Souls and Creatures are But of these things there is enough said at present and I hope I have not thus far Impertinently Philosophised To return again to the matter in Question It is already proved That there is in a Man a Supernatural Idea of GOD from whence it easily may be concluded There are other Supernatural Idea's in Man also to wit Concerning Divine and Supernatural Things Yea as the Saints Experience doth prove it neither doth sound Reason any ways Contradict it As there are then Natural Idea's concerning the things of the Natural World as for instance Idea's of Light and Colours Supernatural Idea's deducible from the Natural Idea's of Voice and Sounds Idea's of Savouring and Smelling Idea's of Tasting and Feeling as of Heat and Cold of Grief and Joy it follows also that there are Idea's of supernatural things concerning the Divine and Supernatural things of the Divine and Supernatural World as Idea's of those things above mentioned in the Spiritual World And as the Natural Idea's are stirred up in us by Outward and Natural Bodies so those Divine and Supernatural Idea's are stirred up in us by a certain Principle which is a Body in Naturals in Relation to the Spiritual World and therefore may be called a Divine Body Not as if it were a part of GOD who is a most pure Spirit but the Organ or Instrument of GOD The Flesh and Blood of Christ by which the Saints are nourished by which he worketh in us and stirreth up in us these Idea's of Divine things This is that Flesh and Blood of Christ by which the Saints are nourished which is a Mystery to all Vnregenerated and meer Natural Men never to be reached by them while they remain in that State Now if there be such Supernatural Idea's there are also Senses or Perceptive Faculties by which those Ideas are perceived for those are two Relatives that suppose and infer one another But in Wicked men those Senses or Faculties do as it were sleep as the Visive Faculty of a Blind man But in the Godly they are stirred up Now by these Divine and Spiritual Senses which are distinct and distinguishable from all the natural Faculties of the Soul whether of Imagination or natural Reason Spiritual-minded Men do behold the Glory and Beauty of GOD The Beauty of God makes the Glory of this World Despicable in respect whereof and for which all the Glory of this World is despicable to them yea even as dross and dung and tkey also hear GOD Inwardly speaking in their Souls words truly Divine and Heavenly full of Virtue and Divine Life and they savour and tast of Divine things and do as it were handle them with the hands of their Souls And those Heavenly Enjoiments do as really differ in their nature from all false Similitudes and fictitious Appearances of them which either the mind of Man by its own strength can Imitate or any evil Spirit to deceive Man can Counterfeit as a true Man differs from the dead Image of a Man or true Bread Honey Wine or Milk doth from the meer Picture of those things And albeit either the Imagination of Man or Subtilty of the Devil may Counterfeit false Likenesses of these Enjoiments by which Men may be deceived and no doubt many are deceived that doth not hinder but that those Divine Enjoiments are clearly perceived in such in whom the Divine and Spiritual Senses are truly opened The Cause of Mistakes by false Likenesses of Reason and the true Supernatural Idea's of those things truly raised up And if there be at any time a Mistake the Divine Illumination is not the cause of that Mistake but some evil disposition of the Mind as happeneth in those things relating to natural Reason For there are many false Appearances of Reason which differ as much from true
they may be justly punished If these Sayings do not plainly and evidently Import that God is the Author of Sin we must not then seek these mens Opinions from their Words but some way else it seems as if they had Assumed to themselves that Monstrous and Twofold Will they feign of God one by which they declare their minds openly and another more secret and hidden which is quite contrary to the other Nor doth it at all help them to say That Man sins willingly since that Willingness proclivity and propensity to Evil is according to their Judgment so necessarily imposed upon him that he cannot but be Willing because God hath willed and decreed him to be so Which Shift is just as if I should take a Child uncapable to Resist me and throw it down from a great Precipice the Weight of the Child's body indeed makes it go readily down and the Violence of the Fall upon some Rock or Stone beats out its Brains and kills it Now then I pray though the Body of the Child goes willingly down for I suppose it as to its mind is Vncapable of any Will and the weight of its Body and not any immediate stroke of my hand who perhaps am at a great distance makes it Die whether is the Child or I the proper Cause of its Death Let any man of Reason judge if God's part be with them as great yea more Immediate in the Sins of men as by the Testimonies above brought doth appear whether doth not this make him not only the Author of Sin but more Vnjust than the unjustest of men § III. Secondly This Doctrine is Injurious to God because it makes him delight in the Death of Sinners yea 2. It makes God delight in the Death of a Sinner and to will many to Die in their Sins Contrary to these Scriptures Ezech. 33.11 1 Tim. 2.3 2 Pet. 3.9 For if he hath Created men only for this very End that he might shew forth his Justice and Power in them as these men affirm and for effecting thereof hath not only with-held from them the means of doing Good but also predestinated the Evil that they might fall into it and that he inclines and forces them into great sins certainly he must necessarily delight in their death and will them to die seeing against his own Will he neither doth nor can do any thing § IV. Thirdly It is highly Injurious to Christ our Mediator and to the Efficacy and Excellency of his Gospel 3. It renders Christ's Mediation Ineffectual for it renders his Mediation Ineffectual as if he had not by his Sufferings throughly broken down the Middle Wall nor yet removed the Wrath of God or purchased the Love of God towards all Mankind if it was afore Decreed that it should be of no service to the far greater part of Mankind It is to no purpose to alledge that the Death of Christ was of Efficacy enough to have saved all Mankind if in Effect its vertue be not so far Extended as to put all Mankind into a Capacity of Salvation 4. It makes the Gospel a Mock Fourthly It makes the preaching of the Gospel a meer Mock and Illusion if many of these to whom it is preached be by an Irrevocable Decree Excluded from being benefited by it it wholly makes Vseless the preaching of Faith and Repentance and the whole Tenor of the Gospel-Promises and Threatnings as being all relative to a former Decree and Means before appointed to such which because they cannot fail Man needs do nothing but wait for that Irresistible Snatch which will come though it be but at the last hour of his Life if he be in the Decree of Election And be his diligence and waiting what it can he shall never Attain it if he belong to the Decree of Reprobation 5. It makes the Coming of Christ an Act of Wrath. Fifthly It makes the Coming of Christ and his propitiatory Sacrifice which the Scripture affirms to have been the Fruit of God's Love to the World and transacted for the Sins and Salvation of all men to have been rather a Testimony of God 's Wrath to the World and one of the greatest Judgments and severest Acts of God 's Indignation towards Mankind it being only ordain'd to save a very few and for the hardening obduring and augmenting the Condemnation of the far greater Number of Men because they believe not truly in it the Cause of which Vnbelief again as the Divines so called above assert is the hidden Counsel of God Certainly the Coming of Christ was never to them a Testimony of God's love but rather of his Implacable Wrath and if the World may be taken for the far greater Number of such as live in it God never loved the World according to this Doctrine but rather hated it greatly in sending his Son to be Crucified in it 6. It renders Mankind in a worse Condition than the Devils § V. Sixthly This Doctrine is Highly Injurious to Mankind for it renders them in a far worse Condition than the Devils in Hell For these were sometimes in a Capacity to have Stood and to suffer only for their own Guilt whereas many Millions of men are for ever Tormented according to them for Adam's Sin which they neither knew of nor ever were Accessary to It renders them worse than the Beasts of the Field of whom the Master requires not more than they are able to perform and if they be killed death to them is the End of Sorrow whereas Man is for ever Tormented for not doing that which he never was able to do It puts him into a far worse Condition than Pharaoh put the Israelites for though he with-held Straw from them Than the Israelites under Pharaoh yet by much labour and pains they could have gotten it But from men they make God to withhold all means of Salvation so that they can by no means attain it Yea they place Mankind in that Condition Tantalus his Condition which the Poets feign of Tantalus who oppressed with Thirst stands in water up to the Chin yet can by no means reach it with his Tongue and being tormented with Hunger hath Fruit hanging at his very lips yet so as he can never layâ—hold on them with his Teeth and these things are so near him not to Nourish him but to Torment him So do these men They make the outward Creation of the Works of Providence the smitings of the Conscience sufficient to Convince the Heathens of Sin and so to Condemn and Judge them but not at all to Help them to Salvation They make the preaching of the Gospel the Offer of Salvation by Christ the Vse of the Sacraments of Prayer and good Works sufficient to Condemn those they account Reprobates within the Church serving only to Inform them to beget a seeming Faith and vain Hope yet because of a secret Impotency which they had from their Infancy all these are wholly
then makes just he adds But let them have a care lest by too great and empty subtilty unknown both to the Scriptures and the Fathers they lessen and diminish the weight and dignity of so great and Divine a Benefit so much celebrated in the Scripture to wit Justification of the Wicked For if to the formal Reason of Justification of the Ungodly doth not at all belong his Justification so to speak i. e. his being made Righteous then in the Justification of a sinner although he be justified yet the stain of sin is not taken away but remains the same in his Soul as before Justification And so notwithstanding the benefit of Justification he remains as before Unjust and a Sinner and nothing is taken away but the Guilt and obligation to Pain and the Offence and Enmity of God through non-Imputation But both the Scriptures and Fathers do affirm that in the Justification of a sinner their sins are not only remitted forgiven covered not imputed but also taken away blotted out cleansed washed purged and very far removed from us as appears from many places of the Holy Scriptures The same Forbes shews us at length in the following Chapter that this was the Confessed Judgment of the Fathers out of the Writings of those who hold the contrary Opinion some whereof out of him I shall note Calvin Inst. l. 3. c. 11. § 15. As First Calvin saith That the Judgment of Augustine or at lest his manner of speaking is not throughout to be received who although he took from man all praise of Righteousness and ascribed all to the Grace of God yet he refers Grace to Sanctification by which we are Regenerate through the Spirit unto newness of life Chemnitius saith That they do not deny but that the Fathers take the word Justify for Renewing Chemnitius in Exam. Concil Trid. de Just. p. 129. by which works of Righteousness are wrooght in us by the Spirit And p. 130. I am not ignorant that the Fathers indeed often use the word Justify in this signification to wit of making just Zanchius saith That the Fathers and chiefly Augustine interpret the word Justify according to this signification Zanchius in cap. 2. ad Eph. ver 4. loc de Just. Thes. 1.5 to wit of making Just so that according to them to be Justified was no other than of Unjust to be made Just through the Grace of God for Christ. He mentioneth more but this may suffice to our purpose Assert I § VIII Having thus sufficently proved that by Justification is to be understood a really being made Righteous I do boldly affirm and that not only from a Notional Knowledge Christ revealed and formed in the Soul of a man is the formal Cause of man's Justification but from a real inward experimental Feeling of the thing that the Immediate Nearest or Formal Cause if we must in Condescendence to some use this word of a man's Justification in the sight of God is the Revelation of Jesus Christ in the Soul changing altering and renewing the mind by whom even the Author of this inward Work thus formed and revealed we are truly justified and accepted Proof I in the sight of God For it is as we are thus covered and cloathed with him in whom the Father is always well-pleased that we may draw near to God and stand with Confidence before his Throne being purged by the blood of Jesus inwardly poured into our Souls and cloathed with his life and righteousness therein revealed And this is that Order and Method of Salvation held forth by the Apostle in that Divine saying Rom. 5.10 For if when we were Enemies we were reconciled to God by the Death of his Son much more being Reconciled we shall be saved by his Life For the Apostle first holding forth the Reconciliation wrought by the Death of Christ wherein God is near to receive and redeem man holds forth his Salvation and Justification to be by the Life of Jesus Now that this Life is an Inward Spiritual thing revealed in the Soul whereby it is renewed and brought forth out of Death where it naturally has been by the Fall and so quickned and made alive unto God the same Apostle shews Eph. 2.5 Even when we were dead in Sins and Trespasses he hath quickned us together in Christ by whose Grace ye are saved and hath raised us up together Now this none will deny to be the Inward Work of Renovation and therefore the Apostle gives that Reason of their being saved by Grace which is the inward Vertue and Power of Christ in the Soul but of this place more hereafter Of the Revelation of this Inward Life the Apostle also speaketh 2 Cor. 4.10 That the Life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our bodies and v. 11. That the Life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh Now this inward Life of Jesus is that whereby as is before observed he saith We are saved Secondly That it is by this Revelation of Jesus Christ and the New Proof II Creation in Vs that we are Justified doth evidently appear from that Excellent Saying of the Apostle included in the Proposition it self Tit. 3.5 According to his mercy he hath saved us by the washing of Regeneration and Renewing of the Holy Ghost c. Now that whereby we are saved that we are also no doubt Justified by which words are in this respect Synonymous The Immediate Cause of Justification is the inward Work of Regeneration Here the Apostle clearly ascribes the Immediate Cause of Justification to this inward work of Regeneration which is Jesus Christ Revealed in the Soul as being that which formally states us in a capacity of being Reconciled with God the Washing or Regeneration being that inward Power and Vertue whereby the Soul is cleansed and cloathed with the Righteousness of Christ so as to be made fit to appear before God Thirdly This Doctrine is manifest from 2 Cor. 13.5 Examine your own Proof III selves whether ye be in the faith prove your own selves know ye not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you except ye be Reprobates First It appears here how earnest the Apostle was that they should know Christ in them so that he presses this Exhortation upon them and inculcates it three times Secondly The Cause of Reprobation is Christ not known by Inward Revelation he makes the Cause of Reprobation or Not-justification the Want of Christ thus Revealed and known in the Soul whereby it necessarily follows by the Rule of Contraries where the parity is alike as in this case it is evident that Where Christ is inwardly known there the persons subjected to him are Approved and Justified For there can be nothing more plain than this that if we must know Christ in us except we be Reprobates or Vnjustified persons that if we do know him in us we are not Reprobates and consequently Justified ones Like unto
were written and they lay their Separation upon this Which has been followed with an Age of Severity on one hand as Zealous of Church-Discipline and on the other Hand of great Sufferings both in Person and Estate out of Conscience and Zeal for the Simplicity Purity and Example of Scripture-Worship against Humane Inventions But this is neither our Case nor our Dissenters Pretence for we never Assumed to our selves a Faith or Worship-Making-Power nor did any one of the most scrupulous of them ever Charge it upon us We pretend not to Introduce fresh Points of Faith or other Methods of Worship than it pleased God by his Heavenly Light and Spirit to lead us into at the beginning of our blessed Dispensation There are no Forms of Words set Gestures or peculiar Garments Dedicated and Injoined among us or any Novelties as to our Places of Worship Introduced in which we Symbolize with others we Condemned or Differ from our selves in what we once owned Our Case is plain Order not Articles of Faith and the Discipline of Government not of Worship We are a a Society and therefore cannot be longer Independent one of another We believe indeed for our selves and ought to do so and came Voluntarily into this Communion the Ground of it being the Inward Perswasion of our own Minds from a Spiritual Liking of Principles and Practice and above all that Divine Sense and Power which we felt to Vnite our Hearts in the Communion of VVorship without which Primitive Sense and Integrity the best part of the Fellowship will be Lost and the rest be but as a Body without a Spirit But being hereby drawn and engaged in Society there is an Outward a Civil and Temporal Part that must be Considered and Discharged though in Comparison of the Inmost Motives of our Fellowship it is but as a Body to the Soul And in this Sense we are not our own Masters We are in Subjection and must be in Subjection a Kin one to another and Answerable one to another and in some sense one for another at least to those that are without For which Cause we cannot say as Cain Answered God when he asked him Where his Brother was I am not my Brother's Keeper But as the Apostle said We are not our own in Reference to the Title God hath to us and that not only by Creation but by Redemption also and that Faith Worship and Obedience we therefore owe to him So in Society we are not our own but Christ's and the Church's to Good Works and Services yet all in Love For Example All Societies have Poor Sick Aged Widows Orphans c. These cannot be duly regarded and supplied but by the Care of the Whole nor that Care so effectually taken without Method nor that Method settled without the Concurrence of the Communion Here then is Power and here is Order What must he be called that Opposes this But yet further All Societies Marry Trade and Converse promiscuously and have one Time or other some that are Vnjust Litigious Licentious and others that though they may not fall under the Censure of those without yet deviate from their First Testimony and Principles upon which they Joined themselves in Fellowship What is to be done in this Case Has this Society no Power to Establish such wholesom Methods as may prevent Disorder and Scandal both to those within and those without And is she not the proper Judge as well as Authorizer of what is fittest to be done in such Cases Remembring all along that it is not about things relating to Faith and Worship or such a Sort of Exercise of Conscience towards God but about such things as immediately refer to Conversation and Practice among Men wherein nevertheless we ought to have the Fear of God before our Eyes that as the Apostle says We may do all things to the Praise and Glory of God I say here is no need of such an Exercise of Conscience in these things as if it had Faith for an Object Nor would it sound Congruous to Common Sense that because we may reasonably plead Conscience against acknowledging such an Article of Belief or practising such an Institution of Worship which hath God for the Object where Conscience is not satisfied therefore I may say It is against my Conscience to Comply with such Orders as tend to support the Poor visit the Sick help the Aged End Differences Reprove the Licentious Comfort the Tempted Reclaim the Back-slider Or if I should say It is against my Conscience to Ask my Relations Leave or the Woman's I intend to Marry before I propound my Design to her or to give them or the Society I am of any Satisfaction of my Clearness from all others by staying before I marry such a due Time for Inquiry as they think Safe and Decent both for my Credit and their own and which is at the same Time the General Practice of that Society of which I am a Member This I say has no Consequence or Coherence with the other Just Plea of Conscience that has Faith and Worship for Objects It must be therefore at least a Fruit of Inadvertency and Weakness not to Distinguish rightly between the Discipline of Worship where Conformity is Free and the Discipline of Conversation and Society where it is certainly Obligatory or Society Ceases For what is Society but a Voluntary Compound of Independent Persons or the Resignation of Singles into Community And what is every Member's Doing as it Listeth but a Dissolution of that Society and reducing it again into so many Singles or Personal Independencies And this is the Mischievous Consequence of Liberty Misunderstood and Challenged in the wrong Place I beseech God to make Those sensible of it that are concerned in the Mistake of whom I hope and for whom I heartily wish the best that they may see we mean not any thing against the Truth but for the Truth nor to Enthral their Minds but to Adorn their Conversation and that of the whole Society And that what we plead for do's not subject their Consciences but their Conveniences only â—o the General Good which every private Person of Course delivers up to the Benefit of Society when-ever he Joins himself to it and has what is better in the Room of it the Sweetness of Civil or Christian Fellowship For if he serves others which he was not equally obliged to before he is also served of others that formerly owed him no Obligation For the rest it is a good Life which is a Duty incumbent and so no Tyranny in Society to Require it and Censure the Contrary See then the Upshot pray of this whole Matter Conscience is God's therefore not our's to give nor any Man's or Society's to take or Usurp Conveniencies are our's and those we submit to the Benefit of Society when we enter into it for the Advantages we receive from it And a Just and Sober Life is a General Duty and therefore is not
4 5 6 7 8 9. For if there come unto your Assembly a man with a Gold Ring in goodly Apparel and there come in also a poor Man in vile Raiment and ye have Respect to him that weareth the gay Cloathing and say unto him sit thou here in a good Place and say to the poor stand thou there or sit here under my Foot-stool Are ye not then partial in your selves and are become Judges of evil Thoughts Hearken my beloved Brethren hath not God chosen the poor of this World rich in Faith and Heirs of the Kingdom which he hath promised to them that love him but ye have despised the Poor Do not rich men oppress you and draw you before the Judgement-seat Do they not blaspheme that worthy Name by the which ye are called If ye fulfil the Royal Law according to the Scripture Thou shalt love thy Neighbour as thy self ye do well but if ye have RESPECT to Persons ye commit Sin and are convinced of the Law as Transgressors Q. Though that be indeed sufficient to reprove the different Ranks among Christians upon the Account of Riches or Birth Master and Servant yet is there not a Relative Respect among Christians as betwixt Master and Servants What Admonitions gives the Apostle in this Case A. Servants be Obedient to them that are your Masters according to the Flesh with Fear and Trembling in Singleness of your Heart Ephes. 6.5 6 7 8 9. as unto Christ not with Eye-Service as Men-Pleasers but as the Servants of Christ doing the Will of God from the Heart with Good will doing service as to the Lord and not to Men knowing that whatsoever good Thing any Man doth the same shall he receive of the Lord whether he be bond or free And ye Masters do the same Things unto them forbearing Threatning knowing that your Master also is in Heaven neither is there Respect of Persons with him Servants obey in all things your Masters according to the Flesh not with Eye-Service as Men-pleasers but in Singleness of Heart Col. 3.22 23 24 25. fearing God And whatsoever ye do do it heartily as to the Lord and not unto Men knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the Reward of the Inheritance for ye serve the Lord Christ. But he that doth Wrong shall receive for the Wrong which he hath done and there is no Respect of Persons Masters give unto your Servants that which is Just and Equal knowing that ye also have a Master in Heaven Col. 4.1 Let as many Servants as are under the Yoke count their own Masters worthy of all Honour 1 Tim. 6.1 2· that the Name of God and his Doctrine be not blasphemed And they that have believing Masters let them not despise them because they are Brethren but rather do them Service because they are faithful and beloved Partakers of the Benefit These things teach and exhort Exhort Servants to be obedient unto their own Masters Tit. 2.9 10. and to please them well in all Things not answering again not purloining but shewing all good Fidelity that they may adorn the Doctrine of God in all Things 1 Pet. 2.18 19 20 21. Servants be subject to your Masters with all Fear not only to the good and gentle but also to the froward for this is Thank-worthy if a Man for Conscience towards God endure Griefs suffering wrongfully For what Glory is it if when ye be buffeted for your Faults ye shall take it patiently but if when ye do well and suffer for it ye take it patiently this is acceptable with God For even hereunto were ye called because Christ also suffered for us leaving us an Example that ye should follow his Steps Parents and Children Q. What good Admonitions gives the Scripture as to the Relation betwixt Parents and Children Ephes. 6.1 2 3 4. A. Children Obey your Parents in the Lord for this is right Honour thy Father and thy Mother which is the first Commandment with Promise that it may be well with thee and thou may'st live long on the Earth And ye Fathers provoke not your Children to Wrath but bring them up in the Nurture and Admonition of the Lord. Col. 3.20 21. Children Obey your Parents in all Things for this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers provoke not your Children to Anger lest they be discouraged Q. What between Husbands and Wives Husband and Wife A. Wives submit your selves unto your own Husbands as unto the Lord for the Husband is the Head of the Wife even as Christ is the Head of the Church Ephes. 5.22 23 24 25 28 31 33. and he is the Saviour of the Body Therefore as the Church is subject unto Christ so let the Wives be to their own Husbands in every thing Husbands love your Wives even as Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it so ought men to love their own Wives as their own Bodies he that loveth his Wife loveth himself for this Cause shall a Man leave his Father and Mother and shall be joined unto his Wife and they two shall be one Flesh. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his Wife even as himself and the Wife see that she Reverence her Husband Col. 3.19 1 Pet. 3.1 2 7. Husbands love your Wives and be not bitter against them Likewise ye Wives be subject to your own Husbands that if any obey not the Word they also may without the Word be won by the Conversation of the Wives while they behold your Chaste Conversation coupled with Fear Likewise ye Husbands dwell with them according to Knowledge giving Honour unto the Wife as unto the weaker Vessel and as being Heirs together of the Grace of Life that your Prayers be not hindered Q. * Christian's Armour What is the Armour of a true Christian and wherewith ought he to wrestle A. †Ephes. 6.11 12 13 14 15 16 17. Put on the whole Armour of God that ye may be able to stand against the Wiles of the Devil for we wrestle not against Flesh and Blood but against Principalities against Powers against the Rulers of the Darkness of this World against Spiritual Wickedness in high Places wherefore take unto you the whole Armour of God that ye may be able to withstand in the Evil Day and having done all to stand Stand therefore having your Loins girt about with Truth and having on the Breast-Plate of Righteousness and your Feet shod with the Preparation of the Gospel of Peace above all taking the Shield of Faith wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery Darts of the Wicked One and take the Helmet of Salvation and the Sword of the Spirit which is the Word of God Q. What are Christians Weapons and for what End and Weapons A. For though we walk in the Flesh we do not war after the Flesh for the Weapons of our Warfare are not carnal 2 Cor.
few but will acknowledge the Care and Order in these Cases to be Commendable and Expedient Now I come to consider the things of another kind which either verily are or are supposed to be Matters of CONSCIENCE or at least wherein People may lay claim to Conscience in the acting or forbearing of them In which the great Question is How far in such Cases the Church may give positive Orders or Rules How far her Authority reacheth or may be supposed to be binding and ought to be submitted to For the better clearing and Examination of which it will be fit to Consider First Whether the Church of Christ have Power in any Cases that Quest. I are Matters of Conscience to give a positive Sentence and Decision which may be Obligatory upon Believers Secondly If so in what Cases and Respects she may so do Quest. II Thirdly Wherein consisteth the Freedom and Liberty of Conscience Quest. III which may be exercised by the Members of the true Church diversly without judging one another And Lastly In whom the Power decisive is in Case of Controversy Quest. IV or Contention in such Matters Which will also lead us To observe the vast Difference betwixt us and the Papists and others in this particular As to the First Whether the Church of Christ have Power in any Quest. I Cases that are Matters of Conscience to give a positive Sentence and Decision which may be Obligatory upon Believers I Answer Affirmatively she hath Answ. and shall prove it from divers Instances both from Scripture and Reason For First All Principles and Articles of Faith which are held doctrinally Articles of Faith are Matters of Conscience are in Respect to those that believe them Matters of Conscience We know the Papists do out of Conscience such as are zealous among them adore worship and pray to Angels Saints and Images yea and to the Eucharist as judging it to be really Christ Jesus and so do others place Conscience in things that are absolutely wrong Now I say 1. Proof from Right-Reason We being gathered together into the Belief of certain Principles and Doctrines without any Constraint or worldly Respect but by the meer Force of Truth upon our Understanding and its Power and Influence upon our Hearts these Principles and Doctrines and the Practices necessarily depending upon them are as it were the Terms that have drawn us together and the * Yet this is not so the Bond but that we have also a more inward and invisible to wit the Life of Righteousness whereby we also have Vnity with the upright Seed in all even in those whose Vnderstandings are not yet so enlightned But those who are once enlightned this is as an outward Bond and if they suffer themselves to be darkned through Disobedience which as it does in the outward Bond so it doth in the inward Bond by which we became centered into one Body and Fellowship and distinguished from others Now if any one or more so engaged with us should arise to teach any other Doctrine or Doctrines contrary to these which were Ground of our being One who can deny but the Body hath Power in such a Case to declare This is not according to the Truth we profess and therefore we pronounce such and such Doctrines to be wrong with which we cannot have Unity nor yet any more Spiritual Fellowship with those as hold them And so such Cut themselves off from being Members by dissolving the very Bond by which they were linked to the Body Now this cannot be accounted Tyranny and Oppression no more than in a Civil Society if one of the Society shall contradict one or more of the fundamental Articles upon which the Society was contracted it can be reckon'd a breach or iniquity in the whole Society to declare that such Contradictors have done wrong and forfeited their Right in that Society in case by the Original Constitution the Nature of the Contradiction implys such a Forfeiture as usually it is and will no doubt hold in Religious Matters As if a Body be gathered into one Fellowship by the Belief of certain Principles The Disbeliever of the Principles of a Fellowship excludes himself therefrom and scatters he that comes to believe otherways naturally scattereth himself for that the Cause that gathered him is taken away and so those that abide Constant in declaring the thing to be so as it is and in looking upon him and witnessing of him to others if need be to be such as he has made himself do him no Injury I shall make the Supposition in the general and let every People make the Application to themselves abstracting from us and then let Conscience and Reason in every Impartial Reader declare whether or not it doth not hold Suppose a People really gathered unto the Belief of the true and certain Principles of the Gospel if any of these people shall arise and Contradict any of those fundamental Truths whether has not such as stand good right to Cast such a one out from among them and to pronounce positively This is contrary to the Truth we profess and own and therefore ought to be rejected and not received nor yet he that Asserts it as one of us And is not this Obligatory upon all the Members seeing all are concerned in the like Care as to themselves to hold the right and shut out the wrong I cannot tell if any man of Reason can well deny this however I shall prove it next from the Testimony of the Scripture Gal. 1.8 But though we or an Angel from Heaven preach any other Gospel unto you 2 Proof from Scripture than that which we have preached unto you let him be accursed As we said before so say I now again If any man preach any other Gospel unto you than that ye have received let him be accursed 1 Tim. 1.19 20. Holding Faith and a Good Conscience which some having put away concerning Faith have made shipwrack Of whom is Hymeneus and Alexander whom I have delivered unto Satan that they may learn not to blaspheme 2 John 10. If there come any unto you and bring not this Doctrine receive him not into your House neither bid him Rejoyce for so the Greek hath it These Scriptures are so plain and clear in themselves as to this Purpose that they need no great Exposition to the Unbyassed and Unprejudicate Reader Fore-seeing it is so that in the True Church there may men arise and speak perverse things contrary to the Doctrine and Gospel already received what is to be the place of those that hold the pure and ancient Truth Must they look upon these perverse men still as their Brethren Must they cherish them as Fellow-Members or must they judge condemn and deny them We must not think the Apostle wanted Charity who will have them Accursed and that gave Hymenaeus and Alexander over to Satan Hymenaeus and Alexander Instanced after that they had departed from
preaching to the Gentiles and what Weight his and James's Words had in the Contest about Circumcision towards the bringing the Matter to a Conclusion Acts 15. Yet that we may see Infallibility was not inseparably annexed to him he was found blamable in a certain Matter Gal. 2.11 notwithstanding his Sentence was positively received in many particulars So also the Apostle Paul argues from his Gathering of the Churches of Corinth and Galatia that they ought to be Followers of him and positively Concludes in divers Things and upon this Supposition exhorts the Churches both he and Peter in many Passages heretofore mentioned which I will not to avoid Repetition again rehearse To obey the Elders that watch for them to hold such in Reputation and to submit themselves to them that have addicted themselves to the Ministry of the Saints 1 Cor. 16.15 16. Also we see how the Lord makes use of John his beloved Disciple to Inform and Reprove the seven Churches of Asia and no doubt John the Rest by the usual Computation being at that Time all Removed was then the most-noted and famous Elder alive And indeed I mind not where under the Gospel Christ hath used any other Method but that he always in Revealing his Will hath made use of such as he himself had before appointed Elders and Officers in his Church Though it be far from us to limit the Lord so as to Exclude any from this Priviledge nor yet on the other hand will the Possibility hereof be a sufficient Warrant to allow every obscure Member to stand up and offer to Rule Judge and Condemn the whole Body nor yet is it without Cause that such an one's Message is Jealoused and called in Question unless it have very great Evidence and be bottomed upon some very weighty and solid Cause and Foundation And God doth so furnish those whom he raises up in a singular Manner of which as I said I mind no Instance in the New Testament and in the Old we see though it was strange that little David should Oppose himself to the great Goliah yet he had before that killed both the Lion and the Bear which was no less improbable and which of all is most observable was before that Time by the Appointment of God and the Hand of the Prophet Anointed King of Israel Compare the 16th and 17th Chap. of the 1 st of Samuel Now as to the Third That any particular Persons de facto or effectually Assert 3 giving out a positive Judgment Proved is no Incroaching nor Imposing upon their Brethren's Conscience is necessarily included in what is said before upon which for further Probation there will only need this short Reflection That for any Member or Members in Obedience to the Lord to give forth a positive Judgment in the Church of Christ is their proper Place and Office they being called to it and so for them to exercise that Place in the Body which the Head moves them to is not to Vsurp Authority over their Fellow-Members As on the other Hand to submit and obey it being the Place of some so to do is not a Renouncing a being led by the Spirit seeing the Spirit leads them so to do And not to Obey in Case the Judgment be according to Truth and the Spirit lead to it is no doubt both Offensive and Sinfull And that all this may be supposed in the Church of Christ without Absurdity and so establish the above-mentioned Propositions will appear by a short Review of the former Passages If that Peter and James their giving a positive Judgment in the Case of Difference in divers particulars did not infer them to be Imposers so neither will any so doing now being led to it by the same Authority Every one may easily make the Application And on the Contrary if for any to have stood up and Resisted their Judgment pretending an Vnclearness or so and thereby held up the Difference after their Sentence breaking the Peace and Vnity of the Church Things being concluded with an It seemed good to the Holy Ghost and to us I say if such would have given just Cause of Offence Acts 15.21 and have been Cut off as Despisers of Dignities of old will not the like Case now occurring hold the same Conclusion Now whether those Propositions do not hold upon the Principles before laid down and proved I leave to every Judicious and Impartial Reader to judge Moreover we see how positive the Apostle Paul is in many particulars throughout all his Epistles insomuch as he saith 2 Thess. ult v. 14. If any Man obey not our Word by this Epistle note that Man and have no Company with him that he may be ashamed And in many more Places before-mentioned where he Commands them both to Obey him and several others Submission and Obedience to the Judgment of Truth the Spirit of God leads into who were Appointed no doubt by the Spirit of God to be Rulers among them and yet who will say that either the Apostle did more than he ought in Commanding or they less than they were obliged to in Submitting and yet neither were to do any thing Contrary or more than the Spirit of God in themselves led them to or allowed them in And if the Church of God bear any Parity or Proportion now in these Days with what it did of Old as I know no Reason why it should not the same things may now be supposed to take Effect that did then and also be lawfully done upon the like Occasion proceeding from the same Spirit and established upon the same Basis and Foundation And thus much as to that Part to shew In whom the Power of Decision is Which being seriously and impartially considered is sufficient to clear us from the Tyranny either of Popery or any other of that Nature with those that are not either wilfully Blind or very Ignorant of Popish Principles as the Judicious Reader may observe But seeing To manifest that Difference was one of those things propsoed to be Considered of I shall now come to say something of it in its proper Place Section VIII How this Government altogether differeth from the Oppressing and Persecuting Principality of the Church of Rome and other Anti-Christian Assemblies Head III. WHatever Way we understand the Popish Principles in this Matter Prop. 3 whether of those that are Most devoted to the See of Rome as the King of Spain's Dominions Proved and the Princes of Italy the Jesuites and Generality of all those called Religious Orders who hold that Papa in Cathedrâ non potest errare licet absque Concilio that is That the Pope in his Chair cannot Err though without a Council or of those that are Less devoted who plead this Infallibility in the Pope and Council lawfully Convened who yet by the more zealous are reckoned Petty Schismaticks I say whatever Way we take them all those that do profess themselves Members of the Romish Church Principles
of Reason And Thirdly as to Reason I shall not need to say much for whence come all the Controversies The Debates hence arising betwixt the old and late Philosophers Contentions and Debates in the World but because every man thinks he follows Right Reason Hence of old came the Jangles betwixt the Stoicks Platonists Peripateticks Pythagoreans and Cynicks as of late betwixt the Aristotelians Cartesians and other Naturalists Can it be thence inferred or will the Socinians those great Reasoners allow us to Conclude Because many and that very Wise men have Erred by following as they supposed their Reason and that with what diligence care and industry they could to find out the Truth that therefore no man ought to make use of it at all nor be positive in what he knows certainly to be Rational And thus far as to Opinion the same Vncertainty is no less incident unto those other Principles Anabaptists for their Wild Practices and Protestants and Papists for their Wars and â—loodshed each pretending Scripture for it § XIV But if we come to Practices though I confess I do with my whole heart abhor and detest those wild Practices which are written concerning the Anabaptists of Munster I am bold to say as bad if not worse things have been Committed by those that lean to Tradition Scripture and Reason wherein also they have averred themselves to have been Authorised by these Rules I need but mention all the Tumults Seditions and horrible Blood-shed wherewith Europe hath been Afflicted these divers Ages in which Papists against Papists Calvinists against Calvinists Lutherans against Lutherans and Papists assisted by Protestants against other Protestants assisted by Papists have miserably shed ane onothers Blood hiving and forcing men to kill one another who were Ignorant of the Quarrel and Strangers to one another All mean while pretending Reason for so doing and pleading the Lawfulness of it from Scripture For what have the Papists pretended for their many Massacres acted as well in France Tradition Scripture and Reason made a Cover for Persecution and Murder as elsewhere but Tradition Scripture and Reason Did they not say that Reason perswaded them Tradition allowed them and Scripture commanded them to persecute destroy and burn Hereticks such as denied this plain Scripture Hoc est Corpus meâ—m This is my Body And are not the Protestants Assenting to this Blood-shed who assert the same thing and encourage them by burning and banishing while their Brethren are so treated for the same Cause Are not the Islands of Great Britain and Ireland yea and all the Christian World a lively Example hereof which were divers years together as a Theatre of Blood where many lost their lives and Numbers of Families were utterly destroyed and ruined For all which no other Cause was principally given than the Precepts of the Scripture If we then compare these Actings with those of Munster we shall not find great difference for both Affirmed and Pretended they were Called and that it was lawful to Kill Burn and Destroy the Wicked We must Kill all the Wicked said those Anabaptists that we that are the Saints may possess the Earth We must burn obstinate Hereticks say the Papists that the holy Church of Rome may be purged of Rotten Members and may live in peace We must cut-off seducing Separatists say the Prelatick Protestants who trouble the peace of the Church and refuse the Divine Hierarchy and Religious Ceremonies thereof We must kill say the Calvinistick Presbyterians the profane Malignants who accuse the holy Consistorial and Presbyterian Government and seek to defend the Popish and Prelatick Hierarchy as also those other Sectaries that trouble the Peace of our Church What Difference I pray thee Impartial Reader seest thou betwixt these If it be said Object The Anabaptists went without and against the Authority of the Magistrate so did not the other I might easily Refute it Answ. by alledging the mutual Testimonies of these Sects against one another The Behaviour of the Papists towards Henry the third and fourth of France Examples of Popish Cruelties Their Designs upon James the sixth in the Gun-Powder Treason as also their Principle of the Pope's Power to depose Kings for the cause of Heresy and to absolve their Subjects from their Oath and give them to others proves it against them And as to the Protestants Protestant Violences and Persecutions in Scotland England and Holland how much their Actions differ from those other above-mentioned may be seen by the many Conspiracies and Tumults which they have been Active in both in Scotland and England which they have Acted within these Hundred Years in divers Towns and Provinces of the Nether-Lands Have they not often times sought not only from the Popish Magistrates but even from those that had begun to Reform or that had given them some Liberty of Exercising their Religion That they might only be permitted without trouble or hinderance to exercise their Religion promising they would not hinder or molest the Papists in the Exercise of theirs And yet did they not on the Contrary so soon as they had power trouble and abuse those Fellow-Citizens and turn them out of the City and which is worse even such who together with them had forsaken the Popish Religion Did they not these things in many places against the Mind of the Magistrates Have they not publickly with Contumelious speeches Assaulted their Magistrates from whom they had but just before sought and obtained the free Exercise of their Religion Representing them so soon as they opposed themselves to their Hierarchy as if they had regarded neither God nor Religion Have they not by violent hands possessed themselves of the Popish Churches so called or by force against the Magistrates mind taken them away Have they not turned out of their Office and Authority whole Councils of Magistrates under pretence that they were Addicted to Popery Which Popish Magistrates nevertheless they did but a little before acknowledge to be Ordained by God affirming themselves obliged to yield them obedience and subjection not only for Fear but for Conscience sake To whom moreover the very Preachers and Overseers of the Reformed Church had willingly sworn Fidelity and yet afterwards have they not said That the People is bound to force a wicked Prince to the observation of God's Word There are many other Instances of this kind to be found in their Histories not to mention many worse things which we know to have been acted in our time and which for brevities sake I pass by I might say much of the Lutherans whose Tumultuous Actions against their Magistrates not professing the Lutheran Profession are testified of by several Historians worthy of Credit Lutheran Seditions against the Reformed Teachers and Assault upon the Marquess of Brandenburgh c. in Germany Among others I shall propose only one Example to the Reader 's Consideration which fell out at Berlin in the year 1615. Where the
Adam's Sin is Confessed but that that infers necessarily a Guilt in all others that are Subject to them is denied For though the whole outward Creation suffered a Decay by Adam's Fall Death the Wages of Sin Answer'd which groans under Vanity according to which it is said in Job That the Heavens are not clean in the sight of God yet will it not from thence follow that the Herbs Earth and Trees are Sinners Next Death though a Consequent of the Fall incident to man's Earthly Nature is not the Wages of Sin in the Saints but rather a Sleep by which they pass from Death to Life which is so far from being Troublesom and Painful to them as all real punishments for sin are that Prop. 5 6 the Apostle counts it Gain To me saith he to die is Gain Phil. 1.21 Some are so foolish as to make an Objection further saying Object That if Adam's sin be not imputed to those who actually have not sinned then it would follow that all Infants are saved But we are willing Answ. that this supposed Absurdity should be the Consequence of our Doctrine rather than that which it seems our Adversaries reckon not Absurd though the undoubted and unavoidable consequence of theirs viz. that Many Infants Eternally perish not for any sin of their own but only for Adam 's Iniquity where we are willing to let the Controversy â—ist commending both to the Illuminated Vnderstanding of the Christian Reader This Error of our Adversaries is both Denied and Refuted by Zwinglius that Eminent Founder of the Protestant Churches of Switzerland in his Book De Baptismo for which he is Anathematized by the Council of Trent in the fifth Session We shall only add this Information That we Confess then that a Seed of Sin is Transmitted to all men from Adam although Imputed to none Original Sin no Scripture-Phrase until by sinning they actually join with it in which Seed he gave occasion to all to sin and it is the Origin of all Evil Actions and Thoughts in mens hearts 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to wit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it is in Romans 5. i. e. in which death all have sinned For this Seed of Sin is frequently called Death in the Scriptures and The body of death seeing indeed it is a Death to the Life of Righteousness and Holiness Therefore its Seed and its Product is called the Old Man the Old Adam in which all Sin is for which cause we use this name to express this sin and not that of Original sin of which phrase the Scripture makes no mention and under which Invented and Vnscriptural Barbarism this Notion of Imputed Sin to Infants took place among Christians PROPOSITIONS V. VI. Concerning the Universal Redemption by Christ and also the Saving and Spiritual Light wherewith every Man is Inlightened PROPOSITION V. GOD out of his Infinite Love Ezech. 18.32 and 33 11. who delighteth not in the death of a sinner but that all should live and be saved hath so loved the World that he hath given his Only Son a LIGHT that whosoever believeth in him should be saved Joh. 3.16 who enlighteneth EVERY man that cometh into the world Joh. 1.9 and maketh manifest all things that are Reprovable Eph. 5.13 and teacheth all Temperance Righteousness and Godliness And this Light lighteneth the hearts of all in a Day in order to Salvation and this is it which Reproves the sin of all Individuals and would work out the Salvation of all if not Resisted Nor is it less Universal than the Seed of Sin being the purchase of his Death who tasted Death for every Man For as in Adam all die even so in Christ all shall be made alive 1 Cor. 15.22 PROPOSITION VI. According to which Principle or Hypothesis all the Objections against the Universality of Christ's Death are easily solved neither is it needful to recur to the Ministry of Angels and those other Miraculous Means which they say God useth to manifest the Doctrine and History of Christ's Passion unto such who living in the places of the World where the outward preaching of the Gospel is unknown have well improved the first and common Grace For as hence it well follows that some of the Old Philosophers might have been Saved so also may some who by Providence are cast into those Remote Parts of the World where the knowledge of the History is wanting be made partakers of the Divine Mystery if they Receive and Resist not that Grace 1 Cor. 12.7 A Manifestation whereof is given to every Man to profit withal This most certain Doctrine being then received that there is an Evangelical and Saving Light and Grace in all the Universality of the Love and Mercy of God towards Mankind both in the Death of his Beloved Son the Lord Jesus Christ and in the Manifestation of the Light in the heart is established and confirmed against all the Objections of such as deny it Therefore Christ hath tasted Death for every Man Hebr. 2.9 not only for all kind of men as some vainly talk but for every man of all kinds the benefit of whose Offering is not only extended to such who have the distinct outward Knowledge of his Death and Sufferings as the same is declared in the Scriptures but even unto those who are necessarily Excluded from the benefit of this Knowledge by some Inevitable Accident Which Knowledge we willingly Confess to be very Profitable and Comfortable but not absolutely Needful unto such from whom God himself hath with-held it yet they may be made partakers of the Mystery of his Death though ignorant of the History if they suffer his Seed and Light enlightening their hearts to take place in which Light Communion with the Father and the Son is enjoyed so as of wicked men to become holy and lovers of that Power by whose inward and secret Touches they feel themselves turned from the Evil to the Good and learn to do to others as they would be done by in which Christ himself affirms all to be Included As They have then falsly and erroneously Taught who have denied Christ to have died for all men so neither have They sufficiently Taught the Truth who affirming him to have died for all have added the Absolute Necessity of the outward Knowledge thereof in order to obtain its Saving Effect Among whom the Remonstrants of Holland have been chiefly wanting and many other Assertors of Universal Redemption in that they have not placed the Extent of his Salvation in that Divine and Evangelical Principle of Light and Life wherewith Christ hath enlightened Every man that cometh into the World which is excellently and evidently held forth in these Scriptures Gen. 6.3 Deut. 30.14 John 1.7 8 9 16. Rom. 10.8 Tit. 2.11 HItherto we have Considered Man 's fall'n lost corrupted and degenerated Condition Now is it fit to Inquire How and by what means he may come to be Freed out of this miserable
Doctrine of Papists that as the generality of them do not Vnderstand it so the Learned among them oppose it and dispute against it and particularly Bellarmine Thus then as I may say the formal Cause of Justification is not the Works to speak properly they being but an Effect of it but this Inward Birth this Jesus brought forth in the heart who is the Well-beloved whom the Father cannot but Accept and all those who thus are sprinkled with the blood of Jesus and washed with it By this also comes that Communication of the goods of Christ unto us by which we come to be made partakers of the Divine Nature as saith Peter 2 Pet. 1.4 and are made one with him as the Branches with the Vine and have a Title and Right to what he hath done and suffered for us Christ's Obedience Righteousness Death and Sufferings are ours So that his Obedience becomes Ours his Righteousness ours his Death and Sufferings ours And by this Nearness we come to have a Sense of his Sufferings and to suffer with his Seed that yet lies pressed and crucified in the hearts of the ungodly and so travel with it and for its Redemption and for the Repentance of those Souls that in it are Crucifying as yet the Lord of Glory Even as the Apostle Paul who by his Sufferings is said to fill up that which is behind of the Afflictions of Christ for his Body which is the Church Though this be a Mystery sealed up from all the Wise men that are yet Ignorant of this Seed in themselves and oppose it nevertheless some Protestants speak of this Justification by Christ inwardly put-on as shall hereafter be recited in its place Lastly Though we place Remission of Sins in the Righteousness and Expl. 5 Obedience of Christ performed by him in the flesh as to what pertains to the Remote procuring Cause and that we hold our selves formally Justified by Christ Jesus formed and brought forth in us yet can we not as some Protestants have unwarily done Exclude Works from Justification Good Works are not excluded Justification for though properly we be not Justified for them yet are we Justified in them and they are necessary even as Causa sine quâ non i. e. the Cause without which none are justified For the denying of this as it 's contrary to the Scriptures Testimony so it hath brought a great Scandal to the ProProtestant Religion opened the mouths of Papists and made many too secure while they have believed to be justified without good works Moreover though it be not safe to say They are Meritorious yet seeing they Prop. 5 6 are Rewarded many of those called the Fathers have not spared to use the word Merit which some of us have perhaps also done in a qualified Sense but no ways to infer the Popish Abuses above-mentioned And lastly If we had that notion of good works which most Protestants have we could freely agree to make them not only not necessary but Reject them as hurtful viz. That the best works even of the Saints are defiled and polluted For though we judge so of the best Works performed by man endeavouring a Conformity to the outward Law by his own strength and in his own will yet we believe that such works as naturally proceed from this Spiritual Birth and Formation of Christ in us are pure and holy even as the Root from which they come and therefore God Accepts them Justifies us in them and Rewards us for them of his own Free Grace The State of the Controversy being thus stated these following Positions do hencefrom arise in the next place to be proved Position I § IV. First That the Obedience Sufferings and Death of Christ is that by which the Soul obtains Remission of Sins and is the procuring Cause of that Grace by whose inward workings Christ comes to be formed inwardly and the Soul to be made Conformable unto him and so just and justified And that therefore in respect of this Capacity and Offer of Grace God is said to be Reconciled not as if he were actually Reconciled or did actually Justify or account any Just so long as they remain in their Sins really Impure and Vnjust Position II Secondly That it is by this Inward Birth of Christ in man that man is made Just and therefore so accounted by God Wherefore to be plain we are thereby and not till that be brought forth in us formally if we must use that word Justified in the sight of God because Justification is both more properly and frequently in Scripture taken in its proper signification for making one Just and not reputing one meerly such and is all one with Sanctification Position III Thirdly That since good Works as naturally follow from this Birth as heat from fire therefore are they of Absolute Necessity to Justification as Causa sine quâ non i. e. though not as the Cause for which yet as that Good Works are Causa sine quâ non of Justification in which we are and without which we cannot be Justified And though they be not Meritorious and draw no Debt upon God yet he cannot but Accept and Reward them for it is contrary to his Nature to deny his own since they may be perfect in their kind as proceeding from a Pure Holy Birth and Root Wherefore their Judgment is false and against the Truth that say That the holiest Works of the Saints are defiled and sinful in the sight of God for those Good Works are not the Works of the Law excluded by the Apostle from Justification Position I § V. As to the first I prove it from Rom. 3.25 Whom God hath set forth to be a Propitiation through Faith in his blood Proof I to declare his Righteousness for the Remission of Sins that are past through the forbearance of God Here the Apostle holds forth the Extent and Efficacy of Christ's Death The Efficacy of Christ's Death to Redeem man out of Evil. shewing that thereby and by Faith therein Remission of sins that are past is obtained as being that wherein the forbearance of God is exercised towards Mankind So that though men for the Sins they daily Commit deserve Eternal Death and that the Wrath of God should lay hold upon them yet by virtue of that most-satisfactory Sacrifice of Christ Jesus the Grace and Seed of God moves in love towards them during the day of their Visitation yet not so as not to strike against the Evil for that must be burned-up and destroyed but to Redeem man out of the Evil. Prop. 7 Secondly If God were perfectly Reconciled with men Proof II and did esteem them Just while they are actually Vnjust and do Continue in their Sins then should God have no Controversy with them * I do not only speak concerning men before Conversion who afterwards are Converted whom yet some of our Antagonists called Antinomians do aver were Justified from the beginning but also
All which they barely assert but do not offer to prove Again they say It is but a meer Action and applicatio agentis ad passum But how do they prove it Here they are as dumb as Stones Perhaps they think to prove it because Manifestation is a Nomen Verbale which commonly being derived from the Active Verb signifieth an Action but this is meerly to play in words and not to Dispute for they may as well say because the whole World is called the Creation for Creation is an active verbale therefore the whole World is a meer Action or Applicatio agentis ad passum We deny not but the Action or Motion which proceeds from the Spirit of God may also be called a Manifestation but we say the Seed it self is also a Manifestation and those inward heavenly Refreshments which God ministers unto the Souls of his Saints are as real substantial spiritual Manifestations of his goodness as the outward earthly Refreshments to wit Meat and Drink are real substantial natural Manifestations Lastly they query If the Manifestation be a Substance whether is it One Manifestation or all the Manifestations To this we Answer They that please to call the Action or Motion which proceeds from the Spirit of God as an Efficient Cause a Manifestation may easily distinguish Manifestation as it is a Principle or quid permanens or as it is an Action or quid transiens Now to Apply we say The substantial Manifestations of God inwardly to our souls are many as they are quid permanens and per modum principii for as God nourisheth our outward Man not with Bread and Drink once only but often and many are our outward refreshments all which are Substances agreeing in this that they are Manifestations and pledges of Gods bounty unto us so doth he nourish our inward Man with spiritual Bread and Drink not once only but often giving us daily the Super-substantial Bread as the words in the Prayer may be translated and have been by some Learned Men. And thus we have answered their last Argument in their § 5. without recurring to any Idea Platonica a Term they vainly bring in to their Argument to move People to laugh at their Folly And thus we hope it is apparent that we have no need to retract our Answers given in the Dispute as they vainly imagin It would be more labour and expence of Time and Paper than the thing is worth to answer them in all their pitiful ridiculous Reasonings in these matters in every particular Therefore not to weary the Reader nor mispend Time we shall set down some few clear distinct Propositions which shall clearly Answer any seeming Difficulties alledged by them in this whole Section as in relation to Christ. 1. Proposition The Word or Son of God hath the whole intire Prop. i. nature of Man Spirit Soul and Body united to him in the Heavens and he is the same in Substance what he was upon Earth both in Spirit Soul and Body 2. Christ in us or the Seed is not a third spiritual Nature distinct Prop. ii from that which was in the Man Christ Jesus that was crucified according to the Flesh at Jerusalem For the same that is in us was and is in him and as it is in him it s the fulness or Spring of the same in us as the Stream nor is there any difference but such as is betwixt the Spring and the Stream which are one in their nature and substance 3. We say that the same Seed and Life is in us which was in Prop. iii. him and is in him in the fulness as Water is in the Spring and in us as the Stream and this Seed and spiritual Nature which is both in him and us doth belong to him as he is the second Adam or Man Christ. Therefore this Seed being in us the Man Christ is in us not according to his whole Manhood but according unto that which is proper unto it and yet without all division As the natural Life is in all the Members but more principally in the Head and Heart without any Division so this Spiritual Life and nature is both in Christ our Head and in us by which he dwelleth in us as the Spirit of Man doth in the Body and we eat and partake of his Flesh. 4. But if they argue that at least Christ hath three Natures in Prop. iv himself we say Their own Principle will Conclude that as much as ours For the Godhead is One Nature the Nature of the Soul is a Second and the Nature of the Body is the Third and our Adversaries themselves teach that as God is Three Persons in One Nature so Christ is Three Natures in One Person 5. Although the Word or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 should assume into Vnion with Prop. v. it self not only Two Natures but Three it should not make either Two or Three Christs but One. For they grant that the Word hath assumed two to wit the Soul and Body of the Man Christ and yet he is not two Christs but One even as the King is but One King although he possess Three Kingdoms for Ad multiplicationem Obliquorum non multiplicantur Concreta As your Logick teacheth 6. The Seed and Spiritual Body of Christ both in him and in us belonging to Christ as he is the Second Adam is as really and immediately Prop. vi united unto the Word as his outward Body was for the whole Manhood of Christ was united to the Logos and the Logos to it and in it therefore the Sufferings of this Seed and Spiritual Body of Christ in us are as really his Sufferings as these He accomplished at Jerusalem Prop. vii 7. This Seed is not our Souls but is a Medium betwixt God and us and our Vnion with God is but Mediate through this whereas the Vnion of God with this is Immediate Therefore none of us are either Christ or God but God and Christ are in us Prop. viii 8. Seeing this Seed and Spiritual Nature of Christ is one and the same both in him and in us it is most unreasonable to argue that there are as many Christs as Men as it is unreasonable to argue that because the Soul of Man is in all his Members that therefore as many Members as many Souls The Element of the Air is but one only Element although it fill the whole Vniverse betwixt the Stars and the Earth And the Element of Water is but one although it fill many Channels Prop. ix 9. Christ outwardly dyed but once but inwardly he dieth in a Spiritual and Mystical Sense as often as any Crucify him to themselves by their Unfaithfulness and Disobedience as the Scriptures declare Prop. x. 10. As for the Satisfaction of Christ without us we own it against the Socinians and that it was Full and Compleat in its kind yet not so as to exclude the real Worth of the Work and Sufferings of Christ in us nor his present
the Words of Eternal Life which he speaketh in his Servants And as in the Days of his Flesh he was said to speak with Authority or Power and not as the Scribes and the People wondered at the gracious words which proceeded out of his mouth all which import a living Influence and Vertue in the Words of Christ which the Words of the Scribes and Pharisees had not so it is at this Day For Christ doth as really speak by his Spirit in his Servants as he did in his Body of Flesh So that Paul said he spake in him and therefore his Preaching was in demonstration of the Spirit and Power And for this cause true Preachers and Prophets are called good Trees of which Men gather good Fruit whereas bad Men or evil Trees have no good Fruit True Prophets and Preachers distinguished from the fals although they have the Prophets and Apostles Words Also they are compared to wit the False Prophets to Clouds without Rain and Wells without Water although they have good Words yet they have no Rain nor Water Their whole Ministry is dry and empty of Life and Vertue But the True Prophets Ministry is as a Shower of Rain Deut. 32.2 And sometimes it is compared unto Fire as it is said in the Psalm He maketh his Angels or Messengers Spirits and his Ministers a Flame of Fire And Fire was said to go out of the Mouths of the two Witnesses Also the Influences of Life that go forth through the true Prophets in their Ministry are compared to Golden Oil and the Men are compared unto Golden Pipes Zech. 4.12 And therefore the Apostle Peter exhorted the Ministers in his Day To minister of the ability which God giveth as good Stewards of the manifold Grace of God so they ministred not only Words but Grace Many other Testimonies might be cited to prove this Truth Another Instance brought by the Students is That an Heretick forbearing Prayer a Year or two or his whole Life-time may justify himself by this Doctrine To this it was answered That though he may pretend yet he hath no just Ground from our Principle All Men are bound to pray often For we believe That all Men are bound to pray often unto God yea daily and that God doth inwardly call and move all Men often unto Prayer during the Day of their Visitation And when that is Expired or when at any other Time they want that Inward Call or Influence through Vnfaithfulness they are still bound And if they pray not they sin because they ought to have an Influence But that our Account saith All have not Vtterance to pray in Words Vtterance of Words in Prayer is no Excuse for Hereticks For they must needs acknowledge as well as we that all have not Vtterance who may be good Christians seeing some that are naturally dumb may be good Christians and yet they must confess these have not Vtterance Also many good Christians who have no Natural Impediment do want Vtterance in a Spiritual Way to speak or pray vocally in the hearing of others at some times although we believe it is given at times to all that are faithful who have no Natural Defect that they may pray vocally or in the Hearing of others But how oft it is more than we can determine seeing it is not Revealed But if any fail of this Vtterance through Vnfaithfulness their sin is nothing the less if they omit Prayer And thus their last two Instances are also Answered For we do affirm with great Freedom That all who are faithful to the Lord never want sufficient Inspiration or Influence to wait upon God fear him love him desire his Grace and divers other Inward Duties We say not All For some Inward Duties such as Meditation on a particular Subject or Place of Scripture are not always required more than it is always required to speak but if they be unfaithful we deny not but they may and will want them and in that case although they want Inspirations and Influences they are bound to pray yet not without them but with them As a Man that wanteth both Money and Goods to pay his Debt yet is bound to pay his Debt yet he must not nor ought to pay it without Money or Goods The Example is clear and the Application is easie As for that Story they bring in concerning T. M. which that their Deceit may be the more hid they do not positively affirm but only propose by way of Question Have not Quakers declared to People c. To which we Answer That we know not that any Quaker ever declared any such thing and we believe divers things in the Story are utterly false The Story about T. M. Answered for not praying in the Family as pretended If T. M. or any other of our Profession having none in the Family that can join with them in the true Spirit of Prayer but are professed Opposers of the Quakers Way be not so frequently heard pray by them is excusable by your own Way who will not readily pray in our Hearing when they have none to join with them And indeed the want of that true Vnity on the part of those who are not of our Faith doth oft hinder our Freedom to pray in their Hearing unless we have some of our Faith present to join with us We may pray for them as it pleaseth God to move us in their hearing but we cannot so properly pray with them as not being in Vnity with them Where two or three said Christ agree together to seek any thing in my name But let our Adversaries if they can shew us where in the Scripture it is commanded for any Man to pray in the Hearing of others where all present have no Agreement with him Yet we deny not but that God upon some solemn Occasion may move to such a thing especially when a publick Testimony is required as in the Case of Stephen who prayed audibly in the Hearing of others all which were so far from having any Agreement with him that they were at that time stoning him to Death Acts 7. Moreover we could easily upon a more just Ground Retort the Question upon your own Church-Members How many of your own Church-Members were not only for a Twelve month but for many twelve months never heard pray and yet they pass among you for good Christians It is well known that although ye hold Family-Prayer Morning and Evening to be a Duty and the want of it a great sin that yet many thousand Families in the Nation who belong to your Church want it and many whole Families are so grosly Ignorant that none in the Family can go about it even in that Natural Way which ye plead for As for us it doth suffice unto us God heareth Prayer in secret that God heareth us in secret although Men do not so frequently hear us Yet we own with all our Hearts publick Expressive Prayer as it is
Arnoldus pag. 18 19. to which I refer For I believe All Men in a Day have by the gracious Visitation of God's Love an Vnderstanding well disposed to some Divine Revelations which becomes Disposed for others as these are Received which will after in its place be discussed And some Divine Revelations which are Prophetick of things to come may so far manifest themselves by their Self-Evidence even to Men not Regenerate as to force an Assent as in the Case of Balaam mentioned by him did apper What he saith further pag. 36 and 37. inquiring How and after what manner these Revelations were the Object of the Saints Faith of Old is easily answered by applying it to what is before mentioned in Answer to his Queries and Conjectures of the Formal Object For those of Old that had these Revelations Immediately the Formal Object of their Faith was God manifesting himself and his Will in them to them by such Revelations And those who received and obeyed the things delivered by the Patriarchs and Prophets those things so delivered as he confesseth were not the Formal The Material and Formal Object of FAITH but Material Object of their Faith but the Formal Object was GOD by the secret and inward Testimony of his Spirit perswading them in their Hearts that these things declared to them were really his Command and thence inclining and bowing their Minds to an Assent and Obedience to them And albeit pag. 38. he terms this a Wild Assertion yet he hath but said and not proved it to be so and till he prove he needs no further Refutation Neither is it Non-sense nor yet a destroying of the Cause as with the like proofless Confidence he affirms p. 37. That where Revelations are made by outward Voices or in a manner objected to the outward Senses the Cause or Motive of Credibility is not so much because of what the outward Senses perceive as because of the Inward Testimony of the Spirit assuring the Soul that it is GOD so manifesting himself Which Testimony to answer his Question is distinguishable from what is objected to the outward Senses albeit it go always along with it simul semel as they use to say since he with me accounts it a Serious Truth to say The Devil may delude the External Senses and he can far more easily deceive them than the True Inward and Spiritual Senses of the Soul by Counterfeiting the Inward Testimony of the Spirit Since by that the Apostle saith We know and partake of that which neither Eye hath seen nor Ear heard ¶ 9. Pag. 39. He confesseth with me That the Formal Object of the Saints Faith is always the same But yet that he may say something he spendeth the Paragraph in Railing accusing me As writing Non-sense and being an Ignoramus because I bring Instances which relate to the Material Object which himself Confesseth also to be the same in Substance But by his good Leave for all he is so positive in his Judgment I must shew the Reader his Mistake The Formal Object of Abraham's Faith For those Examples of Abraham and others are adduced by me to shew the one-ness of the Formal Object neither has he shewn that they are Impertinent for that End Since as the Formal Object of Abraham's Faith was God's speaking to him by Divine Revelations so is the same the Formal Object of the Saints now and therein stands the Vnity or Oneness of our Faith with him and not in the Material Object which often differs For to offer up his Son was a part of the Material Object of his Faith which is none of ours now And so for as much as he desires to know of me What was the Material Object of Adam 's Faith before the Fall a Question not to the purpose he must first tell me why he so Magisterially and positively denies Christ to have been the Object of his Faith And then he may have an Answer And whereas he flouts at that Reason That Actions are specified from their objects as Non-sensical he should have proved and shewn Wherein And then I might have Answer'd him He might have Wit enough to know that no man of Reason will be moved by his bare Railing Assertions pag. 40. besides a deal of Railing wherein he accuseth me of Confusion and Darkness He accounts my Arguing for Immediate Revelation from the Revelations the Patriarchs and Prophets had Impertinent to which I Answered before The sum of which is that since these Immediate Revelations were so frequent under the Law Revelations frequent under the Law it must be very absurd to say They are Ceased under the Gospel He himself proveth pag. 41. that under the New there is a more clear Discovery according to that of Paul 2 Cor. 3.18 But we all with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord c. which being brought by him albeit against himself I leave him to Answer In this page and the next 42 he alledgeth the sayings of Christ and his Apostles brought by me and my Arguments thence do prove no more than he Confesseth But whether they prove not all I plead for from thence is left to the Reader 's Judgment Here according to his Custom tho I Condemn the Socinians he will be insinuating that I Agree with them to whose Notions of the Spirit albeit I Assent not yet I desire to know of him That the Spirit is a distinct Person of the Trinity no Proof in Scripture for it in what Scripture he finds these words That the Spirit is a distinct Person of the Trinity For I freely acknowledge according to the Scripture That the Spirit of God proceedeth from the Father and the Son and is God And by what Authority he seeks to obtrude upon others Expressions of the Chief Articles of Faith not to be found in Scripture or to accuse such as will not Accept of them and Assent to them or whether any has reason to think he truly makes the Scripture the Rule of his Faith notwithstanding his pretence when he either will not or can not find words in it to Express the Chief Articles of his Creed ¶ 10. Pag. 43. By a strange Mistake he would have me prove since I make use of these promises of Christ relating to the Spirit I would prove that all have Warrant to write Scripture As if no man could have Immediate Revelation without he write Scripture Whereas himself Confesseth that many of the Patriarchr had it before Moses who yet wrote no Scripture yea and Cain whom I suppose he judgeth to have been no Writer of Scripturs And by the like Mistake pag. 55. He Confesseth all I plead for J. B's Self-Contradiction in granting Revelation and Contradicts all he has been fighting for in affirming That Believers now have free Access to Christ the great Teacher of his People always to get his mind known and Written in their Hearts but not to get Prophetick Revelations
Printer the Figures may be misplaced and so miss Truly they must be very happy that can secure themselves from this hazzard he has not been so happy who denied the Words to be in a place where the knowing of it depended not upon the diligence of others but of his own locking to it as I have just now shewen Pag. 315. to prove That Justified is not taken in the Epistles of the Apostle Paul to the Romans Corinthians Galatians for Making Just as I affirmed in the Passages cited by me he saith To take it so would make the Apostle Contradict himself But this he affirms upon the meer Supposition that the Apostle with him Excludes all Works from Justification which is but to beg the Question as will after appear What he adds here and in the following page in answer to the Citations I bring out of divers Protestant Authors I need not trouble the Reader with a Reply to it because he turns by the most material of them as not having the Authors by him to examin them Others he positively Rejects as not agreeing with them as Forbes and Baxter And at last Insinuates That the Trial is not to be by Humane Testimonies for such he accounts all the Writings of his Brethren whereunto I do very well agree Only I brought some of his own Folks not as if I needed them to Confirm me in my Opinion but as having Weight with those among whom they are esteemed Doctors In this page answering what I urge from Rom. 8.30 shewing how in that Golden Chain Sanctification must be excluded or Justification must be taken in its proper Sense he saith That Sanctification is comprehended under Vocation If this be true which he asserts then he gives again away his Cause for then no Man is sooner Called than he is Sanctified and since he will not say seeing he disclaims to be an Antinomian that any Man is Justified before he be Called it follows then necessarily That no Man is Justified No Man is justifed before he be Sanctified before he be Sanctified and then to what purpose has he been fighting and wrestling all this while Pag. 316. N. 33. he acccuses me of Vnparalleled Falshood Impudency and Boldness for saying That I have sufficiently proved that by Justification ought to be understood to be made really Just whereas I undertook only to prove that the Word might be so understood without Absurdity Adding I wonderfully conclude a must be from a may be c. But the best is his greatest Charges are built either upon forged Calumnies or his own pitiful Mistakes I never Concluded by Justification ought to be understood to be made really Just only upon that which I said from the Etymology of the Word nor by Justification there did I understand meerly the Word but I conclude from all my Scripture-Arguments of the thing as my following Words manifest where I say We know it from Sensible Experience But he may be sure it is not the Etymology of the Word we know so And if thence he urge That this falleth not under the inward Sensation of the Soul he but fights with his own Mistake For that the Real Justification of the Saints falleth under the Inward Sensation of the Soul I think no Man of Sense will deny for Christ is formed in the Mind where he is said to be Revealed Inwardly and that gives a Sense of Justification Albeit he seem to wonder at it asking What Scripture speaketh so He may read Gal. 1.16 Whether was not the Apostle here Justifyed and under the Sense of it He is angry p. 317. that I call the Life of Christ an Inward and Spiritual Thing but will he say it is an Outward and Carnal Thing The Life of Christ is an Inward and Spiritual thing But what thinks he of 2 Cor. 4.10 11 He Confesseth This Life of Christ supported and carried the persecuted Apostles through many Miseries and Deaths Will he say then it was not an Inward and Spiritual thing that carried them through these Trials But he addeth But who except a Quaker could say That the Apostle says We are Justified by this Life I answer All except such Absurd Men as will deny that where we are said to be Saved by a thing we are said to be Justified by it Rom. 5.10 Tit. 3.5 we are said to be saved by Regeneration And whereas he saith The Apostle saith not That this is the Formal Objective Cause of Justification These are Words the Apostle useth not at all and therefore no wonder there be no Word of it here He looks upon it as being Absurd for me to think that Reprobation is Non-justification but I would know of him if there be any Reprobates who are Justified That the Marks and Evidences are not always taken from the Immediate Nearest and Formal Cause I confess but that therefore the not having Christ revealed in the Soul is only a Sign and no Cause of Reprobation remains for him to prove The Cause Reprobation Wickedness is a Sign of Reprobation will he therefore affirm it is not the Immediate nor Formal Cause of it After the same manner he denieth p. 319. That we must lean to that which the Apostle calleth Col. 1.27 28. Christ within the Hope of Glory his Reason is because the Apostle saith Phil. 1.28 And in nothing terrified by your Adversaries which is to you an evident Token of Salvation asking Must we also lean to that in Justification But will he say there is no difference betwixt that which is only a Token and Christ within If there be his Reason concludes nothing ¶ 6. Lastly he comes to answer The Necessity of Good Works to Justification what I say of the Necessity of Good Works to Justification And what I urge from Isai 2. he confesseth that Good Works are an Instrumental Cause Which Concession doth prove all I Affirm If they be an Instrumental Cause they must be a Cause sine qua non and Necessary since the Instrumental Cause of a thing must be necessary towards its being What! though Abraham was Justified before he Offered up his Son it will not follow that he was Justified without Works His Absurdity as if it would thence follow That no Man is Justified when he sleeps or is not actually doing some Work looks liker the Objection of a Man Sleeping who knows not what he saith than of one Awake for by the same way it might be said that Faith is not Necessary since Men do no more actually believe than do Good Works when they are sleeping My Argument deduced from Heb. 12.14 Matth. 7.21 John 13.17 1 Cor. 7.19 Revel 22.14 he sayes proves the Necessity of Works unto final Salvation but not to Justification and if it do so it doth the business unless he will say that full and perfect Justification is not sufficient to Salvation My answer to their first Objection he observes but replies not To the second answering what
Charge in this Chapter is indeed great enough J. B. calls the Movings of the Power of God upon the Quakers Devilry and that they are certianly acted by the Devil in their Assemblies if he could make it out and that is That the Quakers are guilty of Devilry and are certainly acted by the Devil in their Assemblies But this he only strongly affirms without Proof unless one which whether it be valid or not comes now to be Examined And that is pag. 418. from my saying That there will be sometimes an inward Struggling yea so as the Body will be strangely moved To this he adds a Story of one Gilpin long ago answered and describeth these Motions of the Quakers to be Foam Swell and Froth at the Mouth Which is false and returneth upon him as a Calumny however he compares these Motions of the Body as Asserted by me to the Work of the Devil and the old Pythonicks But it seems Malice hath wonderfully blinded the Man here else he would not have given his own Cause which he esteems The great Cause of God so deep a Wound For in the Book called The Fulfilling of the Scriptures a Treatise much applauded by them whose Author is said to be Robert Fleeming Vnusual Motions Asserted by J. B's party of their own Hearers as of the Power of God which J. B. calls Devilry in others one of their Non-conforming Brethren he relates as a Convincing Proof of the Power of God how some were so choked and taken by the Heart that they were made to fall over and so carried out of the Church And as a convincing Appearance of God and down-pouring of the Spirit that there was a strange and unusual Motion on the Hearers which by the Profane was called The Stewarton Sickness from the Name of the Parish Now what difference is betwixt this and my speaking of Mens being strangely moved by the Power of God Will not this prove as much that all this way Devilry and the passions of the old Pythonicks Since these Motions are made the great Argument why the Quakers are said to be Acted by the Devil let him the next time assign clear Reasons according to Scripture Why these Motions upon the Presbyterian Bodies are a Convincing Sign of the Working of the Power of God among them but that the Motions on the Quakers Bodies are enough to Confirm they are Acted by the Devil And if he do this effectually he may be in some Hopes of gaining a Proselyte Next to this I come to consider what he urges as a great Absurdity to wit That the Quakers turning their Minds inward which he will needs term Introverting and not interpret the Word that he may make Ignorant Folks believe For Men to abstain from their own Thoughts is in J. B's Sense a becoming worse than Brutes c. it is a piece of the Quakers Devilry and laying side all their own Thoughts and Imaginations were a laying aside both Christianity and Humanity a becoming no Men but Brutes and worse and most capable to be deluded by the Devil Upon this he insists pag. 414 422. and elswhere as if for Men to abstain from their own Thoughts and Imaginations were the way to Vnman them Yet if he will understand it of the Old Man the Man of Sin that is Corrupted we will say with the Apostle That ought to Die and be Crucified And are so far from thinking this is against Christianity that we believe according to Scripture it is the Way to become a Christian and to overcome the Devil not to lay our selves open to him And therefore his Railing against Man's Silence from his own Thoughts That God may speak and work in him doth evidence his great Ignorance in the work of a true Christian for this is so far from Descending from Humanity to Brutism that it is rather an Ascending from Humanity to Divinity so that albeit in one sense we are said to Die or be Emptied as to our selves To Die to Self is Life and Love in Christ the Crucified yet we do more truly Live and Exist And if he think this a Contradiction let him consider that of the Apostle Gal. 2.20 I am crucified with Christ nevertheless I live yet not I but Christ liveth in me and this if rightly Considered will answer his Questions pag. 422. by answering of which he would have me Clear my Way of Devilry As for any Arguments in this Chapter that have the least shew of solidity or weight I have looked narrowly but can find none only instead thereof he has some little nibbling Quibbles and Questions which albeit they be so Inconsiderable as scarce deserve the pains to Answer yet lest he may think something of them if omitted I will now take notice of them and Answer them As first pag. 412. he asketh Set times and places for to Worship do not stint the Holy One. Whether the appointing of set Times and Places be not a limiting of the Spirit Answ. If it were to Exclude other times and places when God moves thereunto it might be so judged but other ways it is not for Meeting together is not an Immediate Act of Worship but a matter of Outward Conveniency and therefore needs not always a particular Motion As for his desiring me in this page to Answer what he has said of the Sabbath the denying of which in their sense he accounteth a great Error I must wait then till he come to his matter which he has not done in his first Tome which I have only seen as yet albeit it be a Book about an hundred Sheets of Paper and when he has written all that he can say upon that Subject I doubt whether it may not be sufficiently Refuted by a few Lines which Calvin has written thereon Inst. lib. 2. cap. 8. § 34. from whom as well as the generality of Protestants I know not that I differ in this matter J. B.'s Preparation to Worship proceeds in Infinitum Pag. 413. he proposeth as an Exception against the manner of Worship expressed by me That it wanteth that preparation requisite which he accounts to be some Impression of that Divine Majesty with whom they have to do But I see no reason why he should Accuse us for Want Of this since none can be more fit than such as make Silence and an Inward Turning of the mind necessary to their Entring to Worship but if he understand this by Outward Prayer meaning this should be done first since it is an actual part of Worship by which we draw near to that Majesty there would be a preparation to that by the same Rule and another to that and so a progressus in infinitum But a Godly Frame of Spirit The true Preparation and a Studying to be found always in the sence of God's holy fear in all things is a good general preparation to all Acts of Worship And for his crying out against Silence as