God Of the first the Apostle Saint Paule saieth VVee are predestinated into the adoption of the sonnes of God and therefore to a heauenlie inheritance of the other that it was done for the praise of the glory of his grace 6 The saluation therefore of the elect in Iesus Christ is certaine and necessarie the foundation whereof is the ternall free and vnchaungable purpose of the will of God 7 Who so haue beene chosen from the beginning in Christ vnto life euerlasting and to the meanes thereunto all they and onely they in the time appointed of the father ver 7 which is called the fulnesse of time were in verie deede through Christ and in Christ redeemed from their sinnes and so from the euill which followeth sinnes the Apostle saying in Iesus Christ vvee haue redemption euen remission of sinnes 8 Neither were we redeemed Tit. 3. v. 5 ver 7. according to the merits works of righteousnes which we haue done but according to the mercies of God and according to the riches of his grace by the blood of Christ Iesus both which are manifestly confirmed by the Apostle 9 And albeit the eternall father redeemed saued vs by his sonne by whome he also created vs yet the â—onne is he which by an especiall respect the church of God vseth to call the redeemer of mankinde and our Sauiour 10 For the Sonne alone Lev. 25. ver 48.49 was and is God and man and he alone had the right of proprietie as they call it or of kindred to redeeme vs hee alone shedd his blood whereby as by a ransome we were redeemed Lastlie he it is alone in whose person our redemption is made perfect and accomplished 11 By the name of this ransome which wee are said to haue in Christ â— Cor. 1. v. 30 wee meane that full and accomplished redemption in as much as it containeth not onely remission of sinnes in this life but also in the life to come after this a perfect deliuerance from all ill and from the bondage of all corruption so that there is no ransome which we haue not in Christ our most perfect redeemer who as he is made vnto vs by God our wisedome righteousnes sanctification so also our redemption Of the resurrection of Christ Iesus from the dead his ascension into heauen and sitting at Gods right hand out of the first of Paule to the Ephesians yeare 1581. 1 GOd did effectually shewe the greatnes of his power in Christ Eph. 1. â—â— by raising him from the dead therefore onely God by his infinite power is the efficient cause of the resurrection of Christ and all the dead 2 Yea but Christ also by his power raised him selfe from death as he said destroy this temple Ioh. 2.19 and in three dayes I will build it vp but hee spake of the temple of his bodie and that Ioh. 10.17 I lay downe my life that I may take it againe Christ therefore is no lesse God then the father neither is hee God of lesser might 3 But one and the same cannot be truely the raiser and the raised from the dead vnlesse he consist of diuers natures of the diuine according to which he doth raise and the humane according to which he is raised Therefore the same Christ as he is true God coessentiall with the father so hee is true man coessentiall with his mother and his brethren 4 Neither can any bee truely said to be raised and to rise from the dead vnlesse the same bee truely said to be dead and to haue died But death consisteth in a true separation of the soule froÌ„ the bodie whereby the body which dieth may presently bee rightly called a dead carkasse Christ then if he truely rose from the dead it can by no meanes be denied but that he also truely died his soule being truely separated from his bodie 5 If then sith he truely died neither his soule for that time of his death was in his bodie neither sith he was truely buried his bodie while it honge vppon the crosse was in the graue or while it lay in the graue hong vppon the crosse neither sith God truely raised him from the dead either his soule recalled his body or his body recalled himselfe from death to life therefore the humane nature in Christ was neither omnipotent nor euery where present in it owne substance 6 For as this consequence is not good Christ Iesus himselfe was dead and buried and rose againe from the dead therefore he was dead and buried and rose againe according to both his natures So neither is this behold I am vvith you euen to the ende of the vvorlde therefore not onely in his deitie but also in the substance of his humanitie hee is really present with vs on the earth 7 But as this consequence is good Christ being God suffered therefore he suffered not according to his deitie but according to his humanitie so is this other Christ Iesus being man is euerie where and simply omnipotent therefore he is euery where and omnipotent not according to his humanitie but according to his deitie seing the diuine nature is no lesse vnited to the humane then the humane is to the diuine in the same person of Christ Iesus 8 If God himselfe and so the diuine nature in Christ raised his body from the dead not by the same bodie but by it selfe namely by the diuine nature then it is false that the diuine nature in Christ did all things and doeth not onely in and with but also by the humane nature 9 For the soule of Christ Iesus doth not work all thinges by the bodie as neither doe our mindes vnderstand or will thinges by the bodies and that for this cause that as the philosophers also taught our minde dependeth not on the bodie Much lesse then doth the deitie of Christ worke all thinges by the flesh which it tooke 10 For doth the deitie vnderstand by the humane vnderstanding or doeth it will by the humane will or doth it keepe or sustaien the humane nature in the person of the word by the verie same humane nature or doth it beare all thinges by the humane flesh or rather by the word of it owne vertue Lastlie if the forme of God doe nothing but by the forme of a seruant how can that saying of Leo be true each fo rme doth the propertie of it selfe vvith communion of the other 11 Like as therefore the forme of God is one and the forme of a seruant another so the actions and proprieties of the one and of the other be diuers though manie times both the one the other haue one and the same worke and operacion 12 Wherefore this is no coÌ„sequence to whomsoeuer Christ commeth with the father according to the forme of God to him he also commeth and abideth in him in his owne substaÌ„ce according to the forme of a seruant much lesse that he is so euery where 13 Further
Christ and he shall raigne in the house of Iacob for euer and the Apostle that he is as the sonne ouer his owne house and this house we are that is the church and in another place that he is the head of the church Eph. 5.23 the same is the Sauiour of his bodie II. Christ ordereth his church partly by himselfe and partly by assistance of fellowe labourers But the gouernment wherewith Christ guideth his church we know to be two fold one wherein he of himselfe and by his holy spirit without any help or seruice of man Phil. 2.13 Eph. 1.23 raigneth inwardly in the hearts of beleeuers and worketh in them to will and to performe and is euen all in all and mooueth vnto that which is good defending vs from euill against Sathan the worlde and all our enemies The other wherein he so guideth the church as hee also vouchsafeth to vse the help and ministerie of others aswell Angells as men especially to the preseruation of the church As of Angells the Apostle speaketh Heb. 1.14 They are ministring spirits sent forth to minister for their sakes which shal bee heires of saluation 1. Cor. 3.5.9 and of men he saieth Wee are Gods ministers by whome yee haue beleeued For like as in a man the head of it selfe by vertue of the minde which liueth worketh chieflie therein doeth so rule the whole bodie that it also vseth the helpe of euerie member to the profite of the whole bodie so Christ the head of the church doth in like sort beare himselfe in the gouernment thereof not for his owne cause or that hee needeth our ministerie but doth it for our necessitie yea for our manifest commoditie and honour III. A difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men By the way wee acknowledge a difference betweene the ministerie of Angells and of men sith the Angells are not sent either to teach in the church or to administer Sacraments but to performe other dueties those for the most part inuisible neither come they ordinarily alwaies and to all but at such time and to such persons as God sendeth them but the ministerie of men is apparent and perpetuall and pertaineth to euerie one IV. Jt was most aduisedly done that Angells should not teach in the church but men And wee know it was most wisely and aduisedly done of God that Christ should teach in his church not by Angells but by men both because we can not more willingly suffer our selues to be informed familiarly of our equalles then to be taught of spirits of a farre diffring nature with an vnaquainted maiesty and also because we might more easily be deceiued of Satan falsly faining himselfe to bee sent of God and transforming himselfe to an Angel of light And those surely in our iudgement are two not the least causes why the sonne of God when he was to fulfill the office of a teacher in the church would bee made a man and our brother and familier and like vnto vs in all thinges sinne onely excepted whereto that same tendeth Heb. 4.15 Heb. 2.12 Heb. 1.1 I vvill declare thy name to my brethren in the midst of the congregation will I praise thee and that same In these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his sonne namely being nowe made man and liuing familiarlie in the church V. There be two kinds of men especially whose ministery Christ vseth to the gouernment and preseruation of the church And although there be not one member in this whole great body of the church but Christ vseth the same to some profite of the other mēbers 1. Cor. 12.7 and so of the whole bodie as Paule teacheth yet wee acknowledge two principall kindes of men whose help and seruice he is wont to vse for the gouernment and preseruation of the church namely first teachers and others to administer the word sacraments other ecclesiasticall dueties then godly princes and magistrats whose ministeries or offices we confound not but acknowledge them to be distinct and verie diuerse among which differences this also is not the least that the ministerie of teachers is alwaies verie necessarie to the church but of politicke magistrates not so sith the former the church cannot bee without but the other it often hath wanted and may want them VI. About what matters especially the ecclesiasticall ministerie is imployed But as the summe of christian pietie consisteth in three things in faith in Christ in continual repentance that is in the mortification of our flesh and of our sinnes and quickening of the spirite and lastlie in charitie towards our neighbour so also wee acknowledge three principall parts of the ecclesiasticall ministerie First to teach and to preach the worde of the gospell and also to administer the sacraments and offer vpp the publike sacrifice of praise to God through Iesus Christ Secondly to declared by the Apostles and lastly to do all such things which though they be not expressed in the scriptures yet doe belong to order and to decencie and do make for edification and not for destruction according to the generall rule giuen by the Apostle 1. Cor. 14.40 that all things ought to be done in the church in order decently and to edification Neither thinke wee that any authoritie is giuen vnto ministers beyonde the boundes of the word of God or to any other ende then for edification therefore we denie that one Bishop or all Bishops together haue authoritie to appoint any thing against the scriptures to adde or detract any thing or chaunge any thing in them to dispense with the commaundements of God to make new articles of faith to institute new sacraments to bring new rites into the church to prescribe any lawes which may binde consciences or may be thought equall to gods law to forbid any things which God hath graunted and left free or lastly to commaund any thing without the word of God as necessary to saluatiō sith not the whole church can haue or truely be said to haue this authoritie XXI The Bishops which are also princes their politicall authoritie is not denied By the way we disallow not but that bishops which are also princes besids their ecclesiasticall authoritie they haue also their politicall rites and secular powers euen as other princes haue the law of commaunding in secular causes the law of the sword some of them the law of choosing and confirming kinges and emperors and of directing and ordering other politicall matters and to constraine people that are their subiects to do them obedience and therefore we confesse that their politicall commandements which may be kept without breach of Gods law are to be obeyed by their subiects not onely for feare but also for conscience sake Rom. 13.5 For we know that all power is of God Rom. 13.1.2 and vvhosoeuer resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God and that kings are to be honoured 1. Pet. 2.17 and that we
malice and therefore he had no part in the kingdome of Christ Many also as saith Augustine doe eate the bread of the Lord but not the bread the Lord. For as they that heare the gospel are not all made partakers of the forgiuenes of sinne declared therein vnlesse they repent them of their former ill-life and doe beleeue in Christ so neither do they obtaine those things which are represented and offred by the sacraments because they receiue the same sacramentes vnlesse they haue also true repentance and faith XIV By the vnworthinesse of the receiuers the vertue of the Sacraments is not taken away nor weakened Neither yet do we thereby weaken or take away the vertue of the sacraments and the force and power giuen vnto them of God which we acknowledge to depend not vpon the vnworthines of the ministers or receiuers but on the faith and vertue of Christ the institutor of the sacraments For euen as the gospell doth keepe vnto it selfe alwaies both the signification though it bee not vnderstood of all and the power of giuing all things which it offreth though all bee not made partakers thereof euen so the sacraments those visible wordes doe the like namely that as the gospell of it selfe is the power of God to saluation but indeed to none but the beleeuers So also the sacramentes are alwaies the working instruments of the holy ghost to saluatiō howsoeuer none receiue this powerfull working but the true beleeuers For which cause the Apostles feared not to call them all which were baptized 1. Cor. 6.11 holy renued righteousse although they knew that among them were many hypocrits For by such speaches they declared the great power giuen by God vnto the sacraments what we should beleeue they would work vnlesse perhaps our hypocrisie did hinder them In which sence if a man saye that who so doe eate the bread of the Lord they also are made partakers of the Lords body that is it cannot stand with the vertue of the sacrament and with the vertue of the author and distributor thereof but who so be partakers of the sacramēt must needs also be partakers of the thing signified and offered by it such a manner of speach we cannot disallow so that such expositions might be added by which the people might be instructed and those false opinions conceiued before of the worke wrought might be drawne out of their mindes XV. Betvveene the signes and the matters is a sacramentall vnion and what it is And although we saye that the matter of the sacraments is not tied to the sacraments or included in them namely either physically or locally or corporally or also by any knott or bande as though God had simply promised the very matters themselues to euery one that should receiue the sacraments howsoeuer they lacked faith so that he were bound to communicate them vnto vnrepentant and vnbeleeuers yet we take not away all coniunction and copulation of the thing signified with the signes For we acknowledge confesse a sacramentall that is such an vnion as is agreeable to a sacrament with the thinges of the Sacrament And this sacramentall vnion consisteth in a certaine mistical and holy relation namely in as much as the signes do signifie the things and offer them to be receiued the things are signified by the signes and are giuen to be receiued no otherwise thē the vnion is betweene the word signifying exhibiting and betweene the things by the word signified and exhibited But the coniunction aswell that of the sacraments as this of the word with the things themselues hangeth or dependeth vpon the wil and counsell of God the institutor who when he instituted the preaching of the gospell and administration of the sacraments did institute them to this ende and purpose as is declared both that we hearing the word and seeing and receiuing the signes should by by lift vpp the eyes of our minde to the things signified by them beeing offred vnto vs should receiue them with the hands of faith and might indeed be vnited vnto Christ whom they preach vnto vs and shewe as it were with the finger by their signification Therefore as the coniunctiō of vs with Christ is al full of mistery as the Apostle teacheth in the 5. to the Ephe. So also we thinke this vnion both of the word sacramēts with the things wherof they be signes and sacraments to be misticall and spirituall XVI A definition of the sacraments We iudge therefore sacraments in fewe wordes to comprehend manie things to bee externall signes and such as are obiect to our senses ioyned to the word of the gospell according to Christes institution for our ignorance and infirmitie and the more earnestlie to stirre vp and confirme our faith by which all men are seriously called to the true and reall communion with Christ and so with his flesh and blood and consequently to the parking of all the good things which ar in Christ and which are signified offred by the word and by the signes and as for the elect faithfull they are indeed drawne by the holy spirit inwardly working in their mindes that they being incorporated to Christ may accomplish and make vpp the bodie of the whole church preordained of the Father to his owne praise and glorie and their eternall blessednesse XVII The sacraments of the old Testament what in general they had in them common vvith ours Touching the sacraments of the old Testament there is no cause we should speak much seing they are quite abrogated only this that the Fathers had the same God the same promises the same mediatour the same spirite of regeneration the same faith and hope and the same sacraments in respect of the substance which is Christ howsoeuer in cerimonies they were diuerse from ours especiallie sith theirs were deliuered to them for the same ende and purpose for which ours were deliuered to vs namely that they might bee confirmed in the faith of Christ and bee ioyned in communion with him Whereunto belong those sayings The lambe slaine from the beginning of the worlde Apoc. 13.8 1. Cor. 10.4 Heb. 13.8 Also All did drinke of the same rock and the rocke was Christ And Christ yesterday to day and for euer XVIII There be onely two sacraments of Christs church And wee acknowledge two sacramentes which are properly to be called by that name and which haue euer bin common to the vniuersal church of Christ Baptisme the Lords supper of which the one properly belongeth to the beginning of the communion with Iesus Christ the other to the increase whereupon also the one is called the water of regeneration the other the holy banquett and supper XIX Errors Wherefore we cannot allow of those who will haue sacramentes to be there where no word is heard but only the element seene nor those which distinguish not the matter of the sacrament from the sacrament but will haue it come into the mouth aswell
remembrance of it and to waigh in their minds to what ende they were baptized or what they haue obtained of God by baptisme what also they promised to God therein whereby they may the more be confirmed in faith and grow vp into the communion with Christ and bee made more carefull of performing their dueties For baptisme is not bestowed on vs for remission of originall sinne onely or our sinnes past but of all the offences of our whole life euē as the pulling out of the waters is a signe of a newe life not for one day but for al our time as the Apostle saith Rom. 6.4 VVe are buried with him euer into his death by baptisme that as Christ rose from death by the glory of his father so we should alwaies walke in newnesse of life Wee were once washed with outward water but the blood of Christ is a continuall streame washing and cleansing vs daily from our sinnes VIII By whome baptisme ought to bee administred Wee beleeue also that holie baptisme is to bee administred by those by whome also the gospell is preached For to whom Christ said Goe into the whole worlde and preach the gospell to them he also said Baptizing them in the name of the father and the sonne and the holy ghost teaching them to obserue whatsoeuer is commaunded you IX Errors Therefore we condemne all aswell auncient as late herisies which haue at anie time beene scattered against the sound doctrine of baptisme Seleucus and Hermias who baptized with fire The Cerdonians and Marcionites who vsed another forme of words then that which was prescribed by Christ baptized in the name of another God then of the father sonne and holy ghost those also which baptized in the name of Iohn or any other man the Cataphriges who baptized dead mē with all Donatists and Anabaptists who rebaptize them which come vnto them which denie that infants ought to be baptized and those also that denie baptisme to be true vnlesse there bee added exorcismes spittle salt and other cerimonies deuised by men CHAP. XVI Of the Lords supper BY that which we haue saide of the communion with Christ and of the worde of the gospell of the sacramentes in generall and of Baptisme may easilie be gathered what our faith is concerning the Lordes Supper I. The sacrament of the supper is an instrument of the holie ghost to helpe forvvard the communion with Christ and with the church We beleeue that the sacrament of the supper is not onely a testimonie of our communion with Christ and with his flesh and blood and with the whole church but also an instrument of the holie ghost to confirme helpe foreward the same the Apostle saying the bread vvhich we breake 1. Cor. 10.16 is it not the communion of the Lords bodie the breaking and the taking of the blessed bread he calleth the communion of the Lordes bodie because they which eate with an actuall faith in the Lorde doe ioyne in communion with the Lord and with his flesh and blood as also they that imbrace the word of the Apostles in faith do receiue a communion with the Apostles that cōmunion is with the father and with his sonne Iesus Christ II. A confirmation of the former opinion For as baptisme is an instrument to begin this communion because by it wee are borne againe in Christ so is the supperinstituted to make perfect the same because in it wee are fedd or nourished with the flesh and blood of Christ that we may growe vp in him as the Apostle saith 1. Cor. 12.13 vve are all baptized into one bodie and we all drinke of one drinke into one spirite III. The increase of our communion with Christ is the principall end of the Lords supper There are also other endes of the institutiō of the Lords supper namely that beeing admonished both by the words signes which represent vnto vs Christs death and his blood shedd for vs we should reuerently esteeme of the benefite of our redemption as the Apostle saith As oft as yee shall eate of this bread 1. Cor. 11.20 yee showe the Lords death And therefore the ende is that we may be confirmed in the faith concerning remission of sinnes we may be nourished into hope of a blessed resurrection wee maye giue thanks to him for so great a benefite we may be stirred vp to repentance and lastly we may openly before the whole congregation renue our couenant begunne with God But sith all these things tend to this that we may more more be vnited to Christ be made one with him and he more feelinglie liue in vs and we in him being now made flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone therfore we doubt not but the supper is principally instituted for the increase of this vniting and communion with Christ wherein our saluation is made perfect and accomplished Whereunto it also tendeth that bread and wine are the nourishments of the bodie so as wee may hold it for most certaine the flesh and blood of Christ is the same in nourishing of our soules preseruing thē in life that the bread and wine is to our bodies IV. The bread why it is called the bodie of Christ Whereuppon we may also vnderstand why Christ called this bread his own body namely not for that it is either properly his verie true bodie or that there is any such body cōtained within it or also that it is onely a bare signe of his bodie broken and dead for vs but that it is a sacrament for sacraments saith Augustine take vnto them the names of the things whereof they be sacraments and therefore an instrument also of the holie ghost to communicate vnto vs the true body of Christ to confirme vs in his communion Like as for the same cause the Apostle also called baptisme not the signe of regeneration Eph. 5.26 but the vvashing water it self of regeneration namely because that by this washing of water through the worde as by a fitt instrument Christ by the working power of his spirite doeth inwardly wash and cleanse vs and begett vs a new V. The true and substantiall body of Christ is spoken of the bread but improperly and figuratiuely Wherefore we doubt not but in the words of the supper the true and naturall bodie of Christ is spoken of the bread especially sith it is added for expositions sake which is giuen for you So that it is most truely said that the bread is Christs bodie euen that true bodie which was giuen for vs but yet this is improperly figuratiuely sith in verie deede the bread was not giuen for vs but the verie bodie of Christ whereof the bread is a sacrament VI. The bodie of Christ is not in the bread reallie and properlie Hereby we are also confirmed in this opinion that as the bread is not properlie the verie bodie of Christ but a sacrament thereof so also Christ is not
same godly man eateth sometime worthily sometime not worthily enough as in the 1. to the Corinth 11. it appeareth And the vngodly also which receiue onely the element and not the thing of the sacrament are not all of one sort For among them are also conteyned the Hypocrites of whome we spake eveÌ„ now We thought good therefore here to ioyne a more plaine and cleare distinction There be two kindes of men which like as they come to the hearing of the word so may they come to receiue the supper of the Lord the vngodly and the godly Againe of the vngodly some are wholly and simplie wicâ—ed as Atheists Godlesse men also Iewes and Turkes and all such as knowe nothing and beleeue nothing of all those thinges which they heare by the preaching of the gospell or see to bee done by the administration of the Sacraments nay they rather laugh at and coÌ„temne all such matters These if they come to the Lords table they neither eate nor drinke anie thing else but bread and wine and that also not as they are sacrameÌ„ts for they know not of what thinges they are sacraments but onely as they are of their owne nature namelie bread wine For euen so also at the preaching of the gospell they receiue nothing but bare words and the sound of the words Another sort are indeed and before God wicked though they are not so in respect I meane in profession or in sight of men such as are the hypocrites in the church who are not indued with the true and liuelie faith which is proper to the elect but haue onely a temporall and an hypocriticall beleefe These comming to the supper doe indeed eate and drinke no more then the former that is bread wine The reason is because they haue no true faith by which alone Christs body is truely eaten For all this the difference betweene these and the other is not little 1 For the former seing they beleeue none of all the things which they heare concerning Christs bodie in the supper nor perceiue anie thing with their mindes as little do they eate the true bodie of Christ but onely with the mouth of the bodie they eate bread as common bread But the other seing that by their onely historicall hypocriticall and temporall beleefe they vnderstand in their minde and in some sort doe beleeue the things which are spoken and done therefore by the same beleefe and minde they may bee saide in some sort to receiue and in some sorte to taste the bodie of Christ offred in the word and sacraments although they doe not in verie deede eate it seing they do not swallow nor retaine the same for this properlie is to eate in the stomacke of their soule for nourishment of their spirite but rather do spue or vomitt out the same being tasted and after a sorte receiued downe For so also we read in the 6 to the Heb. of those temporary professors that they tasted the heauenlie gifte and good word of God as if he had said they tasted indeed and that also by the gift of the holie ghost but being tasted they cast it vp againe And in the parable of the seede the temporary ones were said to receiue the seede of the word but that they kept it not and therefore brought forth no fruite by it These things cannot be said of the first sort of these wicked ones which are most true of the second sort namelie these temporarie hypocrites Let this then bee the first difference hereuppon followes another difference betweene the eating of those and these 2 They seing the bread which they take into their mouthes they nether acknowledge nor beleeue it to bee a Sacrament of Christs bodie therefore they take it and eate it not as a Sacrament but as common bread and therefore can they not be said to eate the bodie of Christ sacramentallie But these take the bread not as common bread but as a Sacrament of Christs bodie and for that cause are said to eate Christs bodie though not in verie deede seing they lack the mouth and teeth of true faith yet to eate it sacramentallie by an argument drawne as they call it à coniugatis they eate the Sacrament as the Sacrament of Christs bodie therefore they eate Christs body sacramentally and so farre forth as it is a Sacrament because they eate not Christs bodie in verie deed but onely the Sacrament thereof Hereupon followeth that expositioÌ„ wherof we spake before that it is not vngodlie to say simply and absolutely that the hypocrites do eate not onelie the Sacrament but also the thing of the SacrameÌ„t that is not onely bread but also the verie bodie of Christ But in what sense namelie in that wherein the Apostle said all they of Corinth in their first state were vncleane vngodlie c afterwards he said they were not onely vvashed which some might haue interpreted onelie of the water of baptisme but also sanctified and iustified when notwithstaÌ„ding they were not all made truelie such but as yet there lacked not some hypocrits amoÌ„g them So all they which professing faith in Christ doe come to his supper and eate the SacrameÌ„t of the Lotds bodie are saide also to eate the Lords true bodie by reason of the sacramentall vnion which causeth that he which receiueth the signe is by the church iudged to haue receiued also the thing signified because there is no fault either in the institutor of the Sacrament or in the Sacrament it selfe but that he which hath receiued eaten the one might haue also receiued and eaten the other sith Christ by the minister doeth truelie offer them both and the soundnes and trueth of the Sacrament dependeth not vppon our faith but vppon Christs institution So that if we receiue not the whole Sacrament but onely the signe without the thing signified the fault is in our owne selues who receiue one part with the mouth of our bodie and cast away the other part by our infidelitie for an hypocritical faith is infidelitie separating those thinges which God would haue to be ioyned By these thinges it appeareth what difference is in the eating of those that are simplie wicked the hypocrites although neither sort can bee said truely to eate Christs true bodie For such only do truely eate Christ who are also truely ingrafted into Christ by a true and liuelie faith with which alone the elect are indued They which are dead corporallie can no longer eate corporall meate how then should they which are dead spirituallie bee fedd with spirituall foode And onelie the faithfull doe therefore liue because by a liuelie faith they are ioyned vnto Christ which is our life as members to their head as braunches to the vine as the boughes to their tree And if as Cyprian saieth it be meate of the minde not of the bellie surely it is eaten vvith the teeth not of the bodie but of a faithfull minde which onely the godlie can doe If
like as no other but the verie same Christ rose from the dead so he rose in no other but in the verie same bodie in which he suffred died and was buried 14 For he could not be truely said to be raised and to rise from the dead except that which truely died the verie same quickened againe should rise againe 15 Now the bodie wherein Christ suffred died and was buried was a true humane bodie visible palpable circumscribed Therefore Christ after his resurrection had and retained no body but that which was circumscribed in a certaine place and wheresoeuer it was and is might and may be seene and handled 16 Add also that the Apostle carefully discoursing of the qualities with which our bodies being raised vp to eternall life shal be indued he saith not that they shal not be subiect either to the eye or to the touch or not bee circumscribed in a definite place but he rehearseth onely incorruption glorie and power as is the agilitie thereof and that they shall rise spirituall not that the corporall substance shal be chaunged into an incorporeall but that they shal be as the greeks call it immortall and shal be full of the holie spirite dwelling and working in them The Apostle therefore taught that these are qualities neuer to bee seperated from the bodies namely that they shal be circumscribed visible palpable Wherefore neither did Christs body after his resurrection put of these qualities 17 Neither is that exception any thing that Christ after he was risen came in to his disciples the dores beeing shut For it was not therefore either made vnvisible or vncircumscribed or vnpalpable seeing Christ being come in and seene of his disciples presently saide Feele or handle and see Luc. 24. for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me haue And therefore as the Fathers teach there was no chaunge made of Christs bodie no more then there was when he or Peter walked vpon the waters but by the omnipotency of his diety hauing power ouer all things the doores gaue place to the true and firme bodie of the sonne of God 18 Wherefore not without cause did the Fathers condemne not onely Marcion the Maniches and others which taught that Christ tooke not a true and firme humane bodie but a phantasticall one and did all things according to imagination and phantasie but also the Originists Iohn of Hierusalem and Euticius of Constantinople Hier. tom 12. ad PaÌ„mach Greg. in Iob. lib. 24 c. 29. Bishops and others which said that Christs bodie after his resurrectioÌ„ was made so spirituall that it was more thinne then ayre and therefore invisible and vnpalpable 19 Seeing then that in the supper no other bodie of Christ is giuen vs to be eaten but that which was broken for vs that is truely suffered and died it followeth that Christs 〈◊〉 body which we eate in the Supper is truely circumscribed visible and palpable and consequently seeing nothing is seene touched or perceiued in the Supper besides bread the same body cannot in it owne substance really be contained vnder the formes of bread and wine or lie hidden in the very bread and wine 20 Nowe we acknowledge the resurrection of Christ is both the cause and an example of our as well spirituall as corporall resurrection The cause of the spirituall because the Apostle saith to the Rom. 4. he rose againe for our iustification and an example because he saith Rom. 6. we are burâ—ed togither with him by baptisme into his death that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father so we also should vwalke in newenesse of life 21 But that he is the cause of our corporall resurrection we doubt not 1. Cor. 5. for that the Apostle saith If Christ be risen againe we shall also rise againe and for that he also saith Christ is the first fruits of them that rise and an example for that the same Apostle also writeth he shall chaunge our vile bodies Phil 3.21 that they shall be like his glorious bodie 22 Wherupon It also followeth either Christs bodie not to be invisible vnpalpable vncircumscribed and so not spirituall bodies but incorporall spirits 23 For where Christ saith Feele and see for a spirite hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue hee did not onely conclude that himselfe was no spirite but he especially taught this that there is no flesh nor bones but may bee seene and felt 24 The Scripture teacheth and the church coÌ„fesseth that our Lord Iesus Christ being raised from the dead did shew vnto his disciples for fortie daies space by many arguments that he was truely risen and then euen in the beholding of the Apostles that he was lifted vpp from the earth ascended into heauen Therfore like as no other Christ rose againe then he which died so no other ascended into heauen nor in no other body then he in which that truely rose againe froÌ„ the dead the sonne of God truely humane visible palpable and circumscribed 25 Wherefore as the conuersation of the same Lord Iesus Christ wherein he conuersed amoÌ„g his Apostles after his refurrection for fortie daies space was not fantasticall but reall and true so also his ascension was not onely visible but also truely as the fathers say locall when the Apostles sawe him ascend from the earth vp into heruen 26 But such an ascension and mouing cannot agree to his divine nature therefore he ascended according to his humane nature 27 Yet by the way we denie not this but that Christ as God like as he is said to haue descended from heauen in respect that he abased himselfe taking vpon him the vile forme of a seruant and suffred in it so also it may rightly be said that he is exalted and ascended vp into heauen namely in respect that in the very same forme of a seruant when it was glorified euen the forme of God was after a sort glorified by his ascention and after it that is was made glorious in the wholle world 28 But it is apparent that as this consequence is not good Christ himselfe beeing God and man ascended into heauen in a locall and visible moouing Therefore he in the same sort ascended according to his dietie so neither is this good Christ God and man is with us to the ende of the world truely and in his owne essence therefore he is present on earth as wel in the substance of his body and soule as in the essence of his dietie 29 If also the Apostles sawe with their eies Christan his owne body by chaunge of place ascending from earth into heauen then the heauen into which he did ascend caÌ„not be an vbiquitary heauen but it must needes be farre distant from the earth 30 Moreover nature and all right requireth that for every thing some certeÌ„ place must be assigned as we see god hath done in all the things which he created Seing then no created thing
can be found more excellent then Christs body both for the vnion with the word and for the wonderfull gifts created in the same and so also for the most perfect glorie and happines wherein he nowe liveth It must needes be that this bodie must exist in some certaine most happie place 31 Neither can it proceede but onely from trupiety and from our true reverence towardes Christ that we should beleeue that his body doth dwell not vnder the earth not in the earth not in the waters not in a peece of bread not in every leafe of a tree not in the ayre or in the celestiall speres but in a place as the most happie faire perfect so the highest of al others which we with Ambrose think the Apostle spake of when he said that he was caught vp 2. Cor. 12.2 4. into the third heaven and into paradise 32 To this the same scripture also teacheth the Catholike faith beleeueth and confesseth that the same Iesus Christ shall come out of that heauen in the cloudes Phil. 3.20 1. Thes 4.16 1. Thes 4.17 to iudge the quicke and the dead and that we beeing raised from the dead shall be caught vp into the aire to meete him in the cloudes and so shall be with him in that heauen for euer 33 And this heauen Ioh. 14.2 which is called the Fathers house and the heauenly citty and by many other names The scripture prooueth to be placed aboue all the visible and mooveable heauēs saying that Christ is ascended aboue all heauens Eph. 4.16 and that he is in heauen 34 For this heauen wherein he is in his body and wherein we shall be in our bodies and soules cannot be some vast and I knowe not what vncreated roome partly because nothing is vncreated but God partly because it is plainely to the Hebr. Heb. 11.10 said to be Gods workmāship 35 Moreover the chiefe and principall efficient cause of that moouing wherein his bodie was carried vp into heauen was the divine nature remaining in him according to that to the Phil. 2. God hath exalted him And he was taken vp of God into glory But a secondary efficient cause was the gift of agility which followed his glorious resurrection bestowed on the humane nature by the diety by which agility that flesh ascended vp not held and sustained by angels or by the cloudes as once Elias was in the fierie chariot but of it owne accord and without trouble or difficultie and therefore that motion was not a violent motion 36 Now this ascention of Christ our head was the cause and the example of our ascension which shal be into heaven For sith the head is ascended it must needes be that the members shall ascend and as his ascension was so ours shall bee For he shall chaunge our vile bodies to be like to his glorious body and we shall be caught vp into the cloudes to meete Christ in the ayre and so we shall be with the Lord for euer 37 If then ours shall be a true ascention and that we shall truely be lifted from the earth into heauen Therefore Christs body also did truely ascend from earth into heauen not imaginarily or putatively 38 And this doctrine of Christs true ascention into that highest heauen and his perpetuall abiding there is most profitable and full of cōsolation 39 For first it serueth to strengthen our faith about the certaine place where with the eyes and hands of our faith we may behold touch and take hold of the body of Christ Then to establish our hope namely that it shall be that before the resurrection of our bodies our soules beeing separated from our bodies they shall neither discend beneath the earth nor shall flote in the waters or the aire nor roule about with the spheres but shall be carried aboue all these heauens to that blessed and heauenly house of the Father into which Christ in his body is already entred that they may be euer with Christ Lastly to kindle in our hearts the loue and desire of a heauenly life and conversation as the Apostle saith If ye be risen vvith Christ seeke those things which are aboue set your affections on thinges vvhich are aboue vvhere Christ sitteth at the right hand of God 40 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of the father thus speaketh the Apostle And hath set him Christ raised from the dead and carried vp into heauen in the heauenly places farre aboue all principallities and power and might domination and euerie name that is named not onely in this vvorld but also in that which is to come and hath made all thinges subiect vnder his feete c. YVhatsoeuer is read otherwise in the holy scripture or confessed by the church in the Creedes concerning this sitting is agreeable vnto this 41 But we cā no where read that for this sitting at Gods right hand either Christ Iesus tooke any other body call it howesoeuer or that in his naturall body there was any chaūge made of the substance of it or of any of those naturall qualities and essentiall proprieties which it retained after his resurrection It is therefore manifest that in what body Christ rose and ascended into heauen namely a visible palpable and circumscribed body in the same he also sitteth at the Fathers right hand in the highest heauens and wheresoeuer he is or pleaseth to be he keepeth still to himselfe such a body 42 The Apostle also witnesseth and the church confesseth in the Creedes that Christ first died was buried raised from the dead and taken vp into heauen before he fare at the Fathers right hand Therefore either it is false that Christs humaine nature thē first receiued a gift for substance of his body to be really euery where or if it be true then it receiued it not by the hypostaticall vnion which was made in his very incarnation 43 Neither is this exception any thing that by the hypostaticall vnion this was giuen him in the first act as that if he would he might be present every where but by the sitting at Gods right hand it was giuen him in the second act that is that he was indeed present every where 44 For besides that the tearmes of this distinction are tearmes not taken from the fountaines of Israel but out of the puddles of sophisters Christ himselfe also refelleth this exception when speaking not of the first act but of the second that is of his actuall presence he said both a little before his death Where two or three shall be gathered together in my name there am I in the middest of them and after his resurrection bofore his ascension he said Beholde I am vvith you even to the ende of the world 45 By those sayings it evidently appeareth that either Christ spake not of the reall presēce of his body but onely of the presence of his diety and power of his spirit or that he is present to vs
in the same manner that he was to the Apostles namely visibly seeing he saide not I will be but I am neither is there any necessity to alter the sense of those wordes 46 Adde this that if he speake of the same reall presence of his body and that this promise pertained not to the Apostles onely but also to all the faithfull which were then in the world Christ had not spoken a trueth For he was not before his death or after his Resurrection present in a visible presence with all the faithfull which were then in the world and which were gathered together in his name 47 VVherefore the doctrine of the reall and substantiall yet invisible presence of the body of Christ Iesus on the earth and euerie where is not agreeable with the holy scriptures but seemeth to come neere to the Maniches who as Augustine sheweth against Faustus saie that Christs bodie doth invisiblie hang on euerie tree 48 If Christ also satte not at Gods right hand in his bodie before his resurrection and ascension into heauen as the wholle Church confesseth then their doctrine is impious and hereticall which teacheth that Christ Iesus euen from his mothers wombe according to the flesh he tooke hath sitteth at the right hand of Gods power 49 If this also be true which the Apostle teacheth and the whole scripture confirmeth and the Catholike Church confesseth that Christ Iesus not only then sate at his Fathers right hand after he ascended into heauen but also is so placed in the same at Gods right hand as he is neuer read to sitte at such a right hand in any other place then in heauen therefore then it cannot onely not be saide according to the holy scriptures that Christ Iesus sitteth any other where at God the Father his right hand then in heauen but also it is false that he also so sitteth in the earth that he is no lesse present really in substance of his body in the bread of the Lords supper and in euerie place then he is in heauen 50 For the Apostle also in other places and specially in the epistle of S. Paule to the Hebrues denieth that he is vpon the earth namely in a corporall presence for as much as hee sitting at the right hand of the throne of maiestie in heauen executeth his office of priesthood 51 Moreouet wee hold beyond all controuersie that Christ sitting at Gods right hand is a figuratiue speach seing God to speake properly hath neither right hand nor left hand neither is it lawfull to imagine any carnall thing concerning the seates and thrones in heauen wherein they are saide to sitt and often-times in the scriptures this word sitting is vsed besides other significations for dwelling ruling exercising iudgment and for resting 52 But that the Apostle Paule ment not by this phrase that Christ Iesus in his owne bodie is truely and substantially present in all places besides that which hath bin already saide it is also euident by that which for declaration sake he adioyneth 53 For to this sitting of Christ at Gods right hand the Apostle addeth for declaration sake three thinges First that Christ is so placed at Gods right hand that he is aboue all principallitie that is that he hath no creature aboue him or equall to him no not in heauen but is made higher then the heauens and al heauenly things then he addeth that all thinges are made subiect to him that is that there is nothing beneath him ouer which he hath not power and authoritie thirdly that he was giuen to be a head of the church 54 Now as we said that whatsoeuer wee haue before spoken of the resurrection from the dead and so of the ascension ought to bee vnderstood according to the humane nature of Christ so wee thinke with the sound fathers that these thinges also must bee vnderstood especially according to the same humane nature 55 The exaltation of Christs humane nature aboue al things may be vnderstood two waies either in re-pect of the locall placing as this he ascended aboue all the heauens that the meaning may be the humane nature was placed locally aboue all created things or in respect of the excellēt preheminence of the dignitie and power thereof then the meaning may be Christ euen touching his humane nature was set ouer all created thinges and to him was giuen power and authoritie ouer all things For in these two manners any thing of the same kinde is said to bee ouer another eiin place or in dignitie 56 If then this saying be vnderstood the latter waye thereupon the vbiquitie cannot be proued seing Christ in that in his humane nature he may vse his authoritie ouer all creatures although he be not in substance of body euerie where If the former way then he is not euery where seing that which is euerie where is aswell beneath and at and within as aboue all creatures 57 But Paule doeth plainely teach that Christ touching his humane nature did so rise from the dead that hee was no longer among the dead and so ascended into heauen that hee was no longer on earth and so being exalted aboue all creatures sitteth at the fathers right hand that he is nether beneath nor within created things seing all thinges are put vnder his feete 58 Neither can the head bee saide to bee in it owne substance where the feete are although it be in them in vertue and operation and indeed aswell the head to the feete as the feet to the head are ioyned together in their substāce by the sinues and by the soule 59 But the Apostle saieth Christ Iesus is giuen for a head of the church namely according to his humanitie nowe the head is aboue all the bodie 60 The Apostle therefore ment nothing lesse by his wordes of Christs sitting at Gods right hand then to conclude that Christs bodie in it owne substance is present in all places Wherefore they doe great wrong to the Apostle which by their cauills labour to conclude this out of his words 61 Neither can any such Vbiquitie be proued by any necessary consequence out of that article of faith 62 For although it were graunted which cannot bee graunted that by the sitting at Gods right hand the humane nature is made truely by it selfe omnipotent yet vnlesse it bee prooued to bee so made omnipotent that it is also made infinite and immeasurable it can by no meanes bee conuinced that Christs bodie in it owne substance is euerie where present 63 For so is this the onely cause why God also in his owne essence is euerie where that if ye take immeasurablenesse from him he cannot be saide to be euery where in his owne essence 64 And if also yee faine an infinite body and therefore euerie where yet that it is whollie in all places at once you shall neuer prooue while the world stands vnlesse yee can shewe that the same body is also a most simple essence seing God is